Re: GuideLine book for CCIE Written [7:73925]
Just because someone has something nice to say doesn't mean it was self-generated... :-) Thank you for the kind words Doug; I hope you do well on the exam... --- Dennis Laganiere - Original Message - From: Kaminski, Shawn G To: Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:57 PM Subject: RE: GuideLine book for CCIE Written [7:73925] Who's Doug? Dennis' clone? :-) Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Thomas Larus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: GuideLine book for CCIE Written [7:73925] Look into Dennis Laganiere's and Brad Ellis' Study Guide for the CCIE written. I got a deal on it through Amazon.com. Laganiere makes a good search term. Check out Dennis Laganiere's website, too. www.laganiere.net I am amazed how much advice he gives away. As someone who is almost finished with a book of advice and learning labs, I can say that the amount of advice he gives away for free convinced me that I could not write a little book with just advice about preparing for the CCIE. Thus, the advice is a small part of my book, and the scenarios and explanations of the scenarios are the major part. Thanks, Doug, for making me work harder. Tom Larus, CCIE #10,014 Piedrahita Orlando wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all my name is Orlando, and i am starting to peruse the CCIE written, I am aware that there is no magic book to prepare you for the test, i am however looking for a book to be used as an OUTLINE to study. Currently i have bought the TCP IP Vol1 TCP IP Vol2 by Jeff Doyle and Lan switching from CCIE Development by Kennedy Clark, Kevin Hamilton Any recomendations, thank you! **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73957t=73925 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
VLAN Access maps and bridge ACLs [7:73844]
Does anybody have any good links for VLAN Access maps and bridge ACLs? I've gone through my Cisco library and the CCO, and haven't found much... Thanks in advance for any help... --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73844t=73844 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: We (Cisco mailing list) are moving ... [7:72060]
Paul... Many of us feel the same way. If you setup a paypal account, I think you'll find a lot of us will help to defray some of your expenses... Thanks for all your efforts... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Walker, James, IS To: Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:32 AM Subject: RE: We (Cisco mailing list) are moving ... [7:72060] Paul, Can we help you out with this great service you are providing to us by making a small donation? I know I'm not alone when I say that your service has been invaluable to us in the Ciscos of the world. Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: Paul Borghese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: We (Cisco mailing list) are moving ... [7:72060] Hey Everyone, We will be moving the mailing list function to a new server. If you are currently receiving this list via e-mail, you will be affected. This has been planned for some time now but we need to move faster then I would like. I just received a bill from our co-location facility for the GroupStudy service and let's just put it this way, in most locations rent on a two bedroom apartment is less expensive. So we need to try and reduce our bandwidth usage (an eventually find another co-location facility). It has been quite clear for some time now that the GroupStudy server needs help. We are dropping an unacceptable number of messages (I personally have had five in a row discarded) and the messages that make it take a random amount of time to propagate. To fix this, I have purchased a new server and bandwidth (at a lower cost facility). We will be migrating to the new server in the next few days. Once the move is complete we will cut over to the new server. But wait it gets better .. We are dumping majordomo as our list software! Our new software will allow you to change a number of options. For example you will be able to suspend distribution of the e-mails, receive e-mails in digest format, change your e-mail address, etc. You will receive a welcome message with your account information. The message will contain your username/password, instructions on how to login to the server, and instructions on how to unsubscribe. Please save this e-mail for future reference. It is also a good idea to login to the server and set your password to something more memorable then the random password given. If you stop receiving e-mails from the list after the change, please send me an e-mail (after verifying it is not a problem at your end such as misconfigured anti-spam software etc.). Take care, Paul Borghese Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72169t=72060 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New CCNA tracks [7:71256]
I haven't seen anything about this before, so I thought I'd share an article from CertMag Cisco_PolishesCisco Polishes CCNA Certification Cisco Systems will announce several enhancements to the Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA) program tomorrow, June 24th. CCNA, Cisco's most popular certification, was introduced in April 1998 and is the entry-level certification for the Cisco Career Certification Program. It requires base-level knowledge of IP networking and troubleshooting. Enhancements to the CCNA program include a new two-step exam path, revisions to content and a new recertification option. Candidates will now have two paths to approach CCNA certification: a single-exam path that includes exam #640-801 (which will be available June 30th) or a two-exam path that includes exam #640-821 (Introduction to Cisco Networking Technologies, or INTRO) and exam #640-811 (Interconnecting Cisco Network Devices, or ICND). http://www.certmag.com/articles/templates/cmag_nl_extra_content.asp?articlei d=298 zoneid=37 (watch the wrap)... --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71256t=71256 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Simple config issues [7:70482]
Do you have a route to x.x.x.x? If your router does not have a route to x.x.x.x it will not install the static route in the routing table since the next hop is unreachable. As far as RIP goes you are seeing the correct behavior. Remember that RIP is classful. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP-Dial/Security) Anil Gupte wrote: I am trying to configure a 2600 router. I have two problems: 1. I issued the default route command ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x I can see this under ip classless in sh run However, when I do a sh ip route, it does not appear there and in fact says: Gateway of last resort is not set 2. I configured it for RIP using router rip network 63.x.x.0 and it shows as 63.0.0.0 in sh run. Is this correct behavior? Until now I had only dealt with networks in the Class C range. This is a Class C assigned to us but by the first octet you can see that it is from a Class A range. Any help or pointers will be muchly appreciated. Thanx, Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70489t=70482 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF over FR [7:70025]
You can not mix point-to-point and non-broadcast network types which is what you are trying to do. You can make them neighbors but they will never install routes into the routing table. Look at their OSPF databases and you will see the LSA's but the routers will not install them in the routing table. Also note the Adv Router is not-reachable error message above each LSA. Network types that use a DR (broadcast and non-broadcast) can be mixed together just as network types that do not use a DR (point-to-point and point-to-multipoint) can mixed but DR types can NOT mix with non-DR types. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP-Dial/Security) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Catherine Wu Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 2:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OSPF over FR [7:70025] I am testing Hub-Spoke for OSPF over FR, I verified the neighbor adjacency,but I couldn't see route 2.2.2.2 and 3.3.3.3 in the routing table, RouterA#sh ip ospf nei Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface 3.3.3.3 1 FULL/ -00:01:4110.1.1.6 Serial0/0.2 2.2.2.2 1 FULL/ -00:01:3910.1.1.2 Serial0/0.1 RouterB#sh ip ospf nei Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface 1.1.1.1 1 FULL/BDR00:01:3810.1.1.1 Serial0/0 RouterC#sh ip ospf nei Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface 1.1.1.1 1 FULL/BDR00:01:3410.1.1.5 Serial0/0 RouterA#sh ip ro Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR P - periodic downloaded static route Gateway of last resort is not set 1.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 1.1.1.1 is directly connected, Loopback0 10.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 2 subnets C 10.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0.1 C 10.1.1.4 is directly connected, Serial0/0.2 Please help. Thanks Catherine RouterA interface Loopback0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi no sh ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.252 ip ospf hello-interval 30 frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! interface Serial0/0.2 point-to-point ip address 10.1.1.5 255.255.255.252 ip ospf hello-interval 30 frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ! router ospf 1 log-adjacency-changes network 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 1 network 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.3 area 0 network 10.1.1.4 0.0.0.3 area 0 RouterB ! interface Loopback0 ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 ! interface Serial0/0 ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.252 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.1 110 broadcast no frame-relay inverse-arp frame-relay lmi-type ansi no sh ! router ospf 1 log-adjacency-changes network 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 2 network 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.3 area 0 neighbor 10.1.1.1 ! RouterC interface Loopback0 ip address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255 ! interface Serial0/0 ip address 10.1.1.6 255.255.255.252 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.5 120 broadcast no frame-relay inverse-arp frame-relay lmi-type ansi no sh ! router ospf 1 log-adjacency-changes network 3.3.3.3 0.0.0.0 area 3 network 10.1.1.4 0.0.0.3 area 0 neighbor 10.1.1.5 [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70028t=70025 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 different CCNP certifications [7:66547]
It depends on how strong (and or overconfident) you are. If you REALLY know all the material, than the Foundation is a nice shortcut. It's quite a bit more expensive than the other exams, but cheaper in total (if you pass); and if you pass, you're through in one test session. The problem is, if you blow one part of the test, you blow it all. For most people (myself included) taking the separate tests allows you to compartmentalize your studying - study switching for a few weeks, and take the test; study remote access for a few weeks, and take the test; etc. Unless you've got BGP running through your nervous system all the way to your ASs, than I would go the multi-test route. Just my $.02 --- Dennis - Original Message - From: DeVoe, Charles (PKI) To: Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 5:00 AM Subject: 2 different CCNP certifications [7:66547] Since I just recently passed my CCNA I thought I would continue on up the ladder. In looking at the CCNP I see there are 2 ways to get it. 1. Take the BSCI 640-901, Switching 640-604, Remote Access 640-605 and Support 640-606 exams. OR 2. Take the Foundation exam 640-841 (combination of the BSCI, Switching and Remote Access exams) and the Support 640-606 exam. What is the difference and what is proffered? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66553t=66547 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 2 hour CCIE Written Exam [7:66563]
Here's what the CCO has to say about it... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html#1 There's nothing about changing topics. Just the time you're given... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Stepp Harless To: Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 9:49 AM Subject: New 2 hour CCIE Written Exam [7:66563] Has anyone taken the new 2 hour exam yet? I understand that it has changed from 3 hours to two hours. I just changed on the 28th but I thought maybe somebody took the test over the weekend. I wanted to know how many questions are on the new exam. The old one was 150 and I believe someone stated earlier that they received an e-mail from Cisco stating that the number of questions was also decreasing to 100 instead of 150. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66581t=66563 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE R/S Bootcamp [7:66239]
The current IPexpert CCIE classes are all brand new so there really isn't anyone that can give you a review. The first instructor led class is scheduled for next month and the first CCIE mock lab class is in June. We also are offering a distance learning vClass. Seeing as I'm the developer of the courses and the instructor for them I can answer any questions. If you do have any questions you would like answered, feel free to e-mail me directly or call me. My contact information is below. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP-Dial/Security) Director of CCIE Training and Development - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Toll Free: 866.225.8064 Outside U.S. Canada: 312.321.6924 URL: http://www.IPexpert.NET Self-Paced, Instructor Led Distance Learning (vClass) CCIE Training! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Firesox Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 7:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE R/S Bootcamp [7:66239] Folks, In preparation for R/S lab this summer, I am looking to take a bootcamp. I know there are few organizations offering the R/S bootcamps, I was wondering if someone has recommendations. Has anyone taken IPExpert's bootcamp? I would prefer somewhere in east caost, but would appreciate any input. Also looking for some lab materials so practice in my lab. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66412t=66239 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP default-originate crashes the router every [7:66269]
Look into Cisco bug ID CSCdp26660. Basically you'll need to either not use the command or upgrade the IOS. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP-Dial/Security) Director of CCIE Training and Development - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Outside U.S. Canada: 312.321.6924 URL: http://www.IPexpert.NET Self-Paced, Instructor Led Distance Learning (vClass) CCIE Training! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cisco Nuts Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 7:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP default-originate crashes the router everytime - Why?? [7:66258] Hello, Everytime, I configure #nei a.b.c.d default-originate on my routers, it crashes the router. I have tried this on different routers and it's the same result every time. Is this a problem on 25xx's series? My routers have 16Flash and 16Dram. Anyone with a similar experience? Thank you. Sincerely, CN Excerpt from my router: AS1239-A(config-router)#nei 180.80.10.1 default-originate AS1239-A(config-router)# === Flushing messages (21:04:23 UTC Mon Mar 1 1993) === Buffered messages: 00:00:12: %SYS-7-NV_BLOCK_INIT: Initalized the geometry of nvram 00:00:14: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 00:00:14: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial0, changed state to up 00:00:14: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial1, changed state to down 00:00:15: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 00:00:15: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to up 00:01:54: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 00:01:56: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to up 00:02:01: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Serial1, changed state to administratively down 00:02:02: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial1, changed state to down 00:02:02: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from memory by console 00:02:50: %SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted -- Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JK8OS-L), Version 12.2(1), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Fri 27-Apr-01 15:20 by cmong 00:03:10: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 180.80.10.1 Up 01:20:21: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 01:50:45: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 19:09:35: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 19:12:12: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 160.60.10.1 Up 19:30:06: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 19:52:26: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:02:48: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:11:47: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:35:37: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:44:02: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 180.80.10.1 Down Interface flap 20:44:02: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:44:04: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to administratively down 20:44:05: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to down 20:49:20: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:49:21: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 20:49:22: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 20:49:30: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 180.80.10.1 Up 21:00:44: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 180.80.10.1 Down Interface flap 21:00:45: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 21:00:46: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to administratively down 21:00:47: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to down 21:01:19: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 21:01:21: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 21:01:22: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 21:01:47: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 180.80.10.1 Up Queued messages: Exception: Illegal Instruction at 0x0 (PC) System Bootstrap, Version 5.2(8a), RELEASE SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1995 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 14336 Kbytes of main memory F3: 15343148+1154396+1180856 at 0x360 Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134-1706 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JK8OS-L), Version 12.2(1), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Fri 27-Apr-01 15:20 by cmong Image text-base: 0x0307EE08, data-base: 0x1000 Compliance with U.S
Re: CCIE written RS [7:65972]
