Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

> Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Dezember 2019 um 01:00 Uhr > Von: "Martin Koppenhoefer" > > it will contain a lot of postcode information from the original OpenStreetMap > database, > in adapted/translated form. Whether the amount is sufficient to be considered > substantial > will have to be

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

> Gesendet: Montag, 16. Dezember 2019 um 17:03 Uhr > Von: "Tom Lee via legal-talk" >  > This is an admirable impulse, but it is worth emphasizing that those of > us who participate on OSM listservs are a small and unrepresentative > fraction of the project's 5.9 million registered users. Lists

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] distance calculations

> Von: "Nuno Caldeira" > it's a derivated, therefore share alike. I'm glad they trusted OSM data.  So the distance calculations are derivated, of course. But what about their points of interests? They've interacted with the roads. ___ legal-talk

[OSM-legal-talk] distance calculations

urse, the results were released in public. Do such distance calculations also trigger share-alike on the non-free data (here: schools & houses). Regards, Matthias ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstree

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

ata, selected by using OSM data ..." would be possible. That might be an idea for future license drafts. Regards, Matthias ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

nsive than paying for other datasets :-) Regards, Matthias ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

I don't care about the money it costs, I even would pay for OpenStreetMap. I just wanted to use OSM, since the data quality is pretty high in the area I need it.   In a future license it would be better to allow attributions like "Data: (c) Non-Free, selected using (c) OpenStreetMap under

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

> Von: "Christoph Hormann" > > The idea that your process of intersecting non-OSM data with OSM based > admin polygons results in a collective database is not realistic. To > me this kind of operation would be a textbook example of something > generating a derivative database - you combine OSM

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

> > existing OSMF community guidelines suggest spatial operations like > ST_Difference() and ST_Intersection() yield Derivative Databases that > are subject to share-alike. Let's take the Collective Database Guideline, you've mentioned:

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

secondary list so it is not a Derivative >> Database. > This is blatantly untrue. There is OSM data there, only transformed. So as soon I'm selecting any data using OSM polygons, it gets transformed OSM data? They're not even touching on the same layer, since it's a different featur

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

Hi Lars-Daniel, yeah, same here.   I've read you tried to do similar work in the past. I think, you've merged postcodes with OSM data in a seperate column and didn't need to attribute it as share-alike.   What did you end up with?   Gesendet: Freitag, 13. Dezember 2019 um 19:25 Uhr Von: 

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

Let me get into detail is this project to proof that this case isn't constructed.   We've purchased geodata with real estate prices (houses & flats) for Germany's federal state "Northrhine Westfalia". Each row has coordinates in WGS84. The TOS of the purchhased dataset state, that it's not

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

> we are here to create more open data, not to feed proprietary data than is > lock under their TOS.   I want to apologize for my misunderstanding: my final product does not contain any OpenStreetMap data. ___ legal-talk mailing list

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

> From a practical point of view, boundaries in OSM rarely originate from > surveys, > you might be lucky to be able to identify the original source (most likely > open data) > which may have a more liberal license than ODbL (check the history and > changeset > source tags / object source

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

Hi, > when you write „number of boundaries“, you intend „boundary points“? No, for example postcodes. I want to merge some of them to new polygons. Regards, Matthias ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org ht

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

e polygons, derived from OpenStreetMap. Regards, Matthias ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

[OSM-legal-talk] use OSM data to select proprietary data

. The result of the intersections is a geodatabase, which doesn't contain any OSM data. Is there some kind of share-alike? Does the resulting dataset need attribution like "selected with OSM data"? Regards, Matthias ___ legal-talk mailing

Re: [Talk-de] Geoportal Wiesbaden WMS

Hallo Joachim, Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass es keine oder zumindest keine positive Antwort vom Vermessungsamt bzw. der Stadt Wiesbaden gab? Viele Grüße Matthias Am Mi., 9. Mai 2018 um 22:49 Uhr schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > > > sent from a phone >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] cimetière et religion

Bonjour, Pour continuer dans les exceptions, il y a l'Alsace et la Moselle, non soumises à la loi de 1905 (Strasbourg a d'ailleurs ouvert un cimetière musulman en 2012). Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 17:10, Topographe Fou a écrit : > Bonjour, > > Attention, il peut y avoir des exceptions françaises

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [osm-alsace] name:gsw pour les noms régionals?

