RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-04-08 Thread William Gragido

No, we upgraded it ourselves Rico, I was there throughout the ninetieswe
went from Banyan environments to IP (Unix/NT).

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rico Ortiz
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 6:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


When I was in the Marines (about 10 yrs ago) the used Banyard Vines for
there networks. I believe EDS has been hired to upgrade there current
network to an IP setup.. Rico

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


And I've heard that the US side in Desert Storm used Banyan for their
networking systems, not TCP/IP!?

Priscilla

At 12:05 PM 3/28/02, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
 Thats what the DoD taught in their DataCommunications Schools.  Sorry
Dom.

Absolutely, positively wrong, though. That's an urban legend that has
been disavowed by every early developer I can think of, including the
DARPA people. It developed out of pure DARPA sponsored research in
networking.

I'm hard-pressed to think of any nuclear command  control
communications system, before the mid-80's or so, that used TCP/IP,
and at one time I knew pretty much every system that was deployed.
Among the ones I can talk about, they were circuit-switched or radio.
Some of the circuit-switched networks were computer controlled,
including AUTODIN I and a variety of intelligent networks.

Without detailed research, I'd tend to say the first military TCP/IP
applications were in tactical, not strategic, nets.

Actually, the first demonstration that packet switched networks were
resilient to massive attack came from the Iraqi air defense system in
Desert Storm.

 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Chuck
 Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:00 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
 
 the real reason being.?
 
 
 
 
   wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   Sorry, the
 
   be resilient to Global Thermal Nuclear attacks
 
   is a myth.
 
   Dom Stocqueler
 
 
 
 
 
   William
   Gragido To:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:     RE: TCP/IP and DOD
   [7:39657]
   Sent
   by:
 
   nobody@groups
 
   tudy.com
 
 
 
   27/03/2002
 
   20:17
 
   Please
   respond
   to
 
   William
 
   Gragido
 
 
 
 
 
 
   The DoD adopted TCP/IP as its native protocol for communications in
1983.
   DARPA lead the charge for a communications system that would be
resilient
   to
   Global Thermal Nuclear attacks (therein allowing for continued,
   uninterrupted comm), and would allow for common connectivity of
   multi-vendor
   solutions.  This of course did yield 'ARPA NET' which, by a decision
of
 the
   DCA (Defense Communications Agency), in 1983 was split in two yielding
a
   smaller version of 'ARPA NET' and 'MILNET'.  The evolution of the
modern
   internet can followed done the line from 'ARPA NET' and as we all know
by
   virtue of adding new networks to the mix, 'ARPA NET' was de-regulated
in
   1991 ushering the age of the modern internet.
 
   Hope that helps,
 
   Will Gragido
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
   Michael Williams
   Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:37 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
 
   It's kinda fuzzy.  I myself just got through doing a tech review of a
book
   covering this topic as well as have written my own materials for
   training,
   etc covering this topic.  IMHO, DoD is credited with creating the
   internet
   even though at the time it wasn't called the internet and didn't use
the
   same protocols we do now.  Although the DoD started the whole mess,
from
   what I've read DoD commisioned ARPANET to research this.  I'm sure
that
   peoples are various universities and colleges were in on the actual
   deveopment evidenced by the fact that in 1971 there were 15 nodes
(with a
   total of 23 hosts), namely UCLA, SRI, UCSB, U of Utah, BBN, MIT, RAND,
 SDC,
   Harvard, Lincoln Lab, Stanford, UIU(C), CWRU, CMU, and NASA/Ames.
Note
   most
   of those listed are colleges/universities. I've read some about BBN,
   however
   it seems to me their main role was to supply the first computers
   (Honeywell 516 mini computers with 12K of memory) that acted as
 Information
   Message Processors (IMPs) (routers?).
 
   However, I would humbly suggest that Howard B. or Priscilla O. throw
their
   2
   cents in here.
 
   Also, since your doing a technical edit, be careful of the words you
 choose
   as well.  For example you use the word written over and over above,
but
 I
   don't think the conversation is really about which pro

RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-04-08 Thread Brian Zeitz

I worked my last contract I don't want to say where, but a major
educational testing place. They still had banyan Vines in 2001. although
I didn't touch it besides migration. I didn't think it was still around.
We migrated them to Windows 2000. The banyan Vines servers left, but the
mindsets of the admins were still banyan, even after the servers left.
Every conversation was always on banyan, we used to. Thankfully I was
just a contractor and left after 7 Months. Me and the other contracters
with current skills would always roll our eyes. 



-Original Message-
From: William Gragido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

No, we upgraded it ourselves Rico, I was there throughout the
ninetieswe
went from Banyan environments to IP (Unix/NT).

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rico Ortiz
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 6:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


When I was in the Marines (about 10 yrs ago) the used Banyard Vines for
there networks. I believe EDS has been hired to upgrade there current
network to an IP setup.. Rico

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


And I've heard that the US side in Desert Storm used Banyan for their
networking systems, not TCP/IP!?

Priscilla

At 12:05 PM 3/28/02, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
 Thats what the DoD taught in their DataCommunications Schools.  Sorry
Dom.

Absolutely, positively wrong, though. That's an urban legend that has
been disavowed by every early developer I can think of, including the
DARPA people. It developed out of pure DARPA sponsored research in
networking.

I'm hard-pressed to think of any nuclear command  control
communications system, before the mid-80's or so, that used TCP/IP,
and at one time I knew pretty much every system that was deployed.
Among the ones I can talk about, they were circuit-switched or radio.
Some of the circuit-switched networks were computer controlled,
including AUTODIN I and a variety of intelligent networks.

Without detailed research, I'd tend to say the first military TCP/IP
applications were in tactical, not strategic, nets.

Actually, the first demonstration that packet switched networks were
resilient to massive attack came from the Iraqi air defense system in
Desert Storm.

 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of
 Chuck
 Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:00 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
 
 the real reason being.?
 
 
 
 
   wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   Sorry, the
 
   be resilient to Global Thermal Nuclear attacks
 
   is a myth.
 
   Dom Stocqueler
 
 
 
 
 
   William
   Gragido To:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:     RE: TCP/IP and DOD
   [7:39657]
   Sent
   by:
 
   nobody@groups
 
   tudy.com
 
 
 
   27/03/2002
 
   20:17
 
   Please
   respond
   to
 
   William
 
   Gragido
 
 
 
 
 
 
   The DoD adopted TCP/IP as its native protocol for communications
in
1983.
   DARPA lead the charge for a communications system that would be
resilient
   to
   Global Thermal Nuclear attacks (therein allowing for continued,
   uninterrupted comm), and would allow for common connectivity of
   multi-vendor
   solutions.  This of course did yield 'ARPA NET' which, by a
decision
of
 the
   DCA (Defense Communications Agency), in 1983 was split in two
yielding
a
   smaller version of 'ARPA NET' and 'MILNET'.  The evolution of the
modern
   internet can followed done the line from 'ARPA NET' and as we all
know
by
   virtue of adding new networks to the mix, 'ARPA NET' was
de-regulated
in
   1991 ushering the age of the modern internet.
 
   Hope that helps,
 
   Will Gragido
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of
   Michael Williams
   Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:37 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
 
   It's kinda fuzzy.  I myself just got through doing a tech review
of a
book
   covering this topic as well as have written my own materials for
   training,
   etc covering this topic.  IMHO, DoD is credited with creating the
   internet
   even though at the time it wasn't called the internet and didn't
use
the
   same protocols we do now.  Although the DoD started the whole
mess,
from
   what I've read DoD commisioned ARPANET to research this.  I'm sure
that
   peoples are various universities and colleges were in on the
actual
   deveopment evidenced by the fact that in 1971 there were 15 nodes
(with a
   total of 23 hosts), namely U

RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-04-05 Thread Rico Ortiz

My understanding is Vint Cerf, was the creator of the TCP/IP protocols. Not
sure but was he not commissioned by DOD/BBN during the ARPAnet days..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Steven A. Ridder
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP was
written by the Depertment of Defense.  I am confident that ARPAnet was
commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN, and maybe TCP/IP was derived from
these early protocls, but to say the the DoD, or BBN or anyone other than
the Internet community wrote TCP and IP would be incorrect, right?  I seem
to remember that IP was used in ArpaNet, but not TCP.  I thought TCP was
written in various universities.  I could even look up the couple (who used
to work at Cisco) who wrote it.

--

RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40632t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-04-05 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

Vint Cerf wasn't commissioned. He was a graduate student at UCLA. BBN set 
up the infrastructure of the ARPANET and got the Interface Message 
Processors (routers) and the 56-Kbps links up and running. To use the 
ARPANET, universities had to write software for the devices that connected 
to the ARPANET. TCP/IP grew out of that effort.

Priscilla

At 03:47 PM 4/5/02, Rico Ortiz wrote:
My understanding is Vint Cerf, was the creator of the TCP/IP protocols. Not
sure but was he not commissioned by DOD/BBN during the ARPAnet days..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Steven A. Ridder
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP was
written by the Depertment of Defense.  I am confident that ARPAnet was
commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN, and maybe TCP/IP was derived from
these early protocls, but to say the the DoD, or BBN or anyone other than
the Internet community wrote TCP and IP would be incorrect, right?  I seem
to remember that IP was used in ArpaNet, but not TCP.  I thought TCP was
written in various universities.  I could even look up the couple (who used
to work at Cisco) who wrote it.

--

RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40637t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-04-05 Thread Brian Zeitz

Yea, it was Al Gore who invented TCP/IP and the internet, all by
himself. 

-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

Vint Cerf wasn't commissioned. He was a graduate student at UCLA. BBN
set 
up the infrastructure of the ARPANET and got the Interface Message 
Processors (routers) and the 56-Kbps links up and running. To use the 
ARPANET, universities had to write software for the devices that
connected 
to the ARPANET. TCP/IP grew out of that effort.

Priscilla

At 03:47 PM 4/5/02, Rico Ortiz wrote:
My understanding is Vint Cerf, was the creator of the TCP/IP protocols.
Not
sure but was he not commissioned by DOD/BBN during the ARPAnet days..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Steven A. Ridder
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP was
written by the Depertment of Defense.  I am confident that ARPAnet was
commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN, and maybe TCP/IP was derived
from
these early protocls, but to say the the DoD, or BBN or anyone other
than
the Internet community wrote TCP and IP would be incorrect, right?  I
seem
to remember that IP was used in ArpaNet, but not TCP.  I thought TCP
was
written in various universities.  I could even look up the couple (who
used
to work at Cisco) who wrote it.

--

RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40639t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-04-05 Thread Don Claybrook

Well, if we're veering off into the realm of political commentary and
putdown, I suppose it's ok to ask whether George W. Bush could spell TCP/IP
all by himself.

