On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:55 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Cool thats really helpful. Ok so if we can have a Tomcat TuscanyHost
(i.e.
an extension of org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did a full checkout and build. The build failed in the
helloworld-bpel sample with the following exception.
Simon
Running helloworld.BPELHelloWorldTestCase
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
In the SCA Policy framework spec there is a section that talks about
bindingType as it appears in the definitions.xml file(s). It says...
702 The bindingType element is used to declare a class of binding available
in a SCA Domain. It declares
703 the QName of the binding type, and the set of
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:02 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Please find my comments inline.
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In the SCA Policy framework spec
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:19 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to use the new distributed domain stuff - domain-manager
and node2* etc - to get Tomcat as a domain manager with SCA webapps being
individual nodes, but not really making much progress getting it to work so
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Charuka Jayarathna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear all,
I am a Masters student in Georgia State University, and hope to work
on my Theses with some contribution to Tuscany. My adviser is fine
with my suggestion to take over a Tuscany project and work on that as
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Anyhow if this code is doing what I think it's doing then maybe we should
move it to be a little earlier in the process and more general than the
sca
binding. We could take the
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 7:23 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
If you are up for adding a bit of dynamic behaviour we could extend the
domain manager to provide a feed of the services that are currently
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
When we reference SCA in the charter, should we use Service Component
Architecture (SCA) instead?
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
* Paul Fremantle pzf at apache dot org
* Pete Robbins robbinspg at apache dot org
* Raymond Feng rfeng at apache dot org
* Simon Laws slaws at apache dot org
* Simon Nash nash at apache dot org
* Venkata Krishnan svkrish at apache dot org
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I share the same concerns as Sebastien raised. Mixing the policy
definitions with tuscany runtime extensions in one file doesn't seem to be
right. For example, we could have two tuscany extensions to support
binding.ws,
snip
I prefer a branch to make it clear that all in the community can work in
it, to make it clear that it's accepted by the project, that it's buildable
etc, instead of having work buried in the middle of a sandbox together with
obsolete or broken stuff, with an unclear status.
So you
for the validation errors.
- Identify which exceptions are safe to ignore, so that we allow the
processing to proceed furthur. This way we could catch hold of max
possible
user-errors in one go.
On 5/6/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Hasan
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
snip
I prefer a branch to make it clear that all in the community can work
in
it, to make it clear that it's accepted by the project, that it's
buildable
etc, instead
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
There hasn't been any reminders sent out yet but according to the
schedule
today is when our Incubator report is due. I've made a rough start, feel
free update: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2008
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graham Charters wrote:
Hi,
I've been working on a small sample to act as an OSGi sniff test for
Tuscany running in OSGi. It's basically a cut-down version of what
Rajini has done in itest/osgi-tuscany and
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rajini Sivaram wrote:
Hello,
Following on from the discussion in thread [1], and based on Sebastien's
comments [2], we need to make a decision on the best way forward to
OSGi-enable third party libraries used
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- create a domain manager (did u mean create an domain? deploy a
domain
manager as a web app? start an
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the heads-up. Let us see whether the Assembly TC does the same
this time too with the proposal to add a top level interface element.
++Vamsi
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Mike Edwards
...snip
The two sets of SPIs could co-exist for a while with BindingProviders
working with bindings and ServiceProviders (I just made up that name) with
service endpoints.
--
Jean-Sebastien
At r656959 I've just enabled some changes to take a step toward using an
Endpoint representation in
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Regarding Mike's build breaking comment, one of the reasons for
including this in the main build is to have it break to flag when new
dependencies are being introduced. This will help us focus on
improving
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Graham Charters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Regarding Mike's build breaking comment, one of the reasons for
including this in the main build is to have it break to flag when new
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:22 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing the same problem. (... and it doesn't seem very intermittent)
...ant
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Rajini Sivaram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
With the latest codebase, I get intermittent
To help people get started with Tuscany and to generally promote the project
some of us are embarking on putting a book together about how to use
Tuscany. We are toying with the idea of building a sample in a similar vain
to our store tutorial but based on a travel agency based scenario. I've
More comments in line...
Simon
Created a separate factory for it (separate as I though the model may need
to be pluggable as some point)
Would it be possible to just add the create method the AssemblyFactory?
Yep, we could do that. Am going to hold back for a little while on this in
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:22 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing the same problem. (... and it doesn't seem very intermittent)
...ant
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Rajini Sivaram
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:22 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing the same problem. (... and it doesn't seem very intermittent
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone seeing the same problem? svn.apache.org seems very slow today and
times out most of the times.
--
Jean-Sebastien
Yep. SVN has been up and down regularly today. I've only manage to do one
checkin today.
I've just checked in Ram's patch to convert validation messages (i.e. those
messages indicating that the user have provided invalid input of some form)
to resource bundles and pass them through the Monitor. We need to take
account of this change as we change or add code to do with validation.
in my maven repo), and it would
presumably take less time as nothing would need to be written to disk.
Simon
2008/5/16 Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Simon Laws
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Graham Charters
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Simon, itests for these validation messages are now available with
TUSCANY-2329.
On 5/19/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just checked in Ram's patch to convert validation messages (i.e.
those
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks Simon, itests for these validation messages are now available with
TUSCANY-2329.
On 5/19/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did a clean checkout and full build. It failed in
itest/contribution-classloader with the following stack trace.
The problem is caused by a null value in the monitor variable
on line 124 of JavaInterfaceProcessor.
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/22/08, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations everyone!
+1
Robert
Paul
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's great news.
.
My mistake. For some reason I had it in my mind that I had added a
dependency at some point. Maybe it was just something I did locally at some
point.
On 5/22/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did a clean
before every monitor call.
Simon
On 5/22/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did a clean checkout and full build. It failed in
itest/contribution-classloader with the following stack trace.
The problem
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:21 PM, tomas darbois (JIRA)
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599068#action_12599068]
tomas darbois commented on
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Hasan Muhammad (JIRA)
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
Option to turn Validation on/off
Key: TUSCANY-2336
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2336
Project: Tuscany
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:56 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
We have talked about adding a helper method (from an old Node
implementation
we have) that allows a simpler API
node
I've been playing with the Node2 impl a bit with a composite that has
policies in it and getting really confused. I've had a fun(?) day scratching
my head but I now realize that Node2 doesn't seem to run the piece of code
that executes the policy set appliesTo XPath expressions so that policy
sets
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Sowerby wrote:
Hi Simon,
With regards to the 1.2.1 release you are correct that we have a
patched version of tuscany-sca-all which would work, but this however
leaves us in an awkward configuration position.
We're
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Scott Kurz (JIRA)
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
Scott Kurz updated TUSCANY-2332:
Attachment:
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graham Charters wrote:
I've been wondering whether we should make this an itest rather than a
sample. We could keep it as a sample, but it relies on
maven-dependency-plugin to work out the dependencies required to run
Hi Scott, more comments...
Simon
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Scott Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon,
I used my own interpretation of the JAX-WS spec (in Sec 2.3 and its
subsections) to construct my example WSDL, and noticed that the JAXWS-RI
wsimport tool handled it by generating
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
After introducing the monitors in various part of the code. Now I am
trying
to remove the exception that are being thrown from these modules. As a
first
step we are removing the exceptions that are safe to
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Rajini Sivaram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/28/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graham Charters wrote:
I've been wondering whether we should make this an itest rather
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Imagine PolicyOuterComposite
component name=TargetClientComponent
implementation.java class=policy.TargetClientImpl
Hi
FYI. I've seen a couple of problems with the widget and resource validation
testing during may latest build. CouldNotResolveLocation doesn't seem to be
raise. I've @Ignored these tests for now just in case it's going to affect
others (I changed the test to JUnit4 to make this easy) .
As an
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:32 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a fresh check out I'm getting a failure in
JAXWSJavaInterfaceProcessorTestCase, anyone else seeing that or is it just
me?
...ant
OR reopen the older ones to apply the
patch again. Please suggest.
Also would be helpful if you could elobrate more about the conversion of
tests to JUnit4. Thakns.
On 5/29/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
FYI. I've seen a couple of problems with the widget and resource
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
I have provided the fix with TUSCANY-2362 for the same.
For Junit4, let me have a look and provide the changes accordingly.
On 6/2/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:14 AM
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Imagine PolicyOuterComposite
component name=TargetClientComponent
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations! You are well deserved.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 11:15 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org;
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Gilbert Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently, Tuscany does not generate any error for both cases (marked
as Error).
I will open a Jira to log this down as Mike suggested
Gilbert
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 1:09 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Hi
Some comments in line
Simon
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
Thinking about this further, we should I think come up with a common and
consistent model for the handling of problems found during model processing.
Let me make a proposal
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Should we really be restricting the behavior of the service side SOAP
stack?
If your intent is to support 1_2 does that mean we outlaw 1_1 if the SOAP
stack happens to be able to make sense
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:56 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...snip
The two sets of SPIs could co-exist for a while with BindingProviders
working with bindings and ServiceProviders (I just made up
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/4 ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Currently the trunk has a version of 2.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT, we need to
remove incubating at some point and as its not clear if the next
release
would be 2.0 or something else so
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that we log a warning that an unknown element is encountered.
Isn't it sufficient?
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June
Hi
More comments in line
Simon
Hi Simon,
Initially our idea was to disable most of the exception throws from the
processors and log the warnings/exception via the monitors. Lets say we
might still leave some exceptions to be thrown like the type1 exceptions,
in
such cases me might
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I was trying to use a reference with multiplicity (see composite
below), and looks like the reference is being populated with two
references for the same component, instead of one reference for each
component. Any ideas
It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then there
has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels like the
right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over the last
couple of months there are quite a few candidates for inclusion that
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Mark Little [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I just wanted to let people know officially that people from Red
Hat/JBoss will be getting involved with Tuscany over the coming months as we
look at the best way in which to provide SCA support for our SOA Platform
) {
if (problemCache.containsKey(messageId)) return true;
else return false;
}
Like to know your thoughts on it. Thanks.
On 6/6/08, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/5/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here the processor would never throw ContributionReadException, when
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:33 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
I did a recent svn update and rebuild and I'm seeing the following test
error from the helloworld-bpel sample. Are other people
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:56 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...snip
The two sets of SPIs could co-exist for a while
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 8:45 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I've created an itest (late-reference-resolution) to show how late
resolution could be done using endpoint resolvers.
In the itest
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
The Tuscany PMC has voted for Scott Kurz to become a Tuscany committer.
Welcome Scott!
...ant
Congratulations and welcome, Scott.
I look forward to working with you.
Yours, Mike.
Welcome on
to remove. I've
not seen a follow-up email on this subject.
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Simon Laws [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 June 2008 09:21
To: tuscany-dev
Subject: Release 1.3?
snip
I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and remove
Hi All
Now that the new domain manager app is starting to settle down a bit I'd
like to disable the unused domain modules from the main build. They are...
modules/domain
modules/domain-api
modules/domain-xml
modules/node
modules/node-api
modules/node-xml
I have removed these from most of the
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:17 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lou Amodeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
Axis2 1.4 and the associated wss4j and rampart releases for 1.4 are all
out
and available in the
Hi Ram
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
I believe both the DefaultMonitorImpl and DefaultLoggingMonitorImpl would
need this change in them and also believe that any new monitor
implementation should follow the same.
The reason why I feel so
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Marina Deslaugiers (JIRA)
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
Marina Deslaugiers updated TUSCANY-2355:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Marina Deslaugiers (JIRA)
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:41 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
How about 1.5-SNAPSHOT ? This would probably give us some room to have
couple releases without the necessity to
I'm looking at TUSCANY-2352 (which I raised when I was doing some policy
testing). The issue is that promoted service bindings aren't augmented with
the composite service bindings that promote them. Looking at the
BaseWireBuilderImpl code there is a method called
reconcileReferenceBindings() that
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Edwards wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then
there
has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels like
the
right time to do a 1.3
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm looking at TUSCANY-2352 (which I raised when I was doing some policy
testing). The issue is that promoted service bindings aren't augmented with
the composite service bindings that promote them. Looking
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm looking at TUSCANY-2352 (which I raised when I was doing some policy
testing). The issue is that promoted service bindings aren't augmented
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:23 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Nishant Joshi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi All,
I can now run JMS client successfully with latest binding.jms, but you
need
to confirm following with WAS 6 before testing it.. this was
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:34 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:23 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Nishant Joshi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
comments in line.
Simon
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
...
I've created an itest (late-reference-resolution) to show how late
resolution could be done using endpoint resolvers.
...
I've spent some time looking
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:20 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Since I am not much of a Maven expert, I thought I would run this by the
Tuscany community to see if I am going down the right path or to see if
there
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks Raymond for pointing this out. We never used this strategy in
Geronimo (infact, I have never put any JIRA number in any of the source
files other that Release Notes may be). I have come across this in
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 2:46 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jsdelfino
Date: Wed Jun 11 18:46:06 2008
New Revision: 666943
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=666943view=rev
Log:
Merged implementation-node-xml with implementation-node as it only depends
on assembly-xml and no other
I'm trying to apply the patches on TUSCANY-2347 so these issues here may be
caused by these changes however
The first problem I see is that I get a NPE in samples/helloworld-bpel.
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:22 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
20 minutes! what sort of super machine do you have, its approaching an hour
on my machine!
I do agree with the principal though. I think one of the problems is its
just getting so big we try to take short cuts by not always
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:59 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:17 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lou Amodeo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
Axis2 1.4 and the
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I'm trying to apply the patches on TUSCANY-2347 so these issues here may
be
caused by these changes however
The first problem I see is that I get a NPE in samples/helloworld-bpel.
Caused
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I'm trying to apply the patches on TUSCANY-2347 so these issues here may
be
caused by these changes however
The first
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:47 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Edwards wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
It's been a little while now
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
i've a proposal for current svn. We could make most of our effort to
make the svn compile.
I suggest to trying a fresh build before committing meaniful things
and after committing.
It's matter of 20
I'm down to my last problem with the 2347 patch I'm trying to apply and it's
a real good one. If feels awfully familiar. But I can't for the life of me
work out how a patch which makes changes to do with validation errors can
cause the attached exception in the XQuery sample. I'm on IBM JDK 5 and,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am seeing this too, but when i run from my eclipse IDE the test seems to
be passing.
On 6/13/08, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get this too, and can't figure it out either. Doesn't seem at all
intermittent for
1.3 branch.
Raymond
--
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:26 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Release 1.3?
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:47 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:48 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:41 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
How about 1.5-SNAPSHOT ? This would
I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain
modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done with
things I want to do before cutting the R1.3 branch. I'm planning on doing
this first thing tomorrow morning UK time. Can you let me know if there
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain
modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done
with
things I want to do before cutting the R1.3 branch
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just checked in some improvements in the databinding area after a full
clean build. Now I will stay away from the code :-).
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm done with the JSR 250 issues, and got a clean build from latest
svn revision.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED
1301 - 1400 of 1885 matches
Mail list logo
