Re: (313) But can they sing?

2005-11-04 Thread Tim Moore


On Nov 3, 2005, at 3:53 PM, Ian Malbon wrote:

Clearly there has been a move by many producers to incorporate more 
vocals in techno and related genres (Diva-house has always been an 
exception).  I remember thinking this was going to become a trend when 
Juan dropped The Flow.  Some, like Recloose, employ guest vocals, 
and others, like Jeremy Ellis, handle the task themselves.


First, what's your general reaction to vocal tracks?  And does it 
bother you when some of these vocalists can't quite cut it?




I think that vocal tracks, used sparingly, can really enhance a set or 
an album, but it is easy to overdo it. Bad vocals can be pretty bad... 
or not, just as in rock music. It's not as much a matter of whether the 
vocals are on key as whether the style fits the rest of the music and 
the rest of the set. To choose some examples, I think Matthew Dear 
pulls it off really well, because his delivery sounds very techno to 
me. On the other hand, when I saw Safety Scissors live, I have to say 
his vocals were a low point. Maybe it's the difference between using 
live, dry (and not especially strong) vocals vs. studio-manipulated 
ones. But then to further contradict myself, I thought the Nitzer Ebb 
track on the first Dex Efx  909 mix ruined the flow of the mix, even 
though I have no problems with the track on its own.


Overall, I like the move towards more vocals... I don't mind the 
blurring of the boundary between techno and pop music at all. But when 
DJing, you have to put each track into the context of the set as a 
whole (as always) and make sure you're neither playing too much of one 
style, nor constantly jarring people with tracks that are totally out 
of place.

--
Tim Moore



(313) Derrick May Innovator Track List

2005-09-30 Thread Tim Moore
OK I'm sure this comes up here a lot, but I couldn't find a good 
definitive answer in the archives.


I have the Transmat (TMT CD 4) version of the Innovator 2xCD. The 
tracklist on the label is obviously wrong, but I haven't been able to 
fully figure out the correct one.


The best I've found so far is this:

http://elists.resynthesize.com/313/2000/09/49920/

CD1

 1) rest 1:08
 2) strings of the strings of life 8:22
 3) another kaos beyond kaos   0:50
 4) freestyle  4:30
 5) beyond kaos1:31
 6) the dance  7:13
 7) a little spaced out0:57
 8) daymares   0:33
 9) it is what it is   6:27
10) ? (chords from it is...)   0:09
11) ? (another synth chord)0:09
12) beyond the dance (cult mix)6:59
13) original feel sureal   0:54
14) ? (beyond a synth chord)   0:19
r-theme6:21

CD2

 1) to be or not to be 5:48
 2) icon (montage mix) 5:49
 3) phantom1:46
 4) kaotic harmony 6:33
 5) more phantom   1:11
 6) salsa life 5:27
 7) nude photo 5:39
 8) the beginning (pt. 1)  5:25
 9) the beginning (pt. 2)  3:30
10) another relic from the relics  1:01
11) drama  4:29
12) strings - the original mix   6:04
13) wiggin - juan atkins mix   6:14


But there are still some gaps. Does anybody know?
--
Tim Moore



Re: (313) Stacey Pullen in SF

2005-08-12 Thread Tim Moore

On Aug 11, 2005, at 2:41 PM, Carceri wrote:


http://phuturenow.net/

Not sure if anyone had seen this, I thought it was
worth mentioning.



Where and when?  That website doesn't seem to have any information 
about the event...

--
Tim Moore



Re: (313) Re: legit mp3 downloads

2005-06-24 Thread Tim Moore
*Everything* is an approximation! I'm pretty sure those pops and 
crackles weren't on the master! ;-)


On Jun 23, 2005, at 3:43 PM, Guilherme Menegon Arantes wrote:



May I be annoying, and raise a technical point here?

Digitalised music is always an approximation, so I prefer to stick
with the real thing and keep my vinyl.
In a decent sound system anyone can tell the difference when
comparing the real thing with .wav, .mp3 or any other standard
digital format...

I am planning to digitalise some vinyl in 24bit/96KHz (or higher) to
see if this is a better solution. Anyone had experience with this? Fab?