- Original Message -
From: Brian Zeitz 
To: 
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:09 PM
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


 Yea, it was Al Gore who invented TCP/IP and the internet, all by
 himself.

 -Original Message-
 From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:30 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

 Vint Cerf wasn't commissioned. He was a graduate student at UCLA. BBN
 set
 up the infrastructure of the ARPANET and got the Interface Message
 Processors (routers) and the 56-Kbps links up and running. To use the
 ARPANET, universities had to write software for the devices that
 connected
 to the ARPANET. TCP/IP grew out of that effort.

 Priscilla

 At 03:47 PM 4/5/02, Rico Ortiz wrote:
 My understanding is Vint Cerf, was the creator of the TCP/IP protocols.
 Not
 sure but was he not commissioned by DOD/BBN during the ARPAnet days..
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Steven A. Ridder
 Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:05 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
 
 I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP was
 written by the Depertment of Defense.  I am confident that ARPAnet was
 commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN, and maybe TCP/IP was derived
 from
 these early protocls, but to say the the DoD, or BBN or anyone other
 than
 the Internet community wrote TCP and IP would be incorrect, right?  I
 seem
 to remember that IP was used in ArpaNet, but not TCP.  I thought TCP
 was
 written in various universities.  I could even look up the couple (who
 used
 to work at Cisco) who wrote it.
 
 --
 
 RFC 1149 Compliant.
 Get in my head:
 http://sar.dynu.com
 

 Priscilla Oppenheimer
 http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40642t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-04-05 Thread MADMAN

Ya we just had 8 years with a smart president.  Gimme a break.
  
  Going to have me a beer before the liberals outlaw it, tabacco, fatty
foods, skateboards, SUVs etc...

  Dave

Don Claybrook wrote:
 
 Well, if we're veering off into the realm of political commentary and
 putdown, I suppose it's ok to ask whether George W. Bush could spell TCP/IP
 all by himself.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Brian Zeitz
 To:
 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:09 PM
 Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
  Yea, it was Al Gore who invented TCP/IP and the internet, all by
  himself.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:30 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
  Vint Cerf wasn't commissioned. He was a graduate student at UCLA. BBN
  set
  up the infrastructure of the ARPANET and got the Interface Message
  Processors (routers) and the 56-Kbps links up and running. To use the
  ARPANET, universities had to write software for the devices that
  connected
  to the ARPANET. TCP/IP grew out of that effort.
 
  Priscilla
 
  At 03:47 PM 4/5/02, Rico Ortiz wrote:
  My understanding is Vint Cerf, was the creator of the TCP/IP protocols.
  Not
  sure but was he not commissioned by DOD/BBN during the ARPAnet days..
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
  Steven A. Ridder
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:05 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
  
  
  I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP was
  written by the Depertment of Defense.  I am confident that ARPAnet was
  commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN, and maybe TCP/IP was derived
  from
  these early protocls, but to say the the DoD, or BBN or anyone other
  than
  the Internet community wrote TCP and IP would be incorrect, right?  I
  seem
  to remember that IP was used in ArpaNet, but not TCP.  I thought TCP
  was
  written in various universities.  I could even look up the couple (who
  used
  to work at Cisco) who wrote it.
  
  --
  
  RFC 1149 Compliant.
  Get in my head:
  http://sar.dynu.com
  
 
  Priscilla Oppenheimer
  http://www.priscilla.com
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40645t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-04-05 Thread Jeffrey W. Hall

What??  Those of you who insist on detracting a good conversation with
needless comments like that have to much time on your hands, Don.
Why don't you and others like you stick to the topic and not be so
tempted to provide such a short-sighted remark.

Jeffrey W. Hall
Network Administrator, MCSE, CCNA, SCSA


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Don Claybrook
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 6:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

Well, if we're veering off into the realm of political commentary and
putdown, I suppose it's ok to ask whether George W. Bush could spell
TCP/IP
all by himself.

- Original Message -
From: Brian Zeitz 
To: 
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:09 PM
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


 Yea, it was Al Gore who invented TCP/IP and the internet, all by
 himself.

 -Original Message-
 From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:30 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

 Vint Cerf wasn't commissioned. He was a graduate student at UCLA. BBN
 set
 up the infrastructure of the ARPANET and got the Interface Message
 Processors (routers) and the 56-Kbps links up and running. To use the
 ARPANET, universities had to write software for the devices that
 connected
 to the ARPANET. TCP/IP grew out of that effort.

 Priscilla

 At 03:47 PM 4/5/02, Rico Ortiz wrote:
 My understanding is Vint Cerf, was the creator of the TCP/IP
protocols.
 Not
 sure but was he not commissioned by DOD/BBN during the ARPAnet days..
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of
 Steven A. Ridder
 Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:05 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
 
 I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP
was
 written by the Depertment of Defense.  I am confident that ARPAnet
was
 commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN, and maybe TCP/IP was
derived
 from
 these early protocls, but to say the the DoD, or BBN or anyone other
 than
 the Internet community wrote TCP and IP would be incorrect, right?  I
 seem
 to remember that IP was used in ArpaNet, but not TCP.  I thought TCP
 was
 written in various universities.  I could even look up the couple
(who
 used
 to work at Cisco) who wrote it.
 
 --
 
 RFC 1149 Compliant.
 Get in my head:
 http://sar.dynu.com
 

 Priscilla Oppenheimer
 http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40646t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-04-05 Thread Rico Ortiz

When I was in the Marines (about 10 yrs ago) the used Banyard Vines for
there networks. I believe EDS has been hired to upgrade there current
network to an IP setup.. Rico

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


And I've heard that the US side in Desert Storm used Banyan for their
networking systems, not TCP/IP!?

Priscilla

At 12:05 PM 3/28/02, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
 Thats what the DoD taught in their DataCommunications Schools.  Sorry
Dom.

Absolutely, positively wrong, though. That's an urban legend that has
been disavowed by every early developer I can think of, including the
DARPA people. It developed out of pure DARPA sponsored research in
networking.

I'm hard-pressed to think of any nuclear command  control
communications system, before the mid-80's or so, that used TCP/IP,
and at one time I knew pretty much every system that was deployed.
Among the ones I can talk about, they were circuit-switched or radio.
Some of the circuit-switched networks were computer controlled,
including AUTODIN I and a variety of intelligent networks.

Without detailed research, I'd tend to say the first military TCP/IP
applications were in tactical, not strategic, nets.

Actually, the first demonstration that packet switched networks were
resilient to massive attack came from the Iraqi air defense system in
Desert Storm.

 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Chuck
 Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:00 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
 
 the real reason being.?
 
 
 
 
   wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   Sorry, the
 
   be resilient to Global Thermal Nuclear attacks
 
   is a myth.
 
   Dom Stocqueler
 
 
 
 
 
   William
   Gragido To:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:     RE: TCP/IP and DOD
   [7:39657]
   Sent
   by:
 
   nobody@groups
 
   tudy.com
 
 
 
   27/03/2002
 
   20:17
 
   Please
   respond
   to
 
   William
 
   Gragido
 
 
 
 
 
 
   The DoD adopted TCP/IP as its native protocol for communications in
1983.
   DARPA lead the charge for a communications system that would be
resilient
   to
   Global Thermal Nuclear attacks (therein allowing for continued,
   uninterrupted comm), and would allow for common connectivity of
   multi-vendor
   solutions.  This of course did yield 'ARPA NET' which, by a decision
of
 the
   DCA (Defense Communications Agency), in 1983 was split in two yielding
a
   smaller version of 'ARPA NET' and 'MILNET'.  The evolution of the
modern
   internet can followed done the line from 'ARPA NET' and as we all know
by
   virtue of adding new networks to the mix, 'ARPA NET' was de-regulated
in
   1991 ushering the age of the modern internet.
 
   Hope that helps,
 
   Will Gragido
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
   Michael Williams
   Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:37 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
 
   It's kinda fuzzy.  I myself just got through doing a tech review of a
book
   covering this topic as well as have written my own materials for
   training,
   etc covering this topic.  IMHO, DoD is credited with creating the
   internet
   even though at the time it wasn't called the internet and didn't use
the
   same protocols we do now.  Although the DoD started the whole mess,
from
   what I've read DoD commisioned ARPANET to research this.  I'm sure
that
   peoples are various universities and colleges were in on the actual
   deveopment evidenced by the fact that in 1971 there were 15 nodes
(with a
   total of 23 hosts), namely UCLA, SRI, UCSB, U of Utah, BBN, MIT, RAND,
 SDC,
   Harvard, Lincoln Lab, Stanford, UIU(C), CWRU, CMU, and NASA/Ames.
Note
   most
   of those listed are colleges/universities. I've read some about BBN,
   however
   it seems to me their main role was to supply the first computers
   (Honeywell 516 mini computers with 12K of memory) that acted as
 Information
   Message Processors (IMPs) (routers?).
 
   However, I would humbly suggest that Howard B. or Priscilla O. throw
their
   2
   cents in here.
 
   Also, since your doing a technical edit, be careful of the words you
 choose
   as well.  For example you use the word written over and over above,
but
 I
   don't think the conversation is really about which programmers
actually
   wrote the code it's more about who either spearheaded or caused the
   evolution of the *standards* we call TCP/IP in which case I don't
think
   crediting the DoD is incorrect.
 
   My 2 cents =)
   Mike W.


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted 

RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-04-05 Thread Don Claybrook

Sorry, Mr. Hall.  Take a look at the order of operations.  I was making the
point that this was a technical forum that probably didn't need politics
inserted.  I was RESPONDING to someone who made the political remark in the
first place.  I'll discontinue this since the purpose is supposed to be all
Cisco all the time here, but since you called me out by name, I thought I'd
take a stab at defending my statement before bowing out.

Thanks.
Peace.

Don Claybrook
CCNP, CCDP, CSS1
(without much extra time on my hands)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jeffrey W. Hall
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

What??  Those of you who insist on detracting a good conversation with
needless comments like that have to much time on your hands, Don.
Why don't you and others like you stick to the topic and not be so
tempted to provide such a short-sighted remark.

Jeffrey W. Hall
Network Administrator, MCSE, CCNA, SCSA


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Don Claybrook
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 6:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

Well, if we're veering off into the realm of political commentary and
putdown, I suppose it's ok to ask whether George W. Bush could spell
TCP/IP
all by himself.

- Original Message -
From: Brian Zeitz
To:
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:09 PM
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


 Yea, it was Al Gore who invented TCP/IP and the internet, all by
 himself.

 -Original Message-
 From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:30 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

 Vint Cerf wasn't commissioned. He was a graduate student at UCLA. BBN
 set
 up the infrastructure of the ARPANET and got the Interface Message
 Processors (routers) and the 56-Kbps links up and running. To use the
 ARPANET, universities had to write software for the devices that
 connected
 to the ARPANET. TCP/IP grew out of that effort.

 Priscilla

 At 03:47 PM 4/5/02, Rico Ortiz wrote:
 My understanding is Vint Cerf, was the creator of the TCP/IP
protocols.
 Not
 sure but was he not commissioned by DOD/BBN during the ARPAnet days..
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of
 Steven A. Ridder
 Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:05 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
 
 I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP
was
 written by the Depertment of Defense.  I am confident that ARPAnet
was
 commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN, and maybe TCP/IP was
derived
 from
 these early protocls, but to say the the DoD, or BBN or anyone other
 than
 the Internet community wrote TCP and IP would be incorrect, right?  I
 seem
 to remember that IP was used in ArpaNet, but not TCP.  I thought TCP
 was
 written in various universities.  I could even look up the couple
(who
 used
 to work at Cisco) who wrote it.
 
 --
 
 RFC 1149 Compliant.
 Get in my head:
 http://sar.dynu.com
 

 Priscilla Oppenheimer
 http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40652t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-04-05 Thread Tom Ranalli

My two cents - for what it's worth ... first, we all understand the purpose
of this forum, but like in 3D conversations, sometimes the topics veer.
Perhaps we need to redirect things back, but my God, folks - we're human
beings, after all.  Just because we're so intimately involved in machinery,
they are, after all, just machines!

And my own pet peeve, just because someone comments on something not
appealing to you doesn't mean they have too much time on their hands -
frankly, they seem to be more well-rounded than the one-trick ponies in the
world.  If you disagree with the man's politics, great - just say so in a
non-aggressive manner and move on.

Have a non-confrontational weekend, folks.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Don Claybrook
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 5:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


Sorry, Mr. Hall.  Take a look at the order of operations.  I was making the
point that this was a technical forum that probably didn't need politics
inserted.  I was RESPONDING to someone who made the political remark in the
first place.  I'll discontinue this since the purpose is supposed to be all
Cisco all the time here, but since you called me out by name, I thought I'd
take a stab at defending my statement before bowing out.

Thanks.
Peace.

Don Claybrook
CCNP, CCDP, CSS1
(without much extra time on my hands)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jeffrey W. Hall
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

What??  Those of you who insist on detracting a good conversation with
needless comments like that have to much time on your hands, Don.
Why don't you and others like you stick to the topic and not be so
tempted to provide such a short-sighted remark.

Jeffrey W. Hall
Network Administrator, MCSE, CCNA, SCSA


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Don Claybrook
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 6:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

Well, if we're veering off into the realm of political commentary and
putdown, I suppose it's ok to ask whether George W. Bush could spell
TCP/IP
all by himself.

- Original Message -
From: Brian Zeitz
To:
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:09 PM
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


 Yea, it was Al Gore who invented TCP/IP and the internet, all by
 himself.

 -Original Message-
 From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:30 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

 Vint Cerf wasn't commissioned. He was a graduate student at UCLA. BBN
 set
 up the infrastructure of the ARPANET and got the Interface Message
 Processors (routers) and the 56-Kbps links up and running. To use the
 ARPANET, universities had to write software for the devices that
 connected
 to the ARPANET. TCP/IP grew out of that effort.

 Priscilla

 At 03:47 PM 4/5/02, Rico Ortiz wrote:
 My understanding is Vint Cerf, was the creator of the TCP/IP
protocols.
 Not
 sure but was he not commissioned by DOD/BBN during the ARPAnet days..
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of
 Steven A. Ridder
 Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:05 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
 
 I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP
was
 written by the Depertment of Defense.  I am confident that ARPAnet
was
 commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN, and maybe TCP/IP was
derived
 from
 these early protocls, but to say the the DoD, or BBN or anyone other
 than
 the Internet community wrote TCP and IP would be incorrect, right?  I
 seem
 to remember that IP was used in ArpaNet, but not TCP.  I thought TCP
 was
 written in various universities.  I could even look up the couple
(who
 used
 to work at Cisco) who wrote it.
 
 --
 
 RFC 1149 Compliant.
 Get in my head:
 http://sar.dynu.com
 

 Priscilla Oppenheimer
 http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40656t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I would recommend Where Wizards Stay Up Late : The Origins of the Internet

Touchstone Books; ISBN: 0684832674

This book does not just have the technical detail, but is a great read.

HTH

Dom Stocqueler




   

   
Michael
WilliamsTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD
[7:39657]
Sent
by:
   
nobody@groups
   
tudy.com
   

   

   
27/03/2002
   
19:37
   
Please
respond
to
   
Michael
   
Williams
   

   





It's kinda fuzzy.  I myself just got through doing a tech review of a book
covering this topic as well as have written my own materials for
training,
etc covering this topic.  IMHO, DoD is credited with creating the
internet
even though at the time it wasn't called the internet and didn't use the
same protocols we do now.  Although the DoD started the whole mess, from
what I've read DoD commisioned ARPANET to research this.  I'm sure that
peoples are various universities and colleges were in on the actual
deveopment evidenced by the fact that in 1971 there were 15 nodes (with a
total of 23 hosts), namely UCLA, SRI, UCSB, U of Utah, BBN, MIT, RAND, SDC,
Harvard, Lincoln Lab, Stanford, UIU(C), CWRU, CMU, and NASA/Ames.  Note
most
of those listed are colleges/universities. I've read some about BBN,
however
it seems to me their main role was to supply the first computers
(Honeywell 516 mini computers with 12K of memory) that acted as Information
Message Processors (IMPs) (routers?).

However, I would humbly suggest that Howard B. or Priscilla O. throw their
2
cents in here.

Also, since your doing a technical edit, be careful of the words you choose
as well.  For example you use the word written over and over above, but I
don't think the conversation is really about which programmers actually
wrote the code it's more about who either spearheaded or caused the
evolution of the *standards* we call TCP/IP in which case I don't think
crediting the DoD is incorrect.

My 2 cents =)
Mike W.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39737t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sorry, the

be resilient to Global Thermal Nuclear attacks

is a myth.

Dom Stocqueler



   

   
William
Gragido To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD
[7:39657]
Sent
by:
   
nobody@groups
   
tudy.com
   

   

   
27/03/2002
   
20:17
   
Please
respond
to
   
William
   
Gragido
   

   





The DoD adopted TCP/IP as its native protocol for communications in 1983.
DARPA lead the charge for a communications system that would be resilient
to
Global Thermal Nuclear attacks (therein allowing for continued,
uninterrupted comm), and would allow for common connectivity of
multi-vendor
solutions.  This of course did yield 'ARPA NET' which, by a decision of the
DCA (Defense Communications Agency), in 1983 was split in two yielding a
smaller version of 'ARPA NET' and 'MILNET'.  The evolution of the modern
internet can followed done the line from 'ARPA NET' and as we all know by
virtue of adding new networks to the mix, 'ARPA NET' was de-regulated in
1991 ushering the age of the modern internet.

Hope that helps,

Will Gragido

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Michael Williams
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


It's kinda fuzzy.  I myself just got through doing a tech review of a book
covering this topic as well as have written my own materials for
training,
etc covering this topic.  IMHO, DoD is credited with creating the
internet
even though at the time it wasn't called the internet and didn't use the
same protocols we do now.  Although the DoD started the whole mess, from
what I've read DoD commisioned ARPANET to research this.  I'm sure that
peoples are various universities and colleges were in on the actual
deveopment evidenced by the fact that in 1971 there were 15 nodes (with a
total of 23 hosts), namely UCLA, SRI, UCSB, U of Utah, BBN, MIT, RAND, SDC,
Harvard, Lincoln Lab, Stanford, UIU(C), CWRU, CMU, and NASA/Ames.  Note
most
of those listed are colleges/universities. I've read some about BBN,
however
it seems to me their main role was to supply the first computers
(Honeywell 516 mini computers with 12K of memory) that acted as Information
Message Processors (IMPs) (routers?).

However, I would humbly suggest that Howard B. or Priscilla O. throw their
2
cents in here.

Also, since your doing a technical edit, be careful of the words you choose
as well.  For example you use the word written over and over above, but I
don't think the conversation is really about which programmers actually
wrote the code it's more about who either spearheaded or caused the
evolution of the *standards* we call TCP/IP in which case I don't think
crediting the DoD is incorrect.

My 2 cents =)
Mike W.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39738t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-28 Thread Jay Dunn

I wonder if its just urban legend, but I've always heard that the reason
IPv4 is expressed in decimal (as opposed to hex) is because a military
review (i.e. a general) nixed it. Those aren't numbers. Those are
letters.

Jay Dunn
IPI*GrammTech, Ltd.
www.ipi-gt.com
Nunquam Facilis Est

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

The history of TCP/IP is somewhat muddy, as you can imagine.

At 02:04 PM 3/27/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP was
written by the Depertment of Defense.

I agree that you should question that.

  I am confident that ARPAnet was
commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN

Yes, you could say that. The Information Processing Techniques Office 
(IPTO) of ARPA awarded the contract to build the Interface Message 
Processors (IMP) for ARPANET to BBN in late 1968. IMPs were the early 
routers. BBN built the IMPs with the help (or hindrance if you believe
some 
reports) of Honeywell. Honeywell developed and manufactured the
hardware. 
BBN did the software.

Descriptions of the network layer software that ran on these IMPs
doesn't 
sound much like IP at all. It was connection-oriented, for one thing,
and 
handled error correction. It was very East-Coast anal-retentive stuff.
;-)

The software that evolved into TCP/IP was a West-Coast hippy-dippy geeky

phenomenon. UCLA, SRI, UC Santa Barbara, USC, and University of Utah 
graduate students and researchers worked on it. Originally they had to
make 
sure their software interoperated with the IMPs of the ARPANET. They 
developed a protocol called the Network Control Protocol (NCP) that
worked 
on the end devices that communicated with the IMPs. It was a
host-to-host 
protocol that could be considered a predecessor to TCP.

NCP worked only with ARPANET. By 1973 or so, ARPANET wasn't the only
game 
in town though. There was packet radio (which evolved into Ethernet), 
SATNET, and others. A more general-purpose protocol was needed. Vint
Cerf 
who was with UCLA at the time and Bob Kahn, who had been at BBN but now 
worked for ARPA directly, worked on a new protocol called Transmission 
Control Protocol (TCP) that was general-purpose. They made the
assumption 
that the underlying network was unreliable. The new protocol shifted the

job of reliability from the network to the destination hosts.

Originally TCP handled the routing of packets also. TCP had jobs that we

would today assign to the network and transport layers.

And finally, in 1978, we come to the birth of the Internet Protocol
(IP). 
In 1978, the job of routing packets was broken away from TCP. TCP was
given 
the task of breaking messages into packets, reassembling them at the
other 
end, detecting errors, resending anything lost, and putting packets in
the 
right order. IP was simply responsible for forwarding individual
packets. 
The specifications for how this should work were written by Cerf at
UCLA, 
and Postel and Cohen from the University of Southern California's 
Information Sciences Institute (ISI).

In the early 1980s, the ARPANET got really congested and the National 
Science Foundation created its own network for the academic computer 
science community. It used TCP/IP and is sometimes considered the real 
forerunner of the Internet, although it probably could never have 
happened without the work that went into the ARPANET. ARPANET converted
to 
TCP/IP in 1983. It also divided into MILNET and ARPANET. It had 
connectivity with all the other networks by then. Later it got 
decommissioned. By 1989, it was gone, but its legacy lived on. May it
RIP.
;-)

Here's a recommendation for a terrific book about the history of the
Internet:

Where Wizards Stay Up Late: The Origins of the Internet by Katie
Hafner 
and Matthew Lyon.

Priscilla




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39739t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-28 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP was
written by the Depertment of Defense.  I am confident that ARPAnet was
commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN, and maybe TCP/IP was derived from
these early protocls, but to say the the DoD, or BBN or anyone other than
the Internet community wrote TCP and IP would be incorrect, right?  I seem
to remember that IP was used in ArpaNet, but not TCP.  I thought TCP was
written in various universities.  I could even look up the couple (who used
to work at Cisco) who wrote it.


Well, the first problem would be to define Internet Community, 
which always has had research participants at government labs.

The first widely available reference implementation of TCP/IP was in 
Berkeley UNIX 4.2.  Subnets were introduced in 4.3.  IP and TCP were 
developed roughly at the same time.

While Vint Cerf wrote the specification for TCP, I vaguely remember 
that Dan Lynch may have written the code. I'm honestly not sure. It 
definely was not Len Bosack and Sandy Lerner.

Yes, there were ARPANET protocols that preceded TCP/IP.

You must remember, however, that in the early days, much of the 
academic work was funded by government (mostly military ARPA) grants 
and contracts.

BBN had the non-trivial job of herding cats...I mean running the network.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39746t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-28 Thread Chuck

the real reason being.?




 wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Sorry, the

 be resilient to Global Thermal Nuclear attacks

 is a myth.

 Dom Stocqueler





 William
 Gragido To:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject:     RE: TCP/IP and DOD
 [7:39657]
 Sent
 by:

 nobody@groups

 tudy.com



 27/03/2002

 20:17

 Please
 respond
 to

 William

 Gragido






 The DoD adopted TCP/IP as its native protocol for communications in 1983.
 DARPA lead the charge for a communications system that would be resilient
 to
 Global Thermal Nuclear attacks (therein allowing for continued,
 uninterrupted comm), and would allow for common connectivity of
 multi-vendor
 solutions.  This of course did yield 'ARPA NET' which, by a decision of
the
 DCA (Defense Communications Agency), in 1983 was split in two yielding a
 smaller version of 'ARPA NET' and 'MILNET'.  The evolution of the modern
 internet can followed done the line from 'ARPA NET' and as we all know by
 virtue of adding new networks to the mix, 'ARPA NET' was de-regulated in
 1991 ushering the age of the modern internet.

 Hope that helps,

 Will Gragido

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Michael Williams
 Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:37 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


 It's kinda fuzzy.  I myself just got through doing a tech review of a book
 covering this topic as well as have written my own materials for
 training,
 etc covering this topic.  IMHO, DoD is credited with creating the
 internet
 even though at the time it wasn't called the internet and didn't use the
 same protocols we do now.  Although the DoD started the whole mess, from
 what I've read DoD commisioned ARPANET to research this.  I'm sure that
 peoples are various universities and colleges were in on the actual
 deveopment evidenced by the fact that in 1971 there were 15 nodes (with a
 total of 23 hosts), namely UCLA, SRI, UCSB, U of Utah, BBN, MIT, RAND,
SDC,
 Harvard, Lincoln Lab, Stanford, UIU(C), CWRU, CMU, and NASA/Ames.  Note
 most
 of those listed are colleges/universities. I've read some about BBN,
 however
 it seems to me their main role was to supply the first computers
 (Honeywell 516 mini computers with 12K of memory) that acted as
Information
 Message Processors (IMPs) (routers?).

 However, I would humbly suggest that Howard B. or Priscilla O. throw their
 2
 cents in here.

 Also, since your doing a technical edit, be careful of the words you
choose
 as well.  For example you use the word written over and over above, but
I
 don't think the conversation is really about which programmers actually
 wrote the code it's more about who either spearheaded or caused the
 evolution of the *standards* we call TCP/IP in which case I don't think
 crediting the DoD is incorrect.

 My 2 cents =)
 Mike W.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39753t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-28 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

the real reason being.?

Research. (see below)







  
  be resilient to Global Thermal Nuclear attacks

  is a myth.

   Dom Stocqueler


  Lobachevsky
Tom Lehrer



Who made me the genius I am today,
The mathematician that others all quote,
Who's the professor that made me that way?
The greatest that ever got chalk on his coat.

One man deserves the credit,
One man deserves the blame,
And Nicolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky is his name.
Hi!
Nicolai Ivanovich Lobach-

I am never forget the day I first meet the great Lochevsky.
In one word he told me secret of success in mathematics:
Plagiarize!

Plagiarize,
Let no one else's work evade your eyes,
Remember why the good Lord made your eyes,
So don't shade your eyes,
But plagiarize, plagiarize, plagiarize -
Only be sure always to call it please 'research'.

And ever since I meet this man
My life is not the same,
And Nicolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky is his name.
  Hi!
Nicolai Ivanovich Lobach-

I am never forget the day I am given first original paper
to write. It was on analytic and algebraic topology of
locally Euclidean metrization of infinitely differentiable
Riemannian manifold.
Bozhe moi!
This I know from nothing.
But I think of great Lobachevsky and get idea - ahah!

I have a friend in Minsk,
Who has a friend in Pinsk,
Whose friend in Omsk
Has friend in Tomsk
With friend in Akmolinsk.
His friend in Alexandrovsk
Has friend in Petropavlovsk,
Whose friend somehow
Is solving now
The problem in Dnepropetrovsk.

And when his work is done -
Haha! - begins the fun.
   From Dnepropetrovsk
To Petropavlovsk,
By way of Iliysk,
And Novorossiysk,
To Alexandrovsk to Akmolinsk
To Tomsk to Omsk
To Pinsk to Minsk
To me the news will run,
Yes, to me the news will run!

And then I write
By morning, night,
And afternoon,
And pretty soon
My name in Dnepropetrovsk is cursed,
When he finds out I publish first!

And who made me a big success
And brought me wealth and fame?
Nicolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky is his name.
Hi!
Nicolai Ivanovish Lobach -

I am never forget the day my first book is published.
Every chapter I stole from somewhere else.
Index I copy from old Vladivostok telephone directory.
This book was sensational!
Pravda - well, Pravda - Pravda said: (Russian double-talk)
It stinks.
But Izvestia! Izvestia said: (Russian double-talk)
It stinks.
Metro-Goldwyn-Moskva buys movie rights for six million rubles,
Changing title to 'The Eternal Triangle',
With Ingrid Bergman playing part of hypotenuse.

And who deserves the credit?
And who deserves the blame?
Nicolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky is his name.
Hi!




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39776t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-28 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

Thats what the DoD taught in their DataCommunications Schools.  Sorry Dom.

Absolutely, positively wrong, though. That's an urban legend that has 
been disavowed by every early developer I can think of, including the 
DARPA people. It developed out of pure DARPA sponsored research in 
networking.

I'm hard-pressed to think of any nuclear command  control 
communications system, before the mid-80's or so, that used TCP/IP, 
and at one time I knew pretty much every system that was deployed. 
Among the ones I can talk about, they were circuit-switched or radio. 
Some of the circuit-switched networks were computer controlled, 
including AUTODIN I and a variety of intelligent networks.

Without detailed research, I'd tend to say the first military TCP/IP 
applications were in tactical, not strategic, nets.

Actually, the first demonstration that packet switched networks were 
resilient to massive attack came from the Iraqi air defense system in 
Desert Storm.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Chuck
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


the real reason being.?




  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Sorry, the

  be resilient to Global Thermal Nuclear attacks

  is a myth.

  Dom Stocqueler





  William
  Gragido To:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:     RE: TCP/IP and DOD
  [7:39657]
  Sent
  by:

  nobody@groups

  tudy.com



  27/03/2002

  20:17

  Please
  respond
  to

  William

  Gragido






  The DoD adopted TCP/IP as its native protocol for communications in 1983.
  DARPA lead the charge for a communications system that would be resilient
  to
  Global Thermal Nuclear attacks (therein allowing for continued,
  uninterrupted comm), and would allow for common connectivity of
  multi-vendor
  solutions.  This of course did yield 'ARPA NET' which, by a decision of
the
  DCA (Defense Communications Agency), in 1983 was split in two yielding a
  smaller version of 'ARPA NET' and 'MILNET'.  The evolution of the modern
  internet can followed done the line from 'ARPA NET' and as we all know by
  virtue of adding new networks to the mix, 'ARPA NET' was de-regulated in
  1991 ushering the age of the modern internet.

  Hope that helps,

  Will Gragido

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
  Michael Williams
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:37 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


  It's kinda fuzzy.  I myself just got through doing a tech review of a
book
  covering this topic as well as have written my own materials for
  training,
  etc covering this topic.  IMHO, DoD is credited with creating the
  internet
  even though at the time it wasn't called the internet and didn't use the
  same protocols we do now.  Although the DoD started the whole mess, from
  what I've read DoD commisioned ARPANET to research this.  I'm sure that
  peoples are various universities and colleges were in on the actual
  deveopment evidenced by the fact that in 1971 there were 15 nodes (with a
  total of 23 hosts), namely UCLA, SRI, UCSB, U of Utah, BBN, MIT, RAND,
SDC,
  Harvard, Lincoln Lab, Stanford, UIU(C), CWRU, CMU, and NASA/Ames.  Note
  most
  of those listed are colleges/universities. I've read some about BBN,
  however
  it seems to me their main role was to supply the first computers
  (Honeywell 516 mini computers with 12K of memory) that acted as
Information
  Message Processors (IMPs) (routers?).

  However, I would humbly suggest that Howard B. or Priscilla O. throw
their
  2
  cents in here.

  Also, since your doing a technical edit, be careful of the words you
choose
  as well.  For example you use the word written over and over above, but
I
  don't think the conversation is really about which programmers actually
  wrote the code it's more about who either spearheaded or caused the
  evolution of the *standards* we call TCP/IP in which case I don't think
  crediting the DoD is incorrect.

  My 2 cents =)
  Mike W.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39778t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-28 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

And I've heard that the US side in Desert Storm used Banyan for their 
networking systems, not TCP/IP!?

Priscilla

At 12:05 PM 3/28/02, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
 Thats what the DoD taught in their DataCommunications Schools.  Sorry Dom.

Absolutely, positively wrong, though. That's an urban legend that has
been disavowed by every early developer I can think of, including the
DARPA people. It developed out of pure DARPA sponsored research in
networking.

I'm hard-pressed to think of any nuclear command  control
communications system, before the mid-80's or so, that used TCP/IP,
and at one time I knew pretty much every system that was deployed.
Among the ones I can talk about, they were circuit-switched or radio.
Some of the circuit-switched networks were computer controlled,
including AUTODIN I and a variety of intelligent networks.

Without detailed research, I'd tend to say the first military TCP/IP
applications were in tactical, not strategic, nets.

Actually, the first demonstration that packet switched networks were
resilient to massive attack came from the Iraqi air defense system in
Desert Storm.

 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Chuck
 Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:00 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
 
 the real reason being.?
 
 
 
 
   wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   Sorry, the
 
   be resilient to Global Thermal Nuclear attacks
 
   is a myth.
 
   Dom Stocqueler
 
 
 
 
 
   William
   Gragido To:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:     RE: TCP/IP and DOD
   [7:39657]
   Sent
   by:
 
   nobody@groups
 
   tudy.com
 
 
 
   27/03/2002
 
   20:17
 
   Please
   respond
   to
 
   William
 
   Gragido
 
 
 
 
 
 
   The DoD adopted TCP/IP as its native protocol for communications in
1983.
   DARPA lead the charge for a communications system that would be
resilient
   to
   Global Thermal Nuclear attacks (therein allowing for continued,
   uninterrupted comm), and would allow for common connectivity of
   multi-vendor
   solutions.  This of course did yield 'ARPA NET' which, by a decision of
 the
   DCA (Defense Communications Agency), in 1983 was split in two yielding
a
   smaller version of 'ARPA NET' and 'MILNET'.  The evolution of the
modern
   internet can followed done the line from 'ARPA NET' and as we all know
by
   virtue of adding new networks to the mix, 'ARPA NET' was de-regulated
in
   1991 ushering the age of the modern internet.
 
   Hope that helps,
 
   Will Gragido
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
   Michael Williams
   Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:37 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
 
   It's kinda fuzzy.  I myself just got through doing a tech review of a
book
   covering this topic as well as have written my own materials for
   training,
   etc covering this topic.  IMHO, DoD is credited with creating the
   internet
   even though at the time it wasn't called the internet and didn't use
the
   same protocols we do now.  Although the DoD started the whole mess,
from
   what I've read DoD commisioned ARPANET to research this.  I'm sure that
   peoples are various universities and colleges were in on the actual
   deveopment evidenced by the fact that in 1971 there were 15 nodes
(with a
   total of 23 hosts), namely UCLA, SRI, UCSB, U of Utah, BBN, MIT, RAND,
 SDC,
   Harvard, Lincoln Lab, Stanford, UIU(C), CWRU, CMU, and NASA/Ames.  Note
   most
   of those listed are colleges/universities. I've read some about BBN,
   however
   it seems to me their main role was to supply the first computers
   (Honeywell 516 mini computers with 12K of memory) that acted as
 Information
   Message Processors (IMPs) (routers?).
 
   However, I would humbly suggest that Howard B. or Priscilla O. throw
their
   2
   cents in here.
 
   Also, since your doing a technical edit, be careful of the words you
 choose
   as well.  For example you use the word written over and over above,
but
 I
   don't think the conversation is really about which programmers
actually
   wrote the code it's more about who either spearheaded or caused the
   evolution of the *standards* we call TCP/IP in which case I don't
think
   crediting the DoD is incorrect.
 
   My 2 cents =)
   Mike W.


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39815t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-28 Thread William Gragido

Yes, thats true, we ran Banyon Vines, the USMC that is in addition to
various Unix variants.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


And I've heard that the US side in Desert Storm used Banyan for their
networking systems, not TCP/IP!?

Priscilla

At 12:05 PM 3/28/02, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
 Thats what the DoD taught in their DataCommunications Schools.  Sorry
Dom.

Absolutely, positively wrong, though. That's an urban legend that has
been disavowed by every early developer I can think of, including the
DARPA people. It developed out of pure DARPA sponsored research in
networking.

I'm hard-pressed to think of any nuclear command  control
communications system, before the mid-80's or so, that used TCP/IP,
and at one time I knew pretty much every system that was deployed.
Among the ones I can talk about, they were circuit-switched or radio.
Some of the circuit-switched networks were computer controlled,
including AUTODIN I and a variety of intelligent networks.

Without detailed research, I'd tend to say the first military TCP/IP
applications were in tactical, not strategic, nets.

Actually, the first demonstration that packet switched networks were
resilient to massive attack came from the Iraqi air defense system in
Desert Storm.

 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Chuck
 Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:00 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
 
 the real reason being.?
 
 
 
 
   wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   Sorry, the
 
   be resilient to Global Thermal Nuclear attacks
 
   is a myth.
 
   Dom Stocqueler
 
 
 
 
 
   William
   Gragido To:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:     RE: TCP/IP and DOD
   [7:39657]
   Sent
   by:
 
   nobody@groups
 
   tudy.com
 
 
 
   27/03/2002
 
   20:17
 
   Please
   respond
   to
 
   William
 
   Gragido
 
 
 
 
 
 
   The DoD adopted TCP/IP as its native protocol for communications in
1983.
   DARPA lead the charge for a communications system that would be
resilient
   to
   Global Thermal Nuclear attacks (therein allowing for continued,
   uninterrupted comm), and would allow for common connectivity of
   multi-vendor
   solutions.  This of course did yield 'ARPA NET' which, by a decision
of
 the
   DCA (Defense Communications Agency), in 1983 was split in two yielding
a
   smaller version of 'ARPA NET' and 'MILNET'.  The evolution of the
modern
   internet can followed done the line from 'ARPA NET' and as we all know
by
   virtue of adding new networks to the mix, 'ARPA NET' was de-regulated
in
   1991 ushering the age of the modern internet.
 
   Hope that helps,
 
   Will Gragido
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
   Michael Williams
   Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:37 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
 
   It's kinda fuzzy.  I myself just got through doing a tech review of a
book
   covering this topic as well as have written my own materials for
   training,
   etc covering this topic.  IMHO, DoD is credited with creating the
   internet
   even though at the time it wasn't called the internet and didn't use
the
   same protocols we do now.  Although the DoD started the whole mess,
from
   what I've read DoD commisioned ARPANET to research this.  I'm sure
that
   peoples are various universities and colleges were in on the actual
   deveopment evidenced by the fact that in 1971 there were 15 nodes
(with a
   total of 23 hosts), namely UCLA, SRI, UCSB, U of Utah, BBN, MIT, RAND,
 SDC,
   Harvard, Lincoln Lab, Stanford, UIU(C), CWRU, CMU, and NASA/Ames.
Note
   most
   of those listed are colleges/universities. I've read some about BBN,
   however
   it seems to me their main role was to supply the first computers
   (Honeywell 516 mini computers with 12K of memory) that acted as
 Information
   Message Processors (IMPs) (routers?).
 
   However, I would humbly suggest that Howard B. or Priscilla O. throw
their
   2
   cents in here.
 
   Also, since your doing a technical edit, be careful of the words you
 choose
   as well.  For example you use the word written over and over above,
but
 I
   don't think the conversation is really about which programmers
actually
   wrote the code it's more about who either spearheaded or caused the
   evolution of the *standards* we call TCP/IP in which case I don't
think
   crediting the DoD is incorrect.
 
   My 2 cents =)
   Mike W.


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3983

Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-28 Thread Steven A. Ridder

Now they use TCP/IP for the most part and run Cisco routers.

--

RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com


William Gragido  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Yes, thats true, we ran Banyon Vines, the USMC that is in addition to
 various Unix variants.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Priscilla Oppenheimer
 Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:12 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


 And I've heard that the US side in Desert Storm used Banyan for their
 networking systems, not TCP/IP!?

 Priscilla

 At 12:05 PM 3/28/02, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
  Thats what the DoD taught in their DataCommunications Schools.  Sorry
 Dom.
 
 Absolutely, positively wrong, though. That's an urban legend that has
 been disavowed by every early developer I can think of, including the
 DARPA people. It developed out of pure DARPA sponsored research in
 networking.
 
 I'm hard-pressed to think of any nuclear command  control
 communications system, before the mid-80's or so, that used TCP/IP,
 and at one time I knew pretty much every system that was deployed.
 Among the ones I can talk about, they were circuit-switched or radio.
 Some of the circuit-switched networks were computer controlled,
 including AUTODIN I and a variety of intelligent networks.
 
 Without detailed research, I'd tend to say the first military TCP/IP
 applications were in tactical, not strategic, nets.
 
 Actually, the first demonstration that packet switched networks were
 resilient to massive attack came from the Iraqi air defense system in
 Desert Storm.
 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
  Chuck
  Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:00 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
  
  
  the real reason being.?
  
  
  
  
wrote in message
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Sorry, the
  
be resilient to Global Thermal Nuclear attacks
  
is a myth.
  
Dom Stocqueler
  
  
  
  
  
William
Gragido To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
      Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD
[7:39657]
Sent
by:
  
nobody@groups
  
tudy.com
  
  
  
27/03/2002
  
20:17
  
Please
respond
to
  
William
  
Gragido
  
  
  
  
  
  
The DoD adopted TCP/IP as its native protocol for communications in
 1983.
DARPA lead the charge for a communications system that would be
 resilient
to
Global Thermal Nuclear attacks (therein allowing for continued,
uninterrupted comm), and would allow for common connectivity of
multi-vendor
solutions.  This of course did yield 'ARPA NET' which, by a decision
 of
  the
DCA (Defense Communications Agency), in 1983 was split in two
yielding
 a
smaller version of 'ARPA NET' and 'MILNET'.  The evolution of the
 modern
internet can followed done the line from 'ARPA NET' and as we all
know
 by
virtue of adding new networks to the mix, 'ARPA NET' was
de-regulated
 in
1991 ushering the age of the modern internet.
  
Hope that helps,
  
Will Gragido
  
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of
Michael Williams
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
  
  
It's kinda fuzzy.  I myself just got through doing a tech review of
a
 book
covering this topic as well as have written my own materials for
training,
etc covering this topic.  IMHO, DoD is credited with creating the
internet
even though at the time it wasn't called the internet and didn't use
 the
same protocols we do now.  Although the DoD started the whole mess,
 from
what I've read DoD commisioned ARPANET to research this.  I'm sure
 that
peoples are various universities and colleges were in on the actual
deveopment evidenced by the fact that in 1971 there were 15 nodes
 (with a
total of 23 hosts), namely UCLA, SRI, UCSB, U of Utah, BBN, MIT,
RAND,
  SDC,
Harvard, Lincoln Lab, Stanford, UIU(C), CWRU, CMU, and NASA/Ames.
 Note
most
of those listed are colleges/universities. I've read some about BBN,
however
it seems to me their main role was to supply the first computers
(Honeywell 516 mini computers with 12K of memory) that acted as
  Information
Message Processors (IMPs) (routers?).
  
However, I would humbly suggest that Howard B. or Priscilla O. throw
 their
2
cents in here.
  
Also, since your doing a technical edit, be careful of the words you
  choose
as well.  For example you use the word written over and over
above,
 but
  I
don't think the conversation is really about which programmers
 actually
wrote th

Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-28 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

ARPA managers were irritated by the lack of communications between diverse 
systems and the need to learn many arcane command languages to talk to each 
system.

Priscilla

At 10:00 AM 3/28/02, Chuck wrote:
the real reason being.?




  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Sorry, the
 
  be resilient to Global Thermal Nuclear attacks
 
  is a myth.
 
  Dom Stocqueler
 
 
 
 
 
  William
  Gragido To:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:     RE: TCP/IP and DOD
  [7:39657]
  Sent
  by:
 
  nobody@groups
 
  tudy.com
 
 
 
  27/03/2002
 
  20:17
 
  Please
  respond
  to
 
  William
 
  Gragido
 
 
 
 
 
 
  The DoD adopted TCP/IP as its native protocol for communications in 1983.
  DARPA lead the charge for a communications system that would be resilient
  to
  Global Thermal Nuclear attacks (therein allowing for continued,
  uninterrupted comm), and would allow for common connectivity of
  multi-vendor
  solutions.  This of course did yield 'ARPA NET' which, by a decision of
the
  DCA (Defense Communications Agency), in 1983 was split in two yielding a
  smaller version of 'ARPA NET' and 'MILNET'.  The evolution of the modern
  internet can followed done the line from 'ARPA NET' and as we all know by
  virtue of adding new networks to the mix, 'ARPA NET' was de-regulated in
  1991 ushering the age of the modern internet.
 
  Hope that helps,
 
  Will Gragido
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
  Michael Williams
  Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:37 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]
 
 
  It's kinda fuzzy.  I myself just got through doing a tech review of a
book
  covering this topic as well as have written my own materials for
  training,
  etc covering this topic.  IMHO, DoD is credited with creating the
  internet
  even though at the time it wasn't called the internet and didn't use the
  same protocols we do now.  Although the DoD started the whole mess, from
  what I've read DoD commisioned ARPANET to research this.  I'm sure that
  peoples are various universities and colleges were in on the actual
  deveopment evidenced by the fact that in 1971 there were 15 nodes (with a
  total of 23 hosts), namely UCLA, SRI, UCSB, U of Utah, BBN, MIT, RAND,
SDC,
  Harvard, Lincoln Lab, Stanford, UIU(C), CWRU, CMU, and NASA/Ames.  Note
  most
  of those listed are colleges/universities. I've read some about BBN,
  however
  it seems to me their main role was to supply the first computers
  (Honeywell 516 mini computers with 12K of memory) that acted as
Information
  Message Processors (IMPs) (routers?).
 
  However, I would humbly suggest that Howard B. or Priscilla O. throw
their
  2
  cents in here.
 
  Also, since your doing a technical edit, be careful of the words you
choose
  as well.  For example you use the word written over and over above, but
I
  don't think the conversation is really about which programmers actually
  wrote the code it's more about who either spearheaded or caused the
  evolution of the *standards* we call TCP/IP in which case I don't think
  crediting the DoD is incorrect.
 
  My 2 cents =)
  Mike W.


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39848t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-28 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

ARPA managers were irritated by the lack of communications between diverse
systems and the need to learn many arcane command languages to talk to each
system.

Priscilla

But ARPANET just gave you the pipes. You still had to use CP/CMS on 
the 360/67, MULTICS on the Honeywells, NCP CLI on the Vaxen, JCL or 
TSO on the other 360s and 370s, EXEC 8 language on the 1108s, etc

I will agree that the incompatible communications _protocols_ were an 
issue, but ARPANET did nothing to solve command language 
compatibility.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39864t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-28 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

Having a network made the problem of command language incompatibility less 
of an issue. A researcher could use the hardware and OS of choice and at 
least send messages to a different piece of hardware with some other OS. 
With the right software, one could send messages to users and also execute 
commands and jobs. There was less need to learn many different command 
languages.

According to Bob Taylor of ARPA, this is the problem he wanted to solve. He 
was an early victim of the swivel chair approach to IS (having to work with 
many different terminals). We still have that problem, of course, so 
obviously networks don't solve everything!

(I get the info about Bob Taylor secondhand from the book Where Wizards 
Stay Up Late. It's possible the author slightly misinterpreted what he said 
about his goals. The book is fascinating but there are a few cases where 
someone who actually works in the industry kind of wonders about the 
details described.)

Priscilla

At 08:17 PM 3/28/02, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
 ARPA managers were irritated by the lack of communications between diverse
 systems and the need to learn many arcane command languages to talk to
each
 system.
 
 Priscilla

But ARPANET just gave you the pipes. You still had to use CP/CMS on
the 360/67, MULTICS on the Honeywells, NCP CLI on the Vaxen, JCL or
TSO on the other 360s and 370s, EXEC 8 language on the 1108s, etc

I will agree that the incompatible communications _protocols_ were an
issue, but ARPANET did nothing to solve command language
compatibility.


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39875t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-27 Thread Michael Williams

It's kinda fuzzy.  I myself just got through doing a tech review of a book
covering this topic as well as have written my own materials for training,
etc covering this topic.  IMHO, DoD is credited with creating the internet
even though at the time it wasn't called the internet and didn't use the
same protocols we do now.  Although the DoD started the whole mess, from
what I've read DoD commisioned ARPANET to research this.  I'm sure that
peoples are various universities and colleges were in on the actual
deveopment evidenced by the fact that in 1971 there were 15 nodes (with a
total of 23 hosts), namely UCLA, SRI, UCSB, U of Utah, BBN, MIT, RAND, SDC,
Harvard, Lincoln Lab, Stanford, UIU(C), CWRU, CMU, and NASA/Ames.  Note most
of those listed are colleges/universities. I've read some about BBN, however
it seems to me their main role was to supply the first computers
(Honeywell 516 mini computers with 12K of memory) that acted as Information
Message Processors (IMPs) (routers?).

However, I would humbly suggest that Howard B. or Priscilla O. throw their 2
cents in here.

Also, since your doing a technical edit, be careful of the words you choose
as well.  For example you use the word written over and over above, but I
don't think the conversation is really about which programmers actually
wrote the code it's more about who either spearheaded or caused the
evolution of the *standards* we call TCP/IP in which case I don't think
crediting the DoD is incorrect.

My 2 cents =)
Mike W.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39670t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-27 Thread William Gragido

The DoD adopted TCP/IP as its native protocol for communications in 1983.
DARPA lead the charge for a communications system that would be resilient to
Global Thermal Nuclear attacks (therein allowing for continued,
uninterrupted comm), and would allow for common connectivity of multi-vendor
solutions.  This of course did yield 'ARPA NET' which, by a decision of the
DCA (Defense Communications Agency), in 1983 was split in two yielding a
smaller version of 'ARPA NET' and 'MILNET'.  The evolution of the modern
internet can followed done the line from 'ARPA NET' and as we all know by
virtue of adding new networks to the mix, 'ARPA NET' was de-regulated in
1991 ushering the age of the modern internet.

Hope that helps,

Will Gragido

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Michael Williams
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


It's kinda fuzzy.  I myself just got through doing a tech review of a book
covering this topic as well as have written my own materials for training,
etc covering this topic.  IMHO, DoD is credited with creating the internet
even though at the time it wasn't called the internet and didn't use the
same protocols we do now.  Although the DoD started the whole mess, from
what I've read DoD commisioned ARPANET to research this.  I'm sure that
peoples are various universities and colleges were in on the actual
deveopment evidenced by the fact that in 1971 there were 15 nodes (with a
total of 23 hosts), namely UCLA, SRI, UCSB, U of Utah, BBN, MIT, RAND, SDC,
Harvard, Lincoln Lab, Stanford, UIU(C), CWRU, CMU, and NASA/Ames.  Note most
of those listed are colleges/universities. I've read some about BBN, however
it seems to me their main role was to supply the first computers
(Honeywell 516 mini computers with 12K of memory) that acted as Information
Message Processors (IMPs) (routers?).

However, I would humbly suggest that Howard B. or Priscilla O. throw their 2
cents in here.

Also, since your doing a technical edit, be careful of the words you choose
as well.  For example you use the word written over and over above, but I
don't think the conversation is really about which programmers actually
wrote the code it's more about who either spearheaded or caused the
evolution of the *standards* we call TCP/IP in which case I don't think
crediting the DoD is incorrect.

My 2 cents =)
Mike W.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39677t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-27 Thread Steven A. Ridder

I know I shouldn't say written, but I seem to remember a Wired atricle
mentioning Judy Estrin and Bill Carrico, working under Vint Cerf, as the
authors of TCP's predacessor in 1975.  Anyone know?

--

RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com


Michael Williams  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 It's kinda fuzzy.  I myself just got through doing a tech review of a book
 covering this topic as well as have written my own materials for
training,
 etc covering this topic.  IMHO, DoD is credited with creating the
internet
 even though at the time it wasn't called the internet and didn't use the
 same protocols we do now.  Although the DoD started the whole mess, from
 what I've read DoD commisioned ARPANET to research this.  I'm sure that
 peoples are various universities and colleges were in on the actual
 deveopment evidenced by the fact that in 1971 there were 15 nodes (with a
 total of 23 hosts), namely UCLA, SRI, UCSB, U of Utah, BBN, MIT, RAND,
SDC,
 Harvard, Lincoln Lab, Stanford, UIU(C), CWRU, CMU, and NASA/Ames.  Note
most
 of those listed are colleges/universities. I've read some about BBN,
however
 it seems to me their main role was to supply the first computers
 (Honeywell 516 mini computers with 12K of memory) that acted as
Information
 Message Processors (IMPs) (routers?).

 However, I would humbly suggest that Howard B. or Priscilla O. throw their
2
 cents in here.

 Also, since your doing a technical edit, be careful of the words you
choose
 as well.  For example you use the word written over and over above, but
I
 don't think the conversation is really about which programmers actually
 wrote the code it's more about who either spearheaded or caused the
 evolution of the *standards* we call TCP/IP in which case I don't think
 crediting the DoD is incorrect.

 My 2 cents =)
 Mike W.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39679t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-27 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

The history of TCP/IP is somewhat muddy, as you can imagine.

At 02:04 PM 3/27/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP was
written by the Depertment of Defense.

I agree that you should question that.

  I am confident that ARPAnet was
commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN

Yes, you could say that. The Information Processing Techniques Office 
(IPTO) of ARPA awarded the contract to build the Interface Message 
Processors (IMP) for ARPANET to BBN in late 1968. IMPs were the early 
routers. BBN built the IMPs with the help (or hindrance if you believe some 
reports) of Honeywell. Honeywell developed and manufactured the hardware. 
BBN did the software.

Descriptions of the network layer software that ran on these IMPs doesn't 
sound much like IP at all. It was connection-oriented, for one thing, and 
handled error correction. It was very East-Coast anal-retentive stuff. ;-)

The software that evolved into TCP/IP was a West-Coast hippy-dippy geeky 
phenomenon. UCLA, SRI, UC Santa Barbara, USC, and University of Utah 
graduate students and researchers worked on it. Originally they had to make 
sure their software interoperated with the IMPs of the ARPANET. They 
developed a protocol called the Network Control Protocol (NCP) that worked 
on the end devices that communicated with the IMPs. It was a host-to-host 
protocol that could be considered a predecessor to TCP.

NCP worked only with ARPANET. By 1973 or so, ARPANET wasn't the only game 
in town though. There was packet radio (which evolved into Ethernet), 
SATNET, and others. A more general-purpose protocol was needed. Vint Cerf 
who was with UCLA at the time and Bob Kahn, who had been at BBN but now 
worked for ARPA directly, worked on a new protocol called Transmission 
Control Protocol (TCP) that was general-purpose. They made the assumption 
that the underlying network was unreliable. The new protocol shifted the 
job of reliability from the network to the destination hosts.

Originally TCP handled the routing of packets also. TCP had jobs that we 
would today assign to the network and transport layers.

And finally, in 1978, we come to the birth of the Internet Protocol (IP). 
In 1978, the job of routing packets was broken away from TCP. TCP was given 
the task of breaking messages into packets, reassembling them at the other 
end, detecting errors, resending anything lost, and putting packets in the 
right order. IP was simply responsible for forwarding individual packets. 
The specifications for how this should work were written by Cerf at UCLA, 
and Postel and Cohen from the University of Southern California's 
Information Sciences Institute (ISI).

In the early 1980s, the ARPANET got really congested and the National 
Science Foundation created its own network for the academic computer 
science community. It used TCP/IP and is sometimes considered the real 
forerunner of the Internet, although it probably could never have 
happened without the work that went into the ARPANET. ARPANET converted to 
TCP/IP in 1983. It also divided into MILNET and ARPANET. It had 
connectivity with all the other networks by then. Later it got 
decommissioned. By 1989, it was gone, but its legacy lived on. May it RIP.
;-)

Here's a recommendation for a terrific book about the history of the
Internet:

Where Wizards Stay Up Late: The Origins of the Internet by Katie Hafner 
and Matthew Lyon.

Priscilla

, and maybe TCP/IP was derived from
these early protocls, but to say the the DoD, or BBN or anyone other than
the Internet community wrote TCP and IP would be incorrect, right?  I seem
to remember that IP was used in ArpaNet, but not TCP.  I thought TCP was
written in various universities.  I could even look up the couple (who used
to work at Cisco) who wrote it.

--

RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39681t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-27 Thread Steven A. Ridder

Priscilla Oppenheimer  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 The history of TCP/IP is somewhat muddy, as you can imagine.

 At 02:04 PM 3/27/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
 I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP was
 written by the Depertment of Defense.

 I agree that you should question that.

   I am confident that ARPAnet was
 commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN

 Yes, you could say that. The Information Processing Techniques Office
 (IPTO) of ARPA awarded the contract to build the Interface Message
 Processors (IMP) for ARPANET to BBN in late 1968. IMPs were the early
 routers. BBN built the IMPs with the help (or hindrance if you believe
some
 reports) of Honeywell. Honeywell developed and manufactured the hardware.
 BBN did the software.

 Descriptions of the network layer software that ran on these IMPs
doesn't
 sound much like IP at all. It was connection-oriented, for one thing, and
 handled error correction. It was very East-Coast anal-retentive stuff. ;-)


Us Bostonians aren't that bad, are we?


 The software that evolved into TCP/IP was a West-Coast hippy-dippy geeky
 phenomenon.

Is UDP a west-coast thing?

UCLA, SRI, UC Santa Barbara, USC, and University of Utah
 graduate students and researchers worked on it. Originally they had to
make
 sure their software interoperated with the IMPs of the ARPANET. They
 developed a protocol called the Network Control Protocol (NCP) that worked
 on the end devices that communicated with the IMPs. It was a host-to-host
 protocol that could be considered a predecessor to TCP.

 NCP worked only with ARPANET. By 1973 or so, ARPANET wasn't the only game
 in town though. There was packet radio (which evolved into Ethernet),
 SATNET, and others. A more general-purpose protocol was needed. Vint Cerf
 who was with UCLA at the time and Bob Kahn, who had been at BBN but now
 worked for ARPA directly, worked on a new protocol called Transmission
 Control Protocol (TCP) that was general-purpose. They made the assumption
 that the underlying network was unreliable. The new protocol shifted the
 job of reliability from the network to the destination hosts.

 Originally TCP handled the routing of packets also. TCP had jobs that we
 would today assign to the network and transport layers.

 And finally, in 1978, we come to the birth of the Internet Protocol (IP).
 In 1978, the job of routing packets was broken away from TCP. TCP was
given
 the task of breaking messages into packets, reassembling them at the other
 end, detecting errors, resending anything lost, and putting packets in the
 right order. IP was simply responsible for forwarding individual packets.
 The specifications for how this should work were written by Cerf at UCLA,
 and Postel and Cohen from the University of Southern California's
 Information Sciences Institute (ISI).

 In the early 1980s, the ARPANET got really congested and the National
 Science Foundation created its own network for the academic computer
 science community. It used TCP/IP and is sometimes considered the real
 forerunner of the Internet, although it probably could never have
 happened without the work that went into the ARPANET. ARPANET converted to
 TCP/IP in 1983. It also divided into MILNET and ARPANET. It had
 connectivity with all the other networks by then. Later it got
 decommissioned. By 1989, it was gone, but its legacy lived on. May it RIP.
 ;-)

 Here's a recommendation for a terrific book about the history of the
 Internet:

 Where Wizards Stay Up Late: The Origins of the Internet by Katie Hafner
 and Matthew Lyon.

I'll definitely read that book, as I love that kind of stuff.


 Priscilla

 , and maybe TCP/IP was derived from
 these early protocls, but to say the the DoD, or BBN or anyone other than
 the Internet community wrote TCP and IP would be incorrect, right?  I
seem
 to remember that IP was used in ArpaNet, but not TCP.  I thought TCP was
 written in various universities.  I could even look up the couple (who
used
 to work at Cisco) who wrote it.
 
 --
 
 RFC 1149 Compliant.
 Get in my head:
 http://sar.dynu.com
 

 Priscilla Oppenheimer
 http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39684t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-27 Thread Rasman

Start with RFC 01 ietf org site.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Steven A. Ridder
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP was
written by the Depertment of Defense.  I am confident that ARPAnet was
commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN, and maybe TCP/IP was derived from
these early protocls, but to say the the DoD, or BBN or anyone other than
the Internet community wrote TCP and IP would be incorrect, right?  I seem
to remember that IP was used in ArpaNet, but not TCP.  I thought TCP was
written in various universities.  I could even look up the couple (who used
to work at Cisco) who wrote it.

--

RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39694t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-27 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

No, you Bostonians aren't that bad. I'll be there in June for my hubby's 
MIT reunion. Should be interesting.

I don't know the history of UDP. It sounds like it could have come from 
Berkeley or Santa Cruz or Eugene or some such pinko, commie, anarchist 
place! ;-)

Priscilla

At 03:41 PM 3/27/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
Priscilla Oppenheimer  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  The history of TCP/IP is somewhat muddy, as you can imagine.
 
  At 02:04 PM 3/27/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
  I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP was
  written by the Depertment of Defense.
 
  I agree that you should question that.
 
I am confident that ARPAnet was
  commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN
 
  Yes, you could say that. The Information Processing Techniques Office
  (IPTO) of ARPA awarded the contract to build the Interface Message
  Processors (IMP) for ARPANET to BBN in late 1968. IMPs were the early
  routers. BBN built the IMPs with the help (or hindrance if you believe
some
  reports) of Honeywell. Honeywell developed and manufactured the hardware.
  BBN did the software.
 
  Descriptions of the network layer software that ran on these IMPs
doesn't
  sound much like IP at all. It was connection-oriented, for one thing, and
  handled error correction. It was very East-Coast anal-retentive stuff.
;-)


Us Bostonians aren't that bad, are we?

 
  The software that evolved into TCP/IP was a West-Coast hippy-dippy geeky
  phenomenon.

Is UDP a west-coast thing?

UCLA, SRI, UC Santa Barbara, USC, and University of Utah
  graduate students and researchers worked on it. Originally they had to
make
  sure their software interoperated with the IMPs of the ARPANET. They
  developed a protocol called the Network Control Protocol (NCP) that
worked
  on the end devices that communicated with the IMPs. It was a host-to-host
  protocol that could be considered a predecessor to TCP.
 
  NCP worked only with ARPANET. By 1973 or so, ARPANET wasn't the only game
  in town though. There was packet radio (which evolved into Ethernet),
  SATNET, and others. A more general-purpose protocol was needed. Vint Cerf
  who was with UCLA at the time and Bob Kahn, who had been at BBN but now
  worked for ARPA directly, worked on a new protocol called Transmission
  Control Protocol (TCP) that was general-purpose. They made the assumption
  that the underlying network was unreliable. The new protocol shifted the
  job of reliability from the network to the destination hosts.
 
  Originally TCP handled the routing of packets also. TCP had jobs that we
  would today assign to the network and transport layers.
 
  And finally, in 1978, we come to the birth of the Internet Protocol (IP).
  In 1978, the job of routing packets was broken away from TCP. TCP was
given
  the task of breaking messages into packets, reassembling them at the
other
  end, detecting errors, resending anything lost, and putting packets in
the
  right order. IP was simply responsible for forwarding individual packets.
  The specifications for how this should work were written by Cerf at UCLA,
  and Postel and Cohen from the University of Southern California's
  Information Sciences Institute (ISI).
 
  In the early 1980s, the ARPANET got really congested and the National
  Science Foundation created its own network for the academic computer
  science community. It used TCP/IP and is sometimes considered the real
  forerunner of the Internet, although it probably could never have
  happened without the work that went into the ARPANET. ARPANET converted
to
  TCP/IP in 1983. It also divided into MILNET and ARPANET. It had
  connectivity with all the other networks by then. Later it got
  decommissioned. By 1989, it was gone, but its legacy lived on. May it
RIP.
  ;-)
 
  Here's a recommendation for a terrific book about the history of the
  Internet:
 
  Where Wizards Stay Up Late: The Origins of the Internet by Katie Hafner
  and Matthew Lyon.

I'll definitely read that book, as I love that kind of stuff.

 
  Priscilla
 
  , and maybe TCP/IP was derived from
  these early protocls, but to say the the DoD, or BBN or anyone other
than
  the Internet community wrote TCP and IP would be incorrect, right?  I
seem
  to remember that IP was used in ArpaNet, but not TCP.  I thought TCP was
  written in various universities.  I could even look up the couple (who
used
  to work at Cisco) who wrote it.
  
  --
  
  RFC 1149 Compliant.
  Get in my head:
  http://sar.dynu.com
  
 
  Priscilla Oppenheimer
  http://www.priscilla.com


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39697t=39657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-27 Thread Steven A. Ridder

I used to work with a guy who loved to call University of Berkely the
University of Bezerkly.

--

RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com


Priscilla Oppenheimer  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 No, you Bostonians aren't that bad. I'll be there in June for my hubby's
 MIT reunion. Should be interesting.

 I don't know the history of UDP. It sounds like it could have come from
 Berkeley or Santa Cruz or Eugene or some such pinko, commie, anarchist
 place! ;-)

 Priscilla

 At 03:41 PM 3/27/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
 Priscilla Oppenheimer  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   The history of TCP/IP is somewhat muddy, as you can imagine.
  
   At 02:04 PM 3/27/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
   I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP
was
   written by the Depertment of Defense.
  
   I agree that you should question that.
  
 I am confident that ARPAnet was
   commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN
  
   Yes, you could say that. The Information Processing Techniques Office
   (IPTO) of ARPA awarded the contract to build the Interface Message
   Processors (IMP) for ARPANET to BBN in late 1968. IMPs were the early
   routers. BBN built the IMPs with the help (or hindrance if you believe
 some
   reports) of Honeywell. Honeywell developed and manufactured the
hardware.
   BBN did the software.
  
   Descriptions of the network layer software that ran on these IMPs
 doesn't
   sound much like IP at all. It was connection-oriented, for one thing,
and
   handled error correction. It was very East-Coast anal-retentive stuff.
 ;-)
 
 
 Us Bostonians aren't that bad, are we?
 
  
   The software that evolved into TCP/IP was a West-Coast hippy-dippy
geeky
   phenomenon.
 
 Is UDP a west-coast thing?
 
 UCLA, SRI, UC Santa Barbara, USC, and University of Utah
   graduate students and researchers worked on it. Originally they had to
 make
   sure their software interoperated with the IMPs of the ARPANET. They
   developed a protocol called the Network Control Protocol (NCP) that
 worked
   on the end devices that communicated with the IMPs. It was a
host-to-host
   protocol that could be considered a predecessor to TCP.
  
   NCP worked only with ARPANET. By 1973 or so, ARPANET wasn't the only
game
   in town though. There was packet radio (which evolved into Ethernet),
   SATNET, and others. A more general-purpose protocol was needed. Vint
Cerf
   who was with UCLA at the time and Bob Kahn, who had been at BBN but
now
   worked for ARPA directly, worked on a new protocol called Transmission
   Control Protocol (TCP) that was general-purpose. They made the
assumption
   that the underlying network was unreliable. The new protocol shifted
the
   job of reliability from the network to the destination hosts.
  
   Originally TCP handled the routing of packets also. TCP had jobs that
we
   would today assign to the network and transport layers.
  
   And finally, in 1978, we come to the birth of the Internet Protocol
(IP).
   In 1978, the job of routing packets was broken away from TCP. TCP was
 given
   the task of breaking messages into packets, reassembling them at the
 other
   end, detecting errors, resending anything lost, and putting packets in
 the
   right order. IP was simply responsible for forwarding individual
packets.
   The specifications for how this should work were written by Cerf at
UCLA,
   and Postel and Cohen from the University of Southern California's
   Information Sciences Institute (ISI).
  
   In the early 1980s, the ARPANET got really congested and the National
   Science Foundation created its own network for the academic computer
   science community. It used TCP/IP and is sometimes considered the real
   forerunner of the Internet, although it probably could never have
   happened without the work that went into the ARPANET. ARPANET
converted
 to
   TCP/IP in 1983. It also divided into MILNET and ARPANET. It had
   connectivity with all the other networks by then. Later it got
   decommissioned. By 1989, it was gone, but its legacy lived on. May it
 RIP.
   ;-)
  
   Here's a recommendation for a terrific book about the history of the
   Internet:
  
   Where Wizards Stay Up Late: The Origins of the Internet by Katie
Hafner
   and Matthew Lyon.
 
 I'll definitely read that book, as I love that kind of stuff.
 
  
   Priscilla
  
   , and maybe TCP/IP was derived from
   these early protocls, but to say the the DoD, or BBN or anyone other
 than
   the Internet community wrote TCP and IP would be incorrect, right?  I
 seem
   to remember that IP was used in ArpaNet, but not TCP.  I thought TCP
was
   written in various universities.  I could even look up the couple
(who
 used
   to work at Cisco) who wrote it.
   
   --
   
   RFC 1149 Compliant.
   Get in my head:
   http://sar.dynu.com
   
  
   Priscilla Oppenheimer
   http://www.priscilla.com
 

RE: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]

2002-03-27 Thread Wright, Jeremy

i heard a saying one time that the only good things that came out of berkley
was Free BSD and LSD   ;)
no offense to alumni


-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TCP/IP and DOD [7:39657]


I used to work with a guy who loved to call University of Berkely the
University of Bezerkly.

--

RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com


Priscilla Oppenheimer  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 No, you Bostonians aren't that bad. I'll be there in June for my hubby's
 MIT reunion. Should be interesting.

 I don't know the history of UDP. It sounds like it could have come from
 Berkeley or Santa Cruz or Eugene or some such pinko, commie, anarchist
 place! ;-)

 Priscilla

 At 03:41 PM 3/27/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
 Priscilla Oppenheimer  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   The history of TCP/IP is somewhat muddy, as you can imagine.
  
   At 02:04 PM 3/27/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
   I am a technical reviewer for a book, and someone wrote that TCP/IP
was
   written by the Depertment of Defense.
  
   I agree that you should question that.
  
 I am confident that ARPAnet was
   commissiond by the DoD in the 60's to BBN
  
   Yes, you could say that. The Information Processing Techniques Office
   (IPTO) of ARPA awarded the contract to build the Interface Message
   Processors (IMP) for ARPANET to BBN in late 1968. IMPs were the early
   routers. BBN built the IMPs with the help (or hindrance if you believe
 some
   reports) of Honeywell. Honeywell developed and manufactured the
hardware.
   BBN did the software.
  
   Descriptions of the network layer software that ran on these IMPs
 doesn't
   sound much like IP at all. It was connection-oriented, for one thing,
and
   handled error correction. It was very East-Coast anal-retentive stuff.
 ;-)
 
 
 Us Bostonians aren't that bad, are we?
 
  
   The software that evolved into TCP/IP was a West-Coast hippy-dippy
geeky
   phenomenon.
 
 Is UDP a west-coast thing?
 
 UCLA, SRI, UC Santa Barbara, USC, and University of Utah
   graduate students and researchers worked on it. Originally they had to
 make
   sure their software interoperated with the IMPs of the ARPANET. They
   developed a protocol called the Network Control Protocol (NCP) that
 worked
   on the end devices that communicated with the IMPs. It was a
host-to-host
   protocol that could be considered a predecessor to TCP.
  
   NCP worked only with ARPANET. By 1973 or so, ARPANET wasn't the only
game
   in town though. There was packet radio (which evolved into Ethernet),
   SATNET, and others. A more general-purpose protocol was needed. Vint
Cerf
   who was with UCLA at the time and Bob Kahn, who had been at BBN but
now
   worked for ARPA directly, worked on a new protocol called Transmission
   Control Protocol (TCP) that was general-purpose. They made the
assumption
   that the underlying network was unreliable. The new protocol shifted
the
   job of reliability from the network to the destination hosts.
  
   Originally TCP handled the routing of packets also. TCP had jobs that
we
   would today assign to the network and transport layers.
  
   And finally, in 1978, we come to the birth of the Internet Protocol
(IP).
   In 1978, the job of routing packets was broken away from TCP. TCP was
 given
   the task of breaking messages into packets, reassembling them at the
 other
   end, detecting errors, resending anything lost, and putting packets in
 the
   right order. IP was simply responsible for forwarding individual
packets.
   The specifications for how this should work were written by Cerf at
UCLA,
   and Postel and Cohen from the University of Southern California's
   Information Sciences Institute (ISI).
  
   In the early 1980s, the ARPANET got really congested and the National
   Science Foundation created its own network for the academic computer
   science community. It used TCP/IP and is sometimes considered the real
   forerunner of the Internet, although it probably could never have
   happened without the work that went into the ARPANET. ARPANET
converted
 to
   TCP/IP in 1983. It also divided into MILNET and ARPANET. It had
   connectivity with all the other networks by then. Later it got
   decommissioned. By 1989, it was gone, but its legacy lived on. May it
 RIP.
   ;-)
  
   Here's a recommendation for a terrific book about the history of the
   Internet:
  
   Where Wizards Stay Up Late: The Origins of the Internet by Katie
Hafner
   and Matthew Lyon.
 
 I'll definitely read that book, as I love that kind of stuff.
 
  
   Priscilla
  
   , and maybe TCP/IP was derived from
   these early protocls, but to say the the DoD, or BBN or anyone other
 than
   the Internet community wrote TCP and IP would be incorrect, right?  I
 seem
   to remember that IP was used in ArpaNet,