What does the number means? [7:56511]
hi, i have list of IOS that supports MPLS. 12.0[3], 12.1[4.6], 12.1[7.3], 12.1[8.4],@12.1(20011103:114302) Please tell me what does the numbers in bracket mean. thank you very much Yahoo! Travel - Great flight deals, travel info and prizes! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56511&t=56511 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What does the number means? [7:56511]
ha... CCIE practice question (at least that's where I think I saw it) I call it revision but I think the test answer is "maintenance version" - the higher the number in brackets the more fixes that version of IOS contains. Tim ""champion boliao"" wrote in message news:200210300815.IAA20427@;groupstudy.com... > hi, > > i have list of IOS that supports MPLS. > > 12.0[3], 12.1[4.6], 12.1[7.3], 12.1[8.4],@12.1(20011103:114302) > > Please tell me what does the numbers in bracket mean. > > thank you very much > > > > Yahoo! Travel > - Great flight deals, travel info and prizes! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56512&t=56511 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MPLS on low-end hardware [7:56487]
Guys, What is the minimal flash/ram memory needed to run this code on a 26xx. Rgds, Umar. ""Reinhold Fischer"" wrote in message news:200210300723.HAA11457@;groupstudy.com... > Michael, > > if it is only for lab/learning purpose you can use the 12.0S > images from ftp-eng.cisco.com. They are not supported by cisco, > but work quite well. Use anonymous login and look under /isp > > Note: The cisco2500 image does not have too much MPLS features > built in. No problems with the 2600 images here. > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 40002eng 8275120 Oct 15 02:07 c2500-p-l.120-22.4.S2 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 40002eng 5671856 Oct 15 02:07 c2600-p-mz.120-22.4.S2 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 40002eng 5846156 Oct 15 02:07 c3620-p-mz.120-22.4.S2 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 40002eng 6048724 Oct 15 02:07 c3640-p-mz.120-22.4.S2 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 40002eng 5372564 Oct 15 02:07 c4500-p-mz.120-22.4.S2 > > hth > > Reinhold > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:58:28PM +, Michael Vasilenko wrote: > > Hello! > > > > One question - is it possible to run MPLS (edge or LSR) on 26xx? > > Any experience? Right IOS? > > > > -- > > Michael Vasilenko Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56513&t=56487 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab setup information [7:56514]
Hi, I am currently trying to setup a network in my lab to provide MPLS features. I am given 4 routers, 2 Cisco 7200 series and 2 Cisco 3600 series. As I am an alien in this field. I have a few questions. 1) Does a router come with IOS by default? 2) What is the command to check the IOS version of a router? 3) If I want to upgrade the IOS version, says from 12.0 to 12.1, what should I do? Can the IOS file be downloaded from internet? 4) Is IOS version backward compatible? Example, version 12.1 supports all the features in version 12.0? Please give me your advice and help me. I am dying. Thank you very much. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56514&t=56514 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
serial up, line ptotocol up..for a while [7:56515]
hi all, after i unshut the serial interface for frame relay service, the status was up, up...but after a while(maybe 10 secs), it went back to up,down...and the status up,up didn't represent the PVC is up because the Service Provider always claim that their LMI status remained down during that period...anybody pls explain why did i get up,up although LMI status is down. Thanks rgds naz Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56515&t=56515 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to telnet to other FROM PIX? [7:56435]
Hi.. Mark and Dear senior
I reason that I want to enable GUI is because I want to know more about PIX
features and I am quite familiar with CLI now
I have obtain my free DES activation key from cisco software center. But my
PIX version is 6.0 and PDM is version 1.0. I can't use
PIX(config)#activation-key command to input the key.
In order to install the key, I was told to install the new software image
and entering the new activation-key.
But I want to know
1)What is the new software image that I need to install, new version of PDM?
2)After I use tftp to install the new flash image, in what step it will
prompt me whether I want to install the activation-key?
3)After the installation complete, will my old configuration retain?
4)What is the different between PDM and PIX secure policy manager? Is
license for secure policy manager free?
Thanks a lot!!
>From: "Mark W. Odette II"
>Reply-To: "Mark W. Odette II"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: how to telnet to other FROM PIX? [7:56435]
>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 06:45:43 GMT
>
>Kenny,
>
>...Never had working on a PIX that didn't have any Encryption installed,
>I wouldn't know if it is absolutely true that you have to have it just
>to use the GUI, but if the requirements are such, then you need to go
>onto Cisco's website and apply for the free DES license key.
>
>After that, if you want to connect to a remote PIX using the GUI, you
>will need to follow the cook-book solution Cisco has posted on CCO for
>establishing a VPN tunnel between the two PIXen in question, and then
>you can use the GUI to remotely manage the other PIX. Your best bet is
>to just forget about the GUI for now, and set up SSH on each PIX, and
>connect using that. Learn the CLI well, and then use the GUI for all it
>really is good for- Monitoring functions.
>
>My biggest pet peeve is that the GUI does not support ALIAS commands in
>your PIX config... as well as a few other items like the such that are
>more advanced.
>
>For the time setting, just set the clock using the following syntax:
>
>Usage: clock set { | }
>
>clock summer-time recurring [
>] []
>
>clock summer-time date { | }
> { | }
>[]
>
>no clock summer-time
>
>clock timezone []
>
>no clock timezone
>
>show clock [detail]
>
>
>Hope that helps.
>
>Mark
>-Original Message-
>From: Kenny Smith [mailto:fwdog@;hotmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:04 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: how to telnet to other FROM PIX? [7:56435]
>
>Hi.. Thanks for your information. I think I didn't fullfil the
>following
>two requirements in order to connect to the PIX via GUI.
>
> e. The PIX Firewall clock is set to UTC. To determine if the PIX
>Firewall
>clock is set to UTC, enter the show clock command and check the output.
>
>singpix01(config)# sh clock
>06:54:07 Oct 30 2002
>
>May I know how to set clock to UTC, I found that I can't set the
>timezone.
>Why we need to set the clock to UTC in order to connect PIX via GUI?
>
>f. You have the activation key to use DES or above.
>
>I don't have it as shown below. Do I need to buy ?
>singpix01(config)# sh ver
>
>Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Version 6.0(1)
>PIX Device Manager Version 1.0(1)
>
>Compiled on Thu 17-May-01 20:05 by morlee
>
>singpix01 up 9 days 22 hours
>
>Hardware: PIX-515, 64 MB RAM, CPU Pentium 200 MHz
>Flash i28F640J5 @ 0x300, 16MB
>BIOS Flash AT29C257 @ 0xfffd8000, 32KB
>
>0: ethernet0: address is 0003.6bf6.e752, irq 11
>1: ethernet1: address is 0003.6bf6.e753, irq 10
>2: ethernet2: address is 00e0.b603.4830, irq 9
>3: ethernet3: address is 00e0.b603.482f, irq 9
>4: ethernet4: address is 00e0.b603.482e, irq 9
>5: ethernet5: address is 00e0.b603.482d, irq 9
>
>Licensed Features:
>Failover: Enabled
>VPN-DES:Disabled
>VPN-3DES: Disabled
>Maximum Interfaces: 6
>Cut-through Proxy: Enabled
>Guards: Enabled
>Websense: Enabled
>Throughput: Unlimited
>ISAKMP peers: Unlimited
>
>Serial Number: (XXX)
>Activation Key: X
>
> >From: "Ritchie, Brian"
> >Reply-To: "Ritchie, Brian"
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: RE: how to telnet to other FROM PIX? [7:56435]
> >Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:54:03 GMT
> >
> >The PIX does not support telnet in the same way that a router or switch
> >does, you can telnet to the PIX but you cannot telnet from it to other
> >hosts.
> >
> >To manage the PIX using a web browser you use HTTPS not HTTP, so the
>'url'
> >would be https://PIX_IP_Address. This will allow you to browse to it
> >assuming all other configuration tasks have been completed. If you are
> >still
> >having problems visit
> >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_60/pdm_in
>/impr
> >ove.htm#xtocid1 for more help.
