On Tuesday 15 February 2005 21:49, Kashani wrote:
> Maarten wrote:
> > [retrying send since it never made it to the list it seems]
> >
> > Hi List,
> >
> > Today I (more or less) followed some howto's I found in the forum to
> > yield all of postfix (+TLS), amavisd-new, clamav, spamd,
> > courier-i
Kashani wrote:
Look in your /etc/postfix/master.cf for a -v flag in the args field.
Remove it and restart.
another option to look for is:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:debug_peer_level = 2
/etc/postfix/main.cf:#debug_peer_list = 127.0.0.1
/etc/postfix/main.cf:#debug_peer_list = some.domain
Like the above e
> For every single mail I get I see a few hundred(!) lines of logs... :-(
> I reckon something is running in debug mode, but try as I might I cannot
> find
> what is (and where it is configured). A log excerpt is to be found below.
It's mostly the smtpd guy (it looks like) that is generating the l
Maarten wrote:
[retrying send since it never made it to the list it seems]
Hi List,
Today I (more or less) followed some howto's I found in the forum to yield all
of postfix (+TLS), amavisd-new, clamav, spamd, courier-imapd-ssl,
squirrelmail and apache (+SSL) (but without virtual mail setup).
The
[retrying send since it never made it to the list it seems]
Hi List,
Today I (more or less) followed some howto's I found in the forum to yield all
of postfix (+TLS), amavisd-new, clamav, spamd, courier-imapd-ssl,
squirrelmail and apache (+SSL) (but without virtual mail setup).
The good news is
More strange problems... I'm using
postfix/amavisd-new/clamav/spamassassin for my mail server. This came
up in the Postfix log after a massive update of my office server:
Feb 10 19:41:21 commserver amavis[23600]: (23600-02) TROUBLE in
check_mail: mime_decode-1 FAILED: Unix utility file(1) not avai
James said, "for Box A to have mailmain utilize Box A's postfix, in the
main.cf file for postfix, you will need to enable relay ability for the
IP 10.0.0.1 and 127.0.0.1"
Thanks for the help! Just the push in the right direction I needed.
For archives' sake, I'll cc the gentoo-user list with the
Tom Caudron wrote:
I've emerged Postfix 2.0.16-r1, Mailman 2.1.4, and Fetchmail 6.2.3 on
the same server.
I've set up Postfix with "inet_interfaces = localhost" so that it should
be listening on 127.0.0.1:25. Checking with netstat, I see that it does
seem to be listening:
# netstat -nlp |grep 2
I've emerged Postfix 2.0.16-r1, Mailman 2.1.4, and Fetchmail 6.2.3 on
the same server.
I've set up Postfix with "inet_interfaces = localhost" so that it should
be listening on 127.0.0.1:25. Checking with netstat, I see that it does
seem to be listening:
# netstat -nlp |grep 25 |grep tcp
tcp0
You may want to have a look at:
http://postfix.openu.ac.il/faq.html
HTH
Moshe
+ Steve B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/01/04 21:48]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Well I got DNS and Apache up, the next logical setup is to setup the mail
> server. I decided I would try with P
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 06:49:24PM +, Steve B. wrote:
> Well I got DNS and Apache up, the next logical setup is to setup the mail
> server. I decided I would try with Postfix, however is there like a Idiots
> guide to setting it up?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/virt-mail-howto.xml
--
Pe
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 18:49:24 +
"Steve B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well I got DNS and Apache up, the next logical setup is to setup the mail
> server. I decided I would try with Postfix, however is there like a Idiots
> guide to setting it up? I know its supposedly easier than sendmail,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well I got DNS and Apache up, the next logical setup is to setup the mail
server. I decided I would try with Postfix, however is there like a Idiots
guide to setting it up? I know its supposedly easier than sendmail, but
reading the documentation
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:23:25 -0600 (CST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ok, i have postfix installed and running, and it's recieving mail, but it
> doesn't show up in pine or pop mailboxes,
>
> it's there when i look at the postoffice in webmin, but i can't get to them
>
>
Does it by any chance s
ok, i have postfix installed and running, and it's recieving mail, but it doesn't show
up in pine or pop mailboxes,
it's there when i look at the postoffice in webmin, but i can't get to them
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "gentoo-user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 3:17 PM
Subject: [gentoo-user] [postfix] Mails to root@ are sent to nobody@
> Hello folks,
>
> I recently merged postfix-2.0.11.