Hi rbx10... I would say that you need to read many of the same books you'll need to read for the lab anyway. I put together a list of books I thought are important, along with some preparation advice, at www.laganiere.net I hope you find it useful... Thanks... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: rbx10 Defcom To: Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:03 PM Subject: CCIE written RS [7:65972] To All the CCIEs out there: I'm a newbie to CCIE...:-) I'm currently trying to prepare for my written Exam And honestly it's very puzzling and scary These are the books that I have read so far: LAN switching, Clarks Routing with TCP/IP I, Doyle Internet Routing Architecture, Sam Halabai I fear that the above books are not enough. I'm also going to read every last one of the Cisco recommended links. I was wondering if you could please tell me: 1) What book do I use to study for IP Multicast, QOS, and Multiservice. 2) What should I focus on the most (Especially For those of you who recently took the exam) 3) If I need to buy more books Thank you all very much in advance for your response. rbx10, CCNA CCNP CCIE in training Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65992t=65972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Good book for CCIE Written Prep [7:65104]
I spent several months last year updating everything to the new blueprint (as I'm sure every other author did), and I think it's now representative of what's out there. That said, the new exam is much toughter; you're lucky you passed the old one. Make sure you don't let your status slip... :-) --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Logan, Harold To: Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:17 PM Subject: RE: Good book for CCIE Written Prep [7:65104] Dennis, Has your Boson test been updated for the new written? I found your old test very helpful when I took the old written, and I have a friend who is getting ready for the new one. Thanks, Hal Logan CCAI, CCDP, CCNP: Voice Network Specialist / Adjunct Faculty Computing Engineering Technology Manatee Community College -Original Message- From: Dennis Laganiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 10:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Good book for CCIE Written Prep [7:65104] I recently revised the list of the book I thought were useful for this exam at www.laganiere.net, let me know if you find it useful... --- Dennis Laganiere - Original Message - From: Troy Leliard To: Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:44 AM Subject: RE: Good book for CCIE Written Prep [7:65104] I think you should be asking good books? :) I am currently using Bruces Caslows, Routing and Switching, New Cisco Press CCIE book, and the Cisco Press CCIE - Practical Book. I think the best way to tackle the big one is to start a file yourself, an in it have a chapter for each topic that appears on the blueprint, methodically go through each topic and research if from a number of sources (books, white papers, RFC's) etc, Obviously, topics where you are stronger needs less detail. And of course back it all up with hands on. Even for the written ecam, memory retention, I find is always better when I have worked through a lab or section of a lab. The idea being that you will cover everything off, and realise that the area's you dont like, you need to put in a little but more work. At the end of it and, when you get the email saying congrats, you're ccie is you can then sell you file and get it published :) hehehe, then future ccie wannabies will be asking,.what is s good bookm, and you can recommend your own. :) Good luck studying! Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote: Can anyone recomend a good book for CCIE Written preperation ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66006t=65104 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eBGP Multi-hop [7:65823]
The 0.0.0.0/1 and 128.0.0.0/1 routes will work for the next hop. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP Dial/Security) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.labforge.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 1:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: eBGP Multi-hop [7:65823] A default route, aka a route of last resort. For BGP, route to the next hope must be explicitly in the routing table. This is one of the pre-reqs for BGP to advertise its own routes as well (unless you have synchronisation turned off). In my deployments of BPG, we alway suse the loopbak interface for iBGP peers as this is already distributed using our IGP, and then use the interface address of the peering routing for eBGP, with a atatic route to that IP. Good old bgp :). Right now lets spark of some discussion about the security of BGP peering :) Brian Dennis wrote: Jim, The default route as you've seen won't work but this will: Rack4R2#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. Rack4R2(config)#ip route 0.0.0.0 128.0.0.0 192.168.33.2 Rack4R2(config)#ip route 128.0.0.0 128.0.0.0 192.168.33.2 Rack4R2(config)#^Z Rack4R2#show ip route static S0.0.0.0/1 [1/0] via 192.168.33.2 S128.0.0.0/1 [1/0] via 192.168.33.2 Rack4R2# It's the next best thing to a default route ;-) Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP Dial/Security) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.labforge.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Devane Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: eBGP Multi-hop [7:65823] Thanks for the replies so far... Hmm, Well, actually becuase BGP uses TCP 179 is can traverse non-BGP speakers to a router that does speak BGP ( Just like TFTP'ing to another router) I put the config I was testing below. The config works, BGP runs everyone is happy when I have a specific route to the opposite side peer's Loopback address. ip route 172.16.10.1 255.255.255.255 192.168.33.2 but if I remove that and install ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.33.2 then BGP breaks. I don't understand why. There is no IGP. Both routes point to exactly the same place. conf t router bgp 65500 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 192.168.47.0 network 192.168.55.0 aggregate-address 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 neighbor 172.16.10.1 remote-as 6 neighbor 172.16.10.1 ebgp-multihop5 neighbor 172.16.10.1 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 172.16.10.1 version 4 neighbor 172.16.10.1 soft-reconfiguration inbound neighbor 172.16.10.1 password 7 140705191C117B3821 neighbor 172.16.10.1 filter-list 3 in neighbor 172.16.10.1 filter-list 4 out - Original Message - From: Carroll Kong To: Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 6:54 AM Subject: Re: eBGP Multi-hop [7:65823] I guess I am kind of just going to a quick stab. Do you have no synchronization under the BGP configuration? hello all, (Re-post...not sure if original msg made it our not) playing around again and have a question. eBGP multi-hop cannot come up if the peer is known through a default route. Is there a reason why? I mean, what is the point of a static route that causes a recursive lookup or a static route that simply points to the same next hop as a default route? For that matter, I can't see it being a matter of proximity either. If convergence time were not an issue, what is really wrong with having a 10 hop or even 50 hop BGP session? (I know it is unlikely and there are cetainly better ways to handle it (GRE or IPSec tunnel)) but for the sake of argument... Just curious, not able to find much on WHY it is like this... thanks, Jim -Carroll Kong Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65934t=65823 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eBGP Multi-hop [7:65823]
Jim, The default route as you've seen won't work but this will: Rack4R2#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. Rack4R2(config)#ip route 0.0.0.0 128.0.0.0 192.168.33.2 Rack4R2(config)#ip route 128.0.0.0 128.0.0.0 192.168.33.2 Rack4R2(config)#^Z Rack4R2#show ip route static S0.0.0.0/1 [1/0] via 192.168.33.2 S128.0.0.0/1 [1/0] via 192.168.33.2 Rack4R2# It's the next best thing to a default route ;-) Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP Dial/Security) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.labforge.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Devane Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: eBGP Multi-hop [7:65823] Thanks for the replies so far... Hmm, Well, actually becuase BGP uses TCP 179 is can traverse non-BGP speakers to a router that does speak BGP ( Just like TFTP'ing to another router) I put the config I was testing below. The config works, BGP runs everyone is happy when I have a specific route to the opposite side peer's Loopback address. ip route 172.16.10.1 255.255.255.255 192.168.33.2 but if I remove that and install ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.33.2 then BGP breaks. I don't understand why. There is no IGP. Both routes point to exactly the same place. conf t router bgp 65500 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 192.168.47.0 network 192.168.55.0 aggregate-address 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 neighbor 172.16.10.1 remote-as 6 neighbor 172.16.10.1 ebgp-multihop5 neighbor 172.16.10.1 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 172.16.10.1 version 4 neighbor 172.16.10.1 soft-reconfiguration inbound neighbor 172.16.10.1 password 7 140705191C117B3821 neighbor 172.16.10.1 filter-list 3 in neighbor 172.16.10.1 filter-list 4 out - Original Message - From: Carroll Kong To: Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 6:54 AM Subject: Re: eBGP Multi-hop [7:65823] I guess I am kind of just going to a quick stab. Do you have no synchronization under the BGP configuration? hello all, (Re-post...not sure if original msg made it our not) playing around again and have a question. eBGP multi-hop cannot come up if the peer is known through a default route. Is there a reason why? I mean, what is the point of a static route that causes a recursive lookup or a static route that simply points to the same next hop as a default route? For that matter, I can't see it being a matter of proximity either. If convergence time were not an issue, what is really wrong with having a 10 hop or even 50 hop BGP session? (I know it is unlikely and there are cetainly better ways to handle it (GRE or IPSec tunnel)) but for the sake of argument... Just curious, not able to find much on WHY it is like this... thanks, Jim -Carroll Kong Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65875t=65823 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CS ACS - import Utilities? [7:65698]
With Cisco ACS users can be added, updated or deleted manually or by using an external database. Importing User and AAA Client Information: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_soft/csacs4nt/acs31/acsuser/ae.htm#687 RDBMS Synchronization Import Definitions: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_soft/csacs4nt/acs31/acsuser/ag.htm Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP Dial/Security) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.labforge.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65722t=65698 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to change dial up prompt [7:65712]
Look into using the aaa authentication username-prompt and aaa authentication password-prompt commands. Rack4R1(config)#aaa new-model Rack4R1(config)#aaa authentication ? arap Set authentication lists for arap. banner Message to use when starting login/authentication. enable Set authentication list for enable. fail-message Message to use for failed login/authentication. loginSet authentication lists for logins. nasi Set authentication lists for NASI. password-prompt Text to use when prompting for a password ppp Set authentication lists for ppp. username-prompt Text to use when prompting for a username Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP Dial/Security) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.labforge.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65721t=65712 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP recertification [7:65292]
There is only one test, but it covers all the materials from the four CCNP exams. You could use whatever study material you used the first time around, but keep in mind the tests have evolved in the last three years, and there are some new topics. Here's the link on the Cisco website: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_exam s/640-851.html I've been studying the various topics, and started putting together a practice exam for Boson. It should be released in the next week or so, but please keep in mind it will be in beta for a while, shaking out the bugs and adding new material. I hope that helps... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Reza To: Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 5:42 AM Subject: CCNP recertification [7:65292] Hello Group, I just got an email from Cisco that I need to renew my CCNP by August 25th. From what I was reading at Cisco's Web site, I only need to pass 1 exam for recertification. Has any body prepare for this recently? if you have what material was most helpful. I saw this book CCNP Preparation Library (CCNP Self-Study) has any body used it? is this enough to prepare you to pass the exam? Thanks Reza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65313t=65292 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pinging a Multicast address [7:65132]
John, You can look into using Multicast Routing Monitor (MRM). Here is a working config. R5 ip mrm manager myTest manager Ethernet 0/0 group 226.2.3.4 senders 1 receivers 2 sender-list 1 ! access-list 1 permit 161.1.45.4 access-list 2 permit 161.1.127.1 R4 interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 161.1.45.4 255.255.255.0 ip mrm test-sender R1 interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 161.1.127.1 255.255.255.252 ip mrm test-receiver R5 mrm myTest start Basically you configure a manager, multicast test sender, and multicast test receiver. In this case R5 is the manager. R4 is the multicast sender and R1 is the multicast receiver. Look at some of the show ip mrm commands to see the results. This can also be used in the real world to monitor a real multicast stream. The config is essentially the same except the multicast test sender isn't needed. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP Dial/Security) CCSI# 98640 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tafasi Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 10:11 PM To: Cisco Group Study; ccielab Subject: Pinging a Multicast address Hi group, I practicing multicast and I am trying to get the router below to send a continuous multicast stream. I receive response to only the first multicast packet. Can some one give me a solution for this? Thanks John Tafasi r1#ping Protocol [ip]: Target IP address: 225.2.2.2 Repeat count [1]: 100 Datagram size [100]: Timeout in seconds [2]: Extended commands [n]: Sweep range of sizes [n]: Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 100, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 225.2.2.2, timeout is 2 seconds: Reply to request 0 from 150.50.7.7, 440 ms.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65132t=65132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Good book for CCIE Written Prep [7:65104]
I recently revised the list of the book I thought were useful for this exam at www.laganiere.net, let me know if you find it useful... --- Dennis Laganiere - Original Message - From: Troy Leliard To: Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:44 AM Subject: RE: Good book for CCIE Written Prep [7:65104] I think you should be asking good books? :) I am currently using Bruces Caslows, Routing and Switching, New Cisco Press CCIE book, and the Cisco Press CCIE - Practical Book. I think the best way to tackle the big one is to start a file yourself, an in it have a chapter for each topic that appears on the blueprint, methodically go through each topic and research if from a number of sources (books, white papers, RFC's) etc, Obviously, topics where you are stronger needs less detail. And of course back it all up with hands on. Even for the written ecam, memory retention, I find is always better when I have worked through a lab or section of a lab. The idea being that you will cover everything off, and realise that the area's you dont like, you need to put in a little but more work. At the end of it and, when you get the email saying congrats, you're ccie is you can then sell you file and get it published :) hehehe, then future ccie wannabies will be asking,.what is s good bookm, and you can recommend your own. :) Good luck studying! Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote: Can anyone recomend a good book for CCIE Written preperation ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65177t=65104 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Lightstream 100, SVC [7:65088]
Looks like you have an NSAP incorrect. 470001000100010001000100001110111000 s): SETUPv2 ci: 0xF3 mp: 0 ei: 0x 04:02:04: ATMSIG: Called len 20 04:02:04: ATMSIG: Calling len 20 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:0) build Setup msg, Null(U0) state 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:0) API - from sig-client ATM_OWNER_SMAP 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:245) Input event : Req Setup in Null(U0) 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:245) Output Setup msg(XferAndTx), Null(U0) state 04:02:04: ATMSIG: Called Party Addr: 47.000200020002000200020002.222022202220.00 r6# 04:02:04: ATMSIG: Calling Party Addr: 47.000100010001000100010001.111011101110.00 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:245) Null(U0) - Call Initiated(U1) 04:02:04: E164 NOT Converted 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:245) Input event : Rcvd Release Complete in Call Initiated(U1) 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:245)cause = mandatory information element is missing, location = User 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:245) Call Initiated(U1) - Null(U0) 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:245) API - notifying Release Complete event to client ATM0.1 04:02:04: ATMAPI: (cs): SETUPv2 ci: 0xE9 mp: 0 ei: 0x 04:01:04: ATMSIG: Called len 20 04:01:04: ATMSIG: Calling len 20 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:0) build Setup msg, Null(U0) state 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:0) API - from sig-client ATM_OWNER_SMAP 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:234) Input event : Req Setup in Null(U0) 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:234) Output Setup msg(XferAndTx), Null(U0) state 04:01:04: ATMSIG: Called Party Addr: 47.000200020002000200020002.222022202220.00 04:01:04: ATMSIG: Calling Party Addr: 47.000200020002000200020002.222022202220.00 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:234) Null(U0) - Call Initiated(U1) 04:01:04: E164 NOT Converted 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:234) Input event : Rcvd Release Complete in Call Initiated(U1) 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:234)cause = mandatory information element is missing, location = User 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:234) Call Initiated(U1) - Null(U0) 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:234) API - notifying Release Complete event to client ATM0.1 04:01:04: ATMAPI: (c To: John Tafasi ; Cisco Group Study ; ccielab Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 1:18 PM Subject: Re: Problem with Lightstream 100, SVC Your IP addresses are incorrect. It looks like you forgot the 8 in 108 on R6. Tony Schaffran Network Analyst CCIE #11071 CCNP, CCNA, CCDA, NNCSS, NNCDS, CNE, MCSE www.cconlinelabs.com Your #1 choice for Cisco rack rentals. - Original Message - From: John Tafasi To: Cisco Group Study ; ccielab Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:37 AM Subject: Problem with Lightstream 100, SVC Hi Group, I have two atm routers that are connected to a Cisco Lightstream 100 atm switch. I am trying to cause r6 to call r9 but the call does not succeed. I have configured svc routes on the switch and configured the two routers to use svc to reach each other. Below you will find the necessary configurations and output of the debug commands. From the output of the debug commands on the routers I can see that the routers could not register their addresses with the arp server. A r6#show run Building configuration... Current configuration : 883 bytes ! version 12.2 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname r6 ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ip ssh time-out 120 ip ssh authentication-retries 3 ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address shutdown media-type 10BaseT ! interface Ethernet1 no ip address shutdown media-type 10BaseT ! interface Serial0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! interface ATM0 no ip address atm pvc 1 0 5 qsaal atm pvc 2 0 16 ilmi no atm ilmi-keepalive ! interface ATM0.1 multipoint ip address 138.10.168.1 255.255.255.0 atm nsap-address 47.000100010001000100010001.111011101110.00 atm arp-server nsap 47.000200020002000200020002.222022202220.00 ! ! ip classless no ip http server ip pim bidir-enable ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 logging synchronous line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end r6# === r9ena r9#show run Building configuration... Current configuration : 643 bytes ! version 12.2 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname r9 ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ip ssh time-out 120 ip ssh authentication-retries 3 ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Ethernet1
Re: Dogs and Cats, Re: OT Re: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707]
Ahhh, but cats are better because dogs won't try and sit between you and your monitor; on top of your monitor swinging their tail in front of it; or lay with all their body weight on your mouse-hand, do they? Oh wait... those aren't good things, are they - never mind... At least cats sleep alot, and they generally leave you alone while their doing that, right? Just believe me, cats are better... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: John Neiberger To: Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 9:50 AM Subject: Dogs and Cats, Re: OT Re: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707] John Hutchison wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have an Akita dog. (pure bred) She's a year and a couple months old. She's 5 ft tall and about 100 pounds. She'll eat any cat. Dogs are superior. :) Dogs naturally love people; cats naturally dislike people and you have to train them to be friendly. :-) Dogs have owners, cats have staff. Dogs are better. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64836t=64707 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Lightstream 100, SVC [7:64794]
Looks like you have an NSAP incorrect. 470001000100010001000100001110111000 s): SETUPv2 ci: 0xF3 mp: 0 ei: 0x 04:02:04: ATMSIG: Called len 20 04:02:04: ATMSIG: Calling len 20 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:0) build Setup msg, Null(U0) state 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:0) API - from sig-client ATM_OWNER_SMAP 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:245) Input event : Req Setup in Null(U0) 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:245) Output Setup msg(XferAndTx), Null(U0) state 04:02:04: ATMSIG: Called Party Addr: 47.000200020002000200020002.222022202220.00 r6# 04:02:04: ATMSIG: Calling Party Addr: 47.000100010001000100010001.111011101110.00 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:245) Null(U0) - Call Initiated(U1) 04:02:04: E164 NOT Converted 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:245) Input event : Rcvd Release Complete in Call Initiated(U1) 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:245)cause = mandatory information element is missing, location = User 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:245) Call Initiated(U1) - Null(U0) 04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:245) API - notifying Release Complete event to client ATM0.1 04:02:04: ATMAPI: (cs): SETUPv2 ci: 0xE9 mp: 0 ei: 0x 04:01:04: ATMSIG: Called len 20 04:01:04: ATMSIG: Calling len 20 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:0) build Setup msg, Null(U0) state 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:0) API - from sig-client ATM_OWNER_SMAP 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:234) Input event : Req Setup in Null(U0) 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:234) Output Setup msg(XferAndTx), Null(U0) state 04:01:04: ATMSIG: Called Party Addr: 47.000200020002000200020002.222022202220.00 04:01:04: ATMSIG: Calling Party Addr: 47.000200020002000200020002.222022202220.00 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:234) Null(U0) - Call Initiated(U1) 04:01:04: E164 NOT Converted 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:234) Input event : Rcvd Release Complete in Call Initiated(U1) 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:234)cause = mandatory information element is missing, location = User 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:234) Call Initiated(U1) - Null(U0) 04:01:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0233/00): (vcnum:234) API - notifying Release Complete event to client ATM0.1 04:01:04: ATMAPI: (c To: John Tafasi ; Cisco Group Study ; ccielab Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 1:18 PM Subject: Re: Problem with Lightstream 100, SVC Your IP addresses are incorrect. It looks like you forgot the 8 in 108 on R6. Tony Schaffran Network Analyst CCIE #11071 CCNP, CCNA, CCDA, NNCSS, NNCDS, CNE, MCSE www.cconlinelabs.com Your #1 choice for Cisco rack rentals. - Original Message - From: John Tafasi To: Cisco Group Study ; ccielab Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:37 AM Subject: Problem with Lightstream 100, SVC Hi Group, I have two atm routers that are connected to a Cisco Lightstream 100 atm switch. I am trying to cause r6 to call r9 but the call does not succeed. I have configured svc routes on the switch and configured the two routers to use svc to reach each other. Below you will find the necessary configurations and output of the debug commands. From the output of the debug commands on the routers I can see that the routers could not register their addresses with the arp server. A r6#show run Building configuration... Current configuration : 883 bytes ! version 12.2 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname r6 ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ip ssh time-out 120 ip ssh authentication-retries 3 ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address shutdown media-type 10BaseT ! interface Ethernet1 no ip address shutdown media-type 10BaseT ! interface Serial0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! interface ATM0 no ip address atm pvc 1 0 5 qsaal atm pvc 2 0 16 ilmi no atm ilmi-keepalive ! interface ATM0.1 multipoint ip address 138.10.168.1 255.255.255.0 atm nsap-address 47.000100010001000100010001.111011101110.00 atm arp-server nsap 47.000200020002000200020002.222022202220.00 ! ! ip classless no ip http server ip pim bidir-enable ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 logging synchronous line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end r6# === r9ena r9#show run Building configuration... Current configuration : 643 bytes ! version 12.2 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname r9 ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ip ssh time-out 120 ip ssh authentication-retries 3 ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Ethernet1
Re: CCIE BOOKS [7:64321]
This question comes up on a regular basis, so a while back I put together a document with a list of books and advice for taking the CCIE Written. If you want to take a look, you'll find it at www.laganiere.net. Please let me know if anybody has any extra suggestions, I'd be glad to add to the document. Good luck with your studies... --- Dennis Laganiere - Original Message - From: milind tare To: Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 10:26 PM Subject: CCIE BOOKS [7:64321] HI Cisco Buddy's I am planning for CCIE Written exam can u ppl suggest me the books or any other good stuff so i can clear my written exam. Thanks Regards, Milind Tare __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64352t=64321 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Catalyst 3550 SMI or EMI [7:64450]
If the image name starts with c3550-i5 it's EMI. If it starts with c3550-i9 it's SMI. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP Dial/Security) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.labforge.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tafasi Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:32 PM To: Cisco Group Study; ccielab Subject: Catalyst 3550 SMI or EMI How do I know if a catalyst 3550 is running EMI or SMI image. I tried using show version but that gave me no clue. Thanks John Tafasi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64450t=64450 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Certified Cisco System Instructor (CCSI) [7:64319]
In order to become a CCSI you have to be sponsored by a Cisco Training (Learning) Partner. In today's market there aren't a lot of jobs, if any, for CCSIs. I would estimate that about 50% of the CCSIs I know aren't teaching authorized Cisco classes anymore. All the good CCSIs I know are off on there own consulting or teaching private classes. Unless someone can teach a ton of Cisco classes right off the bat (MPLS, CVOICE, CWFUN, MCAST, etc) I would be very surprised if a Cisco training partner was willing to sponsor someone new. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP Dial/Security) CCSI #98640 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tafasi Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 7:59 PM To: Cisco Group Study; ccielab Subject: Certified Cisco System Instructor (CCSI) Hi Group, I am interested in becoming a CCSI but i could not find any information regarding procedures for this certification on Cisco's web site. Can some one give me some advice. Thanks John Tafasi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64319t=64319 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPLS on 2500 [7:64174]
Someone gave me a better link for the special IOS, so I updated the document on www.laganiere.net I'd be curious if anybody has tried to run a TE configuration using this version. I played a bit, but then got distracted with wireless over the last few months... Thanks all... --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64174t=64174 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FTP site needed for MPLS for 2500 files [7:63054]
A few months ago I put together a free document for loading an experimental version of IOS that allows you to run MPLS on cheap 2500 series routers. I didn't create the software, I just gave instructions for installing it and then pointed out where the files were, for anybody who wanted to play with it. Since then the ftp site where the files were posted keeps deleting them (not surprising, since I didn't ask permission)... Is anyone running an FTP server where the files can be posted for anybody who wants to play with MPLS to be able to pull them down? Think of it as contributing to the common good of the group (or rather, groupstudy)... Let me know. Thanks... --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63054t=63054 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FTP site needed for MPLS for 2500 files [7:63070]
As long as it's available to everybody, that's good enough for me. Thanks... --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Aidan Marks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:34 PM To: Dennis Laganiere Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FTP site needed for MPLS for 2500 files The 2500 mpls images are available here: ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/rraszuk/specials/ They have been there for a while. What more do you need? Aidan At 07:09 AM 15/02/2003, Dennis Laganiere wrote: A few months ago I put together a free document for loading an experimental version of IOS that allows you to run MPLS on cheap 2500 series routers. I didn't create the software, I just gave instructions for installing it and then pointed out where the files were, for anybody who wanted to play with it. Since then the ftp site where the files were posted keeps deleting them (not surprising, since I didn't ask permission)... Is anyone running an FTP server where the files can be posted for anybody who wants to play with MPLS to be able to pull them down? Think of it as contributing to the common good of the group (or rather, groupstudy)... Let me know. Thanks... --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63070t=63070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Blown Away By The New CCIE Written [7:62396]
The Bruno book is just a place to start. It will at least give you an introduction to each of the topics... I would recommend reading both of Doyle's Routing TCP/IP books, Sam Halabi's Internet Routing Architectures, Caslow's Cisco Certification, as well as a good MPLS book. I'm the author of one of the Boson exams for this test (which means I have a bit of an agenda), so I think those are useful too... I also put together a fairly basic study guide for this exam that you can download from www.cramsession.com (but you have to really look around to find the free version)... Lastly, I put together a bunch of free material at www.laganiere.net I hope that helps give you a place to start getting ready for a second attempt. As hard as the qualifying exam is, trust me, the lab is much worse... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Panella Todd To: Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 3:02 PM Subject: Blown Away By The New CCIE Written [7:62396] Has anyone taken the new format of the written test? I just got my head handed to me. Needed a 58 to pass and got a 47. I definitely studied the wrong material. I thought the test would emphasize OSPF, BGP, WAN and the basic Routing Protocol interaction. Boy was I wrong. 75% of the test was Multicast, IPX, Token Ring and QoS. I studied QoS pretty well, but slacked a bit on Multicast and totally wrote off Token Ring or IPX. Ooops$300 down the drain. Anyone else have a similiar experience? As far as what I used, I thought the official CCIE RS Exam Cert. Guide would be enough. Uhh, that's a big NO! Bruno and clan don't even cover half of what was on this test. Anyone else recommend something different for next time? Should I just say No to all books and print out all the links on the Exam blueprint page? I think that's what I'm going to do this time, oh, that and concentrate on useless protocols. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62416t=62396 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Richard A. Deal Books [7:62027]
Having written one book and a bunch of web content, I can tell you that (IMHO) it's great to be able to keep updating and tinkering around with what you've done. Once something is printed on the page, it can haunt you forever - electronic documents, on the otherhand, can evolve over time to become better and better... I don't know if this is univerally true, but the best thing about writting a book for me was to be able to say I wrote a book... Getting a pat on the back from your mom, being able to send copies to a few old friends, monitoring the comments on Amazon, and getting e-mail from people who said it was useful; those were are the highlights for me. The actual process of writting is always painful, and that big a project can seem to take forever. That said, I'd do it again if I found a topic that interested me enough to spend four or five months buried in it... Just my $0.02 --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:31 PM Subject: RE: Richard A. Deal Books [7:62027] Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate) wrote: I know a lot of people on this group have been published, some multiple times, and I hope I'm not offending anyone by asking this question: How well does a book publisher pay for the books you write? I'm not expecting any specific figures, but a ballpark figure would be interesting. Thanks! They don't pay you to write the book, but they do pay you royalties on the sales. So, how much you make depends on how well the book sells. Regardless, though, it's only a few dollars per book. We don't do it for the money. We do it because we have a lot to say! :-) The publisher gets most of the money made on sales. They incur costs printing the book, of course. They also incur many other costs. Personally, I think that they incur a lot of costs that they shouldn't. They redraw our figures, with the end result looking exactly the same except with numerous errors; they edit the material, with the end result being incomprehensible sentences in some cases; they layout the book pages, wrecking the flow in many cases, and so on. Some publishers, rumor has it, are trying to streamline this and are letting authors work with a WYSIWYG template that requires less messing with by non-technical people. People often complain about the quality of books. Someone said it was because it's easy to get a book deal these days. That's not true. (Maybe it was true during the boom?) The quality problem is due to the processes currently in use for producing books. I think Web-based training materials are much better in many ways. Now, I have done some work for CertificationZone, so I'm a bit biased, but I loved what they said in a recent e-mail about the advantages they have over books (more up-to-date, more accurate because they can more easily fix any errors, more interactive with color graphics, etc.) Priscilla GM -Original Message- From: Richard Deal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 7:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Richard A. Deal Books [7:62027] Mark, Thanks for the kudos. I worked really hard on the book and I know, after having written 6 books, that you can't please everyone. However, of all of the books that I've written, I'm proudest of this book. Yes, there are some errors that slipped in during my last review of the book and when it went to production, which does, unfortunately, happen. But as I discover these, I put them on my web site. As to my MCNS book, which is what the first poster asked, I had finished it, but before it went to print, the publisher (The Coriolis Group) went out of business. Since the MCNS has changed, I've decided not to create a new book. I'm getting a contract this week to write a CCNA book for McGraw-Hill and have been desparately trying to convince them to write a Cisco VPN book--one that covers ALL aspects of VPNS with Cisco products--PIX, router, concentrator, and their software clients. If you have any questions about my PIX book, please don't hesitate in shooting me an email. Thanks for your support! Cheers! Mark Smith wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I think his PIX book is very good. I've not found many errors in it but then maybe I've not looked at it in as much depth as you have. If I have a gripe about it it's for one thing. I use it as a desktop reference. Sometimes I'm looking up how to accomplish X and find out that before I can do that I need to accomplish A, B and/or C. The instructions will simply say That process was covered earlier and won't be repeated here. Now to accomplish X. Earlier? WhereEXACTLY? I've spent more time looking for earlier sometimes than I do accomplishing the task at hand. Earlier in this chapter under
