So, when will we see beta3 out?
[]'s!
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(11) 8565-7739
(11) 3055-2060
(48) 8404-1300
ill send 2 headers. Also we have
special
> support for the head request: 'If-Modified-Since'
I agree with Johan, though giving it a serious look sometime wouldn't
hurt I guess. I think it wouldn't be very complex to look at. Bruno,
how about you write a little proof-of-concept?
xamines the ETag and determines that the page hasn't
changed since last time the client requested it, so sends back a response of
304 (Not Modified) with an empty body.
What you guys think about this? :)
Is the wicket cache system "etagged" already?
[]'s!!
--
Bruno Borges
Summa
+1... But just to make sure: is the DEPLOYMENT configuration going to be
default?
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(11) 8565-7739
(11) 3055-2060
(48) 8404-1300
On 5/31/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Al Maw:
> - We default to DEVELOPME
Well done Congratulations!!
[]'s
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(11) 8565-7739
(11) 3055-2060
(48) 8404-1300
On 5/27/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
I just wanted to let you know that the Wicket graduation proposal has
supported = javac -target 1.4
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 5/23/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
define 'supported'
On 5/23/07, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm just
I'm just wondering if isn't a good idea to have Wicket been supported under
1.4 until Sun drops it. :)
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 5/23/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
really ? i thought sun wanted
version?
[]'s
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
from Tapestry's description :)...
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 5/23/07, Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Excelent Quote.
Should be on the Site.
f(t)
On 5/23/07, James McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED
portant fix. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
[x] I'm ready to freeze the codebase for RC bug fixing...
Keep the good job! :)
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 5/14/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ x ] I'm ready to freeze the codebase for RC bug fi
I agree...
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 5/14/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/14/07, Ryan Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fwiw, I think your initial opinion was correct (i.e. validator H
Why limit to getTargetClass() when its possible to return with getTarget()
and do a getTarget().getClass() ?
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 5/11/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This discussion came out of t
To follow with onAttach/onDetach (I don't remember if these has -ed)
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 5/11/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so why is it onadded() here and bind() in ibehavior?
-igor
On 5/1
Because Wicket is component based... :) We actually reuse components and
somewhere we want to disable validators. For example: chained components
where one component if selected, must disable another component's validator.
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404
How about enabled/disabled validators (and their behaviors) ? This way, no
counting down is needed and when validatores are disabled, they propagate
this state to behaviors. Removing validators is strange to me, but disabling
them for a while, I think this is more reasonable.
--
Bruno Borges
There's no removeValidator(), right? So, we dont have to care about
behaviors added by validators.
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 5/10/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/10/07, Johan Compagner <[E
[x] All above
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 5/10/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we are talking about client side validators: then you want support for
2
behaviors that are attached to "blur" and
What if we want to have in one IValidator, more than one IBehavior? just
wondering... :)
This could be important and usefull, if in one Validator two _very simple_
behaviors are needed, and they need to be keep separated with each other.
[]'s
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.
Updated to revision
2123<http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-hibernate-behavior/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/hibernate/validator/HibernateFormComponentValidator.java?revision=2123&view=markup>
[]'s
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies
to discuss about.
[]'s
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 5/10/07, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cool. This can do the job. :)
Dummy question: why newValidationBehavior and not just newBehavior ? :D
[]' s!
--
Bruno
Cool. This can do the job. :)
Dummy question: why newValidationBehavior and not just newBehavior ? :D
[]' s!
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 5/10/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's what we ha
o test a Form? If nobody has ever tried this, I'll create an
issue to it on JIRA.
[]'s!
miojo
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
Why don't let IValidator has its own behavior if it wants to.
IValidator.getBehavior()
Behavior goes on the client-side, right? (I'm still a little confused about
all these interfaces...)
Isn't this ok ? If not, why?
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
Commited.
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 5/9/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, updating myself in this thread... :D
>
> I think for this integration succeed, one important question must be
> res
n only (in javascript) been evaluated at client and
server side. :) Of course, this shouldn't be required and the unique option
to IValidators, but I think is the best approach.
Any thoughts?
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 5/9/
Ryan, lets finish this thread and move on to gTalk and *talk* about this.
I'm adding you right now.
No, I dont have an account yet, and yes you can start the project in
wicket-stuff and after that, I'll ask you for permission. What'd you think?
[]' s
--
Bruno Borges
Su
Ryan, want to work together on this?
Regards,
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 5/8/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think someone (you?) just has to take up the initiative. I think the
core team is too tight
Isn't this already implemented in Wicket's Core?
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 5/7/07, Mark Sandori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am looking at making a version of the Form component that supports the
"acti
work/technology.
Maybe, listeners/events could resolve some other problems like that one
about onFirstAttach or whatever.
What you guys think?
[]'s
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
[X] Yes, propose Wicket for Graduation
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 5/4/07, Jan Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[X] Yes, propose Wicket for Graduation
Jan.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com
I'd vote for 2.0, but what about waiting for that, after wicket leaves
apache incubator? Until, 1.4 is fine I think. :)
Cheers
PS: Wicket in Brazil... :)
http://blog.brunoborges.com.br/search/label/Wicket
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055
+1... lol :D
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 4/25/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/25/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/25/07, Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sorry.. worst than Draft Review: JSR 303 is in Draft Ballot yet!! So it'll
take some time until a final specification for this under JPA. :(
Let's continue with HV ? :D
[]'s
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 4/25/0
Hibernate Validation is related to JSR
303<http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303>,
which is in draft review yet... :(
And most probably HV will be used as RI with changes to JPA for sure.
But maybe it can start as a contrib project, what'd you think?
[]'s
--
Bruno Borges
Summa
support annotations in the Pojo itself, as H.V. is an
independent framework (doesn't need to have annotations at the persistence
level).
[]'s
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 4/25/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
lement it around the examples... :D )
[]'s
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
On 4/24/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been thinking about it, haven't got around doing it. Should be
pretty easy to do, especi
Has anybody made an integration between Wicket and Hibernate Validator? HV
is probably going to be the reference implementation for JSR 303 and JBoss
Seams use it integrated with JSF. Looks cool...
http://hibernate.org/412.html
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303
Cheers
--
Bruno Borges
Summa
er the id attribute for css styling
wicket:id allows duplicates in markup while id doesnt, so validation would
fail.
is allowed.
it is cleaner to use our own namespaced attribute to avoid interference.
-igor
On 4/23/07, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I couldn't
not allow
this? :D
Cheers!
PS: I posted an article in my blog about Wicket (in portuguese) at
blog.brunoborges.com.br
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
[x] Apache Wicket 7.05 - I'm an Ubuntu user... :D
On 4/19/07, Janne Hietamäki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 19.4.2007, at 1.04, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Apache Wicket 1.3 will be followed by:
>
> [x] Apache Wicket 2.0 (i.e. becomes our old 2.0 minus the c'tor
>
Guys, is it possible to apply this patch before 1.3 goes out? :D
Cheers
On 3/12/07, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well... As you guys can see in JIRA, I sent the diff implementing this
functionality... Really... It's really useful :)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
... bug... omg!... :)
[]'s
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
If you need anything
special use Links and you can do whatever you want.
Juergen
On 3/9/07, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not? This is great for menus, bookmarkable pages, etc... =)
>
> On 3/9/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > pe
Why not? This is great for menus, bookmarkable pages, etc... =)
On 3/9/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
personally: don't use auto links ;(
On 3/9/07, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-374
>
> Gu
jsr for software defect annotations that includes something
like @MustCallSuper (forget what its called), that combined with an apt
builder in an ide will make these kinds of contracts very easy to enforce
at
compile time. we are just not there just yet.
-igor
On 3/9/07, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTE
, and of course, wicket-375 would probably be an issue asking
to allow this setting per page... :)
Is there wicket tags with attributes? sounds
nice... Or maybe in Java, something in the wicket.WebMarkupContainer class.
What do you guys think?
Cheers!
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc
mmobile.com
>
> Eventful - Intelligent Event Management
> http://www.eventfulhq.com
>
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060
48 matches
Mail list logo