> >
> >Hope this helps, Brian
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Kenny Smith [mailto:fwdog@;hotmail.com]
> >Sent: 29 October 2002 06:56
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: how to telnet t
RE: serial up, line ptotocol up..for a while [7:56515]
10 seconds? That almost sound like the keepalive time setting. After the no shut, the router tried to bring the interface up, sending a keepalive to the other side, but it didn't receive anything back so it brought the interface down again. You may want to check the way you are receiving you're clock and if the encapsulation is the same on both sides of the serial link. Peter > -Original Message- > From: Md Nazri [mailto:mdnazri@;telekom.com.my] > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:01 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: serial up, line ptotocol up..for a while [7:56515] > > > hi all, > > after i unshut the serial interface for frame relay service, > the status was > up, up...but after a while(maybe 10 secs), it went back to > up,down...and the > status up,up didn't represent the PVC is up because the > Service Provider > always claim that their LMI status remained down during that > period...anybody pls explain why did i get up,up although LMI > status is down. > > Thanks > > rgds > naz Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56518&t=56515 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Queuing question(s) again ! [7:56519]
Hi Folks, I'm still confused on Cisco's Terminology and just want to clarify something again. We all know that priority queuing is the strictest form of queuing, in the sense that the 'lower' queues have to defer / wait until the 'superior' queues have been drained, before they (the lower queues) can be serviced. But then what should I take this to mean? (Excerpt from the QoS guide):- --- IP RTP Priority The IP RTP Priority feature provides a strict priority queueing scheme that allows delay-sensitive data such as voice to be dequeued and sent before packets in other queues are dequeued. This feature can be used on serial interfaces and Frame Relay PVCs in conjunction with either WFQ or CBWFQ on the same outgoing interface. In either case, traffic matching the range of UDP ports specified for the priority queue is guaranteed strict priority over other CBWFQ classes or WFQ flows; packets in the priority queue are always serviced first. --- Should I take it to mean that all queuing schemes such is RTP and LLQ, which use a variant of WFQ as their basis have (1) 'modified' one queue to be act as a HIGH PQ, or if you like, System Queue 0 in custom queuing, in that it has to be drained first, before the other queues get serviced or (2) is it once again, a case of one queue having a higher weight which means more data gets sent, (but not all data), at each pass. My take on "Strict Priority queuing" and "Guaranteed Strict Priority" is that once again that specific queue's have to be emptied completely, before other queue's get serviced, and then and only then does WFQ / CBWFQ do it's thing on the interface Thanks for your insights into this as Cisco's terminology is driving me kooky! Manish ___ Manish Hira ( >) Network Administrator If you woke up breathing, Congratulations! You have another chance! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56519&t=56519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Queuing question(s) again ! [7:56519]
Hi Manish - Regarding your questions about queuing: > Should I take it to mean that all queuing > schemes such is RTP and LLQ, which > use a variant of WFQ as their basis have > > (1) 'modified' one queue to be act as a HIGH > PQ, or if you like, System > Queue 0 in custom queuing, in that it has to be > drained first, before the > other queues get serviced or Yes, I believe this to be true. Keep in mind the "evolution" of queuing mechanisms: after WFQ came CBWFQ and PQ simultaneously (I think - someone correct my history if I'm mistaken). PQ is *too* strict, and not granular enough. CBWFQ is too loose, and cannot guarantee that a certain type of traffic will *always* get through. Enter IP RTP Priority, which states that RTP packets (usually voice) will *always* go through, and any other traffic type will be handled in a WFQ fashion. LLQ opens up the possibility of giving priority to other traffic types (not necessarily voice traffic), and then handling everything else in a bandwidth-based WFQ fashion. > (2) is it once again, a case of one queue > having a higher weight which means > more data gets sent, (but not all data), at > each pass. This is pure CBWFQ that you're describing here. HTH, BJ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56520&t=56519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GSR line card utilization guidelines [7:56521]
I'm considering enabling some features on a E0 GSR line card. I'm going to monitor the line card CPU utilization in order to track the impact the features have on the LC. Does anyone have any general rules of thumb (or reference document) that provides guidelines on how far, utilization wise, a line card might be pushed before packet forwarding performance is affected? Said differently, what's the threshold for line card utilization, that if exceeded, probably means I should disable these features? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56521&t=56521 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP Switching exam [7:56507]
The switching exam questions that refer to IOS based switches will be more like the 2900 and 3500 series and less like the 1900 series. ""Ahed Naimi"" wrote in message news:200210300639.GAA02527@;groupstudy.com... > Hi All; > I am working on CCNP switching exam and I saw that , there are differences > in commands between Cat 1900 and Cat 2900-3500 switches (IOS based > switches). On which series of IOS switches the exam > questions are? > > Pls, advise Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56523&t=56507 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GSR line card utilization guidelines [7:56521]
At 12:27 PM 10/30/2002 +, bergenpeak wrote: >I'm considering enabling some features on a E0 GSR line >card. I'm going to monitor the line card CPU utilization >in order to track the impact the features have on the LC. > >Does anyone have any general rules of thumb (or reference >document) that provides guidelines on how far, utilization >wise, a line card might be pushed before packet forwarding >performance is affected? Said differently, what's the >threshold for line card utilization, that if exceeded, >probably means I should disable these features? I would highly suggest conferring with your Cisco account team before implementing any features on a live network. Furthermore, try and bench this stuff in a lab if at all possible. The effects vary tremendously depending on Line card versions, features, IOS trains, etc. Navigating this maze is a job for the folks with the most information :-) >Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56524&t=56521 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: GBIC Types [7:56468]
Hi, Use the command - show port capabilities, that works on my 5500's. Regards Colin Tetluk CCIE# 5767 -Original Message- From: Larry Letterman [mailto:lletterm@;cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: GBIC Types [7:56468] sh port Tim Champion wrote: >Does anyone know of a show command on a Catalyst 5k which will show the type >of GBIC installed, SH, LX/LH etc? > >Many thanks > >Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56526&t=56468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lab setup information [7:56514]
1) yes 2) show version 3) hit www.cisco.com and search, read, search, read. 4) yes good luck. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56527&t=56514 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Switching exam [7:56507]
Well actually there are questions on the set based OS and the IOS. I don't recall a great deal in the menu structure of a 1900. You should be able to find out on Cisco's site, although a quick look didn't come up with much. Symon -Original Message- From: Ahed Naimi [mailto:anaimi@;hotmail.com] Sent: 30 October 2002 06:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP Switching exam [7:56507] Hi All; I am working on CCNP switching exam and I saw that , there are differences in commands between Cat 1900 and Cat 2900-3500 switches (IOS based switches). On which series of IOS switches the exam questions are? Pls, advise = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56528&t=56507 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Switching exam [7:56507]
I found that the CLSC course notes were the most helpful when I wrote, in fact 90% of the exam was based on these notesthat was back in 2000, I would think that LAN Switching notes today are still very valid for latest exam! Regards Colin Tetluk CCIE# 5767 -Original Message- From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:sthurlow@;webvein.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 4:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCNP Switching exam [7:56507] Well actually there are questions on the set based OS and the IOS. I don't recall a great deal in the menu structure of a 1900. You should be able to find out on Cisco's site, although a quick look didn't come up with much. Symon -Original Message- From: Ahed Naimi [mailto:anaimi@;hotmail.com] Sent: 30 October 2002 06:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP Switching exam [7:56507] Hi All; I am working on CCNP switching exam and I saw that , there are differences in commands between Cat 1900 and Cat 2900-3500 switches (IOS based switches). On which series of IOS switches the exam questions are? Pls, advise = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56529&t=56507 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic - of general interest [7:56500]
To me, it would be corporate welfare if the government subsidized the actual investment into the telecom industry. If private investment is encouraged to head that way because of the tax code or deregulation the so be it. It's not Washington's money first. IMHO Jim ""Tim Metz"" wrote in message news:200210300736.HAA14144@;groupstudy.com... > Chuck, > > didn't this strike you as corporate welfare? > > Tim > > > ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in > message news:200210300050.AAA32516@;groupstudy.com... > > saw this one come through today. Personally, I agree with the premise. > > > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;3953254;5700831;g?http://207.27.3.33/2/ > > watch the wrap > > > > -- > > > > www.chuckslongroad.info Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56530&t=56500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: serial up, line ptotocol up..for a while [7:56515]
All the interfaces will come up up for a short time after doing a no shut until the interface realizes it's not seeing LMI in your example or keepalive on an ethernet... Dave Md Nazri wrote: > > hi all, > > after i unshut the serial interface for frame relay service, the status was > up, up...but after a while(maybe 10 secs), it went back to up,down...and the > status up,up didn't represent the PVC is up because the Service Provider > always claim that their LMI status remained down during that > period...anybody pls explain why did i get up,up although LMI status is down. > > Thanks > > rgds > naz -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56531&t=56515 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Queuing question(s) again ! [7:56519]
