RIF FIELDS [7:35268]
Hi , is there any web link which can help me to memorize and understand RIF calculation ?Thanks in advance . A Beginner . Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35268t=35268 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco mc3810 [7:35269]
hey all. I just bought an mc 3810. What's the going rate for one of these without any modules except the 2 serials and 1 ethernet that it comes with. I'd like to be able to use this in a home lab to do VOIP testing. Can I buy the FXS personality modules or do I need some sort of NM to put those cards into it. Thanks group! Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35269t=35269 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN 3000 Auth. with W2k ActiveDirectory? [7:35270]
Is it possible to get the VPN 3000 Concentrator to authenticate dial-in users using an internal Windows 2000 Active Directory, or is it only the old Windows NT 4 Domain model that's supported? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35270t=35270 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco mc3810 [7:35269]
No, Tim, you don't need to buy any NM. You can buy: MC3810-AVM6 (6 port Analog Voice Interface) - Motherboard for FXS, FXO, EM MC3810-APM-FXS (FXS Analog Personality Module) - one per endpoint - analog telephone MC3810-HCM6 (6 DSP High Density Voice Compression Module) - Compression module (if there aren't any inside :) ) Andrey Bykov CCNP, CCDP -Original Message- From: Ouellette, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco mc3810 [7:35269] hey all. I just bought an mc 3810. What's the going rate for one of these without any modules except the 2 serials and 1 ethernet that it comes with. I'd like to be able to use this in a home lab to do VOIP testing. Can I buy the FXS personality modules or do I need some sort of NM to put those cards into it. Thanks group! Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35271t=35269 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice Error [7:35272]
Hi, I get this error message on my console when I think a voice call is terminated. FAILURE in act_release_timeout Any pointers on this plz? Thanks, Sujal Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35272t=35272 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VPN 3000 Auth. with W2k ActiveDirectory? [7:35270]
Yes, it can be done. I've set up AD with RADIUS for authentication of dial-in users. I found a doc on cisco.com for the VPN5000 concentrator, it will probably tell you enough to figure it out. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/vpn5k-msias.shtml Good luck. Pieter Jan Bakhuijzen iXio Networks Johan Hjalmarsson wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Is it possible to get the VPN 3000 Concentrator to authenticate dial-in users using an internal Windows 2000 Active Directory, or is it only the old Windows NT 4 Domain model that's supported? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35273t=35270 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184]
what switch did you use for xmodem ??? - Original Message - From: Wilson, Christian To: Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:26 PM Subject: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184] Begging for help once again . . . I have upgraded the flash in a 3640 from the 8 Mb chip to a 16 Mb chip. I did this by installing the second, 16 Mb chip into slot 1 of the motherboard, leaving the original 8 Mb in slot 1, for a total of 24 Mb of flash memory. I then installed 12.1, which was the reason I needed to upgrade the flash. 12.1 went on without a hitch, but when the router was reloaded, it would run for about 30 minutes and then go into rommon mode. It did this repeatedly, so I removed the 8 Mb chip, installed the 16 Mb chip into slot 0, and then used xmodem to transfer 12.1 through the console, a painstaking two hour task. Now the file is on flash, but at reload the file is unable to decompress, returning these errors: Error: Uncompression of the image failed. invalid compressed data-format violated Error: zip decompress failed ***System received a software forced crash *** signal = 0x17, code = 0x7, context = 0x0 PC = 0x80008094, cause = 0x20, Status Reg = 0x3041f003 The crc checks are the same as displayed on the software centers web page. I have downloaded a new copy of the file and it still did not work. I put the original 8 Mb chip in slot 0 and removed the 16 Mb chip, reloaded a fresh 11.3 image, and received the same errors. What have I done?? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35274t=35184 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Re: VOIP Vic-2fx cards [7:34768]
Sujal thought it could be case, just couldn't remember as it was some time back, Thanks Sujal G. Ajmera wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Pat and Rich: I had a similar problem and got it solved just today. What we did was change the IOS and that made a difference. Sujal Richard I've had the very same problem some time ago, it was really annoying, can you post the config, it'll probably jog my memory as to what was wrong Cheers Pat - Original Message - From: Richard Botham Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 6:13 PM Subject: VOIP Vic-2fx cards [7:34768] Hi All, I have 2 x Cisco 2621 routers and each have a 2port fxs voice card - vic-2fxs installed. When I plug my phone into port 1/0/0 of a vic-2fxs card installed in a 2621 I get dial tone. When I use port 1/0/1 I do not get dial tone. Is there any reason for this and what am I doing wrong. Regards Richard _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35276t=34768 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Adding more VTYs [7:35188]
I think you eitehr have ip only or ip plus image. You will be needing an Enterprise feature set IOS for adding vty lines..Check out for a jin the new IOS Ziyad - Original Message - From: A Mehr To: Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:50 PM Subject: Adding more VTYs [7:35188] Hi all Is there a way I can create additional VTYs on my 2621 Cisco Router ? someone told me that the Line Vty 0 n can be used for this purpose , It didn't work . No clues ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35275t=35188 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245]
In the book that I read it says that you can only use fast ethernet or gig ethernet -Original Message- From: Colin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 8:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245] Hello I have been doing some reading on VLANs and Trunking and have read conflicting information. Can you use a 10Mbs Ethernet interface when running ISL or 801.1q or does the interface have to be FastEthernet? Some books/articles I've read say you must use at least a FastEthernet interface and others say you can use an Ethernet interface. Note: this is for my CCNP lab studies, not a production network. Thanks Colin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35277t=35245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RIF FIELDS [7:35268]
http://www.ccprep.com/resources/cc-news/archives/Token_Ring.pdf enjoy :-) -Original Message- From: muhammad haroon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 09:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RIF FIELDS [7:35268] Hi , is there any web link which can help me to memorize and understand RIF calculation ?Thanks in advance . A Beginner . Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35279t=35268 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6000 Hybrid vs Native [7:35216]
Sorry to spoil the party but I've had a problem with IOS on 6Ks. With version 12.1(3a)E4, using the console port would put the switch into rommon mode, the switch would keep running but you couldn't config it, it's a recognised bug I think. Apart from that though I think it simplifies things by having just the one set of commands and will be upgrading the Cat OS 6Ks to IOS Cheers Pat Michelle Loechel wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can anyone comment on having used the native mode IOS feature on the 6000 series switches? Like/dislikes? Stability? Supportability, etc? Preference of hybrid or native? Compatibility issues with future Cisco features? Thanks Michelle Loechel Network Analyst Exempla Healthcare [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Exempla Healthcare. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35278t=35216 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
great ftp [7:35280]
examaway.myftp.org login: ex pw : ex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35280t=35280 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35261]
Way to go Chuck! Perserverance pays off! Pat - Original Message - From: Chuck Church To: ; Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:43 PM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet. But still the most useful book I've found. Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in that book. Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company was cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't! Great preparation and simulation for the test. Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source! Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/ Bruce and Val explain the most difficult subjects very well. A couple of things are a little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class. Be prepared to work your a** off that week though. 8:30AM to 11PM is the norm that week. But I highly recommend it, especially if you've come close to passing before. Well, sorry to ramble on so much. I'm off to bed for a L O N G sleep. Thanks again, Chuck Church CCIE 8776 CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE Sr. Network Engineer Magnacom Technologies 140 N. Rt. 303 Valley Cottage, NY 10989 845-267-4000 x218 _ Comercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35261t=35261
Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35281]
Congrats! What did you do the last couple of months? Practice speed? Or maybe practice the many little things in IOS? Thanks! I too long for a good night sleep - Original Message - From: Chuck Church To: ; Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 AM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet. But still the most useful book I've found. Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in that book. Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company was cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't! Great preparation and simulation for the test. Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source! Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/ Bruce and Val explain the most difficult subjects very well. A couple of things are a little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class. Be prepared to work your a** off that week though. 8:30AM to 11PM is the norm that week. But I highly recommend it, especially if you've come close to passing before. Well, sorry to ramble on so much. I'm off to bed for a L O N G sleep. Thanks again, Chuck Church CCIE 8776 CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE Sr. Network Engineer Magnacom Technologies 140 N. Rt. 303 Valley Cottage, NY 10989 845-267-4000 x218 _ Comercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab
Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35267]
Congrats!!! 3:30am and I'm still studying. Reading about your success helps make it seem worthwhile. I hope to join you on the other side soon. Bob - Original Message - From: Chuck Church To: ; Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 AM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet. But still the most useful book I've found. Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in that book. Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company was cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't! Great preparation and simulation for the test. Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source! Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/ Bruce and Val explain the most difficult subjects very well. A couple of things are a little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class. Be prepared to work your a** off that week though. 8:30AM to 11PM is the norm that week. But I highly recommend it, especially if you've come close to passing before. Well, sorry to ramble on so much. I'm off to bed for a L O N G sleep. Thanks again, Chuck Church CCIE 8776 CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE Sr. Network Engineer Magnacom Technologies 140 N. Rt. 303 Valley Cottage, NY 10989 845-267-4000 x218 _ Comercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list.
Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35258]
Thousands of Congrats, Chuck! --- Chuck Church wrote: All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet. But still the most useful book I've found. Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in that book. Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company was cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't! Great preparation and simulation for the test. Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source! Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/ Bruce and Val explain the most difficult subjects very well. A couple of things are a little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class. Be prepared to work your a** off that week though. 8:30AM to 11PM is the norm that week. But I highly recommend it, especially if you've come close to passing before. Well, sorry to ramble on so much. I'm off to bed for a L O N G sleep. Thanks again, Chuck Church CCIE 8776 CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE Sr. Network Engineer Magnacom Technologies 140 N. Rt. 303 Valley Cottage, NY 10989 845-267-4000 x218 _ Comercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at:
Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35257]
All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet. But still the most useful book I've found. Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in that book. Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company was cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't! Great preparation and simulation for the test. Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source! Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/ Bruce and Val explain the most difficult subjects very well. A couple of things are a little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class. Be prepared to work your a** off that week though. 8:30AM to 11PM is the norm that week. But I highly recommend it, especially if you've come close to passing before. Well, sorry to ramble on so much. I'm off to bed for a L O N G sleep. Thanks again, Chuck Church CCIE 8776 CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE Sr. Network Engineer Magnacom Technologies 140 N. Rt. 303 Valley Cottage, NY 10989 845-267-4000 x218 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35257t=35257 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35263]
Congrats.. - Original Message - From: Lab Candidate To: Chuck Church ; ; Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:03 AM Subject: Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! Thousands of Congrats, Chuck! --- Chuck Church wrote: All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet. But still the most useful book I've found. Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in that book. Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company was cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't! Great preparation and simulation for the test. Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source! Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/ Bruce and Val explain the most difficult subjects very well. A couple of things are a little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class. Be prepared to work your a** off that week though. 8:30AM to 11PM is the norm that week. But I highly recommend it, especially if you've come close to passing before. Well, sorry to ramble on so much. I'm off to bed for a L O N G sleep. Thanks again, Chuck Church CCIE 8776 CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE Sr. Network Engineer Magnacom Technologies 140 N. Rt. 303 Valley Cottage, NY 10989 845-267-4000 x218 _ Comercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial
Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! (strange) [7:35265]
Millions of Congrats mate, You know.. it is the stragest thing.. I did the one day lab, one week after it was released.. and I came out of the lab thinking a 94 is the least I will get... only to find out that I have failed by a considerably low mark! To this date, I am devastated! I feel that I was being used as a Beta Tester... leagal action coming up babies 8- Speedo talbotpat , x.net , Sent by: cc: nobody@groupsSubject: Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! tudy.com 13/02/2002 05:13 PM Please respond to talbotpat Way to go Chuck! Perserverance pays off! Pat - Original Message - From: Chuck Church To: ; Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:43 PM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the
RE: RIF FIELDS [7:35268]
also http://www.groupstudy.com/notes/notepages/rif2.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RIF FIELDS [7:35268] http://www.ccprep.com/resources/cc-news/archives/Token_Ring.pdf enjoy :-) -Original Message- From: muhammad haroon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 09:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RIF FIELDS [7:35268] Hi , is there any web link which can help me to memorize and understand RIF calculation ?Thanks in advance . A Beginner . Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35282t=35268 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco mc3810 [7:35285]
You need fxs modules. This router doesn't uses nm's I believe. From: Ouellette, Tim Reply-To: Ouellette, Tim To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' CC: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Cisco mc3810 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 04:17:14 -0500 hey all. I just bought an mc 3810. What's the going rate for one of these without any modules except the 2 serials and 1 ethernet that it comes with. I'd like to be able to use this in a home lab to do VOIP testing. Can I buy the FXS personality modules or do I need some sort of NM to put those cards into it. Thanks group! Tim _ Comercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Absolutely Positively Continuously Sincerely, Duy NguyenCCNP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell (817) 707-7451 _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35285t=35285 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245]
Hi Colin, I have configured a port on a 2900 for 10Mbit and half duplex, and it lets me issue the command 'switchport trunk encapsulation isl' without any problems. On CatOS switches, you can issue the command 'show port capabilities', which will tell you the capabilities of each port. Regards, georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35287t=35245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ethernet versus Token Ring [7:35291]
Hi Group Off the topic really , but can anyone please point me to a Web site where I can get topics on Ethernet versus Token Ring . Some sales and technical infomation is needed on why the customer will want to migate from Token Ring To Ethernet. Thanks Naeiym Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35291t=35291 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ethernet versus Token Ring [7:35291]
www.cisco.com/univercd Naeiym Omar wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Group Off the topic really , but can anyone please point me to a Web site where I can get topics on Ethernet versus Token Ring . Some sales and technical infomation is needed on why the customer will want to migate from Token Ring To Ethernet. Thanks Naeiym Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35292t=35291 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX information [7:35294]
Hello group, What command can I use to copy a configuraton form a tftp server to a PIX Firewall? I have look on the cisco web site for the command but couldn't find. Can somebody help. Thank you. Rock Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35294t=35294 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35286]
Congratulations !!! You have been a valuable assets to this group as well. You passing is well deserved !! Jeff Kesemeyer CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNE www.bradshawlabs.com Your CCIE Rack Rental Source -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chuck Church Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet. But still the most useful book I've found. Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in that book. Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company was cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't! Great preparation and simulation for the test. Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source! Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/ Bruce and Val explain the most difficult subjects very well. A couple of things are a little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class. Be prepared to work your a** off that week though. 8:30AM to 11PM is the norm that week. But I highly recommend it, especially if you've come close to passing before. Well, sorry to ramble on so much. I'm off to bed for a L O N G sleep. Thanks again, Chuck Church CCIE 8776 CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE Sr. Network Engineer Magnacom Technologies 140 N. Rt. 303 Valley Cottage, NY 10989 845-267-4000 x218
Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35257]
Congrats! It looks like about 20 people a week get the CCIE looking at the last person who announced his passing. Chuck Church wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet. But still the most useful book I've found. Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in that book. Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company was cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't! Great preparation and simulation for the test. Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source! Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/ Bruce and Val explain the most difficult subjects very well. A couple of things are a little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class. Be prepared to work your a** off that week though. 8:30AM to 11PM is the norm that week. But I highly recommend it, especially if you've come close to passing before. Well, sorry to ramble on so much. I'm off to bed for a L O N G sleep. Thanks again, Chuck Church CCIE 8776 CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE Sr. Network Engineer Magnacom Technologies 140 N. Rt. 303 Valley Cottage, NY 10989 845-267-4000 x218 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35283t=35257 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL
RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! (strange) [7:35284]
I think you hit that one on the head. Even today, I don't think I could have passed that test I had in November. In fact, when our proctor arrived back in November, we were all waiting for him. His exact words were: Wow, you guys are in a hurry to fail. True story. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:12 AM To: talbotpat Cc: Chuck Church; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! (strange) Millions of Congrats mate, You know.. it is the stragest thing.. I did the one day lab, one week after it was released.. and I came out of the lab thinking a 94 is the least I will get... only to find out that I have failed by a considerably low mark! To this date, I am devastated! I feel that I was being used as a Beta Tester... leagal action coming up babies 8- Speedo talbotpat , x.net , Sent by: cc: nobody@groupsSubject: Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! tudy.com 13/02/2002 05:13 PM Please respond to talbotpat Way to go Chuck! Perserverance pays off! Pat - Original Message - From: Chuck Church To: ; Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:43 PM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most
Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35257]
Chuck Congratz, Congratz, Contratz... Ziyad - Original Message - From: Chuck Church To: Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 5:46 PM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35257] All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet. But still the most useful book I've found. Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in that book. Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company was cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't! Great preparation and simulation for the test. Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source! Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/ Bruce and Val explain the most difficult subjects very well. A couple of things are a little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class. Be prepared to work your a** off that week though. 8:30AM to 11PM is the norm that week. But I highly recommend it, especially if you've come close to passing before. Well, sorry to ramble on so much. I'm off to bed for a L O N G sleep. Thanks again, Chuck Church CCIE 8776 CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE Sr. Network Engineer Magnacom Technologies 140 N. Rt. 303 Valley Cottage, NY 10989 845-267-4000 x218 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35289t=35257 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35288]
