Adfinis SyGroup?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Marcus
Am 15.08.2017 um 19:46 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Opengrok, http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/, times out.
This makes it very unlikely I will be able to solve the RC2 OLE problem
before I go out of town for a few days starting
Opengrok, http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/, times out.
This makes it very unlikely I will be able to solve the RC2 OLE problem
before I go out of town for a few days starting on Thursday. I can use
find and grep instead, but it takes a lot longer.
--
I am rebuilding my 4.1.4 debug environment to make sure it is up to
date. I am going to work on this ASAP, but I do have travel planned and
will not be available Thursday through Tuesday.
On 8/14/2017 1:35 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Well, not exactly the same...
If I zoom into the document I c
Have you tried repeating "build --all" a few times?
I quite often have failures that go away with a few repeated builds. My
interpretation is that whatever is supposed to make sure all
dependencies are satisfied before building a module does not quite work
right. Sooner or later, everything th
One of the changes for 4.1.4 is supposed to tighten validation of doc
files. Unfortunately, I made a mistake in the version that went into
RC1, and it gets false positives.
The problem should be fixed in RC2.
On 8/10/2017 4:27 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
Forum volunteer John_Ha has sent me a DO
Regardless of anything else you do, retry the full build, without
cleaning but also without specifying starting from the failure.
Sometimes the windows builds don't seem to get all the dependency
ordering right. If that is the cause of the failure, repeating the build
can resolve it. For examp
Reminder: Please add the steps that were taken to get Jim able to grant
release blocker for 4.1.4 to the "How to Cook a Release" page at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release
-
To unsubscri
This issue is my current focus, so the analysis is very valuable and
timely. It seems likely that there is a common problem, applying to both
documents and profiles, of AOO believing it has finished writing
something too early.
Unfortunately, I don't think we have any developers who are famili
Apache Ant(TM) version 1.9.6 compiled on June 29 2015
On 7/20/2017 9:20 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Patricia, could you tell me which version of Apache Ant you are using?
Matthias
Am 20.07.2017 um 16:02 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
As another data point, I just did a clean checkout of the trunk
As another data point, I just did a clean checkout of the trunk and
built it on Windows 8.1. Here are my configure parameters:
SDK_PATH="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0"
./configure \
--enable-symbols \
--disable-strip-solver \
--with-frame-home="$SDK_
I use Visual Studio as a debug tool, and sometimes as an editor. I do my
builds in a Cygwin shell, following
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7.2C_Windows_8.1.2C_Windows_10
instructions.
I edit using either gvim or Visual Studio depending o
Would it make sense to put the "official" configuration options in "How
to Cook a Release"? It would make it more of a one-stop shop for the
release construction information.
On 6/23/2017 8:14 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 23.06.2017 um 16:44 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
You don't need the whol
I have reproduced the problem in my US English 4.1.4, and also a debug
build based on the trunk but with additional 4.1.4 changes.
On 6/23/2017 7:01 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi!
Confirmed on Windows 7.
These builds are primarily meant for testing the build process and the
different configur
On 6/18/2017 5:51 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
On 06/17/2017 01:52 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Without going into details here, some recently fixed security issues
have related to the use of fixed size arrays without bounds checks.
In general, that is not a very robust programming practice. It
this youtube video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86xWVb4XIyE
And since I learned C++ in the 90ies, but never used it I thought it is
a good invest.
Am 18.06.2017 um 01:06 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I don't know. I have not read that particular book. If the code
snippet includes "using
e: Circle myarray[10]
array example: array myarray
so std::array::at is equal to the arrayexample?
sorry if the question is dumb. I am not sure if what I know is the same
what you talk about.
I am in the "early carrier" category. lol.
All the best
Peter
Am 17.06.2017 um 19:52 schrieb P
the screen when building AOO I see
a lot of messages that make me think that the code could need a review...
Your suggestion sounds very reasonable to me!
