Re: [Drakelist] Station upgrade?

2011-03-08 Thread Richard Palmer
Well I'm guessing that the only thing that has changed antenna wise is it's
advertising. And most of that is now not only crap, it is an out and out
lie. And because the ARRL(for one) does not require truth in the advertising
that they print it sorta looks like there is all this new stuff. Most
notably are vertical antennas that do not require radials or even a
counterpoise.

I use a Butternut HF-6V with a MN2000 and have (can) tune the WARC bands
with it.
I know that this does not directly address your system but the theory does.
If your MN2700 is anything like the older MN2000 you should not have a
problem. DO NOT use RG8X. I think that anything short of Times LMR 400 is a
waste of money and time.

The best thing anyone can do is to ignore the advertising and get your
information from other Hams... just like you are doing.

Take Care
KB8NXO

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Michael  Sue Trussell 
mtruss8...@comcast.net wrote:

 The weather and old age have taken its toll on my old AV5 Cushcraft 5 band
 vertical antenna. I am considering a purchase of another all band MBVE-1UP
 45 foot vertical by DX Engineering. Because I have been out of amateur radio
 for many years the technical knowledge that I thought knew about antennas
 and such has evolved so much by the various equipment manufactures that my
 knowledge base has become outdated somewhat. I need to stick with a vertical
 because of lack real estate and living in a city lot!



 I would like some suggestions from you who have been keeping up on the art
 and technology to offer some suggestions on using an antenna like the above
 mentioned MBVE-1, with my Drake MN2700 antenna tuner. I would like to use
 all of the capacity of this antenna; I also understand that the capacity of
 the MN2700 is limited to the standard amateur radio frequencies.  I would
 like to use the WARC bands that I now have the capacity to use with my TR7
 along with the L4B amp just recently rebuilt. It works even better now with
 a new power supply.



 Should I look for another tuner to use or purchase another MN2700 and
 attempt to modify it?



 Any suggestion or ideas would be greatly appreciated





 Thank you in advance





 Michael J TrussellKA8ASN

 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] T-4XC sudden loss of RF output?

2010-11-13 Thread Richard Palmer
The first thing that came to my mind was your power supply. Now you have .04
cents.

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Curt Nixon cptc...@flash.net wrote:

 GE Group:

 Joe:

 Just my 2 cents here...sudden failures of output are not caused by
 alignment.   It really sounds like a component failure of some sort.  The
 only thing messing with alignment will do for you at this point is mask the
 solution to real problem.

 You will get good advice here regarding sorting thru the possible causes
 and isolating the fault.  Don't mess with the alignment.

 FWIW

 Curt
 KU8L
 4 Line A and B, TR3 TR4 TR7 and much non-Drake classic equipment.


 joe loverti wrote:

 Garey,

 I'm not sure I mentioned this to you or not. When I first realized I was
 having this trouble with the low output on the TX I heard some kind of a
 sound when I was tuning up. This was right at the onset of the trouble.
 After hearing that sound is when I noticed my plate and RF out was way low.
 Its been like this ever since I heard the sound. I can't really accurately
 describe it other than a flash or a sizzle. Not sure if it was an arc or
 what. I don't see anything on the variable capacitors that indicate that an
 arc occurred. I was not using an amp at the time. Just tuning up barefoot
 into my DL and at a fairly low power level. Could a component have failed?

 I'm a little hesitant to attempt an alignment myself. I don't consider
 myself much of a technician. I will read up on that procedure some more
 before I give it a go.

 Also, I am getting the exact same results whether I'm using the RCVR,
 XMTR, or in separate to tune up.

 73 and thanks!

 -Joe
 WS8X
 

 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist




 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Tuning skirt calibration

2010-10-18 Thread Richard Palmer
Should I have to calibrate my tuning skirt every time I change bands or is
this indicative of an alignment needed?

(sorry about all the rookie questions but I am a rookie)

Thanks
KB8NXO
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Tuning skirt calibration

2010-10-18 Thread Richard Palmer
Thanks as always. The difference is only about .5 to 1.5 kc. So I guess the
rig is aging well. It's not so much a bother as much as me being
hypersensitive about my TR-4's operation. I love my Drakes. And after
starting a fire in one while trying to tune it up... I just try to watch
everything and want to keep it on the air. I just love putting out a couple
of hundred watts barefoot. Actually I love everything about them.

Great list... always helpful.

KB8NXO

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Garey Barrell k4...@mindspring.com wrote:

 Richard -

 This is function of the aging of the BAND oscillator crystals.  The
 crystals were originally specified as +/- 0.003% tolerance, which is about
 +/- 550 Hz for the 40M crystal, and up to about +/- 1.2 kHz for the 10M
 crystal.  So when new, the typical variation could be up to +/- 1 kHz, or
 one skirt division.  However, crystals 'age' over time, and the frequencies
 change at seemingly random rates and directions.  Most that I am familiar
 with tend to drift UP in frequency, but this is not always the case.  The
 aging rate varies, but typically runs 6 - 8 ppm per year, or 60 - 80 ppm for
 ten years.  This translates to ~1.2 kHz for the 18.1 MHz 40M crystal.  Forty
 years means ~ 4.8 kHz.