Bonjour Christine, Oui, le code "gsw" est utilisé pour l'alsacien, du moins pour sa forme alémanique. Il n'existe pas à ma connaissance de code ISO pour le francique (fränkisch). Voir http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/langcodes-keyword.php?SearchTerm=gsw=ALL=Go En tout cas, c'est ce que

Re: [Talk-de] Geoportal Wiesbaden WMS

Hi Joachim, vielen Dank! Bin gespannt auf die Antwort. Viele Grüße Matthias Am 2. Mai 2018 um 11:59 schrieb Joachim Kast <osm...@dd1gj.de>: > Hallo Matthias, > > ich habe mit dem Vermessungsamt der Stadt Wiesbaden telefoniert und eine > "offizielle" Anfrage für

[Talk-de] Geoportal Wiesbaden WMS

ge bei der Stadt? Ist da irgendwo etwas dokumentiert (auf dieser Liste und im Forum habe ich bisher nichts gefunden)? Was kann man da ggf. unternehmen? Viele Grüße Matthias ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/lis

[Talk-de] hi

Greetings! Just wanted to say hi and tell you how much I miss you, here are some interesting things for you <http://nguspuhuci.nycredhead.com/lnnxex> Yours faithfully, Matthias Regiert ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

[Talk-de] useful information

Dear! I thought this information regarding my favourite stuff may be usefull for you too, just take a look here <http://tushaxospa.specific-steps.com/lnqxp> Sincerely, Matthias Regiert ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

[OSM-legal-talk] Comparing geodata results in ODbL? (was metadata)

interpretation of the ODbL terms. It would be nice to get an answer by the OSMF :-) kind regards from the city of Rostock, Matthias Meißer user:KVLA-HRO-Mei ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo

[OSRM-talk] Using custom data

profile or data? Are there maybe any OSM tags which are absolutely required by OSRM directly, even if a fully customised profile is being used? Any help or suggestions on this are greatly appreciated! Many thanks and best regards, Matthias -- [1] - https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm

Re: [OSRM-talk] Using custom data

beforehand, in order to be able to create a noded OSM dataset. Well, I'll try that... :-) Thanks again, Matthias On 15.10.2015 17:34, Daniel Patterson wrote: Hi Matthias, Emil is right, your ways are not connected. The connection needs to happen like

Re: [OSRM-talk] State of the Art - Dynamic Routing

nnot offer help unfortunately. I thought it has to be possible somehow, since GraphHopper offers this traffic data integration thing [1], which might show the way how to do this? Best, Matthias -- [1] - https://github.com/karussell/graphhopper-traffic-data-integration On 14.10.2015 13:05, Patri

Re: [OSRM-talk] Using custom data

so it should be fine for that. Thanks for pointing me to this issue and all the best, Matthias On 15 October 2015 20:15:28 Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: Hi, On 10/15/2015 05:43 PM, Matthias Loeks wrote: I though OSRM, clever as it is, would do the noding itself and not

Re: [OSRM-talk] State of the Art - Dynamic Routing

th a usual (slow) Dijkstra? Thanks a lot for your help! Cheers, Matthias On 09.10.2015 15:37, Patrick Niklaus wrote: If you want to ingest dynamic data like traffic information into the routing, the main objective is to reduce pre-processing times so that the data will not be stale before you ca

[OSRM-talk] State of the Art - Dynamic Routing

the best, Matthias -- [1] - https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2015-August/000898.html [2] - https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2013-June/000179.html [3] - https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/165 [4] - https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend

[Talk-GB] Deleted railway tracks after revert

- http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/bzE Or the whole changeset on achavi (long loading): http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=33890248 Is that correct? Or, any ideas to solve this problem? Thanks, Matthias J. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB

[OSRM-talk] Map-Matching geometry

, Matthias -- Matthias Schwamborn University of Osnabrück Tel.: +49-541-969-7167 Institute of Computer Science Fax:+49-541-969-2799 Albrechtstr. 28 E-mail: schwamb...@informatik.uos.de D-49076 Osnabrück, Germany http://cs.uos.de/schwamborn/ signature.asc