Joe, I practiced mostly on speed. Plus some crack and methanphetamines as well. Just kidding. I've got 8 routers at home. The last couple of weeks, I've practiced just blasting in the various frame maps as fast as possible, and then configuring the most bizarre IGP configurations. Multiple mutual redistribution points, and crazy netmasks all over the place. Eventually I got the hang of it, and found the 'distance' command with it's options after the metric most useful. I did a little studying of the 'little' things, but focused mostly on the 'meat and potatoes' of the lab - IGPs. Thanks, Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Morabito Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:47 AM To: Chuck Church; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! Congrats! What did you do the last couple of months? Practice speed? Or maybe practice the many little things in IOS? Thanks! I too long for a good night sleep - Original Message - From: Chuck Church To: ; Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 AM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet. But still the most useful book I've found. Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in that book. Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company was cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't! Great preparation and simulation for the test. Various docs from CCO
RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35286]
Congratulations !!! You have been a valuable assets to this group as well. You passing is well deserved !! Jeff Kesemeyer CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNE www.bradshawlabs.com Your CCIE Rack Rental Source -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chuck Church Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet. But still the most useful book I've found. Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in that book. Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company was cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't! Great preparation and simulation for the test. Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source! Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/ Bruce and Val explain the most difficult subjects very well. A couple of things are a little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class. Be prepared to work your a** off that week though. 8:30AM to 11PM is the norm that week. But I highly recommend it, especially if you've come close to passing before. Well, sorry to ramble on so much. I'm off to bed for a L O N G sleep. Thanks again, Chuck Church CCIE 8776 CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE Sr. Network Engineer Magnacom Technologies 140 N. Rt. 303 Valley Cottage, NY 10989 845-267-4000 x218
OT: RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! (strange) [7:35290]
We were all like little lab rats that's what we were... The gave us a new drug and tried it on us until they got it right (if they have) Church, Chuck To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' , 'talbotpat' .comcc: 'Chuck Church' , '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' , 14/02/2002 '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' , 12:02 AM '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! (strange) I think you hit that one on the head. Even today, I don't think I could have passed that test I had in November. In fact, when our proctor arrived back in November, we were all waiting for him. His exact words were: Wow, you guys are in a hurry to fail. True story. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:12 AM To: talbotpat Cc: Chuck Church; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! (strange) Millions of Congrats mate, You know.. it is the stragest thing.. I did the one day lab, one week after it was released.. and I came out of the lab thinking a 94 is the least I will get... only to find out that I have failed by a considerably low mark! To this date, I am devastated! I feel that I was being used as a Beta Tester... leagal action coming up babies 8- Speedo talbotpat , x.net , Sent by: cc: nobody@groupsSubject: Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! tudy.com 13/02/2002 05:13 PM Please respond to talbotpat Way to go Chuck! Perserverance pays off! Pat - Original Message - From: Chuck Church To: ; Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:43 PM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started
OT: RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! (strange) [7:35290]
We were all like little lab rats that's what we were... The gave us a new drug and tried it on us until they got it right (if they have) Church, Chuck To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' , 'talbotpat' .comcc: 'Chuck Church' , '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' , 14/02/2002 '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' , 12:02 AM '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! (strange) I think you hit that one on the head. Even today, I don't think I could have passed that test I had in November. In fact, when our proctor arrived back in November, we were all waiting for him. His exact words were: Wow, you guys are in a hurry to fail. True story. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:12 AM To: talbotpat Cc: Chuck Church; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! (strange) Millions of Congrats mate, You know.. it is the stragest thing.. I did the one day lab, one week after it was released.. and I came out of the lab thinking a 94 is the least I will get... only to find out that I have failed by a considerably low mark! To this date, I am devastated! I feel that I was being used as a Beta Tester... leagal action coming up babies 8- Speedo talbotpat , x.net , Sent by: cc: nobody@groupsSubject: Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! tudy.com 13/02/2002 05:13 PM Please respond to talbotpat Way to go Chuck! Perserverance pays off! Pat - Original Message - From: Chuck Church To: ; Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:43 PM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started
RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35257]
Congratulations Chuck, Thanks for all the info. Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Chuck Church [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 6:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35257] All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet. But still the most useful book I've found. Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in that book. Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company was cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't! Great preparation and simulation for the test. Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source! Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/ Bruce and Val explain the most difficult subjects very well. A couple of things are a little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class. Be prepared to work your a** off that week though. 8:30AM to 11PM is the norm that week. But I highly recommend it, especially if you've come close to passing before. Well, sorry to ramble on so much. I'm off to bed for a L O N G sleep. Thanks again, Chuck Church CCIE 8776 CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE Sr. Network Engineer Magnacom Technologies 140 N.
Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35257]
Chuck Congratz, Congratz, Contratz... Ziyad - Original Message - From: Chuck Church To: Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 5:46 PM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35257] All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet. But still the most useful book I've found. Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in that book. Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company was cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't! Great preparation and simulation for the test. Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source! Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/ Bruce and Val explain the most difficult subjects very well. A couple of things are a little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class. Be prepared to work your a** off that week though. 8:30AM to 11PM is the norm that week. But I highly recommend it, especially if you've come close to passing before. Well, sorry to ramble on so much. I'm off to bed for a L O N G sleep. Thanks again, Chuck Church CCIE 8776 CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE Sr. Network Engineer Magnacom Technologies 140 N. Rt. 303 Valley Cottage, NY 10989 845-267-4000 x218 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35289t=35257 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35288]
Joe, I practiced mostly on speed. Plus some crack and methanphetamines as well. Just kidding. I've got 8 routers at home. The last couple of weeks, I've practiced just blasting in the various frame maps as fast as possible, and then configuring the most bizarre IGP configurations. Multiple mutual redistribution points, and crazy netmasks all over the place. Eventually I got the hang of it, and found the 'distance' command with it's options after the metric most useful. I did a little studying of the 'little' things, but focused mostly on the 'meat and potatoes' of the lab - IGPs. Thanks, Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Morabito Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:47 AM To: Chuck Church; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! Congrats! What did you do the last couple of months? Practice speed? Or maybe practice the many little things in IOS? Thanks! I too long for a good night sleep - Original Message - From: Chuck Church To: ; Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 AM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet. But still the most useful book I've found. Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in that book. Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company was cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't! Great preparation and simulation for the test. Various docs from CCO
RE: PIX information [7:35294]
Config net TFTP_IP:FILENAME ? Thanks! TJ -Original Message- From: BASSOLE Rock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:PIX information [7:35294] Hello group, What command can I use to copy a configuraton form a tftp server to a PIX Firewall? I have look on the cisco web site for the command but couldn't find. Can somebody help. Thank you. Rock * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35295t=35294 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6000 Hybrid vs Native [7:35216]
Yes you can order the SUP in either mode. When converting make sure you follow every step or you will be RMAing the sup!! Dave Michael Williams wrote: Jose Almodovar wrote: The onyl thing that I found cumbersome was the intial change from Hybrid to Native. Actually, I found the conversion process quite by the book and straight-forward. Granted I did this on a box with MSFC2 which doesn't require the boot-helper image like the MSFC(1) so this simplified things a touch. I recall hearing (or reading, etc. you know that mystery source of information) that you could order your 6500s with Native or Hybrid, your choice, but by default it comes with Hybrid. Mike W. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35297t=35216 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CIT Test [7:34856]
This test was not the hardest, maybe the 2nd hardest. You better study though. Use the Transcenders, they come close to crossing the line as far as the NDA goes. -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 1:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CIT Test [7:34856] It sounds to me like everyone agree to it being either the easiest or hardest - so it probably won't help answering Joshua's answer very well. And Joshua, I can strongly recommend Priscilla's flash cards - they helped me pass the test; Thanks again for that Priscilla. Good luck on your exam, and have a great weekend, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 12:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CIT Test [7:34856] CIT was by the far the easiest for me. I took the Foundation exam before that and it was much more challenging. Do you know about my CIT flash cards, just for fun? The URL is: http://www.priscilla.com/cit/toc.html Good luck. I think you will pass. Priscilla At 11:46 AM 2/8/02, Joshua Barnes wrote: I know that folks have asked about this test, but I am taking it Thursday, I would like to know of the people who thought that it was the hardest test, did you also feel it was equally hard to study for? I am studying through the book and BOSON, and quite honestly I think that this part comes natural to me. I certainly don't want to underestimate the test. ( I don't think I will) but I would like some feedback on this. Let me know if you guys remember how you felt. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35298t=34856 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245]
