Passed CCIE Written [7:30165]
Dear list, I've just taken the CCIE written qualification test and passed. I was queer though that though I thought i can answer most to of them I found the score says the other way around... I want to thank you to each and everyone of you and Lou Rossi (if he's in the list) for making it possible for me. Thank you all. I understand that the written test is a start of something far more difficult, guess no I will shoved myself into more serious studies than I've ever been for the lab. Donny _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30165&t=30165 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Howard Berkowitz to speak at EveCon 19 [7:30121]
IIFC The Balrog was released from the netherworld when the dwarves mined too deeply. It is a fiery beast that even the orcs fear. It destroys everything in its environment. To destroy it you have to sacrifice yourself. Sure sounds like Bill Gates to me! I understand that Howard likes fine foods. If so, he would be Bilbo Baggins. Who is Golum? sp? > -Original Message- > From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 11:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Howard Berkowitz to speak at EveCon 19 [7:30121] > > > that was "Saruman", not "Sorry Man" ;-> > > I consider JRR Chambers to be the Sauron of networking :-> > > that still leaves the Balrog. Linux, maybe? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30164&t=30121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More BGP fun - aggregate-address attribute-map vs [7:30162]
going through Parkhurst. 1.4 aggregate-address net mask attribute-map route-map name 1.5 aggregate-address net mask route-map name no difference. So what's the point? BTW the CCO command and configurations guides aren't a lot of help here. The command reference is quite sparse, in fact, when it comes to the switches available to the aggregate-address command. There is some slightly better information available on the TAC pages. Ever wonder about code bloat? I gather this is a god example of how it can happen. Today's BGP lesson - what can and cannot be used with the aggregate-address command. using either form - attribute-map route-map OR route-map - one can use the following set comands: community ( and all related switches ) extcommunity ( and all related switches - although I haven't a clue what this does - have not researched it yet ) local-preference ( used only within the same AS ) metric ( suggestion to a neighbor only, the neighbor does not forward it ) origin ( transitive - forwarded from originating router into eternity, so to speak ) weight ( local router only ) someone a while back had a question about commands that show up with the ? - this is a perfect example of not all commands having any effect in all situations, even if they do show up with the "help" I keep wishing someone would do a good book or white paper on route-maps... Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30162&t=30162 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Len Lee/CHI/NTRS is out of the office. [7:30160]
I will be out of the office starting December 26, 2001 and will not return until December 27, 2001. I will respond to your message when I return. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30160&t=30160 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interface TokenRing0 changed state to initializing [7:30159]
Thanks ahead of time for your help. Just powered up a 2nd hand 2504 router and get the output below (see below). I am connected via console only. Router "hangs" at Interface TokenRing0, changed state to initializing (goes no further). I have tried the break sequence at boot and get the the > prompt but, router will not accept commands (i.e., locked up). output: System Bootstrap, Version 4.14(6)[fc3], SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1994 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 16384 Kbytes of main memory Unknown tcp configuration command "synwait-time" Illegal IP keyword - mroute-cache Unknown or ambiguous frame_relay subcommand-inverse-arp Illegal IP keyword - classless Booting cisco2-2500 .. %TR-3-OPENFAIL: Unit 0, open failed: Lobe Test, failed. Abort at 0x1013EC4 (PC) > System Bootstrap, Version 4.14(6)[fc3], SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1994 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 16384 Kbytes of main memory Unknown tcp configuration command "synwait-time" Illegal IP keyword - mroute-cache Unknown or ambiguous frame_relay subcommand-inverse-arp Illegal IP keyword - classless Booting cisco2-2500 .. %TR-3-OPENFAIL: Unit 0, open failed: Lobe Test, failed.. [timed out] Network load failed System Bootstrap, Version 4.14(6)[fc3], SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1994 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 16384 Kbytes of main memory Unknown tcp configuration command "synwait-time" Illegal IP keyword - mroute-cache Unknown or ambiguous frame_relay subcommand-inverse-arp Illegal IP keyword - classless Booting cisco2-2500 Abort at 0x1013E94 (PC) > Unknown tcp configuration command "synwait-time" Illegal IP keyword - mroute-cache Unknown or ambiguous frame_relay subcommand-inverse-arp Illegal IP keyword - classless Booting c2500-js56i-1.120-9.mz from Flash address space [buffer overflow - 5115 388/646438 bytes] Flash load failed System Bootstrap, Version 4.14(6)[fc3], SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1994 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 1024 Kbytes of main memory Unknown tcp configuration command "synwait-time" Illegal IP keyword - mroute-cache Unknown or ambiguous frame_relay subcommand-inverse-arp Illegal IP keyword - classless Booting c2500-js56i-1.120-9.mz from Flash address space [buffer overflow - 5115 388/646438 bytes] Flash load failed System Bootstrap, Version 4.14(6)[fc3], SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1994 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 1024 Kbytes of main memory Abort at 0x1098324 (PC) > 2500 processor with 16384 Kbytes of main memory Unknown tcp configuration command "synwait-time" Illegal IP keyword - mroute-cache Unknown or ambiguous frame_relay subcommand-inverse-arp Illegal IP keyword - classless Booting c2500-js56i-1.120-9.mz from Flash address space rr [OK - 5115388/16375078 bytes] F3: 8564+5106792+165012 at 0x1000 Self decompressing the image : # # [OK] Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134-1706 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS56I-L), Version 12.0(9), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 25-Jan-00 01:54 by bettyl Image text-base: 0x144C, data-base: 0x009D986C Compliance with U.S. Export Laws and Regulations - Encryption This product performs encryption and is regulated for export by the U.S. Government. This product is not authorized for use by persons located outside the United States and Canada that do not have prior approval from Cisco Systems, Inc. or the U.S. Government. This product may not be exported outside the U.S. and Canada either by physical or electronic means without PRIOR approval of Cisco Systems, Inc. or the U.S. Government. Persons outside the U.S. and Canada may not re-export, resell, or transfer this product by either physical or electronic means without prior approval of Cisco Systems, Inc. or the U.S. Government. cisco 2500 (68030) processor (revision B) with 16384K/2048K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 01166016, with hardware revision Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp). TN3270 Emulation software. Basic Rate ISDN software, Version 1.1. 1 Token Ring/IEEE 802.5 interface(s) 2 Serial network interface(s) 1 ISDN Basic Rate interface(s) 32K bytes of non-volatile c
Re: Tunneling over Inetnet with Cisco [7:30150]
let's see - if I say that there are lots of examples on CCO, I'm not very helpful. OK http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/inte r_c/icdlogin.htm you should be able to get to the tunnel interface configuration guide from there. HTH Chuck PS it is NEVER too soon to learn to do CCO searches. ""Slava Kosoy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can you pus something concrete in? > Thank you. > > > > ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > unless there are firewalls involved, this is a no brainer. trhere are MANY > > examples on CCO. > > > > I have done this several times in the last year with folks over the 'net. > > works just fine, with every routing protocol I can think of. > > > > Chuck > > > > > > ""Slava Kosoy"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Can anyone give me a configutration examples of two tunneled over the > the > > > Internet routers? > > > IP over IP tunnel that is my concern. > > > > > > Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30158&t=30150 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tunneling over Inetnet with Cisco [7:30150]
interface Tunnel0 ip address 56.1.1.1 255.0.0.0 no ip directed-broadcast tunnel source 10.16.1.2 tunnel destination 10.15.1.2 interface Tunnel0 ip address 56.1.1.2 255.0.0.0 no ip directed-broadcast tunnel source 10.15.1.2 tunnel destination 10.16.1.2 Depending on your situation it can be much more complicated, but this is the basic config. Marc Russell www.ccbootcamp.com ""Slava Kosoy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can you pus something concrete in? > Thank you. > > > > ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > unless there are firewalls involved, this is a no brainer. trhere are MANY > > examples on CCO. > > > > I have done this several times in the last year with folks over the 'net. > > works just fine, with every routing protocol I can think of. > > > > Chuck > > > > > > ""Slava Kosoy"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Can anyone give me a configutration examples of two tunneled over the > the > > > Internet routers? > > > IP over IP tunnel that is my concern. > > > > > > Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30156&t=30150 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Howard Berkowitz to speak at EveCon 19 [7:30121]
that was "Saruman", not "Sorry Man" ;-> I consider JRR Chambers to be the Sauron of networking :-> that still leaves the Balrog. Linux, maybe? ""Nigel Taylor"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Chuck, > You'll get my vote on being the Saruman! Howard, is it possible > that there might be a few copies of your new book on hand for sale. I got > to thinking a signed copy would do nicely for all of us who haven't seen the > movie yet...Imagine that, a book signed by the "Gandalf of Networking" > > Priscilla thanks for the thought. Sounds like "ebay" material to me... :-> > > Nigel > > - Original Message - > From: "Chuck Larrieu" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 8:33 PM > Subject: Re: Howard Berkowitz to speak at EveCon 19 [7:30121] > > > > who's the Balrog of networking? who's the Saruman? > > > > > > ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > So, completely OT, but has anyone seen the first LOTR movie yet? Is it > any > > > good? I think Howard could be considered the Gandalf of networking. ;-) > > > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > > > > At 04:53 PM 12/26/01, Bruce Evry wrote: > > > >Dear Friends, > > > > > > > > Howard Berkowitz will be doing a presentation this coming > > weekend, > > > >where he will combine his knowledge of Network Design with his > expertise > > > >at all things Monty Python. Should be fascinating! > > > > > > > > EveCon 19 is a Science Fiction and Fact convention, that in > > > >addition to several other talks on computer topics (and routing...) has > > > >such things as Costume workshops, Chainmail lessons, 24 hour movies on > a > > > >180 inch projection tv, and the traditional drummers and belly dancers. > > > > > > > > Place is the Sheraton Reston Hotel in sunny Reston, Virginia. > > > > The convention runs from Friday until Sunday, non-stop. Cost > > $30. > > > > Howard's presentation will be at 3 pm in the Video Room. > > > > Bring your own Parrot! > > > > > > > > Yours Truly - Bruce Evry > > > > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30152&t=30121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Howard Berkowitz to speak at EveCon 19 [7:30121]
>Chuck, > You'll get my vote on being the Saruman! Howard, is it possible >that there might be a few copies of your new book on hand for sale. I got >to thinking a signed copy would do nicely for all of us who haven't seen the >movie yet...Imagine that, a book signed by the "Gandalf of Networking" > >Priscilla thanks for the thought. Sounds like "ebay" material to me... :-> > >Nigel Well, the new one isn't out yet...I don't have the date yet, other than early 2002. I will have some additional Web presence Real Soon Now, but that's hard to sign. > >- Original Message - >From: "Chuck Larrieu" >To: >Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 8:33 PM >Subject: Re: Howard Berkowitz to speak at EveCon 19 [7:30121] > > >> who's the Balrog of networking? who's the Saruman? >> >> >> ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> > So, completely OT, but has anyone seen the first LOTR movie yet? Is it >any >> > good? I think Howard could be considered the Gandalf of networking. ;-) >> > >> > Priscilla >> > >> > >> > At 04:53 PM 12/26/01, Bruce Evry wrote: >> > >Dear Friends, >> > > >> > > Howard Berkowitz will be doing a presentation this coming >> weekend, >> > >where he will combine his knowledge of Network Design with his >expertise >> > >at all things Monty Python. Should be fascinating! >> > > >> > > EveCon 19 is a Science Fiction and Fact convention, that in >> > >addition to several other talks on computer topics (and routing...) has >> > >such things as Costume workshops, Chainmail lessons, 24 hour movies on >a >> > >180 inch projection tv, and the traditional drummers and belly dancers. >> > > >> > > Place is the Sheraton Reston Hotel in sunny Reston, Virginia. >> > > The convention runs from Friday until Sunday, non-stop. Cost >> $30. >> > > Howard's presentation will be at 3 pm in the Video Room. >> > > Bring your own Parrot! >> > > >> > > Yours Truly - Bruce Evry >> > >> > >> > Priscilla Oppenheimer >> > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30155&t=30121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tunneling over Inetnet with Cisco [7:30150]
Can you pus something concrete in? Thank you. ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > unless there are firewalls involved, this is a no brainer. trhere are MANY > examples on CCO. > > I have done this several times in the last year with folks over the 'net. > works just fine, with every routing protocol I can think of. > > Chuck > > > ""Slava Kosoy"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Can anyone give me a configutration examples of two tunneled over the the > > Internet routers? > > IP over IP tunnel that is my concern. > > > > Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30154&t=30150 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Howard Berkowitz to speak at EveCon 19 [7:30121]
>- Original Message - >From: "Chuck Larrieu" >To: >Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 8:33 PM >Subject: Re: Howard Berkowitz to speak at EveCon 19 [7:30121] > > > > who's the Balrog of networking? who's the Saruman? How about the Shelob? Hopefully not me! ;-) I identify with Eowyn. Sorry for wasting _more_ bandwidth! Priscilla > > > > > > ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > So, completely OT, but has anyone seen the first LOTR movie yet? Is it >any > > > good? I think Howard could be considered the Gandalf of networking. ;-) > > > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > > > > At 04:53 PM 12/26/01, Bruce Evry wrote: > > > >Dear Friends, > > > > > > > > Howard Berkowitz will be doing a presentation this coming > > weekend, > > > >where he will combine his knowledge of Network Design with his >expertise > > > >at all things Monty Python. Should be fascinating! > > > > > > > > EveCon 19 is a Science Fiction and Fact convention, that in > > > >addition to several other talks on computer topics (and routing...) has > > > >such things as Costume workshops, Chainmail lessons, 24 hour movies on >a > > > >180 inch projection tv, and the traditional drummers and belly dancers. > > > > > > > > Place is the Sheraton Reston Hotel in sunny Reston, Virginia. > > > > The convention runs from Friday until Sunday, non-stop. Cost > > $30. > > > > Howard's presentation will be at 3 pm in the Video Room. > > > > Bring your own Parrot! > > > > > > > > Yours Truly - Bruce Evry > > > > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > > http://www.priscilla.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30153&t=30121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tunneling over Inetnet with Cisco [7:30150]
unless there are firewalls involved, this is a no brainer. trhere are MANY examples on CCO. I have done this several times in the last year with folks over the 'net. works just fine, with every routing protocol I can think of. Chuck ""Slava Kosoy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can anyone give me a configutration examples of two tunneled over the the > Internet routers? > IP over IP tunnel that is my concern. > > Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30151&t=30150 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Howard Berkowitz to speak at EveCon 19 [7:30121]
Chuck, You'll get my vote on being the Saruman! Howard, is it possible that there might be a few copies of your new book on hand for sale. I got to thinking a signed copy would do nicely for all of us who haven't seen the movie yet...Imagine that, a book signed by the "Gandalf of Networking" Priscilla thanks for the thought. Sounds like "ebay" material to me... :-> Nigel - Original Message - From: "Chuck Larrieu" To: Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 8:33 PM Subject: Re: Howard Berkowitz to speak at EveCon 19 [7:30121] > who's the Balrog of networking? who's the Saruman? > > > ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > So, completely OT, but has anyone seen the first LOTR movie yet? Is it any > > good? I think Howard could be considered the Gandalf of networking. ;-) > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > At 04:53 PM 12/26/01, Bruce Evry wrote: > > >Dear Friends, > > > > > > Howard Berkowitz will be doing a presentation this coming > weekend, > > >where he will combine his knowledge of Network Design with his expertise > > >at all things Monty Python. Should be fascinating! > > > > > > EveCon 19 is a Science Fiction and Fact convention, that in > > >addition to several other talks on computer topics (and routing...) has > > >such things as Costume workshops, Chainmail lessons, 24 hour movies on a > > >180 inch projection tv, and the traditional drummers and belly dancers. > > > > > > Place is the Sheraton Reston Hotel in sunny Reston, Virginia. > > > The convention runs from Friday until Sunday, non-stop. Cost > $30. > > > Howard's presentation will be at 3 pm in the Video Room. > > > Bring your own Parrot! > > > > > > Yours Truly - Bruce Evry > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30141&t=30121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: DirectTV [7:30136]
Jeff, You could always throw up a small antenna system or tower if you really want it bad enough. http://www.rohnnet.com/ Be sure to check your local county and city regulations before you put anything up over 50ft. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/quicklinks.html ""Jeff Smith"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I had them out last week to install mine, but there was no clear path to the > satellite from my roof, due to large trees, so they couldn't do it. I am > going to try someone else and hope they have a satellite in a different > spot. I think he said if there is no clear line of sight from your roof to > the southwest you may have problems, with DirectTV at least. Good luck. > > > >From: "Jeff D" > >Reply-To: "Jeff D" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: OT: DirectTV [7:30136] > >Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 21:00:59 -0500 > > > >I was thinking about doing this, but was curious if anyone knows of > >anything > >better or pros/cons to this: > > > >http://store.yahoo.com/dialadish/dirtvdsssatt.html > > > >Cheers, > >Jeff > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30149&t=30136 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tunneling over Inetnet with Cisco [7:30150]
Can anyone give me a configutration examples of two tunneled over the the Internet routers? IP over IP tunnel that is my concern. Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30150&t=30150 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jobs for a CCNP [7:30143]
Yes it is outdated. But I think it is more appropriate to post job related questions on there, than on this list. -junovtv Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30148&t=30143 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jobs for a CCNP [7:30143]
And typically see some horrifically outdated info, at least last time i looked. Bri - Original Message - From: "juno vtv" To: Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 7:47 PM Subject: RE: Jobs for a CCNP [7:30143] > You can look in the HelpWanted section of groupstudy.com. > > -junovtv Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30147&t=30143 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: DirectTV [7:30136]
I had them out last week to install mine, but there was no clear path to the satellite from my roof, due to large trees, so they couldn't do it. I am going to try someone else and hope they have a satellite in a different spot. I think he said if there is no clear line of sight from your roof to the southwest you may have problems, with DirectTV at least. Good luck. >From: "Jeff D" >Reply-To: "Jeff D" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: OT: DirectTV [7:30136] >Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 21:00:59 -0500 > >I was thinking about doing this, but was curious if anyone knows of >anything >better or pros/cons to this: > >http://store.yahoo.com/dialadish/dirtvdsssatt.html > >Cheers, >Jeff _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30146&t=30136 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Jobs for a CCNP [7:30143]
You can look in the HelpWanted section of groupstudy.com. -junovtv Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30144&t=30143 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF into iBGP with Sync [7:30126]
To my knowledge, this is purely a cisco implementation issue and you'd need to look at the code or ask the coders what their particular intention was. OSPF didn't play much of a role in transit networks during the time when synchronization was a relevant option as far as I know so I doubt there was very extensive testing done on this particular feature. I would expect this was just an additional check to ensure route authenticity. Given this feature is many years antiquated, I'm surprised so many folks try and make it work. pete At 06:23 PM 12/26/2001 -0500, John Neiberger wrote: >We discovered something on the CCIE list recently and I'm >wondering if anyone might be able to explain the reasoning >behing this behavior. > >BGP synchronization rules require that if an iBGP peer is to >advertise a route learned via iBGP, it must have that prefix >*and* the next hop for that route in the routing table already. > >An interesting added complexity to this occurs if your IGP is >OSPF. If the router in question has learned these prefixes via >OSPF, then the advertising router ID in the OSPF database must >match the router ID of the iBGP peer that advertised the route. > >Has this behavior caused any problems for any of you? Do you >know why the synchronization rules have a special case for OSPF >and not other routing protocols? > >I was working with someone else on a practice lab and we ran >into this issue. We were both going nuts trying to figure out >why the iBGP routes weren't synchronizing and this turned out >to be the cause. > >Any thoughts? > >Thanks, >John > > >Get your own "800" number >Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more >http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30145&t=30126 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jobs for a CCNP [7:30143]
Hi Everybody, I hope you all had a very happy holiday. I am a CCNP with about 3 years of experience. My company has gone through a reorganization and my position was affected. I need help from all of you to find a job. Does anybody know a company that is hiring? Can I send my resume to anybody? Thanks, Stephane Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30143&t=30143 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Howard Berkowitz to speak at EveCon 19 [7:30121]
>So, completely OT, but has anyone seen the first LOTR movie yet? Is it any >good? I think Howard could be considered the Gandalf of networking. ;-) > >Priscilla Priscilla, I thought we had generally given up on ring networks? Is this a token attempt to bring them back? Anyway, Scott Bradner looks more like Gandalf than I do. > >At 04:53 PM 12/26/01, Bruce Evry wrote: >>Dear Friends, >> >> Howard Berkowitz will be doing a presentation this coming weekend, >>where he will combine his knowledge of Network Design with his expertise >>at all things Monty Python. Should be fascinating! >> >> EveCon 19 is a Science Fiction and Fact convention, that in >>addition to several other talks on computer topics (and routing...) has >>such things as Costume workshops, Chainmail lessons, 24 hour movies on a >>180 inch projection tv, and the traditional drummers and belly dancers. >> >> Place is the Sheraton Reston Hotel in sunny Reston, Virginia. >> The convention runs from Friday until Sunday, non-stop. Cost $30. >> Howard's presentation will be at 3 pm in the Video Room. >> Bring your own Parrot! >> >> Yours Truly - Bruce Evry > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer >http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30142&t=30121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DirectTV [7:30136]
Hey this looks better. http://www.dishdirect.com/ Free 2 receiver system + installation. - Original Message - From: Jeff D To: Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 8:00 PM Subject: OT: DirectTV [7:30136] > I was thinking about doing this, but was curious if anyone knows of anything > better or pros/cons to this: > > http://store.yahoo.com/dialadish/dirtvdsssatt.html > > Cheers, > Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30139&t=30136 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DirectTV [7:30136]
I love mine. The only con to it is no reception during really bad weather. It's usually a pretty severe storm with really thick clouds before I lose reception. Make sure you get the receiver with recording so you can record up to 30 hrs of shows ;) BTW I use DirectDish instead but it's pretty much the same service/channels. No internet connections "yet" on mine but I imagine the lag time for going into orbit & back for each ACK could be pretty bad Go for it ;) - Original Message - From: Jeff D To: Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 8:00 PM Subject: OT: DirectTV [7:30136] > I was thinking about doing this, but was curious if anyone knows of anything > better or pros/cons to this: > > http://store.yahoo.com/dialadish/dirtvdsssatt.html > > Cheers, > Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30138&t=30136 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Howard Berkowitz to speak at EveCon 19 [7:30121]
At 07:48 PM 12/26/01 -0500, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: >So, completely OT, but has anyone seen the first LOTR movie yet? Is it any >good? I think Howard could be considered the Gandalf of networking. ;-) > >Priscilla Yes, not a bad movie at all. I felt it was a fairly close translation to the book. Obviously some parts had to be omitted, but I think they did a great job. Of course, your mileage may vary, especially if you are pedantic about following the book to the letter. -Carroll Kong Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30137&t=30121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: DirectTV [7:30136]
I was thinking about doing this, but was curious if anyone knows of anything better or pros/cons to this: http://store.yahoo.com/dialadish/dirtvdsssatt.html Cheers, Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30136&t=30136 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Howard Berkowitz to speak at EveCon 19 [7:30121]
who's the Balrog of networking? who's the Saruman? ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > So, completely OT, but has anyone seen the first LOTR movie yet? Is it any > good? I think Howard could be considered the Gandalf of networking. ;-) > > Priscilla > > > At 04:53 PM 12/26/01, Bruce Evry wrote: > >Dear Friends, > > > > Howard Berkowitz will be doing a presentation this coming weekend, > >where he will combine his knowledge of Network Design with his expertise > >at all things Monty Python. Should be fascinating! > > > > EveCon 19 is a Science Fiction and Fact convention, that in > >addition to several other talks on computer topics (and routing...) has > >such things as Costume workshops, Chainmail lessons, 24 hour movies on a > >180 inch projection tv, and the traditional drummers and belly dancers. > > > > Place is the Sheraton Reston Hotel in sunny Reston, Virginia. > > The convention runs from Friday until Sunday, non-stop. Cost $30. > > Howard's presentation will be at 3 pm in the Video Room. > > Bring your own Parrot! > > > > Yours Truly - Bruce Evry > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30135&t=30121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Secure Client to 3620 with dynamic map [7:30134]
I configured IPSec and ISAKMP on the 3620 using a dynamic map. I configure the pre-shared key with the following command: "crypto isakmp key ciscocisco address 0.0.0.0" but it would not work until I specified a specific IP address: "crypto isakmp key ciscocisco address 192.168.1.14" I am running IOS version 12.0 on the 3620 and Cisco Secure Client 1.1. Is this an IOS bug or did I configure something incorrectly. Bruce Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30134&t=30134 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Howard Berkowitz to speak at EveCon 19 [7:30121]
So, completely OT, but has anyone seen the first LOTR movie yet? Is it any good? I think Howard could be considered the Gandalf of networking. ;-) Priscilla At 04:53 PM 12/26/01, Bruce Evry wrote: >Dear Friends, > > Howard Berkowitz will be doing a presentation this coming weekend, >where he will combine his knowledge of Network Design with his expertise >at all things Monty Python. Should be fascinating! > > EveCon 19 is a Science Fiction and Fact convention, that in >addition to several other talks on computer topics (and routing...) has >such things as Costume workshops, Chainmail lessons, 24 hour movies on a >180 inch projection tv, and the traditional drummers and belly dancers. > > Place is the Sheraton Reston Hotel in sunny Reston, Virginia. > The convention runs from Friday until Sunday, non-stop. Cost $30. > Howard's presentation will be at 3 pm in the Video Room. > Bring your own Parrot! > > Yours Truly - Bruce Evry Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30133&t=30121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF into iBGP with Sync [7:30126]
the first thing that comes to mind is that OSPF is the only other routing protocol where RID is an inherant part of the structure and the process. as to why this becomes an issue, since RIDs can change based upon reconfigurations and reloads and process clearing, I can see the code getting confused. add a loopback. clear the ospf process, the RID changes, but does not change for BGP because the process is stable. or visa versa. this is starting to tell me that maybe there is a RID routine in the IOS code that both BGP and OSPF reference when starting up. write it off as "cronkite" because "that's the way it is"? not a bug, but a feature? Chuck ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > We discovered something on the CCIE list recently and I'm > wondering if anyone might be able to explain the reasoning > behing this behavior. > > BGP synchronization rules require that if an iBGP peer is to > advertise a route learned via iBGP, it must have that prefix > *and* the next hop for that route in the routing table already. > > An interesting added complexity to this occurs if your IGP is > OSPF. If the router in question has learned these prefixes via > OSPF, then the advertising router ID in the OSPF database must > match the router ID of the iBGP peer that advertised the route. > > Has this behavior caused any problems for any of you? Do you > know why the synchronization rules have a special case for OSPF > and not other routing protocols? > > I was working with someone else on a practice lab and we ran > into this issue. We were both going nuts trying to figure out > why the iBGP routes weren't synchronizing and this turned out > to be the cause. > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks, > John > > > Get your own "800" number > Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more > http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30132&t=30126 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Howard Berkowitz to speak at EveCon 19 [7:30121]
>Sorry, this is totally OT, but STAY AWAY FROM THE MONKEY HOUSE! It's been torn down. > >Just finished Hot Zone by Richard Preston (yes it is actually possible to >read a non-cisco book :-0) Hey...I've worked in Biosafety Level 3 labs. Networking one of them was rather reminiscent of the Andromeda Strain. This was in 1970 or so, so interconnect phone systems were still quite rare. My company was bought by Electronucleonics, which built a large cancer virus production facility in White Oak, Maryland. The computer center was in Bethesda, MD, and we communicated by dialup. Unfortunately, there had been some screwup of dates, and the telco lines were scheduled to be brought in the day AFTER the big open house (no viruses present yet). But we had quite a guest list, and HAD to demonstrate things including the virology data management system. The only line available was on a pay phone. Unfortunately, when I found this out, there was no one at the data center that could change the timeout for connections, which was around a minute. While I was able to connect the pay phone to a pair that took it to my modem, I was now faced with the problem that there were two airlocked pressure levels between the phone and the computer. Someone had to drop in a coin, dial, and yell to me at the first airlock. I'd leap into it, cycle as fast as possible, run across to the next airlock, cycle that, and hope I could log in before the nuclear demolition device (ooops...wrong movie)...the login timed out. It was the most aerobic demonstration I ever did, for a couple of hours. Helpful people would find the phone off the hook and replace it, or try to make their own calls. Eventually, I got someone to go to the computer center and change the timeout to about 5 minutes for the evening. > >Anyway, this is one of the best and scariest non-fiction books I have ever >read. It is the true story about how they suddenly had an Ebola virus >killing many monkeys everyday in a monkey house in Reston, Virginia - not >very far away from the Washington DC. Luckily, this particular Ebola strain, now known as Ebola Reston, doesn't seem to affect humans. > >I can apart from several Cisco books (see my RouterChief link below) highly >recommend the two books I have read so far by Richard Preston: > > The Hot Zone & Cobra Event > >if you need to get away from the Cisco books for a while. > >Hope y'all had a great christmas... > >Ole Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30131&t=30121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: destination nat [7:30106]
There's a table at the following URL which shows that the opposite is obviously also true: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/12.html#8 Cheers, Gaz ""Gaz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > "ip nat inside source" is effectively the same as "ip nat outside > destination" when you look at the "flow". > > Not sure whether that's a good way of explaining it, but it works. > > > Gaz > > > ""Ozgur Guler"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi, > > is there a way to nat the destination addresses on cisco routers... > > thanx. > > Ozgur > > > > > > _ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30128&t=30106 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF into iBGP with Sync [7:30126]
We discovered something on the CCIE list recently and I'm wondering if anyone might be able to explain the reasoning behing this behavior. BGP synchronization rules require that if an iBGP peer is to advertise a route learned via iBGP, it must have that prefix *and* the next hop for that route in the routing table already. An interesting added complexity to this occurs if your IGP is OSPF. If the router in question has learned these prefixes via OSPF, then the advertising router ID in the OSPF database must match the router ID of the iBGP peer that advertised the route. Has this behavior caused any problems for any of you? Do you know why the synchronization rules have a special case for OSPF and not other routing protocols? I was working with someone else on a practice lab and we ran into this issue. We were both going nuts trying to figure out why the iBGP routes weren't synchronizing and this turned out to be the cause. Any thoughts? Thanks, John Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30126&t=30126 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: destination nat [7:30106]
"ip nat inside source" is effectively the same as "ip nat outside destination" when you look at the "flow". Not sure whether that's a good way of explaining it, but it works. Gaz ""Ozgur Guler"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > is there a way to nat the destination addresses on cisco routers... > thanx. > Ozgur > > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30125&t=30106 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best Labs for CCIE studies [7:30025]
Hi Try www.practicelabs.net they have a condense version of the CCbootcamp labs. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30118&t=30025 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best Labs for CCIE studies [7:30025]
Hi Try www.practicelabs.net they have a condense version of the CCbootcamp labs. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30118&t=30025 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Practice Labs [7:30119]
Practicelabs.net have a condense verion of the CCBootCamp's labs which as good as the full version. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30119&t=30119 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Parkhurst Ch. 8 first lab not working [7:30115]
my quick mockup as follows: R7---R8 R7 is Parkhurst's router A R8 is Parkhurst's router B R7 config R7#sr bgp router bgp 1 bgp log-neighbor-changes network 144.223.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 network 156.26.32.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 10.1.1.2 remote-as 2 neighbor 10.1.1.2 advertise-map secondary non-exist-map primary ! ip classless ip default-network 10.0.0.0 no ip http server ! access-list 1 permit 156.26.32.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 2 permit 144.223.8.0 0.0.0.255 route-map primary permit 10 match ip address 1 ! route-map ospf-igrp-default permit 10 set interface TokenRing0 ! route-map secondary permit 10 match ip address 2 ! R7#b BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 10.1.1.1 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path *> 144.223.8.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i *> 156.26.32.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i *> 172.16.2.0/2410.1.1.2 0 0 2 i *> 172.16.3.0/2410.1.1.2 0 0 2 i R7# R8#b BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 172.16.3.1 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path *> 156.26.32.0/24 10.1.1.1 0 0 1 i *> 172.16.2.0/240.0.0.0 0 32768 i *> 172.16.3.0/240.0.0.0 0 32768 i R8# So far all is according to plan Now, shut down R7 primary loopback R7# 00:34:48: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by consoleb BGP table version is 7, local router ID is 10.1.1.1 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path *> 144.223.8.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i *> 172.16.2.0/2410.1.1.2 0 0 2 i *> 172.16.3.0/2410.1.1.2 0 0 2 i R7# and R8 show the proper information: R8#b BGP table version is 8, local router ID is 172.16.3.1 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path *> 144.223.8.0/24 10.1.1.1 0 0 1 i *> 172.16.2.0/240.0.0.0 0 32768 i *> 172.16.3.0/240.0.0.0 0 32768 i R8# I notice ther is an error in the book in access-list 1 - did you correct that? Chuck ""Kane, Christopher A."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > All/Chuck > > Wrapping up my BGP studies and using Parkhurst's BGP book to lab some stuff. > The first lab in Chapter 8 (advertise-map) is not working for me. The routes > advertise fine until I get to the step of shutting int loopback 0. rtrA > retains the secondary route but rtrB is not receiving that route. All of my > results follow the examples until this point. I've tried the lab several > times and my configs are correct. If anyone has had any luck with this lab > or if you could throw it together real quick, I'd appreciate it. It only > requires 2 routers and a fairly simple config. > > My sanity may be at stake. t?t > > Thanks > Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30124&t=30115 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP classless command [7:30056]
The history is like this: In the beginning it used to be that a classful IP address block (such as 170.15.0.0 /16 or 197.100.2.0 /24) was assigned to a particular organization for its exclusive use. If that organization chose to subnet that block, and the organization's routers did not have a route listed for a particular subnet of that block, then a packet for that block would be dropped (even if a gateway of last resort had been configured). The logic being that if your organization doesn't know where that subnet is then nobody does, and thus the packet is dropped. These days, ISPs have possession of various address blocks which they divvy up as needed to their customers. So its absolutely common for the various subnets of a particular classful address block to be split up amongst multiple organizations. So the ip classless command was used to get around this default behavior of the router. Recognizing the changed landscape of IP address allocation, ip classless became part of a router's default configuration starting with IOS version 11.3, permitting packets for any destination not explicitly listed in the router's routing table to utilize the router's configured gateway of last resort. Official information: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/np1_r /1rprt2/1ripadr.htm#1018036 Dan Garfield CCNP, CCDP, CCSI, MCSE, CNE, CTT, A+ 221 Oak Springs Drive San Anselmo, CA 94960 phone: (415) 453-5659 fax: (413) 691-6074 ""[EMAIL PROTECTED]"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Brilliant! > > Pierre-Alex > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Bernard Omrani > Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2001 7:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: IP classless command [7:30056] > > > For a simple explanation if IP classless, see: > > http://www.networkking.net/out/ipclassless.htm > > > Bernard > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2001 12:41 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: IP classless command [7:30056] > > > > IP CLASSLESS is a little hard to understand. Even Cisco is very vague > on > > this. Once a > > TAC engineer just told me that the command just makes routing better. > > Here > > is what I > > believe happens. > > > > If you don't have the "IP CLASSLESS" command defined in a Cisco > router > > then > > the router > > will not forward any packets towards a default route for any subnets > of a > > classfull > > network that the router thinks are local. For instance. > > > > Rtr A local net 10.1.0.0/24. > > 192.168.1.0 interconnects routers a and b > > RTR B (sends default network only to RTR A and RTR C) > > 192.168.2.0 interconnects routers b and C > > RTR C local net 10.2.0.0/24 > > Note how 10.0.0.0 is split by the 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0 > networks. > > > > In the above example if RTR A gets a packet destined for 10.2.0.1, but > it > > does not have > > the "IP CLASSLESS" command defined then RTR A will drop the packets. > > > > If you include the IP CLASSLESS command then the packets will be > forwarded > > to the > > default router b. > > > > I hope this helps > > Mike Paulson > > Network Architect > > Infrastructure Design Systems LLP > > > > > > Hunt Lee wrote: > > > > > Can anyone please explain to me what is "ip classless" used for? I > > looked > > > it up on the Caslow book, and it states that by enabling IP > classless, > > it > > > allows one to override the contiguous subnet rule and allow the > router > > to > > > look for the longest match beyond the listed subnets. > > > > > > But I still don't understand what it means? Can anyone give me some > > > examples? > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Hunt Lee > > > IP Solution Analyst > > > Cable & Wireless > > > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a > > name > > of michael.paulson.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30122&t=30056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Howard Berkowitz to speak at EveCon 19 [7:30121]
Dear Friends, Howard Berkowitz will be doing a presentation this coming weekend, where he will combine his knowledge of Network Design with his expertise at all things Monty Python. Should be fascinating! EveCon 19 is a Science Fiction and Fact convention, that in addition to several other talks on computer topics (and routing...) has such things as Costume workshops, Chainmail lessons, 24 hour movies on a 180 inch projection tv, and the traditional drummers and belly dancers. Place is the Sheraton Reston Hotel in sunny Reston, Virginia. The convention runs from Friday until Sunday, non-stop. Cost $30. Howard's presentation will be at 3 pm in the Video Room. Bring your own Parrot! Yours Truly - Bruce Evry Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30121&t=30121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 ISPs, BGP and load-balancing [7:30104]
If you want to get better control of your inbound traffic, you could talk to you ISPs. Some ISPs such as AS701 let you set the local pref and prepending through the community strings. Local Pref = 80 701:80 set localpref 80 Local Pref = 120 701:120 set localpref 120 AS Path prepend 1 701:1 prepend 1x: 701 [cust-AS] AS Path prepend 2 701:2 prepend 2x: 701 701[cust-AS] AS Path prepend 3 701:3 prepend 3x: 701 701 701[cust-AS] You always have better control of outboud traffic since you have full control of your bgp routers, but for inbound traffic tuning the above tool is pretty handy. HTH Kent Yu ""Yarie"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > Wow, there are lots of ways to achieve that, you might want to read some > material on it, to see what's best for your network. > > I can think of some ways from the top of my head: > > 1. just receive all routes from both providers, and let the BGP process > decide best on the algorithm. > 2. you can use filter-lists like: > > ip as-path access-list 1 permit _1_ > ip as-path access-list 1 permit _701_ > ip as-path access-list 1 permit _7018_ > ip as-path access-list 1 permit _1239_ > > to the big backbones, match them separately on routemaps, and play with > local pref to achieve the load balancing. > > 3. you can ask from your ISP to supply you with communities which will be > configured on your side also, that will prioritize on your router the routes > going to their connected backbones. > > 4. you can use the bgp command: maximum-paths > > 5. you can see this link: > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122 > t/122t2/ftbgpls.htm > > As you can see, there is allot that can be done. > > good luck, > > Yaron > > > ""TMS"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hello > > > > I have two 4mbps internet links connected to 2 diffrent ISPs. How > > I can create load-balancing between both ISPs ? At > > this moment my router configuration (Cisco 7206VXR, NPE-400) > > looks like that: > > > > ! > > router bgp 6 > > network 20.20.20.0 0.0.0.255 > > neighbor 1.1.1.1 weight 50 > > neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 1 > > neighbor 1.1.1.1 description ISP-1 (ex.UUNET) > > neighbor 1.1.1.1 filter-list 1 out > > neighbor 1.1.1.1 route-map SETMETRIC in > > neighbor 2.2.2.2 weight 50 > > neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 2 > > neighbor 2.2.2.2 description ISP-2 (ex.AT&T) > > neighbor 2.2.2.2 filter-list 1 out > > neighbor 2.2.2.2 route-map SETMETRIC in > > ! > > ip as-path access-list permit ^6$ > > ip as-path access-list deny .* > > ! > > route-map SETMETRIC permit 10 > > match ip address 1 > > set metric 100 > > ! > > access-list 10 permit any > > ! > > > > Any propositions ? Maybe I must set local-preference or > > as prepend for neighbors ? > > > > -- > > greets, TMS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30120&t=30104 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ICMP Error [7:30030]
Ahh, ICMP error messages.., sorry, in that case you are right. Thks Alejandro,- -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12/26/01 4:49 PM Subject: RE: ICMP Error [7:30030] We said ICMP error messages shouldn't be broadcast. ICMP is mostly used to report a problem. Ping is the exception and yes you can send a ping to a broadcast address. It's not a nice thing to do, but that doesn't stop people! ;-) Here's a list of ICMP messages: ICMP Types and Codes TypeCodeMeaning 8 0 Echo (ping) 0 0 Echo reply (ping reply) 3 x Destination unreachable (generic category) 3 0 Network unreachable 3 1 Host unreachable 3 2 Protocol unreachable 3 3 Port unreachable 3 4 Fragmentation was needed and the don't fragment (DF) bit was set 3 5 Source route failed 3 13 Packet administratively prohibited 4 0 Source quench 11 x Time exceeded (generic category) 11 0 Time-to-live (TTL) exceeded 11 1 Fragment reassembly time exceeded Priscilla At 10:50 AM 12/26/01, Alejandro Acosta wrote: >Hi All, > Why some you have said that ICMP packets should not be broadcasted?. I >mean, many people ping the broadcast address to know which hosts are >working. Right?, this kind of ping does not work on Windows systems, but in >Unix does. > >Thks, > >Alejandro > > >-Original Message- >From: Phil Barker >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 12/24/01 3:06 PM >Subject: Re: ICMP Error [7:30030] > >Have you got a sniffer to trace the error ? > >It would be interesting to see the packet in question >since ICMP has 20 ish different error codes. > >The ICMP error should not be broadcast either, it >should be unicast back to the originator of the >erroring device. Off the top of my head I cannot think >of a purpose for b/cast ICMP. I'll have a dig around >in the RFC to confirm. > >Phil. >--- Cisco Breaker wrote: > Hi >All, > > > > I have a client that installed a Linux NIS server > > which is working with > > broadcasts. That server is connected to cisco 4908. > > Server IP is > > 192.168.5.2. He is saying that when NIS server > > starts to work all clients > > and NIS server is receiving a message at below, > > > > " 192.168.5.2 sent an invalid ICMP error to > > broadcast" > > > > What is the meaning of this message, I searched on > > cisco but didnt find > > anything. Can it be because of "no ip > > directed-broadcast" command on the > > interface. > > > > Any help will be appreciated? > > > > Best regards, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >__ >Do You Yahoo!? >Everything you'll ever need on one web page >from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts >http://uk.my.yahoo.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30117&t=30030 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Parkhurst Ch. 8 first lab not working [7:30115]
All/Chuck Wrapping up my BGP studies and using Parkhurst's BGP book to lab some stuff. The first lab in Chapter 8 (advertise-map) is not working for me. The routes advertise fine until I get to the step of shutting int loopback 0. rtrA retains the secondary route but rtrB is not receiving that route. All of my results follow the examples until this point. I've tried the lab several times and my configs are correct. If anyone has had any luck with this lab or if you could throw it together real quick, I'd appreciate it. It only requires 2 routers and a fairly simple config. My sanity may be at stake. t?t Thanks Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30115&t=30115 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ICMP Error [7:30030]
We said ICMP error messages shouldn't be broadcast. ICMP is mostly used to report a problem. Ping is the exception and yes you can send a ping to a broadcast address. It's not a nice thing to do, but that doesn't stop people! ;-) Here's a list of ICMP messages: ICMP Types and Codes TypeCodeMeaning 8 0 Echo (ping) 0 0 Echo reply (ping reply) 3 x Destination unreachable (generic category) 3 0 Network unreachable 3 1 Host unreachable 3 2 Protocol unreachable 3 3 Port unreachable 3 4 Fragmentation was needed and the don't fragment (DF) bit was set 3 5 Source route failed 3 13 Packet administratively prohibited 4 0 Source quench 11 x Time exceeded (generic category) 11 0 Time-to-live (TTL) exceeded 11 1 Fragment reassembly time exceeded Priscilla At 10:50 AM 12/26/01, Alejandro Acosta wrote: >Hi All, > Why some you have said that ICMP packets should not be broadcasted?. I >mean, many people ping the broadcast address to know which hosts are >working. Right?, this kind of ping does not work on Windows systems, but in >Unix does. > >Thks, > >Alejandro > > >-Original Message- >From: Phil Barker >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 12/24/01 3:06 PM >Subject: Re: ICMP Error [7:30030] > >Have you got a sniffer to trace the error ? > >It would be interesting to see the packet in question >since ICMP has 20 ish different error codes. > >The ICMP error should not be broadcast either, it >should be unicast back to the originator of the >erroring device. Off the top of my head I cannot think >of a purpose for b/cast ICMP. I'll have a dig around >in the RFC to confirm. > >Phil. >--- Cisco Breaker wrote: > Hi >All, > > > > I have a client that installed a Linux NIS server > > which is working with > > broadcasts. That server is connected to cisco 4908. > > Server IP is > > 192.168.5.2. He is saying that when NIS server > > starts to work all clients > > and NIS server is receiving a message at below, > > > > " 192.168.5.2 sent an invalid ICMP error to > > broadcast" > > > > What is the meaning of this message, I searched on > > cisco but didnt find > > anything. Can it be because of "no ip > > directed-broadcast" command on the > > interface. > > > > Any help will be appreciated? > > > > Best regards, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >__ >Do You Yahoo!? >Everything you'll ever need on one web page >from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts >http://uk.my.yahoo.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30114&t=30030 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems [7:30079]
Etherchannel is for trunking between devices at layer-2; HSRP provides a redundant router, and is a layer-3 three thing. That's a gross simplification, but I think is shows that the two technologies are just plain different from each other. Nick's right. Etherchannel will continue to pass data at a reduced rate should one or more links fail (but not all, of course). HSRP will provide an alternative device to route traffic to a separate network segment, should the primary router fail. --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Nick S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 3:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problems [7:30079] In Tacacs+ only the body of the packet is encrypted (not the header). And the Interfaces supported by FastEtherchannel can be from 2 to 8 (so 6 is correct) but Etherchannel offers its own failover mechanism whereby failure of one or more channel doesnt bring the whole etherchannel down, but it works at a reduced capacity, so HSRP is NOT an option. Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30112&t=30079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Data [7:30074]
Scottie @ PacBell wrote: >Of course you'll have to assign them ip address also. If you're using Windows 9x or NT/2000 machines, you could use NetBEUI as your transport protocol and at least not have to mess with IP addresses. If you're used to it, setting up IPs are a piece of cake, but if not, use NetBEUI and that simplifies your setup. Just make sure both PCs are in the same Workgroup (although technically not needed, it again simplifies things). Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30111&t=30074 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems [7:30079]
Nick S. wrote: > In Tacacs+ only the body of the packet is encrypted (not the > header). And the Interfaces supported by FastEtherchannel can > be from 2 to 8 (so 6 is correct) but Etherchannel offers its > own failover mechanism whereby failure of one or more channel > doesnt bring the whole etherchannel down, but it works at a > reduced capacity, so HSRP is NOT an option. Do you have some good links to info about the inner workings of TACACS+? I'd like to read more about exactly how it works. As far as the HSRP, I guess at this point we need to be clear about what we mean when we say "Etherchannel supporting HSRP". Etherchannel does have it's own failover mechanism, so using HSRP between channels in a bundle is not possible nor needed. However, you could have, for instance, multiple etherchannel bundles and run HSRP between them as if they were standard interfaces. The Kid wrote: >Sure enough, I just looked it up and it does support up to 8 ports. >I don't know where I was getting 4 from. Maybe an older IOS version >or something. Thanks for pointing that out. Some line cards and devices only support up to 4 channels in a bundle. If I'm not mistaken, the Cat5000/5500 only supports up to 4 channels in a bundle. I don't know if this is a line-card or Sup limitation. However, from the document I referred to earlier, it seems some hardware supports up to 8 channels and some doesn't. Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30110&t=30079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 ISPs, BGP and load-balancing [7:30104]
Hi, Wow, there are lots of ways to achieve that, you might want to read some material on it, to see what's best for your network. I can think of some ways from the top of my head: 1. just receive all routes from both providers, and let the BGP process decide best on the algorithm. 2. you can use filter-lists like: ip as-path access-list 1 permit _1_ ip as-path access-list 1 permit _701_ ip as-path access-list 1 permit _7018_ ip as-path access-list 1 permit _1239_ to the big backbones, match them separately on routemaps, and play with local pref to achieve the load balancing. 3. you can ask from your ISP to supply you with communities which will be configured on your side also, that will prioritize on your router the routes going to their connected backbones. 4. you can use the bgp command: maximum-paths 5. you can see this link: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122 t/122t2/ftbgpls.htm As you can see, there is allot that can be done. good luck, Yaron ""TMS"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello > > I have two 4mbps internet links connected to 2 diffrent ISPs. How > I can create load-balancing between both ISPs ? At > this moment my router configuration (Cisco 7206VXR, NPE-400) > looks like that: > > ! > router bgp 6 > network 20.20.20.0 0.0.0.255 > neighbor 1.1.1.1 weight 50 > neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 1 > neighbor 1.1.1.1 description ISP-1 (ex.UUNET) > neighbor 1.1.1.1 filter-list 1 out > neighbor 1.1.1.1 route-map SETMETRIC in > neighbor 2.2.2.2 weight 50 > neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 2 > neighbor 2.2.2.2 description ISP-2 (ex.AT&T) > neighbor 2.2.2.2 filter-list 1 out > neighbor 2.2.2.2 route-map SETMETRIC in > ! > ip as-path access-list permit ^6$ > ip as-path access-list deny .* > ! > route-map SETMETRIC permit 10 > match ip address 1 > set metric 100 > ! > access-list 10 permit any > ! > > Any propositions ? Maybe I must set local-preference or > as prepend for neighbors ? > > -- > greets, TMS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30109&t=30104 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ICMP Error [7:30030]
Hi All, Why some you have said that ICMP packets should not be broadcasted?. I mean, many people ping the broadcast address to know which hosts are working. Right?, this kind of ping does not work on Windows systems, but in Unix does. Thks, Alejandro -Original Message- From: Phil Barker To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12/24/01 3:06 PM Subject: Re: ICMP Error [7:30030] Have you got a sniffer to trace the error ? It would be interesting to see the packet in question since ICMP has 20 ish different error codes. The ICMP error should not be broadcast either, it should be unicast back to the originator of the erroring device. Off the top of my head I cannot think of a purpose for b/cast ICMP. I'll have a dig around in the RFC to confirm. Phil. --- Cisco Breaker wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a client that installed a Linux NIS server > which is working with > broadcasts. That server is connected to cisco 4908. > Server IP is > 192.168.5.2. He is saying that when NIS server > starts to work all clients > and NIS server is receiving a message at below, > > " 192.168.5.2 sent an invalid ICMP error to > broadcast" > > What is the meaning of this message, I searched on > cisco but didnt find > anything. Can it be because of "no ip > directed-broadcast" command on the > interface. > > Any help will be appreciated? > > Best regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30108&t=30030 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems [7:30079]
Sure enough, I just looked it up and it does support up to 8 ports. I don't know where I was getting 4 from. Maybe an older IOS version or something. Thanks for pointing that out. The k1d ""Michael Williams"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I could be mistaken, but I think I've seen somethings that support up to 8 > interfaces in an etherchannel bundle. From URL: (watch for wrap) > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/lan_switching/6.html > > "Some cards and platforms also support Gigabit EtherChannel and have the > ability to use from two to eight ports in an EtherChannel" > > From URL: (watch for wrap) > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/techno/media/lan/ether/channel/tech/fete c_wp.htm > > "Compatible with Cisco IOS---Fast EtherChannel connections are fully > compatible with Cisco IOS virtual LAN and routing technologies. The > Inter-Switch Link (ISL) VLAN trunking protocol can carry multiple VLANs > across a Fast EtherChannel, and routers attached to Fast EtherChannel trunks > can provide full multiprotocol routing with support for hot standby using > HSRP" > > So it would appear both answers A. and B. are incorrect (i.e. they are both > supported by EtherChannel) > > As far as TACACS, I read through RFC 1492 (watch for wrap) > > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1492.html > > and didn't see where it told about encryption, so I can't offer any help > there. > > HTH, > Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30107&t=30079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
destination nat [7:30106]
Hi, is there a way to nat the destination addresses on cisco routers... thanx. Ozgur _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30106&t=30106 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ICMP Error [7:30030]
Thanks for your answers. Ill report these ideas to my customer and wait for his response. Best regards, ""Cisco Breaker"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > I have a client that installed a Linux NIS server which is working with > broadcasts. That server is connected to cisco 4908. Server IP is > 192.168.5.2. He is saying that when NIS server starts to work all clients > and NIS server is receiving a message at below, > > " 192.168.5.2 sent an invalid ICMP error to broadcast" > > What is the meaning of this message, I searched on cisco but didnt find > anything. Can it be because of "no ip directed-broadcast" command on the > interface. > > Any help will be appreciated? > > Best regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30105&t=30030 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2 ISPs, BGP and load-balancing [7:30104]
Hello I have two 4mbps internet links connected to 2 diffrent ISPs. How I can create load-balancing between both ISPs ? At this moment my router configuration (Cisco 7206VXR, NPE-400) looks like that: ! router bgp 6 network 20.20.20.0 0.0.0.255 neighbor 1.1.1.1 weight 50 neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 1 neighbor 1.1.1.1 description ISP-1 (ex.UUNET) neighbor 1.1.1.1 filter-list 1 out neighbor 1.1.1.1 route-map SETMETRIC in neighbor 2.2.2.2 weight 50 neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 2 neighbor 2.2.2.2 description ISP-2 (ex.AT&T) neighbor 2.2.2.2 filter-list 1 out neighbor 2.2.2.2 route-map SETMETRIC in ! ip as-path access-list permit ^6$ ip as-path access-list deny .* ! route-map SETMETRIC permit 10 match ip address 1 set metric 100 ! access-list 10 permit any ! Any propositions ? Maybe I must set local-preference or as prepend for neighbors ? -- greets, TMS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30104&t=30104 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: back to back ATM NM-1A-T3 w/ 3620's [7:30062]
reverse the TX & the RX cables so basically a TX on one end, goes into the RX port on the other end, and vice versa. Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30103&t=30062 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems [7:30079]
In Tacacs+ only the body of the packet is encrypted (not the header). And the Interfaces supported by FastEtherchannel can be from 2 to 8 (so 6 is correct) but Etherchannel offers its own failover mechanism whereby failure of one or more channel doesnt bring the whole etherchannel down, but it works at a reduced capacity, so HSRP is NOT an option. Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30102&t=30079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