Re: CCNP Recertification [7:60972]
s/640-851.html and http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_exam s/640-529.html Watch the wrap... I hope that helps... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Helena To: Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 3:13 PM Subject: RE: CCNP Recertification [7:60972] Can someone please direct me to the website that says thatyou can take all those tests again, instead of just doing the recertification exam please? Thanks Helena On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Peter Marsh wrote: saj, I just took it, it was really hard. I screwed up on the scenario, but didn't miss by too much. I will study some more and get it the next time. I would rather one big test at once, and get it over with, rather than taking them all over again. Good luck! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61929t=60972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP Recertification [7:60972]
For some reason my message seemed to get the first line chopped off. Helena - you'll find the entire links listed below (watch the wrap)... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Dennis Laganiere To: Helena ; Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 4:25 PM Subject: Re: CCNP Recertification [7:60972] http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_exam s/640-851.html and http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_exam s/640-529.html Watch the wrap... I hope that helps... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Helena To: Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 3:13 PM Subject: RE: CCNP Recertification [7:60972] Can someone please direct me to the website that says thatyou can take all those tests again, instead of just doing the recertification exam please? Thanks Helena On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Peter Marsh wrote: saj, I just took it, it was really hard. I screwed up on the scenario, but didn't miss by too much. I will study some more and get it the next time. I would rather one big test at once, and get it over with, rather than taking them all over again. Good luck! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61931t=60972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Simple Question [7:61830]
There are actually three types (IOS, Set and Menu based). I posted a list of which switches use what interface, and a sample configuration of each at www.laganiere.net, I hope you find it useful... --- Dennis Laganiere - Original Message - From: Pat Do To: Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 12:56 PM Subject: RE: Simple Question [7:61830] I'm enrolled in Cisco's CCNP Network Academy program and just completed their Multi-Layer Switching curriculum last semester. In their online curriculum, they refer to two flavors of switches: Set Based and IOS Based In Cisco's Network Academy online curriculum universe, Set Based switches are switches which use set commands, e.g. 4000 6000 series switches. IOS Based switches don't use set commands, e.g. the 2900XL switches. However, if you look at Cisco's CCNP Switching book by Hucaby, et al., they make the following distinction: IOS-based commands (found on CAT 1900/2820, 2900XL, and 3500XL) are similar to many IOS commands used on Cisco routers. Set-based, command-line interface (CLI) commands (found in 2926G, 4000, 5000 and 6000) use set and clear commands to make changes to the configuration. Pat Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61878t=61830 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Simple Question [7:61830]
CLI is simply the Command Line Interface, meaning you are given a prompt to enter commands at. Set- and IOS-based CLI's appear on different families of switches. There is a third category of switches that are configured through menu choices. I've already posted this, but in case it doesn't make it back to the original author of the thread - I tried to answer this question by listing which models of switches use which CLI, and provide a sample configuration for each. You'll find this free document at www.laganiere.net, please let me know if you find it useful... Thanks... --- Dennis Laganiere - Original Message - From: Bill To: Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 5:18 PM Subject: Simple Question [7:61830] I have a simple question. I am confused about hearing about these three things: 1) IOS-BASED SWITCHES 2) CLI-BASED SWITCHES 3) SET-BASED SWITCHES Now, can somebody very accurately classify what these mean and categorise the common switches into the three groups? Im not even sure if there are 3 groups or only 2. If its 2, then it means that two of the above groups mean one and the same. Thank You Bill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61880t=61830 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IDS [7:60769]
Steve Thanks for your information. I would love to go for the Cisco approach especially I am working on the CCSP as well. However, I got overruled by my boss. Dennis steve wrote: hi, it really depends on how you want to implemnet it ... the cisco stuff comes as a physicall probe device...i.e either a PCI card and stand-alone probe or a 6500 card... wear-as realsecure can come as a agent/software app that you can put on server`s ... the plus and minus point Cisco REAL + Easyier to config from box Req`s more devices out of box (agent/collector/reporter/manager..these can all be on goes into 6509 seperate boxes) user int good can run as Unix/linux/w2k agent or probe or standalone probe lots of support - not easy to develop and expand reqs somone with Dbase knoweledge database req`s work after multiple probes agents can crash on NT HTH steve - Original Message - From: Dennis Ko To: Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:54 PM Subject: IDS [7:60769] If you have a choice of choosing ISS Real Secure IDS or Cisco IDS, which one would you pick? Please let me know your idea. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60842t=60769 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IDS [7:60769]
If you have a choice of choosing ISS Real Secure IDS or Cisco IDS, which one would you pick? Please let me know your idea. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60769t=60769 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No input access group defined for BRI0 [7:59854]
John, Is lock and key security configured on R5? Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP Dial/Security) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tafasi Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:51 AM To: Cisco Group Study; ccielab Subject: No input access group defined for BRI0 Hi Groub, r2 and r5 are connected via isdn. I am trying to telnet to r5 from r2 but I receive the message No input access group defined for BRI0. Does that mean you cannot access a router via its bri interface unless an access list is configured on bri0? r2#telnet 10.10.10.2 Trying 10.10.10.2 ... Open User Access Verification Password: Password: No input access group defined for BRI0. [Connection to 10.10.10.2 closed by foreign host] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No input access group defined for BRI0 [7:59862]
John, Look under the vty's for an autocommand access-enable command and remove it. You should be okay then. line vty 0 4 autocommand access-enable host timeout 10 Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP Dial/Security) -Original Message- From: John Tafasi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 12:49 PM To: Brian Dennis; 'Cisco Group Study'; 'ccielab' Subject: Re: No input access group defined for BRI0 here is the configuration in r5: ! interface BRI0 ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp dialer callback-secure dialer idle-timeout 300 dialer enable-timeout 1 dialer map ip 10.10.10.1 name r2 class eng broadcast 8358661 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 0835866201 isdn spid2 0835866401 cdapi buffers regular 0 cdapi buffers raw 0 cdapi buffers large 0 snapshot server 5 ppp callback accept ppp authentication chap ppp chap hostname r5 ! - Original Message - From: Brian Dennis To: 'John Tafasi' ; 'Cisco Group Study' ; 'ccielab' Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 1:17 PM Subject: RE: No input access group defined for BRI0 John, Is lock and key security configured on R5? Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP Dial/Security) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tafasi Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:51 AM To: Cisco Group Study; ccielab Subject: No input access group defined for BRI0 Hi Groub, r2 and r5 are connected via isdn. I am trying to telnet to r5 from r2 but I receive the message No input access group defined for BRI0. Does that mean you cannot access a router via its bri interface unless an access list is configured on bri0? r2#telnet 10.10.10.2 Trying 10.10.10.2 ... Open User Access Verification Password: Password: No input access group defined for BRI0. [Connection to 10.10.10.2 closed by foreign host] . Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59862t=59862 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No input access group defined for BRI0 [7:59868]
John, Remove the autocommand access-enable host timeout 5 from under your line vty 0 4 and you'll be set. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP Dial/Security) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tafasi Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 12:53 PM To: Brian McGahan; 'Cisco Group Study'; 'ccielab' Subject: Re: No input access group defined for BRI0 Here is the complete configuration file for r5 r5#show run Building configuration... Current configuration : 2245 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 22:38:53 UTC Thu Mar 11 1993 ! NVRAM config last updated at 15:54:58 UTC Wed Mar 10 1993 ! version 12.2 no service single-slot-reload-enable service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname r5 ! logging rate-limit console 10 except errors ! username omer password 7 14141B180F0B username r4 password 7 095E1B username r2 password 7 045802150C2E username r5 password 7 13061E010803 ip subnet-zero no ip finger no ip domain-lookup ! ip reflexive-list timeout 1000 no ip dhcp-client network-discovery isdn switch-type basic-ni ! ! ! ! interface Loopback5 ip address 5.5.5.5 255.255.255.0 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 10.10.110.3 255.255.255.0 shutdown ! interface Serial0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! interface BRI0 ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp dialer callback-secure dialer idle-timeout 300 dialer enable-timeout 1 dialer map ip 10.10.10.1 name r2 class eng broadcast 8358661 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 0835866201 isdn spid2 0835866401 cdapi buffers regular 0 cdapi buffers raw 0 cdapi buffers large 0 snapshot server 5 ppp callback accept ppp authentication chap ppp chap hostname r5 ! router rip network 5.0.0.0 network 10.0.0.0 ! ip kerberos source-interface any ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.1 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.110.16 ip http server ! ! ip access-list extended abc dynamic test permit ip any any permit tcp any host 10.10.110.3 eq telnet ip access-list extended inboundfilter permit igrp any any evaluate tcptraffic ip access-list extended outboundfilter permit tcp any any reflect tcptraffic timeout 5000 ! map-class dialer eng dialer callback-server username access-list 21 deny any access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq telnet access-list 100 permit icmp any any dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 100 ! snmp-server engineID local 55 snmp-server engineID remote 10.10.10.1 22 ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 logging synchronous transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password cisco login autocommand access-enable host timeout 5 ! ntp clock-period 17179628 end - Original Message - From: Brian McGahan To: 'John Tafasi' ; 'Cisco Group Study' ; 'ccielab' Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 1:29 PM Subject: RE: No input access group defined for BRI0 John, This is most likely due to the fact that you have a dynamic access-list configured, yet the dynamic list is not applied to that interface. Once you have the 'access-enable' command defined, telnet on tcp 23 is used exclusively to authenticate. Try something like this: line vty 0 3 autocommand access-enable host timeout 20 line vty 4 rotary 1 Now the router will listen on TCP 7001 for actual telnet traffic to the CLI. HTH Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 Director of Design and Implementation [EMAIL PROTECTED] CyscoExpert Corporation Internetwork Consulting Training Voice: 847.674.3392 Fax: 847.674.2625 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tafasi Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 1:51 PM To: Cisco Group Study; ccielab Subject: No input access group defined for BRI0 Hi Groub, r2 and r5 are connected via isdn. I am trying to telnet to r5 from r2 but I receive the message No input access group defined for BRI0. Does that mean you cannot access a router via its bri interface unless an access list is configured on bri0? r2#telnet 10.10.10.2 Trying 10.10.10.2 ... Open User Access Verification Password: Password: No input access group defined for BRI0. [Connection to 10.10.10.2 closed by foreign host] . FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anybody have the wireless Cisco Distance Calculation [7:59715]
The Cisco Distance Calculation sheet is mentioned in the requirements for the wireless design exam, but I can't find a reference on the CCO. I was hoping somebody on the list might have a copy or URL, so I could know what they're talking about. Thanks... --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59715t=59715 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: problem with reflexive access list [7:59222]
You also misspelled outboundfilter when you applied it to Ethernet 0. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP Dial/Security) -Original Message- From: John Tafasi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 11:43 PM To: Brian Dennis; 'Cisco Group Study'; 'ccielab' Subject: Re: problem with reflexive access list I tried that too and it did not work. - Original Message - From: Brian Dennis To: 'John Tafasi' ; 'Cisco Group Study' ; 'ccielab' Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 11:56 PM Subject: RE: problem with reflexive access list John, By default packets sourced by the router will not be affected by an outbound ACL. Since the outbound ACL does not see the telnet traffic sourced by the router, the router does not add an entry to the inbound ACL to allow the traffic to return. Try telneting from behind R5. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP Dial/Security) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tafasi Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 4:32 PM To: Cisco Group Study; ccielab Subject: problem with reflexive access list Hello, I have a problem telneting from r5 to r2 when reflexive ip access list is configured. Without the reflexive access list, the telnet will work fine. The two routers are directly connect via their ethernet 0 interfaces. Could some one find out what is wrong with my configuration. Both routers are using their ethernet ip addresses for source and destination of the telnet traffic. hostname r5 ! ip reflexive-list timeout 1000 ! ip access-list extended inboundfilter permit igrp any any evaluate tcptraffic ip access-list extended outboundfilter permit tcp any any reflect tcptraffic timeout 5000 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 10.10.110.3 255.255.255.0 ip access-group inboundfilter in ip access-group outboundfiler out ntp disable hostname r2 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 10.10.110.16 255.255.255.0 . Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59222t=59222 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: problem with reflexive access list [7:59213]
John, By default packets sourced by the router will not be affected by an outbound ACL. Since the outbound ACL does not see the telnet traffic sourced by the router, the router does not add an entry to the inbound ACL to allow the traffic to return. Try telneting from behind R5. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP Dial/Security) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tafasi Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 4:32 PM To: Cisco Group Study; ccielab Subject: problem with reflexive access list Hello, I have a problem telneting from r5 to r2 when reflexive ip access list is configured. Without the reflexive access list, the telnet will work fine. The two routers are directly connect via their ethernet 0 interfaces. Could some one find out what is wrong with my configuration. Both routers are using their ethernet ip addresses for source and destination of the telnet traffic. hostname r5 ! ip reflexive-list timeout 1000 ! ip access-list extended inboundfilter permit igrp any any evaluate tcptraffic ip access-list extended outboundfilter permit tcp any any reflect tcptraffic timeout 5000 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 10.10.110.3 255.255.255.0 ip access-group inboundfilter in ip access-group outboundfiler out ntp disable hostname r2 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 10.10.110.16 255.255.255.0 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: hsrp isl trunking [7:57896]
The way we have it is 2 routers connected to the 4000 switch with 4 vlans on the switch. Have set up 4 subinterfaces on each router, 1 for each van. Each with a separate ip address corresponding to the vlan number. We have 2 HSRP groups set up with 2 vlans in each group. 1 router will be the active for 1 group (2 of the vlans) and the other router will be the active for the other group (2 vlans). On each subinterface for each router for each vlan, it has a unique virtual HSRP IP address. I originally thought that all would use the same virtual HSRP IP address. You are saying that there should be 4 groups (1 for each vlan) instead of the 2 groups that we have?? Or is it OK with 2 groups and the 4 unique virtual HSRP IP addresses on each router?? This type of setup wasn't covered together in our class, just vlans and HSRP seperately. But in this lab we have Vlans running thru HSRP router doing ISL trunking and the routers are also running BGP and EIGRP to connect to a remote router. AHHH! Thanks for your help. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58138t=57896 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: hsrp isl trunking [7:57896]
