Re: measuring VPN speed [7:12419]
uhhh, Chuck? you mean this one??? http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/neso/sqso/eqso/dplip_in.htm ;-) -e- - Original Message - From: Chuck Larrieu To: Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 2:42 PM Subject: RE: measuring VPN speed [7:12419] > 64K less the layer two overhead. ;-> > > seriously, nothing changes. > > on the other hand, if your question is "what is the overhead that IPSec > places on a datastream" you might be able to calculate an answer. > > the encryption algorithm takes time, obviously. depending on the platform > processor, depending on hardware versus software encryption, depending on > memory, that time will vary. There can be issues with IP fragmentation as > well, if you are transmitting large packets. > > If you are able to locate the IPSec Design Guide on CCO, there is a nice > section that covers some of this stuff. I no longer have the link, and as I > recall, finding it and downloading it has always been a pain. > > HTH > > Chuck > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Farhan Ahmed > Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 10:48 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: measuring VPN speed [7:12419] > > > lets say i have 64k connection on both ends > if i built up a vpn what will be the speed of the tunnel > > any thoughts? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12598&t=12419 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
isdn status [7:12599]
Hi all, these contarary messages from to commands ahve me stumped once it says that layer 1 is working and then it says that it isnt. Could anybody tell me what the problem is??? Omer 2503#sh isdn stat The current ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni1 ISDN BRI0 interface Layer 1 Status: ACTIVE Layer 2 Status: TEI = 76, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED TEI = 77, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED Spid Status: TEI 76, ces = 1, state = 5(init) spid1 configured, spid1 sent, spid1 valid Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 1, tid = 1 TEI 77, ces = 2, state = 5(init) spid2 configured, spid2 sent, spid2 valid Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 3, tid = 1 Layer 3 Status: 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s) Activated dsl 0 CCBs = 1 CCB: callid=0x0, sapi=0, ces=1, B-chan=0 Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 1 2504#ping 172.16.71.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.71.1, timeout is 2 seconds: ISDN BR0: TX -> SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x05 Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 Channel ID i = 0x83 Keypad Facility i = '8358661' ISDN BR0: RX <- RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x85 Cause i = 0x82A2 - No channel available ISDN BR0: Setup was rejected, cause = 22. Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) BRI unit 0 D Chan Info: Layer 1 is DEACTIVATED idb 0xBB2F0, ds 0xCB6E8, reset_mask 0x8 buffer size 1524 RX ring with 2 entries at 0x2101600 : Rxhead 1 00 pak=0x108E34 ds=0x407EDC4 status=D000 pak_size=0 01 pak=0x0CBA78 ds=0x403E1C0 status=F000 pak_size=0 TX ring with 1 entries at 0x2101640: tx_count = 0, tx_head = 0, tx_tail = 0 00 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=00 pak_size=0 0 missed datagrams, 0 overruns, 0 bad frame addresses 0 bad datagram encapsulations, 0 memory errors 0 transmitter underruns 0 d channel collisions B1 Chan Info: Layer 1 is DEACTIVATED idb 0xC0628, ds 0xCB7C0, reset_mask 0x0 buffer size 1524 RX ring with 8 entries at 0x2101400 : Rxhead 0 00 pak=0x0CC87C ds=0x40410C8 status=D000 pak_size=0 01 pak=0x0CC6AC ds=0x4040A10 status=D000 pak_size=0 02 pak=0x0CC4DC ds=0x4040358 status=D000 pak_size=0 03 pak=0x0CC30C ds=0x403FCA0 status=D000 pak_size=0 X ring with 4 entries at 0x2101440: tx_count = 0, tx_head = 0, tx_tail = 0 00 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 01 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 02 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 03 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=7C00 pak_size=0 0 missed datagrams, 0 overruns, 0 bad frame addresses 0 bad datagram encapsulations, 0 memory errors 0 transmitter underruns 0 d channel collisions B2 Chan Info: Layer 1 is DEACTIVATED idb 0xC5960, ds 0xCB890, reset_mask 0x2 buffer size 1524 RX ring with 8 entries at 0x2101500 : Rxhead 0 00 pak=0x0CE6D0 ds=0x4047C48 status=D000 pak_size=0 01 pak=0x0CE500 ds=0x4047590 status=D000 pak_size=0 02 pak=0x0CE330 ds=0x4046ED8 status=D000 pak_size=0 03 pak=0x0CE160 ds=0x4046820 status=D000 pak_size=0 04 pak=0x108524 ds=0x407CC2C status=D000 pak_size=0 05 pak=0x108354 ds=0x407C574 status=D000 pak_size=0 06 pak=0x108184 ds=0x407BEBC status=D000 pak_size=0 07 pak=0x107FB4 ds=0x407B804 status=F000 pak_size=0 TX ring with 4 entries at 0x2101540: tx_count = 0, tx_head = 0, tx_tail = 0 00 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 01 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 02 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 03 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=7C00 pak_size=0 0 missed datagrams, 0 overruns, 0 bad frame addresses 0 bad datagram encapsulations, 0 memory errors 0 transmitter underruns 0 d channel collisions 2504#ping 172.16.71.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.71.1, timeout is 2 seconds: ISDN BR0: Outgoing call id = 0x8007 ISDN BR0: Event: Call to 8358661 at 64 Kb/s ISDN BR0: Activating.. %ISDN-6-LAYER2DOWN: Layer 2 for Interface BR0, TEI 73 changed to down ISDN BR0: received HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK ISDN BR0: Error: Unexpected Disconnect_Ack - callid 8007.. ISDN BR0: Physical layer is IF_DOWN ISDN BR0: Shutting down ME ISDN BR0: Shutting down ISDN Layer 3. Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) 2504#ping 172.16.71.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.71.1, timeout is 2 seconds: BRI0: Dialing cause ip (s=172.16.71.2, d=172.16.71.1) BRI0: Attempting to dial 8358661 ISDN BR0: Outgoing call id = 0x8008 ISDN BR0: Event: Call to 8358661 at 64 Kb/s ISDN BR0: Activating.. %ISDN-6-LAYER2DOWN: Layer 2 for Interface BR0, TEI 73 changed to down ISDN BR0: received HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK ISDN BR0: Error: Unexpected Disconnect_Ack - callid 8008.. BRI0: wait for carrier timeout, call id=0x8008 ISDN BR0: Physical layer is IF_DOWN ISDN BR0: Shutting down ME ISDN BR0: Shutting down ISDN Layer 3. Success rate is 0 percent (0/5 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12599&t=12599 -- FAQ, list archives,
Get Your Free Digital One Touch Auto Scan Radio... [7:12600]
Free...Free...Free Thanks to our sponsors, this beautiful lightweight Digital one touch auto scan Radio at left will be yours if you response to the few questions below. Wear this anywhere you go! with this attractive lightweight Digital One Touch Auto Scan Radio. Incorporated with the concept of Space . Being wholly hanged on ear, you avoid the trouble of carrying it. Give you the freedom of whatever you do. Idea for a walk or jogging in the park, exercising at the Gym or anyway you feel like enjoying your favorite FM radio Stations. The iEar radio is designed to hanged comfortably on your ear along with the second earphone, which produce exceptional stereo sound quality music from your favorite radio stations. iEar uses the state of the art auto scanning technology, with the single touch of a button. It will scan and lock on the Radio station with the best possible signal. It comes in this cool translucent Blue color, and it's so easy to use. Makes you want to bring this anywhere you go this Summer. iEar is powered by 2 included lithium batteries. Similar gadgets like this sells for $65 in retail store, but it will be yours FREE. Our sponsors will assure you that your responses will in no way go into your personal profile. They are interested in statistical data only. Wear this anywhere you go! with this attractive lightweight Digital One Touch Auto Scan Radio. Incorporated with the concept of Space . Being wholly hanged on ear, you avoid the trouble of carrying it. Give you the freedom of whatever you do. Idea for a walk or jogging in the park, exercising at the Gym or anyway you feel like enjoying your favorite FM radio Stations. The iEar radio is designed to hanged comfortably on your ear along with the second earphone, which produce exceptional stereo sound quality music from your favorite radio stations. iEar uses the state of the art auto scanning technology, with the single touch of a button. It will scan and lock on the Radio station with the best possible signal. It comes in this cool translucent Blue color, and it's so easy to use. Makes you want to bring this anywhere you go this Summer. iEar is powered by 2 included lithium batteries. "> QuestionsResponse Do you own or use any kind of PDA(Personal Digital Assistant)? yes no Do you own or use a digital camera or camcorder?yes no Do you own or use a Sony game console such as PS1,PS2 or Gameboy? yes no Do you own or use a MP3 player? yes no Do you own or use a DVD player? yes no Group Profile: Area CodeGender: Male Female Age Group select below 18 and below 19-30 31-45 46-60 60+ Income select below less than 20k 20-30k 30-40k 40-60k 60-80k 80-100k 100k+ This survey is intended for [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you are not the intended recipient, please fill out your email address at right. Thanks. After you answer the questions, don't forget to Links to some of our sponsors: _ _ This email is sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you believe you did not belong to our sponsors customers list, you can remove your email address from our distribution list by clicking the link below. Click here if you prefer not to receive future e-mail from us. Click here to view our permission marketing policy. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12600&t=12600 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Block Icq With Pix Firewall [7:12601]
Hi How can i block Icq through Pix Firewall ? Any ideas ? Makis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12601&t=12601 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Catalyst 3920 token ring switch [7:12467]
Try this link - http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3920/3920ug4/config.h tm#39377 -e- - Original Message - From: Ruen-Chze Loh To: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 4:18 AM Subject: Catalyst 3920 token ring switch [7:12467] > Hi, > Can anyone let me know the steps to configure the > Catalyst 3920 for IP management, so that the Catalyst > 3920 can be managed from one of the token rings ? > > Thank-you. > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12602&t=12467 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Block Icq With Pix Firewall [7:12603]
Hi How can i block Icq through Pix Firewall ? Any ideas ? Makis _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12603&t=12603 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: isdn status [7:12599]
The first call failed because there were no available b-channels at the remote end (0x82A2). >From this information I cannot see why layer 1 is going down - try running "debug isdn q921" and "debug bri" to see if that gives any clues - it is most likely to be a telco problem though. Cheers Charlie --- Omer Ehsan Dar wrote: > Hi all, > these contarary messages from to commands ahve me stumped once it > says > that layer 1 is working and then it says that it isnt. Could > anybody > tell me what the problem is??? > Omer > > 2503#sh isdn stat > The current ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni1 > ISDN BRI0 interface > Layer 1 Status: > ACTIVE > Layer 2 Status: > TEI = 76, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED > TEI = 77, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED > Spid Status: > TEI 76, ces = 1, state = 5(init) > spid1 configured, spid1 sent, spid1 valid > Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 1, tid = 1 > TEI 77, ces = 2, state = 5(init) > spid2 configured, spid2 sent, spid2 valid > Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 3, tid = 1 > Layer 3 Status: > 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s) > Activated dsl 0 CCBs = 1 > CCB: callid=0x0, sapi=0, ces=1, B-chan=0 > Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 1 > 2504#ping 172.16.71.1 > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.71.1, timeout is 2 > seconds: > > ISDN BR0: TX -> SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x05 > Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 > Channel ID i = 0x83 > Keypad Facility i = '8358661' > ISDN BR0: RX Cause i = 0x82A2 - No channel available > ISDN BR0: Setup was rejected, cause = 22. > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) > > BRI unit 0 > D Chan Info: > Layer 1 is DEACTIVATED > idb 0xBB2F0, ds 0xCB6E8, reset_mask 0x8 > buffer size 1524 > RX ring with 2 entries at 0x2101600 : Rxhead 1 > 00 pak=0x108E34 ds=0x407EDC4 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 01 pak=0x0CBA78 ds=0x403E1C0 status=F000 pak_size=0 > TX ring with 1 entries at 0x2101640: tx_count = 0, tx_head = 0, > tx_tail > = 0 > 00 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=00 pak_size=0 > 0 missed datagrams, 0 overruns, 0 bad frame addresses > 0 bad datagram encapsulations, 0 memory errors > 0 transmitter underruns > 0 d channel collisions > B1 Chan Info: > Layer 1 is DEACTIVATED > idb 0xC0628, ds 0xCB7C0, reset_mask 0x0 > buffer size 1524 > RX ring with 8 entries at 0x2101400 : Rxhead 0 > 00 pak=0x0CC87C ds=0x40410C8 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 01 pak=0x0CC6AC ds=0x4040A10 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 02 pak=0x0CC4DC ds=0x4040358 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 03 pak=0x0CC30C ds=0x403FCA0 status=D000 pak_size=0 > X ring with 4 entries at 0x2101440: tx_count = 0, tx_head = 0, > tx_tail = > 0 > 00 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 > 01 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 > 02 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 > 03 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=7C00 pak_size=0 > 0 missed datagrams, 0 overruns, 0 bad frame addresses > 0 bad datagram encapsulations, 0 memory errors > 0 transmitter underruns > 0 d channel collisions > B2 Chan Info: > Layer 1 is DEACTIVATED > idb 0xC5960, ds 0xCB890, reset_mask 0x2 > buffer size 1524 > RX ring with 8 entries at 0x2101500 : Rxhead 0 > 00 pak=0x0CE6D0 ds=0x4047C48 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 01 pak=0x0CE500 ds=0x4047590 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 02 pak=0x0CE330 ds=0x4046ED8 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 03 pak=0x0CE160 ds=0x4046820 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 04 pak=0x108524 ds=0x407CC2C status=D000 pak_size=0 > 05 pak=0x108354 ds=0x407C574 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 06 pak=0x108184 ds=0x407BEBC status=D000 pak_size=0 > 07 pak=0x107FB4 ds=0x407B804 status=F000 pak_size=0 > TX ring with 4 entries at 0x2101540: tx_count = 0, tx_head = 0, > tx_tail > = 0 > 00 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 > 01 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 > 02 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 > 03 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=7C00 pak_size=0 > 0 missed datagrams, 0 overruns, 0 bad frame addresses > 0 bad datagram encapsulations, 0 memory errors > 0 transmitter underruns > 0 d channel collisions > > 2504#ping 172.16.71.1 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.71.1, timeout is 2 > seconds: > > ISDN BR0: Outgoing call id = 0x8007 > ISDN BR0: Event: Call to 8358661 at 64 Kb/s > ISDN BR0: Activating.. > %ISDN-6-LAYER2DOWN: Layer 2 for Interface BR0, TEI 73 changed to > down > ISDN BR0: received HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK > ISDN BR0: Error: Unexpected Disconnect_Ack - callid 8007.. > ISDN BR0: Physical layer is IF_DOWN > ISDN BR0: Shutting down ME > ISDN BR0: Shutting down ISDN Layer 3. > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) > > 2504#ping 172.16.71.1 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.71.1, timeout is 2 > seconds: > > BRI0: Dialing cause ip (s=172.16.71.2, d=172.16.71.1) > BRI0: Attempting to dial 8358661 > ISDN BR0: Outgoing call id = 0x8008 > ISDN BR0: Event:
Ports with PIX Firewall [7:12605]
I configured my PIX Firewall and opened all the TCP ports, I found that i can ping yahoo or cisco by ip address but not with name i.e ping cisco.com doesn't worked, then I opened all the UDP Ports also and my Surfing started also I was been able to PING by name. I just want to allow port 80 (HTTP), FTP , SMTP access to my users. Which all Ports do I need to Open?? DO I Need to open a port for DNS Name Resolution ? I am using DNS Server of ISP as I don't have resources to set-up my own DNS. Please Help Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12605&t=12605 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Block Icq With Pix Firewall [7:12601]
outbound 10 deny 0 0 icqport tcp apply (inside) 10 outgoing_src -Original Message- From: Makis To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 7/17/01 12:13 PM Subject: Block Icq With Pix Firewall [7:12601] Hi How can i block Icq through Pix Firewall ? Any ideas ? Makis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12606&t=12601 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ports with PIX Firewall [7:12605]
when u configure the dynamic nat users will start connecting i dont know what u done with the config send me the config to block some port u need for static mapping static (inside,outside) 204.31.17.4 192.168.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.255 conduit permit tcp host 10.1.1.1 eq smtp any outbound 10 permit 192.168.1.42 255.255.255.255 irc tcp apply (INSIDE) 10 outgoing_src SEND ME THE CONFIG -Original Message- From: Lano Kris To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 7/17/01 12:54 PM Subject: Ports with PIX Firewall [7:12605] I configured my PIX Firewall and opened all the TCP ports, I found that i can ping yahoo or cisco by ip address but not with name i.e ping cisco.com doesn't worked, then I opened all the UDP Ports also and my Surfing started also I was been able to PING by name. I just want to allow port 80 (HTTP), FTP , SMTP access to my users. Which all Ports do I need to Open?? DO I Need to open a port for DNS Name Resolution ? I am using DNS Server of ISP as I don't have resources to set-up my own DNS. Please Help Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12607&t=12605 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Boson [7:12609]
How much helpful are the Boson practice tests??? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12609&t=12609 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611]
