Re: OSPF Route Summary [7:49085]
You'd probably be well-served to distinguish between a mask you wish to use at each site vs. a mask used for the purposes of summarization. The interface or subinterface used as a gateway for these networks should probably incorporate your suggested mask within their respective configurations, since you do wish to maintain 2 or more layer 3 boundaries at each site. Routing protocol summarization statements should probably reflect the mask your supervisor specified, unless other, as-yet unmentioned considerations would prevent that. - Original Message - From: John Brandis To: Sent: 17 July 2002 10:56 pm Subject: OSPF Route Summary [7:49085] G'Day All, A client has sent me a list of IP's that are to be used in a new global network. Our Global network will IP is 10.64.x.x . Now, for for each office, we will have two networks, for example, Paris is 10.64.4.0 through to 10.64.6.0 . The only exception is Sydney, where the client will have 4 networks, 10.64.0.0-10.64.4.0 . Now I wish to use at each site, subnet mask 255.255.255.0 (24bit), however to summarise my routes in OSPF, my superior has handed me this Sydney 10.64.0.0./22 Paris 10.64.0.4./23 LA 10.64.0.6./23 NYC 10.64.0.8./23 This looks wrong to me. What am I missing. John Brandis ** visit http://www.solution6.com visit http://www.eccountancy.com - everything for accountants. UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49102t=49085 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Broadcasting and the all ones subnet [7:48996]
as always, the answers may be found in the RFC's - specifically in RFC 1812. See in particular pages 93 and 94. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1812.txt?number=1812 comments below: Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Wesley wrote: Heya Priscilla, Thanks for the explaination. Is it safe to assume that Cisco routers do not perform an all subnets broadcast? to quote the RFC: In a CIDR routing domain, wherein classical IP network numbers are meaningless, the concept of an all-subnets-directed-broadcast is also meaningless. To the knowledge of the working group, the facility was never implemented or deployed, and is now relegated to the dustbin of history. in other words - some pretty smart folks have already been there, done that, and concluded it weren't worth the effort I've never seen them do it, but I can't say for sure that they never do. to quote the RFC: The first version of this memo described an algorithm for distributing a directed broadcast to all the subnets of a classical network number. This algorithm was stated to be broken, and certain failure cases were specified. the reference seems to be to RFC 1009, which does indeed discuss directed broadcasts and certain exceptions. I found something off Google that I would like to share with you guys. This is an excerpt from TCP/IP Tutorial by IBM. no doubt written by folks who studied the RFC's Good stuff. Thanks. All-Subnets-Directed Broadcast Address If the network number is a valid network number, the network is subnetted and the local part is all ones (for example, 128.2.255.255), then the address refers to all hosts on all subnets in the specified network. In principle routers may propagate broadcasts for all subnets but are not required to do so. In practice, they do not; there are few circumstances where such a broadcast would be desirable, and it can lead to problems, particularly if a host has been incorrectly configured with no subnet mask. Consider the wasted resource involved if a host 9.180.214.114 in the subnetted Class A network 9 thought that it was not subnetted and used 9.255.255.255 as a local broadcast address instead of 9.180.214.255 and all of the routers in the network respected the request to forward the request to all clients. If routers do respect all-subnets-directed broadcast address, they use an algorithm called reverse path forwarding to prevent the broadcast messages from multiplying out of control. See RFC 922 for more details on this algorithm. again, if I read my RFC history correctly, this avenue proved more difficult than at first believed, and was eventually abandoned. I guess an important point here is whether routers respect the all-subnets directed broadcast. no longer important. it isn't done. A question on the /32 entries in the routing table. I can understand that each async line can only have one host at the remote end and therefore would have a host route in the routing table. So how do the hosts on async lines receive broadcasts? Why would the hosts need to receive broadcasts? A broadcast means go to everyone. Well, everyone is just one device in this case! ;-) There's no need for anyone other than possibly the router to find the MAC address of these devices, so there's no need for ARP broadcasts (which may not have any meaning for async anyway). I suspect that the point here is that in an asynch world there might still be applications that do broadcast, and that all hosts in the same subnet e.g. 192.168.1.x receive that broadcast, even if every host is asynch, and every host was in theory a /32 let's say, for example, I'm a brokerage firm, and a lot of my brokers work from home. they dial in, and they run their quote application. the quote server sends nothing but broadcasts. You wouldn't want a host on an async link to be announcing things like the existance of its local printer, so there's little need for service announcement-type broadcasts. If you did need service announcements to get forwarded, you could use a helper address. DHCP broadcasts probably aren't necessary. (A lot of async lines use PPP. The IP PPP NCP does IP address assignment). If you did need DHCP, then you could use a helper address. What would be their broadcast address? I guess it would be the same as the actual address if there were a need for it, but there may not be any need for it. It would only make sense that the broadcast packet was not delivered to the hosts connected to Router 5. That is why the packets kept bouncing back and forth. Otherwise it would have been delivered to the hosts and this problem would not have surfaced. Why is it that the all ones subnet was initially excluded as a valid subnet? Paranoia?? ;-) Prisoner: Who are you? Voice: I am the new Number 2
RE: I need a help from you guys. (NAT, IPSEC and Extended [7:49104]
Leonardo What version of Exchange are you using, and what connectors are you using between your server and the other countries? When you say synchronization, are you receiving mail from the servers in the other countries? Lastly have you verified that your tunnel is up, are you using any other application that's connecting to servers in these other countries? A coupla questions to get started with. Mike -Original Message- From: Leonardo Borda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 July 2002 01:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: I need a help from you guys. (NAT, IPSEC and Extended [7:49069] Hello ALL I am having a very interesting problem here. Please any help will be very appreciate because I have tried to find out documents and so on and I did not find nothing yet... SCENARIO: I have a cisco 2600 router doing NAT and VPN. - My ethernet has 192.168.25.0/255.255.255.0 as primary and ip address 200.2x.y.z / 255.255.255.192 as secondary (doing nat inside - allow my users access the internet) - My S0/0 is doing nat outside and establishing tunnel between my other countries. ip address - 200.18x.y.z / 255.255.255.252 This serial has an access-list 120 out which is denying some ports and blocking user access from some p2p applications and etc. PROBLEM: I have an Exchange Server wich does synchronization between other servers around the world through the VPN. It has an external ip configured and an internal ip configured in the same interface. (its working until now). It has sync through the VPN not over the Internet. My job is apply an access-list in S0/0 to permit just smtp, pop3, www and 443 traffic from the internet to that exchange server, but still synchronize through the VPN my exchange server connections around the world. Now is the problem: I have configured an (access-list 121 in) in s0/0 and I cannot sync my Exchange Organization anymore and my users does not receive messages coming from my internal Exchange Server organization. But users from the internet can send messages to my exchange server ( in fact the access-list 121 in is correct to traffic from internet, but not from the VPN). Does anybody know how to solve that weird problem Which ports do I have to open to allow VPN and Internet access using together an access-list? My best regards to everybody! Leonardo Borda Systems Engineer Brazil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49104t=49104 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WAN utilisation [7:49105]
Hi Does cisco recommends that if the WAN utilisation is above 70 % ,it will cause performance degradation ? I think i have read it somewhere in one of the ciscopress book. Can someone out there verify this for me ? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49105t=49105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WAN utilisation [7:49105]
Yes, the recommended WAN utilization should not exceed 70% (on average, I think). Are you doing CCDA soon - because this is more of CCDA stuff? Well, I am doing it in about 2 weeks time, and if you have any experience or ideas, please, let me know. It seems to be a feared exam! Anyway, WAN utilization is less than 70%, as is Token Ring/FDDI! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49106t=49105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF/RIP w/ Summary address. [7:49107]
Serial connection between r2 and r1 is hdlc on the 141.108.1.0/24 network with RIP running on it for both r2 and r1. R1--R3 and R1-- R4 are running OSPF in area 0. Generating the 141.108.3.0/24 from lo0 on r4 and 141.108.4.0/24 from r3. r2 ---141.108.1.0/24 ---r1 -- 141.108.255.0/30-r3 \___ 141.108.255.4/30 r4 What i'm trying to do is get the 141.108.3.0/24 and 141.108.4.0/24 to show up on r2 as rip routes heard from r1. I'm redistributing ospf 1 into rip with a metric of 5. Since r1 is considered a border router because it's connected to another protcol I figured I could use the summary-address 141.108.3.0 255.255.255.0 command to generate a summary address to r2. This did not work until a put a static route to null0 for that particular network and then it showed up. r2#r 141.108.0.0/24 is subnetted, 3 subnets C 141.108.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0 R 141.108.3.0 [120/1] via 141.108.1.4, 00:00:22, Serial0 R 141.108.4.0 [120/1] via 141.108.1.4, 00:00:22, Serial0 150.150.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 150.150.150.0 is directly connected, Loopback0 My understanding of the summary-address command is to normally take external routes and summarize them into OSPF but maybe I'm using it backwards in this case to solve the my issue. I would have also though that there would be the same /24 route installed in the rest of the OSPF routers but it is not there (atleast not as a /24) or in the ospf database. r4#r Gateway of last resort is not set 141.108.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 5 subnets, 3 masks C 141.108.255.4/30 is directly connected, Serial0 O 141.108.255.0/30 [110/128] via 141.108.255.5, 00:09:10, Serial0 C 141.108.3.0/29 is directly connected, Loopback0 O 141.108.5.0/28 [110/129] via 141.108.255.5, 00:09:10, Serial0 O 141.108.4.0/28 [110/129] via 141.108.255.5, 00:09:10, Serial0 r4# I would have thought it would show up on R4 and R3 but only the /28's are. Below is the config of the router with the redistribution and the summary-addresses. Is there another way to do this with multiple ospf processes too or any other tricks you folks may know? r1#sr Building configuration... Current configuration : 2950 bytes ! version 12.2 no service single-slot-reload-enable service timestamps debug datetime localtime service timestamps log datetime localtime no service password-encryption ! hostname r1 ! logging rate-limit console 10 except errors enable secret 5 $1$eE3Z$08gdpU0xizpkuKkrvzmr0. ! clock timezone est -5 clock summer-time est recurring ip subnet-zero no ip finger ip tcp synwait-time 5 no ip domain-lookup ! no ip dhcp-client network-discovery frame-relay switching ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 141.108.2.1 255.255.255.128 ip ospf network point-to-point ! interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no fair-queue no frame-relay inverse-arp ! interface Serial0.1 point-to-point ip address 141.108.255.1 255.255.255.252 ip ospf network non-broadcast frame-relay interface-dlci 103 ! interface Serial0.2 point-to-point ip address 141.108.255.5 255.255.255.252 ip ospf network non-broadcast frame-relay interface-dlci 104 ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial2 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 103 interface Serial4 301 frame-relay route 104 interface Serial5 401 ! interface Serial3 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial4 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 301 interface Serial2 103 ! interface Serial5 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 401 interface Serial2 104 ! interface Serial6 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial7 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial8 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial9 ip address 141.108.1.4 255.255.255.0 clockrate 64000 ! interface TokenRing0 no ip address shutdown ! interface BRI0 no ip address shutdown cdapi buffers regular 0 cdapi buffers raw 0 cdapi buffers large 0 ! router ospf 1 router-id 141.108.255.5 log-adjacency-changes summary-address 141.108.3.0 255.255.255.0 summary-address 141.108.4.0 255.255.255.0 passive-interface Loopback0 network 141.108.255.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 141.108.255.5 0.0.0.0 area 0 neighbor 141.108.255.6 priority 1 neighbor 141.108.255.2 priority 1 ! router rip redistribute ospf 1 metric 2 network 141.108.0.0 ! ip kerberos source-interface any ip classless ip route 141.108.3.0 255.255.255.0 Null0 ip route 141.108.4.0 255.255.255.0 Null0 ip http server ! alias exec ib sh ip int brief alias exec c config terminal alias exec sr sh run alias exec r sh ip route alias exec bs sh ip bgp summary alias exec b sh ip bgp alias exec cb clear ip bgp * alias exec on sh ip ospf neigh ! l end r1# Message Posted at:
Re: Voice jargon [7:49068]
