Re: Community Sync Interval

[Michael Park]

The result of this poll was:

Bi-weekly: 12
Weekly: 10

So while pretty even, bi-weekly wins the vote. Let's proceed with bi-weekly
community syncs and we can always reevaluate going forward.

Thanks,

MPark.

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:51 PM zhiwei  wrote:

> +1 bi-weekly
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Alexander Rojas 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 bi-weekly (and I as bernd have been assuming rotating times)
> >
> > > On 15 Oct 2015, at 19:19, Michael Park  wrote:
> > >
> > > We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly
> > > (once every 2 weeks).
> > >
> > > There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync
> > > today.
> > >
> > > An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting
> > won't
> > > be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
> > >
> > > An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these
> > > meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's time
> > > commitments.
> > >
> > > This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might
> have!
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > MPark.
> >
> >
>

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Alexander Rojas]

+1 bi-weekly (and I as bernd have been assuming rotating times)

> On 15 Oct 2015, at 19:19, Michael Park  wrote:
> 
> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly
> (once every 2 weeks).
> 
> There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync
> today.
> 
> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting won't
> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
> 
> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these
> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's time
> commitments.
> 
> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might have!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> MPark.

Re: Community Sync Interval

[zhiwei]

+1 bi-weekly

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Alexander Rojas 
wrote:

> +1 bi-weekly (and I as bernd have been assuming rotating times)
>
> > On 15 Oct 2015, at 19:19, Michael Park  wrote:
> >
> > We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly
> > (once every 2 weeks).
> >
> > There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync
> > today.
> >
> > An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting
> won't
> > be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
> >
> > An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these
> > meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's time
> > commitments.
> >
> > This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might have!
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > MPark.
>
>

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Marco Massenzio]

Alex - everyone is welcome to join, we usually send an email to this
mailing list a day or two prior to the event with the agenda and a link to
the livestream and the hangout.

I don't think there is "a form" as such (or, if there is one, I don't know
where it is :) ).

--
*Marco Massenzio*
Distributed Systems Engineer
http://codetrips.com

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Alex Clemmer <clemmer.alexan...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> (Sorry, just out of ignorance: is anyone allowed to come to the
> community sync? I googled around and it looks like the answer is yes,
> but I don't see a living schedule anywhere... If the answer is indeed
> yes, is there a form where I can sign up for the calendar invite?)
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Christopher M Luciano
> <cmluci...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > +1 weekly
> >
> >  On Oct 16, 2015, 12:38:31 PM, "Marco Massenzio" <ma...@mesosphere.io>
> wrote:
> >  Just to clarify, I'd been assuming rotating times when I gave my +1 for
> >  bi-weekly.
> >  Having said that, I don't feel too strongly about it - the positive
> thing
> >  about weekly meetings is that we can skip one every other for those who
> >  "like it bi-weekly" :) (the other way, instead, not being possible!)
> >  Thanks!
> >  --
> >  *Marco Massenzio*
> >  Distributed Systems Engineer
> >  http://codetrips.com
> >  On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Diana J Arroyo  wrote:
> >  > +1 for weekly.
> >  >
> >  > Best Regards,
> >  > Diana Arroyo
> >  > darr...@us.ibm.com
> >  >
> >  > [image: Inactive hide details for tommy xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13
> >  > AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske >
> xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36
> >  > GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske :
> >  >
> >  > From: tommy xiao
> >  > To: dev@mesos.apache.org
> >  > Date: 10/16/2015 07:20 AM
> >  > Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval
> >  > --
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > +1 for bi-weekly.
> >  >
> >  > 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske :
> >  >
> >  > > +1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the
> first
> >  > > place, as I suspect many others as well.
> >  > >
> >  > > (9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am
> and
> >  > 5pm
> >  > > or something like that.)
> >  > >
> >  > > > On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent  wrote:
> >  > > >
> >  > > > If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and
> 9pm(Pacific)
> >  > OK
> >  > > > for UTC+8.
> >  > > >
> >  > > > +1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host
> places?
> >  > > >
> >  > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon
> >  > > wrote:
> >  > > >
> >  > > >> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the
> times
> >  > to
> >  > > >> better accommodate people in different time zones. This could
> mean
> >  > > >> something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of
> these a
> >  > > week,
> >  > > >> then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west
> >  > coast
> >  > > >> that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can
> still
> >  > > include
> >  > > >> Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to
> attend at
> >  > > >> least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer
> present.
> >  > > >> Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave
> weekly
> >  > > >> meetings have a chance.
> >  > > >>
> >  > > >> +1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get
> it on
> >  > > the
> >  > > >> calendar!
> >  > > >>
> >  > > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma  wrote:
> >  > > >>
> >  > > >>> +1 for weekly
> >  > > >>>
> >  > > >>> Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress
> step by
> >  > > >> step
> >  > > >>>
> >  > > >>>
> >  > > >>> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote:

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Adam Bordelon]

We previously proposed creating a google calender that we can share on the
dev list for people to use, but need to decide on the frequency/schedule
before we can set that up. In the meantime, watch this list for the
announcement of the weekly or bi-weekly meeting, usually happening on
Thursdays.

And yes, anybody can attend, but keep in mind that this meeting focuses on
Mesos developer issues rather than user issues. Alex, you are of course
quite welcome to attend. We cannot fit everybody in a hangout, so we have
recently switched to using "hangouts on air". That way, most attendees can
watch the video and ask brief questions on IRC, while those with agenda
items (or lengthier questions/comments) can join the actual hangout to have
their voices heard.

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Marco Massenzio <ma...@mesosphere.io>
wrote:

> Alex - everyone is welcome to join, we usually send an email to this
> mailing list a day or two prior to the event with the agenda and a link to
> the livestream and the hangout.
>
> I don't think there is "a form" as such (or, if there is one, I don't know
> where it is :) ).
>
> --
> *Marco Massenzio*
> Distributed Systems Engineer
> http://codetrips.com
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Alex Clemmer <clemmer.alexan...@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > (Sorry, just out of ignorance: is anyone allowed to come to the
> > community sync? I googled around and it looks like the answer is yes,
> > but I don't see a living schedule anywhere... If the answer is indeed
> > yes, is there a form where I can sign up for the calendar invite?)
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Christopher M Luciano
> > <cmluci...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > +1 weekly
> > >
> > >  On Oct 16, 2015, 12:38:31 PM, "Marco Massenzio" <ma...@mesosphere.io>
> > wrote:
> > >  Just to clarify, I'd been assuming rotating times when I gave my +1
> for
> > >  bi-weekly.
> > >  Having said that, I don't feel too strongly about it - the positive
> > thing
> > >  about weekly meetings is that we can skip one every other for those
> who
> > >  "like it bi-weekly" :) (the other way, instead, not being possible!)
> > >  Thanks!
> > >  --
> > >  *Marco Massenzio*
> > >  Distributed Systems Engineer
> > >  http://codetrips.com
> > >  On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Diana J Arroyo  wrote:
> > >  > +1 for weekly.
> > >  >
> > >  > Best Regards,
> > >  > Diana Arroyo
> > >  > darr...@us.ibm.com
> > >  >
> > >  > [image: Inactive hide details for tommy xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13
> > >  > AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske >
> > xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36
> > >  > GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske :
> > >  >
> > >  > From: tommy xiao
> > >  > To: dev@mesos.apache.org
> > >  > Date: 10/16/2015 07:20 AM
> > >  > Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval
> > >  > --
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >  > +1 for bi-weekly.
> > >  >
> > >  > 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske :
> > >  >
> > >  > > +1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the
> > first
> > >  > > place, as I suspect many others as well.
> > >  > >
> > >  > > (9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am
> > and
> > >  > 5pm
> > >  > > or something like that.)
> > >  > >
> > >  > > > On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent  wrote:
> > >  > > >
> > >  > > > If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and
> > 9pm(Pacific)
> > >  > OK
> > >  > > > for UTC+8.
> > >  > > >
> > >  > > > +1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host
> > places?
> > >  > > >
> > >  > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon
> > >  > > wrote:
> > >  > > >
> > >  > > >> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the
> > times
> > >  > to
> > >  > > >> better accommodate people in different time zones. This could
> > mean
> > >  > > >> something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of
> > these a
> > >  > > week,
> > >  &g

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Vaibhav Khanduja]

+1 biweekly

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Alex Clemmer <clemmer.alexan...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> (Sorry, just out of ignorance: is anyone allowed to come to the
> community sync? I googled around and it looks like the answer is yes,
> but I don't see a living schedule anywhere... If the answer is indeed
> yes, is there a form where I can sign up for the calendar invite?)
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Christopher M Luciano
> <cmluci...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > +1 weekly
> >
> >  On Oct 16, 2015, 12:38:31 PM, "Marco Massenzio" <ma...@mesosphere.io>
> wrote:
> >  Just to clarify, I'd been assuming rotating times when I gave my +1 for
> >  bi-weekly.
> >  Having said that, I don't feel too strongly about it - the positive
> thing
> >  about weekly meetings is that we can skip one every other for those who
> >  "like it bi-weekly" :) (the other way, instead, not being possible!)
> >  Thanks!
> >  --
> >  *Marco Massenzio*
> >  Distributed Systems Engineer
> >  http://codetrips.com
> >  On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Diana J Arroyo  wrote:
> >  > +1 for weekly.
> >  >
> >  > Best Regards,
> >  > Diana Arroyo
> >  > darr...@us.ibm.com
> >  >
> >  > [image: Inactive hide details for tommy xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13
> >  > AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske >
> xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36
> >  > GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske :
> >  >
> >  > From: tommy xiao
> >  > To: dev@mesos.apache.org
> >  > Date: 10/16/2015 07:20 AM
> >  > Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval
> >  > --
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > +1 for bi-weekly.
> >  >
> >  > 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske :
> >  >
> >  > > +1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the
> first
> >  > > place, as I suspect many others as well.
> >  > >
> >  > > (9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am
> and
> >  > 5pm
> >  > > or something like that.)
> >  > >
> >  > > > On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent  wrote:
> >  > > >
> >  > > > If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and
> 9pm(Pacific)
> >  > OK
> >  > > > for UTC+8.
> >  > > >
> >  > > > +1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host
> places?
> >  > > >
> >  > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon
> >  > > wrote:
> >  > > >
> >  > > >> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the
> times
> >  > to
> >  > > >> better accommodate people in different time zones. This could
> mean
> >  > > >> something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of
> these a
> >  > > week,
> >  > > >> then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west
> >  > coast
> >  > > >> that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can
> still
> >  > > include
> >  > > >> Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to
> attend at
> >  > > >> least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer
> present.
> >  > > >> Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave
> weekly
> >  > > >> meetings have a chance.
> >  > > >>
> >  > > >> +1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get
> it on
> >  > > the
> >  > > >> calendar!
> >  > > >>
> >  > > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma  wrote:
> >  > > >>
> >  > > >>> +1 for weekly
> >  > > >>>
> >  > > >>> Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress
> step by
> >  > > >> step
> >  > > >>>
> >  > > >>>
> >  > > >>> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote:
> >  > > >>>
> >  > > >>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
> >  > > >>>>
> >  > > >>>> Regards!
> >  > > >>>>
> >  > > >>>> Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥）
> >  > > >>>>
> >  > > >>&g

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Adam Bordelon]

Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the times to
better accommodate people in different time zones. This could mean
something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of these a week,
then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west coast
that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can still include
Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to attend at
least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer present.
Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave weekly
meetings have a chance.

+1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get it on the
calendar!

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma <kl...@cguru.net> wrote:

> +1 for weekly
>
> Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress step by step
>
>
> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote:
>
>> +1 for bi-weekly.
>>
>> Regards!
>>
>> Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥）
>>
>>
>>
>> From:   Jojy Varghese <j...@mesosphere.io>
>> To: dev@mesos.apache.org
>> Date:   16/10/2015 09:01
>> Subject:Re: Community Sync Interval
>>
>>
>>
>> +1 bi-weekly
>>
>>
>> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez
>>>
>> <contact.isabeljime...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for bi-weekly
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov <a...@mesosphere.com>
>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg
>>>>
>>> <elizab...@mesosphere.io
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 Weekly
>>>>>
>>>>> -Elizabeth
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann <g...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to
>>>>>>
>>>>> see
>>>>
>>>>> how people are liking it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu <gyliu...@gmail.com
>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Guangya
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer <
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> dmer...@fantoccini.com
>>>>
>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> always
>>>>
>>>>> reset
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> to biweekly.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya <ka...@mesosphere.io
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht <j...@mesosphere.io
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ar...@mesosphere.io <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent <
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> haosd...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park <
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> mcyp...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>
>>>>> bi-weekly
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> (once every 2 weeks).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were differing opinions on the subject during the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> community
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sync
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> today.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> missing
>>>>
>>>>> a
>>>>>
>>>>>> meeting
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>
>>>>> these
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> people's
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> commitments.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>
>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> have!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MPark.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Haosdent Huang
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> *Jan Schlicht*
>>>>>>>>>> Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Da (Klaus), Ma (马达) | PMP® | Advisory Software Engineer
> Platform Symphony/DCOS Development & Support, STG, IBM GCG
> +86-10-8245 4084 | mad...@cn.ibm.com | http://www.cguru.net
>
>

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Bernd Mathiske]

+1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the first place, as 
I suspect many others as well.

(9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am and 5pm or 
something like that.)

> On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent <haosd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and 9pm(Pacific) OK
> for UTC+8.
> 
> +1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host places?
> 
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon <a...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
> 
>> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the times to
>> better accommodate people in different time zones. This could mean
>> something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of these a week,
>> then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west coast
>> that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can still include
>> Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to attend at
>> least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer present.
>> Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave weekly
>> meetings have a chance.
>> 
>> +1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get it on the
>> calendar!
>> 
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma <kl...@cguru.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 for weekly
>>> 
>>> Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress step by
>> step
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards!
>>>> 
>>>> Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥）
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> From:   Jojy Varghese <j...@mesosphere.io>
>>>> To: dev@mesos.apache.org
>>>> Date:   16/10/2015 09:01
>>>> Subject:Re: Community Sync Interval
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> +1 bi-weekly
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez
>>>>> 
>>>> <contact.isabeljime...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov <a...@mesosphere.com>
>>>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg
>>>>>> 
>>>>> <elizab...@mesosphere.io
>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1 Weekly
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -Elizabeth
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann <g...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> see
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> how people are liking it.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu <gyliu...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Guangya
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer <
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> dmer...@fantoccini.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> reset
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> to biweekly.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya <ka...@mesosphere.io
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
>>>>>>&

Re: Community Sync Interval

[haosdent]

If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and 9pm(Pacific) OK
for UTC+8.

+1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host places?

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon <a...@mesosphere.io> wrote:

> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the times to
> better accommodate people in different time zones. This could mean
> something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of these a week,
> then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west coast
> that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can still include
> Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to attend at
> least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer present.
> Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave weekly
> meetings have a chance.
>
> +1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get it on the
> calendar!
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma <kl...@cguru.net> wrote:
>
> > +1 for weekly
> >
> > Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress step by
> step
> >
> >
> > On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote:
> >
> >> +1 for bi-weekly.
> >>
> >> Regards!
> >>
> >> Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥）
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From:   Jojy Varghese <j...@mesosphere.io>
> >> To: dev@mesos.apache.org
> >> Date:   16/10/2015 09:01
> >> Subject:Re: Community Sync Interval
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> +1 bi-weekly
> >>
> >>
> >> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez
> >>>
> >> <contact.isabeljime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 for bi-weekly
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov <a...@mesosphere.com>
> >>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 for bi-weekly.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg
> >>>>
> >>> <elizab...@mesosphere.io
> >>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 Weekly
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Elizabeth
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann <g...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> see
> >>>>
> >>>>> how people are liking it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu <gyliu...@gmail.com
> >>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Guangya
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer <
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> dmer...@fantoccini.com
> >>>>
> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> always
> >>>>
> >>>>> reset
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> to biweekly.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya <ka...@mesosphere.io
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht <j...@mesosphere.io
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1 for weekly.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan <
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ar...@mesosphere.io <javascript:;>>
> 

Re: Community Sync Interval

[tommy xiao]

+1 for bi-weekly.

2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske <be...@mesosphere.io>:

> +1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the first
> place, as I suspect many others as well.
>
> (9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am and 5pm
> or something like that.)
>
> > On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent <haosd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and 9pm(Pacific) OK
> > for UTC+8.
> >
> > +1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host places?
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon <a...@mesosphere.io>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the times to
> >> better accommodate people in different time zones. This could mean
> >> something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of these a
> week,
> >> then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west coast
> >> that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can still
> include
> >> Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to attend at
> >> least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer present.
> >> Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave weekly
> >> meetings have a chance.
> >>
> >> +1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get it on
> the
> >> calendar!
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma <kl...@cguru.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 for weekly
> >>>
> >>> Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress step by
> >> step
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards!
> >>>>
> >>>> Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥）
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> From:   Jojy Varghese <j...@mesosphere.io>
> >>>> To: dev@mesos.apache.org
> >>>> Date:   16/10/2015 09:01
> >>>> Subject:Re: Community Sync Interval
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 bi-weekly
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez
> >>>>>
> >>>> <contact.isabeljime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov <a...@mesosphere.com
> >
> >>>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> <elizab...@mesosphere.io
> >>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 Weekly
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Elizabeth
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann <g...@mesosphere.io>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit
> to
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> see
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> how people are liking it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu <gyliu...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Guangya
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer <
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> dmer...@fantoccini.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can
> >>>&

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Diana J Arroyo]

+1 for weekly.

Best Regards,
Diana Arroyo
darr...@us.ibm.com



From:   tommy xiao <xia...@gmail.com>
To: dev@mesos.apache.org
Date:   10/16/2015 07:20 AM
Subject:    Re: Community Sync Interval



+1 for bi-weekly.

2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske <be...@mesosphere.io>:

> +1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the first
> place, as I suspect many others as well.
>
> (9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am and
5pm
> or something like that.)
>
> > On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent <haosd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and 9pm(Pacific)
OK
> > for UTC+8.
> >
> > +1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host places?
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon <a...@mesosphere.io>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the times
to
> >> better accommodate people in different time zones. This could mean
> >> something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of these a
> week,
> >> then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west
coast
> >> that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can still
> include
> >> Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to attend at
> >> least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer present.
> >> Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave weekly
> >> meetings have a chance.
> >>
> >> +1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get it on
> the
> >> calendar!
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma <kl...@cguru.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 for weekly
> >>>
> >>> Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress step by
> >> step
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards!
> >>>>
> >>>> Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥）
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> From:   Jojy Varghese <j...@mesosphere.io>
> >>>> To: dev@mesos.apache.org
> >>>> Date:   16/10/2015 09:01
> >>>> Subject:Re: Community Sync Interval
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 bi-weekly
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez
> >>>>>
> >>>> <contact.isabeljime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov
<a...@mesosphere.com
> >
> >>>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> <elizab...@mesosphere.io
> >>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 Weekly
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Elizabeth
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann <g...@mesosphere.io>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a
bit
> to
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> see
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> how people are liking it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu <gyliu...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Guangya
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer <
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> dmer...@fantoccini.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>&g

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Isabel Jimenez]

+1 for bi-weekly

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov  wrote:

> +1 for bi-weekly.
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg  >
> wrote:
>
> > +1 Weekly
> >
> > -Elizabeth
> >
> > On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann  wrote:
> >
> > > I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to
> see
> > > how people are liking it.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu  > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for bi-weekly
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Guangya
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer <
> dmer...@fantoccini.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can
> always
> > > > reset
> > > > > to biweekly.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya  > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht  > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 for weekly.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan <
> > > > > ar...@mesosphere.io >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 for weekly.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent <
> haosd...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park <
> > > mcyp...@gmail.com 
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly
> or
> > > > > > bi-weekly
> > > > > > > > >> (once every 2 weeks).
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> There were differing opinions on the subject during the
> > > > community
> > > > > > sync
> > > > > > > > >> today.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and
> missing
> > a
> > > > > > meeting
> > > > > > > > won't
> > > > > > > > >> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved
> in
> > > > these
> > > > > > > > >> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces
> > > > people's
> > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > >> commitments.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas
> > you
> > > > > might
> > > > > > > > have!
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> MPark.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > > > Haosdent Huang
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > *Jan Schlicht*
> > > > > > > Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Yong Qiao Wang]

+1 for bi-weekly.

Regards!

Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥）



From:   Jojy Varghese <j...@mesosphere.io>
To: dev@mesos.apache.org
Date:   16/10/2015 09:01
Subject:    Re: Community Sync Interval



+1 bi-weekly


> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez 
<contact.isabeljime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 for bi-weekly
> 
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov <a...@mesosphere.com> 
wrote:
> 
>> +1 for bi-weekly.
>> 
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg 
<elizab...@mesosphere.io
>>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 Weekly
>>> 
>>> -Elizabeth
>>> 
>>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann <g...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to
>> see
>>>> how people are liking it.
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu <gyliu...@gmail.com
>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Guangya
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer <
>> dmer...@fantoccini.com
>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can
>> always
>>>>> reset
>>>>>> to biweekly.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya <ka...@mesosphere.io
>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht <j...@mesosphere.io
>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan <
>>>>>> ar...@mesosphere.io <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent <
>> haosd...@gmail.com
>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park <
>>>> mcyp...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly
>> or
>>>>>>> bi-weekly
>>>>>>>>>>> (once every 2 weeks).
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> There were differing opinions on the subject during the
>>>>> community
>>>>>>> sync
>>>>>>>>>>> today.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and
>> missing
>>> a
>>>>>>> meeting
>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved
>> in
>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>>> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces
>>>>> people's
>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>> commitments.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas
>>> you
>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>>> have!
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> MPark.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Haosdent Huang
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> *Jan Schlicht*
>>>>>>>> Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Alex Rukletsov]

+1 for bi-weekly.

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg 
wrote:

> +1 Weekly
>
> -Elizabeth
>
> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann  wrote:
>
> > I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to see
> > how people are liking it.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu  > > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for bi-weekly
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Guangya
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer  > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can always
> > > reset
> > > > to biweekly.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya  > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for bi-weekly.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht  > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 for weekly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan <
> > > > ar...@mesosphere.io >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 for weekly.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent  > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park <
> > mcyp...@gmail.com 
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or
> > > > > bi-weekly
> > > > > > > >> (once every 2 weeks).
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> There were differing opinions on the subject during the
> > > community
> > > > > sync
> > > > > > > >> today.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing
> a
> > > > > meeting
> > > > > > > won't
> > > > > > > >> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in
> > > these
> > > > > > > >> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces
> > > people's
> > > > > > time
> > > > > > > >> commitments.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas
> you
> > > > might
> > > > > > > have!
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> MPark.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > > Haosdent Huang
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Jan Schlicht*
> > > > > > Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Jojy Varghese]

+1 bi-weekly


> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez  
> wrote:
> 
> +1 for bi-weekly
> 
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov  wrote:
> 
>> +1 for bi-weekly.
>> 
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg >> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 Weekly
>>> 
>>> -Elizabeth
>>> 
>>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann  wrote:
>>> 
 I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to
>> see
 how people are liking it.
 
 On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu > wrote:
 
> +1 for bi-weekly
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Guangya
> 
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer <
>> dmer...@fantoccini.com
 >
> wrote:
> 
>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can
>> always
> reset
>> to biweekly.
>> 
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya > wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht >
> wrote:
>>> 
 +1 for weekly.
 
 On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan <
>> ar...@mesosphere.io >
 wrote:
 
> +1 for weekly.
> 
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent <
>> haosd...@gmail.com
 >
>> wrote:
>> +1 for bi-weekly
>> 
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park <
 mcyp...@gmail.com 
>> 
 wrote:
>> 
>>> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly
>> or
>>> bi-weekly
>>> (once every 2 weeks).
>>> 
>>> There were differing opinions on the subject during the
> community
>>> sync
>>> today.
>>> 
>>> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and
>> missing
>>> a
>>> meeting
> won't
>>> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
>>> 
>>> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved
>> in
> these
>>> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces
> people's
 time
>>> commitments.
>>> 
>>> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas
>>> you
>> might
> have!
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> MPark.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Haosdent Huang
> 
 
 
 
 --
 *Jan Schlicht*
 Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere
 
>>> 
>> 
> 
 
>>> 
>> 

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Marco Massenzio]

+1 bi-weekly

--
*Marco Massenzio*
Distributed Systems Engineer
http://codetrips.com

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Yong Qiao Wang <yq...@cn.ibm.com> wrote:

> +1 for bi-weekly.
>
> Regards!
>
> Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥）
>
>
>
> From:   Jojy Varghese <j...@mesosphere.io>
> To: dev@mesos.apache.org
> Date:   16/10/2015 09:01
> Subject:Re: Community Sync Interval
>
>
>
> +1 bi-weekly
>
>
> > On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez
> <contact.isabeljime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for bi-weekly
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov <a...@mesosphere.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 for bi-weekly.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg
> <elizab...@mesosphere.io
> >>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 Weekly
> >>>
> >>> -Elizabeth
> >>>
> >>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann <g...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to
> >> see
> >>>> how people are liking it.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu <gyliu...@gmail.com
> >>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Guangya
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer <
> >> dmer...@fantoccini.com
> >>>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can
> >> always
> >>>>> reset
> >>>>>> to biweekly.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya <ka...@mesosphere.io
> >>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht <j...@mesosphere.io
> >>>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1 for weekly.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan <
> >>>>>> ar...@mesosphere.io <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent <
> >> haosd...@gmail.com
> >>>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park <
> >>>> mcyp...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly
> >> or
> >>>>>>> bi-weekly
> >>>>>>>>>>> (once every 2 weeks).
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> There were differing opinions on the subject during the
> >>>>> community
> >>>>>>> sync
> >>>>>>>>>>> today.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and
> >> missing
> >>> a
> >>>>>>> meeting
> >>>>>>>>> won't
> >>>>>>>>>>> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved
> >> in
> >>>>> these
> >>>>>>>>>>> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces
> >>>>> people's
> >>>>>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>> commitments.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas
> >>> you
> >>>>>> might
> >>>>>>>>> have!
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> MPark.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>> Haosdent Huang
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> *Jan Schlicht*
> >>>>>>>> Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Elizabeth Lingg]

+1 Weekly

-Elizabeth

On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann  wrote:

> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to see
> how people are liking it.
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu  > wrote:
>
> > +1 for bi-weekly
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Guangya
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can always
> > reset
> > > to biweekly.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya  > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for bi-weekly.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht  >
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for weekly.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan <
> > > ar...@mesosphere.io >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 for weekly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent  >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park <
> mcyp...@gmail.com 
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or
> > > > bi-weekly
> > > > > > >> (once every 2 weeks).
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> There were differing opinions on the subject during the
> > community
> > > > sync
> > > > > > >> today.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a
> > > > meeting
> > > > > > won't
> > > > > > >> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in
> > these
> > > > > > >> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces
> > people's
> > > > > time
> > > > > > >> commitments.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you
> > > might
> > > > > > have!
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> MPark.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > Haosdent Huang
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Jan Schlicht*
> > > > > Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Kapil Arya]

+1 for bi-weekly.

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht  wrote:

> +1 for weekly.
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for weekly.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent  wrote:
> > > +1 for bi-weekly
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park 
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly
> > >> (once every 2 weeks).
> > >>
> > >> There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync
> > >> today.
> > >>
> > >> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting
> > won't
> > >> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
> > >>
> > >> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these
> > >> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's
> time
> > >> commitments.
> > >>
> > >> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might
> > have!
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> MPark.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Haosdent Huang
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Jan Schlicht*
> Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere
>

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Daniel Mercer]

+1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can always reset
to biweekly.

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya  wrote:

> +1 for bi-weekly.
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht  wrote:
>
> > +1 for weekly.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for weekly.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent  wrote:
> > > > +1 for bi-weekly
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or
> bi-weekly
> > > >> (once every 2 weeks).
> > > >>
> > > >> There were differing opinions on the subject during the community
> sync
> > > >> today.
> > > >>
> > > >> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a
> meeting
> > > won't
> > > >> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
> > > >>
> > > >> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these
> > > >> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's
> > time
> > > >> commitments.
> > > >>
> > > >> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might
> > > have!
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >>
> > > >> MPark.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Haosdent Huang
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Jan Schlicht*
> > Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere
> >
>

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Artem Harutyunyan]

+1 for weekly.

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent  wrote:
> +1 for bi-weekly
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park  wrote:
>
>> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly
>> (once every 2 weeks).
>>
>> There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync
>> today.
>>
>> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting won't
>> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
>>
>> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these
>> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's time
>> commitments.
>>
>> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might have!
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> MPark.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Haosdent Huang

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Greg Mann]

I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to see
how people are liking it.

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu  wrote:

> +1 for bi-weekly
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guangya
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can always
> reset
> > to biweekly.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya  wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for bi-weekly.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for weekly.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan <
> > ar...@mesosphere.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for weekly.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent 
> > wrote:
> > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or
> > > bi-weekly
> > > > > >> (once every 2 weeks).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> There were differing opinions on the subject during the
> community
> > > sync
> > > > > >> today.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a
> > > meeting
> > > > > won't
> > > > > >> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in
> these
> > > > > >> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces
> people's
> > > > time
> > > > > >> commitments.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you
> > might
> > > > > have!
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> MPark.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > Haosdent Huang
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Jan Schlicht*
> > > > Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Jan Schlicht]

+1 for weekly.

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan 
wrote:

> +1 for weekly.
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent  wrote:
> > +1 for bi-weekly
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park  wrote:
> >
> >> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly
> >> (once every 2 weeks).
> >>
> >> There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync
> >> today.
> >>
> >> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting
> won't
> >> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
> >>
> >> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these
> >> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's time
> >> commitments.
> >>
> >> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might
> have!
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> MPark.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Haosdent Huang
>



-- 
*Jan Schlicht*
Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere

Re: Community Sync Interval

[Guangya Liu]

+1 for bi-weekly

Thanks,

Guangya

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer 
wrote:

> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can always reset
> to biweekly.
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya  wrote:
>
> > +1 for bi-weekly.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht  wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for weekly.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan <
> ar...@mesosphere.io>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for weekly.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent 
> wrote:
> > > > > +1 for bi-weekly
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or
> > bi-weekly
> > > > >> (once every 2 weeks).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> There were differing opinions on the subject during the community
> > sync
> > > > >> today.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a
> > meeting
> > > > won't
> > > > >> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these
> > > > >> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's
> > > time
> > > > >> commitments.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you
> might
> > > > have!
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> MPark.
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > Haosdent Huang
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Jan Schlicht*
> > > Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere
> > >
> >
>

Community Sync Interval

[Michael Park]

We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly
(once every 2 weeks).

There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync
today.

An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting won't
be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.

An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these
meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's time
commitments.

This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might have!

Thanks,

MPark.

Re: Community Sync Interval

[haosdent]

+1 for bi-weekly

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park  wrote:

> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly
> (once every 2 weeks).
>
> There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync
> today.
>
> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting won't
> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
>
> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these
> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's time
> commitments.
>
> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might have!
>
> Thanks,
>
> MPark.
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Haosdent Huang