Hi , I am facing an error in configuring the ISDN on my Cisco 2620 with the BRI S/T interface card , it keeps on getting disconnected after it dials , can anyone guide me what mistake I could be making ? cisco2620#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname cisco2620 ! ! username mcse password 0 mcse ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! isdn switch-type basic-net3 isdn voice-call-failure 0 ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 200.100.10.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/0 ip address 10.100.10.1 255.0.0.0 no ip directed-broadcast clockrate 64000 ! interface BRI0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer string 172324 dialer-group 2 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 0 isdn spid2 0 isdn calling-number 172324 ppp authentication chap ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface BRI0/0 overload ip classless no ip http server ! access-list 1 permit any dialer-list 2 protocol ip list 2 ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end cisco2620# The error message that I am recieving is as follows : cisco2620# 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Outgoing call id = 0x800C, dsl 0 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to 172324 at 64 Kb/s 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: process_bri_call(): call id 0x800C, called_number 172324, speed 64, call type DATA 07:14:154618822656: CC_CHAN_GetIdleChanbri: dsl 0 07:14:154618822656: Found idle channel B1 07:14:154618822656: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_INFORMATION call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: ISDN Event: dsl 0 call_id 0x800C B channel assigned by switch 0 ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_PROCEEDING call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: B-channel assigned in previous message call id = 0x800C 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_ALERTING call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: ISDN BR0/0: DEV_CALL_PROGRESSING: modem 3A bchan 0, call_id 800C, cause 0 07:14:184683593728: ISDN BR0/0: HOST_PROGRESS: VOICE ERROR 3A: bchan 0, call id 800C 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_CONNECT call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593775: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up 07:14:184683593792: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to 172324 07:14:186844205036: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Connected to 172324 on B1 at 64 Kb/s 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_INFORMATION call_id 0x800C 07:14:197568495616: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT call_id 0x800C 07:14:197568495616: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to was hung up. 07:14:199729106892: ISDN BR0/0: process_disc_ack(): call id 0x800C, ces 1, call type DATA 07:14:197568495663: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 disconnected from 172324 , call lasted 3 seconds 07:14:199729106700: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to down 07:14:206158430207: CC: dsl 0 No CCB Src->L3 cid 0x800C, ev 0x99 ces 1 07:14:244813135872: %ISDN-6-LAYER2DOWN: Layer 2 for Interface BR0/0, TEI 80 changed to down 07:14:244813135872: In L3_StopT309 for dsl 0. 07:14:246973706992: ISDN BR0/0: Incoming call id = 0x3, dsl 0 07:14:246971349881: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK call_id 0x0 07:14:246973747196: ISDN BR0/0: HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK: call type is INTERNAL 07:14:244813135872: %ISDN-6-LAYER2UP: Layer 2 for Interface BR0/0, TEI 80 changed to up 07:14:249108103167: Null Spid: 0 07:14:246971359084: In L3_StopT309 for dsl 0. cisco2620# cisco2620# cisco2620# My interface configurations are as follows : cisco2620#sh int bri0/0 BRI0/0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing) Hardware is PQUICC BRI MTU 1500 bytes, BW 64 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation PPP, loopback not set Last input 00:00:03, output never, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters 01:08:36 Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/1/16 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 352 packets input, 1622 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort 352 packets output, 1524 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 3 carrier transitions cisco2620#sh int bri0/0 sdn stat Global ISDN Switchtype = basic-net3 ISDN BRI0/0 interface dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni Layer 1 Status: ACTIVE Layer 2 Status: TEI = 80, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED I_Queue_Len 0, UI_Queue_Len
NSE-1 and full BGP table with IOS 12.2 [7:12612]
hi,
Does anyone happen to know the memory requirements for cisco NSE-1 running
IOS 12.2.2T in order to carry full BGP table (+/- 10 routes)?
I have seen problems with having 128mb - the router runs out of memory a few
minutes after rebooting then shuts down CEF and BGP.
thanks
George
This e-mail may contain confidential information and may be legally
privileged and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you may not use,
distribute or copy this document in any manner whatsoever. Kindly also
notify the sender immediately by telephone, and delete the e-mail. When
addressed to clients of the company from where this e-mail originates ("the
sending company") any opinion or advice contained in this e-mail is subject
to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable terms of business or
client engagement letter . The sending company does not accept liability for
any damage, loss or expense arising from this e-mail and/or from the
accessing of any files attached to this e-mail.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12612&t=12612
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611]
No IP address has been provided for your BRI0/0 interface. CM > -Original Message- > From: NKP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 17 July 2001 11:25 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] > > > Hi , >I am facing an error in configuring the ISDN on my Cisco > 2620 with the > BRI S/T interface card , it keeps on getting disconnected > after it dials , > can anyone guide me what mistake I could be making ? > > > cisco2620#sh run > Building configuration... > > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.0 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname cisco2620 > ! > ! > username mcse password 0 mcse > ! > ! > ! > ! > ip subnet-zero > no ip domain-lookup > ! > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > isdn voice-call-failure 0 > ! > ! > ! > interface FastEthernet0/0 > ip address 200.100.10.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ip nat inside > duplex auto > speed auto > ! > interface Serial0/0 > ip address 10.100.10.1 255.0.0.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > clockrate 64000 > ! > interface BRI0/0 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > ip nat outside > encapsulation ppp > dialer string 172324 > dialer-group 2 > isdn switch-type basic-ni > isdn spid1 0 > isdn spid2 0 > isdn calling-number 172324 > ppp authentication chap > ! > ip nat inside source list 1 interface BRI0/0 overload > ip classless > no ip http server > ! > access-list 1 permit any > dialer-list 2 protocol ip list 2 > ! > line con 0 > transport input none > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > login > ! > end > > cisco2620# > > The error message that I am recieving is as follows : > > > cisco2620# > 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Outgoing call id = 0x800C, dsl 0 > 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to 172324 at 64 Kb/s > 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: process_bri_call(): call id 0x800C, > called_number > 172324, speed 64, call type DATA > 07:14:154618822656: CC_CHAN_GetIdleChanbri: dsl 0 > 07:14:154618822656: Found idle channel B1 > 07:14:154618822656: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_INFORMATION > call_id 0x800C > 07:14:184683593728: ISDN Event: dsl 0 call_id 0x800C B > channel assigned by > switch 0 > ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_PROCEEDING call_id 0x800C > 07:14:184683593728: B-channel assigned in previous message > call id = 0x800C > 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_ALERTING call_id 0x800C > 07:14:184683593728: ISDN BR0/0: DEV_CALL_PROGRESSING: modem > 3A bchan 0, > call_id 800C, cause 0 > 07:14:184683593728: ISDN BR0/0: HOST_PROGRESS: VOICE ERROR > 3A: bchan 0, call > id 800C > 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_CONNECT call_id 0x800C > 07:14:184683593775: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, > changed state to up > 07:14:184683593792: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is > now connected to > 172324 > 07:14:186844205036: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Connected to 172324 on > B1 at 64 Kb/s > 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_INFORMATION > call_id 0x800C > 07:14:197568495616: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT > call_id 0x800C > 07:14:197568495616: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to was hung up. > 07:14:199729106892: ISDN BR0/0: process_disc_ack(): call id > 0x800C, ces 1, > call type DATA > 07:14:197568495663: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 > disconnected > from 172324 , call lasted 3 seconds > 07:14:199729106700: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, > changed state to > down > 07:14:206158430207: CC: dsl 0 No CCB Src->L3 cid 0x800C, > ev 0x99 ces 1 > 07:14:244813135872: %ISDN-6-LAYER2DOWN: Layer 2 for Interface > BR0/0, TEI 80 > changed to down > 07:14:244813135872: In L3_StopT309 for dsl 0. > 07:14:246973706992: ISDN BR0/0: Incoming call id = 0x3, dsl 0 > 07:14:246971349881: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK > call_id 0x0 > 07:14:246973747196: ISDN BR0/0: HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK: call > type is INTERNAL > 07:14:244813135872: %ISDN-6-LAYER2UP: Layer 2 for Interface > BR0/0, TEI 80 > changed to up > 07:14:249108103167: Null Spid: 0 > 07:14:246971359084: In L3_StopT309 for dsl 0. > cisco2620# > cisco2620# > cisco2620# > > My interface configurations are as follows : > cisco2620#sh int bri0/0 > BRI0/0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing) > Hardware is PQUICC BRI > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 64 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, > reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 > Encapsulation PPP, loopback not set > Last input 00:00:03, output never, output hang never > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 01:08:36 > Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0 > Queueing strategy: weighted fair > Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) > Conversations 0/1/16 (active/max active/max total) > Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) > 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > 352 packets input, 1622 bytes, 0 no buffer > Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0
RE: Ports with PIX Firewall [7:12605]
sorry the correct u need for static mapping static (inside,outside) 204.31.17.4 192.168.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.255 conduit permit tcp host 192.168.3.4 eq smtp any -Original Message- From: Farhan Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Ports with PIX Firewall [7:12605] when u configure the dynamic nat users will start connecting i dont know what u done with the config send me the config to block some port u need for static mapping static (inside,outside) 204.31.17.4 192.168.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.255 conduit permit tcp host 10.1.1.1 eq smtp any outbound 10 permit 192.168.1.42 255.255.255.255 irc tcp apply (INSIDE) 10 outgoing_src SEND ME THE CONFIG -Original Message- From: Lano Kris To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 7/17/01 12:54 PM Subject: Ports with PIX Firewall [7:12605] I configured my PIX Firewall and opened all the TCP ports, I found that i can ping yahoo or cisco by ip address but not with name i.e ping cisco.com doesn't worked, then I opened all the UDP Ports also and my Surfing started also I was been able to PING by name. I just want to allow port 80 (HTTP), FTP , SMTP access to my users. Which all Ports do I need to Open?? DO I Need to open a port for DNS Name Resolution ? I am using DNS Server of ISP as I don't have resources to set-up my own DNS. Please Help Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12615&t=12605 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sample config on PIX AND VPN ON CISCO [7:12618]
Greetings , Can u please send me the sample config on PIX FIREWALL WITH STATIC AND DYNAMIC NAT AND VPN ON CISCO BOX WITH PRESHARED KEYSS CHEERS RAJESH _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12618&t=12618 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611]
u r too much wrong hostname Cisco2620 ! enable password f ! no ip name-server ! isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ip routing ! interface Dialer 1 description connected to Internet ip address negotiated ip nat outside no ip split-horizon encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 120 dialer string 8008000 dialer hold-queue 10 dialer-group 1 ppp authentication chap pap callin ppp chap hostname a ppp chap password a ppp pap sent-username a password a no ppp multilink no cdp enable ! interface FastEthernet 0/0 no description no ip address ip nat inside shutdown ! interface BRI 0/0 no shutdown description connected to Internet no ip address ip nat outside dialer rotary-group 1 ! ! Access Control List 1 ! no access-list 1 access-list 1 deny any ! ! Dialer Control List 1 ! no dialer-list 1 dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! ! Dynamic NAT ! ip nat translation timeout 86400 ip nat translation tcp-timeout 86400 ip nat translation udp-timeout 300 ip nat translation dns-timeout 60 ip nat translation finrst-timeout 60 ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer 1 overload ! router rip version 2 passive-interface Dialer 1 no auto-summary ! ! ip classless ! ! IP Static Routes ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer 1 Hi , I am facing an error in configuring the ISDN on my Cisco 2620 with the BRI S/T interface card , it keeps on getting disconnected after it dials , can anyone guide me what mistake I could be making ? cisco2620#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname cisco2620 ! ! username mcse password 0 mcse ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! isdn switch-type basic-net3 isdn voice-call-failure 0 ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 200.100.10.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside duplex auto speed auto no dialer? ! interface Serial0/0 ip address 10.100.10.1 255.0.0.0 no ip directed-broadcast clockrate 64000 ! no ip thing interface BRI0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer string 172324 dialer-group 2 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 0 isdn spid2 0 isdn calling-number 172324 ppp authentication chap ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface BRI0/0 overload ip classless no ip http server ! access-list 1(2) not 1 anyway there is no use permit any dialer-list 2 protocol ip list 2 ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end cisco2620# The error message that I am recieving is as follows : cisco2620# 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Outgoing call id = 0x800C, dsl 0 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to 172324 at 64 Kb/s 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: process_bri_call(): call id 0x800C, called_number 172324, speed 64, call type DATA 07:14:154618822656: CC_CHAN_GetIdleChanbri: dsl 0 07:14:154618822656: Found idle channel B1 07:14:154618822656: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_INFORMATION call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: ISDN Event: dsl 0 call_id 0x800C B channel assigned by switch 0 ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_PROCEEDING call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: B-channel assigned in previous message call id = 0x800C 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_ALERTING call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: ISDN BR0/0: DEV_CALL_PROGRESSING: modem 3A bchan 0, call_id 800C, cause 0 07:14:184683593728: ISDN BR0/0: HOST_PROGRESS: VOICE ERROR 3A: bchan 0, call id 800C 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_CONNECT call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593775: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up 07:14:184683593792: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to 172324 07:14:186844205036: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Connected to 172324 on B1 at 64 Kb/s 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_INFORMATION call_id 0x800C 07:14:197568495616: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT call_id 0x800C 07:14:197568495616: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to was hung up. 07:14:199729106892: ISDN BR0/0: process_disc_ack(): call id 0x800C, ces 1, call type DATA 07:14:197568495663: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 disconnected from 172324 , call lasted 3 seconds 07:14:199729106700: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to down 07:14:206158430207: CC: dsl 0 No CCB Src->L3 cid 0x800C, ev 0x99 ces 1 07:14:244813135872: %ISDN-6-LAYER2DOWN: Layer 2 for Interface BR0/0, TEI 80 changed to down 07:14:244813135872: In L3_StopT309 for dsl 0. 07:14:246973706992: ISDN BR0/0: Incoming call id = 0x3, dsl 0 07:14:246971349881: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK call_id 0x0 07:14:246973747196: ISDN BR0/0: HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK: call type is INTERNAL 07:14:244813135872: %ISDN-6-LAYER2UP: Layer 2 for Interface BR0/0, TEI 80 changed to up 07:14:249108103167: Null Spid: 0 07:14:246971359084: In L3_StopT309 for dsl 0. cisco2620# cisco2620# cisco2620# My interface configurations are as follows : cisco2620#sh int bri0/0 B
RE: Ports with PIX Firewall [7:12605]
access-list ping_acl permit icmp any any access-list ping_acl permit tcp any any eq www access-list ping_acl permit tcp any any access-list ping_acl permit udp any any access-list acl_out permit icmp any any access-list acl_out permit tcp any any eq www access-list acl_out permit tcp any any access-list acl_out permit udp any any pager lines 24 interface ethernet0 100basetx interface ethernet1 100basetx mtu outside 1500 mtu inside 1500 mtu ndtv 1500 ip address outside 172.110.0.2 255.255.0.0 ip address inside 172.100.0.1 255.255.0.0 ip audit info action alarm ip audit attack action alarm no failover failover timeout 0:00:00 failover poll 15 failover ip address outside 0.0.0.0 failover ip address inside 0.0.0.0 pdm history enable arp timeout 600 global (outside) 1 202.196.214.40-202.196.214.45 netmask 255.255.255.224 global (outside) 1 202.196.214.46 nat (inside) 1 172.100.0.0 255.255.0.0 0 0 access-group acl_out in interface outside access-group ping_acl in interface inside route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.110.0.1 1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12620&t=12605 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question About Ciscowork [7:12621]
