Re: Sorting Filters

2000-07-23 Thread Curtis
hat is correct. You already suggested that, and wrongly told you NA>> that I had tried that, but was unsuccessful. I lied. :o( C> None of my replied filters use a Re string to differentiate C> replied messages from others. TB! can already differentiate which C> m

Re: Sorting Filters

2000-07-23 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Curtis, On Sunday, July 23, 2000 at 19:20:32 GMT -0500 (which was 5:20 PM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: JA>> The only thing I would add is to add a filter string 'Re:' in an AND JA>> relationship to distinguish new messages from replies. > You don't need to do that fo

Re: Sorting Filters

2000-07-23 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Nick, Set the Filter strings to: Strings LocationPresence [EMAIL PROTECTED]Recipient Yes Re: Subject Yes (Note: You add AND strings by clicking on the Add button on the rule page) -- Tha

Re: Sorting Filters

2000-07-23 Thread Nick Andriash
On Sunday, July 23, 2000, 6:28:03 PM, Januk Aggarwal wrote: JA> Set the Filter strings to: JA> Strings LocationPresence JA> [EMAIL PROTECTED]Recipient Yes JA> Re: Subject Yes JA> (Note: You add AND strings by c

Re: Sorting Filters

2000-07-23 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Nick, On Sunday, July 23, 2000 at 18:55:27 GMT -0700 (which was 6:55 PM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: > On Sunday, July 23, 2000, 6:28:03 PM, Januk Aggarwal wrote: JA>> Set the Filter strings to: JA>> Strings LocationPresence JA>> [EMAIL P

Re: Sorting Filters

2000-07-23 Thread Nick Andriash
On Sunday, July 23, 2000, 5:05:33 PM, Curtis wrote: C> In that case create two filters: C> a) Create an outgoing filter who's source folder is the outbox and C> destination folder, 'TBUDL Replies'. For the filter string you may use C> "[EMAIL PRO

Re: Sorting Filters

2000-07-23 Thread Curtis
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 19:00:03 -0700, Januk Aggarwal wrote: >> Yes, that is how I had it set up, and it works, but as Allie pointed >> out, putting the "Re:" under "Subject" is redundant... because TB! can >> already distinguish a reply. So, based on his recommendations, I removed >> the AND rule a

Re: Sorting Filters

2000-07-23 Thread Steve Lamb
Sunday, July 23, 2000, 10:24:59 PM, phil wrote: > There's always a way to do anything with logic. Justify Windows? -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. --

Re: Sorting Filters

2000-07-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Steve, On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 22:34:29 -0700GMT (24/07/2000, 13:34 +0800GMT), Steve Lamb wrote: >> There's always a way to do anything with logic. SL> Justify Windows? Yes. Somewhere on either this or the beta list, someone said that the government needs people to widely use insecure softw

"make identity" filters

2000-09-15 Thread Luca
Since I don't organize my folders on a per account basis, I'm wondering if there's a way to keep track of which of my accounts a certain message has been received by, even if it has moved into a folder in another account. That's to say, when I reply or forward a message that is archived, let's s

multiple Kill Filters?

2000-10-09 Thread Don Mulvihill
Hi there, do I need to make a 'new' kill filter for each word I want to filter? Or is there a way to put multiple words in the Signal Strings area of a single kill filter. I've tried this, but it didn't work, so I'm wondering if it's possible at all, and that perhaps I was just missing some ne

junk mail filters

2000-10-11 Thread Rainfall
Hello TBUDL, What is the best way to implement a junk mail filter? Is it possible to move all incoming messages where the sender is in my address book to a folder like "known senders"? -- Best regards, Rainfall mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -

Re[2]: Filters

2000-11-19 Thread Doug Weller
lstone> live) Doug Weller wrote and made these points: DW>> I'm getting to grip with filters, but can someone please tell me how DW>> I make a filter for TBUDL? Marck D. Pearlstone> I use "Reply-To: TBUDL" in Kludges. This will distinguish between Marck D

Re[2]: Filters

2000-11-19 Thread Doug Weller
Hello Nick, Sunday, November 19, 2000, 9:35:33 PM, you wrote: Nick Andriash> Doug, do you think you can shorten your quote prefix? It makes it very Nick Andriash> difficult to read your messages when you use almost 25% of your available Nick Andriash> sentence length, just for the quote prefix

Re[2]: Filters

2000-11-19 Thread Doug Weller
Hello JM14, Thanks Jerry. Doug -- Doug Weller Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated Submissions to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.demon.co.uk Co-owner UK-Schools mailing list: email me for details --

Re[2]: Filters

2000-11-20 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Brian, On Sunday, November 19, 2000 @ 20:00:19 -0500, you wrote the following about "Filters" Brian> [...] I've tried setting up a filter to highlight any e-mail Brian> sent by me navy blue. [...] I have a filter that seems to work: Rule

Re: Filters - rearranging

2004-09-14 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Joe, On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:53:30 -0400GMT (14-9-2004, 20:53 +0200, where I live), you wrote: J> I some noce filters build. I have to make some changes to them for J> various reasons. The one change is just to insert an AND in the J> mix. It seems I can only append. I can&#x

Re: Filters - rearranging

2004-09-14 Thread Roelof Otten
all honesty I have to say that I can imagine why. In most of the filters it won't matter when you'd drag the conditions up and down, so it would be (a lot of) work for hardly any profit. However you could simplify your filters by using subfilters and you'd have some more possibiliti

Re: Message Filters

2004-09-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Mean, On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:45:09 +0530 GMT (23/09/2004, 02:15 +0700 GMT), Mean Drake wrote: MD> Selective download filter. MD> Condition: Message size greater than 800KB MD> Action Kill. I have one of those, with a limit of 50KB. Works fine. MD> Still doesn't work. I am an a mailing lis

Re: Message Filters

2004-09-24 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Mean, On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 23:44:03 +0530 GMT (24/09/2004, 01:14 +0700 GMT), Mean Drake wrote: >> Which TB version are you using? MD> Version 3.0 Sorry, ignore my comments. Maybe someone else can help out. -- Cheers, Thomas. A duck walks into a drugstore and ask the clerk for Chapstic

BayesIT! and filters

2004-10-15 Thread Michael L. Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I get some pretty rude email spam. I have setup a filter to delete from the server anything with certain words in the subject. Many of these still get processed by BayesIT! and not deleted from the server. I am using a series of OR statements i

Cool filters thread

2004-12-09 Thread Matt Thoene
Hello everyone... I know that Marck keeps a great library of templates, macros, and some filters...but I think there may be some other very cool filters out there that are not on his site. I feel like I'm not taking full advantage of how powerful the filtering is with TB. I'd like th

Re: Changing filters

2005-04-07 Thread Chris
Thomas Fernandez @ 2005-Apr-7 10:26:30 AM "Changing filters" <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > But my new idea is to use the country folders in the main account as > an archive, while having the current messages (30 days or so) in the > department folders. Thus, I need to co

Re: Changing filters

2005-04-07 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Chris, On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 20:50:50 -0400 GMT (08/04/2005, 07:50 +0700 GMT), Chris wrote: >> Is there an easy way to change the filters from "Move" to "Copy", or >> would I have to open and go through all of them? C> It seems like Virtual Folders may

Re: Changing filters

2005-04-07 Thread Chris
Thomas Fernandez @ 2005-Apr-7 9:50:50 PM "Changing filters" <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> It seems like Virtual Folders may be a good solution for you. They >> basically are the results of a constantly updated search query >> stored in a folder for easy access. &g

Re: Changing filters

2005-04-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
using Incoming filters, I use Read filters. This way, the message stays in the original account until I open it, and then it will be copied to the archive folder. Perfect! (Except that I do indeed have to manually move each single filter, but that is a one-time effort.) One drawback I still h

Re: Changing filters

2005-04-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Thomas, On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:05:08 +0700 GMT (08/04/2005, 21:05 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF> I found a way around: Instead of using Incoming filters, I use Read TF> filters. This way, the message stays in the original account until I TF> open it, and then it will be