Kind regards, Matthias
Am 17.06.2017 um 19:52 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Without going into details here, some recently fixed security issues
Without going into details here, some recently fixed security issues
have related to the use of fixed size arrays without bounds checks.
In general, that is not a very robust programming practice. It depends
on careful checking in the source code to prevent array overflow.
I suggest a project to
The new build, done clean and incorporating Matthias' suggested change,
completed successfully. Thanks again for the suggestions.
On 6/2/2017 11:20 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions.
I am doing a clean build, but it takes a while on Windows 8.1. I have
441 GB of
Thanks for the suggestions.
I am doing a clean build, but it takes a while on Windows 8.1. I have
441 GB of free space on the disk, so I don't think that is the problem.
On 6/2/2017 11:02 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 02.06.2017 um 18:51 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I checked out 4.1.4, and tri
rce.tar.gz";
That source is not existent any more and I had to change to:
--with-epm-url=https://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz
(See:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO
)
Regards, Matthias
Am 02.06.2017 um 18:51 s
I checked out 4.1.4, and tried to build it, Windows 8.1. The build fails
right at the end. I'm attaching my configure parameters. Any tips for
how to fix this?
... unopkg.exe sync --verbose -env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_JREHOME=true 2>&1 | ...
... creating archive file ...
... cleaning the output tree
Since this is getting into specifics of security issues, I think it
should be moved to the security list.
On 5/22/2017 1:22 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Well, I see only 2 attack path for us.
Ssh interface and the macro/scripting interface.
SSH or web we need to update libs, so wee need a flexible
On 5/20/2017 2:11 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
...
We have way too many users to abandon the 4.x branch completely. We
do need to handle security issues.
If we want start a rewrite for a 5.x then we will need to map the
functionality particularly in Calc. We will also need to pick a more
modern langua
On 5/20/2017 1:43 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Hi Patricia
Am .05.2017, 22:04 Uhr, schrieb Patricia Shanahan :
...
A retired Sun or StarOffice person who understands how the code is
put together could save me a lot of time. My current low level
objective is to find where to put a break point to
On 5/20/2017 9:07 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Hi all
Am .05.2017, 16:32 Uhr, schrieb esh1907 :
Maybe we should try to locate and convince people who used to work during
Star and Sun Microsystems to rejoin the project?
I think this is the wrong way to go. We can't get the good old time
back. W
On 5/20/2017 7:32 AM, esh1907 wrote:
Maybe we should try to locate and convince people who used to work during
Star and Sun Microsystems to rejoin the project?
If you can see a way to make this happen, it would be very helpful. Even
having someone familiar with the source code available as a c
The OpenOffice name is probably the best asset we have for attracting
volunteers.
On 5/15/2017 11:26 AM, esh1907 wrote:
But for releases and interesting stuff, people are needed ("chicken or the
egg")...
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Peter Kovacs
wrote:
Nah. That will not attract people.
On 5/2/2017 8:42 AM, Jorg Schmidt wrote:
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
The issue that I see is that our end-user community is not the same
as, for example, subversion... I would hazard that the vast majority
of AOO users have no idea what "open source" means and the distincti
If it needs to be done early, put it early in the document.
In general, what needs doing should drive the form of the "How to Cook a
Release" document. If the current form does not accommodate a necessary
step, change it. The objective is to have a complete recipe.
We currently have two secti
I have a lot of non-Apache activities over the next month, so I'm taking
a break from OpenOffice. I've made some progress towards learning my way
around the code and data structures, but it is taking time.
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
On 2/14/2017 10:40 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with
writing, editing, and copyediting skills hoping to help. The
doc@ list
seems to be dead, except for one message posted this
I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with
writing, editing, and copyediting skills hoping to help. The doc@ list
seems to be dead, except for one message posted this year.
What would be the best way to get started on improving our website or
documentation?
In looking at AOO source code, I'm finding lots of uses of fixed size
arrays. As far as I can tell, there is little use of the STL data
structures. I assume this reflects conditions when StarOffice was designed.
On 2/5/2017 7:42 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
From: Damjan Jovanovic [mailto:dam...@
ows VM doesn't have disk space for a
debug build anyway...
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Applying the patch fixed the vcl case, but not the one I really care
about, main/sw
On 1/29/2017 6:51 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 1/29/2017 5:59 PM, Damjan Jovan
Applying the patch fixed the vcl case, but not the one I really care
about, main/sw
On 1/29/2017 6:51 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 1/29/2017 5:59 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
I am trying a Windows rebuild now. In the meanwhile, what debugger are
you using? Can you debug any other modules
.mk <http://windows.mk>. If so, please try
the attached patch which should do that.
I'll try it.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Patricia Shanahan mailto:p...@acm.org>> wrote:
On 1/25/2017 9:35 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
For a while I've noticed
On 1/25/2017 9:35 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
For a while I've noticed how gbuild modules don't have debug symbols unless
built with the maximum debug level ("./configure --enable-debug" globally
or "build debug=true" per module) which also produces oceans of log
messages we usually don't wan
p.
Damjan
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I am trying to set up a new debug environment, incorporating the recent
changes to how debug works. Unfortunately, my configure-and-bootstrap
cannot find dmake. It looks for it in a different URL from the one
specified as DMAK
I am trying to set up a new debug environment, incorporating the recent
changes to how debug works. Unfortunately, my configure-and-bootstrap
cannot find dmake. It looks for it in a different URL from the one
specified as DMAKE_URL from configure.
run_configure.sh contains my configure paramet
I am being held up by a similar failure on Windows 8.1:
checking if C:/ant/bin/ant works... Ant works
checking Ant lib directory... Ant lib directory found.
checking whether ant is >= 1.6.0... yes, 1.9.6
./configure: line 22505: syntax error near unexpected token `else'
./configure: line 22505: `
have to rebuild the module I need
right now.
Thanks for the suggestions.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I built with --enable-symbols in the configure parameters.
For several modules, I can get symbols generated using:
make clean; make debug=3Dtrue
and copy
I built with --enable-symbols in the configure parameters.
For several modules, I can get symbols generated using:
make clean; make debug=3Dtrue
and copying the updated .dll files.
I just tried this for main/setup_native and there does not seem to be a
suitable makefile.
Is there any way t
We also need to split tasks out into those that primarily need
OpenOffice user skills, and those that require digging deeply into the
implementation code.
In the long term, I think I may be on the leading edge of a major future
source of open software developers - retirees.
On 1/14/2017 12
11.01.2017 09:44, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 1/10/2017 11:29 PM, Nagy �kos wrote:
Hi,
it is impossible, because the LO license is LGPL+MPL, that can't be
merged in OpenOffice.
That choice of license was very unfortunate, and a regrettable barrier
to cooperation between the projects. When LO
On 1/10/2017 11:29 PM, Nagy Ákos wrote:
Hi,
it is impossible, because the LO license is LGPL+MPL, that can't be
merged in OpenOffice.
That choice of license was very unfortunate, and a regrettable barrier
to cooperation between the projects. When LO split off they could have
kept the Apache
I plan to be back on AOO next week, and would also appreciate a
reasonably stable, reliably building svn environment.
There are two options. Ideally, trunk becomes stable and reliably
building, and destabilizing activities go in branches. If that gets in
the way of using the buildbots to test
If this is the 4.1.3 source, it has been compiled many times. I would
look for a configuration problem affecting the the value of bits_per_pixel.
On 01/02/2017 06:07 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:legi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 1
I am confused about this. I believe Zsolt is now a member of our
"committers" group. Is there another step I need to do to give svn
access? If so, what is it?
Forwarded Message
Subject: access grant
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:19:33 +0100
From: Zsolt Kúti
Reply-To: priv...@ri
On 12/5/2016 12:35 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
...
