Hi,
I've set up an OpenBSD PDC server for a client, serving some 40
computers, and did not encounter that performance issue you mentioned.
I did not use OpenLDAP, relying instead on tdbsam and unix accounts.
It runs OpenBSD 4.4 with samba from packages.
Also, as some have mentioned,
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Pedro Almeida
wrote:
>
> This was probably true by the time of this document write, but hopefully
> things change over time.
> Please take a look at ypldap(8). I think it solves the problem you refer.
>
> There are some small issues, but I bet they are being worke
Quoting Paul M :
> I recall seeing in the samba docs that setting the account info in
> samba could optionally also add the entries on the unix side - meaning
> you only need to set set it once. I'm hazy on the details, perhaps look
> into alternatives to using LDAP. When I've done this I've alway
I recall seeing in the samba docs that setting the account info in
samba could optionally also add the entries on the unix side - meaning
you only need to set set it once. I'm hazy on the details, perhaps look
into alternatives to using LDAP. When I've done this I've always
entered them separately
On May 14, 2009, at 9:25 AM, BSD nuub wrote:
On this page, there's something that bothers me:
"Please note that, though Samba account information will be stored in
LDAP, smbd(8) will still obtain the user's UNIX account information
via the standard C library calls, such as getpwnam() (see
doc
Dear misc@ readers,
I'm planning to set up a OpenBSD 4.5 based server serving a local
network with Windows XP based client computers.
There's no mention of this in the OpenBSD faq, but I found a nice
guide that seems to be pretty recent and up-to-date.
http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/pdc/pdc4.h
Henning Brauer(lists-open...@bsws.de)@2009.01.06 14:42:09 +0100:
> * Toni Mueller [2009-01-06 12:25]:
> > > openldap is still a piece of shit, but the ldbm backend is probably the
> > > sanest one.
> >
> > This pattern comes up often, but almost noone sugges
* dan-openbsd-m...@ourbrains.org [2009-01-16
19:38]:
> Henning Brauer(lists-open...@bsws.de)@2009.01.06 14:42:09 +0100:
> > I am not aware of any. Lack of options doesn't make openldap better.
>
> There is an option for people who have very basic LDAP needs - tinyldap
>
Henning Brauer(lists-open...@bsws.de)@2009.01.06 14:42:09 +0100:
> I am not aware of any. Lack of options doesn't make openldap better.
There is an option for people who have very basic LDAP needs - tinyldap
from fefe.de. It's high quality but lacks many features at the time.
On Tue, 06.01.2009 at 06:27:17 -0500, ppruett-lists wrote:
> Actually a lot linux users suggest using mysql for the non relational
> authentication tables
> ;)
I knew you've got to be kidding!
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Tue, 06.01.2009 at 14:42:09 +0100, Henning Brauer
wrote:
> * Toni Mueller [2009-01-06 12:25]:
> > This pattern comes up often, but almost noone suggests an alternative
> > LDAP server package.
> I am not aware of any. Lack of options doesn't make openldap better
* Toni Mueller [2009-01-06 12:25]:
> > openldap is still a piece of shit, but the ldbm backend is probably the
> > sanest one.
>
> This pattern comes up often, but almost noone suggests an alternative
> LDAP server package.
I am not aware of any. Lack of options doesn&#
Moving this to po...@. Reply-To/MFT set, please honour it.
On 2009/01/06 06:11, ppruett-lists wrote:
> > Here's an untested tarball of an updated openldap port, split into
> > directories for 2.3 and 2.4: http://spacehopper.org/tmp/openldap.tgz
>
>
>
> This issue has
> This pattern comes up often, but almost noone suggests an alternative
> LDAP server package
Actually a lot linux users suggest using mysql for the non relational
authentication tables
;)
Hi,
On Tue, 06.01.2009 at 01:08:27 +0100, Henning Brauer
wrote:
> I am using openldap with ldbm backend in an not exactly small
> installation for 9 or 10 years now. I have never ever experienced a
> broken database. never.
my last encounter with ldbm, a few years back, drove me to b
> Here's an untested tarball of an updated openldap port, split into
> directories for 2.3 and 2.4: http://spacehopper.org/tmp/openldap.tgz
This issue has been kicked around for maybe two years, it has been on
the misc list before,
https://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-mis
ast I checked the libc
>> btree code, a crash while writing out a page split would corrupt the
>> subtree.