Come on, anyone?? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58093t=57896 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP Switching exam [7:57981]
I posted a free document at www.laganiere.net that has sample configurations for each of the different types of switches so you can see how the CLI works. Other then that I can only recommend reading the Sybex book, and working through the Boson sample exams. Good luck... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Peter Kingston To: Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 4:02 AM Subject: Re: CCNP Switching exam [7:57981] Know which switches are IOS based or CLI base, 5 or 6 questions in my exam were based on knowing this. -- Regards, Peter Kingston Telstra BigPond Direct Freecall 1800 066 594 Siddiqi Kenan wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Friend, Romans, Countrymen (aka techies ;) ) I got my CCNP switching exam tomorrow. Any study tips? I don't feel to good about it 'cos my preparation is over the top. Any help would be much appreciated. Cheers, Kenan P.S. I will post whether I passed or failed... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57989t=57981 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hsrp isl trunking [7:57896]
In my Cisco Academy class, we are doing an lab with a lot of different topics rolled into one lab. We have 2 routers set up with hsrp and has a virtual ip address. Now a 4000 switch has 4 vlans configured on it and to use isl trunking to the hsrp routers. These routers have 4 subinterfaces on the fastethernet port going to the switch (one subinterface per vlan on each router). On the 4000 switch we set up a default gateway to the hsrp virtual ip address. But on the hsrp routers when we set up the subinterfaces and enter the standby command for the virtual ip address, I thought that we use the hsrp virtual ip address but the instructor says no. She says we need to put in the vlan number as part of the virtual ip address. Example: subinterface number for vlan 20...Fa0/0.20, ip address...10.200.20.2, standby ip address...10.200.20.1. And for vlan 30 it would be 10.200.30.1 for the virtual ip address. I thought that all subinterfaces would use the same hsrp virtual ip address. I tried to find more info on the Cisco site, but could not. Is this actually correct?? Why would the virtual ip address be different for each vlan?? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57896t=57896 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bounce [7:57561]
rebound - Original Message - From: Richard Tufaro To: Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 10:35 AM Subject: bounce [7:57561] bounce --Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57562t=57561 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: C2503 Flash upgrade [7:57570]
Getting a 2500 to let you write to the Flash is always a challenge. I did a text capture the last time I did it and posted it on www.laganiere.net as part of the MPLS for 2500 procedure. If you follow the procedure, it should work fine... Good luck... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Kenneth Yeung To: Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 9:28 PM Subject: C2503 Flash upgrade [7:57570] Folks, I have a router with one 8M flash (Right now, it is running a flash with 7M in the single flash. And i plan to add an additional 8M flash into the spare slot. After rebooting the router, i saw 16M Flash in place. But I can't put in a larger flash: c2500-js-l.121-9.bin (14M) by copy tftp flash -- It show the exisit space is not enough for the new image. I have tried to erase flash but flash is of read only Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57573t=57570 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: RIF URL changed...(Was: Re: New CCIE written exam) [7:57486]
You'll find this and a few other free documents I wrote for the CCIE Written and Cisco Switching exams at www.laganere.net (which resolves to http://home.attbi.com/~blaga/index.htm). I'll try and dress up the webpage a bit in the next week or so... :-) --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Darren S. Crawford To: Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 3:47 PM Subject: RIF URL changed...(Was: Re: New CCIE written exam) [7:57478] It's now http://home.attbi.com/~blaga/rif.pdf HTH D At 10:40 PM 9/10/2002 +, Jim Tickle wrote: There's a good RIF document at http://home.attbi.com/~blaga/doingrifsv2.pdf Mark Godfrey wrote:I agree your not helping us by sharing the exact question on the test but you could open up a focus on a particular area that we all could hit on as a group. :-) Say Token Ring and RIF's thats were I need lots of work if you can believe it. I like to here that the new test is a challenge though makes me feel sorry for all those guys that have to re-certify the CCIE. hehe ya right!!! MG Roberts, Larry wrote in message news:200209101947.TAA13868;groupstudy.com... Just to be the first to jump In, but DON'T post the questions on this list. This list is monitored by Cisco and rest assured that if you post a question to this list that is real, you will most likely be contacted. I for one didn't have any help from knowing what was on the test, and neither did most people who have passed it. You need to learn the material, not just regurgitate answers that you have memorized. I'm being much more polite that most of the replies that are likely to follow, so please take the advice and forget that you even offered...or asked Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: YILMAZ ACAR [mailto:nobody;groupstudy.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 1:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: New CCIE written exam. [7:53005] Rajesh; do you have real exam questions? can you post it. did you saw old exam questions your exam. Thank you netcisco Yahoo! - We Remember 9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost + International Network Services Darren S. Crawford - CCNP, CCDP, CISSP Sr. Network Systems Consultant Northwest Region - Sacramento Office Voicemail (916) 859-5200 x310 Pager (800) 467-1467 mailto://darren.crawford;ins.com + Every Job is a Self-Portrait of the person Who Did It...Autograph Your Work With EXCELLENCE! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57486t=57486 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2500 Flash - Read Only [7:57323]
I did a text capture of the whole process of coping a new version of IOS to a 2500 as part of the MPLS for 2500's document on www.laganiere.net Helpfully the helps... Good luck... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: DW To: Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 2:10 PM Subject: 2500 Flash - Read Only [7:57323] Can I manually change the Flash memory on a 2500 to Read\Write in order to load an image onto it. It is displaying as Read Only at the moment. I can load images with the software loader so I am assuming there is a way of changing the designation. Sincerely, DW Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57335t=57323 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Study group in/around Los Angeles [7:55947]
LA is a really big place. Where are you talking about? I'm way north in Valencia... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: ciscophile To: Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 8:56 AM Subject: Study group in/around Los Angeles [7:55947] Anyone interested in study group in and around LA, preferably with previous lab experience preparing for the new lab. Others are welcomed as well. I've been to a few and now I am preparing for the new one. Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if interested. Thanks - Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56966t=55947 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Study Material for New Written Format [7:56692]
All three http://www.boson.com practice exams for the CCIE Written have been updated to the new blueprint. --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Steve Williams [mailto:ipaqadmin;sbcglobal.net] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 9:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Study Material for New Written Format Has anyone found any companies with a good study questions for the new CCIE Writen format ? Doesnt seem to be any out their.. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56692t=56692 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPLS on 2500 - the final chapter [7:56375]
This weekend I've had a chance to spend some more time with the experimental IOS version that supports MPLS for 2500's, and have been sucessful loading it on five routers. I've done quite a few MPLS configurations from various books, and it seems to work great. I haven't seen any flacky behavior from the routers at all. I updated the instructions on www.laganiere.net to include a text capture of the process of loading it, and a basic configuration. I hope some people find it useful... Thanks... --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56375t=56375 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tag-switching and MPLS interface commands [7:56376]
Thank you to all the people who responded to my query; I appreciate the help. --- Dennis - Original Message - From: To: Dennis Laganiere Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 7:33 PM Subject: Re: Tag-switching and MPLS interface commands no difference, they are functionally equivalent. tag- switching ip command is used as a cisco proprietary protocol available in IOS 11.1 as well as 12.0 and all subsequent releases. mpls ip is IETF standard available in 12.2T release. Bal-- Does anybody know the differences between the the interface commands tag-switching ip and mpls ip (or better yet, have a good URL for it)? On both my 2610 and 2500's, when I enter the mpls ip command, the tag-switching ip command appears in my configuration. I've been through both of my MPLS books and haven't seen how they differ... Thanks... --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56376t=56376 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Thanks God... [7:56389]
Excellent work... Congratulations!!! --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Juan Blanco To: Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 4:12 PM Subject: Thanks God... [7:56389] Team, This morning I was able to pass the DQoS test, wow...what a rideThe test is very hard if you don't have the Course Book and the reason is because all the information need for the test is very well put and organized by the course. All the information required for the test is on Cisco's web but is very hard to find it, the test follow the blueprint by the book. I want to give my special thanks to Chuck Larrieu (The Long and Winding Road) for his support. I really recommend this test for those who are in the process of taking the lab. The following link will take you where you can find all the information need for this test except the Course Book (fully recommended). Well now to get back to the books for the CVOICE (another animal) test. A good starting point for the QoS on CCO is the following: DQoS 9E0-601 Cisco AVVID QoS Guide http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/ip_tele/avvidqos/index .htm Cisco IOS QoS Solutions Guide 12.2 http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos _c/ http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/voice-qos/voip-ov-fr-qos.html ... http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/intsolns/qossol/qosvoip.htm http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/788/voip/delay-details.html. Juan Blanco The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall . -- Nelson Mandela Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56400t=56389 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tag-switching and MPLS interface commands [7:56368]
Does anybody know the differences between the the interface commands tag-switching ip and mpls ip (or better yet, have a good URL for it)? On both my 2610 and 2500's, when I enter the mpls ip command, the tag-switching ip command appears in my configuration. I've been through both of my MPLS books and haven't seen how they differ... Thanks... --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56368t=56368 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPLS on 2500 - Success (so far) [7:56058]
This evening I was much more successful at loading the experimental IOS version that supports MPLS on 2500s. I was able to get it running stable on a 2513 and a 2515; and I was even able to start playing with configs (before my eyes started to get too droopy). As always, the hardest part was getting the flash in the 2500's to not be read-only. Anyway, I rewrote my notes, and posted them on www.laganiere.net, along with a new location for the files... I hope somebody finds them useful (especially if your studying for the CCIE Written)... :-) --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56058t=56058 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MPLS for 2500 - almost (filename) [7:55988]
The file name is MPLS for the 2500.ZIP and it's in the / rather then /upload area... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Desmond To: Dennis Laganiere Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 5:18 PM Subject: Re: MPLS for 2500 - almost Hi Dennis The file is gone. Could yo tell me where I can get the file ? Thank ! Des - Original Message - From: Dennis Laganiere To: ; Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 7:39 PM Subject: MPLS for 2500 - almost I've managed to find the IOS image for the 2500 that supports MPLS, but so far I've only been able to load it on a couple of routers that have 18mb of memory. Even then, I run out of memory when I enable tag-switching. Perhaps somebody else in the group has a better understanding of how memory has to be configured to make it work. I posted instructions for downloading and implimenting it at www.laganiere.net, please let me know if anybody has greater success getting it to work. If we can work out the bugs, I think this will be a useful study tool; but I, personally, have had enough fustration for one day; I'm going outside to grill a couple of pizza's for the kids. Good luck all... --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55988t=55988 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Switching VTP [7:55438]
I'm in semester 7 of the Cisco Academy program and one subject is not clear. This is the VTP revision number that is sent out between switches. Normally the number increments to indicate the most current information to that switch. And when you are introducing a used switch into your network you have to reset the number to 0. That's the sticking point, how to reset it. The official academy text say to power cycle the switch to reset the revision number. A student who works with these says the same. But on the Cisco web site it says to change the domain name and then change it back to reset the number. The Cisco Press certification guide says to change the mode to transparent then to server. Or it says to change the domain name and change it back. Or it says to issue the CLEAR CONFIG ALL command (on set based switches) to clear the VTP info and the revision number. Also, when you issue the command SHOW SPANNING-TREE on a 4000 series switch it gives a listing of the different ports and information about those ports. EXAMPLE: INTERFACE FA0/1 (port 13) in spanning tree 1 is FORWARDING My question is, what is the (port 13) to mean?? The actual port on the switch is port 1, not 13. Each interface has a number that seems to increment but INT FA0/12 is (port 25) where if they incremented correctly it would be (port 24). The info says it's a designated port. What?? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55438t=55438 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switching VTP [7:55438]
A correction. The command SHOW SPANNING-TREE is issued a IOS based switch such as the 2900, not 4000. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55439t=55438 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tech Tips [7:55026]
You should be able to access the old-style web pages at http://www.cisco.com/cco.shtml --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tech Tips Hey folks, where did the Tech Tips go that I cannot find it anywhere in the new Cisco site? Did anybody find it already? :( Regards, Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55026t=55026 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP exam [7:53668]
You're right about the IS-IS part. Our instructor in my BCMSN class brought that up just last week. Also for the new exams, there are simulation and drag and drop type questions. On my BCRAN exam, there was even a question where I had to enter the commands to configure frame relay. Some questions give you a list and you have to pick the command, some you just have to know as you get no list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53750t=53668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: simulations questions [7:53662]
It depends on the pool of questions that you get. On my BCRAN exam, I had 1 drag and drop, several that gave a list of commands and you had to pick from those to answe the question and 1 where I had to cofigure frame relay on the fly. Others have said that they had more of the drag and drop type and less of the others. Some say they had more of the configure type questions. Best to be prepared for all situations. If you know the material, it will be easy. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53751t=53662 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New CCIE written [7:52717]
If you take a quick look in the group archives at www.groupstudy.com you'll find several months worth of comments about it, but basically they dropped a few older technologies, added a bunch of new ones, upped the number of questions, and ratcheted up the level of the questions. It's much harder, but I think it's more relevant and does a better job of getting you ready for the lab. I wrote a free study guide for the exam last month that is posted at www.cramsession.com, and I have a bunch of free documents I put together at www.laganiere.net that you might find useful. I hope that helps... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Robert Emert To: Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:50 AM Subject: New CCIE written [7:52717] Hi, Does anyone knows how much is new CCIE written different from old one. I saw that Cisco added some objectives, there is no appletalk, decnet, fddi, Cisco added some new tehnologies (wirelless, mpls) but how much are really this topics coverd on the exam. Robert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52728t=52717 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE-Written Books? [7:52547]
I believe all the books that are currently out there are based on the old blueprint (except perhaps the Cisco Press book, which I have not seen yet). Earlier today I posted a free update to my own book (the NLI study guide) that should be applicable to any of the last generation texts. You'll find it at www.laganiere.net. I hope you find it useful... Thanks... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: sisco To: Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 7:49 AM Subject: CCIE-Written Books? [7:52547] I got Routing and Switching Prep kit by QUE' and CCIE-Study Guide by John Swartz Todd Lammle, What else do i need to read or what books can you guys recommend? Do i need to have routing TCP/IP by Jeff Doyle? I dunno where to focus?! PLS HELP! Many Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52556t=52547 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: RE: CCIE qualification Exam, misconception? Lo [7:52235]
I've spent the last three months updating Cramsession, Boson and Quizware test preparation materials, so I've been buried in this for a while now. I would definitely agree that the new blueprint is much harder then before; and I think Bernard's suggestion about preparing as if for the lab is a great idea. I would, however, like to offer a slightly different perspective on this. Many people who passed the old written exam were nowhere near ready to face a lab attempt. From this point forward, the people enter the lab for the first time will be in a better position to pass; and that might save you time and money in the long run. I feel like what you need to know for the new written is more relevant, not just for the lab, but in the real world at work as well. Perhaps I'm just being overly optimistic, but I don't see this as a pure negative... Just my $.02, let's see if I'm just as well-disposed after I spend the long weekend writing test questions on QoS... :) Thanks all, and good luck with your studying. Please let me know if I can do anything to help... --- Dennis From: Bolton, Travis D Reply-To: Bolton, Travis D To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE qualification Exam, misconception? Longi [7:52235] Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 21:54:29 GMT Yes I talked to Dennis for Boson #3 and he is updating his version weekly. It's nice to know that I don't have to purchase it again down the road. -Original Message- From: Nick Lesewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE qualification Exam, misconception? Longi [7:52235] I believe Boson #1 and #3 have been updated. NIC From: dominoo dominoo Reply-To: dominoo dominoo To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE qualification Exam, misconception? Longi [7:52235] Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:19:59 GMT Does Boson 4.0 provide good help on the new ccie written. Or do we have to wait for a newer version of Boson ? thank you _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52410t=52235 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: which switch series are CLI switches? [7:52074]
I put together a breakdown of which switches have which CLI, and a sample configuration of each. You'll find it at www.laganiere.net I hope you find it useful... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Metin Pasaoglu To: Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:15 AM Subject: which switch series are CLI switches? [7:52074] hi, i couldnt find any addresses or infirmation about which switches are CLI swtches or which are IOS command based. Can anyone give me information about CLI switch series? i only know that catalsyt 4000, 5000, 6000 series and 2948G and 2980G series are CLI command-based. Metin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52083t=52074 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: New CCIE Written Exam [7:50946]
It's a weird time right now because there isn't much out there yet. Your right that I updated the free cramsession.com study guide; I've also updated Boson #3 and I've got a new practice test coming out on Quizware.com in the next few days. I'm sure everybody else is updating their stuff as well. In a few months there should be lots of stuff, but right now you're caught in a transition. I'm up to my neck in this stuff because I've been updating all my materials over the last few months, and that's going to continue for a while as I continue to grow the question databases. If there are a number of people getting ready for the new exam, we should start doing something together; either here on groupstudy, at @!#$.com or off-line. I've been doing a lot of work with my router pod recently to create troubleshooting and configuration questions, and would be glad to help out. Let me know if I can help... --- Dennis From: Stepp Harless Reply-To: Stepp Harless To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: New CCIE Written Exam [7:50946] Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:25:34 GMT Are there any new study guides or practice tests out for the new exam yet? I see that Dennis has updated his study notes but I have not been able to find any other updates than what is on Cisco's website which do not tell you much. I took the old exam on the 6th and I scored a 58 percent. I was not really ready to take the exam but thought I would give it a shot before it was retired. I know some on this forum have taken the beta of the new test and wanted to know what new items do you need to know in addition to the items tested on the old test. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50963t=50946 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3550 EMI [7:50103]
Put me down for two... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Cisco Nuts To: Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 1:12 PM Subject: Re: 3550 EMI [7:50103] Where can I buy this switch for $500.00 as someone posted this a few days ago?? Thank you. From: Chuck Reply-To: Chuck To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3550 EMI [7:50103] Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:28:31 GMT just getting into it. 1500 pages of documentation to read :-O They do IGRP, EIGRP, RIPv1, RIPv2, and OSPF. Don't believe the output of the router ? BGP is expected to be released real soon now, but according to Cisco people I've spoken to, it will not be a full featured release. Limitations as to the number of routes processed and stored, for example ( due to the physical limitations of the switch ) I.e. don't expect to get full BGP routes over your DSL connection. Chuck Symon Thurlow wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Anyone played with the new 3550 EMI switches? They report layer 3 routing etc. Symon _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50182t=50103 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New CCIE Written is here. He afraid, be very afraid... [7:49572]
The CCIE Program is proud to announce the upcoming release of the revised CCIE Routing and Switching Written Exam (350-001). The new version of the exam will go live, and replace the current exam, on August 7th, 2002. Note: The revised exam will consist of 150 questions and be 180 minutes in duration. To prepare for this exam, candidates may wish to review the exam blueprint and study suggestions. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html#5 If this is anything like the beta, things just got quite a bit harder... --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49572t=49572 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: Re: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121]
I don't think it's fair that I be excluded from commenting... I usually try and stay out of conversations that I have a vested interest in; but here goes... I think there are a lot of very useful tools to prepare for this exam, and if I were preparing to take it I would avail myself of several of them. The subject matter is both broad and deep. Shawn Kaminski has talked about a project he's developed that people say good things about; I think Bernard's Boson #1 is very good, and of course I'm particularly fond of Boson #3, but I'm hardly impartial about that... :) On my website I posted several free documents to help with some of the more problematic topics; and I put together a list of common wisdom CCIE Written exam preparation from the groupstudy archive. You can get access to them at www.laganiere.net. You can also grab the free study guide at www.cramsession.com; it's fairly superficial, but it will give you a place to start. You'll also find a list of corrections to it on my website... Lastly, I would look up every topic from the blueprint on both the CCO and the groupstudy archives. They're really great free resources... I hope this proves useful, and please let me know if I can do anything further to help... Dennis - Original Message - From: Persio Pucci To: Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:30 PM Subject: RE: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121] anybody would have any more comments on this? (that excludes you, Dennis :) Rgds Persio - Original Message - From: Wright, Jeremy To: Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:30 PM Subject: RE: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121] I used 3 and it was a great resource to helping me pass. -Original Message- From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Boson CCIE Tests [7:49121] Folks, is it only me or the Boson Tests #1 and #2 for CCIE Writen are just crap comparing to #3? I am considering to buy one of these but I am not sure wich one... Is #3 really the most close it can get to the real deal? Rgds, Persio Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49208t=49121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP unnumbered and CBAC [7:48721]
Hi Steve Here is an extract from the config - access-list 100 controls traffic from the untrusted section of the company being migrated. firewall is the name of the ip inspect policy interface Ethernet0/0 description Sydney Local Ethernet Segment ip address 172.25.201.1 255.255.0.0 no keepalive ! interface Ethernet1/0 ip address 192.168.3.3 255.255.255.0 ip access-group 100 in ! interface Serial1/0 description 192K CIR - 576K ACCESS to Head Office mtu 800 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no ip mroute-cache priority-group 1 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay route 16 interface Serial1/1 16 frame-relay route 20 interface Serial1/1 20 frame-relay route 22 interface Serial1/1 22 ! interface Serial1/0.1 point-to-point description 192K CIR PVC to Head Office mtu 800 backup delay 5 10 backup interface Dialer0 ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0 ip inspect firewall in bandwidth 192 frame-relay de-group 1 17 frame-relay interface-dlci 17 frame-relay payload-compression packet-by-packet Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... show me the configs Dennis Cooper wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi guys The scenario is two customer networks merging in the same building and we have a Cisco 3620 in between the two LAN networks. (E0/0 and E1/0) S0/0 ---3620---E0/0 172.25.0.0/16 ---E1/0192.168.3.0 There is a Frame Relay service to head office on interface Serial 0/0 and is currently ip unnmbered to the E0/0 interface. Using CBAC I cannot get the ip inspect stuff to work and I suspect either 1. the code 12.0(3)T FFS 2. IP unnumbered Q. Any one done this before? Regards Dennis Cooper Lab date 13/08/2002 (but who's counting) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48796t=48721 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP unnumbered and CBAC [7:48721]
access-list 100 permit tcp any 203.19.170.0 0.0.0.31 eq www access-list 100 permit tcp any 203.19.170.0 0.0.0.31 eq 443 access-list 100 permit tcp any 203.19.170.0 0.0.0.31 eq ftp-data access-list 100 permit tcp any 203.19.170.0 0.0.0.31 eq ftp access-list 100 permit tcp any any established priority-list 1 protocol ip normal priority-list 1 protocol cdp normal priority-list 1 default high dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit route-map static2eigrp permit 10 match ip address 1 ! snmp-server engineID local 000902107B309C81 snmp-server community public RO alias exec sa show access-list ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password 7 XX login ! Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... not enough info to tell Need more of the config. Dennis Cooper wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Steve Here is an extract from the config - access-list 100 controls traffic from the untrusted section of the company being migrated. firewall is the name of the ip inspect policy interface Ethernet0/0 description Sydney Local Ethernet Segment ip address 172.25.201.1 255.255.0.0 no keepalive ! interface Ethernet1/0 ip address 192.168.3.3 255.255.255.0 ip access-group 100 in ! interface Serial1/0 description 192K CIR - 576K ACCESS to Head Office mtu 800 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no ip mroute-cache priority-group 1 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay route 16 interface Serial1/1 16 frame-relay route 20 interface Serial1/1 20 frame-relay route 22 interface Serial1/1 22 ! interface Serial1/0.1 point-to-point description 192K CIR PVC to Head Office mtu 800 backup delay 5 10 backup interface Dialer0 ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0 ip inspect firewall in bandwidth 192 frame-relay de-group 1 17 frame-relay interface-dlci 17 frame-relay payload-compression packet-by-packet Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... show me the configs Dennis Cooper wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi guys The scenario is two customer networks merging in the same building and we have a Cisco 3620 in between the two LAN networks. (E0/0 and E1/0) S0/0 ---3620---E0/0 172.25.0.0/16 ---E1/0192.168.3.0 There is a Frame Relay service to head office on interface Serial 0/0 and is currently ip unnmbered to the E0/0 interface. Using CBAC I cannot get the ip inspect stuff to work and I suspect either 1. the code 12.0(3)T FFS 2. IP unnumbered Q. Any one done this before? Regards Dennis Cooper Lab date 13/08/2002 (but who's counting) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48802t=48721 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mac Layer access list - solved [7:48433]
I have just set up some Aironet 350 access points and they have MAC filtering built- in Regards Dennis Cooper Dennis Laganiere wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Thank you all for your helpful suggestions. Below is the configuration that did what I wanted: to block all but a select list of MAC addresses from accessing my network through a wireless access point. The configuration below allows me to add MAC addresses as my users buy NICs. Keep in mind this is a temporary solution until I buy a Cisco Aironet 1200, which people have told me has some of this functionality built in. Thanks... --- Dennis R2#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 830 bytes ! version 12.1 hostname R2 no logging console enable password cisco ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! bridge irb ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address bridge-group 1 bridge-group 1 input-address-list 705 ! interface Ethernet1 no ip address bridge-group 1 ! ip classless ip http server ! access-list 705 permit ..abaa .. access-list 705 permit 0050..7a4c .. ! bridge 1 protocol ieee alias exec co config t alias exec i show ip route ! -Original Message- From: Dennis Laganiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:05 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Mac Layer access list I looked through the CCO, the groupstudy archive and my stack of cisco press books, but I can't find any information about setting up an ACL for MAC addresses. Has anybody done it before? Here's what I'm trying to do: I've got a wireless access point that lets just anybody join. I want to put a router upstream to block all but a limited number of pre-defined MAC addresses. Any thoughts? _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48720t=48433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP unnumbered and CBAC [7:48721]
Hi guys The scenario is two customer networks merging in the same building and we have a Cisco 3620 in between the two LAN networks. (E0/0 and E1/0) S0/0 ---3620---E0/0 172.25.0.0/16 ---E1/0192.168.3.0 There is a Frame Relay service to head office on interface Serial 0/0 and is currently ip unnmbered to the E0/0 interface. Using CBAC I cannot get the ip inspect stuff to work and I suspect either 1. the code 12.0(3)T FFS 2. IP unnumbered Q. Any one done this before? Regards Dennis Cooper Lab date 13/08/2002 (but who's counting) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48721t=48721 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mac Layer access list - solved [7:48433]
Thank you all for your helpful suggestions. Below is the configuration that did what I wanted: to block all but a select list of MAC addresses from accessing my network through a wireless access point. The configuration below allows me to add MAC addresses as my users buy NICs. Keep in mind this is a temporary solution until I buy a Cisco Aironet 1200, which people have told me has some of this functionality built in. Thanks... --- Dennis R2#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 830 bytes ! version 12.1 hostname R2 no logging console enable password cisco ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! bridge irb ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address bridge-group 1 bridge-group 1 input-address-list 705 ! interface Ethernet1 no ip address bridge-group 1 ! ip classless ip http server ! access-list 705 permit ..abaa .. access-list 705 permit 0050..7a4c .. ! bridge 1 protocol ieee alias exec co config t alias exec i show ip route ! -Original Message- From: Dennis Laganiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:05 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Mac Layer access list I looked through the CCO, the groupstudy archive and my stack of cisco press books, but I can't find any information about setting up an ACL for MAC addresses. Has anybody done it before? Here's what I'm trying to do: I've got a wireless access point that lets just anybody join. I want to put a router upstream to block all but a limited number of pre-defined MAC addresses. Any thoughts? _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48433t=48433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mac Layer access list [7:48324]
I looked through the CCO, the groupstudy archive and my stack of cisco press books, but I can't find any information about setting up an ACL for MAC addresses. Has anybody done it before? Here's what I'm trying to do: I've got a wireless access point that lets just anybody join. I want to put a router upstream to block all but a limited number of pre-defined MAC addresses. Any thoughts? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48324t=48324 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mac Layer access list [7:48324]
My intention is to buy an Aeronet 1200, which I believe will have much of this functionality built in. For the initial testing I'm using an old Lucent (Orinoco) access point that I had in my desk from the last time I played with 802.11b two years ago. Since I've long since lost the cable and documentation I haven't been very successful getting a console session to make any changes (if anybody knows the cable pinout and console settings, let me know). I can easily filter based on static IP addresses, but MAC addresses would be better because it would make it that much more difficult to hack. By the way, even once I get the Areonet AP, the principle security tool is 128-bit WEP. The problem here is that WEP only offers encryption, not authentication or other security features; and It's already known to have been hacked - so the access list would still be nice as an extra layer of security. --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Logan, Harold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 12:32 PM To: Dennis Laganiere; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Mac Layer access list [7:48324] As others have pointed out, having your upstream router act as a bridge is your best bet. Out of curiosity, what brand of access point is involved? If you haven't yet, you may want to see if the vendor has an updated firmware available for download that includes the option for the AP to filter by source mac. Hal -Original Message- From: Dennis Laganiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mac Layer access list [7:48324] I looked through the CCO, the groupstudy archive and my stack of cisco press books, but I can't find any information about setting up an ACL for MAC addresses. Has anybody done it before? Here's what I'm trying to do: I've got a wireless access point that lets just anybody join. I want to put a router upstream to block all but a limited number of pre-defined MAC addresses. Any thoughts? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48349t=48324 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Written Exam [7:47797]
Since this question comes up all the time, I put together a document that outlines the common wisdom for CCIE Written preparation. I listed several useful books (not to mention my own). You can grab the document for free from www.laganiere.net (as well as several other sites that have posted the same document). I hope that you find it useful... Thanks... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 10:05 PM Subject: Written Exam Hi Dennis, Iam preparing to take the written exam very soon (before the new format is taken). I have posted this question to the group (Groupstudy) but I would realy like to have your advice. I have studied the following books: - Routing TCP/IP, Vol. 1, by Doyle - Cisco LAN Switching (CCIE Professional Developement Series) By HamiltonClark - Cisco Certification, Roures Bridges Switches for CCIEs, by Caslow I was just wondering wether these books were enough for the written exam or not. I have the Sybex CCIE study guide available as well (borrowed it from a friend). But personally I don't like Todd Lammle's books because he explains even simple topics too much and that makes me sick of it !!! Well I will be using Boson's #3 test as sample tests. Could you please give me your advice? Thanks, Hamid Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47797t=47797 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab Help [7:47736]
This question comes up often enough that I put together a document with some hints for starting at www.laganiere.net, I hope it helps... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Lan Wong To: Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 9:44 PM Subject: CCIE Lab Help [7:47736] Hi Group, I've just finished my CCIE Written today after studying for two months. I need some advice as to how to start my CCIE lab study. I am not sure where or how to start. I have most of the routers I need for my lab. Could someone shed some lights as to what is the most effective way to go about this journey. TIA, LW _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47738t=47736 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
802.11a [7:47594]
I've been reading about the new, faster wireless solutions. Is anybody's 802.11a technology ready-for-prime time? I'm ordering a Aironet 1200 access point to play with, and it should be capable (with the right antenna), but I understand Cisco's product is not out yet... Anybody know anything about the new a standard? Thanks... --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47594t=47594 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 802.11a [7:47603]
There are several good write-ups on the technology on the CCO, so I knew that; but I was looking for an actual product to play with to determine if the 5 MGHz traffic interferes with other systems in my manufacturing group (a major concern). Cisco's Aironet 1200 access point has the capability, but it looks the antennas and NICs aren't out yet. D-Link has a fully functioning set-up I can use for my initial testing. --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Harish DV/peakxv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:20 PM To: Dennis Laganiere Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 802.11a 802.11a works at 5GHz and can support upto 54mbps as compared to 2.4GHz/11mbps of 802.11b This link might help http://www.wlana.org/pdf/highspeed.pdf Harish Dennis Laganiere , '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ionics.com Sent by: cc: nobody@groupstudy.Subject: 802.11a com 06/27/2002 01:39 PM Please respond to Dennis Laganiere I've been reading about the new, faster wireless solutions. Is anybody's 802.11a technology ready-for-prime time? I'm ordering a Aironet 1200 access point to play with, and it should be capable (with the right antenna), but I understand Cisco's product is not out yet... Anybody know anything about the new a standard? Thanks... --- Dennis _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47603t=47603 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 802.11a [7:47606]
Several people sent me some excellent links. Thank you all... Here's what I ended up with... Cisco - The Aironet 1200 access point can be configured to support any of the standards, but they only have 802.11b available right now. NetGear - They have 802.11b and 802.11a access points, but nothing that will do both, which means losing all my current investment in NICs. D-Link - They have an access point that does both. I went ahead and ordered the D-link access point and a couple of NICs so I could start to play right away; and I'll upgrade to the Cisco unit once they have a real product offering... Thanks all, you guys are great... By the way, if there are any Cisco people on the list who would like to put me on a beta list, I'm open to it... :) --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Dennis Laganiere Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:06 PM To: 'Harish DV/peakxv'; Dennis Laganiere Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 802.11a There are several good write-ups on the technology on the CCO, so I knew that; but I was looking for an actual product to play with to determine if the 5 MGHz traffic interferes with other systems in my manufacturing group (a major concern). Cisco's Aironet 1200 access point has the capability, but it looks the antennas and NICs aren't out yet. D-Link has a fully functioning set-up I can use for my initial testing. --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Harish DV/peakxv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:20 PM To: Dennis Laganiere Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 802.11a 802.11a works at 5GHz and can support upto 54mbps as compared to 2.4GHz/11mbps of 802.11b This link might help http://www.wlana.org/pdf/highspeed.pdf Harish Dennis Laganiere , '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ionics.com Sent by: cc: nobody@groupstudy.Subject: 802.11a com 06/27/2002 01:39 PM Please respond to Dennis Laganiere I've been reading about the new, faster wireless solutions. Is anybody's 802.11a technology ready-for-prime time? I'm ordering a Aironet 1200 access point to play with, and it should be capable (with the right antenna), but I understand Cisco's product is not out yet... Anybody know anything about the new a standard? Thanks... --- Dennis _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47606t=47606 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 802.11a [7:47611]
As a last note on this topic, I checked Orinoko just to make sure. That have an access point that will support both, but the radio module and NICs for 802.11a are not currently available, with no expected delivery data. I guess I'm still going with D-link... By the way, here's an interesting article on some long range wireless stuff that sounds pretty cool (watch the wrap)... http://www.techtv.com/news/internet/story/0,24195,3389078,00.html Thanks... --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Dennis Laganiere Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:32 PM To: Dennis Laganiere Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: 802.11a Several people sent me some excellent links. Thank you all... Here's what I ended up with... Cisco - The Aironet 1200 access point can be configured to support any of the standards, but they only have 802.11b available right now. NetGear - They have 802.11b and 802.11a access points, but nothing that will do both, which means losing all my current investment in NICs. D-Link - They have an access point that does both. I went ahead and ordered the D-link access point and a couple of NICs so I could start to play right away; and I'll upgrade to the Cisco unit once they have a real product offering... Thanks all, you guys are great... By the way, if there are any Cisco people on the list who would like to put me on a beta list, I'm open to it... :) --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Dennis Laganiere Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:06 PM To: 'Harish DV/peakxv'; Dennis Laganiere Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 802.11a There are several good write-ups on the technology on the CCO, so I knew that; but I was looking for an actual product to play with to determine if the 5 MGHz traffic interferes with other systems in my manufacturing group (a major concern). Cisco's Aironet 1200 access point has the capability, but it looks the antennas and NICs aren't out yet. D-Link has a fully functioning set-up I can use for my initial testing. --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Harish DV/peakxv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:20 PM To: Dennis Laganiere Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 802.11a 802.11a works at 5GHz and can support upto 54mbps as compared to 2.4GHz/11mbps of 802.11b This link might help http://www.wlana.org/pdf/highspeed.pdf Harish Dennis Laganiere , '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ionics.com Sent by: cc: nobody@groupstudy.Subject: 802.11a com 06/27/2002 01:39 PM Please respond to Dennis Laganiere I've been reading about the new, faster wireless solutions. Is anybody's 802.11a technology ready-for-prime time? I'm ordering a Aironet 1200 access point to play with, and it should be capable (with the right antenna), but I understand Cisco's product is not out yet... Anybody know anything about the new a standard? Thanks... --- Dennis _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47611t=47611 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 802.11a [7:47606]
For my current needs I can live with a fork lift upgrade when 802.11g comes allong. So far I'm only out about $350 for the D-link access point that supports both b and a. It will serve as a stop gap tool until the Cisco solution is ready for prime-time. Other then the wait, I completely agree with you... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Steve Ridder To: Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:26 PM Subject: RE: 802.11a [7:47606] HOLD OFF FOR 802.11G!! It runs on B's freq (so you get b's distance), you get a's speed (54mb) and is backward compatable with b clients. I HIGHLY expect 802.11a to quietly go away. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47630t=47606 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE home lab [7:46395]
There's a couple of threads running about it right now on the group. Basically Cisco has announced Token Ring, IPX and a few other things are gone from the lab in October. Like I say, review some of the other current threads and you'll see more detail... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Walker, Jim To: Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:34 AM Subject: RE: CCIE home lab [7:46395] YES, please do explain what happens after October. Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 8:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Hi, Could you explain a bit more what happen after October ? Thanks Philip - Original Message - Wrom: IYZUNNYCGPKYLEJGDGVCJVTLBXFGGMEPYOQKED To: Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: RE: CCIE home lab [7:46395] you apparently dont need the token or cat switch anymore if you are taking the lab after october... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Wrom: OTWFAOBUZXUWLSZLKBRNVWWCUFPEGAUTFJMVRESKPNKMBIPBARHDMNNSKVFVWRKJ Hunt Lee Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Hi, I know that this may have come up many times. But since I'm about to start preparing for the CCIE lab, it would be great if anyone could give me some suggestions on this. I'm planning to continue to build up my lab. Currently, I have the following: 2 x 1603R 3 x 2501 2 x 2503 2 x 2511 1 x Cat 5000 I'm thinking whether I should get the below:- 2 x Token routers - maybe 2 x 2502?? MAU?? What else do I need for Token?? I really don't know what else I need... 1 x Frame switch - 1 x ISDN Simulator (do u know which one is good?) And I probably need to upgrade RAM / Flash on my routers... since most of them only had 4MB Flash on the moment... Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Hunt Lee WebCentral Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46459t=46395 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: CCIE home lab [7:46395]
I put together a free document with accumulated list wisdom on starting lab preparation on www.laganiere.net, but just off the top of my head - 1) You only need one terminal server, and the 2511's sell well on ebay, so I'd keep the better one, and sell the other to raise cash to buy some of the other things you'll need. 2) If you're planning to take the exam before October, keep the 5k, otherwise sell it and get an IOS-based switch (as of today). 3) Unless you're planning to take the exam before October, forget the TR stuff (as of today). 4) You definitly want something with more then four serial ports so you can do frame 5) It's great that you have the 2503's, but get an ISDN sim (remember that you might need NT1's) 6) Max the memory out on the routers and load up the most feature-rich current IOS you can find. Voice and ATM can be done on-line cheaply enough. At that point, you've got a great pod, and can do most anything. I'd only suppliment it as you start doing labs and see that you need specific things. I hope that helps... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Hunt Lee To: Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:01 PM Subject: CCIE home lab [7:46395] Hi, I know that this may have come up many times. But since I'm about to start preparing for the CCIE lab, it would be great if anyone could give me some suggestions on this. I'm planning to continue to build up my lab. Currently, I have the following: 2 x 1603R 3 x 2501 2 x 2503 2 x 2511 1 x Cat 5000 I'm thinking whether I should get the below:- 2 x Token routers - maybe 2 x 2502?? MAU?? What else do I need for Token?? I really don't know what else I need... 1 x Frame switch - 1 x ISDN Simulator (do u know which one is good?) And I probably need to upgrade RAM / Flash on my routers... since most of them only had 4MB Flash on the moment... Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Hunt Lee WebCentral Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46405t=46395 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Token ring, IGRP, Cat5k removed from lab [7:46378]
These two topics were also added to the new ccie written exam blueprint during the beta period... --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Brian Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:42 PM To: 'Narvaez, Pablo'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Token ring, IGRP, Cat5k removed from lab CCO states that the Cat5500 going to be replaced by the Cat3550. Cisco is adding MPLS and IPv6 to the CCNP track so I would expect that come October 1 some folks are going to be surprised ;-) Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS/ISP Dial) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5G Networks, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Narvaez, Pablo Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:01 PM To: CiscoJunkie; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Token ring, IGRP, Cat5k removed from lab else, um but what's to be added? what about the Cat6500? . anyone knows something 'bout this? -Original Message- From: CiscoJunkie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Miircoles, 12 de Junio de 2002 03:34 p.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Token ring, IGRP, Cat5k removed from lab Latest from CCO... CCIE candidates should note changes to the technical content and equipment in the lab exam. Effective October 1st, 2002, candidates will no longer be tested in the areas of IGRP, Token Ring, Token Ring Switching, or IPX. Note: DLSW+ will remain as a protocol that can be tested in the lab. The Catalyst 5500 switch will be replaced with the Catalyst 3550. _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46378t=46378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE LAB EXAM CHANGES..... [7:46377]
I bet you find these topics take a higher precedence in the new written exam... :) --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Mike Needham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE LAB EXAM CHANGES. OK Guys get ready... It is going to get a little more complex. When something is taken away usually something harder takes is place :( CCIE candidates should note changes to the technical content and equipment in the lab exam. Effective October 1st, 2002, candidates will no longer be tested in the areas of IGRP, Token Ring, Token Ring Switching, or IPX. Note: DLSW+ will remain as a protocol that can be tested in the lab. The Catalyst 5500 switch will be replaced with the Catalyst 3550. http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html#18 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of mineedha.vcf] _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46377t=46377 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE RS written update [7:46373]
I don't believe Cisco has announced when the old version will go away, but I think the common wisdom among the people who have taken the beta is that it is much harder. If you're close to ready for the exam, now is a good time to get in study mode and be done with it. By the way, if I'm wrong and it turns out there's a lot of time before the update comes up; so what... You'll already have finished it and moved on to lab preparation, which is a lot more fun... :-) If you need some extra study materials, I've posted some free documents as www.laganiere.net and the old cramsession I wrote years ago is still at www.cramsession.com (with corrections on my website)... Good luck... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:25 PM Subject: CCIE RS written update [7:46373] Hi all, I heard lots of rumours saying that CCIE RS written will get updated very soon. When was the last exam date for the beta? Does anyone know when will it get updated? Do we get advance warning from Cisco? I'm asking this because I'm currently do my preparation based on the current blue-print. TIA. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46384t=46373 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE LAB EXAM CHANGES..... [7:46389]
Maybe somebody will correct me, but you should be able to practice most of the same material using another, cheaper, IOS-based switch. I put this together some time ago, but here is a rough approximation of which switch runs which software: Set-based Switches (CatOS) 7 Catalyst 1200 Series 7 Catalyst 2901 7 Catalyst 2902 7 Catalyst 2926T/F 7 Catalyst 2926GS/L 7 Catalyst 2948G 7 Catalyst 2980G 7 Catalyst 4000 Series 7 Catalyst 5000 Series 7 Catalyst 5500 Series 7 Catalyst 6000 Series 7 Catalyst 6500 Series 7 Catalyst 8500 Series IOS-like Switches 7 Catalyst 2912XL 7 Catalyst 2924XL 7 Catalyst 3550 Series 7 Catalyst 3500XL Series 7 Catalyst 2950 Series Menu Setup Switches 7 Catalyst 1700 Series 7 Catalyst 1900 Series 7 Catalyst 2100 Series 7 Catalyst 2800 Series 7 Catalyst 2820 Series 7 Catalyst 3000 Series Token Ring Switches 7 Catalyst 3900 Series 7 Catalyst 2600 Series I hope that helps... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: Re: CCIE LAB EXAM CHANGES. [7:46389] Great... Now where am I going to get a 3550 and not pay an arm and a leg for it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46399t=46389 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recommended Reading for CCIE Written [7:45837]
I wrote the now very old document for this exam at www.cramsession.com, it's free and you might find it useful as a place to start. On my home site I've published a list of corrections for the cramsession, and posted a few other documents covering RIFs, the boot sequence and a few other commonly questioned items from this exam. I also put togehter a bit of collective wisdom from the groupstudy archives with tips on how to prepare for this particular exam. Everything is free, and the site is www.laganiere.net. Thanks, and let me know if that helps... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Reza To: Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:09 PM Subject: Re: Recommended Reading for CCIE Written [7:45837] Hamid, I am also planning to take the exam before the end of this month and before Cisco brings the new monster test on line. I have read all the books that you mention here except, CCIE LAN Switching ,by Hamilton I am also doing the Boson practice#3 and have the CCXX material. I am sure you know about Token Ring paper. Good luck and let me know how you do. Reza Hamid wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, I am studying for the written exam and I am going to take the exam in 3 or 4 weeks. I have used the following books: - CCIE LAN Switching ,by Hamilton - Routing TCP/IP Vol. 1, by Doyle - Routers, Switches Bridges for CCIEs, by Caslow - Some other matterials such as Exam Cram , I was wondering wether I should study any other books for the Exam? Any input would be welcome. Hamid Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45896t=45837 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535]
Congratulations!!! Excellent work!!! --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Pierre-Alex Guanel To: Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:46 AM Subject: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535] I took the CCIE written yesterday afternoon and passed (80%) I was expecting more, but I flunked the performance/QoS section of the exam, which I neglected somewhat during preparation. I used both Boson #1 and Boson #3. Those 2 tests are complementary and are NOT substitute for each other. Boson #3 focuses on SNA issues where as Boson #1 focuses on the other networking topics. If you can, you should purchase both tests. For preparation I did a pre-test on Boson #3 and discovered how little SNA and ATM I knew. For 3 weeks, I studied SNA and ATM using CCO + hands-on until the whole thing felt natural. Then, on the 4th week of preparation I repeated the same strategy with Boson #1. I dicovered 3 areas of networking where I had some weaknesses. I only had time to work on 2 of them thoroughly before the test. Thank you to Bernard and Dennis for excellent test materials and to all those who gracefully took the time to answer my questions. I particularly want to thank Priscilla and Leigh Anne who both put me back on track several times during the last two years and Daniel Cotts for squeezing some time out of his busy schedule to spend some time discussing Cisco with me. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45580t=45535 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN BRI Simulator Comparison [7:44763]
Earlier today I proposed putting together some comparative information on the various ISDN Simulators available. Since the question which simulator do I buy? comes up regularly on the list, I though a cooperative effort to develop an answer would be an interesting exercise for the group. Just to start the conversation, here's a review of the two that I have in my home pod... Arca Emutel Lite Recent e-bay sales: $1,250 - $1,400 Features: * 2 port BRI * Switch types supported: NAT-1, DMS100 and 5ESS Default settings (just because I think its useful): PortB-channel DN SPID 1 1 384000 384001 1 2 384010 384002 2 1 384020 384021 2 2 384030 384022 The default ISDN switch-type is basic-dms100 Pro: * Been using it for a year without a problem * Built-in battery backup means you can use it without AC power for a quick demonstration * Supports either S (4-wire) or U (2-wire) interfaces (selected through software) * Simple console-like configuration Con: * Since I'm using 2503's, it requires 2 x NT1 (approx $30 each on ebay) * Power supply is an external brick. Minor thing, but kind of annoying. Teltone ILS-B-01 ISDN Demonstrator Recent e-bay sales: $1,225 - $1,599 (New from the manufacture, $1,855.00) Features: * 2 port BRI * Switch types supported: NAT-1, ATT Custom Default settings (just because I think its useful): PortB-channel DN SPID 1 1 835-86610835866101 1 2 835-86630835866301 2 1 835-86620835866201 2 2 835-86640835866401 The default ISDN switch-type is basic-nil Pro: * Built in power supply. * Windows-based configuration (I haven't tried it yet, but the book makes it look easy) Con: * Since I'm using 2503's, it requires 2 x NT1 (approx $30 each on ebay) * Only has U Interfaces I look forward to seeing what other people have used... Thanks... --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Dennis Laganiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:36 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:ISDN BRI Simulator Comparison This brings to mind an interesting side-project, if anybody has the time and inclination to help out. I've not seen a comprehensive comparison between the various simulators that are available, factoring in features and approximate cost. Myself personality, I've got an Emutel Lite at home that I've had a for while, and I just picked up a Teltone ISDN Demonstrator that I'm going to start playing with this weekend. I could probably put together a quick write up on those if it were a conversation that other people would like to contribute too. Anybody what to play? Let me know... --- Dennis From: Dennis Laganiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:48 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: ISDN BRI Simulator Um... I'll pay $125... Next bidder... :) I don't believe you'll find too many in this range, but I'd love to learn that I'm wrong... Thanks... --- Dennis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:ISDN BRI Simulator I am looking for a 2 port ISDN BRI Simulator for under $100. Does anyone know where I can get one? Thanks, Bill Cook, Network Project Manager _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44763t=44763 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN BRI Simulator Comparison - way to expensi [7:44770]
I'd agree, especially if you've got a study buddy to split the cost with... On the other hand, the prices I found were from e-bay - so provided Cisco doesn't drop ISDN from the lab, you can always resell the unit once you're done and the only thing you're out is the delta in the prices and any interest you might have lost by not investing in Enron stock... Ummm, forget that last part... :) --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Treptow, Georg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:58 PM To: 'Dennis Laganiere'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: ISDN BRI Simulator Comparison - way to expensive!! For that price you might as well order 2 ISDN lines from your local telco. That should only cost you about $80.00 a month as you don't need to get ISP service with it. You would be able to use those for 17 months until coming up even. Georg Treptow -Original Message- From: Dennis Laganiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:34 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: ISDN BRI Simulator Comparison Earlier today I proposed putting together some comparative information on the various ISDN Simulators available. Since the question which simulator do I buy? comes up regularly on the list, I though a cooperative effort to develop an answer would be an interesting exercise for the group. Just to start the conversation, here's a review of the two that I have in my home pod... Arca Emutel Lite Recent e-bay sales: $1,250 - $1,400 Features: * 2 port BRI * Switch types supported: NAT-1, DMS100 and 5ESS Default settings (just because I think its useful): PortB-channel DN SPID 1 1 384000 384001 1 2 384010 384002 2 1 384020 384021 2 2 384030 384022 The default ISDN switch-type is basic-dms100 Pro: * Been using it for a year without a problem * Built-in battery backup means you can use it without AC power for a quick demonstration * Supports either S (4-wire) or U (2-wire) interfaces (selected through software) * Simple console-like configuration Con: * Since I'm using 2503's, it requires 2 x NT1 (approx $30 each on ebay) * Power supply is an external brick. Minor thing, but kind of annoying. Teltone ILS-B-01 ISDN Demonstrator Recent e-bay sales: $1,225 - $1,599 (New from the manufacture, $1,855.00) Features: * 2 port BRI * Switch types supported: NAT-1, ATT Custom Default settings (just because I think its useful): PortB-channel DN SPID 1 1 835-86610835866101 1 2 835-86630835866301 2 1 835-86620835866201 2 2 835-86640835866401 The default ISDN switch-type is basic-nil Pro: * Built in power supply. * Windows-based configuration (I haven't tried it yet, but the book makes it look easy) Con: * Since I'm using 2503's, it requires 2 x NT1 (approx $30 each on ebay) * Only has U Interfaces I look forward to seeing what other people have used... Thanks... --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Dennis Laganiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:36 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:ISDN BRI Simulator Comparison This brings to mind an interesting side-project, if anybody has the time and inclination to help out. I've not seen a comprehensive comparison between the various simulators that are available, factoring in features and approximate cost. Myself personality, I've got an Emutel Lite at home that I've had a for while, and I just picked up a Teltone ISDN Demonstrator that I'm going to start playing with this weekend. I could probably put together a quick write up on those if it were a conversation that other people would like to contribute too. Anybody what to play? Let me know... --- Dennis From: Dennis Laganiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:48 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: ISDN BRI Simulator Um... I'll pay $125... Next bidder... :) I don't believe you'll find too many in this range, but I'd love to learn that I'm wrong... Thanks... --- Dennis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:ISDN BRI Simulator I am looking for a 2 port ISDN BRI Simulator for under $100. Does anyone know where I can get one? Thanks, Bill Cook, Network Project Manager _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list
Re: CCIE Written Question [7:44578]
The problem of canonical and non-canonical MAC addresses exists because Token Ring devices start reading each bit of a byte at the most significant bit, while Ethernet devices start reading each bit of a byte at the least significant bit. The 0's and 1's are exactly the same on the Token Ring wire as they are on the Ethernet wire. It is how the Network Interface Cards (NIC) and device drivers read the 0's and 1's that is different. For example, an Ethernet host would see 0100 when reading an unconverted byte sent from a Token Ring host as 0010. Since we usually look at MAC addresses in Hexadecimal, let's review how to convert the numbers for our purposes. Take a look at the table below. It provides the converted hex digits, and binary examples to show how the numbers were derived: 0=0 ( - ) 8=1 (1000 - 0001) 1=8 (0001 - 1000) 9=9 (1001 - 1001) 2=4 (0010 - 0100) A=5 (1010 - 0101) 3=C (0011 - 1100) B=D (1011 - 1101) 4=2 (0100 - 0010) C=3 (1100 - 0011) 5=A (0101 - 1010) D=B (1101 - 1011) 6=6 (0110 - 0110) E=7 (1110 - 0111) 7=E (0111 - 1110) F=F ( - ) When converting from canonical and non-canonical, or the other way around, take the address in one byte (two hexadecimal digits), convert the digits based on this chart or by actually reversing the bits. Once the individual digits are converted, swap them. For example, A7 would become E5, and E5 would become A7. There are several examples in the questions at the end of this chapter. I hope that helps... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Hunt Lee To: Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 5:11 PM Subject: CCIE Written Question [7:44578] I was just wondering if anybody knows a way to translate Ethernet MAC (Cananical) to Token MAC (non-Cananical) vice versa?? I know how to do the simple ones: e.g. 1078.xsxx. HexDec SwapDecHex 10 = 16= 0001 = 1000 = 8 = 08 Or any other ones like DecHex 101 202 303 404 505 606 707 808 909 10 0A 11 0B 12 0C 13 0D 14 0E 15 0F 16 10 17 11 18 12 19 13 20 14 21 15 22 16 23 17 24 18 25 19 But I don't know how to do it if they give me a large one e.g. Hex of 78, or AC etc?? Thanks. Best Regards, Hunt Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44581t=44578 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written Question [7:44578]
Excellent!!! I hope you don't mind if I steal that for the next book... :-) --- Dennis - Original Message - From: Peter I. Racz To: Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:04 PM Subject: Re: CCIE Written Question [7:44578] Hello, I just want to add my own to what Dennis has said (actually I have learned it from his book too - Thanks Dennis) How can you easily memorize this you may be wondering... 0=0 ( - ) 8=1 (1000 - 0001) 1=8 (0001 - 1000) 9=9 (1001 - 1001) 2=4 (0010 - 0100) A=5 (1010 - 0101) 3=C (0011 - 1100) B=D (1011 - 1101) 4=2 (0100 - 0010) C=3 (1100 - 0011) 5=A (0101 - 1010) D=B (1101 - 1011) 6=6 (0110 - 0110) E=7 (1110 - 0111) 7=E (0111 - 1110) F=F ( - ) Like this: 3 Cats 5 Apples 7 Elefants and DeciBel. These stand for: 3=C (and C=3 of course) 5=A 7=E D=B The rest is really easy to remember because they are very easy to project in your head in binary. 0=0 F=F 6=6 9=9 F=F 1=8 2=4 Good Luck, Peter Peter Ivo Racz Hunt Lee wrote: I was just wondering if anybody knows a way to translate Ethernet MAC (Cananical) to Token MAC (non-Cananical) vice versa?? I know how to do the simple ones: e.g. 1078.xsxx. HexDec SwapDec Hex 10 = 16= 0001 = 1000 = 8 = 08 Or any other ones like DecHex 101 202 303 404 505 606 707 808 909 10 0A 11 0B 12 0C 13 0D 14 0E 15 0F 16 10 17 11 18 12 19 13 20 14 21 15 22 16 23 17 24 18 25 19 But I don't know how to do it if they give me a large one e.g. Hex of 78, or AC etc?? Thanks. Best Regards, Hunt . Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44596t=44578 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT - Selling my CCIE Written library [7:44383]
I'm selling my library of CCIE Written books on ebay (watch the wrap). http://cgi6.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItems userid=laganiereinclude=0since=-1sort=3rows=25 If you're interested in passing 350-001 before it goes away, here's a chance to get all the books in one shot at a good price, plus the notes of one of the authors (I wrote the www.cramsession.com doc, the NLI study guide, and Boson #3 for this exam). Please keep in mind that I won't break the NDA, so these are valid notes and documents I've researched and written, not braindumps. If you want the notes, but don't need the books, I've also got several routers for sale, and I've included a copy of my notes with each of these. Thanks for helping me clean up my office a bit, and I apologize for the OT (over time)... --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44383t=44383 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Selling my CCIE Written library [7:44391]
Here's a better link for this, sorry... http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem item=2023737187 --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Dennis Laganiere Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:46 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: OT - Selling my CCIE Written library I'm selling my library of CCIE Written books on ebay (watch the wrap). http://cgi6.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItems userid=laganiereinclude=0since=-1sort=3rows=25 If you're interested in passing 350-001 before it goes away, here's a chance to get all the books in one shot at a good price, plus the notes of one of the authors (I wrote the www.cramsession.com doc, the NLI study guide, and Boson #3 for this exam). Please keep in mind that I won't break the NDA, so these are valid notes and documents I've researched and written, not braindumps. If you want the notes, but don't need the books, I've also got several routers for sale, and I've included a copy of my notes with each of these. Thanks for helping me clean up my office a bit, and I apologize for the OT (over time)... --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44391t=44391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: OT - Selling routers [7:44390]
Here are some better links for this, sorry... http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2023718078 http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2023730604 http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2023737187 http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2023817739 --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Dennis Laganiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:02 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:OT - Selling routers I'm selling several routers from my home study pod. I've got a 2501, a 4000-m w/6 serial ports and a 2610 w/8 serial ports (great Frame Relay switch). Here's the link on ebay for all the auctions, if anybody is interested (watch the wrap). http://cgi6.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItems userid=laganiereinclude=0since=-1sort=3rows% Thanks for helping me clean up my office a bit, and I apologize for the OT (over time)... --- Dennis _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44390t=44390 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
