Re: Upgrade HSQLDB to fix regression on 2.3.2

master is fine I think Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannib

Re: Upgrade HSQLDB to fix regression on 2.3.2

Hi Thibaud, yes a PR is fine. Please respect the java 7 constraint on master (but tomee 8 branch can use a java 8 lib) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g

Re: Application InstanceManager is null causing crash with RestEasy Provider

Did you try with the tomcat version compatible of tomee (8.5)? Le 13 déc. 2017 19:25, "awmurray" a écrit : > I've been debugging a startup error deploying a WAR in an EAR. > > After downloading the source and debugging, I can see that the Instance > Manager is null > which causes line 108 to Nul

Re: tomee git commit: style

Buildbot is there for that ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-12-06 14:59 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Gallimore : > Thanks and apologies for not catching these. > > Jon > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 1:40 PM, wrote: > >> Repository: t

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

guess taglib community will have a more relevant feedback but that's what I had in mind at least, yes avoiding it in tomee means either removing the libs or deactivating the auto registration but none of these solutions are really stable and reliable on the long term. Romain Manni-

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

tomcat doesnt, taglib does implicitly you can try to hack openejb.classloader properties to make it work - without any guarantees Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-25 17:26 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead : > does tomcat still ship with Xalan a

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

depends the perfs. If javax gives the same no need of xalan, otherwise we would need some flag. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-21 11:52 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead : > should xalan be available through some route or does everything n

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

yes, that's the ones to fix - make it compiling + validate perfs are still ok. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-21 11:25 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead : > it is imported in these ones in main as well as loads in test > ./impl/src/main/java

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

No, you see this stack cause the test cant be loaded but it is in several classes of taglib project, XalanUtil and a few others. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-21 11:14 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead : > so do i need to replace it with something e

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask me why xalan is not in the name ;)) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead : > mvn install

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

the way to go I think. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead : > hi rmannibucau, > i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue after a > busy period. > what do you mean about moving up

Re: Kill JVM on deployment failure

Hi Thiago To test it I would create a fake tomee - min libs used by the remoteserver, in target/mytest/faketomee and create a plain junit test and a nested main class using remote server that the unit test will launch through a fork. Then you just need to check the exit code of your fork (Process)

Re: LinkageError with tomee

Hi is it in an ear? any easy way to reproduce it? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-06 16:32 GMT+01:00 gabrielHneini : > Hello all, > > I am having a problem with my web application, on starting my tomee I get > this error below at sta

Re: XmlJavaTypeAdapter not working

Hi is User part of a webservice signature or referenced through a @XmlSeeAlso? If not then it is not passed to the JAXBContext creation. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-02 15:15 GMT+01:00 Alinezhad.a : > Hi > > i'm get confused w

Re: Github question

Hi Alex Just do a normal github PR: http://tomee.apache.org/community/sources.html Le 28 oct. 2017 04:02, "Alex Gout" a écrit : > Hi guys, > > I just picked up and finished a JIRA. However, I got lost a bit in the > documentation on how to continue now. Should I follow > https://git-wip-us.apac

Re: Issue when performing the ejb look up

Can you test against the 7.0.3 or 7.0.4? Also can you check the JVM system properties more than tomee ones? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-10-27 8:32 GMT+02:00 Dignesh : > No I dont have SSL. > Here is my system.properties file. > system.p

Re: Issue when performing the ejb look up

Hmm, looks good, do you have some ssl or ejbd system properties? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-10-27 7:46 GMT+02:00 Dignesh : > Yes. > Below are the contents > > server = org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.EjbServer > bind

Re: Issue when performing the ejb look up

Hi Dignesh Do you have an ejbd.properties in conf/conf.d? Le 27 oct. 2017 07:19, "Dignesh" a écrit : > Hi, > I am using 7.0.2 version of TomEE. When performing the lookup using the > multicast .I am seeing the below exception > > javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: No appropriate pr

Re: "How to test latest TomEE 7.0.5 snapshots (w or without Arquilian) ?"

git clone https://github.com/apache/tomee.git Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-10-11 11:34 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker : > Okay so how do I get access to latest TomEE 7.0.5 sources? > > Alexandre > > > > 2017-10-11 10:57 GMT+02:

Re: "How to test latest TomEE 7.0.5 snapshots (w or without Arquilian) ?"