Some platfors support it on 10M ethernet with the right IOS: C2611A#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. C2611A(config)#inter e0/1.1 C2611A(config-subif)#enc C2611A(config-subif)#encapsulation ? dot1Q IEEE 802.1Q Virtual LAN sdeIEEE 802.10 Virtual LAN - Secure Data Exchange Dave Schneider, Matt wrote: In the book that I read it says that you can only use fast ethernet or gig ethernet -Original Message- From: Colin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 8:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245] Hello I have been doing some reading on VLANs and Trunking and have read conflicting information. Can you use a 10Mbs Ethernet interface when running ISL or 801.1q or does the interface have to be FastEthernet? Some books/articles I've read say you must use at least a FastEthernet interface and others say you can use an Ethernet interface. Note: this is for my CCNP lab studies, not a production network. Thanks Colin -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35300t=35245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rtp and frame relay [7:35301]
Hi, I want to configure for a FR PVC rtp which should have a guaranted bandwidth of 300 k. And 20 k per session. Can any on help with a solution on IOS 12.09 or 12.1 ? Thanks Udo Konstantin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35301t=35301 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mac address [7:35302]
Is it possible to add a dynamic mac address to a cisco catalyst switch? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35302t=35302 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dynamic Mac Address Assignment [7:35303]
Pls ignore my previous post b'cos it's wrongly frame. Here's what I want to ask: Is it possible to assign a mac address to a catalyst switch such that the switch would not use the burned-in-mac but rather use the assigned mac? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35303t=35303 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX information [7:35294]
PIX-FW1# copy ? usage: copy tftp[:[[//location][/pathname]]] flash For instance: copy tftp://192.168.2.2/configs/pix.cfg flash Thus spake BASSOLE Rock, on Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:06:59AM -0500: Hello group, What command can I use to copy a configuraton form a tftp server to a PIX Firewall? I have look on the cisco web site for the command but couldn't find. Can somebody help. Thank you. Rock -- Jose Celestino - Little prigs and three-quarter madmen may have the conceit that the laws of nature are constantly broken for their sakes. -- Friedrich Nietzsche Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35304t=35294 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Understanding BGP (was: Any advice for first attempt at JNCIE [7:35305]
Let me share what made the light dawn for me about BGP: first understanding the problem it was meant to solve, not how the protocol proper works or how to configure it on Cisco or Juniper. It's a reasonable simplification to say that BGP is policy controlled. Therefore, it makes sense to understand what those policies are. I started with the now-obsolete RIPE-181 document, but there now is a Routing Policy Specification Language and a fair bit of tutorials about it. See http://www.radb.net/ and for a wide range of sources, and also browse the archives of http://www.nanog.org. Look for both RPSL and BGP at NANOG. Another tutorial is at http://ncne.nlanr.net/training/techs/2001/0128/presentations/200101-prior2/. In my new service provider book, due out in April, I found it a very different approach to Halabi: start with the customer (or provider) problem definition, map it to RPSL (at least informally), and then configure based on RPSL. There is a freeware conversion program called RtConfig (part of the RAtoolset) that will take RPSL and produce about 80% of the BGP code for an actual router. You can download the RAToolset and get other information at http://www.isi.edu/ra. RtConfig best supports Cisco command language, but will also generate GateD, Bay RS, and RsD configurations. I don't know if there is a version specific to Juniper, but GateD configuration language is quite close to Juniper. The RAtoolset runs on most *NIX boxes. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35305t=35305 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35296]
Chuck, Congratulations! Thanks for the good word on NMC-1 because I'll be taking that class the week of February 25th. Todd Carswell - Original Message - From: Chuck Church To: ; Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 AM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet. But still the most useful book I've found. Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in that book. Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company was cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't! Great preparation and simulation for the test. Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source! Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/ Bruce and Val explain the most difficult subjects very well. A couple of things are a little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class. Be prepared to work your a** off that week though. 8:30AM to 11PM is the norm that week. But I highly recommend it, especially if you've come close to passing before. Well, sorry to ramble on so much. I'm off to bed for a L O N G sleep. Thanks again, Chuck Church CCIE 8776 CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE Sr. Network Engineer Magnacom Technologies 140 N. Rt. 303 Valley Cottage, NY 10989 845-267-4000 x218 _ Comercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message
ISDN line drops at the same time [7:35306]
Hey guys and gals this one is very weird. I have a PRI than connects to a AS5200. All is fine except 1 client. This persons connection gets dropped everyday at 9:26. TAC has no idea so far. debug shows nothing on either side. Any ideas? Here is the config. I have been playing with the mppp and the dialer load-thresh but nothing yet. IP's changed to protect the innocent. If I take the ppp multi out of the BRI0 i get an error: ISDN BRI0: isdn_is_bchannel_available: No Free B-channels service timestamps debug datetime service timestamps log datetime service password-encryption ! hostname hootie ! logging buffered 8192 debugging ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero no ip source-route ip dhcp excluded-address 1.2.3.4 1.2.3.5 ! ip dhcp pool DHCPPoolLAN_0 network 1.2.0.0 255.255.255.0 dns-server 1.2.3.4 1.2.3.3 default-router 1.2.3.4 ! ip name-server 1.2.3.4 ip name-server 1.2.3.5 isdn switch-type basic-ni ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 1.2.3.4255.255.255.0 ip access-group 121 in no ip proxy-arp ip nat inside ! interface BRI0 no ip address encapsulation ppp dialer pool-member 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 5556660101 isdn spid2 555666444380101 ppp authentication chap pap callin ppp multilink ! interface Dialer1 description ISP ip address 7.8.9.6 255.255.255.0 ip access-group 121 in no ip proxy-arp ip nat outside encapsulation ppp no ip route-cache no ip split-horizon dialer remote-name Cisco1 dialer pool 1 dialer idle-timeout 2147483 either dialer string 555 class DialClass dialer hold-queue 10 dialer load-threshold 2 outbound dialer-group 1 pulse-time 0 ppp authentication chap pap callin ppp chap hostname hootie ppp chap password pootie ppp pap sent-username hootie password pootie ! ip nat inside source list 18 interface Dialer1 overload ip nat inside source static tcp 1.2.3.4 9100 6.7.8.9 9162 extendable no ip http server ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 ! ! map-class dialer DialClass dialer isdn speed 56 access-list 18 permit 1.2.0.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 121 deny udp any eq netbios-dgm any access-list 121 deny udp any eq netbios-ns any deny udp any eq netbios-ss any access-list 121 deny tcp any eq 137 any access-list 121 deny tcp any eq 138 any access-list 121 deny tcp any eq 139 any access-list 121 permit ip any any time-range TIME dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 exec-timeout 120 0 transport input none stopbits 1 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 0 0 password pootie login ! ! time-range TIME periodic daily 0:00 to 23:59 ! Steve Smith MCSE, CCNA, CCDA Data Networks Technical Manager Freeliant Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] The brave may not live forever, but the cautious never live. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35306t=35306 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245]
I had read (and understood) that you needed FastEthernet for ISL trunking. I'm not for sure about Dot1Q though. It appears from the post from MADMAN, that you can indeed perform Dot1Q on Ethernet ports. But I still think FastEthernet I read a post in this thread that on a 2900 switch someone set it for 10-half and didn't receive an error when setting up ISL trunking. However, it appears from that post that he's using a 2900(XL) switch (because of the 'switchport trunk' IOS command). If that's the case, then regardless of speed/duplex settings, that port is still (technically) a FastEthernet port, and therefore capable of ISL trunking. That's my take on it.. Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35307t=35245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ethernet versus Token Ring [7:35291]
Begin padding so URL won't be deleted. Here's a page with lots of links covering Token Ring: http://www.nwfusion.com/research/token.html -Original Message- From: Naeiym Omar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ethernet versus Token Ring [7:35291] Hi Group Off the topic really , but can anyone please point me to a Web site where I can get topics on Ethernet versus Token Ring . Some sales and technical infomation is needed on why the customer will want to migate from Token Ring To Ethernet. Thanks Naeiym Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35308t=35291 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6000 Hybrid vs Native [7:35216]
MADMAN wrote: When converting make sure you follow every step or you will be RMAing the sup!! LOL Funny you mention that. It is very true as before I came to this job, one of the other people here tried to wing it through a conversion and ended up having to RMA another Sup.. heh... I followed the instructions on Cisco's website at the following URL and had zero problems. (watch for wrap) http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/81.shtml Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35310t=35216 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245]
I also belive that it is possible to run isl/802.1Q over ethernet. I seem to remember reading that the limiting factor was the age of the ethernet hardware. The originally ethernet chips used in cisco network modules only supported a fixed frame size. When ISL/802.1Q came along, the hardware needed to support some additional space to accomadate the VLAN info. This was a problem with older ethernet chips sets however the newer hardware supports this. The chip sets used on the FE board did not have this problem because they were already designed to allow for a larger frame. Can anyone verify my recollection??? Oleg Oz.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35311t=35245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN line drops at the same time [7:35306]
I take it this is the remote site that dials into the PRI. Have you tried a debug dialer? This will give you and indication of why the call was dropped and by whom. Dave Steve Smith wrote: Hey guys and gals this one is very weird. I have a PRI than connects to a AS5200. All is fine except 1 client. This persons connection gets dropped everyday at 9:26. TAC has no idea so far. debug shows nothing on either side. Any ideas? Here is the config. I have been playing with the mppp and the dialer load-thresh but nothing yet. IP's changed to protect the innocent. If I take the ppp multi out of the BRI0 i get an error: ISDN BRI0: isdn_is_bchannel_available: No Free B-channels service timestamps debug datetime service timestamps log datetime service password-encryption ! hostname hootie ! logging buffered 8192 debugging ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero no ip source-route ip dhcp excluded-address 1.2.3.4 1.2.3.5 ! ip dhcp pool DHCPPoolLAN_0 network 1.2.0.0 255.255.255.0 dns-server 1.2.3.4 1.2.3.3 default-router 1.2.3.4 ! ip name-server 1.2.3.4 ip name-server 1.2.3.5 isdn switch-type basic-ni ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 1.2.3.4255.255.255.0 ip access-group 121 in no ip proxy-arp ip nat inside ! interface BRI0 no ip address encapsulation ppp dialer pool-member 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 5556660101 isdn spid2 555666444380101 ppp authentication chap pap callin ppp multilink ! interface Dialer1 description ISP ip address 7.8.9.6 255.255.255.0 ip access-group 121 in no ip proxy-arp ip nat outside encapsulation ppp no ip route-cache no ip split-horizon dialer remote-name Cisco1 dialer pool 1 dialer idle-timeout 2147483 either dialer string 555 class DialClass dialer hold-queue 10 dialer load-threshold 2 outbound dialer-group 1 pulse-time 0 ppp authentication chap pap callin ppp chap hostname hootie ppp chap password pootie ppp pap sent-username hootie password pootie ! ip nat inside source list 18 interface Dialer1 overload ip nat inside source static tcp 1.2.3.4 9100 6.7.8.9 9162 extendable no ip http server ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 ! ! map-class dialer DialClass dialer isdn speed 56 access-list 18 permit 1.2.0.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 121 deny udp any eq netbios-dgm any access-list 121 deny udp any eq netbios-ns any deny udp any eq netbios-ss any access-list 121 deny tcp any eq 137 any access-list 121 deny tcp any eq 138 any access-list 121 deny tcp any eq 139 any access-list 121 permit ip any any time-range TIME dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 exec-timeout 120 0 transport input none stopbits 1 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 0 0 password pootie login ! ! time-range TIME periodic daily 0:00 to 23:59 ! Steve Smith MCSE, CCNA, CCDA Data Networks Technical Manager Freeliant Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] The brave may not live forever, but the cautious never live. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35312t=35306 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Source [7:35313]
Be very careful if you are dealing with this company. They were formerly Grandstore , until the name was trashed like @!#$ and then they became IQSale , and then THAT name was trashed and now they changed name again.. So BE CAREFUL ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35313t=35313 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX information [7:35294]
AND, am I to understand correctly, as the manual is quite vague, that an upgrade of the primary failover unit also updates the secondary? Or, must the hapless administrator do each individually? Best, G. -Original Message- From: Jose Celestino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PIX information [7:35294] PIX-FW1# copy ? usage: copy tftp[:[[//location][/pathname]]] flash For instance: copy tftp://192.168.2.2/configs/pix.cfg flash Thus spake BASSOLE Rock, on Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:06:59AM -0500: Hello group, What command can I use to copy a configuraton form a tftp server to a PIX Firewall? I have look on the cisco web site for the command but couldn't find. Can somebody help. Thank you. Rock -- Jose Celestino - Little prigs and three-quarter madmen may have the conceit that the laws of nature are constantly broken for their sakes. -- Friedrich Nietzsche Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35314t=35294 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184]
Hi Rik, Anybody, Regarding formatting the flash from rommon mode. I have looked on Cisco's website for a couple of hours trying to find the commands to format flash from rommon and haven't found any useful information. I have looked through all the commands in rommon and haven't found the commands either. I know if you tftp a IOS from rommon you can erase the flash. Could someone help me on this one. Scott -Original Message- From: Rik Guyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184] Did you format the new flash? I've had issues with corruption adding flash while existing flash is still installed. Try to boot to rommon mode and format the flash. You should be able to do this with both sticks installed without too much problem. Then install IOS, build the config, etc. Rik -Original Message- From: Wilson, Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184] Begging for help once again . . . I have upgraded the flash in a 3640 from the 8 Mb chip to a 16 Mb chip. I did this by installing the second, 16 Mb chip into slot 1 of the motherboard, leaving the original 8 Mb in slot 1, for a total of 24 Mb of flash memory. I then installed 12.1, which was the reason I needed to upgrade the flash. 12.1 went on without a hitch, but when the router was reloaded, it would run for about 30 minutes and then go into rommon mode. It did this repeatedly, so I removed the 8 Mb chip, installed the 16 Mb chip into slot 0, and then used xmodem to transfer 12.1 through the console, a painstaking two hour task. Now the file is on flash, but at reload the file is unable to decompress, returning these errors: Error: Uncompression of the image failed. invalid compressed data-format violated Error: zip decompress failed ***System received a software forced crash *** signal = 0x17, code = 0x7, context = 0x0 PC = 0x80008094, cause = 0x20, Status Reg = 0x3041f003 The crc checks are the same as displayed on the software centers web page. I have downloaded a new copy of the file and it still did not work. I put the original 8 Mb chip in slot 0 and removed the 16 Mb chip, reloaded a fresh 11.3 image, and received the same errors. What have I done?? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35315t=35184 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=?iso-8859-1?Q?FYI_-_CERT=AE_Advisory_CA-2002-03_Multiple_=28SN [7:35316]
FYI - If your running SNMP on your networks you'll probably want to check this out. Just popped up on Cert.org and Cisco.com another DOS technique has reared its head again. - http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html#vendors - http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-malformed-snmp-msgs-pub.shtml Eric Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35316t=35316 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FYI - CERT® Advisory CA-2002-03 Multiple [7:35318]
Is there anyting to this? I, for one, am not happy at all with CERT for this press offensive (its in the NY Times as well). Is there any there - there?? Eric wrote: FYI - If your running SNMP on your networks you'll probably want to check this out. Just popped up on Cert.org and Cisco.com another DOS technique has reared its head again. - http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html#vendors - http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-malformed-snmp-msgs-pub.shtml Eric Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35318t=35318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FYI - CERT® Advisory CA-2002-03 Multiple [7:35320]
Is there anyting to this? I, for one, am not happy at all with CERT for this press offensive (its in the NY Times as well). Is there any there - there?? Eric wrote: FYI - If your running SNMP on your networks you'll probably want to check this out. Just popped up on Cert.org and Cisco.com another DOS technique has reared its head again. - http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html#vendors - http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-malformed-snmp-msgs-pub.shtml Eric Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35320t=35320 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FYI - CERT® Advisory CA-2002-03 Multiple [7:35317]
Is there anyting to this? I, for one, am not happy at all with CERT for this press offensive (its in the NY Times as well). Is there any there - there?? Eric wrote: FYI - If your running SNMP on your networks you'll probably want to check this out. Just popped up on Cert.org and Cisco.com another DOS technique has reared its head again. - http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html#vendors - http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-malformed-snmp-msgs-pub.shtml Eric Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35317t=35317 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FYI - CERT® Advisory CA-2002-03 Multiple [7:35321]
Is there anyting to this? I, for one, am not happy at all with CERT for this press offensive (its in the NY Times as well). Is there any there - there?? Eric wrote: FYI - If your running SNMP on your networks you'll probably want to check this out. Just popped up on Cert.org and Cisco.com another DOS technique has reared its head again. - http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html#vendors - http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-malformed-snmp-msgs-pub.shtml Eric Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35321t=35321 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FYI - CERT® Advisory CA-2002-03 Multiple [7:35319]
Is there anyting to this? I, for one, am not happy at all with CERT for this press offensive (its in the NY Times as well). Is there any there - there?? Eric wrote: FYI - If your running SNMP on your networks you'll probably want to check this out. Just popped up on Cert.org and Cisco.com another DOS technique has reared its head again. - http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html#vendors - http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-malformed-snmp-msgs-pub.shtml Eric Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35319t=35319 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco mc3810 [7:35323]
Please have a look in to the archieves. we have discussed it allot... -Mamoor - Original Message - From: Ouellette, Tim To: Cc: Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:17 PM Subject: Cisco mc3810 hey all. I just bought an mc 3810. What's the going rate for one of these without any modules except the 2 serials and 1 ethernet that it comes with. I'd like to be able to use this in a home lab to do VOIP testing. Can I buy the FXS personality modules or do I need some sort of NM to put those cards into it. Thanks group! Tim _ Comercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35323t=35323 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIPS default-network [7:35324]
Hello folks, I am tring to figure out what RIPs ip default-network command actually does. If you have a router with: router rip network 172.16.0.0 network 192.168.17.0 ip default network 192.168.17.0 and the network 192.168.17.0 is on a serial link to a second router. What does the ip default network do? I cannot seem to figure out why one network would be the default. Thanks for any info, Ryan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35324t=35324 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re: [7:35325]
Can you send your message one more time...I don't think I got it... heh Frederick R. Carlson 02/13/02 01:25PM Is there anyting to this? I, for one, am not happy at all with CERT for this press offensive (its in the NY Times as well). Is there any there - there?? Eric wrote: FYI - If your running SNMP on your networks you'll probably want to check this out. Just popped up on Cert.org and Cisco.com another DOS technique has reared its head again. - http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html#vendors - http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-malformed-snmp-msgs-pub.shtml Eric Confidentiality Disclaimer This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. (WellStar) and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35325t=35325 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35296]
Chuck, Congratulations! Thanks for the good word on NMC-1 because I'll be taking that class the week of February 25th. Todd Carswell - Original Message - From: Chuck Church To: ; Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 AM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out in the past with problems. Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list together. As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole story. Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the Novell and MS Certs. After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE written in October 2000. Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP. Didn't know much more than your average CCNP would. Tried again in April, but BGP killed me, and again I didn't make it to day 2. After that, I found a study partner (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer. Did all the bootcamp labs, thought I knew everything I needed to. November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab. I don't know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1 day format had a very low pass rate. I know I could have used a couple more hours to finish. If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and failed, don't be discouraged. I think they've scaled it back a little nowadays. Fast forwarding to today. After spending a week with Val, Bruce, and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed, I felt pretty prepared. Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's book made sense. Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this morning. Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch. At that point I was done with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's. In other words about 2/3 of the way done, by my estimate. At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back and work on 3 things I couldn't figure out. A little discussing with the proctor, and 2 of them were fixed. But then I think I read too much. I had solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might change what they were looking for. Checking with the proctor, I got the impression that he really didn't like my solution. So there I am, 1.5 hours to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :( Looked OK, but with 1/2 an hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o 10 minutes to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double check all my other work as time expired. I know I left 1 thing unconfigured (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes. They said to expect the results tomorrow afternoon. A plane flight back to New York, and there's the email waiting. 8776! If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list: Groupstudy! Paul's done a great job. There are certain people on this list that should be flagged as must-reads. I won't mention any last names, but there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a huge asset to this list. Thanks guys. Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP, but were afraid to ask. Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val Pavlichenko - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon. This book covers most everything. I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet. But still the most useful book I've found. Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is in that book. Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company was cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't! Great preparation and simulation for the test. Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source! Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/ Bruce and Val explain the most difficult subjects very well. A couple of things are a little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class. Be prepared to work your a** off that week though. 8:30AM to 11PM is the norm that week. But I highly recommend it, especially if you've come close to passing before. Well, sorry to ramble on so much. I'm off to bed for a L O N G sleep. Thanks again, Chuck Church CCIE 8776 CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE Sr. Network Engineer Magnacom Technologies 140 N. Rt. 303 Valley Cottage, NY 10989 845-267-4000 x218 _ Comercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message
RE: Dynamic Mac Address Assignment [7:35303]
IOS based switch - 3524XL_ATL(config-if)#mac-address ? H.H.H MAC address Joseph Brunner ASN 21572 MortgageIT MITLending New York, NY 10038 (212) 651 - 7695 Voice (212) 651 - 7795 Fax -Original Message- From: Kwame [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dynamic Mac Address Assignment [7:35303] Pls ignore my previous post b'cos it's wrongly frame. Here's what I want to ask: Is it possible to assign a mac address to a catalyst switch such that the switch would not use the burned-in-mac but rather use the assigned mac? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35309t=35303 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX information [7:35294]
I believe it sync's them auto-magically, or perhaps on a timed basis. Regardless ... I always do a wr standby ... just to be sure. Thanks! TJ -Original Message- From: Hartnell, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: PIX information [7:35294] AND, am I to understand correctly, as the manual is quite vague, that an upgrade of the primary failover unit also updates the secondary? Or, must the hapless administrator do each individually? Best, G. -Original Message- From: Jose Celestino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PIX information [7:35294] PIX-FW1# copy ? usage: copy tftp[:[[//location][/pathname]]] flash For instance: copy tftp://192.168.2.2/configs/pix.cfg flash Thus spake BASSOLE Rock, on Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:06:59AM -0500: Hello group, What command can I use to copy a configuraton form a tftp server to a PIX Firewall? I have look on the cisco web site for the command but couldn't find. Can somebody help. Thank you. Rock -- Jose Celestino - Little prigs and three-quarter madmen may have the conceit that the laws of nature are constantly broken for their sakes. -- Friedrich Nietzsche * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35326t=35294 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Advisory on SNMP [7:35327]
All, What is the real risk in the newly announced CERT bullitin on SNMP. Its at : http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html Thanks in advance, FRC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35327t=35327 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry in advance for the Duplicates [7:35328]
EOM Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35328t=35328 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNMP- (S)ecurity is (N)ot (M)y (P)roblem [7:35329]
It's kind of high but not really. Most networks have SNMP pretty well hidden behind firewalls, or turned off if on the net, but if it's open, then I can ddos you and / or add code into the memory space of the crashed SNMP process (servers). There haven't been many attacks reported yet from the firewall logs people have examined - YET. Maybe the script kiddies are just waiting to write the good tools. But, as I said earlier, a properly designed system will have SNMP protected. Frederick R. Carlson wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... All, What is the real risk in the newly announced CERT bullitin on SNMP. Its at : http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html Thanks in advance, FRC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35329t=35329 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP Recertification Test.. [7:35330]
Hello all- Has anyone taken recertification test for CCNP?? Any experiences on how it is ?? Thanks Devinder Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35330t=35330 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Unknown protocol on network [7:35331]
After watching a sniffer connected to one of our LANs we're seeing a lot of different clients attempting to reach UDP port 1034 on one of our primary servers. The source UDP port is in the range 1026-1033. I'm not able to find any good information regarding these ports. Some sites say that some of these are used by BBN Integrated Access Devices. I have no idea what those are and I'm pretty sure we don't have any around. :-) Other pages mention that 1032-1034 are used for rstatd, rusers, and walld. Again, I don't really know what those are but it looks like they'd be more appropriate in a unix context. Any ideas? Thanks! John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35331t=35331 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SNMP- (S)ecurity is (N)ot (M)y (P)roblem [7:35329]
As demonstrated by the security group, some vendor SNMP implementations crash when this new test suite is run against them -- even when SNMP is not actively listening! I do agree about protecting SNMP devices, but this is much more difficult from INSIDE an SNMP network. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SNMP- (S)ecurity is (N)ot (M)y (P)roblem [7:35329] It's kind of high but not really. Most networks have SNMP pretty well hidden behind firewalls, or turned off if on the net, but if it's open, then I can ddos you and / or add code into the memory space of the crashed SNMP process (servers). There haven't been many attacks reported yet from the firewall logs people have examined - YET. Maybe the script kiddies are just waiting to write the good tools. But, as I said earlier, a properly designed system will have SNMP protected. Frederick R. Carlson wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... All, What is the real risk in the newly announced CERT bullitin on SNMP. Its at : http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html Thanks in advance, FRC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35332t=35329 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Recertification Test.. [7:35330]
Was not bad, did it at the last Networkers in Chicago... I think I had an 865, passing was 757... Although I was working on the CCIE Lab at the time, and the Written was somewhat fresh... John A. Johns, CCIE No. 7983, CCDP, CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I, CCA, A+ System Engineer The Hillman Company 1900 Grant Building Pittsburgh, PA 15219 412-338-3585 Voice 412-370-2454 Cell 412-338-3425 Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Devinder Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP Recertification Test.. [7:35330] Hello all- Has anyone taken recertification test for CCNP?? Any experiences on how it is ?? Thanks Devinder Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35333t=35330 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unknown protocol on network [7:35331]
I found three that it could be. Any of the other ports open listed below? I hope this comes through readable... 1. Pal Talk [support page] (Watch Out! Opens a wide port range!) IN UDP 2090 [voice] IN UDP 2091 [control stream] IN TCP 2090 [file transfer] IN TCP 2091 [video listening] IN TCP 2095 [file transfer- older versions] OUT TCP 5001 - 50015 [text messaging] OUT TCP 8200 - 8700 [Firewall / network mode group voice] OUT UDP 8200 - 8700 [Firewall / network mode group voice] OUT UDP 1025 - 2500 [outbound voice control stream (user configurable)] The last 2 UDP outbound ports are usually set in pairs. 1024 - 1025, 1026 - 1027, etc... Most users never have to set these lower two ports. They are dynamically assigned if you leave the lower two boxes set to 0's on the 'paltalk port settings' tab. Outbound ports are usually not an issue but are listed here for network users who may need to manually configure for a proxy or NAT server or other hardware device. 2. Everquest (it's a videogame) (Watch Out! Opens a wide port range!) See this Everquest page for more info IN TCP 1024 7000 IN UDP 1024 6000 Note: May have to open this last UDP range even wider 3. CarbonCopy32 host on your LAN (Watch Out! Opens a wide port range!) INTCP 1680 INUDP 1023-1679 John Neiberger wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... After watching a sniffer connected to one of our LANs we're seeing a lot of different clients attempting to reach UDP port 1034 on one of our primary servers. The source UDP port is in the range 1026-1033. I'm not able to find any good information regarding these ports. Some sites say that some of these are used by BBN Integrated Access Devices. I have no idea what those are and I'm pretty sure we don't have any around. :-) Other pages mention that 1032-1034 are used for rstatd, rusers, and walld. Again, I don't really know what those are but it looks like they'd be more appropriate in a unix context. Any ideas? Thanks! John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35334t=35331 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: One Source [7:35313]
It's funny that you mention that. I just recently bought a couple of routers from them off ebay and one of them was dead when I received it. I took almost a month to get a replacement. The one shipped did work but during the whole process, they never responded to email and never initiated a call to me to atleast let me know the status of the shipment. I guess it could have been worse but how hard is it to send a freakin' email? Woody -Original Message- From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: One Source [7:35313] Be very careful if you are dealing with this company. They were formerly Grandstore , until the name was trashed like @!#$ and then they became IQSale , and then THAT name was trashed and now they changed name again.. So BE CAREFUL ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35322t=35313 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unknown protocol on network [7:35331]
We now think that this is related to the Corporate Edition of Norton AntiVirus. There is some sort of scanning involved there, but I'm not very clear on the details. Our LAN people just rolled this version out into our network a couple of weeks ago which explains why I wasn't seeing it in the past. Thanks for the research! John Steven A. Ridder 2/13/02 1:00:53 PM I found three that it could be. Any of the other ports open listed below? I hope this comes through readable... 1. Pal Talk [support page] (Watch Out! Opens a wide port range!) IN UDP 2090 [voice] IN UDP 2091 [control stream] IN TCP 2090 [file transfer] IN TCP 2091 [video listening] IN TCP 2095 [file transfer- older versions] OUT TCP 5001 - 50015 [text messaging] OUT TCP 8200 - 8700 [Firewall / network mode group voice] OUT UDP 8200 - 8700 [Firewall / network mode group voice] OUT UDP 1025 - 2500 [outbound voice control stream (user configurable)] The last 2 UDP outbound ports are usually set in pairs. 1024 - 1025, 1026 - 1027, etc... Most users never have to set these lower two ports. They are dynamically assigned if you leave the lower two boxes set to 0's on the 'paltalk port settings' tab. Outbound ports are usually not an issue but are listed here for network users who may need to manually configure for a proxy or NAT server or other hardware device. 2. Everquest (it's a videogame) (Watch Out! Opens a wide port range!) See this Everquest page for more info IN TCP 1024 7000 IN UDP 1024 6000 Note: May have to open this last UDP range even wider 3. CarbonCopy32 host on your LAN (Watch Out! Opens a wide port range!) INTCP 1680 INUDP 1023-1679 John Neiberger wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... After watching a sniffer connected to one of our LANs we're seeing a lot of different clients attempting to reach UDP port 1034 on one of our primary servers. The source UDP port is in the range 1026-1033. I'm not able to find any good information regarding these ports. Some sites say that some of these are used by BBN Integrated Access Devices. I have no idea what those are and I'm pretty sure we don't have any around. :-) Other pages mention that 1032-1034 are used for rstatd, rusers, and walld. Again, I don't really know what those are but it looks like they'd be more appropriate in a unix context. Any ideas? Thanks! John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35335t=35331 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cef vs fast switching [7:35183]
CEF was designed to improve performance on core, backbone routers, that handle a lot of dynamic traffic to a variety of destinations. It also has major benefits for load sharing. It wasn't designed for an edge router with only one egress like you're talking about. Nonetheless, I think it would still speed things up. The main advantage of CEF is that it never has to do any process switching. It can immediately use the FIB and adjacency table. Compare CEF to fast switching. With fast switching, the first packet to a Layer-3 destination must be process switched. If you have lots of Layer-3 destinations, this is especially bad. In that case, CEF would definitely help. Packet Magazine did a nice article on CEF here: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/oct00/p94-cover.html And here's an even better article from TAC: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/20.html Priscilla bergenpeak wrote: Suppose you have an edge router that has 10 or so connected subnets and a default egress route. This box is not running a dynamic routing protocol. If one was to enable CEF on this box (over fast switching), would one expect to see any/much performance improvement? This box does not support dCEF (72xx chassis). Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35336t=35183 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ethernet versus Token Ring [7:35291]
Sometimes if you send something, especially with a url as first line (or only line), it get's deleted by server. SO he put in his creative padding. Michael Williams wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Daniel Cotts wrote: Begin padding so URL won't be deleted. Huh? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35339t=35291 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: Number of people passing CCIE [7:35341]
Vaguely fitting this thread, I was once giving a protocols seminar at NASA's Kennedy Space Center. During one of my breaks, I eavesdropped at one of the classrooms, where a frustrated lecturer on the Space Shuttle burst out, this is rocket science, it isn't BGP! Hmm... That actually sounds like an LSAT question; Every lawyer passes the bar exam and every CCIE passes the CCIE lab! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason Graun Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:58 PM To: 'Michael C. Popovich'; 'McCallum, Robert'; ''Ccielab' (E-mail)' Subject: RE: Number of people passing CCIE I totally agree. People compare the CCIE lab exam to the Bar Exam but very lawyer passes the bar exam. Only the cream-of-the-crop pass the CCIE exam. Jason C. Graun CCNP CCDA MCSE Network Engineering -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael C. Popovich Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:51 PM To: McCallum, Robert; 'Ccielab' (E-mail) Subject: RE: Number of people passing CCIE I would say that average is not consistent for an entire month or year. I would rather be doing this than competing at being a lawyer. :):) MP -Original Message- From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:01 PM To: 'Ccielab' (E-mail) Subject: Number of people passing CCIE I see that, from Saturday, that judging by Chucks number there has been 21 people pass since I got my number. That's an average of 7 per day. That's a lot, NO? Robert McCallum CCIE #8757 You can swim all day in the Sea of Knowledge and still come out completely dry. Most people do. _ Comercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. _ Comercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. _ Comercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. _ Comercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35341t=35341 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ip subnet Zero Ip classess [7:35340]
Can someone give a gerneral explanation on these two commands? ip subnet-zero ip-classless What do they do and why would you use them? Thanks. Arnaldo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35340t=35340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ethernet versus Token Ring [7:35291]
Daniel Cotts wrote: Begin padding so URL won't be deleted. Huh? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35337t=35291 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ip subnet Zero Ip classess [7:35340]
This is definitely a topic where you should search the archives. There have been some excellent discussions in the past that have resulted in some great explanations of each of these commands. It would be better for you to read them than to have the original posters type them in all over again. :-) Regards, John Arnaldo Gomez 2/13/02 2:44:37 PM Can someone give a gerneral explanation on these two commands? ip subnet-zero ip-classless What do they do and why would you use them? Thanks. Arnaldo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35342t=35340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ip subnet Zero Ip classess [7:35340]
Well, From http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/np1_r /1rprt2/1ripadr.htm#xtocid12 : ip classless At times the router might receive packets destined for a subnet of a network that has no network default route. To have the Cisco IOS software forward such packets to the best supernet route possible, use the ip classless global configuration command. To disable this feature, use the no form of this command. Regarding subnet zero, the IOS didn't used to let you assign an address that was part of subnet zero. It wasn't allowed because it could create an address that was the same as the subnet address. Here's a link from cisco with more lovely info about that and the all one's subnet: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/40.html -Original Message- From: Arnaldo Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ip subnet Zero Ip classess [7:35340] Can someone give a gerneral explanation on these two commands? ip subnet-zero ip-classless What do they do and why would you use them? Thanks. Arnaldo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35343t=35340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ip subnet Zero Ip classess [7:35340]
subnet zero lets you do this: ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252 ip classless lets you do this ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.0.0 and probably more importantly it will allow a router to forward a packet via a default route even though router is connected to a subnet of the major network your trying to reach, i.e. discontiguous. Dave Arnaldo Gomez wrote: Can someone give a gerneral explanation on these two commands? ip subnet-zero ip-classless What do they do and why would you use them? Thanks. Arnaldo -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35344t=35340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Secret Clearance? [7:4152]
You were not Lucky that you had nothing in your background. You made the right choices. People who make the wrong choices pay for it their whole life. It is called Character. William Gragido wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Well, since this is obviously a never ending thread I'll add my 2 cents. I have a Top Secret SCI that is still valid from my active duty period in the USMC. In regards to joining the service just to get a clearance, I'd say thats some of the most low brow thinking that I've ever heard. There are no guarantees that you'll get one. It all depends on the investigation and what they unearth, so don't be fooled into thinking that simply by selecting an MOS that requires a clearance you'll automatically qualify. Its not the case. I saw Marines go through schools only to be turned down for clearances. I was lucky and had nothing in my background that would prohibit my from obtaining one, but again, it all depends on what one's civilian life is compromised of that helps dictates whehter or not a person rates one. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Faubion Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 10:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Secret Clearance? [7:4152] Ohh that's a good idea, then when you get orders to Bosnia, Somalia, Kuwait, or Afghanistan, you can be like the whiners of Desert Storm that cried about joining to get an education, not to go to war. Only this time it will be about getting a security clearance instead of going to war! While you can get a security clearance in the military, it is not valid after leaving the military unless it is documented correctly. However the reinstatement cost can be drastically reduced since the previous leg work has already been done. John - Original Message - From: Steven A. Ridder To: Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 7:52 PM Subject: Re: Secret Clearance? [7:4152] 80K!!! You could always do what I did and join the Army. If you pick a good MOS, you'll get a secret clearance for free while you are in Basic or AIT. Some jobs I'm sure will give you a top secret if needed. I bet just joining the reserves would get you a secret if the MOS called for it. Julian Eccli wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... A secret clearance can cost somewhere between $50K-$80K to get all the proper paper work and verifications done, hence why they want you to have it already :) -Julian Patrick Ramsey wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... not to mention that if they say it is required they probably do not want to pay the $$$ to have it done...hence the required portion of the job description. - Patrick Craig Columbus 02/09/02 15:38 PM Check the archives of the list. This has been discussed many, many times. Craig At 11:04 AM 2/9/2002 -0500, you wrote: So how does one gain Secret Clearance? --- Jeff D wrote: The contractor has no say in it. If the government says you need a clearance to enter the building, then you have to have one, period. Why waste your time if you don't? Jeff wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... this Clearance thing is kind of funny. I think they should screen someone who is qulaified for the position even if they dont have the Clearance. = Paul M. Immo CCDP, CCNP, CCIE Written, MCSE (248)634-3362 Home (248)343-0440 Cell View my Resume online: http://briefcase.yahoo.com/paulimmo Imagination is more important than knowledge Albert Einstein __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com Confidentiality DisclaimerThis email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. (WellStar) and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. Message Posted at:
CCIE Written+Lab [7:35345]
As a new member I want to say Hi to all. I am pretty sure, you have heard this question before: I am looking to buy material for CCIE RS written and lab, so please take few seconds to type your best recommendation. . Thanks, -- Ishrat Nadeem Zahid CCNP Cisco Systems,Inc. Chelmsford, MA 01824 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35345t=35345 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
power session tapes [7:35346]
does anyone know where I can find/order the power session voice tapes? TIA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35346t=35346 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Injecting a default route to an IGRP stub router-HOW?? [7:35347]
Hello, I can't seem to figure out how to inject a default route to an IGRP stub router from another router without actually typing in the default route cmd.(ip route 0.0) on the stub router itself? Basically, I have stub router RTA connected to RTB on netw 8. RTB is connected to RTC and RTD on netw 6 and 7 respectively. on RTB typed: #ip default-network 8.0.0.0 on RTA:#sh ip route No default route injected on RTB: #ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 s0 #redistribute static under igrp or #network 0.0.0.0 on RTA:#sh ip route No default route still.. :-( No problem with RIP, OSPF, EIGRP or BGP(obviously with the reqd. cmds. for them except RIP). Unless, I type in the #ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 e0 cmd. on RTA, it cannot ping any networks past RTB. Why is this so? I thought IGRP does not understand the 0.0.0.0 default route(as per Cisco doc.) and thus needs the ip default-network cmd. (BTW setting this cmd. on the stub router RTA still does not work). Then am I missing something important here?? Please advise. Thank you. _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35347t=35347 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ip subnet Zero Ip classess [7:35340]
ip classless is used to tell the routing protocols which supports VLSM that subnet should be sdvertised as part of the route. ip classfull on the other hand is used to restrict to use major class subnet mask. Nadeem == Arnaldo Gomez wrote: Can someone give a gerneral explanation on these two commands? ip subnet-zero ip-classless What do they do and why would you use them? Thanks. Arnaldo -- Ishrat Nadeem Zahid CCNP Cisco Systems,Inc. Chelmsford, MA 01824 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35348t=35340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Serial (X.21) X-over cables [7:35212]
Joel, Have a look at www.kg2.com Kelly Griffin used to post to the group. Not heard of him for a while. I've noticed he's doing some DB60 to RJ45 converters from March 2002 for around 20 dollars, so one of each DCE/DTE for 40 dollars and you're away - whatever length you want, and I believe the full crossover cables were around 25 dollars. I must add I have no links with Kelly or the company and not enough knowledge of them to recommend, but prices look decent and I know he's been around a while now. I keep meaning to buy the same but never got round to it. Gaz Joel Satterley wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Anyone know the Cisco part number (or pin-outs) for the Cab-x.21MT crossover equivalent ? I need to use some back to back serial connections without using a kilostream simulator. Any help would be gratefully rec'd. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35349t=35212 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: V35 - smartserial cross-over cable [7:35181]
Try this link as a starting point; http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/534/index.shtml -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Taco Hettema Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 6:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: V35 - smartserial cross-over cable [7:35181] Hello, can anyone tell me the pinout of a V35 - smart serial serial DCE/DTE cross-over cable and that of a smart-serial-smart-serial dce/dte cross-over cable? I want to connect a AGS to a 2500 and 2 2500's with one cable (instead of ordering expensive cable-pairs at cisco). Thanks in advance Taco Hettema Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35351t=35181 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Serial (X.21) X-over cables [7:35212]
Try this Link as a start; http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/534/index.shtml -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joel Satterley Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Serial (X.21) X-over cables [7:35212] Anyone know the Cisco part number (or pin-outs) for the Cab-x.21MT crossover equivalent ? I need to use some back to back serial connections without using a kilostream simulator. Any help would be gratefully rec'd. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35350t=35212 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RIPS default-network [7:35324]
a default route is used as the out of last resorte. In case router receives a packet and it cannot figure out where to send it, it forwards to the default route. Nadeem == Ryn wrote: Hello folks, I am tring to figure out what RIPs ip default-network command actually does. If you have a router with: router rip network 172.16.0.0 network 192.168.17.0 ip default network 192.168.17.0 and the network 192.168.17.0 is on a serial link to a second router. What does the ip default network do? I cannot seem to figure out why one network would be the default. Thanks for any info, Ryan -- Ishrat Nadeem Zahid CCNP Cisco Systems,Inc. Chelmsford, MA 01824 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35352t=35324 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: set community no-export V.S. set community local-as [7:35355]
John, So isn't that Local-AS means can only send routes within the local AS, while no-export means only advertised to IBGP peers (which means advertised to only local AS).. so aren't they the same thing - I'm still very confused. Best Regards, Hunt Lee WebCentral John Neiberger wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... From reading an FAQ on CCO: Community Description Local-AS: Use in confederation scenarios to prevent sending packets outside the local autonomous system (AS). no-export: Do not advertise to external BGP (eBGP) peers. Keep this route within an AS. no-advertise: Do not advertise this route to any peer, internal or external. none: Apply no community attribute when you want to clear the communities associated with a route. internet: Advertise this route to the internet community, and any router that belongs to it. HTH, John Get your own 800 number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Cebuano ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Aren't these two acvhieving the same purpose? Please tell me what i'm missing. Thanks. Elmer In the following example, routes that pass the autonomous system path access list 1 have the community set to 109. Routes that pass the autonomous system path access list 2 have the community set to no-export (these routes will not be advertised to any external BGP [eBGP] peers). route-map set_community 10 permit match as-path 1 set community 109 route-map set_community 20 permit match as-path 2 set community no-export In the following similar example, routes that pass the autonomous system path access list 1 have the community set to 109. Routes that pass the autonomous system path access list 2 have the community set to local-as (the router will not advertise this route to an eBGP peer outside the local autonomous system. route-map set_community 10 permit match as-path 1 set community 109 route-map set_community 20 permit match as-path 2 set community local-as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35355t=35355 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: rtp and frame relay [7:35301]
You can use RSVP on FR. I think RSVP code was in 12.1 first time but you might wannat try. You can also use priority ququeing with CBWQ and allocating a b/w of 300K for voice class. Nadeem == [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I want to configure for a FR PVC rtp which should have a guaranted bandwidth of 300 k. And 20 k per session. Can any on help with a solution on IOS 12.09 or 12.1 ? Thanks Udo Konstantin -- Ishrat Nadeem Zahid CCNP Cisco Systems,Inc. Chelmsford, MA 01824 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35356t=35301 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subnet mask question [7:35357]
We know that 127.0.0.1 is for loopback. If we need to assing a subnet mask for it, what the number should be. for Class A, the noraml subnet mask is 255.0.0.0 for Class B, the normail subnet mask is 255.255.0.0. 127 is not belong to Class A and B. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35357t=35357 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Route-map question [7:34431]
Tom, Can you please elaborate how the outbound filter with the community tag of no-export would help... as I'm still not too clear what it will achieve. And sorry for the stupid question... Thanks again. Best Regards, Hunt Lee Tom Martin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I read the question as if Router B should only be used for packets _originating_ from AS 202, which should use the T1 connection. In this case an outbound filter would be appropriate, along with a community tag of no-export. On Mon, 04 Feb 2002 23:43:41 -0500, Hunt Lee wrote: I have a Route-Map question that I'm very confused about: The scenario is from Caslow (p840), it is as follows: Company A has a full T3 connection to the Internet thru the ISP AAA-101.NET. Company B has a T1 connection to the Internet thru the ISP BBB-202.Net. Company A acquires Company B, but Company A wants to keep both Internet connections, with the exception of packets originating from the AS of BBB-202.Net (BBB-202.Net's AS is 202). All traffic originating from AS 202 will use the T1 Internet connection. Caslow states in order to do this, the following configs should be used on RouterB router bgp 1000 neighbor 10.1.1.1 remote-as 1000 neighbor 172.16.1.100 remote-as 202 neighbor 172.16.1.100 route-map AS-200-IN in no ip classless ip as-path access-list 1 permit _300$ route-map AS-200-IN permit 10 match as-path 1 set local-preference 200 route-map AS-200-IN permit 20 What I don't understand is: With the set local-preference 200 statement, it directs the traffic (routes coming from AS 202 / neighbor 172.16.1.100) to go out via Router B. However, what makes the router not passing any other routes (not from AS 200)? Wouldn't they still be able to go out thru Router B as well? In consideration that the local preference has not been changed on the router. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Hunt Lee System Engineer WebCentral misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35358t=34431 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184]
Did you try format disk0: command? Nadeem Scott Nawalaniec wrote: Hi Rik, Anybody, Regarding formatting the flash from rommon mode. I have looked on Cisco's website for a couple of hours trying to find the commands to format flash from rommon and haven't found any useful information. I have looked through all the commands in rommon and haven't found the commands either. I know if you tftp a IOS from rommon you can erase the flash. Could someone help me on this one. Scott -Original Message- From: Rik Guyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184] Did you format the new flash? I've had issues with corruption adding flash while existing flash is still installed. Try to boot to rommon mode and format the flash. You should be able to do this with both sticks installed without too much problem. Then install IOS, build the config, etc. Rik -Original Message- From: Wilson, Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184] Begging for help once again . . . I have upgraded the flash in a 3640 from the 8 Mb chip to a 16 Mb chip. I did this by installing the second, 16 Mb chip into slot 1 of the motherboard, leaving the original 8 Mb in slot 1, for a total of 24 Mb of flash memory. I then installed 12.1, which was the reason I needed to upgrade the flash. 12.1 went on without a hitch, but when the router was reloaded, it would run for about 30 minutes and then go into rommon mode. It did this repeatedly, so I removed the 8 Mb chip, installed the 16 Mb chip into slot 0, and then used xmodem to transfer 12.1 through the console, a painstaking two hour task. Now the file is on flash, but at reload the file is unable to decompress, returning these errors: Error: Uncompression of the image failed. invalid compressed data-format violated Error: zip decompress failed ***System received a software forced crash *** signal = 0x17, code = 0x7, context = 0x0 PC = 0x80008094, cause = 0x20, Status Reg = 0x3041f003 The crc checks are the same as displayed on the software centers web page. I have downloaded a new copy of the file and it still did not work. I put the original 8 Mb chip in slot 0 and removed the 16 Mb chip, reloaded a fresh 11.3 image, and received the same errors. What have I done?? -- Ishrat Nadeem Zahid CCNP Cisco Systems,Inc. Chelmsford, MA 01824 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35359t=35184 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
