Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-03 Thread cunobelinus

On 2 Feb 2012, at 15:36, cliveb wrote:

 
 cunobelinus;688073 Wrote: 
 You can transfer a 45 minute LP in 15 minutes? That's a neat trick.
 Surely TheLastMan means that it takes an extra 15 mins on top of the
 time to do the actual recording.

Clearly, in which case by setting his figure of 15 minutes against mine of 3 to 
4 hours he was, for his own purpose, failing to compare like with like, which 
is what I was pointing out. His figure was only for post processing. Mine was 
for the whole process from the moment I selected the record to transfer to the 
last full stop at the end of tagging. It seemed to me rather strange - one 
might almost say wilful - to juxtapose the two figures without acknowledgement 
of that fact.

My apologies if that was unclear, but I'd much prefer light heartedly to use a 
little wit and indirection to counter a fallacy - and possibly raise a laugh in 
the process - than plod clumsily through some tedious step by step rebuttal, 
(which would in any case to have expended more time and energy on the point 
than it deserved), unusual though this approach might be on an audiophile list.
 
 cunobelinus;688073 Wrote: 
 It tends to take me 45 minutes, plus the time it takes to clean, set
 levels (often needing a complete dry run through in itself, watching
 the meters all the time, if I'm dealing with unfamiliar music on a disc
 I've not previously heard)
 Assuming you're using a decent modern soundcard its noise floor will be
 so far below that of the vinyl that you have heaps of headroom
 available. Therefore you can afford to be very conservative when
 setting levels and normalise later. So no need for a dry run, which
 will save you 45 mins.

Thanks for the suggestion, but as far as I remember, despite a very decent ADC, 
that was not my experience with those of the classical recordings that I was 
transferring that have an extremely wide dynamic range. I'll experiment again 
next time I have a session, though, and pray I'm wrong.
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-03 Thread cunobelinus

On 2 Feb 2012, at 18:33, TheLastMan wrote:

 
 cunobelinus;688073 Wrote: 
 Automatic track division tends to be very dodgy indeed with classical -
 the bulk of my music. I'll try VinylStudio again and see if it works
 now, but it certainly didn't last time.
 You are right, track breaks tend to be a lot less obvious in classical
 music.  As I stated in my post, I don't bother to record classical LPs.

Yes, you did state that, which is why I was making the point that our 
experience and requirements - and the experience and requirements in general of 
those contemplating transferring LPs to hard disc - differ.

 I try and buy an appropriate CD. With classical music I am not worried
 too much about the particular performance of a work, as long as there
 is at least one decent performance on CD. I find that most of the
 renowned historical performances are on CD anyway.
 
 If you are looking for obscure classical music tag data then I doubt
 you will find VinylStudio any better than before.

A huge range lies between the obvious classic recordings of great, popular 
works, (most of which have indeed been transferred) and obscure classical 
music. What I've got is a good, comprehensive, but not exceptional, collection 
by a knowledgeable music lover, which is only occasionally abstruse, (and then, 
illuminatingly so) dating between 1960 or so and 1991. My aim is to preserve, 
in a useable digital reference archive, the integrity of that collection, 
(including that of the individual LPs, very few of which have been released in 
their original form on CD) which in itself throws a light of interest to me 
personally on the related professional field in which the collector was 
distinguished. 

 These databases are
 very much geared up to popular music formats.

Yes, indeed, That's why I said that they are no use to me, and was warning that 
the same might be true for others who might be contemplating transferring 
classical LPs. Others will have different experience and requirements.

 I use my own peculiar
 and very personal tagging scheme for classical CDs which probably would
 not suit anybody else anyway.

Likewise. Re-tagging the inconsistent and even absurd offerings of CDDB so that 
they are consistent and logical enough to use with LMS in itself takes hours - 
although not as many as tagging from scratch.
 
 You can transfer a 45 minute LP in 15 minutes?If I were being uncharitable, 
 I might accuse you of wilful
 misunderstanding! I, of course, mean 15 minutes on top of the time
 needed to record the album, as I stated clearly in my previous post on
 this thread.

If I were being uncharitable, I might accuse you of wilfully failing to take 
the point I was light-heartedly making here: that your 15 minutes and my 3-4 
hours refer to different things, although that is not how it appeared in the 
way you used the figures in juxtaposition, and in opposition.
 
 I find that with pop/rock I can set levels adequately by sampling a
 minute or two from one or two obviously loud tracks. I have got better
 at this with practice.
 
 All the stuff I'm transferring is the stuff with which you don't bother.
 It is all acoustic. There is no way round doing it because none of it is
 issued on CD.

 Fair enough. It is not that I don't bother it is more that my
 collection contains very little music that has not been released on CD.

My apologies. I misread that part of your previous post in which, on 
re-reading, you appear to be saying that you didn't bother post-processing 
classical or quiet acoustic folk music. However, you did subsequently also 
repeat in the post to which I was replying

 As I stated in my post, I don't bother to record classical LPs.

which made me for some reason think that it meant that you don't bother to 
record classical LPs, and then to use that phrase in my reply. I am sorry if 
you found this in some way derogatory.

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-03 Thread cliveb

cunobelinus;688319 Wrote: 
 On 2 Feb 2012, at 15:36, cliveb wrote:
 
  Assuming you're using a decent modern soundcard its noise floor will
 be
  so far below that of the vinyl that you have heaps of headroom
  available. Therefore you can afford to be very conservative when
  setting levels and normalise later. So no need for a dry run, which
  will save you 45 mins.
 
 Thanks for the suggestion, but as far as I remember, despite a very
 decent ADC, that was not my experience with those of the classical
 recordings that I was transferring that have an extremely wide dynamic
 range. I'll experiment again next time I have a session, though, and
 pray I'm wrong.
Well, just because the music is well-recorded classical does not alter
the fact that vinyl LPs have a maximum dynamic range around the 60dB
mark - perhaps 70dB for a pristine audiophile pressing with a
following wind.

Modern soundcards routinely achieve noise floors below -90dB. (Even my
modest M-Audio AP2496, which must be well over 5 years old, achieves
about -93dB). Using such a soundcard, you can safely record LPs at a
peak level down around -12dB and the vinyl surface noise will still
overwhelm the soundcard's noise floor. My recommendation is to visually
inspect the LP to find what looks to be the loudest section, then set
levels to peak at about -9dB on that section. That still gives you a
decent amount of headroom for surprise peaks.


-- 
cliveb

Transporter - ATC SCM100A

cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-03 Thread cunobelinus

On 3 Feb 2012, at 12:22, cliveb wrote:

 Well, just because the music is well-recorded classical does not alter
 the fact that vinyl LPs have a maximum dynamic range around the 60dB
 mark - perhaps 70dB for a pristine audiophile pressing with a
 following wind.
 
 Modern soundcards routinely achieve noise floors below -90dB. (Even my
 modest M-Audio AP2496, which must be well over 5 years old, achieves
 about -93dB). Using such a soundcard, you can safely record LPs at a
 peak level down around -12dB and the vinyl surface noise will still
 overwhelm the soundcard's noise floor. My recommendation is to visually
 inspect the LP to find what looks to be the loudest section, then set
 levels to peak at about -9dB on that section. That still gives you a
 decent amount of headroom for surprise peaks.


That's what I usually do, saving the -9dB suggestion, which may well be very 
useful. I have been caught out just visually inspecting, but that might well 
make the difference. I'll try it with the next batch. Thank you! (My M-Audio is 
definitely over 5 years old, too, incidentally).
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-03 Thread TheLastMan

cliveb;688331 Wrote: 
 Well, just because the music is well-recorded classical does not alter
 the fact that vinyl LPs have a maximum dynamic range around the 60dB
 mark - perhaps 70dB for a pristine audiophile pressing with a
 following wind.
 