G

--
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:42:14PM -, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:02:39 +0200
To: 313@hyperreal.org
From: fab. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (313) legit mp3 downloads (artists get PAID)?
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

That's why i have embraked on the gargantuan task of ripping all my 
vinyl to
mp3 - digital files ARE easier to use, although for me there is 
nothing like

vinyl. the sound, the feel, the smelland the packaging.



--
Tim Moore



Re: (313) New Richie Hawtin Mix CD: DE9: Transition

2005-06-01 Thread Tim Moore

On May 31, 2005, at 1:03 PM, Matt MacQueen wrote:

i'll listen with an open mind but this press release gets at the whole 
problem i have with techno being so technical and 'of the second' it 
becomes utterly disposable.  the second you've heard it it's suddenly 
irrelevant because another production method has replaced it.  when 
all that's there is technique, pure technique, once that novelty wears 
off there's nothing underneath it.   what is the real artistic 
statement?  Reminds me of the Emperor's New Clothes.


I shouldn't read press releases.

--
MM
http://sonicsunset.com




Hey, someone has to experiment, right?

I do agree that the product is more important than the process, but, 
really, what can you say about the product in a press release? 
Honestly, this reads better than your average mix CD blurb, which 
usually can't muster more than a few tired cliches and a bio of the DJ. 
While this is guilty of that too, at least there is something 
interesting to say about the mix itself. At the same time, you have to 
publicize somehow...


I don't think anyone would say that new production and performance 
techniques have replaced existing ones as much as they have augmented 
them. And some of my favorite uses of new technology have been to blend 
old and new in ways that wouldn't otherwise be possible (some of 
Surgeon's Ableton mixes come to mind).

--
Tim Moore



Re: (313) SF techno party time weekend

2005-05-13 Thread Tim Moore
I'm definitely hitting the Sutekh joint and probably the 2LS one too. 
It would be cool to meet some SF 313ers.



On May 12, 2005, at 7:32 PM, James Hurlbut wrote:


Hey 313. Detroit countdown: 14 days 3 hrs, but who's counting?

Here are some techno oriented events going on here in the bay area of 
the us this weekend for those who know, or maybe just for those who 
care:


Tomorrow we have Andrew Weatherall and Keith Tenniswood aka 2 lone 
swordsmen aka radioactive man backed up by ninja tune playa Diplo at 
megaclub 1015. This club is super cookie cutter but has been booking 
quality acts on Fridays. Word is Ken Ishii will be making up his 
missed gig in two weeks, but I'll have to catch him at the fuse-in. 
shucks. check www.subalicious.net


Then on Saturday, Adult is playing live at the indie rock joint Bottom 
of the Hill. punch a hipster in the face for me if you go.


After Adult, one should swing over to Transplant for an all night 
warehouse jammy thinger. Sutekh of Kompakt, Force Inc., Soul Jazz (who 
would've thought), etc.. is doing a rare live PA (rare even though he 
lives here g...) thats at a newish space the Werepad 
www.werepad.com


Not techno, but brokenbeat/house/good music related is that Victor 
Duplaix is playing on Saturday at Miguel Mig's Salted party. Last 
month they brought Ian Pooley which was very loud and bassy. That's at 
mighty at 119 utah street. http://mighty119.com/


That's 14 days 2 hrs and 48 min. till the D. over and out.



--
Tim Moore



Re: (313) san fran

2005-04-22 Thread Tim Moore
So are there a lot of San Franciscans on the list? I just moved here a 
couple of weeks ago from the DC area. I'm planning on hitting the Ark 
event on Saturday. It would be nice to meet a few more heads out here.


Tim

On Apr 20, 2005, at 5:01 PM, Melody Ng wrote:



I also suggest Aquarius, which has an interesting selection of music -
mostly on CD (I liken this place to the old Waterfront records or Red
Eye in Sydney). They are slightly out of the way (1055 Valencia Street)
but it's easy to get there

And unlike the other stores, you can have a look in advance to see what
they have in store - http://www.aquariusrecords.org/

But I agree, Ameoba is the place to go. You could literally spend hours
in there. Just to give you an idea how big the place is
http://melody.outer-rim.org/gallery/album10/aquariusrecords.

m

-Original Message-
##
Notice: The information contained in this electronic mail is intended
solely for the addressee(s) and may be confidential and/or privileged.
If you have received this electronic mail in error, please delete it
from your system and kindly notify the sender. If you are not the
intended recipient you must not reproduce any part of this electronic
mail or disclose its contents to any other party.
##



--
Tim Moore



Re: (313) Monobox/Ae

2005-03-29 Thread Tim Moore


On Mar 29, 2005, at 2:37 PM, darnistle wrote:


Martin Dust wrote:


Sorry, that's what all the glitch and chin kids call them up here ;)



glitch and chin?