At 11:40 AM + 10/30/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hi Folks, > >I'm still confused on Cisco's Terminology and just want to clarify something >again. > >We all know that priority queuing is the strictest form of queuing, in the >sense that the 'lower' queues have to defer / wait until the 'superior' >queues have been drained, before they (the lower queues) can be serviced. >But then what should I take this to mean? > >(Excerpt from the QoS guide):- >--- >IP RTP Priority >The IP RTP Priority feature provides a strict priority queueing scheme that >allows delay-sensitive data such as voice to be dequeued and sent before >packets in other queues are dequeued. This feature can be used on serial >interfaces and Frame Relay PVCs in conjunction with either WFQ or CBWFQ on >the same outgoing interface. In either case, traffic matching the range of >UDP ports specified for the priority queue is guaranteed strict priority >over other CBWFQ classes or WFQ flows; packets in the priority queue are >always serviced first. >--- > >Should I take it to mean that all queuing schemes such is RTP and LLQ, which >use a variant of WFQ as their basis have I think you know this, but IP RTP Priority is a special case of LLQ. > >(1) 'modified' one queue to be act as a HIGH PQ, or if you like, System >Queue 0 in custom queuing, in that it has to be drained first, before the >other queues get serviced or (1) is how I read the description in "Inside Cisco IOS Software Architecture" > >(2) is it once again, a case of one queue having a higher weight which means >more data gets sent, (but not all data), at each pass. > > >My take on "Strict Priority queuing" and "Guaranteed Strict Priority" is >that once again that specific queue's have to be emptied completely, before >other queue's get serviced, and then and only then does WFQ / CBWFQ do it's >thing on the interface > >Thanks for your insights into this as Cisco's terminology is driving me >kooky! > >Manish > >___ >Manish Hira ( >) >Network Administrator >If you woke up breathing, Congratulations! >You have another chance! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56522&t=56519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LAN auditing [7:56516]
Hi all, Does anybody know of a site or document providing info on the points to be covered in a LAN Design and performance audit? Like what to look out for...focus areasetc. Thanks Simon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56516&t=56516 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE LAB Re-Grade [7:56458]
you get a regrade and the same detail, takes ages apparently, unless your really close you are giving cisco free money >From: "Michael Witte" >Reply-To: "Michael Witte" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: CCIE LAB Re-Grade [7:56458] >Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:50:12 GMT > >I took the lab on 9/24/2002 and did not pass. I didn't agree on my scores >and put in for a re-grade on Sat.I know I did much better. Does anyone know >what the process is and if they will be contacting me for credit card info >ect?It also took them until Sat afternoon to get my grade so I think >something was wrong down there. thanks. _ Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56506&t=56458 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE LAB Re-Grade [7:56458]
""DAve Diaz"" wrote in message news:200210301521.PAA21871@;groupstudy.com... > you get a regrade and the same detail, takes ages apparently, unless your > really close you are giving cisco free money > CL: probably "takes forever" because the proctor would have to rebuild your pod from the saved configurations, and then go through the inspection process again. It is probably a matter of finding the time and the space to do so. CL: I don't know, but from what I have seen in the Lab, the proctors grade the previous day's exams while a new group is in taking their exam. So, in between the interruptions from the current test takers and the work necessary to save yesterday's setups and grade yesterdays results, it is no doubt a matter of resources. it's not like they keep your pod intact for the waiting period. > > > > > > >From: "Michael Witte" > >Reply-To: "Michael Witte" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: CCIE LAB Re-Grade [7:56458] > >Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:50:12 GMT > > > >I took the lab on 9/24/2002 and did not pass. I didn't agree on my scores > >and put in for a re-grade on Sat.I know I did much better. Does anyone know > >what the process is and if they will be contacting me for credit card info > >ect?It also took them until Sat afternoon to get my grade so I think > >something was wrong down there. thanks. > _ > Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56532&t=56458 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPX bridge on 6509?? [7:56533]
I have a LAN segment in which I wish to move the routing from a 7206 to a new 6509. On the 7206, The interface I want to move has the one main segment (172.16.x.y/24) and around 15 secondary interfaces of various networks (My predecessors apparently didn't like sub-interfaces). Unfortunately, IPX is also being routed off of that interface. I want to separate all of these IP networks into individual VLAN's and route between them. My question is how can I get this one IPX network amongst the vlan's that need it? Is this possible? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56533&t=56533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACS for Windows 2000 [7:56534]
Hi guys I have problems in configuring ACS for RAS to authenticate users using Active Directory on the Windows domain? I'm having problems in getting this to work. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56534&t=56534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACS for Windows 2000 [7:56535]
Hi guys I have problems in configuring ACS for RAS to authenticate users using Active Directory on the Windows domain? I'm having problems in getting this to work. __ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56535&t=56535 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FXO vs other Analog Voice Card [7:56536]
Hello All, When FXO receives a phone call, it strips out corresponding called-number that matches destination pattern settings.. For instance, If call string that matches 333 , it will strip 333 and pass on last four digit. IF there is next hop voip router only sees last four digit. (Isn't that correct?. Now, how can we make that happen for E&M card? (VIC-2E&M)? "digit-strip" is enabled by default, but next router only sees 333- instead of . Help me out. Thank you. -Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56536&t=56536 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off Topic - Expand Networks [7:56537]
Does anybody have any experience with Expand Networks Acellerator products? Could anybody share with me the results you've seen with them? More specifically, if you've used them over a VPN? -- Ben Woltz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56537&t=56537 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Using the DOC CD?? [7:56497]
Does any body know where to get a CD Doc on CD?(version 12.1) The ones that come with routers are very old. Thanks Reza ""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message news:20021032.AAA21502@;groupstudy.com... > Hello, > Does any one know of any specific shortcuts ( one example) on how to use the > DOC Cd efficiently? > > I keep hearing and reading that you should know how to navigate this cd as > it is your friend in the Lab but all I can do is get to the command and > configuration guide and lookup specific features/cmds? > > Is there a better way? Can someone point out with an example? > > For eg. on CCO I can type www.cisco.com/public/technotes/tech_protocol.shtml > and get to the Technical Tips section. > > Is there a way to get this info. on the Doc CD? > > Thanks for your help. > > Sincerely. > > > > > > _ > Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband. Join now! > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56539&t=56497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GSR line card utilization guidelines [7:56521]
Take heed to the warning of not testing this on a producton network. Never had a problem w/CPU over utilization, BUT my organization has had A LOT of problems with buffer utilization/overflow on GSR's on 12K's. We have experienced small pvc's (5MB or less) dragging down entire OC-3 aggregate circuits due to buffer problems(not supposed to be possible). Problem was not solved even after we upgraded IOS & cards memory to maximum. We ended up buying 10K's for each hub to add a distribution layer to our network. Expensive fix. ""bergenpeak"" wrote in message news:200210301227.MAA27007@;groupstudy.com... > I'm considering enabling some features on a E0 GSR line > card. I'm going to monitor the line card CPU utilization > in order to track the impact the features have on the LC. > > Does anyone have any general rules of thumb (or reference > document) that provides guidelines on how far, utilization > wise, a line card might be pushed before packet forwarding > performance is affected? Said differently, what's the > threshold for line card utilization, that if exceeded, > probably means I should disable these features? > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56540&t=56521 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE LAB Re-Grade [7:56458]
At 03:42 PM 10/30/2002 +, The Long and Winding Road wrote: >""DAve Diaz"" wrote in message >news:200210301521.PAA21871@;groupstudy.com... > > you get a regrade and the same detail, takes ages apparently, unless your > > really close you are giving cisco free money > > > >CL: probably "takes forever" because the proctor would have to rebuild your >pod from the saved configurations, and then go through the inspection >process again. It is probably a matter of finding the time and the space to >do so. I'm pretty sure they just run scripts to suck configs and mark the configs themselves. I don't think they actually test if a config works, just that you have the right knobs on in the right places. Hence, a regrade should just be a case of comparing the answer set to the candidates answers. >CL: I don't know, but from what I have seen in the Lab, the proctors grade >the previous day's exams while a new group is in taking their exam. So, in >between the interruptions from the current test takers and the work >necessary to save yesterday's setups and grade yesterdays results, it is no >doubt a matter of resources. it's not like they keep your pod intact for the >waiting period. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Michael Witte" > > >Reply-To: "Michael Witte" > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: CCIE LAB Re-Grade [7:56458] > > >Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:50:12 GMT > > > > > >I took the lab on 9/24/2002 and did not pass. I didn't agree on my scores > > >and put in for a re-grade on Sat.I know I did much better. Does anyone >know > > >what the process is and if they will be contacting me for credit card >info > > >ect?It also took them until Sat afternoon to get my grade so I think > > >something was wrong down there. thanks. > > _ > > Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! > > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56538&t=56458 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contract Trainers for Cisco Telephony [7:56541]
My company is looking for a Cisco contract trainer with experience teaching the Cisco telephony classes, particularly 9E0-402 CIPT-Cisco IP Telephony. Does anyone know of a site I can go to get a listing of available trainers, or other resources I can explore in my search for a trainer capable of teaching this material. Thanks, Kevin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56541&t=56541 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Contract Trainers for Cisco Telephony [7:56541]
Only Cisco "Learning Partners" can legally teach Cisco classes. So you would want to deal with a such a company, not an individual contractor. There's a site for learning about Learning Partners here: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le31/le29/learning_learning_partners_home.html I recommend Advanced Network Information. They were one of the fist Learning Partners to specialize in voice/data integration. Both Howard Berkowitz and I have done work for them and I think Howard would agree with me that they are very competent. There's more info about them here: http://www.ani-training.com/ Priscilla Kevin Hafner wrote: > > My company is looking for a Cisco contract trainer with > experience teaching > the Cisco telephony classes, particularly 9E0-402 CIPT-Cisco IP > Telephony. > Does anyone know of a site I can go to get a listing of > available trainers, > or other resources I can explore in my search for a trainer > capable of > teaching this material. > > Thanks, > > Kevin > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56542&t=56541 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
About the new written CCIE exam (350-001) [7:56543]
Hello, I'm brazilian and I my english is not very well, so patience with me... I can read a lot of messages about the new CCIE written exam, I'm studying to do this exam too, then for those people that do the exam, topics as MPLS, Advanced QoS, ATM, VoIP/FR/ATM are hardly covered? If yes... what's is the tip, study guide to these topics? I'm actually reading the Cisco Lan Switching (Cisco Press), so, after this book, I will read the Doyle's Book, and Network Design and Case Studies (all are Cisco Press)... Are there another good book for read? I think about Cisco ATM (Cisco Press)??? Thanks and again sorry for my english... Jefferson Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56543&t=56543 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: About the new written CCIE exam (350-001) [7:56543]
Jefferson, the books you have mentioned are good, I'm not to sure that you need to read a whole book on ATM for the written exam, although it wouldn't hurt. You might want to read the CCIE certification book by Anthony Bruno,(publisher Cisco Press) it covers just about everything. Jason ""Jefferson Orsi Siratuti"" wrote in message news:200210302010.UAA22473@;groupstudy.com... > Hello, > > I'm brazilian and I my english is not very well, so patience with me... > > I can read a lot of messages about the new CCIE written exam, I'm studying > to do this exam too, then for those people that do the exam, topics as MPLS, > Advanced QoS, ATM, VoIP/FR/ATM are hardly covered? > > If yes... what's is the tip, study guide to these topics? > > I'm actually reading the Cisco Lan Switching (Cisco Press), so, after this > book, I will read the Doyle's Book, and Network Design and Case Studies (all > are Cisco Press)... Are there another good book for read? I think about > Cisco ATM (Cisco Press)??? > > Thanks and again sorry for my english... > > Jefferson Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56544&t=56543 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Queuing question(s) again ! [7:56519]
Hi, Am I wrong or the CBWFQ does allow you to strict priority a traffic class using the keyword 'priority' ? Thanks, Alaerte "\"\"B.J. Wilson\"\"" @groupstudy.com em 30/10/2002 09:07:36 Favor responder a "\"\"B.J. Wilson\"\"" Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Assunto:Re: Queuing question(s) again ! [7:56519] Hi Manish - Regarding your questions about queuing: > Should I take it to mean that all queuing > schemes such is RTP and LLQ, which > use a variant of WFQ as their basis have > > (1) 'modified' one queue to be act as a HIGH > PQ, or if you like, System > Queue 0 in custom queuing, in that it has to be > drained first, before the > other queues get serviced or Yes, I believe this to be true. Keep in mind the "evolution" of queuing mechanisms: after WFQ came CBWFQ and PQ simultaneously (I think - someone correct my history if I'm mistaken). PQ is *too* strict, and not granular enough. CBWFQ is too loose, and cannot guarantee that a certain type of traffic will *always* get through. Enter IP RTP Priority, which states that RTP packets (usually voice) will *always* go through, and any other traffic type will be handled in a WFQ fashion. LLQ opens up the possibility of giving priority to other traffic types (not necessarily voice traffic), and then handling everything else in a bandwidth-based WFQ fashion. > (2) is it once again, a case of one queue > having a higher weight which means > more data gets sent, (but not all data), at > each pass. This is pure CBWFQ that you're describing here. HTH, BJ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56545&t=56519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Queuing question(s) again ! [7:56519]
> Am I wrong or the CBWFQ does allow you to strict priority a traffic class > using the keyword 'priority' ? The priority keyword is what differentiates LLQ from CBWFQ. The priority command is used when configuring the "priority" LLQ queue, whereas the rest of the queues in LLQ can be configured with the "bandwidth" command. The "priority" command is not used with CBWFQ. HTH, BJ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56547&t=56519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
videoconference over frame relay [7:56548]
Hi All I am configuring videoconferencing on frame relay for two sites. I wondering if someone has a sample config ? _ Choose an Internet access plan right for you -- try MSN! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56548&t=56548 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: videoconference over frame relay [7:56548]
What video equipment are you using? ""johnman johnman"" wrote in message news:200210302119.VAB05984@;groupstudy.com... > Hi All > > I am configuring videoconferencing on frame relay for two sites. > I wondering if someone has a sample config ? > > > > > > _ > Choose an Internet access plan right for you -- try MSN! > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56549&t=56548 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: videoconference over frame relay [7:56548]
I am using small polycom cameras connected to my windows XP computers. The main site is frame relay T1 (CIR 500) and the remote site is 640Kbps (CIR 256) Here is the sample config I want to test at my remote site ! interface Serial0 description local circuit at remote site dlci 58 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay bandwidth 640 frame-relay traffic-shaping frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0.1 point-to-point description subinterface to the main site ip address 192.168.85.30 255.255.255.252 frame-relay class vcofr frame-relay interface-dlci 52 access-list 110 permit ip any any dscp cs4 access-list 110 permit ip any any dscp af41 ! ! class-map video-conf match access-group 110 policy-map qos-policy class video-conf priority 256 class class-default fair-queue ! ! map-class frame-relay vcofr frame-relay traffic-rate 576000 64 no frame-relay adaptive-shaping service-policy output qos-policy >From: "John Huston" >Reply-To: "John Huston" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: videoconference over frame relay [7:56548] >Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:22:18 GMT > >What video equipment are you using? > >""johnman johnman"" wrote in message >news:200210302119.VAB05984@;groupstudy.com... > > Hi All > > > > I am configuring videoconferencing on frame relay for two sites. > > I wondering if someone has a sample config ? > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > Choose an Internet access plan right for you -- try MSN! > > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp _ Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband. Join now! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56550&t=56548 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
odd & even # IPs on an ACL [7:56551]
Just wondering what the correct syntax would be if you wanted to have - two networks - one network with students with Omiting odd numbered IPs. - second network with faculty omiting the even numbered IPs. Im looking for a one line command to do this. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56551&t=56551 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Update: OSPF Route mystery - what am I missing [7:55975]
Chuck, I may not all answers, but have few broken pieces which may help you... When multiple ASBR advertises same LSA then router will choose an ASBR that advertises lowest cost, if advertised cost from both ASBR is same then lowest internal cost to reach ASBR will be considered. If advertised cost of LSA & cost to reach ASBR is same in such case load-balancing will occur. I tried identical scenario few months ago to check/debug loop & following is my few findings (based on your topology)... 1. Upon receiving update from R4, R1 & R3 updates their RIP database & redistributes into OSPF domain. 2. This will be flooded throughout the domain & both R1 & R3 prefers R2 for route that is originated in RIP (This is because of adm.distance). And flushes their RIP database. 3. Since RIP database is flushed LSA will removed or advertised as unreachable to R2 by R1 & R3. 4. Within next 30 seconds, it repeats same story from step1 onwards. You may have observed random ASBR selection by R2, this may be due to timing-issue of updating & advertising on R1 & R3. First fix R1 & R3 by route-map/distance etc to prefer R4 for routes advertised by R4, later you will see R2 will choose R1 as ASBR but still has LSA info in LSDB. If you want to load-balance then make equal cost between token ring & serial & see if you can get your results. Make sure all the time you watch both RIP/OSPF database changes while there is loop, its fun ;-) thanks, rahul. ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in message news:200210210158.BAA20429@;groupstudy.com... > in line ( like the skates ) > > > ""Nigel Taylor"" wrote in message > news:200210202246.WAA27657@;groupstudy.com... > > Chuck, > > I can't believe anyone understood a word I wrote. After > reading > > my post I could only laugh. Nonetheless, I think you got what I was > trying > > to say and I do believe your thoughts and observations are correct. In > > reading your post I was trying to recall what could have possibly provided > > the material for the discussion you mentioned. > > > > The author that comes to mind is no other than "Terry Slattery". > > CL: Slattery remains an interesting read. A lot different, and maybe not a > landmark work, a la Doyle, but still worth looking at. > > > >I too did > > notice the constant flapping of R4's common network using the "debug ip > > routing" command. > > I must say this is definitely interesting. Lately, I've had the > opportunity > > to look at a few situations where the use of RIP lead to some very unique > > results as it pertains to redistribution. (check this one out... > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/10.html). > > Look at the route table on r2504 take note of the 3.22.x.x and 3.44.x.x > > networks. Why is it on r2507 that the routes show as ospf exteranl type2 > > routes. This is just another example of how rip simply works outside of > the > > rules. > > CL: I was going to say that it's because the routes are RIP routes that have > been redistributed into OSPF. However, looking at the configuration, I see > the interfaces are in the OSPF domain as well. Maybe the configuration is > being misreported? Maybe if an interface is in both a RIP and an OSPF > domain, RIP takes preference? That can't be right. > > CL: hhhmmm.. fooling around with the configs a bit. Mystery upon > mystery. I can't duplicate the result on the CCO link below. I'm wondering > if there are some IOS bugs. > > CL: the other thing I got to wondering is if there is some provision in the > standard in the case of multiple ABSR's advertising the same route. I can't > find anything off hand. It might require a more careful read than I have > time for right now. > > > > > > Although, at first look everything does seem to be very straight-forward, > > not until you get under the hood do you really see or observe the real > > issues involved. Thanks for keeping us all sane :-) > > > > Nigel > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "The Long and Winding Road" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 5:33 PM > > Subject: Re: Update: OSPF Route mystery - what am I missing [7:55975] > > > > > > > funny you should mention it. I've spent the last forty minutes looking > at > > > debugs on all of the routers involved. > > > > > > given the topology, > > > > > > R1tr--R2 > > > | | > > > | serial |serial > > > | | > > > R4tr--R3 > > > > > > R1, R2, and R3 are OSPF routers > > > R1, R4, and R3 are RIP ver 2 routers > > > > > > 2 way redistribution occurs on R1 and R3. The configurations for > > > redistribution are identical on both routers-- > > > > > > > > > here is what I believe I am seeing: > > > > > > R4 is advertising RIP routes to both R1 and R3 > > > > > > R1 and R3, in turn, redistribute those routes into OSPF as E2's > > > > > > R2 receives those routes and installs them in
RE: IPX bridge on 6509?? [7:56533]
Jason Owens wrote: > > I have a LAN segment in which I wish to move the routing from a > 7206 to a new 6509. On the 7206, The interface I want to move > has the one main segment (172.16.x.y/24) and around 15 > secondary interfaces of various networks (My predecessors > apparently didn't like sub-interfaces). Unfortunately, IPX is > also being routed off of that interface. I want to separate all > of these IP networks into individual VLAN's and route between > them. My question is how can I get this one IPX network amongst > the vlan's that need it? Is this possible? Very interesting question. I will attempt to stir up some discussion to try to get you an answer. :-) Couldn't you bridge IPX traffic between these VLANs? To do this you wouldn't put any ipx network numbers on the subinterfaces, but you would put the ones that have IPX devices in the same bridge group. The Cisco LAN Switching book also talks about Routed Switch Virtual Interfaces (SVIs) for situations like this. Check Chapter 18. You should take some time to learn how the IPX clients are getting L3 information in the current network. (Always characterize the exiting network before designing enhancements.) Then take some time to think about the traffic once you introduce VLANs and isolate broadcast domains. (Are VLANs new to this network? Was it all one big broadcast domain before??) When an IPX client boots, it broadcasts a Get Nearest Server (GNS) message, as you may know. Either a router or server can respond to this. But it has to be in the same broadcast domain to hear it. What is responding now? And will it still be in the same broadcast domain in your new design? After the client learns about a server, including its L3 address, it broadcasts a Find Network Number message to find a router that can get it to the server. Through these messages, the client learns its own network number, the address of a server, and the address of a local router. Luckily, you don't have to worry about ARP broadcasts. Because a L3 address in IPX is network.node, where node is the MAC address, there's no need for ARP. If a client knows the L3 address for a devie it needs to reach, it also knows the MAC address. So, consider how all that is working now and what will happen when you subdivide broadcast domains. Think about the logical design and then figure out the configuration, hopefully with help from somebody who knows the 6509 better than I do! :-) ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56553&t=56533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: odd & even # IPs on an ACL [7:56551]
in any octet 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 if the rightmost bit is 0 ( zero ) the number is even if the rightmost bit is 1 ( one ) the number is odd = even 0010 = even 0100 = even etc 0001 = odd = odd etc you should be able to figure out a one line access-list using this info. www.chuckslongroad.info ""Casey Miles"" wrote in message news:20021030.WAA16240@;groupstudy.com... > Just wondering what the correct syntax would be if you wanted to have > - two networks > - one network with students with Omiting odd numbered IPs. > - second network with faculty omiting the even numbered IPs. > > Im looking for a one line command to do this. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56554&t=56551 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: Update: OSPF Route mystery - what am I missing [7:55975]
Forgot to mention, let me know if you need logs I think i have it thanks, rahul. - Original Message - From: "Rahul Kachalia" Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 2:26 PM Subject: Re: Update: OSPF Route mystery - what am I missing [7:55975] Chuck, I may not all answers, but have few broken pieces which may help you... When multiple ASBR advertises same LSA then router will choose an ASBR that advertises lowest cost, if advertised cost from both ASBR is same then lowest internal cost to reach ASBR will be considered. If advertised cost of LSA & cost to reach ASBR is same in such case load-balancing will occur. I tried identical scenario few months ago to check/debug loop & following is my few findings (based on your topology)... 1. Upon receiving update from R4, R1 & R3 updates their RIP database & redistributes into OSPF domain. 2. This will be flooded throughout the domain & both R1 & R3 prefers R2 for route that is originated in RIP (This is because of adm.distance). And flushes their RIP database. 3. Since RIP database is flushed LSA will removed or advertised as unreachable to R2 by R1 & R3. 4. Within next 30 seconds, it repeats same story from step1 onwards. You may have observed random ASBR selection by R2, this may be due to timing-issue of updating & advertising on R1 & R3. First fix R1 & R3 by route-map/distance etc to prefer R4 for routes advertised by R4, later you will see R2 will choose R1 as ASBR but still has LSA info in LSDB. If you want to load-balance then make equal cost between token ring & serial & see if you can get your results. Make sure all the time you watch both RIP/OSPF database changes while there is loop, its fun ;-) thanks, rahul. ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in message news:200210210158.BAA20429@;groupstudy.com... > in line ( like the skates ) > > > ""Nigel Taylor"" wrote in message > news:200210202246.WAA27657@;groupstudy.com... > > Chuck, > > I can't believe anyone understood a word I wrote. After > reading > > my post I could only laugh. Nonetheless, I think you got what I was > trying > > to say and I do believe your thoughts and observations are correct. In > > reading your post I was trying to recall what could have possibly provided > > the material for the discussion you mentioned. > > > > The author that comes to mind is no other than "Terry Slattery". > > CL: Slattery remains an interesting read. A lot different, and maybe not a > landmark work, a la Doyle, but still worth looking at. > > > >I too did > > notice the constant flapping of R4's common network using the "debug ip > > routing" command. > > I must say this is definitely interesting. Lately, I've had the > opportunity > > to look at a few situations where the use of RIP lead to some very unique > > results as it pertains to redistribution. (check this one out... > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/10.html). > > Look at the route table on r2504 take note of the 3.22.x.x and 3.44.x.x > > networks. Why is it on r2507 that the routes show as ospf exteranl type2 > > routes. This is just another example of how rip simply works outside of > the > > rules. > > CL: I was going to say that it's because the routes are RIP routes that have > been redistributed into OSPF. However, looking at the configuration, I see > the interfaces are in the OSPF domain as well. Maybe the configuration is > being misreported? Maybe if an interface is in both a RIP and an OSPF > domain, RIP takes preference? That can't be right. > > CL: hhhmmm.. fooling around with the configs a bit. Mystery upon > mystery. I can't duplicate the result on the CCO link below. I'm wondering > if there are some IOS bugs. > > CL: the other thing I got to wondering is if there is some provision in the > standard in the case of multiple ABSR's advertising the same route. I can't > find anything off hand. It might require a more careful read than I have > time for right now. > > > > > > Although, at first look everything does seem to be very straight-forward, > > not until you get under the hood do you really see or observe the real > > issues involved. Thanks for keeping us all sane :-) > > > > Nigel > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "The Long and Winding Road" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 5:33 PM > > Subject: Re: Update: OSPF Route mystery - what am I missing [7:55975] > > > > > > > funny you should mention it. I've spent the last forty minutes looking > at > > > debugs on all of the routers involved. > > > > > > given the topology, > > > > > > R1tr--R2 > > > | | > > > | serial |serial > > > | | > > > R4tr--R3 > > > > > > R1, R2, and R3 are OSPF routers > > > R1, R4, and R3 are RIP ver 2 routers > > > > > > 2 way redistribution occurs on R1 and R3. The configurations for > > > redistribution
Re: IPX bridge on 6509?? [7:56533]