Re[2]: Filters

2005-10-25 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Thomas, Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 7:50:27 AM, you wrote: TF> Where are you? TF> I go to Account / Sorting Office. I go to Incoming Mail and I have a TF> General tab, not a Rules tab. I do not have an Alternatives tab. He is using version 2.11.02 which uses the old filtering system. I

Re[2]: Filters

2005-10-26 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Mica, Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 9:38:04 AM, you wrote: MM> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MM> Hash: RIPEMD160 MM>***^\ ."_)~~ MM> ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Tue, 25 Oct 2005, MM>@ @ at 05:58:49 -0500, when Jack S. LaRosa wrote: >> I can't seem to figure

Re[2]: Filters

2005-10-26 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Bill, Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 11:46:01 AM, you wrote: BM> On Tue, 2005-10-25, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: >> I can't seem to figure out how to get a single filter to route >> incoming mail to individual folders based on the sender field. I have >> one name in the RULE tab under FILTERING STR

Re[3]: Filters

2005-10-26 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Stuart, Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 8:14:08 AM, you wrote: SC> Hello Thomas, SC> Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 7:50:27 AM, you wrote: TF>> Where are you? TF>> I go to Account / Sorting Office. I go to Incoming Mail and I have a TF>> General tab, not a Rules tab. I do not have an Alternatives

Re[2]: Filters

2005-10-27 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
address RO> maintenance in your AB. My heartfelt thanks to all who have tried to help me with this problem. I finally did what I should have done in the beginning, namely 'if all else fails, read the instructions.' I was actually able to find the solution by reading TB's HELP se

Re[2]: Filters

2005-10-28 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Roelof, Friday, October 28, 2005, 3:57:01 AM, you wrote: RO> Hallo Jack, RO> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:09:13 -0500GMT (28-10-2005, 4:09 +0200, where I RO> live), you wrote: JSL>> Roelof, your suggestion looked considerably more elegant and I tried JSL>> to make it work but, alas, it wouldn't

Re: Disappearing filters

2005-11-20 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Marten, On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 18:56:09 +GMT (20-11-2005, 19:56 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MG> Has anyone else experienced the mysterious case of the disappearing filters? Not here. MG> I.e: set up a series of filters that sort incoming and outgoing to different common fold

Filters in v3

2006-01-05 Thread Chris
Hi, I'm having a problem with filters since upgrading to v3. In v2, I had x number of filters which stopped messages from being placed in my inbox, and moved them as they were received into certain folders. As the last filter (which I named 'Spam'), I had a filter with nothing i

Re: Backup filters

2006-01-18 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Peter, On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:11:52 +0100GMT (18-1-2006, 21:11 +0100, where I live), you wrote: PF> How do I back up my filters and move them to another location/Bat PF> installation? PF> Global Options? What _is_ this? They're backupped either with account proper

Re: Backup filters

2006-01-18 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Roelof, On 18-01-2006 23:38, you [RO] wrote in : PF>> How do I back up my filters and move them to another location/Bat PF>> installation? PF>> Global Options? What _is_ this? RO> They're backupped either with account properties or global options in RO> the

Re: Sharing Filters

2002-10-02 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello David, > Is there any way to share filters between accounts? No. > There are several filters which I want in all accounts but do I really > have to create these in each account? No, create them in one. Then copy (Ctrl+C) the filter, open the Sorting Office for the other accou

Re: Sharing Filters

2002-10-02 Thread Thomas F.
Hello David, On Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:58:32 -0700 GMT (03/10/02, 02:58 +0700 GMT), David Tod Sigafoos wrote: DTS> Do you know where the Filters are stored? In the files account.srx in your mail directories. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. If Barbie is

Re: Sharing Filters

2002-10-02 Thread Thomas F.
Hello David, On Wed, 2 Oct 2002 13:41:45 -0700 GMT (03/10/02, 03:41 +0700 GMT), David Tod Sigafoos wrote: DTS>>> Do you know where the Filters are stored? TF>> In the files account.srx in your mail directories. DTS> Thanks .. I had though I looked there DTS> Guess i

Re: Sharing Filters

2002-10-03 Thread Thomas F.
Hello David, On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 07:10:10 -0700 GMT (03/10/02, 21:10 +0700 GMT), David Tod Sigafoos wrote: DTS> Go into create filters and at that point i have to say if I am DTS> creating and inni or outti. It would seem to me that it should be DTS> possible to define this in one pla

Re: Sharing Filters

2002-10-03 Thread Gerard
ON Thursday, October 3, 2002, 4:10:10 PM, you wrote: DTS> IN/OUT Filter Example: DTS> I have an email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] I want to DTS> have a folder for all correspondence to/from SpadeDetectiveAgency.com Hi David, Correct me if I am wrong, but if you are receiving emails from the same

Re: Export filters?

