Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix)
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me.
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
I'll make this change in plugman now. On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM,
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Just pushed 0.7.12 of plugman that writes out both .js and .json files. The .js file is wrapped in a cordova.define module whereas the .json file is a simple array of plugins that were added using plugman. Next I will update cordova-js to: 1. Try to load the .json file using an xhr 2. If that throws, it will try to load the .js file by injecting a script tag. I will then test out this action on ios/android/bb10 and get Mapes to test it out on WP. THEN: retag will happen. Will report back shortly. On 6/19/13 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME.
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not guaranteed, and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between the 2 methods. Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best approach is: 1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json 2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case it continues on to a script injection attempt. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote:
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
I've pushed a pl branch to cordova-js that combines both loading techniques in the plugin_loader. I am in the process of testing on android/ios/bb10. Benn is working on testing that on the Windows Phone platforms. If it all works out I will merge this back into master on cordova-js, cherry pick into the 2.9.x branch and retag the JS. On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not guaranteed, and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between the 2 methods. Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best approach is: 1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json 2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case it continues on to a script injection attempt. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote:
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10. Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on windows phone * On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not guaranteed, and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between the 2 methods. Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best approach is: 1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json 2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case it continues on to a script injection attempt. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
I am testing on windows as well. I think I have a change, give me a few minutes to verify. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10. Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on windows phone * On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not guaranteed, and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between the 2 methods. Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best approach is: 1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json 2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case it continues on to a script injection attempt. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Benn and I just tested the pl branch of cordova-js on Windows Phone 7, works well. We are gonna test on WP8 now too. On 6/19/13 2:03 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I am testing on windows as well. I think I have a change, give me a few minutes to verify. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10. Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on windows phone * On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not guaranteed, and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between the 2 methods. Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best approach is: 1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json 2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case it continues on to a script injection attempt. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Works on WP7 and Jesse reports it working on WP8. I am merging back into master and retagging JS shortly. On 6/19/13 2:03 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I am testing on windows as well. I think I have a change, give me a few minutes to verify. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10. Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on windows phone * On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not guaranteed, and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between the 2 methods. Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best approach is: 1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json 2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case it continues on to a script injection attempt. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Ok so how do we update the JS on all platforms now? coho? On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Works on WP7 and Jesse reports it working on WP8. I am merging back into master and retagging JS shortly. On 6/19/13 2:03 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I am testing on windows as well. I think I have a change, give me a few minutes to verify. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10. Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on windows phone * On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not guaranteed, and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between the 2 methods. Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best approach is: 1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json 2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case it continues on to a script injection attempt. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Ha, my next question. I want to know too ... I have pushed to master and cherry-pick'd into 2.9.x My change just added support for a case where XHR was permitted, but there wasn't a json file. It then attempts the script injection to load a .js plugins file, instead of just giving up. This would likely be the case in iOS on/after 3.0.0 or whenever we stop generating both a js+json files. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Ok so how do we update the JS on all platforms now? coho? On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Works on WP7 and Jesse reports it working on WP8. I am merging back into master and retagging JS shortly. On 6/19/13 2:03 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I am testing on windows as well. I think I have a change, give me a few minutes to verify. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10. Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on windows phone * On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not guaranteed, and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between the 2 methods. Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best approach is: 1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json 2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case it continues on to a script injection attempt. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Tag it the ol' fashioned way, then. Not sure why we need magic to do `git tag 2.9.0rc1 git push --tags apache 2.9.x` On 6/19/13 2:50 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Ha, my next question. I want to know too ... I have pushed to master and cherry-pick'd into 2.9.x My change just added support for a case where XHR was permitted, but there wasn't a json file. It then attempts the script injection to load a .js plugins file, instead of just giving up. This would likely be the case in iOS on/after 3.0.0 or whenever we stop generating both a js+json files. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Ok so how do we update the JS on all platforms now? coho? On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Works on WP7 and Jesse reports it working on WP8. I am merging back into master and retagging JS shortly. On 6/19/13 2:03 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I am testing on windows as well. I think I have a change, give me a few minutes to verify. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10. Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on windows phone * On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not guaranteed, and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between the 2 methods. Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best approach is: 1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json 2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case it continues on to a script injection attempt. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned:
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Yeah I'm stalled on this one. If I run jake on cordova-js 2.9.x branch, the version in the .js header is still 2.7.0 - checked the VERSION file is correct. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Ha, my next question. I want to know too ... I have pushed to master and cherry-pick'd into 2.9.x My change just added support for a case where XHR was permitted, but there wasn't a json file. It then attempts the script injection to load a .js plugins file, instead of just giving up. This would likely be the case in iOS on/after 3.0.0 or whenever we stop generating both a js+json files. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Ok so how do we update the JS on all platforms now? coho? On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Works on WP7 and Jesse reports it working on WP8. I am merging back into master and retagging JS shortly. On 6/19/13 2:03 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I am testing on windows as well. I think I have a change, give me a few minutes to verify. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10. Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on windows phone * On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not guaranteed, and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between the 2 methods. Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best approach is: 1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json 2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case it continues on to a script injection attempt. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Its the magical computeGitVersion in jakefile. Apparently it boils down: $ git describe --tags --long 2.7.0rc1-94-g002f33d Not sure why that returns 2.7.0, nor why we use that instead of VERSION. I suggest moving forward and manually tagging. On 6/19/13 2:52 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah I'm stalled on this one. If I run jake on cordova-js 2.9.x branch, the version in the .js header is still 2.7.0 - checked the VERSION file is correct. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Ha, my next question. I want to know too ... I have pushed to master and cherry-pick'd into 2.9.x My change just added support for a case where XHR was permitted, but there wasn't a json file. It then attempts the script injection to load a .js plugins file, instead of just giving up. This would likely be the case in iOS on/after 3.0.0 or whenever we stop generating both a js+json files. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Ok so how do we update the JS on all platforms now? coho? On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Works on WP7 and Jesse reports it working on WP8. I am merging back into master and retagging JS shortly. On 6/19/13 2:03 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I am testing on windows as well. I think I have a change, give me a few minutes to verify. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10. Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on windows phone * On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not guaranteed, and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between the 2 methods. Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best approach is: 1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json 2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case it continues on to a script injection attempt. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Just re-tagged, test and fly! I am now getting : // Platform: windowsphone // 2.9.0rc1-0-g002f33d @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah I'm stalled on this one. If I run jake on cordova-js 2.9.x branch, the version in the .js header is still 2.7.0 - checked the VERSION file is correct. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Ha, my next question. I want to know too ... I have pushed to master and cherry-pick'd into 2.9.x My change just added support for a case where XHR was permitted, but there wasn't a json file. It then attempts the script injection to load a .js plugins file, instead of just giving up. This would likely be the case in iOS on/after 3.0.0 or whenever we stop generating both a js+json files. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Ok so how do we update the JS on all platforms now? coho? On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Works on WP7 and Jesse reports it working on WP8. I am merging back into master and retagging JS shortly. On 6/19/13 2:03 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I am testing on windows as well. I think I have a change, give me a few minutes to verify. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10. Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on windows phone * On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not guaranteed, and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between the 2 methods. Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best approach is: 1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json 2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case it continues on to a script injection attempt. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Never mind me dum dum. Thanks Jesse On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah I'm stalled on this one. If I run jake on cordova-js 2.9.x branch, the version in the .js header is still 2.7.0 - checked the VERSION file is correct. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Ha, my next question. I want to know too ... I have pushed to master and cherry-pick'd into 2.9.x My change just added support for a case where XHR was permitted, but there wasn't a json file. It then attempts the script injection to load a .js plugins file, instead of just giving up. This would likely be the case in iOS on/after 3.0.0 or whenever we stop generating both a js+json files. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Ok so how do we update the JS on all platforms now? coho? On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Works on WP7 and Jesse reports it working on WP8. I am merging back into master and retagging JS shortly. On 6/19/13 2:03 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I am testing on windows as well. I think I have a change, give me a few minutes to verify. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10. Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on windows phone * On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not guaranteed, and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between the 2 methods. Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best approach is: 1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json 2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case it continues on to a script injection attempt. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Late to the game here, but to re-tag JS: ./cordova-coho/coho tag-release --version 2.9.0rc1 -r js To update JS snapshots in all repos, coho can't handle that yet. I think I'll break updating of JS out into its own command so that we can address this usecase. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Never mind me dum dum. Thanks Jesse On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah I'm stalled on this one. If I run jake on cordova-js 2.9.x branch, the version in the .js header is still 2.7.0 - checked the VERSION file is correct. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Ha, my next question. I want to know too ... I have pushed to master and cherry-pick'd into 2.9.x My change just added support for a case where XHR was permitted, but there wasn't a json file. It then attempts the script injection to load a .js plugins file, instead of just giving up. This would likely be the case in iOS on/after 3.0.0 or whenever we stop generating both a js+json files. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Ok so how do we update the JS on all platforms now? coho? On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Works on WP7 and Jesse reports it working on WP8. I am merging back into master and retagging JS shortly. On 6/19/13 2:03 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I am testing on windows as well. I think I have a change, give me a few minutes to verify. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10. Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on windows phone * On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not guaranteed, and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between the 2 methods. Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best approach is: 1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json 2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case it continues on to a script injection attempt. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach throws an Access Denied error on WP*. With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to include this bit of functionality. Thoughts? [1]
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Okay, made more sense to just update the existing command to handle this. For next time, we can just re-tag the JS and re-run: ./cordova-coho/coho prepare-release-branch --version 2.9.0rc1 and it will update all the JS snapshots on both master and the release branch. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.orgwrote: Late to the game here, but to re-tag JS: ./cordova-coho/coho tag-release --version 2.9.0rc1 -r js To update JS snapshots in all repos, coho can't handle that yet. I think I'll break updating of JS out into its own command so that we can address this usecase. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Never mind me dum dum. Thanks Jesse On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah I'm stalled on this one. If I run jake on cordova-js 2.9.x branch, the version in the .js header is still 2.7.0 - checked the VERSION file is correct. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Ha, my next question. I want to know too ... I have pushed to master and cherry-pick'd into 2.9.x My change just added support for a case where XHR was permitted, but there wasn't a json file. It then attempts the script injection to load a .js plugins file, instead of just giving up. This would likely be the case in iOS on/after 3.0.0 or whenever we stop generating both a js+json files. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Ok so how do we update the JS on all platforms now? coho? On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Works on WP7 and Jesse reports it working on WP8. I am merging back into master and retagging JS shortly. On 6/19/13 2:03 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I am testing on windows as well. I think I have a change, give me a few minutes to verify. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10. Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on windows phone * On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not guaranteed, and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between the 2 methods. Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best approach is: 1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json 2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case it continues on to a script injection attempt. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: JSON files are not valid Javascript code. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension have to be .js? On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote: Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both cordova_plugins.js and cordova_plugins.json for a while. Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote: Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the change to use a .js file and script tag looks fine. It's hard to make Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version of cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? Braden On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows Phone *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that Jesse converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to apache's master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing to the
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
I am going to tag the tests and JavaScript now.. On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Tried your coho commands and they worked well Andrew :) ./cordova-coho/coho create-release-branch --version 2.8.0rc1 -r js -r app-hello-world ./cordova-coho/coho tag-release --version 2.8.0rc1 -r js -r app-hello-world App and JS are branched/tagged. On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 that I wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to all the rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so I can get that done. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Can we get a test for it to confirm the fix? On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
I can get a test in first, to confirm the bug :) then it's just a matter of fixing the bug. On Monday, June 17, 2013, Joe Bowser wrote: Can we get a test for it to confirm the fix? On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe - This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe - This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe - This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
So, if CoHo handles tagging now, are we going to use this on 2.9.0rc1? On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe - This transmission (including any attachments) may contain
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe - This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe - This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information.
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
I should add that the Google team has a busy week this week, and so most of us won't be able to work on release tasks until next week. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned to me. I will tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, James Jong wjamesj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple of the ones Shaz mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. -James Jong On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote: I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) (e.g. cb-3185) - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between Android and iOS (Jesse brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) I was also planning on working on adding some Plugin-behaving-nicely checks on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin takes spends more than 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) thread. Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, and so I clearly won't get this all done in the next few hours :P. So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we can focus more on 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo some more, and hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool (Steven - I'm looking at you for the uploading a release part :P). On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Thanks Jeff! On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, Jeffrey Heifetz jheif...@blackberry.com wrote: Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check out CB-3797, CB-3799 On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues anywhere? I'd like to refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're speaking of. On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote: For BB10, we're working on moving out the environment settings from project to HOME. That work is pretty much done. We should have it tested and committed within the next few hours. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com wrote: The only thing that I'm working on this morning that could be a candidate for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob) that will accept a Cordova File object in place of a native Blob object. (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for 2.9) If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I can take care of it post-rc1. Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this morning. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? Anyone still working on something that they are gunning to get in for 2.9? On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
+1 for Monday RC1, can't wait to get all the 3.0.0 stuff in once we branch ;) On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.cawrote: Monday RC1 sounds good to me. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
+1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.comwrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Looking at iOS 2.9.0: Definitely as you said: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 Then all iOS cli and docs issues. If there is time for iOS I am going to tackle: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 (to fix) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 (to investigate, no fix yet) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 (there is a PR to investigate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562 (fix in the issue, to evaluate) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534 (the reporter has filed an excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe fix) Maybe this Untappd issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.comwrote: be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be resolved? I am aware of a bug in Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything else you want in? On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote: I wish I could say there was more velocity in the iOS / OS X repos but there hasn't been any with me being away at WWDC this week, but if that's where the wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to get more issues resolved by rc2. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote: +1, let's tackle this early On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote: meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe
2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe
Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
meh @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote: Huge +1! On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote: Hey I know this is pretty soon, but how does a 2.9.0rc1 on Monday sound? Since this is supposed to be a hardening release anyway, I don't see why we shouldn't start with the RCs. Any thoughts? Joe
