On 03/24/2016 06:05 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> I observed the note below in 2010 when that comment was first made (I
> cribbed that comment from 2.2.x checkin). So I now wonder if that note
> was based on an Express edition perhaps? Or on an early release - and
> MS later added or fixed the c
t convert our .dsp files.
> That's not true, I convert them.
>
> Steffen
>
>
>
> From: William A Rowe Jr Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:23 PM
> To: httpd Subject: ***** Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build
> files.
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:12 AM
Good now.
Little note: Visual Studio 2010 users cannot convert our .dsp files.
That's not true, I convert them.
Steffen
From: William A Rowe Jr
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:23 PM
To: httpd
Subject: * Re: 2.4.20 Change dsp: Win32-specific build files.
On Wed, Mar 23, 20
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Steffen wrote:
> I went earlier back, so I did a .dsp/GUI build with no issues.
>
> Build with SVN revision 1736328.
>
> Running looks also fine sofar.
>
Glad to hear, thanks for testing. I've updated the commit log message
to more clearly explain the intent an
Running now AL: mod_http2 (v1.4.4, nghttp2 1.8.0), initializing...
Was running 1.2.8 (git).
Little confusing the version number httpd vs git (1.4.4 vs 1.2.8)
Still worried about the memory footprint:
Mod_http2 1.0.11 (2.4.18) average ~100 MB peaks with 200 MB.
with 1.2.8 average ~200 MB wit
Thanks, Steffen!
> Am 23.03.2016 um 17:12 schrieb Steffen :
>
> I went earlier back, so I did a .dsp/GUI build with no issues.
>
> Build with SVN revision 1736328.
>
> Running looks also fine sofar.
>
>
>
> On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:50, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Thx... I would like to
I went earlier back, so I did a .dsp/GUI build with no issues.
Build with SVN revision 1736328.
Running looks also fine sofar.
On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:50, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Thx... I would like to T&R today if possible, because I was hoping
for a release by the end of this week, b
On Mar 23, 2016 3:15 AM, "Steffen" wrote:
>
> Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche.
>
> The comment says the the .dsp flies are entirely ! unusable.
>
> I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the
issue ?
They were directly usable on VC98. They wer
Thx... I would like to T&R today if possible, because I was hoping
for a release by the end of this week, but I also don't want to
have to punt 2.4.20 as well, so we should wait.
> On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:39 AM, Steffen wrote:
>
> Sure I like to do, but sorry I am out of town, to morrow morning (m
Sure I like to do, but sorry I am out of town, to morrow morning (my
time) I can build.
Maybe Jan E and/or Gregg can give it a .dsp try.
When I look to the changes, it should build.
On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:36, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Can you do a quick check that HEAD of 2.4 builds f
Can you do a quick check that HEAD of 2.4 builds for you?
THX!!
> On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Steffen wrote:
>
> Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe does
> not break a .dsp build.
>
> My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not usab
OK, thanks for clarifying Steffen.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Steffen wrote:
> Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe does
> not break a .dsp build.
>
> My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not usable,
> which is not true.
>
>
>
>
Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe
does not break a .dsp build.
My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not
usable, which is not true.
On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:20, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100):
>>Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche.
>>
>>The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable.
>>
>>I can tell that they are entirely usabl
Agreed! wtf?!
> On Mar 23, 2016, at 6:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
>
> Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100):
>> Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche.
>>
>> The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable.
>>
>> I can tell that t
Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100):
>Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche.
>
>The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable.
>
>I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the issue ?
I agree with Steffen
Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche.
The comment says the the .dsp flies are entirely ! unusable.
I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the issue ?
So please explain why for you it is not usable ?
Change comment:
The actual .dsp files are enti
17 matches
Mail list logo