2002-10-09 Thread Joseph N.
On Wednesday, October 09, 2002, syv wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: s> Is there a way to export the filters? syv, I'm not sure what is your ultimate intended use, so there may be other ways to accomplish your objectives, but each filter can be

Re: Export filters?

2002-10-09 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo syv, On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 07:42:22 -0700GMT (9-10-02, 16:42 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: s> Is there a way to export the filters? Only the manual way: Ctrl-C Ctrl-V into a text-file and to copy the whole sorting office, the account.srx file. -- Groetjes, Roe

Re: Export filters?

2002-10-09 Thread Gerard
ON Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 4:42:22 PM, you wrote: s> Is there a way to export the filters? Hi syv, You can copy (ctrl-c) and Paste (Ctr-V) them. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= The sex was so good that even the neighb

Re: Export filters?

2002-10-09 Thread Adam
Hello syv, Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 2:14:59 PM, you wrote: s> On Wednesday, October 09, 2002, Joseph N. wrote: s> The purpose is to move some of the filters to the mail s> server [mostly to filter spam] and to make sure I do not s> miss some. Hard to imagine a mail server run

Re[2]: Filters.

2002-10-24 Thread Patrick G.
Hello Chris, On Thursday, October 24, 2002, 3:52:32 PM, you wrote: CW> I've got a few in there that I've now turned to manual. CW> How do I trigger a bunch of filters together rather than running 1 at a CW> time? I think this is what you are looking for: You can do t

Re[2]: Filters.

2002-10-24 Thread Patrick G.
difference between adding addresses in the bottom of CW> the 'Rule' tab in filters compared to adding addresses in CW> 'Alternatives'? My understanding of this is adding under filter sets under the rules tab treats them as boolean 'AND' where the alternatives t

Recovering deleted filters

2002-11-27 Thread Carter Thomas
HI! tbudl: I accidently deleted a set of office filters for sorting incoming mail. (I thought I was deleting just one rule but ended up deleting the entire set.) Is there anyway to recover the deleted set? (I had about 40+ spam filters in there and I don't really want to recreate them

Re: Bayesian Filters

2002-12-16 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Ron, On 16-12-2002 13:08, you [R] wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: R> I was talking with a friend about Bayesian mail filters, which R> apparently learn to sort one's mail by being given examples. Is R> anyone using such a filter with TheBat!? Any a

Re: Bayesian Filters

2002-12-16 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Ron, > I was talking with a friend about Bayesian mail filters, which apparently learn > to sort one's mail by being given examples. Is anyone using such a filter with > TheBat!? Any advice will be appreciated. See a thread with Subject: "[SOT] The best filter for SPAM

Sorting Office/Filters

2002-12-30 Thread Raf Hofmans
Hello, I've just switched to 'The Bat!', and am still exploring all the functions and features of this program. I have a simple question about the 'Sorting Office' (Account > Sorting Office/Filters): Is it possible to apply a newly created 'Sorting Rule' t

Re: Transferring filters

2003-01-19 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo John, On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 20:45:25 +1100GMT (19-1-03, 10:45 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: JP> Is there any way of simply transferring all my existing filters to JP> this third isp from my other two accounts? First you select the account with the most filters. ;-) Close TB Co

Re: Transferring filters

2003-01-19 Thread John Phillips
Hi Roelof, On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, at 15:04:55 [GMT +0100] (which was 01:04 where I live) you wrote: > First you select the account with the most filters. ;-) > Close TB etc. Thanks for the help! -- John Phillips, Sydney, Australia Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows

Re[2]: filters

2003-01-29 Thread greekdivers
Hello Miguel, Wednesday, January 29, 2003, 11:08:36 PM, you wrote: MAU> Yes, try Selective Download filters. It worked,thanks -- Best regards, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | "Usi

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Meyns [PM] wrote:' PM> The first one works fine here, manually and automatically. The PM> second one takes me to the SpamCop log in dialog. Albeit not too PM> much of an effort to do it manually - I

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Allie, on Sun, 9 Feb 2003 08:39:09 -0500GMT (09.02.03, 14:39 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PM>> I'd like to submit my login name and password automatically along PM>> with the URL. Any ideas if/how I could do that? AM> No facility there on the web

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Peter, on Sun, 9 Feb 2003 15:14:26 +0100GMT (09.02.03, 15:14 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PM>>> I'd like to submit my login name and password automatically along PM>>> with the URL. Any ideas if/how I could do that? AM>> No facility there on the

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread ~John
I hit the keyboard shortcuts Ctrl+Alt+S and it put the message in the outbox, then I sent them, however I got this error message back from Spamcop: "SpamCop encountered errors while saving spam for processing: SpamCop could not find your spam message in this email:" -- Best Regards, ~John - - -

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread ~John
Is this how the reply template supposed to be setup? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= From:%OFromName <%OFromAddr> To: %OToName <%OToAddr> Date:%ODateEn, %OTimeLongEn Subject: %OSubj Files: %Attachments --

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ~John, @9-Feb-2003, 14:17 -0600 (20:17 UK time) ~John [j] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I have reformatted this message without the top posting because it is harder to work out what's going on in a vacuum. Please see below for

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, @9-Feb-2003, 14:24 +0100 (13:24 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: PM> ...I'd like to submit my login name and password automatically PM> along with the URL. Any ideas if/how I could do that? Yes -

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread ~John
I don't know what in the world your talking about, type a little more "down-to-earth" for me, just tell me "do this" or "don't do this" As for the "SpamCop filter" forget it, I was looking back through some past email's and agree with the argument that I would just be wasting my time reporting spam

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sunday, February 9, 2003, 3:49 PM, you wrote: PM>> ...I'd like to submit my login name and password automatically PM>> along with the URL. Any ideas if/how I could do that? MDP> Yes - I just got this working: MDP> BeginFilter MDP> Name: SpamCop AutoResponder MDP> Active: 1 MDP> Source: \\Mar

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ~John, @9-Feb-2003, 14:51 -0600 (20:51 UK time) ~John [j] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: j> I don't know what in the world your talking about, type a little j> more "down-to-earth" for me, Okay. Sorry if it wasn't clear enough

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, @9-Feb-2003, 17:18 -0500 (22:18 UK time) Paul Cartwright said: > how does this get my password?? You have to edit *your* login and password in place of mine where it says marck:password (of course "password" is not my real password ). - --

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread ~John
d as knowledgeable as you are.) And the person mentioned that he had tried SpamPal, SpamCop, etc.. etc.. and come to realize taht theBats filters was just as efficient. - - - End of Marck D Pearlstone's message, and ~John's Reply - - - __

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sunday, February 9, 2003, 7:08 PM, you wrote: >> how does this get my password?? MDP> You have to edit *your* login and password in place of mine where it MDP> says marck:password (of course "password" is not my real password MDP> ). DUH ! -- Paul Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Marck, on Sun, 9 Feb 2003 20:49:02 +GMT (09.02.03, 21:49 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP> Hash: SHA1 MDP> Hi Peter, MDP> @9-Feb-2003, 14:24 +0100 (13:24 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in MDP> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-09 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 07:27:28 +0100 GMT (10/02/03, 13:27 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: > Thanks a lot Marck! I'm just afraid it won't work completely for me as > my username is an e-mail address to be submitted with %40 instead of @ > (myname%40domain.com:password). If I enter it lik

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, @10-Feb-2003, 14:50 +0700 (07:50 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: TF> Usually escaping it with another % works. So if you need %40, TF> you type %%40. (I didn't try it.) Precisely - this wil

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Thomas, on Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:50:24 +0700GMT (10.02.03, 08:50 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : TF> Usually escaping it with another % works. So if you need %40, you type TF> %%40. (I didn't try it.) Thanks, but it doesn't work here. Another % leads to l

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, @10-Feb-2003, 14:37 +0100 (13:37 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: TF>> Usually escaping it with another % works. So if you need %40, TF>> you type %%40. (I didn't try it.) PM> Thanks, but it doesn

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello ~John, > And the person mentioned that he had tried SpamPal, SpamCop, etc.. > etc.. and come to realize taht theBats filters was just as > efficient. That is for a different story. They were talking about _detecting_ spam while Marck's filters the thread is about is for _repo

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread ~John
- - - Miguel A. Urech wrote - - - M> That is for a different story. They were talking about _detecting_ M> spam while Marck's filters the thread is about is for _reporting_ spam M> to Spamcop. - - - End of Miguel A. Urech's message - - - Miguel, I still don't see where S

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello ~John, > I still don't see where SpamCop has done anything to stop Spam. With all affection and respect to you: "There is no one blinder than that who doesn't want to see" :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 __

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Miguel, @10-Feb-2003, 17:33 +0100 (16:33 UK time) Miguel A. Urech [MAU] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> I still don't see where SpamCop has done anything to stop Spam. MAU> With all affection and respect to you: "There is no

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Marck, on Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:39:42 +GMT (10.02.03, 15:39 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PM>> ...name%%40domain.com... turns to name0domain.com... PM>> Strange... MDP> Not necessarily. Could this be to do with batch files? %4 is the MDP> fourth pa

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread ~John
- - - Peter Meyns wrote - - - P> on Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:39:42 +GMT (10.02.03, 15:39 +0100GMT here), P> you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PM>>> ...name%%40domain.com... turns to name0domain.com... Could someone give me some good instructions on how to setup the "SpamCop"

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Marck, > ... or to put it another way, the work SpamCop does... Thanks Marck, I couldn't have explained it better :-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" in

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Peter Meyns
whole thread as read. So your chances of a good reply are much better when you start a new thread with a new message. As for your question about the SpamCop filters, it's not difficult. Once you have set up your account with www.spamcop.net you can use the service easily with the filters fr

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sunday, February 9, 2003, 3:49 PM, you wrote: PM>> ...I'd like to submit my login name and password automatically PM>> along with the URL. Any ideas if/how I could do that? MDP> Yes - I just got this working: MDP> \22c:\5CProgram\20Files\5CInternet\20Explorer\5CIEXPLORE.EXE\22\20%-\0D\0Ahtt

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Paul, On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:42:28 -0500 GMT (11/02/03, 02:42 +0700 GMT), Paul Cartwright wrote: MDP>> \22c:\5CProgram\20Files\5CInternet\20Explorer\5CIEXPLORE.EXE\22\20%-\0D\0Ahttp://[...] > [...] You may need to change the launcher (which refers to IE) if IE > is not your default browse

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Monday, February 10, 2003, 5:28 PM, you wrote: MDP>>> \22c:\5CProgram\20Files\5CInternet\20Explorer\5CIEXPLORE.EXE\22\20%-\0D\0Ahttp://[...] >> [...] You may need to change the launcher (which refers to IE) if IE >> is not your default browser. >> my default browser is now Mozilla... it say

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Paul, On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 17:45:41 -0500 GMT (11/02/03, 05:45 +0700 GMT), Paul Cartwright wrote: TF>> Yes it would. What he meant is "You may want to change the launcher, TF>> depending on your preferences." Assuming that the default browser is TF>> your preferred browser. ;-) > my default

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello ~John, > I still don't see where SpamCop has done anything to stop Spam. This is part of the full report I got for one of the last spam I submitted to Spamcop: ,- [ ] | ISP has already cancelled the account used to send this spam. ISP | resolved this issue sometime after martes, 11 d

Re: SpamCop filters

2003-02-10 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Monday, February 10, 2003, 5:54 PM, you wrote: >> my default browser is Mozilla, but I have IE and opera installed. Opera >> is fastest, but flakiest. I'd rather use Mozilla than IE, but I think >> you need to have IE installed to do the wonderful windows updates. I >> seem to recall it wouldn