 Modern soundcards routinely achieve noise floors below -90dB. (Even my
 modest M-Audio AP2496, which must be well over 5 years old, achieves
 about -93dB). Using such a soundcard, you can safely record LPs at a
 peak level down around -12dB and the vinyl surface noise will still
 overwhelm the soundcard's noise floor. My recommendation is to visually
 inspect the LP to find what looks to be the loudest section, then set
 levels to peak at about -9dB on that section. That still gives you a
 decent amount of headroom for surprise peaks.
Yep, that is pretty much how I do it too. One of the facilities of
VinylStudio is that it counts clips in your recording as you go
along. As I usually listen to the music as it is recording I am aware
of any clips and can make a quick fine adjustments on the fly.  I am
not usually worried if I have one or two clips in a recording.  If I
have the basic level about right they are usually the very peak of a
transient of a couple of milliseconds and no distortion is audible.

I think the misunderstandings between myself and Cunobelinus is that he
and you  digitise precious recordings that are not available any other
way.  Because of that you are both taking an appropriately diligent and
serious approach.

For me the process of digitising my LPs started as a casual experiment
but quickly became just added on to a process of rediscovering the
older parts of my music collection. Without that extra motivation I
doubt I would have got past recording the first 3 or 4 discs.

However, as I am listening to the music anyway, I might as well record
it at the same time and save myself the cost of buying the CD. For
instance last night I listened to, and recorded, Rickie Lee Jones The
Magazine.  I remember playing it avidly for a few months after I
bought it in 1984 but I don't think it has been out of its sleeve since
I moved to London in 1989. It was pretty pristine so I just manually
removed 3 pops at the start of one of the tracks but otherwise dumped
it straight into FLAC files. The Discogs database via VinylStudio had no
trouble finding tag data with track times and cover art came from
Amazon. Processing time was about 6 minutes setting track breaks, 5
minutes removing the three pops and 40 seconds to save the FLAC files.

Last week I played Donald Fagen's Nightfly and Kamakiriad. Although
Kamakiriad was fine, I had played Nightfly to death in the past and the
disc showed it. There was no visible damage or grime, but a lot of
intrusive clicks and pops. After trying to repair the surface noise in
the first track I got bored, dumped the computer WAV file and ordered
the CD for £4.50 from Amazon. In the meantime I am listening to it on
Napster.  Brilliant album!


-- 
TheLastMan

Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet (Controller + two receivers)
*Server:* Synology DS107+ (500GB) NAS running LMS 7.7.0 on SSODSmod
4.14
*Network:* Netgear DG834GT ADSL modem/router, 2 x Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 as
access points
*Livingroom:* Receiver into Naim 42/110 amp, BW CM2 speakers
*Kitchen:* Receiver into Denon DM37 mini-system, BW 686 speakers
*Study:* Linn LP12, Naim 72/Hi-cap/Headline.

TheLastMan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16021
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-03 Thread cliveb

TheLastMan;688345 Wrote: 
 One of the facilities of VinylStudio is that it counts clips in your
 recording as you go along.
Of course once the signal is digitised, there is no way to know for
sure if it has been clipped - all you can do is apply some kind of rule
such as 4 or more consecutive full scale samples is probably a clip.
Does VinylStudio allow you to parameterise this? For example, some
older soundcards (eg. the Creative ones based on the Ensoniq 137x
chipset) have some sort of analgue saturation/clipping at about -2dBFS,
and the samples delivered are not all at the same level. So to detect
clipping through a soundcard like that, you need to be able to set a
threshold level.

TheLastMan;688345 Wrote: 
 I think the misunderstandings between myself and Cunobelinus is that he
 and you  digitise precious recordings that are not available any other
 way.
I can't speak for Cunobelinus, but I started out doing this in order to
digitise LPs that were unavailable or unaffordable on CD. Then after a
while I found I was enjoying the process, so I began transferring some
LPs that were on CD but were not that essential to me. But as a general
rule, I do buy the CD unless I know it's a poor transfer.


-- 
cliveb

Transporter - ATC SCM100A

cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-03 Thread TheLastMan

cliveb;688379 Wrote: 
 Of course once the signal is digitised, there is no way to know for sure
 if it has been clippedTrue.  However I am usually aware of when the clipping 
 takes place and a
pretty good idea where in the  track it is. 

I have never let a recording go grossly into clipping. If I have let
a clip through it is usually percussion, something like a single kick
drum beat, just tipping over the top. A tweak on the Naim's volume
control usually stops further problems.

I have never felt the need to identify the clips after the event. If I
thought I needed to do that I would just re-record the offending track
at a lower level.


-- 
TheLastMan

Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet (Controller + two receivers)
*Server:* Synology DS107+ (500GB) NAS running LMS 7.7.0 on SSODSmod
4.14
*Network:* Netgear DG834GT ADSL modem/router, 2 x Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 as
access points
*Livingroom:* Receiver into Naim 42/110 amp, BW CM2 speakers
*Kitchen:* Receiver into Denon DM37 mini-system, BW 686 speakers
*Study:* Linn LP12, Naim 72/Hi-cap/Headline.

TheLastMan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16021
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-02 Thread TheLastMan

cunobelinus;687552 Wrote: 
 
 The process is a chore - times about 20 compared with ripping CDs, not
 least because of the manual entry, without the aid of any online
 database, of all the tags, and because it's not a process you can leave
 to itself, like CD rips.You can make it shorter if you are prepared to use 
 simpler software that
finds track breaks and tag information automatically.

*'VinylStudio'
(http://www.alpinesoft.co.uk/VinylStudio/screenshots.aspx)* gives
access to all the usual tagging databases *while the LP is recording*
and adds the data to your FLAC, OGG or MP3 files automatically.  All
you do is enter the artist and album name and it finds the track
information and album art. It also detects breaks between tracks either
through the silences or using the timing information that usually comes
with the tags. A bit of fine adjustments of the track breaks is usually
necessary but it has very simple tools for doing that.

If you don't do any de-clicking the whole process only takes 5-10
minutes on top of recording the LP.

 And then there's the cleaning beforehand, which seems to me to be
 greatly preferable to digital noise removal because it doesn't in any
 way risk the sound of the recording, but which takes an age.

I don't usually clean my disks as I find very little benefit.  Very
occasionally, with an obviously grubby record, I simply rub washing up
detergent (Fairy or similar) into the face of the disk with my fingers
and then carefully rinse off under the tap - making sure not to get the
central label damp.

I have always been -very- careful about the care of my LPs. It helps
that the UK is a fairly damp place so there is rarely a problem with
static electricity attracting dust. 

The quality and type of cartridge and stylus plays its part. The ATOC9
uses a fine line stylus that digs deep into the groove.  This means it
tends to read the signal further down the groove which has not been
damaged by previous styli.  It has a larger contact area so does not
distort the vinyl and that reduces wear.  It also sticks to the track
like an F1 car! It is a revelation on inner tracks - where once there
was distortion now there is none.  No mis-tracking means less groove
damage.

Finally, a really good turntable and tonearm will provide a much higher
dynamic range signal making surface noise much less obvious - but you
seem to have that sorted.  

I am surprised at your combination of Technics and SME V. I would have
thought a highly rigid, high mass arm like the SME would be better
suited to a rigid belt drive suspended sub-chassis turntable. Have you
looked at the SME turntables?

 ...if an LP has been issued as a CD, I buy that rather than rip the LP.
 There is no post processing other than topping, tailing, splitting and
 tagging - and it still takes the best part of four hours per
 (classical) LP including the tagging.

Four hours!?!
I give up if it takes me more than 15 minutes!!

I only go through this process with pop, rock and jazz that are
generally loud.  I do not bother with classical or quiet acoustic
folk music where surface noise can be more intrusive.  Also classical
CD recordings are usually much better than you find with recent
pop/rock CD reissues.  There is not the same compression and loudness
wars going on with classical CDs.

I am very suspicious of recent digitally remastered re-issues of
albums from the 1970s - 1990s. I prefer to buy the original CDs second
hand which are probably more faithful to the vinyl version.


-- 
TheLastMan

Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet (Controller + two receivers)
*Server:* Synology DS107+ (500GB) NAS running LMS 7.7.0 on SSODSmod
4.14
*Network:* Netgear DG834GT ADSL modem/router, 2 x Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 as
access points
*Livingroom:* Receiver into Naim 42/110 amp, BW CM2 speakers
*Kitchen:* Receiver into Denon DM37 mini-system, BW 686 speakers
*Study:* Linn LP12, Naim 72/Hi-cap/Headline.

TheLastMan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16021
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-02 Thread cliveb

TheLastMan;688020 Wrote: 
 I find a few minor crackles between tracks strangely comforting in a
 nostalgic kind of way.
 
 As long as there are no loud pops I rarely notice surface noise when
 playing the music through speakers (at least with pop, rock and jazz).
 If there is enough to be annoying I just buy the CD.
Different people obviously have different thresholds for annoyance wrt.
surface noise. I remember way back in the 1980s I attended an open day
at Naim's Salisbury factory, and it included a demo of their new SBL
speakers. They put on a record (using a Linn LP12) and I was absolutely
gob-smacked that they considered the crackle-fest which emerged as
appropriate for a professional demo. And yet there were others in the
room who seemed able to ignore it. I'm not talking about a bit of minor
noise - it was like one of the musicians was using bacon in a frying pan
as his instrument!


-- 
cliveb

Transporter - ATC SCM100A

cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-02 Thread cunobelinus

On 2 Feb 2012, at 10:52, TheLastMan wrote:

 You can make it shorter if you are prepared to use simpler software that
 finds track breaks and tag information automatically.

Audacity and Amadeus Pro are about as simple as it gets! I suspect that you 
mean more complex software that makes the process simpler!
 
 *'VinylStudio'
 (http://www.alpinesoft.co.uk/VinylStudio/screenshots.aspx)* gives
 access to all the usual tagging databases *while the LP is recording*
 and adds the data to your FLAC, OGG or MP3 files automatically.

Very useful reminder. I'd forgotten I'd tried VinylStudio. Thank you. It is 
some time now since I did any transferring, and it's obviously progressed a lot 
since I last looked at it. (I can't even remember now whether it was for Mac 
when I did, or whether it handled Aiff and ALAC). However, there would have to 
be a very good classical database indeed in order to enable this. It would need 
to include classical LPs going back to the 1960s, many of which have never been 
transferred to CD, or which have been issued only as filleted and repackaged 
transfers with missing tracks, extra tracks, amalgamation of tracks from 
several different LPs and so on. Last time I checked, it didn't exist and 
tagging on all the discs I had chosen to transfer (because I couldn't buy the 
CD) had to be completely manual.

 All
 you do is enter the artist and album name and it finds the track
 information and album art. It also detects breaks between tracks either
 through the silences or using the timing information that usually comes
 with the tags. A bit of fine adjustments of the track breaks is usually
 necessary but it has very simple tools for doing that.

Automatic track division tends to be very dodgy indeed with classical - the 
bulk of my music. I'll try VinylStudio again and see if it works now, but it 
certainly didn't last time.

 
 If you don't do any de-clicking the whole process only takes 5-10
 minutes on top of recording the LP.

I very rarely de-click, and never noise reduce. I clean.
 

snip
 
 
 I am surprised at your combination of Technics and SME V. I would have
 thought a highly rigid, high mass arm like the SME would be better
 suited to a rigid belt drive suspended sub-chassis turntable. Have you
 looked at the SME turntables?

Yes. I do not need to spend more than, or use a setup different from, this. The 
combination I have is better than my ears.
 
 ...if an LP has been issued as a CD, I buy that rather than rip the LP.
 There is no post processing other than topping, tailing, splitting and
 tagging - and it still takes the best part of four hours per
 (classical) LP including the tagging.
 
 Four hours!?!
 I give up if it takes me more than 15 minutes!!

You can transfer a 45 minute LP in 15 minutes? That's a neat trick. It tends to 
take me 45 minutes, plus the time it takes to clean, set levels (often needing 
a complete dry run through in itself, watching the meters all the time, if I'm 
dealing with unfamiliar music on a disc I've not previously heard), run/record, 
divide, top, tail, and tag.
 
 I only go through this process with pop, rock and jazz that are
 generally loud.  I do not bother with classical or quiet acoustic
 folk music where surface noise can be more intrusive. Also classical
 CD recordings are usually much better than you find with recent
 pop/rock CD reissues.  There is not the same compression and loudness
 wars going on with classical CDs.

That's the difference, then. All the stuff I'm transferring is the stuff with 
which you don't bother. It is all acoustic. There is no way round doing it 
because none of it is issued on CD. My collection of amplified music is, on the 
other hand, almost all - with a few exceptions - on CD.  These were either 
bought when the original LPs were first transferred and issued in the new 
format, or were always CD only.
 
 I am very suspicious of recent digitally remastered re-issues of
 albums from the 1970s - 1990s. I prefer to buy the original CDs second
 hand which are probably more faithful to the vinyl version.

 I don't use remasters if I can help it, either.

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-02 Thread Jeff Flowerday

Vinyl noise annoys the crap out of me.  I manually clean everything that
I care about.  I have a few bootleg LPs that are only worth an automatic
declicking.

What annoys me more is when you hear clicks and noises on modern
accurately ripped CDs, where is the quality control?  It's not often
but still happens.  LOL


-- 
Jeff Flowerday

Jeff Flowerday's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15883
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-02 Thread TheLastMan

cliveb;687573 Wrote: 
 Vinyl surface noise (apart from big clicks) didn't bother me either back
 then, but once I started using CD it did begin to annoy me.I find a few minor 
 crackles between tracks strangely comforting in a
nostalgic kind of way.

As long as there are no loud pops I rarely notice surface noise when
playing the music through speakers (at least with pop, rock and jazz).
If there is enough to be annoying I just buy the CD.


-- 
TheLastMan

Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet (Controller + two receivers)
*Server:* Synology DS107+ (500GB) NAS running LMS 7.7.0 on SSODSmod
4.14
*Network:* Netgear DG834GT ADSL modem/router, 2 x Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 as
access points
*Livingroom:* Receiver into Naim 42/110 amp, BW CM2 speakers
*Kitchen:* Receiver into Denon DM37 mini-system, BW 686 speakers
*Study:* Linn LP12, Naim 72/Hi-cap/Headline.

TheLastMan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16021
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-02 Thread TheLastMan

cunobelinus;688073 Wrote: 
 Automatic track division tends to be very dodgy indeed with classical -
 the bulk of my music. I'll try VinylStudio again and see if it works
 now, but it certainly didn't last time.
 You are right, track breaks tend to be a lot less obvious in classical
music.  As I stated in my post, I don't bother to record classical LPs.
I try and buy an appropriate CD. With classical music I am not worried
too much about the particular performance of a work, as long as there
is at least one decent performance on CD. I find that most of the
renowned historical performances are on CD anyway.

