On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:20 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 5/2/2011 6:24 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> BTW, checked performance against previous version?
>
> For 1:1 testing of the patterns that exist in test/testfnmatch.c,
> 100,000 iterations here on my box, 8626494 u
BTW, checked performance against previous version?
Index: strings/apr_fnmatch.c
===
--- strings/apr_fnmatch.c (revision 1098800)
+++ strings/apr_fnmatch.c (working copy)
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
* Both pattern and string are **char to support pointer increment of arbitrary
* m
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> this fails unexpectedly:
>
> res = apr_fnmatch("a?z", "a/z", 0);
> ABTS_INT_EQUAL(tc, 0, res);
same as the other one, I just got there with a different thoug
this fails unexpectedly:
res = apr_fnmatch("a?z", "a/z", 0);
ABTS_INT_EQUAL(tc, 0, res);
this related testcase works:
res = apr_fnmatch("a?z", "a/z", APR_FNM_PATHNAME);
ABTS_INT_EQUAL(tc, APR_FNM_NOMATCH, res);
this fails unexpectedly:
res = apr_fnmatch("a?z", "azz", 0);
ABTS_INT_EQUAL(tc, 0, res);
I just started playing and ran into this doc issue:
Index: include/apr_fnmatch.h
===
--- include/apr_fnmatch.h (revision 1098590)
+++ include/apr_fnmatch.h (working copy)
@@ -90,9 +90,9 @@
*
* PATTERN: [ followed by a
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Stefan Ruppert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> attached you will find a small doxygen patch for the apr_os_thread_equal()
> function. I looked for the correct return value and needed to consult the
> pthread_equal() man page... ;-)
apr_portable.h now fixed in 1.4.x through tr
Anticipated timeline for release:
* Jeff to review/test wrowe's fnmatch rewrite today (Monday)
* someone else do the same???
* Jeff handles T&R of apr-1.4.3 as soon as a couple of people have spoken up
* apr-1.4.3 testing/voting over 3 days, re-roll if necessary
* joint release/announce of apr-1.4
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 3:47 PM, John Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> (adding dev@apr, since some of the report covers apr code)
>>
>>
>> There are some harmless bugs, some bugs which are truly useful to fix
>> beyond &qu
(adding dev@apr, since some of the report covers apr code)
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:05 PM, John Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just for fun, I ran the statistical source code analyzer 'clang' on
> the Apache httpd-2.3.11-beta sources. Looks like either the analyzer
> generates way too many false positiv
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Tarballs/zipballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. I
> anticipate that we will release this, or its replacement if flawed, in
> conjunction with the upcoming apr 1.4 release. Hopefully we will be
> ready for T&am
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Richard van der Laan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We use GraniteDS and server push based on APR from Tomcat native 1.1.20 in
> JBoss-4.2.3.
> When we connect to the server with a client flex app which sets up the comet
> connection and then stop the client (e.g. stop the brows
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Ming Ruan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> It should be possible to send a text message to an EXISTING queue, and if
> the queue does not exist, NO new queue may be created, but how? I search al
> the way in the internet, it seems nobody has any trouble or need to do li
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Ming Ruan wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
>
>
> I am using activeMQ-CPP to develop an application in C++…
>
>
>
> As you may know that we can send a textMessage to an queue, in most case we
> use the following code:
This is not the correct mailing list for this discus
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:22 AM, wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Thu Apr 14 07:22:24 2011
> New Revision: 1092027
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1092027&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix VC10 release build running on Windows7/Server 2008
>
> Submitted by: Steve Hay
BTW, I heard off-line that this
[X] Release apr-util 1.3.11 as GA
Unix source package tested with apr 1.4.x-latest on Windows XP+MinGW.
. Built-in expat
. MinGW libiconv
All tests passed.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:51 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> In order to disambiguate what was released by external entities from what
> the ASF APR Project has voted upon and released,
are you referring to some apr-util-1.4.0 RPM from opensuse.org, or
something else?
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 19:55 -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> [ ] Release apr-util 1.3.10 as GA
>
> I vote for that particular version without testing :-)
Qt
[ ] Release apr-util 1.3.11 as GA
Tarballs/zipballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. I
anticipate that we will release this, or its replacement if flawed, in
conjunction with the upcoming apr 1.4 release. Hopefully we will be
ready for T&R of that soon :)
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-util 1.3.10 as GA
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Speak up if you're working on something for apr-util.
FWIW, this new apr_memcache report+patch doesn't affect the 1.3.x branch:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51064
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 4/14/2011 10:32 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> Speak up if you're working on something for apr-util.
>>
>> I had originally planned to T&R this at the same time as apr 1.4.3,
>> but I may as well get
Speak up if you're working on something for apr-util.
I had originally planned to T&R this at the same time as apr 1.4.3,
but I may as well get started. If folks want to wait for apr 1.4.3 to
test apr-util, that's fine too.
I still anticipate that apr will be ready for T&R of 1.4.3 within a
coup
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>> On 4/13/2011 1:11 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:51 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 4/13/2011 9:53
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 4/13/2011 1:11 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:51 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> wrote:
>>> On 4/13/2011 9:53 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:28 AM, wro
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:51 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>> On 4/13/2011 9:53 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:28 AM, wrote:
>>>> Author: trawick
>>>> Date: Tue Ap
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:51 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 4/13/2011 9:53 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:28 AM, wrote:
>>> Author: trawick
>>> Date: Tue Apr 5 13:28:59 2011
>>> New Revision: 1089031
>>>
>>>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:55 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>> APR_HA... excellent! If you can add these other symbols at your leisure,
>> it is good for documentation purposes, even if they have been mismatched
>
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:28 AM, wrote:
> Author: trawick
> Date: Tue Apr 5 13:28:59 2011
> New Revision: 1089031
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1089031&view=rev
> Log:
> restructure Windows apr_socket_connect() to more closely match
> the Unix implementation, fixing the getpeername()
Oh, how could I forget :)
Running myapp.exe against libapr-2-0.dll can result in a myapp.exe.###
droplet that looks like this:
75B3 0001 1774 LoadLibraryA() misc/win32/misc.c:175
(My initial web searches for this issue were not successful, but I
didn't try very hard.)
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Sob wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> while experimenting with httpd and IPv6 on WinXP, I found out that it's not
>> working well.
>> In short, the code expects that IPv4 mapped a
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Sob wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while experimenting with httpd and IPv6 on WinXP, I found out that it's not
> working well.
> In short, the code expects that IPv4 mapped addresses and IPV6_V6ONLY socket
> option are supported. This is not true for NTs < 6.0. They have IPv4
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> I have one dev question for my apr_fnmatch() refactoring
>
> Today we lowercase the two characters (and don't support case-insensitive
> range matches at all, I won't change this apr-specific quirk). But IIRC
> there are language with
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:13 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 4/12/2011 10:21 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:55 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> wrote:
>>> On 4/11/2011 3:09 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>>>
>>>> # enableIPv6
>&
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:55 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 4/11/2011 3:09 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>> # enableIPv6
>> export ac_cv_define_sockaddr_in6=yes
>> export ac_cv_working_getaddrinfo=yes
>> export ac_cv_working_getnameinfo=yes
>> expor
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:10 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 4/11/2011 7:45 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>> trunk:
>>>
>>> looks pretty good here other than the IPv6 detection; I think the only
>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> trunk:
>
> looks pretty good here other than the IPv6 detection; I think the only
> test failures are also broken with a Visual Foo build
>
> I build like this:
>
> # enable IPv6
export CPPFLAGS=-DIPV6_V6ONLY=27
^
Th
trunk:
looks pretty good here other than the IPv6 detection; I think the only
test failures are also broken with a Visual Foo build
I build like this:
# enable IPv6
export ac_cv_define_sockaddr_in6=yes
export ac_cv_working_getaddrinfo=yes
export ac_cv_working_getnameinfo=yes
export ac_cv_func_ga
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Jeff, Niq,
> Am 30.03.2011 01:26, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 30.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
>>>>
>>>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:25 AM, wrote:
> Author: fuankg
> Date: Tue Mar 29 15:25:00 2011
> New Revision: 1086625
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086625&view=rev
> Log:
> Backport Windows apr.h.in stuff from HEAD (r892148).
the right way to go here for Windows gunk is to match apr.hw
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 08.04.2011 17:45, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>>
>> process.h has a cute history
>>
>> 1.4.x:
>>
>> APR_HAVE defined in apr.hw/apr.h.in; the include is performed in
>> apr.hw if defined
>>
>
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:29 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 4/8/2011 9:07 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>> Am 08.04.2011 08:02, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
>>> Jeff, I've lost your thread, probably because it's half at httpd.
