RE: Questions before tests [7:56452]
I don't believe the survey questions effect the difficulty level of question that you receive on the ensuing exam, as the exam has already been downloaded to the workstation prior to the point where you are asked the survey questions. Those testing engines are generally not sophisticated enough to adjust test scoring on the fly. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody;groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Moffett, Ryan Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Questions before tests [7:56452] The way I interpret this is that the answers you provide will be evaluated against your score and performance for future development of tests, including future scoring mechanisms on exams that are authored. I don't think it is real-time modification of question pools or scoring criteria. I believe they are attempting to gather statistics to make sure the tests are updated properly as time goes on. For example, if someone has 1 year of experience, but can pass all of the CCNP tests, great, good for him. But if a high percentage of candidates with 1 year of experience can pass the CCPN tests, then they must evaluate why the tests are so easy to pass. It would make sense that they would want these kinds of statistics. This is purely my speculation as to the reasoning behind the pre-exam questions.. -Original Message- From: Kaminski, Shawn G [mailto:shawn.kaminski;eds.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Questions before tests [7:56452] Although this topic has been discussed in the past, there seems to be disagreement on the correct answer. Personally, I have read the wording before some of the surveys and it actually says that your answers will be used to help determine scoring on the exam. I don't believe it determines what questions you get, only the scoring. Whether it's done on all the exams or just some, I don't know. How it's done, I also don't know. My guess is if you downplay your skills too much, you will be graded harder because your skills should match the certification you're trying to achieve. Regardless, don't downplay your skills too much and make sure you really know the material to be safe! :-) Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Aaron Ajello [mailto:aajello;yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Questions before tests [7:56452] I'm working on my CCNP, just have CIT to go and when I have taken the first three, I just kindof flew through the questions before the test where Cisco asks about your experience level, whether or not you can configure things on your own or need help with a coworker, etc. Is it true that your answers will determine how the test is graded or what types of questions you will get on the actual test? I thought it was merely a survey so Cisco could get an idea of what types of backgrounds people had who were taking their tests. But recently I read where someone says those questions will actually determine how Cisco tests you and which questions from the pool you will receive. This seems ridiculous to me, but I have to ask. thanks, Aaron Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56760t=56452 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opinions on Cisco Interactive Mentor [7:49060]
All, Has anyone tried the CIM products? I was considering purchasing the BGP CIM and wanted to get some feedback before making the investment. Chris Christopher Supino CCDP, CCNP, MCSE, Compaq ASE, CNA Senior Network Design Engineer TransNet Corp. 45 Columbia Road Somerville, New Jersey 08876 Ph 908 947 0198 Cell 908 296 0446 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49060t=49060 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47921]
Tuesday night sounds like a better plan. We have customer appreciation night at Universal on Wednesday evening. Or we could do Thu. night, if everyone will be around. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Borghese Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 9:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47921] Hey Guys, May I make a suggestion. Let's meet on Tuesday night or Wednesday night. Some of us will be arriving late Monday night and will miss the event. Of coure Monday is the welcome reception, so it might be a good time to just say hello to your fellow GS'ers. Paul - Original Message - From: Philip Jache To: Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 3:46 AM Subject: RE: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47921] I will be there and would like to meet up with any members. Phil = Original Message From R. Benjamin Kessler = Anyone from the list going? Is there going to be a GroupStudy gathering? _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48264t=47921 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846]
I'll be there. Taking the CCIE PS on Monday. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Benjamin Kessler Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846] Anyone from the list going? Is there going to be a GroupStudy gathering? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48063t=47846 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Networkers Orlando (Was Re: San Diego) [7:46151]
Jay, I am scheduled for the Monday CCIE power session in Orlando. Looking forward to it. I was originally scheduled for the 24th of July in RTP, but common sense prevailed and I probably will be looking for a date sometime in the fall. I have been using Cisco's ASET labs and reading some of the books on the reading list, but do not feel quite ready, as some of the technologies on the labs I have never worked with (DLSW, SRB, etc..). Also, I was thinking about attending one of the bootcamps, either Boson or CCBootcamp. They both come pretty highly recommened. Chris Supino Senior Network Design Engineer CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNA, ASE TransNet Corporation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jay Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 9:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Networkers Orlando (Was Re: San Diego) [7:46151] I'm taking the CCIE Power session in Orlando, is anyone else? Jay Greenberg On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 18:44, Oleg Oz wrote: I think I saw a thread on this a few weeks ago but can no longer find it.. Is anyone going to networkers in San Diego.. Taking power sessions? Oleg. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46155t=46151 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: enquiry on Cisco 3550 switch [7:44009]
Kenny, The 3550 series supports layer 3 out of the box. So the ports can be configured like router ports (with an address on each interface), with each port in it's own b'cast domain. Alternately, the ports can be configured normally e.g. all in the same b'cast domain. You can also do intervlan routing by creating virtual interfaces, similar to an MSFC. These switches are very flexible in their Config (and run traditional 29xx/35xx Switch IOS, rather than the oddball IOS that the 2948G-L3 ran). As far as why port one is showing no switchport, you stated that the gig slot interfaces were 0/12 and 0/13 correct? That would give you 13 ports rather than 12. Perhaps GIG 0/1 represents the controller for the RJ-45 ports and not a physical port? I've seen this sort of thing before (think catalyst 4000 Layer 3 engine). Hope this helps. Chris Supino CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNA, ASE Senior Network Design Engineer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kenny Smith Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: enquiry on Cisco 3550 switch [7:44009] Hi.. We just bought a cisco 3550 switch and it has 2 gigabyte fiber ports 12, 13 and 10 gigabyte fastethernet ports 1-10. But why they are all shown to be the same for eg interface GigabitEthernet0/1-12 in the config. And What kind of cable should I connected to port 1-10? Cat5 or Cat6? If we connected via Cat5 it means the speed is 1000Mbit?? I also feel strange that why the config shown as no ip address in all the interface, I thought we can only configure IP for VLAN in switches not interface? What is means by no switchport?? hostname Switch ! enable secret 5 $1$ej9.$DMUvAUnZOAmvmgqBEzIxE0 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 no switchport no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2 no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet0/3 no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet0/4 no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet0/5 no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet0/6 no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet0/7 no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet0/8 no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet0/9 no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet0/10 no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet0/11 no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet0/12 no ip address ...! interface VLAN1 ip address 172.20.137.50 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44014t=44009 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trunk Port and multi-VLAN port [7:35859]
