BGP load balancing questions [7:61095]
Hello groupstudy, I've been banging my head against the wall and figured I would defer this question to those of you more learned and experienced. Here is the the scenario: 2 routers running BGP Router 1 has a connection to ISP 1 and router 2 has a connection to ISP 2 Each receives full routes. Each provider has given us a class C address Only the class C from provider 1 is actively used, because provider 2 will probably be dropped eventually(ssshhh don't tell ARIN) The class C is advertised to both ISPs, however ISP 1 aggregates this address space so instead of being 1.1.1.x /24 it's 1.1.x.x /16 This was checked using various looking glasses. What that means is that traffic to my Class C will arrive primarily via ISP 2 because it will see the /24 I advertise though it. That is bad, for various reasons. Mainly because we are charged by usage from ISP2, but also because we are going to upgrade ISP1 to a fractional t3 and use ISP 2 primarily as a backup eventually. Also the traffic coming in is 90% via ISP 2 and 10% via ISP 1. If I remember from my studying so long ago, even prepending my AS number to ISP 2 will not work, becuase it doesn't even make it to that criteria, but rather see the /24 and chooses that route. I searched some newsgroups, but amazingly enough nobody seemed to have this issue. I saw someone who had a larger block than /24 and some suggestions there but that would not work in this case. Options not available: Using the Class C from Carrier 2 to load balance using IP space and traffic types Getting a class C independant of a provider from ARIN. (That costs money :)) Robert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61095t=61095 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN/Access List Problem - Need to allows IPSEC tunnels to [7:59476]
Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59476t=59476 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco routers and MRTG [7:56794]
MRTG reports in bytes not bits 1250 * 8 = 1 12500 * 8 = 10 I've found MRTG to be extremely accurate. We've just started using Solarwinds in addition to MRTG. It looks a lot nicer and is easier to use and isn't really all that expensive. Robert -Original Message- From: Firesox [mailto:sando2;attbi.com] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 5:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco routers and MRTG [7:56794] Folks, I am using MRTG to pull cisco Router's snmp mibs. On ehternet interface the graph shows the max speed of 1250.0K which is only 1.25 meg and on Fastthernet is shows as 12.5 megs. I am wondering why they don't show 10 meg and 100 megs respectively and starting to suspect how accurate MRTG is. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56822t=56794 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP subnet Tool - Slightly off topic [7:52999]
Good morning, I've been using an excel spreadsheet to track about 100+ sites on our network as far as subnetting etc. But we are going to be moving to a standardized subnetting scheme and I was wondering if anyone had an access database tool or other program that they would recommend for ip subnet tracking so you don't use duplicates ranges when adding a site etc. Does anyone know of a tool that will handle this? Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52999t=52999 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: GRE [7:52997]
Try the link below... It has more information than you'll need but should be helpful. There are just a few basic commands needed to set it up. I just finished implementing GRE (along with IPSec etc) so if you have any questions I'd be glad to answer them. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/ipsec_gre.shtml (EIGRP + GRE + IPSEC) -Original Message- From: Casey, Paul (6822) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 11:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: GRE [7:52997] I have also been looking for a guide to gre tunneling, though on CCO everything seems to be with ipsec or tunneling desktop protocols. I am just looking to tunnel ip, and looking for a basic guide to start with.. Anyone know where to pick up this information.. Any help appreciated Kind regards Paul. -- Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld This E-mail is from O2. The E-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may also be privileged and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any unauthorised direct or indirect dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received the E-mail in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] or telephone ++ 353 1 6095000. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53000t=52997 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build your own PIX [7:52364]
I was just reading slashdot.org and saw this article. For those who are studying it might be a valuable tool. http://www.wiretapped.net/routermonkey/ R_ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52364t=52364 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can anyone break this Cisco 4912G password? [7:40505]
Boson has some free utilities that include a password breaker. IT won't work if you have the high level encryption enabled. Someone posted some equipment for sale once on e-bay. They gave a limited logon, and did a show config. I cracked the password utility with the boson cracker and when it prompted for a password for higher level stuff I entered it and it worked. I didn't do anything to the machine of course, and I did let the seller know. But most people are aware of it. Also another common password I found is the company name. Robert -Original Message- From: Tom Monte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Can anyone break this Cisco 4912G password? [7:40505] It is possible to break a Cisco IOS password. I had a piece of software on my Palm Pilot that does it, but I left it home. :( I know there are alot of others and there was a website that did it at one point. Cisco password encryption isn't that strong. I would try password, cisco and the name of your company before you go any further. If you know something about the person who set it up, you could try things related to them. People tend to pick there children or a favorite sport as a password or simply ask him or her if they are available. I will look around and see if I can find something to break them for you. -Original Message- From: Orlosky, Glenn M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 2:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can anyone break this Cisco 4912G password? [7:40505] I have forgotten the enable level password on this Cisco 4912G Catalyst OS switch. I don't want to go through the Password Recovery Procedure on this production switch. Can you help? Thanks Glenn set password $1$0o8Z$yoRgp68KqY9Qi1Hi9mu8s0 set enablepass $1$FMFQ$HfZR5DUszVHIRhrz4h6V70 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the message and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and contact the sender by return e-mail. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40579t=40505 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Book on IPv6 [7:40515]
I could be wrong since I don't have it in front of me, but I think Jeff Doyle's 2nd book as a section devoted to it, otherwise you could check out the RFC. -Original Message- From: Hamid Ali Asgari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 3:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Book on IPv6 [7:40515] Hi, I am looking for a book on IPv6. Any suggestions? Thanks Hamid __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40518t=40515 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: please help **location migration** [7:40162]
I'm not sure if this will help but here goes: I used to work for a dotcom and we had to move our Datacenter from SiteA to SiteB with 2 different address blocks. The problem you might say is if you move the website what happens? Well we made a duplicate copy of the website (minus the database) at site B and then used IIS forwarding to point to the new site and put the Database under maintenance until we got it transferred to Site B. Then we changed our DNS entries for the website and left the IIS forwarding on for a few days. I now this doesn't actually answer your question but it could solve your problem. -Original Message- From: Kevin Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 5:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: please help **location migration** [7:40162] I work for a collocation and bandwidth provider and need help with an issue for a migration. We need to move about 30 servers from a offsite location to our data center. The move of the servers needs to be done over the period of a month. We need to do this without changing the ip addresses of the servers. so either through an internet connection or wan link (both possible) we need to share the ip block. It cannot be subnetted and must remain a single ip block. We have ruled out the use of bridge groups across a T1 circuit and would like a better option than using a VPN. If you have any ideas please help. thanks for the help and all the useful post. I have been in this group for about 6 months and have made very few posts but have benefited immensely from users in this group. I thank you for that. Kevin Campbell MCSE, MCT, CCNP [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40174t=40162 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
Yes this has been made clear to me by 5 different people including Galina herself. However there was a typo at the bottom of the page listing her with the incorrect CCIE # that is now fixed. -Original Message- From: Nguyen, Cuong Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is CCIE # 3176 and currently is active. C.Q.Nguyen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Fowler Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 3:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] I noticed a Galina Pildush was listed as CCIE # 5858, but using Cisco's on-line verification tool it shows a David Wolsefer as being CCIE # 5858. Does Cisco has a certification path for people with split personalities? :) -Original Message- From: David Wolsefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40191t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: test prep 607 CCNA HELP [7:40228]
For a more detailed answer on this I would recommend reading the article at TCPMAG.com . It has a great article from someone who has taken all 3 the 407, 507 and 607. Basically he says the material is the same just the way it's presented is different although he is careful not to break the NDA. Robert -Original Message- From: Jimmy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 3:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test prep 607 CCNA HELP [7:40228] I'm studying for the CCNA test. but should i wait to pick up the Sybex 607 book, or will the 507 book suffice? You guys mention Todd's book. You guys are reffering to the Sybex book right? Also, is the test the same as the 507 but with simulators or did they scrap the entire question list and start a new one? Please help me out... thanks, Jimmy. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40231t=40228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any RFCs published today? [7:40040]