Integrating Voice and Data Networks, by Scott Keagy and CVOICE were the two best. Then you need to learn LLQ and diffserv, as that's the latest QoS stuff in Cisco land. I look at cco for that stuff. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Dan Penn wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Out of curiosity, what ones did you like? Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steven A. Ridder Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 6:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Voice jargon [7:49068] Yes, it's the same thing. Everything I learned was from Cisco press, there's a couple of great books out there. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49108t=49068 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: management platforms [7:49042]
That's a good justification. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Roberts, Larry wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... If the Wan Guys were the only one who could access the NMS, then I would agree, but giving others access to our Routers scares me. We started adding some of our Lan Guys to the Whats Up message group, and we ending up getting flooded with questions with every message that went out. I shiver at the thought of the calls we would get when someone looked at the map and thought they noticed a problem. Now to be fair, most of the guys are pretty good about not panicing, but the few that doman do they panic. I also hate the thought of adding another server to the mix. We have a really smooth system where, CW2K monitors changes, what's up tells us what's down ( I think they got the name wrong on their product :) and solarwinds gives us utilization stats. I have tried to figure out what adding OpenView would give us that we don't already have, but I cant think of any right off the top of my head. Im just having a hard time justifing the extra product that I cant see that we need. Thanks to all for the input! Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: management platforms [7:49042] You would be going against conventional wisdom, Cisco's Kool-ade and every other help-desk manager. I think one platform SHOULD manage all the stuf. Roberts, Larry wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Guys, I'm trying to justify why I don't want a single management platform for all our servers, as well as our routers and switches. We are 2 distinct group with no cross-functionality between the Wan group and the Server group. Our Server guys are trying to purchase OpenView to manage it all, but we already have a fully functional CW2K installation And don't see the advantages of using OpenView. I'm looking for all of your experiences and recommendations for and against a single platform. We use CW2K,Solarwinds and What's Up currently to manage and report on up/down and utilization.. Thanks Larry Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49109t=49042 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Modem on Aux [7:49077]
Usually there are the jumpers on back of the modem you need to flip. Plus there may be some configs you need to enter into the router. If you search for US Robotics on CCO, you shuold find the paper that tells you how to connect the modem to the con port, which IS the way to go because you can reboot it and still have control of the router, for rommon and such. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. supernet wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I've got a US Robatics modem on 2621 Aux port. When I dialed up to the router, I got connected to the modem but not router. I know the configuration is good. Do I have to do anything on the modem? I can reverse telnet to the modem. I heard that if I connect to 2621 Console port, I won't get disconnected if I reboot the router. Do I have to do anything special on the modem? Thanks. Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49110t=49077 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Line protocol up/down on serial interface [7:49111]
Hi Group, I am setting up WAN link on serial interface using HDLC encap across VSAT link. I uplink my TX carrier and have CD, ie lock on remote carrier, in short good TX and RX across Satellite link. I set up static route to next hop but no route appeared in my routing table. I noticed line protocol on my serial interface going up and down, carrier transitions, and interface resets. So I did interface loopback on modem and the line protocol came up (looped). I removed the loopback, changed cables and line protocol came and stayed up. I concluded there's a problem with VSAT link and had the remote end on hand to do end-to-end test across the link, and the test sets synched. Now when I plug the good V.35 serial cable back into my modem, I observe the line protocol stays down, even when am sure cable's properly plugged in. I am kinda stuck and will appreciate any insight on resolving this. Tunji _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49111t=49111 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WAN utilisation [7:49105]
Is the limitation in the router hardware or the WAN circuit itself? Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. Cell 717-805-5536 Office 717-737-8586 FAX 717-737-0290 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Abu Mwalie Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 3:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: WAN utilisation [7:49105] Yes, the recommended WAN utilization should not exceed 70% (on average, I think). Are you doing CCDA soon - because this is more of CCDA stuff? Well, I am doing it in about 2 weeks time, and if you have any experience or ideas, please, let me know. It seems to be a feared exam! Anyway, WAN utilization is less than 70%, as is Token Ring/FDDI! Confidential e-mail for addressee only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy the original communication. 1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49112t=49105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 T1's to our provider [7:49039]
Why not use BGP? If both lines are to the same provider, it should be a no-brainer (relatively speaking of course). Are you using these T1's for failover/backups or for expanding bandwidth? BGP should help in either case. The 2600 should be sufficient and I don't think you'd need to have the the full BGP tables on your router if you're going to the same provider. Also, you could get away with a private ASN so there wouldn't be any cost to you. Now I've never done this, I've only done the BGP with T1's to different providers, which is considerably more difficult, IMHO. Hi Kevin, We were in the same scenario in which you have described. The way I choose to do is keep it simple and efficient and cost effective. We have dual PTP connections on a Cisco 2650 with CEF, default routes, and per packet load sharing. I can max out the t1's and it barely taxes the router resources and on top of this I have about a 20 line access control list filtering traffic. =) This router is a workhorse and I'm in love it. The 2650 uses a faster memory and cpu than the 2621 but I think the 2621 would work. Hope this helps you in some way, Scott -Original Message- From: W. Kevin Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2 T1's to our provider [7:49039] We are upgrading to 2 T1's to our provider, Fractional DS3 is prohibitively expensive in our rural area. Has anyone done any speed comparisons on using round robin style static routes (i.e. 2 default routes w/ same cost) versus EIGRP's load balanceing versus running MLPPP on the Serial interfaces? We're currently using a 2621 but are open to bigger routers. Kevin Hunt CCNP, MCSE, MCT, Linux+ SME Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49114t=49039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WAN utilisation [7:49105]
I don't think it's a limitation so much as a guideline. And this guideline applies to the circuit, not the router hardware. There are other criteria used to judge if the router needs to be beefed up, like looking at CPU load, memory, etc. Mike W. Jeffrey Reed wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Is the limitation in the router hardware or the WAN circuit itself? Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. Cell 717-805-5536 Office 717-737-8586 FAX 717-737-0290 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49116t=49105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VLans and Multicast/IP forward protocol [7:49115]
I just want to make sure I'm correct: A VLAN will contain multicast traffic unless ip multicast routing is on the router (or other l3 device) right? So a whole switch (or stack of switches) will not be flooded with one VLAN's multicast traffic, right? Also, why is ip forward-protocol or Ip helper-address on vlan interfaces on a l2 switch such as a cat 3500? Shouldn't that be on the subinterface of the l3 device? -- RFC 1149 Compliant Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49115t=49115 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPSec on IP unnumbered with 3DES [7:49113]
This will work, we have many routers configured with the serial link (going to ISP) as ip unnumbered ethernet 0/0. The only additional command you will need is crypto map rtp local-address FastEthernet0/0 Doug -Original Message- From: Firesox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 7:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IPSec on IP unnumbered with 3DES [7:49113] Folks I have 2621 trying to bring up IPSec tunnel using 3DES. My ethernet interface is assigned a public IP and serial is using IP unnumbered to the ISP. Default route is set to ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 s0/0. I do have a firewall doing the NAT. so the network is like this. LAN - BRICK(firewall) - Router - ISP I haven't been successfull on getting the IPsec trunnel to my business partner who is using VPNet from Avaya. Their config seems to be fine. I am getting conflicting information on IP unnumbered interface. One source tells me IPSec cannnot be terminated on an interface with ip unnumbered assigned. Some tell me I can. Anyone know the answere to this? Anyone have an example config on 3DES and IP unnumbered? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49117t=49113 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: private addressing [7:49083]
Can anyone tell me. 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.0.0 is used for class B private addressing.. That means that it can use 16 class B network address Now, let say I wan to use 172.35.0.0 block, so is this consider a private address or a public address ? Public. The private blocks are 10/8 172.16/12 192.168/16 Again, the sooner you stop thinking in classful terms, the easier real-world addressing becomes. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49118t=49083 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VLans and Multicast/IP forward protocol [7:49115]
Comments inline. Steven A. Ridder wrote: I just want to make sure I'm correct: A VLAN will contain multicast traffic unless ip multicast routing is on the router (or other l3 device) right? So a whole switch (or stack of switches) will not be flooded with one VLAN's multicast traffic, right? I think it depends on the type of multicast, right? I don't recall specifically enabling multicast, but EIGRP still works. But I'm not sure about other multicast traffic. Most of the time, can't you set the TTL = 1 on your multicast source so that it won't cross L3 boundaries? Also, why is ip forward-protocol or Ip helper-address on vlan interfaces on a l2 switch such as a cat 3500? Shouldn't that be on the subinterface of the l3 device? Which model 3500? AFAIK, the 3550s have full L3 capabilites, so evey port could be an L3 device (this is just my understanding but I could be mistaken). The older 3524 and 3548, since they are just L2, I guess you could put IP Helper on the VLAN interface, but I can't think of why. That VLAN interface is only used for the switch (as an IP device) to communicate with the rest of the network, not that the VLAN interface is actually doing anything at L3 with any of the traffic coming in on the switchports. That's about the best I can figure =) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49119t=49115 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Control Break Sequence [7:4988]
You are right. This probelm happens with windows NT 4. and the way you discribe is correct. It is also on Cisco,s web site. Reza YASSER ALY wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Once upon a time I have been told that doing the following will let you to the ROMMON even if you don't know the proper break key combinations 1- Open your software that you use to access the router through the console. 2- Adjust the Baud Rate to be 2400 bps 3- Power on your router. 4- Keep pressing on the space bar for like a min. 5- Re-adjust the Baud Rate to the normal speed. 6- Reconnecting to the router you will find it in the ROMMON. The concept behind this procedure is playing with the 1's and 0's signal level that a router should expect to go to ROMMON. Sounds wierd but I tried it and it works. HTH I am trying to break into a 4000 router and cant seem to get into ROMMON mode with all fo the standards break key combinations. I have a dell lap top and have tried control-break sequence . Does any one have any suggestions that I may have not misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49120t=4988 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF/RIP w/ Summary address. [7:49122]
Under your 2 loopback put Ip ospf network point-to-point That will cause ospf to see them as /24 not /32's as they are now. Since rip is using the same mask as the loopbacks, your redistribution should work without a summary. Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Timothy Ouellette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OSPF/RIP w/ Summary address. Serial connection between r2 and r1 is hdlc on the 141.108.1.0/24 network with RIP running on it for both r2 and r1. R1--R3 and R1-- R4 are running OSPF in area 0. Generating the 141.108.3.0/24 from lo0 on r4 and 141.108.4.0/24 from r3. r2 ---141.108.1.0/24 ---r1 -- 141.108.255.0/30-r3 \___ 141.108.255.4/30 r4 What i'm trying to do is get the 141.108.3.0/24 and 141.108.4.0/24 to show up on r2 as rip routes heard from r1. I'm redistributing ospf 1 into rip with a metric of 5. Since r1 is considered a border router because it's connected to another protcol I figured I could use the summary-address 141.108.3.0 255.255.255.0 command to generate a summary address to r2. This did not work until a put a static route to null0 for that particular network and then it showed up. r2#r 141.108.0.0/24 is subnetted, 3 subnets C 141.108.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0 R 141.108.3.0 [120/1] via 141.108.1.4, 00:00:22, Serial0 R 141.108.4.0 [120/1] via 141.108.1.4, 00:00:22, Serial0 150.150.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 150.150.150.0 is directly connected, Loopback0 My understanding of the summary-address command is to normally take external routes and summarize them into OSPF but maybe I'm using it backwards in this case to solve the my issue. I would have also though that there would be the same /24 route installed in the rest of the OSPF routers but it is not there (atleast not as a /24) or in the ospf database. r4#r Gateway of last resort is not set 141.108.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 5 subnets, 3 masks C 141.108.255.4/30 is directly connected, Serial0 O 141.108.255.0/30 [110/128] via 141.108.255.5, 00:09:10, Serial0 C 141.108.3.0/29 is directly connected, Loopback0 O 141.108.5.0/28 [110/129] via 141.108.255.5, 00:09:10, Serial0 O 141.108.4.0/28 [110/129] via 141.108.255.5, 00:09:10, Serial0 r4# I would have thought it would show up on R4 and R3 but only the /28's are. Below is the config of the router with the redistribution and the summary-addresses. Is there another way to do this with multiple ospf processes too or any other tricks you folks may know? r1#sr Building configuration... Current configuration : 2950 bytes ! version 12.2 no service single-slot-reload-enable service timestamps debug datetime localtime service timestamps log datetime localtime no service password-encryption ! hostname r1 ! logging rate-limit console 10 except errors enable secret 5 $1$eE3Z$08gdpU0xizpkuKkrvzmr0. ! clock timezone est -5 clock summer-time est recurring ip subnet-zero no ip finger ip tcp synwait-time 5 no ip domain-lookup ! no ip dhcp-client network-discovery frame-relay switching ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 141.108.2.1 255.255.255.128 ip ospf network point-to-point ! interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no fair-queue no frame-relay inverse-arp ! interface Serial0.1 point-to-point ip address 141.108.255.1 255.255.255.252 ip ospf network non-broadcast frame-relay interface-dlci 103 ! interface Serial0.2 point-to-point ip address 141.108.255.5 255.255.255.252 ip ospf network non-broadcast frame-relay interface-dlci 104 ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial2 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 103 interface Serial4 301 frame-relay route 104 interface Serial5 401 ! interface Serial3 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial4 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 301 interface Serial2 103 ! interface Serial5 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 401 interface Serial2 104 ! interface Serial6 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial7 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial8 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial9 ip address 141.108.1.4 255.255.255.0 clockrate 64000 ! interface TokenRing0 no ip address shutdown ! interface BRI0 no ip address shutdown cdapi buffers regular 0 cdapi buffers raw 0 cdapi buffers large 0 ! router ospf 1 router-id 141.108.255.5 log-adjacency-changes summary-address 141.108.3.0 255.255.255.0 summary-address 141.108.4.0 255.255.255.0 passive-interface Loopback0 network 141.108.255.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 141.108.255.5 0.0.0.0 area 0 neighbor 141.108.255.6 priority 1 neighbor 141.108.255.2 priority 1 ! router rip
Lab Swap!!!!!!!!! [7:49124]
Have the 15th of August in RTP would like to swap lab . I am looking for anytime between September and December 2002. Please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Terry Stout Design Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49124t=49124 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on Cisco Interactive Mentor [7:49125]
I've tried them before. Save your 100 bucks for a 25xx. They're not nearly close enough to the IOS for you to benefit from them CCIEwise. There are no debugs and console messages. Most of the show commands are missing. -Original Message- From: Christopher Supino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Opinions on Cisco Interactive Mentor All, Has anyone tried the CIM products? I was considering purchasing the BGP CIM and wanted to get some feedback before making the investment. Chris Christopher Supino CCDP, CCNP, MCSE, Compaq ASE, CNA Senior Network Design Engineer TransNet Corp. 45 Columbia Road Somerville, New Jersey 08876 Ph 908 947 0198 Cell 908 296 0446 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49125t=49125 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab equipment question [7:49123]
Hey guys, I have a question about soem equipment I have for my home lab. I have an AS5200 and a Cat5005 that I'm thinking about selling, do I really need them to help pass the CCIE lab? I'm thinking of keeping the 5200 because of the Bri port. Any thoughts? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49123t=49123 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5 Problem [7:49090]
Are you running exchange on a Cisco IOS based platform? If not, I think you might have the wrong newsgroup (or at least post with OT in front of the subject). Now on a side note - try re-installing deleting and reinstalling IMS on your exchange box. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cisco home labs: www.optsys.net Firesox wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have Exchange 5.5 running on Windows 2000 server. All clients are using Outlook 2000. For some reason users get this message when certain message comes in to their mailbox. The Microsoft Exchange Server received an Internet message that could not be processed. To view the original message content, open the attached message. Most messages come in just fine. I am no sure why this is happening. I have an Exchange 2000 running at home and the same email comes in just fine. I appreciate any help. Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49100t=49090 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab Swap [7:49126]
Hey all, I was able to get a lab date around my preferred time (August 29) in SJ. Thanks for everyone's help and advice on this. Now, I was wondering if anyone had an August 29 or 30 date in RTP that they would be willing to swap with me. Maybe if SJ is closer and more convenient for you (as RTP is for me), we could just do an even swap? I'm only interested in dates on the 29th or 30th, however... Please let me know ASAP. Thanks! Eddie [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of Notebook.jpg] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49126t=49126 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121]
Folks, is it only me or the Boson Tests #1 and #2 for CCIE Writen are just crap comparing to #3? I am considering to buy one of these but I am not sure wich one... Is #3 really the most close it can get to the real deal? Rgds, Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49121t=49121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with vlan!! [7:49127]
I currently have just 2 vlan's in my network. The native 1 and vlan 2. I have a 7513 doing the routing with a fast Ethernet and 3500xl and 2900xl in my network. I have one vtp server and I added vlan 2 it works! . then I created another vlan 3 on the router with ip 10.0.4.1 isl encapsulation on it and add it to the vtp server. (3508xl) and name it lab , doesn't work! I have trunking all the way here is a diagram of my network (port1) 7513-3524trunking2900xl---trunking---2900xl-users on the 2900xl that the users are connected I place switchport access vlan 3 on all the ports and made it a client with the proper vtp domain.. The other 2900 xl that's connected to my 3524 is also a client with the correct vtp domain however when I do a show vlan I show vlan 3 but a different vlan name not lab my question is what im I doing wrong? Do I have to configure a vtp server for each vlan? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49127t=49127 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF/RIP w/ Summary address. [7:49107]
Timothy Ouellette wrote: What i'm trying to do is get the 141.108.3.0/24 and 141.108.4.0/24 to show up on r2 as rip routes heard from r1. I'm redistributing ospf 1 into rip with a metric of 5. Hi Tim, The short answer to your problem is that you are not actually redistributing between your protocols. The proof is your route table at R2: you said you're redistributing with a metric of 5, but look at the metric on R2, it's 1. Rip will only redistribute routes in (from the same classful network) if they have the same subnet mask. Your OSPF network has no /24 routes, therefore no redistribution. The reason you get the routes when you add a null0 routes to R1 is that your rip network 141.104.0.0 statement picks up the static null0 routes and sends them natively - no resitribution required. (kill your ospf and watch the routes stay in rip) Summary-address only works for routes being distributed *INTO* OSPF, not the other way round. The only places you can summarize a route within OSPF is between areas. Now you can do some funky virtual-link or dual-process summarization, but really that's like hammering the square peg into the round hole. Really, it comes down to whether your network has been designed for proper summarization: this network as it stands can't easily be summarized. If you still want to summarize, I would start thinking about re-architecting to multi-area OSPF, and injecting summaries between the areas. If you make R1 the border between the areas, you should find that the /24 summarized routes which will appear on R1 will flow to R2 just fine. As always, good luck! --Wes Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49128t=49107 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT:Module / Interface Visio stencils [7:49132]
Does anyone know where I might be able to find Visio stencils that include WIC and NM interface images? I have checked the stuff available on Cisco's site and cannot find anything. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49132t=49132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lab equipment question [7:49123]
Hey guys, Actually I have the same dilemma with my 5500, Should I sell it in order for me to get 3500 or should I keep it in order for me to be able to build different scenarios. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Lab equipment question [7:49123] Hey guys, I have a question about soem equipment I have for my home lab. I have an AS5200 and a Cat5005 that I'm thinking about selling, do I really need them to help pass the CCIE lab? I'm thinking of keeping the 5200 because of the Bri port. Any thoughts? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49133t=49123 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lab equipment question [7:49123]
John McCartney wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hey guys, I have a question about soem equipment I have for my home lab. I have an AS5200 and a Cat5005 that I'm thinking about selling, do I really need them to help pass the CCIE lab? I'm thinking of keeping the 5200 because of the Bri port. Any thoughts? Uh, what BRI port? The 5200 doesn't have any BRI port. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49134t=49123 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121]
I used 3 and it was a great resource to helping me pass. -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121] Folks, is it only me or the Boson Tests #1 and #2 for CCIE Writen are just crap comparing to #3? I am considering to buy one of these but I am not sure wich one... Is #3 really the most close it can get to the real deal? Rgds, Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49129t=49121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121]
One thing to watch for is whether you plan to take the current 350-001 exam or the new 350-001 exam that will be in place somewhere around 8/1/02 (at least according to Cisco). If you will be taking the new exam, most of the materials from Boson or any other company will not cover what you need to know until they are updated. In that case, wait until all these companies update their material. Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121] Folks, is it only me or the Boson Tests #1 and #2 for CCIE Writen are just crap comparing to #3? I am considering to buy one of these but I am not sure wich one... Is #3 really the most close it can get to the real deal? Rgds, Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49135t=49121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Router 4000 series [7:49131]
Hi Guys, I have just bought a 4000 router for my home lab, unfortunately it is running IOS ver 10.3. I have tried to upgrade the IOS to ver 11.3, but this router wouldn't allow this version. I have spoken to CISCO Systems and they recommended that I will need to upgrade the DRAM and FLASH memory in order to run 11.3 IOS. They gave me the old part numbers for these components: MEM-4500M-16F - (16 mb) Flash Memory MEM-4500M-32D - (32 mb) DRAM Memory However, I am only wondering if there is any alternative solution as CISCO has discontinued the 4000 series router. Cheers Akin __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49131t=49131 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with vlan!! [7:49127]
did u tried these: is it really trunking betw 3524 and 2900xl, or betw different switches? sh trunk compare vtp revision numbers if they are the same...sh vtp domain see if vtp advertisements are sent and received... sh vtp statistics HTH, -Original Message- From: GEORGE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help with vlan!! [7:49127] I currently have just 2 vlan's in my network. The native 1 and vlan 2. I have a 7513 doing the routing with a fast Ethernet and 3500xl and 2900xl in my network. I have one vtp server and I added vlan 2 it works! . then I created another vlan 3 on the router with ip 10.0.4.1 isl encapsulation on it and add it to the vtp server. (3508xl) and name it lab , doesn't work! I have trunking all the way here is a diagram of my network (port1) 7513-3524trunking2900xl---trunking---2900xl-users on the 2900xl that the users are connected I place switchport access vlan 3 on all the ports and made it a client with the proper vtp domain.. The other 2900 xl that's connected to my 3524 is also a client with the correct vtp domain however when I do a show vlan I show vlan 3 but a different vlan name not lab my question is what im I doing wrong? Do I have to configure a vtp server for each vlan? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49136t=49127 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lab equipment question [7:49123]
Uh, what BRI port? The 5200 doesn't have any BRI port I meant PRI, sorry...typo today Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49140t=49123 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VLans and Multicast/IP forward protocol [7:49115]
