Re: OSPF demand-circuit does not work [7:74954]
what do you see when you do sh dialer on the calling router, as a dial reason? or debug dialer, debug isdn q931 will be telling you regards De - Original Message - From: Lesly Verdier To: Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:25 PM Subject: OSPF demand-circuit does not work [7:74954] Hello All, I've configured ip ospf demand-circuit on an ISDN connection and this statement is supposed to supress the calls initiated by the Hello Packets. Still my router keeps on dialing. Does anybody know what the reason might be? Thanks, Lesly Verdier **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74967t=74954 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: PPP Question [7:74568]
This should work. You can be overriding the hostname and the password by using the interface commands: ppp chap hostname ... ppp chap password ... also one more thing that you can be aware: in an outgoing call, if you do not want to send an OUTGOING CHALLENGE you can be using the callin option like: ppp authen chap callin To: Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 5:02 AM Subject: PPP Question [7:74568] Hiyah guys, I have a question on PPP CHAP. From the various sources, we just need to declare the remote router's username and have the same password, apply CHAP on the PPP serial interfaces and the link will be up. In my case, it doesn't work. It became a flapping link. I am using a 2500 and 2600 router to run PPP. Instead, I have to configure this: Router1 Username Router2 password abc Username Router1 password abc Router2 Username Router1 password abc Username Router2 password abc Applying CHAP now will have the link up. Any comments on this matter would be appreciated. Thanks. Kenneth **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74572t=74568 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: ISDN dialer rotatry groups [7:74159]
Hi Dialer rotary-groups are point-to-multipoint interfaces for ex:this is a dialer rotary group sample int bri x dialer rotary y To: Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:49 AM Subject: ISDN dialer rotatry groups [7:74159] Hi, have a C3640 with ISDN dialin capability currently around 40 dialer interfaces setup and would like to streamline memory used.. rotary groups will give me that function but not sure on how to set it up and how exactly it works with 'hunting' phone numbers also pro's and cons of using this functions... any advice would be appreciated. many thanks Ants **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74166t=74159 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: ISDN dialer rotatry groups [7:74159]
Hi Dialer rotary-groups are point-to-multipoint interfaces for ex:this is a dialer rotary group sample int bri x dialer rotary y To: Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 1:27 PM Subject: Re: ISDN dialer rotatry groups [7:74159] Hi Dialer rotary-groups are point-to-multipoint interfaces for ex:this is a dialer rotary group sample int bri x dialer rotary y To: Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:49 AM Subject: ISDN dialer rotatry groups [7:74159] Hi, have a C3640 with ISDN dialin capability currently around 40 dialer interfaces setup and would like to streamline memory used.. rotary groups will give me that function but not sure on how to set it up and how exactly it works with 'hunting' phone numbers also pro's and cons of using this functions... any advice would be appreciated. many thanks Ants **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74169t=74159 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: IOS image.... [7:73481]
Latest 12.2 mainline is ok. The real lab is already with the 12.2 mainline images , although the 12.2 feautures will be included in September. Regards De - Original Message - From: Shab Hanon To: Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 8:05 PM Subject: IOS image [7:73481] Hello everybody... Which IOS image is the best to work on once doing preparations for the RS lab I am working with IP Plus and there is no ISIS... Can any one put his or her experience...? Cheers, Shab. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73488t=73481 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: ISIS SUMMARY ONLY? [7:73355]
are u sure of that ISIS is excluded? to be honest i am not sure of this... isis is not mentioned here: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html regards de - Original Message - From: Shab Hanon To: Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 12:04 PM Subject: Re: ISIS SUMMARY ONLY? [7:73355] Hi, If you are going to the CCIE RS lab, then it is good to know that ISIS is no more in the lab exam. you can get more information's on the Cisco web about the removed topics Cheers, Shab. wexo la wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DOES ANYONE KNOW IF YOU CAN SEND SUMMARY-ONLY IN ISIS WITHOUT USING DISTRIBUTE LISTS OR ROUTE-MAPS ? THANKS **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73438t=73355 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: IP services, from case study ... [7:73435]
a) look at menu command options. b) could not get the question c) map your local IP to local DLCI d) is this back to back, then put the clock rate command where the DCE cable is connected Regards De - Original Message - From: Shab Hanon To: Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 12:04 PM Subject: IP services, from case study ... [7:73435] Hi, This is from a case study Can any one help on these ? a) Setup Rxx such that when a user telnets to it they will receive a menu system that consists of the following options. Ability to display the IP routing table Ability to clear the IP routing table Ability to print off a Cisco TAC troubleshooting screen Exit to command line interface b) When issuing a telnet session from Rxx ensure that the destination IP address is not shown in the display. c) R1, R2 R6 are not allowed subinterfaces on the frame-relay network that commonly connects them. R1, R2, R5 and R6 should be able to ping their own interfaces. how it can be possible to ping it their own interfaces on a serial ??? d) Make sure the frame-relay connection between R1 and R2 has a speed of 128k Cheers, Shab **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73437t=73435 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: ISIS SUMMARY ONLY? [7:73355]
defining level-1 will create the summary... devvv - Original Message - From: wexo la To: Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 6:05 PM Subject: ISIS SUMMARY ONLY? [7:73355] DOES ANYONE KNOW IF YOU CAN SEND SUMMARY-ONLY IN ISIS WITHOUT USING DISTRIBUTE LISTS OR ROUTE-MAPS ? THANKS **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73363t=73355 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com
Re: Tacacs help required [7:71818]
It seems we are getting the LCP I 00:27:39: BR0:1 LCP: I TERMREQ [Open] id 3 len 4 not very clear, in fact why is the remote sending LCP O TERM could you collect? (from remote) deb ppp neg deb ppp authen deb aaa author deb isdn q931 deb tacacs regards devvv - Original Message - From: Shane Stockman To: Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 7:53 PM Subject: Tacacs help required [7:71818] 1720 router with 128K primary link and ISDN Backup. Problem When primary link falls ISDN backup has authentications problems due to tacacs on both sides (Remote and HQ). Here is my Remote side config and debug aaa new-model aaa authentication login default group tacacs+ local aaa authentication enable default group tacacs+ enable aaa authentication ppp default local none aaa authorization exec default local group tacacs+ aaa authorization network default local none aaa accounting exec default start-stop group tacacs+ aaa accounting commands 15 default start-stop group tacacs+ aaa accounting network default start-stop group tacacs+ Log Buffer (4096 bytes): CONFREQ [ACKsent] id 8 len 26 00:23:49: BR0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0x0958D9C8 (0x05060958D9C8) 00:23:49: BR0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 ALBERANTE (0x131001414C424552414E5445 5F424D57) 00:23:49: BR0:1 LCP: I CONFACK [ACKsent] id 8 len 26 00:23:49: BR0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0x0958D9C8 (0x05060958D9C8) 00:23:49: BR0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 ALBERANTE (0x131001414C424552414E5445 5F424D57) 00:23:49: BR0:1 LCP: State is Open 00:23:49: BR0:1 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, by the peer Jul 2 18:48:06: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 011654760 0 00:24:00: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 1 00:24:10: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 2 00:24:20: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 3 00:24:30: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 4 00:24:48: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 5 00:24:58: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 6 00:25:08: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 7 00:25:18: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 8 00:25:28: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 9 00:25:38: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 10 00:25:48: BR0:1 LCP: I TERMREQ [Open] id 15 len 4 00:25:48: BR0:1 LCP: O TERMACK [Open] id 15 len 4 00:25:48: BR0:1 PPP: Phase is TERMINATING Jul 2 18:49:59: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 disconnected from 0116547 600 , call lasted 119 seconds Jul 2 18:49:59: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to down Jul 2 18:49:59: %DIALER-6-UNBIND: Interface BR0:1 unbound from profile Di0 00:25:48: BR0:1 LCP: State is Closed 00:25:48: BR0:1 PPP: Phase is DOWN Jul 2 18:50:00: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up Jul 2 18:50:00: %DIALER-6-BIND: Interface BR0:1 bound to profile Di0 00:25:49: BR0:1 PPP: Treating connection as a callout 00:25:49: BR0:1 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Active Open 00:25:49: BR0:1 PPP: Authorization required 00:25:49: BR0:1 PPP: No remote authentication for call-out 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 9 len 30 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0x095AAF85 (0x0506095AAF85) 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP:MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 ALBERANTE (0x131001414C424552414E5445 5F424D57) 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 2 len 14 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP:AuthProto PAP (0x0304C023) 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0x3375A3CD (0x05063375A3CD) 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP: O CONFACK [REQsent] id 2 len 14 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP:AuthProto PAP (0x0304C023) 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0x3375A3CD (0x05063375A3CD) 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP: I CONFREJ [ACKsent] id 9 len 8 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP:MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4) 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKsent] id 10 len 26 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0x095AAF85 (0x0506095AAF85) 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 ALBERANTE (0x131001414C424552414E5445 5F424D57) 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP: I CONFACK [ACKsent] id 10 len 26 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP:MagicNumber 0x095AAF85 (0x0506095AAF85) 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP:EndpointDisc 1 ALBERANTE (0x131001414C424552414E5445 5F424D57) 00:25:49: BR0:1 LCP: State is Open 00:25:49: BR0:1 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, by the peer Jul 2 18:50:06: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 0112345678 0 00:25:59: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 1 00:26:09: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 2 00:26:19: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 3 00:26:29: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 4 00:26:39: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 5 Jul 2 18:50:57: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, change d state to up 00:26:49: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 6 00:26:59: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 7 Jul 2 18:51:13: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by vty1 (172.16.54.69) 00:27:10: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 8 Jul 2 18:51:29: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dialer0, changed state to standby mo de 00:27:18: Di0 LCP: Not allowed on a Dialer Profile 00:27:20: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 9 00:27:30: BR0:1 AUTH: Timeout 10 00:27:39: BR0:1 LCP: I TERMREQ [Open] id 3 len 4 00:27:39: BR0:1 LCP: O TERMACK [Open] id 3 len 4 00:27:39: BR0:1 PPP: Phase is TERMINATING Jul 2 18:51:51: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 disconnected
Re: MPLS for CCIE [7:71132]
For the Communication Services Written Exam , general knowledge for MPLS, MPLS/VPN should be oki I think. Cisco's MPLS and MPLS/VPN Tech Support page should be enough for the written part for the MPLS and MPLS VPN questions. http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/browse/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:M PLSs=Implementation_and_Configuration My regards De - Original Message - From: Swapnil Shah To: Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:20 PM Subject: MPLS for CCIE [7:71132] Hi Can you suggest me some URL / Books on MPLS for Preparing for CCIE Written Exam. Do you need to know MPLS as a technology or required to configure MPLS based Network / VPN... as I dont have access to equipments supporting MPLSso no hand-on would be possible for me at this moment.. Thanks Swapnil Shah Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71138t=71132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ADSL over ISDN question [7:70676]
First of all you need Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2(13)ZH for adsl over isdn support. Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2(13)ZH is a short-lived, early deployment release that will be supported in the second release of Cisco IOS Software Release 12.3T. It supports the Cisco 831, 836, and 837 routers, and Cisco 1700 Series routers Check: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps380/prod_bulletin09186a0080 1746b0.html sh dsl int atm 0 is needed... a.. a.. 0x8 means that the modem is waiting to hear from CO. This probably means that you do not have a good connection to the central office. Check connection and make sure the correct cable is being used. a.. 0x10 means that the modem head from CO and now training. The CO is connected, and the modems are attempting to negotiate a connection. If it fails in this state then there is probably some incompatibility between the ADSL interface and the central office. Make sure the correct VPI/VCI is being used. a.. 0x20 means that activation is completed and link is up. Regards De - Original Message - From: dlci_16 To: Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 8:44 PM Subject: ADSL over ISDN question [7:70676] Hello i am having layer 1 problems in placing an 836 router for ADSL over ISDN, the story so far ; the LEDs of the ATM interface (Rx,Tx and CD) keep going on and off(constantly, yes i know, not good), doing a #show ip int brief, obviously shows that both ATM0 and ATM0.1 are in down state (they are not admin. down), i have followed Cisco4s troubleshooting 'steps' from their website, from checking if DSL port is plugged in correctly, checking correct powersupply, placing dsl operating-mode in auto to checking if the circuit is tested (i have placed an Alcatel SpeedTouch and it works), now i am running out of options. a curious thing is when i issue a #debug atm event, i get the usual readout for activation state changes, then : LOCAL:Max noise margin for power cutoff 31 followed by a long list of bad news, modem state 0x8, on other adsl capable cisco routers(not over ISDN) i usually have dsl power-cutback set at 0 at the interface ATM 0, whereas with this router, i dont have this option. i tried to hunt for any intel relating to what does this power-cutback 'feature' actually do and if its related to this layer 1 problem and found nothing, maby i am taking the wrong approach to figuering what is wrong/missing, maby i should leave that Alcatel modem running and put that cisco router back in the box thing is i dont know where to look anymore, help? ;) sample of my config: ! vpdn enable ! vpdn-group pppoe request-dialin protocol pppoe ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.0.210 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ip tcp adjust-mss 1452 ! interface ATM0 no ip address no atm ilmi-keepalive dsl operating-mode auto ! ! interface ATM0.1 point-to-point pvc 0/35 pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1 ! ! interface Dialer1 mtu 1492 ip address negotiated ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 no cdp enable ppp chap hostname xxx ppp chap password 7 xxx ppp pap sent-username xxx password 7 xxx ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer1 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 ! access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70681t=70676 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ADSL over ISDN question [7:70676]
First of all you need Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2(13)ZH for adsl over isdn support. Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2(13)ZH is a short-lived, early deployment release that will be supported in the second release of Cisco IOS Software Release 12.3T. It supports the Cisco 831, 836, and 837 routers, and Cisco 1700 Series routers Check: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps380/prod_bulletin09186a0080 1746b0.html sh dsl int atm 0 is needed... -- 0x8 means that the modem is waiting to hear from CO. This probably means that you do not have a good connection to the central office. Check connection and make sure the correct cable is being used. ---0x10 means that the modem head from CO and now training. The CO is connected, and the modems are attempting to negotiate a connection. If it fails in this state then there is probably some incompatibility between the ADSL interface and the central office. Make sure the correct VPI/VCI is being used. --- 0x20 means that activation is completed and link is up. Regards De - Original Message - From: dlci_16 To: Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 8:44 PM Subject: ADSL over ISDN question [7:70676] Hello i am having layer 1 problems in placing an 836 router for ADSL over ISDN, the story so far ; the LEDs of the ATM interface (Rx,Tx and CD) keep going on and off(constantly, yes i know, not good), doing a #show ip int brief, obviously shows that both ATM0 and ATM0.1 are in down state (they are not admin. down), i have followed Cisco4s troubleshooting 'steps' from their website, from checking if DSL port is plugged in correctly, checking correct powersupply, placing dsl operating-mode in auto to checking if the circuit is tested (i have placed an Alcatel SpeedTouch and it works), now i am running out of options. a curious thing is when i issue a #debug atm event, i get the usual readout for activation state changes, then : LOCAL:Max noise margin for power cutoff 31 followed by a long list of bad news, modem state 0x8, on other adsl capable cisco routers(not over ISDN) i usually have dsl power-cutback set at 0 at the interface ATM 0, whereas with this router, i dont have this option. i tried to hunt for any intel relating to what does this power-cutback 'feature' actually do and if its related to this layer 1 problem and found nothing, maby i am taking the wrong approach to figuering what is wrong/missing, maby i should leave that Alcatel modem running and put that cisco router back in the box thing is i dont know where to look anymore, help? ;) sample of my config: ! vpdn enable ! vpdn-group pppoe request-dialin protocol pppoe ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.0.210 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ip tcp adjust-mss 1452 ! interface ATM0 no ip address no atm ilmi-keepalive dsl operating-mode auto ! ! interface ATM0.1 point-to-point pvc 0/35 pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1 ! ! interface Dialer1 mtu 1492 ip address negotiated ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer pool 1 no cdp enable ppp chap hostname xxx ppp chap password 7 xxx ppp pap sent-username xxx password 7 xxx ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer1 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 ! access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70683t=70676 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Eigrp NBMA environment [7:70552]
In eigrp you have to be careful of the following: In F/R -- split-horizon is disabled on the physical interface, you may need to enable this on the spokes.. In F/R -- split-horizon is enabled on the subinterfaces (point-to-point or multipoint) you may need to disable this on the HUB. also there is a nice example (for eigrp-NBMA) in the book of Henry Benjamin (CCIE Security..) if you can not use broadcast you can be using a tunnel :) Regards Devvv - Original Message - From: rooban Ravi To: Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:25 AM Subject: Eigrp NBMA environment [7:70552] I have seen so much about OSPF in NBMA environment but not about eigrp in NBMA environment. I am surprise that this isn't captured in the most of text books since hello packets of eigrp are multicast. I would like to know your thoughts regard with matter. = cheers, rooban http://mobile.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Mobile - Check compose your email via SMS on your Telstra or Vodafone mobile. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70557t=70552 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MPLS TE crash the router 2500 [7:70221]
this is an experimental image. IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Experimental Version so this trace can not be decoded like this.. the DE of the image should be contacted.. %Software-forced reload regards devvv - Original Message - From: alaerte Vidali To: Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 4:55 PM Subject: Re: MPLS TE crash the router 2500 [7:70221] I tried another version, but occurs the same error message: R2#sh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Experimental Version 12.0(20011017:155337) [rraszuk -New_reorg_oct17 110] 2#sh flash System flash directory: File Length Name/status 1 12940544 c2500-js-l.20oct2001 00:51:15: %SYS-2-WATCHDOG: Process aborted on watchdog timeout, process = MPLS TE LM. -Traceback= 3206E92 3209C6C 320449C 3204672 1005AF8 100453E 1000196 00:51:16: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr 3.3.3.3 on Serial0.23 from EXSTART to DOWN, Nei ghbor Down: Dead timer expired 00:51:16: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 01:07:04: %SYS-2-WATCHDOG: Process aborted on watchdog timeout, process = MPLS TE LM. -Traceback= 3206E92 3209C6C 320449C 3204672 1005AF8 100453E 1000196 01:22:53: %SYS-2-WATCHDOG: Process aborted on watchdog timeout, process = MPLS TE LM. -Traceback= 3206E92 3209C6C 320449C 3204672 1005AF8 100453E 1000196 01:38:39: %SYS-2-WATCHDOG: Process aborted on watchdog timeout, process = MPLS TE LM. -Traceback= 3206E92 3209C6C 320449C 3204672 1005AF8 100453E 1000196 01:54:23: %SYS-2-WATCHDOG: Process aborted on watchdog timeout, process = MPLS TE LM. -Traceback= 3206E92 3209C6C 320449C 3204672 1005AF8 100453E 1000196 02:10:07: %SYS-2-WATCHDOG: Process aborted on watchdog timeout, process = MPLS TE LM. -Traceback= 3206E92 3209C6C 320449C 3204672 1005AF8 100453E 1000196 02:25:49: %SYS-2-WATCHDOG: Process aborted on watchdog timeout, process = MPLS TE LM. -Traceback= 3206E92 3209C6C 320449C 3204672 1005AF8 100453E 1000196 02:41:31: %SYS-2-WATCHDOG: Process aborted on watchdog timeout, process = MPLS TE LM. -Traceback= 3206E92 3209C6C 320449C 3204672 1005AF8 100453E 1000196 02:57:11: %SYS-2-WATCHDOG: Process aborted on watchdog timeout, process = MPLS TE LM. -Traceback= 3206E92 3209C6C 320449C 3204672 1005AF8 100453E 1000196 03:12:51: %SYS-2-WATCHDOG: Process aborted on watchdog timeout, process = MPLS TE LM. -Traceback= 3206E92 3209C6C 320449C 3204672 1005AF8 100453E 1000196 03:28:31: %SYS-2-WATCHDOG: Process aborted on watchdog timeout, process = MPLS TE LM. -Traceback= 3206E92 3209C6C 320449C 3204672 1005AF8 100453E 1000196 03:44:11: %SYS-2-WATCHDOG: Process aborted on watchdog timeout, process = MPLS TE LM. -Traceback= 3206E92 3209C6C 320449C 3204672 1005AF8 100453E 1000196 03:59:51: %SYS-2-WATCHDOG: Process aborted on watchdog timeout, process = MPLS TE LM. -Traceback= 3206E92 3209C6C 320449C 3204672 1005AF8 100453E 1000196 Queued messages: %Software-forced reload Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70478t=70221 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Simple config issues [7:70482]
comments inline: - Original Message - From: Anil Gupte To: Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:46 PM Subject: Simple config issues [7:70482] I am trying to configure a 2600 router. I have two problems: 1. I issued the default route command ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x it depends on what x.x.x.x is ? if x.x.x.x is the next hop ip then it will work however if you put any other hop you will not see here. I can see this under ip classless in sh run However, when I do a sh ip route, it does not appear there and in fact says: Gateway of last resort is not set 2. I configured it for RIP using router rip network 63.x.x.0 and it shows as 63.0.0.0 in sh run. Is this correct behavior? Until now I had only dealt with networks in the Class C range. This is a Class C assigned to us but by the first octet you can see that it is from a Class A range. -that is normal -rip is putting the major net all the time -it is a classful protocol Any help or pointers will be muchly appreciated. Thanx, Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70487t=70482 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RIP updates trough a serial and ISDN connection [7:70480]
comments inline: - Original Message - From: Iwan Hoogendoorn To: Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:20 PM Subject: RIP updates trough a serial and ISDN connection [7:70480] Hi I have a question here: If i have 2 Routers and they are connected to the serial connection... and the ethernet and the ISDN interfaces allso has a IP address. AND THE ISDN LINE IS CONFUGRED AS BACKUP FOR THE SERIAL LINE. (So is in standby mode (down))and all of the 3 interfaces have different network numbers...lets say: SER = 193.1.1.0 ETH = 195.1.1.0 BRI = 196.1.1.0 Only the Serial interfaces are UP and the ethernet and the BRI are down...(the BRI is down because its in standy mode) DOES RIP ALLSO BROADCAST ROUTES (NETWORK NUMBERS) WHERE TEH INTERFACES ARE DOWN OF? -no.. And if the answer is yes how does it know the Network number of ISDN if the serial goes down...? -if you are using back-up interface then when the serial goes down, the isdn will not be in the standby mode any more. so any interesting traffic that you defined with the dialer-group x will trigger the isdn Regards De Because it has to know the IP/NETWORK to take over the line right? Well i hop someone can help me with this one ...and sorry for my long question... Thank You, Iwan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70488t=70480 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with backup line... [7:70386]
comments inline ... - Original Message - From: Iwan Hoogendoorn To: Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 9:39 AM Subject: Problem with backup line... [7:70386] Hi, I am having a problem with setting up a backup line with 2 ISDN routers (2503) they are connected with a serial connection and a ISDN as backup. I can ping the serial ip adresses...but if i do an extended ping and lets say i ping the interface 1000 times and disconnect the Serial cable it should come up with the ISDN line but t does not come up. This is allso very strange ... I have RouterA and RouterB... When i log into the routerB and i tupe a no shutdown command on the BRI interface i get this: RouterB#config t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. RouterB(config)#interface bri0 RouterB(config-if)#no shut RouterB(config-if)# %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to down %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:2, changed state to down %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 disconnected from unknown , call lasted 81 seconds %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0:2 disconnected from unknown , call lasted 82 seconds %ISDN-6-LAYER2DOWN: Layer 2 for Interface BRI0, TEI 102 changed to down %ISDN-6-LAYER2UP: Layer 2 for Interface BR0, TEI 103 changed to up It comes UP again...that is strange isnt it? when you shut bri, layer one also should be in deactivated. ISDN is not up yet. This only layer 2, which is between your router and the switch.. this is normal.. in routerB isdn line is not a back up interface also if you have interesting traffic the line (layer 3) will come up as well... If i am not missing smt i have not seen a problem here... Regards De These are my configs for the routers: RouterA RouterA#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 11.2 no service password-encryption no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname RouterA ! enable password cisco ! username RouterB password 7 030752180500 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 195.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no keepalive shutdown ! interface Serial0 backup delay 5 20 backup interface BRI0 ip address 193.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp no fair-queue clockrate 64000 ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! interface BRI0 ip address 196.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 90 dialer map ip 196.1.1.2 name RouterB broadcast 21 dialer-group 1 no fair-queue ppp authentication chap ppp multilink ! router rip network 195.1.1.0 network 193.1.1.0 network 196.1.1.0 ! no ip classless dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 password cisco login line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end RouterA#sh ip route Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, * - candidate default U - per-user static route, o - ODR Gateway of last resort is not set 193.1.1.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 193.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0 C 193.1.1.2/32 is directly connected, Serial0 R196.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 193.1.1.2, 00:00:09, Serial0 # RouterB### RouterB#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 11.2 service timestamps debug datetime localtime no service password-encryption no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname RouterB ! enable password cisco ! username RouterA password 7 030752180500 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 197.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no keepalive shutdown ! interface Serial0 ip address 193.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! interface BRI0 ip address 196.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 90 dialer map ip 196.1.1.1 name RouterA broadcast 20 dialer-group 1 no fair-queue ppp authentication chap ppp multilink ! router rip network 193.1.1.0 network 197.1.1.0 network 196.1.1.0 ! no ip classless dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password cisco login ! end RouterB#sho ip route Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, * - candidate default U -
Re: RE: RE: RE: number of CCIE??? [7:70328]
Everybody has his or her own idea. I will appreaiciate if you can stop this from now on. I think this discussion is becoming too long and it seems it will never end.. If you would like to keep on discussing please unicast to those people that u like. Regards Devvv - Original Message - From: n rf To: Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:03 AM Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: number of CCIE??? [7:70328] Jack Nalbandian wrote: My friend NRF (what is your name anyhow?), Others have expressed concern, true, and most of them are legitimate. You mentioned that the MCSE was thought of as a means to get easy money from a relatively naive market faced with the new IT dimension. Expressing legitimate concern by citing facts has its value, but I see that you are indeed peddling myths, but, so far (forgive me for generalizing due to limited exposure to your thoughts) you have been very one-sided ad biased in your concerns. The CCIE number thread is based on some objective opinion of ONE person, you. You have also not provided data to back your opinion, and doubt very much that you can provide definitive data on the matter. It is not one-sided at all. Again, answer the question - all other things being equal, would you prefer a lower or a higher number for yourself or not? Of course you prefer a lower number. I know I do. Pretty much everybody does. So actually, I would say that the majority is on my side. The only difference is that some people like me are willing to admit it, and others aren't. But in our hearts, we all know what the truth is. Again, if you don't believe me, go look in the mirror and ask yourself honestly would you take a lower number if Cisco offered it to you? Be honest with yourself. I think you know exactly what I'm talking about and that's about as definitive as you're ever going to get. Who are those some people, those who (allegedly) required lower number CCIE's and what percentage of the global population of HR managers do they constitute? Do they, furthermore, qualify to judge either way? How expertly knowledgable are they of the CCIE certification process? How familiar are you? Once again with the ad-hominem attacks. Why do people insist on attacking my character and my motives rather than my actual points? First of all, I obviously don't think it's stupid that people who do hiring prefer the lower number. I think it's actually entirely logical. But fine, let's have it your way. Even if it was illogical, what does that prove? You ask how what makes these HR people qualified to judge? Simple. The mere fact that HR managers have jobs to give makes that person qualified to judge. Why? Simple - the golden rule. He who has the gold makes the rules. If you want a job, and they have the jobs to give, then they are the ones with the power. They are the ones who tell you what they are looking for, and if you refuse to play by their rules, then they won't give you the job, simple as that. Unfair? Maybe. But get over it. That's life. If you have your own company, then you can decide what criteria you will use to hire. But if you don't, then you have to dance to the tune of the piper. Let me put it to you another way. Surely we all know that many companies prefer that certain positions be filled by college graduates, despite the fact that those positions don't really require anything that you would learn in college. So you might then say that it's stupid that they do things this way. Yeah, but at the end of the day, so what? Since they are the ones who have the jobs, they get to decide what they want. Ranting and raving about how you think the requirement is stupid isn't going to change their minds. Do you seriously believe that you'll be able to go to these companies and use your power of persuasion to convince them that their own requirement is stupid? Of course not. You either have want they want, or you'll be passed by. The key, therefore, is if you want that job, you should get that thing that they want, even if you don't agree that it's necessary. Telling companies that you don't agree with their hiring practices doesn't help you in paying the rent. Sometimes you gotta put up with things you don't agree with in order to get something you want (like a job). That's life. You gotta be pragmatic here. I hate stopping at red lights at 3 AM when there's nobody around to crash into. But hey, if I run one and get pulled over, am I really going to win an argument with the cop over how I shouldn't need to obey the light because there's nobody around? Of course not. He's gonna hand me a ticket and I'm going to be out $300, end of story. I stop at red lights at 3AM simply because I don't want to get a ticket. I think it's stupid that I would get one because there's nobody around to crash into, but that's neither here nor there. In the final
Re: Modem question [7:70392]
you can connect to a serial if that serial has async capability... do sh ver in your router like: sabenash ver .. cisco 2520 (68030) processor (revision M) with 14336K/2048K bytes of memory. .. 2 Low-speed serial(sync/async) network interface(s) == you see this serial interface can work in both sync and async... however the default is sync... so make that corresponding interface async with the physical layer async command.. this command will create a line x as well... Regards De - Original Message - From: Shane Stockman To: Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:03 PM Subject: Modem question [7:70392] Is there a way to connect a modem to a serial or ethernet port for direct telnet to a remote router with a modem ?. I have a 2507 and 2522. Thanks _ Download MSN Messenger 5.0. http://messenger.msn.co.za/ It's free! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70397t=70392 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 40% Ping Success [7:70327]
please verify where the packets are lost...(which layer...?) Like any routing issue..2 packets may be sent from one link and 3 may be from other.. or physical layer issue (like packet loss... ) cle counters and check sh int ser ..., sh controller.. which outputs are increasing regards de - Original Message - From: Nathan To: Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 10:01 AM Subject: 40% Ping Success [7:70327] Ok guys here's an interesting issue. Once we got the internet circuit up, the ping was only 40% successful. Why would that be? Here's the setup: 3700 - CSU/DSU - DMARK - SBC - Service Provider. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70329t=70327 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't ping anymore if i rename routernames [7:70330]
you are using: dialer map ip 196.1.1.2 name RouterB broadcast 21 and ppp authentication chap so if you rename the routers you have 2 options: either use ppp chap hostname and password under the bri interfaces because the routers send the hostnames by default in ppp authentication or change the names in dialer-map after changing the router names as well regards De - Original Message - From: Iwan Hoogendoorn To: Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 11:32 AM Subject: Can't ping anymore if i rename routernames [7:70330] I am connected to the TS //2511// On ports 5 and six I connected 2 ISDN routers //2503// The routers are called RouterA and Router B If I rename the routers to R5 and R6 I cant ping them anymore... If I rename them back again I can ping them...the line comes up and I can ping them... Can someone help me with this STRANGE thing? Thank You /2503(RouterA) (want to rename to R5) PC -- TS(2511) \2503(RouterB) (want to rename to R6) This are my configs: //2511/ ! version 11.2 service timestamps log uptime no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname 2511 ! no ip domain-lookup ip host R1 2001 1.1.1.1 ip host R2 2002 1.1.1.1 ip host R3 2003 1.1.1.1 ip host R4 2004 1.1.1.1 ip host R5 2005 1.1.1.1 ip host R6 2006 1.1.1.1 ip host R7 2007 1.1.1.1 ip host R9 2008 1.1.1.1 ip host SW3 2009 1.1.1.1 ip host SW2 2010 1.1.1.1 ip host R10 2011 1.1.1.1 ! interface Loopback0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0 no ip address ! no ip classless ! line con 0 line 1 16 no exec transport input all line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end ///RouterA// ! version 11.2 no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname RouterA ! enable password cisco ! username RouterB password 7 030752180500 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface Serial0 no ip address ! interface BRI0 ip address 196.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 90 dialer map ip 196.1.1.2 name RouterB broadcast 21 dialer-group 1 no fair-queue ppp authentication chap ppp multilink no shutdown ! no ip classless dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 password cisco login line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end ///RouterB// ! version 11.2 service timestamps debug datetime localtime no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname RouterB ! enable password cisco ! username RouterA password 7 030752180500 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface BRI0 ip address 196.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 90 dialer map ip 196.1.1.1 name RouterA broadcast 20 dialer-group 1 no fair-queue ppp authentication chap ppp multilink no shutdown ! no ip classless dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password cisco login ! end Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70335t=70330 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't ping anymore if i rename routernames [7:70330]
you are using: dialer map ip 196.1.1.2 name RouterB broadcast 21 and ppp authentication chap so if you rename the routers you have 2 options: either use ppp chap hostname and password under the bri interfaces because the routers send the hostnames by default in ppp authentication or change the names in dialer-map after changing the router names as well regards De - Original Message - From: Iwan Hoogendoorn To: Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 11:32 AM Subject: Can't ping anymore if i rename routernames [7:70330] I am connected to the TS //2511// On ports 5 and six I connected 2 ISDN routers //2503// The routers are called RouterA and Router B If I rename the routers to R5 and R6 I cant ping them anymore... If I rename them back again I can ping them...the line comes up and I can ping them... Can someone help me with this STRANGE thing? Thank You /2503(RouterA) (want to rename to R5) PC -- TS(2511) \2503(RouterB) (want to rename to R6) This are my configs: //2511/ ! version 11.2 service timestamps log uptime no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname 2511 ! no ip domain-lookup ip host R1 2001 1.1.1.1 ip host R2 2002 1.1.1.1 ip host R3 2003 1.1.1.1 ip host R4 2004 1.1.1.1 ip host R5 2005 1.1.1.1 ip host R6 2006 1.1.1.1 ip host R7 2007 1.1.1.1 ip host R9 2008 1.1.1.1 ip host SW3 2009 1.1.1.1 ip host SW2 2010 1.1.1.1 ip host R10 2011 1.1.1.1 ! interface Loopback0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0 no ip address ! no ip classless ! line con 0 line 1 16 no exec transport input all line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end ///RouterA// ! version 11.2 no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname RouterA ! enable password cisco ! username RouterB password 7 030752180500 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface Serial0 no ip address ! interface BRI0 ip address 196.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 90 dialer map ip 196.1.1.2 name RouterB broadcast 21 dialer-group 1 no fair-queue ppp authentication chap ppp multilink no shutdown ! no ip classless dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 password cisco login line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end ///RouterB// ! version 11.2 service timestamps debug datetime localtime no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname RouterB ! enable password cisco ! username RouterA password 7 030752180500 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface BRI0 ip address 196.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 90 dialer map ip 196.1.1.1 name RouterA broadcast 20 dialer-group 1 no fair-queue ppp authentication chap ppp multilink no shutdown ! no ip classless dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password cisco login ! end Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70334t=70330 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't ping anymore if i rename routernames [7:70330]
based on the fact that it was working before changing the hostnames the issue should be related to authentication please just collect the following 3 debugs and you will see the problem more probably in authentication. (like the hostnames are case sensitive) debug isdn q931 deb ppp neg den ppp authen regards De - Original Message - From: Iwan Hoogendoorn To: Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 2:11 PM Subject: Re: Can't ping anymore if i rename routernames [7:70330] I do not understand what you are meaning with the first option but the second option i allready tryed ... I changed the routernames in the hostname as weel in the dialer map command...on both routers... I just dont get it... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70339t=70330 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Connect a BRI router to a PRI? [7:70346]
you can not connect a bri interface to a pri line isdn switch type, d channel , tei assignment ... is different regards devvv - Original Message - From: Stuart Pittwood To: Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 8:05 PM Subject: Connect a BRI router to a PRI? [7:70346] Excuse the newbie question. We have a PRI line (8 channels) with nothing attached to it (for disaster recovery). Is it possible to connect 2 BRI routers (800 series) to this line to test the line configurations etc (dial out from one router and into the other) Thanks Stu P Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70351t=70346 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MPLS TE crash the router 2500 [7:70221]
it is strange i used this command many times and my routers never crashed :) is this only happening on the 2500 platform? and could you tell your sh ver regards De - Original Message - From: alaerte Vidali To: Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:13 PM Subject: MPLS TE crash the router 2500 [7:70221] After entering 'tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 dynamic' the router crash. The configuration is: ip cef mpls traffic-eng tunnels ! interface loopback 0 ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 ! interface se 0.23 ip address 192.168.23.1 255.255.255.255 mpls traffic-eng tunnels ip rsvp bandwidth 1000 ! router ospf 0 network 192.168.23.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0 mpls traffic-eng area 0 ! interface tunnel1 ip unnumbered loopback 0 tunnel destination 3.3.3.3 tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng tunnel mpls traffic-eng bandwidth 100 tunnel mpls traffic-eng priority 1 1 ! end When the command 'tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 dynamic' is entered, the following messages appear and it is necessary reload the router (physically). 8w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Tunnel1, changed state to down 8w5d: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Loopback0, changed state to administratively down 8w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Loopback0, changed state to down 8w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Loopback0, changed state to up 8w5d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Loopback0, changed state to up 8w5d: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr 3.3.3.3 on Serial0.23 from EXCHANGE to DOWN, Neighb or Down: Interface down or detached hbor Down: Interface down or detached 8w5d: %OSPF-4-NONEIGHBOR: Received database description from unknown neighbor 3.3.3.3 8w5d: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr 3.3.3.3 on Serial0.23 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done 8w5d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Tunnel1, changed state to up Queued messages:Local Timeout (control reg=0x118) Error, address: 0x20201FE at 0x34CEA50 (PC) I also tried explicity path; the result is the same. And IS-IS too. Any Thoughts? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70257t=70221 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: setup adsl 2621xm wic card [7:70185]
what will you configure? rfc 1483 routing, bridging, irb, pppoa, pppoe...? Check this for various conf options... http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/browse/index.pl?i=Technologiesf=1242 I think your layer 1 is already up? if not check this http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/794/wicadsl_lyr1.html Regards De - Original Message - From: hugo To: Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:18 PM Subject: setup adsl 2621xm wic card [7:70185] hi i've a cisco 2621xm with a wic card adsl i can't config the ATM help me thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70187t=70185 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E1 PRI to E1 PRI via DialupAll channels [7:70134]
configure one router smilating the ISDN switch one router for the client with pri-group timeslots 1-31 under the D channel and to kick in all B channels with ppp multilink and dialer-load thershold 1 it should work regards devrim - Original Message - From: Valeri Marinski To: Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:43 PM Subject: E1 PRI to E1 PRI via DialupAll channels [7:70134] Hi, i'd like to configure a PRI to PRI DIALUP connection between two routers using all the available channels but i get only 1 or 2 channels up what is the problem?!? Is it the right way to configure: pri-group timeslots 1-31 and than to use a Dialer interface to dialer map ip or should i for a channel group with: channel-group 0 timeslots 1-31 i tried but i couldn't bind the Serial1/0:0 interface that was created by this configuration to any dialer --- is it only for cable-to-cable connection ?? because i have to dial a number for this approach. thanks in advance for any comments or recommendations Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70149t=70134 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BRI [7:70059]
debug isdn q921 is for the layer 2 activity ( for the signalling between the router and the swith, like TEI, SAPI...) you can be using: debug dialer debug isdn q931 to watch what is going layer 3. you can check sh isdn stat -- and see the number of channels occupied or sh int bri 0 -- for the D channel sh int bri 0:1- for the first B channel sh int bri 0:2 for the second be channel Regards De - Original Message - From: Dom To: Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:39 PM Subject: RE: BRI [7:70059] Show isdn status then use debug isdn q921 for more detailed information. Best regards, Dom Stocqueler CTO - SysDom Technologies -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 June 2003 10:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BRI [7:70059] Hi ppl, i'm encountering some issues on the 2nd channel, it takes quite a while for it to come up despite the 1st channel hits the threshold, is there any command that i can issue to monitor on the 2nd channel? thanks regards, jef Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70067t=70059 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BRI [7:70059]
debug isdn q921 is for the layer 2 activity ( for the signalling between the router and the swith, like TEI, SAPI...) you can be using: debug dialer debug isdn q931 to watch what is going layer 3. you can check sh isdn stat -- and see the number of channels occupied or sh int bri 0 -- for the D channel sh int bri 0:1- for the first B channel sh int bri 0:2 for the second be channel Regards De - Original Message - From: Dom To: Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:39 PM Subject: RE: BRI [7:70059] Show isdn status then use debug isdn q921 for more detailed information. Best regards, Dom Stocqueler CTO - SysDom Technologies -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 June 2003 10:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BRI [7:70059] Hi ppl, i'm encountering some issues on the 2nd channel, it takes quite a while for it to come up despite the 1st channel hits the threshold, is there any command that i can issue to monitor on the 2nd channel? thanks regards, jef Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70069t=70059 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CBWFQ and Bandwidth Percentage [7:69823]
Just one thing to clarify before telling my comments %75 percent is not valid for F/R ( in F/R you use mincir, if mincir NOT configured then you use CIR/2) I have tested this some time ago, however if I am not wrong it should be like this: In your question I am assuming that, this is not a F/R interface. To make this example clear let as assume we have 1Meg on the interface So, 750k will be used with CBWFQ. So %100 should be equal to 750k ... if you say band percent 50 thent this should be 750/2k I am too lazy to make a set-up now, however someone may have a fresh set-up Regards Devvv - Original Message - From: Mark Pruitte To: Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:08 PM Subject: CBWFQ and Bandwidth Percentage [7:69823] Here is a question to which I have not been able to find a definitive answer. Assume the following. In a default configuration, you are asked to configure DLSW for 50% of the interfaces bandwidth, IP traffic should receive 25% of the interface bandwidth, and all other traffic should use the remaining 25%. Given the fact that CBWFQ by default only uses 75% of the interface bandwidth unless you configure the max-reserved-bandwidth x%, if you put the following configuration onto the interface, what percentages of the interfaces's bandwidth are you actually allocating? policy-map shape class DLSW bandwidth percent 50 class IP bandwidth percent 25 If you do not issue the max-reserved-bandwidth command, have you only allocated 75% of the default 75% available to CBWFQ or have you actually met the requirements of the task? -- Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69832t=69823 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Encapsulation PPP not working on some Cisco routers [7:69862]
1- whatt kind of interface (sh diag ) 2- version? (sh ver) 3- config? (aaa used, authentication and authorizatio used?) 4-and what do you mean by sayin not working? (in wich phase of the PPP, LCP, authen, IPCP) (debug ppp neg, deb ppp authen, deb aaa authen, deb aaa author) If you only see LCP O , Timeout and resents this may be known ... Plase supply more information :) Regards De - Original Message - From: Marakalas To: Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:35 AM Subject: Encapsulation PPP not working on some Cisco routers [7:69855] Hi All Has anyone ever encountered a problem of configuring 2 x Cisco routers back-to-back with encapsulation PPP and it does not work? I'm experiencing this with 2 of my routers. Whenever I connect them to other routers with encapsulation HDLC, everything is fine, not with PPP. Any help will be appreciated. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69862t=69862 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
