On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:28 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why is there a $ here?
public interface ConnectionFactorySource {
Object $getResource();
}
This and the AdminObjectSource are implemented by "dynamic gbeans"
that are swizzled to expose the getters and setters on the javabean
(Man
That sounds fine - it doesn't really matter what header you use as the
'correlation token', you could make up your own header if you wish.
Though the reason I said to use JMSCorrelationID was that most well
behaving JMS services should always copy the JMSCorrelationID from any
incoming message an
Why is there a $ here?
public interface ConnectionFactorySource {
Object $getResource();
}
--jason
Hi James,
Thanks for the response.
I achieved the desired behavior for persistent responses and my consumer
application requires applicability to non-persistent
responses for which I would be trying out your suggestions soon.
Queries down there. :)
> Great James
> Your suggestion
Wow...didn't see that one coming ;-P
Ok
Jason Dillon wrote:
Okay... *kick*
Can you release tranql using m2, into an m2 repo... that is one of the G
deps that currently must be pulled from an m1 repo, which does not give
us valid v4 poms. I posted patches to djencks for the m2 build a while
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2307:
Description:
Geronimo redistributes the Sun J2EE schema files for deployment descriptors etc
but doesn't appear to include anything in the global li
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=comments#action_12428914
]
John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-2307:
---
Where does it say that they are under the Berkley license? We should document
the source of this information if
FYI, I have no objections to a formal vote... just I'm not sure how
the voting rules play with our current situation, and was hoping
someone from the PMC would have started the vote.
You want to start one now that you have been recently blessed?
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 9:55 PM, Alan D.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2307:
Description:
Geronimo redistributes the Sun J2EE schema files for deployment descriptors etc
but doesn't appear to include anything in the global li
I asked a few times about a formal vote... that all went unanswered. Informally though the response was positive, as I noted in a previous email: +1: dain, jason (me), paul, sachin, david jencks, david blevins,prasad, anita, gianny, alan, matt"in favor": aaron"all for dropping, w/ tck consideratio
What happened to a vote?
Regards,
Alan
Jason Dillon wrote:
Okay... replying to myself.
How about... since no one has had anything to say.
I suggest we drop the m1 build at the end of next week, friday the 25th.
And unless I hear any objections I am going to follow through... so
please speak
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=comments#action_12428898
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2307:
How is that different than just stripping out the comments and other docs from
the existing schemas?
> Includ
Okay... *kick*
Can you release tranql using m2, into an m2 repo... that is one of
the G deps that currently must be pulled from an m1 repo, which does
not give us valid v4 poms. I posted patches to djencks for the m2
build a while ago, but they were never published.
Probably needs a bit
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=comments#action_12428897
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-2307:
-
My understanding is that you crack open the Spec and type in the elements that
need to be specific and eith
Heh, I should have checked the incoming Andrus...my bad...
Jason, on the M2 stuff for Tranql you can kick me or Gianny.
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Yeah :-) so I was checking if there is a parser in the works. Ok, we'll
work on it.
Andrus
On Aug 18, 2006, at 12:29 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Andr
Yeah :-) so I was checking if there is a parser in the works. Ok,
we'll work on it.
Andrus
On Aug 18, 2006, at 12:29 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Andrus is Cayenne ;-)
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
For EJB 3 persistence we're looking to leverage other projects like
OpenJPA and / or Cayenne.
Andrus Ad
I dunno what is up the with TranQL ML either... need to get some more
m2 related changes into that project and not sure where to ask.
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 9:29 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Andrus is Cayenne ;-)
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
For EJB 3 persistence we're looking to leverage other
Andrus is Cayenne ;-)
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> For EJB 3 persistence we're looking to leverage other projects like
> OpenJPA and / or Cayenne.
>
> Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> Not sure if there is such thing as TranQL mailing list, so I figured,
>> I'll ask here.
>>
>> Are there any plans to extend Tr
For EJB 3 persistence we're looking to leverage other projects like OpenJPA and
/ or Cayenne.
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Not sure if there is such thing as TranQL mailing list, so I figured,
I'll ask here.
Are there any plans to extend TranQL with EJB3 QL support?
Thanks
Andrus
I'm all for getting rid of those test related errors that are not
errors (or maybe are errors and they test is broken and does not
fail)... but I think they are independent.
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 9:19 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Does pristine mean that all those ugly runtime exceptions, gb
Does pristine mean that all those ugly runtime exceptions, gbean start
errors, illegal state errors, assertion errors, and NoClassDefFound
errors mentioned in the "Maven2 ... we are almost there" thread will be
resolved? If so, and we must first remove the m1 build to get these
addressed, t
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=comments#action_12428896
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2307:
Um, so how would we go about making our own versions?
Open up a text editor with theirs, open up a new file an
Not sure if there is such thing as TranQL mailing list, so I figured,
I'll ask here.
Are there any plans to extend TranQL with EJB3 QL support?
Thanks
Andrus
On Aug 17, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
I caution against removing the m1 until the m2 build has been stable
for a period of time. We made this mistake with ActiveMQ and
ServiceMix and wound up having to restore the m1 build while gremlins
were flushed from the m2 build.
Hrm... its sta
On 8/9/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So far there have been no negative reponses, and several PMC +1s
Can we start an official vote and then plan for the removal of m1?
--jason
On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> +1
>
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>> I propose we remov
Dave Colasurdo did the workDave?
Jason Dillon wrote:
Where in tomcat? Got a SVN URL handy?
--jason
On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:47 PM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
We grabbed the jars from Tomcat, unpacked them and manually made a few
changes to them (outside of source control) and published the
r
On Aug 17, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 8/17/06, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/17/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We still need to finish getting the 4.x series into the server. I
> think this is a must for 1.2. The AMQ folks are close to releasing
> 4
On 8/17/06, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/17/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We still need to finish getting the 4.x series into the server. I
> think this is a must for 1.2. The AMQ folks are close to releasing
> 4.1, which is the first release that is using m2 and
On 8/17/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We still need to finish getting the 4.x series into the server. I
think this is a must for 1.2. The AMQ folks are close to releasing
4.1, which is the first release that is using m2 and has m2
artifacts. I think we should switch over trunk to
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-882?page=all ]
james strachan resolved AMQ-882.
Fix Version/s: 4.1
4.0.2
4.0.1
Resolution: Fixed
This problem looks like the socket is being closed for some reas
Okay... replying to myself.
How about... since no one has had anything to say.
I suggest we drop the m1 build at the end of next week, friday the 25th.
And unless I hear any objections I am going to follow through... so
please speak up if you want to keep the old rusting clunker around for
long
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-94?page=all ]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-94:
Attachment: devtools94.patch
Patch has been tested on importing war projects.
JAR project still doesn't want, but that is not because the impo
We still need to finish getting the 4.x series into the server. I
think this is a must for 1.2. The AMQ folks are close to releasing
4.1, which is the first release that is using m2 and has m2
artifacts. I think we should switch over trunk to use the 4.1-
SHAPSHOT and then 4.1 when they g
Litterbox sounds like the right name...although JIRA linking is probably more appropriate. You have
my vote.
Jason Dillon wrote:
Or we can make a litterbox as a peer to the sandbox, then get the
scooper out quarterly and toss the undesirables.
I don't care too much... just want it out of trun
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=comments#action_12428875
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2307:
Its so dumb that we have to rewrite these... when to be compliant they need to
be identical... content-wise th
Where in tomcat? Got a SVN URL handy?
--jason
On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:47 PM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
We grabbed the jars from Tomcat, unpacked them and manually made a
few changes to them (outside of source control) and published the
resulting wars. Here is the description of the manual cha
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2307:
Description:
Geronimo redistributes the Sun J2EE schema files for deployment descriptors etc
but doesn't appear to include anything in the global li
On 8/17/06, Vadim Pesochinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am wondering what would be the estimate date for 4.1 release?
Do we have an idea of when and what releases are going to happen?
How many more 4.0.x releases will we have?
Now that 4.0.2 is pretty much out (the vote on the Incubator PMC
Or we can make a litterbox as a peer to the sandbox, then get the
scooper out quarterly and toss the undesirables.
I don't care too much... just want it out of trunk.
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 7:07 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Or, create a JIRA and post their demise and the revision number?
Well, I defs don't want cats in there... its not a litterbox... and
partly why I'm hesitant to toss stuff in there... after a while it
might start to smell bad.
I think it is reasonable to create an issue to state its going to be
dropped, then let the JIRA svn plugin link to it from the com
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2307:
If we need to create these then create these we must.
Here are the files that I know of in our development tree that need to have
substitutes created.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2299?page=comments#action_12428864
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2299:
So, Java sucks when it comes to file perms... even if we unzip or untgz these
files, they will *NOT* have the
Or, create a JIRA and post their demise and the revision number? Not sure how this is normally
handled. Just looking for how someone might resurrect the beast later.
Our box-o-sand in the backyard attracts cats...lucky you only have flies ;-P
Jason Dillon wrote:
Eh, you mean the box-o-sand?
Eh, you mean the box-o-sand? I can though my guess is that they will
just fester in there and attract flies.
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 6:50 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Go for it. Are you going to move it to the island of mis-fit
toys? Remember that Rudolph saved them :)
Jason Dillon wr
Go for it. Are you going to move it to the island of mis-fit toys? Remember
that Rudolph saved them :)
Jason Dillon wrote:
Since we are not going to put any effort into getting the izpack
installer back up in trunk/1.2 right now, I'd like to remove this module.
If needed we can always resur
Since we are not going to put any effort into getting the izpack
installer back up in trunk/1.2 right now, I'd like to remove this
module.
If needed we can always resurrect it later.
Objections?
--jason
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1722?page=comments#action_12428852
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-1722:
This patch is not valid... does not apply cleanly to trunk...
and I can't find these deps in a m2 repo, only m
Hey guys can one of you spare a few cycles to help me to get the
ActiveMQ integration sorted using 4.x in G 1.2/trunk?
Thanks,
--jason
Hi Tim,
Wild, I just ran it and it was ok.
Try setting you MAVEN_OPTS shell variable to something like -Xmx800M
Regards,
Hiram
On 8/17/06, Timothy Bish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey guys
I'm trying to understand the openwire command generator. My first task is
just getting it to run and ge
Congratulations Guillaume!
Regards,
John
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
Please join us in welcoming Guillaume who recently accepted an
invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. Guillaume is probably best known
for his work on Xbean and ServiceMix. Has always been available to
help out folks and is
Congratulations Alan!
Regards,
John
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to let everyone know that Alan
Cabrera has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. We are
excited to have Alan assisting with project oversight in addition to
his technical contributions to
Hey guys
I'm trying to understand the openwire command generator. My first task is
just getting it to run and generate commands for the current set of
clients..
Once I build the broker I attempt to run the generator with
Mvn gram:gram
from the activemq-core folder. I get tons of er
On Aug 11, 2006, at 2:41 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:21 AM, David Blevins wrote:
I'm going to start a branch tomorrow to experiment with JPA stuff
Done. Got a branch up here:
- Revision 430900: /geronimo/branches/jpa-plugin
Didn't turn out to need this as I'm not chang
It works great. We've used it in the past for switching to pre-
release branches, etc.
-David
On Aug 16, 2006, at 1:49 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Maybe... I've never used svn switch before... not sure I would
trust it ;-)
--jason
On Aug 16, 2006, at 1:01 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On 8
I'm trying to motivate to writing this... :-\
--jason
On Aug 16, 2006, at 7:41 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Aug 16, 2006, at 7:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 16, 2006, at 3:56 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
What is the status on 1.1.1 wrt this change? Can I go ahead and
make these changes?
Most likely.
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:42 PM, David Jencks wrote:
YAY!!!
Can you make the File ref to ${basedir} work in idea without
setting test properties?
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I'd like to add a new module to our build, geronimo-te
YAY!!!
Can you make the File ref to ${basedir} work in idea without setting
test properties?
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I'd like to add a new module to our build, geronimo-testsupport,
which provides at the moment a single TestSupport class which
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2330?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2330.
--
Resolution: Fixed
fixed rev 432413
> mismatched constructor gbean error message doesn't actually show the expected
> classes
>
mismatched constructor gbean error message doesn't actually show the expected
classes
-
Key: GERONIMO-2330
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2330
Pro
I'd like to add a new module to our build, geronimo-testsupport,
which provides at the moment a single TestSupport class which sets up
logging and some other commonly used bits (like the File ref to $
{basedir}).
And then incrementally I'd like for all of our test classes to extend
from th
Hi folks,
Thanks for taking the time to check the release. Vote passes with 8
+1's . We just need to get the incubator PMC to now approve the
release.
+1 Votes:
Hiram Chirino
James Strachan
Rob Davies
Guillaume Nodet
Kevan Miller
Alan D. Cabrera
Aaron Mulder
Brian McCallister
No +/- 0 or -1's
Yep. I'll run the tally.
On 8/17/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe it's time to ask the incubator PMC to vote on this release ?
On 8/8/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some NOTICE file issues were found in the 2nd release candidate of the
> 4.0.2 build. I have
I am wondering what would be the estimate date for 4.1 release?
Do we have an idea of when and what releases are going to happen?
How many more 4.0.x releases will we have?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Release-schedule-tf2124265.html#a5860619
Sent from the Ac
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=comments#action_12428806
]
Geir Magnusson Jr commented on GERONIMO-2307:
-
Clearly the documents as is are not appropriate for redistribution, as they say
"no redistribution".
On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Ok, let's go with "specs/tags/-"
This is my preference as well.
It is easy enough to change later if/when the top-level tags dir
becomes unwieldy... so I am fine with this.
--jason
I have seen this problem happen only when a m1 repo is in the mix... something about m2 getting confused about metadata.xml bits...Do you have an m1 repo in your build?--jasonOn Aug 15, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:Trying to build a plugin to integrate ServiceMix in G 1.1,i' ve just seen
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=comments#action_12428791
]
Geir Magnusson Jr commented on GERONIMO-2307:
-
following a voice discussion, I've asked formally for Sun to
a) confirm no problem with typing the
And it seems I have the magic incantation now :-) Going to see how
well I can cast it on the car plugin later today.
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:51 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
--- Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMO we should not overload the mechanism here, but define ne
On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:51 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Bill, if you do not want to improve the existing car-maven-plugin,
you will need to use the scope.
Who said anything about not wanting to improve it?
just like how I added classpathPrefix to be used to
control the prefix for manif
Thanks a lot. It worked. Sorry it was my mistake.
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> Ah - you are connecting on the default stomp port (61613) could you
> try connecting on 61616?
>
> On 8/17/06, Sudhakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to use the .Net Message Service
>> API(
Ah - you are connecting on the default stomp port (61613) could you
try connecting on 61616?
On 8/17/06, Sudhakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to use the .Net Message Service
API(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet/)
in C# to communicate t
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-865?page=all ]
james strachan resolved AMQ-865.
Fix Version/s: 4.1
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied in SVN trunk if you want to try along with the test cases for
this issue and the related AMQ-883
>
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-883?page=all ]
james strachan resolved AMQ-883.
Fix Version/s: 4.1
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for the suggestions and ideas on how to fix it! :)
I've added a bunch more test cases to AsyncConsumeTest
On Aug 17, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Earlier this week, David convinced me to help him get the JPA
entity manager factories mapped into JNDI. And, that was the easy
part, he also wanted it to work in G 1.1. Today, I finally got it
working and wrote u
Hello,
I am trying to use the .Net Message Service
API(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet/)
in C# to communicate to ACtive MQ. Using the following code i am able to
successfully connect to Activer MQ but when i am trying to create a session
using connection
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2113?page=comments#action_12428764
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2113:
What is up with this issue? Seems like lowhanging fruit...
Patch is complaining though:
{noformat}
*
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1813?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1813:
---
Attachment: hotdeploy_projectxml_06042006.txt
Also need to apply hotdeploy_projectxml_06042006.txt (which was created against
the latest 1.1.1 branch)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1644?page=all ]
Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-1644.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jason Dillon (was: Jacek Laskowski)
This module is converted to m2.
> Migrate kernel mod
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1672?page=all ]
Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-1672.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.2
(was: 1.x)
Resolution: Fixed
This module is converted to m2.
> Module migration to Maven2: security
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2174?page=all ]
Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-2174.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
> Remove "modules/console-web"
>
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2174
>
FYI, I added pending-merge-log.sh which will svn log the remaining changes to easily see what needs to be done.--jasonBegin forwarded message:From: Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: August 17, 2006 11:52:27 AM PDTTo: dev@geronimo.apache.orgSubject: Trimmed more Unnecessary changes out of all_ch
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2113?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2113:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.1.2
1.2
(was: 1.1.x)
Affects Version/s: 1.1.1
1.2
> G
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1986?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1986:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.1.2
(was: 1.1.x)
Affects Version/s: 1.1
1.1.2
> TranQL Connector doesn't che
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1557?page=comments#action_12428740
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-1557:
This has applied to 1.1.1 -
Revision: 423005
Author: djencks
Date: 4:08:10 AM, Tuesday, July 18, 2006
Message:
I've pruned most of the build system changes, and the javamail-
transport bits.
Down to 113 revisions marked as Not Merged.
--jason
--- Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMO we should not overload the mechanism here, but define new
>
> configuration elements that allow us to add the additional metadata
> needed
Bill, if you do not want to improve the existing car-maven-plugin,
you will need to use t
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2174?page=comments#action_12428737
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2174:
This is a pending merge from dead-1.2...
{quote}
r383111 | jlaskowski | 2006-03-04 05:26:30 -0800 (Sat, 04 Mar
FYI. Fixed.
Regards,
Alan
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I found the problem and will fix it tonight.
Regards,
Alan
Aaron Mulder wrote:
I'm not sure if this is related to the recent web app security fix or
not.
I hacked the build enough that I got the 1.1.1 server running.
I went to the consol
+1
Regards,
Alan
David Blevins wrote:
+1, it's gotten a bit awkward the way we have it now.
-David
On Aug 15, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I think we should move the top-level trunk, tags and branches to
server/*. This will make the top-level of our repository more
consistent.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1739?page=all ]
Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-1739.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Strategy for installer needs to be reevaluated before any more work is done on
integration with m2.
> Plugin migration to Maven 2
David Blevins wrote:
On Aug 16, 2006, at 5:16 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Aug 16, 2006, at 4:38 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Aug 16, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Aug 16, 2006, at 3:21 PM, David Blevins wrote:
I guess I'd still prefer we do - for the tag
names as maven does.
I'm
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
We're pleased to announce that Grant McDonald has accepted
the invitation to join Apache ServiceMix as a committer.
Welcome Grant, and congratulations !
Congratulations Grant!
Regards,
Alan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
Please join us in welcoming Guillaume who recently accepted an
invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. Guillaume is probably best known
for his work on Xbean and ServiceMix. Has always been available to
help out folks and is a great example of working in the community
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Earlier this week, David convinced me to help him get the JPA entity
manager factories mapped into JNDI. And, that was the easy part, he
also wanted it to work in G 1.1. Today, I finally got it working and
wrote up some very rudimentary instruction on how to manually ins
On Aug 17, 2006, at 1:04 PM, System Architect wrote:On 8/17/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:46 AM, System Architect wrote:I feel strongly that is should be stated: Testing is not a "relatively specific use case" but a natural stage in a lifecycle of an application
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-547?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-547.
Resolution: Fixed
Author: gnodet
Date: Thu Aug 17 10:14:03 2006
New Revision: 432299
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432299&view=rev
Log:
SM-547: When t
When the xbean deployer throws a RuntimeException or Error on first deployment,
redeployment of the SU fails
Key: SM-547
URL: https://issues.apache.org/ac
On 8/17/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:46 AM, System Architect wrote:I feel strongly that is should be stated: Testing is not a "relatively specific use case" but a natural stage in a lifecycle of an application. You cannot grow into an adult without being a kid
On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:46 AM, System Architect wrote:I feel strongly that is should be stated: Testing is not a "relatively specific use case" but a natural stage in a lifecycle of an application. You cannot grow into an adult without being a kid first. And how well one were treated as a child, how
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-529?page=comments#action_36802 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-529:
Seems to run fine also for me.
Do you have the associated log file ?
> Servicemix-Component's MPSSettingTest.java hangs inde
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
