RE: Changing License key.

[Ben Schorr]

I've never tried it but my understanding is that you should just be able
to install the licensed version over the eval version.  Of course,
you'll want to do a full backup of your system first, as always.


-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 18:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Changing License key.

Is it possible to change the license key from evaluation to fully
supported or do you have to do a complete re-install?
Is it the same for upgrading from Standard server to enterprise?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 2003 - OMA

[DOT]

I'm attempting to configure Mobile Services under Global Settings to
test/configure Outlook Mobile Access.  Does anyone know where to find the
how-to configure info on this piece?   The Microsoft site seems to be a
little vague on the implementation and configuration portion of this.

Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator
William Blair  Company

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Slightly OT: MOM with Exchange Module

[Tony Hlabse]

What do you mean by something wrong. MOM by default has most of the Alerts 
buit in. It is a matterf of selecting which rules you put in place and 
configure to the Alerts. My limited experience with the product makes me 
want to wait for a promised newer version from MS. Remember it is a stripped 
down versionn of NETIQ

From: Carmila Fresco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Slightly OT: MOM with Exchange Module
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 21:51:06 -0700
Is anyone using MOM with the Exchange 2000 module pack?  I'm interested
in knowing how useful it is in monitoring Exchange and alerting you when
something is wrong with exchnage.
Thanks,
Carmila


This email message may contain information that is confidential and 
proprietary to Babcock  Brown or a third party.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and 
any copies of the original message.  Babcock  Brown takes measures to 
protect the content of its communications.  However, Babcock  Brown cannot 
guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or 
that email messages will be free of errors or viruses.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee. 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Paging File Question....

[Chyka Robert]

Hi Everyone.

im runnig exchange 2000 on a dell 6650 server and windows 2000 advanced server.  i 
have the /3 GB switch on the boot.ini and the specs on the server are the following:

Dual XEON 1.60Ghz Processors
3 Gigs RAM
OS RAID 1 (9 gig)
Log Files RAID 1 (18 gig)
IS Drive RAID 5 (140 gigs)

i have my paging file on the raid 5 drive with the database.  is this good or bad?  im 
getting mixed reviews from local people here...  another thing i cant figure out is 
windows is recommending the paging file to be 5374 but it wont allow me to change it 
to that high.  it tells me i have to have it smaller than 4095..  any ideas why this 
is doing this?  any input or recommendations on location of the paging file is 
appreciated because in outlook i get pauses and chokes every few minutes when i am 
opening messages or scrolling through my mail.

thanks for any input and help.

Bob Chyka

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

[Paul Hutchings]

As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it looks
quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much).

Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories using
it?

regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Paging File Question....

[Martin Blackstone]

Typically you want the  page file on the fastest array. RAID 5 is actually
the slowest in your setup.

As for the size, I'm sure whatever its at now is sufficient. 

-Original Message-
From: Chyka Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Paging File Question

Hi Everyone.

im runnig exchange 2000 on a dell 6650 server and windows 2000 advanced
server.  i have the /3 GB switch on the boot.ini and the specs on the server
are the following:

Dual XEON 1.60Ghz Processors
3 Gigs RAM
OS RAID 1 (9 gig)
Log Files RAID 1 (18 gig)
IS Drive RAID 5 (140 gigs)

i have my paging file on the raid 5 drive with the database.  is this good
or bad?  im getting mixed reviews from local people here...  another thing i
cant figure out is windows is recommending the paging file to be 5374 but it
wont allow me to change it to that high.  it tells me i have to have it
smaller than 4095..  any ideas why this is doing this?  any input or
recommendations on location of the paging file is appreciated because in
outlook i get pauses and chokes every few minutes when i am opening messages
or scrolling through my mail.

thanks for any input and help.

Bob Chyka

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Paging File Question....

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

Paging file on the same volume as the database???

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


-Original Message-
From: Chyka Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Paging File Question

Hi Everyone.

im runnig exchange 2000 on a dell 6650 server and windows 2000 advanced
server.  i have the /3 GB switch on the boot.ini and the specs on the
server are the following:

Dual XEON 1.60Ghz Processors
3 Gigs RAM
OS RAID 1 (9 gig)
Log Files RAID 1 (18 gig)
IS Drive RAID 5 (140 gigs)

i have my paging file on the raid 5 drive with the database.  is this
good or bad?  im getting mixed reviews from local people here...
another thing i cant figure out is windows is recommending the paging
file to be 5374 but it wont allow me to change it to that high.  it
tells me i have to have it smaller than 4095..  any ideas why this is
doing this?  any input or recommendations on location of the paging file
is appreciated because in outlook i get pauses and chokes every few
minutes when i am opening messages or scrolling through my mail.

thanks for any input and help.

Bob Chyka

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Paging File Question....

[Chyka Robert]

not any more..i put it on the OS RAID 1 set

Bob C.

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Paging File Question


Paging file on the same volume as the database???

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


-Original Message-
From: Chyka Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Paging File Question

Hi Everyone.

im runnig exchange 2000 on a dell 6650 server and windows 2000 advanced
server.  i have the /3 GB switch on the boot.ini and the specs on the
server are the following:

Dual XEON 1.60Ghz Processors
3 Gigs RAM
OS RAID 1 (9 gig)
Log Files RAID 1 (18 gig)
IS Drive RAID 5 (140 gigs)

i have my paging file on the raid 5 drive with the database.  is this
good or bad?  im getting mixed reviews from local people here...
another thing i cant figure out is windows is recommending the paging
file to be 5374 but it wont allow me to change it to that high.  it
tells me i have to have it smaller than 4095..  any ideas why this is
doing this?  any input or recommendations on location of the paging file
is appreciated because in outlook i get pauses and chokes every few
minutes when i am opening messages or scrolling through my mail.

thanks for any input and help.

Bob Chyka

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

[Chris Scharff]

The free version is certainly worth the price, but the memory usage and
slow response when trying to execute against even the maximum number of
free supported servers has prompted me to look elsewhere for a solution
I'd invest $ in. YMMV

-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:45 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
Subject: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it looks
quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much).

Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories
using
it?

regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

[Sirius F. Crackhoe]

We've been testing it on a 400 node network and have been fairly impressed
with it. It does have some flaws, but so far, does it's job. 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it looks
quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much).

Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories using
it?

regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

[Sirius F. Crackhoe]

Yeah, that has been our observation as well. We have scanned machines in
batches of 50 and it does get VERY SLOW during the scans. Hoping it is
something they will work on in future releases.

Sirius 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

The free version is certainly worth the price, but the memory usage and slow
response when trying to execute against even the maximum number of free
supported servers has prompted me to look elsewhere for a solution I'd
invest $ in. YMMV

-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:45 AM Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
Subject: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it looks
quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much).

Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories using
it?

regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

[Tony Hlabse]

Could you define slow? I mean hours or ?/machine

From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:07:44 -0400
Yeah, that has been our observation as well. We have scanned machines in
batches of 50 and it does get VERY SLOW during the scans. Hoping it is
something they will work on in future releases.
Sirius

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
The free version is certainly worth the price, but the memory usage and slow
response when trying to execute against even the maximum number of free
supported servers has prompted me to look elsewhere for a solution I'd
invest $ in. YMMV
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:45 AM Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
Subject: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it looks
quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much).
Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories using
it?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Fast, faster, fastest: Upgrade to Cable or DSL today!   
https://broadband.msn.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Appointments not Showing in Outlook

[Brian Ko]

I don't know if you have fixed this problem or not, but I just ran into
something similar to your situtation so I thought I give my 2 cents...

Can you check to see if you have NoOST key in the
HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\OST?  If you do have the
key, what type of the registry key is that?  string value, Binary Value,
DWORD value, etc?  If it's not the DWORD registry key, delete and
recreate it with DWORD value.  

I accidently created the NoOST key with the string value and it caused
my appoitments to disappear, but I was able to see them in OWA.  After
replacing it with DWORD registry key, everything came back...

Brian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Appointments not Showing in Outlook


All online no OST. I tried the new profile thing on a different box as
well with no luck.  This is really scaring me that no one else has ever
seen this before.

Thanks,
 
Alex 

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

Ho wis your Outlook configured to run. If in Offline mode maybe your OST
is 
wrecked. Try going to another machine and configure a proflie and see if
it 
follows. Also grant some one permissions to your calendar and see how
they 
see it.


From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Appointments not Showing in Outlook
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:24:13 -0400

Andrew maybe I didn't explain it clear enough in the original message.
I 
can see the appointments if I look in OWA or in my Blackberry but not if
I 
look in Outlook.  It has happened to me and to others as well.  I know
about 
the M drive but I don't think it pertains to this.  This is different 
because the meetings are still viewable through OWA and Blackberry.  I
have 
checked all the views and I have used all the switches I can think of
with 
no luck.

Alex

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

Often it starts off by looking weird. Then gets worse.

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 5:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Appointments not Showing in Outlook

If by weird you mean wrecked, then yes you are correct.

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Appointments not Showing in Outlook

Scanning M: drive for viruses or backing it up may cause weird things to
happen. Just a thought.


Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Appointments not Showing in Outlook

I tried that one and it didn't work either.  It doesn't make sense that
it
wouldn't be affecting OWA.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Try Outlook /cleanviews against mailboxes that are having problem.  You
may have a few mailboxes that have corrupted views which may have to be
reset in order to view from Outlook again.

Brian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 1:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Appointments not Showing in Outlook


It's only happening to a few users but I am unfortunately one of them.
I have looked at the views and they are set properly.  This is one of
the weirdest things I have ever seen.  I have also tried to recreate my
profile some where else and that doesn't seem to help.  Any new items
still show in my calendar but my older items don't.

  -Original Message-
From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Is it happening to all users or just one or two?

