Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
You can import sites, via CSV from RM to TC. ;) -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jay Weekley Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 1:11 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage? Adam Moffett wrote: > The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one > to the other. There's some learning curve. > > > -- Original Message -- > From: ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >> The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. >> I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am >> comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am >> pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? >> *From:* Mitch Koep >> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >> >> The one problem I have with towercoverage is >> >> the only monthly payment option is paypal. >> >> Credit card is by far safer. >> >> I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal >> >> IMO >> >> Mitch Koep >> >> >> On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: >>> It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the >>> data rates on? >>> On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" >>> wrote: >>> >>> Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J >>> >>> Dennis Burgess >>> >>> www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 >>> x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net >>> >>> *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >>> >>> yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. >>> >>> I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak >>> wrote: >>> >>> Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? >>> >>> For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and >>> fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 >>> RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but >>> it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash >>> on something that specializes in modeling LTE. >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones >>> wrote: >>> >>> we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to >>> profile against existing cutovers. is there something as >>> accurate as linkplanner? >>> >> > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > Virus-free. www.avg.com > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&u > tm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
Highly optimized, plus with web integration, there are many new features as well. A coverage map at proper 3000x3000 px resolution in RM takes 45 min on a I7 3.4 GHz system, we can do that in under 2 min. ☺ Lots of efficiencies are created, plus it works with any workstation with nothing to download. You can also take it and put a coverage map on-line if you wish. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:17 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? From: Mitch Koep Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools The one problem I have with towercoverage is the only monthly payment option is paypal. Credit card is by far safer. I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal IMO Mitch Koep On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the data rates on? On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>> wrote: Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to ☺ Dennis Burgess www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve Jones Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak mailto:jno...@lrcomm.com>> wrote: Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash on something that specializes in modeling LTE. Joe On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote: we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile against existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as linkplanner?
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
thanks On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Rick Harnish wrote: > We have Atoll. Check with cameron.kil...@baicells.com, if you need > propagation studies done. > > > > Respectfully, > > > > -[image: BaiCells_Tiny3]- > > Rick Harnish > > > > Director of WISP Markets > > > > Baicells Technologies North America, Inc. <https://na.baicells.com/> > > Mobile: (972) 922-1443 > > > > rick.harn...@baicells.com > > www.facebook.com/baicells > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones > *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 4:48 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > > > do you guys have a propagation/profile tool like linkplanner available, or > in the works? > > > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Rick Harnish > wrote: > > Baicells has been testing with Federated Wireless for several months. We > did a demo for Commissioner O’Reilly at the CBRS Alliance meeting in > California last month. The other things Mark mentioned can be added > relatively easy. > > > > Respectfully, > > > > -[image: BaiCells_Tiny3]- > > Rick Harnish > > > > Director of WISP Markets > > > > Baicells Technologies North America, Inc. <https://na.baicells.com/> > > Mobile: (972) 922-1443 > > > > rick.harn...@baicells.com > > www.facebook.com/baicells > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mark Radabaugh > *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 2:45 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > > > SAS’s exist in testing form - but the rules, testing procedures, equipment > certification, etc. are not complete yet and will not be until early next > year. > > > > Mark > > > > > > On Sep 22, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Steve Jones > wrote: > > > > https://na.baicells.com/cbrs/ > > > > > > I'm curious about how vendors are testing their SAS software, when there > is no SAS to test to > > > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Rory Conaway > wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, aren't the 3.65GHz licenses going away in 3 years? > > Rory > > -Original Message- > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jay Weekley > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:11 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage? > > Adam Moffett wrote: > > The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one > > to the other. There's some learning curve. > > > > > > -- Original Message -- > > From: ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> > > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > > Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > > >> The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. > >> I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am > >> comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am > >> pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? > >> *From:* Mitch Koep > >> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM > >> *To:* af@afmug.com > >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >> > >> The one problem I have with towercoverage is > >> > >> the only monthly payment option is paypal. > >> > >> Credit card is by far safer. > >> > >> I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal > >> > >> IMO > >> > >> Mitch Koep > >> > >> > >> On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: > >>> It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the > >>> data rates on? > >>> On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J > >>> > >>> Dennis Burgess > >>> > >>> www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 > >>> x103 > – > dmburg...@linktechs.net > >>> > >>> *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones > >>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM > >>> *To:* af@afm
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
We have Atoll. Check with <mailto:cameron.kil...@baicells.com> cameron.kil...@baicells.com, if you need propagation studies done. Respectfully, -- Rick Harnish Director of WISP Markets <https://na.baicells.com/> Baicells Technologies North America, Inc. Mobile: (972) 922-1443 <mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com> rick.harn...@baicells.com <http://www.facebook.com/baicells> www.facebook.com/baicells From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve Jones Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 4:48 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools do you guys have a propagation/profile tool like linkplanner available, or in the works? On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Rick Harnish mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com> > wrote: Baicells has been testing with Federated Wireless for several months. We did a demo for Commissioner O’Reilly at the CBRS Alliance meeting in California last month. The other things Mark mentioned can be added relatively easy. Respectfully, -- Rick Harnish Director of WISP Markets <https://na.baicells.com/> Baicells Technologies North America, Inc. Mobile: (972) 922-1443 <mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com> rick.harn...@baicells.com <http://www.facebook.com/baicells> www.facebook.com/baicells From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 2:45 PM To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools SAS’s exist in testing form - but the rules, testing procedures, equipment certification, etc. are not complete yet and will not be until early next year. Mark On Sep 22, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Steve Jones mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: https://na.baicells.com/cbrs/ I'm curious about how vendors are testing their SAS software, when there is no SAS to test to On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Rory Conaway mailto:r...@triadwireless.net> > wrote: Just out of curiosity, aren't the 3.65GHz licenses going away in 3 years? Rory -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf Of Jay Weekley Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:11 AM To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage? Adam Moffett wrote: > The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one > to the other. There's some learning curve. > > > -- Original Message -- > From: ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com > <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> > > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> <mailto:af@afmug.com > <mailto:af@afmug.com> > > Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >> The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. >> I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am >> comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am >> pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? >> *From:* Mitch Koep >> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >> >> The one problem I have with towercoverage is >> >> the only monthly payment option is paypal. >> >> Credit card is by far safer. >> >> I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal >> >> IMO >> >> Mitch Koep >> >> >> On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: >>> It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the >>> data rates on? >>> On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" >> <mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J >>> >>> Dennis Burgess >>> >>> www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> >>> <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 >>> x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net >>> <mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net> >>> >>> *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] >>> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path pro
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
do you guys have a propagation/profile tool like linkplanner available, or in the works? On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Rick Harnish wrote: > Baicells has been testing with Federated Wireless for several months. We > did a demo for Commissioner O’Reilly at the CBRS Alliance meeting in > California last month. The other things Mark mentioned can be added > relatively easy. > > > > Respectfully, > > > > -[image: BaiCells_Tiny3]- > > Rick Harnish > > > > Director of WISP Markets > > > > Baicells Technologies North America, Inc. <https://na.baicells.com/> > > Mobile: (972) 922-1443 > > > > rick.harn...@baicells.com > > www.facebook.com/baicells > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mark Radabaugh > *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 2:45 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > > > SAS’s exist in testing form - but the rules, testing procedures, equipment > certification, etc. are not complete yet and will not be until early next > year. > > > > Mark > > > > > > On Sep 22, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Steve Jones > wrote: > > > > https://na.baicells.com/cbrs/ > > > > > > I'm curious about how vendors are testing their SAS software, when there > is no SAS to test to > > > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Rory Conaway > wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, aren't the 3.65GHz licenses going away in 3 years? > > Rory > > -Original Message- > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jay Weekley > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:11 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage? > > Adam Moffett wrote: > > The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one > > to the other. There's some learning curve. > > > > > > -- Original Message -- > > From: ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> > > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > > Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > > >> The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. > >> I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am > >> comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am > >> pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? > >> *From:* Mitch Koep > >> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM > >> *To:* af@afmug.com > >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >> > >> The one problem I have with towercoverage is > >> > >> the only monthly payment option is paypal. > >> > >> Credit card is by far safer. > >> > >> I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal > >> > >> IMO > >> > >> Mitch Koep > >> > >> > >> On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: > >>> It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the > >>> data rates on? > >>> On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J > >>> > >>> Dennis Burgess > >>> > >>> www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 > >>> x103 > – > dmburg...@linktechs.net > >>> > >>> *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones > >>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM > >>> *To:* af@afmug.com > >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >>> > >>> yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. > >>> > >>> I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? > >>> > >>> For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and > >>> fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 > >>> RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but > >>> it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash > >>> on something that specializes in modeling LTE. > >>> > >>> Joe > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to > >>> profile against existing cutovers. is there something as > >>> accurate as linkplanner? > >>> > >> > > > > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&; > utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > Virus-free. www.avg.com > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&u > > tm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > > > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > > > >
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
Baicells has been testing with Federated Wireless for several months. We did a demo for Commissioner O’Reilly at the CBRS Alliance meeting in California last month. The other things Mark mentioned can be added relatively easy. Respectfully, -- Rick Harnish Director of WISP Markets <https://na.baicells.com/> Baicells Technologies North America, Inc. Mobile: (972) 922-1443 <mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com> rick.harn...@baicells.com <http://www.facebook.com/baicells> www.facebook.com/baicells From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 2:45 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools SAS’s exist in testing form - but the rules, testing procedures, equipment certification, etc. are not complete yet and will not be until early next year. Mark On Sep 22, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Steve Jones mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: https://na.baicells.com/cbrs/ I'm curious about how vendors are testing their SAS software, when there is no SAS to test to On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Rory Conaway mailto:r...@triadwireless.net> > wrote: Just out of curiosity, aren't the 3.65GHz licenses going away in 3 years? Rory -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf Of Jay Weekley Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:11 AM To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage? Adam Moffett wrote: > The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one > to the other. There's some learning curve. > > > -- Original Message -- > From: ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com > <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> > > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> <mailto:af@afmug.com > <mailto:af@afmug.com> > > Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >> The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. >> I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am >> comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am >> pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? >> *From:* Mitch Koep >> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >> >> The one problem I have with towercoverage is >> >> the only monthly payment option is paypal. >> >> Credit card is by far safer. >> >> I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal >> >> IMO >> >> Mitch Koep >> >> >> On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: >>> It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the >>> data rates on? >>> On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" >> <mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J >>> >>> Dennis Burgess >>> >>> www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> >>> <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 >>> x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net >>> <mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net> >>> >>> *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] >>> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >>> >>> yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. >>> >>> I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak >> <mailto:jno...@lrcomm.com> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? >>> >>> For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and >>> fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 >>> RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but >>> it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash >>> on something that specializes in modeling LTE. >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> O
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
SAS’s exist in testing form - but the rules, testing procedures, equipment certification, etc. are not complete yet and will not be until early next year. Mark > On Sep 22, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > > https://na.baicells.com/cbrs/ <https://na.baicells.com/cbrs/> > > > I'm curious about how vendors are testing their SAS software, when there is > no SAS to test to > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Rory Conaway <mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>> wrote: > Just out of curiosity, aren't the 3.65GHz licenses going away in 3 years? > > Rory > > -Original Message- > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On > Behalf Of Jay Weekley > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:11 AM > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage? > > Adam Moffett wrote: > > The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one > > to the other. There's some learning curve. > > > > > > -- Original Message -- > > From: ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com > > <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> > > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> <mailto:af@afmug.com > > <mailto:af@afmug.com>> > > Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > > >> The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. > >> I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am > >> comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am > >> pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? > >> *From:* Mitch Koep > >> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM > >> *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >> > >> The one problem I have with towercoverage is > >> > >> the only monthly payment option is paypal. > >> > >> Credit card is by far safer. > >> > >> I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal > >> > >> IMO > >> > >> Mitch Koep > >> > >> > >> On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: > >>> It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the > >>> data rates on? > >>> On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" >>> <mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J > >>> > >>> Dennis Burgess > >>> > >>> www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> > >>> <http://www.linktechs.net/ <http://www.linktechs.net/>> – 314-735-0270 > >>> > >>> x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net > >>> <mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net> > >>> > >>> *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] > >>> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones > >>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM > >>> *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >>> > >>> yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. > >>> > >>> I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak >>> <mailto:jno...@lrcomm.com>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? > >>> > >>> For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and > >>> fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 > >>> RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but > >>> it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash > >>> on something that specializes in modeling LTE. > >>> > >>> Joe > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones > >>> mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to > >>> profile against existing cutovers. is there something as > >>> accurate as linkplanner? > >>> > >> > > > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient > > > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>> > > Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/> > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&u > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&u> > > tm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > > > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > >
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
https://na.baicells.com/cbrs/ I'm curious about how vendors are testing their SAS software, when there is no SAS to test to On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Rory Conaway wrote: > Just out of curiosity, aren't the 3.65GHz licenses going away in 3 years? > > Rory > > -Original Message- > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jay Weekley > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:11 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage? > > Adam Moffett wrote: > > The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one > > to the other. There's some learning curve. > > > > > > -- Original Message -- > > From: ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> > > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > > Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > > >> The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. > >> I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am > >> comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am > >> pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? > >> *From:* Mitch Koep > >> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM > >> *To:* af@afmug.com > >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >> > >> The one problem I have with towercoverage is > >> > >> the only monthly payment option is paypal. > >> > >> Credit card is by far safer. > >> > >> I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal > >> > >> IMO > >> > >> Mitch Koep > >> > >> > >> On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: > >>> It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the > >>> data rates on? > >>> On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J > >>> > >>> Dennis Burgess > >>> > >>> www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 > >>> x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net > >>> > >>> *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones > >>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM > >>> *To:* af@afmug.com > >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >>> > >>> yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. > >>> > >>> I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? > >>> > >>> For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and > >>> fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 > >>> RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but > >>> it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash > >>> on something that specializes in modeling LTE. > >>> > >>> Joe > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to > >>> profile against existing cutovers. is there something as > >>> accurate as linkplanner? > >>> > >> > > > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&; > utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > Virus-free. www.avg.com > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&u > > tm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > > > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > >
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
I would not say CBRS is ‘right around the corner’. First release of the specification will be March 2018 time frame. The second release which is needed for WISP outdoor use (CatB) is due sometime next year - possibly mid 2008. There is no sign of the FCC moving to conduct the PAL auctions - figure 2019 at the earliest. And the FCC is about to reopen the design of CBRS. I expect that we will have to be asking for an extension of the existing licenses very soon. Mark > On Sep 22, 2017, at 2:19 PM, Rick Harnish wrote: > > The FCC will renew them until April 17th 2020. > > Respectfully, > > -- > Rick Harnish > > Director of WISP Markets > > Baicells Technologies North America, Inc. > Mobile: (972) 922-1443 > > rick.harn...@baicells.com > www.facebook.com/baicells > > > -Original Message- > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 2:18 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > Nope. CBRS is right around the corner. Vendors are testing their SAS > software. > > Existing NN licenses are good at least until they expire. I don't know if > the FCC will renew them, but I'm assuming they will. > > > -- Original Message ------ > From: "Rory Conaway" > To: "af@afmug.com" > Sent: 9/22/2017 2:09:15 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >> Just out of curiosity, aren't the 3.65GHz licenses going away in 3 >> years? >> >> Rory >> >> -----Original Message- >> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jay Weekley >> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:11 AM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >> >> Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage? >> >> Adam Moffett wrote: >>> The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one >>> to the other. There's some learning curve. >>> >>> >>> -- Original Message -- >>> From: ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> >>> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> >>> Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >>> >>>> The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. >>>> I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am >>>> comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am >>>> pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? >>>> *From:* Mitch Koep >>>> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >>>> >>>> The one problem I have with towercoverage is >>>> >>>> the only monthly payment option is paypal. >>>> >>>> Credit card is by far safer. >>>> >>>> I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal >>>> >>>> IMO >>>> >>>> Mitch Koep >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: >>>>> It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the >>>>> data rates on? >>>>> On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J >>>>> >>>>>Dennis Burgess >>>>> >>>>> www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 >>>>>x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net >>>>> >>>>>*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve >>>>> Jones >>>>>*Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM >>>>>*To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >>>>> >>>>>yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. >>>>> >>>>>I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware >>>>> >>>>>On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? >>>>> >>>>>For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and >>>>>fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 >>>>>RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but >>>>>it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash >>>>>on something that specializes in modeling LTE. >>>>> >>>>>Joe >>>>> >>>>>On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to >>>>>profile against existing cutovers. is there something as >>>>>accurate as linkplanner? >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> >>> Virus-free. www.avg.com >>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&u >>> tm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> >>> >>> >>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >> > >
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
The FCC will renew them until April 17th 2020. Respectfully, -- Rick Harnish Director of WISP Markets Baicells Technologies North America, Inc. Mobile: (972) 922-1443 rick.harn...@baicells.com www.facebook.com/baicells -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 2:18 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools Nope. CBRS is right around the corner. Vendors are testing their SAS software. Existing NN licenses are good at least until they expire. I don't know if the FCC will renew them, but I'm assuming they will. -- Original Message -- From: "Rory Conaway" To: "af@afmug.com" Sent: 9/22/2017 2:09:15 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >Just out of curiosity, aren't the 3.65GHz licenses going away in 3 >years? > >Rory > >-Original Message- >From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jay Weekley >Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:11 AM >To: af@afmug.com >Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage? > >Adam Moffett wrote: >>The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one >>to the other. There's some learning curve. >> >> >>-- Original Message -- >>From: ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> >>To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> >>Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM >>Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >> >>>The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. >>>I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am >>>comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am >>>pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? >>>*From:* Mitch Koep >>>*Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM >>>*To:* af@afmug.com >>>*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >>> >>>The one problem I have with towercoverage is >>> >>>the only monthly payment option is paypal. >>> >>>Credit card is by far safer. >>> >>>I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal >>> >>>IMO >>> >>>Mitch Koep >>> >>> >>>On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: >>>>It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the >>>>data rates on? >>>>On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>> Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J >>>> >>>> Dennis Burgess >>>> >>>>www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 >>>> x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net >>>> >>>> *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve >>>>Jones >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >>>> >>>> yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. >>>> >>>> I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? >>>> >>>> For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and >>>> fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 >>>> RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but >>>> it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash >>>> on something that specializes in modeling LTE. >>>> >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to >>>> profile against existing cutovers. is there something as >>>> accurate as linkplanner? >>>> >>> >> >><http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> >> Virus-free. www.avg.com >><http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&u >>tm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> >> >> >><#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
The will become part of the CBRS band 3550-3700 MHz. Respectfully, -- Rick Harnish Director of WISP Markets Baicells Technologies North America, Inc. Mobile: (972) 922-1443 rick.harn...@baicells.com www.facebook.com/baicells -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 2:09 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools Just out of curiosity, aren't the 3.65GHz licenses going away in 3 years? Rory -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jay Weekley Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:11 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage? Adam Moffett wrote: > The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one > to the other. There's some learning curve. > > > -- Original Message -- > From: ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >> The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. >> I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am >> comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am >> pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? >> *From:* Mitch Koep >> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >> >> The one problem I have with towercoverage is >> >> the only monthly payment option is paypal. >> >> Credit card is by far safer. >> >> I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal >> >> IMO >> >> Mitch Koep >> >> >> On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: >>> It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the >>> data rates on? >>> On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" >>> wrote: >>> >>> Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J >>> >>> Dennis Burgess >>> >>> www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 >>> x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net >>> >>> *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >>> >>> yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. >>> >>> I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak >>> wrote: >>> >>> Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? >>> >>> For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and >>> fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 >>> RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but >>> it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash >>> on something that specializes in modeling LTE. >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones >>> wrote: >>> >>> we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to >>> profile against existing cutovers. is there something as >>> accurate as linkplanner? >>> >> > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > Virus-free. www.avg.com > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&u > tm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
Nope. CBRS is right around the corner. Vendors are testing their SAS software. Existing NN licenses are good at least until they expire. I don't know if the FCC will renew them, but I'm assuming they will. -- Original Message -- From: "Rory Conaway" To: "af@afmug.com" Sent: 9/22/2017 2:09:15 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools Just out of curiosity, aren't the 3.65GHz licenses going away in 3 years? Rory -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jay Weekley Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:11 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage? Adam Moffett wrote: The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one to the other. There's some learning curve. -- Original Message -- From: ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? *From:* Mitch Koep *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools The one problem I have with towercoverage is the only monthly payment option is paypal. Credit card is by far safer. I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal IMO Mitch Koep On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the data rates on? On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" wrote: Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J Dennis Burgess www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak wrote: Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash on something that specializes in modeling LTE. Joe On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones wrote: we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile against existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as linkplanner? <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&u tm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
Just out of curiosity, aren't the 3.65GHz licenses going away in 3 years? Rory -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jay Weekley Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:11 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage? Adam Moffett wrote: > The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one > to the other. There's some learning curve. > > > -- Original Message -- > From: ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > >> The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. >> I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am >> comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am >> pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? >> *From:* Mitch Koep >> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >> >> The one problem I have with towercoverage is >> >> the only monthly payment option is paypal. >> >> Credit card is by far safer. >> >> I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal >> >> IMO >> >> Mitch Koep >> >> >> On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: >>> It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the >>> data rates on? >>> On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" >>> wrote: >>> >>> Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J >>> >>> Dennis Burgess >>> >>> www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 >>> x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net >>> >>> *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >>> >>> yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. >>> >>> I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak >>> wrote: >>> >>> Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? >>> >>> For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and >>> fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 >>> RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but >>> it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash >>> on something that specializes in modeling LTE. >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones >>> wrote: >>> >>> we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to >>> profile against existing cutovers. is there something as >>> accurate as linkplanner? >>> >> > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > Virus-free. www.avg.com > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&u > tm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage?
Adam Moffett wrote:
The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one
to the other. There's some learning curve.
-- Original Message --
From: ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for
free. I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am
comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am
pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM?
*From:* Mitch Koep
*Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
The one problem I have with towercoverage is
the only monthly payment option is paypal.
Credit card is by far safer.
I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal
IMO
Mitch Koep
On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the
data rates on?
On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess"
wrote:
Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J
Dennis Burgess
www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270
x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
*Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there.
I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak
wrote:
Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side?
For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and
fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100
RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but
it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash
on something that specializes in modeling LTE.
Joe
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones
wrote:
we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to
profile against existing cutovers. is there something as
accurate as linkplanner?
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
Virus-free. www.avg.com
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one to the other. There's some learning curve. -- Original Message -- From: ch...@wbmfg.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? From:Mitch Koep Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM To:af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools The one problem I have with towercoverage is the only monthly payment option is paypal. Credit card is by far safer. I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal IMO Mitch Koep On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the data rates on? On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" wrote: Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J Dennis Burgess www.linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve Jones Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM To:af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak wrote: Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash on something that specializes in modeling LTE. Joe On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones wrote: we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile against existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as linkplanner?
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
yeah, and it only does 2D modelling, so I'm not quite sure how its accurate on multipolarity antennas. I know its "just math" and "only as good as the data put in". I never could get super NLOS accurate results in RM for 320, I assume its because of the WiMAX magic and custom radio mites Has anybody ever priced out one of these cellular modelling systems that you do 3D structure renderings into? My guess is its way outside a small WISP budget, like over 50k On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 9:17 AM, wrote: > The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. I > have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am comfortable > with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am pretty proficient. > Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? > > *From:* Mitch Koep > *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > > The one problem I have with towercoverage is > > the only monthly payment option is paypal. > > Credit card is by far safer. > > I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal > > IMO > > Mitch Koep > > On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: > > It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the data > rates on? > > On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" wrote: > >> Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J >> >> >> >> Dennis Burgess >> >> www.linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 <%28314%29%20735-0270> – >> dmburg...@linktechs.net >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools >> >> >> >> yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. >> >> >> >> I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak wrote: >> >> Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? >> >> >> >> For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a >> -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It >> seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise without spending >> loads of cash on something that specializes in modeling LTE. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Joe >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones >> wrote: >> >> we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile against >> existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as linkplanner? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. I have
sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am comfortable with RM.
Always learning new stuff about it but I am pretty proficient. Isn’t
towercoverage just a web version of RM?
From: Mitch Koep
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
The one problem I have with towercoverage is
the only monthly payment option is paypal.
Credit card is by far safer.
I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal
IMO
Mitch Koep
On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the data rates
on?
On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" wrote:
Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J
Dennis Burgess
www.linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve Jones
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there.
I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak wrote:
Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side?
For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a
-80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It
seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise without spending
loads of cash on something that specializes in modeling LTE.
Joe
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones
wrote:
we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile against
existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as linkplanner?
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
It won't give you data rates like Link Planner. You would have to extrapolate that on you own based on predicted RSSI. -- Original Message -- From: "Steve Jones" To: af@afmug.com Sent: 9/22/2017 9:35:32 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the data rates on? On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" wrote: Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J Dennis Burgess www.linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve Jones Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM To:af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak wrote: Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash on something that specializes in modeling LTE. Joe On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones wrote: we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile against existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as linkplanner?
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
We can take a yearly payment via credit card or check if needed. You can also pay with paypal credit card as well. Dennis Burgess www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mitch Koep Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 8:45 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools The one problem I have with towercoverage is the only monthly payment option is paypal. Credit card is by far safer. I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal IMO Mitch Koep On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the data rates on? On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>> wrote: Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to ☺ Dennis Burgess www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of Steve Jones Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak mailto:jno...@lrcomm.com>> wrote: Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash on something that specializes in modeling LTE. Joe On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote: we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile against existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as linkplanner?
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
The one problem I have with towercoverage is
the only monthly payment option is paypal.
Credit card is by far safer.
I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal
IMO
Mitch Koep
On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the
data rates on?
On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" <mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>> wrote:
Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J
Dennis Burgess
www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 x103
– dmburg...@linktechs.net
<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
*Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there.
I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak mailto:jno...@lrcomm.com>> wrote:
Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side?
For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and
fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100
RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but it's
hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash on
something that specializes in modeling LTE.
Joe
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones
mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to
profile against existing cutovers. is there something as
accurate as linkplanner?
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
Much more accurate, given data, etc..We go down to 1/9 arc second data. Dennis Burgess www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve Jones Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 8:36 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the data rates on? On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>> wrote: Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to ☺ Dennis Burgess www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of Steve Jones Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak mailto:jno...@lrcomm.com>> wrote: Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash on something that specializes in modeling LTE. Joe On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote: we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile against existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as linkplanner?
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the data rates on? On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" wrote: > Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J > > > > Dennis Burgess > > www.linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 <(314)%20735-0270> – > dmburg...@linktechs.net > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones > *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools > > > > yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. > > > > I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware > > > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak wrote: > > Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? > > > > For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a > -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It > seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise without spending > loads of cash on something that specializes in modeling LTE. > > > > > > > > Joe > > > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones > wrote: > > we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile against > existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as linkplanner? > > > > > > > > >
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to ☺ Dennis Burgess www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve Jones Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak mailto:jno...@lrcomm.com>> wrote: Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash on something that specializes in modeling LTE. Joe On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote: we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile against existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as linkplanner?
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
Attenuation is attenuation whether it's LTE or WiFi or cans & string. Why do you guys think Radio Mobile can't predict coverage for LTE? -- Original Message -- From: "Steve Jones" To: "af@afmug.com" Sent: 9/21/2017 10:09:22 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak wrote: Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash on something that specializes in modeling LTE. Joe On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones wrote: we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile against existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as linkplanner?
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak wrote: > Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? > > For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a > -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It > seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise without spending > loads of cash on something that specializes in modeling LTE. > > > > Joe > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones > wrote: > >> we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile against >> existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as linkplanner? >> >> >> >
Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash on something that specializes in modeling LTE. Joe On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile against > existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as linkplanner? > > >