Steven A. Ridder wrote: I just want to make sure I'm correct: A VLAN will contain multicast traffic unless ip multicast routing is on the router (or other l3 device) right? Yes. VLANs contain multicasts just like they contain broadcasts. Or maybe constrain is a better verb. Actually, bound may be the best verb. So a whole switch (or stack of switches) will not be flooded with one VLAN's multicast traffic, right? Right. Also, why is ip forward-protocol or Ip helper-address on vlan interfaces on a l2 switch such as a cat 3500? Shouldn't that be on the subinterface of the l3 device? I agree that ip forward-protocol and ip helper-address only have meaning on a L3 switch. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com -- RFC 1149 Compliant Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49142t=49115 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FW: Help with vlan!! [7:49127]
GEORGE wrote: I got it to work!!! The only thing I had to change was on the transparent mode add the vlan and the name and it work, those this have to happen every time you add a new vlan to the switch network? Why are you using transparent mode? Why not just client mode? That's great that you got it to work, though. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arlante, Neil Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Help with vlan!! [7:49127] did u tried these: is it really trunking betw 3524 and 2900xl, or betw different switches? sh trunk compare vtp revision numbers if they are the same...sh vtp domain see if vtp advertisements are sent and received... sh vtp statistics HTH, -Original Message- From: GEORGE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help with vlan!! [7:49127] I currently have just 2 vlan's in my network. The native 1 and vlan 2. I have a 7513 doing the routing with a fast Ethernet and 3500xl and 2900xl in my network. I have one vtp server and I added vlan 2 it works! . then I created another vlan 3 on the router with ip 10.0.4.1 isl encapsulation on it and add it to the vtp server. (3508xl) and name it lab , doesn't work! I have trunking all the way here is a diagram of my network (port1) 7513-3524trunking2900xl---trunking---2900xl-users on the 2900xl that the users are connected I place switchport access vlan 3 on all the ports and made it a client with the proper vtp domain.. The other 2900 xl that's connected to my 3524 is also a client with the correct vtp domain however when I do a show vlan I show vlan 3 but a different vlan name not lab my question is what im I doing wrong? Do I have to configure a vtp server for each vlan? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49143t=49127 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Help with vlan!! [7:49127]
I got it to work!!! The only thing I had to change was on the transparent mode add the vlan and the name and it work, those this have to happen every time you add a new vlan to the switch network? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arlante, Neil Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Help with vlan!! [7:49127] did u tried these: is it really trunking betw 3524 and 2900xl, or betw different switches? sh trunk compare vtp revision numbers if they are the same...sh vtp domain see if vtp advertisements are sent and received... sh vtp statistics HTH, -Original Message- From: GEORGE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help with vlan!! [7:49127] I currently have just 2 vlan's in my network. The native 1 and vlan 2. I have a 7513 doing the routing with a fast Ethernet and 3500xl and 2900xl in my network. I have one vtp server and I added vlan 2 it works! . then I created another vlan 3 on the router with ip 10.0.4.1 isl encapsulation on it and add it to the vtp server. (3508xl) and name it lab , doesn't work! I have trunking all the way here is a diagram of my network (port1) 7513-3524trunking2900xl---trunking---2900xl-users on the 2900xl that the users are connected I place switchport access vlan 3 on all the ports and made it a client with the proper vtp domain.. The other 2900 xl that's connected to my 3524 is also a client with the correct vtp domain however when I do a show vlan I show vlan 3 but a different vlan name not lab my question is what im I doing wrong? Do I have to configure a vtp server for each vlan? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49141t=49127 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WAN utilisation [7:49105]
Michael L. Williams wrote: I don't think it's a limitation so much as a guideline. Yes. The 70% average utilization threshold for WANs is just a guideline. I'm the one who introduced it to Cisco documentation when I put it in the Designing Cisco Networks course! ;-) And I got it from the guideline we used when I did network consulting for Network General (now Network Associates). The reason we chose 70% was just to make sure that most traffic could still get through even if there were bursts. It's 70% in a 10-minute window, by the way. Utilization stats only make sense, by the way, if you include a timeframe. Take baseball for example. We can all think of someone who has a really high batting average for this season or maybe just for this week, but their average for the last few years or their lifetime average sucks. (Maybe steroids have something to do with that. ;-) And this guideline applies to the circuit, not the router hardware. There are other criteria used to judge if the router needs to be beefed up, like looking at CPU load, memory, etc. Indeed. Good points. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Mike W. Jeffrey Reed wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Is the limitation in the router hardware or the WAN circuit itself? Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. Cell 717-805-5536 Office 717-737-8586 FAX 717-737-0290 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49146t=49105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLans and Multicast/IP forward protocol [7:49115]
Comments inline: Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Steven A. Ridder wrote: I just want to make sure I'm correct: A VLAN will contain multicast traffic unless ip multicast routing is on the router (or other l3 device) right? Yes. VLANs contain multicasts just like they contain broadcasts. Or maybe constrain is a better verb. Actually, bound may be the best verb. Is there any way a switch can bleed multicast traffic from one port to another, even though they are both tagged with different VLANS? I have a customer that when the do multicast traffic in one VLAN, all the lights light up on all the ports, like it would in a STP loop or something. I'm just trying to figure out how that could happen, when I know multicast is turned off. It's driving me nuts. So a whole switch (or stack of switches) will not be flooded with one VLAN's multicast traffic, right? Right. Also, why is ip forward-protocol or Ip helper-address on vlan interfaces on a l2 switch such as a cat 3500? Shouldn't that be on the subinterface of the l3 device? I agree that ip forward-protocol and ip helper-address only have meaning on a L3 switch. But for a 3524, the command is there, and it's a L2 switch, so can I assume the IOS developers just didn't remove it? Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com -- RFC 1149 Compliant Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49148t=49115 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: Help with vlan!! [7:49127]
MADMAN wrote: You have to be either transparent or server mode to add a VLAN. Were you in client mode originally? You statement is 100% correct. However, I think it is important to make it clear that if a switch is in transparent mode, the VLAN you create (or modify/delete) on it will only take effect locally and nowhere else in the VTP domain. Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49151t=49127 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT:Module / Interface Visio stencils [7:49132]
I'll take a copy if someone locates it =) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49153t=49132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: Help with vlan!! [7:49127]
You have to be either transparent or server mode to add a VLAN. Were you in client mode originally? Dave GEORGE wrote: I got it to work!!! The only thing I had to change was on the transparent mode add the vlan and the name and it work, those this have to happen every time you add a new vlan to the switch network? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arlante, Neil Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Help with vlan!! [7:49127] did u tried these: is it really trunking betw 3524 and 2900xl, or betw different switches? sh trunk compare vtp revision numbers if they are the same...sh vtp domain see if vtp advertisements are sent and received... sh vtp statistics HTH, -Original Message- From: GEORGE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help with vlan!! [7:49127] I currently have just 2 vlan's in my network. The native 1 and vlan 2. I have a 7513 doing the routing with a fast Ethernet and 3500xl and 2900xl in my network. I have one vtp server and I added vlan 2 it works! . then I created another vlan 3 on the router with ip 10.0.4.1 isl encapsulation on it and add it to the vtp server. (3508xl) and name it lab , doesn't work! I have trunking all the way here is a diagram of my network (port1) 7513-3524trunking2900xl---trunking---2900xl-users on the 2900xl that the users are connected I place switchport access vlan 3 on all the ports and made it a client with the proper vtp domain.. The other 2900 xl that's connected to my 3524 is also a client with the correct vtp domain however when I do a show vlan I show vlan 3 but a different vlan name not lab my question is what im I doing wrong? Do I have to configure a vtp server for each vlan? -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49150t=49127 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cisco command [7:49152]
Is their a cisco command that will show you the serial number of the router Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49152t=49152 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACL studying [7:49154]
Folks, what would be the smallest way to put an ACL to filter, let's say, IPs 10.10.10.35 to 10.10.10.49? (just want to check if I am doing it ok...) Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49154t=49154 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dhcp and subinterfaces [7:49070]
Yep - IP helper address on the sub interface works fine in this situation. It's secondary addresses which cause problems (in fact don't work as far as I know). Gaz GEORGE wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... If I have subinterfaces configured for my vlans' and I wanted a dhcp server for one vlan can I create the dhcp server and assign it to that subinterfaces pertaining the vlan in question. I don't have a server on that vlan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49155t=49070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cisco command [7:49152]
show ver for the board ID and show diag for the mod. serial numbers, khalid ameen - Original Message - From: GEORGE To: Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:09 PM Subject: cisco command [7:49152] Is their a cisco command that will show you the serial number of the router Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49157t=49152 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cisco command [7:49152]
My GSR 12008's use show diags and 7505's use show diagbus. Hope that helps. MG GEORGE wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Is their a cisco command that will show you the serial number of the router Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49158t=49152 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lab Swap!!!!!!!!! [7:49124]
I hate to tell you but you're too late. According to Cisco, you can only swap within 28 days of the lab with someone in the same company as you are. -- Johnny Routin Stout, Terry wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Have the 15th of August in RTP would like to swap lab . I am looking for anytime between September and December 2002. Please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Terry Stout Design Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49160t=49124 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need Help with Token Ring [7:49159]
Could someone share any online resources to help with Token Ring. That part of the CCIE Written test kicked my ass yesterday. :-( Thanks, MG Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49159t=49159 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: FW: Help with vlan!! [7:49127]
The switches were set to client and only one was set to server,however when I added the vlan name to the server it did not propogate to the other switches I wonder why? How many vtp severs can I have in one domain -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of MADMAN Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 1:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: Help with vlan!! [7:49127] You have to be either transparent or server mode to add a VLAN. Were you in client mode originally? Dave GEORGE wrote: I got it to work!!! The only thing I had to change was on the transparent mode add the vlan and the name and it work, those this have to happen every time you add a new vlan to the switch network? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arlante, Neil Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Help with vlan!! [7:49127] did u tried these: is it really trunking betw 3524 and 2900xl, or betw different switches? sh trunk compare vtp revision numbers if they are the same...sh vtp domain see if vtp advertisements are sent and received... sh vtp statistics HTH, -Original Message- From: GEORGE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help with vlan!! [7:49127] I currently have just 2 vlan's in my network. The native 1 and vlan 2. I have a 7513 doing the routing with a fast Ethernet and 3500xl and 2900xl in my network. I have one vtp server and I added vlan 2 it works! . then I created another vlan 3 on the router with ip 10.0.4.1 isl encapsulation on it and add it to the vtp server. (3508xl) and name it lab , doesn't work! I have trunking all the way here is a diagram of my network (port1) 7513-3524trunking2900xl---trunking---2900xl-users on the 2900xl that the users are connected I place switchport access vlan 3 on all the ports and made it a client with the proper vtp domain.. The other 2900 xl that's connected to my 3524 is also a client with the correct vtp domain however when I do a show vlan I show vlan 3 but a different vlan name not lab my question is what im I doing wrong? Do I have to configure a vtp server for each vlan? -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49161t=49127 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ACL studying [7:49154]
host 10.10.10.35 10.10.10.36 0.0.0.3 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 1:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ACL studying [7:49154] Folks, what would be the smallest way to put an ACL to filter, let's say, IPs 10.10.10.35 to 10.10.10.49? (just want to check if I am doing it ok...) Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49162t=49154 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cisco command [7:49152]
hi use the show diag command in previleged mode regards deepak Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49164t=49152 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Router 4000 series [7:49131]
ALADE ADAGUN wrote: However, I am only wondering if there is any alternative solution as CISCO has discontinued the 4000 series router. Take a look at http://www.memoryx.net, http://www.memorydealers.com or http://www.crucial.com. They all sell Cisco-compatible memory (and no doubt others do) for *far* lower prices than Cisco itself. Regards, Marco. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49147t=49131 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121]
anybody would have any more comments on this? (that excludes you, Dennis :) Rgds Persio - Original Message - From: Wright, Jeremy To: Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:30 PM Subject: RE: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121] I used 3 and it was a great resource to helping me pass. -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121] Folks, is it only me or the Boson Tests #1 and #2 for CCIE Writen are just crap comparing to #3? I am considering to buy one of these but I am not sure wich one... Is #3 really the most close it can get to the real deal? Rgds, Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49145t=49121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lab equipment question [7:49123]
The last time I looked on eBay, 5500's weren't selling very well. Personally, I'm keeping mine because I want a set-based switch in my lab as well as an IOS-based switch. Just because Cisco is using a 3500 series switch in their CCIE lab doesn't mean that the whole world is going to stop using set-based switches. There are tons of them out in the real-world networks and you still need to know how to configure and troubleshoot them. If you've already bought and paid for it, you may as well hang on to it because you probably won't get a good price for it and you still need to keep up your set-based chops! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Juan Blanco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 11:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Lab equipment question [7:49123] Hey guys, Actually I have the same dilemma with my 5500, Should I sell it in order for me to get 3500 or should I keep it in order for me to be able to build different scenarios. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Lab equipment question [7:49123] Hey guys, I have a question about soem equipment I have for my home lab. I have an AS5200 and a Cat5005 that I'm thinking about selling, do I really need them to help pass the CCIE lab? I'm thinking of keeping the 5200 because of the Bri port. Any thoughts? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49144t=49123 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: Problem with CISCO 3640 [7:49163]
Dear friends: My CISCO 3640 is rebooting frequently. I receive the following message: - - -- === Flushing messages (03:06:53 UTC Mon Mar 1 1993) === Queued messages: No fault history 0x. Need 11.1 (2) or higher ROM -Traceback= 60993B90 609949DC 6098041C 60980910 604C98A8 604C9B7C 604C9D08 6040D E0C 6040DDF8 *** System received a Bus Error exception *** signal= 0xa, code= 0x10, context= 0x60fe4740 PC = 0x60436d74, Cause = 0x420, Status Reg = 0x34018002 System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(20)AA2, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. C3600 processor with 131072 Kbytes of main memory Main memory is configured to 64 bit mode with parity disabled program load complete, entry point: 0x80008000, size: 0x583cdc Self decompressing the image : # # ### # ### # ### # ### # ### ### [OK] Smart Init is enabled smart init is sizing iomem IDMEMORY_REQ TYPE 44 0X0004FE00 Single Port Fast Ethernet 44 0X0004FE00 Single Port Fast Ethernet 6F 0X00012580 Sixteen port A/D Modem 6F 0X00012580 Sixteen port A/D Modem 0X0010A6F8 public buffer pools 0X00211000 public particle pools TOTAL: 0X003DFDF8 If any of the above Memory Requirements are UNKNOWN, you may be using an unsupported configuration or there is a software problem and system operation may be compromised. Rounded IOMEM up to: 4Mb. Using 3 percent iomem. [4Mb/128Mb] Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134-1706 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3640-I-M), Version 12.1(5)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Sat 11-Nov-00 01:38 by ccai Image text-base: 0x60008950, data-base: 0x60A26000 cisco 3640 (R4700) processor (revision 0x00) with 126976K/4096K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 15635903 R4700 CPU at 100Mhz, Implementation 33, Rev 1.0 Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. 2 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 32 terminal line(s) DRAM configuration is 64 bits wide with parity disabled. 125K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) - - -- Do you know where is the problem? Regards,, Ing. Joseba M. Izaga K|hn Gerente de Operaciones Alfanumeric, S.A. Tel.: (505) 278-3200 Ext. 300 Fax: (505) 278-5857 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.alfanumeric.com.ni Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49163t=49163 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FW: Help with vlan!! [7:49127]
transparent mode wont update the vtp domain info to or from a server. If the info was inserted from a switch in transparent mode it wont go anywhere. If the new vlan data was inserted in a switch that is running in server mode, it will propagate the info to other servers and clients in the same domain. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MADMAN Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 11:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: Help with vlan!! [7:49127] You have to be either transparent or server mode to add a VLAN. Were you in client mode originally? Dave GEORGE wrote: I got it to work!!! The only thing I had to change was on the transparent mode add the vlan and the name and it work, those this have to happen every time you add a new vlan to the switch network? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arlante, Neil Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Help with vlan!! [7:49127] did u tried these: is it really trunking betw 3524 and 2900xl, or betw different switches? sh trunk compare vtp revision numbers if they are the same...sh vtp domain see if vtp advertisements are sent and received... sh vtp statistics HTH, -Original Message- From: GEORGE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help with vlan!! [7:49127] I currently have just 2 vlan's in my network. The native 1 and vlan 2. I have a 7513 doing the routing with a fast Ethernet and 3500xl and 2900xl in my network. I have one vtp server and I added vlan 2 it works! . then I created another vlan 3 on the router with ip 10.0.4.1 isl encapsulation on it and add it to the vtp server. (3508xl) and name it lab , doesn't work! I have trunking all the way here is a diagram of my network (port1) 7513-3524trunking2900xl---trunking---2900xl-users on the 2900xl that the users are connected I place switchport access vlan 3 on all the ports and made it a client with the proper vtp domain.. The other 2900 xl that's connected to my 3524 is also a client with the correct vtp domain however when I do a show vlan I show vlan 3 but a different vlan name not lab my question is what im I doing wrong? Do I have to configure a vtp server for each vlan? -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49165t=49127 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VoIP Problem [7:49139]
We are connecting two QSIG voice switches through a compressed VoIP trunk (E1, except channel 15 and 18) using two cisco 2620 routers with IOS 12.2(8)T4, and NM-HDV-1E1-30. Switch1 Router1 Router2 Switch2 (network) (user) (network)(user) With this setup we can connect any call originating from switch2 to switch1 direction. But a call originating from switch1 does not connect the *voice path* after several successful calls when under moderate/heavy load. (ie: the call is connected but voice is not heard by either party) Shutting down the voice port and bringing it up again could resolve this temporarily. But after several calls, same problem occurs. Calls from switch2 to switch1 continue to connect properly. Config summary of Router1 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- voice-card 1 ! isdn switch-type primary-qsig call rsvp-sync ! controller E1 1/0 framing NO-CRC4 pri-group timeslots 1-14,16-17,19-31 ! interface Serial1/0:15 no ip address no logging event link-status isdn switch-type primary-qsig isdn incoming-voice voice isdn contiguous-bchan no cdp enable ! voice-port 1/0:15 ! dial-peer cor custom Config summary of Router2 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ! voice-card 1 ! isdn switch-type primary-qsig call rsvp-sync ! controller E1 1/0 framing NO-CRC4 pri-group timeslots 1-14,16-17,19-31 ! interface Serial1/0:15 no ip address no logging event link-status isdn switch-type primary-qsig isdn protocol-emulate network isdn incoming-voice voice no isdn T309-enable isdn contiguous-bchan no cdp enable ! voice-port 1/0:15 ! dial-peer cor custom ! I have not included the dial-peers as they seems to work properly. Any ideas what the problem might be? Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49139t=49139 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11050 dropping packets [7:49169]
Hi, Has anyone seen a problem with the 11050 load balancer dropping packets from http 1.1 browsers? Http 1.0 seem to work fine but 1.1 doesnt seem to send the full header info and the 11050 drops packets like mad. Software version 4.00 build 3 Hardware Major version: 02 Hardware Minor version: 0 Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49169t=49169 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
boot sequence [7:49174]
If a router has the configuration setting ser to 0x102 , what would be the sequence? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49174t=49174 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: cisco command [7:49152]
Try it on a mc3810v3 did not work -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: cisco command [7:49152] hi use the show diag command in previleged mode regards deepak Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49173t=49152 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ACL studying [7:49154]
A different spin. access-list 1 permit 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.1 access-list 1 permit host 10.10.10.34 access-list 1 deny 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.127 access-list 1 deny host 10.10.10.49 access-list 1 permit any -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ACL studying [7:49154] Folks, what would be the smallest way to put an ACL to filter, let's say, IPs 10.10.10.35 to 10.10.10.49? (just want to check if I am doing it ok...) Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49175t=49154 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Opinions on Cisco Interactive Mentor [7:49137]
Now is a great time to buy Cisco routers for a home lab, as the prices of token ring routers must certainly be low now that token ring is going to be taken off the Lab. You can learn BGP just as well with token ring routers as you can with ethernet. You get two serial interfaces with a 2502, just as you get with a 2501. There is a lot that can be learned with these serial interfaces. Frame-relay with OSPF, IGRP, RIP, BGP, frame-relay traffic shaping. ISIS over frame-relay and the issues associated therewith. With token ring, you still have the OSPF DR election issues that ethernet will give you. You still need to get experience with whatever ethernet Catalyst will be used when you take the lab, so you will want to get at least three ethernet routers, but using token ring in your lab can lower your overall cost per router. iginal Message - From: JAKE REYNOLDS To: 'Christopher Supino' ; ; Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:07 AM Subject: RE: Opinions on Cisco Interactive Mentor I've tried them before. Save your 100 bucks for a 25xx. They're not nearly close enough to the IOS for you to benefit from them CCIEwise. There are no debugs and console messages. Most of the show commands are missing. -Original Message- From: Christopher Supino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Opinions on Cisco Interactive Mentor All, Has anyone tried the CIM products? I was considering purchasing the BGP CIM and wanted to get some feedback before making the investment. Chris Christopher Supino CCDP, CCNP, MCSE, Compaq ASE, CNA Senior Network Design Engineer TransNet Corp. 45 Columbia Road Somerville, New Jersey 08876 Ph 908 947 0198 Cell 908 296 0446 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49137t=49137 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Limiting bandwidth [7:49177]
Hello, Today I'll be installing DC3 card on my router. I wanted to restrict the bandwidth only to 14 Mbps. How can I do that?, do I have to use rate-limit? Thanks. Alejandro Acosta Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49177t=49177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ACL studying [7:49154]
Too bad you couldn't use a block of addresses in this case. Unfortunately, you would have to use a block size of 32. You can't use a block of 16 because a single block doesn't include all 15 of the hosts you want to deny (0-15, 16-31, 32-47, 48-63, etc.). If you could have used a block of 16, you would still be denying an additional host that you didn't want denied (providing all 15 of the hosts you wanted to deny fell in the same block). It's even worse with block size of 32 (0-31, 32-63, 64-95, etc.) access-list 50 deny 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.31 The problem here is that you're also denying hosts 32-34 and hosts 50-63 which makes this useless unless you don't care about the other hosts! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 3:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ACL studying [7:49154] host 10.10.10.35 10.10.10.36 0.0.0.3 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 1:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ACL studying [7:49154] Folks, what would be the smallest way to put an ACL to filter, let's say, IPs 10.10.10.35 to 10.10.10.49? (just want to check if I am doing it ok...) Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49179t=49154 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ACL studying [7:49154]
I reckon you typo'd with the third line Philip. How's this: access-list 1 permit 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.1 access-list 1 permit host 10.10.10.34 access-list 1 deny 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.15 access-list 1 deny host 10.10.10.49 access-list 1 permit any Blair, Philip S wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... A different spin. access-list 1 permit 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.1 access-list 1 permit host 10.10.10.34 access-list 1 deny 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.127 access-list 1 deny host 10.10.10.49 access-list 1 permit any -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ACL studying [7:49154] Folks, what would be the smallest way to put an ACL to filter, let's say, IPs 10.10.10.35 to 10.10.10.49? (just want to check if I am doing it ok...) Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49178t=49154 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: private addressing [7:49083]
Howard, Since 192.168/16 is supposedly Class C, can you tell me why if I configure RIPv1 it allows me to configure network 192.168.0.0 instead of giving me an error? I've tested it and of course it does not generate or accept any updates until you change it something like 192.168.10.0. Although it reports when you do a sh ip prot that it is routing for networks 192.168.0.0 and 192.168.10.0. Is this a Cisco IOS feature? I guess the same thing holds true with my question on the 172.16/12 Private IP. Thanks in advance for your input. Elmer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Howard C. Berkowitz Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: private addressing [7:49083] Can anyone tell me. 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.0.0 is used for class B private addressing.. That means that it can use 16 class B network address Now, let say I wan to use 172.35.0.0 block, so is this consider a private address or a public address ? Public. The private blocks are 10/8 172.16/12 192.168/16 Again, the sooner you stop thinking in classful terms, the easier real-world addressing becomes. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49181t=49083 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: boot sequence [7:49174]
There's a nice right-up on this at www.laganiere.net From: GEORGE Reply-To: GEORGE To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: boot sequence [7:49174] Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 20:24:52 GMT If a router has the configuration setting ser to 0x102 , what would be the sequence? _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49182t=49174 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Implementiong QoS [7:49183]
Hi All, Please recommend a QoS technique for implementing on Cisco 2600's connected by Wireless links ( Aironet Wireless) which does not support any Qos. I mean I am planning to implement QoS on the Router's and the send the traffic to Bridges on to sides. I was planning to implement CBWFQ on the ethernet interfaces on the 2600. Any help will be highly appreciated. Sunil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49183t=49183 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ACL studying [7:49154]
But doesn't 10.10.10.48 sneek through? -Original Message- From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 3:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ACL studying [7:49154] I reckon you typo'd with the third line Philip. How's this: access-list 1 permit 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.1 access-list 1 permit host 10.10.10.34 access-list 1 deny 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.15 access-list 1 deny host 10.10.10.49 access-list 1 permit any Blair, Philip S wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... A different spin. access-list 1 permit 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.1 access-list 1 permit host 10.10.10.34 access-list 1 deny 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.127 access-list 1 deny host 10.10.10.49 access-list 1 permit any -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ACL studying [7:49154] Folks, what would be the smallest way to put an ACL to filter, let's say, IPs 10.10.10.35 to 10.10.10.49? (just want to check if I am doing it ok...) Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49185t=49154 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Limiting bandwidth [7:49177]
shape. Alejandro Acosta Alamo wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello, Today I'll be installing DC3 card on my router. I wanted to restrict the bandwidth only to 14 Mbps. How can I do that?, do I have to use rate-limit? Thanks. Alejandro Acosta Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49187t=49177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Implementiong QoS [7:49183]
What kind of traffic is going across? What type of link connects the router to the AP (10 or 100 MB)? neil K. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All, Please recommend a QoS technique for implementing on Cisco 2600's connected by Wireless links ( Aironet Wireless) which does not support any Qos. I mean I am planning to implement QoS on the Router's and the send the traffic to Bridges on to sides. I was planning to implement CBWFQ on the ethernet interfaces on the 2600. Any help will be highly appreciated. Sunil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49186t=49183 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSCI 640-901 [7:49188]
7/18/2002 4:44pm Thursday Professionals, I am planning on taking the 640-901 in a few days to get started on the CCIP. I have not been to a class or bought any books. Has anyone taken this test already ? The cisco blueprint does not look too bad - OSPF EIGRP BGP ISIS mostly real world stuff. Richard // Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49188t=49188 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: management platforms [7:49042]
Have the server group looked into NetIQ? It's great for managing/monitor NT servers and it'll probably do a better job than OpenView because it monitors the hardware of the server as well the applications running on them. - Original Message - From: Roberts, Larry To: Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:00 PM Subject: RE: management platforms [7:49042] If the Wan Guys were the only one who could access the NMS, then I would agree, but giving others access to our Routers scares me. We started adding some of our Lan Guys to the Whats Up message group, and we ending up getting flooded with questions with every message that went out. I shiver at the thought of the calls we would get when someone looked at the map and thought they noticed a problem. Now to be fair, most of the guys are pretty good about not panicing, but the few that doman do they panic. I also hate the thought of adding another server to the mix. We have a really smooth system where, CW2K monitors changes, what's up tells us what's down ( I think they got the name wrong on their product :) and solarwinds gives us utilization stats. I have tried to figure out what adding OpenView would give us that we don't already have, but I cant think of any right off the top of my head. Im just having a hard time justifing the extra product that I cant see that we need. Thanks to all for the input! Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: management platforms [7:49042] You would be going against conventional wisdom, Cisco's Kool-ade and every other help-desk manager. I think one platform SHOULD manage all the stuf. Roberts, Larry wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Guys, I'm trying to justify why I don't want a single management platform for all our servers, as well as our routers and switches. We are 2 distinct group with no cross-functionality between the Wan group and the Server group. Our Server guys are trying to purchase OpenView to manage it all, but we already have a fully functional CW2K installation And don't see the advantages of using OpenView. I'm looking for all of your experiences and recommendations for and against a single platform. We use CW2K,Solarwinds and What's Up currently to manage and report on up/down and utilization.. Thanks Larry Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49138t=49042 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
callmanager intercluster setup [7:49191]
Where can I find some information on how to set up callmanager instercluter? Thanks. Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49191t=49191 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using different fallback VLAN for dynamic vlans [7:49192]
I am setting up different closets in the building to use different VLAN's for the PC's. But, all printers will be on the their own VLAN. So what I would like to do is enter the printer MAC addresses in a table for using dynamic VLAN's and have a different fallback VLAN (if the MAC isn't in the table, use a specific VLAN for that closet) for each closet. I've looked on Cisco's website and see you can use fallback VLAN's but it looks like it would be a global setting for any switch pointing to the table. Anyone have ideas on how to get around this? Could I just create different tables for each closet, put the printer MAC's in all the tables, and define different fallback VLAN's for each table/closet? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49192t=49192 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: private addressing [7:49083]
At 9:08 PM + 7/18/02, cebuano wrote: Howard, Since 192.168/16 is supposedly Class C, can you tell me why if I configure RIPv1 it allows me to configure network 192.168.0.0 instead of giving me an error? The traditional class C space began with 192/8, of which 192.168/16 is a part. I'm puzzled by your comment, since I generally use 192.168.0.0/24 for /30 serial links when I write scenarios, and never have any problem. There's no formal relationship between RIPv1 and RFC1918 addressing; RIPv1 long preceded private addressing. According to the IETF, RIPv1 is in Historic status, or considered obsolete. I've tested it and of course it does not generate or accept any updates until you change it something like 192.168.10.0. I know this runs in some of the Gett scenarios. From S0010: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! ! Establishes initial RIP-only routing on R1. ! hostname r1 ! interface Loopback0 ip address 192.168.255.1 255.255.255.252 ! interface Loopback1 ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.0.0 ! interface Ethernet0/0 description to Cat 5K 3/1 ip address 192.168.4.1 255.255.255.0 half-duplex ! interface Serial1/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no frame-relay inverse-arp frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial1/0.2 point-to-point description FR hub to R2; rev should be 211 ip address 192.0.2.1 255.255.255.252 frame-relay interface-dlci 112 ! interface Serial1/0.3 point-to-point description FR hub to R3; rev should be 311 ip address 192.0.2.5 255.255.255.252 frame-relay interface-dlci 113 ! interface Serial1/1 description serial to R3 bandwidth 56 ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.252 ! router rip network 172.16.0.0 network 192.0.2.0 network 192.168.0.0 network 192.168.2.0 network 192.168.4.0 network 192.168.255.0 ip classless Although it reports when you do a sh ip prot that it is routing for networks 192.168.0.0 and 192.168.10.0. Is this a Cisco IOS feature? I guess the same thing holds true with my question on the 172.16/12 Private IP. Thanks in advance for your input. Elmer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Howard C. Berkowitz Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: private addressing [7:49083] Can anyone tell me. 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.0.0 is used for class B private addressing.. That means that it can use 16 class B network address Now, let say I wan to use 172.35.0.0 block, so is this consider a private address or a public address ? Public. The private blocks are 10/8 172.16/12 192.168/16 Again, the sooner you stop thinking in classful terms, the easier real-world addressing becomes. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49194t=49083 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2 T1's to our provider [7:49039]
Hi Bob, You have a very valid point and I have weighed the option of using BGP. The question iswhy us BGP when default routes work very well and use less system resources and administration. Actually BGP will take more resources of the router and will not provide any increased functionality or efficiencies in this case. The outcome was to increase bandwidth and a redundancy in the physical wiring from the CO to us...the most likely scenario is a carrier technician messing up the wiring in the wiring cans because of poor and no documentation. This happens all the time with our carrier. Thank your for the different perspective. Scott -Original Message- From: Bob Timmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 5:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2 T1's to our provider [7:49039] Why not use BGP? If both lines are to the same provider, it should be a no-brainer (relatively speaking of course). Are you using these T1's for failover/backups or for expanding bandwidth? BGP should help in either case. The 2600 should be sufficient and I don't think you'd need to have the the full BGP tables on your router if you're going to the same provider. Also, you could get away with a private ASN so there wouldn't be any cost to you. Now I've never done this, I've only done the BGP with T1's to different providers, which is considerably more difficult, IMHO. Hi Kevin, We were in the same scenario in which you have described. The way I choose to do is keep it simple and efficient and cost effective. We have dual PTP connections on a Cisco 2650 with CEF, default routes, and per packet load sharing. I can max out the t1's and it barely taxes the router resources and on top of this I have about a 20 line access control list filtering traffic. =) This router is a workhorse and I'm in love it. The 2650 uses a faster memory and cpu than the 2621 but I think the 2621 would work. Hope this helps you in some way, Scott -Original Message- From: W. Kevin Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2 T1's to our provider [7:49039] We are upgrading to 2 T1's to our provider, Fractional DS3 is prohibitively expensive in our rural area. Has anyone done any speed comparisons on using round robin style static routes (i.e. 2 default routes w/ same cost) versus EIGRP's load balanceing versus running MLPPP on the Serial interfaces? We're currently using a 2621 but are open to bigger routers. Kevin Hunt CCNP, MCSE, MCT, Linux+ SME Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49195t=49039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco command [7:49152]