Hi gys. Currently I' m installing Ciscowork 2000, but have some problem regarding ANI server. I cannot make the ANI server up. Could anybody gime some hint on how to make the ANI server up? Thank in advance. Syam _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12621&t=12621 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Colt Exams [7:12561]
COLT's dead, baby. COLT's dead. ""Baker, Jason"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > hi all, > > Does anyone know the URL for the colt exams ? > > TIA > > Jason Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12622&t=12561 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passing marks for Cisco exam [7:12562]
Nowhere. Cisco says that the exam marks can change without notice and they don't publish them. They are different for each exam. You will find your passing score just befor the exam begins. Regards. ""cheekin"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > Where does one find the passing marks for the Cisco exams at Cisco website? > > Thanks. > > Regards, > cheekin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12623&t=12562 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BSCN [7:12555]
Hey, be very well prepared. The exam is very hard. It doesn't even compare with the CCNA. I just passed it (yesterday) and I got 896. Frankly, in the middle of the exam I was sure that I won't pass it but as you can see I was wrong. I didn't expec this exam to be so hard. I got lots of OSPF and BGP questions, many policy routing and some supernettting. That's all I can remember. Regards. ""Chris Headings"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Taking the first step on fri the 20th (Routing Exam)been studying for a > while now...used the Sybex and Cisco PRessany tips > > Thx > > Chris > CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12624&t=12555 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sample config on PIX AND VPN ON CISCO [7:12618]
do u wana connect ciso to pix via vpn? -Original Message- From: RAJESH AGNIHOTRI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 3:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sample config on PIX AND VPN ON CISCO [7:12618] Greetings , Can u please send me the sample config on PIX FIREWALL WITH STATIC AND DYNAMIC NAT AND VPN ON CISCO BOX WITH PRESHARED KEYSS CHEERS RAJESH _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12626&t=12618 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VIP2 [7:12540]
VIP2 did not supports GBIC but supports FE for ISL. VIP4 supports GBIC. Haykan Sugeng CCNP, MCSE+i -- Original Message -- From: "Lupi, Guy" Reply-To: "Lupi, Guy" Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:30:02 -0400 >Does anyone know if the VIP2 supports Gigabit ethernet? I have a 7507 that >I need to put Gigabit Ethernet in but I only see a card for the VIP4. Can >anyone confirm this? Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12627&t=12540 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: isdn status [7:12599]
Cause i = 0x82A2 No circuit/channel available The connection cannot be established because no appropriate channel is available to take the call. u dont have a free channel how many bri u have? -Original Message- From: Charlie Hartwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 12:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: isdn status [7:12599] The first call failed because there were no available b-channels at the remote end (0x82A2). >From this information I cannot see why layer 1 is going down - try running "debug isdn q921" and "debug bri" to see if that gives any clues - it is most likely to be a telco problem though. Cheers Charlie --- Omer Ehsan Dar wrote: > Hi all, > these contarary messages from to commands ahve me stumped once it > says > that layer 1 is working and then it says that it isnt. Could > anybody > tell me what the problem is??? > Omer > > 2503#sh isdn stat > The current ISDN Switchtype = basic-ni1 > ISDN BRI0 interface > Layer 1 Status: > ACTIVE > Layer 2 Status: > TEI = 76, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED > TEI = 77, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED > Spid Status: > TEI 76, ces = 1, state = 5(init) > spid1 configured, spid1 sent, spid1 valid > Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 1, tid = 1 > TEI 77, ces = 2, state = 5(init) > spid2 configured, spid2 sent, spid2 valid > Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 3, tid = 1 > Layer 3 Status: > 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s) > Activated dsl 0 CCBs = 1 > CCB: callid=0x0, sapi=0, ces=1, B-chan=0 > Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 1 > 2504#ping 172.16.71.1 > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.71.1, timeout is 2 > seconds: > > ISDN BR0: TX -> SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x05 > Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 > Channel ID i = 0x83 > Keypad Facility i = '8358661' > ISDN BR0: RX Cause i = 0x82A2 - No channel available > ISDN BR0: Setup was rejected, cause = 22. > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) > > BRI unit 0 > D Chan Info: > Layer 1 is DEACTIVATED > idb 0xBB2F0, ds 0xCB6E8, reset_mask 0x8 > buffer size 1524 > RX ring with 2 entries at 0x2101600 : Rxhead 1 > 00 pak=0x108E34 ds=0x407EDC4 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 01 pak=0x0CBA78 ds=0x403E1C0 status=F000 pak_size=0 > TX ring with 1 entries at 0x2101640: tx_count = 0, tx_head = 0, > tx_tail > = 0 > 00 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=00 pak_size=0 > 0 missed datagrams, 0 overruns, 0 bad frame addresses > 0 bad datagram encapsulations, 0 memory errors > 0 transmitter underruns > 0 d channel collisions > B1 Chan Info: > Layer 1 is DEACTIVATED > idb 0xC0628, ds 0xCB7C0, reset_mask 0x0 > buffer size 1524 > RX ring with 8 entries at 0x2101400 : Rxhead 0 > 00 pak=0x0CC87C ds=0x40410C8 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 01 pak=0x0CC6AC ds=0x4040A10 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 02 pak=0x0CC4DC ds=0x4040358 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 03 pak=0x0CC30C ds=0x403FCA0 status=D000 pak_size=0 > X ring with 4 entries at 0x2101440: tx_count = 0, tx_head = 0, > tx_tail = > 0 > 00 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 > 01 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 > 02 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 > 03 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=7C00 pak_size=0 > 0 missed datagrams, 0 overruns, 0 bad frame addresses > 0 bad datagram encapsulations, 0 memory errors > 0 transmitter underruns > 0 d channel collisions > B2 Chan Info: > Layer 1 is DEACTIVATED > idb 0xC5960, ds 0xCB890, reset_mask 0x2 > buffer size 1524 > RX ring with 8 entries at 0x2101500 : Rxhead 0 > 00 pak=0x0CE6D0 ds=0x4047C48 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 01 pak=0x0CE500 ds=0x4047590 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 02 pak=0x0CE330 ds=0x4046ED8 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 03 pak=0x0CE160 ds=0x4046820 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 04 pak=0x108524 ds=0x407CC2C status=D000 pak_size=0 > 05 pak=0x108354 ds=0x407C574 status=D000 pak_size=0 > 06 pak=0x108184 ds=0x407BEBC status=D000 pak_size=0 > 07 pak=0x107FB4 ds=0x407B804 status=F000 pak_size=0 > TX ring with 4 entries at 0x2101540: tx_count = 0, tx_head = 0, > tx_tail > = 0 > 00 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 > 01 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 > 02 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=5C00 pak_size=0 > 03 pak=0x00 ds=0x00 status=7C00 pak_size=0 > 0 missed datagrams, 0 overruns, 0 bad frame addresses > 0 bad datagram encapsulations, 0 memory errors > 0 transmitter underruns > 0 d channel collisions > > 2504#ping 172.16.71.1 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.71.1, timeout is 2 > seconds: > > ISDN BR0: Outgoing call id = 0x8007 > ISDN BR0: Event: Call to 8358661 at 64 Kb/s > ISDN BR0: Activating.. > %ISDN-6-LAYER2DOWN: Layer 2 for Interface BR0, TEI 73 changed to > down > ISDN BR0: received HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK > ISDN BR0: Error: Unexpected Disconnect_Ack - callid 8007.. > ISDN BR0: Physical layer is IF_DOWN > ISDN BR0: Shutt
VTP config on 3548 [7:12629]
Im trying to configure VTP on a 3548 switch, but when its asking me to provide a file of vtp configuration details as shown below: FSFPH0600B(config)#vtp ? file Configure IFS filesystem file where VTP configuration is stored. Does anyone know how this works and what is the syntax of the information in file? Thanks, Dion * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12629&t=12629 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VTP config on 3548 [7:12629]
NV Ram or TFTP server -Original Message- From: Radford Dion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 4:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VTP config on 3548 [7:12629] Im trying to configure VTP on a 3548 switch, but when its asking me to provide a file of vtp configuration details as shown below: FSFPH0600B(config)#vtp ? file Configure IFS filesystem file where VTP configuration is stored. Does anyone know how this works and what is the syntax of the information in file? Thanks, Dion * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12630&t=12629 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question About Ciscowork [7:12621]
Hi norsyam, Can you provide little more information as to what are the some of the errors are, the configuration and version of server and ciscoworks release? Jin Jung ccnp,mcse,cne,ccda - Original Message - From: "norsyam ariffin" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 7:49 AM Subject: Question About Ciscowork [7:12621] > Hi gys. > > Currently I' m installing Ciscowork 2000, but have some problem regarding > ANI server. I cannot make the ANI server up. Could anybody gime some hint on > how to make the ANI server up? > > Thank in advance. > > Syam > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12631&t=12621 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HELP! Frame Relay HELP! [7:12632]
I was doing one of the frame relay labs from Hutnik's CCIE lab books and did not understand the following:- 1. Why is it that I could only ping from Router-A to Router-B and vice-versa, but can not ping their own interfaces? 2. Why is the routing protocol (RIP in this case) configured on Router-A but not on Router-B, yet I was still able to ping accross end-to-end? Can someone out there explain this to me? Thanks Ray _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12632&t=12632 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eigrp doesn't form neighborship trhough an ISDN link [7:12633]
Hi all.. Strange problem two router having a ISDN (bri) and a FR connection form neighborship thru FR, but not thru ISDN. Take a look at the conf... What I'm missing? === ROUTER A === interface Loopback0 ip address 200.100.100.17 255.255.255.248 ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no ip mroute-cache delay 1 no fair-queue ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point ip address 212.1.22.17 255.255.255.240 delay 1 frame-relay interface-dlci 51 ! interface BRI0/0 ip address 212.1.22.66 255.255.255.240 encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 100 dialer map ip 212.1.22.65 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! router eigrp 101 network 200.100.100.0 network 212.1.22.0 no auto-summary no eigrp log-neighbor-changes ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit 1w5d: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Serial0/0.1 nbr 212.1.22.18 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/0 1w5d: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on BRI0/0 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 1w5d: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on Loopback0 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 1w5d: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Loopback0 nbr 200.100.100.17 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 ROUTER B interface Loopback0 ip address 200.100.100.25 255.255.255.248 ! interface Serial0/0 description Seriale verso R5 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no fair-queue ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point ip address 212.1.22.1 255.255.255.240 delay 1 frame-relay interface-dlci 55 ! interface BRI0/0 ip address 212.1.22.65 255.255.255.240 encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 100 dialer map ip 212.1.22.66 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! router eigrp 101 network 200.100.100.0 network 212.1.22.0 no auto-summary no eigrp log-neighbor-changes dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12633&t=12633 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: VTP config on 3548 [7:12629]
The solution was to type vlan database at the enable mode, which allows me to configure vtp parameters. Thanks go to Andrew. Dion > -Original Message- > From: Radford Dion [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: VTP config on 3548 [7:12629] > > Im trying to configure VTP on a 3548 switch, but when its asking me to > provide a file of vtp configuration details as shown below: > > > FSFPH0600B(config)#vtp ? > file Configure IFS filesystem file where VTP configuration is stored. > > > Does anyone know how this works and what is the syntax of the information > in > file? > > Thanks, > > Dion > * > DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential > and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, > copying > or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other > person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please > notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12634&t=12629 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access List problem. [7:12525]
Line 6 should be there. Line 5 define subset of line 6 with type of deny and is widest range in prior lines. should stay. Line 4 source address is in range of 5 with type of permit. destination address out of range of 5, so, it equivalence to: permit x.x.x.x 0.0.31.255 y.y.y.y 0.0.0.63. This line should stay. Line 3's destination address out of range 4, 5. and fall into 6 with deny. so, it should stay. Line 1, 2 are all in range 6 with permit, is overlapped. Then, the access-list become: 1.access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 2.access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 3.access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 4.access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 If it is not wrong with my derive above and original access is equivalent to access list above, it is ealy to prove that none of those lines can be removed any more. So, I think 4 lines access list required. Robert Fowler wrote: > Someone sent me this and I just can't figure it out. I've been staring at it > and trying things since last week. Any ideas? > > Jeff Doyle says this access-list can be rewritten with 3 lines and still > provide the same functionality. Let me know if you guys figure out: > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.6 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.95 0.0.0.0 10.11.12.0 0.0.0.255 > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255 > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 > access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 > > Have fun... > > Thank You, > Robert Fowler [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of jeffrey.wang.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12635&t=12525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VTP config on 3548 [7:12629]
You have to go into VLAN Database mode first. i.e. config term VLAN database vtp client vtp domain domainname config term VLAN database vtp server It is important to put in into client mode before joining the domain. If you don't, Murphy's law says that all of your VLANS on all of your switches will be erased. -Ejay -Original Message- From: Radford Dion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 8:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VTP config on 3548 [7:12629] Im trying to configure VTP on a 3548 switch, but when its asking me to provide a file of vtp configuration details as shown below: FSFPH0600B(config)#vtp ? file Configure IFS filesystem file where VTP configuration is stored. Does anyone know how this works and what is the syntax of the information in file? Thanks, Dion * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12636&t=12629 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sample config on PIX AND VPN ON CISCO [7:12618]
Please look at this link http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/37.html Additionally, please check http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/index.shtml There are many sample configurations here. If you have a more specific question, the post to the group. -E -Original Message- From: RAJESH AGNIHOTRI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 7:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sample config on PIX AND VPN ON CISCO [7:12618] Greetings , Can u please send me the sample config on PIX FIREWALL WITH STATIC AND DYNAMIC NAT AND VPN ON CISCO BOX WITH PRESHARED KEYSS CHEERS RAJESH _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12637&t=12618 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VTP config on 3548 [7:12629]
I forgot to put in the link to the page on Cisco.com http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/29_35wc/sc/swgvl ans.htm The 35xx's software is the same as the 2900xl, so you can look to the 2900xl's documentation. The section on VTP is about 2 pages down. -Original Message- From: Hire, Ejay Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 9:20 AM To: 'Radford Dion'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VTP config on 3548 [7:12629] You have to go into VLAN Database mode first. i.e. config term VLAN database vtp client vtp domain domainname config term VLAN database vtp server It is important to put in into client mode before joining the domain. If you don't, Murphy's law says that all of your VLANS on all of your switches will be erased. -Ejay -Original Message- From: Radford Dion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 8:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VTP config on 3548 [7:12629] Im trying to configure VTP on a 3548 switch, but when its asking me to provide a file of vtp configuration details as shown below: FSFPH0600B(config)#vtp ? file Configure IFS filesystem file where VTP configuration is stored. Does anyone know how this works and what is the syntax of the information in file? Thanks, Dion * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12638&t=12629 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Colt Exams [7:12561]
They are no longer available external to Cisco. (even if you have a CCO login) -Ejay -Original Message- From: Baker, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 9:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Colt Exams [7:12561] hi all, Does anyone know the URL for the colt exams ? TIA Jason Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12642&t=12561 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Eigrp doesn't form neighborship trhough an ISDN link [7:12640]