>
> I am using openldap with ldbm backend in an not exactly small
> installation for 9 or 10 years now. I have never ever experienced a
> broken database. never.
I secon
crash while writing out a page split would corrupt the
> subtree.
I am using openldap with ldbm backend in an not exactly small
installation for 9 or 10 years now. I have never ever experienced a
broken database. never.
trying bdb lead to disasters all over the place. but admittedly that
w
; If a servers freaks out and reboots for whatever reason I expect that the
> database will recover from this event without having to recover, repair or
> optimize datasets.
So write-ahead-logging is ruled out because the database has to rerun
the tail of the log? Then I don't think OpenLDAP
On 2009-01-05, ppruett-lists wrote:
>
> So choices for those with older openbsd port of openldap with bdb flavor
> are:
> * don't upgrade ( bad choice)
> * upgrade to openbsd 4.4 or current using the official port and renter
> data storing in the obsolete backend ldbm
;>
>
> Yep since I am not write heavy then the non bdb could be okay,
> but as an afore mentioned in this thread I am concerned that The LDBM
> backend is now obsolete for openldap since 2.4.12.
> http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200810/msg00154.html
>
An
For OpenBSD 4.4 and current the flavor "bdb" is broken on openldap
BROKEN= OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
So, what to do? My experience is that compiling BDB and OpenLDAP
yourself isn't hard,
yep, I remember compiling apache back in the middle 90
in this thread I am concerned that The LDBM
backend is now obsolete for openldap since 2.4.12.
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200810/msg00154.html
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:30 AM, P.Pruett wrote:
> For OpenBSD 4.4 and current the flavor "bdb" is broken on openldap
> BROKEN=OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
>
> Most past articles have strongly suggested haveing openldap use "bdb"
> as it
Damn, forgot to send my response to list:
Message-ID: <49624a88.3020...@raapid.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:59:36 -0600
From: tico
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "P.Pruett"
Subject: Re: OpenLDAP w/o bdb okay?
References
P.Pruett wrote:
For OpenBSD 4.4 and current the flavor "bdb" is broken on openldap
BROKEN= OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
Most past articles have strongly suggested haveing openldap use "bdb"
as its storage method. Seeing that even the current
For OpenBSD 4.4 and current the flavor "bdb" is broken on openldap
BROKEN= OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
Most past articles have strongly suggested haveing openldap use "bdb"
as its storage method. Seeing that even the current port is not ready
to im
"sudo which slaptest" will tell you where in your PATH slaptest is. add that to
your root's PATH and it will work.
also, depending on you are invoking the root shell .profile might not be
executed at all.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:42:10AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 10/23/08, Almir Kar
On 10/23/08, Almir Karic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> most likelly /usr/local/sbin is not in your root's PATH, do
> PATH="$PATH:/usr/local/sbin" as root and slaptest should be found.
Would you kindly demonstrate a foolproof root's ~/.profile, since I
wasn't able to figure the lines to do it perman
I've been trying to set OpenBSD 4.3 (release) primary domain
controller according to howto o Danielle Mazzechio
http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/pdc/ and I'm facing a strange
problem I'm not able to figure. Following the instructions, upon
configuration of /etc/openldap/slapd.con
ording to howto o Danielle Mazzechio
> http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/pdc/ and I'm facing a strange
> problem I'm not able to figure. Following the instructions, upon
> configuration of /etc/openldap/slapd.conf, I'm not able to execute
> slaptest -u as root, but once I
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:33 PM, John Nietzsche
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i would like to know if openldap (in ports collection) will be shipped
> with suport for BDB in openbsd 4.4 ports infra structure?
Since the release is frozen, UTSL:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/
Dear members list,
i would like to know if openldap (in ports collection) will be shipped
with suport for BDB in openbsd 4.4 ports infra structure?
Thanks a lot for your time and cooperation.
Best regards,
John.
asm, it's more likely to pollute the archives
rather than help.
.if ${FLAVOR:L:Mbdb}
BROKEN= OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
If you want to use bdb as a backend, you'll likely have to compile
OpenLDAP manually (see Philip Guenther's earlier post [2]
--- On Wed, 9/3/08, Philip Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Philip Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: OpenLDAP
> To: "John Nietzsche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "misc"
> Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 6:00 PM
>
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:15 AM, John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
I presume you're referring to the port/packages version. The answer
depends on whose definition of "unbroken" you prefer
next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
I'd say the chance of ever having an unbroken OpenLDAP release on any
OS is pretty damn low.
that said, openldap works as well on openbsd as it does on other oses.
the only thing that does not work in 4.4 is the bdb backend. but then,
th
On 9/3/08, John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am in need for performance. Is replacing bdb with ldbm a good ideia?
Is working faster than not working?
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:15 AM, John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
>
Since openbsd d
ase holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
>
> I'd say the chance of ever having an unbroken OpenLDAP release on any
> OS is pretty damn low.
>
> that said, openldap works as well on openbsd as it does on other oses.
> the only thing that does not work in 4.4 is the bdb backend. but then,
>
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:15 AM, John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
>
> Thanks in advance.
And how is it broken exactly? I was able to install it just a month
ago and I didn't se
* John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-03 13:22]:
> is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
I'd say the chance of ever having an unbroken OpenLDAP release on any
OS is pretty damn low.
that said, openldap works as well on openbsd as it does
Hi,
is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
Thanks in advance.
On 2008-09-02, John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i have just installed OpenBSD and i would like to use it (the server
> with OpenBSD) as a directory services. When i try to install openldap
> from ports i am prevented with the following message:
>
>===> openldap
Hi list,
i have just installed OpenBSD and i would like to use it (the server
with OpenBSD) as a directory services. When i try to install openldap
from ports i am prevented with the following message:
===> openldap-client-2.3.39 is marked as broken: OpenLDAP 2.3 is
incompatible with Berke
On 2008-08-14, Ross Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to set my new OpenBSD 4.3 installation up as a PDC for a
> windows network. I am following directions from
> http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/pdc/pdc2.html but I cannot get
> openldap-server to build from the
Thanks for the bandwidth.
Ross
/pdc2.html but I cannot get
openldap-server to build from the ports, because the bdb flavor is
marked broken in 4.3! In the tutorial, he just continues on without
explaining what to do. What ought I do to get openldap-server to
build?
Thank you very much for your patience and time.
Ross Tucker
--- On Tue, 8/5/08, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: slapd hangs, was: Re: OpenLDAP and Berkeley DB 4.6
> To: "Toni Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> port
r database.
>
> I tried that, but now run into the problem that now, slapd can't be
> stopped. Maybe it has something to do that the server in question runs
> as a syncrepl client together with TLS (master is
> openldap-server-2.3.33p1-bdb on 4.2). In any case, the only way to ge
ow, slapd can't be
stopped. Maybe it has something to do that the server in question runs
as a syncrepl client together with TLS (master is
openldap-server-2.3.33p1-bdb on 4.2). In any case, the only way to get
slapd down seems to be to kill -9 it, which is _very_ugly_ for other
reasons. My othe
--On Sunday, March 09, 2008 11:13 PM +0800 Dongsheng Song
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible[1] with Berkeley DB 4.6,
so I must stick to BDB 4.5 or upgrade to OpenLDAP 2.4 ?
Yes.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbr
On 2008-03-09, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible[1] with Berkeley DB 4.6,
it is incompatible with DB 4.6.3 and up (where they quietly
broke the API). 4.6.2 and below are ok.
> so I must stick to BDB 4.5 or upgrade to OpenLDAP 2.4 ?
You
Since OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible[1] with Berkeley DB 4.6,
so I must stick to BDB 4.5 or upgrade to OpenLDAP 2.4 ?
[1] http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/databases/openldap/Makefile
Thanks for some help.
Dongsheng
no backends were compiled in except bdb,hdb,monitor,relay and
ldap.
But really, I don't think these configure options are relevant,
because the crash happens with the db-4.6 libraries (according to gdb).
>
> Usually, I have problems even when no one else has any issues so I am
> surp
t; > > > > Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
> > > > > > the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
> > > > > > openldap-{client,server}, dbv4 and cyrus-sasl2 packages from
> > > > > > t
On 1 January 2008, Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vijay Sankar mrta:
[...]
> >> there's support in 2.4 but iirc it's not a simple thing to
> >> backport.
> Why should we backport the db4.6 support? We just need to use 2.4.
[...]
(1) Historically, upgr
On 2008/01/01 13:27, Daniel wrote:
>>> there's support in 2.4 but iirc it's not a simple thing to backport.
> Why should we backport the db4.6 support? We just need to use 2.4.
Well, you mentioned one reason why not just upgrade:
> With openldap-2.4, one can not use the
Vijay Sankar mrta:
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and buil
Quoting Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
> > > > Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
> > > >
> > > > Anyone experiencing or experi
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
> > > > > Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap
> > > On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
> > > > Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
> > > >
> > > > Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
> > > > the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree,
aniel wrote:
> > > > Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
> > > >
> > > > Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
> > > > the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
> > > > openldap-{client,server
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:41:06 -0600
Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
> > Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
> >
> > Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
> > the bdb backed? I
On December 29, 2007 02:15:15 pm Daniel wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:41:06 -0600
>
> Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
> > > Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
> > >
> > > Anyone experienc
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
> Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
>
> Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using the bdb
> backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
> openldap-{client,server}, dbv4 and cyrus-sasl2 packages fr
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using the bdb
backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
openldap-{client,server}, dbv4 and cyrus-sasl2 packages from there.
I will certanly provide much more info, I just want to kn
I've been asked to deploy an openldap server so that we can test our
software's authentication layer against it. I've never messed with LDAP
before now, so I look forward to going through this tutorial. I read the
first few slides last night and it looked pretty good.
Thanks!
Thanks a lot,
it gives the opportunity to read something new.
Now I know better about it.
I think it's a good idea to share our current reading.
On Dec 13, 2007 12:25 AM, badeguruji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.acay.com.au/~oscarp/tutor/
>
> for all new Openldap
http://www.acay.com.au/~oscarp/tutor/
for all new Openldap users.
thx, and sorry if you don't need this.
-BG
~~Kalyan-mastu~~
Hello,
I have a strange problem:
--8<
# pkg_add -i cyrus-sasl-2.1.21p3-ldap
Error from
http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/OpenBSD/4.1/packages/i386/:
ftp: Writing -: Broken pipe
Can't install cyrus-sasl-2.1.21p3-ldap: can't resolve
openldap-client-2.3.33
Can'
On Saturday 26 May 2007 14:14, Vijay Sankar wrote:
> I have been using the openldap (openldap-server-2.3.33p1-bdb) from
> ports and it works great when I use slurpd for replication.
>
> I would like to use syncrepl instead of slurpd, just to see what the
> benefits are. However I do
I have been using the openldap (openldap-server-2.3.33p1-bdb) from ports
and it works great when I use slurpd for replication.
I would like to use syncrepl instead of slurpd, just to see what the
benefits are. However I don't know how to enable the dynamic backend
modules since they ar
On Thu, 24 May 2007, neustream wrote:
Thanks all for your help.
I was using vim with tabs converted to spaces in my vimrc. I edited
/etc/syslog.conf with vi and used tabs between local4.* and path.
Works now!
Great!
I'd call that pretty good support, ~ 3.5 hours from your original post t
ocal4.* and path?
DS
Yea
someone else with the the same comment as mine
for the original poster see this thread related to syslog configuration
for slapd
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200111/msg00307.html
appears to be a similar question asked in Nov 2001
diana
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Darren Spruell wrote:
You've got tabs, or spaces between your local4.* and path?
DS
Yea
someone else with the the same comment as mine
for the original poster see this thread related to syslog configuration
for slapd
http://www.openldap.org/lists/ope
On 5/24/07, neustream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm having problems getting log messages from syslogd for local4 messages.
In syslog.conf, I added:
local4.*/var/log/ldap.log
I issued a restart for syslogd:
kill -HUP `cat /var/run/syslog.pid`
I compil
Ok..well I am thinking, if I have:
local4.*/var/log/ldap.log
in syslog.conf and I issue:
kill -HUP `cat /var/run/syslog.pid`
Then this command should work:
logger -p local4.info Hello World
and log to /var/run/ldap.log.
When I issue:
logger -p mail.info Hello World
I get "Hello Wo
Thanks all for your help!
Well yes slapd runs when I issue:
/usr/local/libexec/slapd -u _openldap -g _openldap -f
/etc/openldap/slapd.conf
With "ps ax | grep slapd", I get:
3347 ?? Is 0:00.03 /usr/local/libexec/slapd -u _openldap -g
_openldap -f /etc/openldap/slapd.conf
Wit
On Thu, 24 May 2007, neustream wrote:
Yes..I forgot to mention I did a:
touch /var/log/ldap.log
Yes but that the _openldap user have write access to the log file?
--
Antoine
lpful.
Does slapd start properly with the /usr/local/libexec/slapd -u
_openldap -g _openldap -f /etc/openldap/slapd.conf ? Can you verify
with a ps auwx | grep slapd that it is running and listening on port
389?
On my test system, I got the following when I tried your startup command
ems getting log messages from syslogd for local4
messages.
In syslog.conf, I added:
local4.*/var/log/ldap.log
I issued a restart for syslogd:
kill -HUP `cat /var/run/syslog.pid`
I compiled OpenLDAP:
--with-syslog --with-debug
I start OpenLDAP with:
/usr/local/libex
tart for syslogd:
>
> kill -HUP `cat /var/run/syslog.pid`
>
> I compiled OpenLDAP:
>
> --with-syslog --with-debug
>
> I start OpenLDAP with:
>
> /usr/local/libexec/slapd -u _openldap -g _openldap -f
> /etc/openldap/slapd.conf
>
> I get no logs though. Anyone k
Hi,
I'm having problems getting log messages from syslogd for local4 messages.
In syslog.conf, I added:
local4.*/var/log/ldap.log
I issued a restart for syslogd:
kill -HUP `cat /var/run/syslog.pid`
I compiled OpenLDAP:
--with-syslog --with-debug
I start Ope
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 07:29:45AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Uv Pzaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-20 23:12]:
> > I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
> > uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks are
> > s
I still want to push this little points directly from the OpenLDAP faq:
* back-ldbm is /obsolete/ and /should not be used/.
*As a historical note, the back-ldbm code is a direct descendant of the
original University of Michigan code. The age of the code and its
byzantine data structures were
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Dave Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-21 08:26]:
>> Henning Brauer wrote:
>>> * Uv Pzaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-20 23:12]:
>>>> I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
>>>> uses
* Dave Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-21 08:26]:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * Uv Pzaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-20 23:12]:
> >> I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
> >> uses ldbm as database backend especially si
* Bryan Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-21 09:01]:
> Older versions of bdb went bad a fairly regular basis. I had DB's go
> corrupt as often as once a day under older verson of OL using bdb.
> This hasn't been a problem for a while though. I havn't had a db go
> bad in 2 years, even after powe
On 5/20/07, Dave Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Uv Pzaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-20 23:12]:
>> I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
>> uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Uv Pzaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-20 23:12]:
>> I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
>> uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks are
>> stating that this is no good any more:
>>
* Uv Pzaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-20 23:12]:
> I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
> uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks are
> stating that this is no good any more:
> (http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/75
I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks are
stating that this is no good any more:
(http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/756.htm) and not bdb or hdb.
By the way I'm just wondering i don't th
On 3/6/07, Jose Fragoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am running OpenBSD 4.0 stable. I updated the ports tree and tried
cd /usr/ports/databases/openldap
env FLAVOUR=bdb make install
Although I think the script is building both client and server, it
only adds the client package.
au
On 3/6/07, Jose Fragoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am running OpenBSD 4.0 stable. I updated the ports tree and tried
>
> cd /usr/ports/databases/openldap
> env FLAVOUR=bdb make install
That's not a bug that's a feature!
env FLAVOR=bdb env SUBPACKAGE=-server make install
--Bryan
Hi,
I am running OpenBSD 4.0 stable. I updated the ports tree and tried
cd /usr/ports/databases/openldap
env FLAVOUR=bdb make install
Although I think the script is building both client and server, it
only adds the client package.
autoconf-2.13p0 automatically configure source code on many
On Monday 12 February 2007 09:27, Antonis Faragitakis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> im trying to install openldap-server-2.3.11p4.tgz (i386) and
> openldap-client-2.3.11p4.tgz (i386) under OpenBSD3.9. After
> i've configured my slapd.conf im trying to start the server (slapd -d
Hi all,
im trying to install openldap-server-2.3.11p4.tgz (i386) and
openldap-client-2.3.11p4.tgz (i386) under OpenBSD3.9. After
i've configured my slapd.conf im trying to start the server (slapd -d4 )
but the i get the following error:
# /usr/local/libexec/slapd -d 4
@(#) $OpenLDAP:
Hi,
On Fri, 08.12.2006 at 10:02:37 -0800, Bryan Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been running 2.2.27 (with db4 FWIW) since august-ish of last year
> with zero corruption problems.
please also be sure to enable the sync option on bdb databases. I've
only experienced data loss when slapd we
there was a version of
openldap where that happened a lot. I was having to restore from
backups about once a week. IIRC it was 2.2.24 (and earlier?).
I've been running 2.2.27 (with db4 FWIW) since august-ish of last year
with zero corruption problems.
YMMV though. I only have a few tens
101 - 200 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