No but a previous RFC was used in this article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1892000/1892085.stm Watch the wrap -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Any RFCs published today? [7:40040] Today is a special day for new RFCs. Does anyone know if one or more were published today? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40051t=40040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
Actually, the site provides much more than that. I subscribed over a month ago and it is full of information that is compiled so that it is easy to read etc. I have the PowerPoint slides also, but I've found the diagrams, tests etc are much more valuable and make things easier to learn. I think it's worth every dollar my employer spent. :) Robert -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Figure out the font then? It is probably Wingdings, ha ha. I could figure this out, but I don't put much stock in this site. People really pay money for white papers? The jokes on the people that send money to that site to subscribe! I have a bunch of MPLS stuff from Cisco like Documents, Powerpoint slides etc. Maybe they encrypted it in DES? Ha ha. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] This isn't in Russian, it's a transliteration of English using Cyrillic characters. April Fool. Someone's cute idea - bet the English character version is going to cost. Fred. Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Get the award winning ISP, ATT WorldNet Service http://download.att.net/webtag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40081t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
I noticed a Galina Pildush was listed as CCIE # 5858, but using Cisco's on-line verification tool it shows a David Wolsefer as being CCIE # 5858. Does Cisco has a certification path for people with split personalities? :) -Original Message- From: David Wolsefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40094t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
I wish I got paid for doing work for them. However even if I had the knowledge to write one of the papers they don't have, I would probably lack the technical writing skills. However if they want to start paying me I'd probably be a less obvious in my praise. I would agree that anything on their site is obtainable for free from anywhere else. However reading the papers I find that they written in an easy to understand form, so you spend less time having to reread information and can spend more time thinking about it. Granted I don't think it's perfect, I'd like a better structure on the site, I think it's an excellent tool for someone who isn't pursuing their Masters degree but instead one of the Cisco Certifications. :) (that'd be me) Robert Fowler Unpaid, Unofficial site endorser of certificationzone.com who is merely stating his long winded opinion in pursuit of his 3rd major certification. :) -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 4:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] I don't know, last time someone made a pitch like that. I found out they got paid for doing work for the site. My employer gives me 3500 a year for educational stuff, and that money is going for a Masters degree. All I need is an internet terminal and some free time to get those things you mentioned :-) Anyway, to each his own -Original Message- From: Robert Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 3:00 PM To: Brian Zeitz; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Actually, the site provides much more than that. I subscribed over a month ago and it is full of information that is compiled so that it is easy to read etc. I have the PowerPoint slides also, but I've found the diagrams, tests etc are much more valuable and make things easier to learn. I think it's worth every dollar my employer spent. :) Robert -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Figure out the font then? It is probably Wingdings, ha ha. I could figure this out, but I don't put much stock in this site. People really pay money for white papers? The jokes on the people that send money to that site to subscribe! I have a bunch of MPLS stuff from Cisco like Documents, Powerpoint slides etc. Maybe they encrypted it in DES? Ha ha. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] This isn't in Russian, it's a transliteration of English using Cyrillic characters. April Fool. Someone's cute idea - bet the English character version is going to cost. Fred. Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Wolsefer Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will only be available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for those studying for the CS exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS well. Regards, David Wolsefer Get the award winning ISP, ATT WorldNet Service http://download.att.net/webtag i=40070t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40102t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: compress command unavailable on FR or hdlc intf??.....Why? [7:38770]
Page 314 Remote Access Book. - For HDLC links, STAC is the only available choice. Page 316 - For FRame RElay deployments, use the frame-relay payload-compress command to enable STAC compression on an interface or a subinterface. The reason that you can only use payload compression on a framer-relay interface is becuase the header information needs to remain intact so it can be read by the switches that the transmission crosses. Robert -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: compress command unavailable on FR or hdlc intf??.Why? [7:38746] Hello,Can't seem to get the compress command to work on Fr intfsAlso on hdlc inft. only the stac compression shows up Any reason as to why?? Ex. On a FR inft.RTD(config)#int s0/0 RTD(config-if)#compress ? % Unrecognized command On a PPP intf.OKRTB(config-if)#compress ? mppc MPPC compression type predictor predictor compression type stac stac compression algorithm On a HDLC intf.RTC(config)#int s 0 RTC(config-if)#compress ? stac stac compression algorithm Thank you for your help. Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38770t=38770 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP exams [7:38097]