Solved... I need dialer map ip 212.1.22.65 >>>broadcast Hi all.. DF> Strange problem two router having a ISDN (bri) and a FR connection DF> form DF> neighborship thru FR, but not thru ISDN. DF> Take a look at the conf... What I'm missing? DF> === DF> ROUTER A DF> === DF> interface Loopback0 DF> ip address 200.100.100.17 255.255.255.248 DF> ! DF> interface Serial0/0 DF> no ip address DF> encapsulation frame-relay DF> no ip mroute-cache DF> delay 1 DF> no fair-queue DF> ! DF> interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point DF> ip address 212.1.22.17 255.255.255.240 DF> delay 1 DF> frame-relay interface-dlci 51 DF> ! DF> interface BRI0/0 DF> ip address 212.1.22.66 255.255.255.240 DF> encapsulation ppp DF> dialer idle-timeout 100 DF> dialer map ip 212.1.22.65 DF> dialer-group 1 DF> isdn switch-type basic-net3 DF> ! DF> router eigrp 101 DF> network 200.100.100.0 DF> network 212.1.22.0 DF> no auto-summary DF> no eigrp log-neighbor-changes DF> ! DF> dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit DF> 1w5d: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Serial0/0.1 nbr 212.1.22.18 DF> 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely DF> 0/0 DF> 1w5d: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on BRI0/0 DF> 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 DF> 1w5d: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on Loopback0 DF> 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 DF> 1w5d: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Loopback0 nbr 200.100.100.17 DF> 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 DF> DF> ROUTER B DF> DF> interface Loopback0 DF> ip address 200.100.100.25 255.255.255.248 DF> ! DF> interface Serial0/0 DF> description Seriale verso R5 DF> no ip address DF> encapsulation frame-relay DF> no fair-queue DF> ! DF> interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point DF> ip address 212.1.22.1 255.255.255.240 DF> delay 1 DF> frame-relay interface-dlci 55 DF> ! DF> interface BRI0/0 DF> ip address 212.1.22.65 255.255.255.240 DF> encapsulation ppp DF> dialer idle-timeout 100 DF> dialer map ip 212.1.22.66 DF> dialer-group 1 DF> isdn switch-type basic-net3 DF> ! DF> router eigrp 101 DF> network 200.100.100.0 DF> network 212.1.22.0 DF> no auto-summary DF> no eigrp log-neighbor-changes DF> dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit -- Best regards, Davide Ferrari Cisco Systems Service Provider System Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12640&t=12640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Configuring 2600 series router for use with DSL [7:12643]
Hey all, anyone have any success in configuring a 2600 series router to use a DSL connection that uses PPPoE? Is this possible? Thanks, -C Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12643&t=12643 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611]
I may be way off, but I thinks your spids are wrong. Call the Phone company and ask them what your spids are supposed to be. > TEI 80, ces = 1, state = 8(established) > spid1 configured, no LDN, spid1 NOT sent, spid1 NOT valid > TEI Not Assigned, ces = 2, state = 1(terminal down) > spid2 configured, no LDN, spid2 NOT sent, spid2 NOT valid -Ejay -Original Message- From: NKP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] Hi , I am facing an error in configuring the ISDN on my Cisco 2620 with the BRI S/T interface card , it keeps on getting disconnected after it dials , can anyone guide me what mistake I could be making ? cisco2620#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname cisco2620 ! ! username mcse password 0 mcse ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! isdn switch-type basic-net3 isdn voice-call-failure 0 ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 200.100.10.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/0 ip address 10.100.10.1 255.0.0.0 no ip directed-broadcast clockrate 64000 ! interface BRI0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer string 172324 dialer-group 2 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 0 isdn spid2 0 isdn calling-number 172324 ppp authentication chap ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface BRI0/0 overload ip classless no ip http server ! access-list 1 permit any dialer-list 2 protocol ip list 2 ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end cisco2620# The error message that I am recieving is as follows : cisco2620# 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Outgoing call id = 0x800C, dsl 0 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to 172324 at 64 Kb/s 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: process_bri_call(): call id 0x800C, called_number 172324, speed 64, call type DATA 07:14:154618822656: CC_CHAN_GetIdleChanbri: dsl 0 07:14:154618822656: Found idle channel B1 07:14:154618822656: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_INFORMATION call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: ISDN Event: dsl 0 call_id 0x800C B channel assigned by switch 0 ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_PROCEEDING call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: B-channel assigned in previous message call id = 0x800C 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_ALERTING call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: ISDN BR0/0: DEV_CALL_PROGRESSING: modem 3A bchan 0, call_id 800C, cause 0 07:14:184683593728: ISDN BR0/0: HOST_PROGRESS: VOICE ERROR 3A: bchan 0, call id 800C 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_CONNECT call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593775: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up 07:14:184683593792: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to 172324 07:14:186844205036: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Connected to 172324 on B1 at 64 Kb/s 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_INFORMATION call_id 0x800C 07:14:197568495616: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT call_id 0x800C 07:14:197568495616: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to was hung up. 07:14:199729106892: ISDN BR0/0: process_disc_ack(): call id 0x800C, ces 1, call type DATA 07:14:197568495663: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 disconnected from 172324 , call lasted 3 seconds 07:14:199729106700: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to down 07:14:206158430207: CC: dsl 0 No CCB Src->L3 cid 0x800C, ev 0x99 ces 1 07:14:244813135872: %ISDN-6-LAYER2DOWN: Layer 2 for Interface BR0/0, TEI 80 changed to down 07:14:244813135872: In L3_StopT309 for dsl 0. 07:14:246973706992: ISDN BR0/0: Incoming call id = 0x3, dsl 0 07:14:246971349881: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK call_id 0x0 07:14:246973747196: ISDN BR0/0: HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK: call type is INTERNAL 07:14:244813135872: %ISDN-6-LAYER2UP: Layer 2 for Interface BR0/0, TEI 80 changed to up 07:14:249108103167: Null Spid: 0 07:14:246971359084: In L3_StopT309 for dsl 0. cisco2620# cisco2620# cisco2620# My interface configurations are as follows : cisco2620#sh int bri0/0 BRI0/0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing) Hardware is PQUICC BRI MTU 1500 bytes, BW 64 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation PPP, loopback not set Last input 00:00:03, output never, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters 01:08:36 Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/1/16 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 352 packets input, 1622 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0
Re: Source Quench [7:12477]
Hello Stephen, Thanks for your reply. The Speed and the duplex settings of the server giving problem is hardcoded to 100 and Full. The ping from any other Unix machine is Ok. Regds Amit --- Stephen Skinner wrote: > Hi, > > The Source-Quench message comes from a server when > it`s buffers are unable > to process all the info bieng sent to it.. > > this usually means that the nt is set for 100/Full - > the switch is set for > 100/full for the nt box , but the UX box (and its > switch port)is only set > for 10/half ...usually the switch is aet to auto . > > without any special processing on the switch it will > just send as many > packets out of one port that it recieve`s from > another... > > check the settings on both servers and make sure > there the same... > > then try agian ... > > happens to me all the time.and the server guys > INsist it`s the network > > > HTH > > steve > > > > >From: "Amit Gupta" > >Reply-To: "Amit Gupta" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Source Quench [7:12477] > >Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:29:14 -0400 > > > >Hi All, > > > >I am getting a " Source Quench message " from one > of > >my HP-UX Servers when I try to ping it from an NT > >machine / Switch > > > >I am getting the following msg when I ping the > server > >from the external router > >Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to x.x.x.x timeout > is 2 > >seconds: > >Q > > > >However if I ping the same server from a Unix > machine > >/ server, it is ok. > > > >Could it be a problem with the server NIC > > > >Thanks & Regards > > > >Amit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >__ > >Do You Yahoo!? > >Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > >http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at > http://www.hotmail.com. > __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12645&t=12477 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Eigrp doesn't form neighborship trhough an ISDN link [7:12644]
Add the broadcast statement to your dialer map. Raul - Original Message - From: "Davide Ferrari" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 9:21 AM Subject: Eigrp doesn't form neighborship trhough an ISDN link [7:12633] > Hi all.. > Strange problem two router having a ISDN (bri) and a FR connection > form > neighborship thru FR, but not thru ISDN. > > Take a look at the conf... What I'm missing? > > === > ROUTER A > === > > interface Loopback0 > ip address 200.100.100.17 255.255.255.248 > ! > interface Serial0/0 > no ip address > encapsulation frame-relay > no ip mroute-cache > delay 1 > no fair-queue > ! > interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point > ip address 212.1.22.17 255.255.255.240 > delay 1 > frame-relay interface-dlci 51 > ! > interface BRI0/0 > ip address 212.1.22.66 255.255.255.240 > encapsulation ppp > dialer idle-timeout 100 > dialer map ip 212.1.22.65 > dialer-group 1 > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ! > router eigrp 101 > network 200.100.100.0 > network 212.1.22.0 > no auto-summary > no eigrp log-neighbor-changes > ! > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit > > > 1w5d: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Serial0/0.1 nbr 212.1.22.18 > 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely > 0/0 > 1w5d: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on BRI0/0 > 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 > 1w5d: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on Loopback0 > 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 > 1w5d: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Loopback0 nbr 200.100.100.17 > 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 > > > > > ROUTER B > > > interface Loopback0 > ip address 200.100.100.25 255.255.255.248 > ! > interface Serial0/0 > description Seriale verso R5 > no ip address > encapsulation frame-relay > no fair-queue > ! > interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point > ip address 212.1.22.1 255.255.255.240 > delay 1 > frame-relay interface-dlci 55 > ! > interface BRI0/0 > ip address 212.1.22.65 255.255.255.240 > encapsulation ppp > dialer idle-timeout 100 > dialer map ip 212.1.22.66 > dialer-group 1 > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ! > router eigrp 101 > network 200.100.100.0 > network 212.1.22.0 > no auto-summary > no eigrp log-neighbor-changes > > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12644&t=12644 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Eigrp doesn't form neighborship trhough an ISDN link [7:12646]
Add the broadcast command to your dialer map. Marc Russell www.ccbootcamp.com ""Davide Ferrari"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all.. > Strange problem two router having a ISDN (bri) and a FR connection > form > neighborship thru FR, but not thru ISDN. > > Take a look at the conf... What I'm missing? > > === > ROUTER A > === > > interface Loopback0 > ip address 200.100.100.17 255.255.255.248 > ! > interface Serial0/0 > no ip address > encapsulation frame-relay > no ip mroute-cache > delay 1 > no fair-queue > ! > interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point > ip address 212.1.22.17 255.255.255.240 > delay 1 > frame-relay interface-dlci 51 > ! > interface BRI0/0 > ip address 212.1.22.66 255.255.255.240 > encapsulation ppp > dialer idle-timeout 100 > dialer map ip 212.1.22.65 > dialer-group 1 > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ! > router eigrp 101 > network 200.100.100.0 > network 212.1.22.0 > no auto-summary > no eigrp log-neighbor-changes > ! > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit > > > 1w5d: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Serial0/0.1 nbr 212.1.22.18 > 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely > 0/0 > 1w5d: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on BRI0/0 > 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 > 1w5d: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on Loopback0 > 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 > 1w5d: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Loopback0 nbr 200.100.100.17 > 1w5d: AS 101, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 > > > > > ROUTER B > > > interface Loopback0 > ip address 200.100.100.25 255.255.255.248 > ! > interface Serial0/0 > description Seriale verso R5 > no ip address > encapsulation frame-relay > no fair-queue > ! > interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point > ip address 212.1.22.1 255.255.255.240 > delay 1 > frame-relay interface-dlci 55 > ! > interface BRI0/0 > ip address 212.1.22.65 255.255.255.240 > encapsulation ppp > dialer idle-timeout 100 > dialer map ip 212.1.22.66 > dialer-group 1 > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ! > router eigrp 101 > network 200.100.100.0 > network 212.1.22.0 > no auto-summary > no eigrp log-neighbor-changes > > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12646&t=12646 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HELP! Frame Relay HELP! [7:12632]
You don't need a routing protocol to ping a directly connected neighbor ip address on the same subnet. Inverse arp should of taken care of the layer-2 to layer-3 mapping. As for your own interface add a frame map command for your own interface and it will work. Marc Russell www.ccbootcamp.com ""Ray Smith"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I was doing one of the frame relay labs from Hutnik's CCIE lab books and did > not understand the following:- > > 1. Why is it that I could only ping from Router-A to Router-B and > vice-versa, but can not ping their own interfaces? > > 2. Why is the routing protocol (RIP in this case) configured on Router-A but > not on Router-B, yet I was still able to ping accross end-to-end? > > Can someone out there explain this to me? Thanks > > > Ray > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12647&t=12632 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question About Ciscowork [7:12621]
Call Cisco! Seriously, if you don't have a service contract on this software, get one because you're going to need it. CW2k is great if you can get it working, but it has so many problems that sometimes it takes a while to resolve them all. We couldn't get it to work at all on HPUX, even with Cisco's help, so we migrated to NT. We decided to get the LAN Management Solutions bundle and had lots of problems with it. With Cisco's help we were able to resolve a couple of issues but it still wasn't stable and had some major bugs. So, we had to wait for the latest release which seems to be working just fine, but we need to run it on a bigger box. Right now it's on a dual-processor 450MHz machine and it's hogs the cpu pretty badly. Anyway, back to issue at hand. There are a number of reasons why you could be having problems with the ANI server and you really should enlist the help of a Cisco engineer. It may end up being very difficult to resolve this on your own. Good luck! John >>> "norsyam ariffin" 7/17/01 5:49:16 AM >>> Hi gys. Currently I' m installing Ciscowork 2000, but have some problem regarding ANI server. I cannot make the ANI server up. Could anybody gime some hint on how to make the ANI server up? Thank in advance. Syam _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12648&t=12621 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Source Quench [7:12477]
Hello Priscilla, Thanks for your response. Yes, it could not be a problem with the NIC since Ping from any of the UNIX machines is fine. I am using the default timeout while pinging from Unix machines. I get a Source quench message even when I specify a higher timeout setting. Regds Amit --- Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > I doubt it's related to a problem with the NIC. If > there were a problem > with the NIC, it would probably be unable to respond > at all or to send the > source quench. > > The server is just telling you that it doesn't have > buffers or other > resources to handle the ping. When you ping from the > Unix machine, what is > the timeout? Does the Unix machine send less often > than the router, > resulting in the server not getting overwhelmed? > > What else is the server doing? I have seen Mac OS > send source quench when > pinged. I have never considered it a problem. The > Mac is OK in every other > respect. > > I'm glad this topic came up again because I had > previously said that source > quench was obsolsete per RFC 1812. RFC 1812 is > Requirements for IPv4 > Routers. A router should not send a source quench. > > But a host may send a source quench. Per RFC 1122, > Requirements for IP > Hosts, "a host may send a source quench message if > it is approaching, or > has reached, the point at which it is forced to > discard incoming datagrams > due to a shortage of reassembly buffers or other > resources." > > Even though RFC 1122 is old, it has not been > replaced as far as I can tell. > So, source quench is not obsolete for hosts. > > Priscilla > > At 10:29 AM 7/16/01, Amit Gupta wrote: > >Hi All, > > > >I am getting a " Source Quench message " from one > of > >my HP-UX Servers when I try to ping it from an NT > >machine / Switch > > > >I am getting the following msg when I ping the > server > >from the external router > >Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to x.x.x.x timeout > is 2 > >seconds: > >Q > > > >However if I ping the same server from a Unix > machine > >/ server, it is ok. > > > >Could it be a problem with the server NIC > > > >Thanks & Regards > > > >Amit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >__ > >Do You Yahoo!? > >Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > >http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com > __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12649&t=12477 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611]