We had a few users try to modify their view and ended up in the same
situation you are describing.  To fix we: highlight calendar, select
view | current view | customize current view.  Click the fields button
and make sure the Start and End fields show Start and End.  In our case
the users in question had changed these fields to Created.

Hope that helps

Mark

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Appointments not Showing in Outlook

We are currently experiencing a weird 

RE: Appointments not Showing in Outlook

[Gonzalez, Alex]

I haven't fixed it yet but I do have that key.  Its dword and its set to 3.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Ko
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

I don't know if you have fixed this problem or not, but I just ran into
something similar to your situtation so I thought I give my 2 cents...

Can you check to see if you have NoOST key in the
HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\OST?  If you do have the
key, what type of the registry key is that?  string value, Binary Value,
DWORD value, etc?  If it's not the DWORD registry key, delete and
recreate it with DWORD value.  

I accidently created the NoOST key with the string value and it caused
my appoitments to disappear, but I was able to see them in OWA.  After
replacing it with DWORD registry key, everything came back...

Brian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Appointments not Showing in Outlook


All online no OST. I tried the new profile thing on a different box as
well with no luck.  This is really scaring me that no one else has ever
seen this before.

Thanks,
 
Alex 

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

Ho wis your Outlook configured to run. If in Offline mode maybe your OST
is 
wrecked. Try going to another machine and configure a proflie and see if
it 
follows. Also grant some one permissions to your calendar and see how
they 
see it.


From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Appointments not Showing in Outlook
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:24:13 -0400

Andrew maybe I didn't explain it clear enough in the original message.
I 
can see the appointments if I look in OWA or in my Blackberry but not if
I 
look in Outlook.  It has happened to me and to others as well.  I know
about 
the M drive but I don't think it pertains to this.  This is different 
because the meetings are still viewable through OWA and Blackberry.  I
have 
checked all the views and I have used all the switches I can think of
with 
no luck.

Alex

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

Often it starts off by looking weird. Then gets worse.

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 5:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Appointments not Showing in Outlook

If by weird you mean wrecked, then yes you are correct.

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Appointments not Showing in Outlook

Scanning M: drive for viruses or backing it up may cause weird things to
happen. Just a thought.


Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Appointments not Showing in Outlook

I tried that one and it didn't work either.  It doesn't make sense that
it
wouldn't be affecting OWA.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Try Outlook /cleanviews against mailboxes that are having problem.  You
may have a few mailboxes that have corrupted views which may have to be
reset in order to view from Outlook again.

Brian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 1:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Appointments not Showing in Outlook


It's only happening to a few users but I am unfortunately one of them.
I have looked at the views and they are set properly.  This is one of
the weirdest things I have ever seen.  I have also tried to recreate my
profile some where else and that doesn't seem to help.  Any new items
still show in my calendar but my older items don't.

  -Original Message-
From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Is it happening to all users or just one or two?

We had a few users try to modify their view and ended up in the same
situation you are describing.  To fix we: highlight calendar, select
view | current view | customize current view.  Click the fields button
and make sure the Start and End fields show Start and End.  In our case
the users in question had changed these fields to Created.

Hope 

Re: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

[Paul Hutchings]

I did notice it to be a little laggy sometimes, I get the impression it is
doing stuff, it's just not overly informative in telling you what it's
doing.

Basically I'm looking for a way of handling patch management, whilst we
weren't affected the recent bugs/worms have really hit home that we need
some way to handle this across 300 or so workstations (we still have 95
machines on site but I figure those are beyond redemption!) and whilst I
admit I've not yet tried it I belive SUS may be a little restrictive (too
all or nothing/everthing or none).

If we did go for it it would initially be to manage around 25 servers with a
view to expanding to cover more machines if it works out.

It would probably live on a decent specced server, or my machine - nice
excuse for a Dell Dual Xeon workstation :-0

The reason I was drawn to it is a few factors -  no agents, the pricing,
which does seem attractive, plus Shavlik seem very cosy with Microsoft - I
figure if they're working together and MS licence their technology there's
quite an incentive for Shavlik to do a decent job?

I may give updateexpert a look, also I recall someone mentioning a product
called patchlink, and if I'm feeling real brave I might try SUS.

I appreciate any info you advice/info can offer - I appreciate it's OT but
most of here are professionals and do this for a job so the advice tends to
be good!

regards,
Paul
- Original Message - 
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 4:31 PM
Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?


The free version is certainly worth the price, but the memory usage and
slow response when trying to execute against even the maximum number of
free supported servers has prompted me to look elsewhere for a solution
I'd invest $ in. YMMV

-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:45 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
Subject: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it looks
quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much).

Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories
using
it?

regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

[Dflorea]

I'm using the free version, and scanning about 35 machines in maybe 10
minutes - that's in its 'quick scan' mode.  I'm perfectly happy with it.
Many of my workstations didn't have the office software installed from
the network, so the office patches don't work as well.  But the OS
patches seem to be fine.

David

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?



Could you define slow? I mean hours or ?/machine

From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:07:44 -0400


Yeah, that has been our observation as well. We have scanned machines in
batches of 50 and it does get VERY SLOW during the scans. Hoping it is
something they will work on in future releases.

Sirius


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

The free version is certainly worth the price, but the memory usage and
slow response when trying to execute against even the maximum number of
free supported servers has prompted me to look elsewhere for a solution
I'd invest $ in. YMMV

-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:45 AM Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
Subject: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it looks
quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much).

Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories
using it?

regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Fast, faster, fastest: Upgrade to Cable or DSL today!   
https://broadband.msn.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

[Steck, Herb]

I am currently using GFI's LanGuard.  It's pretty cheap and it works pretty fast.  
Scanning about 40 servers and 300 workstations, half of that through a VPN.  My only 
concern about the product is how often it is updated.  Would prefer it to check 
against microsofts site for patch info automatically instead of having to do it 
manually.  I run it right off my laptop which is nice if I need to do patch updates at 
home or any other remote site.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?


I'm using the free version, and scanning about 35 machines in maybe 10
minutes - that's in its 'quick scan' mode.  I'm perfectly happy with it.
Many of my workstations didn't have the office software installed from
the network, so the office patches don't work as well.  But the OS
patches seem to be fine.

David

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?



Could you define slow? I mean hours or ?/machine

From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:07:44 -0400


Yeah, that has been our observation as well. We have scanned machines in
batches of 50 and it does get VERY SLOW during the scans. Hoping it is
something they will work on in future releases.

Sirius


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

The free version is certainly worth the price, but the memory usage and
slow response when trying to execute against even the maximum number of
free supported servers has prompted me to look elsewhere for a solution
I'd invest $ in. YMMV

-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:45 AM Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
Subject: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it looks
quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much).

Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories
using it?

regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Fast, faster, fastest: Upgrade to Cable or DSL today!   
https://broadband.msn.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged 
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any 
action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the 
sender and delete the material from all computers. 


_
List posting FAQ:   

Exchange 2000 direcory access

[Joe Berthiaume]

We have 2 Exchange 2000 SP3 servers and 2 domain controllers (Windows
2000 SP4). It's a very small, single domain environment with less than
100 users.

Recently we had a power/UPS problem where a UPS cut out completely,
killing power to one of the domain controllers. The 2 Exchange servers
and the other domain controller remained running throughout. During the
outage, a number of users could not access their mailboxes (everyone
uses either outlook 2000 or 2002). Most of those users simply had to
restart their Outlook application, and they were in (although I had
hoped that would be more seem-less...but whatever) There was however one
user who was unable to get into his mailbox until we had restored power
to that DC. That's problem #1. 

The other problem is, I think, more severe. Even after both DC's were
running again, one of the Exchange servers only reports seeing one DC in
its directory access tab. (obviously that's the DC that was never shut
down) The other Exchange server shows both DC's normally.

Both DC's are also GC's. The DC that had shutdown holds all FSMO rolls.

Everything is on a simple LAN, and physical connectivity does not appear
to be the problem.

I've run DSAdiag 2 on the Exchange server in question and it does indeed
show both DC's and I've run DCdiag on both the DC's and everything
appears to be normal. 

I guess my question is 2 part:

1. Why did that one user have such a problem connecting during the
outage and 
2. Why is one Exchange Server not seeing that DC since it's been
restored...or is it actually seeing it and the interface just isn't
reporting it?

Thanks in advance.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

[Sirius F. Crackhoe]

Takes us about 30-40 minutes to do full scans on 50 machines.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions


Could you define slow? I mean hours or ?/machine

From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:07:44 -0400


Yeah, that has been our observation as well. We have scanned machines in
batches of 50 and it does get VERY SLOW during the scans. Hoping it is
something they will work on in future releases.

Sirius


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

The free version is certainly worth the price, but the memory usage and slow
response when trying to execute against even the maximum number of free
supported servers has prompted me to look elsewhere for a solution I'd
invest $ in. YMMV

-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:45 AM Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
Subject: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it looks
quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much).

Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories using
it?

regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Fast, faster, fastest: Upgrade to Cable or DSL today!   
https://broadband.msn.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

[Paul Hutchings]

See I wouldn't call that particularly slow, I don't know if I could put a
figure on what I would consider slow, but that's the sort of figure that
sounds acceptable, but it probably bloody annoying idf you're sat watching
it :-)

I think I read something on the shavlik newsgroups about a registry patch
that increases the simultaneous connections/performance?

regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 08 September 2003 18:17
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
 
 
 
 Takes us about 30-40 minutes to do full scans on 50 machines.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:40 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 
 Could you define slow? I mean hours or ?/machine
 
 From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:07:44 -0400
 
 
 Yeah, that has been our observation as well. We have scanned 
 machines in
 batches of 50 and it does get VERY SLOW during the scans. Hoping it is
 something they will work on in future releases.
 