With the trunks configured on the switches you definitely will not be able to configure a multi-vlan port. I would recommend adding a second NIC card to the box that needs to be a member of both VLANs and setting up two switch ports one in vlan 1 and one in vlan 2. Or, if it is a Windows box, I believe that some vendors NICs support 802.1q trunking. So you could trunk to the box, effectively putting it in both vlans. Hope this helps. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alfredo Pulido Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 6:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Trunk Port and multi-VLAN port [7:35859] Ok, I will be more specific Let's see, I have 3 Catalyst 3524 XL configuration Catalyst 1: int f0/1 - trunk port with Catalyst 2 int f0/2 - trunk port with Catalyst 2 int f0/3 - trunk port with Catalyst 3 int f0/4 - trunk port with Catalyst 3 int f0/5 - vlan 1 int f0/6 - vlan 2 int f0/7 - I need vlan 1 and vlan 2 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35938t=35859 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trunk Port and multi-VLAN port [7:35859]
Alfredo, There is one important difference. A multi vlan port strips the tags from the frames it passess for each vlan and a trunk port leaves the VLAN tags intact. So it really depends on what you are attempting to accomplish here. Can you be more specific? Christopher Supino CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNA5, ASE Senior Network Design Engineer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of MADMAN Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Trunk Port and multi-VLAN port [7:35859] To what are you conecting the multivlan port? Since a trunk is by definition multiple VLANs can you set up all the ports as trunks? Dave Alfredo Pulido wrote: Hello , I have a problem, I have 3 Catalyst 3524XL EN, but I need enable Trunk Port and Multi-Vlan in various Interfaces. I had read in Cisco Documentation that is not possible You cannot configure a multi-VLAN port when a trunk is configured on the switch. referents Chapter 5 Creating and Maintaining VLANs. My questions is, How could I to solve this problem? I will need install a GigaStack module or something 1000Base-X GBIC module for eliminate trunk port. Sincerely -- -- Alfredo Pulido [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. Sistemas, IdecNet S.A. Juan XXIII 44 // E-35004 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas // SPAIN Tel: +34 828 111 000 Fax: +34 828 111 112 http://www.idecnet.com/ -- -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Christopher Supino ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35917t=35859 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Interesting Web Alias [7:34994]
Makes sense now. Thanks for clearing that up for me. Pretty cool URL to have though, huh? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of bergenpeak Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 1:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Interesting Web Alias [7:34994] AIC (American Internet Comp) made, among other things, a DHCP server product. Cisco bought AIC and repackaged the AIC DHCP server as CNR. Ozzie Sutcliffe wrote: This guy also made site bulder for Novell way back when..1995 and he owned www.american.com then So Cisco got the site name as bonus I guess http://www.i-m.com/February-22-29-1996/0030.html here is what the corp did amd the corp name was American Internet Company. I think Cisoc like the name more than anything else. kinda would have made some in San Hose choke if the competition got that name to trade under//Grin Oz Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35058t=34994 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting Web Alias [7:34994]
All, Interesting? Follow this link: www.american.com Can't imagine why Cisco registered this domain name. Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34994t=34994 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Command to save config to mem on 5500 cat [7:30985]
No command necessary. Commands are committed to NVRAM as they are entered in CatOS. Once you make a change it is made. You must undo your change to recover. No copy star run :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of McHugh Randy Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 6:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Command to save config to mem on 5500 cat [7:30985] What is the command to save your configuration to memory or NVRAM on CAT 5500 runing sh ver WS-C5505 Software, Version McpSW: 6.2(2) NmpSW: 6.2(2) ? Thank you, Randy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30991t=30985 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is an ISDN/PRI and T1 the same? [7:30507]
Good point. For a PRI you must also specify the switch type that you will be communicating with at the CO. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Odette II Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Is an ISDN/PRI and T1 the same? [7:30507] ... And to add to this, answering the other part of your question: Yes- you have to specify framing, line coding, and clock source, no matter what type (PRI or T1) of circuit it is. Mark Odette II -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher Supino Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 10:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Is an ISDN/PRI and T1 the same? [7:30507] Some of the differences: a T1 uses Channel Associated Signaling and a PRI uses Common Channel Signaling. Or in English, in a T1 you have 24 timeslots which carry signaling information along with the data(in-band signaling) and in a PRI you have 23 data-only channels and a signaling only channel(out of band signaling); PRI's are used primarily for voice applications, whereas T1s or fractional T1s can be used for voice or data; A T1 is a leased line connection and a PRI is a subsciber connection for access to the PSTN (generally). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of McHugh Randy Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 10:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Is an ISDN/PRI and T1 the same? [7:30507] Is an ISDN primary rate interface the same as a T1 and do you have to set the framing, linecoding , clock source and carve out your timeslots on both a T1 and an ISDN PRI? Thanks Randy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30529t=30507 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is an ISDN/PRI and T1 the same? [7:30507]
Some of the differences: a T1 uses Channel Associated Signaling and a PRI uses Common Channel Signaling. Or in English, in a T1 you have 24 timeslots which carry signaling information along with the data(in-band signaling) and in a PRI you have 23 data-only channels and a signaling only channel(out of band signaling); PRI's are used primarily for voice applications, whereas T1s or fractional T1s can be used for voice or data; A T1 is a leased line connection and a PRI is a subsciber connection for access to the PSTN (generally). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of McHugh Randy Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 10:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Is an ISDN/PRI and T1 the same? [7:30507] Is an ISDN primary rate interface the same as a T1 and do you have to set the framing, linecoding , clock source and carve out your timeslots on both a T1 and an ISDN PRI? Thanks Randy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30511t=30507 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607]
Packet Internet eXchanger -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 6:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607] Hi all. What are some of the reasons why a person would choose a PIX solution rather than a good router with the the right IOS for security? From what I've read on Cisco's site, there does not seem to be the huge gap between using a router as a firewall solution vs. using a PIX, as some people make it sound. One last thing...for the life of me, I can't find what PIX stands for! Any help appreciated! Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26612t=26607 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: NT DHCP Clients receive incorrect Subnet Masks and No [7:21218]
All, This is off-topic, but I have been up against this issue with one of our customers for quite awhile, and I am accessing any avenue possible to get it solved. We have a customer that is running a distributed NT domain. The topolgy is as follows: Core location: Core Switch/Router is Alcatel ATM OmniSwitch (the ATM WAN backbone was integrated by a third party provider, who also is the ISP), which terminates 10mb ATM WAN connections from 8 remote locations, and also provides a 100mb PVC for the Internet. This switch is wearing many hats, as it is the router (layer three switch) for these 9 sites, as well as the internet router. As well as ATM connections(8 for remote sites, 1 for Internet), there are 2 active FE connections on this box. One feeds the local LAN (10.1.0.0/16), the other is attached to a PIX box (public address on PIX outside interface to public address on OmniSwitch FE interface routed via ATM PVC back to provider CO through). This configuration is actually a bit kludgy, but it works because the web clients point to a proxy server that sits behind the PIX box. On the LAN at the core location are a bunch of file servers, including the PDC for the domain. This server also performs DHCP for the core location. Distribution switch is a Catalyst 6000, single vlan, and the access layer is 35xx switches. The PC's are Dell OptiPlex models. Remote Sites: Alcatel OmniAccess Switches, falling back via ATM to core location, single ethernet port handing off to LAN. LAN consists of Cisco 35xx switches, and a BDC at each location, providing DHCP and print services. Remote LANS are addresses 10.2.x.x-10.9.x.x/16. HERE IS THE PROBLEM: Frequently, client will receive an improper subnet mask and other incorrect DHCP information at boot-up. The address is correct for the clients scope, but the mask is a class A rather than class B. Also, client sometimes experience login problems, and some users are unable to change their password over the network. The DHCP server listed is correct. These problems are evident at both the core site and the remote locations. Has anyone ever experienced anything similar to this, and if so what was the solution. Any help would be appreciated. Chris Supino Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21218t=21218 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: apple machine and cisco switch problem [7:20825]
Moe, Set all of the switchports that the McIntosh clients are attached to to begin forwarding immediately. See this document on CCO. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/12.html Hope this helps Christopher Supino CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNA, ASE Senior Network Design Engineer TransNet Corp. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of king kaung Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 7:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: apple machine and cisco switch problem [7:20825] Hi All, I have big problem with our apple machines. Last week, I replaced my old 3Com switches to cisco 3524 switches. Then most of my apple machine can not see each other(cannot access appleshare)but it can see and can access PC Servers. I try to configure the speed and duplex according apple's NIC specification on individual ports. But some of the apple machine still cannot see. I put those Mac machines back to 3Com switch and it works again. We don't have zone setting on apple machines.The protocols are all default.Our network is flat network and no subnet, no VLAN. Anything I miss out to configure on my Cisco switches? Or any special setting for apple machines I need to set? Many thanks, Moe. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20832t=20825 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: US Stock [7:19433]
I think we all need to turn down the scripting quoting and bible thumping a bit. Like someone said earlier, religious talk on a technical distribution list approaches the unacceptable. Everyone is entitled to their beliefs, but this is really not the forum for religious debate. I am sure that we are all deeply affected by todays events. Let's not start a theological open debate forum on this CISCO STUDY GROUP over it though. Just my two cents. That being said, living in Hudson County, NJ (directly across the Hudson River from lower Manhattan), this hits really close to home for me. I was at home today (on a vacation day) and I was able to see the towers from a couple of blocks from my home. The NYC skyline will never be the same. My heart goes out to the families of the brave policemen and firefighters who lost their lives, not to mention the innocent people who worked in the buildings, whose only crime was being in the wrong place at the wrong time. I will think of these people every time I look to the East. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Circusnuts Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 7:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: US Stock [7:19433] In Biblical history I believe this (assuming this US attack sourced out of the middle east) started in Genesis with Abraham's sons Isaac Ishmael. As far as the why me, we can again look @ scriptures to see that it rains on both the just unjust. We can also analyze America see that it's not exactly consumed with what I would call God's chosen people. Many of us are faithful, but many of us are not. We should be horrified by the violence, but not surprise. This we are reminded of in Genesis too. I couldn't help but think as I left work today, driving across the Woodrow Wilson bridge heading into Virginia, I could see beyond National Airport to the Pentagon where huge smoke trails filled the sky. Is what I'm feeling the same sentiment felt almost 60 years ago during the Pearl Harbor attack ??? The it's in my backyard what am I willing to do effect has set in. I myself am a new father, with all the pride, hang-up's, paranoia that goes along with that new roll. I would fight like I have never had to fight before to secure freedoms I have all but grown up with know no different. I hope the good people of the world can figure this thing out, but referring to my first paragraph it should be no surprised. A nation in our prayers Phil - Original Message - From: Puckett, Larry (TIFPC) To: Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 6:27 PM Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] Funny how it's always Pushing religion is unacceptable but never ' Pushing atheism is unacceptable' . -Original Message- From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 4:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: US Stock [7:19433] pushing religion is pushing the limits of acceptable OT converstaion IMHO My deepest sympathy to those affected by this series of atrocities. A few weeks ago, a car bomb went off just up the road from my place (West London), and I thought that was a wake up call the scale of this disaster is just incomprehensible. Symon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Richardson Sent: 11 September 2001 21:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: US Stock [7:19433] I know this is off-topic and long, but I'll give it a shot anyway... Hello all, and much respect to everyone on this list. This is my first time writing to this list (as far as I can remember), although I have observed it for awhile. Most topics seem to be out of my Cisco range, but I do enjoy the information that crosses the list and I do respect everyone's opinion as their own. Terrible tragedies have been suffered today, and many lives are now changed forever. As Priscilla mentioned, the damage to families is irreparable. However, to think that if God existed, this incredible loss of life wouldn't have occurred in the first place, is to say that that the devil does not exist. God is very real and He does exist. Unfortunately, the devil is very real also, and he does exist. Many people think that the devil is a mythical figure that has nothing to do with current events, so they equate God with all of the good and the bad things. The fact is, that God does love us all, and it is not his desire that anyone of us should perish, but we all have an enemy, and that is the devil. Every opportunity he gets, he seeks to devour. God works through his people and He is patient. Tragedies do occur, but the blame should go to the devil, not God. When we pray, our prayers do make a difference as God hears our prayers. The we that I'm talking about is those that believe on His son, Jesus Christ. There is a spiritual war going on that must not be overlooked. Todays events are part of this war.
RE: 94%? that's possible! ;) [7:19165]
Don't you play for the New York Islanders? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alexey Yashin Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 3:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 94%? that's possible! ;) [7:19165] Hello, colleges! The last week was so hard, but this doesn't matter because I passed CCIE Written exam with 94%. ;) Well, last minutes of test I had known my success, but I was impressed of this percentage when I press last button. ;) This test was not so hard for me, especially I should notice accuracy of questions and fair of choices. A lot of questions was too tricky, but all what you need is only attention. Personally, I haven't problem with that. I have 6 years cisco hardware experience, I took my CCNA 3 years ago, and completed my CCNP/CCDP last year. I do my networking job every day, and I love that (isn't this reason for success? ;). But of course some useful things, books, webs help me a lot. Jeff Doyle, Caslow, Halabi - you shouldn't miss this. Boson preparation tests are useful too. Sybex CCIE guide is a nice blueprint for methodical study (but there's a lot of errors and lacks in some topics). In my opinion, for ccie written you must understand basic routing and bridging technologies inside and out, that's a big deal. That's not very cisco specific or hardware oriented exam (well, some questions are specific, but few of). You should memorize some hex values, but don't worry about that, because of lot of cramnotes on the web consist all you need. ;) Actually, all tips and url's are in this mail list already, but I want put this one: http://www.heinzulm.com/test.html There's bunch of questions. No answers. Good questions for feel yourself ccie prepared. ;) Try it. Okay, now it's time for lab. Let's look how I'm _really_ good. ;) From Russia but with love. Vladivostok city, Russia. - Alexey Yashin, CCNP, CCDP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19230t=19165 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Part Number [7:18352]
Thanks. -Original Message- From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 10:39 PM To: Christopher Supino; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Part Number [7:18352] The big question is will the below links make it through the mail server :o) Here's the 2500 providing clock (DCE) http://pacificcable.com/Picture_Page.asp?DataName=CAB-5060X-10 Here's the 50 pin providing clock (DTE) http://pacificcable.com/Picture_Page.asp?DataName=CAB-6050X-10 or http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1270229319 So- the respective stock #'s are 5060X 6050X. All the best !!! Phil - Original Message - From: Christopher Supino To: Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 10:27 PM Subject: Part Number [7:18352] Anyone know the part number for a 50 pin serial to 60 pin serial X-over cable? (Cisco 4000 to Cisco 2500) Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erick B. Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 9:40 PM To: kenairs; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF message You'll see this w/12.1T and above if you're redistributing a connected network into OSPF that is already natively part of OSPF. With 12.1 mainline and below IOS will redistribute the network into OSPF externally even though it is already part of OSPF. I posted a summary of my findings on this a few days ago. There may be other reasons why it occurs as well but I can't think of any at moment. --- kenairs wrote: Hi , I was doing some debug on OSPF and came across this below. OSPF: Start redist-scanning 01:33:18: OSPF: Scan for both redistribution and translation 01:33:18: OSPF: max-aged external LSA for summary 170.150.23.0 255.255.255.0 01:33:18: OSPF: End scanning, Elapsed time 8ms Any one can explain this ? Tks __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18383t=18352 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Don't think this is true ! Re: CCIE One-Day Lab layout [7:18341]
Michael, I believe there are still stability issues with the Native IOS on the 6xxx boxes. Also, what would be so wrong about one OS for switches and another for routers? These two device types do operate pretty much completely differently, so why would one expect to be able to configure them with the same OS. The 29/35xx series runs Switch IOS which I find to be not nearly as feature rich as CatOS. Of, course, these are lower end platforms, but one does not even have the ability to configure multiple interfaces simultaneously. This is a pain in the butt if you have a lot of switches to integrate. I just feel that the CatOS is a cleaner interface, and was designed to configure switches, whereas IOS was designed with routing devices in mind( I say routing devices, because it runs devices like the 2948G L3 beautifully, even though it is not a true router). All that being said, much of this comes down to opinion, and what you are accustomed to. I have done far more work with CatOS and switches than I have with routers, so I guess my comfort level with CatOS is higher. I have also been frustrated by the limitations of switch IOS on the lower end series, so I guess my opinion is slightly biased :) Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael L. Williams Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 5:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Don't think this is true ! Re: CCIE One-Day Lab layout [7:18337] Although there are some features that the Native IOS doesn't support that the CatOS does, they are few and far between, and Cisco is quickly integrating all CatOS functionality into Native IOS. I don't think moving away from CatOS is a major loss. Using the Native IOS gives a uniformity to the command line and the modes used to configure a piece of hardware, which IMHO is a BIG plus for everyone involved. I disagree that Hybrid (CatOS) is far more intuitive, scalable and flexible. I say this because I'm much more familiar with IOS commands than CatOS Set commands, so whether or not it's more intuitive really depends on what you've used more. As far as scalable and flexible, keep in mind it's the same hardware with the same capabilites either way, so I can't say that using CatOS as opposed to Native IOS makes much of a difference. If anything, using the Native IOS gives the advantage of using Distributed CEF, which can't be done with Hybrid. IMHO, Native IOS is more flexible because now every port in the chassis can be used as a switchport or as a router interface. With the CatOS, you need to designate a port in a VLAN, then go to the MSFC and assign an IP to that VLAN, etc with Native, you simply configure that port as you would a router interface and it's treated as such. I have noticed that most people that order the 6500s don't get Native IOS on it, however CatOS is still the default and many people aren't aware that Native IOS is even an option. However, every single shop I've seen that is large is running Native because it conserves IPs, etc.. If you get a chance, throw the Native IOS on a switch before you send it out. you can always convert back to CatOS. Just remember not to erase the boot image from the MSFC bootflash =) (If you have MSFC2, you don't need the boot image to use Native IOS. However, if you have MSFC1, you need a boot image for Native IOS. No matter which MSFC you have, you need a boot image for CatOS, so that's the one you don't wanna erase if you're just wanting to try out Native and then convert back later) Here's a link on how to get from CatOS (Hybrid) to Native.. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/81.shtml Here's a link on how to convert from Native back to Hybrid.. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/80.shtml Enjoy!!! Mike W. Christopher Supino wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... That would be a shame if it were true, as CatOS, for the platform it runs, is a far superior operating system IMHO. Far more intuitive, scaleable and flexible. I'd hate to see it go. I've implemented quite a few of the Cat6xxxs and I've never had a customer request Native IOS on the box, so I unfortunately have not seen it first hand. Have to try that pre-deployment on the next one. :) Chris Supino CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNA5, ASE Senior Network Design Engineer TransNet Corporation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael L. Williams Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 4:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Don't think this is true ! Re: CCIE One-Day Lab layout [7:18246] (without trying to piss off people that have spent money on a 5000) I sure hope they move the lab to the 6500 series... my 2 cents. The 6500 can have 2 modes. a Hybrid IOS, where the switch side of things is run by the Cat OS and the MSFC is run by the IOS. Under that setup, you would use the SET commands to c
Part Number [7:18352]
Anyone know the part number for a 50 pin serial to 60 pin serial X-over cable? (Cisco 4000 to Cisco 2500) Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erick B. Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 9:40 PM To: kenairs; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF message You'll see this w/12.1T and above if you're redistributing a connected network into OSPF that is already natively part of OSPF. With 12.1 mainline and below IOS will redistribute the network into OSPF externally even though it is already part of OSPF. I posted a summary of my findings on this a few days ago. There may be other reasons why it occurs as well but I can't think of any at moment. --- kenairs wrote: Hi , I was doing some debug on OSPF and came across this below. OSPF: Start redist-scanning 01:33:18: OSPF: Scan for both redistribution and translation 01:33:18: OSPF: max-aged external LSA for summary 170.150.23.0 255.255.255.0 01:33:18: OSPF: End scanning, Elapsed time 8ms Any one can explain this ? Tks __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18352t=18352 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124]
When did CCIE Written become a certification? I take serious issue with engineers who do this. It only adds to the cheapening of the cert. Pass your lab, get your number, call yourself a CCIE. Til then, you are a CCNP, CCDP. My two cents. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ahmed adil Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 1:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124] Just cant do it without a router Ahmed CCIE Written CCNP CCDP MCSE Dan Faulk wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Having recently just passed CCNP this year I will say you must have a Router. The reason is that the prescribed rituals must be performed in front of the Router. Without a Router the powerful spirit of routing, BGPOSPF, wont bless your efforts and even if you do pass all knowledge will be removed from you within 2 months. Some have said scrificing your most valuable possesion before the router helps. I give it my time which seemed to work well. Others have given the Router spirit money, bought it accessories, even food but so far time works best. Hope this helps and smile cause TGIF!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of D Rick Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 11:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18107] Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? I'm doing practice test from Boson and doing the Sybex study guide? Is that sufficient? Do I need to be in front of a router? Thanks in advance, Rick D Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18239t=18124 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124]
Nice Chuck. Don't forget to add CFTA(Certified Flush Toilet Administrator), and MCBD(Miller Certified Beer Drinker). :) Chris -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 3:22 PM To: Christopher Supino; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher Supino Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124] When did CCIE Written become a certification? I take serious issue with engineers who do this. It only adds to the cheapening of the cert. Pass your lab, get your number, call yourself a CCIE. Til then, you are a CCNP, CCDP. My two cents. CL: about the same time the CCNP 2.0 became a certification. Some people will do anything to make themselves look better Chuck primary school diploma, high school diploma, Universal Life Church minister Costco GoldStar Member, United Mileage Plus member, Calif. State AAA member should I join the NRA and look tough too? ;- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ahmed adil Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 1:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124] Just cant do it without a router Ahmed CCIE Written CCNP CCDP MCSE Dan Faulk wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Having recently just passed CCNP this year I will say you must have a Router. The reason is that the prescribed rituals must be performed in front of the Router. Without a Router the powerful spirit of routing, BGPOSPF, wont bless your efforts and even if you do pass all knowledge will be removed from you within 2 months. Some have said scrificing your most valuable possesion before the router helps. I give it my time which seemed to work well. Others have given the Router spirit money, bought it accessories, even food but so far time works best. Hope this helps and smile cause TGIF!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of D Rick Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 11:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18107] Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? I'm doing practice test from Boson and doing the Sybex study guide? Is that sufficient? Do I need to be in front of a router? Thanks in advance, Rick D Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18252t=18124 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Don't think this is true ! Re: CCIE One-Day Lab layout [7:18253]
That would be a shame if it were true, as CatOS, for the platform it runs, is a far superior operating system IMHO. Far more intuitive, scaleable and flexible. I'd hate to see it go. I've implemented quite a few of the Cat6xxxs and I've never had a customer request Native IOS on the box, so I unfortunately have not seen it first hand. Have to try that pre-deployment on the next one. :) Chris Supino CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNA5, ASE Senior Network Design Engineer TransNet Corporation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael L. Williams Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 4:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Don't think this is true ! Re: CCIE One-Day Lab layout [7:18246] (without trying to piss off people that have spent money on a 5000) I sure hope they move the lab to the 6500 series... my 2 cents. The 6500 can have 2 modes. a Hybrid IOS, where the switch side of things is run by the Cat OS and the MSFC is run by the IOS. Under that setup, you would use the SET commands to configure the switch and IOS commands to configure the MSFC. The other mode is Native IOS, in which the switch and RSM are combined into a single router-esque unit. In Native IOS, you use IOS commands to configure the MSFC/switch, but there are little CatOS-like extensions to the IOS command to let you configure ports as switchports (instead of like router interfaces). I've heard many people say that Cisco is really pushing to get away from CatOS, so it wouldn't surprise me to see them use a 6500 running Native IOS in the lab. just a guess tho. Mike W. Ahmed Mamoor Amimi wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Is 6500 the router SET base as those of 5000 series or the IOS like 1900 or routers I also agree that they will not put PIX in the exam . i think that rack will contain PIX but we will not have to config it it will be for other CCIE track. -Mamoor Brian H. Jones wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I dont know about the PIX but the 6500s will replace the 5500s. That you can count on. jc0 wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Guys, I DO NOT think this is true though. Unless someone can verify this with Cisco. Brad Ellis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Here's the info from the grapevine on the layout for the new ONE-DAY CCIE Lab: 1x Cisco PIX 1x 2600 3x 25xx 3x 3640 1x 4000 (Frame router) 1x Cat 6509 This is the standard layout for all CCIE lab's except for WAN switching. Gotta wonder if people will start seeing some Pix stuff on the CCIE RS lab!!! -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Learning Inc Used Cisco: www.optsys.net Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18253t=18253 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124]
Consider them rolled. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of B.J. Wilson Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 5:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124] I heard that cert was still in Draft stage. (insert collective eye-roll here.) - Original Message - From: Christopher Supino To: Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 4:06 PM Subject: RE: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124] Nice Chuck. Don't forget to add CFTA(Certified Flush Toilet Administrator), and MCBD(Miller Certified Beer Drinker). :) Chris -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 3:22 PM To: Christopher Supino; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher Supino Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124] When did CCIE Written become a certification? I take serious issue with engineers who do this. It only adds to the cheapening of the cert. Pass your lab, get your number, call yourself a CCIE. Til then, you are a CCNP, CCDP. My two cents. CL: about the same time the CCNP 2.0 became a certification. Some people will do anything to make themselves look better Chuck primary school diploma, high school diploma, Universal Life Church minister Costco GoldStar Member, United Mileage Plus member, Calif. State AAA member should I join the NRA and look tough too? ;- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ahmed adil Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 1:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124] Just cant do it without a router Ahmed CCIE Written CCNP CCDP MCSE Dan Faulk wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Having recently just passed CCNP this year I will say you must have a Router. The reason is that the prescribed rituals must be performed in front of the Router. Without a Router the powerful spirit of routing, BGPOSPF, wont bless your efforts and even if you do pass all knowledge will be removed from you within 2 months. Some have said scrificing your most valuable possesion before the router helps. I give it my time which seemed to work well. Others have given the Router spirit money, bought it accessories, even food but so far time works best. Hope this helps and smile cause TGIF!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of D Rick Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 11:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18107] Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? I'm doing practice test from Boson and doing the Sybex study guide? Is that sufficient? Do I need to be in front of a router? Thanks in advance, Rick D Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18259t=18124 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ccna companion question [7:17648]
The first answer would be correct, because it would require IP subnet-zero to be running. This command allows the router to use the zero subnet (subnet with a base address of 0.0) to be used as a valid subnet. In this example, you have 4 bits of subnetting, which allows for 16 sub-networks(theoretically if the .255 and .0 subnets are valid, but then a again, thats what we are discussing) with 4094 valid hosts per subnet. The first valid subnet would be 156.100.0.0-156.100.15.255 with a base address of 156.100.0.0. Some older network equipment doesn't allow for the use of the zero-subnet, as it is seen as a base(even though it isn't . 0s in the host=base address) or even stranger a brodcast(some older gear from other manufacturers used all 0s as a broadcast, rather than all 1s. Just remember, we are talking about a zero in the network portion, not the host portion. Hope this explanation helps. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Teresa Presutto Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ccna companion question [7:17648] CNNA Companion question (obviously I read the answer and I know the command , but I would like to know why...) Which of the following addresses would be require the use of ip subnet-zero command? 156.100.11.37 255.255.240.0 131.64.16.133 255.255.255.128 192.168.36.10 255.255.255.0 205.100.16.3 255.255.255.0 Ciao e grazie, Teresa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17653t=17648 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BPDUs [7:17607]
All , I came across this question while studying: How are BPDU's propagated amongst switches? Broadcast, multicast, or unicast? Anyone have an explanation? Christopher Supino CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNA5, ASE Senior System Engineer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17607t=17607 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passed Written [7:17466]
ASET is Cisco's CCIE mentoring program for resellers. They help you thru the certification process, and will even allow you some rack time once you have PAID for a lab. Sounds good, I was just wondering if anyone on the list had been through it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Allison Dan Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 8:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Passed Written [7:17466] Congratulations. I've been studying for it. Plan on taking it soon. What is the ASET program? Dan Allison CCNP, MCSE, CNE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17609t=17466 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed Written [7:17466]
Hey all, Well, I passed the written today. That was one tough test! Glad it is over. I plan on taking a break from studying for a couple of months. One question: What are the scheduling times looking like right now? I am hoping to get in for an early April lab. Ohh.. and let me not forget. Thanks again to all on the list for all the great posts that stimulate thinking. This list has been an invaluable asset to me throughout my Cisco studies. P.S. Are any of the CCIE candidates on the list involved with the Cisco ASET program, and if so, can you contact me offline with what the experience has been like? Thanks in advance. Christopher Supino CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNA5, ASE Senior Network Design Engineer (and CCIE candidate that feels good :)) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17466t=17466 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Written [7:14429]
Hey, Has anyone else heard the rumor that the CCIE written will not be required for CCNP's to schedule a lab date after September 1st? Christopher Supino CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNA5, ASE Senior System Engineer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14429t=14429 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE vLab Assessor -- vLab CCIE ReadyNow! [7:14430]
Hear, hear. I agree. Why should we pay to be Beta testers? Cisco's certifacation program is beggining to look eerily like Microsoft's. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David L. Blair Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 9:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE vLab Assessor -- vLab CCIE ReadyNow! [7:14430] I have two issues with your e-mail. First, your company wants ME to pay $250.00 to beta test your product. I think not!!! I am not saying it has to be free, but $250.00 is WAY to MUCH!!! Maybe $50.00 to $75.00. Basically, you expect me to provide you with VALUABLE feedback on your product and you want to charge me an arm and a leg for providing with VALUABLE beta testing feedback. I normally charge customers for the service you expect ME to pay for. Second, the e-mail did not have an e-mail address in the To: field. I normally regard e-mails like this as SPAM e-mail. I suggest you use a did way to hide receipants of future e-mails from your company. My $0.02 worth Through Complexity there is Simplicity, Through Simplicity there is Complexity David L. Blair - CCNP, CCNA, MCSE, CBE, A+, 3Wizard - Original Message - From: Glinke, Julie Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 5:48 PM Subject: CCIE vLab Assessor -- vLab CCIE ReadyNow! Greetings, Thank you for your interest CCIE vLab. Assessor Pilot Program -- vLab. CCIE ReadyNow! The Pilot Program includes: * Directions on how to use the vLab. Assessor exercises * Two practice vLab. Assessor exercises * One CCIE vLab. Assessor exercise * One Survey to provide us with your feedback. The pilot will be launched by September 1st and all participants will be expected to complete the program by September 15th. If you are interested in participating please call or e-mail either of the contacts below: Cher Kephart Nikki Snyder 888-638-7275 888-638-7285 (International) +1 + 240-568-7275 (International) +1 + 240-568-7285 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] The fee for the Pilot Program is a one-time fee of $250.00 to be paid in full by credit card. Julie Glinke Program Manager Mentor Technologies Group, Inc. (240)568-6693 Office (443)994-9253 Cell Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14433t=14430 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reverse Telnet [7:14317]
Hey all, Anyone have a config for setting up reverse telnet from an AUX port directly to a console port? Christopher Supino CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNA5, ASE Senior System Engineer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14317t=14317 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Certification Statistics [7:13477]
Interesting. What is the source of this info? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of cheekin Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Certification Statistics [7:13477] FYI. Breakdown by certification through May 2001 US/CAN EMEA Asia/Pac Americas Japan CCIE 2,876 1,940 755 135 267 CCNA87,72426,69434,231 1,972 23,689 CCNP20,7789,633 9,244 40723,689 CCDA14,8256,580 3,705 6521,038 CCDP4,264 3,911 1,449 94 245 cheekin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13483t=13477 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VLAN: ISL or 802.1Q? [7:13325]
The only real benefit of ISL was Per VLAN Spanning-tree, which has now been incorporated into Cisco's rendition of 802.1q, and is also becoming a standard, 802.1s or w, I believe. 802.1q is the way to go if you have any non-Cisco gear in your environment, as ISL turns VLAN tagged frames into mini-giants which non-Cisco switches will see as errors. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Remmert Veen Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 8:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VLAN: ISL or 802.1Q? [7:13325] Hi Sammi, Indeed, ISL is Cisco propietary, so should you consider other vendor's switches in your network, now or in the future, I'd recommend 802.1q. Beware however, dot1q has some drwabacks with regards to loops. Check out http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/29_35wc/sc/swgvl ans.htm#xtocid1196639 for the details. If not (so your network is all Cisco) you might wanna consider ISL. Since it is Cisco propietary, it's obviously fully supported by Cisco and has some minor benefits. Hth, Remmert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13429t=13325 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DCE definition [7:13291]
All, I was reading thru the Sybex CCIE study guide this evening, when a came across the term DCE in the context we are all familiar with( the end of a connection that provides clocking) defined as distributed computing environment. Perhaps the authors should get themselves a new IT encyclopedia, huh. Do Sybex books generally have many errors? I am relatively unfamiliar with them as until now I have used Cisco Press books. Christopher Supino CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNA5, ASE Senior System Engineer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13291t=13291 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: To CCIE's without a job [7:12805]
Howard and Chuck are both in rare form this evening! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Medley Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2001 10:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: To CCIE's without a job [7:12805] Howard, stop my head is going to explode! Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Howard C. Berkowitz Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 4:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: To CCIE's without a job [7:12805] That's a scary thought: CCIEs who develop protocols. ;-] I know very few respected protocol or platform designers that ever mentioned having a CCIE. On the other hand, it only occasionally comes up that one has a PhD, which isn't always in a relevant discipline. I'm amused by the degree requirement--I could see an argument for a master's or doctorate, but the undergraduate computer science program gets into relatively little you need to know to design and implement protocols, other than as a coder. Personally, I'm a much better developer than I am a support person. There's overlap between the skills of product/protocol design and large network design, but much less with troubleshooting. Even quality testing is a somewhat different skill set than troubleshooting. For example, has anyone seen a Cisco exam that explored the differences among conformance, interoperability, and performance testing? The difference between a correct but boundary condition event, a syntactically incorrect event, and an inopportune event? They are looking for software engineers. They aren't going to find many that have a CCIE? It's a different skill set and requires a different type of personality. Priscilla At 09:41 AM 7/18/01, Ole Drews Jensen wrote: Forgive me for sending this here, I know there's a place for job discussions, but I noticed that there have been several e-mails about how CCIE's now have a harder time getting jobs. I received this e-mail (look at the message included after my signature) on another Cisco list I'm a member of: Hth, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.OleDrews.com/CCNP ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ Message: 1 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:11:26 - From: JDO Subject: Looking for a Special Kind of CCIE Hello, My name is Johnna Smith and I work for a placement firm in Dallas, Texas. I am in desperate need of a CCIE that DEVELOPS routing protocols. I need them to have BGP, DSPF, IS-IS, and MPLS. The must be a software engineer and they must be degreed. If any of you could help me, please give me a call or shoot me an email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or at 972-991-7569. Just to take a look at someof our other positions please go to We also work with another agency that focuese more on IT, you can find their site at Thanks Johnna Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13308t=12805 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Large Collisions on Vlan1 [7:12961]
It means you have a problem. Mostly a port speed or duplex mismatch. Or you have a hub attached to that switchport :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kwame Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 12:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Large Collisions on Vlan1 [7:12961] What does it mean when the sh int vlan1 output shows large collisions? For example on a 2924 XL with an ISL trunk to a 6509 I go the ff output upon issuing the SH INT VLAN1 command: 0 output errors, 19108404 collisions, 0 interface resets Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13054t=12961 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed CID [7:12886]
Hey folks, Passed CID today to finish the CCDP track. Tough exam. Second only to BCRAN IMHO. I would like to know what books or study materials this group has found to be effective in preparing for the CCIE written test. I am scheduled for early September to take the test. I planned on purchasing at least one of the Boson exams. I value the opinion of most here, as I have been a lurker and sometime poster for about 2 years now, and the group has yet to steer me wrong. Thanks in advance for any suggestions and thanks for the invaluable information in the past. Christopher Supino CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNA5, ASE Senior Network Design Engineer TransNet Corporation Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12886t=12886 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: To CCIE's without a job [7:12805]
That would be CSPF--- Cheapest Shortest Path First! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Slow Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 5:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: To CCIE's without a job [7:12805] is that one of those protocols that upper managment uses for making networking decisions? -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 4:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: To CCIE's without a job [7:12805] I want to deploy DSPF here at work. - Original Message - From: Tony Medeiros To: Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 1:41 PM Subject: Re: To CCIE's without a job [7:12805] I want to be a developer for DSPF What is that? Dumbest Shortest Path First ? My name is Johnna Smith and I work for a placement firm in Dallas, Texas. I am in desperate need of a CCIE that DEVELOPS routing protocols. I need them to have BGP, DSPF, IS-IS, and MPLS. The must be a software engineer and they must be degreed. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12887t=12805 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Routing EXam [7:12888]
Know your BGP and OSPF. Also, I remember a lot of EIGRP stuff being in there. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 7:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP Routing EXam [7:12888] Two days and counting till my examany last words of wisdom? Thx Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12889t=12888 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Which companys are good for CCIE? Seeking a job! [7:11284]
I hear there are some good opportunities on Neptune right now :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of NY50TT Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 9:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Which companys are good for CCIE? Seeking a job! [7:11284] I would like to know more information about working at jupiter. Tom York wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello everyone! I am a graduate student in UT Dallas majoring in Computer Science. I passed CCIE written exam, and I bought many routers to prepare for the lab exam. I will graduate the end of this year, so I start looking for a job. My question is, which companys are good for CCIE? Do you think Cisco is good if I have CCIE? Or are any ISP companys good for CCIE? Or Jupiter? Is there any company which helps people to pass CCIE? I don't have any internetworking work experience, so I think even if I passed CCIE lab exam, it will still be difficult to find job. But at least, I would like to know which companys I should check and apply. Any suggestion will be very welcome. Thank you very much for your help. Tomohiro Yoshizawa Join 18 million Eudora users by signing up for a free Eudora Web-Mail account at http://www.eudoramail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11330t=11284 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed CIT [7:10220]
All, Passed Support yesterday with an 827. I took the test basically cold, based only on work experience, as it was being offered here at Networkers complimentary . Well, that completes the CCNP track for me. I am go to attempt the Design exam on Friday under the same circumstances. Anyone have any feedback on this exam.(without violating the NDA)? Christopher Supino Senior Design Engineer CCNP, CCDA, MCSE, CNA5, ASE TransNet Corp. PH 908 253 0500 x2101 Mobile 908 313 0130 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10220t=10220 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spanning Tree Protocol [7:2564]
Seen it first hand. Similar environment. Large private school. Spanning tree on a MacIntosh Network. Seemed to hose everything nicely. Not to mention the fact that there were 600 AT nodes on the ethernet network(thats a no-no). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 9:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Spanning Tree Protocol [7:2564] Oh, speaking of AppleTalk. We've got a customer (not mine, but one of the engineers working the account bounced this off me): They claim their new Macs can't access the network if Spanning Tree is enabled. Supposedly this has been verified by Apple and TAC (but we've never had a customer lie to us, so that must be gospel, right. Heh, not). I don't know what exactly the details are, but basically it just doesn't function. The simple solution is to kill spanning-tree on all the switches, but this is at a number of public schools, and I can't wait to hear about a kid bringing in his Linksys 8 port 10/100 switch and melting their network. Anyone else hear such rumors? -- Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... At 11:08 AM 4/30/01, Phil Barker wrote: Strongly in favour, A similar problem occurs in an IPX environment. Make sure all Servers/Clients are 'portfast' and switch/switch disable 'portfast'. A similar problem happens with AppleTalk too. That's what we get for expecting switches to replace hubs in a topology. ;-) They were designed as bridges and to talk to other bridges. Despite switches being the new-fangled thing (well, sort of new), a lot of their functionality is vintage 1980s. Priscilla Regards, Phil. --- John Gotti wrote: Hey all...we are having a problem where workstations sporatically will not be able to obtain an IP address from our DHCP server. After about 4 minutes, you can perform a manual renew from WINIPCFG and you get your IP address. This has baffled me for quite some time and I have recently been told it is our Cisco 2924 Switch to blame. The story I was told is below. I welcome any comments for or against this opinion. Thank you for your time. It appears the problem is connected to the spanning tree algorithm used by the CISCO switches. By default, ports on the switch block as they are initialised; during this phase the port is in its spanning tree algorithm learning and listening state - it is not forwarding. This is specifically aimed at ports that will be used to connect to other switches/routers in a stack. After a default time (4 mins?) they switch to the standard forwarding mode and everything seems normal, the problem is that you have missed all the important DHCP broadcast and acknowledgment from client to DHCP server during this period. You can change this default state by changing the PORT-FAST setting on each port. The port is then immediately in the FORWARDING mode as it is initialised. By default this setting is DISABLED, I have ENABLED all ports except the ports doing the linking to other switches _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2966t=2564 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VLAN routing in Cat6000
You must have at least one active switch port in VLAN 2 in order for the interface to come up. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel ma Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 5:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VLAN routing in Cat6000 I am trying to configure VLAN routing in Cat 6006, (Super engine does support routing). However, after I configure interface VLAN2, it said VLAN 2 is shutdown. it's no use to issue 'no shutdown' command. How should I configure it? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telnet Bandwidth
Hey all, Slightly off topic(maybe not). How much bandwidth does your average telnet session take up? Christopher Supino Senior System Engineer, CCNA, MCSE, CNA5, ASE TransNet Corp. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed BSCN
Hey all, Passed BSCN 2.0 today with an 896. Pretty surprised at relative low difficulty of most of the questions. Any recommendations on which test should be next? Christopher Supino Senior Systems Engineer, CCNA, MCSE, Novell CNA, Compaq ASE TransNet Corp. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows 2000 sniffer
Can anyone recommend a good sniffer program for Windows 2000? I am having problems attempting to run the NT version on 2000. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