Hi Alex, this command was for tomee source directory, sources (master) look good so can be a deployment thing, building locally will say us quickly Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-10-11 10:38 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker : > Hello Romain, > >

Re: "How to test latest TomEE 7.0.5 snapshots (w or without Arquilian) ?"

doesn't look so on master, maybe give a quick try to build locally (mvn clean install -DskipTests -T4 -pl tomee/tomee-embedded -am) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-10-11 10:25 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker : > Hello Romain, > > I

Re: "How to test latest TomEE 7.0.5 snapshots (w or without Arquilian) ?"

@Alex: did you check a dependency tree out? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-10-11 9:59 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker : > Hello, > > I am confused : I have updated my pom.xml for my tests based on > Arquilian with tomee-embedded to point to 7.

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21: > * [lifted from xalan] > ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: xalan > ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: xalan > ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar > ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

Yes Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead" a écrit : > ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all xalan > refs? > > On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date >> http://to

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <http

Re: "How to test latest TomEE 7.0.5 snapshots (w or without Arquilian) ?"

small typo: actual snapshot repo is repository.apache.org/snapshots/, not central Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rm

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;) Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead" a écrit : > is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other versions > of xalan from the pom but it didn't work > > On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrot

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

et us know and I can deploy one manually. >>>> >>>> Jon >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead < >>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>> are the dist builds sti

Re: "How to test latest TomEE 7.0.5 snapshots (w or without Arquilian) ?"

Think you need asf snapshot repo @Jon: did you get a chance to check why our daily deployment fails? Le 10 oct. 2017 13:45, "Jonathan Gallimore" a écrit : > Good shout. Let me deploy the latest snapshot for you. Then you should just > need to use 7.0.5-SNAPSHOT as your version number, and you s

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/ (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibuca

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

Hi Alex, you can set as system property (through surefire) openejb.deployer.repository= Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2

@Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/ content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

Re: Potentially having some part of documentation in the main repo

arent we already using asciidoc? ( https://github.com/apache/tomee-site-generator/tree/master/src/main/jbake/content ) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g

Re: Potentially having some part of documentation in the main repo

+0 to have it all and sync somehow in the site build process - i like having it with the code since it enables some more stuff to happen but it increases contribution cost -0 to have it partially to ensure we dont loose contributors Side note: if you import it, ensure to update all the contributor

Re: tomee git commit: Fix licence issues

is we include both licenses in the header. > > I don’t call which file it is or what I was working on, but we definitely > had one in there like that from years ago. > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Se

Re: want to use load balancer while doing lookup , so that request can go to multiple instances for EJB

Hi You can use failover:url1,url2 or failover:roundrobin:url1,url2 for instance to pass multiple instance. If you want a custom strategy just do N lookups and implement a proxy with the custom strategy - like circuit breaker for instance. Le 16 sept. 2017 04:35, "VikasRathee" a écrit : > Hi > >

Re: tomee git commit: Fix licence issues

Hey Andy Livereload is under MIT license as written in the notice file, not asf one, we should probably strip the header from it to keep the original file. If better we can dowload the file during the build to make it more obvious it is not ours. Le 14 sept. 2017 21:39, a écrit : Repository:

Re: lookup failed in tomee

Hi Vikas You dont use the remote context factory, is it intended? If so the provider url is ignored Le 8 sept. 2017 17:49, "VikasRathee" a écrit : I have one webservice project and one EJB 3.0 project deployed in Tomee plume in same EAR. From webservice class i'm calling EJB bean class using r

Re: 7.0.4 release plans

mind) but nothing really blocking compared to 7.0.3 AFAIK. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <ht

Re: @Provider scan not working

Hi if you put it in tomee/lib then it is not scanned by default for backward compatibility reasons you can try to set -Dopenejb.scan.webapp.container=true Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Ol

Re: TomEE documenation

Hi Mark Doesnt the xa part cover it? Le 1 sept. 2017 22:47, "Márk" a écrit : > Hi, > > I had a problem with tomee: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45964924/tomee-ora- > 01017-server-tries-to-authenticate-with-os-user/45965073 > > http://tomee.apache.org/datasource-config.html is wrong. T

Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.9.0-alpha-2: sending email fails

If you use tomee.xml or resources.xml yes, if you don't use the built-in factory then you need to handle it yourself Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.

Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.9.0-alpha-2: sending email fails

tomee instantiate sessions https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/core/MailSessionFactory.java (which is not the case if you use context.xml) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <htt

Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.9.0-alpha-2: sending email fails

Hi Dignesh, Can you try to set mail.smtp.auth before creating the session? Also maybe debug in your authenticator to check it is well used. Le 1 sept. 2017 06:22, "Dignesh" a écrit : Loading javamail.default.providers from jar:file:/C:/Users/dgoyal/Desktop/geronimo-javamail_1.4_ mail-1.7.jar!/M

Re: JSTL

+1 side note: we should pby link this to the user thread, can try to find it back later this week if needed Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

Re: JSTL

yep, 3, 1, 2 for the complete order (a mix of compatibility and influence/asf consistence). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: JSTL

Hmm, shout if wrong but think you misunderstood the "optional" in my sentence. I meant we patch trunk to remove the adherence to xalan. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://

Re: JSTL

Hi Jon there is another thread on it (probably on user@) I think we should just make xalan optional in the lib and upgrade. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpres

Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.9.0-alpha-2: sending email fails

just add in properties mail.debug=true BTW, why not using tomee.xml to define this resource? We have some code using this decriptor to handle the authentication a default resource wouldn't have. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog &l

Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.9.0-alpha-2: sending email fails

Hi what is your mail server? can you activate the debug traces? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: TOMEE-2106: Tomee does not encode '%' in war filename

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE

Re: tomee-javaee-api buildbot fails to deploy

401, needs infra i fear Le 15 août 2017 16:05, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > can anyone plz look at this? > > https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-javaee-api/builds/1 > > tried to kick it off but it fails at the deploy step. > > LieGrue, > strub >

Re: [DISCUSS] Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

at. > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Aug 11, 2017, at 11:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > > > Does it mean we drop the ssh module? > > > > Why ot going incubator to promote the

Re: [DISCUSS] Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

Does it mean we drop the ssh module? Why ot going incubator to promote the portability of these projects? (Whatever you do, if tomee subproject it is perceived as tomee bound). Are they too small? Why not geronimo subprojects since it is the official umbrella project now - vs tomee is not until w

Re: [DISCUSS] Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

Interesting reasoning. What about tackling new specs - like mvc - which dont have yet a home at asf and would more inline with tomee and require more activity than "done" projects? Le 10 août 2017 22:44, "David Blevins" a écrit : > On Aug 10, 2017, at 1:12 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: > > Do

Re: [DISCUSS] Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

Same thought, for asf it sounds like a G subproject and not sure tomee fits but not strongly against neither. Side note: we had a ssh module already which never got attraction - not a need i guess - so not sure it would get better welcoming this time. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <ht

Re: The road to TomEE 8

sible" if you get what I mean ;) > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 09.08.2017 um 07:09 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > > > Well we can go with 8.0.x when finished since for users - and versioning > - > > it doesnt change much. > >

Re: The road to TomEE 8

with 8.0.x when finished since for users - and versioning - it doesnt change much. Anyway it can move to master directly if you branch 7.x before LieGrue, strub > Am 08.08.2017 um 23:09 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 and no need of 8.0/8.1 branch for now IMHO. > > Le 8 août 20

Re: The road to TomEE 8

+1 and no need of 8.0/8.1 branch for now IMHO. Le 8 août 2017 22:21, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" a écrit : > Hi Mark, > > That sounds good. > +1 > > Jean-Louis > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Mark Struberg

Re: Default resources for Java EE 7.

om/apache/tomee/pull/103 On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Cunha wrote: > Hi Romain, > > well, I get it. But If you don't want the defaults resources then I'll set > the flag to false. The server should always start with default resource > IMHO. > > On Sun,

Re: Default resources for Java EE 7.

Hi Daniel The side note here is: having them by default was intended cause it breaks tomee deeply in term of resource matching and user existing config. Idea was to set the flag if you want ee7 behavior to stay backward compat (and this solution is fine for a EE container). Le 6 août 2017 02:0

Re: Outdated/Junk PR

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE

Re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2100 - @Priority

gt; wrote: > > > Yep - that's what I had in my mind. Makes sense if a comparator is > > specified, we should use that instead of the @Priority ordering. > > > > Jon > > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail

Re: Probleme with johnzon

2017-07-26 11:19 GMT+02:00 olivier_1 : > Hi > Thank you for your reactivity > > i have already make it . > Not really. This specifies the endpoint types but jackson is still */*: @Provider @Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON) @Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)

Re: Probleme with johnzon

Hi this is an old jackson bug now, story short jackson is defined as a fallback provider (*/*) whereas johnzon is a json one. Just wrap jackson override produces/consumes type to application/json in your app. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog

Re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2100 - @Priority

+1 What's do we want to do? Looks like a EE 8 feature we can eagerly support as a default comparator (if the comparator is set we must bypass it to respect the comparator IMHO) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcl

Re: [jira] [Commented] (TOMEE-2102) IvmContext bind/unbind creates duplicate contexts

looks like the class is not packaged in an arquillian war so it is not instantiable. is that an option? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

Re: Work assignment protocol?

Hi Jon, was writing the same kind of thing - for the same reason pby. Saw you were assigned only in the "fixed" popup :s. Since list is first for now (vs jira), what about fwding the jira saying "i'm on it"? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com

Re: [PR] TOMEE-2087 IvmContext.list() does not correctly list the context content

looks good to apply to me Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rm

Re: TOMEE-2098: TomcatWebAppBuilder does not correctly handle the case when startInternal(StandardContext) fails

Hi Svetlin, looks like a good idea but if we need to ensure it comes with tests for war and ear cases - they dont 100% have the same lifecycle. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Ol

Re: @PostConstruct and @PreDestrory

.. > So probably do a clean rewrite in TomEE8? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 13.07.2017 um 13:14 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Hi Jon > > > > Side note before digging: you can rewrite the test this way (i find it > > easier to enter in bu

Re: @PostConstruct and @PreDestrory

hem in the AppContext (resources list?) to avoid to mess up wrappings/unwrapping like we do today and have a straight implmentation. Then the JNDI interaction is a plain unbind but the app resource lifecycle management is not relying on jndi by itself (like EJBs). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https:

Re: old openejb site is still top ranked in google!

the "don't remove the old site" but is outdated. We have a pending task to add a banner on all old pages to show it is no more maintained. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <

Re: Adds an option to ignore mdb.activation fields

logic is key for maintenance and ensure it is done in the right order (which is something to ensure we test - override priorities) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpres

Re: Adds an option to ignore mdb.activation fields

org.apache.openejb.jee.oejb3.EjbDeployment#getContainerId should give you the container Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: Adds an option to ignore mdb.activation fields

Hi Otavio, I have 2 notes on this: 1. the getProperties() is useless I think (IDE generated?) 2. it would probably better fit ActivationConfigPropertyOverride to have a right ordering of overrides, no? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <htt

Re: Site and "documentation" usage

just push it, regressions were fixed (thanks again Ivan) so risks are now low enough IMHO Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

readable). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibuc

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

We can also "just" add a video to the website to have it permanent in case part of the world misses the webinar ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordp

Re: [PR] TOMEE-2087 IvmContext.list() does not correctly list the context content

2017-07-11 12:38 GMT+02:00 Svetlin Zarev : > I've added several JUnit test cases in openejb-core that should verify > IvmContext.list() behaviour, yet I'll feel safer if we keep the arquillian > test as well. > +1, both are needed > > 2017-07-11 10:10 GMT+03:00 Rom

Re: [PR] TOMEE-2087 IvmContext.list() does not correctly list the context content

side note: embedded (not tomcat based) testing is needed to ensure we don't break but doesn't fully test the ivmcontext code because the federation is different so guess starting with tomcat is not that bad. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Bl

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

//eldermoraes.com > > > > > > > > > > 2017-07-09 2:50 GMT-03:00 David Blevins : > > > >> Hi Elder! just checking to see if you got the help you were looking > for. > >> > >> When you get it figured out any new docs would be amazing. > >

Re: When building locally TomEE has tons of broken tests.

2017-07-10 8:53 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > IF we want to increase the community activity, then we first need to have > a stable local build. > One has to checkout, run mvn clean install and get a green build. > Currently that's just not the case. It seems that the tests only run fine > on the CI

Re: Miss the contributing section on the new web site

enhancement is to add 1 line with a link to github, kind of "quick link", in souce part and probably the dev list in support part. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibuca

Re: Miss the contributing section on the new web site

Hi Mark 2017-07-10 7:51 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi folks! > A bit of feedback for the new site.It looks really great but there are a > few minor glitches still: > * The most important information is missing: How to obtain the source > code!This information used to be here in the old site > ht

Re: Site and "documentation" usage

get this change merged? > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > wrote: > > > Not a big fan of "list sites" cause basically you dont find anything (or > it > > is faster to find it in code). Arquillian one is way better IMO. > > >

Re: [Discuss] Review-than-commit 3 month trial

@Andy: discussion is not if the process is easy or not but if it would be beneficial to the project. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

Re: [Discuss] Review-than-commit 3 month trial

What Mark meant is if we go through a "vote" then we need to comply to ASF rules. Otherwise anything is up to the project and not a "vote". #semantic ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.

Re: [Discuss] Review-than-commit 3 month trial

Not sure there will be a consensus so how do we close that thread? >From what happent last weeks seems project is back on track so I'm tempted to say we should keep it like that for now. Alternative is to do an ASF vote to see if we go with RTC. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibuca

Re: Example+request

Hi did you have a look to https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/examples/rest-example? Except the client part it matches it. Not sure what you mean by "client using EJBContainer" since EJBContainer is a server technology so orthogonal to the client needs. Romain Manni-Bucau @r

Re: Adds an option to ignore mdb.activation fields

good catch for the typo, -0 to backport it (really read it as "this flag shouldnt have existed anyway" more than "don't backport it") Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old B

Re: Adds an option to ignore mdb.activation fields

sounds good this way for container activation props Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <

Re: Adds an option to ignore mdb.activation fields

2017-07-06 23:01 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore : > I'm +1 for back porting that patch, thanks Otavio. > > One thing I'd be interested in as an extra, is seeing if we can set > activation properties on a per-container basis too. > Mean like adding one new key in https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

outch, no more, didnt resetup a cluster since 2 years. But if you push a tomee-maven-plugin sample it would be quick to help. Side note: Tomcat list can also be more relevant since they fully own that part. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <htt

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

) and switch it to send messages Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.c

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

heck the depends_on option. It will > > guarantee you have your name available. It does not guarantee you have > the > > service fully up and running though. If you need that too, you will need > > the script to wait for the service behind that name to be ready. > > >

Re: Site and "documentation" usage

is. The content inside is not perfect, but we are getting > better. > >> > > > >> > > The links for the changes made are below, please give feedback on > >> them. > >> > > > >> > > Pull Request: > >> > > https://

Re: Site and "documentation" usage

> for 404, could be this a solution: > > > Just an idea. :) > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > wrote: > > > Ivan pushed a way to solve the 404, we just nees to extend it instead of > > having it "inline". It is the c

Re: Site and "documentation" usage

we are getting better. > > > > > > > > The links for the changes made are below, please give feedback on > them. > > > > > > > > Pull Request: > > > > https://github.com/apache/tomee-site-generator/pull/1 > > > > > > >

Re: Site and "documentation" usage

Ok, saw Andy did a similar comment on github so probably let's reverse the question. Anyone feeling like me it is a passthrough? (if not under 1 day think we can "close it" and just push it in prod) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >