URGENT Cisco 2511 for SALES [7:52881]
Dear All, Those intrested above used router, please contact me ASAP. Thanks Rgds, Steiven Poh Penang, Malaysia Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52881&t=52881 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New CCNP EXAM [7:52875]
Well Thanx Mr/Ms K MC You solve my problem cuz I was between choosing of 603 or 901 ;) Anybody who recently passed 901 ? ""K MC"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > CCNP 640-603(Routing) was replaced by 640-901(BSCI),the new exam cover > IS-IS, this is a difference for the old exam 603(Routing). > > Regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52883&t=52875 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP [7:52830]
Which one you passed 603 or 901 ? Joupin ""Edgar A. Howard"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Friends, > > I passed the CCNP - Routing Exam today. It took two > months of study for this first of four. I will work on Switching > next. Should I expect the three remaining to take as much > time as the Routing? I have equal experience with each > area, very little. There does not appear to be any jobs > anyway, so I'm in no great hurry. > > Any suggestions where I might get any kind of > experience/practice?? I would work for free to get it. > > -edgar > P.S. I can work for free because I am independently wealthy. > > > > . . . there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, > the messager of Satan to buffet me, > lest I should be exalted above measure. > - 2 Corinthians 12:7 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52884&t=52830 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPX and Timers [7:52850]
Hy I also know on my Lab , and i already tryed out to have the same timers on al interfaces within the AS, but no success. I created a very small AS. Router---Et0Et1---Router the whole is ipx router eig 200 , ipx network 100 ipx rip is off But it still do not synchronize the ipx timers. What I do wrong?? Regards philipp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hello Goodbye Sent: Samstag, 7. September 2002 20:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IPX and Timers [7:52850] First, have you made sure that all the hello and hold times are the same on all interfaces on all routers in the AS. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1908.htm#xtocid15 The default hold time is 3 times the hello time. Is there any reason to not keep this relationship? I'm going to play with this in my lab this weekend to verify that all the timers need to be set the same but I have a feeling that DUAL will get messed up if they are not. Ben --- hagedorn wrote: > Hy guys > > I have a problem with the IPX timers, if I would > change the IPX eigrp > hold-time , I can do this with ipx hold-time inteval > ... command, other > possibility is to change the ipx hello interval , > that should work but in > all the possibility that I tryed out it will not > work. > Ciscos statement is if the hold time is > smaller then twice a hello > interval , the timers should be synchronize. ( will > not work ) any ideas are > VERY welcome. > Other if i change the Hold time of 60 seconds on a > ethernet , the ipx hello > interval will stay on 5 seconds , no synch?? > now if someone cxan help me to get this question > answered , that would be > super. > > Regards Philipp > > PS: Already tryed several IOS version. Not work [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52885&t=52850 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Management Sofware [7:52886]
Anyone know of some great shareware/freeware or low cost Network management software. To run on win 2000 server/desktop and analyse traffic flows and report link state. We host multiple small business WAN's providing remote office connectivity soutions. HP Open View is prohibitively expensive and Cisco Works will cost the company upwards of $2200 and at this price, my CIO would rather purchase another 1700 router. We are having bandwidth problems (limited bandwidth via 256k leased line). Our ISP is implementing a Lucent AP450 QOS box as a managed solution and it is just compounding the problem. Also, my CIO is concerned that if I implement an IOS based SNMP solution it will add to the protocol overhead. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52886&t=52886 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIP Cisco press [7:52878]
Marwa For the MCAST+QOS exam you will probably want to look at at Cisco Press - Beau Williamson Developing IP multicast networks Cisco Press - Srinivas Vegesna IP Quality of service Syngress - Mike Flannagan Administering Cisco QOS for IP networks. Obviously Cisco.com has a wealth of information. Also, you should study the blueprint for the exam and be aware that the blueprint covers some areas not in the QOS books (but these are covered by documents on CCO). For the MPLS exam (which I dont have experience of) You could try Cisco Press - Ivan Pepelnjak, Jim Guichard MPLS and VPN Architectures (CCIP edition) Sybex also have a CCIP MPLS study guide out, but I dont know if it is any good. Hope this helps Peter Walker CISSP, CSS1, CIPTSS, CCIP, CCNP, etc Marwa Ismail wrote: > > Hi all.. > > I am now trying to take CCIP Certificate, I already took BSCI exam, and I > want after that to take the multicast and QOS exam then MPLS > specialization.. > > Can anyone please recommend for me a Cisco Press books for these exams as I > am not able to take courses in them,, > > Thanks a lot.. > > > Kind regards.. > Marwa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52887&t=52878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Testing [7:52888]