>
> Now I am missing mails, which are sent to r
Hello folks,
I recently merged postfix-2.0.11.
Now I am missing mails, which are sent to root and via .procmailrc
they are resent to my local user-account. This was working properly
with sendmail. I can't use an alias "root->user", because some mails
*must* be sent to root...
Now I determined, t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 01 December 2003 18:58, Radomir wrote:
> Great! It's working now :-). Thank you! - (but emerge -u postfix did not
> work, I had to use emerge -C postfix; emerge postfix). I am new in gentoo
> (migrated from mandrake) so I'm still not very fam
; > From: Chris Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 01 December 2003 19:12
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] Postfix and SASL problem
> >
> > > I installed Postfix first and Cyrus SASL as
Did you read the ebuild??
DEPEND=">=sys-libs/db-3.2
>=dev-libs/libpcre-3.4
sasl? ( >=dev-libs/cyrus-sasl-1.5.27 )
ldap? ( >=net-nds/openldap-1.2 )
mysql? ( >=dev-db/mysql-3.23.28 )
ssl? ( >=dev-libs/openssl-0.9.6d )"
Adding sasl looks like what works to me.
TECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] Postfix and SASL problem
>
>
> > I installed Postfix first and Cyrus SASL as the next :-(. I
> > have tried to
> > unmerge Postfix and merge it again but it has no effect. How
> > ca
> I installed Postfix first and Cyrus SASL as the next :-(. I
> have tried to
> unmerge Postfix and merge it again but it has no effect. How
> can I tell
> emerge to compile postfix with SASL?
Try
USE="sasl"
Cheers!
Chris
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hi,
I have just installed postfix and have following problem: my ISP wants me to
authenticate myself when using SMTP - so (I guess) I need SASL support. I
have installed dev-libs/cyrus-sasl, configured /etc/main.cf and created
/etc/saslpass.db. But when I try to send mail it bounces back and
Hello
If you want an inclusive solution for rejecting Sobig attached emails.
Follow the link below. I found it very useful and thought I would share it.
Apparently, this takes the load off anti-virus etc.
http://sbserv.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb/postfix/postfix_sobigf.shtml
HTH.
Dhruba.
--
You pretty much have to switch to syslog.. :(
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Bergmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [gentoo-user] postfix and mailgraph
I have successfully installed the GENTOO postfix package and
I have successfully installed the GENTOO postfix package and want to
setup mailgraph [1] now.
I don't have a /var/log/syslog file on my system (I am using metalog as
my system logger) so I thought /var/log/mail/current, the file to which
postfix logs, would be the appropriate file to fee
Hi all,
I have set up and running Postfix (w/ virtual domains, MySQL auth.,
etc. like in virtual mail system guide from Gentoo.org docs).
Now I want to add a vacation autoresponder to this system (maybe with
the programm "vacation", but this is not a must). I only found
answers on google for n
Hi Matthias,
you can use formail and maildrop for this.
add this
mailbox_command = /usr/bin/maildrop
to your main.cf
and then create a $HOME/.mailfilter file:
SHELL=/bin/bash
if ( !/^From: MAILER-DAEMON/ )
{
if ( !/^X-Loop/ )
{
exception {
cc "| (/usr/bin/formail -I\"Return-Path\" -r -A\"X
begin quote
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 03:56:31 +0200
Kees Bergwerf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why do I receive email from that program? My messages is received here
> in the mailing list! I have received it myself. So I don't understand
> why this postfix program is sending email to ME??? I did not
Why do I receive email from that program? My messages is received here in the
mailing list! I have received it myself. So I don't understand why this
postfix program is sending email to ME??? I did not send something to it :-(
Please can somebody do something about it
--
This
Hi -
My ISP has their mail server set up to only allow mail to be relayed
through it from their IPs; less work than explaining to users SASL or
POP-before-SMTP, I guess. In any event, they made some changes a month
or so ago, and I am now unable to relay mail from my local home network
through th
On Wednesday 16 Jul 2003 22:52, MIKE MacMartin wrote:
> I installed postfix, and it's sending client returns the following
> error:
>
> fatal: gethostbyname: no such file or directory
>
> ... what's the fix for that? I've also had the problem where I can't
> start the receiving client (due to the
> > I installed postfix, and it's sending client returns the following error:
> >
> > fatal: gethostbyname: no such file or directory
>
> check your logs *or* sudo /usr/sbin/postfix start. Hopefully, postfix will
> tell you which file (or directory) is missing.
Still nothing: the only thing in mai
MIKE MacMartin wrote:
> I installed postfix, and it's sending client returns the following error:
>
> fatal: gethostbyname: no such file or directory
>
check your logs *or* sudo /usr/sbin/postfix start. Hopefully, postfix will
tell you which file (or directory) is missing.
Norberto
pgp0.pg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MIKE MacMartin wrote:
| I installed postfix, and it's sending client returns the following error:
|
| fatal: gethostbyname: no such file or directory
|
| ... what's the fix for that? I've also had the problem where I can't
start
| the receiving client
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 05:52:48PM -0400, MIKE MacMartin wrote:
> I installed postfix, and it's sending client returns the following error:
>
> fatal: gethostbyname: no such file or directory
>
> ... what's the fix for that? I've also had the problem where I can't start
> the receiving client (
> > > > After I have upgraded postfix from 2.0.9 to 2.0.11, the server is
unable to send local mail. When I send a mail from pine, I recieve a
"unexpected record type: 84" error message in logs. If I configure Pine to
use an external IP of this box as an SMTP server, everything is fine. When I
use
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 12:32:43AM +0300, Leonid Podolny wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Jim Bailey wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 09:02:45PM +0300, Leonid Podolny wrote:
> > > After I have upgraded postfix from 2.0.9 to 2.0.11, the server is unable to send
> > > local mail. When I send
I installed postfix, and it's sending client returns the following error:
fatal: gethostbyname: no such file or directory
... what's the fix for that? I've also had the problem where I can't start
the receiving client (due to the initscript not being able to calculate
dependencies)
MIKE
--
B
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Jim Bailey wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 09:02:45PM +0300, Leonid Podolny wrote:
> > After I have upgraded postfix from 2.0.9 to 2.0.11, the server is unable to send
> > local mail. When I send a mail from pine, I recieve a "unexpected record type: 84"
> > error message
Of course :)
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> Did you run "newaliases"?
>
> Tom Veldhouse
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Leonid Podolny
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 1:02 PM
> Subject: [gentoo-user]
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 09:02:45PM +0300, Leonid Podolny wrote:
> After I have upgraded postfix from 2.0.9 to 2.0.11, the server is unable to send
> local mail. When I send a mail from pine, I recieve a "unexpected record type: 84"
> error message in logs. If I configure Pine to use an external I
After I have upgraded postfix from 2.0.9 to 2.0.11,
the server is unable to send local mail. When I send a mail from pine, I recieve
a "unexpected record type: 84" error message in logs. If I configure Pine to use
an external IP of this box as an SMTP server, everything is fine. When I
use t
Peter Ruskin wrote:
With all this stuff moving to stable the last few days, my local mail
stopped working last night.
# sendmail
sendmail: fatal: gethostbyname: Bad file descriptor
# postfix check
postfix: fatal: gethostbyname: Success
(fatal Success - what is that?)
# cat /var/log/mail.e
With all this stuff moving to stable the last few days, my local mail
stopped working last night.
# sendmail
sendmail: fatal: gethostbyname: Bad file descriptor
# postfix check
postfix: fatal: gethostbyname: Success
(fatal Success - what is that?)
# cat /var/log/mail.err
Jul 15 01:00:0
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 03:02:24PM -0400, Owen Gunden wrote:
> I'm curious why Exim never made it into this discussion. Is it considered
> to be in a different class of MTAs? Nobody's using Exim in a large
> production enviroment?
We use exim for out production environment, as to my previous
emp
On Saturday 14 June 2003 12:02, Owen Gunden wrote:
> I'm curious why Exim never made it into this discussion. Is it considered
> to be in a different class of MTAs? Nobody's using Exim in a large
> production enviroment?
>
> Owen
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Correct. I have never use
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 10:34, Bobby R. Cox wrote:
> I thought I would poll the masses and see what the groups take is on
> these two. I am currently contemplating either of the two for mail at
> the ISP level. I like Postfix, but have been told Qmail is the way to
> go.
>
> What do you think? P
I'm curious why Exim never made it into this discussion. Is it considered
to be in a different class of MTAs? Nobody's using Exim in a large
production enviroment?
Owen
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
>>On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Matt Meola wrote:
> Yeah, just be advised that running postfix with mailman is a PITA.
>
> Of course, getting mailman built properly with qmail wan't quite
> a joy, either, but it was just a small modification to the ebuild.
>
> Mailman with postfix was a PITA on FreeBSD, too.
Yeah, just be advised that running postfix with mailman is a PITA.
Of course, getting mailman built properly with qmail wan't quite
a joy, either, but it was just a small modification to the ebuild.
Mailman with postfix was a PITA on FreeBSD, too...
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 06:32, brett holcomb wr
-- quoting Larry Wright --
> Npw wait a minute, are you trying to say that there is some other
> editor *besides* emacs?
hehe, I have a good one too: why is this "nano" the default editor on
Gentoo LiveCD? *nocommentsplease*
--
Mmm ... gummy-bear
- Homer Simpson
--
[EMAIL PRO
Yes .. that editor draws a lot of air.
Tom Veldhouse
- Original Message - >
> hehe, I have a good one too: why is this "nano" the default editor on
> Gentoo LiveCD? *nocommentsplease*
>
> --
> Mmm ... gummy-bear
> - Homer Simpson
>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[Please don't top-post]
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:30:23PM -0400, brett holcomb wrote:
> What kind of license is it???
It's probably best to compare:
http://cr.yp.to/distributors.html
http://www.linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/#djb
and make your own mind up.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
What kind of license is it???
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 18:00:49 +0100
Andy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:45:21AM +0200, Frank Tegtmeyer
wrote:
The discussion Postfix vs. qmail nearly always comes
down to the point
where someone says that either the qmail license or
Bern
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:45:21AM +0200, Frank Tegtmeyer wrote:
> The discussion Postfix vs. qmail nearly always comes down to the point
> where someone says that either the qmail license or Bernstein
> sucks. But personal feelings or FUD feeded knowledge are not the base
> to choose an MTA.
Alth
Good to know. Thanks.
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 00:27:00 -0400 (EDT)
"Rev. Jeffrey Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What made Postfix so good you never looked back. Or
what
> made Qmail such that you never wanted to go back to
it?
Primarily, the confi
Hehehe glad you understand my point!
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: donderdag 5 juni 2003 12:05
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Postfix vs. Qmail
>
>
> Npw wait a minute, are you trying to say tha
Npw wait a minute, are you trying to say that there is some other editor
*besides* emacs?
:)
On Thursday 05 June 2003 04:51 am, DE SMET Bram (BDSR) wrote:
> Let us try to stop this before it gets into a flamewar.
> Next thing we know, people are going to say that emacs is better than vi
> ;-)
>
gt; Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Postfix vs. Qmail
>
>
> Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Never used qmail, but I've heard the author/license/etc is a
> > bit..odd..
>
> If you never tried qmail you may have read nothing from the
> autho
Harald Arnesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I didn't manage to set up qmail at all. Totally confusing for me.
>
> Postfix is dead easy.
Such is life. For me its the opposite :)
Regards, Frank
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Never used qmail, but I've heard the author/license/etc is a bit..odd..
If you never tried qmail you may have read nothing from the author. If
this is the case why do you spread this nonsense then?
The discussion Postfix vs. qmail nearly always come
I have to say, I am quite happy with qmail. It takes a little bit to
wrap one's head around all the little pieces, but the design is really
elegant, and totally unix in philosophy: simple tools that do simple
things reliably, that you string together to do what you want.
I too have implemented sp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > What made Postfix so good you never looked back. Or what
> > made Qmail such that you never wanted to go back to it?
>
> Primarily, the configuration. Postfix's configuration seems alot more
> straight forward to me. Qmail was not HARD to config
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What made Postfix so good you never looked back. Or what
> > made Qmail such that you never wanted to go back to it?
>
> Primarily, the configuration. Postfix's configuration seems alot more
> straight forward to me. Qmail was not HARD to configur
Thanks. I'll need to run something like that and I wondered if it was some
bigger issues.
> > What made Postfix so good you never looked back. Or what
> > made Qmail such that you never wanted to go back to it?
>
> Primarily, the configuration. Postfix's configuration seems alot more
> straigh
"Bobby R. Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought I would poll the masses and see what the groups take is on
> these two. I am currently contemplating either of the two for mail at
> the ISP level. I like Postfix, but have been told Qmail is the way to
> go.
>
> What do you think? Pros a
> What made Postfix so good you never looked back. Or what
> made Qmail such that you never wanted to go back to it?
Primarily, the configuration. Postfix's configuration seems alot more
straight forward to me. Qmail was not HARD to configure, but I feel alot
more comfortable with postfix.
--
What made Postfix so good you never looked back. Or what
made Qmail such that you never wanted to go back to it?
Thanks.
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:05:20 -0500 (CDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Bobby R. Cox wrote:
I thought I would poll the masses and see what the
groups take is o
>>On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Bobby R. Cox wrote:
> I thought I would poll the masses and see what the groups take is on
> these two. I am currently contemplating either of the two for mail at
> the ISP level. I like Postfix, but have been told Qmail is the way to
> go.
Ran Qmail for about a year. Migra
Bobby R. Cox wrote:
I thought I would poll the masses and see what the groups take is on
these two. I am currently contemplating either of the two for mail at
the ISP level. I like Postfix, but have been told Qmail is the way to go.
What do you think? Pros and Cons for both.
This could end
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:34:34 -0600 Bobby R. Cox wrote:
> I thought I would poll the masses and see what the groups take is on
> these two. I am currently contemplating either of the two for mail at
> the ISP level. I like Postfix, but have been told Qmail is the way to
> go.
>
> What do you th
-
From: Bobby R. Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: quarta-feira, 4 de Junho de 2003 18:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [gentoo-user] Postfix vs. Qmail
I thought I would poll the masses and see what the groups take is on these
two. I am currently contemplating either of the two for mail at the
Personally, I prefer Qmail + Vpopmail combination, since it is easier to setup
and run. Further more, qmail is lightweight MTA and it is running on my
servers even under high load without taking much CPU time, comparing to
sendmail and probably other monsters in the same situation.
regards,
Mik
I thought I would poll the masses and see what the groups
take is on these two. I am
currently contemplating either of the two for mail at the ISP level. I like
Postfix, but have been told Qmail is the way to
go.
What do you think? Pros and Cons for both.
Bobby R. Cox
To answer my own question,
it does not work
May 30 13:59:23 rivendell postfix/pipe[7008]: warning: truncated macro reference:
"${recipient"
May 30 13:59:23 rivendell postfix/smtpd[7004]: disconnect from
rivendell.arda.org[127.0.0.1]
May 30 13:59:23 rivendell amavisd[7054]: starting. amavis 0.3.
Hi,
I want to use amavis (because of windows users), and have found in the documentation
following configuration for postfix.
Can i use this or are there people on this list who have a better solution.
Patrick
add to /etc/postfix/main.cf:
content_filter = vscan:
soft_bounce = yes
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] postfix 2.0.3 over 1.11
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:15:14AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> > 2.0.3 works fine and with the same config files. Before I upgrade items
>
tc/init.d/postfix start
>
> Tom Veldhouse
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Henk Abma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 4:05 PM
> Subject: [gentoo-user] postfix 2.0.3 over 1.11
>
>
>
.
# /etc/init.d/postfix stop
# emerge -u postfix
# newaliases
# /etc/init.d/postfix start
Tom Veldhouse
- Original Message -
From: "Henk Abma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 4:05 PM
Subject: [gentoo-user] postfix 2.0
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Henk Abma wrote:
> Hello,
>
> recently a sytem I had intended to run unattended forever has emerged
> postfix 2.0.3 over a perfectly working 1.11 installation and since than.
> The log says that the connection to postfix/private/proxymap is refused.
> What's the easiest
Hello,
recently a sytem I had intended to run unattended forever has emerged
postfix 2.0.3 over a perfectly working 1.11 installation and since than.
The log says that the connection to postfix/private/proxymap is refused.
What's the easiest way to return to a working version?
Thanks,
Henk.
82 matches
Mail list logo