 Sirius
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Chris Scharff
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 The free version is certainly worth the price, but the memory 
 usage and slow
 response when trying to execute against even the maximum 
 number of free
 supported servers has prompted me to look elsewhere for a solution I'd
 invest $ in. YMMV
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Posted At: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:45 AM Posted To: swynk
 Conversation: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
 Subject: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
 
 As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers 
 and it looks
 quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much).
 
 Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror 
 stories using
 it?
 
 regards,
 Paul
 --
 Paul Hutchings
 Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
 Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=
 lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Fast, faster, fastest: Upgrade to Cable or DSL today!   
https://broadband.msn.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

[Sirius F. Crackhoe]

IMHO, it's slow to me, especially when scanning 400+ machines. :)

It's all in the eyes of the beholder. :)

Sirius 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

See I wouldn't call that particularly slow, I don't know if I could put a
figure on what I would consider slow, but that's the sort of figure that
sounds acceptable, but it probably bloody annoying idf you're sat watching
it :-)

I think I read something on the shavlik newsgroups about a registry patch
that increases the simultaneous connections/performance?

regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 08 September 2003 18:17
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
 
 
 
 Takes us about 30-40 minutes to do full scans on 50 machines.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:40 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 
 Could you define slow? I mean hours or ?/machine
 
 From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:07:44 -0400
 
 
 Yeah, that has been our observation as well. We have scanned machines 
 in batches of 50 and it does get VERY SLOW during the scans. Hoping it 
 is something they will work on in future releases.
 
 Sirius
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris 
 Scharff
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 The free version is certainly worth the price, but the memory usage 
 and slow response when trying to execute against even the maximum 
 number of free supported servers has prompted me to look elsewhere for 
 a solution I'd invest $ in. YMMV
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Posted At: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:45 AM Posted To: swynk
 Conversation: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
 Subject: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
 
 As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it 
 looks quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much).
 
 Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories 
 using it?
 
 regards,
 Paul
 --
 Paul Hutchings
 Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
 Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=
 lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Fast, faster, fastest: Upgrade to Cable or DSL today!   
https://broadband.msn.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   

Using Remote Desktop Connector locks up Exchange

[Orin Rehorst]

Whoa!  Using Remote Desktop Connector locks up Exchange server for 10 to 25 minutes. 
(E2K, Win2000, latest SPs.)

Please advise.

TIA

Regards, 
Orin
Orin Rehorst 
Port of Houston Authority 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Message failure

[Erick Thompson]

Hello,

I'm fairly new at working with Exchange. I'm having a problem with
sending mail from my account. With almost every message (but not every
one), I get an error. The problem is, the message that Exchange sends
back to me is all but useless, I can't find any other references to the
error. How can I dig into this and find out what happened? I've check
the event log with no success.

Thanks,
Erick


Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  FW: Budget
  Sent: 9/8/2003 11:59 AM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 9/8/2003 11:59 AM
The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did
not report a specific reason.  Check the address and try again.  If it
still fails, contact your system administrator.
dc.nbr.lan #5.0.0

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

[Robert Moir]

Why does the idea of a security product that does stuff without telling you what 
worry me?
 
I've been using GFI languard. I like it but don't have a big baseline of similar 
things to compare it with.

-Original Message- 
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Mon 08/09/2003 17:51 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?



I did notice it to be a little laggy sometimes, I get the impression it is
doing stuff, it's just not overly informative in telling you what it's
doing.


 

[EMAIL 
PROTECTED])j¹%ŠË\¢oâŸùr®+)•éíz·±r§ë^ÆuéZž§‚X¬…:.ž±Êâm[h•æ¯yì\…©àz[,Ã)är‰„ÅÈZž‹ŠËZvh§–+-ižÌ2žG(

RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG

[Kelley, Jason]

It wasn't a premier article.  I had pulled up the article when I sent
the e-mail but now I can't find it either.  It's not even on the list of
bugs that the rollup hotfix addresses.

Basically the mailbox size in ESM is different than what outlook tells
the user and when you run an isinteg the mailbox size in ESM is larger,
more accurate to what outlook says it is.

Sorry I didn't send the full link initially

Jason



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG


Is that a premier only article ? cant seem to find it on technet.

G.

- Original Message -
From: Kelley, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 6:34 PM
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG


Check out Q article Q818830

We applied the single instance store hotfix before it was part of the
Sept hotfix rollup.  When we ran isinteg we had many mailboxes jump in
size.

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 9:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG


All,

Recently we have been having some strange behaviours with user
mailboxes, such as users being denied access to folders in their
mailboxes, rules disappearing etc.  After running ISINTEG on all stores
(approx 20), a number of errors were found and fixed...all good so far.
After remounting the stores everything looked fineuntil the next
morning when people came back to work.

A number of mailboxes had suddenly a LOT more mail in their inboxes and
deleted items folders, some users over 200mb worth, which threw a lot of
the organisation over the store limits and stopped them sending and
receiving mail.  We temporarily increased the store limits to cope with
the problem, however we are still at a loss to explain what happened.

After speaking with PSS, they are also at a bit of a loss as well. I've
also checked Technet and other online resources, but no mention is made
of this sort of problem.

- Some users had no effect on their mailboxes
- Some users had lots of mail return to either their deleted items or
inbox (we are surmising that the way the message was originally deleted
has determined where it came back to - shift-delete - back to inbox,
deleted via deleted items - back to delete items).
- The restored messages don't seem to be from the previous days. In all
of the cases we have confirmed, messages deleted the couple of days
previous didn't come back, but messages deleted prior to that did come
back.

Has anyone seen this behaviour before and could possibly explain what
happened ? As with all of these things, the people most affected were
senior management, and they are screaming for a satisfactory response.

Config:
Windows 2000 SP2 with hotfixes
Exchange 2000 SP2 - 6 Servers, 2 badly affected, 1 with minor effects, 3
not affected at all Trend Scanmail installed on all servers 1 Storage
group on each server, between 2 and 4 databases per storage group

On the servers that were affected, only one or two of the 4 stores was
affected.

As far as we can determine, either Exchange wasn't properly cleaning out
deleted items from mailboxes (but was reducing the size of mailboxes as
users were under the mailbox limit cap until the messages were
restored), OR something happened and exchange replayed some of the
transaction logs restoring old messages (but in that case all of the
stores in the storage group should have been affected, but weren't)

Thoughts ?

TIA

Glenn Corbett


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: 

RE: Message failure

[Blunt, James H (Jim)]

Erick,

The message is actually very informative.  Three things:
1.  Did you actually look at where you were trying to send it?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Shouldn't that be @nbr.ORG?
2.  The system is telling you it couldn't deliver the message and is
giving you a code to look up.
3.  Did you Google the following terms email delivery codes?

Here is a link you may want to bookmark:

http://www.mailsbroadcast.com/email.boltsnuts/smtp.codes.command.group.htm
(may wrap)

You really need to start doing your own research and being a little more
descriptive in not only your problem, but the layout of your system and what
you have done to try and fix the problem to this point.

-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Message failure


Hello,

I'm fairly new at working with Exchange. I'm having a problem with sending
mail from my account. With almost every message (but not every one), I get
an error. The problem is, the message that Exchange sends back to me is all
but useless, I can't find any other references to the error. How can I dig
into this and find out what happened? I've check the event log with no
success.

Thanks,
Erick


Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  FW: Budget
  Sent: 9/8/2003 11:59 AM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 9/8/2003 11:59 AM
The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not
report a specific reason.  Check the address and try again.  If it still
fails, contact your system administrator.
dc.nbr.lan #5.0.0

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OLK 2002 Rules Error

[John Q Jr.]

I know I have seen this topic discussed, but can not locate anything in the
archive.

Some users are getting the error;
One or more rules could not be uploaded to the Exchange server and have been
deactivated.  This could be because some of the parameters are not supported
or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules.


I found this on the MS site, I asume it's due to the 32KB limit.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;278066


Is there anyway to check the limit other than getting a rough estimate by
adding up the # of fules and reciepients?
Is there a work around or fix.

Thanks,
- John Q

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Message failure

[Erick Thompson]

That was a bad example, as it was a mistake on my part. However, I am
still getting a lot of the error messages, with addresses I know are
good. 

As for the error code, you're right, it does tell me something, but not
a lot. I know what the various codes mean, but it's not that useful
without some context. For example, 500 is Syntax error, command
unrecognized. What was the command that was unrecognized? 

So, let me further define my question. What I am looking for is
information on exactly what failed. On another SMTP engine (Lyris) I
admin, I get an error message that has enough information to give me
some idea of what went wrong. Something like this is what I'm looking
for (some personal info stripped).

Here is additional information about this error:

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Name:  
List:  japanforum
Cause: Mail is undeliverable after 3 attempts.

To delete this member, send the following two line message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   login (enter your password here)
   delete japanforum [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---

Mail Transaction log:

-- Sending email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- DNS lookup succeeded, found 12 acceptable mail servers for
hotmail.com
-- Attempting to connect to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.254.129 25)
-- [connection refused]
-- Connection refused to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.254.129 25)
-- Attempting to connect to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.252.99 25)
-- Connected to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.252.99 25)
-- 220 mc5-f19 Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 5.0.2195.5600
ready at  Sun, 7 Sep 2003 02:10:35 -0700 
-- HELO 192.168.2.99
-- 250 mc5-f19 Hello [204.201.190.99]
-- MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
-- RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
-- QUIT

With this, I can see exactly what went wrong, and if it's something that
I should take a look at or not. So, where can I get this type of
information for a failed message in Exchange? I've check the log file
specified in the default SMTP virtual server, but only appears to
contain source/dest IP addresses.

Thanks,
Erick


 -Original Message-
 From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:33 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Message failure
 
 
 Erick,
 
 The message is actually very informative.  Three things:
   1.  Did you actually look at where you were trying to send it?
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Shouldn't that be @nbr.ORG?
   2.  The system is telling you it couldn't deliver the 
 message and is
 giving you a code to look up.
   3.  Did you Google the following terms email delivery codes?
 
   Here is a link you may want to bookmark:
   
 http://www.mailsbroadcast.com/email.boltsnuts/smtp.codes.comm
 and.group.htm
 (may wrap)
 
 You really need to start doing your own research and being a 
 little more
 descriptive in not only your problem, but the layout of your 
 system and what
 you have done to try and fix the problem to this point.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:01 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Message failure
 
 
 Hello,
 
 I'm fairly new at working with Exchange. I'm having a problem 
 with sending
 mail from my account. With almost every message (but not 
 every one), I get
 an error. The problem is, the message that Exchange sends 
 back to me is all
 but useless, I can't find any other references to the error. 
 How can I dig
 into this and find out what happened? I've check the event log with no
 success.
 
 Thanks,
 Erick
 
 
 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
 
   Subject:FW: Budget
   Sent:   9/8/2003 11:59 AM
 
 The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 9/8/2003 11:59 AM
 The e-mail system was unable to deliver the 
 message, but did not
 report a specific reason.  Check the address and try again.  
 If it still
 fails, contact your system administrator.
 dc.nbr.lan #5.0.0
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Message failure

[Blunt, James H (Jim)]

Erick,

Have you attempted to Telnet anywhere and send mail manually?

-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message failure


That was a bad example, as it was a mistake on my part. However, I am still
getting a lot of the error messages, with addresses I know are good. 

As for the error code, you're right, it does tell me something, but not a
lot. I know what the various codes mean, but it's not that useful without
some context. For example, 500 is Syntax error, command unrecognized. What
was the command that was unrecognized? 

So, let me further define my question. What I am looking for is information
on exactly what failed. On another SMTP engine (Lyris) I admin, I get an
error message that has enough information to give me some idea of what went
wrong. Something like this is what I'm looking for (some personal info
stripped).

Here is additional information about this error:

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Name:  
List:  japanforum
Cause: Mail is undeliverable after 3 attempts.

To delete this member, send the following two line message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   login (enter your password here)
   delete japanforum [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---

Mail Transaction log:

-- Sending email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- DNS lookup succeeded, found 12 acceptable mail servers for hotmail.com
-- Attempting to connect to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.254.129 25)
-- [connection refused]
-- Connection refused to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.254.129 25)
-- Attempting to connect to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.252.99 25)
-- Connected to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.252.99 25)
-- 220 mc5-f19 Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 5.0.2195.5600 ready
at  Sun, 7 Sep 2003 02:10:35 -0700 
-- HELO 192.168.2.99
-- 250 mc5-f19 Hello [204.201.190.99]
-- MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
-- RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
-- QUIT

With this, I can see exactly what went wrong, and if it's something that I
should take a look at or not. So, where can I get this type of information
for a failed message in Exchange? I've check the log file specified in the
default SMTP virtual server, but only appears to contain source/dest IP
addresses.

Thanks,
Erick


 -Original Message-
 From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:33 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Message failure
 
 
 Erick,
 
 The message is actually very informative.  Three things:
   1.  Did you actually look at where you were trying to send it? 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Shouldn't that be @nbr.ORG?
   2.  The system is telling you it couldn't deliver the
 message and is
 giving you a code to look up.
   3.  Did you Google the following terms email delivery codes?
 
   Here is a link you may want to bookmark:
   
 http://www.mailsbroadcast.com/email.boltsnuts/smtp.codes.comm
 and.group.htm
 (may wrap)
 
 You really need to start doing your own research and being a
 little more
 descriptive in not only your problem, but the layout of your 
 system and what
 you have done to try and fix the problem to this point.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:01 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Message failure
 
 
 Hello,
 
 I'm fairly new at working with Exchange. I'm having a problem
 with sending
 mail from my account. With almost every message (but not 
 every one), I get
 an error. The problem is, the message that Exchange sends 
 back to me is all
 but useless, I can't find any other references to the error. 
 How can I dig
 into this and find out what happened? I've check the event log with no
 success.
 
 Thanks,
 Erick
 
 
 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
 
   Subject:FW: Budget
   Sent:   9/8/2003 11:59 AM
 
 The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 9/8/2003 11:59 AM
 The e-mail system was unable to deliver the
 message, but did not
 report a specific reason.  Check the address and try again.  
 If it still
 fails, contact your system administrator.
 dc.nbr.lan #5.0.0
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Message failure

[Erick Thompson]

I have, but I must admit not for some time. It seems like the telnet
built into Windows 2000 won't allow a connection to any other port then
23. I could download another client, but I haven't needed to for some
time. Why do you ask?

Erick

 -Original Message-
 From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:38 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Message failure
 
 
 Erick,
 
 Have you attempted to Telnet anywhere and send mail manually?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:12 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Message failure
 
 
 That was a bad example, as it was a mistake on my part. 
 However, I am still
 getting a lot of the error messages, with addresses I know are good. 
 
 As for the error code, you're right, it does tell me 
 something, but not a
 lot. I know what the various codes mean, but it's not that 
 useful without
 some context. For example, 500 is Syntax error, command 
 unrecognized. What
 was the command that was unrecognized? 
 
 So, let me further define my question. What I am looking for 
 is information
 on exactly what failed. On another SMTP engine (Lyris) I 
 admin, I get an
 error message that has enough information to give me some 
 idea of what went
 wrong. Something like this is what I'm looking for (some personal info
 stripped).
 
 Here is additional information about this error:
 
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Name:  
 List:  japanforum
 Cause: Mail is undeliverable after 3 attempts.
 
 To delete this member, send the following two line message to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
login (enter your password here)
delete japanforum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ---
 
 Mail Transaction log:
 
 -- Sending email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -- DNS lookup succeeded, found 12 acceptable mail servers 
 for hotmail.com
 -- Attempting to connect to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.254.129 25)
 -- [connection refused]
 -- Connection refused to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.254.129 25)
 -- Attempting to connect to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.252.99 25)
 -- Connected to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.252.99 25)
 -- 220 mc5-f19 Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 
 5.0.2195.5600 ready
 at  Sun, 7 Sep 2003 02:10:35 -0700 
 -- HELO 192.168.2.99
 -- 250 mc5-f19 Hello [204.201.190.99]
 -- MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -- 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
 -- RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -- 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
 -- QUIT
 
 With this, I can see exactly what went wrong, and if it's 
 something that I
 should take a look at or not. So, where can I get this type 
 of information
 for a failed message in Exchange? I've check the log file 
 specified in the
 default SMTP virtual server, but only appears to contain 
 source/dest IP
 addresses.
 
 Thanks,
 Erick
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:33 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Message failure
  
  
  Erick,
  
  The message is actually very informative.  Three things:
  1.  Did you actually look at where you were trying to send it? 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Shouldn't that be @nbr.ORG?
  2.  The system is telling you it couldn't deliver the
  message and is
  giving you a code to look up.
  3.  Did you Google the following terms email delivery codes?
  
  Here is a link you may want to bookmark:
  
  http://www.mailsbroadcast.com/email.boltsnuts/smtp.codes.comm
  and.group.htm
  (may wrap)
  
  You really need to start doing your own research and being a
  little more
  descriptive in not only your problem, but the layout of your 
  system and what
  you have done to try and fix the problem to this point.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:01 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Message failure
  
  
  Hello,
  
  I'm fairly new at working with Exchange. I'm having a problem
  with sending
  mail from my account. With almost every message (but not 
  every one), I get
  an error. The problem is, the message that Exchange sends 
  back to me is all
  but useless, I can't find any other references to the error. 
  How can I dig
  into this and find out what happened? I've check the event 
 log with no
  success.
  
  Thanks,
  Erick
  
  
  Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
  
Subject:  FW: Budget
Sent: 9/8/2003 11:59 AM
  
  The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 9/8/2003 11:59 AM
  The e-mail system was unable to deliver the
  message, but did not
  report a specific reason.  Check the address and try again.  
  If it still
  fails, contact your system administrator.
  dc.nbr.lan #5.0.0
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   

RE: Message failure

[Guy Swartwood]

To telnet to a host on a different port:

telnet host port

telnet localhost 25

Guy Swartwood
Kopatich Enterprises

-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message failure


I have, but I must admit not for some time. It seems like the telnet
built into Windows 2000 won't allow a connection to any other port then
23. I could download another client, but I haven't needed to for some
time. Why do you ask?

Erick


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Message failure

[Blunt, James H (Jim)]

Because if you telnet to the mail server on port 25 and send your mail
manually, then you will be able to see exactly where it fails in the sending
process.

-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message failure


I have, but I must admit not for some time. It seems like the telnet built
into Windows 2000 won't allow a connection to any other port then 23. I
could download another client, but I haven't needed to for some time. Why do
you ask?

Erick

 -Original Message-
 From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:38 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Message failure
 
 
 Erick,
 
 Have you attempted to Telnet anywhere and send mail manually?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:12 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Message failure
 
 
 That was a bad example, as it was a mistake on my part.
 However, I am still
 getting a lot of the error messages, with addresses I know are good. 
 
 As for the error code, you're right, it does tell me
 something, but not a
 lot. I know what the various codes mean, but it's not that 
 useful without
 some context. For example, 500 is Syntax error, command 
 unrecognized. What
 was the command that was unrecognized? 
 
 So, let me further define my question. What I am looking for
 is information
 on exactly what failed. On another SMTP engine (Lyris) I 
 admin, I get an
 error message that has enough information to give me some 
 idea of what went
 wrong. Something like this is what I'm looking for (some personal info
 stripped).
 
 Here is additional information about this error:
 
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Name:  
 List:  japanforum
 Cause: Mail is undeliverable after 3 attempts.
 
 To delete this member, send the following two line message to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
login (enter your password here)
delete japanforum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ---
 
 Mail Transaction log:
 
 -- Sending email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -- DNS lookup succeeded, found 12 acceptable mail servers
 for hotmail.com
 -- Attempting to connect to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.254.129 25)
 -- [connection refused]
 -- Connection refused to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.254.129 25)
 -- Attempting to connect to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.252.99 25)
 -- Connected to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.252.99 25)
 -- 220 mc5-f19 Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version:
 5.0.2195.5600 ready
 at  Sun, 7 Sep 2003 02:10:35 -0700 
 -- HELO 192.168.2.99
 -- 250 mc5-f19 Hello [204.201.190.99]
 -- MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -- 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
 -- RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -- 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
 -- QUIT
 
 With this, I can see exactly what went wrong, and if it's
 something that I
 should take a look at or not. So, where can I get this type 
 of information
 for a failed message in Exchange? I've check the log file 
 specified in the
 default SMTP virtual server, but only appears to contain 
 source/dest IP
 addresses.
 
 Thanks,
 Erick
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:33 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Message failure
  
  
  Erick,
  
  The message is actually very informative.  Three things:
  1.  Did you actually look at where you were trying to send it?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Shouldn't that be @nbr.ORG?
  2.  The system is telling you it couldn't deliver the
  message and is
  giving you a code to look up.
  3.  Did you Google the following terms email delivery codes?
  
  Here is a link you may want to bookmark:
  
  http://www.mailsbroadcast.com/email.boltsnuts/smtp.codes.comm
  and.group.htm
  (may wrap)
  
  You really need to start doing your own research and being a little 
  more descriptive in not only your problem, but the layout of your
  system and what
  you have done to try and fix the problem to this point.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:01 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Message failure
  
  
  Hello,
  
  I'm fairly new at working with Exchange. I'm having a problem with 
  sending mail from my account. With almost every message (but not
  every one), I get
  an error. The problem is, the message that Exchange sends 
  back to me is all
  but useless, I can't find any other references to the error. 
  How can I dig
  into this and find out what happened? I've check the event 
 log with no
  success.
  
  Thanks,
  Erick
  
  
  Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
  
Subject:  FW: Budget
Sent: 9/8/2003 11:59 AM
  
  The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 9/8/2003 11:59 AM
  The e-mail system was 

RE: Message failure

[Erick Thompson]

I could try that, but that doesn't tell what went wrong when Exchange
sent the message. There are a number of ways I can send it (HELO VS EHLO
just for example). But I'm not interested in what happened when I send
the message, more what happened when Exchange sent it. I take it this
information isn't stored anywhere? 

The email address that's giving me problems is a listserv on
sourceforge.net. The list remains active, so I have a strong feeling
it's a problem on my end. I've tried multiple messages, and have had
success sending to this list in the past, so I have a feeling (hope)
that this is a transitory error. However, I really don't like not
knowing what happened.

Thanks,
Erick

 -Original Message-
 From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:21 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Message failure
 
 
 Because if you telnet to the mail server on port 25 and send your mail
 manually, then you will be able to see exactly where it fails 
 in the sending
 process.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:10 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Message failure
 
 
 I have, but I must admit not for some time. It seems like the 
 telnet built
 into Windows 2000 won't allow a connection to any other port 
 then 23. I
 could download another client, but I haven't needed to for 
 some time. Why do
 you ask?
 
 Erick
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:38 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Message failure
  
  
  Erick,
  
  Have you attempted to Telnet anywhere and send mail manually?
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:12 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Message failure
  
  
  That was a bad example, as it was a mistake on my part.
  However, I am still
  getting a lot of the error messages, with addresses I know 
 are good. 
  
  As for the error code, you're right, it does tell me
  something, but not a
  lot. I know what the various codes mean, but it's not that 
  useful without
  some context. For example, 500 is Syntax error, command 
  unrecognized. What
  was the command that was unrecognized? 
  
  So, let me further define my question. What I am looking for
  is information
  on exactly what failed. On another SMTP engine (Lyris) I 
  admin, I get an
  error message that has enough information to give me some 
  idea of what went
  wrong. Something like this is what I'm looking for (some 
 personal info
  stripped).
  
  Here is additional information about this error:
  
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Name:  
  List:  japanforum
  Cause: Mail is undeliverable after 3 attempts.
  
  To delete this member, send the following two line message to 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 login (enter your password here)
 delete japanforum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  ---
  
  Mail Transaction log:
  
  -- Sending email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  -- DNS lookup succeeded, found 12 acceptable mail servers
  for hotmail.com
  -- Attempting to connect to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.254.129 25)
  -- [connection refused]
  -- Connection refused to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.254.129 25)
  -- Attempting to connect to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.252.99 25)
  -- Connected to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.252.99 25)
  -- 220 mc5-f19 Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version:
  5.0.2195.5600 ready
  at  Sun, 7 Sep 2003 02:10:35 -0700 
  -- HELO 192.168.2.99
  -- 250 mc5-f19 Hello [204.201.190.99]
  -- MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  -- 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
  -- RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  -- 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
  -- QUIT
  
  With this, I can see exactly what went wrong, and if it's
  something that I
  should take a look at or not. So, where can I get this type 
  of information
  for a failed message in Exchange? I've check the log file 
  specified in the
  default SMTP virtual server, but only appears to contain 
  source/dest IP
  addresses.
  
  Thanks,
  Erick
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:33 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Message failure
   
   
   Erick,
   
   The message is actually very informative.  Three things:
 1.  Did you actually look at where you were trying to send it?
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Shouldn't that be @nbr.ORG?
 2.  The system is telling you it couldn't deliver the
   message and is
   giving you a code to look up.
 3.  Did you Google the following terms email delivery codes?
   
 Here is a link you may want to bookmark:
 
   http://www.mailsbroadcast.com/email.boltsnuts/smtp.codes.comm
   and.group.htm
   (may wrap)
   
   You really need to start doing your own research and 
 being a little 
   more descriptive in not only your 

RE: Using Remote Desktop Connector locks up Exchange

[Ely, Don]

Does it pop up with an ID-10-T error?  I've seen a few people with that
problem on this list... 

-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Using Remote Desktop Connector locks up Exchange

Whoa!  Using Remote Desktop Connector locks up Exchange server for 10 to 25
minutes. (E2K, Win2000, latest SPs.)

Please advise.

TIA

Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Using Remote Desktop Connector locks up Exchange

[Mark Nold]

ouch

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 4:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using Remote Desktop Connector locks up Exchange

Does it pop up with an ID-10-T error?  I've seen a few people with that
problem on this list... 

-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Using Remote Desktop Connector locks up Exchange

Whoa!  Using Remote Desktop Connector locks up Exchange server for 10 to
25
minutes. (E2K, Win2000, latest SPs.)

Please advise.

TIA

Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Delivery to Alternate MX Records

[Durkee, Peter]

Hi All,
I'm a bit puzzled by something and I'm hoping that someone can help out. There's a 
particular domain, seanet.com, that we can't send messages to at the moment. Any 
message sent to this domain hangs in the IMC queue with the error, 452 4.3.0 Cannot 
write message to disk. According to this ISP's support group they've recently 
reconfigured their main mail server so it can no longer receive messages from the 
outside world, and I assume that the error we're seeing is a result of this 
reconfiguration. They further claim that our server should try to deliver messages to 
their second or third mail server, something it definitely isn't doing. 

So here are my questions. Should an Exchange server (5.5, by the way) try the next MX 
record after getting a 452 from the primary server, and are there any settings in 
Exchange that affect this behavior? As an additional philosophical question, does it 
strike anyone else as strange that they should deliberately put an essentially 
malfunctioning server at the address of their first MX record in the name of spam 
fighting and security?

-Peter


__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

[Filipe Joel de Almeida]

Hi folks, 

I'm having a very disturbing problem. My Exchange server starts normaly and
logs no errors, but after it starts, I can't use any client to log in. When
I try to use a previously well working Outlook client to connect, it says:
The attempt to initiate a session in the exchange server failed

I have Windows 2000 server, exchange 2000, Norton AVF.

This is very urgent, so all help will be appreciated

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG

[Ely, Don]

Damn Glenn!  That is some serious BAS(tm) you got there! 

Have you tried disabling the AV software for a start?  Have you considered
SP3 for Exchange?  Are you aware you are vulnerable to MSBlaster running W2k
SP2?

-Original Message-
From: Glenn Corbett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 12:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG

All,

Recently we have been having some strange behaviours with user mailboxes,
such as users being denied access to folders in their mailboxes, rules
disappearing etc.  After running ISINTEG on all stores (approx 20), a number
of errors were found and fixed...all good so far.  After remounting the
stores everything looked fineuntil the next morning when people came
back to work.

A number of mailboxes had suddenly a LOT more mail in their inboxes and
deleted items folders, some users over 200mb worth, which threw a lot of the
organisation over the store limits and stopped them sending and receiving
mail.  We temporarily increased the store limits to cope with the problem,
however we are still at a loss to explain what happened.

After speaking with PSS, they are also at a bit of a loss as well. I've also
checked Technet and other online resources, but no mention is made of this
sort of problem.

- Some users had no effect on their mailboxes
- Some users had lots of mail return to either their deleted items or inbox
(we are surmising that the way the message was originally deleted has
determined where it came back to - shift-delete - back to inbox, deleted via
deleted items - back to delete items).
- The restored messages don't seem to be from the previous days. In all of
the cases we have confirmed, messages deleted the couple of days previous
didn't come back, but messages deleted prior to that did come back.

Has anyone seen this behaviour before and could possibly explain what
happened ? As with all of these things, the people most affected were senior
management, and they are screaming for a satisfactory response.

Config:
Windows 2000 SP2 with hotfixes
Exchange 2000 SP2 - 6 Servers, 2 badly affected, 1 with minor effects, 3 not
affected at all Trend Scanmail installed on all servers
1 Storage group on each server, between 2 and 4 databases per storage group

On the servers that were affected, only one or two of the 4 stores was
affected.

As far as we can determine, either Exchange wasn't properly cleaning out
deleted items from mailboxes (but was reducing the size of mailboxes as
users were under the mailbox limit cap until the messages were restored), OR
something happened and exchange replayed some of the transaction logs
restoring old messages (but in that case all of the stores in the storage
group should have been affected, but weren't)

Thoughts ?

TIA

Glenn Corbett


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Using Remote Desktop Connector locks up Exchange

[Keith Kikta - iLand Internet Solutions Corp.]

Thats kind of rude.

-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 6:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using Remote Desktop Connector locks up Exchange


Does it pop up with an ID-10-T error?  I've seen a few people with that
problem on this list... 

-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Using Remote Desktop Connector locks up Exchange

Whoa!  Using Remote Desktop Connector locks up Exchange server for 10 to 25
minutes. (E2K, Win2000, latest SPs.)

Please advise.

TIA

Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

[Filipe Joel de Almeida]

I just had a new update on this. According to the technician who was taking
care of that machine, this started happening when the disk where the
exchange server is installed filled up. He deleted some unnecessary files
(Instalation CDs copied to the servers disk) to free disk space, and then
got 4 gb free space, but the problem continued.

When I got to the server, and couldn't identify the problem, I rebooted it.
It still doesn't authenticate users... what can be done?

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 0:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Hi folks, 

I'm having a very disturbing problem. My Exchange server starts normaly and
logs no errors, but after it starts, I can't use any client to log in. When
I try to use a previously well working Outlook client to connect, it says:
The attempt to initiate a session in the exchange server failed

I have Windows 2000 server, exchange 2000, Norton AVF.

This is very urgent, so all help will be appreciated

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

[Ben Schorr]

Check and make sure that all of the necessary services have started and are running. 


-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

I just had a new update on this. According to the technician who was taking care of 
that machine, this started happening when the disk where the exchange server is 
installed filled up. He deleted some unnecessary files (Instalation CDs copied to the 
servers disk) to free disk space, and then got 4 gb free space, but the problem 
continued.

When I got to the server, and couldn't identify the problem, I rebooted it.
It still doesn't authenticate users... what can be done?

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 0:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Hi folks, 

I'm having a very disturbing problem. My Exchange server starts normaly and logs no 
errors, but after it starts, I can't use any client to log in. When I try to use a 
previously well working Outlook client to connect, it says:
The attempt to initiate a session in the exchange server failed

I have Windows 2000 server, exchange 2000, Norton AVF.

This is very urgent, so all help will be appreciated

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Delivery to Alternate MX Records

[Dean Cunningham]

IMNSHO their logic is screwed. The MX records work as follows

Get me a list of MX records for the domain seanet.com [done]
Can I connect to highest priority MX record ?
Yes = try and send the email
No = try next MX record

Under Yes, if having trouble sending email , exchange server retries but because 
server can always connect to highest priority MX record, it will keep choosing to use 
that one until the message holding peroid for your exchange server times it out and 
sends the message back to the server.

The people at seanet.com need to block port 25 for their server with the highest 
priority MX record. this will then force the exchange server to use the next available 
MX record.

Whilst not exactly explained see

ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2821.txt
and
http://www.rfc-editor.org

for a 452 error your sherver should be (and is ) reacting as follows

4yz   Transient Negative Completion reply
  The command was not accepted, and the requested action did not
  occur.  However, the error condition is temporary and the action
  may be requested again.  The sender should return to the beginning
  of the command sequence (if any).  It is difficult to assign a
  meaning to transient when two different sites (receiver- and
  sender-SMTP agents) must agree on the interpretation.  Each reply
  in this category might have a different time value, but the SMTP
  client is encouraged to try again.  A rule of thumb to determine
  whether a reply fits into the 4yz or the 5yz category (see below)
  is that replies are 4yz if they can be successful if repeated
  without any change in command form or in properties of the sender
  or receiver (that is, the command is repeated identically and the
  receiver does not put up a new implementation.)

cheers
dean




 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/09/2003 11:28:04 a.m. 
Hi All,
I'm a bit puzzled by something and I'm hoping that someone can help out. There's a 
particular domain, seanet.com, that we can't send messages to at the moment. Any 
message sent to this domain hangs in the IMC queue with the error, 452 4.3.0 Cannot 
write message to disk. According to this ISP's support group they've recently 
reconfigured their main mail server so it can no longer receive messages from the 
outside world, and I assume that the error we're seeing is a result of this 
reconfiguration. They further claim that our server should try to deliver messages to 
their second or third mail server, something it definitely isn't doing. 

So here are my questions. Should an Exchange server (5.5, by the way) try the next MX 
record after getting a 452 from the primary server, and are there any settings in 
Exchange that affect this behavior? As an additional philosophical question, does it 
strike anyone else as strange that they should deliberately put an essentially 
malfunctioning server at the address of their first MX record in the name of spam 
fighting and security?

-Peter





**
 Northland State of the Environment Report 2002
 now online at  www.nrc.govt.nz
**
NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they   
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?

[Edgington, Jeff]

So just script it and schedule it to run the scans... 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sirius F.
Crackhoe
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?



IMHO, it's slow to me, especially when scanning 400+ machines. :)

It's all in the eyes of the beholder. :)

Sirius 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

See I wouldn't call that particularly slow, I don't know if I could put
a
figure on what I would consider slow, but that's the sort of figure that
sounds acceptable, but it probably bloody annoying idf you're sat
watching
it :-)

I think I read something on the shavlik newsgroups about a registry
patch
that increases the simultaneous connections/performance?

regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 08 September 2003 18:17
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
 
 
 
 Takes us about 30-40 minutes to do full scans on 50 machines.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:40 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 
 Could you define slow? I mean hours or ?/machine
 
 From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:07:44 -0400
 
 
 Yeah, that has been our observation as well. We have scanned machines 
 in batches of 50 and it does get VERY SLOW during the scans. Hoping it

 is something they will work on in future releases.
 
 Sirius
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris 
 Scharff
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 The free version is certainly worth the price, but the memory usage 
 and slow response when trying to execute against even the maximum 
 number of free supported servers has prompted me to look elsewhere for

 a solution I'd invest $ in. YMMV
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Posted At: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:45 AM Posted To: swynk
 Conversation: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
 Subject: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
 
 As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it 
 looks quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much).
 
 Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories 
 using it?
 
 regards,
 Paul
 --
 Paul Hutchings
 Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
 Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=
 lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Fast, faster, fastest: Upgrade to Cable or DSL today!   
https://broadband.msn.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

[Filipe Joel de Almeida]

Yes, all the exchange services are up and runing, and the server receives
and sends mail. I have a custom recipient redirecting mail to an external
e-mail, and if I send an e-mail to that address, I receive it in my external
e-mail, so the server is working right. It just doesn't let anyone log into
the mailboxes.

I even tried to use an IMAP connection, but it failed too... I'm getting a
bit desperate here...

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 1:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Check and make sure that all of the necessary services have started and are
running. 


-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

I just had a new update on this. According to the technician who was taking
care of that machine, this started happening when the disk where the
exchange server is installed filled up. He deleted some unnecessary files
(Instalation CDs copied to the servers disk) to free disk space, and then
got 4 gb free space, but the problem continued.

When I got to the server, and couldn't identify the problem, I rebooted it.
It still doesn't authenticate users... what can be done?

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 0:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Hi folks, 

I'm having a very disturbing problem. My Exchange server starts normaly and
logs no errors, but after it starts, I can't use any client to log in. When
I try to use a previously well working Outlook client to connect, it says:
The attempt to initiate a session in the exchange server failed

I have Windows 2000 server, exchange 2000, Norton AVF.

This is very urgent, so all help will be appreciated

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

[Ben Schorr]

Have you done the usual client/server troubleshooting?  Checked to see if you can ping 
the Exchange server by name and so forth?  Can your Exchange server contact a GC in 
your domain?  Anything at all in the Event Viewer?


-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Yes, all the exchange services are up and runing, and the server receives and sends 
mail. I have a custom recipient redirecting mail to an external e-mail, and if I send 
an e-mail to that address, I receive it in my external e-mail, so the server is 
working right. It just doesn't let anyone log into the mailboxes.

I even tried to use an IMAP connection, but it failed too... I'm getting a bit 
desperate here...

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 1:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Check and make sure that all of the necessary services have started and are running. 


-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

I just had a new update on this. According to the technician who was taking care of 
that machine, this started happening when the disk where the exchange server is 
installed filled up. He deleted some unnecessary files (Instalation CDs copied to the 
servers disk) to free disk space, and then got 4 gb free space, but the problem 
continued.

When I got to the server, and couldn't identify the problem, I rebooted it.
It still doesn't authenticate users... what can be done?

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 0:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Hi folks, 

I'm having a very disturbing problem. My Exchange server starts normaly and logs no 
errors, but after it starts, I can't use any client to log in. When I try to use a 
previously well working Outlook client to connect, it says:
The attempt to initiate a session in the exchange server failed

I have Windows 2000 server, exchange 2000, Norton AVF.

This is very urgent, so all help will be appreciated

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

[Edgington, Jeff]

And nothing in the eventlogs?

Did you check the eventlogs on your GCs / DCs?

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 7:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients


Yes, all the exchange services are up and runing, and the server receives
and sends mail. I have a custom recipient redirecting mail to an external
e-mail, and if I send an e-mail to that address, I receive it in my external
e-mail, so the server is working right. It just doesn't let anyone log into
the mailboxes.

I even tried to use an IMAP connection, but it failed too... I'm getting a
bit desperate here...

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 1:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Check and make sure that all of the necessary services have started and are
running. 


-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

I just had a new update on this. According to the technician who was taking
care of that machine, this started happening when the disk where the
exchange server is installed filled up. He deleted some unnecessary files
(Instalation CDs copied to the servers disk) to free disk space, and then
got 4 gb free space, but the problem continued.

When I got to the server, and couldn't identify the problem, I rebooted it.
It still doesn't authenticate users... what can be done?

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 0:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Hi folks, 

I'm having a very disturbing problem. My Exchange server starts normaly and
logs no errors, but after it starts, I can't use any client to log in. When
I try to use a previously well working Outlook client to connect, it says:
The attempt to initiate a session in the exchange server failed

I have Windows 2000 server, exchange 2000, Norton AVF.

This is very urgent, so all help will be appreciated

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

[Filipe Joel de Almeida]

This is a small network (15 computers). The exchange server is the GC.
Everything is working fine. Everybody accesses the server, and the internet
through the ISA server installed there. I can contact with AD. Nothing
strange in event viewer.  Just can't log in to the exchange mailboxes.

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 1:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Have you done the usual client/server troubleshooting?  Checked to see if
you can ping the Exchange server by name and so forth?  Can your Exchange
server contact a GC in your domain?  Anything at all in the Event Viewer?


-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Yes, all the exchange services are up and runing, and the server receives
and sends mail. I have a custom recipient redirecting mail to an external
e-mail, and if I send an e-mail to that address, I receive it in my external
e-mail, so the server is working right. It just doesn't let anyone log into
the mailboxes.

I even tried to use an IMAP connection, but it failed too... I'm getting a
bit desperate here...

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 1:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Check and make sure that all of the necessary services have started and are
running. 


-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

I just had a new update on this. According to the technician who was taking
care of that machine, this started happening when the disk where the
exchange server is installed filled up. He deleted some unnecessary files
(Instalation CDs copied to the servers disk) to free disk space, and then
got 4 gb free space, but the problem continued.

When I got to the server, and couldn't identify the problem, I rebooted it.
It still doesn't authenticate users... what can be done?

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 0:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Hi folks, 

I'm having a very disturbing problem. My Exchange server starts normaly and
logs no errors, but after it starts, I can't use any client to log in. When
I try to use a previously well working Outlook client to connect, it says:
The attempt to initiate a session in the exchange server failed

I have Windows 2000 server, exchange 2000, Norton AVF.

This is very urgent, so all help will be appreciated

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   

RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

[Andy David]

Well, it doenst sound like everything is working fine to me.
Ask the technician who is working on that machine what he changed. My
guess is he mucked something up in DNS or with that ISA server. I would look
through those event logs again. If a user creates a new Outlook Profile can
they resolve the server,do a Check Name and access the Exch box?



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients


This is a small network (15 computers). The exchange server is the GC.
Everything is working fine. Everybody accesses the server, and the internet
through the ISA server installed there. I can contact with AD. Nothing
strange in event viewer.  Just can't log in to the exchange mailboxes.

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 1:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Have you done the usual client/server troubleshooting?  Checked to see if
you can ping the Exchange server by name and so forth?  Can your Exchange
server contact a GC in your domain?  Anything at all in the Event Viewer?


-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Yes, all the exchange services are up and runing, and the server receives
and sends mail. I have a custom recipient redirecting mail to an external
e-mail, and if I send an e-mail to that address, I receive it in my external
e-mail, so the server is working right. It just doesn't let anyone log into
the mailboxes.

I even tried to use an IMAP connection, but it failed too... I'm getting a
bit desperate here...

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 1:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Check and make sure that all of the necessary services have started and are
running. 


-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

I just had a new update on this. According to the technician who was taking
care of that machine, this started happening when the disk where the
exchange server is installed filled up. He deleted some unnecessary files
(Instalation CDs copied to the servers disk) to free disk space, and then
got 4 gb free space, but the problem continued.

When I got to the server, and couldn't identify the problem, I rebooted it.
It still doesn't authenticate users... what can be done?

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 0:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Hi folks, 

I'm having a very disturbing problem. My Exchange server starts normaly and
logs no errors, but after it starts, I can't use any client to log in. When
I try to use a previously well working Outlook client to connect, it says:
The attempt to initiate a session in the exchange server failed

I have Windows 2000 server, exchange 2000, Norton AVF.

This is very urgent, so all help will be appreciated

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:

RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records

[Andy David]

At least they arent picky about message sizes g

220 ingoio.seanet.com ModusGate ESMTP Receiver Version 2.1.258.0 Ready
250-ingoio.seanet.com
250-SIZE 4872
250-ETRN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-X-IMS 5 22
250-DSN
250-VRFY
250-AUTH LOGIN
250-AUTH=LOGIN
250 8BITMIME



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Cunningham
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Delivery to Alternate MX Records


IMNSHO their logic is screwed. The MX records work as follows

Get me a list of MX records for the domain seanet.com [done] Can I connect
to highest priority MX record ? Yes = try and send the email No = try next
MX record

Under Yes, if having trouble sending email , exchange server retries but
because server can always connect to highest priority MX record, it will
keep choosing to use that one until the message holding peroid for your
exchange server times it out and sends the message back to the server.

The people at seanet.com need to block port 25 for their server with the
highest priority MX record. this will then force the exchange server to use
the next available MX record.

Whilst not exactly explained see

ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2821.txt
and
http://www.rfc-editor.org

for a 452 error your sherver should be (and is ) reacting as follows

4yz   Transient Negative Completion reply
  The command was not accepted, and the requested action did not
  occur.  However, the error condition is temporary and the action
  may be requested again.  The sender should return to the beginning
  of the command sequence (if any).  It is difficult to assign a
  meaning to transient when two different sites (receiver- and
  sender-SMTP agents) must agree on the interpretation.  Each reply
  in this category might have a different time value, but the SMTP
  client is encouraged to try again.  A rule of thumb to determine
  whether a reply fits into the 4yz or the 5yz category (see below)
  is that replies are 4yz if they can be successful if repeated
  without any change in command form or in properties of the sender
  or receiver (that is, the command is repeated identically and the
  receiver does not put up a new implementation.)

cheers
dean




 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/09/2003 11:28:04 a.m. 
Hi All,
I'm a bit puzzled by something and I'm hoping that someone can help out.
There's a particular domain, seanet.com, that we can't send messages to at
the moment. Any message sent to this domain hangs in the IMC queue with the
error, 452 4.3.0 Cannot write message to disk. According to this ISP's
support group they've recently reconfigured their main mail server so it can
no longer receive messages from the outside world, and I assume that the
error we're seeing is a result of this reconfiguration. They further claim
that our server should try to deliver messages to their second or third mail
server, something it definitely isn't doing. 

So here are my questions. Should an Exchange server (5.5, by the way) try
the next MX record after getting a 452 from the primary server, and are
there any settings in Exchange that affect this behavior? As an additional
philosophical question, does it strike anyone else as strange that they
should deliberately put an essentially malfunctioning server at the address
of their first MX record in the name of spam fighting and security?

-Peter





**
 Northland State of the Environment Report 2002
 now online at  www.nrc.govt.nz
**
NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they   
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

[Filipe Joel de Almeida]

That technician claims not to have changed anything except deleting the cds
stored in the disks after the server stopped for lack of space.

I tried creating a new profile, it resolved the name in the check name, but
then couldn't contact to the mailbox.

I checked the DNS and the ISA server, and everything is normal.

I don't know if I did well, but I re-applied Exchange SP3, and now
everything is working again (at least I can connect with the clients to the
mailboxes.)

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 2:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Well, it doenst sound like everything is working fine to me.
Ask the technician who is working on that machine what he changed. My
guess is he mucked something up in DNS or with that ISA server. I would look
through those event logs again. If a user creates a new Outlook Profile can
they resolve the server,do a Check Name and access the Exch box?



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients


This is a small network (15 computers). The exchange server is the GC.
Everything is working fine. Everybody accesses the server, and the internet
through the ISA server installed there. I can contact with AD. Nothing
strange in event viewer.  Just can't log in to the exchange mailboxes.

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 1:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Have you done the usual client/server troubleshooting?  Checked to see if
you can ping the Exchange server by name and so forth?  Can your Exchange
server contact a GC in your domain?  Anything at all in the Event Viewer?


-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Yes, all the exchange services are up and runing, and the server receives
and sends mail. I have a custom recipient redirecting mail to an external
e-mail, and if I send an e-mail to that address, I receive it in my external
e-mail, so the server is working right. It just doesn't let anyone log into
the mailboxes.

I even tried to use an IMAP connection, but it failed too... I'm getting a
bit desperate here...

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 1:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Check and make sure that all of the necessary services have started and are
running. 


-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

I just had a new update on this. According to the technician who was taking
care of that machine, this started happening when the disk where the
exchange server is installed filled up. He deleted some unnecessary files
(Instalation CDs copied to the servers disk) to free disk space, and then
got 4 gb free space, but the problem continued.

When I got to the server, and couldn't identify the problem, I rebooted it.
It still doesn't authenticate users... what can be done?

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 0:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

Hi folks, 

I'm having a very disturbing problem. My Exchange server starts normaly and
logs no errors, but after it starts, I can't use any client to log in. When
I try to use a previously well working Outlook client to connect, it says:
The attempt to initiate a session in the exchange server failed

I have Windows 2000 server, exchange 2000, Norton AVF.

This is very urgent, so all help will be appreciated

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Message failure

[Chris Scharff]

Exchange will tell you in the tracking logs, if you have message tracking
enabled. Connecting from the Exchange server as James suggested is generally
faster than looking in logs.

 From: Erick Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:19:57 -0700
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Message failure
 
 I could try that, but that doesn't tell what went wrong when Exchange
 sent the message. There are a number of ways I can send it (HELO VS EHLO
 just for example). But I'm not interested in what happened when I send
 the message, more what happened when Exchange sent it. I take it this
 information isn't stored anywhere?
 
 The email address that's giving me problems is a listserv on
 sourceforge.net. The list remains active, so I have a strong feeling
 it's a problem on my end. I've tried multiple messages, and have had
 success sending to this list in the past, so I have a feeling (hope)
 that this is a transitory error. However, I really don't like not
 knowing what happened.
 
 Thanks,
 Erick
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:21 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Message failure
 
 
 Because if you telnet to the mail server on port 25 and send your mail
 manually, then you will be able to see exactly where it fails
 in the sending
 process.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:10 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Message failure
 
 
 I have, but I must admit not for some time. It seems like the
 telnet built
 into Windows 2000 won't allow a connection to any other port
 then 23. I
 could download another client, but I haven't needed to for
 some time. Why do
 you ask?
 
 Erick
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:38 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Message failure
 
 
 Erick,
 
 Have you attempted to Telnet anywhere and send mail manually?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:12 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Message failure
 
 
 That was a bad example, as it was a mistake on my part.
 However, I am still
 getting a lot of the error messages, with addresses I know
 are good. 
 
 As for the error code, you're right, it does tell me
 something, but not a
 lot. I know what the various codes mean, but it's not that
 useful without
 some context. For example, 500 is Syntax error, command
 unrecognized. What
 was the command that was unrecognized?
 
 So, let me further define my question. What I am looking for
 is information
 on exactly what failed. On another SMTP engine (Lyris) I
 admin, I get an
 error message that has enough information to give me some
 idea of what went
 wrong. Something like this is what I'm looking for (some
 personal info
 stripped).
 
 Here is additional information about this error:
 
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Name:  
 List:  japanforum
 Cause: Mail is undeliverable after 3 attempts.
 
 To delete this member, send the following two line message to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
login (enter your password here)
delete japanforum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ---
 
 Mail Transaction log:
 
 -- Sending email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -- DNS lookup succeeded, found 12 acceptable mail servers
 for hotmail.com
 -- Attempting to connect to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.254.129 25)
 -- [connection refused]
 -- Connection refused to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.254.129 25)
 -- Attempting to connect to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.252.99 25)
 -- Connected to: mx1.hotmail.com (65.54.252.99 25)
 -- 220 mc5-f19 Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version:
 5.0.2195.5600 ready
 at  Sun, 7 Sep 2003 02:10:35 -0700
 -- HELO 192.168.2.99
 -- 250 mc5-f19 Hello [204.201.190.99]
 -- MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -- 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
 -- RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -- 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
 -- QUIT
 
 With this, I can see exactly what went wrong, and if it's
 something that I
 should take a look at or not. So, where can I get this type
 of information
 for a failed message in Exchange? I've check the log file
 specified in the
 default SMTP virtual server, but only appears to contain
 source/dest IP
 addresses.
 
 Thanks,
 Erick
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:33 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Message failure
 
 
 Erick,
 
 The message is actually very informative.  Three things:
 1.  Did you actually look at where you were trying to send it?
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Shouldn't that be @nbr.ORG?
 2.  The system is telling you it couldn't deliver the
 message and is
 giving you a code to look up.
 3.  Did you Google the following terms email delivery codes?
 
 Here is a 

Re: Delivery to Alternate MX Records

[Chris Scharff]

Like most ISPs, apparently this one wouldn't know an RFC if it bit them in
the ass. The relevant portion of RFC821 is included below. If the box in
question was not supposed to accept inbound mail, it should issue a 500
series error. Likewise, listing as an Mx record a server which is not
intended to receive mail is um... something only an ISP would think is a
good idea.

4yz   Transient Negative Completion reply

   The command was not accepted and the requested action did
   not occur.  However, the error condition is temporary and
   the action may be requested again.  The sender should RFC 821
   return to the beginning of the command sequence (if any).
   It is difficult to assign a meaning to transient when
   two different sites (receiver- and sender- SMTPs) must
   agree on the interpretation.  Each reply in this category
   might have a different time value, but the sender-SMTP is
   encouraged to try again.  A rule of thumb to determine if
   a reply fits into the 4yz or the 5yz category (see below)
   is that replies are 4yz if they can be repeated without
   any change in command form or in properties of the sender
   or receiver.  (E.g., the command is repeated identically
   and the receiver does not put up a new implementation.)

5yz   Permanent Negative Completion reply

   The command was not accepted and the requested action did
   not occur.  The sender-SMTP is discouraged from repeating
   the exact request (in the same sequence).  Even some
   permanent error conditions can be corrected, so the
   human user may want to direct the sender-SMTP to
   reinitiate the command sequence by direct action at some
   point in the future (e.g., after the spelling has been
   changed, or the user has altered the account status).


 From: Durkee, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:28:04 -0700
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
 
 Hi All,
 I'm a bit puzzled by something and I'm hoping that someone can help out.
 There's a particular domain, seanet.com, that we can't send messages to at the
 moment. Any message sent to this domain hangs in the IMC queue with the error,
 452 4.3.0 Cannot write message to disk. According to this ISP's support group
 they've recently reconfigured their main mail server so it can no longer
 receive messages from the outside world, and I assume that the error we're
 seeing is a result of this reconfiguration. They further claim that our server
 should try to deliver messages to their second or third mail server, something
 it definitely isn't doing.
 
 So here are my questions. Should an Exchange server (5.5, by the way) try the
 next MX record after getting a 452 from the primary server, and are there any
 settings in Exchange that affect this behavior? As an additional philosophical
 question, does it strike anyone else as strange that they should deliberately
 put an essentially malfunctioning server at the address of their first MX
 record in the name of spam fighting and security?
 
 -Peter


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Delivery to Alternate MX Records

[Chris Scharff]

prezactly

 From: Dean Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 12:41:18 +1200
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
 
 IMNSHO their logic is screwed. The MX records work as follows
 
 Get me a list of MX records for the domain seanet.com [done]
 Can I connect to highest priority MX record ?
 Yes = try and send the email
 No = try next MX record
 
 Under Yes, if having trouble sending email , exchange server retries but
 because server can always connect to highest priority MX record, it will keep
 choosing to use that one until the message holding peroid for your exchange
 server times it out and sends the message back to the server.
 
 The people at seanet.com need to block port 25 for their server with the
 highest priority MX record. this will then force the exchange server to use
 the next available MX record.
 
 Whilst not exactly explained see
 
 ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2821.txt
 and
 http://www.rfc-editor.org
 
 for a 452 error your sherver should be (and is ) reacting as follows
 
 4yz   Transient Negative Completion reply
 The command was not accepted, and the requested action did not
 occur.  However, the error condition is temporary and the action
 may be requested again.  The sender should return to the beginning
 of the command sequence (if any).  It is difficult to assign a
 meaning to transient when two different sites (receiver- and
 sender-SMTP agents) must agree on the interpretation.  Each reply
 in this category might have a different time value, but the SMTP
 client is encouraged to try again.  A rule of thumb to determine
 whether a reply fits into the 4yz or the 5yz category (see below)
 is that replies are 4yz if they can be successful if repeated
 without any change in command form or in properties of the sender
 or receiver (that is, the command is repeated identically and the
 receiver does not put up a new implementation.)
 
 cheers
 dean
 
 
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/09/2003 11:28:04 a.m. 
 Hi All,
 I'm a bit puzzled by something and I'm hoping that someone can help out.
 There's a particular domain, seanet.com, that we can't send messages to at the
 moment. Any message sent to this domain hangs in the IMC queue with the error,
 452 4.3.0 Cannot write message to disk. According to this ISP's support group
 they've recently reconfigured their main mail server so it can no longer
 receive messages from the outside world, and I assume that the error we're
 seeing is a result of this reconfiguration. They further claim that our server
 should try to deliver messages to their second or third mail server, something
 it definitely isn't doing.
 
 So here are my questions. Should an Exchange server (5.5, by the way) try the
 next MX record after getting a 452 from the primary server, and are there any
 settings in Exchange that affect this behavior? As an additional philosophical
 question, does it strike anyone else as strange that they should deliberately
 put an essentially malfunctioning server at the address of their first MX
 record in the name of spam fighting and security?
 
 -Peter
 
 
 
 
 
 **
Northland State of the Environment Report 2002
now online at  www.nrc.govt.nz
 **
 NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL
 
 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
 are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 **
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=e
 nglish
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients

[Chris Scharff]

Is that quoted error message translated from Portuguese? Because a search on
that exact phrase on Google results in 0 hits and isn't one I've ever seen
with Exchange. If it is a translation, what was the original error message?

 From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 00:37:15 +0100
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients
 
 Hi folks, 
 
 I'm having a very disturbing problem. My Exchange server starts normaly and
 logs no errors, but after it starts, I can't use any client to log in. When
 I try to use a previously well working Outlook client to connect, it says:
 The attempt to initiate a session in the exchange server failed
 
 I have Windows 2000 server, exchange 2000, Norton AVF.
 
 This is very urgent, so all help will be appreciated
 
 Filipe Joel de Almeida
 Network Consultant
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=e
 nglish
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Slightly OT: MOM with Exchange Module

[Carmila Fresco]

 
I am particularly interested in knowing whether it can alert you if a
store has dismounted for some reason.

If you're not using MOM, what do you use to monitor exchange then?

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 6:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

What do you mean by something wrong. MOM by default has most of the
Alerts buit in. It is a matterf of selecting which rules you put in
place and configure to the Alerts. My limited experience with the
product makes me want to wait for a promised newer version from MS.
Remember it is a stripped down versionn of NETIQ


From: Carmila Fresco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Slightly OT: MOM with Exchange Module
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 21:51:06 -0700


Is anyone using MOM with the Exchange 2000 module pack?  I'm interested
in knowing how useful it is in monitoring Exchange and alerting you when
something is wrong with exchnage.

Thanks,
Carmila




This email message may contain information that is confidential and
proprietary to Babcock  Brown or a third party.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original
and any copies of the original message.  Babcock  Brown takes measures
to protect the content of its communications.  However, Babcock  Brown
cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third
parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee. 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to 
Babcock  Brown or a third party.  If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message.  
Babcock  Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications.  However, 
Babcock  Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third 
parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]