If you are looking for obscure classical music tag data then I doubt
you will find VinylStudio any better than before.  These databases are
very much geared up to popular music formats. I use my own peculiar
and very personal tagging scheme for classical CDs which probably would
not suit anybody else anyway.

 You can transfer a 45 minute LP in 15 minutes?If I were being uncharitable, I 
 might accuse you of wilful
misunderstanding! I, of course, mean 15 minutes on top of the time
needed to record the album, as I stated clearly in my previous post on
this thread.

I find that with pop/rock I can set levels adequately by sampling a
minute or two from one or two obviously loud tracks. I have got better
at this with practice.

 All the stuff I'm transferring is the stuff with which you don't bother.
 It is all acoustic. There is no way round doing it because none of it is
 issued on CD.Fair enough.  It is not that I don't bother it is more that my
collection contains very little music that has not been released on CD.


So far, where I have come across a work in my stack of LPs that is not
-currently- available on CD, I have found it has been issued in the
past and might be available second hand. A standing order on e-bay
works surprisingly well at digging out obscure music. 

Having said that, my classical music tastes are very mainstream and
probably not much of a challenge to find issued on CD.

As ever there are horses for courses.


-- 
TheLastMan

Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet (Controller + two receivers)
*Server:* Synology DS107+ (500GB) NAS running LMS 7.7.0 on SSODSmod
4.14
*Network:* Netgear DG834GT ADSL modem/router, 2 x Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 as
access points
*Livingroom:* Receiver into Naim 42/110 amp, BW CM2 speakers
*Kitchen:* Receiver into Denon DM37 mini-system, BW 686 speakers
*Study:* Linn LP12, Naim 72/Hi-cap/Headline.

TheLastMan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16021
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-02 Thread TheOctavist

TheLastMan;688120 Wrote: 
 
 If this does not make you drool you are not a true audiophile ;)
 http://www.sme.ltd.uk/content/Model-203a-Review-hifi-news-1587.shtml

nah..

I like my SOTA Sapphire much better.


[image:
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/.a/6a00df351e888f88340133f575943d970b-800wi]


-- 
TheOctavist

VortexboxSBT(TT 3.0)Forssell MDAC-2Klein and Hummell 0300D

Sota Sapphire/Lyra KleosBespoke Valve Phono StageMastersound Due
VentiLink Audio K100

TheOctavist's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52700
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-02 Thread pski

Interesting opinions on cleaning. I've always used a discwasher and D3
after the zerostat gun. A quick google just now shows they still sell
these guns though they are considerably more expensive than my
antique.

By always I mean even before CD's. The zerostat de-statics TV's and
monitors as well.

P


-- 
pski

real stereo doesn't just wake the neighbors, it -enrages- them.. It is
truly the Golden Age of Wireless

pski's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15574
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-02 Thread cliveb

cunobelinus;688073 Wrote: 
 You can transfer a 45 minute LP in 15 minutes? That's a neat trick.
Surely TheLastMan means that it takes an extra 15 mins on top of the
time to do the actual recording.

cunobelinus;688073 Wrote: 
 It tends to take me 45 minutes, plus the time it takes to clean, set
 levels (often needing a complete dry run through in itself, watching
 the meters all the time, if I'm dealing with unfamiliar music on a disc
 I've not previously heard)
Assuming you're using a decent modern soundcard its noise floor will be
so far below that of the vinyl that you have heaps of headroom
available. Therefore you can afford to be very conservative when
setting levels and normalise later. So no need for a dry run, which
will save you 45 mins.


-- 
cliveb

Transporter - ATC SCM100A

cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-02 Thread cunobelinus

On 2 Feb 2012, at 14:49, pski wrote:

 the zerostat gun.

 By always I mean even before CD's. The zerostat de-statics TV's and
 monitors as well.


Probably my father's coolest gadget (circa 1968?) applied liberally before 
placement on the Garrard 301. I'm looking at the very one right now. Well, both 
of them, in fact - Zerostat and Garrard.
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-02 Thread TheLastMan

TheOctavist;688136 Wrote: 
 nah..
 I like my SOTA Sapphire much better.
 
Yeah, somehow network music players (or even CD players) don't look so
purposeful do they?


-- 
TheLastMan

Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet (Controller + two receivers)
*Server:* Synology DS107+ (500GB) NAS running LMS 7.7.0 on SSODSmod
4.14
*Network:* Netgear DG834GT ADSL modem/router, 2 x Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 as
access points
*Livingroom:* Receiver into Naim 42/110 amp, BW CM2 speakers
*Kitchen:* Receiver into Denon DM37 mini-system, BW 686 speakers
*Study:* Linn LP12, Naim 72/Hi-cap/Headline.

TheLastMan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16021
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-02 Thread Daverz

I use ClickRepair for removing ticks and pops that a cleaning can't
remove.  It works extremely well (well, better at ticks than pops).  I
use it on a low setting (10).

For track splitting, I do it by hand in audacity.  If it's not obvious
where the breaks go, then hopefully the record jacket has timings.  If
not, well there's always listening.


-- 
Daverz

Daverz's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32335
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-02 Thread TheOctavist

TheLastMan;688200 Wrote: 
 Yeah, somehow network music players (or even CD players) don't look so
 purposeful do they?

not at all! its another reason i like having my tt here...just not for
listening most of the time!


-- 
TheOctavist

VortexboxSBT(stock(TT failed dbt)Forssell MDAC-2Klein and Hummell
0300D

Sota Sapphire/Lyra KleosBespoke Valve Phono StageMastersound Due
VentiLink Audio K100

TheOctavist's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52700
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-01 Thread maggior

I'm seeing REAPER mentioned in a lot of places recently - here and in
pro audio forums.  It's appealing not only for it's feature set but
it's cost.  For a personal license, it $60.  The software is the same
whether you purchase a professional or personal license.

I may check it out just for grins.  I'm happy with Audition (Cool Edit)
since that's what I've been using for about 15 years now, but it would
be interesting to see how REAPER compares.

My Yamaha USB audio interface came with a copy of Cubase 5.  I
installed it an ugh - it is the most counter intuitive software I've
ever used.  Unless I can find something it will do that I can't do in
Audition, I don't think I'll be using it.


-- 
maggior

Rich
-
Setup: 2 SB3s, 4 Booms, 1 Duet, 1 Receiver, 1 Touch, iPeng on iPod
Touch, SqueezeCommander on Xoom.  SuSE 11.0 Server running
SqueezeBoxServer 7.5.5, MusicIP, and SqueezeSlave.  
Current library stats: 37,509 songs, 2,934 albums, 515 artists.
http://www.last.fm/user/maggior

maggior's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9080
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-02-01 Thread cunobelinus

On 1 Feb 2012, at 13:48, maggior wrote:

 Cubase 5 is the most counter intuitive software I've
 ever used.  Unless I can find something it will do that I can't do in
 Audition, I don't think I'll be using it.


My feeling precisely. A copy (of the Lite version, I think) came with my 
Focusrite Saffire. I opened it twice, the second time being because I couldn't 
believe it had been as bad as I remembered..

I tend to use Amadeus Pro - a very simple editor for the nearest thing I've 
found to blade and block. Sound Studio gets a look in sometimes, if it's 
obvious a transfer could do with the integration with Sound Soap (although I 
use that as little as possible)
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-31 Thread TheOctavist

use REAPER. 

