matharu Wrote:
> Thanks for that. Is that in the manual somewhere?
Yup - page 19.
--
radish
radish's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=77
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.p
mherger Wrote:
> >
> Hit the "Now Playing" button repeatedly to flip through the different
>
> display modes.
> [/url])
Thanks for that. Is that in the manual somewhere?
--
matharu
matharu's Profile: http://forums.slim
octavian wrote:
Are Apple ever likely to make their songs playable on a SB without
having to write them onto a CD and re import them? I would be much more
inclined to buy ITunes songs if they did. Apple are now talking about a
lossless compression option for their purchased downloads, I wonder if
I think allmusic.com or amazon.com are your best bet, but I haven't seen
any software that would retreive the rating information from these
sites. The problem is to retreive the ratings from the web, when you
have the ratings there are several tools available to set the ratings
in slimserver, tagg
allmusic.com is a useful site, thanks. Just been having a look around. I
like the "similar artists" section, but anyh
What I'm looking for is a way to Automatically populate all my ratings
(at least my unrated tracks) so I can go away and tweak them at my
leisure (or never :-).
I don't t
CardinalFang wrote:
As I said a clean-looking, uncluttered standard sized audio component
with a graphical remote control. The transport would not have a DAC,
but would have high grade power supplies, components and socketry. With
it I'd want a Sonos-like remote so I can browse music from where
Don't get too excited ;) but it might offer a solution for people who
don't want to go for say 4x drives but may want 2x drives in their NAS
box. And that is all I can say ;)
Paul
Paul_B Wrote:
> Now I am intrigued:
--
ultra238a
Paul
Progressive Consumer Electronics Ltd
Fifer Wrote:
> I noticed that, but for a mainstream news report, they didn't do too
> badly on the detail.
Mmmm...
> The $1,999 (£1,079) player is aimed at people who encode music using
> so-called lossless formats, such as Flac or Wav.
FLAC is an acronym, Free Lossless Audio Codec, and should
el payo Wrote:
> In that case I'll order off the web, take the complimentary SB3 and
>
> 1. List it on eBay
> 2. ??
> 3. Profit!
LOL!
We have SB3 gnomes in the forum!!
--
Mark Lanctot
Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://for
EnochLight wrote:
Am I the only one that has a major issue with this equipment costing
$2000?
I'm all about the new design and hardware, but... all of us knowing how
much it costs to build a high-end PC from scratch, even with a quality
soundcard and huge flat panel display... I feel that $2K is
It should be straightforward to hook a transcode option into SlimServer
to downsample from 96 to 48 for SB2/3 devices.
--
inguz
inguz's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1139
View this thread: http:/
Ok now that the transporter has been announced and supports 24/96 source
material. Where are people getting music in this format. CDs are only
recorded in 16/44 sure you could rip them to 24/96 FLAC but that would
give you nothing. I have a few CDs that have DVD-Audio verisons on the
flip side
Don't know what happened. It started when I was using the SB3 to select
a radio station via SqueezeNetwork (SN). Suddenly the display filled
with the Spectrum Analyzer (SA).
Hit the "Now Playing" button repeatedly to flip through the different
display modes.
--
Michael
dangerous_dom Wrote:
>
> I have no doubt there is a market for this, but one thing is for sure;
> they will really have to sort out SlimServer. I love it, but it has
> faults and bugs. Those bugs are annoying with the SB3, but if i had
> forked out $2000 (plus the other few grand for app/speaker
http://www.allmusic.com/ has ratings (whether you agree or not is
another matter).
--
smc2911
smc2911's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4388
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthre
Don't know what happened. It started when I was using the SB3 to select
a radio station via SqueezeNetwork (SN). Suddenly the display filled
with the Spectrum Analyzer (SA).
The SA is only there while I'm logged into SN. It shows up behind every
menu display. The only time it doesn't appear is if
ultra238a Wrote:
> Hi,
> You need to download the All-In-One Slimserver update via Opera or
> Firefox (IE cuts off the .gz extension) once you have this installed
> you can download the 6.3.1 update which just has the .tar file
> extension.
