On Monday, 20 May 2024 at 22:36:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Given last month's successful conversion of a sand pile to an
atomic pile, this #dlang meeting will be about resurrecting the
lost technology of the Atomic Earth Blaster.
Thu May 30 7pm at the Red Robin
2390 148th Ave NE, Redmond,
On Thursday, 7 March 2024 at 17:06:00 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 March 2024 at 07:47:04 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
SecureD 3.0 has been released. This version was set in motion
by a Cedric Picard, a D community member with Cryptography
experience, reaching out and suggesting a
On Thursday, 7 March 2024 at 11:04:08 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 March 2024 at 07:47:04 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
This version was set in motion by a Cedric Picard, a D
community member with Cryptography experience, reaching out
and suggesting a number of improvements to the Symmetric and
On Thursday, 7 March 2024 at 08:17:47 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 March 2024 at 07:47:04 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
SecureD 3.0 has been released. This version was set in motion
by a Cedric Picard, a D community member with Cryptography ...
And I even remembered to update the examples
SecureD 3.0 has been released. This version was set in motion by
a Cedric Picard, a D community member with Cryptography
experience, reaching out and suggesting a number of improvements
to the Symmetric and KDF API's. This resulted in an API for
symmetric encryption that improves correctness
On Thursday, 29 February 2024 at 00:34:59 UTC, zjh wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 20:41:46 UTC, Adam Wilson
wrote:
or start a discussion if there is disagreement on how to
handle this.
Although Github has discussions, why not just discuss them in
the `D forum`? This is `the
On Thursday, 29 February 2024 at 13:44:37 UTC, Andrew wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 20:41:46 UTC, Adam Wilson
wrote:
I am totally on board with this if the community thinks there
are improvements to be had here. Head on over to the Design
repo and you can either submit a PR to the
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 19:45:53 UTC, Greggor wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 15:55:52 UTC, Andrew wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 15:45:06 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
The first PR for Phobos 3 has been merged into the Phobos repo!
Now, to be clear, this is mostly a housekeeping PR that paves the
way for further work and there isn't actually anything useful in
it yet. We've setup the basic structure, DUB build/test config,
and copied over the modules that
On Wednesday, 24 January 2024 at 20:49:51 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
be there or be square!
PhobosV3 is on the menu!
On Saturday, 16 December 2023 at 22:24:46 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
If you want to be on it, email me your address!
We hope to have some fun activities for D aficionados. For
example, I am planning "Ferrari Night" towards the end of the
month where we all meet at the theater to watch
On Tuesday, 12 December 2023 at 17:52:12 UTC, Gregor Mückl wrote:
Hi!
I'm interested in joining this time. Looking forward to meeting
you all!
I look forward to meeting you!
Hello Everyone,
If you're going to be in the Seattle area over the holidays,
Walter, Bruce C, and I will be hanging out at the Red Robin in
Redmond on December 14th from 7PM until whenever they kick us
out. Normally we would meet after NWCPP, but they are on a
holiday break this month so we
On Saturday, 2 December 2023 at 18:09:11 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.106.0, ♥ to the 33 contributors.
This release comes with...
- In the D language, it is now possible to statically
initialize AAs.
- In dmd, there's a new `-nothrow` CLI flag.
- In dub, `dub init` now has a
On Wednesday, 15 November 2023 at 05:27:40 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
If someone misses all of that and tries to use tuples without
specifying edition N, the compiler should be able to tell them
what the problem is, how to solve it (annotate your module
declaration with `@edition(N)`), and
On Tuesday, 14 November 2023 at 17:44:11 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
This might be one of the greatest releases of D ever.
-Steve
I second this.
On Saturday, 16 September 2023 at 12:34:24 UTC, Richard (Rikki)
Andrew Cattermole wrote:
Although I do want a write barrier on each struct/class, to
allow for cyclic handling especially for classes.
How dare you bring the High Heresy of write barriers into D! I
thought that it was well
On Friday, 15 September 2023 at 21:49:17 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
Ikey seems to still want to use D, so the main driving factor
is the contributors, i wonder what are the exact reasons,
pseudo memory safety can't be the only reason
I would guess that the following is the bigger problem:
"we
On Friday, 24 March 2023 at 09:01:21 UTC, Sergey wrote:
On Friday, 24 March 2023 at 07:54:06 UTC, Monkyyy wrote:
On Thursday, 23 March 2023 at 16:02:46 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
Hi.
For those that didn't hear, I resigned from Symmetry in
September and my last day was a couple of weeks back.
SecureD is a library that provides strong cryptography with a
simple-to-use interface that ensures that your data will be correctly
and securely stored with a minimum amount of effort.
What's New in 2.0?
Complete rewrite of symmetric encryption and decryption.
Prior to V2 the standard
On 12/22/18 10:47 AM, Robert M. Münch wrote:
On 2018-12-22 12:18:25 +, Mike Parker said:
Thanks to Symmetry Investments, DConf is heading to London! We're
still ironing out the details, but I've been sitting on this for weeks
and, now that we have a venue, I just can't keep quiet about it
On 12/14/18 2:33 PM, Sjoerd Nijboer wrote:
Is there any overhead on the generated interface? Or overhead the
compiler can't trivially optimise away.
Yes, any overheads that would normally be associated with a P/Invoke
call will be present here.
Do you have any recocmendations about mixing
On 10/11/18 11:20 PM, JN wrote:
On Thursday, 11 October 2018 at 21:22:19 UTC, aberba wrote:
[snip]
That is fine, if you want to position yourself as competition to
languages like Go, Java or C#. D wants to be a viable competition to
languages like C, C++ and Rust, as a result, there are
On 10/3/18 10:15 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 04/10/2018 5:33 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 04:03:27 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 04/10/2018 2:06 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
The Aurora DirectX bindings have been updated to support Windows 10
1809. Also the D2D
The Aurora DirectX bindings have been updated to support Windows 10
1809. Also the D2D Effect Authoring SDK has been added.
GitHub: https://github.com/auroragraphics/directx
DUB: http://code.dlang.org/packages/aurora-directx
Please send PR's if you find any bugs!
--
Adam Wilson
IRC:
On 10/2/18 4:34 AM, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 09:39:14 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 10/1/18 11:26 PM, Joakim wrote:
[snip]
I disagree.
It is not clear what you disagree with, since almost nothing you say has
any bearing on my original post. To summarize, I suggest changing
On 10/1/18 11:26 PM, Joakim wrote:
[snip]
I disagree. There is much more to the conference than just a 4-day
meetup with talks. The idea that it's just the core 8-15 people with a
bunch of hangers-on is patently false. It's not about the conversations
I have with the "core" people. It's
On 06/05/2018 12:28 AM, Brian wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 June 2018 at 06:55:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 June 2018 at 06:45:48 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
Hello Fellow D'ers,
As some of you know I work for Microsoft. And as a result of the
recent acquisition of GitHub by Microsoft, I have
On 06/04/2018 11:55 PM, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 June 2018 at 06:45:48 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
Hello Fellow D'ers,
As some of you know I work for Microsoft. And as a result of the
recent acquisition of GitHub by Microsoft, I have decided, out of an
abundance of caution, to move all of my
On 06/04/2018 08:53 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 6/3/18 20:51, Anton Fediushin wrote:
This is still just a rumour, we'll know the truth on Monday (which is
today).
Some articles about the topic:
https://fossbytes.com/microsoft-github-aquisition-report/
On 06/04/2018 11:46 PM, RalphBa wrote:
Sorry to hear that. Since I do not belive Microsoft changed perspective
and am convinced they still see open source as cancer I need to assume
they try to inflitrate the OSS community the last years. So for sure I
won't rely on their stuff.
So is there
Hello Fellow D'ers,
As some of you know I work for Microsoft. And as a result of the recent
acquisition of GitHub by Microsoft, I have decided, out of an abundance
of caution, to move all of my projects that currently reside on GitHub
to GitLab.
Additionally, until I cease working for
On 6/3/18 20:51, Anton Fediushin wrote:
This is still just a rumour, we'll know the truth on Monday (which is
today).
Some articles about the topic:
https://fossbytes.com/microsoft-github-aquisition-report/
https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/3/17422752/microsoft-github-acquisition-rumors
On 05/29/2018 11:29 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
On 5/29/2018 1:57 AM, Adam Wilson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
One of the pillars of SecureD is that ONLY safe, well-known,
algorithms are presented. If reasonable we will only present one
algorithm for a specific purpose. If there is a good reason
On 05/28/2018 04:02 PM, sarn wrote:
On Monday, 28 May 2018 at 07:52:43 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
I understand that.
Sorry, not for nothing, but you obviously don't. For starters, if you
were familiar with the key derivation tools available 24hrs ago, you
wouldn't have come up with PBKDF2 on
On 05/28/2018 12:14 AM, sarn wrote:
On Monday, 28 May 2018 at 06:22:02 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 05/27/2018 08:52 PM, sarn wrote:
On Monday, 28 May 2018 at 02:25:20 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
I like it. But it does require more space. We need three salts and
three lengths in the header. One for
On 05/27/2018 08:52 PM, sarn wrote:
On Monday, 28 May 2018 at 02:25:20 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
I like it. But it does require more space. We need three salts and
three lengths in the header. One for the PBKDF2 KDK, one for the MAC
key, and one for the encryption key.
HKDF-Expand doesn't need
On 05/27/2018 05:11 PM, sarn wrote:
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 10:27:45 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
struct cryptoHeader {
ubyte hdrVersion; // The version of the header
ubyte encAlg; // The encryption algorithm used
ubyte hashAlg; // The hash algorithm used
uint kdfIters;
On 05/27/2018 09:54 AM, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 10:27:45 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
Now that SecureD v1 is in the books
This would have been a great place to insert a brief description of what
SecureD is or a link to the project.
Good point. SecureD is a cryptography
Now that SecureD v1 is in the books I thought it would be worthwhile to
explore what a second version could like. I specifically want to focus
on expanding compatibility with other systems.
For example: AWS uses SHA2-256 for signing requests. As implemented
today SecureD does not support
Hello!
I am pleased to announce that after a year of development and
stabilization SecureD has been released in stable form. The most recent
release consists of an upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1 in order to be compliant
with more recent and supported versions of OpenSSL. If you need to use
OpenSSL
I am happy to announce that after a prolonged hiatus the Aurora DirectX
bindings have been updated to support DirectX 12.1 and DirectX 11.4. The
project has been refactored to more closely align with the DirectX SDK
headers and the scope is significantly increased to include the D3D
Video, D2D
I booked online. I need a different room than the Conference Rate. But
while I was there I did notice that the online rate for the conference
room was the same as quoted on the conference site (89EUR).
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
import quiet.dlang.dev;
On 3/5/18 15:40, Atila Neves wrote:
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 17:47:13 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 15:16:14 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Saturday, 3 March 2018 at 01:50:25 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.079.0.
This release comes with experimental `@nogc`
On 3/4/18 11:31, Drew Phil wrote:
Hey there!
I'm trying to figure out which of D's many multithreading options to use
for my application. I'm making a game that runs at 60 frames per second
that can also run user-made Lua scripts. I would like to have the Lua
scripts run in a separate thread so
On 12/27/17 00:10, Pawn wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 December 2017 at 09:39:22 UTC, codephantom wrote:
IMHO..What will help the cause, in terms of keeping D as a 'modern'
programming language, is the willingness of its designers and its
community to make and embrace 'breaking changes' ... for
On 12/20/17 10:28, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/20/2017 01:14 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
from developers that learned it before C++98 and
can't care less what is being discussed on Reddit and HN.
I don't blame them one bit because keeping up with C++ and learning C++
Core Guidelines is a tremendous
On 12/5/17 10:20, Seb wrote:
Hi all,
Google Summer of Code (GSoC) 2018 is about to start soon [1] (the
application period for organizations is in January 2018).
Hence, I would very happy about any project ideas you have or projects
which are important to you.
And, of course, if you would be
On 12/3/17 21:28, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/3/2017 8:59 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
I have to agree with this. I make my living on server side software,
and we aren't allowed (by legal) to connect to the server to run
debuggers. The *only* thing I have is logging. If the program crashes
with no
On 12/3/17 00:09, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On Saturday, 2 December 2017 at 23:44:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/2/2017 4:38 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
But then you need to bloat your program with debug info in order to
understand what, why, and how things went wrong.
Most of the time (for me)
On 11/26/17 16:14, IM wrote:
Hi,
I'm a full-time C++ software engineer in Silicon Valley. I've been
learning D and using it in a couple of personal side projects for a few
months now.
First of all, I must start by saying that I like D, and wish to use it
everyday. I'm even considering to donate
On 11/23/17 13:40, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 20:13:31 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
I would focus on a generational GC first for two reasons. The
But generational GC only makes sense if many of your GC objects have a
short life span. I don't think this fits well
On 11/23/17 02:47, Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 13:44:22 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
Thats a linker(?) limitation for OMF (or whatever is the win32 object
file format).
Was just fixed!
What improvements to D's concurrency model is made possible with this
precise GC?
I
On 11/22/17 05:44, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 13:23:54 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 10:53:45 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
Hi all !
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1603
Only the Win32 build fails as
Error: more than 32767 symbols in
On 11/22/17 02:53, Temtaime wrote:
Hi all !
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1603
Can someone investigate and bring it to us ?
4 years passed from gsoc 2013 and there's still no gc.
Many apps suffers from false pointers and bringing such a gc will help
those who affected by it.
It seems
On 11/20/17 05:11, Satoshi wrote:
On Monday, 20 November 2017 at 09:15:15 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
To get an H1B you'll want to get a job with one of the majors.
Microsoft, Google, Apple, Amazon. There are smaller companies, but the
majors have a dedicated team of lawyers who can guide your H1B
On 11/17/17 17:31, Indigo wrote:
What is your reasoning for coming to the US? You might want to rethink
this as America is collapsing.
This is news to me, and I live in the US. Also, if the US is collapsing,
that is very bad news for D, seeing as how I live about 45 minutes from
Walter, and
On 11/10/17 00:24, codephantom wrote:
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 05:23:53 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
MSFT spends a LOT of time studying these things. It would be wise to
learn for free from the money they spent.
Is that the same company that made Windows 10?
And what?
--
Adam Wilson
IRC:
On 11/6/17 12:20, Michael wrote:
I can't quite see why this proposal is such a big deal to people - as
has been restated, it's just a quick change in the parser for a slight
contraction in the code, and nothing language-breaking, it's not a big
change to the language at all.
On Monday, 6
On 10/28/17 04:38, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter and I decided to kick-off project Elvis for adding the homonym
operator to D.
Razvan Nitu has already done a good part of the work:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/7242
https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/1917
On 10/28/17 12:46, Jerry wrote:
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 15:36:38 UTC, codephantom wrote:
But if you really are missing my point..then let me state it more
clearly...
(1) I don't like waiting 4 hours to download gigabytes of crap I don't
actually want, but somehow need (if I want to
On 10/27/17 00:18, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-10-26 12:25, Adam Wilson wrote:
My apologies, something rather the other direction. Instead of forcing
compat with vibe.d, going to vibe.d and say: "here is our standard
event-loop, it has everything you need, you'll need to use it for all
the
On 10/26/17 17:51, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, October 26, 2017 03:25:24 Adam Wilson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 10/25/17 23:57, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I'm more concerned that I don't think we'll manage to implement a
complete API and 100% bug free at the first try.
Depends on how
On 10/26/17 08:51, Bo wrote:
On Thursday, 26 October 2017 at 12:36:40 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
However, if you need Visual Studio installed, then that takes like a
half an hour.
And a gig of space, just because D needs a small part of it. That is why
people do not want to install VS. Why install a
On 10/25/17 23:57, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-10-26 00:53, Adam Wilson wrote:
This of course makes the assumption that we clean-room our own
protocol implementations which I am entirely against. Better to use
what already exists.
I'm entirely against anything that is not compatible with
On 10/26/17 00:32, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-10-26 00:36, Adam Wilson wrote:
Speaking from very long experience, 95%+ of Windows devs have
VS+WinSDK installed as part of their default system buildout. The few
that don't will have little trouble understanding why they need it and
acquiring
On 10/23/17 23:29, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-10-24 00:02, Adam Wilson wrote:
I've been looking pretty extensively at these two items recently.
If the database drivers are compatible with Vibe.d AND we wish to
provide a common abstraction layer for them (presumably via Phobos)
then order
On 10/23/17 18:51, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 23/10/2017 11:02 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 10/23/17 05:08, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
* Database drivers for the common databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite)
compatible with vibe.d
* Database driver abstraction on top of the above drivers, perhaps some
On 10/25/17 11:23, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 08:17:21AM -0600, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Wednesday, October 25, 2017 13:22:46 Kagamin via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 at 16:37:10 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
(Having said all that, though, D is
On 10/25/17 09:34, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 October 2017 at 15:00:04 UTC, bitwise wrote:
VC++ command line tools seem to be available on their own:
http://landinghub.visualstudio.com/visual-cpp-build-tools
Still a big download and requires the Windows SDK to be downloaded and
On 10/24/17 07:14, Kagamin wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 at 13:20:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* RSA Digital Signature Validation in Phobos
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16510 the blocker for botan was
OMF support.
IMO, the correct solution here is to deprecate OMF and
On 10/23/17 22:40, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 at 04:26:42 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 10/23/17 17:27, flamencofantasy wrote:
On Monday, 23 October 2017 at 22:22:55 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 10/23/17 08:21, Kagamin wrote:
[...]
Actually I think it fits perfectly
On 10/23/17 16:47, Nathan S. wrote:
On Monday, 23 October 2017 at 22:22:55 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
Additionally, MSFT/C# fully recognizes that the benefits of
Async/Await have never been and never were intended to be for
performance. Async/Await trades raw performance for an ability to
handle a
On 10/23/17 17:27, flamencofantasy wrote:
On Monday, 23 October 2017 at 22:22:55 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 10/23/17 08:21, Kagamin wrote:
[...]
Actually I think it fits perfectly with D, not for reason of
performance, but for reason of flexibility. D is a polyglot language,
with by far the
On 10/23/17 08:21, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 09:49:34 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
Others are less obvious, for example, async/await is syntax sugar for
a collection of Task-based idioms in C#.
Now I think it's doesn't fit D. async/await wasn't made for performance,
but for
On 10/23/17 05:08, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
* Database drivers for the common databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite)
compatible with vibe.d
* Database driver abstraction on top of the above drivers, perhaps some
lightweight ORM library
I've been looking pretty extensively at these two items
On 10/21/17 11:52, bitwise wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 October 2017 at 08:56:21 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
async/await (vibe.d is nice but useless in comparison to C# or js
async/await idiom)
Reference counting when we cannot use GC...
If I understand correctly, both of these depend on
On 10/20/17 04:04, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, October 20, 2017 02:49:34 Adam Wilson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Here is the thing that bothers me about that stance. You are correct,
but I don't think you've considered the logical conclusion of the
direction your argument is headed. Pray
On 10/20/17 01:32, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, October 20, 2017 08:09:59 Satoshi via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 04:26:24 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, October 20, 2017 02:20:31 Adam D. Ruppe via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at
On 10/18/17 23:50, Fra Mecca wrote:
[snip]
The problem in my opinion is the ecosystem.
We miss a build system that is tailored towards enterprises and there is
so much work to do with libraries (even discovery of them) and
documentation by examples.
Indeed ... :)
--
Adam Wilson
IRC:
On 10/15/17 13:40, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 22:43:33 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 10/7/17 14:08, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
In a polyglot environment, D's code generation and introspection
abilities might be quite valuable if it allows you to write core
building blocks
On 10/15/17 22:20, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On Sunday, 15 October 2017 at 20:24:02 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
database access (MySQL, PostgreSQL, Aerospike) libraries are available,
That is important actually.
So important that it should be a Priority 0 Must Have.
Luckily it should also be
database access (MySQL, PostgreSQL, Aerospike) libraries are available,
That is important actually.
So important that it should be a Priority 0 Must Have.
preferably as a standard library (like in Dart and Go).
Can’t do that. And it’s not standard in Go and Dart but packages, dub
should
On 10/7/17 14:08, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On 10/6/2017 10:19 PM, Adam Wilson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> What if we stop focusing on the C/C++ people so much? The > like
their tools and have no perceivable interest in moving > away from
them (Stockholm Syndrome much?). The arguments
On 10/6/17 23:19, Brad Roberts wrote:
On 10/6/2017 10:19 PM, Adam Wilson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
What if we stop focusing on the C/C++ people so much? The like their
tools and have no perceivable interest in moving away from them
(Stockholm Syndrome much?). The arguments the use are primarily
On 10/12/17 19:50, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, October 12, 2017 14:39:27 b4s1L3 via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
Also i'd like to say that the policy that is that regression
fixes are commited on stable and that the fact that they only
come to master in a "sync operation" is a
On 10/6/17 14:12, Rion wrote:
[snip]
When every new languages besides Rust or Zig are GC. That same "flaw" is
not looked upon as a issue. It seems that D simply carries this GC
stigma because the people mentioning are C++ developers, the same
people D targets as a potential user base.
D can
On 9/21/17 11:49, bitwise wrote:
On Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 08:01:23 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
There is a simple set of simple web server apps written in several
languages (Go, Rust, Scala, Node-js):
https://github.com/nuald/simple-web-benchmark
I've sent PR to include D benchmark
On 6/4/17 04:15, Jakub Szewczyk wrote:
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 09:43:23 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 6/4/17 01:18, Jakub Szewczyk wrote:
This is an interface to the Mono libraries, D/CLI would [...]
My interest is less in code ports than bindings to the actual code. My
experience with code
On 6/4/17 01:18, Jakub Szewczyk wrote:
This is an interface to the Mono libraries, D/CLI would require quite a
lot of compiler changes, both on the front-end and back-end side, but
thanks to metaprogramming a wrapper library can get very close to such
an interface.
I plan on making an automated
On 6/3/17 10:30, Jakub Szewczyk wrote:
Mono runtime is a cross-platform, open-source alternative to Microsoft's
.NET framework [1], and it can be embedded in other applications as a
"scripting" VM, but with JIT-compilation enhanced performance and
support of many languages such as C#, F# or
On 5/9/17 20:23, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 17:34:48 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 02:13:34PM +0200, Adam Wilson via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> [...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
I don't represent any company, but I have to also say that I
*appreciate* break
On 5/8/17 20:33, Brian Schott wrote:
Recently the EMSI data department upgraded the compiler we use to build
our data processing code to 2.074. This caused several of the thousands
of processes to die with signal 8 (floating point exceptions). This was
caused by the fix to issue 17243.
This is
On 5/7/17 12:57, Seb wrote:
On Sunday, 7 May 2017 at 06:58:51 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 5/7/17 07:41, Walter Bright wrote:
Dang, I wish I could participate in that!
Well, technically you could, but it involves a set of rather grueling
flights.
Depending on the day it's held I might be able
On 5/7/17 07:41, Walter Bright wrote:
Dang, I wish I could participate in that!
Well, technically you could, but it involves a set of rather grueling
flights.
Depending on the day it's held I might be able to attend once a year. If
it's on the weekend, I can make a long weekend out of it.
On 5/4/17 16:33, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 04/05/2017 3:22 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 5/4/17 15:32, Seb wrote:
Hi all,
the DConf hackathon isn’t a hackathon in the traditional sense. It is
intended as a day for _collaboratively_ focusing on long-lasting
problems and pain points in the D
On 5/4/17 15:32, Seb wrote:
Hi all,
the DConf hackathon isn’t a hackathon in the traditional sense. It is
intended as a day for _collaboratively_ focusing on long-lasting
problems and pain points in the D ecosystem, planning upcoming features
or DIPs, and creation of a rough roadmap for the
On 3/30/17 10:47 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 04:41:10AM +, Joel via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Linking...
ld: warning: pointer not aligned at address 0x10017A4C9
(_D30TypeInfo_AxS3std4file8DirEntry6__initZ + 16 from
Hello fellow DConfers!
In the spirit of "the DConf 2017 hackathon isn't a hackathon in the
traditional sense as most of the time and focus will hopefully be spent
discussing, planning and developing future D projects"; I was thinking
that it might be beneficial to pull together a list of
Hi Everyone,
I know that the licensing around OpenSSL has been a somewhat
controversial topic around the D world. So I though that you might find
this bit of news interesting:
https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2017/03/22/license/
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
import quiet.dlang.dev;
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