>>>
>>> Just so you know, I did get to spend my hours yesterday and tod
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 08.04.2011 08:02, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
>>
>> Jeff, I've lost your thread, probably because it's half at httpd.
>>
>> Just so you know, I did get to spend my hours yesterday and today on
>> 2008R2
>> with Visual Studio 2010 - mostly
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:02 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Jeff, I've lost your thread, probably because it's half at httpd.
>
> Just so you know, I did get to spend my hours yesterday and today on 2008R2
> with Visual Studio 2010 - mostly on the tasks of rebuilding a VM to which
> I had lost th
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> the patch is based on 1.4.x; trunk isn't building for me today
>
> I see a blunder already in the "timeout / 1000" logic (shouldn't do
> that u
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:10 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 3/23/2011 7:02 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>>
>>>> Repeating my requests from l
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 02.04.2011 16:59, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
>>
>> no, something which is kinda /me giving up on teaching configure to do
>> it right .
>> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/mingw/MWGNUmakefile
>> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/mingw/MWGNU
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> Am 02.04.2011 15:50, schrieb traw...@apache.org:
>>
>> +dnl If building static APR, both the APR build and the app build
>> +dnl need -DAPR_DECLARE_STATIC to generate the right linkage from
>> +dnl APR_DECLARE et al.
>> +dnl If bui
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 9:50 AM, wrote:
> Author: trawick
> Date: Sat Apr 2 13:50:07 2011
> New Revision: 1088023
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088023&view=rev
> Log:
> MinGW/MSYS: Support shared builds of APR, other general improvements
> to support of this toolchain.
>
> PR: 46175
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 30.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
>>
>> are you really sure this is the right thing? /me doubt ...
>> 1. its in an internal header - if we want to expoert that function then
>> it should be moved to a public header
>> 2. if you look
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:36:03 -0400
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:27 PM, wrote:
>> > Author: trawick
>> > Date: Tue Mar 29 22:27:32 2011
>> > New Revision: 1086789
>> >
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:27 PM, wrote:
> Author: trawick
> Date: Tue Mar 29 22:27:32 2011
> New Revision: 1086789
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086789&view=rev
> Log:
> catch up with XML changes, supporting only expat for now
though the link of testall fails to resolve XML_foo func
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Jeff,
> can you please take a look at this commit and verify this is what you
> suggested, and that I did it right? If ok, should I proceed and apply all
> these to build/apr_hints.m4 across all branches?
looks good here; go ahead/thanks!
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 27.03.2011 16:25, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>>
>> I was the last to T&R 1.3.x, slightly after the first 1.4.x release
>> IIRC. I don't intend to do that again, and I'm not making any effort
>> to
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 27.03.2011 16:32, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:57 AM, wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: fuankg
>>> Date: Sun Mar 27 13:57:28 2011
>>> New Revision: 1085937
>>>
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:57 AM, wrote:
> Author: fuankg
> Date: Sun Mar 27 13:57:28 2011
> New Revision: 1085937
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1085937&view=rev
> Log:
> Set APR_HAS_OS_UUID=1 for Windows builds.
trunk build/apr_hints.m4 already sets this
>
> Modified:
> apr/apr/b
I was the last to T&R 1.3.x, slightly after the first 1.4.x release
IIRC. I don't intend to do that again, and I'm not making any effort
to maintain the branch. But that's just me.
Does anyone else have any intentions to release 1.3.x, or otherwise
believe that there is a need? (Günther?)
Dear Lazyweb,
I noticed that pollset_create is missing this particular checking for
NODEFAULT, which is present in pollcb_create. Do you know why?
Index: poll/unix/pollset.c
===
--- poll/unix/pollset.c (revision 1084961)
+++ poll/un
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> the patch is based on 1.4.x; trunk isn't building for me today
I see a blunder already in the "timeout / 1000" logic (shouldn't do
that unless timeout > 0). But that's just a minor detail.
the patch is based on 1.4.x; trunk isn't building for me today
the select() bypass needed more help than in the patch attached to the
bug, as the return code wasn't correct
oh, there's another select()
oh, what about WSAPoll()? yep
there's another unhandled WSAPoll() in the pollcb support; I hav
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:41 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 3/23/2011 2:02 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Stefan Ruppert wrote:
>>>
>>> What about https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49882
>>>
>>> It
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 23.03.2011 20:27, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>>
>> The type is available with 10.2.0.3 and 11.2.0.2 (and probably for eons).
>
> from 8.1.5 oratypes.h (2000-03-15):
> #define ub2 unsigned short
> #define sb2 signed short
very cool
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Stefan Ruppert wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> no there was no reason why I used the apr_int16_t type. I was only happy
> that I got the oracle driver on AIX working and did not go further into
> details... So go ahead!
Thanks for having a look.
The type is available with 10.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Stefan Ruppert wrote:
> On 23.03.2011 13:02, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>>
>>>> Repeating my
I was looking at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1065258 in
consideration of getting it in apr-util 1.3.11 and in doing some
research (finally found
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28395/ociaahan.htm#sthref5358)
I realized there's a signed-ness issue wit
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:01 PM, wrote:
> Author: niq
> Date: Wed Mar 23 16:01:12 2011
> New Revision: 1084621
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1084621&view=rev
> Log:
> Decouple apr_xml from reliance on Expat
>
> Build with expat and it's effectively unchanged.
> The alternative build
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>> Repeating my requests from last year:
>>
>> I would really like to see r960665 ported back and released in the next
>> release to fix this Apr issue, b
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Jeff,
> Am 21.03.2011 14:58, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>>
>> * ensure it is viable to use the MinGW toolchain to build APR on
>> 1.4.x-trunk for the purpose of (at least) me testing simple fixes and
>> running t
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 21.03.2011 20:51, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:12 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/21/2011 12:56 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>>>
>&
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> APR doesn't use gai_strerror() on Windows (because it's not thread
> safe) and apr_streror() return "APR does not understand this code"
> message for failed apr_socket_addr_get() calls. It's not user
> friendly.
>
> Please find attache
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:12 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 3/21/2011 12:56 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>> apr 1.4 doesn't link for me (undefined reference to CreateHardLinkW),
>
> That's odd, it's in kernel32.dll. A broken kernel32.dll.a/kernel32.lib
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Jeff,
> Am 21.03.2011 14:58, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>>
>> * ensure it is viable to use the MinGW toolchain to build APR on
>> 1.4.x-trunk for the purpose of (at least) me testing simple fixes and
>> running t
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:33 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 3/21/2011 9:13 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> Changes for APR 1.4.0
>>
>> + *) Windows: Default build configurations assume NT or higher at run-time;
>> + use Release9x/Debug9x build configurations to support Win9x.
>
> I
* ensure it is viable to use the MinGW toolchain to build APR on
1.4.x-trunk for the purpose of (at least) me testing simple fixes and
running the test suite and using gcc as another perspective on the
Windows code
* provide at least some help in the area of reviewing/testing to those
willing to do
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 6:16 PM, wrote:
> Author: sf
> Date: Sun Mar 20 22:16:26 2011
> New Revision: 1083599
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1083599&view=rev
> Log:
> Backport r1072165, but mark as experimental in CHANGES and "configure --help"
> for now:
>
> Add new configure optio
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:35 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 3/19/2011 5:30 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> (mine, of course)
>>
>> I can't get Visual C++ 2008 Express to build testlfsabi. The files do
>> show up in the converted .vcproj file, but no .obj files are
(mine, of course)
I can't get Visual C++ 2008 Express to build testlfsabi. The files do
show up in the converted .vcproj file, but no .obj files are created.
Below is my current attempt at a patch.
I first left out the included files (.h, _include.c) with no apparent
difference. .c not compiled
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:10 AM, wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Fri Dec 18 06:10:44 2009
> New Revision: 892148
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=892148&view=rev
> Log:
> Finish removing apu_config.h[n]w templates, these need synchronization w/unix
This removed the externally visible APR
I've seen some unexpected directions for building apr trunk with
expat. This works for me:
C:\Users\xxx> \mingw\bin\mingw-get install mingw32-libexpat
bash-3.1$ ./configure --prefix=foo --with-expat=/c/MinGW
FWIW, as of r1083038, here is what I use:
./configure --prefix=/c/Users/Trawick/aprins
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> APR doesn't use gai_strerror() on Windows (because it's not thread
> safe) and apr_streror() return "APR does not understand this code"
> message for failed apr_socket_addr_get() calls. It's not user
> friendly.
>
> Please find attache
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Repeating my requests from last year:
>
> I would really like to see r960665 ported back and released in the next
> release to fix this Apr issue, before Subversion 1.7.0 goes in public beta.
Any concerns out there with this fix for Windows
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:13 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 3/12/2011 7:31 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> lots of fixes awaiting apr 1.4.3, a few fixes awaiting apr-util 1.3.11
>>
>> there's perhaps even some low hanging fruit in bugzilla, but I think
>> we&
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:34 AM, wrote:
> Author: trawick
> Date: Sun Mar 6 16:34:46 2011
> New Revision: 1078507
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1078507&view=rev
> Log:
> style changes only -- make it look a lot more like the bulk of APR
>
> Modified:
> apr/apr/trunk/dbd/apr_dbd_od
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Mar 8, 2011, at 9:49 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 11:13 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>>
On 12/17/2010 7:32 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
The patch for APR trunk
* supposedly fixes bugs interpreting the apr_snprintf() retcode on
Windows (untested)
* adds a test for short input buffer (tested on Unix, anticipated
different retcode on Windows supposedly handled)
* adds weasel words to the apr_strftime() documentation since Windows
has
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Holger Grandy
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that - although APR ICONV is made available under Apache License
> 2.0 according to the website, NOTICE and LICENSE files - the source code
> contains license headers using a modified BSD-style license (e.g.
> apr_iconv.h)
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Monday 21 February 2011, traw...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: trawick
>> Date: Mon Feb 21 12:07:33 2011
>> New Revision: 1072937
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1072937&view=rev
>> Log:
>> add hook function args to the hook pr
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> What's holding us up for a release of apu-1.4.0?
I just posted a patch for an API change. Thanks for reminding me ;)
Currently the hook function arguments aren't available to the probe
macros. This patch adds it. The function args are available within
the hook macros only with surrounding parens, so that is how they must
be passed to the probe macros.
The args are usable by probe macros only with some restrict
2011/1/24 Goetz, Philippe :
> Hi,
>
> Here a copy and paste bug fix. This bug is already in trunk.
The fix is already in the 1.4.x branch as well.
> THIS REQUIRES A NEW VERSION 1.4.3.
Yes, with no further effort the next release will include this fix.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> 1.4.2 was released April 3, 2010, and we had since then some fixes ...
I could probably T&R after Dec 17 if there's more interest.
It would be good for some quality time to be spent with bugzilla to
see if there is any low-hanging fruit (dun
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Chris Knight
wrote:
> Exactly, the problem only appears on 64-bit Snow Leopard. See my patch in
> Bugzilla, which I've verified. (Unsure if the below would also work, been a
> long time since I diagnosed.)
What I understood was that %lld is supposed to work, inde
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>
>>> Looks good here.
>>
>> If folks find this unproblematic, can someone plea
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
>
> On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>
>> Looks good here.
>
> If folks find this unproblematic, can someone please commit it? I don't have
> karma here.
>
> Thanks,
looks fine to me; starting to try it out now
As one of your humble list moderators for some time now, I've saved a
few end users the minor aggravation, perhaps temporary, of subscribing
before posting, and of course rejected hundreds upon hundreds of spam
messages. The number of messages mistakenly accepted to the list (I'm
not saying I did
The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache Portable Runtime
Project are proud to announce the General Availability of
version 0.9.19 of the APR Apache Portable Runtime library, and
version 0.9.19 of the companion APR-util Apache Portable Utility
library.
The corresponding vers
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 13.10.2010 18:54, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
>>
>> Am 13.10.2010 05:24, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>>>
>>> After 3+ days:
>>>
>>> 2 binding votes in favor (need at least one more)
>>> 3
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
>> [+ 1] Release apr 0.9.19 as GA
Thanks...
After 6 days, we have 3 binding votes for release of apr 0.9.19 and
none opposed. There's still time for objections, as we don't have
apr-util 0.9.19 approved yet, and I'll move forward with bot
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are
> enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants
> to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those delivered to the bulk of our
> 0.9.x users,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> This latest level corrects a build problem on some platforms using the
> bundled expat. Let's try to wrap up approval of this follow-up to
> 0.9.18 in 48 hours (httpd 2.0.next needs it for the enclosed security
> fixes).
&
401 - 500 of 1860 matches
Mail list logo