Don't mind me, I'm just testing.. :) Ashley -- Ashley Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] "To know what people really think, pay regard to what they do, rather than what they say." - Rene Descartes Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52888&t=52888 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPsec - what is wrong with this config? [7:52865]
Neal, I you'll also need to have the crypto maps added to the physical interface through which the tunnels are built. Paste a copy of the complete configs without the debug output. However, what I noted seems to be the only thing that stands out! Watch the word wrap... http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/secur _c/scprt4/scipsec.htm#xtocid2141729 HTH Nigel - Original Message - From: "Neal Rauhauser" To: Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 7:41 PM Subject: IPsec - what is wrong with this config? [7:52865] > I have two 1750s sharing an ethernet hub - just trying to get IPsec on > a tunnel between ethernet interfaces and I am having trouble. This > config seems close but I don't know what to do next > > > Here is the error I am getting when I try to ping the opposite end of > the tunnel > > 01:05:29: ISAKMP (0:1): retransmitting phase 1 MM_NO_STATE... > 01:05:29: ISAKMP (0:1): incrementing error counter on sa: retransmit > phase 1 > 01:05:29: ISAKMP (1): sending packet to 192.168.6.50 (I) MM_NO_STATE. > > -- this router is at the bottom of a three router stack > crypto isakmp policy 1 > authentication pre-share > crypto isakmp key duh address 192.168.6.51 > ! > ! > crypto ipsec transform-set MIDDLE ah-sha-hmac esp-des > ! > crypto key pubkey-chain rsa > named-key middle > key-string >305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00D081DF > 26BC7013 >448EA3D2 5C0853FA E0E01770 06D6C4FE A57B165A 4BC25F0E 5FD517B1 > 12EEA345 >8C9CC44E DCDC705E AB6327F9 81868B14 CB2294F1 304611A2 A7020301 0001 > quit > addressed-key 192.168.6.51 > address 192.168.6.51 > key-string >305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00D081DF > 26BC7013 >448EA3D2 5C0853FA E0E01770 06D6C4FE A57B165A 4BC25F0E 5FD517B1 > 12EEA345 >8C9CC44E DCDC705E AB6327F9 81868B14 CB2294F1 304611A2 A7020301 0001 > quit > ! > crypto map MIDDLE2 local-address Tunnel0 > crypto map MIDDLE2 10 ipsec-isakmp > set peer 192.168.6.51 > set transform-set MIDDLE > match address middle > > interface Tunnel0 > ip address 192.168.6.50 255.255.255.0 > tunnel source 192.168.1.50 > tunnel destination 192.168.1.51 > tunnel mode ipip > crypto map MIDDLE2 > ! > interface FastEthernet0 > ip address 192.168.1.50 255.255.255.0 > speed auto > > > --- this router is in the middle of a three router stack > > crypto isakmp policy 1 > authentication pre-share > crypto isakmp key duh address 192.168.6.50 > ! > ! > crypto ipsec transform-set BOTTOM ah-sha-hmac esp-des > ! > crypto key pubkey-chain rsa > named-key bottom > key-string >305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00B941FA > 8C44F60C >76199B3E DADDA933 F5EA1118 9F9410B0 E097836F 166FDC84 3FD06FA0 > 338E77AE >F32142F4 D750F4F0 31844B70 099DD8B2 6F8753D7 70BD2BBA 03020301 0001 > quit > addressed-key 192.168.1.50 > address 192.168.1.50 > key-string >305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00B941FA > 8C44F60C >76199B3E DADDA933 F5EA1118 9F9410B0 E097836F 166FDC84 3FD06FA0 > 338E77AE >F32142F4 D750F4F0 31844B70 099DD8B2 6F8753D7 70BD2BBA 03020301 0001 > quit > ! > crypto map BOTTOM2 local-address Tunnel0 > crypto map BOTTOM2 10 ipsec-isakmp > set peer 192.168.6.50 > set transform-set BOTTOM > match address bottom > interface Tunnel0 > ip address 192.168.6.51 255.255.255.0 > tunnel source 192.168.1.51 > tunnel destination 192.168.1.50 > tunnel mode ipip > crypto map BOTTOM2 > ! > interface Serial0 > ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 > clockrate 100 > ! > interface FastEthernet0 > ip address 192.168.1.51 255.255.255.0 > speed auto > > > > > -- > Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd > "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, > ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52890&t=52865 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIP Cisco press [7:52878]
I am going through the MPLS reference for Sybex. I have no complaints yet of this book. But always supplement your reading with other ways if possible of course.. hth, Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, 8 September 2002 6:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIP Cisco press [7:52878] Marwa For the MCAST+QOS exam you will probably want to look at at Cisco Press - Beau Williamson Developing IP multicast networks Cisco Press - Srinivas Vegesna IP Quality of service Syngress - Mike Flannagan Administering Cisco QOS for IP networks. Obviously Cisco.com has a wealth of information. Also, you should study the blueprint for the exam and be aware that the blueprint covers some areas not in the QOS books (but these are covered by documents on CCO). For the MPLS exam (which I dont have experience of) You could try Cisco Press - Ivan Pepelnjak, Jim Guichard MPLS and VPN Architectures (CCIP edition) Sybex also have a CCIP MPLS study guide out, but I dont know if it is any good. Hope this helps Peter Walker CISSP, CSS1, CIPTSS, CCIP, CCNP, etc Marwa Ismail wrote: > > Hi all.. > > I am now trying to take CCIP Certificate, I already took BSCI exam, and I > want after that to take the multicast and QOS exam then MPLS > specialization.. > > Can anyone please recommend for me a Cisco Press books for these exams as I > am not able to take courses in them,, > > Thanks a lot.. > > > Kind regards.. > Marwa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52891&t=52878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPsec - what is wrong with this config? [7:52865]
Since I want the crypto to flow over a tunnel that is where I placed the crypto maps. I realize that Fa0 on these two machines is the same subnet, but it won't be when I place one of them in Omaha and the other in Houston - hence the tunnel structure. I found the IPsec stuff in the Hutnik & Satterlee CCIE Lab Study Guide(cool book!) after I learned to do it the hard way - my config appears correct but doesn't work. I removed the startup-config and I'm going to go at it from scratch later today. Nigel Taylor wrote: > > Neal, > I you'll also need to have the crypto maps added to the physical > interface through which the tunnels are built. Paste a copy of the complete > configs without the debug output. However, what I noted seems to be the > only thing that stands out! Watch the word wrap... > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/secur > _c/scprt4/scipsec.htm#xtocid2141729 > > HTH > Nigel > > - Original Message - > From: "Neal Rauhauser" > To: > Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 7:41 PM > Subject: IPsec - what is wrong with this config? [7:52865] > > > I have two 1750s sharing an ethernet hub - just trying to get IPsec on > > a tunnel between ethernet interfaces and I am having trouble. This > > config seems close but I don't know what to do next > > > > > > Here is the error I am getting when I try to ping the opposite end of > > the tunnel > > > > 01:05:29: ISAKMP (0:1): retransmitting phase 1 MM_NO_STATE... > > 01:05:29: ISAKMP (0:1): incrementing error counter on sa: retransmit > > phase 1 > > 01:05:29: ISAKMP (1): sending packet to 192.168.6.50 (I) MM_NO_STATE. > > > > -- this router is at the bottom of a three router stack > > crypto isakmp policy 1 > > authentication pre-share > > crypto isakmp key duh address 192.168.6.51 > > ! > > ! > > crypto ipsec transform-set MIDDLE ah-sha-hmac esp-des > > ! > > crypto key pubkey-chain rsa > > named-key middle > > key-string > >305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00D081DF > > 26BC7013 > >448EA3D2 5C0853FA E0E01770 06D6C4FE A57B165A 4BC25F0E 5FD517B1 > > 12EEA345 > >8C9CC44E DCDC705E AB6327F9 81868B14 CB2294F1 304611A2 A7020301 0001 > > quit > > addressed-key 192.168.6.51 > > address 192.168.6.51 > > key-string > >305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00D081DF > > 26BC7013 > >448EA3D2 5C0853FA E0E01770 06D6C4FE A57B165A 4BC25F0E 5FD517B1 > > 12EEA345 > >8C9CC44E DCDC705E AB6327F9 81868B14 CB2294F1 304611A2 A7020301 0001 > > quit > > ! > > crypto map MIDDLE2 local-address Tunnel0 > > crypto map MIDDLE2 10 ipsec-isakmp > > set peer 192.168.6.51 > > set transform-set MIDDLE > > match address middle > > > > interface Tunnel0 > > ip address 192.168.6.50 255.255.255.0 > > tunnel source 192.168.1.50 > > tunnel destination 192.168.1.51 > > tunnel mode ipip > > crypto map MIDDLE2 > > ! > > interface FastEthernet0 > > ip address 192.168.1.50 255.255.255.0 > > speed auto > > > > > > --- this router is in the middle of a three router stack > > > > crypto isakmp policy 1 > > authentication pre-share > > crypto isakmp key duh address 192.168.6.50 > > ! > > ! > > crypto ipsec transform-set BOTTOM ah-sha-hmac esp-des > > ! > > crypto key pubkey-chain rsa > > named-key bottom > > key-string > >305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00B941FA > > 8C44F60C > >76199B3E DADDA933 F5EA1118 9F9410B0 E097836F 166FDC84 3FD06FA0 > > 338E77AE > >F32142F4 D750F4F0 31844B70 099DD8B2 6F8753D7 70BD2BBA 03020301 0001 > > quit > > addressed-key 192.168.1.50 > > address 192.168.1.50 > > key-string > >305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00B941FA > > 8C44F60C > >76199B3E DADDA933 F5EA1118 9F9410B0 E097836F 166FDC84 3FD06FA0 > > 338E77AE > >F32142F4 D750F4F0 31844B70 099DD8B2 6F8753D7 70BD2BBA 03020301 0001 > > quit > > ! > > crypto map BOTTOM2 local-address Tunnel0 > > crypto map BOTTOM2 10 ipsec-isakmp > > set peer 192.168.6.50 > > set transform-set BOTTOM > > match address bottom > > interface Tunnel0 > > ip address 192.168.6.51 255.255.255.0 > > tunnel source 192.168.1.51 > > tunnel destination 192.168.1.50 > > tunnel mode ipip > > crypto map BOTTOM2 > > ! > > interface Serial0 > > ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 > > clockrate 100 > > ! > > interface FastEthernet0 > > ip address 192.168.1.51 255.255.255.0 > > speed auto > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd > > "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, > > ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52892&t=52865
Re: Network Management Sofware [7:52886]
Linda & Vaughan Beckerling wrote: > Anyone know of some great shareware/freeware or low cost Network management > software. To run on win 2000 server/desktop and analyse traffic flows and > report link state. http://opennms.org http://www.sortova.com/tools/opennms/ I've seen it on Unix platforms: Solaris, Redhat, Mandrake. Not sure about Windows. Please post further information if you get any. -- TIA, TT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52893&t=52886 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's official. BSCI 640-901 will replace 640-603 [7:52894]
Per Cisco, "As of September 13, 2002, BSCI 640-901 will replace the Routing exam (RTING 640-603) for CCNP and CCDP certifications." See http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/10/wwtraining/whats_new/ For details. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52894&t=52894 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Network Management Sofware [7:52886]
Hi, You might want to check out What's Up Gold by IPSwitch. http://www.ipswitch.com/ Regards, Albert Lu CCIE #8705 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Linda & Vaughan Beckerling Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 6:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Management Sofware [7:52886] Anyone know of some great shareware/freeware or low cost Network management software. To run on win 2000 server/desktop and analyse traffic flows and report link state. We host multiple small business WAN's providing remote office connectivity soutions. HP Open View is prohibitively expensive and Cisco Works will cost the company upwards of $2200 and at this price, my CIO would rather purchase another 1700 router. We are having bandwidth problems (limited bandwidth via 256k leased line). Our ISP is implementing a Lucent AP450 QOS box as a managed solution and it is just compounding the problem. Also, my CIO is concerned that if I implement an IOS based SNMP solution it will add to the protocol overhead. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52895&t=52886 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New CCNP EXAM [7:52875]
However, you still have until October 25, 2002 to take the RTING (BSCN) 640-603 exam. Shawn K. > -Original Message- > From: Joupin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 3:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: New CCNP EXAM [7:52875] > > Well > Thanx Mr/Ms K MC > You solve my problem cuz I was between choosing of 603 or 901 ;) > > Anybody who recently passed 901 ? > > > ""K MC"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > CCNP 640-603(Routing) was replaced by 640-901(BSCI),the new exam cover > > IS-IS, this is a difference for the old exam 603(Routing). > > > > Regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52896&t=52875 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Network Management Sofware [7:52886]
Keep in mind any monitoring solution using SNMP will add traffic to the network and CPU load to the monitored devices. >>> "Linda & Vaughan Beckerling" 09/08/02 01:16AM >>> Anyone know of some great shareware/freeware or low cost Network management software. To run on win 2000 server/desktop and analyse traffic flows and report link state. We host multiple small business WAN's providing remote office connectivity soutions. HP Open View is prohibitively expensive and Cisco Works will cost the company upwards of $2200 and at this price, my CIO would rather purchase another 1700 router. We are having bandwidth problems (limited bandwidth via 256k leased line). Our ISP is implementing a Lucent AP450 QOS box as a managed solution and it is just compounding the problem. Also, my CIO is concerned that if I implement an IOS based SNMP solution it will add to the protocol overhead. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52897&t=52886 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
experience with modular QoS CLI [7:52898]
Does anyone on this list have experience with modular QoS CLI in a production network? I'd like to know what issues you deal with that might help us as we start implementing and testing. I'd rather stay on a per-device level for now; that's the reason for using the CLI. As long as we're dealing with only a few routers, we're willing to take the time to configure each one separately. Later we might move to some of the management tools like QDM and QPM. If you also have experience with those tools, I'd like to hear the story, the Good, the Bad and the Ugly. -- TT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52898&t=52898 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice Certification [7:52734]
Hi all . There are different roles within voice specialization . for example i took the track for achieve this two specializations. Cisco IP Telephony Support Specialist requirements:CCNP,CVOICE,DQOS,CIPT Cisco IP Telephony Operations Specialist requirements:CCNA,DQOS,IPTT(still not taken by me) And there are other roles focused to design , to Cisco Unity , and so on. The order from easier to harder , at least for me has been : easier --- DQOS--->CIPT--->CVOICE ---harder passing scores. -- CVOICE:710 pts CIPT:699 pts DQOS:720 pts IPTT (IP Telephony Troubleshooting) exam is the only one remaining to pass by me , and i wonder if somebody knows something about this exam , and when can i get supplementary materials to study. Bye everybody. Christian Narvaez M. Ingeniero Soporte , MAGENTA CCNP, Cisco Certified Networking Professional Reyes Lavalle 3350,Las Condes, Santiago de Chile fvfnMesa Central: (56 2) 2408100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52899&t=52734 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exporting data from user tracking DB [7:52900]
Hello, I'm making a script and I'd need a system to use the User Tracking database registers, I know that there's a way of exporting the data from cli (that would be fine for me): http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/477/Campus/ut_export_data.html but unfortunatly this only works with Solaris and NT, and I have CW installed on a HP-UX. If I could avoid to work directly on the database (via DBI or isql) would be great. The other option would be use a modified (by me)version of devexp, but I'm in a hurry and I need to finish the script asap. thanks for your time boys... David. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52900&t=52900 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE and voice. [7:52860]
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > At 6:16 PM + 9/7/02, Casey, Paul (6822) wrote: > >Does anyone know the level to at which voice is tested to on the routing and > >swithing lab exam > >I have purchased some fxs cards and can do so much.. But what about call > >manager, fxo connections, gatekeeper,.etc > > > > > >Or is this detailed level reseved for the voice specialisation exam > > > >The web site still only seems to state that voice technology will account > >for a small apart.. > >Just wondering of the level of detail that one needs to go into.. > > > >not asking anyone to break > > NDA, nor would I expect you, (I wanna do this on my own). but > how > >much is expected of you for this aspect.. > > > > Historically, there has been a list of equipment that can be in the > lab. One question to ask is whether CallManager, for example, could > run on any of it. > > Admittedly, the examinee was never asked to program the ATM switch to > which the ATM interfaces were connected. OTOH, the examinee was never > asked to test ATM functions that require switch programming. > > At least some points of reference. Speaking with the caveat that one should never wager as to what might of might not appear in the lab, I am convinced that over the next year it is likely that one will see IP phones in the Lab, and one will need to configure things such that these phones connect to a Call Manager somewhere. Lord knows there are enough of them at the Cisco facilities! It would not be too difficult for the folks at Cisco to make it possible without having to put Call Managers into the Lab itself. I think it is pretty well know that sometimes requirements include configurations as if certain things exist, whether they do or not. I think it should also be obvious that Lab scenarios are being evolved to the point where CCIE Labs can be given over remote connections ( such as a Sylvan test ceter, for example ), rather than having to physically show up in San Jose, RTP, etc. Last time I was in the Lab, I found no real reason to even look at the rack ( although I did, for various stupid and wrong perceptions ) Given the published equipment list as it stands today, ( http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html#45 ) it would be possible for there to be IP phones. However, and again checking CCO ( http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/voice_faqs.html#2 ) at present the only phones are analogue. Cisco tends to make announcements as to content changes several months in advance. Until it apears on CCO, all one has is speculation. That information should pretty much tell you how to prepare. HTH -- www.chuckslongroad.info starting CCIE Lab preparation? check my study materials recommendations Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52901&t=52860 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Support exam [7:52727]
Well I just got back from taking the test and failed by six points!! What a bummer, now its time to regroup and study some more and re-take the exam in a month. The questions were very different from what I expected, ie very vague as to what they were asking. Oh well, know Appletalk - that's what got me. HTH's Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52902&t=52727 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice Certification [7:52734]
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > The order from easier to harder , at least for me has been : > easier --- DQOS--->CIPT--->CVOICE ---harder > Which I guess goes to show that different people have different perspectives :-) For me the order was CVOICE--->DQOS>CIPT Regards Peter Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52903&t=52734 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIP Cisco press [7:52878]
hi to prepare i used the following: - MPLS and VPN architectures covers all you need (read all chapters up to and inclusive the ospf chapter). but you really need to understand the content. the passing score is quite high (818) and the exam really tough. i'm quite experienced and found it one of the hardest cisco exams! a colleague of mine, who is ccie and mpls experienced as well, needed 2 attempts... - IP Quality of Service - Developing IP Multicast Networks compare with the cisco exam blueprint to decide which chapters to read. i managed the exam with just these 2 books plus the boson test. take care: it's really a lot of stuff in this exam. also quite tough. but passing score 'only' 720. both exams will be much harder than the bsci... i hope you're not too scared now. good luck and cheers lars ""Marwa Ismail"" schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all.. > > I am now trying to take CCIP Certificate, I already took BSCI exam, and I > want after that to take the multicast and QOS exam then MPLS > specialization.. > > Can anyone please recommend for me a Cisco Press books for these exams as I > am not able to take courses in them,, > > Thanks a lot.. > > > Kind regards.. > Marwa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52882&t=52878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice Certification [7:52734]
Ahmad In the first chapter of the CIPT course book there are a number of URLs of documents including Cisco IP telephony Solution Guide Cisco IP telephony Network Design Guides If you have reasonable internet access and a printer (preferably fast and full duplex) it would be worth printing them out and reading them. They contain a wealth of information. It would also be worth taking a look at the avvid product pages to get the current specs of the avvid hardware. If you want to round out your study you could also look at Syngress's Cisco AVVID and IP telephony design and implementation. It doesnt go into the detail needed for the exam but does give a great high level view of the avvid architecture that (at least in my case) really helped put a perspective on all my other study. Regards Peter Walker CISSP, CSS1, CIPTSS, CCIP, CCNP, etc "a. ahmad" wrote: > > Dear all, > > I am going to take CIPT exam with in few days. I can't buy Boson. Right now > I only have official CIPT course book and as well Cisco CallManager System > Guide. CIPT book covers exam topics or I need to read extra stuff as well. > No ne has taken this exam around so no idea at all about this exam. > > I would higly appreciate some suggestions. > > Thanks in advance! > Ahmad Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52889&t=52734 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP BCMSN [7:52904]
hi, everyone , I am currently preparing for my CCNP BCMSN module exam which will be in two month time , womder if any body has got any recommendation to good simulation software orwebsite or any reading material, thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52904&t=52904 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE and voice. [7:52860]
At 8:56 PM + 9/8/02, Chuck's Long Road wrote: >""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> At 6:16 PM + 9/7/02, Casey, Paul (6822) wrote: >> >Does anyone know the level to at which voice is tested to on the routing >and >> >swithing lab exam >> >I have purchased some fxs cards and can do so much.. But what about call >> >manager, fxo connections, gatekeeper,.etc >> > >> > >> >Or is this detailed level reseved for the voice specialisation exam >> > >> >The web site still only seems to state that voice technology will account >> >for a small apart.. >> >Just wondering of the level of detail that one needs to go into.. >> > >> >not asking anyone to break >> > NDA, nor would I expect you, (I wanna do this on my own). but >> how >> >much is expected of you for this aspect.. >> > >> >> Historically, there has been a list of equipment that can be in the >> lab. One question to ask is whether CallManager, for example, could >> run on any of it. >> >> Admittedly, the examinee was never asked to program the ATM switch to >> which the ATM interfaces were connected. OTOH, the examinee was never >> asked to test ATM functions that require switch programming. >> >> At least some points of reference. > > >Speaking with the caveat that one should never wager as to what might of >might not appear in the lab, I am convinced that over the next year it is >likely that one will see IP phones in the Lab, and one will need to >configure things such that these phones connect to a Call Manager somewhere. >Lord knows there are enough of them at the Cisco facilities! It would not be >too difficult for the folks at Cisco to make it possible without having to >put Call Managers into the Lab itself. Then that presumably gives some bounds. At the time IP telephones are added to the equipment list, it might be reasonable to assume connectivity via the Call Manager, but not the Call Manager itself, would be part