LOL!

Is that sorta like nipples and bass? ;)



That sounds pretty good actually.

Though personally I prefer drum  bum.
--
Tim Moore


Re: (313) DJ backpacks

2004-10-25 Thread Tim Moore


On Oct 25, 2004, at 2:45 PM, jason kenjar wrote:


Hey list-

looking for some advice here.

I could use a new backpack for my vinyl. The best one I've seen are 
the UR bags. They are made of strong material and have shoulder straps 
so I can wear it like a backpack. They also stand upright when full of 
record (some bags tip over) and have a large enough front pocket to 
carry around a good amount of stuff. The only thing Im not so sure 
about is the logo, I dont like wearing logos like underground 
resistance because when I travel, I get flagged.


I might just get the UR bag, but I was wondering what you folks use? 
If you really like a bag that has a) shoulder straps, b) stands up 
right when full of record, c) strong material, and d) large 
pockets...please let me know.





I really like my Shure bag.
http://www.needlz.com/accessories/mrb.asp

Really heavy-duty and lots of pockets.
--
Tim Moore



Re: (313) Underated Producers

2004-10-06 Thread Tim Moore
I've got some great Bryan Zentz records on both Intec and Tortured. Is 
that not techno? :-P

--
Tim Moore

On Oct 6, 2004, at 8:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Tell you what. This got me thinking.

(Yeah, yeah, I know that doesn't happen too often)

Everyone bangs on about Tiesto etc. But bringing the conversation 
round a
little, I noticed that the now famous Dj Mani in his top 10 list of 
labels
name checked Intec (Carl Cox's label), and 2 of Billy Nasty's labels 
in his

top 10.

Now. This obviously proves DJ Mani is a total no-brainer, but also on
another level too.
If you ask me, at least with the likes of Tiesto etc you know where you
stand. He's a popular trance dj, and does his thing to the masses.

Carl Cox on the other hand, is a complete band-wagon jumper, who 
changes
his micro style of music every few years or so to keep in with the 
kids.


I forget how many times he's done it, but jesus. Billy Nasty is the 
same.
Their current little thing is so called 'techno' (that's hard dance 
music

to you and me)
and f**kwits like Dj Mani are lapping it up and spending their money 
on it.
There's 101 other worthy UK labels he could spend his money with, and 
has

been for the last 15 years.

Shame Dj Mani ignored all these and chose to spend his money with the
jokers.

He speaks of battles etc, and boycotts, but flippin 'eck, all us here 
in
the UK have been battling against these jokers using the name techno 
from

the year dot. It's nothing new.

These clowns ruined that word 'techno' (and had done by about '92), 
such is

which we can't use it anymore. I don't use it anyway, do you?

Hmm, sorry, more ramblings.

And if you guys from Renegade Rhythm come back with a story like 
well, me

and the advent were having tea and scones and they say Carl Cox is
alright, I'm gonna scream.

Alex




Re: (313) Underated Producers

2004-10-01 Thread Tim Moore

On Oct 1, 2004, at 9:22 AM, robin wrote:



ok i wanna talk about music.

my vote for a hugely underated producer is Gary Martin (teknotika)

i mean check out that Serious Business 12 on Teknotika for recent 
proof.


anyone else have a producer that you think is underated?


robin..





Mathew Jonson

just kidding

I hear you on the Gary Martin thing.

I like Jamie Bissmire a whole lot. I don't know if he's underrated or 
not, but I don't hear much mention of him. Not exactly 313 sound 
though.


I found some really awesome minimal techhouse MP3s by a guy named 
Craque, but I can't find much information about him or anywhere to buy 
his stuff.

--
Tim Moore




Re: (313) DJ MIXER: what would be your choice?

