Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-513) Implement support for dynamic subclasses of statically generated types

Ron, apologies, I should have double checked, it was sitting locally on my machine without having been committed. It's there now. As to the apache license, to date I have added them manually. The issue with adding code for the Apache license specifically is of course that for the end user of th

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-513) Implement support for dynamic subclasses of statically generated types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503452 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-513: Hi Ron, only just seen your comments. The xsd for the Customer

Re: [SDO Java DISCUSS] Contents of the next SDO release

igator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&status=1&status=3&status=4&component=12310660&component=12310973&component=12310802&fixfor=12312262&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC On 09/06/07, Steffen Glomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i would like to

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1122) TypeConversionTestCase fails for JDK 1.4.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12502747 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1122: - A suggestion came from ant on tuscany-dev mailing-list that we

Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1122) TypeConversionTestCase fails for JDK 1.4.2

.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/modules/databinding/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/databinding/extension/SimpleTypeMapperExtensionTestCase.java?view=diff&r1=542408&r2=542409&pathrev=542409 ...ant On 6/8/07, Kelvin Goodson (JIRA) wrote: > > > [ > https://is

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1122) TypeConversionTestCase fails for JDK 1.4.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12502735 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1122: - I propose we add a comment to the test case code, add an FAQ

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1293) SDO does not work with OSGi

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12502730 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1293: - I don't have a feel for how important this is for a

Re: [Java SDO CTS] code coverage tests

e can be removed for the code coverage run [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/kgoodson/sdo_cts/pom.xml On 05/06/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm running the clover maven plugin against SDO and its unit tests to get code coverage figures. H

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1325) Property value with xsd:QName type is not deserialized and serialized correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1325. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed at revision 544858 > Property value with xsd:QName type

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-513) Implement support for dynamic subclasses of statically generated types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501899 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-513: Hi Ron, thanks for this. Would you be able to supply the

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1324) DeserializationNoSchemaTestCase took a long time to run

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1324. - Resolution: Fixed patch applied, thanks Fuhwei. > DeserializationNoSchemaTestC

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1325) Property value with xsd:QName type is not deserialized and serialized correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1325: Patch Info: [Patch Available] > Property value with xsd:QName type is not deseriali

Re: CTS suite SDO version 1.0-incubator-SNAPSHOT or 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT?

Just found time to persist with the "0 tests executed". Problem solved as per http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1249 Kelvin. On 23/05/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ant, I changed the dependency versions, and I added incubating to the version

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1249) SDO CTS executes 0 tests when run in mvn

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1249. - Resolution: Invalid This symptom disappeared after I made 3 changes, not sure which

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-513) Implement support for dynamic subclasses of statically generated types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-513: --- Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next) Java-SDO-1.0 Setting target

[Java SDO CTS] code coverage tests

I'm running the clover maven plugin against SDO and its unit tests to get code coverage figures. However, I'd like to get results for the CTS against the Tuscany SDO implementation. My assumption from reading the clover documentation is that since the SDO implementation is simply a maven depende

SDO Project Structure (was Re: [Vote] release Java SDO beta1)

te them, if it will help I'll volunteer to sort that out for the next release? ...ant On 4/26/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please vote to release the beta1 distribution of Tuscany SDO for Java > > The release candidate RC1 for Tuscany Java SDO beta

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1323) DBInitializerTestCase failure after SDO changes to TUSCANY-1233

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1323. - Resolution: Fixed Preserved the order of simple dependencies by removing use of

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1323) DBInitializerTestCase failure after SDO changes to TUSCANY-1233

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501158 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1323: - It would seem that the error is caused by a resequencing of the

Re: SDO fix for TUSCANY-1233 breaking DAS, was Fwd: svn commit: r543520 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/tools: src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/generate/ src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/gene

Looking at this now Kelvin. On 02/06/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After this commit, DAS test cases are failing as described on the continuum build failure report[1]. I tried updating SDO to the revision prior to this commit (>svn update -r 543519), and then I get a clean DAS

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1233) Enhance SDO static codegen (XSD2Java) to support multiple namespaces in a single pass.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1233. - Resolution: Fixed I spent a fair time testing this update in my local workspace, but