 IF it bothers you too much, you can buy a new set of BAND crystals from
 International Crystal Mfrs, specify 0.001% tolerance, and 'fix' it!  :-)

 73, Garey - K4OAH
 Glen Allen, VA

 Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-B, C-Line
 TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
 www.k4oah.com



 Richard Palmer wrote:

 Should I have to calibrate my tuning skirt every time I change bands or is
 this indicative of an alignment needed?

 (sorry about all the rookie questions but I am a rookie)

 Thanks
 KB8NXO



 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Xmtr gain setting

2010-10-17 Thread Richard Palmer
Per the manual my Xmtr gain setting is at about 8-8:30. But I have no meter
movement when I transmit SSB. If I increase the setting to 12:00 I get
deflection while transmitting.

So How should I set my Xmtr gain control?

Thanks,
KB8NXO
Toledo,Ohio
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Xmtr gain setting

2010-10-17 Thread Richard Palmer
Well my mic is an Electrovoice 605 so there is no adjustment there. I have
no scope and don't foresee getting one. I'm not looking for peak.

All I know is that if I decrease my xmtr gain.. it decreases my output
power. So I'm guessing ... being a total new-be, that if I increase the xmtr
gain over the recommended setting I might be over driving the rig. I hope
this explains better what I'm asking.

Thanks

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Curt Nixon cptc...@flash.net wrote:

 The plate meter will only kick to 100-150ma on voice peaks when set
 properly.  Adjust the mic gain so that is what you have..depending on the
 mic you use, 12 oClock might be fine.  Don't try to get it to peak up to the
 loaded value.  the dynamics of the meter movement prevent it from responding
 fast enough to show the actual peak current.  A scope can be a valuable tool
 to monitor for a while untile you are used to what the Normal meter
 response looks like.


 Curt
 KU8L


 Richard Palmer wrote:

 Per the manual my Xmtr gain setting is at about 8-8:30. But I have no
 meter movement when I transmit SSB. If I increase the setting to 12:00 I get
 deflection while transmitting.

 So How should I set my Xmtr gain control?

 Thanks,
 KB8NXO
 Toledo,Ohio
 

 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist





___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] More MN-4C saga

2010-10-14 Thread Richard Palmer
I have cleaned the medal disc part, that would not clean up with any
chemical, with the eraser on a pencil. It did a GREAT job.
I have tried to clean the ceramic part with alcohol. But with limited
success.

Hope this helps.
KB8NXO

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Curt rhule...@comcast.net wrote:

  What method can be used to restore a porcelain switch deck with carbon
 streaking?  The bandswitch on this MN-4C shows blackening near the 160M
 capacitor position.

 73, Curt KB5JO

 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

2010-09-29 Thread Richard Palmer
Sylvania 6JB6's are on ebay, eham and QRZ normally for $25.00 each. I
believe if the tubes have the same date code they are matched.



On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Edward Swynar gswy...@durham.net wrote:

  *Hi Mike,*

 From a thread re. Drake finals here of some two years ago, there was
 mention of the fact that the *6GJ5* is a *direct substitute* for the 6JB6,
 if you have no luck finding that latter tube...

 *~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ*


 



 - Original Message -
 *From:* m coffey r79b...@gmail.com
 *To:* drakelist@zerobeat.net
 *Sent:* Wednesday, September 29, 2010 4:56 PM
 *Subject:* [Drakelist] 6JB6 vs.6JB6A

 Thanks for the info on 6jb6 vs. 6JB6A. I have seen a few 6JB6 of both
 varieties on line, often advertised as MATCHED. I wonder how they have
 matched them as some have listed an emmisson only tube tester as the match
 unit. I am very leary of these so called matched tubes! Even the ones from
 the large tube sellers may be useless! I was given a T4-R4 set which I took
 to WB4HFN. He went over them and said that I would need a new set of finals
 after I had used them for awhile. I am having some trouble getting a wire up
 for them, but I keeping my eyes open for a nice set of 6JB6 s. Mike, KB1EZL

 --

 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] One R-4A down, two to go, plus a 2B to go

2010-09-22 Thread Richard Palmer
*(1) An intermittent that shows up after an hour or so that causes signal
levels to drop about 20 dB for a few seconds then pop back in.  A burst of
static, switching to STBY and back to RCV, or opening up the bandwidth to
cause a burst of signal will correct the drop, but then after several
seconds it will drop again (but it self-corrects, the drops, then
self-corrects.most annoying).*

I don't know which tube it is for your receiver but try a known good voltage
regulator tube. In my TR-4 it's something like V20 = 0A2.

Good luck.

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:15 AM, ph...@aol.com wrote:

  Finally got one of the three R-4A receivers working well and it's now
 in the shack.  Here's the status:

 R-4A #3781:  A 13-tube, the second-nicest of the three, re-capped and now
 working just fine.  The only issue with this one was a REALLY warbly PTO.
 Since #3735 (see below) was quite stable I swapped out PTOs and got 3781
 checked out  fully aligned.

 R-4A #3735:  Another 13-tube and the worst of the three (the chassis looks
 REALLY bad, chicken coop storage?), this one has a thoroughly hosed-up
 preselector drive that I need to rebuild including turning a new SS center
 shaft on the lathe.  It also now has a warbly PTO (see above) but before I
 swapped out the PTO it worked fine except for the preselector drive.  The
 chassis will make a good test-bed for trouble-shooting  fixing the PTO
 assembly.

 R-4A #5757G:  An 11-tube, this unit looks almost new inside and out and a
 chassis this clean has got to be VERY rare.  Unit has been fully re-capped
 and after a 30-minute warm-up it aligned just fine.  It works great except
 for two things:

 (1) An intermittent that shows up after an hour or so that causes
 signal levels to drop about 20 dB for a few seconds then pop back in.  A
 burst of static, switching to STBY and back to RCV, or opening up the
 bandwidth to cause a burst of signal will correct the drop, but then after
 several seconds it will drop again (but it self-corrects, the drops, then
 self-corrects.most annoying).  The drop is visible on the S-meter as
 well as being audible.  Tube replacement doesn't do a thing for
 it.  Replacing the damaged tube socket for V4 didn't, either.

 (2) Seems to have a little distortion in the AM audio. Haven't searched
 for the cause yet.


 2B #2052:  Has worked great from the day it arrived and I haven't had to
 touch it.  It's due for a re-cap (kit is on hand) and I'll run through the
 alignment, and since it lost its place on the operating desk to R-4A #3781
 tonight I'll probably tackle it fairly soon.  It shouldn't need much other
 than the new caps.

 Problems notwithstanding, it's pretty amazing that these 40+ year-old
 receivers can be made to work so well after all these years.

 73/arf,

 Paul, K4MSG

 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] AC 3 Pot

2010-09-13 Thread Richard Palmer
I need a new pot for my ac 3. Do I just get a 10k 200v that will look good?

Thanks in advance.
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] AC 3 Pot

2010-09-13 Thread Richard Palmer
Thanks. I found nothing anywhere about it. I tried to google the numbers on
the case and got nothing.

The schematic shows 10 k. As you see I was unsure about the voltage.

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Garey Barrell k4...@mindspring.comwrote:

 Richard -

 Nothing special about it.  Never sees more than about 70 VDC to ground.

 73, Garey - K4OAH
 Glen Allen, VA

 Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
 www.k4oah.com



 Richard Palmer wrote:

 I need a new pot for my ac 3. Do I just get a 10k 200v that will look
 good?

 Thanks in advance.



 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Saga continues...

2010-09-13 Thread Richard Palmer
Improper wiring could make the rig key up when plugged in. This takes out
the receive.



On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Jim Shorney jshor...@inebraska.com wrote:

 On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:06:45 -0500, Joe Loverti wrote:

 Anyone have the correct wiring method for these mics?

 Still puzzles me why this would cut the rx out even wired incorrectly.

 All Shure mic data sheets can be found here:

 http://www.shure.com/americas/support/user-guides/all-user-guides/index.htm

 I've found errors in various online wiring guides posted by well-meaning
 hams. In a nutshell:

 White = Audio
 Red = PTT
 Black + Shield = ground

 Red goes to tip, white to ring, and black/shield to the shell.

 A miswired mic can key a transmitter, which will give the symptom you
 describe.

 73

 -Jim



 --
 Ham Radio NU0C
 Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.S.A.
 TR7/RV7/R7A/L7, TR6/RV6, T4XC/R4C/L4B, NCL2000, SB104A, R390A,
 GT550A/RV550A, HyGain 3750, IBM PS/2 - all vintage, all the time!

 Give a man a URL, and he will learn for an hour; teach him to Google, and
 he will learn for a lifetime.

 HyGain 3750 User's Group - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HyGain_3750/
 http://radiojim.exofire.net
 http://incolor.inetnebr.com/jshorney
 http://www.nebraskaghosts.org



 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] AC-3 Pot

2010-09-12 Thread Richard Palmer
Can someone give me a part number and source for the pot in a AC-3. If it
has the mounting tabs all the better.

Thanks,
Richard Palmer
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Fire... really

2010-08-21 Thread Richard Palmer
I did find a small round piece that looks like hard polished leather
It's size is almost an exact match to the tops the slug coils. So if it were
a part of a part that's all I've found. I'm done for now. Thanks for all the
help everyone.

My MFJ is a 941D. I about died when I found myself trying to load to rig
without the coax attached. So I'm just going to save up some money and see
about shipping her off for whatever repairs are needed. I see there is a lot
I couldn't even solder on my best day anymore.

Can't say it enough... thanks.

Rick Palmer

On 8/21/10, Garey Barrell k4...@mindspring.com wrote:

 Rick -

 No problem, better a dupe than not to the list!  :-)

 Fire in the hole is almost always a 'missing antenna' problem.
  Mismatched PA tubes can cause neutralization problems, sometimes with
 oscillation and fireworks.  You don't say what MFJ tuner you have, but is it
 actually rated for 250W?  MFJs also have a habit of things melting and/or
 coming apart over time.  Don't forget that the coax also has a connector on
 each end!

 The relay coil is usually wrapped in a 'varnished cambric' tape, red-brown
 fabric soaked in varnish, that is heat resistant.  Does the relay pull in
 ok?  It is connected directly to the +250V bus, so a short on the 'wrong'
 end of the coil could account for some fireworks.

 Keep us posted!

 73, Garey - K4OAH
 Glen Allen, VA

 Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
 www.k4oah.com


 Richard Palmer wrote:

 I have tried tuning her up only to find a disconnected coax ( 2 rigs no
 switch ). But when it's connected... it goes into a 300w dummy load. I do
 have to tune the antenna on air though. I noticed on your great CD, while
 looking for a titanium cap, that the relay there is wrapped in what looks
 like asbestos. I'm not certain mine is there... should it be???

 All three PA tube are Sylvania. I run Times LMR400 UF... it's new but my
 old MFJ might be causing me problems. I bought it used over ten years ago.
 It seems to be ok with 100w but maybe the Drake stresses it out. That is on
 my have to replace next list. I'm not even going to try it with the drake
 again.

 Thanks everyone for the great ideas. When this get this sussed out you'll
 be the first to know.

 Rick Palmer
 Sorry for the dupe Garry

 On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Garey Barrell k4...@mindspring.commailto:
 k4...@mindspring.com wrote:

Richard -

The fact that it didn't tune indicates that perhaps the antenna
was either not connected (relay?) or wrong band? or bad coax, or
...  Possibly arcing in the relay contacts or coil.

What is the BIAS current?  It should be 100 mA, if it's now 65 mA
or so you may have lost a final tube.

Really not much to flame in the PA cage.  You could get corona on
variable cap plates, again due to mismatch, but that is typically
an ozone smell.  A parasitic could have fried one of the parasitic
suppressors on the PA plate caps.  Are all three PA tubes from the
same manufacturer?

73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com http://www.k4oah.com



Richard Palmer wrote:

My TR-4 did not want to tune... it caught on fire that looked
like it was at the PA section probably around the relay. All I
could really do was grab switches and plugs faster than
anything I've done in the last twenty years.

The smoke was not the conventional electric smell. It was very
acid and burning. I sorta took in a nose full doing the above
and felt high, in a bad way. I just got around to looking at
it and can not find any burnt or distorted part. There is
absolutely no sign of soot or heat anywhere. Seeing this I
tried to tune her up again. I was getting a very solid 4.5 for
the plate current. Now it's only 3. Is it possible (likely)
that I smoked one of my PA tubes?

Thanks in advance,
Richard Palmer
KB8NXO




 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Fire... really

2010-08-20 Thread Richard Palmer
My TR-4 did not want to tune... it caught on fire that looked like it was at
the PA section probably around the relay. All I could really do was grab
switches and plugs faster than anything I've done in the last twenty years.

The smoke was not the conventional electric smell. It was very acid and
burning. I sorta took in a nose full doing the above and felt high, in a bad
way. I just got around to looking at it and can not find any burnt or
distorted part. There is absolutely no sign of soot or heat anywhere. Seeing
this I tried to tune her up again. I was getting a very solid 4.5 for the
plate current. Now it's only 3. Is it possible (likely) that I smoked one
of my PA tubes?

Thanks in advance,
Richard Palmer
KB8NXO
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Fire... really

2010-08-20 Thread Richard Palmer
I forgot to mention that there was a 2 flame... hence fire. The tune and
load caps were clean as are the coils in the tank. I thought that maybe
something wrapped in paper light up. The flame was by where the relay is. I
would have bet good money that some sign of the fire would be obvious. But
no signs on either side of the chassis, no sign on either of the case
covers. No bare leads where something use to be and no blistered pieces. But
that smell was very acid. Even the memory of it makes my head pang.

It's sitting for now and I'm using a TS-570G. (I prefer my Drake though)



On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Ron wd8...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Rick,
 Sorry to her you had issues with one of our loved ones :-)

 Acidic smell sounds like an electrolytic cap.  Don't recall if any exist in
 the PA area, but if they do they would not be in the cage.  There might be
 something below the cage under the chassis.

 If there was a fire and now it is gone without an obvious trace, have a
 look at your tune and load caps.  Arc over in tank circuit caps tend to
 occur and then vanish, but they leave scorch and pits marks on the caps.
 Unfortunately those marks are there to assist another arc over in the
 future.  But I would not think that a tank circuit cap would be acidic
 smelling.

 73,
 Ron WD8SBB

 --- On *Fri, 8/20/10, Richard Palmer burnto...@toast.net* wrote:


 From: Richard Palmer burnto...@toast.net
 Subject: [Drakelist] Fire... really
 To: Drakelist drakelist@zerobeat.net
 Date: Friday, August 20, 2010, 8:04 PM


 My TR-4 did not want to tune... it caught on fire that looked like it was
 at the PA section probably around the relay. All I could really do was grab
 switches and plugs faster than anything I've done in the last twenty years.

 The smoke was not the conventional electric smell. It was very acid and
 burning. I sorta took in a nose full doing the above and felt high, in a bad
 way. I just got around to looking at it and can not find any burnt or
 distorted part. There is absolutely no sign of soot or heat anywhere. Seeing
 this I tried to tune her up again. I was getting a very solid 4.5 for the
 plate current. Now it's only 3. Is it possible (likely) that I smoked one
 of my PA tubes?

 Thanks in advance,
 Richard Palmer
 KB8NXO


 -Inline Attachment Follows-

 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net http://mc/compose?to=drakel...@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Fire... really

2010-08-20 Thread Richard Palmer
I have tried tuning her up only to find a disconnected coax ( 2 rigs no
switch ). But when it's connected... it goes into a 300w dummy load. I do
have to tune the antenna on air though. I noticed on your great CD, while
looking for a titanium cap, that the relay there is wrapped in what looks
like asbestos. I'm not certain mine is there... should it be???

All three PA tube are Sylvania. I run Times LMR400 UF... it's new but my old
MFJ might be causing me problems. I bought it used over ten years ago. It
seems to be ok with 100w but maybe the Drake stresses it out. That is on my
have to replace next list. I'm not even going to try it with the drake
again.

Thanks everyone for the great ideas. When this get this sussed out you'll be
the first to know.

Rick Palmer
Sorry for the dupe Garry

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Garey Barrell k4...@mindspring.comwrote:

 Richard -

 The fact that it didn't tune indicates that perhaps the antenna was either
 not connected (relay?) or wrong band? or bad coax, or ...  Possibly arcing
 in the relay contacts or coil.

 What is the BIAS current?  It should be 100 mA, if it's now 65 mA or so you
 may have lost a final tube.

 Really not much to flame in the PA cage.  You could get corona on variable
 cap plates, again due to mismatch, but that is typically an ozone smell.  A
 parasitic could have fried one of the parasitic suppressors on the PA plate
 caps.  Are all three PA tubes from the same manufacturer?

 73, Garey - K4OAH
 Glen Allen, VA

 Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
 www.k4oah.com



 Richard Palmer wrote:

 My TR-4 did not want to tune... it caught on fire that looked like it was
 at the PA section probably around the relay. All I could really do was grab
 switches and plugs faster than anything I've done in the last twenty years.

 The smoke was not the conventional electric smell. It was very acid and
 burning. I sorta took in a nose full doing the above and felt high, in a bad
 way. I just got around to looking at it and can not find any burnt or
 distorted part. There is absolutely no sign of soot or heat anywhere. Seeing
 this I tried to tune her up again. I was getting a very solid 4.5 for the
 plate current. Now it's only 3. Is it possible (likely) that I smoked one
 of my PA tubes?

 Thanks in advance,
 Richard Palmer
 KB8NXO


 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Low power tuning

2010-08-13 Thread Richard Palmer
Rookie tube radio guy here  Hi Hi.  How do I tune my TR-4 to less than
maximum power?

Thanks,
KB8NXO
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Wanted AC-4

2010-07-18 Thread Richard Palmer
I need a good working AC-4. I really do.

KB8NXO
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Drake 4 line crystals

2010-06-30 Thread Richard Palmer
I believe Gold case refers to the price of $45.00.

KB8NXO

On 6/30/10, Howard Traxler htraxl...@earthlink.net wrote:

  Sorry for duplicating, but:  the way this list handles replies is very
 confusing to me.

 Who was it who posted the
  3.5 MHz band = 14.600 MHz ($45.00) 
Gold case??

 and what is meant by gold case?

 Thanks.
 Howard, WA9RYF


 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] MN-2000/ MN-4

2010-03-15 Thread Richard Palmer

How are the MN-4 and it's big brother at tuning the WARC bands??

Richard Palmer
KB8NXO

--
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to 
sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.   - Anatole 
France


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] MN-2000/ MN-4

2010-03-15 Thread Richard Palmer
I have a brass slinky. Right now end to end about 32 ft. (bad # for 
40m). It is resonate at 15m. And with a mfj 941D tuner will do 80-10m 
1:1.5. I want a Drake tuner and have read that they can tune a garbage 
can (-8. But for the price of  a MN-2000 I wanted to ask.


Thanks for the input.
Richard Palmer
KB8NXO

Curt Nixon wrote:
I use a MN-2000 into a windom cut for 40M and can tune to near zero 
SWR on all bands from 40 up.  It is just a matter of finding which 
band position to use.


In my case, for 30M I use the 40M position--it will also work from the 
twentyM position

for 17 I use 15M for 12 I use 10M

It will depend somewhat on the antenna You use so it may not work for 
every case, but I am happy with the New Carolina Windom 40 and the 
MN-2000


Curt
KU8L





--
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to 
sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.   - Anatole 
France


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] T-4X Audio Question

2010-02-28 Thread Richard Palmer
Geoffry is correct. Your Drake needs a high impedance mic to get that 
Drake sound.


Hulett, Russell wrote:

Trying out my T-4X on SSB, using an old D-104 microphone with T-UG8 stand. Comments were 
audio was ok but sounded like I was in a tunnel.  Another mentioned that the 
audio was higher pitched than my other rigs.  My T-4XB never received any similar 
reports, though the microphone used with that rig is a D-104 on a G base

Being mainly a CW op, am not very adept at identifying the cause.  I seem to 
recall that the T-4X has less filtering than the later versions.  Is this 
likely the cause of poor audio or would the microphone be more likely the 
issue?  The reason am using different base with the T-4X is that is only one 
with the aircraft plug, the T-4XB was converted by some previous owner to 1/4 
inch microphone jack.

Thanks for any info and 73, Curt KB5JO

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


   



--
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to 
sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.   - Anatole 
France


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Crystal Calibrator Alignment TR-4

2010-02-25 Thread Richard Palmer
The manual says to tune to WWV ect.ect. I'm assuming this is 10Mc. . Can 
I use a signal generator set to 10Mc. and accomplish the same desired 
result? I have neither of these and must buy what I need to skin this 
cat. Any suggestions? One caveat... it must be inexpensive.


Thanks in advance,
Richard Palmer
KB8NXO

--
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to 
sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.   - Anatole 
France


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Crystal Calibrator Alignment TR-4

2010-02-25 Thread Richard Palmer
It sure is if you don't count the cost of a receiver and aerial. Both of 
which are needed to get that free station ;-) .



Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF wrote:

What's wrong with WWV?
You don't have to buy that.

On 25-Feb-10 15:51, Richard Palmer wrote:

The manual says to tune to WWV ect.ect. I'm assuming this is 10Mc. . Can
I use a signal generator set to 10Mc. and accomplish the same desired
result? I have neither of these and must buy what I need to skin this
cat. Any suggestions? One caveat... it must be inexpensive.

Thanks in advance,
Richard Palmer
KB8NXO




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2708 - Release Date: 
02/24/10 19:34:00







--
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to 
sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.   - Anatole 
France


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Crystal Calibrator Alignment TR-4

2010-02-25 Thread Richard Palmer
I dug out my am antenna for my receiver and I have two (1) 800kHz - the 
birthplace of MoTown CKLW and (2) 700kHz, someplace around Detroit. 
Their signal is not as strong.


So I guess I'm in business! So much for justifying a Hammarlund purchase 
:-) .



Garey Barrell wrote:

Richard -

Do you have ANY receiver aside from your TR-4?  It doesn't have to 
have a BFO or be particularly stable or sensitive.


If all you have is a Broadcast Band table radio, see if you have a 
commercial station on an even 100 kHz frequency such as 700, 800, 
1200, etc.  It doesn't have to be local, in fact best if it isn't too 
strong, and the higher the better.  Get it close to the TR-4, and 
possibly wrap a turn or two of wire around the calibrator tube, 
bringing the other end near the broadcast receiver antenna.  Turn on 
the calibrator and adjust your wire until the calibrator signal is 
about the same strength as the BC station, then adjust the calibrator 
until the signal is at zero beat.  Adjust as carefully as you can, if 
the signals are near the same strength you'll actually be able to hear 
a slow variation in amplitude when you're within a few Hz of zero.


This is far from ideal, but BC stations are very accurate.   When you 
calibrate at 10 MHz, you are comparing the 100th harmonic of the 
calibrator to a known frequency, whereas with a broadcast station 
you're only at the 10th harmonic on a 1 MHz BC station.  But plenty 
close enough for our purposes.


Better still is if you can borrow a receiver that covers 10 or 15 MHz, 
and if you can resist adjusting the calibrator, they stay correct for 
a LONG time.  In fact, unless someone has been adjusting it, it's 
probably close enough!


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com


Richard Palmer wrote:
The manual says to tune to WWV ect.ect. I'm assuming this is 10Mc. . 
Can I use a signal generator set to 10Mc. and accomplish the same 
desired result? I have neither of these and must buy what I need to 
skin this cat. Any suggestions? One caveat... it must be inexpensive.


Thanks in advance,
Richard Palmer
KB8NXO



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist





--
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to 
sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.   - Anatole 
France


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Crystal Calibrator Alignment TR-4

2010-02-25 Thread Richard Palmer




Chuck,

Not true. You know it. I have a dozen of your emails to prove it.

You are fishing (at best). Leave it alone.

Richard Palmer
KB8NXO

Chuck Grandgent wrote:
Hey Garey,
  
did you mean uF or pF.  Richrd is quite certain you really meant pF.
  
   Chuck, K1OM
  
  On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Garey
Barrell k4...@mindspring.com
wrote:
  Richard
-

OK.   That 0.005 cap isn't particularly critical.  The 1000 ohm
resistor is the load, the cap is just to prevent shorting the DC to
ground.  Any disc ceramic from 0.001 to 0.01 uF at 500V or more would
work just fine.

I wouldn't worry too much about the calibrator.  As long as someone
hasn't twisted on the trimmer cap it's plenty close enough.



73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com


Richard Palmer wrote:

Garey,
  
I have cleaned my eBay TR-4. Replaced two tubes, V1 V20. Along
with tightening up the ps connector pins and probably some other small
forgotten stuff it seems to be working nicely. Although I still have
yet to make "first contact". I thought I'd go through the complete
alignment procedure to check and adjust as necessary.
  
( I thought I had a source for two 0.01pF capacitors from Allied but
their web site ordering is worse than crap. I called them and to my
disbelief still more crap. So I'm still looking for some caps to get
the 0.005pf for the alignment procedure.)
  
That's why I asked about calibrating the calibrator. I don't suspect
any problem... just want to check all the settings.
  
Richard Palmer
KB8NXO
  
  
Garey Barrell wrote:
  
Richard -

Do you have ANY receiver aside from your TR-4?  It doesn't have to have
a BFO or be particularly stable or sensitive.

If all you have is a Broadcast Band table radio, see if you have a
commercial station on an even 100 kHz frequency such as 700, 800, 1200,
etc.  It doesn't have to be local, in fact best if it isn't too strong,
and the higher the better.  Get it close to the TR-4, and possibly wrap
a turn or two of wire around the calibrator tube, bringing the other
end near the broadcast receiver antenna.  Turn on the calibrator and
adjust your wire until the calibrator signal is about the same strength
as the BC station, then adjust the calibrator until the signal is at
zero beat.  Adjust as carefully as you can, if the signals are near the
same strength you'll actually be able to hear a slow variation in
amplitude when you're within a few Hz of zero.

This is far from ideal, but BC stations are very accurate.   When you
calibrate at 10 MHz, you are comparing the 100th harmonic of the
calibrator to a known frequency, whereas with a broadcast station
you're only at the 10th harmonic on a 1 MHz BC station.  But plenty
close enough for our purposes.

Better still is if you can borrow a receiver that covers 10 or 15 MHz,
and if you can resist adjusting the calibrator, they stay correct for a
LONG time.  In fact, unless someone has been "adjusting" it, it's
probably close enough!

73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com
    
    
Richard Palmer wrote:

The manual says to tune to WWV ect.ect. I'm assuming this is 10Mc. .
Can I use a signal generator set to 10Mc. and accomplish the same
desired result? I have neither of these and must buy what I need to
skin this cat. Any suggestions? One caveat... it must be inexpensive.
  
Thanks in advance,
Richard Palmer
KB8NXO

  
  


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


  
  
  
  

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist
  



-- 
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.   - Anatole France  



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Cleaned the TR-4

2010-02-09 Thread Richard Palmer

Thanks Gary,

Next month (2 weeks) I need to get a half dozen tubes. Should the 
12AX7A's be matched? I only need one.


Garey Barrell wrote:

Richard -

The ZERO adjust should not affect the PLATE meter, only the S-Meter.  
There is some  _mechanical_  interaction between the two movements, 
but in transmit the plate meter should read cathode current of the 
Final only, and the S-Meter should indicate ALC action.  In receive, 
the S-Meter should indicate signal strength and the PLATE meter will  
_slightly_  react to movement of the S-Meter.


So the correct setting of the ZERO pot is as described below and in 
the manual.  The only adjustment for the PLATE meter is by selecting 
R13, which was selected at final test.  The only reason to change it 
is if R45 has changed value with age or overload, or has been 
replaced.  It's best to calibrate the meter to read 0.1A correctly, 
since that is critical to proper operation of the Final stage, and the 
meter is NOT a high quality item and is somewhat inaccurate over it's 
entire range.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com


Richard Palmer wrote:

Gary,

Since I cleaned it I knew where it was. I noticed that the zero 
adjust affected the meter's reading of the bias also ... so I wanted 
to get it set correctly.


Thanks for your help,
Richard Palmer

Garey Barrell wrote:

Richard -

The S-Meter is Zero'd with the cleverly disguised ZERO control on 
the right side of the chassis.!!  :-)


Disconnect antenna, detune RF TUNE control, and adjust ZERO control 
for S1 on the meter.  There is no S0 on Drake meters!


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com


Richard Palmer wrote:


There is on thing that is not spelled out. Zeroing the meter. I 
cleaned all the pots and when I went to zero the meter I found 
nothing to help me determine the proper setting. So any help there 
is appreciated.






___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist





--
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to 
sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.   - Anatole 
France


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Cleaned the TR-4

2010-02-08 Thread Richard Palmer

Gary,

Since I cleaned it I knew where it was. I noticed that the zero adjust 
affected the meter's reading of the bias also ... so I wanted to get it 
set correctly.


Thanks for your help,
Richard Palmer

Garey Barrell wrote:

Richard -

The S-Meter is Zero'd with the cleverly disguised ZERO control on the 
right side of the chassis.!!  :-)


Disconnect antenna, detune RF TUNE control, and adjust ZERO control 
for S1 on the meter.  There is no S0 on Drake meters!


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com


Richard Palmer wrote:


There is on thing that is not spelled out. Zeroing the meter. I 
cleaned all the pots and when I went to zero the meter I found 
nothing to help me determine the proper setting. So any help there is 
appreciated.


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist





--
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to 
sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.   - Anatole 
France


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Cleaned the TR-4

2010-02-07 Thread Richard Palmer
Wow. What a difference! Let me preface this by saying my antenna is a 
brass slinky in my attic.. about 20 ft up.


I have just about crowded conditions on 40 and 80m tonight. I don't 
think there was this much activity on 20m when I first plugged it back 
in around 1300hrs. I can't find the right words to describe the change 
in the transceiver's quality and ability to receive.


As a new-be to Drakes I was a bit surprised at cleaning the relay K1. I 
have the earliest TR-4 and getting that plastic cover off qualifies as a 
PITA. There were some gouge marks in it from someone else, so I guess I 
had better luck than they did.


There is on thing that is not spelled out. Zeroing the meter. I cleaned 
all the pots and when I went to zero the meter I found nothing to help 
me determine the proper setting. So any help there is appreciated. All 
my hinkey behavior is gone. Saturday I test for my upgrade so 
hopefully I will be on the air with it soon. FWIW I am the proud new 
owner of  a Jackson 648 S. The tube chart is dated 02/70 and it handles 
all my tubes.


So thanks to all here for the help, words of wisdom and encouragement.

Richard Palmer
KB8NXO

--
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to 
sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.   - Anatole 
France


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] What circa tube tester?

2010-01-30 Thread Richard Palmer
I hope this is not off topic.  With the use of vintage being used for 
all Drakes and tube testers, many from the 1940's and before, up to the 
last ones made, it has become impossible for me to determine what will 
service my early TR-4.


I have spent hours and hours looking up tube testers by type, make and 
model. I have spent hours squinting at pictures trying to count socket 
pins. I am burnt out and am looking for help in finding just where to 
look. I have no idea if post WWII testers even test 9 pins, or if all 7 
pins are of the same size.


Richard Palmer
KB8NXO

--
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to 
sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.   - Anatole 
France


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Rubber feet?

2010-01-15 Thread Richard Palmer
I recently acquired my first tube radio station. A TR-4/RV-4/AC-4. 
Everything seems to work as it should. My question is one only a rookie 
would ask, and I'm sorry to ask but I have looked everywhere I can find, 
without any luck.


Should the AC-4 have rubber feet on it? Mine does not and when I put it 
inside the RV-4 I have a vibrational hum that is not acceptable.


Thanks
KB8NXO

--
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to 
sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.   - Anatole 
France


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Rubber feet?

2010-01-15 Thread Richard Palmer
Ok. Thanks all. I did not know the AC-4 was securely mounted to the 
chassis of the RV-4 with screws. I was just sliding it in there. I see I 
have the threaded type mount power supply. I also see that the feet on 
the RV-4 are nutted. So I'll try to screw the RV-4's rear feet into the 
bottom of the AC-4. That is two mount point short I know.


BTW. I read this all day long and am learning a lot, fast. Thanks again.

Kb8NXO

--
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to 
sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.   - Anatole 
France


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Rubber feet?

2010-01-15 Thread Richard Palmer
The TR-4 has 6 rubber feet (sorta). On the rear there is one in each 
corner and in the front there are two stacked in each corner. This 
raises the front to an angle. The RV-4 has rubber feet in both corners 
up front that look very similar to the ones on the TR-4. And in the rear 
corners there are the half rubber ball feet. I was told the SK who last 
owned this station, ran the power supply out side of the case. The AC-4 
is without feet. So it looks like I'm just a couple of power supply feet 
short. The power supply has no real vibration to the touch. But putting 
inside of the RV-4 without feet and having it rest in the nutted studs 
from the half round feet on the rear of the RV-4 creates a vibration 
that sounds like AC hum.


This is still new to me and I will take care of this rubber footing when 
I do a maintenance cleaning (it needs it) next month. Thanks for the 
information. I now know how it was meant to be.


Rick   KB8NXO

--
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to 
sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.   - Anatole 
France


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist