For the record, RedPhive uses sv_asswipe 0 by default on all his servers
;)
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hlds_linux-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > With all the other concerns that have arisen?
>
> Concerns are great, and the intelligent discussion thereof is welcome.
> The concern I have currently is that instead, we have name-calling,
> derisive comments, dogmatic arguments, etc.
>
Normally By you.
Since signing onto this list there
ah! I didn't have to miss Eric ffor too long
---
Red Phive
http://www.fragmart.com
http://www.redphive.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric
(Deacon)
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds_linu
> All this from someone who doesnt even run a server? (or so he has
stated
> recently)
I am not currently a public internet server owner/operator.
> Have you read any of the posts?
Yes, I have. Many thousands of them, actually. In fact, I've read over
two years' worth of posts including all o
Hrmm, the first 4 messages I've read on this list (I subscribed about 20
mins ago) and it's nothing but a flamefest ..
Why am I suddenly reminded of Fidonet?... and why do I have the urge to
write a twit-filter?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Be
> Wake up Mr Valve ass kisser.
Shouldn't this list have an age requirement for membership?
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listi
All this from someone who doesnt even run a server? (or so he has stated
recently)
Have you read any of the posts?
With all the other concerns that have arisen?
I want cheat protection, but not at the expence of others.
> How about:
> c. option to wipe ass for me
> 1. wipe with circu
> A sane minded non valve ass kissing person would agree.
Heh, nice dogma. At least you're taking the intelligent approach and
maintaining an open mind there... Oh, wait.
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or
> So it would seem the wanted options are;
> 1. non secure
> 2. secure with
> a. option to kick only, no ban
> b. option to kick and ban, with
> 1. option to report to global
> 2. option to use global list.
How about:
c. option to wipe ass for me
1. wipe with circular motion
Depends, on what you would class as 'much'
On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 15:09, Eric (Deacon) wrote:
> > I do not believe its fair that someone who has bought your software
> > should have to wait any period of time to connect to a server due to a
> > software bug that could have been avoided.
>
> Heh, y
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I just received a false cheat detection. I know there are no cheats or hacks on my
Voodoo 3000 machines but all of them are being detected as having a cheat. I have no
idea what to do except turn o
> I do not believe its fair that someone who has bought your software
> should have to wait any period of time to connect to a server due to a
> software bug that could have been avoided.
Heh, you don't actually *use* computers much, do you? ;)
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
__
Upload a cs_i386.so or metamod plugin that dereferences a NULL pointer.
:)
Or equivelently, install one of the many poorly written metamod plugins
out there =P (If you're a metamod plugin author, I'm not necessarily
complaining about you -- just those out there that make a publicly
released meta
oh, so you mean he has no way of creating my shell script... yeah, then he
is fuct, unless someone knows of a way to crash the server.
kev
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Garner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: Again: [hld
From: "Kevin J. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> if your server will autorestart (best way is to make it as a shell script
> imho) then just do an rcon quit and it will shut down the server, then
your
> shell script will pop it back up.
>
Read the rest of the thread, kev ;)
He's already running
if your server will autorestart (best way is to make it as a shell script
imho) then just do an rcon quit and it will shut down the server, then your
shell script will pop it back up.
my shell script for doing so is thus:
#!/bin/sh
while true;
do ./hlds_run -game cstrike
done
so then i
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Gould" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mirror.valve.hlds_linux
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 5:33 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] Re: how will the Valve banlist be hack proof? [was Re:
[hlds_linux] New Security Modules]
> Why bother "simulating" anything. Spoo
From: "Angus Macgyver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sorry to insist Simon and Omer, but I do not have access anymore to the
> shell nor to the scripts. If I could, I would not have any problem.
> What I am tryiing to achieve, Simon, by restarting I wish my server could
> accept people playing again aft
At 10:56 7/18/2002 +1200, you wrote:
>I was actually thinking this on the way home lastnight, except not so
>much hacking, more faking the communication between a server and the
>banlist server.
>
>Now sure its not going to be easy, but it would be possible to write
>code that simulates a CS serve
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Brooking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mirror.valve.hlds_linux
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 3:56 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] Re: how will the Valve banlist be hack proof? [was Re:
[hlds_linux] New Security Modules]
> I was actually thinking this on th
Dear All;
Please respond to me privately as this is (SOT Sorta Off Topic). My Onstream
SC30 tape backup finally died and am looking at spending around $400 - $700
to get a replacement.
What do people use and recommend.
Things I 've looked at so far are Seagate Taravan 40/20GB Hornet ATAPI, and
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I don't like you...u whine too much :-\
Jeremy Brooking wrote:
>If the banlist is tied into VAC (eg: secure server == running valves
>banlist) then I have lost control over who comes onto my server and who
>doesnt. I have to forsake securit
I was actually thinking this on the way home lastnight, except not so
much hacking, more faking the communication between a server and the
banlist server.
Now sure its not going to be easy, but it would be possible to write
code that simulates a CS server using vac, and then sends the same data
b
Omer, what mod are you planning to run on the 4 servers? Do you plan to
offer stats thru a website also? Are you planning on running admin_mod, or
anything else added on to your HLDS servers?
We need to know these things in order to give you a rough estimate of what
server horsepower you need f
> And why do you think that it is
> all about the Admins and not about the players?
/me hands over a cluepon
Allowing administrators to configure daemons to their liking is just good
etiquette; particularly if you want those administrators to use your
software.
In regards to your silly comment,
That sounds weird... :P Should we ask ourself what redhat (or any other
dist) is first of all. It's no a company/group who writes there own
program and sell it... No, instead they take programs which they think
would fit in there product and sell it togheter with other programs, pre
configured so
Is valve going to support this at all
if not what are the best server side options for it
Kingsley
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>Most hacked servers are redhat for the simple reason, theres more redhat
>servers than any other distro flavour.
Some statistics say that 90% of bugs under linux are in red hat distributions xD
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view
28 matches
Mail list logo
