Can we get this updated? std.traits.ParameterIdentifierTuple and
std.traits.ParameterDefaultValueTuple are not showing up, but have been
around at least since 2.060 was released
Is anyone else noticing e.g. std.datetime taking upwards of 30 seconds
to render the blob of links at the top? It's freakin freezing my entire
browser.
On Wednesday, November 14, 2012 06:40:54 Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> Can we get this updated? std.traits.ParameterIdentifierTuple and
> std.traits.ParameterDefaultValueTuple are not showing up, but have been
> around at least since 2.060 was released
They don't have ddoc comments, just normal comment
On 11/14/12, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> Can we get this updated? std.traits.ParameterIdentifierTuple and
> std.traits.ParameterDefaultValueTuple are not showing up, but have been
> around at least since 2.060 was released
>
Related http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8968
On Sunday, December 09, 2012 18:10:42 Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> Is anyone else noticing e.g. std.datetime taking upwards of 30 seconds
> to render the blob of links at the top? It's freakin freezing my entire
> browser.
The link situation definitely needs to be fixed. People keep making noise
abou
On 12/09/2012 08:10 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Is anyone else noticing e.g. std.datetime taking upwards of 30 seconds
to render the blob of links at the top? It's freakin freezing my entire
browser.
Yeah, I see it.
Not browser stalling though, just annoying.
It renders without the links, free
10.12.2012 6:10, Ellery Newcomer пишет:
Is anyone else noticing e.g. std.datetime taking upwards of 30 seconds
to render the blob of links at the top? It's freakin freezing my entire
browser.
Personally I disable JavaScript for dlang.org a long time ago and happy
now. At least because the hyph
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 03:18:30 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
On 12/09/2012 08:10 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
The whole process only takes 5-7 seconds here.
"Only" is not the right word to use here.
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 02:10:43 UTC, Ellery Newcomer
wrote:
Is anyone else noticing e.g. std.datetime taking upwards of 30
seconds to render the blob of links at the top? It's freakin
freezing my entire browser.
ddox* on dlang.org, anyone?
http://vibed.org/temp/phobos/index.html
* htt
On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:10:42 -0800
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> Is anyone else noticing e.g. std.datetime taking upwards of 30
> seconds to render the blob of links at the top? It's freakin freezing
> my entire browser.
It only takes about a second or two for me in FF2. I'm not seeing
any blob of li
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:34:13PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:10:42 -0800
> Ellery Newcomer wrote:
>
> > Is anyone else noticing e.g. std.datetime taking upwards of 30
> > seconds to render the blob of links at the top? It's freakin freezing
> > my entire browser.
>
>
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:45:06 -0800
"H. S. Teoh" wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:34:13PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:10:42 -0800
> > Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> >
> > > Is anyone else noticing e.g. std.datetime taking upwards of 30
> > > seconds to render the blob o
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:58:30PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:45:06 -0800
> "H. S. Teoh" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:34:13PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > > On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:10:42 -0800
> > > Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is anyone else n
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:57:43 -0800
"H. S. Teoh" wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:58:30PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:45:06 -0800
> > "H. S. Teoh" wrote:
> > >
> > > 'cos you're running with JS turned off. :-)
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > It makes the web 10x faster,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:54:52 +0100
"Peter Alexander" wrote:
> On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 03:18:30 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
> > On 12/09/2012 08:10 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> >
> > The whole process only takes 5-7 seconds here.
>
> "Only" is not the right word to use here.
Yea, there's nothing
On 12/10/2012 05:16 AM, Mr. Anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 02:10:43 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Is anyone else noticing e.g. std.datetime taking upwards of 30 seconds
to render the blob of links at the top? It's freakin freezing my
entire browser.
ddox* on dlang.org, anyone?
h
On 12/10/2012 04:20 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:54:52 +0100
"Peter Alexander" wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 03:18:30 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
On 12/09/2012 08:10 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
The whole process only takes 5-7 seconds here.
"Only" is not the right word
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 04:54:43PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:57:43 -0800
> "H. S. Teoh" wrote:
[...]