The spids are definitely wrong: >From debug: 07:14:249108103167: Null Spid: 0 >From config: isdn spid1 0 isdn spid2 0 Is this in a lab setting with a isdn simulator or with a transport from the phone company? If it's with the phone company you need to put the spids the phone company gave you into the configuration or you won't be able to dial correctly. If it's in a lab - I don't know. :( -John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hire, Ejay Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] I may be way off, but I thinks your spids are wrong. Call the Phone company and ask them what your spids are supposed to be. > TEI 80, ces = 1, state = 8(established) > spid1 configured, no LDN, spid1 NOT sent, spid1 NOT valid > TEI Not Assigned, ces = 2, state = 1(terminal down) > spid2 configured, no LDN, spid2 NOT sent, spid2 NOT valid -Ejay -Original Message- From: NKP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] Hi , I am facing an error in configuring the ISDN on my Cisco 2620 with the BRI S/T interface card , it keeps on getting disconnected after it dials , can anyone guide me what mistake I could be making ? cisco2620#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname cisco2620 ! ! username mcse password 0 mcse ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! isdn switch-type basic-net3 isdn voice-call-failure 0 ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 200.100.10.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/0 ip address 10.100.10.1 255.0.0.0 no ip directed-broadcast clockrate 64000 ! interface BRI0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer string 172324 dialer-group 2 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 0 isdn spid2 0 isdn calling-number 172324 ppp authentication chap ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface BRI0/0 overload ip classless no ip http server ! access-list 1 permit any dialer-list 2 protocol ip list 2 ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end cisco2620# The error message that I am recieving is as follows : cisco2620# 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Outgoing call id = 0x800C, dsl 0 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to 172324 at 64 Kb/s 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: process_bri_call(): call id 0x800C, called_number 172324, speed 64, call type DATA 07:14:154618822656: CC_CHAN_GetIdleChanbri: dsl 0 07:14:154618822656: Found idle channel B1 07:14:154618822656: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_INFORMATION call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: ISDN Event: dsl 0 call_id 0x800C B channel assigned by switch 0 ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_PROCEEDING call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: B-channel assigned in previous message call id = 0x800C 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_ALERTING call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: ISDN BR0/0: DEV_CALL_PROGRESSING: modem 3A bchan 0, call_id 800C, cause 0 07:14:184683593728: ISDN BR0/0: HOST_PROGRESS: VOICE ERROR 3A: bchan 0, call id 800C 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_CONNECT call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593775: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up 07:14:184683593792: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to 172324 07:14:186844205036: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Connected to 172324 on B1 at 64 Kb/s 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_INFORMATION call_id 0x800C 07:14:197568495616: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT call_id 0x800C 07:14:197568495616: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to was hung up. 07:14:199729106892: ISDN BR0/0: process_disc_ack(): call id 0x800C, ces 1, call type DATA 07:14:197568495663: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 disconnected from 172324 , call lasted 3 seconds 07:14:199729106700: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to down 07:14:206158430207: CC: dsl 0 No CCB Src->L3 cid 0x800C, ev 0x99 ces 1 07:14:244813135872: %ISDN-6-LAYER2DOWN: Layer 2 for Interface BR0/0, TEI 80 changed to down 07:14:244813135872: In L3_StopT309 for dsl 0. 07:14:246973706992: ISDN BR0/0: Incoming call id = 0x3, dsl 0 07:14:246971349881: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK call_id 0x0 07:14:246973747196: ISDN BR0/0: HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK: call type is INTERNAL 07:14:244813135872: %ISDN-6-LAYER2UP: Layer 2 for Interface BR0/0, TEI 80 changed to up 07:14:249108103167: Null Spid: 0 07:14:246971359084: In L3_StopT309 for dsl 0. cisco2620# cisco2620# cisco2620# My interface configurations are as follows : cisco2620#sh int bri0/0 BRI0/0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing) Hardware is PQUICC BRI MTU 1500 bytes, BW 64 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation PPP, loopback not
who want to change his/her lab date? [7:12651]
Hello, I've scheduled my lab date on the 20th of december but i look for a closer date. Anyone interested in swapping date ? Please tell me. Thank you Lionel Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12651&t=12651 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lab swap [7:12652]
Hi, I want to change my lab date with somebody. I've scheduled it for the 20th on december in Brussels and i look for a date in the month of september. If somebody is interested, please respond to me directly to this email. Thank you Lionel Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12652&t=12652 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX 506 Hang up!!! [7:12653]
Dear All, Please help to solve up this problem Which I faced with my PIX 506. from three days ago, my PIX 506 hang up and stop response to any process even from the console interface... I found the three leds "Power, ACT, Network" switched off. When I turn its power off and on it works fine for few hours... and each time It needs to switching off/on the power key. I do know how to investegate this problem or what is the cause of it... Is there any guy of you can help me in this... Any reply will be appreciated... Thanx Magdy H. Ibrahim CCNA, MCSE Purenet Internetworking Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12653&t=12653 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Get Your Free Digital One Touch Auto Scan Radio... [7:12654]
I thought this newsgroup was moderated... Nate Vanderschaaf (Insert Alphabet Soup Here) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Free...Free...Free > > Thanks to our sponsors, this beautiful > lightweight Digital one touch auto scan Radio at left will be yours > if you response to the few questions below. > > Wear this anywhere you go! > with this attractive lightweight Digital One Touch Auto Scan Radio. > Incorporated with the concept of Space . Being wholly hanged on ear, you > avoid the trouble of carrying it. Give you the freedom of whatever you > do. Idea for a walk or jogging in the park, exercising at the Gym or > anyway you feel like enjoying your favorite FM radio Stations. > The iEar radio is designed to hanged comfortably on your ear along with > the second earphone, which produce exceptional stereo sound quality > music from your favorite radio stations. > iEar uses the state of the art auto scanning technology, with the single > touch of a button. It will scan and lock on the Radio station with the > best possible signal. It comes in this cool translucent Blue color, and > it's so easy to use. Makes you want to bring this anywhere you go this > Summer. iEar is powered by 2 included lithium batteries. > Similar gadgets like this sells for $65 in retail store, > but it will be yours FREE. > Our sponsors will assure you that your responses will in no way go into > your personal profile. > They are interested in statistical data only. > > > Wear this anywhere you go! > with this attractive lightweight Digital One Touch Auto Scan Radio. > Incorporated with the concept of Space . Being wholly hanged on ear, you > avoid the trouble of carrying it. Give you the freedom of whatever you > do. Idea for a walk or jogging in the park, exercising at the Gym or > anyway you feel like enjoying your favorite FM radio Stations. > The iEar radio is designed to hanged comfortably on your ear along with > the second earphone, which produce exceptional stereo sound quality > music from your favorite radio stations. > iEar uses the state of the art auto scanning technology, with the single > touch of a button. It will scan and lock on the Radio station with the > best possible signal. It comes in this cool translucent Blue color, and > it's so easy to use. Makes you want to bring this anywhere you go this > Summer. iEar is powered by 2 included lithium batteries. "> > Questions Response > Do you own or use any kind of PDA(Personal Digital Assistant)? yes > no > Do you own or use a digital camera or camcorder? yes > no > Do you own or use a Sony game console such as PS1,PS2 or Gameboy? > yes > no > Do you own or use a MP3 player? yes > no > Do you own or use a DVD player? yes > no > Group Profile: > Area Code Gender: > Male Female Age Group select below 18 and below 19-30 31-45 46-60 > 60+ Income select below less than 20k 20-30k 30-40k 40-60k 60-80k > 80-100k 100k+ > This survey is intended for [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you are not the > intended recipient, please fill out your email address at right. Thanks. > > After you answer the questions, don't forget to > Links to some of our sponsors: > > > _ > > _ > > > This email is sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you believe you did not > belong to our sponsors customers list, > you can remove your email address from our distribution list by clicking > the link below. > Click here > if > you prefer not to receive future e-mail from us. > Click here to view our > permission marketing policy. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12654&t=12654 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX 506 Hang up!!! [7:12653]
Are you saying that normal operation has all 3 leds on and when you go back there to reboot it, all three leds are off? Sounds like a hardware problem. If that is not the case, and all three leds remain on, then you might have memory problems. Either bad memory, or NAT/PAT is using all available memory and then locking up. What are your resources like while the machine is working proerly? Have you monitored the pix throughout the day to see proc. utilization / memory utilization? -Patrick >>> "Magdy H. Ibrahin" 07/17/01 10:56AM >>> Dear All, Please help to solve up this problem Which I faced with my PIX 506. from three days ago, my PIX 506 hang up and stop response to any process even from the console interface... I found the three leds "Power, ACT, Network" switched off. When I turn its power off and on it works fine for few hours... and each time It needs to switching off/on the power key. I do know how to investegate this problem or what is the cause of it... Is there any guy of you can help me in this... Any reply will be appreciated... Thanx Magdy H. Ibrahim CCNA, MCSE Purenet Internetworking Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12655&t=12653 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Boson [7:12609]
I found BCMSN and BCRAN tests to be about 70% accurate. CCIE written seems to have 2 types of the test. If you get the first one, Boson represents about 30% of it. If you get the second one - it represents about 60-70%. The good thing about Boson is - it teaches you the way Cisco asks questions on tests. Eugene - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:05 AM Subject: Boson [7:12609] > How much helpful are the Boson practice tests??? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12656&t=12609 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco PBX Fundamentals [7:12658]
Has anyone taken the Cisco PBX Fundamental test. I'm trying to find the courseware which is a VOD. I can't find it anywhere on CCO. Keith L. Townsend MCSE, CNE, CCNA AISA Technologies www.aisatech.com 312-629-1100 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12658&t=12658 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ports with PIX Firewall [7:12605]
Lano, No offense intended, but I think you need to do some research. I _strongly_ recommend that if you intend to setup and administer your companies PIX firewall, you read at least: Building Internet Firewalls - Chapman and Zwicky The PIX configuration guide - cisco systems (you can probably knock these out in a weekend) Also, TCP/IP Illustrated vol 1 is excellent. You need to understand what the commands are that people are supplying you and why they work. Its pretty clear from your question that you don't know how DNS works and you've never configured a PIX. Everyone has to learn somewhere so I'm not trying to bash you, just offering a little constructive criticism. Security is very critical and if you've been charged with maintaining your companies security perimeter you need to get up to speed very quickly on at least the basics. Having said that, if all you want to do is allow inside users access to HTTP, FTP and SMTP on the Internet, all you have to do is make sure the PIX interfaces are up, routing is in place and create appropriate NAT and GLOBAL statements. The default mode on the PIX is to allow everything from the inside interface out and only replies from the outside back in. This would include things like DNS, HTTP, FTP, SMTP, etc. Assuming that you have an IP address range given to you by your ISP: nat (inside) 1 0 0 (allow all users on the inside to get global addresses) global (outside) 1 start_ip-end_ip netmask x.x.x.x I don't know what you mean when you say "I opened all the TCP ports", but if your saying that you created a conduit or an access-list to allow all TCP ports in the outside interface, _you don't need to do that and it's VERY dangerous_! This is why I say you need to understand what your doing and not just have people give you configs. If you read the PIX docs it goes step by step through an initial simple PIX configuration, which is what it sounds like you have. My advice would be to read it and follow it to the letter. If you follow the instructions you should end up with a simple working config. If you want to start creating access-lists later and applying them to limit outbound traffic once you understand how things work you can always do that. Until you fully understand how the PIX works and all of its commands, its best to start simple and build up your config. Let me say again, based on what you've stated, it doesn't sound like you need any conduit or access-list statements. If you have them and your explicitly allowing traffic in the outside interface, you have likely opened up large security holes. If you need more help contact me offline and send me your config. Again, I cannot stress enough, read the PIX setup doc, it tells you everything you need to get started with a simple configuration. HTH, Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ports with PIX Firewall [7:12605] I configured my PIX Firewall and opened all the TCP ports, I found that i can ping yahoo or cisco by ip address but not with name i.e ping cisco.com doesn't worked, then I opened all the UDP Ports also and my Surfing started also I was been able to PING by name. I just want to allow port 80 (HTTP), FTP , SMTP access to my users. Which all Ports do I need to Open?? DO I Need to open a port for DNS Name Resolution ? I am using DNS Server of ISP as I don't have resources to set-up my own DNS. Please Help Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12657&t=12605 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT:anybody knows how to become a CCSI? [7:12564]
Actually, #2 is the worst part. There are a limited # of cisco certified training providers, and you need sponsorship by one. In fact, the training center has to pay cisco for each class you are certified to teach, and if the center no longer sponsors you you loose your CCSI. The test teach isn't too bad, a one day hands on configure the routers part and a 1/2 day presentation. You have to present two modules from the ICND course. All of the hands on is based on ICND as well, except setting up a router as a frame relay switch. Neil Schneider CCSI CCNP MCT MCSE ""William Harrison"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > For all whom are concern > > There are three basic parts > > 1. pass the ICND exam by 920 > 2. be sponsored by Cisco training partner > 3. PASS A TEST TEACH IN SAN JOSE. > > The third part is the worst of all > > William Harrison > Cisco Instructor > New Horizons Learning Centers > > P.S. Please do a search for subject material there is more in the archive > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 9:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OT:anybody knows how to become a CCSI? [7:12564] > > > yes I also want to be a CCSI > Where should I apply for the EXAM ? > What is the pre-requisite ? > > From some tutor, CCSI need to pass CCNA with 920 points or above and then > pass the PRESENTATION Exam > > Is it true ? > > > > > ""Loo emotion"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > sorry for bothering you all. > > thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12660&t=12564 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ports with PIX Firewall [7:12605]
Sanjeev, I really hope that this is not taken from your PIX config because the acl_out access-list is effectively completely disabling the PIX adaptive security algorithm. This config would allow all TCP and all UDP packets in the outside interface. In other words, the PIX would not block any inbound TCP or UDP packets at all. I can think of no reason why anyone would want to do that except in very limited test lab situations. Based on the original request, there's no reason for the poster to use access-lists, the PIX ASA will permit the return packets from the inside user requests automatically. Bottom line, this config is downright dangerous and would completely open the firewall. -Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 4:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Ports with PIX Firewall [7:12605] access-list ping_acl permit icmp any any access-list ping_acl permit tcp any any eq www access-list ping_acl permit tcp any any access-list ping_acl permit udp any any access-list acl_out permit icmp any any access-list acl_out permit tcp any any eq www access-list acl_out permit tcp any any access-list acl_out permit udp any any pager lines 24 interface ethernet0 100basetx interface ethernet1 100basetx mtu outside 1500 mtu inside 1500 mtu ndtv 1500 ip address outside 172.110.0.2 255.255.0.0 ip address inside 172.100.0.1 255.255.0.0 ip audit info action alarm ip audit attack action alarm no failover failover timeout 0:00:00 failover poll 15 failover ip address outside 0.0.0.0 failover ip address inside 0.0.0.0 pdm history enable arp timeout 600 global (outside) 1 202.196.214.40-202.196.214.45 netmask 255.255.255.224 global (outside) 1 202.196.214.46 nat (inside) 1 172.100.0.0 255.255.0.0 0 0 access-group acl_out in interface outside access-group ping_acl in interface inside route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.110.0.1 1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12661&t=12605 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question About Ciscowork [7:12621]
What version did you upgrade to? I have ciscworks cd-one 2nd edition and I have a tremendous amounts of problems. I have most of them worked out through trial and error, but I have been working on them for quite a while. I don't have a service contract yet and that has been the major problem. I was also running CiscoWorks on a single processor (450MHZ) with 512 meg of ram and it was so slow!! I am now using a dual gig processor and 1 gig of memory machine and it is a lot faster. One of things that I believe is important when setting up Ciscoworks is you only have to set the CW2000 daemon manager to automatic under services on a nt machine and set the rest of the CW2000 services (cw2000 ani database, cw2000 cmf database, cw2000 essentials, etc...) to manual. The Ciscoworks software will automatically start the daemon manager service which in turn will start the rest of the CW2K services. If you have all of your CW2K services set to automatic then the Ciscoworks software will try to start them once the daemon manager is turned on and then windows NT will try to start them as well, which causes a conflict. Thanks Stan Rossetti NASA - PriSMS Advanced Technology Group IP Phone: (256) 961-7097 Voice: (256) 544-5031 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Beeper: 544-1183 pin 0112 CCDA, CCNA, CCSE -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 9:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question About Ciscowork [7:12621] Call Cisco! Seriously, if you don't have a service contract on this software, get one because you're going to need it. CW2k is great if you can get it working, but it has so many problems that sometimes it takes a while to resolve them all. We couldn't get it to work at all on HPUX, even with Cisco's help, so we migrated to NT. We decided to get the LAN Management Solutions bundle and had lots of problems with it. With Cisco's help we were able to resolve a couple of issues but it still wasn't stable and had some major bugs. So, we had to wait for the latest release which seems to be working just fine, but we need to run it on a bigger box. Right now it's on a dual-processor 450MHz machine and it's hogs the cpu pretty badly. Anyway, back to issue at hand. There are a number of reasons why you could be having problems with the ANI server and you really should enlist the help of a Cisco engineer. It may end up being very difficult to resolve this on your own. Good luck! John >>> "norsyam ariffin" 7/17/01 5:49:16 AM >>> Hi gys. Currently I' m installing Ciscowork 2000, but have some problem regarding ANI server. I cannot make the ANI server up. Could anybody gime some hint on how to make the ANI server up? Thank in advance. Syam _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12659&t=12621 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611]
first of all in basic net3 u dont need spids and the second u dont have a ip assigned to your bri neither you are using esy ip there is no dialer as well what happen to u guys -Original Message- From: Danner, John (ZoomTown) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] The spids are definitely wrong: >From debug: 07:14:249108103167: Null Spid: 0 >From config: isdn spid1 0 isdn spid2 0 Is this in a lab setting with a isdn simulator or with a transport from the phone company? If it's with the phone company you need to put the spids the phone company gave you into the configuration or you won't be able to dial correctly. If it's in a lab - I don't know. :( -John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hire, Ejay Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] I may be way off, but I thinks your spids are wrong. Call the Phone company and ask them what your spids are supposed to be. > TEI 80, ces = 1, state = 8(established) > spid1 configured, no LDN, spid1 NOT sent, spid1 NOT valid > TEI Not Assigned, ces = 2, state = 1(terminal down) > spid2 configured, no LDN, spid2 NOT sent, spid2 NOT valid -Ejay -Original Message- From: NKP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] Hi , I am facing an error in configuring the ISDN on my Cisco 2620 with the BRI S/T interface card , it keeps on getting disconnected after it dials , can anyone guide me what mistake I could be making ? cisco2620#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname cisco2620 ! ! username mcse password 0 mcse ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! isdn switch-type basic-net3 isdn voice-call-failure 0 ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 200.100.10.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/0 ip address 10.100.10.1 255.0.0.0 no ip directed-broadcast clockrate 64000 ! interface BRI0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer string 172324 dialer-group 2 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 0 isdn spid2 0 isdn calling-number 172324 ppp authentication chap ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface BRI0/0 overload ip classless no ip http server ! access-list 1 permit any dialer-list 2 protocol ip list 2 ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end cisco2620# The error message that I am recieving is as follows : cisco2620# 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Outgoing call id = 0x800C, dsl 0 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to 172324 at 64 Kb/s 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: process_bri_call(): call id 0x800C, called_number 172324, speed 64, call type DATA 07:14:154618822656: CC_CHAN_GetIdleChanbri: dsl 0 07:14:154618822656: Found idle channel B1 07:14:154618822656: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_INFORMATION call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: ISDN Event: dsl 0 call_id 0x800C B channel assigned by switch 0 ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_PROCEEDING call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: B-channel assigned in previous message call id = 0x800C 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_ALERTING call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: ISDN BR0/0: DEV_CALL_PROGRESSING: modem 3A bchan 0, call_id 800C, cause 0 07:14:184683593728: ISDN BR0/0: HOST_PROGRESS: VOICE ERROR 3A: bchan 0, call id 800C 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_CONNECT call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593775: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up 07:14:184683593792: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to 172324 07:14:186844205036: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Connected to 172324 on B1 at 64 Kb/s 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_INFORMATION call_id 0x800C 07:14:197568495616: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT call_id 0x800C 07:14:197568495616: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to was hung up. 07:14:199729106892: ISDN BR0/0: process_disc_ack(): call id 0x800C, ces 1, call type DATA 07:14:197568495663: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 disconnected from 172324 , call lasted 3 seconds 07:14:199729106700: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to down 07:14:206158430207: CC: dsl 0 No CCB Src->L3 cid 0x800C, ev 0x99 ces 1 07:14:244813135872: %ISDN-6-LAYER2DOWN: Layer 2 for Interface BR0/0, TEI 80 changed to down 07:14:244813135872: In L3_StopT309 for dsl 0. 07:14:246973706992: ISDN BR0/0: Incoming call id = 0x3, dsl 0 07:14:246971349881: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK call_id 0x0 07:14:246973747196: ISDN BR0/0: HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK: call type is INTERNAL 07:14:244813135872: %ISDN-6-LAYER2UP: Layer 2 for Interface BR0/0, TEI 80 changed to up 07:14:2491
Re: PIX 506 Hang up!!! [7:12653]
Hi Patrick, The 3 leds suddenly goes off and PIX stop response. All I have to do to make it works again is turn PIX power off/on and everything works find again for few hours... Also, I did not think it's memory utilization because I did not shift all my traffic to work bihind the PIX Any idea??? Magdy ""Patrick Ramsey"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Are you saying that normal operation has all 3 leds on and when you go back > there to reboot it, all three leds are off? > > Sounds like a hardware problem. If that is not the case, and all three leds > remain on, then you might have memory problems. Either bad memory, or > NAT/PAT is using all available memory and then locking up. > > What are your resources like while the machine is working proerly? Have you > monitored the pix throughout the day to see proc. utilization / memory > utilization? > > -Patrick > > >>> "Magdy H. Ibrahin" 07/17/01 10:56AM >>> > Dear All, > > Please help to solve up this problem Which I faced with my PIX 506. > from three days ago, my PIX 506 hang up and stop response to any process > even from the console interface... > I found the three leds "Power, ACT, Network" switched off. > When I turn its power off and on it works fine for few hours... > and each time It needs to switching off/on the power key. > I do know how to investegate this problem or what is the cause of it... > Is there any guy of you can help me in this... > > Any reply will be appreciated... > > Thanx > > Magdy H. Ibrahim > CCNA, MCSE > Purenet Internetworking Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12663&t=12653 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Block Icq With Pix Firewall [7:12601]
Well...since ICQ uses a wide range of ports it may be easier just to block access to the ICQ authentication server... - Original Message - From: "Farhan Ahmed" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 3:59 AM Subject: RE: Block Icq With Pix Firewall [7:12601] > outbound 10 deny 0 0 icqport tcp > > apply (inside) 10 outgoing_src > > -Original Message- > From: Makis > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 7/17/01 12:13 PM > Subject: Block Icq With Pix Firewall [7:12601] > > Hi > > How can i block Icq through Pix Firewall ? > Any ideas ? > > Makis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12665&t=12601 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Experiments on why the routing table is growing [7:12667]
This is a very experimental draft that still may be of interest to people who are interested not just that the BGP table is growing, but why it is growing. It's coauthored by Elwyn Davies of Nortel (UK) and Loa Andersson of Utfors (Sweden). -- Title : An Experimental Methodology for Analysis of Growth in the Global Routing Table Author(s) : H. Berkowitz et al. Filename: draft-berkowitz-tblgrow-00.txt Pages : 5 Date: 16-Jul-01 Measurements [3,4,5] have shown that the rate of growth of routes and route instances in the default-free table have resumed exponential growth, which had slowed to linear growth after the introduction of CIDR [7]. This memorandum explores some analytical methods, admittedly heuristic in most cases, to understand why growth is faster than the simple rate of allocation. When accelerated growth can be attributed to operational practices or poor understanding, it may be possible to propose approaches to reducing the rate of table explosion without reducing the services delivered to end users. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12667&t=12667 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New drafts on BGP convergence [7:12666]
These new Internet Drafts are now standards track in the IETF Benchmarking Technology Working Group. The terminology draft may help clear up some often confusing BGP terminology, beyond the pure area of convergence. These were coauthored by a multivendor team, including Alvaro Retana of Cisco, Marianne Lepp of Juniper, Sue Hares and Padma Krisnaswamy of Nexthop, and myself at Nortel. Elwyn Davies (Nortel) should have some early experimental data available in the next couple of weeks, although this is to validate the methodology rather than make any direct comparisons of commercial routers. --- Title : Terminology for Benchmarking External Routing Convergence Measurements Author(s) : H. Berkowitz et al. Filename: draft-ietf-bmwg-conterm-00.txt Pages : Date: 16-Jul-01 This draft establishes terminology to standardize the description of benchmarking methodology for measuring eBGP convergence in the control plane of a single router. Future documents will address iBGP convergence, the initiation of forwarding based on converged control plane information and internet-wide convergence. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-conterm-00.txt --- Title : Benchmarking Methodology for Basic BGP Convergence Author(s) : H. Berkowitz et al. Filename: draft-ietf-bmwg-bgpbas-00.txt Pages : Date: 16-Jul-01 This draft establishes standards for measuring BGP convergence performance. Its initial emphasis is on the control plane of single BGP routers. We do not address forwarding plane performance. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-bgpbas-00.txt Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12666&t=12666 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX 506 Hang up!!! [7:12653]
Sounds almsot like it's overheating & shutting off. Is the fan running in it? If you know anything about SNMP you could use software to browse the MIBs to check status. Keep in mind I never tried that. All I use SNMP for is bandwidth in/out and cpu utilization. Allen - Original Message - From: "Magdy H. Ibrahin" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 9:56 AM Subject: PIX 506 Hang up!!! [7:12653] > Dear All, > > Please help to solve up this problem Which I faced with my PIX 506. > from three days ago, my PIX 506 hang up and stop response to any process > even from the console interface... > I found the three leds "Power, ACT, Network" switched off. > When I turn its power off and on it works fine for few hours... > and each time It needs to switching off/on the power key. > I do know how to investegate this problem or what is the cause of it... > Is there any guy of you can help me in this... > > Any reply will be appreciated... > > Thanx > > Magdy H. Ibrahim > CCNA, MCSE > Purenet Internetworking Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12664&t=12653 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668]
Hello allsetting up a small lab w/2 2621's. Would like to create a "WAN" cable to be able to bring up a serial connection between routers. Is it possible and if so, what is the pin-out's to custom create it Thx Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12668&t=12668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
book question [7:12669]
Does anybody remember a post regarding a book club, where you get 5 books for .99, then you have to buy 1-2 more regular price? Thanks Steven Kell Bates Network Problem Resolution Team CONUS Theater Network Operations and Security Center (CTNOSC) DSN 879-1282 comm. (520) 538-1282 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fax DSN 821-9427 comm (520) 533-9427 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12669&t=12669 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX 506 Hang up!!! [7:12653]
Check the log I had this happen on a switch once and it turned out it was over heating and shutting down. Stocker -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Magdy H. Ibrahin Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 11:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PIX 506 Hang up!!! [7:12653] Hi Patrick, The 3 leds suddenly goes off and PIX stop response. All I have to do to make it works again is turn PIX power off/on and everything works find again for few hours... Also, I did not think it's memory utilization because I did not shift all my traffic to work bihind the PIX Any idea??? Magdy ""Patrick Ramsey"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Are you saying that normal operation has all 3 leds on and when you go back > there to reboot it, all three leds are off? > > Sounds like a hardware problem. If that is not the case, and all three leds > remain on, then you might have memory problems. Either bad memory, or > NAT/PAT is using all available memory and then locking up. > > What are your resources like while the machine is working proerly? Have you > monitored the pix throughout the day to see proc. utilization / memory > utilization? > > -Patrick > > >>> "Magdy H. Ibrahin" 07/17/01 10:56AM >>> > Dear All, > > Please help to solve up this problem Which I faced with my PIX 506. > from three days ago, my PIX 506 hang up and stop response to any process > even from the console interface... > I found the three leds "Power, ACT, Network" switched off. > When I turn its power off and on it works fine for few hours... > and each time It needs to switching off/on the power key. > I do know how to investegate this problem or what is the cause of it... > Is there any guy of you can help me in this... > > Any reply will be appreciated... > > Thanx > > Magdy H. Ibrahim > CCNA, MCSE > Purenet Internetworking Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12671&t=12653 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668]
get a cross over cable from ebay.com -Original Message- From: Chris Headings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 8:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668] Hello allsetting up a small lab w/2 2621's. Would like to create a "WAN" cable to be able to bring up a serial connection between routers. Is it possible and if so, what is the pin-out's to custom create it Thx Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12670&t=12668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668]
Just a standard CAT5 cross-over Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12672&t=12668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
book question [7:12673]
> Does anybody remember a post regarding a book club, where you get 5 books > for .99, then you have to buy 1-2 more regular price? > > Thanks > > Steven Kell Bates > Network Problem Resolution Team > CONUS Theater Network Operations and Security Center (CTNOSC) > DSN 879-1282 comm. (520) 538-1282 > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > fax DSN 821-9427 comm (520) 533-9427 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12673&t=12673 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NSE-1 and full BGP table with IOS 12.2 [7:12612]
George,
You probably end up better with 256megs of ram or more. With 128megs of
ram and you're running 12.2.2T code, assuming that you're running
enterprise or higher level such as for ssh, you probably using about 1/3
of your ram just for loading the ios code. So you don't have much. I
would stick to 12.0xT codes at ip-plus level if all you're doing is bgp on
that router. That will definitely use less memory.
-Frank
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, George Stylianou wrote:
> hi,
>
> Does anyone happen to know the memory requirements for cisco NSE-1 running
> IOS 12.2.2T in order to carry full BGP table (+/- 10 routes)?