Brian, It's a 3 year timer, not a two year timer for recertification. I got the certification to compliment my experience, not to say that I know what I'm doing because I have the CCNP certification. Those people that get it and are entry level will be weeded out by hiring managers. Those that have experience AND the certification can stand on their own from a hiring managers standpoint. Even the certification and experience do not make that person an expert. The CCNP exams CAN be passed by less than par individuals. That said, that is why there is a high-level certification. The CCIE, which when combined with real experience (pretty much required to pass), proves you are the cream of the crop. CCNA shows you want more and have started to learn the basics of routing. CCNP shows you have at least a basic knowledge of how things work. I don't think it shows that you can implement it. You need to have the experience to back up the certification to show you can implement it. The CCIE can pretty much be taken at face value, because almost anyone who has the certification has the experience anyway, but in order to pass the lab you have to prove something more. All the other certs simply pull you apart from other candidates if you have a reasonable amount of real-world experience. Robert -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP exams [7:38097] My comment is with the CCNP exams. When I started it was the 500 series, which was not long ago, now its changing to the 600 series. For some people it takes a while to pass a CCNP exam, so I have not had enough time to get a lot done in the 500 series, let alone switch to 600. I know the 600 is not out yet, but still. Also here is a question, why would someone want to take the last exam in the CCNP series, because when you take the last exam, your 2 year timer starts ticking. Where is the motivation there? I think I am just going to work on the course SNIPPED Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38102t=38097 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed Final Exam for CCNP ( Support ) [7:38018]
Hello, I figured I'd let everyone know I've passed my final exam for my CCNP. Below are answers to FAQ. Please note they are my personal opinions, not general consensus. 1. What order did you take the tests? CCNA (07/00) Switching (11/00) Routing (04/01) Remote Access (10/01) Support (03/02) 2. Why so long between the tests, did you fail any? I've never failed an exam in my life. I've taken 13 so far. I study for each one and make sure I'm prepared. Unfortunately due to work, other obligations and procrastination I didn't pass them sooner. It does make things more difficult in some ways, but since I work with Cisco equipment daily, it helps me keep fresh. 3. Which exams were the hardest? They are listed easiest to hardest. CCNA Switching Remote Access Support Routing Support was more difficult than it had to be, since I waited so long between tests and it has content based on knowing those other areas. 4. What books and study methods did you use? CCNA - Sybex Switching - CiscoPress Routing - CiscoPress Remote Access - CiscoPress and ExamCram Support - Sybex Everything was self-study and on the job experience. I also use brainbuzz.com for a final review before taking the test to make sure I didn't miss anything, overall I wasn't too impressed with their content though. Reading about how other people passed did help to give me confidence. Each person will find a different study method that works for them. I've never taken a training class for any of my certifications. 5. How many years of experience do you have? 8 Years of IT experience as follows: 3 Years, Routing and Switching firewalls etc 3 Years, Servers RAS etc 2 Years, Desktop Support, Computer builds, Retail computer sales 6. What's next? Tough decision, I need to upgrade my MCSE (UGGG) since I still have to use those skills. However I think the CCIE is of much more benefit to me. I have to make sure I'm committed and really study for the CCIE. My work is going to have training for the W2K stuff for our entire group so I've got to learn it one way or the other. I'm going to try and get some training such as a CCIE bootcamp. If anyone knows of a good bootcamp let me know. I'm leaning toward pursuing my CCIE, but it'll be a tough road. I don't believe in quitting, so if I start down that road I know I won't quit, but the high probability of Lab failure frightens me. I hate to fail anything. 7. Did you get a raise etc? Nope, as a matter of fact no one in our department is getting a raise at all this year. I guess some of us are just happy to have a job. We were told we should get year-end bonuses this year, something we didn't get last year. 8. Who paid for the training etc? The last few tests my employer has paid for, but the books I've paid for simply so that they belong to me and I can keep them for reference. I hope that helps anyone out there studying. Keep at it. The tests themselves weren't as hard as I would have hoped. Passing on them is about 700 on a scale of 300 to 1000. That's pretty low, but at the same time the quality of the questions was inferior to other exams. If you have a good reading comprehension level you can probably gain 100 points off just that. Maybe that's a skill they are looking for in certified people though. Robert Fowler - And here they are. A+ MCSE CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38018t=38018 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: aux port issue [7:33466]
These entries work great for me using a US Robotics 56K. modemcap entry usrmodem:MSC=FS0=1C1D3H1R2B1 password 7 whatever you want it to be autoselect during-login autoselect ppp login modem InOut modem autoconfigure type usrmodem transport input all speed 115200 flowcontrol hardware Robert -Original Message- From: Vincent Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: aux port issue [7:33466] I am trying to guide a customer through an aux port setup. so far, we have the following in the router: line aux 0 password cisco login modem InOut transport input all speed 115200 flowcontrol hardware HOwever,when anyone calls the dial to number, the modem answers, but nothing appears on the screen except a blinking cursor. The terminal session shows a status of connected. I believe the attached modem is a USR 56k v.34 capable. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33471t=33466 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message from Yoda - OT [7:32003]
I sense much 11.0 in you... 11.0 leads to crashes... crashes leads to downtime... Downtime leads to suffering... 11.0 is the path to the darkside... Powerful 12.6 is... Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32003t=32003 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: GroupStudy we have a problem.... [7:28901]
How about setting up a paypal account with a link off the website that people can donate to? Can you receive funds from there currently and I'll toss a few $$ your way. Robert -Original Message- From: Paul Borghese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: GroupStudy we have a problem [7:28901] Hey gang, Servers database became corrupt thus preventing messages from being sent out. It has been fixed so if you do not see your posting, please resend. I have shipped more memory to InFlow. Lon has agreed to install it for us. This should help. So by the way, the server will be down for a little while tomorrow :-) The truth is we desperately need some better equipment. Currently we are using a server I built for $500 dollars two years ago. I purchased a used Dell Server but need to upgrade the RAID array and a few other things before putting it online. Take care, Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28919t=28901 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passed switching [7:20868]
I heard that if you read a Coca-cola can backwards it has all the answers to the foundation exam! :) -Original Message- From: TP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Passed switching [7:20868] you are not allowed to take anything in the exam room and this should go for all exams! It is not correct...I was allowed to take coca-cola in the exam room :) Ciao, Teresa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21128t=20868 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aux port - Dialer setup question [7:21088]
While studying for my BCRAN test, I decided to test some of what I learned however I think I may have hit a bump. I think the problem is you can't put an aux port into a dialer pool because it doesn't have a physical interface. However for the purpose of this exercise I let you in on what I have attempted. I have 2 routers, I have a modem connected to each aux port. The 2 routers have a link between them, if that link goes down I want 1 router to call the 2nd and establish a connection using the aux ports. Do I have to have an asynch port in order to accomplish this? Thank You, Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21088t=21088 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Aux port - Dialer setup question [7:21088] -Updated ! [7:21089]
Ok I guess this is why I'm always asked did you check the CCO? and here is the link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/mod-aux-dialout.html it shows that the interface would be async etc and even has an example. Robert -Original Message- From: Robert Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Aux port - Dialer setup question [7:21088] While studying for my BCRAN test, I decided to test some of what I learned however I think I may have hit a bump. I think the problem is you can't put an aux port into a dialer pool because it doesn't have a physical interface. However for the purpose of this exercise I let you in on what I have attempted. I have 2 routers, I have a modem connected to each aux port. The 2 routers have a link between them, if that link goes down I want 1 router to call the 2nd and establish a connection using the aux ports. Do I have to have an asynch port in order to accomplish this? Thank You, Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21089t=21089 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Legacy DDR won't keep quiet [7:20854]
I'm taking a stab in the dark, but I think CDP sends traffic about every 90 seconds... Do a SHOW CDP Interface and see how often it is sending packets. If that is the case turn CDP off. If nothing else activate the improbability drive. Robert -Original Message- From: Sean Wolfe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 7:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Legacy DDR won't keep quiet [7:20854] Howdy there folks, question for you. Studying for the BCRAN, I have a lab with two 1602R's with BRI modules. I am simulating a FR connection with BRI configured for backup in legacy dialer-string mode. The backup works fine; ie. I pull the FR cable and the backup comes up, I send interesting traffic and the BRI dials and routes the packet. Problem is, even when there is no interesting traffic (even when I put an access list on it with 'deny any') the BRI still dials periodically. As far as I can tell it's about 90 seconds between. At first I thought it was RIP. But I disabled RIP and it's still doing it! Here's the config on the spoke router (note Hitchhiker's Guide reference =) : --- Marvin#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname Marvin ! ! username marvin password 0 linka ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ip host zaphod 172.30.1.1 isdn switch-type basic-ni ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Serial0 backup interface BRI0 ip address 172.30.1.2 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast service-module 56k clock source line service-module 56k network-type dds ! interface BRI0 ip unnumbered Ethernet0 no ip directed-broadcast dialer idle-timeout 15 dialer string 6024384633 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 6024384404 isdn spid2 6024384544 ! ip classless ip route 172.20.2.0 255.255.255.0 BRI0 121 ! access-list 1 deny any dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 1 ! line con 0 password cisco login transport input none line vty 0 4 no login ! end Marvin# - Why would this thing dial for no reason??? Let me know your thoughts. BTW congrats to the recent CCIE Written folks (there were a couple recently, no?) Thx, -Sean. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20885t=20854 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DCE to DTE Back to Back Cable Part number [7:20690]
After searching my Cisco Part list, my products reference guide and the cco, I cannot find the part number for a DCE to DTE back to back cable, I am needing one for my lab at work, but we have to have the Cisco part number to order. Any help would be appreciated! Thank You, Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20690t=20690 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Access -list problem, my solution [7:12760]
I've been up 3 hours working on this and my brain is fried. Right before that last synapses died I think I came up with the answer. Here is my worksheet. Let me know what you think. deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 for 172.22.30.x permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255 for 172.22.31.x and below deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 for 172.22.x.x and below permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 deny ip 172.22.30.0 3 lines or less -- deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 denies 172.22.30.x access to 18.27 permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255 allows 172.22.31.x and below to access 18.x deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 denies 172.22.32.x and above from accessing 18.64 - 18.127 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 permits everything else. deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 denies 172.22.30.x access to 18.27 deny ip 172.22.32.0 0.0.224.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 denies 172.22.32.x and above from accessing 18.64 - 18.127 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 permits everything else. Thank You, Robert Fowler Network Administrator Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12760t=12760 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Access List problem. [7:12525]
Someone sent me this and I just can't figure it out. I've been staring at it and trying things since last week. Any ideas? Jeff Doyle says this access-list can be rewritten with 3 lines and still provide the same functionality. Let me know if you guys figure out: access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.6 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.95 0.0.0.0 10.11.12.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 Have fun... Thank You, Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12525t=12525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT - Tuesday funnies [7:11794]
labelled #[other number] Bell: Please describe for me why you think it is down. Avi: Because it is dead. it is down. it is not functioning Bell: No, no, it's uh, it's resting Avi: Look matey, I know a dead T1 when I see it, and I'm looking at one right now. Bell: No no it's not dead, it's, it's restin'! Remarkable line, the T1, idn'it, ay? Beautiful bits! Avi: The bits don't enter into it. It's stone dead. Bell: Nonononono, no, no. It's resting. Avi: All right then, if it's resting, I'll wake it up.[Yells into wall socket] ELLO, MISTER TELLY T1! Bell: See- it's working! Avi: No it isn't- that was you. Bell: I never! Avi: Yes, you did! Bell: I never did anything. Avi: [Pulls wire out of socket and beats it against the side of the server.] 'Ello Mister T1 TESTING TESTING TESTING! This is your 9 o'clock cron job download! [Watches bits physically falling on floor] Now that's what I call a dead T1! Bell: No, no, you stunned it. Avi: STUNNED!? Bell: Yeah- you stunned it just as it was starting to accept packets. T1s stun easily, major. Avi: Um, now look mate. I've had enough of this. This T1 is definitely deceased, and when we hooked it up not more than a day ago, you assured me that its total inability to transmit was due to it being tired and shagged out after trying to pull across all of alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.really.really.nasty last night. Bell: Well, it's , ah, it's just pining for the ARPANET. Avi: PINING FOR THE ARPANET?!? What kind of talk is that? Look, why did it drop every packet as soon as we plugged it into this Sparc? Bell: The T1 prefers to drop packets from a Sparc. Remarkable line, isn't it. Lovely bits. Avi: Look, I took the liberty of dissassembling the smartjack last night, and found that the only reason that it looked like it was working it because you'd wired the lights to a battery. Bell: Well, of course. If we hadn't, it might have burned the whole smartjack out-VOOM VOOM! Avi: VOOM? Mate, this line wouldn't voom if you put four million volts through it. It's bleeding demised! Bell: No, no, it's pining. Avi: It's not pining, it's passed on! This line is not working! It has ceased to transmit! Bereft of data, it lies in peace. If you hadn't wired the lights it would have been recycled. It carries 0MB/sec! It's no longer functional- it's shuffled off the backbone and gone to meet its maker. THIS IS AN EX-T1! Bell: Well, we better fix it then. 'Fraid we're all out of working T1s. Avi: I see, I see. I get the picture Bell: I've got an AOL disk and a 2400 baud modem. Avi: Pray, does it work? Bell: Nnnnot really... Thank You, Robert Fowler Network Administrator MasTec, Inc. Office: 305.406.3150 Fax: 305.599.7085 Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MasTec Building the e-World Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this transmittal, including any attachment, is privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this transmittal from any computer or other data bank. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11794t=11794 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4MB Flash [7:8536]
I have several 4MB flash memory cards taken out of 2650's. Any idea what they could be used for? Robert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8536t=8536 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FastEthernet Adapter for 7206 - How do I enable? [7:6411]
Hello, I've been beating my head on the side of this router. I've searched the CCO on how to enable the PA-2FE adapter, and found some information on microcode. Then I found out the IOS I've upgraded to (12.1.(3)) already has a current version built in. I don't recall learning anything about Microcode in any of my studying. How does it differ from the IOS? Anyway, the adapter card will not enable, and when I do a show diag 1 I get this:(see below) show that it is powered off. I've searched everywhere to find the command to power it on. Any suggestions? Slot 1: Unknown (type 548) Port adapter Port adapter is disabled deactivated powered off Port adapter insertion time unknown EEPROM contents at hardware discovery: Hardware Revision: 1.0 PCB Serial Number: MIC0516000Y Part Number : 73-5419-06 Board Revision : A0 RMA Test History : 00 RMA Number : 0-0-0-0 RMA History : 00 Deviation Number : 0-0 Model: PA-2FE-TX Part Number : 800-08350-06 EEPROM format version 4 EEPROM contents (hex): 0x00: 04 FF 40 02 24 41 01 00 C1 8B 4D 49 43 30 35 31 0x10: 36 30 30 30 59 82 49 15 2B 06 42 41 30 03 00 81 0x20: 00 00 00 00 04 00 80 00 00 00 00 CB 94 50 41 2D 0x30: 32 46 45 2D 54 58 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 0x40: 20 C0 46 03 20 00 20 9E 06 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 0x50: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 0x60: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 0x70: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF Thank You, Robert Fowler Network Administrator MasTec, Inc. Office: 305.406.3150 Fax: 305.599.7085 Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MasTec Building the e-World Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this transmittal, including any attachment, is privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this transmittal from any computer or other data bank. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6411t=6411 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FastEthernet Adapter for 7206 - How do I enable? [7:6411]
Hmm I didn't find that on the HW-SW matrix. As a matter a fact I couldn't find PA-2FE-TX, only PA-2FEISL-TX and PA-FE-FX, both of which supported 12.1(3). Robert -Original Message- From: David C Prall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FastEthernet Adapter for 7206 - How do I enable? [7:6411] Checkout the HW-SW Compatibility Table http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/Support/HWSWmatrix/hwswmatrix.cgi The PA-2FE-TX requires a minimum of 12.1(6) for Mainline. David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com - Original Message - From: Robert Fowler To: Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 8:36 AM Subject: FastEthernet Adapter for 7206 - How do I enable? [7:6411] Hello, I've been beating my head on the side of this router. I've searched the CCO on how to enable the PA-2FE adapter, and found some information on microcode. Then I found out the IOS I've upgraded to (12.1.(3)) already has a current version built in. I don't recall learning anything about Microcode in any of my studying. How does it differ from the IOS? Anyway, the adapter card will not enable, and when I do a show diag 1 I get this:(see below) show that it is powered off. I've searched everywhere to find the command to power it on. Any suggestions? Slot 1: Unknown (type 548) Port adapter Port adapter is disabled deactivated powered off Port adapter insertion time unknown EEPROM contents at hardware discovery: Hardware Revision: 1.0 PCB Serial Number: MIC0516000Y Part Number : 73-5419-06 Board Revision : A0 RMA Test History : 00 RMA Number : 0-0-0-0 RMA History : 00 Deviation Number : 0-0 Model: PA-2FE-TX Part Number : 800-08350-06 EEPROM format version 4 EEPROM contents (hex): 0x00: 04 FF 40 02 24 41 01 00 C1 8B 4D 49 43 30 35 31 0x10: 36 30 30 30 59 82 49 15 2B 06 42 41 30 03 00 81 0x20: 00 00 00 00 04 00 80 00 00 00 00 CB 94 50 41 2D 0x30: 32 46 45 2D 54 58 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 0x40: 20 C0 46 03 20 00 20 9E 06 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 0x50: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 0x60: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 0x70: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF Thank You, Robert Fowler Network Administrator MasTec, Inc. Office: 305.406.3150 Fax: 305.599.7085 Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MasTec Building the e-World Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this transmittal, including any attachment, is privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this transmittal from any computer or other data bank. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6441t=6411 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FastEthernet Adapter for 7206 - How do I enable? [7:6411]
David, My sincerest apologies for ever doubting you. 12.1(6) works great! Thanks, Robert -Original Message- From: David C Prall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FastEthernet Adapter for 7206 - How do I enable? [7:6411] Checkout the HW-SW Compatibility Table http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/Support/HWSWmatrix/hwswmatrix.cgi The PA-2FE-TX requires a minimum of 12.1(6) for Mainline. David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com - Original Message - From: Robert Fowler To: Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 8:36 AM Subject: FastEthernet Adapter for 7206 - How do I enable? [7:6411] Hello, I've been beating my head on the side of this router. I've searched the CCO on how to enable the PA-2FE adapter, and found some information on microcode. Then I found out the IOS I've upgraded to (12.1.(3)) already has a current version built in. I don't recall learning anything about Microcode in any of my studying. How does it differ from the IOS? Anyway, the adapter card will not enable, and when I do a show diag 1 I get this:(see below) show that it is powered off. I've searched everywhere to find the command to power it on. Any suggestions? Slot 1: Unknown (type 548) Port adapter Port adapter is disabled deactivated powered off Port adapter insertion time unknown EEPROM contents at hardware discovery: Hardware Revision: 1.0 PCB Serial Number: MIC0516000Y Part Number : 73-5419-06 Board Revision : A0 RMA Test History : 00 RMA Number : 0-0-0-0 RMA History : 00 Deviation Number : 0-0 Model: PA-2FE-TX Part Number : 800-08350-06 EEPROM format version 4 EEPROM contents (hex): 0x00: 04 FF 40 02 24 41 01 00 C1 8B 4D 49 43 30 35 31 0x10: 36 30 30 30 59 82 49 15 2B 06 42 41 30 03 00 81 0x20: 00 00 00 00 04 00 80 00 00 00 00 CB 94 50 41 2D 0x30: 32 46 45 2D 54 58 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 0x40: 20 C0 46 03 20 00 20 9E 06 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 0x50: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 0x60: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 0x70: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF Thank You, Robert Fowler Network Administrator MasTec, Inc. Office: 305.406.3150 Fax: 305.599.7085 Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MasTec Building the e-World Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this transmittal, including any attachment, is privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this transmittal from any computer or other data bank. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6454t=6411 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: For those using 12.1(2)T or 12.1(3)T [7:5904]
How do I get on the security announcement list? Is there a form on Cisco's site? -Original Message- From: Allen May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 11:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: For those using 12.1(2)T or 12.1(3)T [7:5904] Security scanning vulnerability that causes router reload. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/ios-tcp-scanner-reload-pub.shtml Just an FYI for those not on the security announcement lists. Allen FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=5909t=5904 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DDR into a PRI [7:1701]
Ok here is my question, Say you setup DDR with analog lines back to a central location with PRI, would you need to have the MICA modems or is there a command that will let the PRI interface card use the lines from the t1-PRI? I've search the CCO and I've found a lot of information on DDR but nothing on the specifics for coming back into a central PRI. Lost in DDR land Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1701t=1701 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DDR into a PRI [7:1701]
We have several remote sites that need to dial-in if there frame relay connection fails, I figured I would set them up with modems hooked to the aux port as a backup interface. My questions revolves around the central site with the PRI. I've been told my another NA that I work with that there is a command that you can enter that will allow you to use the dial-in lines directly on the router without using MICA modems. I thought a modem had to talk to another modem. Hope this helps. What kind of setup did you do and did it work successfully? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DDR into a PRI [7:1701] I'm confused give me more information! I just setup a T1-PRI with Mica modems. -Original Message- From: Robert Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DDR into a PRI [7:1701] Ok here is my question, Say you setup DDR with analog lines back to a central location with PRI, would you need to have the MICA modems or is there a command that will let the PRI interface card use the lines from the t1-PRI? I've search the CCO and I've found a lot of information on DDR but nothing on the specifics for coming back into a central PRI. Lost in DDR land FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1703t=1701 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