> > Heh. I used to browse with no JS. But due to the annoying bandwagon
> > jumping trend that is a common pathology in people involved with
> > computers,
>
> Very we
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 22:33:49 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
On 12/10/2012 05:16 AM, Mr. Anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 02:10:43 UTC, Ellery Newcomer
wrote:
Is anyone else noticing e.g. std.datetime taking upwards of
30 seconds
to render the blob of links at the top? It's freaki
On 12/11/12 3:54 PM, Rob T wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 22:33:49 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
On 12/10/2012 05:16 AM, Mr. Anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 02:10:43 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Is anyone else noticing e.g. std.datetime taking upwards of 30 seconds
to render the bl
On Tuesday, 11 December 2012 at 21:13:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 12/11/12 3:54 PM, Rob T wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 22:33:49 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
On 12/10/2012 05:16 AM, Mr. Anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 02:10:43 UTC, Ellery Newcomer
wrote:
Is anyone else
Am 11.12.2012 22:13, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
> On 12/11/12 3:54 PM, Rob T wrote:
>> On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 22:33:49 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
>>> On 12/10/2012 05:16 AM, Mr. Anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 02:10:43 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> Is anyone else noticin
On Tuesday, 11 December 2012 at 21:41:10 UTC, Pragma Tix wrote:
Soenke Ludwig, or ask here
http://news.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejectedsoftware.vibed/
IMO dlang should be powered by vibe.d
If Vibe.d is stable enough at this point (it's a WIP) then yes
that would be a good idea, and a good
Am 11.12.2012 22:13, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
> On 12/11/12 3:54 PM, Rob T wrote:
>> On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 22:33:49 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
>>> On 12/10/2012 05:16 AM, Mr. Anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 02:10:43 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> Is anyone else noticin
On 12/21/12, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> Is any further work on this desired?
The start of the code section needs to be moved a little bit to the
right so the text doesn't appear to touch the edge:
http://i.imgur.com/VuXE1.png
And maybe the color scheme should match the one before, dark text on
light
On 2012-12-21 13:24, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Example generated site is here:
http://vibed.org/temp/d-programming-language.org/phobos/index.html
Is any further work on this desired? If so, what would be the next steps to
integrate it into the
general dlang.org workflow? (or rather, how is that wo
12/21/2012 4:24 PM, Sönke Ludwig пишет:
Am 11.12.2012 22:13, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
Do whom do we talk about Borging the vibe dox into dlang.org?
Andrei
[snip]
Example generated site is here:
http://vibed.org/temp/d-programming-language.org/phobos/index.html
Like it!
--
Dmitr
Am 21.12.2012 15:20, schrieb Andrej Mitrovic:
> On 12/21/12, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>> Is any further work on this desired?
>
> The start of the code section needs to be moved a little bit to the
> right so the text doesn't appear to touch the edge:
> http://i.imgur.com/VuXE1.png
>
> And maybe the
On 12/21/12 10:43 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-12-21 13:24, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Example generated site is here:
http://vibed.org/temp/d-programming-language.org/phobos/index.html
Is any further work on this desired? If so, what would be the next
steps to integrate it into the
general dl
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:05:47PM -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 12/21/12 10:43 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> >On 2012-12-21 13:24, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> >
> >>Example generated site is here:
> >>
> >>http://vibed.org/temp/d-programming-language.org/phobos/index.html
> >>
> >>
> >>Is any fur
On Friday, 21 December 2012 at 17:23:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
+1. The blob of links generated by JS at the top of the current
pages is
(1) ugly, and (2) useless. Grouping symbols by category is by
far more
useful. We need to keep that.
Yes, a category list is far more useful. The best the bl
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 07:20:16PM +0100, Rob T wrote:
> On Friday, 21 December 2012 at 17:23:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >+1. The blob of links generated by JS at the top of the current pages
> >is (1) ugly, and (2) useless. Grouping symbols by category is by far
> >more useful. We need to keep th
Am 21.12.2012 18:05, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
> (...)
>
> The cheat sheet in std.algorithm is unnecessary (though I liked the brief
> examples), but there's a
> lot of value in the symbols grouped by category (searching, comparison, ...)
> at the top. So we need
> to have a means to group th
On 2012-12-21 18:05, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
s/remove/integrate/
s/ugly/awesome/
It's ugly that they are manually created. Over 300 lines of comments
that the doc generator should be doing automatically. I would say that
is far from awesome.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2012-12-21 19:31, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
What also would be nice is to have the methods inline, expandable.
Would that mean the Classes/Structs/... tables as f.ex. in std.datetime?
So there would be a small clickable thing and all members would fly out below
it as direct links?
and possibly w
On 12/21/12 7:24 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Example generated site is here:
http://vibed.org/temp/d-programming-language.org/phobos/index.html
Is any further work on this desired?
Thanks for this work! Let me provide a little feedback. I'm looking
mainly at std.array and std.algorithm.
* The
On 12/21/12 6:46 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[snip]
Forgot to emphasize what I already mentioned: alphabetic order is okay,
but I wonder how we can integrate that with grouping per functionality
area (the way std.algorithm does).
Andrei
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Thanks for this work! Let me provide a little feedback. I'm
looking mainly at std.array and std.algorithm.
Compare a page like this:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_array.html
With the docs of the Prelude module of Haskell:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/librarie
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> * But by very, very far the community-contributed stuff is just perfect. I
> really really really hope we can get something like that integrated. There are
> many ways to approach this:
>
> - By integrating a wiki page via e.g. an IFRAME.
> - By i
On Friday, 21 December 2012 at 23:46:05 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
* "Module" in the title is redundant I guess.
I don't think it is redundant because when you are looking at a
page, the module as the title instantly tells you (or reminds
you) what module you are looking at, otherwise
On Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 00:00:43 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
The current separate wiki pages that mirror the dlang site are
the worse
of both worlds in that the content exists, is hardly ever
folded in, and
isn't even visible along side the page but hidden off behind a
link that I
bet mo
On 12/21/12 7:16 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
I love community / croudsourcing. But where it falls down in most of the
examples I've seen is that the majority of the feedback / comments really
belong as edits to the actual content, not additional notes. We need to
aim for making both happen, imho.
On 12/21/12 7:29 PM, Rob T wrote:
On Friday, 21 December 2012 at 23:46:05 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* "Module" in the title is redundant I guess.
I don't think it is redundant because when you are looking at a page,
the module as the title instantly tells you (or reminds you) what modu
On 12/21/12 7:52 PM, Rob T wrote:
On Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 00:00:43 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
The current separate wiki pages that mirror the dlang site are the worse
of both worlds in that the content exists, is hardly ever folded in, and
isn't even visible along side the page but hidden
On 12/10/2012 2:31 PM, 1100110 wrote:
I've had dail-up, I've had satelite internet.
"Only" is indeed the appropriate word to use.
I've had floppy disks :-)
It's still hard to get used to the superfast disks we have these days.
On Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 02:36:44 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
I was referring only to the actual word.
Ah I see, but it's still debatable to remove, although not a big
deal either way.
Behold: http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.exp.php
I understand what you mean now, just
On 12/21/12 10:27 PM, Rob T wrote:
Behold: http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.exp.php
I understand what you mean now, just didn't at first. What I see looks
very good in the php page.
I think there's a lot to be said about the contribution of PHP's
excellent documentation to the success o
On Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 03:34:55 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/21/12 10:27 PM, Rob T wrote:
Behold: http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.exp.php
I understand what you mean now, just didn't at first. What I
see looks
very good in the php page.
I think there's a lot to be s
Am 22.12.2012 00:46, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
> On 12/21/12 7:24 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>> Example generated site is here:
>>
>> http://vibed.org/temp/d-programming-language.org/phobos/index.html
>>
>>
>> Is any further work on this desired?
>
> Thanks for this work! Let me provide a little f
On 2012-12-21 13:24, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Is any further work on this desired? If so, what would be the next steps to
integrate it into the
general dlang.org workflow? (or rather, how is that workflow in terms of folder
structure, build
scripts etc.?)
It would also need a phase of bug fixing r
On 12/22/12 10:16 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-12-21 13:24, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Is any further work on this desired? If so, what would be the next
steps to integrate it into the
general dlang.org workflow? (or rather, how is that workflow in terms
of folder structure, build
scripts etc.?)
>> * There's lots of wasted real estate at the top of the page: the source,
>> license, and authors
>> sections are way spaced. They should compactly fill the top of the page.
>
> I'll try to get closer to the original there. There are some differences
> because the current pages
> use a lot of
On 12/22/12 11:49 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
* There's lots of wasted real estate at the top of the page: the source,
license, and authors
sections are way spaced. They should compactly fill the top of the page.
I'll try to get closer to the original there. There are some differences
because the
Am 22.12.2012 17:49, schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
>
> Continuing the thought of screen real estate - shouldn't these sections
> better be at the _bottom_ of
> the page? After all they are just noise for the typical reader and since the
> pages are not as long
> anymore, they still won't get drowned by
On 12/22/12 12:53 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 22.12.2012 17:49, schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
Continuing the thought of screen real estate - shouldn't these sections better
be at the _bottom_ of
the page? After all they are just noise for the typical reader and since the
pages are not as long
anymore,
On Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 17:54:29 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
In the latest upload a number of items is addressed:
- vertical margins at the top
- redundant column headers
- +/- signs for the package tree
- jumps to line numbers on github (which are off because of
changes after the rel
Am 22.12.2012 19:13, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
> On 12/22/12 12:53 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>> Am 22.12.2012 17:49, schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
>>>
>>> Continuing the thought of screen real estate - shouldn't these sections
>>> better be at the _bottom_ of
>>> the page? After all they are just noise f
Am 22.12.2012 19:20, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
> On Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 17:54:29 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>
>> In the latest upload a number of items is addressed:
>> - vertical margins at the top
>> - redundant column headers
>> - +/- signs for the package tree
>> - jumps to line numb
On 12/22/12 12:53 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 22.12.2012 17:49, schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
Continuing the thought of screen real estate - shouldn't these sections better
be at the _bottom_ of
the page? After all they are just noise for the typical reader and since the
pages are not as long
anymore,
Am 22.12.2012 19:56, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
> On 12/22/12 12:53 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>> Am 22.12.2012 17:49, schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
>>>
>>> Continuing the thought of screen real estate - shouldn't these sections
>>> better be at the _bottom_ of
>>> the page? After all they are just noise f
On Friday, 21 December 2012 at 18:31:48 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 21.12.2012 18:05, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
(...)
The cheat sheet in std.algorithm is unnecessary (though I
liked the brief examples), but there's a
lot of value in the symbols grouped by category (searching,
comparison, .
On Friday, 21 December 2012 at 21:58:34 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-12-21 18:05, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
s/remove/integrate/
s/ugly/awesome/
It's ugly that they are manually created. Over 300 lines of
comments that the doc generator should be doing automatically.
I would say that
On 12/22/12 5:10 PM, foobar wrote:
On Friday, 21 December 2012 at 21:58:34 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-12-21 18:05, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
s/remove/integrate/
s/ugly/awesome/
It's ugly that they are manually created. Over 300 lines of comments
that the doc generator should be doin
I don't know if this has been mentioned yet, but some modules
have a link to the source while others do not. I suppose that's a
problem with the documentation itself not including a link. I'm
just mentioning this in case it has something to do with the
formatting.
--rt
Am 23.12.2012 00:11, schrieb Rob T:
> I don't know if this has been mentioned yet, but some modules have a link to
> the source while others
> do not. I suppose that's a problem with the documentation itself not
> including a link. I'm just
> mentioning this in case it has something to do with th
On Sunday, 23 December 2012 at 07:38:04 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
What I did now was to hide the manually written "Source:"
section (which is not in every module) and
instead generate a procedural "View source code" button on the
top right of the page (which should
always be there).
So if you h
Am 23.12.2012 10:11, schrieb Rob T:
> On Sunday, 23 December 2012 at 07:38:04 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>> What I did now was to hide the manually written "Source:" section (which is
>> not in every module) and
>> instead generate a procedural "View source code" button on the top right of
>> the p
On 12/22/2012 9:36 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Good idea. I'm a big fan of moving uninteresting stuff off the top of a page.
Maybe the source does carry some interest though.
More creative ideas is to represent all that information not in normal paragraph
style, but as small print in a band (
Am 23.12.2012 10:55, schrieb Philippe Sigaud:
> Very nice-looking docs Sönke!
>
> A minor nitpick: in some modules, the _-prefixed version appears as such (I
> mean, with an underscore
> before the name). See for example:
>
> http://vibed.org/temp/d-programming-language.org/phobos/std/paralleli
On Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 23:04:47 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/22/12 5:10 PM, foobar wrote:
On Friday, 21 December 2012 at 21:58:34 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2012-12-21 18:05, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
s/remove/integrate/
s/ugly/awesome/
It's ugly that they are manuall
On 12/23/12 6:44 AM, foobar wrote:
Using an all encompassing "algorithms" module is also unhelpful as all
code is essentially an algorithm to accomplish some task. This is akin
to opening a store called - "A store" or perhaps "A place to sell you
stuff".
That I disagree with a bit. I think it's
On 2012-12-22 18:53, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
- jumps to line numbers on github (which are off because of changes after the
release)
Can you lock it to the same hash that the docs are generated from?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2012-12-22 18:53, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
In the latest upload a number of items is addressed:
- vertical margins at the top
- redundant column headers
- +/- signs for the package tree
- jumps to line numbers on github (which are off because of changes after the
release)
- some macro p
On 2012-12-22 17:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Looks great! I think that belongs in an index page (which doesn't exist
yet, though we do define a sitemap http://dlang.org/sitemap.html).
The sitemap is a bit different. The list of symbols could be the index
page or a part of the index page fo
On Sunday, 23 December 2012 at 13:21:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 12/23/12 6:44 AM, foobar wrote:
Using an all encompassing "algorithms" module is also
unhelpful as all
code is essentially an algorithm to accomplish some task. This
is akin
to opening a store called - "A store" or perha
On 12/23/12 9:08 AM, foobar wrote:
Regarding std.algorithm, the module isn't called - 'classic, consecrated
algorithms the kind you'll find in a book entitled "Algorithms"'. It is
simply called 'std.algorithm' and there are many, *many* books on
algorithms. Should this module include concurrent a
On Sunday, 23 December 2012 at 14:43:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 12/23/12 9:08 AM, foobar wrote:
Regarding std.algorithm, the module isn't called - 'classic,
consecrated
algorithms the kind you'll find in a book entitled
"Algorithms"'. It is
simply called 'std.algorithm' and there are
Am 23.12.2012 14:52, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
> On 2012-12-22 18:53, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>
>> - jumps to line numbers on github (which are off because of changes after
>> the release)
>
> Can you lock it to the same hash that the docs are generated from?
>
I've locked it to the v2.060 tag now
Am 23.12.2012 14:58, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
> I think it would be better if there was more space for the Name column and
> let the Description
> column automatically wrap. It's better that the description uses multiple
> rows than the symbol names.
>
I changed the first column from "width: 150
On 2012-12-23 20:55, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I changed the first column from "width: 150pt;" to "min-width: 170pt". It can
still wrap, but the
two columns can now freely fight for the space if they need to.
Looks much better, thanks.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Am 22.12.2012 00:46, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
> * But by very, very far the community-contributed stuff is just perfect. I
> really really really hope
> we can get something like that integrated. There are many ways to approach
> this:
>
> - By integrating a wiki page via e.g. an IFRAME.
> -
On 12/25/2012 08:17 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
e.g.
http://vibed.org/temp/d-programming-language.org/phobos/std/algorithm/balancedParens.html
Looks good!
BTW the link
http://vibed.org/temp/d-programming-language.org/phobos/std/algorithm/boyerMooreFinder.html
gives a 404 error (linked from
htt
On Sunday, 23 December 2012 at 16:06:57 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Sunday, 23 December 2012 at 14:43:25 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
I like std.algorithm the way it is.
Andrei
Same here. In my mind it's about generality:
General purpose algorithms (sort, partition etc.) belong in
std.alg
On 12/23/12 12:54 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Sunday, 23 December 2012 at 16:06:57 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Sunday, 23 December 2012 at 14:43:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I like std.algorithm the way it is.
Andrei
Same here. In my mind it's about generality:
General purpose algor
On Sunday, December 23, 2012 18:54:15 Peter Alexander wrote:
> Would it be possible to split the library up and add public
> imports to std.algorithm of the moved symbols?
DIPs 15 and 16 relate to the ability to split up a module into separate
modules within a package with the same name without b
85 matches
Mail list logo