[Java SDO and Java SDO CTS] How best to test the java generator

We don't have a very good story for testing the java generator. Currently we check in generated code into the trunk, and manually update it periodically, after the generator is updated. Part of the reason for this is that, given the existing project structure, attempting to use the sdo-plugin t

Re: Website - Consistent navigation menus

Haleh, this looks really good, thanks. I particularly like the "Latest Tuscany Releases" inset box and the new download page layout. The sub-project menu doesn't provide a link back to the sub-project's home. Would it be possible to make the title of the sub-project menu to be a link back to the

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1320) Issues accessing data objects when using HelperContext

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1320. - Resolution: Invalid The HelperContext [1] is in essence a collection of SDO Helper

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1233) Enhance SDO static codegen (XSD2Java) to support multiple namespaces in a single pass.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500161 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1233: - I'm working through this patch, and feeling a l

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1305) Changesummary of datagraph using static interfaces.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1305. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-1.0 resolved at revision 542588

Re: [SDO Java] test case hanging indefinitely

iling after a long timeout. I guess the fact that it is not enable in the test suite means that it perhaps ought to be named something other than *TestCase in order that it is disable in the maven execution too, yes? Kelvin. On 29/05/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'

[SDO Java] test case hanging indefinitely

I'm just trying to commit a fix for TUSCANY-1305, and so went to build with maven. All the tests run fine in eclipse, but in maven the impl project's tests hang indefinitely in DeserializationNoSchemaTestCase. Has anyone else seen this? My impl and lib projects are up to date at revision 54258

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1305) Changesummary of datagraph using static interfaces.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499819 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1305: - The issue here is that the generated code creates the metadata

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1233) Enhance SDO static codegen (XSD2Java) to support multiple namespaces in a single pass.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson reassigned TUSCANY-1233: --- Assignee: Kelvin Goodson > Enhance SDO static codegen (XSD2Java) to supp

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1305) Changesummary of datagraph using static interfaces.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499773 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1305: - Steffen, it does look like a bug. The AccountImpl&#

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1233) Enhance SDO static codegen (XSD2Java) to support multiple namespaces in a single pass.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1233: Patch Info: [Patch Available] > Enhance SDO static codegen (XSD2Java) to supp

Re: Website / Wiki was:Tuscany Logo..

Hi Hernan, Welcome to Tuscany! and thanks very much for offering to help us out with this. -- Kelvin. On 24/05/07, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Venkat, I'm helping with the documentation and web site for the Geronimo project. We recently moved the authoring of our web site to

Re: Java SCA - Including fix numbers in release docs

available at [1] and we could probably > make it more generic to be a Tuscany release process. > > [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Release+Process > > > On 5/22/07, kelvin goodson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think my proposal is consi

Re: CTS suite SDO version 1.0-incubator-SNAPSHOT or 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT?

Hi, just spotted that you were already running with the incubating version, so there's a mystery why there is a failing test. Can you let me have the surefire report please? Kelvin. On 23/05/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The CTS code pom.xml's currently use SDO version 1.0-incub

Re: CTS suite SDO version 1.0-incubator-SNAPSHOT or 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT?

Ant, I changed the dependency versions, and I added incubating to the version tags of the CTS artifacts. I still suffer from the issue that I get 0 tests run in my maven environment, but I get 100% success when running the tests in eclipse. Can you please update and rerun in maven and let me

Re: Java SCA - Including fix numbers in release docs

outstanding from the JIRA overview page which is something I've found useful and have used it in past releases to manage what things need to get done. See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY Maybe just more knowledge about how the versions get used would be enough? ...ant On 5/

Re: Java SCA - Including fix numbers in release docs

Java SDO has been doing this using an Java-SDO-Mx release rather than Java-SDO-Next, but as I said on IRC I think the Next naming is much better. I propose that we adopt the policy that no-one other than a release manager ever assigns anything other than a *Next value for the fix release of a JI

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating

On 21/05/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have done necessary updates to STATUS page [1], and the Incubator Tuscany page [2]. Note that the changes on the incubator page takes a little while to get reflect on the live website. [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tusca

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating

Ant, I've had a good poke around and built the source distro and run the tests successfully. The only potential blocking issue I have found is that absence of a STATUS file, which it was my understanding should be copied in from the project's STATUS file into every distribution, but I haven't b

Re: Public key servers for verifying release distribution files

I take that back, your key is already lodged there, my PGP client just doesn't find it. I guess it must be a client configuration issue, although I don't recall having to configure it. Kelvin. On 21/05/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is in part feedback on

Public key servers for verifying release distribution files

This is in part feedback on the SCA release candidate that ant posted, but doesn't require a respin, so I won't muddy the vote thread for this. If I try to verify an archive in the release candidate with "gpg --verify " it tells me it cant find the public key. I had this issue before and resol

Re: SDO published Snapshots

Have done that now too. It didn't occur to me that it had changed, but of course we switched from 1.0-incubator-SNAPSHOT to 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT Kelvin. On 20/05/07, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/19/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: &

Re: SDO published Snapshots

done Kelvin. On 19/05/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Could someone working with SDO publish new snapshots ? The ones available in the maven repo today is about a month old and has some inconsistencies with current trunk code, this cause issues for those who would like to build

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1250) Static SDO generator generates an erroneous factory class, when inheritance and different Java packages are used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1250: Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-beta1) Java-SDO-Mx were not part of

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1212) SDO 2.1 feature: Property.isNullable() and Property.isOpenContent()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1212: Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-beta1) Java-SDO-Mx were not part of

Re: [DAS] Release distributions - PLEASE PROVIDE FEEDBACK (Original posted on tuscany-dev)

Switching this to tuscany-users to solicit user community input. I think I need some clarification of what it means to ship the samples with the binary distribution. One of the key things a user is going to want to do is to modify and rebuild the samples, so how do we make that easy for them? It

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1290) Databinding-sdo broken with SDO beta1 relesae and lastest SDO trunk snapshot builds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12496511 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1290: - It appears that this might be a local maven repository issue

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1290) Databinding-sdo broken with SDO beta1 relesae and lastest SDO trunk snapshot builds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1290: Comment: was deleted > Databinding-sdo broken with SDO beta1 relesae and lastest

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1290) Databinding-sdo broken with SDO beta1 relesae and lastest SDO trunk snapshot builds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12496509 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1290: - It appears that this might be a local maven repository issue

Re:

Hello, and thanks for the feedback. From the SDO perspective .. - I don't currently see any support in the XSD2JavaGenerator for specifying the package name of any imported namespace in a schema. You can specify the package name for the schema you are currently generating objects for, but

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1272) CrudWithChangeHistory test case fails as it's not finding the deleted object in the changeSummary

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1272. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: Java-DAS-Mx) Java

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1171) SDO Java beta1 Release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1171. - Resolution: Fixed Announce made today > SDO Java beta1 Rele

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1233) Enhance SDO static codegen (XSD2Java) to support multiple namespaces in a single pass.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1233: Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-beta1) Java-SDO-Mx > Enhance

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1171) SDO Java beta1 Release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12496232 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1171: - When moving the maven artifacts from the staging repo to the

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Tuscany SDO Java 1.0-incubating-beta1 released

16th May 2007: The Apache Tuscany community is pleased to announce its 1.0-incubating-beta1 release of SDO (Service Data Objects) Java. You can download binary and source distributions from: http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/1.0-incubating-beta1/ Maven artifacts for this

[SDO Java CTS] adopting ContainmentTest

I propose to move a number of test cases from the under review suite to the adopted suite in the coming days. I think we can adopt the ContainmentTest tests and consolidate them into the DataObject tests that are already part of the adopted set. So I have moved the contents of DataObjectTest into

Re: [DAS/SDO] Did anything got changed around SDO deletes, recently ?

Luciano, Looking at this now. Kelvin. On 14/05/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does anybody know if something got changed on SDO and how it track deletes ? Even tough nothing got changed on that area in DAS, looks like some test cases are now failing, and looks like the issue is

Re: SDO test case fails when compiling with JDK1.4.2

Hi Chris, I don't see this failure when I run against a 1.4.2 environment ... java version "1.4.2_07" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_07-b05) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_07-b05, mixed mode) Which implementation / version of the JDK are you using? Regard

Re: Problems with 2-dimensional arrays in static SDOs

Chris, I don't see this field being generated at all. I'm generating using code from the SDO trunk. Which version of SDO are you using? Regards, Kelvin. On 10/05/07, Chris Mildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I'm having issues generating static SDOs from my schema. The schema can b

Re: Problems with groups and static SDOs.

Hi Chris, the code snippet you supplied doesn't compile against the code that I generated. Person's dog Property is isMany=true so to add a dog you need to do person.getDog().add(aDog) Regards, kelvin. On 10/05/07, Chris Mildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'm having a little generati

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1252) Gold XML files not in the repository

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1252. - Resolution: Fixed Having copied across files to fix the adopted suite of tests it

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1241) Provide CTS Updates for HelperContext and a new DO creation mechanism

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1241. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-CTS-Mx Merged Brian's updates

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1252) Gold XML files not in the repository

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12494672 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1252: - I added the requested resources in revision 536780, however

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1241) Provide CTS Updates for HelperContext and a new DO creation mechanism

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493643 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1241: - Brian, thanks for the update. I merged the updates you

Re: [Java SDO CTS] running the CTS inside eclipse

e.util.BasicFeatureMap.add(BasicFeatureMap.java:1071 ) at org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.BasicSequence.add(BasicSequence.java:105) Thanks, Andy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kelvin goodson Sent: 04 May 2007 10:06 To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.

Re: [Java SDO CTS] running the CTS inside eclipse

Ah, of course the BasicSequence belongs to Tuscany, so the EMF source code attachment was a red herring sorry, but it still remains the fact that we have differnet version of that code. Kelvin. On 04/05/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Another Hmmm moment, the only ins

Re: [Java SDO CTS] running the CTS inside eclipse

reMapUtil.ja va:120) at org.eclipse.emf.ecore.util.BasicFeatureMap.add(BasicFeatureMap.java:1071 ) at org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.BasicSequence.add(BasicSequence.java:105) Thanks, Andy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kelvin goodson Sent: 04 May 2007 10:0

Re: [Java SDO CTS] running the CTS inside eclipse

TECTED] Sent: 04 May 2007 09:07 To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Java SDO CTS] running the CTS inside eclipse On 5/3/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: BTW We still have the issue that many of us don't see any test run under > maven, which i

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1249) SDO CTS executes 0 tests when run in mvn

Affects Versions: Java-SDO-CTS-Mx Reporter: Kelvin Goodson Some users report on the tuscany-dev mailing list that 0 tests execute when running the CTS using maven as described in the instructions. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email

[Java SDO CTS] running the CTS inside eclipse

An issue that is causing a little trouble is that we don't have good instructions on how to set up and run the CTS tests inside eclipse, and I have an insight into that that I'd like to share. We must ensure that the sdo-2.1cts project remains free of any reference to tuscany. The device by whi

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1241) Provide CTS Updates for HelperContext and a new DO creation mechanism

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493391 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1241: - Hi Brian, So far I have applied all but a handful of the

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1241) Provide CTS Updates for HelperContext and a new DO creation mechanism

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493372 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1241: - Brian, thanks for this. I have had a good look at the

[Java SDO CTS] Ensuring and documenting spec coverage

As we are reorganising the CTS right now, how about we begin put a small javadoc comment on test classes and if appropriate on test cases with a link to the page of the spec that the class/test case refers to. For example that can be done with the pdf that is on the OSOA website using the #page=X

Re: [Java SDO CTS] thoughts on structure

te that while slightly diluted ( moved more to an interface > to XML with the lack of work on the RDB DAS ) the intial conception of > SDO as a common API to many datasources shoudl still be maintained. > In my view this means that API tests etc should be performed on a > variety of da

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1171) SDO Java beta1 Release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493034 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1171: - Here's an example command I used to copy repository arti

Re: [Vote] release Java SDO beta1

http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/repo/commonj/sdo-api-r2.1/1.0-incubating-beta1/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/repo/commonj/sdo-api-r2.1/1.0-incubating-beta1/> On 01/05/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Looks ok, +1 ...ant On 5/1/07, kelvin goodson

Re: [Vote] release Java SDO beta1

y plugin to generate them, if it will help I'll volunteer to sort that out for the next release? ...ant On 4/26/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please vote to release the beta1 distribution of Tuscany SDO for Java > > The release candidate RC1

[Java SDO CTS] thoughts on structure

Having spent some time getting to grips with the CTS there are some things I think I'd like to improve. First amongst them is to get some structure that allows us to get a feel for how well the spec is covered by the tests. One thing that concerns me is that one of the most apparent things in th

Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer ------ needs 2 more IPMC votes please

Many thanks for your prompt attention. So now we have 15+1s, 1 non binding, 3 IPMC binding and no -1s I think we can confidently declare this vote closed. Regards, Kelvin. On 01/05/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/1/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Java SDO CTS] Junit parameterized tests at odds with scope isolation

f you think things should be different before I get too far along the way with this change. I also just moved ActiveUpdatingTest into the adopted suite. Kelvin. On 27/04/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After a small dig around I'm not sure how best to approach this

[Java SDO CTS] Junit parameterized tests at odds with scope isolation

After a small dig around I'm not sure how best to approach this slight conundrum. After putting in place some infrastructure to begin ensuring that we have a fresh type scope (HelperContext instance) per test case for the simple test case runs I turned my attention to a test class in the paramete

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1235) CTS tests for Sequence support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1235. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-CTS-Mx added new tests to under

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1234) New test for accessing mixed content

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1234. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-CTS-Mx Added the new test and put

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1232) XSDSimpleTypeTest (New CTS Test)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1232. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-CTS-Mx Applied Andy's patch, t

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1230) Improvements to TypeConversionTest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1230. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-CTS-Mx applied Andy's

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1171) SDO Java beta1 Release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1171: Summary: SDO Java beta1 Release (was: SDO Java M3 Release) > SDO Java beta1 Rele

Re: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when classes don't inherit from TestCase

se CTS. > > Thanks, > > Andy. > > -Original Message- > From: kelvin goodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 20 April 2007 17:19 > To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when > classes don't inherit f

[Vote] release Java SDO beta1

Please vote to release the beta1 distribution of Tuscany SDO for Java The release candidate RC1 for Tuscany Java SDO beta1 archive distribution files are posted here at [1] The maven repository artifacts are posted in a staging repository [2]

Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

the same email address as on the CLA). [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newcommitter [2] http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html Kelvin. On 23/04/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of 2006, in part

Re: Next release name? (was: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it)

aus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375) [INFO] On 25/04/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/25/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've got to the point where I have packaged up a new beta1 SDO java

Re: Next release name? (was: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it)

the recent discussion on incubator general). I'm just about to figure out how to create/configure the repo, but any tips on the process for making the maven repo are welcome; I'll post back my findings. [1] http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/beta1/RC1/ Kelvin. On 24/04/07, ke

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-826) Containment cycle should result in Exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-826: --- Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Mx) Java-SDO-beta1 Affects

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1216) Sequence.add(index,value) is not working due to a type mismatch problem

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1216: Affects Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-beta1) Java-SDO-M2

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1212) SDO 2.1 feature: Property.isNullable() and Property.isOpenContent()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1212: Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-beta1 Affects Version/s: Java-SDO-M2 > SDO 2.1 feat

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1211) SDO 2.1 feature: On-the-fly creation of open content properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1211: Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-beta1 > SDO 2.1 feature: On-the-fly creation of open cont

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1171) SDO Java M3 Release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12491575 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1171: - In the move to a beta1 version i created a 1.0-incubating-beta1

[Tuscany Java CTS] many tests covering the same relatively trivial code path

There are a number of CTS tests in the under review bucket that Tuscany is failing because the assertions tested prior Tuscany behaviour, rather than spec constraints. e.g. SequenceTest.testGetProperty. These assertions are of the form "get property by index and ensure its the same as getting it

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1224) XSDComplexTypeTest patch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1224. - Resolution: Fixed applied patch, but commented out assertions concerning base64binary

Re: [Java SDO CTS] adopting some tests from the optional bucket

mapping of base64binary. How does that sound? Kelvin. On 24/04/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Having looked at XSDChoiceTest I think it's fine for moving to the adopted suite. Any comments? Also I've been looking at Andy's patch for TUSCANY-1224, and the fixe

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >