Sent from my [rhymes with tryPod] ;-)
On 12 Mar 2010, at 13:40, Ron Wheeler
wrote:
Stephen Connolly wrote:
On 10 March 2010 21:48, Ron Wheeler software.com> wrote:
Post things to JIRA (especially with patches) to get things
changed. I
assure you, patches with good/useful changes
> I have a sense - perhaps misguided - that opening a JIRA issue is a
> definite statement that something is wrong and needs fixing.
>
>
You create a jira for something YOU think is wrong or should be clarified.
You could have discussed it on a mailing list in advance, but it's not
necessary if you
Stephen Connolly wrote:
On 10 March 2010 21:48, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Post things to JIRA (especially with patches) to get things changed. I
assure you, patches with good/useful changes in content will be
well-received and the site/documentation will be updated in due
course.
On 10 March 2010 21:48, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> Post things to JIRA (especially with patches) to get things changed. I
>
>> assure you, patches with good/useful changes in content will be
>> well-received and the site/documentation will be updated in due
>> course.
>>
>>
>>
> I am not going to get i
Wayne Fay wrote:
The reference is on the right track. It is too specific to their project and
appears to be a bit short on details.
It would be nice to have something that has a bit of the Maven Upload
to Central flavour but addressing the problem that the GEOT paper addresses.
Those of us
On Mar 10, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>> On Mar 10, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Anders Hammar wrote:
>>>
Maybe something like this:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/How+to+add+a+3rd+party+jar
I know that there
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Mar 10, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Anders Hammar wrote:
Maybe something like this:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/How+to+add+a+3rd+party+jar
I know that there is always possible to add more documentation, but I kindly
ask you to appreciate tha
> The reference is on the right track. It is too specific to their project and
> appears to be a bit short on details.
> It would be nice to have something that has a bit of the Maven Upload
> to Central flavour but addressing the problem that the GEOT paper addresses.
Those of us who have been he
On Mar 10, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> Anders Hammar wrote:
>> Maybe something like this:
>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/How+to+add+a+3rd+party+jar
>>
>> I know that there is always possible to add more documentation, but I kindly
>> ask you to appreciate that most people w
On Mar 10, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>> On Mar 10, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>>
On Mar 10, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> Anders Hammar wrote:
>
>> Eh, not su
Anders Hammar wrote:
Maybe something like this:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/How+to+add+a+3rd+party+jar
I know that there is always possible to add more documentation, but I kindly
ask you to appreciate that most people within the open source world do this
without getting payed. If you'
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Mar 10, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Mar 10, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Anders Hammar wrote:
Eh, not sure what you mean. Are you asking where in the Maven docs it is
stated that the pom should be
Maybe something like this:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/How+to+add+a+3rd+party+jar
I know that there is always possible to add more documentation, but I kindly
ask you to appreciate that most people within the open source world do this
without getting payed. If you've found some documenta
On Mar 10, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>> On Mar 10, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Anders Hammar wrote:
>>>
Eh, not sure what you mean. Are you asking where in the Maven docs it is
stated that the pom should be correct? I think tha
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Mar 10, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Anders Hammar wrote:
Eh, not sure what you mean. Are you asking where in the Maven docs it is
stated that the pom should be correct? I think that would go without saying,
don't you? A default pom is most likely never
On Mar 10, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> Anders Hammar wrote:
>> Eh, not sure what you mean. Are you asking where in the Maven docs it is
>> stated that the pom should be correct? I think that would go without saying,
>> don't you? A default pom is most likely never correct, as think Jas
Anders Hammar wrote:
Eh, not sure what you mean. Are you asking where in the Maven docs it is
stated that the pom should be correct? I think that would go without saying,
don't you? A default pom is most likely never correct, as think Jason said
earlier in this thread.
Cute but not likely th
Eh, not sure what you mean. Are you asking where in the Maven docs it is
stated that the pom should be correct? I think that would go without saying,
don't you? A default pom is most likely never correct, as think Jason said
earlier in this thread.
/Anders
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 13:46, Ron Wheel
Anders Hammar wrote:
Nexus is good, but it can't do magic. It will not solve the fact that there
are no poms/metadata and therefore no dependencies info. You still need to
fix that yourself.
I'm not a fan of just uploading the jars and using the default pom (no
dependency info) as it will break M
Hi, I am using a library called Language tool. Since it does not have a
maven repository anywhere, I had to make a local one for it.
Unfortunately, every time I execute any maven task, Maven will check all the
repositories for updated copies. This process can be rather slow and I'd
rather maven ju
Nexus is good, but it can't do magic. It will not solve the fact that there
are no poms/metadata and therefore no dependencies info. You still need to
fix that yourself.
I'm not a fan of just uploading the jars and using the default pom (no
dependency info) as it will break Maven's dependency manag
I can recommend that you install the Nexus repository.
You can easily upload libraries like Language Tool and it will find it
right away.
It has a lot of other benefits as well and makes using Maven much more
pleasant.
It can proxy all the other repos that you use and that makes you
worksta
On Mar 9, 2010, at 7:30 PM, Ken Egervari wrote:
> Unfortunately the people that create language tool (it's a multi-language
> grammar checker library for Java) don't believe in Maven. They have this
> belief that it's buggy and use Ant. They somehow think that Ant is superior,
> so they just don'
Unfortunately the people that create language tool (it's a multi-language
grammar checker library for Java) don't believe in Maven. They have this
belief that it's buggy and use Ant. They somehow think that Ant is superior,
so they just don't even bother supporting Maven for the people that do use
On Mar 9, 2010, at 7:06 PM, Ken Egervari wrote:
> Oh, Okay... Thanks! I just used the -DgeneratePom=true for all 5 libraries
> and now it doesn't put that annoying stuff. Maybe true should be default
> perhaps? Thanks ;)
>
The reason that's not done by default is that we cannot glean the depend
Did you use Maven to install the .jar, or did you place it there manually?
Maven provides a built-in way to install a 3rd party jar to your repo,
creating a POM for you:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-3rd-party-jars-local.html
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Ken Egervari wrote:
>
Oh, Okay... Thanks! I just used the -DgeneratePom=true for all 5 libraries
and now it doesn't put that annoying stuff. Maybe true should be default
perhaps? Thanks ;)
Ken
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Maven is doing what it's supposed to. You've added the artifact with
Maven is doing what it's supposed to. You've added the artifact without the
POM, add a POM even a stub one and the message will go away.
Artifacts are not allowed in Maven Central with the POM, it's a Maven
requirement.
On Mar 9, 2010, at 6:20 PM, Ken Egervari wrote:
> Hi, I am using a librar
Hi, I am using a library called Language tool. Since it does not have a
maven repository anywhere, I had to make a local one for it.
Unfortunately, every time I execute any maven task, Maven will check all the
repositories for updated copies. This process can be rather slow and I'd
rather maven ju
29 matches
Mail list logo