2004-09-14 Thread Tim Moore
I've always liked playing on this guy 
http://www.allen-heath.com/xone464.asp

--
Tim Moore

On Sep 14, 2004, at 4:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



hi mates!

which DJ mixer would u recommend for a club? it should have 3-4
inputs and most of all: great survival potential=)


../z99






Re: (313) Techno Films

2004-08-16 Thread Tim Moore

On Aug 15, 2004, at 8:31 PM, David Gillies wrote:


Simon Hindle wrote:

Anime fillums are pretty techno I think - Ghost in the shell, Akira,
(off topic can anyone recommend privately some good recent anime
films)?


So many manga films look techno, but it sh1ts me to tears that the 
majority of them have metal soundtracks. What the hells with that?!?


I really enjoyed a series I saw on DVD recently called Boogiepop 
Phantom both for the complex and engaging storyline and for the totally 
kick ass soundtrack, which relied heavily on various types of 
electronic music.

--
Tim Moore




Re: (313) Nitzer Ebb....eh?

2004-06-22 Thread Tim Moore

On Jun 21, 2004, at 11:08 PM, Garrett wrote:


- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 5:48 PM
Subject: (313) Nitzer Ebbeh?



What's with their sudden popularity again?
Is it a result of Richie Hawtin throwing them into his Decks, 
efx909

mix?



i'm sure it had a lot to do with de9 but fwiw i can't remember a time 
he

wasn't playing nitzer ebb..



Maybe this is an unpopular opinion but I've always thought that it was 
the low point of de9. It breaks what is otherwise a seamless flow 
through the mix. I don't dislike the track...I've heard it work well in 
other techno sets I guess... I do have to agree with the OP that they 
are low on my list of favorite EBM/industrial acts though.

--
Tim Moore



Re: (313) ortofon cart question

2004-06-13 Thread Tim Moore

On Jun 12, 2004, at 11:39 AM, Eric Kato wrote:


Raph,

Funny you mentioned the lick and wipe of the contacts.  I do it, 
that's why I mentioned the rust problem with the Ortos.  Ya, I usually 
keep a can of contact cleaner, except the damn can is never around 
when I need it!!




A pencil eraser will do the trick a lot of the time, and it's easy to 
keep one in your record bag.


--
Tim Moore



Re: (313) Ritchie and Magda last night in D.C.

2004-06-13 Thread Tim Moore
I had no idea there were other people from DC/MD on this list! I'll 
echo the praise, and add that I hope the crowd response from Friday 
will convince the Buzzlife folks to book more techno in the future. 
They already have Miss Kitten  Selway coming next month...

--
Tim Moore

On Jun 12, 2004, at 5:56 PM, LR T wrote:

I was there as well and agree, it was a great night.  They were both 
here last summer (well in Baltimore) at a July 4th party and it was 
so-so.  I think that was part of the Control tour and had a very 
different sound/feel.  But last night they were both on and played 
great tracks. Ritchie played hard, reminded me of his sets from a few 
years back. Banging.  Magda pulls out the coolest tracks, her style is 
unique and was a great way to start out the night.


Still smiling about getting too see both of them two weekends in a 
row, first Mutek and then back home in DC.  Unfortunately that will 
probably be it for techno here for a looong time.

Lara



From: Arturo Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) Ritchie and Magda last night in D.C.
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 15:14:48 -0400

Hey, just wanted to say that the Ritchie and Magda show last night 
here in DC went really well. We don't get to see either of these two 
around here very often (I think the last time Ritchie played here was 
like 3 years ago), so this was a real treat for us. You detroiters 
get spoiled with the quality of music you have access to :)   If you 
are anywhere near any of the locations for this Minimize/Maximize 
tour, you should really make an effort to come out. -Art






Re: (313) need a new mixer. advice please!

2004-03-10 Thread Tim Moore
I'll second the Stanton rec. I've got the same model and it's been  
great. It may have more bells  whistles than you need (3 channels, fx  
loop, adjustable fader slopes) so you may prefer to opt for a more  
basic model, but as far as audio components go, if you're looking for a  
good mixer at mid-range price I'd say Stanton or Rane.
--  
Tim Moore

On Mar 10, 2004, at 12:10 PM, Rob Tyte wrote:

My behringer became very very noisy very very quickly on the  
x-fader I would not buy another one personally. I ended up buying  
a STANTON SMX-501 Mixer from Jason Brunton who is on this list  
I've had no problems and love it!! Should come in under EUR400.00 as  
well!


 -Original Message-
From:   Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:   10 March 2004 17:02
To: 'matt kane's brain'; jurren baars; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject:RE: (313) need a new mixer. advice please!

That would be my recomendation to avoid, but hey ho.

-Original Message-
From: matt kane's brain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 2004 5:00
To: jurren baars; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) need a new mixer. advice please!


At 11:54 AM 3/10/2004, jurren baars wrote:
the price plays a huge factor. so no ah recommendations (400 euro's  
tops).


try a behringer. i have a behringer non-dj mixer which i love. i hear  
their
customer service is quite lacking though (from a guy who sells  
behringer

stuff to people no less)


--
unsigned short int to_yer_mama;
http://www.mkb-dj.org
Matthew Kane : Software Engineer : Zebra Atlantek, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED]



*** 


Opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and
not Entergy-Koch Trading Limited or its affiliated companies.
This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies
and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently
transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the
use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by
attorney-client privilege. If you are not listed on the To or Cc
lines of the original email (or are not the person responsible for
delivering to an intended recipient), then you are not an intended
recipient and have received this email in error.  Any use by an
unintended recipient is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this email in error please notify the IT manager
by telephone on +44 (0)20 7337 8300 or via email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], attaching this message. Please
then delete this email and all attachments, and destroy any copies
thereof.  Thank you.
*** 









Re: (313) how do you mix

2004-01-10 Thread Tim Moore


On Jan 9, 2004, at 9:24 PM, /0 wrote:

i used to do the ableton live DJ thing  but it felt more like doing 
a PA

of ripped off 1-2-4-8 bar loops than a DJ set.


I probably jsut freaked myself out

:)

-Joe



I like the idea that it can kind of break down the boundaries between a 
DJ set and a live PA. The difference between mixing a prerecorded track 
and sampling it in another track is really just a matter of degree, 
innit? :-) For me, a lot of the appeal is to be able to do some 
interesting things in real time that you just can't really do with 
turntables. But on the other hand, sometimes you just want to play a 
track and let it stand on its own for a little while. I guess you can 
do that with Ableton, too, if you want.

--
Tim Moore



Re: (313) how do you mix

2004-01-09 Thread Tim Moore


On Jan 8, 2004, at 10:10 AM, robin wrote:



so here's a question. once you get used to mixing with decent eqs 
(where

they will properly cut) do you find it hard to go back to mixing with
just a bog standard no-eq mixer?

i know i do (my style is a lot simpler and more choppy with no eq), i
just wondered if everyone else does.



Definitely. There are a few big clubs around here with old-style rotary 
club mixers (Rane or Urei) where you're lucky if there's a master 
EQ...definitely no per-channel.  Hate it...I can barely mix on those 
things, never mind anything like cuts.


But I'm not much of a cutter anyway, to get back to the original 
question.  I tend to go for long, smooth mixes. EQ the bass a lot to 
smooth out the mix...sometimes cut the treble slightly on the incoming 
if both of the tracks have a lot of high freqs.  I enjoy the type of 
techno DJ that can roll through 30+ tracks in an hour, but I've never 
been that way myself. I tend to ride the mixes too long to blast 
through records like that. Not to mention that I'm totally indecisive 
about what to play next a lot of the time, so I end up waiting until 
the last minute to mix the next track in.

--
Tim Moore



Re: (313) how do you mix

2004-01-09 Thread Tim Moore


On Jan 8, 2004, at 5:45 PM, /0 wrote:


I mix with a laptop, traktor, an oxygen 8, a mixer, an ineko, and an
electrix mofx :)



Good answer! :-) I've got a 12 PowerBook w/Reason and an Edirol USB 
controller, and a copy of Ableton Live is on order. I'm looking forward 
to seeing what I can do with that, either alongside or instead of a 
traditional turntable setup. I always regret admitting this in public 
DJ forums, but I really kind of hate spinning vinyl. I could do without 
the scratches, the pops, the cleaning solutions, the stacks of crates 
in my house and (most of all) the heavy bags!


--
Tim Moore