> Thanks
Re the above comment from Paul, I have always d
The new remote for the Transporter ...
1. Will it work with the Squeezebox?
2. Does it have a matte finish on the faceplate?
--
jonheal
Jon Heal says:
Have a nice day!
http://www.theheals.org/
jonheal's Profile: http://f
New product Transporter looks great for the high end.
Might upgrade my SB3 to it if I can save enough money.
But what about the low end.
If slim took the core of the SB3, maybe downgraded some components,
bolted some speakers on, enhanced clock/timer and the ability to run
off batteries.
Grea
tamanaco Wrote:
> I want a Wi-Fi/IR/RF SB Universal remote to be the "center piece" of my
> AV system as it would be only component that'd need to interact from
> anywhere I sit in my one bedroom NYC apartment. I'm sure it would make
> the place seem bigger than it really is... I can already see
Are Apple ever likely to make their songs playable on a SB without
having to write them onto a CD and re import them? I would be much more
inclined to buy ITunes songs if they did. Apple are now talking about a
lossless compression option for their purchased downloads, I wonder if
they will be SB
I have the same requirment. I would love to wall mount a control unit
that allows touchscreen entry. But a better remote would be a start
--
Paul_B
Paul
~
Slimserver 6.3 on QNAP(1.2) ~ (160GB Maxtor)
SB3 (x1)
RIP - dBpowerAMP v to FLAC
ID3 Tags - MP
bprager Wrote:
> I love my various SB's and with some effort, have gotten a reasonable
> WAF. But the one factor that continues to be a problem is the display.
> As good as it is, (especially compared to other devices), it can't show
> long album/track names without scrolling.
> Yes, I know you
CardinalFang Wrote:
>
>
> I think it will have a tough time against an SB3 plus a $1500 DAC. OK,
> so you can use the Transport DAC for other inputs, but audiophiles will
> most likely already have a DAC at this price point.
>
> Thinking about it some more, I'm really disappointed. I'm in the
The underlying architecture of the SB2 and the SB3 is identical. The
changes from SB2 to SB3 relate to the form of the product.
See:
http://faq.slimdevices.com/index.php?action=artikel&cat=1&id=6&artlang=en&highlight=architecture
or
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19415&highli
Face it. We're not the target market. It hurts but it's possible to get
past it.
--
Michaelwagner
Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com
Why does it say on the display Squeezebox V2 when I have a V3 player?
Because the SB3 is a diguised SB2 - they use the same firmware, have the
same electronics etc. Theoretically it should display the correct player
type, but it's nothing to worry about.
--
Michael
--
What's your point, man?
You asked "So, what do you guys think about Thecus N5200?" - my answer was
"Just another NAS device." (hey, that's just my opinion - no offence
intended). To which you replied "No, that's the point - it seems to be
significantly better then any other NAS.".
So my
pfarrell Wrote:
> Not at all. It is aimed at "audiophiles" and they regularly spend
> unimaginable amounts of money.
>
> The Audiophile magazines regularly review turntables that cost
> $10,000, and a favorite costs $75,000.
>
> You're just not the target market.
>
You got that I right I'm no
Why does it say on the display Squeezebox V2 when I have a V3 player?
--
octavian
octavian's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2161
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=25
I assume your keypads don't have any data feedback
(playlist/artist/track) from the SB so you must be controlling this
from either a PC/handheld or from the SB itself?
Kyle Wrote:
> I have one SB in the den with the analog outputs going into my Russound
> whole house system and the digital (coax
Another vote for the advanced remote. I like the look of the new
transporter, but probably couldn't justify the price.
I've got several SB's around the house, but as most of my kit is hidden
away in cupboards, the Sonos seems more appropriate to me. I do like the
Slim kit, though, and as I've go
What's your point, man? Even if you list all industrial grade servers
available I won't be impressed by your knowledge, becouse I was sure
it's quite clear they are out of the context. Sorry I didn't mention
I'm talking about consumer grade NAS.
--
325xi
Now I am intrigued:
> There is some new Qnap product news in the next couple of weeks - I'll
> keep you posted.
--
Paul_B
Paul
~
Slimserver 6.3 on QNAP(1.2) ~ (160GB Maxtor)
SB3 (x1)
RIP - dBpowerAMP v to FLAC
ID3 Tags - MP3Tag v2.35a
Artwork - Alb
It's interesting that the track Slim picked to display in the product
photography for the Transporter is one that apparently suffers from
over-loud mastering. Notice the clipping left channel? :-)
--
jonheal
Jon Heal says:
Have a nice day!
http://www.theheals.org/
-
No, that's the point - it seems to be significantly better then any
other NAS.
...in its class, maybe. It's based on a Celeron? There are devices out
there with dual (or even quad) Dual Core Xeons.
I'm not talking about DIY PC with Gb, RAID, and bunch of
Neither am I. I've been trying to
The problem with the MP3 poll is the majority of people listen to music
on "stereos", "walkmen", etc. Even the home "hi-fi" system is likely to
be anything but. For goodness sake why do most people just look for the
highest wattage speakers without taken into account, peak, RMS, or
THD.
I remeber
Hi,
I have around, I dunno, 6 thousand songs at last count mosty from
ripping my CD collection, and I'd like to be able to play higher rated
songs some of the time.
However, I'm never going to get round to rating that many songs in this
lifetime!! So, I'm looking for a way to "auto-rate" all my
ajmitchell Wrote:
> Are you sure about this? Lets wait for confirmation
Yes, on the detailed specs page it lists inputs to the dac.
> Digital Outputs and Inputs
>
> Optical, coax, BNC, and XLR digital connectors
> Word clock input for synchronization with an external clock
> Linear-regulated p
Simon Still Wrote:
>
> Even the remote looks a cut above (and much more of a match for the SB3
> than
> the current model - after market upgrade anyone?)
>
Agreed... but can the new remote work with SB3 .. would assume so..
can slim release better pics of the remote .. plus images with the
OK, it's been a while, but I have now successfully upgraded to the
latest nightly and YES! the single-word hostname works now. Strangely,
localhost no longer seemed to work but that doesn't worry me too much.
--
smc2911
sm
Congratulations - this isn't for me (theres no way I could drop that much on a player) but it's a supurb product. With the stable, fast, Slimserver (lets hope) that is promised by 6.5 this will redefine the market.
I've never been a great fan of the industrial design of the squeezebox in either in
I love my various SB's and with some effort, have gotten a reasonable
WAF. But the one factor that continues to be a problem is the display.
As good as it is, (especially compared to other devices), it can't show
long album/track names without scrolling.
Yes, I know you can shrink the font, but t
I'm pretty sure SD people got ready for complaints regarding the
direction their design is heading - there is no high fidelity device on
earth that wouldn't produce at least some negative comments. That's just
perfectly normal.
I'm not interested in built-in DAC either, unless it confirmed to mat
I read these forums before deciding to buy, and I'm really glad that I
did. The troubles that you read on here are no worse than you find on
any wireless networking forum and given the number of computer /
operating system / router types and combinations it seems logical that
some sytems may take
rickwookie Wrote:
> I think they've probably gone out of their way to ensure that there is
> no noise from the display
>
I'm sure they have, but the audiophile community is pretty picky about
stuff like that and you have to convince them that 2 displays are a
good move in a high-end player. Be
amrace Wrote:
> Did you do the "Are you happy with the audio quality of MP3 files?"
> vote. The non audiophile yes voters are winning with 57.82%.
I must be one of those non-audiophiles then because my squeezebox
digital output into my Proceed AVP and NAIM 82/180/SBLs rocks.
Without getting sil
No, that's the point - it seems to be significantly better then any
other NAS. I'm not talking about DIY PC with Gb, RAID, and bunch of
HDDs. This is a commercially available device, a little expensive, and
if what they talk about it is true - it's first I would really consider
to buy.
BTW - the
Kudos to slim on the new product... looks great and I am sure it sounds
great.. bit out of my current price bracket.. but I think it is a
testament to Slim for their commitment to listening to customers and
looking to cater to their needs.. the number of posts I have read about
high end products,
mherger Wrote:
> > "The $1,999 (£1,079) player"
> > Oh really?
>
> That's the writers exchange rate calculation. Paul announced it at
> UKP1299, I think.
>
> --
>
> Michael
>
> ---
> Help translate SlimServer by using the
> SlimString
CardinalFang Wrote:
> it isn't in the same box as the audio components and therefore
> potentially affecting audio quality. You can argue whether it does or
> not, but if there was no display in the transporter and instead it was
> on a remote, then it definitely wouldn't be degrading audio.
I t
> > "The $1,999 (£1,079) player"
> > Oh really?
>
> That's the writers exchange rate calculation. Paul announced it at
> UKP1299, I think.
My point exactly!
Although adding 17.5% UK VAT means this is a pretty good deal as electronics
go...
James
-
"The $1,999 (£1,079) player"
Oh really?
That's the writers exchange rate calculation. Paul announced it at
UKP1299, I think.
--
Michael
---
Help translate SlimServer by using the
SlimString Translation Helper (http://www.herger.net/sl
rickwookie Wrote:
> I don't understand what you mean when you say "transport-only option".
> Surely if you don't need a DAC then a squeezebox IS that option. This
> product is a serious DAC with a squeezebox built in.
>
Yes, but the SB3 form factor isn't right for me and it doesn't have a
linea
ajmitchell Wrote:
> Are you sure about this? Lets wait for confirmation
>
> Alex
I think it says it here
http://www.slimdevices.com/pi_transporter.html
at the end of the paragraph 'Astounding Analog'...
"In addition, Transporter's digital inputs allow its built-in DAC to be
used with other s
Did you do the "Are you happy with the audio quality of MP3 files?"
vote. The non audiophile yes voters are winning with 57.82%.
--
amrace
amrace's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5888
View this th
Ahem:
"The $1,999 (£1,079) player"
Oh really?
James
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. Sender does not
intend to waive confidentiality or privilege. Use of this email is prohibited
when received in error.
__
CardinalFang Wrote:
> Also, I really wish that there was a transport-only option.
If you don't need the on-board DAC I doubt you will see a signnificant
benefit that will justify the outlay - no doubt someone will eventually
do a high end SB3 +DAC vs Transporter comparison...maybe me in 6
m
I noticed that, but for a mainstream news report, they didn't do too
badly on the detail.
--
Fifer
Fifer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=639
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showth
Fantastic!
Thanks very much :)
--
Khuli
http://www.last.fm/user/khuli
Khuli's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=851
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=25761
_
Yes, when ordered directly from us.
Fifer Wrote:
> Paul, I'm glad to see the UK pricing aligned with the US pricing. Does
> the free SB3 offer apply in the UK?
--
ultra238a
Paul
Progressive Consumer Electronics Ltd
ultr
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/5212396.stm
...but they didn't get Patrick's name right :-)
--
Michael
---
Help translate SlimServer by using the
SlimString Translation Helper (http://www.herger.net/slim/)
Paul, does the free SB3 offer apply in the UK?
--
Fifer
Fifer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=639
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=25775
_
rtitmuss Wrote:
> Jon, I have had a quick look at the trace and so far it appears to be a
> problem with the flac decoder. Do you also get this problem playing
> other formats, or just flac?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
Richard,
I have only one mp3 "album," but SoftSqueeze played it all the way
throug
I think it's an exciting development and I'm seriously considering
whether I can justify it or not (a lot depends on the UK pricing). I
have to confess to being a wee bit disappointed that the pre-order
promo appears to be firmly targeted at new customers only, as most
existing customers are more
seanadams Wrote:
> This is a hardware/firmware thing, not SlimServer. It's not that it
> can't be done on SB3, but it would be a separate engineering effort due
> to different hardware in Transporter to facilitate higher sample rates.
Can you clarify Sean - if I have music ripped at 24/96 on my s
Yup, just saw that on the homepage.
All I want now is a cut down version of the Transporter - doesn't need
the uber-DAC cos I can just plug it into the Arcam AV amp and use the
DAC in that (which is pretty amazing). Perhaps with slightly toned down
styling... although that unit would look great i
UK price is going to be £1299 inc VAT contact me directly for
pre-orders.
Paul
Fifer Wrote:
> UK pricing Dean? And will it be available in the UK on the launch date?
> Oh, and do we get a free SB3 too?
--
ultra238a
Paul
Progressive Consumer Electronics Ltd
--
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/5212396.stm
--
cbemoore
cbemoore's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=163
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=25787
Thanks for doing the weather plugin Paul, it's just what I was after!
--
TonyCharman
TonyCharman's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4886
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.ph
Thanks for above:
it turns out it was a conflict with a driver for a Keyspan networked
USB print server: removing that seems to have fixed everything.
Thanks
- STeve
--
SteveWong
SteveWong's Profile: http://forums.sli
CardinalFang Wrote:
> Also, I really wish that there was a transport-only option. The price
> point is fair for what's inside, but a lot of that is unnecessary
> clutter and stuff that will never get used in my view - I don't need a
> DAC, two displays, a fancy wheel and all those buttons, what I
awetmore Wrote:
> I like the form factor and the front panel buttons and knob. I don't
> need the three power supplies, gold plated circuit board, and other
> audiophile features. I wish there was a $400 version that looked
> roughly like this with a knob and buttons and a single display.
Agr
So, what do you guys think about Thecus N5200?
Just another NAS device. x86 CPU based machines have been around in this
market long before NAS devices entered our homes. They're just getting
back to the roots.
Review say it blows
everything around out of the water performance wise.
What
agentsmith Wrote:
> I echo similar concerns. While it looks very slick, the multiple
> buttons and screen dominating the front makes this look less serious
> than a typical high end device.
Also, I really wish that there was a transport-only option. The price
point is fair for what's inside, bu
dean Wrote:
>
> It'll still cost $1999, though.
>
> -dean
In that case I'll order off the web, take the complimentary SB3 and
1. List it on eBay
2. ??
3. Profit!
--
el payo
el payo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices
So, what do you guys think about Thecus N5200? Review say it blows
everything around out of the water performance wise.
Can it be made running SlimServer?
--
325xi
325xi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.ph
Very good. When is it going to be reviewed by Stereophile? :)
I'm starting saving money... no ice cream for me anymore...
Interesting, if I'd connect it and SB3 to the same outboard DAC, how
much difference in SQ should I expect? Beyond the new features, how
different the digital section in them?
I echo similar concerns. While it looks very slick, the multiple
buttons and screen dominating the front makes this look less serious
than a typical high end device.
Coming from the Naim school of thought..
CardinalFang Wrote:
> Me too, but I think those displays are a mistake. Many audiop
Pale Blue Ego Wrote:
> I am also very interested in seeing how this flies with the high-end
> community. I think this could be the machine that pushes computer
> audio into the audiophile mainstream
Me too, but I think those displays are a mistake. Many audiophiles
dislike anything other than a
I'm running the latest 6.3.1 on Linux. Still broken.
I haven't had this working since I retired my old server 18 months ago.
That was running on an ancient version that honoured operating system
specification of hidden files (dot prefix) and the database would not
index cue-sheeted mp3 files tha
UK pricing Dean?
Isn't this 1USD = 1UKP :-)
I expect the exchange rate for CHF at least 1:1.5 :-(
--
Michael
---
Help translate SlimServer by using the
SlimString Translation Helper (http://www.herger.net/slim/)
___
UK pricing Dean? And will it be available in the UK on the launch date?
Oh, and do we get a free SB3 too?
--
Fifer
Fifer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=639
View this thread: http://forums.slimde
fairyliquidizer Wrote:
>
> This issue may not trouble you but I like to keep my tags as slim a
> possible and would rather it was fixed sooner and 6.5 took longer.
> Especially as changing my tags will trigger my incremental backup to
> add a new increment which will be rather large as I have
101 - 184 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