Thank me later. it is a heavyweight professional audio tool. audacity,
cool.edit, vinyl whatever are all mickey mouse in comparison. 


i am well versed in reaper, pro.tools, samplitude and sequoia(my daw of
choice)and am happy to help anyone.


sound card wise..the esi juli@ is a phenomenal choice for this. the
onboard converters are good, loads of i/o and it is cheap!

again...fine to.record at.24 48{any higher is not beneficial) , do your
editing and processing..but imo you should always dither/resample back
to 16\44.1. vinyl has at most...12 bits resolution...so using 24
whatever is like using a industrial warehouse to store a
wristwatch..


-- 
TheOctavist

VortexboxSBT(TT 3.0)Forssell MDAC-2Klein and Hummell 0300D

Sota Sapphire/Lyra KleosBespoke Valve Phono StageMastersound Due
VentiLink Audio K100

TheOctavist's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52700
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-30 Thread firedog

Hi-

The Bellari vp530 is a good unit. I don't remember their models
exactly, but they make phono preamps with USB and tube output. At least
one with both.

As far as the RIAA curve: if you are going digital, there is a lot of
software around that will apply the RIAA curve for you to your file,
and good software will do it better and more accurately than just about
ANY hardware phono preamp. 

So what I recommend is: get a phono pre that gives you the option of
turning off the RIAA curve for recording purposes - Bellari actually
makes one like that (you can of course use it for vinyl playback with
the RIAA curve turned on). Then:

1. Record without the RIAA curve

2. Get rid of or reduce major pops, clicks, and noises.

3. Apply RIAA curve with software. 

4. Listen. If you think it sounds good you are done with the audio
forensics. What's left is tagging, splitting tracks, etc.

If you thing the file needs further processing, do it. I personally
find that automatic tools can work well if you apply very light
processing. Example: I don't try to get rid of all the hiss, I just try
to reduce it so it isn't so noticeable. Same for pops and clicks. I just
try to reduce volume with automatic tools, not eliminate them. I find
that with this approach I don't ruin the sound of my recordings, only
improve them. 

Software: Adobe Audition is good. I use Diamond Cut. It does a great
job applying the RIAA curve, by the way.

The interesting thing about transferring vinyl to digital is that if
you do a good job, the resulting digital tracks sound like analogue.
Sort of shows that digital sounding recordings are due to something
other than the inherent nature of digital.


-- 
firedog

GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running
Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DAC-V3,
MF X-150 as pre-amp, Grant Fidelity B-283MKII bufferClassDaudio SDS-470
amp; Devore Gibbon Super 8 Speakers; Dual 506 + Ortofon M20 (occasional
use); sometimes use PC with M-Audio 192 as digital source. SB Boom in
second room. Arcam CD82 which I don't use anymore, even though it's a
very good player.

firedog's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11550
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-27 Thread Phil Leigh

TheOctavist;686590 Wrote: 
 vinyl at its best is about 12 bit resolution. 
 
 16 bit is plenty. everytime i see someone touting a 24.bit
 vinyl.ripi laugh...because it is an epic waste.
 
 sure, space is cheap..but why waste it? water is cheap too but i dont
 fill up.a cooling tower to haveva drink. :-)

A 24-bit rip is important IF you are going to do any post-processing on
the rip such as volume/fades/noise reduction. The software will work
more effectively and introduce less artifacts.

Once all that is done then for sure you can reduce the final file to
16/44.1 and it will sound fine. In fact, no-one can tell the difference
if done PROPERLY.


-- 
Phil Leigh

You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/W7)+Teddy Pardo PSU - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1
DAC - Linn 5103 - full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's,
ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend
Supertweeters,VdH Toslink,Kimber 8TC Speaker  Chord Signature Plus
Interconnect cables
Stax4070+SRM7/II phones
Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything.

Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-27 Thread guidof

maggior;686501 Wrote: 
 I've used the ART USBPhonoPlus v2.  I think it's a great little device. 
 It supports both line level and phono level signals, with built in RIAA
 eq.  You can plug headphones directly into it, and it has a line out.  

Thanks very much for your detailed post.

On the ART Website there is no information about bitrate output.

One of the reviews on Amazon states: A/D  D/A: 16 bit, 44.1kHz or
48kHz, USB selectable.

Although I tend to agree that 16 bits is overkill for listening to
files converted from LPs, I would like to have the option to record at
24 bits in case any postprocessing is needed.

Do you know if 16 bits is max. with the ART unit?

Regards,

Guido F.


-- 
guidof

MUSIC ROOM:
Marantz TT 15S1 Turntable, Virtuoso Wood Cartridge-Conrad Johnson
Motif preamp
Oppo BDP-83 Universal Player-Cambridge Azur 840C DAC
Vortexbox Appliance-WiFi Bridge-Squeezebox Touch-Toslink-Cambridge
Azur 840C DAC-Adcom GFP-750 preamp-Music Reference RM-200 Mk II amp
- Martin Logan SL3s
DSpeaker Antimode 8033-REL T1 Sub
BEDROOM:
Squeezebox Touch (analog out)-Little Dot Mk III amp-AKG K701
headphones
SECOND BEDROOM:
Squeezebox Touch-Grado SR125 headphones

guidof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40448
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-27 Thread pski

I use the ART USB V.2 with a Sony belt drive and an Audio Technica
cart.

I don't diddle with output from a equalization basis so I use a simple
program called spin-it-again.

It presents a cassette recorder analogy: start play-hit record-play
side-pause-flip and repeat.

At that point the program has a go at identifying where each song
starts and stops and will preview this for you. It's a button you can
use any time.

The songs' stream is shown in a wave form and you can drag the
starts/stops and delete/insert track points. You can also stretch and
shrink the wave time-wise to finely pick starts/stops.

You can also adjust the playback of each song by percentage in case
you recorded at 45.

There's an album look-up that is sometimes effective.

I usually use the gently clean option to get ride of pops  such.

P


-- 
pski

real stereo doesn't just wake the neighbors, it -enrages- them.. It is
truly the Golden Age of Wireless

pski's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15574
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-27 Thread pski

guidof;686694 Wrote: 
 Thanks very much for your detailed post.
 
 On the ART Website there is no information about bitrate output.
 
 One of the reviews on Amazon states: A/D  D/A: 16 bit, 44.1kHz or
 48kHz, USB selectable.
 
 Although I tend to agree that 16 bits is overkill for listening to
 files converted from LPs, I would like to have the option to record at
 24 bits in case any postprocessing is needed.
 
 Do you know if 16 bits is max. with the ART unit?
 
 Regards,
 
 Guido F.

The ART I use shows (Vista CP/Sounds/recording/advanced) the box goes
up to 2 ch 16 bit stereo at 48kHz.

P


-- 
pski

real stereo doesn't just wake the neighbors, it -enrages- them.. It is
truly the Golden Age of Wireless

pski's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15574
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-27 Thread mlsstl

Just a few comments on the conversion process. Over the past 10 years
I've converted about 2,000 LPs and open reels to digital, so have my
process down fairly pat. 

I see no big need to comment on the vinyl playback end of things - if
you've been happy with your rig for playing records, it'll be just fine
playing for the conversion. 

I've tried a number of different sound cards and convertors for the A-D
process, and surprisingly I've always gone back to an older Soundblaster
card. I kept expecting to find better and never did. (I've actually
pulled that card forward through 3 PC upgrades.) 

I used Adobe Audition for recording and processing. It's a bit pricey,
but I'm very comfortable with its operation and features and it
supports everything I need done. 

I'll typically record one whole side of an LP at a time, then apply any
processing and save the side as a single file. Then I open a new window,
then cut and paste the first track from the whole side to the new file.
I'll typically do a fade in/out to take out the between-track noise
(and vinyl always has some), then save the first track. 

Repeat this by opening another new window and cut/paste the second
track. Repeat until the album is done and then tag everything and then
burn the album to CD or move it to the server. 

One note about processing. Click and pop removal can really improve the
listening quality of a conversion. However, I usually ID the really
egregious pops manually. 

I tend to be very light-handed with the automated pop removal as it can
be the source of artifacts. One needs to adjust the auto settings with
every album. Depending the type of music, the instruments played and
how they were recorded, the auto correction can be easy with fantastic
results or really screw things up. The worst auto-correction I ever had
was the Harry James Sheffield album. Auto correction seemed to (very
wrongly) think a close-miked trumpet needed a lot of fixing. The
results weren't pretty and I ended up with doing no auto-processing and
just manually taking out the worst pops. 

Converting your own analog material is a wonderful option. I have LPs
and many original open-reels that simply don't exist on CD. (Stan
Kenton at Drury College in 1975 or Marimba Ideal by Domingo Bethancourt
anyone?)

Alternatively, some of the CD releases of albums originally on LP have
been so mangled in their attempts to modernize the sound that the LP is
far preferable. 

Finally, converting your analog material is also a great way to become
reacquainted with your own collection!


-- 
mlsstl

mlsstl's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9598
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-27 Thread maggior

guidof;686694 Wrote: 
 Thanks very much for your detailed post.
 

You're welcome!

guidof;686694 Wrote: 
 
 Do you know if 16 bits is max. with the ART unit?
 

As pski pointed out, yes, it does 16 bit only.  If you want to do 24
bit and/or higher sampling rates, you are likely moving into the realm
of seperate phono preamp and DAC, rather than an integrated device.


-- 
maggior

Rich
-
Setup: 2 SB3s, 4 Booms, 1 Duet, 1 Receiver, 1 Touch, iPeng on iPod
Touch, SqueezeCommander on Xoom.  SuSE 11.0 Server running
SqueezeBoxServer 7.5.5, MusicIP, and SqueezeSlave.  
Current library stats: 37,509 songs, 2,934 albums, 515 artists.
http://www.last.fm/user/maggior

maggior's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9080
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-27 Thread maggior

As it happens, I've been researching USB audio interface devices to a
little home studio recording.  There are some devices in this category
support 24 bit with 96 kHz sampling.  The only problem with devices
like this are:
1) The inputs are typically designed for a studio environment, using
either XLR or TRS connectors.  So, you'll need adapters and/or special
cables.
2) Right and left channels are controlled seperately with no way to
gang them together so that the level of both channels can be controlled
with a single knob.  This can be viewed as a feature too since you would
have balance control of the signal being input to your computer.

Here are some reasonably priced devices I ran across during my research
that you might find fit your needs:
M-Audio Fast Track Pro Mobile USB - supports 24 bit/96 kHz
M-Audio Fast Track MKii USB Audio Interface - supports 24 bit/ 48 kHz
Lexicon Omega - 24/96 suport
Lexicon Alpha - 24/48 support

For a phono preamp, you could use a receiver you have with a phono in
and use a tape monitor loop to record.  Or, you could get something
like the ART DJPre II phono pramp.

Have fun!


-- 
maggior

Rich
-
Setup: 2 SB3s, 4 Booms, 1 Duet, 1 Receiver, 1 Touch, iPeng on iPod
Touch, SqueezeCommander on Xoom.  SuSE 11.0 Server running
SqueezeBoxServer 7.5.5, MusicIP, and SqueezeSlave.  
Current library stats: 37,509 songs, 2,934 albums, 515 artists.
http://www.last.fm/user/maggior

maggior's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9080
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-27 Thread Jeff Flowerday

Well personally I do feel the A/D converters are important.  I started
with the internal sound card on my motherboard, went to a Presonus
Firestudio Mobile and then settled on a RME Fireface UC.

Each was a notable improvement in sound quality.

If you can afford it I'd recommend the RME Babyface.


-- 
Jeff Flowerday

Jeff Flowerday's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15883
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread guidof

I'm considering ripping at least some of my LPs to my Vortexbox
Appliance for use with my SBTs. Here is Phil Leigh's reply to an
earlier post.

Phil Leigh;686417 Wrote: 
 Well, it was a while ago. I used my Linn LP12/Ittok/Troika into a Linn
 phono stage then an Apogee ADC into a Digital Audio Labs soundcard via
 s/pdif. I can't remember exactly what software I used - probably
 FastEddie for recording/track splitting and DART for mild de-noising.
 Most importantly, I monitored the process on headphones - speakers were
 silent to avoid any acoustic feedback. Although the LP12 is reasonably
 good at feedback suppression/isolation it wasn't by any means perfect!
 
 Albums were cleaned on a Keith Monks machine (thanks to a friend who
 had access to one), captured one side at a time, then split into
 tracks, then any severe clicks were taken out by hand (a very tedious
 process!) by editing at/near the sample level. Then a mild wash
 through DART if required to TRY and get rid of any residual noise - but
 this had to done judiciously - it's easy to overdo it and wreck the
 music. About 30% of my vinyl needed this final step. I only ripped
 stuff I couldn't get elsewhere on CD at the time - although 3/4 of what
 I ripped has since been reissued. The remainder was mostly obscure
 rock/pop stuff that sold 3 copies when released... Tarney/Spencer Band
 or Rockin' Jimmy Byfield anyone?
 Hope this helps
 regards
 Phil

I would probably prefer using some sort of USB phono preamp with
internal ADC rather than a system similar to the one Phil used.

Consequently, I'm looking for users' experiences with USB interfaces
such as the *ART* USBPhonoPlus v2, *NAD* PP3i, or *Pro-Ject* Phono Box
II USB Phono Preamp.

Also, VinylStudio has been suggested as one of the best software
solutions for this purpose. Your experience with this or others?

Ease of operation and SQ of the ultimate result are my main concerns.

Any information will be much appreciated.

Guido F.


-- 
guidof

MUSIC ROOM:
Marantz TT 15S1 Turntable, Virtuoso Wood Cartridge-Conrad Johnson
Motif preamp
Oppo BDP-83 Universal Player-Cambridge Azur 840C DAC
Vortexbox Appliance-WiFi Bridge-Squeezebox Touch-Toslink-Cambridge
Azur 840C DAC-Adcom GFP-750 preamp-Music Reference RM-200 Mk II amp
- Martin Logan SL3s
DSpeaker Antimode 8033-REL T1 Sub
BEDROOM:
Squeezebox Touch (analog out)-Little Dot Mk III amp-AKG K701
headphones
SECOND BEDROOM:
Squeezebox Touch-Grado SR125 headphones

guidof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40448
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread Jeff Flowerday

I go about it the hard way.

VPI 16.5 Record Cleaner
Rega P3-24/Power supply, with other upgrades.  Sumiko Blue MC
cartridge.
Jolida Tube Phono Preamp
RME Fireface UC audio interface
Presonus Studio One software
Click Repair Software (Manual mode click repair, no auto, it messes
with too many transients on auto)

Even though 24/96 is overkill for vinyl I still record it at 24/96. 
The Click Repair software is more precise with more data.


-- 
Jeff Flowerday

Jeff Flowerday's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15883
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread Soulkeeper

I have the NAD PP2 (fully analog), i -almost- wish I'd bought the PP3
instead, but as I later bought a Steinberg CI-1 sound card it's no
longer a problem. The PP2 is good, and the PP3i ought to be easy to use
as well, so I can -almost- recommend it without even having used one.
Software-wise I use Cubase, but I guess it's too complicated (feature
overkill) for the sole purpose of ripping vinyl.


