Thanks Thijs!
I also found another example that works sitting in the Wicket SVN repo:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk/wicket-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/examples/portlet/menu/
Basically all I needed to do was add the init-params to my portlet.xml (in
addition to the st
For us this works in the Application class:
/**
* @see wicket.Application#getHomePage()
*/
public Class getHomePage()
{
PortletRequestContext prc = (PortletRequestContext)
RequestContext.get();
if (PortletMode.EDIT.equals(prc.getPortletRequest().getPortletMode()))
{
Is anyone here using Wicket in a portal (i.e. for portlets)? I'm trying to
figure out how to switch pages when the user changes Portlet mode (e.g. VIEW
-> EDIT).
Looking through the source, it looks like the responsible method
(WicketPortlet#getWicketConfigParameter(PortletRequest request, String
Many thanks to Andreas, now it works smoothly.
- Klaus
Am 13.01.2010 um 14:20 schrieb Wilhelmsen Tor Iver:
> We are running Wicket + Liferay (Webspace) in Glassfish 2, and experience no
> problems; IIRC Glassfish uses the same Catalina engine as Tomcat?
>
>>
>> For AJAX/resource requests, a
On 13-1-2010 14:20, Wilhelmsen Tor Iver wrote:
We are running Wicket + Liferay (Webspace) in Glassfish 2, and experience no
problems; IIRC Glassfish uses the same Catalina engine as Tomcat?
For AJAX/resource requests, another supports element for mime-type
"text/xml" is needed.
This sounds
We are running Wicket + Liferay (Webspace) in Glassfish 2, and experience no
problems; IIRC Glassfish uses the same Catalina engine as Tomcat?
>
> For AJAX/resource requests, another supports element for mime-type
> "text/xml" is needed.
This sounds like a Tomcat issue, our portlets use Ajax fi
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Klaus Astner [mailto:klaus.ast...@ec3.at]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2010 09:40
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Wicket Portlets and Liferay
Hi,
We want to use Wicket Portlets in Liferay. The first step would be that
all the wicket-example stuff is wo
Hi,
We want to use Wicket Portlets in Liferay. The first step would be that all the
wicket-example stuff is working - including Ajax. Onfortunately it does not
work as intended.
The versions to be used are:
- Liferay-5.2.2 with Tomcat 6 (currently they use 6.0.18) bundled
- Apache Wicket 1.4.5
Hello,
I'm currently facing a problem with a simple code. I'm trying and display a
YUI Carousel but my portal (eXo Platform) gives me an error :
exception returned by processAction() or render() methods
Here is the code, which works in a servlet context :
List list = Arrays.asList(new String
am using two Wicket-Portlets in a Liferay 5.2.1 Portal. Both Portlets
> have
> a link which switches to another page within the portlet (via
> setResponsepage(new
> Page()) ).
> When I click the link in Portlet_1 the page within the portlet one changes
> as desired. After that I c
Bruno,
Looking at the issue, this is the reason of the difference
*Environment: Liferay's internal portlet container
(does not happen on Sun's portlet container)
**"1). Add to your portal-ext.properties this line
portlet.container.impl=sun"
*This configuration makes liferay use Sun Portlet
Tonio,
what are the wicket/liferay versions that you are using?
My problem with filtermapping and porltet names are currently registered in
liferay's JIRA
You can take a look at:
http://issues.liferay.com/browse/LPS-1911
But anyway, its working :) !
My fear right now is about using all wicket'
Bruno,
Well that is a surprise for me, this is my web file
kmkApplication
/kmk/*
REQUEST
INCLUDE
FORWARD
and my portlet file
kmkApplication
wicketFilterPath
/kmk
and it works pretty well :)
I remember another thing
Well, its kind of curious... the 2nd issue that you posted:
2). Never call your appl/portlet-name with the same name
as the url-mapping.
In fact, I was not able to see my portlet if the portlet name and
filter-mapping are differents.
Just to confirm , when you say URL Mapping do you mean...?
Hi Bruno,
I'm a beginner in wicket, also in liferay and was able to
use wicket to construct a portlet.
My first experience was a bit tough, a lot of minor problems
Take a look at all the things find in the internet, I was trying to
make a simple doc with all the issues but I was not able.
The 2
Hello Everyone!
Im currently developing portlets with Wicket 1.4-rc2 and liferay 5.2 . They
have some compatibility issues (portlet names must be equal the wicket
filter-mappings). Does anyone know anyother issues? I saw in liferay foruns
some guys that are developing portlets (in liferay) with wi
interfaces for WebLogic
Portal that are needed for Wicket 1.3.5 please let me know - thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-WebLogic-Portal--tp22605855p22663707.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-WebLogi
duh.. :-)
I was just discussing a Liferay issue with a colleague and by mistake
typed that instead of Wicket :-)
Thijs
On 23-3-2009 16:09, jakewicket wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply. I'm using WebLogic Portal, not Liferay. I'll
have to see if WebLogic Portal fully supports the portlet 2.
Thanks for the quick reply. I'm using WebLogic Portal, not Liferay. I'll
have to see if WebLogic Portal fully supports the portlet 2.0 spec, and try
upgrading to Wicket 1.4 (I was trying this with Wicket 1.3.5).
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-P
What version of liferay are you using?
Wicket 1.3.x needs the portlet bridge implementation. (to cater for
portlet1.0 spec). And for weblogic I think you'r on your own. This
bridge implementation is portlet container specific.
Wicket 1.4 you shouldn't need the portlet bridges any more but the
think
that this may be related to the implementation of those two Apache Portals
Bridges interfaces mentioned earlier. If anyone has tried this before
please let me know. Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-WebLogic-Portal--tp22605855p22661884.html
Just another follow-up to this earlier post. If anyone has had any success
getting Wicket portlets to work in WebLogic Portal (or knows if that is even
possible), please let me know. Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-WebLogic-Portal
ction, I'd appreciate it!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-WebLogic-Portal--tp22605855p22605855.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsub
Hi,
I am using two Wicket-Portlets in a Liferay 5.2.1 Portal. Both Portlets have
a link which switches to another page within the portlet (via
setResponsepage(new
Page()) ).
When I click the link in Portlet_1 the page within the portlet one changes
as desired. After that I click the link in
286 support tested on WAS? Are there known issues?
>
> The Wicket documentation mentions that we need to use WicketFilter instead
> of WicketServlet, but when we run the wicket web application in WAS, the
> application doesn't run with the WicketFilter. we need to change it
ad
of WicketServlet, but when we run the wicket web application in WAS, the
application doesn't run with the WicketFilter. we need to change it to
WicketServlet to make it run. do Wicket Portlets also need the WicketServlet
configuration?
Where can we find more documentation on using Wicket for its P
Hi all,
While I was experimenting with date pickers in portlets, I've noticed
something. When a portlet makes a header contribution, it cannot
directly contribute to document's head, instead it generates something like:
Hi Thijs,
thanks for your help, but you don't have to hurry. We faked the whole thing
by running our Wicket-App inside an iFrame in Liferay. It is just for a
showcase.
So we don't need it right now.
Thanks anyway,
Benjamin
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Thijs Vonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Benjamin
I'll see if I have some time left tomorrow, otherwise hopefully before
next tuesday.
Thijs
Benjamin Ernst wrote:
Hi Thijs,
We are currently trying to integrate Liferay 5 with wicket 1.3. Can you give
us the advise you offered? That would be very nice.
Thank you in advance,
Benja
Hi Thijs,
We are currently trying to integrate Liferay 5 with wicket 1.3. Can you give
us the advise you offered? That would be very nice.
Thank you in advance,
Benjamin
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Thijs Vonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently without building wicket against Li
ent about the
>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>> I've been doing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I hope that answers your questions a bit.
>>>>>>> Thijs
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>
Bobby Quninne schreef:
Are JSR-168 portlets also affected by this?
Not sure what you are asking. The current JSR-168 implementation in
wicket is pretty much final, and for wicket 1.3.x will probably not
change. However newer versions of wicket probably will not be backwards
compatible, with
t;
>>>>> gaugat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5 (JSR
>>>>>> 286) to
>>>>>> develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone d
No, as described it depends on several factors
1. my/other people's time to commit to this
2. official release of the portlet 2 specifications
Thijs
Bobby Quninne schreef:
You have a rough guess estimate as to a wicket release that will address
JSR-268 compliance?
Many thanks
Thijs wrote:
> wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there still
>>>> issues
>>>> with Wicket and Liferay?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
Currently without building wicket against Liferay (using
com.liferay.portlet.renderresponseimpl, instead of
javax.portlet.renderresponse) it is not possible to run wicket without
losing most of wickets functionality.
I can, if you want, give you a patch and some instructions to get wicket
--------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p17061496.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However while
doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues
regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the
response (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there is
still some wo
still issues
with Wicket and Liferay?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p16995052.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e
context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-tp16048160p16048160.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ate, your the man :)
I'll try to dive into the parameter problem this week.
Thnx
Thijs
Ate Douma wrote:
Thijs wrote:
I'm trying to get wicket portlets to work in Liferay.
As fas as I can tell there are at least 2 issues at the moment:
1.) A nullpointer exception in WebResponse
Thijs wrote:
I'm trying to get wicket portlets to work in Liferay.
As fas as I can tell there are at least 2 issues at the moment:
1.) A nullpointer exception in WebResponse due to an issue in de Liferay
code that returns null in the encodeRedirectUrl (see
http://www.liferay.com/web/
I'm trying to get wicket portlets to work in Liferay.
As fas as I can tell there are at least 2 issues at the moment:
1.) A nullpointer exception in WebResponse due to an issue in de Liferay
code that returns null in the encodeRedirectUrl (see
http://www.liferay.com/web/guest/community/f
ith portlets and portals, check out the
> WICKET-647 and WICKET-658 issues which have some head start info.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ate Douma
>
> Ate Douma wrote:
> > I'm really happy to announce that a new and quite feature complete
> > Wicket Portlets Demo is now availa
This great news! Thanks for all your hard work on this, Ate.
-scott
-Original Message-
From: Ate Douma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 9:31 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Cc: Jetspeed Users List
Subject: Re: New Wicket Portlets Demo available
I'm even
really happy to announce that a new and quite feature complete
Wicket Portlets Demo is now available for download at:
http://people.apache.org/~ate/wicket/jetspeed-2.1.3-dev-wicket-demo-installer.jar
I've worked hard the last few weeks to improve the Wicket portlet
support branch and it ca
it might be merged into the trunk?
Regards
Dipu
On 9/17/07, Ate Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm really happy to announce that a new and quite feature complete Wicket
Portlets Demo is now available for download at:
http://people.apache.org/~ate/wicket/jetspeed-2.1.3-dev-wic
On Thursday, September 20, 2007, 10:50:30 AM, Ate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've proposed to merge this into trunk now (before -beta4 release),
> but this hasn't been decided or voted upon yet.
Well, you can now vote on it, at least! :-)
/Gwyn
---
eptember 20, 2007, 10:20:23 AM, Dipu <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ate,
>
> > I'm interested in the portlet support which you have implemented in
> wicket.
>
> > Any idea when it might be merged into the trunk?
>
> > Regards
> > Dipu
lly happy to announce that a new and quite feature complete Wicket
Portlets Demo is now available for download at:
http://people.apache.org/~ate/wicket/jetspeed-2.1.3-dev-wicket-demo-installer.jar
I've worked hard the last few weeks to improve the Wicket portlet support
branch and it
might be merged into the trunk?
> Regards
> Dipu
> On 9/17/07, Ate Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I'm really happy to announce that a new and quite feature complete Wicket
>> Portlets Demo is now available for download at:
>>
>>
>> h
Hi Ate,
I'm interested in the portlet support which you have implemented in wicket.
Any idea when it might be merged into the trunk?
Regards
Dipu
On 9/17/07, Ate Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm really happy to announce that a new and quite feature complete Wic
I'm really happy to announce that a new and quite feature complete Wicket
Portlets Demo is now available for download at:
http://people.apache.org/~ate/wicket/jetspeed-2.1.3-dev-wicket-demo-installer.jar
I've worked hard the last few weeks to improve the Wicket portlet support
> But I will need support from all the Wicket committers for trying to maintain
> portlet compatibility as much as possible too!
As long as you tell us when we're breaking the rules, we'll be happy
to comply :)
Eelco
-
To unsub
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
WDYT?
Good news Ate! I'm +1 for putting it in trunk if you take on the
responsibility of maintaining it properly.
Sure :)
I'm pretty much involved in several projects which would like to use the Wicket portlet support, and of course if we manage to rewrite our Jetspeed-
im with eelco
-igor
On 9/17/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > WDYT?
>
> Good news Ate! I'm +1 for putting it in trunk if you take on the
> responsibility of maintaining it properly.
>
> Eelco
>
> -
> To unsubs
> WDYT?
Good news Ate! I'm +1 for putting it in trunk if you take on the
responsibility of maintaining it properly.
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Me too :)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-portlets-on-LIferay-tf4231110.html#a12051726
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Yes, I'm using this experimental portlet branch.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-portlets-on-LIferay-tf4231110.html#a12051724
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
; ...
> protected void init() {
> super.init();
>
> getRequestCycleSettings().setRenderStrategy(IRequestCycleSettings.ONE_PASS_RENDER);
>}
> ...
>
>
> Any idea?
>
> Miso
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Wicket
trategy(IRequestCycleSettings.ONE_PASS_RENDER);
>}
> ...
>
>
> Any idea?
>
> Miso
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-portlets-on-LIferay-tf4231110.html#a12047909
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.
init() {
super.init();
getRequestCycleSettings().setRenderStrategy(IRequestCycleSettings.ONE_PASS_RENDER);
}
...
Any idea?
Miso
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-portlets-on-LIferay-tf4231110.html#a12047909
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archi
gt; org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527)
> at
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80)
> at
> org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(Thr
:684)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-portlets-on-LIferay-tf4231110.html#a12037332
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
65 matches
Mail list logo