# Concerning 12h period. (did not find who brought this up :) )
What I mean is that it would be great if we could devide all activities
in good estimate able chunks. Agile methology claims everything that an
experienced developer estimates beyond 24h
On 12/6/2016 1:55 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Hi all
I'm going to the configure script and I recognize that there are still
parts for solaris. As far as I know, the last version who build with
solaris was the AOO 3.4.x. My question is, if we should ride off the
Solaris stuff or we should keep it.
I think there is something that comes before this. Developers need to be
able to build AOO. I think we still need more work on the step-by-step
instructions, making sure they are complete and work for all systems.
On 12/3/2016 4:21 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Hello all,
I thought a little. There
On 11/26/2016 4:22 AM, Brian Barker wrote:
...
As I explained, the user quite properly derived the hash value of the
installation file. He then - understandably but wrongly - performed the
same process to derive the hash value *of* the hash file - instead of
inspecting the value provided in that
Thanks.
On 11/18/2016 11:25 AM, mar...@apache.org wrote:
Author: marcus
Date: Fri Nov 18 19:25:19 2016
New Revision: 1770427
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1770427&view=rev
Log:
Translated comments from German to English
Modified:
openoffice/trunk/main/sfx2/source/appl/linkmgr2.cxx
Thanks, Marcus. I just updated and reread doc.cxx, the file I'm trying
to understand today. Several of the German comments contained useful
information that I had not been able to guess from automatic translation.
I think we have a good process now.
On 11/10/2016 6:14 AM, bugzi...@apache.org w
are reading.
On 11/9/2016 5:17 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
That sounds like a good idea!
At the times, when StarOffice was a German product no one imagined, that
the code would be open-sourced... ;-)
Am 09.11.2016 um 14:01 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
As a compromise between doing individual
Mechtilde
Am 08.11.2016 um 19:35 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I trying to read some AOO source code. There are few comments, and
several of the ones I have found are in German, which I don't know. I
have tried running some through Google Translate, but the results do
not
make much sense.
Is
I trying to read some AOO source code. There are few comments, and
several of the ones I have found are in German, which I don't know. I
have tried running some through Google Translate, but the results do not
make much sense.
Is there a translation tool that works better on source code commen
If this was a known issue before 4.1.3, please list it under the prior
bug report, not 127176. 127176 was created after 4.1.3 was released, and
describes the problem as a regression relative to 4.1.2.
On 10/25/2016 9:23 AM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=
On 10/21/2016 5:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Methinks that the creation of recruitment@ was ill-advised...
Most new people are joining dev@ which makes recruitment@ look
like a dismal failure.
With 20/20 hindsight, it does not seem to have been useful. The question
was whether dev@'s high traff
try and see if it helps any?
John R. D'Orazio
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I tried to build AOO413 on Windows 10, and got a failure:
/MAP /OPT:NOREF -safeseh -nxcompat -dynamicbase -NODEFAULTLIB -RELEASE
-DEBUG -INCREMENTAL:NO /SUBSYSTEM:CONSOLE /BAS
On 10/18/2016 11:41 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
On FreeBSD, and (according to 1 bug reporter) MacOS X, throwing an
exception from a method which isn't specified by that method's exception
specifier, eg. "throw Exception();" when the specifier was
"throw(RuntimeException)", ends up calling un
On 10/15/2016 1:43 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/14/2016 12:11 AM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
Marcus wrote:
Am 10/13/2016 09:34 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release
You just need to add some text. Don't care about formatting or
o
On 10/14/2016 3:24 AM, iamsuhailans...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a suggestion that Apache should write OpenOffice using Java and Netbeans
platform.
Thanks for your suggestion.
There would certainly be major advantages to it being in Java. We could
do a single build for all platforms. Several fo
On 10/12/2016 11:55 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello Apache, Hello OpenOffice-PMC, Hello Community,
I am absolutely horrified that in a situation where we have to overcome
problems together, no reasonable planning takes place.
I have started a Wiki page on "How to Cook a Release",
https://cwiki
On 10/12/2016 2:55 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/12/2016 11:49 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
First, congratulations to everyone on releasing 4.1.3. If this were a
conventional, co-located project I'd like to take you all out for a
drink after work.
Now back to work :-)
At this moment, I
First, congratulations to everyone on releasing 4.1.3. If this were a
conventional, co-located project I'd like to take you all out for a
drink after work.
Now back to work :-)
At this moment, I hope everyone remembers exactly what they did, what
karma and tools they used, to make the release
Thanks.
On 10/11/2016 10:01 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I don't have the karma either.
I just deleted the content, declared it to be an orphan page and clobbered the
Title. (Titles are mandatory).
-Original Message-
From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
Sent: Tu
On 10/11/2016 9:23 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I need to delete a page, and do not have the karma to do it.
I either need an addition to my confluence permissions, or for someone
who can do so to delete
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Alternative+AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes
I need to delete a page, and do not have the karma to do it.
I either need an addition to my confluence permissions, or for someone
who can do so to delete
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Alternative+AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes
It's an artifact of editing the release notes page - I wanted to be able
to compare two slightly different approaches. At this point, the
"Alternative" should have been deleted, but I have not yet found out how
to do it, or maybe don't have the Confluence karma to do so.
It will be fixed befor
On 10/9/2016 8:56 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
On 9 Oct, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 10/9/2016 10:52 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Marcus wrote:
- Change the RC1 into the real release
This one takes a few seconds and is best done close to the release.
- Uploading to the Sourceforge mirrors
This
On 10/9/2016 10:52 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Marcus wrote:
- Change the RC1 into the real release
This one takes a few seconds and is best done close to the release.
- Uploading to the Sourceforge mirrors
This one takes a few hours. I've already prepared a full svn export of
https://dis
On 10/5/2016 8:26 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I plan to start the 4.1.3 vote today. This is a draft of the action list
assuming the vote passes. Please help by correcting, expanding, and
adding anything missing.
Just in case anyone missed it, the vote passed so it is time to execute
the post
On 10/9/2016 5:13 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 11:37:38PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Can we open the AOO414 branch? Everything seems to show that 4.1.3 will be
coming in a week or so and for sure there is no further code work to do on
it. So I'd like to have an AOO
The vote is now complete, and has passed:
[+1]
Binding: 5 votes
Patricia Shanahan, Carl Marcum, Marcus, Jim Jagielski, Andrea
Pescetti
Advisory: 6 votes
Matthias Seidel, Mechtilde Stehmann, Keith N. McKenna, Pedro,
Jose R R, Peter Kovacs
[0]
1 vote: Jörg Schmidt
[-1
With about three hours to go on the vote, I've prepared a spreadsheet
based on the [VOTE] thread.
The current situation is 10 votes, one [0], nine [+1]. Of the +1 votes,
five are binding. The comments indicate a range of different approaches
to testing, which is good.
Please check the attach
On 10/8/2016 7:18 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 10/8/2016 6:46 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I had to make a change in the key preferences to meet the release
signing requirements. I uploaded to a couple of servers, including MIT,
and waited a few days.
I can find
On 10/8/2016 6:46 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I had to make a change in the key preferences to meet the release
signing requirements. I uploaded to a couple of servers, including MIT,
and waited a few days.
I can find mine here (note: you have to add "0x&quo
I had to make a change in the key preferences to meet the release
signing requirements. I uploaded to a couple of servers, including MIT,
and waited a few days.
I didn't think we were supposed to update KEYS directly?
On 10/8/2016 6:08 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
This is not a blocker for the
On 10/7/2016 4:06 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/07/2016 01:03 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I would not have granted a release blocker request for this one, because
it was already fixed in source in the previous release, 4.1.2-patch1.
All 4.1.3 does for it is include it in a binary distribution
On 10/7/2016 3:55 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/07/2016 12:43 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
...
Thanks. Would you like to be the point person working with Sally on the
press release? It would be smooth to coordinate themes between press
release and blog post.
I don't see a problem to cre
I would not have granted a release blocker request for this one, because
it was already fixed in source in the previous release, 4.1.2-patch1.
All 4.1.3 does for it is include it in a binary distribution, worth
indicating in the release notes, but not a reason to revive the bug.
On 10/7/2016 3
On 10/6/2016 5:42 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/05/2016 06:27 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
RM: Update
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3 to show
vote result etc.
The only important thing to update is that the release is available,
since the
, Oct 05, 2016 at 08:10:40PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Ariel;
In all the builds that I have been involved in with AOO we have
included
a link to a Bugzilla query for all bugs fixed by that release.My
concern
was 2 fold. One that it would give a wrong impression to anyone that
followe
This thread has morphed a bit, and I think a summary may be useful at
this time.
It started with Keith pointing out, correctly, that I was taking a short
cut by starting the vote before all the relevant bugs had been marked
"Fixed", although after I was sure they were all fixed in reality. Tha
On 10/6/2016 5:29 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/05/2016 12:23 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Could people working on the bugzilla entries check the status and update
as appropriate?
I've seen now all issues as "Resolved - Fixed" - or "Verified - Fixed".
Note that
On 10/6/2016 5:21 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/06/2016 01:52 PM, schrieb Marcus:
...
I'll take a look into the issue list, update the release notes with
interesting issues for the average user and keep the full details to the
link of BZ issues.
done.
I've also added a line for the BZ issue 126622
On 10/5/2016 5:51 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 07:17:27PM -0400, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I believe, based on my tracking and testing, that the release blockers
are all fixed. I was hoping the people working on the
They are now marked as fixed.
On 10/5/2016 3:28 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I believe, based on my tracking and testing, that the release blockers
are all fixed. I was hoping the people working on the bugs, especially
those who requested release_blocker, will update them ASAP.
On 10/5/2016 2
On 10/5/2016 2:52 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 04/10/2016 Mechtilde wrote:
Apache OpenOffice is a project with a wide user base, who only use the
binaries. So it is important to release well defined and tested binaries.
Yes, this is important. As we did for 4.1.2, I would leave PMC members
fr
I believe, based on my tracking and testing, that the release blockers
are all fixed. I was hoping the people working on the bugs, especially
those who requested release_blocker, will update them ASAP.
On 10/5/2016 2:35 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Just a procedural Question. How can we be call
On 10/5/2016 2:07 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
The Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 source and binaries,
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/, contain
several bug fixes. See the draft release notes at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes
The Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 source and binaries,
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/, contain
several bug fixes. See the draft release notes at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes
Please vote on releasing it as 4.1.3 by replying
I plan to start the 4.1.3 vote today. This is a draft of the action list
assuming the vote passes. Please help by correcting, expanding, and
adding anything missing.
RM: Update
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3 to show
vote result etc.
RM: Edit
https://cwiki.ap
On 10/5/2016 2:32 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2016-10-05, 12:48 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
Is this approved or not approved as a release blocker???
I thought there was a fix for this.
It is essential that this is fixed for Mac users.
As I understand it, the reason is lack o
Please post only objections to calling a vote on 4.1.3 tomorrow. I will
treat silence as consent.
As far as I can tell, we are ready to go.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands
I have done some basic testing for the following environments and
language versions:
Windows 7 en_GB
Windows 8.1 en_GB, fr
Windows 10 en_GB
Ubuntu 16.04 en_GB
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For
denied it 4.1.3 release blocker, but added a request for 4.1.4.
On 10/4/2016 2:47 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/04/2016 10:31 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes
ah, thanks. I've updated some text (e.g., separated th
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes
On 10/4/2016 1:29 PM, Marcus wrote:
OK, binary and source code testing is on a good way.
What about the release notes. Are these somewhere reachable/readable
already?
Marcus
--
201 - 300 of 665 matches
Mail list logo