of the lab. It's probably reasonable to assume that an analog or ISDN simulator could be present now, so calls between FXS/FXO, E&M, or ISDN ports are possible. > >I think it is pretty well know that sometimes requirements include >configurations as if certain things exist, whether they do or not. > >I think it should also be obvious that Lab scenarios are being evolved to >the point where CCIE Labs can be given over remote connections ( such as a >Sylvan test ceter, for example ), rather than having to physically show up >in San Jose, RTP, etc. > >Last time I was in the Lab, I found no real reason to even look at the rack >( although I did, for various stupid and wrong perceptions ) > >Given the published equipment list as it stands today, ( >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html#45 ) >it would be possible for there to be IP phones. However, and again checking >CCO ( >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/voice_faqs.html#2 ) >at present the only phones are analogue. > >Cisco tends to make announcements as to content changes several months in >advance. Until it apears on CCO, all one has is speculation. > That information should pretty much tell you how to prepare. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52905&t=52860 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPsec - what is wrong with this config? [7:52865]
Hi Neal, You may wanna try this: Apply the crypto map into the "Tunnel0 and the outside interface" CMIAW Best Regards, HATO >From: "Neal Rauhauser" >Reply-To: "Neal Rauhauser" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: IPsec - what is wrong with this config? [7:52865] >Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 23:41:15 GMT > >I have two 1750s sharing an ethernet hub - just trying to get IPsec on >a tunnel between ethernet interfaces and I am having trouble. This >config seems close but I don't know what to do next > > >Here is the error I am getting when I try to ping the opposite end of >the tunnel > >01:05:29: ISAKMP (0:1): retransmitting phase 1 MM_NO_STATE... >01:05:29: ISAKMP (0:1): incrementing error counter on sa: retransmit >phase 1 >01:05:29: ISAKMP (1): sending packet to 192.168.6.50 (I) MM_NO_STATE. > >-- this router is at the bottom of a three router stack >crypto isakmp policy 1 > authentication pre-share >crypto isakmp key duh address 192.168.6.51 >! >! >crypto ipsec transform-set MIDDLE ah-sha-hmac esp-des >! >crypto key pubkey-chain rsa > named-key middle > key-string >305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00D081DF >26BC7013 >448EA3D2 5C0853FA E0E01770 06D6C4FE A57B165A 4BC25F0E 5FD517B1 >12EEA345 >8C9CC44E DCDC705E AB6327F9 81868B14 CB2294F1 304611A2 A7020301 0001 > quit > addressed-key 192.168.6.51 > address 192.168.6.51 > key-string >305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00D081DF >26BC7013 >448EA3D2 5C0853FA E0E01770 06D6C4FE A57B165A 4BC25F0E 5FD517B1 >12EEA345 >8C9CC44E DCDC705E AB6327F9 81868B14 CB2294F1 304611A2 A7020301 0001 > quit > ! > crypto map MIDDLE2 local-address Tunnel0 > crypto map MIDDLE2 10 ipsec-isakmp > set peer 192.168.6.51 > set transform-set MIDDLE > match address middle > >interface Tunnel0 > ip address 192.168.6.50 255.255.255.0 > tunnel source 192.168.1.50 > tunnel destination 192.168.1.51 > tunnel mode ipip > crypto map MIDDLE2 >! >interface FastEthernet0 > ip address 192.168.1.50 255.255.255.0 > speed auto > > >--- this router is in the middle of a three router stack > >crypto isakmp policy 1 > authentication pre-share >crypto isakmp key duh address 192.168.6.50 >! >! >crypto ipsec transform-set BOTTOM ah-sha-hmac esp-des >! >crypto key pubkey-chain rsa > named-key bottom > key-string >305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00B941FA >8C44F60C >76199B3E DADDA933 F5EA1118 9F9410B0 E097836F 166FDC84 3FD06FA0 >338E77AE >F32142F4 D750F4F0 31844B70 099DD8B2 6F8753D7 70BD2BBA 03020301 0001 > quit > addressed-key 192.168.1.50 > address 192.168.1.50 > key-string >305C300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010105 00034B00 30480241 00B941FA >8C44F60C >76199B3E DADDA933 F5EA1118 9F9410B0 E097836F 166FDC84 3FD06FA0 >338E77AE >F32142F4 D750F4F0 31844B70 099DD8B2 6F8753D7 70BD2BBA 03020301 0001 > quit > ! > crypto map BOTTOM2 local-address Tunnel0 > crypto map BOTTOM2 10 ipsec-isakmp > set peer 192.168.6.50 > set transform-set BOTTOM > match address bottom >interface Tunnel0 > ip address 192.168.6.51 255.255.255.0 > tunnel source 192.168.1.51 > tunnel destination 192.168.1.50 > tunnel mode ipip > crypto map BOTTOM2 >! >interface Serial0 > ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 > clockrate 100 >! >interface FastEthernet0 > ip address 192.168.1.51 255.255.255.0 > speed auto > > > > >-- >Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]fcc : k0bsd >"I've seen the angels wearing their disguise, >ordinary people leading ordinary lives" - Tracy Chapman _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52906&t=52865 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unicast flooding on switch ports [7:52907]
Dear Group, I am having a setup like this :- cat6k -- cat6k < Coer switches | | | | | Cat5k| <= Floor switch | Cat5k| <= Floor switch I am connecting the sniffer on one of my core switches (cat6ks) and without doing port mirroring (SPAN) able to see the unicast packets flow between 2 Windows NT servers. Does this indicate unicast port flooding ??? or is this the default behavior of my Sniffer s/w. I am using Network associates Sniffer s/w. The port where the PC is connected is also in the same vlan in which the Windows NT servers are connected. Both the Servers are connected on the same switch. The servers are Win2k. Has anybody faced a similar problem like this ??? many thanks in advance Hitesh DISCLAIMER: Information contained and transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to Wipro Limited and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If this is a forwarded message, the content of this E-MAIL may not have been sent with the authority of the Company. If you are not the intended recipient, an agent of the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering the information to the named recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution, transmission, printing, copying or dissemination of this information in any way or in any manner is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please delete this mail & notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52907&t=52907 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPX and Timers [7:52850]
I tried to update just one of the ipx eigrp timers and found the other did not update as well. I'm not thinking that this can be done in eigrp. I just dont see how they would ever synchronize in eigrp. With IPX RIP you can change the update interval and the time it takes the route to be marked invalid will update with this. You can change the ratio with the ipx rip-multiplier command. I have been unable to figure anything like this out for eigrp. Where did you read or hear otherwise? Ben --- hagedorn wrote: > Hy > > I also know on my Lab , and i already tryed out to > have the same timers on > al interfaces within the AS, but no success. > I created a very small AS. > > Router---Et0Et1---Router > > the whole is ipx router eig 200 , ipx network 100 > ipx rip is off > > But it still do not synchronize the ipx timers. What > I do wrong?? > Regards philipp > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Hello Goodbye > Sent: Samstag, 7. September 2002 20:37 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: IPX and Timers [7:52850] > > > First, have you made sure that all the hello and > hold > times are the same on all interfaces on all routers > in > the AS. > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1908.htm#xtocid15 > > The default hold time is 3 times the hello time. Is > there any reason to not keep this relationship? > > I'm going to play with this in my lab this weekend > to > verify that all the timers need to be set the same > but > I have a feeling that DUAL will get messed up if > they > are not. > > Ben > > --- hagedorn wrote: > > Hy guys > > > > I have a problem with the IPX timers, if I would > > change the IPX eigrp > > hold-time , I can do this with ipx hold-time > inteval > > ... command, other > > possibility is to change the ipx hello interval , > > that should work but in > > all the possibility that I tryed out it will not > > work. > > Ciscos statement is if the hold time is > > smaller then twice a hello > > interval , the timers should be synchronize. ( > will > > not work ) any ideas are > > VERY welcome. > > Other if i change the Hold time of 60 seconds on a > > ethernet , the ipx hello > > interval will stay on 5 seconds , no synch?? > > now if someone cxan help me to get this question > > answered , that would be > > super. > > > > Regards Philipp > > > > PS: Already tryed several IOS version. Not work > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes > http://finance.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52910&t=52850 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
network design results [7:52909]
First, I wish to thank all of you who contributed to the question of network design. In particular, I would like to thank Larry Letterman who spent a fair bit of time, and explained in detail, why he made changes and what benefits these changes made. The end result: Each switch in the network, has a GBIC connection to the core. Originally, only 2 switch's per floor would have a fibre link to the core, and all other switch's on that level would "daisy chain" from that. It was put forward to me, that in the event of a failue back to the core, I could have a potential problem with STP between switch's. The root switch, would see multiple STP networks. This could leed to a problem. Besides that, just simple configuration will get through the implementation phase. Have trunk links carrying for all VLANS on the switchs. Assign VLAN membership per port and away we go. If any one is interested in seeing the final design, please feel free to ask for the doco. Its really such a simple design. I had around 20 people willing to help. I wish to thank you, the un-sung hero's. John Sydney, Australia ** visit http://www.solution6.com UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52909&t=52909 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