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message news:200210302236.WAA17724@;groupstudy.com... > Jason Owens wrote: > > > > I have a LAN segment in which I wish to move the routing from a > > 7206 to a new 6509. On the 7206, The interface I want to move > > has the one main segment (172.16.x.y/24) and around 15 > > secondary interfaces of various networks (My predecessors > > apparently didn't like sub-interfaces). Unfortunately, IPX is > > also being routed off of that interface. I want to separate all > > of these IP networks into individual VLAN's and route between > > them. My question is how can I get this one IPX network amongst > > the vlan's that need it? Is this possible? > > Very interesting question. I will attempt to stir up some discussion to try > to get you an answer. :-) CL: nothing to "stir up". this is relatively straightforward > > Couldn't you bridge IPX traffic between these VLANs? To do this you wouldn't > put any ipx network numbers on the subinterfaces, but you would put the ones > that have IPX devices in the same bridge group. CL: that's exactly right. works for all bridged protocols. > > The Cisco LAN Switching book also talks about Routed Switch Virtual > Interfaces (SVIs) for situations like this. Check Chapter 18. CL: don't know. can do this on the 3550's but I have little direct experience with 65xx's > > You should take some time to learn how the IPX clients are getting L3 > information in the current network. (Always characterize the exiting network > before designing enhancements.) Then take some time to think about the > traffic once you introduce VLANs and isolate broadcast domains. (Are VLANs > new to this network? Was it all one big broadcast domain before??) CL: as always, good advice > > When an IPX client boots, it broadcasts a Get Nearest Server (GNS) message, > as you may know. Either a router or server can respond to this. But it has > to be in the same broadcast domain to hear it. What is responding now? And > will it still be in the same broadcast domain in your new design? > > After the client learns about a server, including its L3 address, it > broadcasts a Find Network Number message to find a router that can get it to > the server. > > Through these messages, the client learns its own network number, the > address of a server, and the address of a local router. CL: all of this is educational, and worth reviewing. the person who asked the questions should be aware that if he bridges all of his formerly separate IPX networks, all his IPX clients will end up in One Big Flat Network, i.e. one broadcast domain. This might not be a bright idea, depending on how many there are. An alternative might be upgrading to an IP/IPX L3 image on the 6509, assuming he has the L3 supervisor. ( it doesn't state so in the description ) > > Luckily, you don't have to worry about ARP broadcasts. Because a L3 address > in IPX is network.node, where node is the MAC address, there's no need for > ARP. If a client knows the L3 address for a devie it needs to reach, it also > knows the MAC address. CL: I always liked this idea of combining L2/L3 in the host address. Unfortunately, MACs are more difficult to deal with than IP. And IPX never seemed to have that wealth of troubleshooting tools that IP has. Maybe because it was less troublesome to begin with? ;-> > > So, consider how all that is working now and what will happen when you > subdivide broadcast domains. Think about the logical design and then figure > out the configuration, hopefully with help from somebody who knows the 6509 > better than I do! :-) > > ___ > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > www.troubleshootingnetworks.com > www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56556&t=56533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX501 to VPN concentrator [7:56558]
Does anyone know if you can connect a PIX501 with version 6.2 software "configured as a VPN client simulating more or less client software" that is going through a static NAT to a VPN concentrator? In theory it should work because you can do it with VPN client software but does the PIX with version 6.2 configured as a VPN client also encapsulate the ESP into UDP packets? Cory Stull CCNP,CCDP,MCSE Communications Concepts Unlimited 262-814-7214 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56558&t=56558 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Internet Draft of interest? [7:56557]
My colleagues Erik Eman and Thomas Eriksson and I have just published an Internet-Draft that tries to clarify the underlying theory and principles of routing. It's still a work in progress, but may provide some useful background. Title : Routing Architecture Building Blocks: an Informational Taxonomy Author(s) : H. Berkowitz et al. Filename: draft-eriksson-rabbit-00.txt Pages : 44 Date: 2002-10-29 This document identifies and categorizes the components of routing, switching, forwarding, and addressing that may be used in routing architectures. The intention is to support the development of a new routing architecture for the Internet. The addressing architecture, address allocation and assignment principles, and possibilities for renumbering are important aspects when designing a routing architecture. How routing information is learned and methods for distributing it are other issues discussed in this document. A number of methods for data traffic forwarding are also described and evaluated A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-eriksson-rabbit-00.txt Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56557&t=56557 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP Switching [7:56559]
Hi all, in relation to the commecnts on the test, I have not seen a set based switch for almost a year now, however I look at some of my SYNGRESS CCNP Switching book, which makes a funny comment on how "ALL" core switchs are set based. I would like to see the tests coming up in the future, as I feel (and this is up for debate) that a certain degree of emphasys must be placed upon IOS based commands at the core, as thats what I expect to see on these platforms in the future. What you think ? ** visit http://www.solution6.com UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk * The Solution 6 Group is on the move. As of Monday 25 November, our Sydney HQ will be located at Level 14, 383 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2002 General Phone:(02) 9278 0666 General Fax: (02) 9278 0555 * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56559&t=56559 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another Internet Draft of Interest [7:56560]
All, I just got through some of the presentations linked from the recent nanog meeting. The draft in question was presented by Henk Uijterwaal titled "New Services from RIPE NCC. There is also this link on the nanog list to his latest draft. http://www.ripe.net/home/henk/draft-ietf-ippm-owmetric-as-01.txt I was just thinking about some of our current tools like ping, hping, and traceroute which measures round trip delay vs one-way delay. RFC 2679 discusses numerous reasons for calculating one-way delay, however would tools like ping and traceroute with the existence of ping6 and traceroute6 be rfc2679 compliant. I've not done any research at this point but, would operational tools in everyday use benefit from this new active measurement? Here's a pretty good link that explains the concept for the "normal" folks like myself. Nigel Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56560&t=56560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: odd & even # IPs on an ACL [7:56551]
Take ex : 192.168.0.0/24 to 192.168.10.0/24 are the networks. For filtering odd networks here is what the ACL will look like 192.168.1.0 and the WCM will be 0.0.254.255 For filtering even networks it will be 192.168.0.0 , WCM - 0.0.254.255. Means that for ODD networks last bit of the third octet will always be 1 For the EVEN networks the last bit of the third octet will always be 0. So you care only that bit in the WCM. PS : The chapter for ACL in CCIE Practical Studies by Karl Solie has an example of this and a good explanation. Hope this helps. Rajesh Casey Miles wrote: > Just wondering what the correct syntax would be if you wanted to have > - two networks > - one network with students with Omiting odd numbered IPs. > - second network with faculty omiting the even numbered IPs. > > Im looking for a one line command to do this. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56561&t=56551 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off Topic - Physical Layer - fiber connectors [7:56562]
ran into another one today. customer specified APC ( angle polished connector ) for his fiber links. I did some searching on the net, and I believe I understand a bit of the physics involved. 8 degree reflection of the lightwave. used in cable tv deployments. ( I may be misunderstanding ) I asked the customer to ask his fiber cable vendor instruct as to how we would terminate to a Cisco switch. The answer was "use the SC connector, but there will be some performance loss" Anyone familiar with the APC fiber specification? Chuck -- www.chuckslongroad.info Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56562&t=56562 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: odd & even # IPs on an ACL [7:56551]
Casey Miles wrote: > > Just wondering what the correct syntax would be if you wanted > to have > - two networks > - one network with students with Omiting odd numbered IPs. > - second network with faculty omiting the even numbered IPs. > > Im looking for a one line command to do this. What makes a number odd? I would say that an odd number is of the form "2n + 1" for some n. Think about that in binary... And now, for my annual joke. Do you know why computer people get confused this time of year and start thinking about Santa Claus instead of the Great Pumpkin? Because OCT 31 = DEC 25. What HEX would you like to put on me for that joke? ;-) I wish I could do ASCII art of a ghost or something, but I'll leave you with this in decimal: 2816! ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56563&t=56551 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX501 to VPN concentrator [7:56558]
Yes Cory I have done this exact thing before, go to cco and look up EasyVPN. -Original Message- From: Stull, Cory [mailto:Cstull@;CCU.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 6:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX501 to VPN concentrator [7:56558] Does anyone know if you can connect a PIX501 with version 6.2 software "configured as a VPN client simulating more or less client software" that is going through a static NAT to a VPN concentrator? In theory it should work because you can do it with VPN client software but does the PIX with version 6.2 configured as a VPN client also encapsulate the ESP into UDP packets? Cory Stull CCNP,CCDP,MCSE Communications Concepts Unlimited 262-814-7214 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56564&t=56558 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX501 to VPN concentrator [7:56558]
About half way of this url there is a example pix config. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps4382/products_feature_ guide09186a00800a8565.html -Original Message- From: Stull, Cory [mailto:Cstull@;CCU.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 6:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX501 to VPN concentrator [7:56558] Does anyone know if you can connect a PIX501 with version 6.2 software "configured as a VPN client simulating more or less client software" that is going through a static NAT to a VPN concentrator? In theory it should work because you can do it with VPN client software but does the PIX with version 6.2 configured as a VPN client also encapsulate the ESP into UDP packets? Cory Stull CCNP,CCDP,MCSE Communications Concepts Unlimited 262-814-7214 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56565&t=56558 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: isdn dual bri [7:56498]
Judging by where in the sequence the disconnect comes, have you tried turning on debug ppp auth? On the remote end as well, if you can. Mind you, I'm not sure why, on the configs given, the first two channels would come up if that was the problem. JMcL Dwayne Saunders wrote: > > Hi all can any one tell me why from my config that i can get > the first 2 b > channels up but the second 2 try to dial and the dissconnect I > think I am > missing something very simple. > > 00:02:26: ISDN BRI0/1: isdn_is_bchannel_available: No Free > B-channels > 00:02:26: ISDN BR0/0: Outgoing call id = 0x8005 > 00:02:111669190656: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to 0198308308 at 64 > Kb/s9 > 00:02:26: %ISDN-6-LAYER2UP: Layer 2 for Interface BR0/0, TEI 76 > changed to > up > 00:02:26: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_PROCEEDING call_id 0x8005 > 00:02:26: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_CONNECT call_id 0x8005 > 00:02:26: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to > up > 00:02:26: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected > to 0198308308 > 00:02:26: BR0/0:1 PPP: Treating connection as a callout > 00:02:26: BR0/0:1 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Active Open > 0:02:26: BR0/0:1 PPP: No remote authentication for call-out > 00:02:26: BR0/0:1 CHAP: Using alternate hostname username > 00:02:26: BR0/0:1 LCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 4 len 22 > 00:02:26: BR0/0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0x30831CF7 > (0x050630831CF7) > 00:02:26: BR0/0:1 LCP:MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) > 00:02:26: BR0/0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 Local > (0x1308017465736173) > 00:02:26: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Connected to 0198308308 on B1 at > 64 Kb/s > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 1 len 33 > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:VendorSpecific OUI 0x01 > (0x0004) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:MRU 1524 (0x010405F4) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 Local > (0x130801737461636B) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:LinkDiscriminator 24066 (0x17045E02) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP: O CONFREJ [REQsent] id 1 len 12 > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:VendorSpecific OUI 0x17 > (0x0004) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:LinkDiscriminator 24066 (0x17045E02) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 4 len 22 > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0x30831CF7 > (0x050630831CF7) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 Local > (0x1308017465736173) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP: I CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 2 len 25 > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:MRU 1524 (0x010405F4) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 Local > (0x130801737461636B) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP: O CONFACK [ACKrcvd] id 2 len 25 > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:MRU 1524 (0x010405F4) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 Local > (0x130801737461636B) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP: State is Open > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, by the peer > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 CHAP: I CHALLENGE id 1 len 28 from "Dial IP" > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 CHAP: Using alternate hostname username > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 CHAP: Username Dial IP not found > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 CHAP: Using default password > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 CHAP: O RESPONSE id 1 len 26 from "username" > 00:02:27: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT call_id 0x8005 > 00:02:27: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to was hung up. > 00:02:27: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to > down > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 PPP: Phase is TERMINATING > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP: State is Closed > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 PPP: Phase is DOWN > 00:02:42: %ISDN-6-LAYER2DOWN: Layer 2 for Interface BR0/0, TEI > 76 changed to > dow > n > conven02# > conven02# > conven02# > conven02# > conven02# > conven02# > conven02#u all > All possible debugging has been turned off > conven02# > conven02#sh ru > Building configuration... > > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.0 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > service password-encryption > ! > hostname conven02 > ! > enable password 7 1511021F0725 > ! > memory-size iomem 10 > ip subnet-zero > no ip domain-lookup > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ! > ! > ! > interface Ethernet0/0 > description connected to EthernetLAN_1 > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ip nat inside > ! > interface BRI0/0 > description connected to Internet > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > ip nat outside > encapsulation ppp > dialer rotary-group 1 > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > no cdp enable > ! > interface BRI0/1 > description connected to Internet > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > ip nat outside > encapsulation ppp > dialer rotary-group 1 > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > no cdp enable > ! > interface Dialer1 > description connected to Internet > ip addr
Re: ACS for Windows 2000 [7:56534]
I had the same problem so I just made the acs server a domain controller and all is well Tim ""Marakalas"" wrote in message news:200210301727.RAA17390@;groupstudy.com... > Hi guys > > I have problems in configuring ACS for RAS to > authenticate users using Active Directory on the > Windows domain? I'm having problems in getting this to work. > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better > http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56567&t=56534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Physical Layer - fiber connectors [7:56562]
Optical Reflections and noise and distortion As in RF systems, reflections in RF / Optical systems are an issue. Optical reflections back into the laser diode cause a disturbance in the lasers gain cavity creating noise and distortion. The main sources of optical reflections are connector interfaces. A simple way to avoid most of the reflections at the interfaces is through the use of angle-polished connectors. The tip of an angle-polished, or APC connector is polished at an 8 degree angle. This is the optimal angle to minimize reflections from traveling back down the fiber into the laser. At this angle most reflections occurring due to the connector will be angled out of the fiber and dissipated harmlessly. Other general rules to minimize reflections: keep the connector tip clean and scratch free and always replace the cap onto the tip when the connector is not mated. Found this info at this page-- http://www.anacomsystems.com/anacom/rfonfiber.htm HTH Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56568&t=56562 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX 525 [7:56569]
What kind of throughput should I be getting if I am using a WinXP with the MS IPsec VPN client through a Cisco PIX 525? How can I test it? Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56569&t=56569 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: serial up, line ptotocol up..for a while [7:56515]
Would a mismatch of LMI types cause this? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56570&t=56515 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Yahoo messanger traffic can be seen/blocked? [7:56571]
Hi all I am network administrator and in our network there are people who use Yahoo messangers.I have few querries pertaining to this as under. 1. Is there any tool by which I can see whether who is chating ? 2. Can I see the content of his chating using that tool ? 3. If I want to block this yahoo messanger in my firewall (I use checkpoint 2000 ) what is the step to be taken ? Thanks in advance Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, Yahoo! TV. visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56571&t=56571 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: isdn dual bri [7:56498]
Jenny, The other end is telstra but does the config look right for it to work. Regards D'Wayne Saunders Data Network Administrator Phone: +61 8 8950 7742 Mobile: +61 412 832 322 Fax: +61 8 8952 1112 www.lasseters.com.au World's First Government Licensed and Regulated Online Casino... *** This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Lasseters Online. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Lasseters Online are neither given nor endorsed by it. *** -Original Message- From: Jenny McLeod [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com] Sent: Thursday, 31 October 2002 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: isdn dual bri [7:56498] Judging by where in the sequence the disconnect comes, have you tried turning on debug ppp auth? On the remote end as well, if you can. Mind you, I'm not sure why, on the configs given, the first two channels would come up if that was the problem. JMcL Dwayne Saunders wrote: > > Hi all can any one tell me why from my config that i can get > the first 2 b > channels up but the second 2 try to dial and the dissconnect I > think I am > missing something very simple. > > 00:02:26: ISDN BRI0/1: isdn_is_bchannel_available: No Free > B-channels > 00:02:26: ISDN BR0/0: Outgoing call id = 0x8005 > 00:02:111669190656: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to 0198308308 at 64 > Kb/s9 > 00:02:26: %ISDN-6-LAYER2UP: Layer 2 for Interface BR0/0, TEI 76 > changed to > up > 00:02:26: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_PROCEEDING call_id 0x8005 > 00:02:26: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_CONNECT call_id 0x8005 > 00:02:26: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to > up > 00:02:26: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected > to 0198308308 > 00:02:26: BR0/0:1 PPP: Treating connection as a callout > 00:02:26: BR0/0:1 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Active Open > 0:02:26: BR0/0:1 PPP: No remote authentication for call-out > 00:02:26: BR0/0:1 CHAP: Using alternate hostname username > 00:02:26: BR0/0:1 LCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 4 len 22 > 00:02:26: BR0/0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0x30831CF7 > (0x050630831CF7) > 00:02:26: BR0/0:1 LCP:MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) > 00:02:26: BR0/0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 Local > (0x1308017465736173) > 00:02:26: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Connected to 0198308308 on B1 at > 64 Kb/s > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 1 len 33 > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:VendorSpecific OUI 0x01 > (0x0004) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:MRU 1524 (0x010405F4) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 Local > (0x130801737461636B) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:LinkDiscriminator 24066 (0x17045E02) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP: O CONFREJ [REQsent] id 1 len 12 > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:VendorSpecific OUI 0x17 > (0x0004) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:LinkDiscriminator 24066 (0x17045E02) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 4 len 22 > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0x30831CF7 > (0x050630831CF7) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 Local > (0x1308017465736173) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP: I CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 2 len 25 > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:MRU 1524 (0x010405F4) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 Local > (0x130801737461636B) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP: O CONFACK [ACKrcvd] id 2 len 25 > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:MRU 1524 (0x010405F4) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 Local > (0x130801737461636B) > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP: State is Open > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, by the peer > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 CHAP: I CHALLENGE id 1 len 28 from "Dial IP" > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 CHAP: Using alternate hostname username > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 CHAP: Username Dial IP not found > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 CHAP: Using default password > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 CHAP: O RESPONSE id 1 len 26 from "username" > 00:02:27: ISDN BR0/0: received HOST_DISCONNECT call_id 0x8005 > 00:02:27: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Call to was hung up. > 00:02:27: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to > down > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 PPP: Phase is TERMINATING > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 LCP: State is Closed > 00:02:27: BR0/0:1 PPP: Phase is D
DHCP (client) problem on Cisco 2514 [7:56573]
Got this weird problem with a 2514 I use as a broadband router. I connect the router to a DSL modem, but it doesn't get an IP address assigned. I got the correct IOS, and have "ip address dhcp" configured on the outside interface. When I connect a PC directly to the DSL modem, it gets an IP address without any problems... Of course I release the IP again before I disconnect the PC. Also tried to statically assign the IP (obtained by DHCP with a PC) to my router, and everything works just fine... But my provider changes the IP every 24hrs. :-( I have other routers (not 2500s), but didn't have the time yet to try with those. Wonder if any of you got similar problems and knows what is wrong? Here is some debug output, FWIW YahooBB-Router# Oct 30 18:56:13 JST: DHCP: DHCP client process started: Oct 30 18:56:17 JST: DHCP: Shutting down from get_netinfo() Oct 30 18:56:17 JST: DHCP: Attempting to shutdown DHCP Client Oct 30 18:56:18 JST: DHCP: allocate request Oct 30 18:56:18 JST: DHCP: new entry. add to queue Oct 30 18:56:18 JST: DHCP: SDiscover attempt # 1 for entry: Oct 30 18:56:18 JST: DHCP: SDiscover: sending 298 byte length DHCP packet Oct 30 18:56:18 JST: DHCP: SDiscover 298 bytes Oct 30 18:56:21 JST: DHCP: SDiscover attempt # 2 for entry: Oct 30 18:56:21 JST: DHCP: SDiscover: sending 298 byte length DHCP packet Oct 30 18:56:21 JST: DHCP: SDiscover 298 bytes Oct 30 18:56:24 JST: DHCP: SDiscover attempt # 3 for entry: Oct 30 18:56:24 JST: DHCP: SDiscover: sending 298 byte length DHCP packet Oct 30 18:56:24 JST: DHCP: SDiscover 298 bytes [OK] YahooBB-Router# YahooBB-Router#%Unknown DHCP problem.. No allocation possible Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56573&t=56573 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP (client) problem on Cisco 2514 [7:56573]
I suppose posting the config would help... YahooBB-Router#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1779 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 16:42:47 JST Wed Oct 30 2002 ! version 12.2 no service single-slot-reload-enable service tcp-keepalives-in service tcp-keepalives-out service timestamps debug datetime localtime show-timezone service timestamps log datetime localtime show-timezone service password-encryption service udp-small-servers service tcp-small-servers ! hostname YahooBB-Router ! logging rate-limit console 10 except errors enable secret 5 $1$c9.a$lpUgd8kGiwWmFJ.yTpfAD. ! clock timezone JST 9 ip subnet-zero no ip finger ip name-server x.x.x.x ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.15 ! ip dhcp pool PrivateNet network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 192.168.1.1 dns-server x.x.x.x ! ip cef no ip dhcp-client network-discovery ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 description toLAN ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside no ip mroute-cache load-interval 30 ! interface Ethernet1 description ToYahooBB_Modem ip address dhcp ip nat outside no ip mroute-cache load-interval 30 ! interface Serial0 no ip address no ip mroute-cache shutdown ! interface Serial1 no ip address no ip mroute-cache shutdown ! ip kerberos source-interface any ip nat inside source list 101 interface Ethernet1 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 ethernet 1 no ip http server ! access-list 1 permit x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 access-list 1 permit x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255 access-list 1 deny any log access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any ! ! line con 0 exec-timeout 500 0 transport input none line aux 0 transport input all line vty 0 4 access-class 1 in exec-timeout 500 0 password 7 xxx login ! ntp clock-period 17180016 ntp server x.x.x.x ntp server x.x.x.x end YahooBB-Router# ""Steven"" wrote in message news:200210310447.EAA24091@;groupstudy.com... > Got this weird problem with a 2514 I use as a broadband router. I connect > the router to a DSL modem, but it doesn't get an IP address assigned. I got > the correct IOS, and have "ip address dhcp" configured on the outside > interface. > When I connect a PC directly to the DSL modem, it gets an IP address without > any problems... Of course I release the IP again before I disconnect the PC. > Also tried to statically assign the IP (obtained by DHCP with a PC) to my > router, and everything works just fine... But my provider changes the IP > every 24hrs. > :-( > > I have other routers (not 2500s), but didn't have the time yet to try with > those. Wonder if any of you got similar problems and knows what is wrong? > > Here is some debug output, FWIW > > YahooBB-Router# > Oct 30 18:56:13 JST: DHCP: DHCP client process started: > Oct 30 18:56:17 JST: DHCP: Shutting down from get_netinfo() > Oct 30 18:56:17 JST: DHCP: Attempting to shutdown DHCP Client > Oct 30 18:56:18 JST: DHCP: allocate request > Oct 30 18:56:18 JST: DHCP: new entry. add to queue > Oct 30 18:56:18 JST: DHCP: SDiscover attempt # 1 for entry: > Oct 30 18:56:18 JST: DHCP: SDiscover: sending 298 byte length DHCP packet > Oct 30 18:56:18 JST: DHCP: SDiscover 298 bytes > Oct 30 18:56:21 JST: DHCP: SDiscover attempt # 2 for entry: > Oct 30 18:56:21 JST: DHCP: SDiscover: sending 298 byte length DHCP packet > Oct 30 18:56:21 JST: DHCP: SDiscover 298 bytes > Oct 30 18:56:24 JST: DHCP: SDiscover attempt # 3 for entry: > Oct 30 18:56:24 JST: DHCP: SDiscover: sending 298 byte length DHCP packet > Oct 30 18:56:24 JST: DHCP: SDiscover 298 bytes [OK] > YahooBB-Router# > YahooBB-Router#%Unknown DHCP problem.. No allocation possible Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56574&t=56573 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Yahoo messanger traffic can be seen/blocked? [7:56571]
block socks port 1080 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Mr piyush shah Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Yahoo messanger traffic can be seen/blocked? [7:56571] Hi all I am network administrator and in our network there are people who use Yahoo messangers.I have few querries pertaining to this as under. 1. Is there any tool by which I can see whether who is chating ? 2. Can I see the content of his chating using that tool ? 3. If I want to block this yahoo messanger in my firewall (I use checkpoint 2000 ) what is the step to be taken ? Thanks in advance Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, Yahoo! TV. visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56575&t=56571 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Another Internet Draft of Interest [7:56560]
"Nigel Taylor" All, > I just got through some of the presentations linked from the recent >nanog >meeting. The draft in question was presented by Henk Uijterwaal titled "New >Services from RIPE NCC. > >There is also this link on the nanog list to his latest draft. > >http://www.ripe.net/home/henk/draft-ietf-ippm-owmetric-as-01.txt > >I was just thinking about some of our current tools like ping, hping, and >traceroute which measures round trip delay vs one-way delay. RFC 2679 >discusses numerous reasons for calculating one-way delay, however would >tools >like ping and traceroute with the existence of ping6 and traceroute6 be >rfc2679 compliant. I've not done any research at this point but, would >operational tools in everyday use benefit from this new active measurement? > >Here's a pretty good link that explains the concept for the "normal" folks >like myself. There are several problems with using timestamped measurement in the router itself. Some of these may be reduced with IPv6, but, for others, external passive hardware or special router hardware seems necessary. See our BGP convergence drafts, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bgpconv-03.txt and http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bgpbas-00.txt First, routers may not give sufficient precision in measurement, because they rate-limit ICMP to protect against ICMP floods, or simply don't prioritize it highly. I mention IPv6 because authenticated source addresses may be used without fear of denial of service. Second, the router may or may not have the capacity to capture and store a statistically valid amount of data. NetFlow data export, for example, summarizes to a degree. If you could shoot debug to syslog, you'd have a much better chance as long as the router could keep up with it, using something like a SPAN port. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56576&t=56560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: odd & even # IPs on an ACL [7:56551]
Cute! So I'm thinking that tomorrow (Halloween) I'll put on a subnet mask. It will be 255.255.0.0, and the two 0's will have little holes in the middle for my eyes ;-) - Jennifer Mellone Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56577&t=56551 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