Filters for Spam

2003-02-21 Thread ~John
Here is a filter that gets rid of alot of spam for me: [strings] £|¥|¤|§|«|»|À|Á|Å|µ|¿ [Location] Subject [Presence] Yes -- Regards, ~John Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows 2000 5.0 (Build 2195) 2 Hard-drives (6 & 40 gig) 439 Mb RAM AMD 455 Processor. Programs running in the background: Griso

Re: Global filters

2003-02-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Allie, On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 08:31:52 -0500 GMT (23/02/03, 20:31 +0700 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: > You seem to be describing a sort of like 'common filter' system > dialog. > You define your common filters in this dialog. You then add them as >

Re: Global filters

2003-02-23 Thread Allie Martin
e original and vice/versa. Modifying one filter would then modify the other. A flag of sorts could be used to indicate that a particular filter is linked to a copy in other accounts. TF> Please explain how this should work. Let's say under Options I have TF> a menu item &quo

Re: Global filters

2003-02-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
nd a central location, like for QTs, better. Matter of taste, maybe. TF>> Please explain how this should work. Let's say under Options I have TF>> a menu item "Global filters", and I create a filter there. What TF>> would it do? > I just created a filter that I

Filters not firing

2003-03-03 Thread Stuart Hemming
I've got a 'read messages' filter that, for messages in a particular colour group, moves a message to a different folder. It works a treat, except, if I mark as read an entire thread. The whole thread was in the colour group but stayed put when marked using ctrl-shift-m. I had to mark them all unre

Re[2]: Filters

2003-03-17 Thread Pete Holsberg
Hello Roelof, Monday, March 17, 2003, 7:17:41 PM, you wrote: RO> Hallo Pete, RO> On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 18:46:08 -0500GMT (18-3-03, 0:46 +0100, where I RO> live), you wrote: PH>> Filters have me stumped! PH>> I have strings set up as follows: PH>> TheBat Text

Re[2]: Filters

2003-03-18 Thread Pete Holsberg
Hello Thomas, Monday, March 17, 2003, 10:28:12 PM, you wrote: >> So the rules are ANDed? How do I get them to be ORed? TF> If they are all on the first tab ("Rule", then they are ANDed. If you TF> put conditions onto the second tab ("Alternatives"), each alternative TF> is ORed to the first tab

Re[2]: Filters

2003-03-18 Thread Pete Holsberg
Tuesday, March 18, 2003, 3:31:33 AM, you wrote: PH>> I have 1.60 and am happy with it. Does 1.62 represent an important PH>> improvement? RO> The most important improvement for you would be that you'd have a RO> help-file. Well, if someone would email me the help file, I could save a download an

Re[2]: Filters

2003-03-18 Thread Joan Josep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas, On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, at 10:28:12 [GMT +0700] (which was 18/03/2003 (D/M/Y) 4:28 where I live) you wrote: TF> so that TF> this dot-asterisk is interpreted as "any characters" I do not see the need of .* If tbudl is prese

Filters and attachments

2003-06-13 Thread Mike Rivers
Is it possible to create filter rules that scan attachments? My question arises because of the daily barrage of bounced Klez mailings (you know the ones that originate from someone else, but supply your email as the From: ) I figured that, if I put "yabbadabbado" as my Organization, I could filte

Filters don't work

2003-07-27 Thread Jos Klaassens
Hello tbudl, All my filters ceased to work. Strange enough the only filters that are still working are the TB's lists filters.. I removed the rest of the filters and made them again (made some new ones too) in my 4 accounts. Tried sender, kludges etc. Without result. Nothing fi

Multiple Account filters

2003-07-29 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello tbudl, In the same way as having "Common Folders" is it possible to have "Common Filters"? At the moment I have a few common folders, and the accounts that these filter into each have their own filters set up. What I want to do is have one filter for multiple accounts t

Re: Bayesian Filters

2003-08-20 Thread Dave Kennedy
o put together some pretty S> effective filters with TB but from using my BeOS Mail daemon S> I've been pretty impressed with what Bayesian filters can do S> and would love to try one out for TB. Check the TBUDL archives for POPFile. I and many others are very satisfied

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >