Re: [Drakelist] R-4C PTO Dial Mechanism Problem

2011-10-11 Thread Ron
Jim,
I've never had the issues to know, but have you looked here?
http://www.wb4hfn.com/DRAKE/DrakeArticles/PTO/Drake_PTO.htm
Discusses binding PTO gears from someone oiling the nylon gear.  It kind of 
looks like you have that going in your photos (brown water mark on your nylon 
gear).

73,
Ron WD8SBB 

--- On Mon, 10/10/11, Jim DiMauro radio6...@yahoo.com wrote:

From: Jim DiMauro radio6...@yahoo.com
Subject: [Drakelist] R-4C PTO Dial Mechanism Problem
To: Drake List drakelist@zerobeat.net
Date: Monday, October 10, 2011, 10:15 PM

Hi All:  Looking for some help on a problem with the PTO dial mechanism of a 
nice R-4C that I bought some years ago but never put into service.  The dials 
do not rotate at a constant speed, although I spin the knob at a constant 
speed.  At a certain point in the rotation the dials abruptly speed up, then 
return to  the slower speed until the whole works comes back 360 degrees 
around.  Of course the dial calibration is constantly changing.  Thinking it 
was nothing more than a dried out rubber bushing I changed it out, but it made 
no difference whatsoever.  While observing the gear train in action I noticed 
that there are two gears sandwiched together, one smaller brass gear with a 
shaft bushing in the center, and the other a larger steel gear that rotates 
around the brass bushing (see photos 006 and 007 here: 
http://www.dcaconsulting.org/R4C_PTO/).  The steel gears didn’t seem to rotate 
smoothly around the bushing, so I removed the dials and the
 gears and I can feel them bind at a certain point while rotating around the 
bushing that holds them together.  I’m guessing that’s where my problem lies.  
If so, then I probably need to find a replacement gear.  I’ve never been into a 
Drake gear train before, so I don’t  know if I’m on the right track or not.  
Also for those of you who are familiar with the gear train, please look at all 
ten photos and let me know if anything obvious jumps out at you.  One thing I 
noticed is that the kc dial disc doesn’t have a hub, but instead was just 
sandwiched against the brass disc on the hundreds kc dial.  This is different 
from what I have seen in material available on the web.  Any suggestions and 
advice would be appreciated.  73,JimW2BVM  
-Inline Attachment Follows-

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] R-4C PTO Dial Mechanism Problem

2011-10-11 Thread Jim DiMauro
Hi Ron:

 

Yes, I’ve been to your site (excellent site BTW) and cleaned out the gunked up 
grease.  The thing was a mess when I got it, with grease everywhere including 
the nylon gears and in between the dial plates.  You’re looking at the “after” 
photos.  Everything is nice and smooth now, except for the skipping.

 

My setup is a bit different from the one in your photos.  The “water mark” you 
referred to seems to be glue that holds the nylon gear onto the dial.

 

73,

Jim

W2BVM

 

 

 

From: Ron [mailto:wd8...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:28 AM
To: Drake List; radio6...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] R-4C PTO Dial Mechanism Problem

 


Jim,
I've never had the issues to know, but have you looked here?
http://www.wb4hfn.com/DRAKE/DrakeArticles/PTO/Drake_PTO.htm
Discusses binding PTO gears from someone oiling the nylon gear.  It kind of 
looks like you have that going in your photos (brown water mark on your nylon 
gear).

73,
Ron WD8SBB 

--- On Mon, 10/10/11, Jim DiMauro radio6...@yahoo.com wrote:


From: Jim DiMauro radio6...@yahoo.com
Subject: [Drakelist] R-4C PTO Dial Mechanism Problem
To: Drake List drakelist@zerobeat.net
Date: Monday, October 10, 2011, 10:15 PM

Hi All:

 

Looking for some help on a problem with the PTO dial mechanism of a nice R-4C 
that I bought some years ago but never put into service.  The dials do not 
rotate at a constant speed, although I spin the knob at a constant speed.  At a 
certain point in the rotation the dials abruptly speed up, then return to  the 
slower speed until the whole works comes back 360 degrees around.  Of course 
the dial calibration is constantly changing.  Thinking it was nothing more than 
a dried out rubber bushing I changed it out, but it made no difference 
whatsoever.

 

While observing the gear train in action I noticed that there are two gears 
sandwiched together, one smaller brass gear with a shaft bushing in the center, 
and the other a larger steel gear that rotates around the brass bushing (see 
photos 006 and 007 here: http://www.dcaconsulting.org/R4C_PTO/).  The steel 
gears didn’t seem to rotate smoothly around the bushing, so I removed the dials 
and the gears and I can feel them bind at a certain point while rotating around 
the bushing that holds them together.  I’m guessing that’s where my problem 
lies.  If so, then I probably need to find a replacement gear.

 

I’ve never been into a Drake gear train before, so I don’t  know if I’m on the 
right track or not.  Also for those of you who are familiar with the gear 
train, please look at all ten photos and let me know if anything obvious jumps 
out at you.  One thing I noticed is that the kc dial disc doesn’t have a hub, 
but instead was just sandwiched against the brass disc on the hundreds kc dial. 
 This is different from what I have seen in material available on the web.

 

Any suggestions and advice would be appreciated.

 

73,

Jim

W2BVM

 


-Inline Attachment Follows-

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist

 

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] R-4C PTO Dial Mechanism Problem

2011-10-11 Thread Gary Poland
Jim,
  After re-reading your email I do believe your problem is with the 
anti-backlash gear/bushing shown in your pictures 6 and 7 as you suspected. The 
two anti-backlash gears are suppose to be tight and not easily move on the 
brass bushing. I think you could probably tighten them up by placing the assy 
in a vise and “ peening “ the aft gear at the brass bushing with something 
round such as a socket or tube.  The other possibility would be maybe to try 
and solder the bushing to the aft gear. Like I said in my previous email the 
gears are suppose to be tight on the brass bushing but at least one gear would 
need to be slightly free to move for the anti-backlash to work. The gear assy I 
have both gears will move on the bushing with some force applied.

73, Gary___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] R-4C PTO Dial Mechanism Problem

2011-10-11 Thread Jim DiMauro
Gary:

 

You nailed it!  Both gears move freely, except for the slight binding I 
mentioned in my original e-mail.  I’ll have a go at securing the outer gear to 
the bushing.  Now that you’ve described how it should work I’m confident that 
it will solve my problem.  My concern is whether or not I’ll be able to do the 
fix.  I’ll be leaving town this evening so I may not get to it before the 
weekend.  I’ll be sure to post my results once I’m done with it.

 

Not having a spare gear train to compare parts I’d have been scratching my head 
over this one for quite some time.  Thanx much for taking the time and trouble 
to look into this for me.

 

73,

Jim

W2BVM

 

 

 

From: Gary Poland [mailto:gpola...@cinci.rr.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 9:34 AM
To: radio6...@yahoo.com; drakelist@zerobeat.net
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] R-4C PTO Dial Mechanism Problem

 

Jim,

  After re-reading your email I do believe your problem is with the 
anti-backlash gear/bushing shown in your pictures 6 and 7 as you suspected. The 
two anti-backlash gears are suppose to be tight and not easily move on the 
brass bushing. I think you could probably tighten them up by placing the assy 
in a vise and “ peening “ the aft gear at the brass bushing with something 
round such as a socket or tube.  The other possibility would be maybe to try 
and solder the bushing to the aft gear. Like I said in my previous email the 
gears are suppose to be tight on the brass bushing but at least one gear would 
need to be slightly free to move for the anti-backlash to work. The gear assy I 
have both gears will move on the bushing with some force applied.

 

73, Gary

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Question for the group

2011-10-11 Thread Kevin Elliott
I purchased a nice TR4 with NB for a fellow and he also tossed in two other 
complete non-working TR4's and an extra AC-4 and a power supply made from a 
Heathkit power supply and an extra RV-4.  One of the non-working radios has had 
the chassis butchered where someone drilled a hole in the side of it and 
installed a toggle switch to turn the radio on and off when the switch failed.  
The other radio is in better shape but the receive is barely audible. The 
repair of the radio is out of pay grade and really not wanting to spends 50 to 
100 dollars to be told it is junk.  I should add both radios have the wired NB 
in them.  The question is would I be better off trying to sell the 2 radio as 
complete units or piece them out and sell them for parts?

Tnx and 73
Kevin - KG0MN
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Update on the search for the load cap spec for the Drake TR-7a VCXO (13.695 MHz) circuit

2011-10-11 Thread Garey Barrell

Ron -

Too bad you didn't send that crystal from John to ICM first!  They could 
characterize it and add it to the database.


Perhaps John has another one??  :-)

73, Garey - K4OAH
St Charles, IL



Ron Ries wrote:

Have now purchased and installed two new crystals, one at 32 pf and one at 20 
pf, both were recommendations by crystal mfrs.

Neither crystal would work in the circuit but John Kriner was kind snuff to 
sell me a used crystal which I soldered in and with minor adjustments the radio 
is playing beautifully.

So I am now $50 poorer and none the wiser. I am sure someone has purchased a 
new crystal out there that has the load cap spec for this particular circuit.

Ron
KK7KZ


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] All band TX for the TR-7

2011-10-11 Thread Jim Pruitt
It has been a long time (pronounced 3 DECADES ) since I did the mod on my TR7 
as well.  I do remember that I did a bit more looking and found that there is a 
male pin sticking up from the motherboard and is the transmit inhibit  line 
(going to Q9001 as I recall).  So I put a piece of spaghetti/insulation/heat 
shrink tubing over that male pin.  That stopped it from making contact when the 
DR7 was plugged in.  That saved having to cut that trace and then jumper the 
break when/if I get rid of the TR7.
 
You want to be really careful with that mod as it allows transmitting across 
the entire spectrum.  Prior to that mod the system would not transmit out of 
the band.  Since the WARC bands did not exist yet when the TR7 came out those 
bands do not work.  This mod enables transmitting in the WARC bands (AND 
EVERYWHERE ELSE From 1.8 mhz to 30 MHZ).
 
If using the AUX7 then the various band segment modules could be programed to 
allow transmit or not allow transmit depending on the presence or absence of a 
diode at that pin in the module.
 
By disabling the transmit inhibit (break the connection by cutting the trace or 
with insulation over the pin) you eliminate any safety net you hand that might 
stop you from accidentally transmitting on a frequency you were listening to 
outside of the ham bands.
 
Good luck.
 
Jim Pruitt


 On 10/8/2011 at 4:34 AM, wd8...@yahoo.com wrote:

Guys the other week someone ask about all band TX for the TR7.  Found this 
method in my notes on the TR7.  There is another mod which cuts PCB traces 
which I think also disables the PLL out of lock TX inhibit.  I think this 
method saves that function.

To enable the TR7 to transmit on all frequencies 1.5-30MHz simply unsolder the 
collector of Q9001 on the DR7 board.  See Figures 4-1 and 4-2 in the Service 
Manual.

It's been quite some time since I was inside my TR7 looking for this mod, but 
seems to my my current TR7 uses this method.




___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] R-4C PTO Dial Mechanism Problem - FIXED

2011-10-11 Thread Jim DiMauro
Gary: I decided that I couldn’t wait until the end of the week to try the fix, 
so I worked on it during lunch.  I soldered the aft gear to the bushing as you 
had suggested.  All fixed, works like new.  Thanx again for your trouble and 
advice.

 

Ron: Although the website you pointed me to didn’t lead to the fix, thank you 
for taking the time to respond with a good suggestion.  BTW, the TR-7 you sold 
me in January 2004 has been running strong, and except for a bad PIN diode the 
radio hasn’t so much as hiccupped.

 

73,

Jim

W2BVM

 

 

 

From: Gary Poland [mailto:gpola...@cinci.rr.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 9:34 AM
To: radio6...@yahoo.com; drakelist@zerobeat.net
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] R-4C PTO Dial Mechanism Problem

 

Jim,

  After re-reading your email I do believe your problem is with the 
anti-backlash gear/bushing shown in your pictures 6 and 7 as you suspected. The 
two anti-backlash gears are suppose to be tight and not easily move on the 
brass bushing. I think you could probably tighten them up by placing the assy 
in a vise and “ peening “ the aft gear at the brass bushing with something 
round such as a socket or tube.  The other possibility would be maybe to try 
and solder the bushing to the aft gear. Like I said in my previous email the 
gears are suppose to be tight on the brass bushing but at least one gear would 
need to be slightly free to move for the anti-backlash to work. The gear assy I 
have both gears will move on the bushing with some force applied.

 

73, Gary

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] uvc divider board

2011-10-11 Thread David
Well, many thanks to all for helpful references.  I was directed to eBay and
purchased apparently NOS for about $1.60 each.  I will let all know the
results.  If this is a fix, will be looking to complete the UV# with a 220
MHz module if available.  Also, the 440 receives but no output.  So, still
some work left.

Incidentally, the email /internet search robots resulted in 12 or so Chinese
replies for the IC.  The costs ranged from $53, to 87 cents each for a
minimum quantity of 100.  Most interesting.

Again thanks.  Will keep all posted on the progress.



David Assaf, III
W5XU

-Original Message-
From: David [mailto:w...@cox.net] 
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 8:40 AM
To: 'k4...@mindspring.com'
Cc: 'drakelist@zerobeat.net'
Subject: RE: [Drakelist] uvc divider board

No, it is the 16 dip plastic package.Even the china references are
saying they do not have any!

David Assaf, III
W5XU

-Original Message-
From: Garey Barrell [mailto:k4...@mindspring.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 9:33 PM
To: David
Cc: drakelist@zerobeat.net
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] uvc divider board

David -

If it's a 14 pin DIP package the MC14016 is available from Mouser, Digi-Key
and others.  It's just a CMOS Quad Analog switch.

Google MC14016BCP is the plastic DIP, the MC14016BCPG is the wide
temperature version.

73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-A, 4-B, C-Line
and TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com


David wrote:

 Looking for a MC4016P for a UV3 divider board.  This is an obsolete part.
Any sources?

 David Assaf, III

 W5XU



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1831 / Virus Database: 2085/4543 - Release Date: 10/07/11


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] NB-4

2011-10-11 Thread Charles Ring
I suspect the noise blanker in my R-4C is not working. How can I 
definitively test it?


73 de W3NU

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] All band TX for the TR-7

2011-10-11 Thread Jim Shorney
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:15:10 -0700, Jim Pruitt wrote:

It has been a long time (pronounced 3 DECADES ) since I did the mod on my TR7 
as well.  I do remember that I did a bit more looking and found that there is 
a male pin sticking up from the motherboard and is the transmit inhibit  line 
(going to Q9001 as I recall).  So I put a piece of spaghetti/insulation/heat 
shrink tubing over that male pin.  That stopped it from making contact when 
the DR7 was plugged in.  That saved having to cut that trace and then jumper 
the break when/if I get rid of the TR7.


The same thing can be accomplished by clipping the insulated jumper wire on the
(old version) digital control board. Exactly the same as the Q9001 mod. A
seperate trace cut on the digital control board is required to enable TX
coverage in the 2.5 and 5.0 MHz bands. As noted before, this method preserves
the Out Of Lock TX disable signal, which the mod published by DRAKE does not!
For this reason, I do not recommend doing it the official Drake way, and have
in fact removed that mod from a couple of rigs and re-did them with this
method. Interestingly, my TR-7 had been all-banded with the Q9001 mod, and I
had noticed that it didn't TX in the 2.5 and 5.0 bands, but never gave it any
thought because there weren't ham frequencies there at the time. Now, of
course, there is a 5 MHz allocation.

73

-Jim


--
Ham Radio NU0C
Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.S.A.
TR7/RV7/R7A/L7, TR6/RV6, T4XC/R4C/L4B, NCL2000, SB104A, R390A, GT550A/RV550A, 
HyGain 3750, IBM PS/2 - all vintage, all the time!

Give a man a URL, and he will learn for an hour; teach him to Google, and he 
will learn for a lifetime.

HyGain 3750 User's Group - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HyGain_3750/
http://incolor.inetnebr.com/jshorney
http://www.nebraskaghosts.org



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] NB-4

2011-10-11 Thread Jim Shorney
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:27:24 -0400, Charles Ring wrote:

I suspect the noise blanker in my R-4C is not working. How can I 
definitively test it?

I have tested noise blankers in the past by wiring up a relay to a variable
power supply through one of it's own normally closed contacts to make it
chatter, then adjusting the power supply for a slow chatter in the range of
typical automotive ignition noise. A clip lead antenna on one of the relay
connections is sometimes necessary. Impluse noise such as this should almost
disappear with a good noise blanker. Atmospheric or constant noise, not so
much. I've never tested an R-4C blanker this way, but in principle it should
work.

73

-Jim


--
Ham Radio NU0C
Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.S.A.
TR7/RV7/R7A/L7, TR6/RV6, T4XC/R4C/L4B, NCL2000, SB104A, R390A, GT550A/RV550A, 
HyGain 3750, IBM PS/2 - all vintage, all the time!

Give a man a URL, and he will learn for an hour; teach him to Google, and he 
will learn for a lifetime.

HyGain 3750 User's Group - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HyGain_3750/
http://incolor.inetnebr.com/jshorney
http://www.nebraskaghosts.org



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Drake TR-4C Fil. Vol. Response To Comments

2011-10-11 Thread jeffers.rj
Hello All,
Thanks for the several comments received re this problem (?).
To VK2IFT: That's the easiest approach and I shall probably do as you suggest.
To WA8ULW: The 'just under 6V' can be taken as 6V. The Manual does call for 
6.3V. Do not know, at this stage, how far 'out of spec' the HV is.
 I do have a copy of an AC-4, built in N.Z. many years 
ago. It would be interesting to see what filament/HV it delivers.
 It made here, probably, because of our 50 Hz Mains and 
was possibly cheaper than importing them from the USA.
To WD8SBB:  This was rather an interesting proposal but, I think I will be 
leaving 'well enough alone'. Especially if I can get over 100W out.
To W1ES/4:We have 50 Hz down here and I agree, 'tube equipment', tends to 
be less fussy than solid state.
T0 WB6KBL:  All the tubes in the TR-4C have indirectly heated cathodes, so I 
don't know if I will get extended tube life.
I had originally thought that lower filament voltage 
would have resulted in lower electron transfer but this would only apply to a
directly heated cathode (I think). However, with 
indirectly heated cathodes, the lower filament voltage will result in lower 
wattage
heating the cathode (about 4.75% lower). 
However, like W1ES/4 says, 'fire it up and see what 
power comes out'.
Once again, thanks for all the comments, they made interesting reading and I 
always learn something.
Bob ZL2AAQ
   ___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist