Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-07-21 Thread Erik Friesen
I don't know, I am not familiar with HID in linux.  I would suggest
posting, or searching the MplabX
forumshttp://www.microchip.com/forums/f238.aspxfor this info, if you
can't get anywhere

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.comwrote:

 On 7/20/2012 10:10 PM, Cathrine Hribar wrote:
 
  On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:47:49 -0400
 Erik Friesen e...@aercon.net wrote:
  On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Dave e...@dc9.tzo.com wrote:
 
  On 4/16/2012 1:15 PM, Erik Friesen wrote:
 
 http://embeddedfun.blogspot.com/2011/05/installing-mplabx-on-ubuntu-1104.html
  ...
 
  Hi Erik:
 
  Well I have MPLAB-X running on Ubuntu 11.10, thanks to you.
 
  My problem is that I still can't get my pickit2 to be seen by MPLABX.
  It is
  listed, along with Pickit3, in the Tool Selector list under Project
  Properties.
 
  The Pickit 2 shows up with two yellow dots in front but the Pickit 3
 shows up
  with two red dots.
 
  According to the talk on Embedded Fun site, that means that Java don't
 have
  all the 32bit libraries it needs to support the pk2.
 
  Anyway, I thought I would download the libraries with sudo apt-get
 install
  ia32-libs. That's the command they gave on the site anyway.
 
  Well of course, it didn't work.  The flag comes back, file deleted or
  missing.  Can you suggest any other place I can find these 32bit
 libraries?
 
  Bill
 

 Bill:

 I haven't tried this myself, but I see a link to downloadable files for
 Oneric Ocelot (e.g., Ubuntu 11.10) on
 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs

 Regards,
 Kent



 --
 Live Security Virtual Conference
 Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
 threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
 will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
 threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-07-21 Thread Cathrine Hribar



On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 23:07:09 -0400
  Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 7/20/2012 10:10 PM, Cathrine Hribar wrote:

 On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:47:49 -0400
Erik Friesen e...@aercon.net wrote:
 On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Dave e...@dc9.tzo.com wrote:

 On 4/16/2012 1:15 PM, Erik Friesen wrote:
 http://embeddedfun.blogspot.com/2011/05/installing-mplabx-on-ubuntu-1104.html
 ...

 Hi Erik:

 Well I have MPLAB-X running on Ubuntu 11.10, thanks to you.

 My problem is that I still can't get my pickit2 to be seen by MPLABX.  It is
 listed, along with Pickit3, in the Tool Selector list under Project
 Properties.

 The Pickit 2 shows up with two yellow dots in front but the Pickit 3 shows 
up
 with two red dots.

 According to the talk on Embedded Fun site, that means that Java don't have
 all the 32bit libraries it needs to support the pk2.

 Anyway, I thought I would download the libraries with sudo apt-get install
 ia32-libs. That's the command they gave on the site anyway.

 Well of course, it didn't work.  The flag comes back, file deleted or
 missing.  Can you suggest any other place I can find these 32bit libraries?

 Bill

 
 Bill:
 
 I haven't tried this myself, but I see a link to downloadable files for 
 Oneric Ocelot (e.g., Ubuntu 11.10) on 
 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs
 
 Regards,
 Kent
 
Hi Kent:
Thanks for the info.  Went to the site and downloaded some stuff, will see 
what I get.

Bill

 
 --
 Live Security Virtual Conference
 Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
 threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
 will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
 threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-07-21 Thread Kent A. Reed
On 7/21/2012 4:46 PM, Cathrine Hribar wrote:


 On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 23:07:09 -0400
Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 7/20/2012 10:10 PM, Cathrine Hribar wrote:
 On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:47:49 -0400
 Erik Friesen e...@aercon.net wrote:
 On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Dave e...@dc9.tzo.com wrote:

 On 4/16/2012 1:15 PM, Erik Friesen wrote:
 http://embeddedfun.blogspot.com/2011/05/installing-mplabx-on-ubuntu-1104.html
 ...

 Hi Erik:

 Well I have MPLAB-X running on Ubuntu 11.10, thanks to you.

 My problem is that I still can't get my pickit2 to be seen by MPLABX.  It is
 listed, along with Pickit3, in the Tool Selector list under Project
 Properties.

 The Pickit 2 shows up with two yellow dots in front but the Pickit 3 shows
 up
 with two red dots.

 According to the talk on Embedded Fun site, that means that Java don't have
 all the 32bit libraries it needs to support the pk2.

 Anyway, I thought I would download the libraries with sudo apt-get install
 ia32-libs. That's the command they gave on the site anyway.

 Well of course, it didn't work.  The flag comes back, file deleted or
 missing.  Can you suggest any other place I can find these 32bit libraries?

 Bill

 Bill:

 I haven't tried this myself, but I see a link to downloadable files for
 Oneric Ocelot (e.g., Ubuntu 11.10) on
 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs

 Regards,
 Kent

 Hi Kent:
 Thanks for the info.  Went to the site and downloaded some stuff, will see
 what I get.

 Bill


Bill, I didn't ask if you are running a 32-bit or 64-bit version of 
Ubuntu. (I don't actually want to know but) I noticed that somewhere 
along the timeline of the 11.x releases of Ubuntu there was a 
repackaging of the ia32-libs; for example there is now metapackage 
ia32-libs-multiarch. I don't pretend to understand what was done but 
apparently it is supposed to help one deal with the differences between 
the two platforms. Only you can judge.

I agree with Erik Friesen that you're much more likely to get good 
answers by posting these questions to the appropriate microchip forum. 
They may not know LinuxCNC but they know tons more that we do about 
MPLABX and about using it on Ubuntu.

Hope your board lights up soon.

Regards,
Kent


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-07-21 Thread Cathrine Hribar



On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 17:15:32 -0400
  Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 7/21/2012 4:46 PM, Cathrine Hribar wrote:


 On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 23:07:09 -0400
Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 7/20/2012 10:10 PM, Cathrine Hribar wrote:
 On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:47:49 -0400
 Erik Friesen e...@aercon.net wrote:
 On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Dave e...@dc9.tzo.com wrote:

 On 4/16/2012 1:15 PM, Erik Friesen wrote:
 http://embeddedfun.blogspot.com/2011/05/installing-mplabx-on-ubuntu-1104.html
 ...

 Hi Erik:

 Well I have MPLAB-X running on Ubuntu 11.10, thanks to you.

 My problem is that I still can't get my pickit2 to be seen by MPLABX.  It 
 is
 listed, along with Pickit3, in the Tool Selector list under Project
 Properties.

 The Pickit 2 shows up with two yellow dots in front but the Pickit 3 shows
 up
 with two red dots.

 According to the talk on Embedded Fun site, that means that Java don't have
 all the 32bit libraries it needs to support the pk2.

 Anyway, I thought I would download the libraries with sudo apt-get install
 ia32-libs. That's the command they gave on the site anyway.

 Well of course, it didn't work.  The flag comes back, file deleted or
 missing.  Can you suggest any other place I can find these 32bit 
 libraries?

 Bill

 Bill:

 I haven't tried this myself, but I see a link to downloadable files for
 Oneric Ocelot (e.g., Ubuntu 11.10) on
 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs

 Regards,
 Kent

 Hi Kent:
 Thanks for the info.  Went to the site and downloaded some stuff, will see
 what I get.

 Bill

 
 Bill, I didn't ask if you are running a 32-bit or 64-bit version of 
 Ubuntu. (I don't actually want to know but) I noticed that somewhere 
 along the timeline of the 11.x releases of Ubuntu there was a 
 repackaging of the ia32-libs; for example there is now metapackage 
 ia32-libs-multiarch. I don't pretend to understand what was done but 
 apparently it is supposed to help one deal with the differences between 
 the two platforms. Only you can judge.
 
 I agree with Erik Friesen that you're much more likely to get good 
 answers by posting these questions to the appropriate microchip forum. 
 They may not know LinuxCNC but they know tons more that we do about 
 MPLABX and about using it on Ubuntu.
 
 Hope your board lights up soon.
 
 Regards,
 Kent
 
Thanks Kent for the update.

will look at that.

I bought the Pickit2 before I started with MPLABX.  They said that it would 
run on mt Windows 2000. Not!

I will get a Pickit3 sometime in future.  Don't have much confidence in this 
as of yet!!\\Bill
 --
 Live Security Virtual Conference
 Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
 threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
 will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
 threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-07-20 Thread Cathrine Hribar


On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:47:49 -0400
  Erik Friesen e...@aercon.net wrote:
 On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Dave e...@dc9.tzo.com wrote:
 

 On 4/16/2012 1:15 PM, Erik Friesen wrote:
 
 http://embeddedfun.blogspot.com/2011/05/installing-mplabx-on-ubuntu-1104.html
 
  http://microchip.wikidot.com/mplab:install-on-linux-bin
 
  On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Cathrine Hribarbhri...@bresnan.net
 wrote:
 
 
 
 
  Hi  Erik:
 
  well i downloaded MPLAB X from microchip.
 
  Tried to run the install program but the Ubuntu system says that I don't
  have
  the software installed needed to run the MPLAB X install file.
 
  Any suggestions of what I need to get and where to get it?
 
  Thanks:
 
  Bill
 

Hi Erik:

Well I have MPLAB-X running on Ubuntu 11.10, thanks to you.

My problem is that I still can't get my pickit2 to be seen by MPLABX.  It is 
listed, along with Pickit3, in the Tool Selector list under Project 
Properties.

The Pickit 2 shows up with two yellow dots in front but the Pickit 3 shows up 
with two red dots.

According to the talk on Embedded Fun site, that means that Java don't have 
all the 32bit libraries it needs to support the pk2.

Anyway, I thought I would download the libraries with sudo apt-get install 
ia32-libs. That's the command they gave on the site anyway.

Well of course, it didn't work.  The flag comes back, file deleted or 
missing.  Can you suggest any other place I can find these 32bit libraries?

Bill
  ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

 --
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
 Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
 Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-07-20 Thread Kent A. Reed
On 7/20/2012 10:10 PM, Cathrine Hribar wrote:

 On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:47:49 -0400
Erik Friesen e...@aercon.net wrote:
 On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Dave e...@dc9.tzo.com wrote:

 On 4/16/2012 1:15 PM, Erik Friesen wrote:
 http://embeddedfun.blogspot.com/2011/05/installing-mplabx-on-ubuntu-1104.html
 ...

 Hi Erik:

 Well I have MPLAB-X running on Ubuntu 11.10, thanks to you.

 My problem is that I still can't get my pickit2 to be seen by MPLABX.  It is
 listed, along with Pickit3, in the Tool Selector list under Project
 Properties.

 The Pickit 2 shows up with two yellow dots in front but the Pickit 3 shows up
 with two red dots.

 According to the talk on Embedded Fun site, that means that Java don't have
 all the 32bit libraries it needs to support the pk2.

 Anyway, I thought I would download the libraries with sudo apt-get install
 ia32-libs. That's the command they gave on the site anyway.

 Well of course, it didn't work.  The flag comes back, file deleted or
 missing.  Can you suggest any other place I can find these 32bit libraries?

 Bill


Bill:

I haven't tried this myself, but I see a link to downloadable files for 
Oneric Ocelot (e.g., Ubuntu 11.10) on 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs

Regards,
Kent


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-05-16 Thread Erik Friesen
I don't know if it will see it unless its connected to a pic chip.

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Cathrine Hribar bhri...@bresnan.netwrote:




 
  On 4/16/2012 1:15 PM, Erik Friesen wrote:
  
 
 http://embeddedfun.blogspot.com/2011/05/installing-mplabx-on-ubuntu-1104.html
  
   http://microchip.wikidot.com/mplab:install-on-linux-bin
  
   On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Cathrine Hribarbhri...@bresnan.net
  wrote:
  
  
  
  
   Hi  Erik:
  
   well i downloaded MPLAB X from microchip.
  
   Tried to run the install program but the Ubuntu system says that I
 don't
   have
   the software installed needed to run the MPLAB X install file.
  
   Any suggestions of what I need to get and where to get it?
  
   Thanks:
  
   Bill
  
  


 Hi Eric:

 The web sites u gave for embeddedfun.blogspot.com, was the best help I've
 gotten so far.  It has allowed me to install MPLABX.

 I followed the advice and got GIT  what do I need this for?

 My MPLABX still don't see my pickit 2 though!

 Bill



 --
 Live Security Virtual Conference
 Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
 threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
 will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
 threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


[Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-05-07 Thread Roland Jollivet
On 6 May 2012 05:32, Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com
 wrote:
  Dave wrote:
  It is just a little overwhelming what can be done with these ARM MCUs.
 
  Yes, I'm using the Beagle Board in some projects.

 I


A bit OT but can anyone recommend a good list for Pic assembly programming.
I see that most the pic groups I joined are basically inactive, or there's
no-one to answer questions ;-(

Regards
Roland
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-05-05 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
 Dave wrote:
 It is just a little overwhelming what can be done with these ARM MCUs.

 Yes, I'm using the Beagle Board in some projects.

I just went to a  Xilinx session about their ZedBoard development kit
for Zynq dual ARM Cortex A9 CPU surrounded by a 7000-class  FPGA with
35k LUTs:

 http://www.zedboard.org

the board costs $400 and runs Linux out of the box. If people figure
out how to run real-time on it, I think it would be an excellent
platform for LinuxCNC hardware motion control using FPGA such as the
MESA boards, especially if someone comes up with a cheaper
ZedBoard-lite version without all the frills (OLED display, sound
card, and other peripherals that ZedBoard has).

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-17 Thread John Prentice
Greetings

- Original Message - 
From: Dave e...@dc9.tzo.com


 On 4/16/2012 5:00 PM, Stephen Dubovsky wrote:
 As far as I can tell, ARMs are in a different class. (Price, complexity,
 performance, etc.)
 There are dozens of companies making
 thousands of ARM processor variations.  One will have the
 peripherial/memory flavor at the price point you need.  The code is 
 mostly
 compatible from the top to bottom of the cortex line (and *WAY* more than
 porting from TI to AVR to PIC, etc)

 Stephen



 OK... I'll bite.   What kind of software tool chain and hardware is good
 to get started on a NXP LPC or similar Arm?


I am not an expert - in fact only just round the next corner from you.

I followed this path:
(a) Arduino UNO/Mega - limitations of the 8 bit data.
(b) Netduino (Atmel AT91SAM7X512) C# in Microsoft VisualStudio - hopeless 
speed on interpreted C# and difficulty of adding native code without 
expensive Kiel tools.
(c) Netduino with IAR Embedded workbench - chip programming by USB but no 
debugging
(d) Atmel AT91SAM7x-EK - same processor albeit smaller memory - JTAG 
connector and a minimal debugging serial port. In-circuit programming and 
debugging by SEGGER J-Link (I got the SAM-ICE customised version but that 
might have been limiting for the future) over the JTAG plus printf to the 
serial port.

IAR is free for limited code size and non-commercial use. So far I have 
found experimentation very pleasant.

Be interested to read others comments.

John Prentice 


--
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-17 Thread Erik Friesen
I know this is somewhat up to debate, but having everything under one roof
is worth something.  To the inexperienced person, everything in the last 5+
posts is complete greek.

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:33 AM, John Prentice 
j...@castlewd.freeserve.co.uk wrote:

 Greetings

 - Original Message -
 From: Dave e...@dc9.tzo.com


  On 4/16/2012 5:00 PM, Stephen Dubovsky wrote:
  As far as I can tell, ARMs are in a different class. (Price,
 complexity,
  performance, etc.)
  There are dozens of companies making
  thousands of ARM processor variations.  One will have the
  peripherial/memory flavor at the price point you need.  The code is
  mostly
  compatible from the top to bottom of the cortex line (and *WAY* more
 than
  porting from TI to AVR to PIC, etc)
 
  Stephen
 
 
 
  OK... I'll bite.   What kind of software tool chain and hardware is good
  to get started on a NXP LPC or similar Arm?
 
 
 I am not an expert - in fact only just round the next corner from you.

 I followed this path:
 (a) Arduino UNO/Mega - limitations of the 8 bit data.
 (b) Netduino (Atmel AT91SAM7X512) C# in Microsoft VisualStudio - hopeless
 speed on interpreted C# and difficulty of adding native code without
 expensive Kiel tools.
 (c) Netduino with IAR Embedded workbench - chip programming by USB but no
 debugging
 (d) Atmel AT91SAM7x-EK - same processor albeit smaller memory - JTAG
 connector and a minimal debugging serial port. In-circuit programming and
 debugging by SEGGER J-Link (I got the SAM-ICE customised version but that
 might have been limiting for the future) over the JTAG plus printf to the
 serial port.

 IAR is free for limited code size and non-commercial use. So far I have
 found experimentation very pleasant.

 Be interested to read others comments.

 John Prentice



 --
 Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
 monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
 resolution app monitoring today. Free.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

--
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-17 Thread Dave
Have you used, or are you using the NXP software tools?

I'm downloading the NXP code_red LPCXpresso software right now.  They 
say it is low cost, but so far there has been no cost. :-)
(Where do they get these names from??  LPCXpresso??  )

To the inexperienced person, everything in the last 5+
posts is complete greek.

Don't underestimate the amount of brainpower on this list.  For a lot of the 
folks on this list, if they don't know it, they can figure it out in short 
order!

Dave




On 4/17/2012 8:21 AM, Erik Friesen wrote:
 I know this is somewhat up to debate, but having everything under one roof
 is worth something.  To the inexperienced person, everything in the last 5+
 posts is complete greek.

 On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:33 AM, John Prentice
 j...@castlewd.freeserve.co.uk  wrote:


 Greetings

 - Original Message -
 From: Davee...@dc9.tzo.com


  
 On 4/16/2012 5:00 PM, Stephen Dubovsky wrote:

 As far as I can tell, ARMs are in a different class. (Price,

 complexity,
  
 performance, etc.)

 There are dozens of companies making
 thousands of ARM processor variations.  One will have the
 peripherial/memory flavor at the price point you need.  The code is
 mostly
 compatible from the top to bottom of the cortex line (and *WAY* more
  
 than
  
 porting from TI to AVR to PIC, etc)

 Stephen

  

 OK... I'll bite.   What kind of software tool chain and hardware is good
 to get started on a NXP LPC or similar Arm?



 I am not an expert - in fact only just round the next corner from you.

 I followed this path:
 (a) Arduino UNO/Mega -  limitations of the 8 bit data.
 (b) Netduino (Atmel AT91SAM7X512) C# in Microsoft VisualStudio - hopeless
 speed on interpreted C# and difficulty of adding native code without
 expensive Kiel tools.
 (c) Netduino with IAR Embedded workbench - chip programming by USB but no
 debugging
 (d) Atmel AT91SAM7x-EK - same processor albeit smaller memory - JTAG
 connector and a minimal debugging serial port. In-circuit programming and
 debugging by SEGGER J-Link (I got the SAM-ICE customised version but that
 might have been limiting for the future) over the JTAG plus printf to the
 serial port.

 IAR is free for limited code size and non-commercial use. So far I have
 found experimentation very pleasant.

 Be interested to read others comments.

 John Prentice


  



--
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-17 Thread Dave
On 4/17/2012 5:33 AM, John Prentice wrote:
 Greetings

 - Original Message -
 From: Davee...@dc9.tzo.com



 On 4/16/2012 5:00 PM, Stephen Dubovsky wrote:
  
 As far as I can tell, ARMs are in a different class. (Price, complexity,
 performance, etc.)
  
 There are dozens of companies making
 thousands of ARM processor variations.  One will have the
 peripherial/memory flavor at the price point you need.  The code is
 mostly
 compatible from the top to bottom of the cortex line (and *WAY* more than
 porting from TI to AVR to PIC, etc)

 Stephen



 OK... I'll bite.   What kind of software tool chain and hardware is good
 to get started on a NXP LPC or similar Arm?


  
 I am not an expert - in fact only just round the next corner from you.

 I followed this path:
 (a) Arduino UNO/Mega -  limitations of the 8 bit data.
 (b) Netduino (Atmel AT91SAM7X512) C# in Microsoft VisualStudio - hopeless
 speed on interpreted C# and difficulty of adding native code without
 expensive Kiel tools.
 (c) Netduino with IAR Embedded workbench - chip programming by USB but no
 debugging
 (d) Atmel AT91SAM7x-EK - same processor albeit smaller memory - JTAG
 connector and a minimal debugging serial port. In-circuit programming and
 debugging by SEGGER J-Link (I got the SAM-ICE customised version but that
 might have been limiting for the future) over the JTAG plus printf to the
 serial port.

 IAR is free for limited code size and non-commercial use. So far I have
 found experimentation very pleasant.

 Be interested to read others comments.

 John Prentice




John,

Thanks for the info..  your comments are very interesting.  The Netduino 
looks interesting but sounds like a non-starter.

It is just a little overwhelming what can be done with these ARM MCUs.

Dave


--
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-17 Thread Jon Elson
Dave wrote:
 It is just a little overwhelming what can be done with these ARM MCUs.
   
Yes, I'm using the Beagle Board in some projects.  One of them receives 
TCP packets
and sets a 32-in 8-out signal multiplexer in a location that is 
sometimes inaccessible
due to radiation.  It is a totally minute application for such a 
powerful processor, but
it was extremely easy to set it all up, since it runs a COMPLETE Linux 
kernel
with X, Ethernet, compilers, etc.  The hard drive is a 4 Gb SD card.
I had never developed a TCP server before, I downloaded a few sample 
programs
off the net and had a working server running in one day.  The entire 
program,
including setting up the OMAP CPU's GPIO ports as I needed them, setting up
the server and binding it to the TCP port and converting incoming packets to
settings of the multiplexer is all less than 3 pages of C code!

Another project that is in the development stage now is a multi-channel
counter/ratemeter that will have a Glade interface accessible through
an ssh -X connection.

The Beagle Bone has even more features and costs less!

Jon

--
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Cathrine Hribar



Hi  Erik:

well i downloaded MPLAB X from microchip.

Tried to run the install program but the Ubuntu system says that I don't have 
the software installed needed to run the MPLAB X install file.

Any suggestions of what I need to get and where to get it?

Thanks:

Bill

--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Dave
Where is a good website that describes the software and hardware tool 
chain required to develop and program Pic controllers?

I've looked at the Willem programmers available on Ebay but I have no 
idea if those are compatible with the newest software development tools 
or not?

Dave

On 4/16/2012 1:15 PM, Erik Friesen wrote:
 http://embeddedfun.blogspot.com/2011/05/installing-mplabx-on-ubuntu-1104.html

 http://microchip.wikidot.com/mplab:install-on-linux-bin

 On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Cathrine Hribarbhri...@bresnan.netwrote:




 Hi  Erik:

 well i downloaded MPLAB X from microchip.

 Tried to run the install program but the Ubuntu system says that I don't
 have
 the software installed needed to run the MPLAB X install file.

 Any suggestions of what I need to get and where to get it?

 Thanks:

 Bill


 --
 For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
 Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
 Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

  
 --
 For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
 Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
 Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users




--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Erik Friesen
My advice is to buy microchip tools.  They are very little more, and you
get support.  MplabX is finicky enough, I wouldn't try other tools at this
point.

I don't know any website right off.  I think you are best off buying a
starter kit like the pickit3 debug express.  The initial learning curve can
be frustrating unless you have outside help, or prior experience.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Dave e...@dc9.tzo.com wrote:

 Where is a good website that describes the software and hardware tool
 chain required to develop and program Pic controllers?

 I've looked at the Willem programmers available on Ebay but I have no
 idea if those are compatible with the newest software development tools
 or not?

 Dave

 On 4/16/2012 1:15 PM, Erik Friesen wrote:
 
 http://embeddedfun.blogspot.com/2011/05/installing-mplabx-on-ubuntu-1104.html
 
  http://microchip.wikidot.com/mplab:install-on-linux-bin
 
  On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Cathrine Hribarbhri...@bresnan.net
 wrote:
 
 
 
 
  Hi  Erik:
 
  well i downloaded MPLAB X from microchip.
 
  Tried to run the install program but the Ubuntu system says that I don't
  have
  the software installed needed to run the MPLAB X install file.
 
  Any suggestions of what I need to get and where to get it?
 
  Thanks:
 
  Bill
 
 
 
 --
  For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
  Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
  Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
  http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
  ___
  Emc-users mailing list
  Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
 
 
 
 --
  For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
  Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
  Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
  http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
  ___
  Emc-users mailing list
  Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
 
 



 --
 For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
 Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
 Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Kirk Wallace
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 14:33 -0400, Dave wrote:
 Where is a good website that describes the software and hardware tool 
 chain required to develop and program Pic controllers?
 
 I've looked at the Willem programmers available on Ebay but I have no 
 idea if those are compatible with the newest software development tools 
 or not?
 
 Dave

I don't mean to offend anybody, but AVR's are cheap and fall down easy
to get started with. Why bother with PIC's? The only reason I can think
of, is to fill time with the challenge at hand.

-- 
Kirk Wallace
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html
California, USA


--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Erik Friesen
I have heard AVR's are easier.  I think once you get used to the complete
picture, none are that much harder than the others.  I know AVR has had
some issues with their supply chain.  Microchip doesn't do much
handholding, I think their bread and butter is supplying the automotive.  I
have their tools, so I tend to stick with their lineup.  I have been
tempted with AVR's though.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Kirk Wallace
kwall...@wallacecompany.comwrote:

 On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 14:33 -0400, Dave wrote:
  Where is a good website that describes the software and hardware tool
  chain required to develop and program Pic controllers?
 
  I've looked at the Willem programmers available on Ebay but I have no
  idea if those are compatible with the newest software development tools
  or not?
 
  Dave

 I don't mean to offend anybody, but AVR's are cheap and fall down easy
 to get started with. Why bother with PIC's? The only reason I can think
 of, is to fill time with the challenge at hand.

 --
 Kirk Wallace
 http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
 http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html
 California, USA



 --
 For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
 Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
 Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Stephen Dubovsky
 I don't mean to offend anybody, but AVR's are cheap and fall down easy
 to get started with. Why bother with PIC's? The only reason I can think
 of, is to fill time with the challenge at hand.


Haha.  I think the same thing now, but my suggestion is ARM.  We've used
PIC for over a decade at the office (+ TI dsp, + Motorola/freescale, +etc)
and have recently gone 100% ARM.  The Cortex M4(F) is bigger, faster 
cheaper than a TI 28xx fixed pt dsp and the Cortex M0 is faster  cheaper
than a tiny freescale HC08.  Whatever peripherals you need, someone prob
makes an ARM w/ just what you want.
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Kenneth Lerman
On 4/16/2012 3:06 PM, Stephen Dubovsky wrote:
 I don't mean to offend anybody, but AVR's are cheap and fall down easy
 to get started with. Why bother with PIC's? The only reason I can think
 of, is to fill time with the challenge at hand.


 Haha.  I think the same thing now, but my suggestion is ARM.  We've used
 PIC for over a decade at the office (+ TI dsp, + Motorola/freescale, +etc)
 and have recently gone 100% ARM.  The Cortex M4(F) is bigger, faster
 cheaper than a TI 28xx fixed pt dsp and the Cortex M0 is faster  cheaper
 than a tiny freescale HC08.  Whatever peripherals you need, someone prob
 makes an ARM w/ just what you want.
As far as I can tell, ARMs are in a different class. (Price, complexity, 
performance, etc.)

Ken

 --
 For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
 Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
 Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Dave
On 4/16/2012 2:51 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
 On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 14:33 -0400, Dave wrote:

 Where is a good website that describes the software and hardware tool
 chain required to develop and program Pic controllers?

 I've looked at the Willem programmers available on Ebay but I have no
 idea if those are compatible with the newest software development tools
 or not?

 Dave
  
 I don't mean to offend anybody, but AVR's are cheap and fall down easy
 to get started with. Why bother with PIC's? The only reason I can think
 of, is to fill time with the challenge at hand.



Kirk,

Excellent point.  I already have plenty of things to fill my time.  :-)

Thanks!

Dave


--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Greg Bernard
I started out with AVR's beginning with an Arduino. Being a beginner 
programmer, this was a great introduction. But now I am preparing to start with 
PIC's for the simple reason that I can find a lot more motion control libraries 
which is my primary interest right now. I've read all sorts of raves about the 
merits of one over the other but to me they are both just tools and I will use 
whichever works best for the task at hand. Yes, there is a small cost 
difference but if you're talking about a couple of bucks for a single project 
it seems inconsequential. 


 
We are like tenant farmers chopping down the fence around our house for 
fuel when we should be using Nature's inexhaustible sources of energy -- sun, 
wind and tide. ... I'd put my money on the sun and solar energy. 
What a source of power! I hope we don't have to wait until oil and coal 
run out before we tackle that. -Thomas Edison, inventor (1847-1931) 




 From: Kirk Wallace kwall...@wallacecompany.com
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB
 
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 14:33 -0400, Dave wrote:
 Where is a good website that describes the software and hardware tool 
 chain required to develop and program Pic controllers?
 
 I've looked at the Willem programmers available on Ebay but I have no 
 idea if those are compatible with the newest software development tools 
 or not?
 
 Dave

I don't mean to offend anybody, but AVR's are cheap and fall down easy
to get started with. Why bother with PIC's? The only reason I can think
of, is to fill time with the challenge at hand.

-- 
Kirk Wallace
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html
California, USA


--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in
 Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread andy pugh
On 16 April 2012 21:06, Dave e...@dc9.tzo.com wrote:

 Excellent point.  I already have plenty of things to fill my time.  :-)

In that case, Arduino is a very convenient set of programmer,
(free/Free Linux) compiler and proto-board, and isn't ruiniously
expensive for one-offs.

-- 
atp
The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong.

--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Neil
Hi guys,

Lurker waking up with this thread.  I use PIC's day and night for 
commercial use, and want to chime in also...

Depending on what you want to do, PICs are great.  AVR's and PIC's 
generally fit the same application space, but Atmel (the AVR folks) 
still struggling to make a profit after several years, so I cannot put 
them into production for anything.  Microchip has never discontinued a 
PIC to date AFAIK.  Atmel has gone more hobbyist in recent years and has 
gained popularity because of the Arduino.  Microchip continues to target 
the commercial markets, so yes you can expect less direct support from 
them.  But IME Atmel's support has been poor and Microchip will respond 
directly to me when I need.  Still though, there is great forum support 
for both.

Atmel has pretty much touted C as the language of choice for years now, 
while Microchip has pushed assembly and is more recently starting to 
push C.  Your choice depends on what you want to do, but I still use 
assembly quite a bit for serious bit-banging.  C of course is much 
quicker to program in.  Atmel offers their C compiler for free, while 
Microchip offers their non-optimizing version for free.  In my tests, 
that still produces great code, but if you want to do a one-off project 
in C and optimize the hell out of it, then Atmel may be the choice for you.

ARM processors fit a different space (that require a bit more processing 
power), but if you know how to code it's amazing what you can do with a 
PIC32.  For example, look at the Chipkit, which is a PIC32 clone of the 
Arduino running at 80Mhz and 32-bit processor, and it runs rings around 
the Arduino while being code compatible.  ARM's may sound nicer because 
of speed and power, but for commercial use, cost becomes a big factor.  
For a one-off, spending a couple extra bucks is no issue.

Anyway, my point here is that smaller microcontrollers like PICs and 
AVRs are a great choice depending on what you want to do, and the time 
and money you want to invest in it.

Cheers,
-Neil.



On 4/16/2012 3:06 PM, Stephen Dubovsky wrote:
 I don't mean to offend anybody, but AVR's are cheap and fall down easy
 to get started with. Why bother with PIC's? The only reason I can think
 of, is to fill time with the challenge at hand.


 Haha.  I think the same thing now, but my suggestion is ARM.  We've used
 PIC for over a decade at the office (+ TI dsp, + Motorola/freescale, +etc)
 and have recently gone 100% ARM.  The Cortex M4(F) is bigger, faster
 cheaper than a TI 28xx fixed pt dsp and the Cortex M0 is faster  cheaper
 than a tiny freescale HC08.  Whatever peripherals you need, someone prob
 makes an ARM w/ just what you want.
 --
 For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
 Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
 Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Stephen Dubovsky
 As far as I can tell, ARMs are in a different class. (Price, complexity,
 performance, etc.)

 Ken


They ARE in a different class:)  They're cheaper AND faster.  The ARM
support community is bigger than any PIC/TI/AVR/etc. (probably bigger than
anything but the x86.)

As examples:
1) NXP LPC (Cortex M0) is $0.50 in qty.  Digikey has for ~$2 for
singles.  Its cheaper then a HC08QT/QY w/ more pins, more speed, lower
power, more memory, 32bit vs 8, etc, etc.

2) ST STM32F407 (Cortex M4F) is ~$5 in qty (depends on memory).  Digikey
has for ~$11 for single in VET6 pkg.  200MIPS, Ethernet MAC, USB, 192kB
RAM, 512kB FLASH, 24x 12bit ADC (~7MSPS in some modes) and *SINGLE CYCLE*
IEEE754 single-precision floating point multiply or add.  MAC is 2cyc.
Divides and SQRT instructions take only 14 cycles.

Just doing a quick digikey ATmega search finds the AVR ATMega2560 (maybe
not the best comparison but Im in a hurry).  $18ea, 8kB RAM, 256kB flash,
16MIPS, 8-bit processor.  Not even on the same continent.

Like I said, we've used them all at work (we have millions of units
shipped).  We were fairly dedicated PIC fans until we needed something w/
more memory than a PIC18.  That lead us to ARM after a fairly exhaustive
comparison of EVERYTHING.  The icing on the cake was the tiny processors
like the LPC that were *WAY* better and (marginally) cheaper than the
HC08s we use on our super low end products (the equivalent of a
'toaster':)).  It REALLY opened our eyes.  We had no idea ARMs had
penetrated so low end into the mkt.  There are dozens of companies making
thousands of ARM processor variations.  One will have the
peripherial/memory flavor at the price point you need.  The code is mostly
compatible from the top to bottom of the cortex line (and *WAY* more than
porting from TI to AVR to PIC, etc)

Stephen
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Bill Hill

On 16 Apr 2012, at 21:09, Greg Bernard wrote:

 I started out with AVR's beginning with an Arduino. Being a beginner 
 programmer, this was a great introduction. But now I am preparing to start 
 with PIC's for the simple reason that I can find a lot more motion control 
 libraries which is my primary interest right now. I've read all sorts of 
 raves about the merits of one over the other but to me they are both just 
 tools and I will use whichever works best for the task at hand. Yes, there is 
 a small cost difference but if you're talking about a couple of bucks for a 
 single project it seems inconsequential. 

Hi,
You've seen grbl? http://grbl.tumblr.com Which speaks a little gcode and runs 
on arduino (treats it like an avr, though). Or the reprap controller? 
http://reprap.org/wiki/G-code
Bill
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Kenneth Lerman
kenneth.ler...@se-ltd.com wrote:
 On 4/16/2012 3:06 PM, Stephen Dubovsky wrote:
 I don't mean to offend anybody, but AVR's are cheap and fall down easy
 to get started with. Why bother with PIC's? The only reason I can think
 of, is to fill time with the challenge at hand.


 Haha.  I think the same thing now, but my suggestion is ARM.  We've used
 PIC for over a decade at the office (+ TI dsp, + Motorola/freescale, +etc)
 and have recently gone 100% ARM.  The Cortex M4(F) is bigger, faster
 cheaper than a TI 28xx fixed pt dsp and the Cortex M0 is faster  cheaper
 than a tiny freescale HC08.  Whatever peripherals you need, someone prob
 makes an ARM w/ just what you want.
 As far as I can tell, ARMs are in a different class. (Price, complexity,
 performance, etc.)

Not really---LPC1xxx are well under 1$, and the Cortex M parts are
quite integrated and don't need external memory or peripherals.
OK, I give you one advantage---probably the smallest package I have
ever seen for ARM is QFN-32 pin; no 8-pin DILs.
The complexity does come in because there are so many of them: NXP,
ST, TI, Broadcom, Marvell and Atmel, each one a little different; but
if you are looking for low price/complexity, just stick to one of
them, for instance NXP LPC series.

--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Neil emc_d...@narwani.org wrote:
 Hi guys,

 Lurker waking up with this thread.  I use PIC's day and night for
 commercial use, and want to chime in also...
...
 ARM processors fit a different space (that require a bit more processing
 power), but if you know how to code it's amazing what you can do with a
 PIC32.  For example, look at the Chipkit, which is a PIC32 clone of the
 Arduino running at 80Mhz and 32-bit processor, and it runs rings around
 the Arduino while being code compatible.  ARM's may sound nicer because
 of speed and power, but for commercial use, cost becomes a big factor.

Cool, but PIC32 is just Microchip's licensed MIPS core, so it really
is in the same class as the ARM microcontrollers. I see that the price
point is 1-2$, and packaging of 30 or more pins. Microchip has a
really disjointed product line: they recommend assembler while having
a whole bunch of binary-incompatible product lines
(PIC-12,14,16.17,18,24,28,32... surely I forgot something). On the
other hand, you have to give them props for excellent execution (no
shortages) and long term support of their product line.

--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Stephen Dubovsky
 The complexity does come in because there are so many of them: NXP,
 ST, TI, Broadcom, Marvell and Atmel, each one a little different; but
 if you are looking for low price/complexity, just stick to one of
 them, for instance NXP LPC series.


8 pin DIP?!  Does anyone release (new) though hole parts anymore? :)  SMT
is just something everyone has to get use to.  Its not going away.  I don't
mind the leadless pkgs but we shy away from BGAs so far.  Rework is
difficult and we have no xray for inspection.  As I told you when you were
here, the IR DirectFETs is the closest thing we use to hidden pads but it
has huge contacts.  You can even do a fair job of them by hand squirting
paste and throwing in the reflow oven.

Agreed, each processor vendor has different peripherals.  The CMSIS
libraries abstract that.  Its not 100% universal (yet), but you can spend a
little time fixing and abstracting the HAL as much as you need.  The cores
are 100% identical though.  We've had very little trouble moving stuff
to/from a M0 to M4.  We're using the M0 as smart I2C I/O expanders w/ a M4
motherboard and the com code is the same in both.  So yes, still a little
different but 1000x more common than different processor families.

Stephen
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Stephen Dubovsky smdubov...@gmail.com wrote:

 8 pin DIP?!  Does anyone release (new) though hole parts anymore? :)  SMT
 is just something everyone has to get use to.

What was the lowest pin-count ARM that you're aware of? Sometimes 4
pins is all you need :)

BTW, DIPs are still coming out, e.g. from Microchip, for prototyping
on breadboards etc. I agree that it doesn't make much sense anymore,
except maybe they are an established formfactor for small pin counts
(8-14-20). Not that you couldn't do 8-pin SMT.

--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-04-16 Thread Dave
On 4/16/2012 5:00 PM, Stephen Dubovsky wrote:
 As far as I can tell, ARMs are in a different class. (Price, complexity,
 performance, etc.)

 Ken

  
 They ARE in a different class:)  They're cheaper AND faster.  The ARM
 support community is bigger than any PIC/TI/AVR/etc. (probably bigger than
 anything but the x86.)

 As examples:
 1) NXP LPC (Cortex M0) is$0.50 in qty.  Digikey has for ~$2 for
 singles.  Its cheaper then a HC08QT/QY w/ more pins, more speed, lower
 power, more memory, 32bit vs 8, etc, etc.

 2) ST STM32F407 (Cortex M4F) is ~$5 in qty (depends on memory).  Digikey
 has for ~$11 for single in VET6 pkg.  200MIPS, Ethernet MAC, USB, 192kB
 RAM, 512kB FLASH, 24x 12bit ADC (~7MSPS in some modes) and *SINGLE CYCLE*
 IEEE754 single-precision floating point multiply or add.  MAC is 2cyc.
 Divides and SQRT instructions take only 14 cycles.

 Just doing a quick digikey ATmega search finds the AVR ATMega2560 (maybe
 not the best comparison but Im in a hurry).  $18ea, 8kB RAM, 256kB flash,
 16MIPS, 8-bit processor.  Not even on the same continent.

 Like I said, we've used them all at work (we have millions of units
 shipped).  We were fairly dedicated PIC fans until we needed something w/
 more memory than a PIC18.  That lead us to ARM after a fairly exhaustive
 comparison of EVERYTHING.  The icing on the cake was the tiny processors
 like the LPC that were *WAY* better and (marginally) cheaper than the
 HC08s we use on our super low end products (the equivalent of a
 'toaster':)).  It REALLY opened our eyes.  We had no idea ARMs had
 penetrated so low end into the mkt.  There are dozens of companies making
 thousands of ARM processor variations.  One will have the
 peripherial/memory flavor at the price point you need.  The code is mostly
 compatible from the top to bottom of the cortex line (and *WAY* more than
 porting from TI to AVR to PIC, etc)

 Stephen



OK... I'll bite.   What kind of software tool chain and hardware is good 
to get started on a NXP LPC or similar Arm?


I found also found..

http://ics.nxp.com/lpcxpresso/~LPC/

http://www.pololu.com/catalog/product/2150

http://www.sparkfun.com/categories/219

http://www.mouser.com/stm32discovery/

http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/STMicroelectronics/STM32F4DISCOVERY/?qs=sGAEpiMZZMutVogd4PRSvEN8XDBeCtgD

Dave



--
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-03-09 Thread Erik Friesen
Mplab 8.8 isn't linux compatible.  You need
mplabXhttp://www.microchip.com/en_US/family/mplabx/index.html

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Cathrine Hribar bhri...@bresnan.net wrote:

  If you plan on using a Windows environment, then you can use
 Microchip's
  MPLAB PIC IDE and several different C compilers, all freeware.
  MPLABX
  ...
  Hi Doug:
 
  Thanks for the info...  I just received the pickit 2 debug from
 microchip.
  Have the latest v. of MPLAB.  Problem is that my software system is
 Windows
  2000 with SP4.  The pickit 2 software doesn't see the pickit 2
 hardware
  pluged
  into the USB port. I know the port works.
 
  thanks:
 
  Bill
 
 
  Bill:
 
  You do know how old Windows 2000 is in technology-years? Microsoft
  terminated support two years ago.
 
  Sorry, I just had to get that out of my system :-)
 
  Did you have administrator privileges when you installed the driver?
  Without a functioning driver, Windows 2000 won't admit your pickit
  exists even if the port itself is electrically sound. Your smart drive
  test was necessary but not sufficient. It exercises a different driver.
 
  Were I in your shoes, I'd install MPLAB X IDE in Linux and drive on
  rather than arm-wrestle with W2K. To paraphrase what Admiral Farragut
  never exactly said, Damn the bugs, full speed ahead.
 
  Regards,
  Kent
 
  Hi Kent:
 
  Thanks for the note.
 
  I am aware of the age of Windows 2000 as I used it in my business of
 computer
  animation in S. W. Florida.  That was up to 2005 before I retired.
 
  I agree it is a pain but sense I am retired and this is a hobby, I used
 what
 I
  had on hand, as MPLAB listed the system software could be Windows 2000
 or
 XP.
 
  Hi, Bill.
 
  My wife and I are retired as well and fully understand the financial
  constraints. We choose to forgo many technology baubles in order to
  spend more in other pursuits, like staying involved in our grandkids'
 lives.
 
  My wife, for example, is still using a Sony laptop we bought when she
  was consulting a decade ago. She likes the full keyboard so much she
  doesn't want to buy a new laptop. We're running Windows 2000 on it
  because that's the latest version that has working drivers for it.
 
  I put that Query on this web site about two weeks ago, asking if there
 was a
  complier that would work for programming the dspic's, under Linux.  One
 of
 the
  fellows said that there was a compiler but it was a pain to get all the
 files,
  in place, that was needed to use it under Linux..  Being the novice
 that I
 am,
  not being a programmer, I thought it would be more of a challenge than I
 could
  overcome with my limited knowledge.
 
  However, I think I will give it a try as I like the Linux operating
 system
  much better that Windows. It reminds me of the Amiga operating system
 that I
  use to use for model building, ray tracing, and animation recording.
 
  Oh, man, a Amiga user. You really were serious about animation work. I
  never had one but I drooled over the one my friend (also in video and
  animation work) had. I have neither the eye nor the temperament for
  graphics work. I envy those who do.
 
  If I need some direction, are you willing to lend a bit of help once in
 a
  while?
 
  I and the rest of the LinuxCNC crowd are always available to kibitz.
  Collectively, we know everything (and if it turns out we don't we can
  still sympathize with you!).
 
  What direction did you decide to go---MPLAB or MPLAB X? And in Linux
  directly or in Windows running as a virtual host in Linux?
 
  Of course, inquiring minds also want to know what you have in mind for
  those dspics.
 
 
  Bill
 
 
  Good luck.
 
  Regards,
  Kent

 Hi Kent:

 Yes we are all for the grand kids too!

 Well I think I will go with Linux. The MPLAB I have just downloaded was
 8.80.

 I purchased the Pickit 2 debug.  The project is a brushed servo controller.
  Knowing me I think it will go beyond that, maybe BLDC. Then who knows
 what.

 Well Kent back in 1985  my wife and I opened an Amiga store in Florida.
 Because I used it for 3 D wire frame modeling, in my Architectural
 Illustration business. I thought it would really catch on.  She and I went
 to
 Commodore's repair school so we could support the machine.

 We were authorized Video Toaster retaillers.

 Opened a larger store in a strip shopping center about 1989.  I ran both
 businesses from that location.  About the time we got rolling the Hi-way
 dept.
 started tearing up the main hi-way that went in front of our center. And
 the
 first war started.  Mail order got going real strong and we were doomed.
 I could buy Commodore Hi-res monitors from mail order cheaper than I could
 buy
 from Commadore direct and we were authorized retailers with them. I hate
 loop
 holes!!

 It was a great machine, 1 main processor and 5 sub-processors. Multitasking
 for real and all on 512K ram.  I networked the Amiga, with the Windows
 NT4.0,
 and the MAC Quadra 950, for all animation and video 

Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-03-08 Thread Cathrine Hribar


On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:14:03 -0500
  Kent A. Reed knbr...@erols.com wrote:
 On 3/2/2012 10:32 PM,  Cathrine Hribar wrote:

 On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:04:54 -0500
Doug Goffdg...@comporium.net  wrote:
 Bill,
 If you plan on using a Windows environment, then you can use Microchip's
 MPLAB PIC IDE and several different C compilers, all freeware.  MPLABX
 is a new platform that is still a bit buggy, though usable.  And it will
 run under Linux.  I use the PICKit 3 to program PICs, no problem.  I use
 it in a Windows environment because I also need to program FTDI chips
 (USB) and they don't offer a Linux version.  I run all Windows within
 VirtualBox, so I don't have to transfer files around between systems.

 Google MPLAB and you should get the microchip site, or
 http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/mplab/X/
 Hi Doug:

 Thanks for the info...  I just received the pickit 2 debug from microchip.
 Have the latest v. of MPLAB.  Problem is that my software system is Windows
 2000 with SP4.  The pickit 2 software doesn't see the pickit 2 hardware 
pluged
 into the USB port. I know the port works.

 thanks:

 Bill


 Bill:
 
 You do know how old Windows 2000 is in technology-years? Microsoft 
 terminated support two years ago.
 
 Sorry, I just had to get that out of my system :-)
 
 Did you have administrator privileges when you installed the driver? 
 Without a functioning driver, Windows 2000 won't admit your pickit 
 exists even if the port itself is electrically sound. Your smart drive 
 test was necessary but not sufficient. It exercises a different driver.
 
 Were I in your shoes, I'd install MPLAB X IDE in Linux and drive on 
 rather than arm-wrestle with W2K. To paraphrase what Admiral Farragut 
 never exactly said, Damn the bugs, full speed ahead.
 
 Regards,
 Kent


Hi Kent:

Thanks for the note.

I am aware of the age of Windows 2000 as I used it in my business of computer 
animation in S. W. Florida.  That was up to 2005 before I retired.

I agree it is a pain but sense I am retired and this is a hobby, I used what I 
had on hand, as MPLAB listed the system software could be Windows 2000 or XP.

I put that Query on this web site about two weeks ago, asking if there was a 
complier that would work for programming the dspic's, under Linux.  One of the 
fellows said that there was a compiler but it was a pain to get all the files, 
in place, that was needed to use it under Linux..  Being the novice that I am, 
not being a programmer, I thought it would be more of a challenge than I could 
overcome with my limited knowledge.

However, I think I will give it a try as I like the Linux operating system 
much better that Windows. It reminds me of the Amiga operating system that I 
use to use for model building, ray tracing, and animation recording.

If I need some direction, are you willing to lend a bit of help once in a 
while?

Bill


--
Virtualization  Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-03-08 Thread Kent A. Reed
On 3/8/2012 12:22 PM,  Cathrine Hribar wrote:

 On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:14:03 -0500
Kent A. Reedknbr...@erols.com  wrote:
 On 3/2/2012 10:32 PM,  Cathrine Hribar wrote:
 On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:04:54 -0500
 Doug Goffdg...@comporium.net   wrote:
 Bill,
 If you plan on using a Windows environment, then you can use Microchip's
 MPLAB PIC IDE and several different C compilers, all freeware.  MPLABX
 ...
 Hi Doug:

 Thanks for the info...  I just received the pickit 2 debug from microchip.
 Have the latest v. of MPLAB.  Problem is that my software system is Windows
 2000 with SP4.  The pickit 2 software doesn't see the pickit 2 hardware
 pluged
 into the USB port. I know the port works.

 thanks:

 Bill


 Bill:

 You do know how old Windows 2000 is in technology-years? Microsoft
 terminated support two years ago.

 Sorry, I just had to get that out of my system :-)

 Did you have administrator privileges when you installed the driver?
 Without a functioning driver, Windows 2000 won't admit your pickit
 exists even if the port itself is electrically sound. Your smart drive
 test was necessary but not sufficient. It exercises a different driver.

 Were I in your shoes, I'd install MPLAB X IDE in Linux and drive on
 rather than arm-wrestle with W2K. To paraphrase what Admiral Farragut
 never exactly said, Damn the bugs, full speed ahead.

 Regards,
 Kent

 Hi Kent:

 Thanks for the note.

 I am aware of the age of Windows 2000 as I used it in my business of computer
 animation in S. W. Florida.  That was up to 2005 before I retired.

 I agree it is a pain but sense I am retired and this is a hobby, I used what I
 had on hand, as MPLAB listed the system software could be Windows 2000 or XP.

Hi, Bill.

My wife and I are retired as well and fully understand the financial 
constraints. We choose to forgo many technology baubles in order to 
spend more in other pursuits, like staying involved in our grandkids' lives.

My wife, for example, is still using a Sony laptop we bought when she 
was consulting a decade ago. She likes the full keyboard so much she 
doesn't want to buy a new laptop. We're running Windows 2000 on it 
because that's the latest version that has working drivers for it.

 I put that Query on this web site about two weeks ago, asking if there was a
 complier that would work for programming the dspic's, under Linux.  One of the
 fellows said that there was a compiler but it was a pain to get all the files,
 in place, that was needed to use it under Linux..  Being the novice that I am,
 not being a programmer, I thought it would be more of a challenge than I could
 overcome with my limited knowledge.

 However, I think I will give it a try as I like the Linux operating system
 much better that Windows. It reminds me of the Amiga operating system that I
 use to use for model building, ray tracing, and animation recording.

Oh, man, a Amiga user. You really were serious about animation work. I 
never had one but I drooled over the one my friend (also in video and 
animation work) had. I have neither the eye nor the temperament for 
graphics work. I envy those who do.

 If I need some direction, are you willing to lend a bit of help once in a
 while?

I and the rest of the LinuxCNC crowd are always available to kibitz. 
Collectively, we know everything (and if it turns out we don't we can 
still sympathize with you!).

What direction did you decide to go---MPLAB or MPLAB X? And in Linux 
directly or in Windows running as a virtual host in Linux?

Of course, inquiring minds also want to know what you have in mind for 
those dspics.


 Bill


Good luck.

Regards,
Kent


--
Virtualization  Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-03-08 Thread Cathrine Hribar
 If you plan on using a Windows environment, then you can use Microchip's
 MPLAB PIC IDE and several different C compilers, all freeware.  MPLABX
 ...
 Hi Doug:

 Thanks for the info...  I just received the pickit 2 debug from microchip.
 Have the latest v. of MPLAB.  Problem is that my software system is Windows
 2000 with SP4.  The pickit 2 software doesn't see the pickit 2 hardware
 pluged
 into the USB port. I know the port works.

 thanks:

 Bill


 Bill:

 You do know how old Windows 2000 is in technology-years? Microsoft
 terminated support two years ago.

 Sorry, I just had to get that out of my system :-)

 Did you have administrator privileges when you installed the driver?
 Without a functioning driver, Windows 2000 won't admit your pickit
 exists even if the port itself is electrically sound. Your smart drive
 test was necessary but not sufficient. It exercises a different driver.

 Were I in your shoes, I'd install MPLAB X IDE in Linux and drive on
 rather than arm-wrestle with W2K. To paraphrase what Admiral Farragut
 never exactly said, Damn the bugs, full speed ahead.

 Regards,
 Kent

 Hi Kent:

 Thanks for the note.

 I am aware of the age of Windows 2000 as I used it in my business of 
computer
 animation in S. W. Florida.  That was up to 2005 before I retired.

 I agree it is a pain but sense I am retired and this is a hobby, I used what 
I
 had on hand, as MPLAB listed the system software could be Windows 2000 or 
XP.
 
 Hi, Bill.
 
 My wife and I are retired as well and fully understand the financial 
 constraints. We choose to forgo many technology baubles in order to 
 spend more in other pursuits, like staying involved in our grandkids' lives.
 
 My wife, for example, is still using a Sony laptop we bought when she 
 was consulting a decade ago. She likes the full keyboard so much she 
 doesn't want to buy a new laptop. We're running Windows 2000 on it 
 because that's the latest version that has working drivers for it.
 
 I put that Query on this web site about two weeks ago, asking if there was a
 complier that would work for programming the dspic's, under Linux.  One of 
the
 fellows said that there was a compiler but it was a pain to get all the 
files,
 in place, that was needed to use it under Linux..  Being the novice that I 
am,
 not being a programmer, I thought it would be more of a challenge than I 
could
 overcome with my limited knowledge.

 However, I think I will give it a try as I like the Linux operating system
 much better that Windows. It reminds me of the Amiga operating system that I
 use to use for model building, ray tracing, and animation recording.
 
 Oh, man, a Amiga user. You really were serious about animation work. I 
 never had one but I drooled over the one my friend (also in video and 
 animation work) had. I have neither the eye nor the temperament for 
 graphics work. I envy those who do.
 
 If I need some direction, are you willing to lend a bit of help once in a
 while?
 
 I and the rest of the LinuxCNC crowd are always available to kibitz. 
 Collectively, we know everything (and if it turns out we don't we can 
 still sympathize with you!).
 
 What direction did you decide to go---MPLAB or MPLAB X? And in Linux 
 directly or in Windows running as a virtual host in Linux?
 
 Of course, inquiring minds also want to know what you have in mind for 
 those dspics.
 
 
 Bill

 
 Good luck.
 
 Regards,
 Kent

Hi Kent:

Yes we are all for the grand kids too!

Well I think I will go with Linux. The MPLAB I have just downloaded was 8.80.

I purchased the Pickit 2 debug.  The project is a brushed servo controller. 
 Knowing me I think it will go beyond that, maybe BLDC. Then who knows what.

Well Kent back in 1985  my wife and I opened an Amiga store in Florida. 
Because I used it for 3 D wire frame modeling, in my Architectural 
Illustration business. I thought it would really catch on.  She and I went to 
Commodore's repair school so we could support the machine.

We were authorized Video Toaster retaillers.

Opened a larger store in a strip shopping center about 1989.  I ran both 
businesses from that location.  About the time we got rolling the Hi-way dept. 
started tearing up the main hi-way that went in front of our center. And the 
first war started.  Mail order got going real strong and we were doomed.
I could buy Commodore Hi-res monitors from mail order cheaper than I could buy 
from Commadore direct and we were authorized retailers with them. I hate loop 
holes!!

It was a great machine, 1 main processor and 5 sub-processors. Multitasking 
for real and all on 512K ram.  I networked the Amiga, with the Windows NT4.0, 
and the MAC Quadra 950, for all animation and video recording. Play back 
recording directly to Beta-cam in real time.

I learned a lot, mostly not to get involved with the computer retail market. 
 That lesson cost us dearly!

Well anyway I will let you know how it goes.

Bill


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-03-02 Thread Doug Goff

Bill,
If you plan on using a Windows environment, then you can use Microchip's 
MPLAB PIC IDE and several different C compilers, all freeware.  MPLABX 
is a new platform that is still a bit buggy, though usable.  And it will 
run under Linux.  I use the PICKit 3 to program PICs, no problem.  I use 
it in a Windows environment because I also need to program FTDI chips 
(USB) and they don't offer a Linux version.  I run all Windows within 
VirtualBox, so I don't have to transfer files around between systems.

Google MPLAB and you should get the microchip site, or 
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/mplab/X/

Hope this helps

Doug Goff
--
Virtualization  Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] C Compiler - MPLAB

2012-03-02 Thread Cathrine Hribar


On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:04:54 -0500
  Doug Goff dg...@comporium.net wrote:
 
 Bill,
 If you plan on using a Windows environment, then you can use Microchip's 
 MPLAB PIC IDE and several different C compilers, all freeware.  MPLABX 
 is a new platform that is still a bit buggy, though usable.  And it will 
 run under Linux.  I use the PICKit 3 to program PICs, no problem.  I use 
 it in a Windows environment because I also need to program FTDI chips 
 (USB) and they don't offer a Linux version.  I run all Windows within 
 VirtualBox, so I don't have to transfer files around between systems.
 
 Google MPLAB and you should get the microchip site, or 
 http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/mplab/X/

Hi Doug:

Thanks for the info...  I just received the pickit 2 debug from microchip. 
Have the latest v. of MPLAB.  Problem is that my software system is Windows 
2000 with SP4.  The pickit 2 software doesn't see the pickit 2 hardware pluged 
into the USB port. I know the port works.

thanks:

Bill


 Hope this helps
 
 Doug Goff
 --
 Virtualization  Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
 Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
 also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
 http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


--
Virtualization  Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users