-- 
Soulkeeper

'Bug 17797: Updating wiki.slimdevices.com'
(http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17797)

Soulkeeper's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35297
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread rgro

Soulkeeper;686487 Wrote: 
 I have the NAD PP2 (fully analog), i -almost- wish I'd bought the PP3
 instead, but as I later bought a Steinberg CI-1 sound card it's no
 longer a problem. The PP2 is good, and the PP3i ought to be easy to use
 as well, so I can -almost- recommend it without even having used one.
 Software-wise I use Cubase, but I guess it's too complicated (feature
 overkill) for the sole purpose of ripping vinyl.

I have the PP3i and, indeed, it is IS really easy to use.  I've used it
extensively with VinylStudio and have been quite pleased with the
results.


-- 
rgro

Rg

System information

Main: PS Audio Quintet  Vortexbox  Touch (wired) via optical  Rega
DAC  LFD LE IV Signature amp  VA Mozart Grands  REL Acoustics R305
sub.  

Home Theatre:  Duet/SBR (Wired)  Pioneer VSX 919  Energy Take 5
Classic 5.1.

SBS 7.7.1 r33751 on a Vortexbox Appliance, V 2.0.  Touch w/Hardware
V.5.  Touch: FW 7.7.1 r9558.  Duet: FW 7.7.1 r9557.

rgro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread krochat

guidof;686481 Wrote: 
 ...
 Also, VinylStudio has been suggested as one of the best software
 solutions for this purpose. Your experience with this or others?
 


I've been using Wave Corrector. ( http://www.wavecor.co.uk/ )

It doesn't download track information, but it can save processed files
as tagged FLAC files. 

I don't see in the VinylStudio help file that it will save as tagged
FLAC. Will it?

(I'm using my SOTA/ETII turntable with my Klyne SK-5A preamp and an
Echo Mio sound card to rip).

Thanks,
Kim


-- 
krochat

krochat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6579
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread Gblenn

guidof;686481 Wrote: 
 I'm considering ripping at least some of my LPs to my Vortexbox
 Appliance for use with my SBTs. Here is Phil Leigh's reply to an
 earlier post.
 
 
 
 I would probably prefer using some sort of USB phono preamp with
 internal ADC rather than a system similar to the one Phil used.
 
 Consequently, I'm looking for users' experiences with USB interfaces
 such as the *ART* USBPhonoPlus v2, *NAD* PP3i, or *Pro-Ject* Phono Box
 II USB Phono Preamp. Or maybe a Rolls bellari vp530?
 
 Also, VinylStudio has been suggested as one of the best software
 solutions for this purpose. Your experience with this or others?
 
 Ease of operation and SQ of the ultimate result are my main concerns.
 
 Any information will be much appreciated.
 
 Guido F.I started out with an integrated Amp connected headphones out to my
PC-soundcard for a DAC. It was quite demanding in terms of footprint on
my table so I switched over to a USB RIAA/DAC by Terratec (iVinyl).
I'd say regardless of price, it has clear advantages from a convenience
perspective over some more alaborate setups. The Nad PP3 looks good and
is not that much more expensive.
Terratec does have a good SW for recording and handles up to 24/96 if
you want. The built in Click and Pop removal is better than Adobe
Soundbooth in my experience. For one, at moderate to light settings it
does not affect over all sound as far as I can tell (Percussion for
example). I have also used the built in DeNoiser on a few bad cases,
but only in the quieter passages. It is ok, at least if you don't push
it too much, but that is probably the case with any noise reduction
sw.

However, you end up with Ripp - Clean - Save - open in some
Waveditor for splitting - convert to FLAC - open in Mp3Tag for
Tagging - find Cover art... finally done...
So now I tried Vinylstudio and although I think the Crack/Pop removal
in the Terratec SW (algorithmix) was better, every step is done inside
Vinylstudio and I save considerable time per LP with it... Not the
least since I don't need to be present while recording, it starts and
stops on needle down/up...


-- 
Gblenn

Gblenn's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=22759
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread maggior

I've used the ART USBPhonoPlus v2.  I think it's a great little device. 
It supports both line level and phono level signals, with built in RIAA
eq.  You can plug headphones directly into it, and it has a line out. 
The one odd thing (if I remember correctly) was that you couldn't play
back on the PC and have the signal come out on the line out jacks -
only the headphone jack.  Or maybe it's signal on the line in only
comes through on the headphone jack?  Not a big deal since it's not
really a sound card, it's more of an input device.  If you think that
could be an issue for you, check it out.  Actually, if you think it
matters to you, let me know and I'll check it out for you.

I found the preamp in it to be very quiet and did a good job of
allowing you to boost the signal of quieter lps without introducing a
bunch of noise.  It's nice to have a knob to tweak to set the levels! 
Many audio input devices with USB output don't have a means of
adjusting levels on the device and result in very low signal levels.

I haven't done much recording lately, so I have it set up on my bedside
table where I use it as a headphone amp with my SB3 connected to it.  It
comes with a wall-wart power supply that lets you use it this way.  It
will draw power from USB if connected to a PC.

Even though they don't state Windows Vista support, I found it works
with Vista.  I'm sure it would work with Win 7 too.  No reason it
shouldn't work with Linux either.

For doing the recording, tracking, noise reduction (declicking and
denoising), I used Cool Edit 2000.  Now I use Audition, which is what
Adobe called Cool Edit after they bought it.  What software you use I
think is more a personal preference - it probably doesn't matter all
that much.  I liked Cool Edit because I could batch process
declicking/denoising.  It also supports setting up snap to grid for
CD block boundaries.  This is important so you don't introduce gaps
when tracking in the middle of music (such as a concert).  This is
really only relevant if you plan on ever burning CDs of the music to be
played in a CD player.  Unfortunately, no cheaper audio software
supports this (last I checked anyway).

It can be a tedious process, but I found it enjoyable and very
educational.  Have fun!


-- 
maggior

Rich
-
Setup: 2 SB3s, 4 Booms, 1 Duet, 1 Receiver, 1 Touch, iPeng on iPod
Touch, SqueezeCommander on Xoom.  SuSE 11.0 Server running
SqueezeBoxServer 7.5.5, MusicIP, and SqueezeSlave.  
Current library stats: 37,509 songs, 2,934 albums, 515 artists.
http://www.last.fm/user/maggior

maggior's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9080
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread rgro

krochat;686496 Wrote: 
 I've been using Wave Corrector. ( http://www.wavecor.co.uk/ )
 
 It doesn't download track information, but it can save processed files
 as tagged FLAC files. 
 
 I don't see in the VinylStudio help file that it will save as tagged
 FLAC. Will it?
 
 (I'm using my SOTA/ETII turntable with my Klyne SK-5A preamp and an
 Echo Mio sound card to rip).
 
 Thanks,
 Kim

Yep, VinylStudio can save in flac.  As well, you can choose which flac
compression level as well as the bit depth.


-- 
rgro

Rg

System information

Main: PS Audio Quintet  Vortexbox  Touch (wired) via optical  Rega
DAC  LFD LE IV Signature amp  VA Mozart Grands  REL Acoustics R305
sub.  

Home Theatre:  Duet/SBR (Wired)  Pioneer VSX 919  Energy Take 5
Classic 5.1.

SBS 7.7.1 r33751 on a Vortexbox Appliance, V 2.0.  Touch w/Hardware
V.5.  Touch: FW 7.7.1 r9558.  Duet: FW 7.7.1 r9557.

rgro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread TheOctavist

the pros use


www.cockos.com/reaper


does all and more


full feature professional daw


-- 
TheOctavist

VortexboxSBT(TT 3.0)Forssell MDAC-2Klein and Hummell 0300D

Sota Sapphire/Lyra KleosBespoke Valve Phono StageMastersound Due
VentiLink Audio K100

TheOctavist's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52700
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread TheOctavist

www.stereophile.com/content/my-first-needle-drop-lessons-learnt-1

also...saving vinyl rips at 24 bits is utterly absurd and offers no
benefit.over redbook


-- 
TheOctavist

VortexboxSBT(TT 3.0)Forssell MDAC-2Klein and Hummell 0300D

Sota Sapphire/Lyra KleosBespoke Valve Phono StageMastersound Due
VentiLink Audio K100

TheOctavist's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52700
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread Daverz

I haven't tried to be scientific about it, but my 24-bit rips do seem to
sound notably better than 16-bit.  I'm using Audacity for recording, so
maybe it's an issue with the way it does the conversion.  I've beein
doing rips at 24/96 lately.  Disk space is cheap, and I don't do that
many rips that space is yet an issue.


-- 
Daverz

Daverz's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32335
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread guidof

To all prior posters:

Thank you very much for your informative replies.

Lots of input to mull over . . .

Any further thoughts will also be welcome.

Best regards,

Guido F.


-- 
guidof

MUSIC ROOM:
Marantz TT 15S1 Turntable, Virtuoso Wood Cartridge-Conrad Johnson
Motif preamp
Oppo BDP-83 Universal Player-Cambridge Azur 840C DAC
Vortexbox Appliance-WiFi Bridge-Squeezebox Touch-Toslink-Cambridge
Azur 840C DAC-Adcom GFP-750 preamp-Music Reference RM-200 Mk II amp
- Martin Logan SL3s
DSpeaker Antimode 8033-REL T1 Sub
BEDROOM:
Squeezebox Touch (analog out)-Little Dot Mk III amp-AKG K701
headphones
SECOND BEDROOM:
Squeezebox Touch-Grado SR125 headphones

guidof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40448
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread Munroe

guidof;686564 Wrote: 
 To all prior posters:
 
 Thank you very much for your informative replies.
 
 Lots of input to mull over . . .
 
 Any further thoughts will also be welcome.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Guido F.

I would like to second that as well.  Great idea starting this thread.


It seems I may have inadvertantly meandered the conversation down a ADC
conversion path in the TT3.0 thread, with questions of how to make my
24/96 on the Squeezebox sound like an LP of the same master pedigree(?)
using TT 3.0 for help.

Not quite as simple as I thought as the consensus seemed to agree that
it wasn't an apples to apples comparison. Fair enough, it never
occurred to me.  In order to get to a real comparison it was suggested
I should rip my vinyl and compare that, so if it can be done in a
fairly inexpensive process I am going to try to apply the knowledge
gained here as best I can.  

I haven't ripped a record since my days with 90 minute Chromium Dioxide
blank tapes using a dual deck Pioneer.  ;)  I have a feeling going
digital may not be as simple, but I'll keep my fingers crossed.


-- 
Munroe

Munroe's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52982
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread Mnyb

Daverz;686562 Wrote: 
 I haven't tried to be scientific about it, but my 24-bit rips do seem to
 sound notably better than 16-bit.  I'm using Audacity for recording, so
 maybe it's an issue with the way it does the conversion.  I've beein
 doing rips at 24/96 lately.  Disk space is cheap, and I don't do that
 many rips that space is yet an issue.

The idea is to always record at for example 24/96/88.2 do all post
processing you feel it need .

And then downconvert with for example dBp to 16/44.1/48 If you wish ,
you should use something with a good samplerate converting algorithm
and dither.

Do not record directly at 16/44.1 and then post process

The recording and processing at higher rates minimises all kinds of
artifacts.
Especially if some fillters is used for click and noise removal.

I can imagine the warps and clics can have a lot of energy so headroom
is needed when recording.

Just like in a studio you work with higher rez recording and producing
even if you only intend to produce a humble redbook cd :)

Hmm that stereophile link was a good one never considered pickup
resonances.

Good luck with vinyl rips, there is a lot of stuff out of print , wish
I did this before selling off my LP's :-/


-- 
Mnyb


Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3
sub.
Bedroom/Office: Boom
Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4
Misc use: Radio (with battery)
iPad 64gB wifi +3g with iPengHD  SqueezePad
(in storage SB3, reciever ,controller )

Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread gizek

Mnyb;686581 Wrote: 
 The idea is to always record at for example 24/96/88.2 do all post
 processing you feel it need 

Second that. 
I listen to vinyl not very often but only for the reason of not
excessive usage of stylus and record itself ;-)
Got recently some valuable records which needed to be digitally
immortalized. For cleaning I use cheapest dish liquid and hot distilled
water. Then goes the Technics 1200 MKII with  Ortofon 2M Blue cartridge
right into Pearl Phono Stage. Recording is usually made by field
recorder at 24/96 through line input. Post processing, crackle removal
etc. done in Sound Forge. 
Now, I found that some alcohol based cleaners increase background noise
- checked that many times, comparing recordings in Sound Forge.
I did not notice any difference among several recorders doing A/D
process. However I always kept them powered by batteries, not external
power supply. Worst sounding turns out to be computer with sound card
input. This is a digitizing process but I would use it in the least
amount needed.   
Also do not underestimate the phono stage. IMO this is, right with
turntable, the most important piece. My diy, all discrete, with passive
equalization Pearl, has very smooth RIAA curve and it really sounds.


-- 
gizek

SB Touch  DIY FDA-1 DAC  Pass Labs X1 preamp  Pass Labs XA30.5 amp 
Sonus Faber Cremona Auditor M

gizek's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34337
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread TheOctavist

for heavy editing, etc 32.bit float or 24 bit is good..only if doing
a lot of processing.


but leaving at.24 bits to listen is a huge waste...there are no sonic
gains16 bits capture the full bandwidth of lp
perfectly.abolutely NOTHING gained from leaving in high res...

so yeah...record at 32 bfp, edit, dither, resamplei like triangular
dither best personallybut powr is great too.

r8 brain is,a great vst ugin that can be used with reaper..


-- 
TheOctavist

VortexboxSBT(TT 3.0)Forssell MDAC-2Klein and Hummell 0300D

Sota Sapphire/Lyra KleosBespoke Valve Phono StageMastersound Due
VentiLink Audio K100

TheOctavist's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52700
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread TheOctavist

vinyl at its best is about 12 bit resolution. 

16 bit is plenty. everytime i see someone touting a 24.bit
vinyl.ripi laugh...because it is an epic waste.

sure, space is cheap..but why waste it? water is cheap too but i dont
fill up.a cooling tower to haveva drink. :-)


-- 
TheOctavist

VortexboxSBT(TT 3.0)Forssell MDAC-2Klein and Hummell 0300D

Sota Sapphire/Lyra KleosBespoke Valve Phono StageMastersound Due
VentiLink Audio K100

TheOctavist's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52700
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-26 Thread TheOctavist

also..the noise involved from the preamp, medium, etc renders the extra
bit depth for any processing in the editor meaningless and futile...


processing a lot of tracks heavily in a daw...yes.


for this? absolutely not. not required or useful.


-- 
TheOctavist

VortexboxSBT(TT 3.0)Forssell MDAC-2Klein and Hummell 0300D

Sota Sapphire/Lyra KleosBespoke Valve Phono StageMastersound Due
VentiLink Audio K100

TheOctavist's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52700
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93265

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles