RE: lost my certification wallet [7:33214]
Yes, On the cisco tracking system, email cisco and ask them to please re-send you certification pack. I had to do this as I never got my ID card the first time round. Phil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33223t=33214 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Eigrp summary address problem [7:30439]
Hi Raymond, I would anticipate that the routing information Router B is receiving is only IGRP routing info, due to the fact you made S1 not pass any EIGRP routing updates - whether they are static or dynamic with the PASSIVE-INTERFACE command. From the config, only IGRP is allowed to distribute routing info out of S1 on Router A. This is correctly advertising only the SUMMARY route for the network at it's class boundry, ie 172.16.0.0. Phil. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30445t=30439 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WIC Problem [7:30298]
Hi, I take it without the DSU, the WIC has been proved working ? Have to got the facility to by a x21 dte-dce to another device, ie router back to back. Or have you got the facility to put on a hardware/software loop on the DSU ? Phil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30363t=30298 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Decreasing telnet packet number [7:27919]
Hi, Can anybody remember how to decrease the amount of packets generated when using Telnet. ie fewer packets with more than 1 byte of data inside them. I can remember only been told this as a 'by-the-way' in a course, I can't find this info again anywhere. Any suggestions greatfully received, Phil. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27919t=27919 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Decreasing telnet packet number [7:27919]
Thanks, but that's not really what I'm after. There is a specific way of telling the router to wait for 'x' amounts of characters, then transmit them in one packet. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27924t=27919 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19673]
of mvn life. Israel's Sharon felt the US' pain and said the country was in mvn mourning with the US. mvn The theme is clear and already you know whom these leaders blame for the mvn attacks. The disdain for 'them' is so evident. The world is slowly dividing mvn itself, us against 'them.' Not against terrorists or acts of terror, in mvn general, but for a particular group of terrorists, a specific kind of mvn terrorism. Slavery and colonialism -- and their legacies, it seems, were not mvn attacks on freedom and democracy; political assassinations do not constitute mvn terrorism -- these barely warrant acknowledgement even, as the world has mvn recently seen. mvn Is it possible that it is this very attitude that so drives some to bring mvn the US down? The idea that one group of people is allowed to declare that mvn another does not count, that another group of people does not deserve to be mvn considered human? When will the US learn it has to co-exist with all the mvn peoples of the world, not just those who serve the US' interests? Hate mvn begets hate. Labeling people of this world as evil produces evil. The US and mvn others have experienced this many times, yet they continue in the same vein. mvn There's no mistaking that terrorism is a threat, as it always has been. mvn There is also no disputing that those responsible for such acts in any way, mvn shape or form must be held accountable. To be sure, prosecute those who are mvn responsible, but do not turn the process into a media circus, as was the mvn case with the execution of Timothy McVeigh convicted for the Oklahoma mvn bombing. Do not use the process to humiliate a people, as the US sought to mvn do when it prosecuted those who bombed the World Trade Center before. mvn Grandstanding, seeking to teach Osama bin Laden and his followers a lesson, mvn the US government did nothing more than reaffirm its role as an arrogant mvn world bully. mvn As calls for retaliation (against whom?) grow, as news analyses continue mvn into the early hours of the morning after, I doubt it matters -- all this mvn talk of US superiority and freedom. Imagine for a moment you are sitting in mvn those planes, facing certain death, or in an office in the Pentagon or the mvn World Trade Center, unaware just how close death is. Terrorism is about mvn people. Perhaps one day the world's leader will realize this. Nice rhetoric and I still don't get your point, but it's not sounding like the way I feel about this tradgedy - please keep this crap off this list. -- Best regards, Perrymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19673t=19673 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180]
Hello Jason, Sunday, September 09, 2001, 4:35:19 PM, you wrote: BJ Correction. BJ Had a friend just do the CCIE written and you cannot mark questions and go BJ back. -Original Message- From: EA Louie [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 7:50 am To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] Time should not be a factor for the CCIE Written exam either. The difference between the CCIE Written and the other exams is that you CAN mark questions and come back to them later on the CCIE Written. Keep that in mind as you take the exam - it becomes a great time-saver when you get stuck on a question. - Original Message - From: Tom Keough To: Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 9:10 AM Subject: Time factor taking the CCIE Written [7:19180] Please, anyone who has taken the written. I am scheduled to take it tomorrow and I feel pretty well prepared. My question is about the time factor. Did you feel a time crunch during the exam or is time not a factor? For me time was not a factor on the CCNP exams. TIA, Tom Tom Keough, CCNP MCSE _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com I took the witten about two months ago and WAS able to mark questions and return to answer them later. -- Best regards, Perrymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19207t=19180 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[4]: CCO Navigation [7:15913]
Hello Chuck, Monday, August 13, 2001, 8:49:34 PM, you wrote: CL -Original Message- CL From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of CL Perry CL Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 8:31 PM CL To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CL Subject: Re[2]: CCO Navigation [7:15913] CL CL configuration examples, of the CD for the lab exam? CL sure looked a lot like the ones that come in the router boxes to me! :- CL Chuck CL -- CL Best regards, CL Perrymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Good to know, I spoke with one of the recent test takers and he swears that the sample configs were not on the CD...maybe the pressure got to him cuz he didn't pass 8-) -- Best regards, Perrymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15979t=15913 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 3660 Router Config [7:16047]
Im not an expert just a cisco hack with a couple configs under my belt. I added another subnet to our network and set IP address to ethernet3/1 and a couple access list entries. The problem is I can ping across the subnets fine, and can access resources (those not needing domain authorization) by IP but not by name, so therefore it will also not see the domain or browse the network. The new subnet also has no problm acessing the intenet via the T1 on the router. Any ideas would be nice Configuration in attachment. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16047t=16047 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 3660 Router Config [7:16048]
Im not an expert just a cisco hack with a couple configs under my belt. I added another subnet to our network and set IP address to ethernet3/1 and a couple access list entries. The problem is I can ping across the subnets fine, and can access resources (those not needing domain authorization) by IP but not by name, so therefore it will also not see the domain or browse the network. The new subnet also has no problm acessing the intenet via the T1 on the router. Any ideas would be nice Configuration in attachment. [demime removed a uuencoded section named Document.rtf which was 120 lines] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16048t=16048 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 3660 Router Config [7:16048]
Yes, thought that was the problem too but all is right and since the router is the thing I know the least about I am assuming the problem lies in my coding of it. Tony Medeiros wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Got a WINS server configured on the host you are testing? You need that for browsing across subnets. Tony M. #6172 - Original Message - From: Charles Perry To: Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:45 AM Subject: Cisco 3660 Router Config [7:16048] Im not an expert just a cisco hack with a couple configs under my belt. I added another subnet to our network and set IP address to ethernet3/1 and a couple access list entries. The problem is I can ping across the subnets fine, and can access resources (those not needing domain authorization) by IP but not by name, so therefore it will also not see the domain or browse the network. The new subnet also has no problm acessing the intenet via the T1 on the router. Any ideas would be nice Configuration in attachment. [demime removed a uuencoded section named Document.rtf which was 120 lines] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16065t=16048 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MCSE in 2 Weeks or CCNA/CCDA in 6 days [7:16046]
Damn Spammers Wright, Jeremy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I can vouge for www.intenseschool.com I attended their CCNA/CCDA camp and also their CCNP camp. I came out of it with all of the certifications I wanted. Their program is cool because the class,training material, hotel, and dinner were taken care of as the total package (at least at the ones I attended). The CCNP camp will beat on you mentally but I figure that is the reason why I was there. They don't teach towards the test, but teach you to understand hands on, which will help you pass the test. Now I have a new job that pays well because of these certifications. Now I'm well on my way to getting my CCIE. No I'm not advertising for them but I had a great experience and I owe everyone ar www.intenseschool.com a lot. -Original Message- From: Ron Rubens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MCSE in 2 Weeks or CCNA/CCDA in 6 days ** Get your MCSE in 2 Weeks or CCNA / CCDA in 6 days for the lowest price ever. We are blowing out the last seats in our August and September classes. CALL NOW! (800) 330-1446 www.intenseschool.com ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16066t=16046 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: CCO Navigation [7:15913]
Hello EA, Monday, August 13, 2001, 3:18:52 PM, you wrote: EL ...but it doesn't work when you're in the CCIE Lab, so get used to EL navigating the CD EL -e- EL - Original Message - EL From: Daniel Cotts EL To: EL Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:53 PM EL Subject: RE: CCO Navigation [7:15913] An addition to the following. From the CCO Home Page - under Service Support go to Technical Support Help - Cisco TAC. From there go to Top Issues and scroll down. Every major area is covered. -Original Message- From: EA Louie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCO Navigation [7:15913] Sure. 1. start at http://www.cisco.com/univercd/home/home.htm 2. choose Cisco IOS Software - Release 12.0 (or whatever release you're interested in - I think the Tables of Contents are close to identical from 11.3 thru 12.2, but I leave this verification as an exercise to the reader) 3. Click on Configuration Guides and Command References 4. Review that page - it gives the rundown on how the IOS documentation is organized by MAJOR TOPIC and TECHNOLOGY 5. Systematically click on every Configuration Guide link. Behind it are two more sets of table of contents links with more specialized topics. Either commit them to memory or print them out, so that you at least know where the major topics are located. 6. When that exercise is complete, realize that the Command Reference exactly parallels the Configuration Guide The other way to navigate CCO is to use the Master Indexes. That's a little trickier, because it just dumps you into a topic page without any context. However, the way to work your way backwards from that is to click the CONTENTS button on the navigation bar, which will back you out into the context and governing topics. When searching, read the actual URL that the search engine gives you and it will indicate what IOS Release the information is pointing to. I usually scroll down until I find a URL hit that has my target Release in it, and then navigate the Configuration Guide or Command Reference from there. Those are some of the methods I use for navigating CCO. Does anyone else have some helpful navigation pointers to share with us? -e- - Original Message - From: Daniel Cotts To: 'EA Louie' ; Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:31 AM Subject: RE: Figuring out Config Register Values [7:15894] You are correct. Instead of posting a URL I've sometimes given directions page by page to show how I reached a given topic. Any thoughts on how to teach CCO navigation? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] EL _ EL Do You Yahoo!? EL Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Is it true that you are provided with a sanatized version i.e., no configuration examples, of the CD for the lab exam? -- Best regards, Perrymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15963t=15913 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: Cisco Books for sale! (Cheap)!!!!! [7:15117]
Hello Donald, Wednesday, August 08, 2001, 5:58:48 AM, you wrote: DBJj Lance those little bluey thingies are called links. DBJj You got to click on them with your mouse. DBJj - Original Message - DBJj From: Lance DBJj To: DBJj Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:23 PM DBJj Subject: Re: Cisco Books for sale! (Cheap)! [7:15117] Are you trying to tell me that the 750 Page second edition book that is DBJj for sale is the same as the 22 Page Pdf file that is on the Cisco site that DBJj you directed me to. www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/index.htm Uhh...I don't think so ;-) Lance JC wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello, I am selling the following books from my collection: 1) All-IN-ONE CCIE Study Guide (Second Edition) by Rosevelt Giles I'm selling this one for $40.00 plus shipping. 2) Firewalls 24 Seven by Sybex. I'm selling this one for $40.00 plus shipping. 3) Mastering Cisco Routers. I'm selling this one for $35.00 Plus shipping. 4) Internetworking Technologies Handbook (2nd edition) by Cisco DBJj Press. I'm selling this one for $25.00 plus shipping. I also have a Wave Technologies Windows 2000 box set which includes the following: 1) Windows 2000 Skills Update. 2) Windows 2000 Services. 3) Windows 2000 Active Directory. 4) Windows 2000 Distributed Management. 5) Cd containing simulation exercises and testing software. I'm selling this box set for $75.00 plus shipping. This price is super low. I have two other Microsoft Selections for those interested: A) Windows 2000 Server for Exam 70-215 by Sybex I'm selling this one for $35.00 plus shipping. B) NT 4.0 Box set which includes the following: 1) Networking Essentials 2) Supporting Windows NT Server in the Enterprise 3) Windows NT Network Administration. 4) Windows NT Technical Support. 5) 120 day evaluation copies of NT 4.0 server, and workstation. 6) Multimedia step by step configuration excercises and challenges. Im selling this box set for $75.00 plus shipping. If you are interested in any of these books please e-mail me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I complete all of my book sales through Paypal, and deliver the DBJj books out the first business day after payment. These books are in mint condition. Why pay more when you can buy used and get the same thing. Thanks, DBJj JC Sorry to jump in...I just wanted to say thanks for the laugh, I need it this week! -- Best regards, Perrymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15305t=15117 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HSRP for a switch [7:14164]
Yes it is possible here. Here is a sample configuration that I have running on a pair of Cat6509 with Sup2 MSFC2: Switch One -- interface Vlan340 ip address 10.120.4.3 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects standby 34 priority 99 preempt standby 34 ip 10.120.4.1 interface Vlan350 ip address 10.120.5.2 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects standby 35 preempt standby 35 ip 10.120.5.1 Switch Two -- interface Vlan340 ip address 10.120.4.2 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects standby 34 preempt standby 34 ip 10.120.4.1 interface Vlan350 ip address 10.120.5.3 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects standby 35 priority 99 preempt standby 35 ip 10.120.5.1 For layer two configuration, I have the gigabit ports on the sup connected as ISL trunks with backbone fast. Servers are dual niced into each chassis. Perry J. Lucas -Original Message- From: Michael L. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 8:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HSRP for a switch [7:14164] This is possible with 2 sups in the same chassis, however, if you have two separate chassis with their own Sups, then I don't think it's possible to have one act as a mirror for the other. You could configure the RSMs (MSFC's, whatever) with HSRP, but that wouldn't do what you said you wanted. Even with HSRP, the other interfaces on each RSM would need to be configured with their own IPs, etc, thus not satisfying your requirement to have a second switch with a copy of the primary's configuration. Unless you have the end devices connected to both switches, your screwed anyway if a sup dies (unless you have a redundant sup installed in which case you're not utilizing the other switch). I do not believe that what you're looking for is possible with to completely separate switches like that. Mike W. Jason Kinney wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I want to protect from a total failure in the switch such as sup, loss of power (if UPS and redundant PS is not present), etc. I am not trying to failover an interface (spanning tree) I want to have a second switch with a copy of the primary's configuration and take over automatically once the primary fails. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Ramsey Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 8:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HSRP for a switch [7:14164] Maybe I am confused If yo uwant redundant switches, you would implement spanning tree... This is at layer two...not three, where routing takes place. Now if you mean using it on say a cat 6509 with a routing module, then yes you can implement it. But it would still be at layer three and not two. You would not create redundant switches. Again, this is where spanning tree comes into play. -Patrick Spencer Plantier 07/30/01 10:39AM yes you can --- Jason Kinney wrote: Can you use HSRP to backup a switch as you would a router? Jason Kinney 925-961-0223 [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Spencer Plantier Internet Solutions Engineer Voice 919-949-9993 Cell 919-696-8848 __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14592t=14164 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Catalyst 6509 vs BlackDiamond [7:13837]
The big question is will Extreme and Foundry be around next year? Perry J. Lucas -Original Message- From: John Hardman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Catalyst 6509 vs BlackDiamond [7:13837] Hi It's true. It's also true that in similar tests with a Foundry will also out perform a Cat. But keep in mind that a lot of this works out to be FUD. Sales people from each company will have various reasons why you should choose their product over the other. The bottom line is that you have to choose which is right for your company based on it's business and technical needs. Both Extreme and Foundry are making a strong push into Cisco's enterprise switch market share. Their products are very competitive, especially at the price point. If I could get switches with Foundry's architecture, Extreme's network management software and CLI, and Cisco's end to end solutions, I would be a very happy engineer! $0.02 -- John Hardman CCNP MCSE mishaal wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... How true is this? Can anyone throw some light on this report from www.zdlabs.com, 70-80% packet loss is rather substantial..hope it's not true! thanks From ZDLAbs : In Layer 2 mode, the Black Diamond and Alpine switches forwarded 100% of the traffic offered during the test without dropping a single packet. This resulted in a throughput of 57.1 million packets/second for the Black Diamond and over 38 million packets/second for the Alpine using 64-byte packets. These results represent the maximum throughput possible, given the port configurations of the switches. The Cisco Catalyst 6509 lost over 78% of the packets offered during the Layer 2 full mesh test at the 64-byte packet size. According to the Catalyst 6509 documentation, the 6509 switch fabric is capable of forwarding 15 million packets/second. This rate is substantially less than the 57.1 million packets/second offered during our test, which explains the large packet loss. 'The Black Diamond and Alpine switches successfully routed 100% of the packets offered (over 5.7 billion 64-byte packets) during the test without dropping a single packet. This results in a Layer 3 throughput of over 95.2 million packets/second for the Black Diamond and over 47.6 million packets/second for the Alpine with 64-byte packets. The Layer 3 full mesh results for the Cisco Catalyst 6509 were very similar to the Layer 2 results. The switch dropped a large number of packets at all block sizes (86.86% with 64-byte packets). As in the previous tests with Catalyst 6509 we verified that the internal switch counters matched the results from the SmartFlow application and that there were no packet errors during the test. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13931t=13837 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Nokia Firewall vs PIX? [7:9371]
Having worked on both platforms, they each have their strength's and weaknesses. I tend to use Nokia Checkpoint firewalls when guarding office type environments to the internet and then use PIX firewalls for guarding production networks. Perry J. Lucas -Original Message- From: Keyboard_Cowboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 12:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Nokia Firewall vs PIX? [7:9371] Anyone have any have a Nokia firewall that they have played with and how does it rate against the PIX? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9663t=9371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Netcool [7:9152]
I have yet to personally work on a Netcool system and have only seen it at an ISP that a friend was working at. I understand it to be an excellent product, but I have also heard that it is very expensive. Perry J. Lucas -Original Message- From: CCB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 4:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Netcool [7:9152] Can anyone recommend some good links to documentation on and give some opinions on Netcool. Thank You Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9664t=9152 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: configuring Hyperterminal Private edition w/Wi [7:9590]
You may want to go the step further and get SecureCRT from vandyke, which allows SSH v1 and v2 connections. It's a $100, but worth the extra functionality if you want to use secure communications. Perry J. Lucas -Original Message- From: Jon Thomasberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 1:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: configuring Hyperterminal Private edition w/Wi [7:9590] Basically, Hyperterm for WinME and Win2000 are horible and rarely work properly. Get CRT. Here's the link to download it. ftp://ftp.vandyke.com/pub/CRT/ntcrt331.exe 30day shareware. 35 bucks to reg. Worth every penny IMHO. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9670t=9590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Differences between TACACS+ and Cisco ACS [7:2245]
I just tried to purchase Cisco ACS for Solaris and was told that it is no longer available on that platform. The only part number they had was for version 2.6 was for Windows NT/2000. We elected to go with a Cisco's freeware TACACS+... Sean Young wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Everyone, The company I am working for is considering purchasing Cisco ACS software. This piece of software will be running on Solaris platform. Currently, I am using TACACS+ (self-supported software with source code) on our environment running on both Solaris and linux platforms (Primary TACACS is on Solaris and backup is on Linux). We've modified the source code so that each user has his/her own privilige password so that we have a record of who is doing what on the network devices (accounting purpose). Everything is running smoothly and the company is happy with the result. In my opinion, learning CLI in Unix/linux is not an easy task to master. Because of this, I am solely responsible for the TACACS servers. Finding someone to train for this thing is NOT an easy thing (thanks to Microsoft mentality of POINT-and-CLICK attitude of new people coming into the IT field these days). I've tried to train several people for this task but it was unsuccessful. Because of this, the company is considering of migrating the TACACS server from Solaris/Linux over to Microsoft Windows platforms (YIKES) so that we can find additional support staffs. The software package that we consider is Cisco ACS. I have several questions regarding this package: 1) Is this software stable on a Windows platform? (Sorry I have to ask) 2) How long does it take to train a newbie to be efficient with Cisco ACS running on Winblows platform? 3) Does Cisco ACS support enable privilege for each individual user (i.e does each user have his/own enable password)? If anyone has done it before or have a similar experience, I would like to hear from you. Many thanks. Sean _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2415t=2245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Netarx (Cisco Premier Partner Job Openings in NY MI)... [7:333]
CCIE candidate, My name is Craig Perry and I am a Corporate Recruiter for Netarx Innovation Technology. We currently have a need for 2 CCIE's in either our NY and/or Michigan office. Please attach a WORD version of your resume which includes salary, US work authorization status, and if you prefer contract and/or permanent placement. WHO IS NETARX? NETARX is a total solution provider of information technology with Headquarters in Bingham Farms, Michigan and offices in Great Neck, NY. We have made a pledge to be the most competitive and responsive customer service company in the industry today and into the future. Our satisfied clients include financial firms, insurance firms, area manufacturers, retailers, media holdings and professional service firms as well as non-profits and government agencies. Our operations are divided into five strategic areas to service our clients optimally: 7 CORPORATE NETWORK INTEGRATION 7 TECHNICAL STAFFING 7 CUSTOM SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT 7 REMOTE NETWORK MONITORING 7 CABLE PLANT INFRASTRUCTURE Ameritech Authorized Distributor (AD), let Netarx provision your lines efficiently. Our strategic partners include: Cisco Systems - Citrix - Compaq - Hewlett Packard - IBM Ipswitch - Microsoft - Novell - Intel 3Com - WYSE - Ameritech Our Mission is Clear: As a technology partner committed to our clients, Netarx combines leading edge technology with solid business understanding to enable tangible growth through innovation. Here are several URLs to illustrate Netarx strategic partners recent honors: Long Island Business News (Feature Article) Cisco: Microsoft: Honors: Future 50 of Greater Detroit ComputerWorld 2001 - 100 Emerging Companies to watch Craig J. Perry 11 Grace Avenue, Suite 306 Great Neck, NY 11021 (516) 829-8700 (516) 829-8777 (Fax) [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netarx.com Michigan Office (Headquarters) 30910 Telegraph Road 13 Mile Road Bingham Farms, MI 48025 248-647-9800 Under Bill s.1618 Title III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress this mail cannot be considered Spam as long as we include contact information and a remove link for removal from our mailing list. To be removed from our mailing list, reply with remove in the subject heading and your email address in the body. Include complete address and domain to be removed. Pursuant to Federal law, if you do not wish to receive future email messages from us, please reply with "remove" and your e-mail address will be promptly removed. To ensure a quick response, please include all pertinent email addresses. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of Craig Perry.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=333t=333 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Premier... [7:245]
I would like to post a job for CCIE's.. How do I do that? Craig J. Perry 11 Grace Avenue, Suite 306 Great Neck, NY 11021 (516) 829-8700 (516) 829-8777 (Fax) [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netarx.com Michigan Office (Headquarters) 30910 Telegraph Road 13 Mile Road Bingham Farms, MI 48025 248-647-9800 Under Bill s.1618 Title III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress this mail cannot be considered Spam as long as we include contact information and a remove link for removal from our mailing list. To be removed from our mailing list, reply with remove in the subject heading and your email address in the body. Include complete address and domain to be removed. Pursuant to Federal law, if you do not wish to receive future email messages from us, please reply with "remove" and your e-mail address will be promptly removed. To ensure a quick response, please include all pertinent email addresses. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of Craig Perry.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=245t=245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disabling American Online Instant-messenger(AIM) and Yahoo IM
You can do the same thing that you do to block napster. Find the authentication server(s) IP range and block access to those IP addresses. If they can't authenticate, they can't communicate. - Original Message - From: "Nabil Fares" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Patrick Bass" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 3:01 PM Subject: RE: Disabling American Online Instant-messenger(AIM) and Yahoo IM Disabling these ports to prevent users from using these application isn't going to do you any good. Simply put, both apps use port 80 as the last option to access their servers. I'm not really sure you can stop these users!. Nabil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Bass Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 1:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Disabling American Online Instant-messenger(AIM) and Yahoo IM Find out the server IPs and use outbound deny at the pix. I did this to block napster and other bandwidth hogs. Frank Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Has anyone implemented port filtering to disable AOL instant messenger and Yahoo instant messenger? If you have, could you send me the ports they use on those? Could you also tell me what techniques you used, doing it at the firellwall(pix) or the router? Thanks for any input. -Frank _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT (sort of) TAC Horror Stories
Dre, The comments you make about this person's network are not fair in regards to why they are using 3548's. For all you know, it maybe just a small workgroup segment of 30 users that does not warrent the expense of a bare bones 600x/650x or a 4000 chassis. It might be taking a sledge hammer to swat a nat. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of dre Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 10:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT (sort of) TAC Horror Stories Bob Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just curious about other peoples experiences with TAC on products "gone bad"... 1) Get call while almost in bed at 9:30 PM 2) 3548XL GigE interface goes down... The problem here was that you are using 3548XL switches... if you were using a modular chassis with redundant everything (i.e. 6500 w/ dual PSs, SUPs, et al), you probably wouldn't be worried about your 3548XL. Not to mention that the MTBF numbers on the XL series suck in comparison to the 6000/6500. I was lucky as the first unit worked (though it's fan did not) and did not over heat (mainly due to it's location)... Had there been cooling problems I would have yanked a fan off one of the other units (though as the part was not a "service item" TAC did not support such creativeness).. Just curious as to what anyone elses TAC horror stories have been like? I've personally never experienced any problems with the TAC. It is often that I get a front line person that has no idea what I'm talking about, and sometimes they try to help anyways, but after I explain to them that I would like it escalated, they do it. Good team of people, IMHO. Best tech-support ever. It sounds like your problems were not even TAC related, more like shipping and receiving problems (UPS, anyone?). So be more careful when trying to pin the blame on a tech-support department, especially the Cisco Technical Assistence Center. They were doing their jobs just fine. -dre _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backplane Speeds
Anyone know the backplane speeds of 3600 series of routers? I can find the PPS stats but can't find anything on their backplane speeds (megabits per second) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISL to 2600 series router
Michael Everett wrote: In my lab at work I have 2 2924xl switches, 1 cat5509, and a Cisco 2600 router with a 10/100 ethernet port. The router will not enable me to enter an encapsulation command on the ethernet interface. Is ISL not an option on plan old 10/100 ethernet? Will it only work on a fast ethernet interface? Dumb question, what is the functional difference between an ethernet interface configured to run at 100m full duplex and a fast ethernet interface? If you wish to respond to me directly please send replies to, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Mike _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to upgrade your IOS to a 12.x version or Enterprise version -- Sedarin Perry Network Engineer NTRDimensional.net _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4000 catalyst, where isl
One useful command is: show port capabilities Tells what each port is capable of doing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Biel Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 8:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 4000 catalyst, where isl I have a 4006, but I have never found a way to do isl trunking as the option simply is not available. Below is the reply from the switch when trying to trunk on module 2 (WS-X4418) which is comprised of 18 gigabit ethernet ports C4006 (enable) set trunk 2/18 ? (mode)Trunk mode (on,off,desirable,auto, nonegotiate) (type) Trunk type (dot1q) (vlan) VLAN number Note the lack of an option other than dot1q at Trunk type. The reply is the same on the other modules (WS-X4013, WS-X4232-L3, WS-X4232-RJ-XX) If I'm missing something please let me know. John It does on it's Gigabit Ethernet Ports. Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oledrews.com/ccnp NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job -Original Message- From: Craig E. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 8:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 4000 catalyst, where isl why does the catalyst 4000 not support isl? Craig E. Smith Network Engineer _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tough Test - CSE
My company is preparing to become a Cisco Premier Partner and one of the requirements is to have people with the Cisco Sales Esstentials (CSE) certification. The test is taken online via the Certification.net's site, and is 50 questions multiple choice with a passing score of 76%. It sounds and looks extremely easy, but it is probably one of the toughest cisco tests I have taken. The first time I took it I got a 58% and just last night took it again to achieve a 78%. Here's a quick breakdown of some topics -IBM -Multiservice -Switching (Token Ring Ethernet) -Differences between similar products -Acronyms - Lots of Acronyms I'm going back to the easier CCNx CCDx tests now... Perry _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wireless Networking
Not really. The ServerIron and BigIron product lines are targeted for DotCom and Enterprise datacenters as well as the FastIron switches. That is how foundry made its debut into the market and is gaining market share. I imagine that is one of the reasons Cisco made the acquisition of Arrowpoint to begin competing on more equal ground with Foundry products. I agree with you on the fact that you get more bang for you buck with the Foundry switches and I have coordinated three deployments myself of their products, all of which were in the DotCom market space. I will concede their products are working their way down the vertical into the wiring closest and small to medium business markets BUT there are other considersations to hardware choices and deployment beyond just how well they perform. One that I find most important is the amount of available support for Cisco products than Foundry products. In any case, to get back on topic with the orginal message that started this thread. The company in question is also looking at implementing VoIP technology in the near future. (VoIP was discussed in an offline correspondance) Based on that and the first look glimpse that we were given, I personally believe Cisco would be a more appropriate vendor choice at this time. - Original Message - From: "Andy Walden" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Perry Lucas" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: "LaRoy Slaughter" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 8:30 AM Subject: RE: Wireless Networking Thats a silly comment. They compete directly and have very similar product lines. As a side note, I happen to prefer Foundry due to my past experiences and it does deliver better bang for the buck and features at wire speed (ie, that don't melt the router if you turn them on). Juniper does also. Cisco may figure it out one day, or just continue to hemorage market share. andy On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Perry Lucas wrote: I am a bit curious myself on that. Foundry is more oriented to webfarms and load balancing while extreme is oriented to Enterprise datacenters and MANs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of LaRoy Slaughter Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Wireless Networking Please explain your choice here. Quncy Lau wrote: If you don't need VLAN and VLAN routing. I suggest Catalyst 6509. If you need VLAN and VLAN routing, I suggest you not to use Cisco. Let's try Extreme or Foundry _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wireless Networking
I would not recommend wireless in your environment. While wireless is a nice gee wiz thing, it should be used to compliment the functionality of your network but not be your network. First, the current limitation is 11 megabit SHARED bandwidth. So you will get better performance by having Cat5e or Cat6 home runned to a switch. Without knowing what your business is, it sounds like you could get away with a stack of 2 to 3 3548 switches. BUT you could potentially also get a Catalyst 4000 series switch. However, if you have QOS, VoIP, IP/TV or other high end needs, a cat 6000 or 6500 series chasis maybe appropriate. - Original Message - From: "Denis A. Baldwin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 10:44 AM Subject: Wireless Networking I am going to have to rewire our whole network for centralization in the next couple of months and am looking at possibly making some or all of it wireless. We have an all NT network. We currently have approximately 60 nodes. We will probably be up to 80-100 nodes within 2 years. We were looking at using Cisco gear to replace our aging Kingston network. The whole LAN is less than 200 feet in length from end to end and will be meeting in the middle at around the 100 foot mark. Here are the questions: Would wireless technology be a possibility? Would it be cheaper in the long run to just rerun homeruns to a centralized switch and stay wired? What technology would we need to make this work? If we have to stay wired, what switch would you recommend? Does wireless really only go up to 11MB? Thanks for all your help. Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator - CAE, Inc. A+, MCP, i-Net+, Network+ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 810-231-9373, ext. 229 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wireless Networking
I am a bit curious myself on that. Foundry is more oriented to webfarms and load balancing while extreme is oriented to Enterprise datacenters and MANs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of LaRoy Slaughter Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Wireless Networking Please explain your choice here. Quncy Lau wrote: If you don't need VLAN and VLAN routing. I suggest Catalyst 6509. If you need VLAN and VLAN routing, I suggest you not to use Cisco. Let's try Extreme or Foundry _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with Access List
Here is the scenario... A 2600 series router is connecting multiple offices in the same location to the Internet. The offices are seperated via VLANs on a Cisco 3500 series switch with ISL Tunk links to the router which is running IP Plus. The IP Subnets are 10.0.1.0, 10.0.2.0, 10.0.3.0, etc with aClass Cmask. The router is also NATing the 10.0.x.0 address to a Public IP Pool. The clientwants to prevent any traffic from being routed between subnets. (i.e. 10.0.1.0 can not talk to 10.0.2.0 or 10.0.3.0 and vice versa.) What is the access list to prevent the subnets from routing to each other, as well as the correctaccess groupon the sub-interface (inbound or outbound)while not interrupting connectivity to the Internet or the IP Nat pool... Perry
RE: Static Routes
The other downfall of using static routes to load balance is that you are process switching the packets and not fast switching. Here's Cisco's definations on the two... Fast Switching Cisco feature whereby a route cache is used to expedite packet switching through a router Process switching Operation that provides full route evaluation and per-packet load balancing across parallel WAN links. Involves the transmission of entire frames to the router CPU, where they are repackaged for delivery to or from a WAN interface, with the router making a route selection for each packet. Process switching is the most resource-intensive switching operation that the CPU can perform. Here is a white paper on load balancing: Alternatives for High Bandwidth Connections Using Parallel T1/E1 Links http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ifaa/pa/much/tech/althb_wp.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of SAM Meng Wai Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 7:13 PM To: 'Phillip Heller'; Brian Cc: Hussam Adili; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Static Routes Yes. I agree with Philip static route will not support load uneven balancing but EIGRP will. Static route will send out the packet in rotating basis and ignore the BW define. Q 1. Up to 6 static routes can be supported by Cisco IOS. Rgds, Sam -Original Message- From: Phillip Heller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 1:47 AM To: Brian Cc: Hussam Adili; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Static Routes 2) how Can traffic be load shared between two redundant links on 1 to 3 ratio using static routing (i.e. 1 packet on one interface and 3 packets on the other.) I don't believe you can do this.not "balancing" like that. Do you have something against running EIGRP on those links? How about 2 secondary addresses on the interface that you wish to send 3/4 of the traffic over? ex: int s0 ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252 int s0 ip address 10.0.0.5 255.255.255.252 ip address 10.0.0.9 255.255.255.252 sec ip address 10.0.0.13 255.255.255.252 sec ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.2 ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.6 ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.10 ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.14 Don't know if this'll work; never tried it. Regards, --phil _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rép. : Cisco Switch 2948G-L3 Question
The Layer3 version is different from Cat OS. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Wigle Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 12:01 AM To: Cisco Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Rép. : Cisco Switch 2948G-L3 Question Ok, as I said I haven't had one of these puppies in my hands yet. But this is why I said what I did: Fully integrated into the Catalyst family of switches, the Catalyst 2948G uses the same Catalyst system software as the industry leading Catalyst 5000/5500 Series thereby ensuring complete interoperability with existing Catalyst switches. So, go figure.. Kevin Kevin, It's nothing like a 5K. I've been working with one of these guys and the IOS is just like a router. Well, not like, but identical to a 48 port 10/100 router. It's not like a switch at all. I haven't had enough time with it yet, but it seems VLANs are a foreign concept to it, except that you can trunk out a port by sub-interfacing and setting the encaps to ISL. (just like a router) You setup a VLAN with IRB and a BVI interface. I may be mistaken, I've only put a few hours in on the box. Rodgers Moore ""Kevin Wigle"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 021b01c0486c$f31b62e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:021b01c0486c$f31b62e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm a bit confused, perhaps I haven't played with this enough but I think you're getting too complicated. The 2948G-L3 switch uses the same IOS as the Cat 5000 family. Also, I'm not sure if you can set any port to be admin or rather you can telnet into any port and admin the switch, a subtle but large difference. In the Cat 5000, by default, the admin VLAN is VLAN 1. It was mentioned that port 48 is in another VLAN (VLAN2 ?). Without inter-VLAN routing, if the device you're pinging from is connected to VLAN1 - it won't get to VLAN2, which wouldn't matter anyways because if you could ping port 48 you would still have to associate VLAN2 as being the admin vlan. You do this by configuring the sc0 interface. You must set an ip address on sc0 and then you still must be plugged into a port assigned to VLAN1. Otherwise, you can change the default admin VLAN with: set interface sc0 [vlan] [ip_addr [netmask [broadcast]]] Therefore you can assign sc0 an address and put it into any vlan you wish. Then you could telnet to it from any port assigned to that vlan. (unless routing gets you there to) Not sure this helps, I don't have a 2948G-L3 to play with but if it has the same IOS as the Cat 5000 this should apply. Kevin Wigle CCDP/CCNP - Original Message - From: "Thierry MARTIN" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 04 November, 2000 12:44 Subject: Rép. : Cisco Switch 2948G-L3 Question hello, Cisco switch 2948-L3 are IOS and each VLAN must be considere as Virtual Bridge. For VLAN 1, each port must have command "bridge-group 1" and you do create a BVI with number 1. The ip address for this VLNA will be in the BVI interface. Is it a configuration BRIDGE IRB. Your config will be as : ! hostname R1 ! bridge irb ! interface bvi 1 ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface bvi 2 ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface ethernet 0/1 bridge-group 1 ! interface ethernet 0/2 bridge-group 1 ! interface ethernet 0/3 bridge-group 1 ! interface ethernet 0/4 bridge-group 2 ! interface ethernet 0/4 bridge-group 2 ! interface ethernet 0/5 bridge-group 2 ! .../.. ! interface ethernet 0/48 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! bridge 1 protocol ieee bridge 1 bridge ip# default no bridge 1 route ip bridge 3 protocol ieee bridge 1 bridge ip# default no bridge 1 route ip ! router rip network 10.0.0.0 network 172.16.0.0 network 192.168.1.0 no auto-summary .../... You must do command in oder, or reboot is a good idea fur running IRB. == Is a CCIE Lab sujet. Best Regard THIERRY * Manoj Ghorpade [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/11/00 02h01 Hi Group, I have a Cisco 2948G-L3 switch and want to setup the management on the switch.I tried doing things the documentation said but it won't work. The documentation says anyone of the ports (1-48 Fastetherenet) can be used for management or the 2 Gigabit ports 49-50 can be used for management. I have a VLAN of first 6 ports in Bridge 1(1-6)( which i don't want to touch) and rest all the ports in Bridge 2 (7-48). I assigned an IP address to port 48 and tried a ping but got no reply. Can anyone help me on this Best Regards Manoj Ghorpade _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
ISL Router and 3548 Switch Question
I have two 3548 switches gigastacked and a 2621 router running IP Plus connected to the Internet on one side and the switch on the other. I need to set up 5 different VLANs on the switches that do not / can not route between each other, but do need to see the 2621 to get out to the internet. I know I need to set up ISL trunking to the router but not sure how do it or set it up so that they can all get out to the Internet but not each other. All the vlans are dividing up the same Class C IP block. Perry _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wireless LANS
Slow? How many end-users (not servers or datacenters) really need more than 10 megabit of bandwidth? Unless you are an engineer or architect pushing around 100 meg Autocad files or an IT department deploying software packages and updates, the average desktop user, who is opening Word Documents, surfing the Internet, and viewing email do not really need anything more than 10 megabit for day-to-day needs. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't deploy anything under a 100 mbit today, with the exception of wireless, but do the _majority_ of end-users really need the bandwidth that they have available to them? Perry J. Lucas -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 3:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Wireless LANS 1. It's pretty slow ( 11 Mbps shared bandwidth) 2. Mobile wireless is fraught with issues. How do you get a new IP address when you move from subnet to subnet? (Of course, that's not too straightforward on wired either, come to think of it.) Priscilla _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wireless LANS - Aironet
Very true, but remember, but we're talking end users. How many of them are transmitting and receving all at the same time and what type of traffic? It's essentially just a wireless HUB and that you can easily fit 30-40 _end-users_ on. And remember one base station is good for 1500 ft. Once you move into a new base station, it's different bandwidth. BTW: For those of you who are cisco resellers, there is a special NFR (Not for Resale) for their Aironet solution in November. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Irwin Lazar Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 5:11 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Wireless LANS Something to note, the 11MB is shared by all users of the base station, they don't each get 11MB. Irwin Slow? How many end-users (not servers or datacenters) really need more than 10 megabit of bandwidth? Unless you are an engineer or architect pushing around 100 meg Autocad files or an IT department deploying software packages and updates, the average desktop user, who is opening Word Documents, surfing the Internet, and viewing email do not really need anything more than 10 megabit for day-to-day needs. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't deploy anything under a 100 mbit today, with the exception of wireless, but do the _majority_ of end-users really need the bandwidth that they have available to them? Perry J. Lucas -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 3:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Wireless LANS 1. It's pretty slow ( 11 Mbps shared bandwidth) 2. Mobile wireless is fraught with issues. How do you get a new IP address when you move from subnet to subnet? (Of course, that's not too straightforward on wired either, come to think of it.) Priscilla _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Check what's new on CCIE R/S Webpage, right now!
I don't know, I can see the need to take things off like Apollo, Vines, DECNet, etc. But ATM Lane? I would believe there are still a lot of ATM installations out there. I could be wrong though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Irwin Lazar Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 9:30 PM To: 'GEM'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Check what's new on CCIE R/S Webpage, right now! - ATM LANE Wow! _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Possible phony CCIE
It is Expert. Engineer is used in MCSE and the CNE certifications. In all reality the CCIE should be Engineer as the magnitude of difficulty compared to MCSE or CNE is enormous in comparision. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Borghese Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:22 PM To: Tim O'Brien; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cisco Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE I thought CCIE stood for Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert. I believe Engineer has legal ramifications. I am sure you can ask for his number then check with Cisco. There has to be some verification system. Paul Borghese - Original Message - From: "Tim O'Brien" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Cisco" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 7:59 AM Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE Just because a guy can config a router it does not make him a god. Lets face it guys, there is nobody out there that knows everything about everything, and if there is someone that thinks they do, I guarantee there is someone else out there that knows more than they do. Obviously if this guy is lying about his CCIE he should be exposed, and after reported it is up to Cisco to deal with as they see fit. .02 Tim - Original Message - From: "Sam LI" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Mark Cohen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 6:41 AM Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE Well, even some real one behave like this, i come across a few in the the past - Original Message - From: Mark Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 3:55 PM Subject: Possible phony CCIE Greetings- I recently worked on a project with a fellow who claimed to be a CCIE. He even gave me his card with the CCIE logo on it. At least I think it is the CCIE logo. It is a router symbol surrounded with laurels and has the words Cisco Certified Internetwork Engineer circling it as well. After asking this person a few questions, I became suspicious of his credentials due to his apparent lack of knowledge of the fundamentals. (I never asked for his CCIE number because I attempted verification only after I left the account). I faxed a copy of the business card he gave me (homemade BTW) to someone in the CCIE program at Cisco. She told me the card is bogus and that she would send the card to the Cisco lawyers. That was three months ago and this person is STILL working on site there. What do you people think I should do now? Send e-mail to the persons that are contracting him there? He is charging a very high bill rate. The people he is working don't have enough knowledge to confirm his credentials. Should I let this go? Isn't part of my cert agreement with Cisco to protect the logo? I feel that Cisco isn't doing anything to protect us here. Mark Cohen CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: blocking napster
Sam, Napster is able to be proxied through port 80 now with the latest revisions. Simply shutting down port 6699, can't be done anymore to block it. You have to block access to their servers. Last I checked, Raptor, Pix, Gauntlet or Checkpoint didn't block napster's IP addresses directly without customization. - Original Message - From: "Sam Adams" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 1:29 PM Subject: RE: blocking napster Funny that you guys are trying to block napster. Any good firewall takes care of napster in two seconds. I have a raptor sitting right here to prove it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Hardman Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 8:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: blocking napster Hi As Howard would say, "What is the problem you are trying to solve?" Since you are asking I will assume you are a network admin for a company and that you want to block Napster do to... 1) It taking up time your employees should be using to do their work and 2) It is eating up bandwidth that your company has to pay for. Solutions: 1) Management problem. There should be a policy in place limiting the personal use of company equipment and resources. Employees not following the policy should be disciplined or terminated. 2) Allow employees to run wide and spend lots of time monitoring and trying block activity that the company doesn't want. To block Napster... do a little digging with your favorite nslookup tool and block all access to their IP ranges. HTH -- John Hardman, MCSE+I, CCNA ArrisTech/CCS-IS SysAdmin ""Dave Santeramo"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Any suggestions on how to block users of Napster? Since it uses a random port number I am not sure how to do this. thanks ___ To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax, all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