>
> I have seen problems with having 128mb - the router runs out of memory a
few
> minutes after rebooting then shuts down CEF and BGP.
>
> thanks
> George
>
>
> This e-mail may contain confidential information and may be legally
> privileged and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you may not use,
> distribute or copy this document in any manner whatsoever. Kindly also
> notify the sender immediately by telephone, and delete the e-mail. When
> addressed to clients of the company from where this e-mail originates
("the
> sending company") any opinion or advice contained in this e-mail is subject
> to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable terms of business
or
> client engagement letter . The sending company does not accept liability
for
> any damage, loss or expense arising from this e-mail and/or from the
> accessing of any files attached to this e-mail.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12674&t=12612
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCBOOTCAMP Labs [7:12526]
Here here, marc Thank You, Donald B Johnson Jr - Original Message - From: "Marc Russell" To: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:54 PM Subject: Re: CCBOOTCAMP Labs [7:12526] > Not sure why you have to refer to me as a clown. I think our reviews speak > for themselves. See http://www.ccbootcamp.com/customer_reviews.htm > > My 2nd and last attempt was over three years ago just as I started this > company and the labs didn't even exist yet. Not everyone passes on their 1st > or 2nd attempt. Since then I have focused my efforts in a much less > technical role. My company now has several products, CCIE Written prep, CCIE > Lab Exam Study Guide, Practice lab Subscription, (5) remote racks, Vue > testing center, and a 5-day CCIE Instructor led CCIE class with (6) > dedicated PODs (Not the same PODs as the remote racks. Did I do this all > myself. No, I hired the talent I needed and got the job done. > > Maybe you should fly out to Detroit and see our facility before you make > judgments about us. > > We are also working on a CCIE security written, CCIE Security lab > subscription, and CCIE Security remote rack. > > Our company is also a Premier Cisco reseller with IP/Telephony and > VPN/Security specializations. > > I have a CCIE on staff and several others on contract. I have plans to pull > some of these contract CCIEs to our staff so we can get Cisco Gold reseller > status. > > I have been too busy building a company to worry about CCIE certification > for myself. That's what employees are for. My current role is now sales, > product development, and corporate management. > > I guess I have just been clowning around the last 2 years and should just > give all this up and get my CCIE instead :-) I just had to through that > in. Joking aside, this is a professional list and you could of asked your > question without being immature and calling me a clown. > > If you have questions about us please call us at 248-299-8114. I'm sure some > of our previous customers will respond here and give you their input. > > > > Marc Russell > President > Network Learning, Inc. > www.ccbootcamp.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ""Yhladi Ghfaskovich"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I am looking to start my CCIE study and have done some research on > practice > > labs. > > It seems that the CCBOOTCAMP labs are the best known to this list. Why > > would > > you buy this lab kit from someone who hasn't passed the CCIE lab? I have > > heard > > that Marc Russell has failed the lab several times. Doesn't this defeat > the > > purpose? > > If this clown didn't pass the labs why would you go to him for study > tools?. > > His > > product is also much more expensive than the other options out there. Does > > anyone > > have any experience with some of the other products out there? > > > > Thank you, > > Yhladi Ghfaskovich > > CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12675&t=12526 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 0x21042 instead of 0x2142 [7:12534]
Thanx Ayers, this worked ./bosire "Ayers, Michael" wrote: > Try this: 2104 and 2102 should look the same, but 1042 would get you 1200 > baud. Try setting your console to 1200 and see if it works > > Michael > -Original Message- > From: Richard Bosire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 12:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:0x21042 instead of 0x2142 [7:12534] > > Hellos' > > I have a cisco 1601 router which I entered confreg 0x21042 instead of > 0x2142 during password recovery. > Now, when i reboot the router I am getting > CCC on the console !!! > > Anyone come across this before > cheers > ./bosire > > -- > ___ > +$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$ > > richard bosire > ccn[ap], ccd[ap], ccs[ae] > Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or > attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do > not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, > conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the > official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor > endorsed by it. -- ___ +$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$ richard bosire ccn[ap], ccd[ap], ccs[ae] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12676&t=12534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX 506 hang up!!!! [7:5132]
security breach is occurring %PIX-7-106011: Deny inbound (No xlate) chars Explanation This is a connection-related message. This message occurs when a packet is sent to the same interface that it arrived on. This usually indicates that a security breach is occurring. When the PIX Firewall receives a packet, it tries to establish a translation slot based on the security policy you set with the global and conduit commands, and your routing policy set with the route command. Failing both policies, PIX Firewall allows the packet to flow from the higher priority network to a lower priority network, if it is consistent with the security policy. If a packet comes from a lower priority network and the security policy does not allow it, PIX Firewall routes the packet back to the same interface. To provide access from an interface with a higher security to a lower security, use the nat and global commands. For example, use the nat command to let inside users access outside servers, to let inside users access perimeter servers, and to let perimeter users access outside servers. To provide access from an interface with a lower security to higher security, use the static and conduit commands. For example, use the static and conduit commands to let outside users access inside servers, outside users access perimeter servers, or perimeter servers access inside servers. Action Fix your configuration to reflect your security policy for handling these attack events. -Original Message- From: Magdy H. Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 7:23 PM To: "Farhan Ahmed" Subject: Re: PIX 506 hang up [1:5132] Assalamo Alikom Farhan, Thanx in advance to your help.. Kindly find attached file which contained the output of sh tech ... Awaiting for your reply Magdy - Original Message - From: ""Farhan Ahmed"" Newsgroups: groupstudy.associate Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:27 PM Subject: RE: PIX 506 hang up [1:5132] > send me the sh tech support > output > > -Original Message- > From: Magdy H. Ibrahin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: PIX 506 hang up [1:5132] > > > Dear All, > > Please help to solve up this problem Which I faced with my PIX 506. > from three days ago, my PIX 506 hang up and stop response to any process > even from the console interface... > I found the three leds "Power, ACT, Network" switched off. > When I turn its power off and on it works fine for few hours... > and each time It needs to switching off/on the power key. > I do know how to investegate this problem or what is the cause of it... > Is there any guy of you can help me in this... > > Any reply will be appreciated... > > Thanx > > Magdy H. Ibrahim > CCNA, MCSE > Purenet Internetworking Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12677&t=5132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX 506 Hang up!!! [7:12653]
I've been having an identical problem with my PIX 506 in the lab. I'll setup a syslog server and check mine to see if there is any correlation. -Original Message- From: Chris Stocker To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 7/17/01 12:23 PM Subject: RE: PIX 506 Hang up!!! [7:12653] Check the log I had this happen on a switch once and it turned out it was over heating and shutting down. Stocker -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Magdy H. Ibrahin Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 11:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PIX 506 Hang up!!! [7:12653] Hi Patrick, The 3 leds suddenly goes off and PIX stop response. All I have to do to make it works again is turn PIX power off/on and everything works find again for few hours... Also, I did not think it's memory utilization because I did not shift all my traffic to work bihind the PIX Any idea??? Magdy ""Patrick Ramsey"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Are you saying that normal operation has all 3 leds on and when you go back > there to reboot it, all three leds are off? > > Sounds like a hardware problem. If that is not the case, and all three leds > remain on, then you might have memory problems. Either bad memory, or > NAT/PAT is using all available memory and then locking up. > > What are your resources like while the machine is working proerly? Have you > monitored the pix throughout the day to see proc. utilization / memory > utilization? > > -Patrick > > >>> "Magdy H. Ibrahin" 07/17/01 10:56AM >>> > Dear All, > > Please help to solve up this problem Which I faced with my PIX 506. > from three days ago, my PIX 506 hang up and stop response to any process > even from the console interface... > I found the three leds "Power, ACT, Network" switched off. > When I turn its power off and on it works fine for few hours... > and each time It needs to switching off/on the power key. > I do know how to investegate this problem or what is the cause of it... > Is there any guy of you can help me in this... > > Any reply will be appreciated... > > Thanx > > Magdy H. Ibrahim > CCNA, MCSE > Purenet Internetworking Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12678&t=12653 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DLCI [7:12679]
Can we have two DLCI having the same number on the same router but point to different destinations on different interfaces? _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12679&t=12679 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DLCI [7:12679]
Yes you can. The local telco will map the DLCI to what ever the host circuit iswe are an ISP and have the same DLCI sometimes 3 or 4 times mapping to different host circuits all destined to different clients Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12680&t=12679 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DLCI [7:12679]
Or were you asking about having the same DLCI on only one circuit point to different locations??? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12681&t=12679 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DLCI [7:12679]
no -Original Message- From: SH Wesson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 8:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DLCI [7:12679] Can we have two DLCI having the same number on the same router but point to different destinations on different interfaces? _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12682&t=12679 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668]
I'm not sure if a cross cable is enough. What about the clock ? If we have 2 DTE cables are we able to generate the clock ? Maybe a DCE cable (for one of the routers) be the best solution. > -Mensagem original- > De: Farhan Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviada em: terga-feira, 17 de julho de 2001 13:23 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Assunto: RE: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668] > > > get a cross over cable from ebay.com > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Headings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 8:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668] > > > Hello allsetting up a small lab w/2 2621's. Would like > to create a > "WAN" cable to be able to bring up a serial connection > between routers. Is > it possible and if so, what is the pin-out's to custom create it > > Thx > > Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12683&t=12668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668]
If it is just a serial port, you'll need a DCE, and DTE v.35 or something similar. If it is a T1 rj45 WIC, cross pins 1-4 2-5 4-1 5-2. -Original Message- From: Chris Headings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 9:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668] Just a standard CAT5 cross-over Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12684&t=12668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668]
I used a CAB-SSV35MT and a CAB-SSV35FC. - Original Message - From: "Farhan Ahmed" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:23 PM Subject: RE: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668] > Acesso pelo menor prego do mercado! R$ 14,90 nos 3 primeiros meses! > ASSINE AGORA! http://www.bol.com.br/acessobol/ > > > get a cross over cable from ebay.com > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Headings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 8:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668] > > > Hello allsetting up a small lab w/2 2621's. Would like to create a > "WAN" cable to be able to bring up a serial connection between routers. Is > it possible and if so, what is the pin-out's to custom create it > > Thx > > Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12685&t=12668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSI Question [7:12686]
What layer do the following things occur at? Network Login and Logout User Synchronization thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12686&t=12686 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668]
If you mean connecting 2 t1 wic's or 2 t1 csu/dsu's, Use a Cat5 cable wired as follows Pin 1 Connected to Pin 4 Pin 2 Connected to Pin 5 This will "crossover" the TX and RX pairs and make a t1 crossover cable. If anybody doesn't have the stuff to make these, I'll make and ship one in the US for $5. If you want to connect 2 serial interfaces, then you need a DTE-DCE cable. These are available from www.pacificcable.com. -ejay -Original Message- From: Chris Headings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 12:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668] Hello allsetting up a small lab w/2 2621's. Would like to create a "WAN" cable to be able to bring up a serial connection between routers. Is it possible and if so, what is the pin-out's to custom create it Thx Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12687&t=12668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668]
You're correct. It will need a DTE and a DCE cable. The part numbers are CAB-V35MT(dte cable) and a CAB-V35-FC(dce cable). He need to configure the clock on the interface: config-if#clock rate 64000 - Original Message - From: "Paulo Cesar Buerger" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 2:04 PM Subject: RE: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668] > Acesso pelo menor prego do mercado! R$ 14,90 nos 3 primeiros meses! > ASSINE AGORA! http://www.bol.com.br/acessobol/ > > > I'm not sure if a cross cable is enough. What about the clock ? If we have 2 > DTE cables are we able to generate the clock ? Maybe a DCE cable (for one of > the routers) be the best solution. > > > -Mensagem original- > > De: Farhan Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviada em: terga-feira, 17 de julho de 2001 13:23 > > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Assunto: RE: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668] > > > > > > get a cross over cable from ebay.com > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Headings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 8:05 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668] > > > > > > Hello allsetting up a small lab w/2 2621's. Would like > > to create a > > "WAN" cable to be able to bring up a serial connection > > between routers. Is > > it possible and if so, what is the pin-out's to custom create it > > > > Thx > > > > Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12688&t=12668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611]
The Switch type as defined under the interface is Basic-ni. According to http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri_invalid_spid.html this switch type requires spids. Additionally, this is an exact copy of the invalid spid example in the Cisco troubleshooter. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri_sh_isdn_stat.html Not having an Ip address wil cause it not to work, but it won't cause the call not to complete. This configuration doesn't require a dialer interface. It is using legacy configuration. -Ejay -Original Message- From: Farhan Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] first of all in basic net3 u dont need spids and the second u dont have a ip assigned to your bri neither you are using esy ip there is no dialer as well what happen to u guys -Original Message- From: Danner, John (ZoomTown) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] The spids are definitely wrong: >From debug: 07:14:249108103167: Null Spid: 0 >From config: isdn spid1 0 isdn spid2 0 Is this in a lab setting with a isdn simulator or with a transport from the phone company? If it's with the phone company you need to put the spids the phone company gave you into the configuration or you won't be able to dial correctly. If it's in a lab - I don't know. :( -John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hire, Ejay Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] I may be way off, but I thinks your spids are wrong. Call the Phone company and ask them what your spids are supposed to be. > TEI 80, ces = 1, state = 8(established) > spid1 configured, no LDN, spid1 NOT sent, spid1 NOT valid > TEI Not Assigned, ces = 2, state = 1(terminal down) > spid2 configured, no LDN, spid2 NOT sent, spid2 NOT valid -Ejay -Original Message- From: NKP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] Hi , I am facing an error in configuring the ISDN on my Cisco 2620 with the BRI S/T interface card , it keeps on getting disconnected after it dials , can anyone guide me what mistake I could be making ? cisco2620#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname cisco2620 ! ! username mcse password 0 mcse ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! isdn switch-type basic-net3 isdn voice-call-failure 0 ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 200.100.10.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/0 ip address 10.100.10.1 255.0.0.0 no ip directed-broadcast clockrate 64000 ! interface BRI0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer string 172324 dialer-group 2 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 0 isdn spid2 0 isdn calling-number 172324 ppp authentication chap ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface BRI0/0 overload ip classless no ip http server ! access-list 1 permit any dialer-list 2 protocol ip list 2 ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end cisco2620# The error message that I am recieving is as follows : cisco2620# 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Outgoing call id = 0x800C, dsl 0 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to 172324 at 64 Kb/s 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: process_bri_call(): call id 0x800C, called_number 172324, speed 64, call type DATA 07:14:154618822656: CC_CHAN_GetIdleChanbri: dsl 0 07:14:154618822656: Found idle channel B1 07:14:154618822656: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_INFORMATION call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: ISDN Event: dsl 0 call_id 0x800C B channel assigned by switch 0 ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_PROCEEDING call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: B-channel assigned in previous message call id = 0x800C 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_ALERTING call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: ISDN BR0/0: DEV_CALL_PROGRESSING: modem 3A bchan 0, call_id 800C, cause 0 07:14:184683593728: ISDN BR0/0: HOST_PROGRESS: VOICE ERROR 3A: bchan 0, call id 800C 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_CONNECT call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593775: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up 07:14:184683593792: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to 172324 07:14:186844205036: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Connected to 172324 on B1 at 64 Kb/s 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_INFORMATION call_id 0x800C 07:14:197568495616: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT call_id 0x800C 07:14:197568495616: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to was hung up. 07:14:199729106892: ISDN BR0/0: process_disc_ack(): call id 0x800C, ces 1, call type DATA 07:14:1975684
RE: DLCI [7:12679]
If you mean 2 seperate pvc's connected to the same physical interface with a single dlci, no. If you mean 2 seperate pvc's connected to seperate physical interfaces, Yes. -Ej -Original Message- From: SH Wesson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 12:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DLCI [7:12679] Can we have two DLCI having the same number on the same router but point to different destinations on different interfaces? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12690&t=12679 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DLCI [7:12679]
OKAY, I THINK WE NEED TO GET THIS STRAIGHT, I HAVE A YES AND A NO WRITTEN EARLIER, IT WAS QUOTED AS SAYING THAT: Yes you can. The local telco will map the DLCI to what ever the host circuit iswe are an ISP and have the same DLCI sometimes 3 or 4 times mapping to different host circuits all destined to different clients -Original Message- From: Farhan Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DLCI [7:12679] no -Original Message- From: SH Wesson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 8:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DLCI [7:12679] Can we have two DLCI having the same number on the same router but point to different destinations on different interfaces? _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12691&t=12679 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: book question [7:12673]
The company is books online. www.booksonline.com The telecom book club has the Cisco stuff. http://tcbc.booksonline.com/cgi-bin/ndCGI.exe/Develop/pagHome?clubId=TBC&pro mo=bhp-1-5 -ej -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 12:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: book question [7:12673] > Does anybody remember a post regarding a book club, where you get 5 books > for .99, then you have to buy 1-2 more regular price? > > Thanks > > Steven Kell Bates > Network Problem Resolution Team > CONUS Theater Network Operations and Security Center (CTNOSC) > DSN 879-1282 comm. (520) 538-1282 > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > fax DSN 821-9427 comm (520) 533-9427 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12692&t=12673 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611]
why he put then and where is the ip ,u cant define switch type on legacy ddr can u? Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname cisco2620 ! ! username mcse password 0 mcse ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! isdn switch-type basic-net3 isdn voice-call-failure 0 ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 200.100.10.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/0 ip address 10.100.10.1 255.0.0.0 no ip directed-broadcast clockrate 64000 ! interface BRI0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer string 172324 dialer-group 2 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 0 isdn spid2 0 isdn calling-number 172324 ppp authentication chap -Original Message- From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 9:27 PM To: 'Farhan Ahmed'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] The Switch type as defined under the interface is Basic-ni. According to http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri_invalid_spid.html this switch type requires spids. Additionally, this is an exact copy of the invalid spid example in the Cisco troubleshooter. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri_sh_isdn_stat.html Not having an Ip address wil cause it not to work, but it won't cause the call not to complete. This configuration doesn't require a dialer interface. It is using legacy configuration. -Ejay -Original Message- From: Farhan Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] first of all in basic net3 u dont need spids and the second u dont have a ip assigned to your bri neither you are using esy ip there is no dialer as well what happen to u guys -Original Message- From: Danner, John (ZoomTown) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] The spids are definitely wrong: >From debug: 07:14:249108103167: Null Spid: 0 >From config: isdn spid1 0 isdn spid2 0 Is this in a lab setting with a isdn simulator or with a transport from the phone company? If it's with the phone company you need to put the spids the phone company gave you into the configuration or you won't be able to dial correctly. If it's in a lab - I don't know. :( -John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hire, Ejay Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] I may be way off, but I thinks your spids are wrong. Call the Phone company and ask them what your spids are supposed to be. > TEI 80, ces = 1, state = 8(established) > spid1 configured, no LDN, spid1 NOT sent, spid1 NOT valid > TEI Not Assigned, ces = 2, state = 1(terminal down) > spid2 configured, no LDN, spid2 NOT sent, spid2 NOT valid -Ejay -Original Message- From: NKP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] Hi , I am facing an error in configuring the ISDN on my Cisco 2620 with the BRI S/T interface card , it keeps on getting disconnected after it dials , can anyone guide me what mistake I could be making ? cisco2620#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname cisco2620 ! ! username mcse password 0 mcse ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! isdn switch-type basic-net3 isdn voice-call-failure 0 ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 200.100.10.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/0 ip address 10.100.10.1 255.0.0.0 no ip directed-broadcast clockrate 64000 ! interface BRI0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer string 172324 dialer-group 2 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 0 isdn spid2 0 isdn calling-number 172324 ppp authentication chap ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface BRI0/0 overload ip classless no ip http server ! access-list 1 permit any dialer-list 2 protocol ip list 2 ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end cisco2620# The error message that I am recieving is as follows : cisco2620# 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Outgoing call id = 0x800C, dsl 0 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to 172324 at 64 Kb/s 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: process_bri_call(): call id 0x800C, called_number 172324, speed 64, call type DATA 07:14:154618822656: CC_CHAN_GetIdleChanbri: dsl 0 07:14:154618822656: Found idle channel B1 07:14:154618822656: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_INFORMATION call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: ISDN Eve
RE: DLCI [7:12679]
Yepas long as the DLCI's are on different interfaces you're fine. Inverse arp should take care of the mappings for you but you could play it safe by setting up some frame-relay map commands. I have this on several routers and have had no problems so far. ie: interface s3/0.100 point-to-point ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x frame-relay interface-dlci 100 ! interface s3/1.100 point-to-point ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x frame-relay interface-dlci 100 -Original Message- From: SH Wesson To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 7/17/01 12:47 PM Subject: DLCI [7:12679] Can we have two DLCI having the same number on the same router but point to different destinations on different interfaces? _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12693&t=12679 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DLCI [7:12679]
may be if u are using a specific service provider dlci is local specific Frame Relay (DLCI) Data Link Connection Identifier Frame Relay virtual circuits are identified by their data link connection identifiers or DLCI. DLCI have numeric values that are usually assigned by the service provider or public carrier. Although they are typically assigned by the service provider they are only important at a local level as the service provider are not unique in the Frame Relay network. Also, it is not unusual for two DTE devices connected with a virtual circuit to use different DLCI values when communicating on the same connection. -Original Message- From: NP-BASS LEON [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 9:32 PM To: 'Farhan Ahmed'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DLCI [7:12679] OKAY, I THINK WE NEED TO GET THIS STRAIGHT, I HAVE A YES AND A NO WRITTEN EARLIER, IT WAS QUOTED AS SAYING THAT: Yes you can. The local telco will map the DLCI to what ever the host circuit iswe are an ISP and have the same DLCI sometimes 3 or 4 times mapping to different host circuits all destined to different clients -Original Message- From: Farhan Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DLCI [7:12679] no -Original Message- From: SH Wesson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 8:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DLCI [7:12679] Can we have two DLCI having the same number on the same router but point to different destinations on different interfaces? _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12695&t=12679 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSI Question [7:12686]
Without knowing exactly what kind of network you are on, one could safely say 4-7. -Patrick >>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 07/17/01 01:24PM >>> What layer do the following things occur at? Network Login and Logout User Synchronization thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12696&t=12686 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611]
its saying connected ? 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_CONNECT call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593775: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up 07:14:184683593792: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to -Original Message- From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 9:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] The Switch type as defined under the interface is Basic-ni. According to http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri_invalid_spid.html this switch type requires spids. Additionally, this is an exact copy of the invalid spid example in the Cisco troubleshooter. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri_sh_isdn_stat.html Not having an Ip address wil cause it not to work, but it won't cause the call not to complete. This configuration doesn't require a dialer interface. It is using legacy configuration. -Ejay -Original Message- From: Farhan Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] first of all in basic net3 u dont need spids and the second u dont have a ip assigned to your bri neither you are using esy ip there is no dialer as well what happen to u guys -Original Message- From: Danner, John (ZoomTown) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] The spids are definitely wrong: >From debug: 07:14:249108103167: Null Spid: 0 >From config: isdn spid1 0 isdn spid2 0 Is this in a lab setting with a isdn simulator or with a transport from the phone company? If it's with the phone company you need to put the spids the phone company gave you into the configuration or you won't be able to dial correctly. If it's in a lab - I don't know. :( -John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hire, Ejay Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] I may be way off, but I thinks your spids are wrong. Call the Phone company and ask them what your spids are supposed to be. > TEI 80, ces = 1, state = 8(established) > spid1 configured, no LDN, spid1 NOT sent, spid1 NOT valid > TEI Not Assigned, ces = 2, state = 1(terminal down) > spid2 configured, no LDN, spid2 NOT sent, spid2 NOT valid -Ejay -Original Message- From: NKP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Error in configuring ISDN [7:12611] Hi , I am facing an error in configuring the ISDN on my Cisco 2620 with the BRI S/T interface card , it keeps on getting disconnected after it dials , can anyone guide me what mistake I could be making ? cisco2620#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname cisco2620 ! ! username mcse password 0 mcse ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! isdn switch-type basic-net3 isdn voice-call-failure 0 ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 200.100.10.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/0 ip address 10.100.10.1 255.0.0.0 no ip directed-broadcast clockrate 64000 ! interface BRI0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer string 172324 dialer-group 2 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 0 isdn spid2 0 isdn calling-number 172324 ppp authentication chap ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface BRI0/0 overload ip classless no ip http server ! access-list 1 permit any dialer-list 2 protocol ip list 2 ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end cisco2620# The error message that I am recieving is as follows : cisco2620# 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Outgoing call id = 0x800C, dsl 0 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to 172324 at 64 Kb/s 07:14:36: ISDN BR0/0: process_bri_call(): call id 0x800C, called_number 172324, speed 64, call type DATA 07:14:154618822656: CC_CHAN_GetIdleChanbri: dsl 0 07:14:154618822656: Found idle channel B1 07:14:154618822656: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_INFORMATION call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: ISDN Event: dsl 0 call_id 0x800C B channel assigned by switch 0 ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_PROCEEDING call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: B-channel assigned in previous message call id = 0x800C 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_ALERTING call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593728: ISDN BR0/0: DEV_CALL_PROGRESSING: modem 3A bchan 0, call_id 800C, cause 0 07:14:184683593728: ISDN BR0/0: HOST_PROGRESS: VOICE ERROR 3A: bchan 0, call id 800C 07:14:186844205132: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_CONNECT call_id 0x800C 07:14:184683593775: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up 07:14:184683593792: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interf
RE: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668]
u can buy 1 cable crossover -Original Message- From: Juliano Moises da Luz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 9:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668] You're correct. It will need a DTE and a DCE cable. The part numbers are CAB-V35MT(dte cable) and a CAB-V35-FC(dce cable). He need to configure the clock on the interface: config-if#clock rate 64000 - Original Message - From: "Paulo Cesar Buerger" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 2:04 PM Subject: RE: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668] > Acesso pelo menor prego do mercado! R$ 14,90 nos 3 primeiros meses! > ASSINE AGORA! http://www.bol.com.br/acessobol/ > > > I'm not sure if a cross cable is enough. What about the clock ? If we have 2 > DTE cables are we able to generate the clock ? Maybe a DCE cable (for one of > the routers) be the best solution. > > > -Mensagem original- > > De: Farhan Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviada em: terga-feira, 17 de julho de 2001 13:23 > > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Assunto: RE: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668] > > > > > > get a cross over cable from ebay.com > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Headings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 8:05 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: WIC to WIC Connection [7:12668] > > > > > > Hello allsetting up a small lab w/2 2621's. Would like > > to create a > > "WAN" cable to be able to bring up a serial connection > > between routers. Is > > it possible and if so, what is the pin-out's to custom create it > > > > Thx > > > > Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12698&t=12668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSI Question [7:12686]
>What layer do the following things occur at? You really have to be more specific for an answer. In general, though, login is an application level function with management aspects. Do you mean synchronization as in who gets to transmit in a conversation? If so, that's session. If you're thinking of data base synchronization, that's application. > > >Network Login and Logout > >User Synchronization > >thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12699&t=12686 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bit Duration [7:12700]
I was reading something about bit duration, does anyone know how to calculate this for signals example, what is the bit duration of a 100 kbps signal thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12700&t=12700 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCBOOTCAMP Labs [7:12526]
Yhladi Ghfaskovich, at least marc has passed his written exam in order to appear for his lab. what about u Mr.CCNA ? Niloufer Tamboly CCNA, CCNP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Here here, marc Thank You, Donald B Johnson Jr - Original Message - From: "Marc Russell" To: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:54 PM Subject: Re: CCBOOTCAMP Labs [7:12526] > Not sure why you have to refer to me as a clown. I think our reviews speak > for themselves. See http://www.ccbootcamp.com/customer_reviews.htm > > My 2nd and last attempt was over three years ago just as I started this > company and the labs didn't even exist yet. Not everyone passes on their 1st > or 2nd attempt. Since then I have focused my efforts in a much less > technical role. My company now has several products, CCIE Written prep, CCIE > Lab Exam Study Guide, Practice lab Subscription, (5) remote racks, Vue > testing center, and a 5-day CCIE Instructor led CCIE class with (6) > dedicated PODs (Not the same PODs as the remote racks. Did I do this all > myself. No, I hired the talent I needed and got the job done. > > Maybe you should fly out to Detroit and see our facility before you make > judgments about us. > > We are also working on a CCIE security written, CCIE Security lab > subscription, and CCIE Security remote rack. > > Our company is also a Premier Cisco reseller with IP/Telephony and > VPN/Security specializations. > > I have a CCIE on staff and several others on contract. I have plans to pull > some of these contract CCIEs to our staff so we can get Cisco Gold reseller > status. > > I have been too busy building a company to worry about CCIE certification > for myself. That's what employees are for. My current role is now sales, > product development, and corporate management. > > I guess I have just been clowning around the last 2 years and should just > give all this up and get my CCIE instead :-) I just had to through that > in. Joking aside, this is a professional list and you could of asked your > question without being immature and calling me a clown. > > If you have questions about us please call us at 248-299-8114. I'm sure some > of our previous customers will respond here and give you their input. > > > > Marc Russell > President > Network Learning, Inc. > www.ccbootcamp.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ""Yhladi Ghfaskovich"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I am looking to start my CCIE study and have done some research on > practice > > labs. > > It seems that the CCBOOTCAMP labs are the best known to this list. Why > > would > > you buy this lab kit from someone who hasn't passed the CCIE lab? I have > > heard > > that Marc Russell has failed the lab several times. Doesn't this defeat > the > > purpose? > > If this clown didn't pass the labs why would you go to him for study > tools?. > > His > > product is also much more expensive than the other options out there. Does > > anyone > > have any experience with some of the other products out there? > > > > Thank you, > > Yhladi Ghfaskovich > > CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12702&t=12526 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bit Duration [7:12700]
If there are 100k bits in a second, then the bit time would be 1/100k th of a second. This may or may not not take into account any overhead as part of the framing. -Ejay -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 2:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bit Duration [7:12700] I was reading something about bit duration, does anyone know how to calculate this for signals example, what is the bit duration of a 100 kbps signal thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12703&t=12700 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Back in Harness [7:12704]
For those of you who noted my demise from IT earlier this year I'm back in again with another job. Best you take cover now then! Karl IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended solely for the use of the Individual or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not use, copy, alter, or disclose the contents of this message. All information or opinions expressed in this message and/or any attachments are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Karl or Pauline HUTCHINSON. Karl & Pauline HUTCHINSON accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from its use, including damage from virus. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12704&t=12704 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3500 xl switch problem [7:12705]
Hello Everyone! I changed the management VLAN of a 3500 switch thorugh the browser-based cisco cluster management suite (CMS). By default the switch IP address belongs to the management VLAN which is VLAN 1. Only one vLan can be adminstratively active at the same time. By changing to a newly created vlan I have lost the chance to manage the default vlan. can't no longer console or access via the assigned IP address. Thanks in advance if anyone knows anything about this! Angel Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12705&t=12705 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
