Re: [Emc-users] [OT] CadSoft releases Eagle V6 to beta testing

2011-11-07 Thread Yi-Shin Li
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Belli Button be...@iafrica.com wrote:

 Funny thing though, if there is a package available that could show
 my Gerber plot on the PC, I would like to see it.


Hi Belli,

You may try gerbv (for ubuntu).
gerbv - Gerber file viewer for PCB design

Yishin
-- 
ARAIS ROBOT TECHNOLOGY
www.araisrobo.com
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing

2011-11-07 Thread Frank Tkalcevic
 
  You might try posting your query over in the CNCZone too.
 
  Once you've settled on an approach I hope you'll provide pictures for
  the rest of us to ooh and aah over :-)
 
 I'll most likely try to get something quick and dirty done, then go from
there.
 At first it won't be anything to write home about, but I'll share what
I've done
 in case it might help.

This is a good read.  Movie at the end too...

http://www.cncathome.com/spindles.html


--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] PC board making and viewing

2011-11-07 Thread Rudy du Preez
Hi

I see some discussion on PC board making. My experience:

1. Look for Gerber view programs (gerbv)

2. You need a high speed spindle - I use a Kavo spindle (about 30 mm dia and
100 mm long - runs 6 rpm) - look for KAVO spindles. Gives excellent
results using PCB-GCODE software and EAGLE layouts.

Rudy


--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing

2011-11-07 Thread andy pugh
On 7 November 2011 02:26, Kirk Wallace kwall...@wallacecompany.com wrote:

  I suppose a draw
 bar is going to be a problem.

How does your current drawbar work?
I can imagine thet it might be possible to use the exisiting drawbar
actuator for the new spindle. Part of the solution might be to hold
the high-speed spindle in place with the 4 tapped holes in the face
rather than with the drawbar.

There are laminations available with a decent-sized central hole that
would allow a through-bore motor to be made.
http://www.gobrushless.com/shop/index.php?app=ccp0ns=prodshowref=SC+65mmstator
I think an ISO10 holder could be made to fit at least partly up inside
that, and you could probably still get at the face mounting bolts.
However I have not found a drawing which shows them.

An Inrunner might package more easily.

Rather than a brushless motor, I wonder if gearing up the existing
spindle is an option. I have seen a centrifugal supercharger drive
which used friction drive to achieve a large speed increase using only
a slightly resilient outer drive ring, and slightly-floating-mounted
planets. These are almost ready-made for the planet job:
http://simplybearings.co.uk/shop/advanced_search_result.php?categories_id=44611_10=9205_121_210=-122_220=9205_2223_230=9205_23x=22y=9extra_field_filter=1


-- 
atp
The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong.

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Dust-proof case?

2011-11-07 Thread andy pugh
On 6 November 2011 17:36, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:

 http://www.newark.com/tyco-electronics-corcom/10vr6/rfi-power-line-filter-10a-700ua/dp/52K3303

 Yes, in the US, corcom is a leading brand of these filters.

My machine has one of these:
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/12330-NEW-Rasmi-3G3MV-PFI-1010-E-RFI-Filter-/170624064389?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item27b9fc9b85#ht_967wt_966

(I think that Rasmi might have a bigger market share in Europe than Corcom)

-- 
atp
The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong.

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing

2011-11-07 Thread Kirk Wallace
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 19:59 +1100, Frank Tkalcevic wrote:
... snip
 This is a good read.  Movie at the end too...
 
 http://www.cncathome.com/spindles.html
... snip

As Paul says in the video, that's pretty cool. The page saves me from
finding out the hard way that something is unlikely to work. Thanks for
the link Frank.

I am tending towards having the same arrangement with the motor offset
and driving the spindle with a belt. Then having the draw bar release
cylinder offset opposite from the motor and pushing on the bar through a
lever. The NMTB 40 taper will be above the spindle on piers. I think
I'll stick with the ISO 20 tool holders.

-- 
Kirk Wallace
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html
California, USA


--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing

2011-11-07 Thread Steve Stallings
ISO 20 toolholders are nice, but you may wish
to investigate the cost of them before making
a commitment. They seem to be less readily
available at cheap surplus prices.

Steve Stallings 

 -Original Message-
 From: Kirk Wallace [mailto:kwall...@wallacecompany.com] 
 Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 12:07 PM
 To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
 Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing
 
 On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 19:59 +1100, Frank Tkalcevic wrote:
 ... snip
  This is a good read.  Movie at the end too...
  
  http://www.cncathome.com/spindles.html
 ... snip
 
 As Paul says in the video, that's pretty cool. The page saves me from
 finding out the hard way that something is unlikely to work. 
 Thanks for
 the link Frank.
 
 I am tending towards having the same arrangement with the motor offset
 and driving the spindle with a belt. Then having the draw bar release
 cylinder offset opposite from the motor and pushing on the 
 bar through a
 lever. The NMTB 40 taper will be above the spindle on piers. I think
 I'll stick with the ISO 20 tool holders.
 
 -- 
 Kirk Wallace
 http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
 http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html
 California, USA
 
 
 --
 
 RSA(R) Conference 2012
 Save $700 by Nov 18
 Register now
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
 


--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing - an OT question

2011-11-07 Thread Kent A. Reed
On 11/7/2011 3:59 AM, Frank Tkalcevic wrote:
 You might try posting your query over in the CNCZone too.

 Once you've settled on an approach I hope you'll provide pictures for
 the rest of us to ooh and aah over :-)
 I'll most likely try to get something quick and dirty done, then go from
 there.
 At first it won't be anything to write home about, but I'll share what
 I've done
 in case it might help.
 This is a good read.  Movie at the end too...

 http://www.cncathome.com/spindles.html


Looking at this website (which I agree is a good read; thanks, Frank) 
reminds me of a niggling question I've had for some time.

What's up with all these die grinders in the marketplace? There can't be 
that many mold and die makers in the world and I doubt a professional 
would use any of these consumer-grade tools anyway.

Is this just a marketing ploy or do they truly have superior performance?

The website in question dismisses the electric ones as basically 
routers with better bearings. Agree?

Regards,
Kent

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing

2011-11-07 Thread Kirk Wallace
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 12:33 +, andy pugh wrote:
 On 7 November 2011 02:26, Kirk Wallace kwall...@wallacecompany.com wrote:
 
   I suppose a draw
  bar is going to be a problem.
 
 How does your current drawbar work?
 I can imagine thet it might be possible to use the exisiting drawbar
 actuator for the new spindle. Part of the solution might be to hold
 the high-speed spindle in place with the 4 tapped holes in the face
 rather than with the drawbar.

I have an electric draw bar like this one:
http://home.insightbb.com/~joevicar3/cheap_drawbar.htm

It's not very subtle and would make short work of a 20 taper collet.

 There are laminations available with a decent-sized central hole that
 would allow a through-bore motor to be made.
 http://www.gobrushless.com/shop/index.php?app=ccp0ns=prodshowref=SC+65mmstator
 I think an ISO10 holder could be made to fit at least partly up inside
 that, and you could probably still get at the face mounting bolts.
 However I have not found a drawing which shows them.

http://www.schaublin.ch/catalogues/PO039-042.pdf 

Usually outrunners are wound to get low RPM. I would most likely need as
much speed as possible. Many of the laminations I have seen have odd
numbers of poles so would not work. I do see the above stator has a
number of poles that evenly divides by three, so would work if I wind
six poles in a row. So let's see, 60 RPS = 3600 RPM. Common VFD's go up
to 400 Hz to give around 24,000 RPM. That would do nicely. This would be
a slam dunk if I didn't want the draw bar and went with ER collets,
hmmm.

 An Inrunner might package more easily.
 
 Rather than a brushless motor, I wonder if gearing up the existing
 spindle is an option. I have seen a centrifugal supercharger drive
 which used friction drive to achieve a large speed increase using only
 a slightly resilient outer drive ring, and slightly-floating-mounted
 planets. These are almost ready-made for the planet job:
 http://simplybearings.co.uk/shop/advanced_search_result.php?categories_id=44611_10=9205_121_210=-122_220=9205_2223_230=9205_23x=22y=9extra_field_filter=1

I found this:
http://www.tormach.com/product_pcnc_acc_speeder.html 

I suppose a smooth belt from the main spindle to an offset idler axle
then a belt back to an on-axis secondary spindle would work, but then
there would be no fancy high-tech electronics involved.


-- 
Kirk Wallace
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html
California, USA


--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] integrating a spindle fault signal in a modular way?

2011-11-07 Thread Jon Elson
On 11/06/2011 10:36 PM, Scott Hasse wrote:
 I am working on the finishing touches of an Anilam 1100 knee mill
 conversion to EMC2, with details here:

 http://code.google.com/p/sector67-sandbox/wiki/ProjectSheetCake

 Over the last couple of months our spindle VFD (a Compumotor SpindleBlok)
 has faulted 5 or 6 times
I have a Magnetek VFD and it has a relay that signals fault.  I wired it 
in series with my
E-top switches, servo amp fault relays, etc.  It works fine to stop the 
machine when
the drive shuts down.  (When I started doing rigid tapping that requires 
the spindle
to reverse several times a minute it started tripping a LOT, I finally 
found out that the
electronic overheat error meant it thought the motor was overheatin g 
due to all the reversals.
I turned that feature off as the Bridgeport motor is made to take plug 
reversing all day long.

If you have a normally-closed E-stop switch, just put the NC contacts on 
the VFD in
series with it.

Jon

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] integrating a spindle fault signal in a modular way?

2011-11-07 Thread Jon Elson
On 11/06/2011 11:47 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote:

 I read a little more from your website. I see your chicken and egg
 problem, even with the independent loop I would think the VFD's fault
 relay would be open until the VFD powers up, but you can't power up
 until the loop is closed. Obviously, I don't have my VFD's set up for
 e-stop, but I been meaning to :)


I can't say for any other make/model, byt the Magnetek will only trip 
the fault relay
for an ACTUAL fault.  So, it will not signal fault unless it has a motor 
run command and
you power it off.  It will not signal fault on power up or power down 
UNLESS it is
running the motor at the time.

Jon

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing

2011-11-07 Thread andy pugh
On 7 November 2011 17:58, Kirk Wallace kwall...@wallacecompany.com wrote:

 I have an electric draw bar like this one:
 http://home.insightbb.com/~joevicar3/cheap_drawbar.htm

 It's not very subtle and would make short work of a 20 taper collet.

Possibly not, if it was simply operating a bolt into the CAT40
adaptor, pushing-off a Belville stack.

  face mounting bolts.
 However I have not found a drawing which shows them.

 http://www.schaublin.ch/catalogues/PO039-042.pdf

That does seem to be a good example of one of the many documents not
showing the bolt holes, yes :-)

According to my Machineries handbook, NMTB40 has two dogs in the face,
and also 4 x 1/2 x 13 tapped holes. Mounting to those would allow you
to poke alternative drawbar arrangements down the hole (and would
preclude using the power-drawbar for fast loading and unloading the
high speed spindle.

 So let's see, 60 RPS = 3600 RPM. Common VFD's go up
 to 400 Hz to give around 24,000 RPM. That would do nicely. This would be
 a slam dunk if I didn't want the draw bar and went with ER collets,

Can you use a VFD with a BLDC?
I am pretty sure that Pete has run his BLDC drives in a 5k servo
thread, which might get you 400Hz of commutation.

 I found this:
 http://www.tormach.com/product_pcnc_acc_speeder.html

 I suppose a smooth belt from the main spindle to an offset idler axle
 then a belt back to an on-axis secondary spindle would work, but then
 there would be no fancy high-tech electronics involved.

I was imagining something similar, but cleverer. :-)

-- 
atp
The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong.

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


[Emc-users] joystick control

2011-11-07 Thread Chris Reynolds
I just downloaded the 10.04 live cd because I'm getting rea dy to setup a new 
computer for my cnc machine and I was wondering if the component for using a 
joystick was already included in that release? I was thinking that having a 
joystick control would be really handy because of the location of my computer 
relative to the cnc machine, but at the moment I'm using the older release of 
EMC2. Will that work with a USB controller?

 
Chris

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] joystick control

2011-11-07 Thread andy pugh
On 7 November 2011 18:35, Chris Reynolds c_reynolds2...@yahoo.com wrote:
 I just downloaded the 10.04 live cd because I'm getting rea dy to setup a new 
 computer for my cnc machine and I was wondering if the component for using a 
 joystick was already included in that release?

hal_input was introduced in early 2007, and appears to be in 2.3.5. I
don't know which version it was introduced into.

-- 
atp
The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong.

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing

2011-11-07 Thread Kirk Wallace
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 18:33 +, andy pugh wrote:
... snip
 I was imagining something similar, but cleverer. :-)
... snip

I just had a vision of using two stators, one with its matching rotor
connected to the main spindle and poles wired UVWUVWUVWUVWUVWUVW. The
other wired UUVVWW and drives the rotor on the secondary
spindle giving an six to one generator Hz to motor RPM ratio. The draw
bar cylinder would be mounted between the upper generator and lower
motor.


-- 
Kirk Wallace
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html
California, USA


--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing - an OT question

2011-11-07 Thread Frank Tkalcevic
I've been using one for years in my hobby router.  I've just replaced it
with a Chinese spindle, but haven't cut anything yet.

I have a Bosch GGS 27LC, won on ebay.  With its straight long neck it is
easy to mount.  It has variable speed from 12k to 24k.  Run-out is awesome.
Never broken a PCB drill while using it.  I've done wood and aluminium with
it too.  3mm, 1/8, 6mm, 1/4, 8mm collets, which are a bit pricey though.
It's very noisy.

It's going to be demoted to the occasional die grinding, and I'll make a
mount for my lathe too.

I don't have air in my room, so electric is perfect.

 -Original Message-
 From: Kent A. Reed [mailto:knbr...@erols.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, 8 November 2011 4:57 AM
 To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
 Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing - an OT question
 
 On 11/7/2011 3:59 AM, Frank Tkalcevic wrote:
  You might try posting your query over in the CNCZone too.
 
  Once you've settled on an approach I hope you'll provide pictures
  for the rest of us to ooh and aah over :-)
  I'll most likely try to get something quick and dirty done, then go
  from
  there.
  At first it won't be anything to write home about, but I'll share
  what
  I've done
  in case it might help.
  This is a good read.  Movie at the end too...
 
  http://www.cncathome.com/spindles.html
 
 
 Looking at this website (which I agree is a good read; thanks, Frank)
reminds
 me of a niggling question I've had for some time.
 
 What's up with all these die grinders in the marketplace? There can't be
that
 many mold and die makers in the world and I doubt a professional would use
 any of these consumer-grade tools anyway.
 
 Is this just a marketing ploy or do they truly have superior performance?
 
 The website in question dismisses the electric ones as basically routers
with
 better bearings. Agree?
 
 Regards,
 Kent
 


--
 RSA(R) Conference 2012
 Save $700 by Nov 18
 Register now
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing

2011-11-07 Thread andy pugh
On 7 November 2011 19:16, Kirk Wallace kwall...@wallacecompany.com wrote:

 I just had a vision of using two stators, one with its matching rotor
 connected to the main spindle and poles wired UVWUVWUVWUVWUVWUVW. The
 other wired UUVVWW and drives the rotor on the secondary
 spindle giving an six to one generator Hz to motor RPM ratio. The draw
 bar cylinder would be mounted between the upper generator and lower
 motor.

Could you do that with one stator, and two rotors with different
magnet arrangements? (Note that the question is could you not
should you :-)


-- 
atp
The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong.

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing

2011-11-07 Thread Kirk Wallace
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 19:42 +, andy pugh wrote:
 On 7 November 2011 19:16, Kirk Wallace kwall...@wallacecompany.com wrote:
 
  I just had a vision of using two stators, one with its matching rotor
  connected to the main spindle and poles wired UVWUVWUVWUVWUVWUVW. The
  other wired UUVVWW and drives the rotor on the secondary
  spindle giving an six to one generator Hz to motor RPM ratio. The draw
  bar cylinder would be mounted between the upper generator and lower
  motor.
 
 Could you do that with one stator, and two rotors with different
 magnet arrangements? (Note that the question is could you not
 should you :-)

No, I think the rotor and stator pole spacings need to match. The
generator pole spacing is much tighter. The wire sizes and turns count
might be different too.

I was half joking with this idea, but it might work. Here is a rough
drawing:
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/Shizuoka/Shiz_Speeder-1a.png 



-- 
Kirk Wallace
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html
California, USA


--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing

2011-11-07 Thread Kirk Wallace
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 12:15 -0500, Steve Stallings wrote:
 ISO 20 toolholders are nice, but you may wish
 to investigate the cost of them before making
 a commitment. They seem to be less readily
 available at cheap surplus prices.
 
 Steve Stallings 

I'll probably try to make my own holders, like Paul did. Oops, now I
need to make a grinder.

-- 
Kirk Wallace
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html
California, USA


--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] joystick control

2011-11-07 Thread John Thornton
Look on the wiki site for Simple Remote Pendant

John

On 11/7/2011 12:35 PM, Chris Reynolds wrote:
 I just downloaded the 10.04 live cd because I'm getting rea dy to setup a new 
 computer for my cnc machine and I was wondering if the component for using a 
 joystick was already included in that release? I was thinking that having a 
 joystick control would be really handy because of the location of my computer 
 relative to the cnc machine, but at the moment I'm using the older release of 
 EMC2. Will that work with a USB controller?

   
 Chris

 --
 RSA(R) Conference 2012
 Save $700 by Nov 18
 Register now
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing

2011-11-07 Thread Kasey Matejcek
Has anyone tried to use and RC controller with EMC to run a RC brushless
motor
They take a pwm control signal from 1ms to 2ms or around there but haven't
tried
It sound like the have to have a signal on the input when there powered up
or the go into disable mode possibly

 On 7 November 2011 02:26, Kirk Wallace kwall...@wallacecompany.com
wrote:
 
   I suppose a draw
  bar is going to be a problem.
 
 How does your current drawbar work?
 I can imagine thet it might be possible to use the exisiting drawbar 
 actuator for the new spindle. Part of the solution might be to hold 
 the high-speed spindle in place with the 4 tapped holes in the face 
 rather than with the drawbar.

I have an electric draw bar like this one:
http://home.insightbb.com/~joevicar3/cheap_drawbar.htm

It's not very subtle and would make short work of a 20 taper collet.

 There are laminations available with a decent-sized central hole that 
 would allow a through-bore motor to be made.
 http://www.gobrushless.com/shop/index.php?app=ccp0ns=prodshowref=SC+
 65mmstator I think an ISO10 holder could be made to fit at least 
 partly up inside that, and you could probably still get at the face 
 mounting bolts.
 However I have not found a drawing which shows them.

http://www.schaublin.ch/catalogues/PO039-042.pdf 

Usually outrunners are wound to get low RPM. I would most likely need as
much speed as possible. Many of the laminations I have seen have odd numbers
of poles so would not work. I do see the above stator has a number of poles
that evenly divides by three, so would work if I wind six poles in a row. So
let's see, 60 RPS = 3600 RPM. Common VFD's go up to 400 Hz to give around
24,000 RPM. That would do nicely. This would be a slam dunk if I didn't want
the draw bar and went with ER collets, hmmm.

 An Inrunner might package more easily.
 
 Rather than a brushless motor, I wonder if gearing up the existing 
 spindle is an option. I have seen a centrifugal supercharger drive 
 which used friction drive to achieve a large speed increase using only 
 a slightly resilient outer drive ring, and slightly-floating-mounted 
 planets. These are almost ready-made for the planet job:
 http://simplybearings.co.uk/shop/advanced_search_result.php?categories
 _id=44611_10=9205_121_210=-122_220=9205_2223_230=9205_23x=22y=9
 extra_field_filter=1

I found this:
http://www.tormach.com/product_pcnc_acc_speeder.html 

I suppose a smooth belt from the main spindle to an offset idler axle then
a belt back to an on-axis secondary spindle would work, but then there would
be no fancy high-tech electronics involved.


--
Kirk Wallace
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html
California, USA



--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing - an OT question

2011-11-07 Thread BRIAN GLACKIN
 .snip.


 It's very noisy.


The reason I went with the HF die grider was the shear weight of the
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing - an OT question

2011-11-07 Thread BRIAN GLACKIN
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:15 PM, BRIAN GLACKIN glackin.br...@gmail.comwrote:

  .snip.


 It's very noisy.


 The reason I went with the HF die grider was the shear weight of the


G - fingers hitting wrong keys

My reason was the DG was soo much lighter reducing the gantry mass and the
minimum amount of cooling air used by the grinder (minimizes dust
dispersion).  My die grinder was also soo much quieter than the router.  I
don't know how that compares with the Bosch DG.

Brian
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Engaver Tool Changing

2011-11-07 Thread Kirk Wallace
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 20:15 -0600, Kasey Matejcek wrote:
 Has anyone tried to use and RC controller with EMC to run a RC brushless
 motor
 They take a pwm control signal from 1ms to 2ms or around there but haven't
 tried
 It sound like the have to have a signal on the input when there powered up
 or the go into disable mode possibly

I posted a little bit of RC servo stuff here:
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?RC_Servo_Test 

I suppose an RC ESC uses the same type of signal.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPLdHeRQp_w

Since an RC brushless motor is just a three phase motor this link might
be of interest too:
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?BLDC 

but in this setup EMC2 fills the ESC role.

-- 
Kirk Wallace
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html
California, USA


--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Has anyone tried to use and RC controller with EMC to run a RC brushless

2011-11-07 Thread jop...@gmail.com
  Has anyone tried to use and RC controller with EMC to run a RC brushless
  motor

Hi!
I try to use it.
Work still in progress, but control part is almost done.
please read more here 
http://www.linuxcnc.org/component/option,com_kunena/Itemid,20/func,view/catid,16/id,2056/limit,6/limitstart,12/lang,english/#14554


On 11/08/2011 06:15 AM, Kasey Matejcek wrote:
 Has anyone tried to use and RC controller with EMC to run a RC brushless
 motor
 They take a pwm control signal from 1ms to 2ms or around there but haven't
 tried
 It sound like the have to have a signal on the input when there powered up
 or the go into disable mode possibly

 On 7 November 2011 02:26, Kirk Wallacekwall...@wallacecompany.com
 wrote:

   I suppose a draw
 bar is going to be a problem.

 How does your current drawbar work?
 I can imagine thet it might be possible to use the exisiting drawbar
 actuator for the new spindle. Part of the solution might be to hold
 the high-speed spindle in place with the 4 tapped holes in the face
 rather than with the drawbar.

 I have an electric draw bar like this one:
 http://home.insightbb.com/~joevicar3/cheap_drawbar.htm

 It's not very subtle and would make short work of a 20 taper collet.

 There are laminations available with a decent-sized central hole that
 would allow a through-bore motor to be made.
 http://www.gobrushless.com/shop/index.php?app=ccp0ns=prodshowref=SC+
 65mmstator I think an ISO10 holder could be made to fit at least
 partly up inside that, and you could probably still get at the face
 mounting bolts.
 However I have not found a drawing which shows them.

 http://www.schaublin.ch/catalogues/PO039-042.pdf

 Usually outrunners are wound to get low RPM. I would most likely need as
 much speed as possible. Many of the laminations I have seen have odd numbers
 of poles so would not work. I do see the above stator has a number of poles
 that evenly divides by three, so would work if I wind six poles in a row. So
 let's see, 60 RPS = 3600 RPM. Common VFD's go up to 400 Hz to give around
 24,000 RPM. That would do nicely. This would be a slam dunk if I didn't want
 the draw bar and went with ER collets, hmmm.

 An Inrunner might package more easily.

 Rather than a brushless motor, I wonder if gearing up the existing
 spindle is an option. I have seen a centrifugal supercharger drive
 which used friction drive to achieve a large speed increase using only
 a slightly resilient outer drive ring, and slightly-floating-mounted
 planets. These are almost ready-made for the planet job:
 http://simplybearings.co.uk/shop/advanced_search_result.php?categories
 _id=44611_10=9205_121_210=-122_220=9205_2223_230=9205_23x=22y=9
 extra_field_filter=1

 I found this:
 http://www.tormach.com/product_pcnc_acc_speeder.html

 I suppose a smooth belt from the main spindle to an offset idler axle then
 a belt back to an on-axis secondary spindle would work, but then there would
 be no fancy high-tech electronics involved.


 --
 Kirk Wallace
 http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
 http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html
 California, USA


 
 --
 RSA(R) Conference 2012
 Save $700 by Nov 18
 Register now
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


 --
 RSA(R) Conference 2012
 Save $700 by Nov 18
 Register now
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users