GEORGE- This has been asked at least 6 times in the past 12 months. You should check the archives, if they are available. The short and quick answer is, on most low end and midrange routers- NO. On a few of the high-end routers (i.e., GSR's, 7200 VXRs, etc.), the answer is YES (according to other list members). If you issue the Show Diag or Show Diag cbus command, you can retrieve Serial Number information of the System Board, and any Line Cards such as NM's (Net Modules) and WIC's/VIC's, PA's, etc. ... But these Serial Numbers are NOT the same as the Serial Number on the Chassis of the Router, which is needed for Tech Support calls with Cisco TAC, as well as registering SMART-NET contracts. Also, I might add, the suggestion to solve this little issue is to put in the description of a Loopback interface the Serial Information from the chassis. That way, if you need that information which was not documented before deployment of the node to a remote location, you could retrieve it by terminal session and viewing the config. Like I said, check the archives for a definitive answer on the few platforms mentioned, or open a Level 4 Case with Cisco TAC to get the answer direct from the horses mouth. Now, I must say, I think I'm the first person to mention the Level 4 Case alternative on this list... :) Guess those Support studies paid off; Cisco would be proud :) -Mark Odette II CCNP, MCSE 2K/4.0, blah, blah, blah. -Original Message- From: GEORGE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 1:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cisco command [7:49152] Is their a cisco command that will show you the serial number of the router Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49166t=49152 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
controlling LocalDirector settings using SNMP [7:49197]
We are trying to send an SNMP request to a LocalDirector to change some of its configuration settings. We'd like to take real and virtual servers in and out of service programmatically. We are trying to use SNMP GET and SNMP SET messages to do this. When we send an SNMP SET message to the Local Director, it responds with an SNMP RESPONSE with an error of no such name. I would think Cisco would not allow changes to the LocalDirector's settings using SNMP SET messages because SNMP is so insecure. However, I thought I'd ask to see if anyone has any experience doing this. Thanks, Sam __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49197t=49197 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: callmanager intercluster setup [7:49191]
IP telephony documentation on -line should help There's also the official documents on-line as well supernet wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Where can I find some information on how to set up callmanager instercluter? Thanks. Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49198t=49191 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIP Problem [7:49139]
Sounds like it could be faulty or out of DSP's. Check the syslogg for errors. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Kevin Love wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... We are connecting two QSIG voice switches through a compressed VoIP trunk (E1, except channel 15 and 18) using two cisco 2620 routers with IOS 12.2(8)T4, and NM-HDV-1E1-30. Switch1 Router1 Router2 Switch2 (network) (user) (network)(user) With this setup we can connect any call originating from switch2 to switch1 direction. But a call originating from switch1 does not connect the *voice path* after several successful calls when under moderate/heavy load. (ie: the call is connected but voice is not heard by either party) Shutting down the voice port and bringing it up again could resolve this temporarily. But after several calls, same problem occurs. Calls from switch2 to switch1 continue to connect properly. Config summary of Router1 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- voice-card 1 ! isdn switch-type primary-qsig call rsvp-sync ! controller E1 1/0 framing NO-CRC4 pri-group timeslots 1-14,16-17,19-31 ! interface Serial1/0:15 no ip address no logging event link-status isdn switch-type primary-qsig isdn incoming-voice voice isdn contiguous-bchan no cdp enable ! voice-port 1/0:15 ! dial-peer cor custom Config summary of Router2 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ! voice-card 1 ! isdn switch-type primary-qsig call rsvp-sync ! controller E1 1/0 framing NO-CRC4 pri-group timeslots 1-14,16-17,19-31 ! interface Serial1/0:15 no ip address no logging event link-status isdn switch-type primary-qsig isdn protocol-emulate network isdn incoming-voice voice no isdn T309-enable isdn contiguous-bchan no cdp enable ! voice-port 1/0:15 ! dial-peer cor custom ! I have not included the dial-peers as they seems to work properly. Any ideas what the problem might be? Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49172t=49139 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: FW: Help with vlan!! [7:49127]
If you configured the VLAN on a server and VTP was up and running between the switches that should have worked. All your switches can be servers if you like though I don't recommend it.. Dave GEORGE wrote: The switches were set to client and only one was set to server,however when I added the vlan name to the server it did not propogate to the other switches I wonder why? How many vtp severs can I have in one domain -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of MADMAN Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 1:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: Help with vlan!! [7:49127] You have to be either transparent or server mode to add a VLAN. Were you in client mode originally? Dave GEORGE wrote: I got it to work!!! The only thing I had to change was on the transparent mode add the vlan and the name and it work, those this have to happen every time you add a new vlan to the switch network? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arlante, Neil Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Help with vlan!! [7:49127] did u tried these: is it really trunking betw 3524 and 2900xl, or betw different switches? sh trunk compare vtp revision numbers if they are the same...sh vtp domain see if vtp advertisements are sent and received... sh vtp statistics HTH, -Original Message- From: GEORGE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help with vlan!! [7:49127] I currently have just 2 vlan's in my network. The native 1 and vlan 2. I have a 7513 doing the routing with a fast Ethernet and 3500xl and 2900xl in my network. I have one vtp server and I added vlan 2 it works! . then I created another vlan 3 on the router with ip 10.0.4.1 isl encapsulation on it and add it to the vtp server. (3508xl) and name it lab , doesn't work! I have trunking all the way here is a diagram of my network (port1) 7513-3524trunking2900xl---trunking---2900xl-users on the 2900xl that the users are connected I place switchport access vlan 3 on all the ports and made it a client with the proper vtp domain.. The other 2900 xl that's connected to my 3524 is also a client with the correct vtp domain however when I do a show vlan I show vlan 3 but a different vlan name not lab my question is what im I doing wrong? Do I have to configure a vtp server for each vlan? -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49171t=49127 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any one still see EA Louie hanging around either CCIE or CCNP [7:49200]
John Brandis Desk: 02-9278-0629 Mobile: 0414-495-320 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.solution6.com ** visit http://www.solution6.com visit http://www.eccountancy.com - everything for accountants. UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49200t=49200 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: callmanager intercluster setup [7:49191]
The doc there is very vague. Any other links? Thanks. Yoshi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steven A. Ridder Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: callmanager intercluster setup [7:49191] IP telephony documentation on -line should help There's also the official documents on-line as well supernet wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Where can I find some information on how to set up callmanager instercluter? Thanks. Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49201t=49191 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC server. Geoff? [7:49203]
Is there still a IRC server for groupstudy folks? Sure could use some after hours support *grin* Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49203t=49203 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 500CS Comm Server [7:49071]
Thanks all for the help. I've got the config in correctly and had it working fine for a little bit, but once I did a reboot the box acts very strange. Basically can't get console access back into the box without doing a default configuration (holding down the default button while booting) To avoid the console issue, I set up telnet for the box and telnet to it when I can't get the console up, and when I do a show line it don't get the * next to the tty lines. It's very weird and I'm not sure if they are hung up or what. I've tried a clear line on the lines as well. here's my config. CS#sh conf Using 503 out of 32512 bytes ! version 9.21 no service pad service password-encryption ! hostname CS ! enable password 7 02050D480809 ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.1.99 255.255.255.0 ! ! line con 0 login line 1 16 no exec exec-timeout 0 0 stopbits 1 line vty 0 password 7 070C285F4D06 login line vty 1 password 7 13061E010803 login line vty 2 password 7 01100F175804 login line vty 3 password 7 060506324F41 login line vty 4 password 7 110A1016141D login ! end See what you guys think. Am I missing something obvious? I haven't played with the comm-servers much at all. thanks a lot! Mike Sweeney wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... H... Mike's and mine are close.. but I run TACACS on mine since it faces the public via a DMZ MikeS Current configuration: ! version 10.3 service config no service pad service password-encryption no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname xxx ! boot system cs500-c-m.103-19a.Z.bin 192.168.50.29 aaa new-model aaa authentication login default tacacs+ enable aaa authentication login old_way none aaa authorization commands 1 tacacs+ if-authenticated aaa authorization commands 15 tacacs+ if-authenticated aaa accounting exec start-stop tacacs+ aaa accounting network start-stop tacacs+ aaa accounting connection start-stop tacacs+ aaa accounting system start-stop tacacs+ enable password 7 zz ! no ip domain-lookup ::snip::: Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49199t=49071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: callmanager intercluster setup [7:49191]
there are some Cisco Press books, that help They're pretty good -- RFC 1149 Compliant. supernet wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... The doc there is very vague. Any other links? Thanks. Yoshi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steven A. Ridder Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: callmanager intercluster setup [7:49191] IP telephony documentation on -line should help There's also the official documents on-line as well supernet wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Where can I find some information on how to set up callmanager instercluter? Thanks. Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49204t=49191 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 500CS Comm Server [7:49071]
Got it working finally. Misinterpreted the * meaning. :) oops. Tweaked a few other things on the lines too. Works fine now. Thanks for the assitance guys. trammer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Thanks all for the help. I've got the config in correctly and had it working fine for a little bit, but once I did a reboot the box acts very strange. Basically can't get console access back into the box without doing a default configuration (holding down the default button while booting) To avoid the console issue, I set up telnet for the box and telnet to it when I can't get the console up, and when I do a show line it don't get the * next to the tty lines. It's very weird and I'm not sure if they are hung up or what. I've tried a clear line on the lines as well. here's my config. CS#sh conf Using 503 out of 32512 bytes ! version 9.21 no service pad service password-encryption ! hostname CS ! enable password 7 02050D480809 ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.1.99 255.255.255.0 ! ! line con 0 login line 1 16 no exec exec-timeout 0 0 stopbits 1 line vty 0 password 7 070C285F4D06 login line vty 1 password 7 13061E010803 login line vty 2 password 7 01100F175804 login line vty 3 password 7 060506324F41 login line vty 4 password 7 110A1016141D login ! end See what you guys think. Am I missing something obvious? I haven't played with the comm-servers much at all. thanks a lot! Mike Sweeney wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... H... Mike's and mine are close.. but I run TACACS on mine since it faces the public via a DMZ MikeS Current configuration: ! version 10.3 service config no service pad service password-encryption no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname xxx ! boot system cs500-c-m.103-19a.Z.bin 192.168.50.29 aaa new-model aaa authentication login default tacacs+ enable aaa authentication login old_way none aaa authorization commands 1 tacacs+ if-authenticated aaa authorization commands 15 tacacs+ if-authenticated aaa accounting exec start-stop tacacs+ aaa accounting network start-stop tacacs+ aaa accounting connection start-stop tacacs+ aaa accounting system start-stop tacacs+ enable password 7 zz ! no ip domain-lookup ::snip::: Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49205t=49071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: boot sequence [7:49174]
I posted this same question a few weeks back; you might find the posts there helpful. Also, you can look at this page: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis4000/4000m/4000sig/vconfig.htm I am still uncertain of the answer, but have little time to research it further. I know, according to Cisco, if bit 13 of the register is not set, 0x102, theoretically, the router will boot: 1. To location specified in the boot statement in the config - if a statement exists, but the image can not be found, and all statements command a netboot, it will look for an image in flash, the boot to RMON if no image is in flash 2. If no boot statement, it will boot from network file - if no network file exists, the router will hang (because bit 13 not set) Add to this logic the idea that boot statements in config override the netboot sequence, and I am stuck with confusion about step 1 above. What happens if a boot statement exists, pointing to flash, but the image can not be found? Theoretically the router should hang if 0x102... however, when I tested it, the router defaulted to RMON. If you come up with a deifinitive answer, let me know. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49206t=49174 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: private addressing [7:49083]
you can enter all kinds of things into the RIP process and not get errors. It doesn't mean it will work the way you want it to. Did you know, for example, that about the only way to get CIDR routes INTO a Cisco RIPv2 router is to redistribute them? cebuano wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Howard, Since 192.168/16 is supposedly Class C, can you tell me why if I configure RIPv1 it allows me to configure network 192.168.0.0 instead of giving me an error? I've tested it and of course it does not generate or accept any updates until you change it something like 192.168.10.0. Although it reports when you do a sh ip prot that it is routing for networks 192.168.0.0 and 192.168.10.0. Is this a Cisco IOS feature? I guess the same thing holds true with my question on the 172.16/12 Private IP. Thanks in advance for your input. Elmer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Howard C. Berkowitz Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: private addressing [7:49083] Can anyone tell me. 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.0.0 is used for class B private addressing.. That means that it can use 16 class B network address Now, let say I wan to use 172.35.0.0 block, so is this consider a private address or a public address ? Public. The private blocks are 10/8 172.16/12 192.168/16 Again, the sooner you stop thinking in classful terms, the easier real-world addressing becomes. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49207t=49083 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 500CS Comm Server [7:49071]
In a message dated 7/17/2002 7:11:02 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Subj:500CS Comm Server [7:49071] Date:7/17/2002 7:11:02 PM Central Standard Time From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent from the Internet Try this: version 9.21 no service pad ! hostname CS1 ! enable password cisco ! ip routing no ip domain-lookup ! interface Loopback0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address shutdown no mop enabled ! ip host R1 2002 1.1.1.1 ip host R2 2003 1.1.1.1 ip host R3 2004 1.1.1.1 ip host R4 2005 1.1.1.1 ip host R5 2006 1.1.1.1 ip host R6 2007 1.1.1.1 ip host R7 2008 1.1.1.1 ip host R8 2009 1.1.1.1 ! line con 0 exec-timeout 120 0 line 1 16 exec-timeout 120 0 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 120 0 password cisco no login ! end HTH, Rob H. NP, DP, CVOICE, blah,blah,blah By any chance would anyone have a sample config for the 500-CS box that they wouldn't mind posting. Trying to get reverse telnet working and most configs are for the 2509-2511. I'm either not looking in the right place or I'm not configuring it right for this older box. Thanks in advance. Cheers. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49209t=49071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dhcp and subinterfaces [7:49070]
In a message dated 7/17/2002 7:10:58 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Subj:dhcp and subinterfaces [7:49070] Date:7/17/2002 7:10:58 PM Central Standard Time From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent from the Internet I think the ip helper-address is what your looking for. Rob H. NP, DP, CVOICE, blah,blah,blah... If I have subinterfaces configured for my vlans' and I wanted a dhcp server for one vlan can I create the dhcp server and assign it to that subinterfaces pertaining the vlan in question. I don't have a server on that vlan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49210t=49070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Limiting bandwidth [7:49177]
Are you paying for 14Mbps fractional DS3 or for full DS3 and want to limit certain traffic to 14Mbps? If you want to limit out outgoing traffic, you can shape it.. but if you want to limit the incoming traffic you need to police it.. Here's a page talking about the older verison Committed Access Rate (CAR) and the newer version Rate-limit http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/cbpcar.html HTH, Mike W. Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... shape. Alejandro Acosta Alamo wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello, Today I'll be installing DC3 card on my router. I wanted to restrict the bandwidth only to 14 Mbps. How can I do that?, do I have to use rate-limit? Thanks. Alejandro Acosta Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49212t=49177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121]
I cannot comment on #1 or #2 but #3 was a good resource for me. I passed last Friday. I would say it is a good indicator. If you know the theory well enough to know why your wrong answers are wrong then you are probably ready. -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121] anybody would have any more comments on this? (that excludes you, Dennis :) Rgds Persio - Original Message - From: Wright, Jeremy To: Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:30 PM Subject: RE: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121] I used 3 and it was a great resource to helping me pass. -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121] Folks, is it only me or the Boson Tests #1 and #2 for CCIE Writen are just crap comparing to #3? I am considering to buy one of these but I am not sure wich one... Is #3 really the most close it can get to the real deal? Rgds, Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49193t=49121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: Re: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121]
I don't think it's fair that I be excluded from commenting... I usually try and stay out of conversations that I have a vested interest in; but here goes... I think there are a lot of very useful tools to prepare for this exam, and if I were preparing to take it I would avail myself of several of them. The subject matter is both broad and deep. Shawn Kaminski has talked about a project he's developed that people say good things about; I think Bernard's Boson #1 is very good, and of course I'm particularly fond of Boson #3, but I'm hardly impartial about that... :) On my website I posted several free documents to help with some of the more problematic topics; and I put together a list of common wisdom CCIE Written exam preparation from the groupstudy archive. You can get access to them at www.laganiere.net. You can also grab the free study guide at www.cramsession.com; it's fairly superficial, but it will give you a place to start. You'll also find a list of corrections to it on my website... Lastly, I would look up every topic from the blueprint on both the CCO and the groupstudy archives. They're really great free resources... I hope this proves useful, and please let me know if I can do anything further to help... Dennis - Original Message - From: Persio Pucci To: Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:30 PM Subject: RE: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121] anybody would have any more comments on this? (that excludes you, Dennis :) Rgds Persio - Original Message - From: Wright, Jeremy To: Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:30 PM Subject: RE: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121] I used 3 and it was a great resource to helping me pass. -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121] Folks, is it only me or the Boson Tests #1 and #2 for CCIE Writen are just crap comparing to #3? I am considering to buy one of these but I am not sure wich one... Is #3 really the most close it can get to the real deal? Rgds, Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49208t=49121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with CISCO 3640 [7:49163]
We had a couple of routers that would randomly reboot, and after rebooting a show ver showed system restarted by bus error. I dug around on Cisco's site and found a page that said many bus errors are memory errors. I traced the address down to a stick of RAM, replaced it and was fine afterwards. Check out: (may wrap) http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/122/crashes_buserror_troubleshooting.shtml http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/ts_buserror.html There are many good links at the bottom of the first web page Both of these pages was found by searching Cisco's site with the keywords 3600 bus error HTH, Mike W. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dear friends: My CISCO 3640 is rebooting frequently. I receive the following message: -- --- -- --- -- === Flushing messages (03:06:53 UTC Mon Mar 1 1993) === Queued messages: No fault history 0x. Need 11.1 (2) or higher ROM -Traceback= 60993B90 609949DC 6098041C 60980910 604C98A8 604C9B7C 604C9D08 6040D E0C 6040DDF8 *** System received a Bus Error exception *** signal= 0xa, code= 0x10, context= 0x60fe4740 PC = 0x60436d74, Cause = 0x420, Status Reg = 0x34018002 System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(20)AA2, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. C3600 processor with 131072 Kbytes of main memory Main memory is configured to 64 bit mode with parity disabled program load complete, entry point: 0x80008000, size: 0x583cdc Self decompressing the image : # # ### # ### # ### # ### # ### ### [OK] Smart Init is enabled smart init is sizing iomem IDMEMORY_REQ TYPE 44 0X0004FE00 Single Port Fast Ethernet 44 0X0004FE00 Single Port Fast Ethernet 6F 0X00012580 Sixteen port A/D Modem 6F 0X00012580 Sixteen port A/D Modem 0X0010A6F8 public buffer pools 0X00211000 public particle pools TOTAL: 0X003DFDF8 If any of the above Memory Requirements are UNKNOWN, you may be using an unsupported configuration or there is a software problem and system operation may be compromised. Rounded IOMEM up to: 4Mb. Using 3 percent iomem. [4Mb/128Mb] Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134-1706 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3640-I-M), Version 12.1(5)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Sat 11-Nov-00 01:38 by ccai Image text-base: 0x60008950, data-base: 0x60A26000 cisco 3640 (R4700) processor (revision 0x00) with 126976K/4096K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 15635903 R4700 CPU at 100Mhz, Implementation 33, Rev 1.0 Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. 2 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 32 terminal line(s) DRAM configuration is 64 bits wide with parity disabled. 125K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) -- --- -- --- -- Do you know where is the problem? Regards,, Ing. Joseba M. Izaga K|hn Gerente de Operaciones Alfanumeric, S.A. Tel.: (505) 278-3200 Ext. 300 Fax: (505) 278-5857 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.alfanumeric.com.ni Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49211t=49163 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Boson CCIE tests [7:49121]
Persio, I used both Boson practice test #1 and # 3 to prapare and pass the exam on Friday July 12th. I smoked the exam with 869 which is not bad for the first attempt. I am glad that I don't have to take the new ccie written exam and can concentrate on the lab instead. I found questions of practice test #1 to be well written, and the coverage of exam topics was awesome. Credit must be given where credit is due. More than the questions and answers that were right on the money, I felt that the author really cared about me as the buyer of his test. On the same day that I purchased the test, I received two or three e-mails from him that showed me where to focus. He not only e-mailed Lou Rossi's excellent white paper on Token Ring to me, he also guided me to his website where I could practice with 150 more questions and answers for free. Also, he has developed a freeware that I downloaded from his website to practice with all sorts of topics, including RIF. BTW, if you want to practice with ISDN, BGP, VPN and PIX firewall commands, this is an excellent tool. I downloaded it from http://www.networkking.net and his ccie website is http://www.networkking.net/ccie I hope the author does not mind the public using his tools. Practice test #3 was also good, but the variety was not as good as #1. I had over 100 questions on RIF only . Come on, decyphering two bytes of RIF does not take 100 questions and ansers to practice with. just my 2 cents Frank -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121] Folks, is it only me or the Boson Tests #1 and #2 for CCIE Writen are just crap comparing to #3? I am considering to buy one of these but I am not sure wich one... Is #3 really the most close it can get to the real deal? Rgds, Persio - Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49190t=49121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need Help with Token Ring [7:49159]
Dennis Laganiere (one of the frequent contributors to this list) has a great source of information on his website at www.laganiere.net and his Boson test (CCIE written #3) covers the required information for token ring very well. I am far from an expert on the subject but would be glad to help clear up anything I can. What, specifically is it you need help with ... functionality, logical design, bridging, RIFs? -Original Message- From: Mark Godfrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Need Help with Token Ring [7:49159] Could someone share any online resources to help with Token Ring. That part of the CCIE Written test kicked my ass yesterday. :-( Thanks, MG Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49168t=49159 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