Re: [OSRM-talk] U-turns in Map-Matching Algorithm

Hi Patrick, thanks for the clarification. So this check is for the input coordinates, only, right? What if some candidates introduce a U-turn (e.g., due to some outliers in the input data)? Thanks. Best, Matthias On 22/07/15 12:17, Patrick Niklaus wrote: Hey Matthias, What the algorithm

[OSRM-talk] U-turns in Map-Matching Algorithm

Hi all, looking at the code in plugins/match.hpp [1], I noticed that candidates resulting in a U-turn are allowed but wouldn't you say that these candidates are actually pretty unlikely compared to candidates that don't result in a U-turn? Am I missing something here? Thanks. Best, Matthias [1

[Talk-de] Antw: Re: MeckPomm - Ergänzung Straßenschlüssel / Abgleich mit öff. Straßen

Wikiseite mal in den offiziellen Namensraum verschoben, in dem Import Katalog vermerkt und noch englische Beschreibungen ergänzt Mit freundlichen Grüßen Matthias Meißer -- Matthias Meißer Sachbearbeiter Regionale Geoinformationsssysteme Hansestadt Rostock Der Oberbürgermeister Kataster

[Talk-de] MeckPomm - Ergänzung Straßenschlüssel / Abgleich mit öff. Straßen

Hallo Community, ich bin Matthias, der ein oder andere kennt mich vielleicht unter meinem privaten Benutzer (user:!i!). Seit einiger Zeit arbeite ich nun im Katasteramt hier in Rostock und helfe da insb. bei verschiedenen Projekten für die Bürger mit. An dieser Stelle geht es hier also um OSM

[Talk-de] tunnel überlagert Buildings auf osm.org

Hallo, auf openstreetmapo.org werden Straßentunnels über Gebäude gelegt trotz vorhandenem tunnel=yes. Beispiele: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23728286#map=17/48.75380/8.23714 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4287421#map=15/48.7579/8.3433 Wer ist hierfür der Ansprechpartner? Gruß Matthias

Re: [Talk-de] tunnel überlagert Buildings auf osm.org

Ein Tunnel ist an der Oberfläche meist nicht sichtbar. Das Gebäude hätte für mich hier Vorrang. Issue auf github.com: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1609 ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSRM-talk] Map Matching Plugin Questions

Thanks a bunch, Patrick! That cleared things up for me considerably. Best, Matthias On 07/05/15 12:40, Patrick Niklaus wrote: - Did you implement all of the described HMM break conditions (route localization, low probability routes, GPS outliers)? After reading the code in OSRM, I was only

[OSRM-talk] Map Matching Plugin Questions

distance for the low probability routes condition. The paper states a delta of 2000m, the implementation uses a delta of 200m. Feature or bug? - What exactly does the confidence return value mean? Thanks! Best, Matthias -- Matthias Schwamborn University of Osnabrück Tel.: +49-541

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Démo Carnet de rando sur la crête des Vosges

Bravo pour le carnet. Toujours aussi bien le rendu R25. Pour répondre à vos interrogations sur les carrés rouges : le Vieil Armand est un champ de bataille de 14-18. Voir http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hartmannswillerkopf. Les sites taggués en tourism=attraction sont des ouvrages construits durant

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [osm-alsace] Re: Guebviller: nouveau plan de circulation...

quelques kilomètres et connaissant très bien Guebwiller, je veux bien m'en occuper, à moins évidemment qu'un non-abonné aux listes s'en charge d'ici là. Matthias ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Ajout de POI pas très bien géocodés par une agence de com

Je déterre un peu le sujet, mais il faut croire qu'ils n'ont toujours pas compris. Je viens de voir passer de nouveaux changesets, avec création de doublons géocodés à la hache. Par exemple ici une pizzeria au milieu d'une salle de cinéma, alors qu'un POI bien placé existe déjà en bordure du

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Osmose Missing object kind sur Piste de ski

Il n'y a pas que les pistes de ski qui sont touchées par cette nouvelle analyse, on trouve également des erreurs sur : - les cols (mountain_pass=yes + name=*) - les panneaux d'entrée d'agglomération (traffic_sign=city_limite + name=*) - les panneaux d'information (information=* + name=*) - les

