Re: KEYS and keys

On 4 September 2013 02:31, Tim Williams wrote: > I notice that Chris just pointed[1] spark to the nifty keys > listing[1]. Our docs still imply manual maintenance of the typical > KEYS file[2]. Honestly, I didn't even know the ldap-driven one was > around. I assume its fair for projects to just

Re: binary release artifacts

On 15 September 2013 14:16, Tim Williams wrote: > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:19 AM, ant elder wrote: >> Tim, one of the things we're trying to teach podlings is how to handle >> disputes and resolve problems in a happy respectful manner. You've out >> of the blue come on to their dev list without

Re: [DISCUSS] Release of Apache Allura (incubating) v1.0.0

On 16 September 2013 14:17, Dave Brondsema wrote: > IPMC members, hello again. We are still waiting for your votes to be > cast for Allura's first release: see vote thread Aug portion [1] and > Sept portion [2] > > If there is anything the Allura PPMC can provide or do, to help, please > let us k

Re: [DISCUSS] Release of Apache Allura (incubating) v1.0.0

Sorry, again forgot: It's useful to have a link to the RAT report (or equivalent) showing that files have the appropriate license headers. On 16 September 2013 23:33, sebb wrote: > Forgot to say: > > AFAIK, Git tags are not immutable, so the vote e-mail should contain > the

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Allura (incubating) v1.0.0

On 28 August 2013 23:04, Cory Johns wrote: > Hello, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.0.0 incubating. This is our > first release. > > A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 9 +1's, and 0 > -1's or +0's (vote thread [1], discussion thread [2] which some of the

Re: [DISCUSS] Release of Apache Allura (incubating) v1.0.0

Forgot to say: AFAIK, Git tags are not immutable, so the vote e-mail should contain the hash for the tag. On 16 September 2013 23:30, sebb wrote: > On 16 September 2013 14:17, Dave Brondsema wrote: >> IPMC members, hello again. We are still waiting for your votes to be >> ca

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (RC6)

On 20 September 2013 21:56, Patrick Wendell wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark > (incubating) version 0.8.0. This will be the first incubator release for > Spark in Apache. > > The tag to be voted on is v0.8.0-incubating (commit 3b85a85): > https://git-wip-us

Re: binary release artifacts

On 24 September 2013 10:05, ant elder wrote: > I closed LEGAL-178 with the resolution "Not A Problem", which is quite > different to a resolution of "Fixed" or "Resolved" or "Answered". > > From my investigation, things like the text of the AL and various posts in > the mailing lists over the year

Re: KEYS files within source archives

On 23 September 2013 21:57, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote: >> >>> Do you have a KEYS file posted somewhere besides within the release? > > Thanks for a good spot and thoughtful observation, Dave. This is worth > discussing. > > MHO: supplying a K

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating

On 24 September 2013 13:44, Leonidas Fegaras wrote: > Hello, > This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating. MRQL is a > query processing and optimization system for large-scale, distributed > data analysis, built on top of Apache Hadoop, Hama, and Spark. > This is our first release.

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating

e binaries for MRQL itself; they will be forced to build it themselves. If there is a need to provide a bundled binary containing 3rd party jars, that is normally done in the zip/tar.gz archives containing the various components as individual jars. > Thanks > Leonidas Fegaras > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kalumet 0.6-incubating release (3rd try)

On 1 October 2013 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi all, > > Apache Kalumet 0.6-incubating release has been voted by the Kalumet podling > PMC. > > I forward the release to the Incubator for "final" vote. Please find the > RELEASE NOTES and staging repository in the original message. > > Tha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.1.0-incubating

On 30 September 2013 11:17, Sebastian Schaffert wrote: > Dear all, > > After several months of work since the last incubating release > (3.0.0-incubating) in April, we are now ready to release version > 3.1.0-incubating. We fixed all the remaining issues that have been > discussed in April (see th

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kalumet 0.6-incubating release (3rd try)

the actual hashes (either MD5 and/or SHA1) of the source archives. For example: apache-kalumet-0.6-incubating-src.zip MD5: 5664ebc70172b3b66f17d3a3db48594d > Thanks again Seb for the reminder, > > Regards > JB > > > On 10/01/2013 06:55 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> On 1 Oc

Re: Apache project bylaws

On 2 October 2013 21:34, Alex Karasulu wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >> > I would like to propose a rewrite of [1] by borrowing heavily from [2] >> but >> > making sure to emphasize that projects are all

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tajo-0.2-incubating RC1

On 27 October 2013 07:40, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > Hi folks > > This is the first release candidate for Apache Tajo-0.2-incubating, > and it is also the first official release for Tajo. > > The PPMC vote [1][2] was passed with 5 binding +1s and no -1. > > Release git tag is at: > https://git-wip-us.a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Weave for Apache Incubator

In which case, maybe consider the related words: Apache Warp Apache Weft Just a thought. On 29 October 2013 22:14, Upayavira wrote: > And Apache Wave too (which is what I first saw before I read the title > more carefully). > > Upayavira > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013, at 09:12 PM, Matt Benson wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tajo-0.2-incubating RC2

On 31 October 2013 11:54, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > Hi folks > > This is the third candidate for Apache Tajo-0.2-incubating, > and it is also the first official release for Tajo. > > The PPMC vote [1][2] was passed with 4 binding +1s and no -1. > > Release git tag is at: > https://git-wip-us.apache.or

Re: Wiki access

What is your Wiki login name? On 6 November 2013 00:55, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > I'm requesting access to the incubator wiki in order to update the storm > podling monthly board report. > > Thanks in advance. > > P. Taylor Goetz > Software Architect > > Health Market Science > The Science of Bet

Re: Majority vs Lazy Majority

On 9 November 2013 07:06, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi, > > Someday I will get back to improving the Voting and Glossary pages, but > meanwhile, the Apache Flex PMC is still trying to construct a set of > bylaws and we are currently discussing whether there is a difference > between "Majority Approval"

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

On 10 November 2013 08:00, Alex Harui wrote: > IMO, there are two problems: > > 1) We're trying to train folks to manage IP for their community but they > have to seek approval from folks are aren't as vested in their community. > My analogy is telling a new city council member: "Welcome to the ci

Re: Majority vs Lazy Majority

On 9 November 2013 12:17, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> Is there such a concept as "Lazy Majority" ? > Yes many Apache projects define it (eg Ant, Kafka, Hadoop, Pig, Hive and > others ) as does Apache HTTP. [1] > "Lazy majority decides each issue in the release plan." The phrase is used, but

Re: Majority vs Lazy Majority

On 19 November 2013 08:29, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:03 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 9 November 2013 12:17, Justin Mclean wrote: > ... >>> My guess is that "Lazy Majority" is used because Majority implies more than >>> 50% of poss

Re: [VOTE] helix-0.7.0-incubating

On 19 November 2013 07:48, Zhen Zhang wrote: > Hi, > > This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > Helix 0.7.0-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our fourth > release at Apache. > > Apache Helix is a generic cluster management framework that makes it

Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating

On 19 November 2013 02:50, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote: > Hi, > > This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > Helix 0.6.2-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our third > release at Apache. > > Apache Helix is a generic cluster management framework that ma

Re: [VOTE] helix-0.7.0-incubating

I see that 0.7.0 has been released. However there was no [VOTE][RESULT] mail as far as I can tell. On 23 November 2013 14:36, sebb wrote: > On 19 November 2013 07:48, Zhen Zhang wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as

Re: [VOTE] Release HDT version 0.0.1.incubating (RC1)

On 20 November 2013 13:45, Rahul Sharma wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to call for a vote for Apache Hadoop Development Tools > (incubating), version 0.0.1.incubating. The vote has happened of the dev > mailing list and the community has approved the second release > candidate(RC1) for Apache Hadoo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

On 20 November 2013 16:09, larry mccay wrote: > Hello All, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Knox Gateway 0.3.1 incubating. > > A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 3 +1's, and 0 > -1's or +0's and now > requires a vote on general@incubator.apache.org. > > The [VOTE]

Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating

On 23 November 2013 19:57, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote: > sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=d12177168347c9253f3b37946c06a7175f8a1997 > > The parent directory doesn't actually contain any artifact

Re: [VOTE] helix-0.7.0-incubating

On 23 November 2013 20:00, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote: > sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=37c20e79d0e132710f0fa0e5e8dbdb95b2e639ff > > The parent project doesn't produce any binary artifacts th

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] helix-0.7.0-incubating

...@hotmail.com >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] helix-0.7.0-incubating >> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 12:00:09 -0800 >> >> sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here: >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=

Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating

; Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 21:28:25 + >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating >> From: seb...@gmail.com >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> >> On 23 November 2013 19:57, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote: >>> sebb, I fixed the ta

Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating

vote on this list? >>> >>> Also, what do we do with the artifacts that have already been released? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Kanak >>> >>> ---- >>>> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 21:28:25 + >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.2.0-incubating RC0

On 26 November 2013 00:33, Hitesh Shah wrote: > Hello folks, > > I have created a tez-0.2.0-incubating release candidate (rc0). This is the > first release for Tez. Therefore, please do not be gentle. > > GIT source tag: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-tez/repo?p=incubator-te

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.2.0-incubating RC0

On 26 November 2013 22:21, Hitesh Shah wrote: > Thanks for the review, Sebb, > > Have already updated NOTICE.txt in the master branch for future releases and > made a note of the other points in our how to release guide. > > Do you recommended starting a new VOTE thread for t

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On 27 November 2013 20:45, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, > > In response to Bertrand's proposal at , I've created > a draft release verification checklist: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReleaseChecklist > > It should be emphasized that completing a checklist

Re: technical question with maven artifacts and incubating suffix

SNAPSHOT releases are temporary, so I suggest you just delete any that have been uploaded to to ASF snapshot repo. Alternatively, change the version to 3.2.1-SNAPSHOT On 28 November 2013 16:07, Sergio Fernández wrote: > Hi, > > in Marmotta we're having now the hangover of the graduation, and I'm

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On 29 November 2013 21:00, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:13 PM, sebb wrote: > >> The N&L files also apply to the SCM tree; > > Yes, true. Here's a message from Doug Cutting to legal-discuss@apache > on the subject: http://s.apache.org/9r7>.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Log4cxx incubation

I'm not sure why the Incubator needs to be involved at all here. On 30 November 2013 19:30, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > zero feedback? :-) > > > On 28 Nov 2013, at 10:50, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >> Dear Incubator people, >> >> I just added a new proposal for the incubation of log4cxx: >> ht

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On 1 December 2013 19:09, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:33 PM, sebb wrote: >> Not sure I understand why the checklist needs to be specific. > > The checklist should include only items which might block the release of the > artifacts under review. Expan

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On 2 December 2013 13:52, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: >> ...In response to Bertrand's proposal at , I've >> created >> a draft release verification checklist: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/R

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

On 20 November 2013 16:09, larry mccay wrote: > Hello All, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Knox Gateway 0.3.1 incubating. > > A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 3 +1's, and 0 > -1's or +0's and now > requires a vote on general@incubator.apache.org. > > The [VOTE]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

On 2 December 2013 20:17, Larry McCay wrote: > Thank you again, Sebb. > I am noting your new findings here and will fix them asap for the next > release. > > I assume that your lack of an actual vote indicates that these fixes can be > made in the next release and that you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

On 2 December 2013 20:44, Kevin Minder wrote: > Sebb, > > Thanks for your careful review. I'd like your continued insight into two > specific issues that you have raised. > > WRT the NOTICE files in root vs gatway-release/home, this is actually an > issue that I struggl

Re: [VOTE] Release HDT version 0.0.1.incubating (RC2)

On 29 November 2013 10:21, Rahul Sharma wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to call for a vote for Apache Hadoop Development Tools > (incubating), version 0.0.1.incubating. The vote has happened of the dev > mailing list and the community has approved the third release > candidate(RC2) for Apache Hadoop

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

Duplicated message. I already responded to the other copy in the thread On 2 December 2013 20:11, Kevin Minder wrote: > Sebb, > > Thanks for your careful review. I'd like your continued insight into two > specific issues that you have raised. > > WRT the NOTICE files in

Re: [VOTE] Release HDT version 0.0.1.incubating (RC2)

On 4 December 2013 03:29, Rahul Sharma wrote: > Thanks Sebb for explaining out in detail, since this is our first release I > think we would require some guidance. We would fix the LICENSE and the > NOTICE but there a few questions, in the same regard. > > This an eclipse plugin

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On 5 December 2013 10:37, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz >> wrote: >> ...3.6 Release consists of source code only, no binaries >> >> Technically we allow some "binary" form

Re: Release Verification Checklist

Just discovered another important aspect of a release that is often overlooked. The current source release artifacts must be released via the ASF mirroring system. Download pages must not point directly to the ASF servers; they must use the mirror CGI scripts Also old releases must not be left on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (rc4)

On 14 December 2013 03:13, Patrick Wendell wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark > (incubating) version 0.8.1. > > The tag to be voted on is v0.8.1-incubating (commit b87d31d): > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-spark/repo?p=incubator-spark.git;

Re: [PROPOSAL] DataFu for Incubation

On 18 December 2013 22:49, Matthew Hayes wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to share our draft ASF incubation proposal for DataFu, a library > that makes it easier to solve data problems in Hadoop and high level > languages based on it. I am the only person to think that the last part of the nam

Re: [PROPOSAL] DataFu for Incubation

ith the name a couple years ago, it was inspired by "kung > fu", in a playful way as Roman mentioned. Sort of like saying your Java Fu > or Python Fu is excellent. > > -Matt > ____ > From: sebb [seb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesd

Re: Question about jar files in svn.

On 19 December 2013 18:26, Henry Saputra wrote: > But at the end, when a podling prepare a release there should not > include jar files as part of the source release artifacts to be VOTED > on, is this correct? I think that depends on what the jar files are. For example. Apache Commons Compress i

Re: Question about jar files in svn.

erated by the project itself (for example for tests) should be >>fine? Again, that's ambiguous. I would not expect to find jars of the project source in source releases. Note that the Compress test jars were manually created on various different systems. >> >>- Henry >&g

Re: Question about jar files in svn.

On 23 December 2013 05:50, David Crossley wrote: > Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> Greg Trasuk wrote: >> > >> > Thanks everyone for the input. To summarize, it appears that the consensus >> > argument is: >> > >> > - Jar files are not prohibited by policy in project repositories (svn), >> > although

Re: LICENSE and NOTICE Role Models

On 23 December 2013 15:28, Kevin Minder wrote: > I was thinking that the real problem is that each new project is forced to > rediscover the right thing to do each time. From my POV there really aren't > that many licenses out there. If there were just a wiki that said... > 1) If you include sou

Re: Release Retention Policy

On 24 December 2013 00:03, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently, DeltaSpike got a ticket to clean up the old dist area in SVN > from when it was a podling. Since we have everything tagged in git, > it's not a big deal to recreate the release in case something goes > wrong, but looking at i

Re: Log4cxx project bootstrapped

On 2 January 2014 10:28, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hello, > > just a short message to let you know i moved the log4cxx tree to the > incubation tree and committed this auth: This has caused a problem for the projects.apache.org site. Please update the location of the DOAP. > Index: asf-author

Re: wiki edit perms for SteveLoughran

Done On 3 January 2014 11:54, Steve Loughran wrote: > Hi,, > > I want to start a proposal for incubating my Hoya work. Can I have edit > permissions for SteveLoughran? > > TIA, > > steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubsc

Re: Wiki write access for CharlesSimpson

Done On 7 January 2014 15:15, Charles Simpson wrote: > Could I have wiki write access for CharlesSimpson to contribute to the Hoya > incubator proposal? > > Thanks, > > Charles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incub

Re: Wiki write permissions for LarryMcCay

Done On 8 January 2014 18:42, larry mccay wrote: > Could I please have wiki write access for LarryMcCay to contribute to the > Hoya > incubator proposal? > > Thanks! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache

Re: January 2014 Incubator report timeline

t 4:27 PM, lars hofhansl wrote: > >> my username is LarsHofhansl > > It looks like sebb has whitelisted both you and Andrew. Thanks, sebb! > > Marvin Humphrey > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general

Re: Hoya Proposal

Jenny ? On 13 January 2014 22:21, Ted Dunning wrote: > Too many people will read that as Jena, the city in Thuringia. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jena > > -1 > > > > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >> On 13/01/14 20:25, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Ja

Voting status page - what does "Resolved" mean?

The voting status page shows recently closed votes. All of these have status "Resolved" What does this status actually mean? Does it mean that the vote thread has been closed? If so, then the column in the table seems redundant as it will never show anything else. --

Re: lost dist changes

It would help to know what was the latest commit in the backup. Can then in theory check the commit e-mails to see what occurred since, and recover any missing files from archive.a.o (presumably) On 26 January 2014 23:17, Joseph Schaefer wrote: > Unfortunately we had to restore dist.apache.org >

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

On 1 February 2014 02:04, Matei Zaharia wrote: > Hi folks, > > The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator > (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: > http://s.apache.org/aEQ). > > I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen as well.

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

On 4 February 2014 20:26, Matei Zaharia wrote: > Hi Craig, > > Thanks for the list, I'm following up with these folks to get them accounts. > I think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were thus > never added to the repo. A couple of questions: > > - What do you mean by

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Knox from the Incubator

The knox incubation status page website link generates a 404. On 7 February 2014 04:49, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > The Apache Knox Incubating podling has VOTEd to graduate from the > Incubator. > The community VOTE has passed below with the provided tallies. The > graduation > resol

Re: Tool to generate disclaimer, NOTICE, etc. files

On 8 February 2014 16:49, Alan Cabrera wrote: > Do you think it would be helpful if we had a tool that generated these files? > It could work like a command line wizard that prompts the person for > licensing information and then generates a valid disclaimer, notice, etc. > files. AIUI the di

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Knox from the Incubator

On 9 February 2014 03:26, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Any idea why Sebb? > > This page exists: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/kno > x.xml This includes: http://incubator.apache.org/knox/";>http://incubator.apache.org/knox/ which

Re: Tool to generate disclaimer, NOTICE, etc. files

On 9 February 2014 06:47, Ted Dunning wrote: > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:42 PM, sebb wrote: > >> > WDYT? >> >> Non-trivial; maintaining the meta-data needed to accurately generate >> the NOTICE file is likely to require more effort than writing the >> NOTI

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

I think it would be better to start a new thread with the updated text. Also, the two scope descriptions are slightly different: "related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis on clusters." v. "related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation and sharing across distributed a

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

On 9 February 2014 17:11, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: > Thanks Matei and sebb. > > Starting a new thread and collecting the VOTEs all over again would be > time consuming. So? Better to than being confusing, as the current thread has become. Also it may not be clear whether n

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Allura 1.1.0 incubating

NOTICE file still refers to 2013. On 13 February 2014 01:06, Dave Brondsema wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.1.0 incubating. This will be our > second release in the incubator. Allura is forge software for the development > of software projects, including so

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version > 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm. > > A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes (6 > binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

to downstream consumers so it is important not to include anything that is not required. On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > +1 (binding) from me. > > Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE file. I > think while it may not be necessary to call ou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating

On 15 February 2014 16:44, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Hi sebb, > > What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file? > > Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed? As I already wrote, this depends on the exact license(s) of the file(s) involved. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Celix version 1.0.0.incubating

On 16 February 2014 08:24, Alexander Broekhuis wrote: > This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 1.0.0.incubating > > This release has already been approved by: > > +1 Marcel Offermans (marrs) (binding) > +1 Karl Pauls (pauls) (binding) > +1 Gerrit Binnenmars (non-binding) > +1 Pepijn No

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating

On 22 February 2014 01:12, James Taylor wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating. Phoenix is a > SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a > JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Tajo from the Incubator

The Incubation status page has one incomplete section: "Verify distribution rights" Seems to me it is fundamental to ensure that this has been done before considering graduation. On 22 February 2014 03:44, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > After a successful community VOTE [1]

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Tajo from the Incubator

BTW, the copy to the dev@tajo list bounced, as I'm not subscribed. On 22 February 2014 10:24, sebb wrote: > The Incubation status page has one incomplete section: > > "Verify distribution rights" > > Seems to me it is fundamental to ensure that this has been done b

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Tajo from the Incubator

On 23 February 2014 06:58, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > Thank you for your checking. We updated the incubation status of Tajo as > follows: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/tajo.xml > > The first item of distribution rights w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.3.0-incubating RC0

On 23 February 2014 19:31, Hitesh Shah wrote: > Hello folks, > > I have created a tez-0.3.0-incubating release candidate (rc0). This is the > second release for Tez. > > GIT source tag: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-tez/repo?p=incubator-tez.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-0.3

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating

On 24 February 2014 18:25, Andrew Purtell wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Henry Saputra > wrote: > >> Are you saying it is ok to contain compiled executed binaries if they >> were signed? >> > > I did not take a position on that. > > The how-to-release documentation perhaps has more ro

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.3.0-incubating RC1

On 28 February 2014 19:48, Alan Gates wrote: > +1 > > One note is that the signatures given say sha1, but you actually have use > openssl sha to get the same values. If you do sha1sum (which was my first > assumption anyway) you get a different non-matching values. You might want > to change

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.3.0-incubating RC1

On 28 February 2014 21:44, Hitesh Shah wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion, Sebb. I went ahead and moved the original SHA into > .sha file and re-generated the SHA1 into the .sha1 file. > > @Alan, @sebb, would either of you mind verifying the modified files? .sha1 now looks OK.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

On 5 March 2014 19:26, Henry Saputra wrote: > The ODF Toolkit website [1] does not indicate which ones are the mentors. > > Do you mind just listing them in this thread for quick FYI? The canonical location for podling status is here: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/odftoolkit.html > Than

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Allura from the Incubator

On 7 March 2014 20:16, Dave Brondsema wrote: > Hi everyone, > > The Apache Allura podling has discussed and voted to graduate from the > incubator. We've made two releases, added several PPMC members, have been > working with Infra to set up forge-allura.a.o, etc. We would now like the > IPMC >

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Allura from the Incubator

The Allura website does not appear to follow the branding guidelines. The page footer does not mention Apache Allura and Allura as trademarks Also the footer date is still 2011 The License link must point to http://www.apache.org/licenses/ - not to a local copy of the license. The intro. parag

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Allura from the Incubator

Also, the podling status page is not complete. On 13 March 2014 18:34, sebb wrote: > The Allura website does not appear to follow the branding guidelines. > > The page footer does not mention Apache Allura and Allura as trademarks > Also the footer date is still 2011 > > The

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Olingo from the Incubator

The website does not appear to have a License link. This must link to http://www.apache.org/licenses/ On 13 March 2014 12:41, Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi (I flipped the reply-to to be general@i.a.o) > > +1 (binding, Mentor) > > Regards, > Dave > > On Mar 13, 2014, at 2:17 AM, Florian Müller wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Allura from the Incubator

icular type of software, it may be difficult to defend Allura as a trademark of the ASF. > -- > Rich Bowen, mobile edition > rbo...@rcbowen.com > Please forgive top posting. > On Mar 13, 2014 2:35 PM, "sebb" wrote: > >> The Allura website does not appear to fo

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Allura from the Incubator

he Allura git repo, so I am >>> curious why it isn't published at the ASF. And again, we have projects >>> who host documentation at ReadTheDocs, so I am not sure that >>> documentation living elsewhere is an inherent problem, but it gives me >>> pause.

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Olingo from the Incubator

OLINGO-208 > [2] http://olingo.incubator.apache.org > > On 13.03.14 19:39, "sebb" wrote: > >>The website does not appear to have a License link. >> >>This must link to http://www.apache.org/licenses/ >> >>On 13 March 2014 12:41, Dave Fisher wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Olingo from the Incubator

kes one to the top of the page. On 14 March 2014 13:22, Klevenz, Stephan wrote: > Ok, it's all changed. Can you please have a look again? > > -- Stephan > > > On 14.03.14 13:35, "sebb" wrote: > >>Thanks, but although the license is an ASF license, what&#

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Olingo from the Incubator

All looks good now. Sorry, it was a cache issue. Thanks for the very prompt attention to these matters. On 14 March 2014 14:06, Klevenz, Stephan wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > see my comments below. > > Stephan > > On 14.03.14 14:46, "sebb" wrote: > >>Home p

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Allura from the Incubator

not seem to be any way to find it from the new site. Also there are some branding requirements that are missing from the site. See http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html In particular http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#navigation > With these changes, we are hopeful th

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Allura from the Incubator

On 16 March 2014 03:43, Dave Brondsema wrote: > On 3/14/14 8:19 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 14 March 2014 20:16, Cory Johns wrote: >>> Ok, I think we've addressed all of the issues. Namely: >>> >>> * The status page (http://incubator.staging.apache.org/projec

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Allura from the Incubator

On 15 March 2014 01:23, Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > Just a minor thing (IMO). I was just taking a look at [1] and what strikes me > is a lack of ASF branding. > > While it's clear in the text and from the domain that the project is an ASF > one, the subtitles "Forge software for hosting softw

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Allura from the Incubator

On 17 March 2014 15:17, Cory Johns wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:58 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 15 March 2014 01:23, Justin Mclean wrote: >> > >> > While it's clear in the text and from the domain that the project is an >> ASF one, the subtitles &quo

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >