I'm having the same problem (I think) with Sage 10.4.beta0 on two different
Apple Silicon machines.
On Wednesday, March 27, 2024 at 9:58:10 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> I've cut out the interesting part of the log.
> It's a linker error (IMHO the linking should be done with C++, not
> with
1f40eb5b0115e1d3a429765e0f43743b79e871352bb8e0c95952>
> from https://www.piwheels.org/project/flit-core/ to
> local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.9/var/lib/sage/wheels. Then compiling sage
> works and flit_core-3.9.0 is installed.
>
> - Heiko
>
> David Joyner schrieb am
In sage-release, Matthias pointed to missing dependencies for editables,
fixed in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36885. Maybe you can just do
"make flit_core" (to build the missing dependency) and then "make".
On Friday, December 15, 2023 at 10:52:10 AM UTC-8 David Joyner wrote:
> Hi:
to add a comment on the ticket?
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Wednesday 13 December 2023 at 12:30:03 pm UTC+11 John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> Could this be related to https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36529?
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 12, 2023 at 3:50:55 PM UT
Could this be related to https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36529?
On Tuesday, December 12, 2023 at 3:50:55 PM UTC-8 Andrew wrote:
> Playing around with this a little more, I think that this is a bug/timing
> issue in sage.misc.latex.py (or in subprocess.run, or a mac oddity since
> it
Isn't log(log(x)^2) = 2 * log(log(x))? Is this your concern, or is it the
absolute value?
On Monday, November 13, 2023 at 1:32:11 PM UTC-8 Bùi Gia Nghĩa wrote:
> Hi!
> I have used Sage Cell Server to integrate the function (ln(x)^2 - 1) / (x
> * ln(x)). It should resulted in (ln(x)^2) / 2 -
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 9:02 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, 20:50 Dima Pasechnik, wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, 20:25 John H Palmieri,
> wrote:
> >>>
>
On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 12:28:18 PM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 5:04 PM John H Palmieri
wrote:
>
> Are endomorphisms better to work with? I might be able to extend my map
to an endomorphism of the larger ring, if that would make the computation
t; h30 |--> h20*xi1^4 + h21*xi1 + h30
> h31 |--> h21*xi1^8 + h31
>
> one can split the problem into cases
> 1) xi1=0
> 2) h21=h20=0
> (but perhaps it's only specific to this particular example)
>
> >
> > On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 6:08:16 PM UTC+9 Dima
gt; 1) xi1=0
> 2) h21=h20=0
> (but perhaps it's only specific to this particular example)
>
> >
> > On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 6:08:16 PM UTC+9 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, 05:57 John H Palmieri,
>
Does anyone have any tips for how to compute the kernel of a map between
polynomial algebras, or for checking whether the map is injective? I have
families of such maps involving algebras with many generators. I'm working
over GF(2), if that matters. In one example I defined the map phi: R -> S
Nils, thanks to you, too, for your responses.
On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 11:16:39 AM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 October 2023 at 05:39:26 UTC-7 Kwankyu wrote:
>
> I looked the Magma code in ask.sagemath. There's no problem in computing a
> canonical divisor for the curve
hink, the gist of the matter is to
>>> convert an element of the function field to a rational function of the
>>> coordinate ring of P2. I have no idea how to do this now... Once you
>>> construct the morphism, Sage can also compute the image of the morphism
>>
(or by Baker's theorem in cases where it applies). For
> this curve the canonical class is of degree -2, so there are no effective
> representatives in this case.
> >
> > On Friday, 27 October 2023 at 15:14:00 UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote:
> >>
> >> If anyone here
If anyone here knows anything about canonical divisors and their
implementation in Sage, please see
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/74034/converting-algebraic-geometry-magmas-code-to-sage/.
The setup:
sage: P2. = ProjectiveSpace(QQ, 2)
sage: f = 2*x^5 - 4*x^3*y*z + x^2*y*z^2 + 2*x*y^3*z +
e function field. You
> may consult the code there.
>
> On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 6:08:15 PM UTC+9 Kwankyu wrote:
>
>> Is you element in the cohomology ring an instance of ModuleElement?
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 8:34:05 AM UTC+9 John H P
The mod 2 cohomology of a simplicial complex has the structure of a module
over the mod 2 Steenrod algebra. I would like to be able to do this in Sage:
sage: x = (some element in a cohomology ring)
sage: a = (some element of SteenrodAlgebra(2))
sage: a * x
I have tried telling Sage
This looks like the issue reported at
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/34233.
--
John
On Thursday, April 13, 2023 at 2:13:44 PM UTC-7 Fernando Gouvea wrote:
> That seems right. Plotting x^6/(1-x)^7 shows the error, but x^5/(1-x)^6
> does not. And
>
> .9^6/.1^7 = 5.314411e6
>
I have found the instructions at
https://github.com/sagemath/trac-to-github/blob/master/docs/Migration-Trac-to-Github.md
useful for me, as someone used to the old trac interface.
On Saturday, April 8, 2023 at 1:23:06 PM UTC-7 G. M.-S. wrote:
>
> Thanks Dima and Drew.
>
> I had the very same
Some recent versions of Singular don't seem to work with Sage. You could
try "make distclean" (to start over) and "./configure
--with-system-singular=no" to force Sage to build its own Singular. Then
"make".
On Friday, April 7, 2023 at 2:22:20 PM UTC-7 Eric Majzoub wrote:
> Following the
In lengthy code, you could start with a line like
OnSets = libgap.OnSets
and then in the rest of the code, you could do `g.Stabilizer([1,2],
OnSets)`. That is, predefine whatever you want from libgap, giving each
item a meaningful name, and then use that name in the rest of the code.
On
>From the ask.sagemath.org answers:
[m.minors(k) for k in range(5)]
is pretty close to what you want: you just have to flatten the list.
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 3:09:07 PM UTC-7 William Stein wrote:
> This is
>
>
>
See also the installation manual:
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/source.html#macos-package-installation.
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 3:45:17 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Assuming you are on macOS with homebrew installed, get Sage source and run
> ./bootstrap
>
> and then
>
I have been setting MAKE and MAKEFLAGS for a long time, and I have not seen
any difference in the behavior of "make build". If I unset MAKE and
MAKEFLAGS, then it takes longer to build sagelib, as it should.
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 11:44:43 AM UTC-8 Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Saturday,
For what it's worth, every now and then I create a virtual linux machine
and build Sage from source using the instructions in the installation
guide, including installing the recommended prerequisite software. It
typically goes smoothly, and it's definitely worth trying on Ubuntu. (I've
done
All of the *_console commands should be fixed by ticket #34547.
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 11:45:59 PM UTC-8 trevor...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Something similar seems to happen with `gap_console()` and `gap.console()`.
>
> On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 5:22:23 PM UTC-6 John H
"mathematica_console()" is available (or at least it should be) when using
Sage from the command-line but not from the notebook. There was a bug, now
fixed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34547, that meant that this
command was not available when it should have been.
On Thursday, January
It may be (as pointed out on a similar thread in the group sage-devel) that
some of the Debian packages have versions that are too new to be used with
Sage. You could tell Sage to build its own Python, its own Gap, perhaps its
own Singular (if the system one is causing problems):
./configure
any space to improve the computation of MPFR which is used by
> RealField?
>
> John H Palmieri 在 2023年1月6日 星期五凌晨3:01:37 [UTC+8] 的信中寫道:
>
>> One way to speed it up might be to work with RDF or QQ or RLF. The
>> documentation for the generic determinant method says, "Note
One way to speed it up might be to work with RDF or QQ or RLF. The
documentation for the generic determinant method says, "Note that for
matrices over most rings, more sophisticated algorithms can be used."
sage: %time ones_matrix(RDF, 600, 600).determinant()
CPU times: user 78.6 ms, sys: 7.6
ill unable to proceed. Any idea how
> to fix the issue? I have attached logs, config.log, and a text file with
> the 4 packages with errors.
>
> Thank you!
> Alex
>
> On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 11:35:39 AM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> Many of the errors are discus
Maybe you also need to do "make flit_core" before "make typing_extension".
On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 11:35:39 AM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote:
> Many of the errors are discussed at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34838.
> You can probably avoid those by runni
Many of the errors are discussed at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34838.
You can probably avoid those by running "make typing_extensions" before
running "make".
The most recent error seems to be for sagelib:
ld: library not found for -lopenblas
I assume that you followed the directions
You can also do `list(S)`, or depending on what you're doing it might be
better to iterate over its elements, as Emmanuel wrote: `for u in S...`
On Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 8:54:25 AM UTC-8 gauri...@gmail.com wrote:
> Oh wow! That was easy!
>
> Thanks so much!
> G
>
> On Sun, Nov 20,
Thanks, Dima, that's helpful. I will open a ticket; I hope this will be an
easy thing for people familiar with the Singular interfaces.
--
John
On Tuesday, September 6, 2022 at 3:31:08 PM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 10:32 PM John H Palmieri
> wrote:
> &g
Let R = k[x_1, x_2, ..., x_n] be a polynomial ring over a field k of
characteristic p. Given elements a_1, a_2, ..., a_m and b in R, I would
like to know if b is in the subalgebra generated by a_1, ..., a_m.My
impression from a superficial skim of the literature (Shannon and Sweedler,
r necessary, as you did.
>>
>> I don't see any value in working hard to try to arrange that every
>> possible thing can be done without ever using a terminal. There is nothing
>> wrong with using a terminal. There are many tasks for which a terminal is
>> the optima
e help to consider the kernel of f-Id (with Id the
> identity map)?
> Best,
> Pedro
>
> El El jue, 25 ago 2022 a las 8:22, Dima Pasechnik
> escribió:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022, 00:38 John H Palmieri, wrote:
>>
>>> I have a polynomial r
Good question, and I don't whether the subring is finitely generated. I
want to compute examples — what's the subring in a range of degrees — to
see what's going on.
On Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 11:22:31 PM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022, 00:38 John H
I have a polynomial ring R = k[x1, x2, ..., xn] and a ring homomorphism f:
R -> R. In case it matters, k=GF(2). I would like to find the subring of
elements x satisfying f(x) = x: that is, I want to find the equalizer of
the pair of maps (f, 1). Is there anything in Sage that will compute this?
Is this the sort of thing you're looking for?
def matrix_rep(z):
"""
INPUT: complex number z = a + bi
OUTPUT: the matrix
[a -b]
[b a]
"""
a = z.real_part()
b = z.imag_part()
return matrix(RR, [[a, -b], [b, a]])
On Friday, July 1, 2022 at 3:04:40 AM
hsize = MAX_WIDTH
> 154 else:
> --> 155 hsize = self._terminal_width()
> 156 # if the draw is larger than the max length, try to split
> it
> 157 if hsize <= self._l and self._breakpoints:
>
> /private/var/tmp/sage-9.
ould actually want to use
> such a feature. Adding features that almost no one needs is not my idea of
> a good design approach.
>
> What do the two of you think?
>
> - Marc
>
> On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 2:08:17 PM UTC-5 John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> Hi Samuel,
&
Your pointer on how to include this into
IPython config files works, as long as the lines are in quotes:
c.InteractiveShellApp.exec_lines = [
'import os; os.environ["PATH"] += ":/usr/local/bin" ']
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 10:09:39 AM UTC-7 slelievre wrote:
&g
How do I set the PATH in the OS X Jupyter notebook, if I'm using the
3-manifolds binary app? I mean, I know how to do it in an individual
notebook, but how do I set the default PATH for every notebook? For
example, how do I add /usr/local/bin so that it's in the PATH every time I
open a new
ch displays; although it's not horribly happy :) (But latex is seldom
> 'horribly happy' in my experience)
> --
>
>
> On 6/4/22 12:37, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> For any Sage object, the code for "view" first constructs a LaTeX version
> and then runs pdflatex (o
though there is a Latex (digraph ?) error
> Try
> -
> %%latex
>
>
> B = crystals.Tableaux(['A',2], shape=[2,1])
> G = B.digraph()
>
> view(G)
> print(B)
> print(G)
> --
>
> Gives inpage; and nothing else
> --B = crystals.Tableaux(['A',2], shape=[2,1]
Here is a workaround, or at least it works for me. The LaTeX code for the
labels seems to be the issue.
sage: B = crystals.Tableaux(['A',2], shape=[2,1])
sage: G = B.digraph()
sage: G.set_latex_options(vertex_labels_math=False)
sage: view(G)
On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 4:06:26 PM UTC-7 John H
I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33947 to trac this problem.
On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 3:30:49 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote:
> For me, `show(G)` works, but not `view(G)`. `show(G)` does not use LaTeX,
> and the problem is the LaTeX code produced by `view(G)`. You can al
> popped, you can save it where you want; manually.
>
> I am sure that
> https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/graphs/sage/graphs/generic_graph.html
> has the key to saving the .PDF programmatically where you want; but I am
> going cross-eyed.
>
> rrogers
> On 6/2/22 1
It's bad LaTeX, but I'm not sure what's producing it. If you run
"view(crystals.Tableaux("A3",shape=[2,1]), debug=True)", then it will first
print the LaTeX code, and if you paste that into a file, it will fail to
compile.
On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 6:42:51 AM UTC-7 HG wrote:
> Some time
install -U pythran" or
> "./sage -pip install -U git+https://github.com/serge-sans-paille/pythran;
> fixes this issue
>
> On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 2:01:49 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> Since upgrading to OS X 12.3 a few days ago, along with the corresponding
&g
Should there be a small list of functions which we import automatically?
For example in sage.all we could do: "from numpy import mean, median". It
seems strange to not have a top-level "mean" or "median" function, given
all of the other esoteric top-level functions.
On Friday, February 25,
Are you using OS X? Could this possibly be due to how Python handles
multiprocessing on OS X vs. other platforms? (See
https://docs.python.org/3/library/multiprocessing.html#contexts-and-start-methods,
in particular the comment "On macOS, the *spawn* start method is now the
default" and
Or if you need single and double quotes, delimit the string with """ or '''
(three double-quotes or three single-quotes):
r"""here is "some" 'text' """
On Monday, November 29, 2021 at 11:07:21 AM UTC-8 slelievre wrote:
> 2021-11-29 18:05:58 UTC+1, Cyrille Piatecki:
> >
> > I often use
The default behavior, at least if you start Sage from a terminal window
with "sage -n", is to store the notebooks in the current directory. If you
want to change this, then: after you download Sage, from a terminal you
should run "sage --jupyter notebook --generate-config". This will print a
Is there a way for users to redefine SAGE_TMP (without editing Sage source
code) so that these graphics files would be produced elsewhere?
On Tuesday, November 9, 2021 at 4:06:34 AM UTC-8 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
> Right, one can see more of these "Chromium cannot open hidden
>
Also addressed in https://github.com/sagemath/binary-pkg/pull/29
On Friday, September 3, 2021 at 10:15:02 AM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> Thanks, I've noted this in
> https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.4#Availability_as_binaries_and_in_distributions
>
> On Friday, September 3,
I believe that most of the traffic these days is on sage-support and
sage-devel, rather than the more specialized groups. Feel free to post
questions about Sage's algebra capabilities here.
On Monday, August 23, 2021 at 8:03:33 PM UTC-7 H wrote:
> On August 23, 2021 7:18:16 PM EDT, Da
On August 23, 2021 7:18:16 PM EDT, David Joyner wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 7:13 PM H wrote:
>
>> I just joined this list a few days ago but also tried to join
>> sage-algebra, that list however seems dead. The moderator has after
>almost
>> a week not approved
I just joined this list a few days ago but also tried to join sage-algebra,
that list however seems dead. The moderator has after almost a week not
approved my membership and the last Google group posting seems to be from
2018...
Are there any other mailing lists/groups? I should also mention
Another option might have been to preparse separately (using "sage
-preparse matp11n2.sage" at the shell prompt) and then load the resulting
Python file.
John
On Friday, April 2, 2021 at 12:02:38 PM UTC-7 Luis Finotti wrote:
> The solution I found was to increase the recursion limit: I did
What happens if you install into another location, for example the Desktop?
On Sunday, March 28, 2021 at 9:26:28 AM UTC-7 Anscari wrote:
> I installed the app you suggested but when I open jupyter I find too many
> bugs. I am not even able to access the jupyter folder created using
> previous
The short answer is that Sage is designed for (among others) research
mathematicians, who may not have the interest or inclination to learn how
to install lots of system packages. So from the beginning it included as
many components as possible. Years ago the presence of MacPorts and other
Is it possible to create a binary distribution that relies on a system
Python 3? Those may already be built with ssl support.
On Sunday, November 22, 2020 at 11:24:45 AM UTC-8 watso...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Right now pip doesn't work in the binary distributions due to the absence
> of the ssl
I was hoping that it might be missing dependencies when building sagenb,
but when I tried this, it didn't help. Maybe something this will work:
./configure --with-python=2 --enable-sagenb=yes
--enable-flask_autoindex=yes --enable-flask_babel=yes --enable-flask=yes
;>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for helping me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I followed the instructions at the end of ./configure output (brew
>>>>>> install ...)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I get l
On Tuesday, November 3, 2020 at 11:30:54 PM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> As far as building from source is concerned, I'd recommend using
> Homebrew, instead of trying
> to build most packages from scratch (as it is the case if you don't use
> it).
> Please pay attention that you need to
No, I do not believe so.
On Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 10:22:36 AM UTC-7, Linden Disney wrote:
>
> I am just starting a project involving persistent homology, did anything
> end up happening with this?
>
> On Wednesday, September 13, 2017 at 1:55:30 AM UTC+1 slelievre wrote:
>
>> Tue
.
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 12:55:50 PM UTC-7, David Joyner wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 1:06 PM John H Palmieri > wrote:
>
>> Building Sage on Big Sur is being tracked at
>> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30651; see also
>> https://trac.sagemath.or
Building Sage on Big Sur is being tracked at
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30651; see also
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30494. Do you have homebrew installed, and
if so, which packages? You could try forcing Sage to build its own zlib,
for example, to try to get Sage's Python to find
On Friday, September 4, 2020 at 9:23:30 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 4:31 PM John H Palmieri > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Friday, September 4, 2020 at 7:14:24 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >>
> >>
> &g
On Friday, September 4, 2020 at 7:14:24 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 12:55 PM Szabolcs Horvát > wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the response. I do have boost installed in
> /opt/local/include, through MacPorts, but I remove MacPorts from the PATH
> before building
indicate that the configure script is confused about cross compiling
> to a different architecture.
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 9:59:59 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 9:52:37 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 9:52:37 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 8:59:14 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> If I do install Python 3.7, then gf2x and ecm both fail to build. The
>> gf2x log file says "configure: error: Can
hout underscore."
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 8:38:47 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote:
> I've been trying to build on Big Sur, too. I removed the
> MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET lines from sage-env, but the Python build still
> fails. The log file is attached. Any suggestions (besi
I've been trying to build on Big Sur, too. I removed the
MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET lines from sage-env, but the Python build still
fails. The log file is attached. Any suggestions (besides installing a
different system version of Python)?
John
On Saturday, August 22, 2020 at 3:44:01 PM UTC-7
See
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3802874/does-isomorphic-mathbb-q-cohomology-implies-isomorphic-mathbb-z-cohomology/3803623#3803623
Can someone who knows the mathematics decide whether this is an issue that
needs to be fixed, or whether the documentation could be clarified?
--
Does IPython have a preparser?
On Thursday, July 9, 2020 at 11:43:36 PM UTC-7, Kwankyu wrote:
>
> Because of the preparser?
>
> On Thursday, July 2, 2020 at 9:19:58 AM UTC+9 John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 4:39:1
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 4:39:12 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 2:22:49 PM UTC-7, Antonio Rojas wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> El miércoles, 1 de julio de 2020, 21:06:43 (UTC+2), John H Palmieri
>> escribió:
>>>
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 2:22:49 PM UTC-7, Antonio Rojas wrote:
>
>
>
> El miércoles, 1 de julio de 2020, 21:06:43 (UTC+2), John H Palmieri
> escribió:
>>
>>
>> Why so many deprecation warnings? I think they're coming from plain
>> Python
This puzzles me: evaluating '\i' in Python 3 just gives '\i'. Same with
IPython. Evaluating it in Sage prints many warning messages: the following
is from a fresh Sage session, and I only evaluated '\i' once, despite the
appearance:
% sage
According to wikipedia, graphs.CirculantGraph(n, [j_1, j_2, ...]) is
connected if and only if gcd(n, j_1, j_2, ...) = 1. In this case, the gcd
is 2. If Sage's definition is correct, it's defined as having 10 vertices,
and vertex i is connected to vertices i+2, i-2, i+4, i-4, then even
vertices
ion of
positivity, checking if something is > 0 feels like the right duck-typing
thing to do. I guess I'll try some other way.
On Saturday, June 27, 2020 at 12:40:54 AM UTC-10, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 10:38 AM Rob H. >
> wrote:
> >
> >
&
Hi all,
So I was surprised to find out that asking if a polynomial is > 0 doesn't
raise an error. Now, maybe there's a good reason why it returns True and
I'm too tired to think about why. At the very least, here is some
disturbing behaviour.
sage: R. = PolynomialRing(QQ)
sage: x > x-1
True
When I follow the directions at
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/conda.html#sec-installation-conda
for installing via conda, it seems that the Sage documentation is not
built, and furthermore, it is not clear to me how to build it. Am I missing
something?
See also
Silly question, but are you sure you are starting up Sage 9.0 when you do
all of this ("sage --notebook" or "sage --sh")? If you give an explicit
path to the Sage 9.0 version, does that help? Do you have any Sage-related
environment variables which could be interfering with things?
On
sage: var('q')
q
sage: (q+q^(-1))^(1/2)
sqrt(q + 1/q)
(By the way, I'm not sure I would call using a fraction field "naive".)
On Sunday, April 26, 2020 at 9:01:35 AM UTC-7, Jin Guu wrote:
>
> I am writing a calculator for various 'q' quantities, and often find that
> I need to manipulate
On Monday, April 20, 2020 at 1:01:24 PM UTC-7, Emmanuel Zuñiga wrote:
>
> Hello, i would like to know how to modify the index of a matrix in
> sagemath. As an example, we all know that every object begins in 0, m[0]
> and that kind of things.
> Now, i need to modify this. to add one to the
Maybe SageCell doesn't have the optional package "tides" installed. This is
the same error I see on my own computer without "tides".
On Thursday, April 16, 2020 at 9:26:21 AM UTC-7, slelievre wrote:
>
> Here is the error after executing the original poster's code in SageCell.
>
>
Did you look at the file "README.md"? It suggests building in parallel to
speed things up. Have you tried that?
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 at 12:35:58 PM UTC-7, hbetx9 wrote:
>
> I htink I know what I did, somehow I change the prefix to a directory that
> didn't exist. I'm recompiling to see
When I have had problems with libpng, it has helped to do "brew install
pkg-config". If you happened to start building Sage and then upgraded
Homebrew and/or Xcode in the middle of that, or if you've installed any new
Homebrew packages, you should probably start over with "make distclean"
On Sunday, March 29, 2020 at 12:24:38 AM UTC-7, rana-aere wrote:
>
> Thank you for clear instructions.
> I used the codes to compare how doctoring of the method _macaulay2_init_
> is displayed.
>
> sage-8.9 (command line and jupyter)
>
> ```
> Init docstring: x.__init__(...) initializes x; see
On Saturday, March 28, 2020 at 7:07:53 AM UTC-7, rana-aere wrote:
>
>
>
> I am compiling binary-pkg and encountered a deprecation warning.
> The warning appeared when I invoked sage from command line.
> (Technically, it was after messages of patching.)
>
> The warning reads
>
> ```
>
/libintmath.py",
> line 161 ? Just interesting :)
>
> вторник, 14 января 2020 г., 21:20:05 UTC+3 пользователь John H Palmieri
> написал:
>>
>> Sorry, I meant Sage *9.1.beta0*.
>>
>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2020 at 10:18:41 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wro
Sorry, I meant Sage *9.1.beta0*.
On Tuesday, January 14, 2020 at 10:18:41 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> Just to confirm: everything works with Sage 9.0.beta1, built with Python
> 2. Fails with Sage built with Python 3.
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 14, 2020 at 5:55:51 A
Just to confirm: everything works with Sage 9.0.beta1, built with Python 2.
Fails with Sage built with Python 3.
On Tuesday, January 14, 2020 at 5:55:51 AM UTC-8, Александр Ватузов wrote:
>
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29009#ticket
>
> вторник, 14 января 2020 г., 16:36:27 UTC+3
On Friday, January 3, 2020 at 11:54:04 AM UTC-8, finotti wrote:
>
> I'm trying to build version 9.0 from source under Linux (Debian
> Unstable/Sid). The machine has Intel Core i7-8700 CPU and 48GB of RAM.
>
> Below is the end of the compilation:
>
> [snip]
>
> [twisted-16.3.0.p0] Finished
If you want to build Sage for use with Python 3, you should do
$ make distclean
$ ./configure --with-python=3
$ make
Where does this fail for you?
On Monday, November 4, 2019 at 8:21:04 AM UTC-8, Александр Ватузов wrote:
>
> No, I am building sage only for using it with python3. So I need to
Since trac #28426 (merged pretty recently), when building with Python 3, we
do not build Python 2. Before that, we always built both.
On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 12:57:02 PM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> I am surprised we still even build python2 by default. Isn't it an
> optional
1 - 100 of 536 matches
Mail list logo