Hi Duane,
On 5/28/09, Duane Ellis wrote:
>
> Imagine
> (1) being able to plug OpenOCD/JTAG into the board.
> (2) using some gerber view program - view the PCB
> (3) Double click on a pin, or a trace with a mouse
> (4) The trace starts blinking
> (5) And openocd makes the trac
Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> Back to the basic, how can OpenOCD to wiggle a pin (forget
> about the PCB Gerber View integration part)? Is this possible?
> I am not so familiar with JTAG. But intuitively I think this is
> already difficult. Without downloading a small program to
> the chips, how do you tog
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Duane Ellis wrote:
> I'm talking about basic continuity and pin drive, and ability to read a
> digital value on a pin.
>
> If I had a program that could take the Schematic netlist + the BSDL files
> for a couple complex chips - and give me a SVF file or something
duane> [I want a board test feature]
> How does those higher end tester like Agilent 3070 in circuit tester
work?
> Do they require extra add-on for JTAG related stuff like Boundary Scan?
> Do they use BDSL files? I know they can flash some MCUs but not all.
> Last time we have to use off-lin
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Duane Ellis wrote:
> No - actually it is useful for other purposes... a method to flash something
> - however slow it may be - is better then no method to flash something, or
> the ability to flash a board with a CPU you do not support.
>
> UrJTAG's approach is to
Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
> Hi Duane,
>
> On 5/27/09, Duane Ellis wrote:
>
>> FYI - most of UrJTAG's support is *BOUNDARY*SCAN* - based external chip
>> flash programing via boundary scan
>>
>>
> Arggg, then it will not help too much!
No - actually it is useful for other purposes... a
Hi Duane,
On 5/27/09, Duane Ellis wrote:
> FYI - most of UrJTAG's support is *BOUNDARY*SCAN* - based external chip
> flash programing via boundary scan
>
Arggg, then it will not help too much!
> There is a variant/fork of UrJTAG - (link below) that ADI supports - a
> private fork ADI maintains
alan> I think other processors supported by UrJtag can be ported as well:
alan> MPC5200B, Blackfin, BCM6358, etc
FYI - most of UrJTAG's support is *BOUNDARY*SCAN* - based external chip
flash programing via boundary scan
There is a variant/fork of UrJTAG - (link below) that ADI supports - a
priv
Hi Xiaofan,
On 5/27/09, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Tiago Maluta
> wrote:
>> I'd like to know if OpenOCD support AVR32 (AP7000) processors? I was
>> looking
>> a tool [1] to write the flash memory of Atmel reference design ATNGW100.
>
> It seems to me that UrJtag has
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Tiago Maluta wrote:
> I'd like to know if OpenOCD support AVR32 (AP7000) processors? I was looking
> a tool [1] to write the flash memory of Atmel reference design ATNGW100.
It seems to me that UrJtag has some kind of AVR32 support.
Maybe it can be ported to Open
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Peter Denison wrote:
>> Does avrdude support AVR32? I do not know that.
> My mistake - I can only confirm (from experience) that it programs AtMega32
> devices.
>
> The man page for avrdude says that it will program AT90,
> ATmega{8,16,32,48,64,128,256} and ATtiny
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Peter Denison wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 May 2009, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>>> I do not think so. From the website, it does not
>>> even program AVR32 properly as of now.
>>
>> It does. The website is woefully out of date. I have u
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Peter Denison wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2009, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> I do not think so. From the website, it does not
>> even program AVR32 properly as of now.
>
> It does. The website is woefully out of date. I have used a USBprog to
> program AVR32s, using avrdude,
On Mon, 25 May 2009, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> 2009/5/25 SimonQian :
>> For supporting AVR32 debugging under IAR EWAVR32 and
>> AVR32Studio, you MUST emulate JTAGICE mkII.
>
> I see. Thanks.
USBprog does do full JTAGICEmkII emulation, I believe - I haven't tested
it myself doing debugging, but I thi
2009/5/26 Michel Catudal :
> Then Fedora 9 should work for you if my Ubuntu script is not complete for
> that. I know it will compile on Fedora 9 but not sure yet on Ubuntu.
> I will have the binary and source by week end.
Thanks a lot. I will take a look. I have a starter kit for XE166 but
I have
Xiaofan Chen a écrit :
> 2009/5/25 Michel Catudal :
>
>
>>> Within theses chips and ColdFire, Infineon XE166 does not seem to have gcc
>>> support.
>>>
>> Incorrect, I have one, do you need it? I could provide some binaries on
>> my web site if I have space left.
>> It is about two years
2009/5/25 Michel Catudal :
>> Within theses chips and ColdFire, Infineon XE166 does not seem to have gcc
>> support.
>
> Incorrect, I have one, do you need it? I could provide some binaries on
> my web site if I have space left.
> It is about two years old, I am trying to get the lastest source bu
Nico Coesel a écrit :
> FYI:
> Coldfire = 68000
> Codesourcery offers precompiled GCC with Coldfire support. Maybe
> Freescale can be persuaded to donate some hardware. They are losing
> designs because they are currently forcing their customers to use
> Codewarrior.
>
The Codewarrior crap is j
Xiaofan Chen a écrit :
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>
>> There are many 16/32bit MCUs which will benefit from OpenOCD if
>> they are supported. Most popular non-ARM ones I can think of are Renesas
>> M16C/32C, H8/H8S/H8SX, Infineon XC166/XE166, TI MSP430.
>>
>> Just l
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de
> [mailto:openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] Namens
> Xiaofan Chen
> Verzonden: maandag 25 mei 2009 10:54
> Aan: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
> Onderwerp: Re: [Openocd
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>
> There are many 16/32bit MCUs which will benefit from OpenOCD if
> they are supported. Most popular non-ARM ones I can think of are Renesas
> M16C/32C, H8/H8S/H8SX, Infineon XC166/XE166, TI MSP430.
>
> Just look at this chart for top 10 MCU
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:46 PM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Sunday 24 May 2009, SimonQian wrote:
>> I have developped JTAG support for MSP430 in versaloon, as I know, JTAG
>> chain of MSP430 isn't standard JTAG. So I don't think it possible to support
>> MSP430 in OpenOCD.
>
> Could you summarize
On Sunday 24 May 2009, SimonQian wrote:
> I have developped JTAG support for MSP430 in versaloon, as I know, JTAG
> chain of MSP430 isn't standard JTAG. So I don't think it possible to support
> MSP430 in OpenOCD.
Could you summarize how msp430 is non-standard?
I know that msp430 -- as well as
2009/5/25 SimonQian :
> For supporting AVR32 debugging under IAR EWAVR32 and
> AVR32Studio, you MUST emulate JTAGICE mkII.
I see. Thanks.
> Does USBprog support AVR32 debugging?
>
I do not think so. From the website, it does not
even program AVR32 properly as of now.
--
Xiaofan http://mcuee.bl
： SimonQian
抄送： David Brownell; openocd-development
主题： Re: Re: [Openocd-development] support avr32
2009/5/25 SimonQian :
> I can test for AVR32 support.
> My company is handling with some projects on AVR32.
>
> My versaloon can also support AVR32 debug and program
> under IAR EWAVR32
430 isn't standard JTAG. So I don't think it possible to support
MSP430 in OpenOCD.
2009-05-25
Best Regards, Simon Qian
SimonQian(simonq...@simonqian.com) www.SimonQian.com
发件人： Xiaofan Chen
发送时间： 2009-05-25 11:28:33
收件人： michelcatudal
抄送： openocd-development
主题： Re: [
2009/5/25 SimonQian :
> I can test for AVR32 support.
> My company is handling with some projects on AVR32.
>
> My versaloon can also support AVR32 debug and program
> under IAR EWAVR32 or AVR32Studio according to the open
> protocol from atmel.
By emulating JTAGICE mkII ?
> The open source versi
AVR32, because it will use JTAGICE mkII's
VID/PID of Atmel.
2009-05-25
Best Regards, Simon Qian
SimonQian(simonq...@simonqian.com) www.SimonQian.com
发件人： Xiaofan Chen
发送时间： 2009-05-25 11:18:37
收件人： David Brownell
抄送： openocd-development
主题： Re: [Openocd-development] support a
2009/5/25 Michel Catudal :
> David Brownell a écrit :
>> - AVR32-specific support. Probably not just the AP7 devices,
>> but also the UC3 flavors (since those seem to be getting
>> the engineering work nowadays).
>>
> I would agree with that. From what I have read the AVR32 is likely to
> c
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:06 AM, David Brownell wrote:
> The simplest way to update the flash on that board would
> be to use the U-Boot that's already installed there. If
> you brick the board, the next simplest solution is to use
> one of Atmel's JTAG adapters with their tools. I don't
> know
David Brownell a écrit :
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Tiago Maluta wrote:
>
>> I'd like to know if OpenOCD support AVR32 (AP7000) processors?
>>
>
> Not yet. I'd partition that work in two parts:
>
> - "Nexus" [3] framework, which could support more than
>just the AVR32 chips.
>
> - A
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Tiago Maluta wrote:
> I'd like to know if OpenOCD support AVR32 (AP7000) processors?
Not yet. I'd partition that work in two parts:
- "Nexus" [3] framework, which could support more than
just the AVR32 chips.
- AVR32-specific support. Probably not just the AP7 de
I'd like to know if OpenOCD support AVR32 (AP7000) processors? I was looking
a tool [1] to write the flash memory of Atmel reference design ATNGW100.
>From this maillist history I saw a thread [2] discussing how to add a new
target but no further discussion.
[1] http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/pr
33 matches
Mail list logo