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Osmose Missing object kind sur Piste de ski

://pypi.python.org/pypi/jsonschema On pourra aussi proposer via ça des listes de balises connexes manquantes Le 18 octobre 2014 14:32, Matthias Dietrich eiger@gmail.com a écrit : Il n'y a pas que les pistes de ski qui sont touchées par cette nouvelle analyse, on trouve également des erreurs

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Osmose Missing object kind sur Piste de ski

qu'Osmose rapporte comme erreur ce qui est la pratique majoritaire, documentée et établie depuis longtemps. Le 18 oct. 2014 22:44, Jérôme Seigneuret jseigneuret-...@yahoo.fr a écrit : @Matthias Dietrich je vais juste reprendre point par point *Après vérification du wiki, il faudrait en effet que

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Sport=climbing pour escalade sur falaises et arêtes

n'y figurent pas. Maintenant pour répondre à ta question, en ce qui me concerne je mets sport=climbing sur ce qui va bien, et je laisse JOSM râler. Matthias Le 30 août 2014 18:06, Pierre Knobel pierr...@gmail.com a écrit : Bonjour, J'ai du mal à comprendre sur quels objets on peut rajouter

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Storing OSM Data in a proprietary format

*, which seems to refer to a the type of storage rather than to the format of the database. BR, Matthias -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Storing-OSM-Data-in-a-proprietary-format-tp5812219p5812336.html Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com

[OSM-legal-talk] Storing OSM Data in a proprietary format

can help me with understanding this more clearly or point me to a previous discussion of this topic, that would be great. Thank you in advance. Matthias Schmid -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Storing-OSM-Data-in-a-proprietary-format-tp5812219.html Sent from

Re: [OSRM-talk] vector::_M_range_check error

Hi John, thanks for the hint. I double-checked and even prepared the map files again with 0.4.1. However, the error still persists. Best, Matthias On 19/06/14 20:18, John Firebaugh wrote: Hi Matthias, One thing to check is that the data files being used were generated with the same version

[OSRM-talk] vector::_M_range_check error

tried getting more information by compiling osrm-routed in debug mode, but to no avail. Any pointers to what this error means and how I can avoid it? Thanks. Best, Matthias -- Matthias Schwamborn University of Osnabrück Tel.: +49-541-969-7167 Institute of Computer Science Fax

[OSRM-talk] Operating on the original road network graph

? Is it even accessible during runtime (since it doesn't seem to be used for routing etc.)? Can you please give me some pointers on where to start? Thanks! Best regards, Matthias -- Matthias Schwamborn University of Osnabrück Tel.: +49-541-969-7167 Institute of Computer Science Fax:+49

Re: [Talk-de] Mapnik Administration blockt QLandkarteGT

Moin, On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:45:38PM +0100, Dirk Sohler wrote: hike39 schrieb: ... here is a quick release to end the OSM misery. I am still not convinced that transmitting the user-agent string does really help to prevent any misuse. […] Damit hat er KOMPLETT recht. Der User-Agent

[Talk-pt] Tchau OSM-PT :)

print it. Would me make very happy to see somebody of you at the wiki.osm.org mainpage picture of the week holding a flyer in front of an typical portuguese cafe :) greetings from Rostock (north east Germany), Matthias (user:!i!) ___ Talk-pt mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] combien d'adresses en Alsace ?

Le 11 janvier 2014 12:06, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft jb.holcr...@gmail.com a écrit : Pour l'opendata et Mulhouse, quelqu'un a importé les arbres ? J'avais regardé les données, c'était impeccable. Il faut simplement s'accorder sûr une référence pour pouvoir tenir à jour les données. Pour les

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] combien d'adresses en Alsace ?

Le 11 janvier 2014 18:06, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft jb.holcr...@gmail.com a écrit : Quelle est la règle actuelle ? REF:FR:M2A ? Il n'y en a pas ;-) (de règle), mais cela pourrait en effet devenir ref:FR:M2A. Les jeux de données de la M2A ne comportent pas tous d'identifiant ou de référence. Les

Re: [Talk-pt] Portuguese flyer? (needs YOUR review!)(now really)

at OSM SVN, but unfortunatly everybody needs a extra account to modify, so maybe it's easier if you post me your suggestions via the ML and I will try to fix it :) kind regards, Matthias Am 26.10.2013 00:40, schrieb Topo Lusitania Lusitania: Olá Abaixo a tradução do folheto em inglês que pode

Re: [Talk-pt] Portuguese flyer? (needs YOUR review!)

with the same length. Bom fim-de-semana, Matthias Am 23.10.2013 18:42, schrieb f.dos.san...@free.fr: Funny, today there's a blog speaking of promotional leaflets : http://blog.gravitystorm.co.uk/ I see that the idea of a portuguese flyer is in good shape but didn't know how I can help you, I

Re: [Talk-pt] Portuguese flyer? (needs YOUR review!)

for FLOSS? Matthias On 25-10-2013 18:36, Matthias Meisser wrote: Hi, thanks to my colleague Miguel here at ISCTE, we have a first translation in Portuguese: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:!i!/PT_flyer So please review and improve it if you like. We also need a new paragraph

[Talk-de] Problem mit Tiefgarage

Relation gemappt werden könnten. Dabei werden aber die unterirdischen `highways` gar nicht gemappt, oder? Da wir die schon haben, würde ich die nur ungern wieder entfernen. Könnte mir bitte jemand helfen, den Fehler zu finden, oder einen Vorschlag zur Lösung des Problems machen? Viele Grüße - Matthias

Re: [Talk-de] Problem mit Tiefgarage

:40 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com: Am 2. September 2013 10:54 schrieb Matthias Gutjahr mattsc...@gmail.com: Könnte mir bitte jemand helfen, den Fehler zu finden, oder einen Vorschlag zur Lösung des Problems machen? Der Mapnik-stil kommt derzeit mit solchen Dingen

Re: [Talk-pt] Visiting Portugal

of a district in Rostock: I think you will like to see Victor's work as well. :-P So Victor did already some 3D modelling with OSM? Now I'm really curious :) I tried to find some models with f4 maps, but had no success. Sadly we have no 3D tag related overlay for osmatrix :/ Matthias -BEGIN

Re: [Talk-pt] Visiting Portugal

Am 29.07.2013 11:41, schrieb Alexandre Neto: Hello Matthias, As far as I know, in Portugal we really have a diferent relation with OSM. For instance, I don't think we have any OSM local groups. Most of our contribuitions are made individualy or by ocasional map parties. Oh thats interesting

[Talk-de] openstreetmap.org und IPV6

) liegt oder noch mehr das Problem haben. Könnte es mal jemand gegen checken? Mit freundlichen Grüßen Timo Matthias aka BudBundi ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-de] Genauigkeit des etrex VISTA HCx

noch beitragen, dass ich mit meinem Garmin am Lenker schon viel rumgefahren bin und eigentlich immer zufrieden war mit der Track-Aufzeichnung. Mag sein, dass andere/neuere Geräte noch genauer sind, aber in der Regel war es für mich zum Mappen hinreichend genau. Viele Grüße - Matthias Am 22. Mai

[OSM-legal-talk] ODbL in 3D toolchains

Hi, this is Matthias (aka !i!) and I'm currently looking for informations on the license debate to prepare a talk for 3D city models, compiled out of OSM. To me (and others), it seems to be pretty hard to distinguish if a step needs to be ODbL licensed or not. http://forum.openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Loire-atlantique et GR - Lettre ouverte à la FFRP ?

Le 29 décembre 2012 10:41, Christophe Merlet red...@redfoxcenter.org a écrit : Cela signifie t'il que du jour au lendemain, ce chemin deviendra une propriété intellectuelle et oeuvre de l'esprit de la FFRP et qu'OpenStreetMap devra l'effacer de sa base de données ? En tout cas, comme je

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Loire-atlantique et GR - Lettre ouverte à la FFRP ?

Le 29 décembre 2012 12:34, Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr a écrit : Tout à fait d'accord. Ce genre d'appropriation exclusive des droits communs des autres est un abus qui ne doit pas être toléré. Même si la mention GR ne figure pas dans la base (si on admet alors que c'est juste un label

Re: [Talk-us] Thank You for the Operation Cowboy mappers

. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yvj-UyZbeY Let me know what you think. M It's great and obviusly you have more artistic skills than me, for OSM grafities ;) Thanks Martijn! Matthias ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http

Re: [Talk-us] Operation Cowboy - Preaparing Thank you gift

, editing existing 3rd party data). Personally I saw that we all have very limited knowledge from other parts of this world :) bye, Matthias ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-de] Operation Cowboy läuft

Zum Schluss nur noch ein GROßES DANKESCHÖN an alle Beteiligten (wortwörtlich) http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/!i!/diary/18132 Also dann, cya! Matthias Am 24.11.2012 21:53, schrieb Matthias Meißer: Hi, gestern fanden schon die lokalen Parties in Deutschland statt. Seither haben 123 Leute

Re: [Talk-us] Operation Cowboy - Preaparing Thank you gift

Hi, one last personal note on the mapathon and a big thank you (literally) http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/!i!/diary/18132 bye, Matthias Am 25.11.2012 15:37, schrieb Matthias Meißer: Hi, if we look at the current stats, 150 users joined the OPC2012 which results in 300 active mappers

[Talk-us] Operation Cowboy - Preaparing Thank you gift

them afterwards? Maybe you have another ideas, how you can thank people contributing from the other end of the world? Matthias ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Operation Cowboy running

be used! Am 23.11.2012 18:02, schrieb Russ Nelson: Matthias Meißer writes: as most noted, the Operation cowboy mapathon with focus on the USA started today! http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Operation_cowboy Putnam County in New York State needs a lot of love still. Lots of misaligned

Re: [Talk-de] Operation Cowboy läuft

! Gruß, Matthias Am 23.11.2012 15:22, schrieb Matthias Meißer: Hi, as most noted, the Operation cowboy mapathon with focus on the USA started today! http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Operation_cowboy Thanks to Pascal everybody can track where our busy mappers contribute and fix data: http

Re: [Talk-us] Operation Cowboy running

be used! Am 23.11.2012 18:02, schrieb Russ Nelson: Matthias Meißer writes: as most noted, the Operation cowboy mapathon with focus on the USA started today! http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Operation_cowboy Putnam County in New York State needs a lot of love still. Lots of misaligned

[OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Operation Cowboy running

a nice little party at the weekend and that we help our friends in America to improve the data (even if just a little bit ;). yours, Matthias (aka !i!) ___ Talk-us mailing list talk...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-de] Operation Cowboy running

a nice little party at the weekend and that we help our friends in America to improve the data (even if just a little bit ;). yours, Matthias (aka !i!) ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

[Talk-us] Operation Cowboy running

a nice little party at the weekend and that we help our friends in America to improve the data (even if just a little bit ;). yours, Matthias (aka !i!) ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] Operation Cowboy - Progress/Todo

, that this party, we __might__ get a nice animation by Derick Rethans. But hey, let's first do the job and enjoy the results afterwards ;) bye, Matthias ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-de] Operation Cowboy - Berlin bei Wikimedia?

, was ihr dazu denkt? (Könnte das jemand bitte auf die lokale Liste weiterleiten?) Gruß, Matthias ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-us] [OPC2012] Operation Cowboy - Mission statement

Am 09.11.2012 05:09, schrieb Richard Weait: On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Matthias Meißer dig...@arcor.de wrote: Hi, as I don't read any discussions about where and what to map, I would like to bring up this essential question again. Just a few possible ideas (that can be also mixed

Re: [Talk-us] [OPC2012] Operation Cowboy - Mission statement

/Operation_Cowboy#State_cake May you can please add some more, that need to be fixed/enriched with details? Think about that you are the only ones with information about the area and there is a bunch of hungry mappers out there ;) Matthias ___ Talk-us mailing

Re: [Talk-de] Operation Cowboy - 23.-25.11

Es wird übrigens in Potsdam eine Party geben und ich hörte, dass Vorbereitung für den Raum Dresden/Leipzig bereits laufen. Scheint also so, dass wir hier oben nicht die einzigen bleiben ;) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Potsdam_OPC2012 Schönes Wochenende, Matthias Am 03.11.2012 11:53

Re: [Talk-us] Fwd: [OPC2012] Operation Cowboy - Mission statement

Can anyone put this into the tasking server please? Offering different levels of nessesary cleanups sounds good to me, but nobody from the other end of the world knows the USA on a county level ;) bye, Matthias Am 08.11.2012 18:32, schrieb Brian May: I agree, but I would suggest we start

[Talk-es] Mapathon Operation Cowboy - 23. -25.11.

, just post it (sorry in english please). I think all general critics on armchair mapping or our choice of the target area would be better in a seperated topic, as the past showed, that they generate a lot of traffic. Greetings from Germany, Matthias (user:!i

[Talk-us] [OPC2012] Operation Cowboy - Mission statement

areas only (big cities) - focus on the countryside (where no one has been before) - focus on n states (and making there a huge step) - ... cya, Matthias ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [OSM-talk] Packaged OSM Tile Sets by US County or State?

-in-a-Box But maybe your consumers will be more happy with shapefiles: http://download.geofabrik.de or if you offer them an WMS/TMS for testing: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WMS http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Featured_tiles bye, Matthias ___ talk

Re: [Talk-de] Operation Cowboy - 23.-25.11

Am 03.11.2012 13:27, schrieb malenki: Matthias Meißer schrieb: 1. *FOSSGIS Sponsoring* Ich hatte die zwar kontaktiert, aber es kam keine Antwort. Könnte da jemand nachhaken, ob die ein zweites Mal noch etwas Geld für die Parties spenden könnten? Wenn nicht, würde jemand probieren (OSM-/GIS

Re: [Talk-de] Operation Cowboy - 23.-25.11

Am 04.11.2012 20:55, schrieb malenki: Matthias Meißer schrieb: Das stimmt alles Thomas, nur bräuchten wir eben gerade jemand, der einfach noch mal probiert den Kontakt mit der FOSSGIS herzustellen (oder eben andere Sponsoren zu motivieren). Wenn das keiner machen will, ist ja auch nicht

[OSM-talk] Operation Cowboy - 23. -25.11.

wish you good luck for finding an appreachated location and I'm happy looking towards our 2nd global mapping action :) cya, Matthias (user:!i!) ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[Talk-de] Operation Cowboy - 23.-25.11

der Suche nach einer Lokalität und freue mich schon auf die 2. globale Mapping-Aktion :) Gruß, Matthias (user:!i!) ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-us] Operation Cowboy - preparations

aproach by Martjin's roulet is better? bye, Matthias Toby On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Matthias Meißer dig...@arcor.de wrote: Hi US community, so now the details of the next global mapathon are fixed: It's called operation cowboy and covering the weekend *23.11-25.11* so every local

Re: [Talk-us] Operation Cowboy - preparations

. On the other hand it's simply very difficult to find a good date for a worldwide community ;) Hope this will be anyway ok for the most of you. Later on, then comes christmas and so we would need to switch to next year... (bad for myself as I had to start my master thesis). goodbye, Matthias

[Talk-us] Operation Cowboy - preparations

guess this will become fun :) bye, Matthias ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] MapRoulette new challenge: connectivity

, but it turned out, that the road didn't match the BING imagery. So what to do? Is BING or TIGER wrong? So my idea is, just to create a short gallery with common TIGER problems, to help strangers to repair this part of our dataset :) bye, Matthias Am 29.10.2012 21:06, schrieb Martijn van Exel: Hi all

Re: [Talk-us] Night of the Living Maps

Hi, this is Matthias from the german OSM community (aka user:!i!). I was the one who started the first NOTLM party and asked Martjin, if the US would be a good area for another global mapathon.This idea came up, when I noticed how empty the US still is (or let's say how big the country

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Motorroad en France?

En effet, le cas 3 limité à 110 existe également. Exemple : La RD83, ex-N83, dans le Haut-Rhin et une partie du Bas-Rhin est une 2x2 voies limitée à 110 km/h mais non classée voie express. Il y a même un giratoire au niveau de Soultz/Bollwiller. On y retrouve de temps en temps des tracteurs, ce

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Motorroad en France?

Le 18 octobre 2012 08:13, Pieren pier...@gmail.com a écrit : Oui, je suis aussi très curieux de voir un exemple. Parce que normalement, c'est pas possible avec la réglementation actuelle. Ca voudrait dire qu'on pourrait circuler en mobylette ou en vélo à côté de voitures qui roulent à 110.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >