RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
The people you have spoken to are crack smoking maniacs, not an ISP support team. 4xx is a temporary error. This is an invitation to try again later. This is what you have. 5.xx would be a fatal error; give up sending email bub it ain't going to happen. You'd see this if they'd deleted the mail accounts, blocked you from sending, whatever. To the best of my knowledge the only time that exchange or any other mail system "should" look for the next MX record is if it fails to connect to the first one. Not if it connects just fine and then gets told to try again later or sod off. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 09/09/2003 00:28 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: Delivery to Alternate MX Records Hi All, I'm a bit puzzled by something and I'm hoping that someone can help out. There's a particular domain, seanet.com, that we can't send messages to at the moment. Any message sent to this domain hangs in the IMC queue with the error, 452 4.3.0 Cannot write message to disk. According to this ISP's support group they've recently reconfigured their main mail server so it can no longer receive messages from the outside world, and I assume that the error we're seeing is a result of this reconfiguration. They further claim that our server should try to deliver messages to their second or third mail server, something it definitely isn't doing. So here are my questions. Should an Exchange server (5.5, by the way) try the next MX record after getting a 452 from the primary server, and are there any settings in Exchange that affect this behavior? As an additional philosophical question, does it strike anyone else as strange that they should deliberately put an essentially malfunctioning server at the address of their first MX record in the name of spam fighting and security? -Peter __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED])j¹%Ë\¢o܂&âùr®+)éíz·±r§ë^Æ٨uéZ§X¬ :.˛±Êâm隊[hæ¯yì\ ©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-i٢Ì2G(
CAL for shared mailbox?
Probably a stupid question. Do I need an Exchange CAL for all mailboxes including shared boxes such as 'meeting room 1' 'IT Support' etc? Thanks Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
Don. BAS ? Anyhoo... Disabling the AV software is certainly something that we have considered, however with the current raft of virii going around, its fairly low on the list, and other servers running exactly the same software and hardware config aren't affected. I would need some pretty serious convincing to disable the AV system on the server for an extended period. MS didnt mention / find anything that pointed at possible AV issues, and disabling it wasnt even mentioned as an option by MS. Yes, we have considered Sp3 for Exchange, however with the "feature" in SP3 of changes to the public folder rights (yes, I know it was fixed in a hotfix), we had put it on hold until the rollup came out this month before we applied it. I also inherited the Exchange servers around March this year in their current state, so have been reluctant to do major patchwork on them as the underlying build is not documented. And no, we aren't vulnerable to blaster/welchia etc, as we have the hotfix applied (and applied it several weeks ago), as the patch can be applied to SP2, 3 or 4 based 2k systems. We did get a spot of welchia on the network, but the exchange servers were unaffected. The main issue we have to deal with atm is that upping the storage limits for the organisation to cope with the massive increase in "undeleted" email has overcommitted our disk space allocations in Exchange by a factor of 8-10 times. We are currently working on a "clean" method of reducing the store limits without impacting the user population, and still allow us to reduce this overcommitment. We have a KVS project in the works to resolve this issue in the longer term. We had a lengthy meeting with MS today about the issue, and their recommendations are basically: - Don't touch the current servers that have the corruption (even though we have cleaned them up). This includes performing any patching or upgrades. The reasoning behind this is that running an Exchange SP on the server may force a db upgrade and "pooch" the databases completely. - Install new kit running the latest of everything (Win2k SP's and hotfixes, E2k Sp's and hotfixes) - Do a managed migration of mailboxes from the existing kit to the new kit, running ISINTEG at regular intervals to see if a) the corruption is returning, and b) if it is, to try and determine if its a hardware problem, or Move Mailbox is bringing the corruption along with it. We were planning on doing an Exchange consolidation anyway (6 servers to 3 + gateways), this has simply bought forward our plans. At least the new servers are cool...Dual 2.8ghz Xeon, 2gb RAM, 12 x 72gb drives, and Dual GBit Ethernet *grin*lucky I'm not paying for them. G. - Original Message - From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 9:42 AM Subject: RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG > Damn Glenn! That is some serious BAS(tm) you got there! > > Have you tried disabling the AV software for a start? Have you considered > SP3 for Exchange? Are you aware you are vulnerable to MSBlaster running W2k > SP2? > > -Original Message- > From: Glenn Corbett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 12:54 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG > > All, > > Recently we have been having some strange behaviours with user mailboxes, > such as users being denied access to folders in their mailboxes, rules > disappearing etc. After running ISINTEG on all stores (approx 20), a number > of errors were found and fixed...all good so far. After remounting the > stores everything looked fineuntil the next morning when people came > back to work. > > A number of mailboxes had suddenly a LOT more mail in their inboxes and > deleted items folders, some users over 200mb worth, which threw a lot of the > organisation over the store limits and stopped them sending and receiving > mail. We temporarily increased the store limits to cope with the problem, > however we are still at a loss to explain what happened. > > After speaking with PSS, they are also at a bit of a loss as well. I've also > checked Technet and other online resources, but no mention is made of this > sort of problem. > > - Some users had no effect on their mailboxes > - Some users had lots of mail return to either their deleted items or inbox > (we are surmising that the way the message was originally deleted has > determined where it came back to - shift-delete - back to inbox, deleted via > deleted items - back to delete items). > - The restored messages don't seem to be from the previous days. In all of > the cases we have confirmed, messages deleted the couple of days previous > didn't come back, but messages deleted prior to that did come back. > > Has anyone seen this behaviour before and could possibly explain what > happened ? As with all of these things, the people most affected were senior > management, a
Re: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
Jason, I did find the article in the end, IIRC you transposed some of the numbers in the article ID. IIRC the article is more in reference to a bug in the SIS component, where a message received by multiple users on the same store is modified by one or more users and the size / references are not updated correctly (or something like that). It certainly could be one of the problems we are having, however the level of corruption (in the order of several hundred thousand messages in one store alone) points to something more fundamental. Glenn - Original Message - From: "Kelley, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:06 AM Subject: RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG It wasn't a premier article. I had pulled up the article when I sent the e-mail but now I can't find it either. It's not even on the list of bugs that the rollup hotfix addresses. Basically the mailbox size in ESM is different than what outlook tells the user and when you run an isinteg the mailbox size in ESM is larger, more accurate to what outlook says it is. Sorry I didn't send the full link initially Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG Is that a premier only article ? cant seem to find it on technet. G. - Original Message - From: "Kelley, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 6:34 PM Subject: RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG Check out Q article Q818830 We applied the single instance store hotfix before it was part of the Sept hotfix rollup. When we ran isinteg we had many mailboxes jump in size. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 9:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG All, Recently we have been having some strange behaviours with user mailboxes, such as users being denied access to folders in their mailboxes, rules disappearing etc. After running ISINTEG on all stores (approx 20), a number of errors were found and fixed...all good so far. After remounting the stores everything looked fineuntil the next morning when people came back to work. A number of mailboxes had suddenly a LOT more mail in their inboxes and deleted items folders, some users over 200mb worth, which threw a lot of the organisation over the store limits and stopped them sending and receiving mail. We temporarily increased the store limits to cope with the problem, however we are still at a loss to explain what happened. After speaking with PSS, they are also at a bit of a loss as well. I've also checked Technet and other online resources, but no mention is made of this sort of problem. - Some users had no effect on their mailboxes - Some users had lots of mail return to either their deleted items or inbox (we are surmising that the way the message was originally deleted has determined where it came back to - shift-delete - back to inbox, deleted via deleted items - back to delete items). - The restored messages don't seem to be from the previous days. In all of the cases we have confirmed, messages deleted the couple of days previous didn't come back, but messages deleted prior to that did come back. Has anyone seen this behaviour before and could possibly explain what happened ? As with all of these things, the people most affected were senior management, and they are screaming for a satisfactory response. Config: Windows 2000 SP2 with hotfixes Exchange 2000 SP2 - 6 Servers, 2 badly affected, 1 with minor effects, 3 not affected at all Trend Scanmail installed on all servers 1 Storage group on each server, between 2 and 4 databases per storage group On the servers that were affected, only one or two of the 4 stores was affected. As far as we can determine, either Exchange wasn't properly cleaning out deleted items from mailboxes (but was reducing the size of mailboxes as users were under the mailbox limit cap until the messages were restored), OR something happened and exchange replayed some of the transaction logs restoring old messages (but in that case all of the stores in the storage group should have been affected, but weren't) Thoughts ? TIA Glenn Corbett _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web I
RE: CAL for shared mailbox?
Ummm... You need a Client Access License for every Client that Accesses the server. AFAIK, the client is defined as the machine that the client software is installed on - Therefore if you run multiple instances if client software on a single machine, one CAL will cover it. Similarly, if you use a single piece of client software to open multiple mailboxes/resources on the same server, a single CAL would suffice. As always though - If you have queries about Microsoft licensing (or any other licensing for that matter), for a definitive answer - Ask the license supplier. Nick -Original Message- From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 September 2003 11:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: CAL for shared mailbox? Probably a stupid question. Do I need an Exchange CAL for all mailboxes including shared boxes such as 'meeting room 1' 'IT Support' etc? Thanks Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information in this e-mail and any attachment(s) is confidential and may be legally privileged. This e-mail is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the addressee, dissemination, copying or other use of this e-mail or any of its content is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the sender immediately and destroy the e-mail and any copies. All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. No contract may be construed by this e-mail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CAL for shared mailbox?
CAL = Client Access License, so its geared to the number of clients you have, not the number of mailboxes. As long as the clients accessing the Exchange server are licensed (eg running a licensed copy of Outlook), you should be covered. G. - Original Message - From: "Rob Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 8:32 PM Subject: CAL for shared mailbox? Probably a stupid question. Do I need an Exchange CAL for all mailboxes including shared boxes such as 'meeting room 1' 'IT Support' etc? Thanks Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
Not only are they breaking their email, they are doing it for naught. Spammers often
PREFER to use a target's second or third MX host. That way, their deluge doesn't have
to compete with every one else's traffic.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
The people you have spoken to are crack smoking maniacs, not an ISP support team. 4xx
is a temporary error. This is an invitation to try again later. This is what you have.
5.xx would be a fatal error; give up sending email bub it ain't going to happen. You'd
see this if they'd deleted the mail accounts, blocked you from sending, whatever.
To the best of my knowledge the only time that exchange or any other mail system
"should" look for the next MX record is if it fails to connect to the first one. Not
if it connects just fine and then gets told to try again later or sod off.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 09/09/2003 00:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
Hi All,
I'm a bit puzzled by something and I'm hoping that someone can help out.
There's a particular domain, seanet.com, that we can't send messages to at the moment.
Any message sent to this domain hangs in the IMC queue with the error, 452 4.3.0
Cannot write message to disk. According to this ISP's support group they've recently
reconfigured their main mail server so it can no longer receive messages from the
outside world, and I assume that the error we're seeing is a result of this
reconfiguration. They further claim that our server should try to deliver messages to
their second or third mail server, something it definitely isn't doing.
So here are my questions. Should an Exchange server (5.5, by the way) try the
next MX record after getting a 452 from the primary server, and are there any settings
in Exchange that affect this behavior? As an additional philosophical question, does
it strike anyone else as strange that they should deliberately put an essentially
malfunctioning server at the address of their first MX record in the name of spam
fighting and security?
-Peter
__
This message is private or privileged. If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+x )r뺷yiǶ)٥+rrʸW{j
.+-¦-xm¶ÿÃ
,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\
öªٖy²'µêßiǡ¶Úþ)íÙl¥ªä+-r¿råʸ¬¦W§µêÞÅÈZ{f¡ץjx
b²èº{.nÇ+·¦j)m¢W½ç±r§él³ §Ê&!jx .+-i٢X¬µ§f{0Êy ¢
RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
Not to mention too many places spend mucho lucre on protecting their main MX from spam
and viruses and suchlike, then nominate a completely unfiltered secondary at their ISP
which of course doesn't have all their carefully crafted filters on it.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 09/09/2003 13:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
Not only are they breaking their email, they are doing it for naught. Spammers
often PREFER to use a target's second or third MX host. That way, their deluge doesn't
have to compete with every one else's traffic.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
The people you have spoken to are crack smoking maniacs, not an ISP support
team. 4xx is a temporary error. This is an invitation to try again later. This is what
you have.
5.xx would be a fatal error; give up sending email bub it ain't going to
happen. You'd see this if they'd deleted the mail accounts, blocked you from sending,
whatever.
To the best of my knowledge the only time that exchange or any other mail
system "should" look for the next MX record is if it fails to connect to the first
one. Not if it connects just fine and then gets told to try again later or sod off.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 09/09/2003 00:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
Hi All,
I'm a bit puzzled by something and I'm hoping that someone can help
out. There's a particular domain, seanet.com, that we can't send messages to at the
moment. Any message sent to this domain hangs in the IMC queue with the error, 452
4.3.0 Cannot write message to disk. According to this ISP's support group they've
recently reconfigured their main mail server so it can no longer receive messages from
the outside world, and I assume that the error we're seeing is a result of this
reconfiguration. They further claim that our server should try to deliver messages to
their second or third mail server, something it definitely isn't doing.
So here are my questions. Should an Exchange server (5.5, by the way)
try the next MX record after getting a 452 from the primary server, and are there any
settings in Exchange that affect this behavior? As an additional philosophical
question, does it strike anyone else as strange that they should deliberately put an
essentially malfunctioning server at the address of their first MX record in the name
of spam fighting and security?
-Peter
__
This message is private or privileged. If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+x )r뺷yiǶ)٥+rrʸW{j
.+--xm ,)r( \ٖy'iǡ)l+-rrʸW{jx욇VmyzrŞvi
.+-¦-xm¶ÿÃ
,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\
öªٖy²'µêßiǡ¶Úþ)íÙl¥ªä+-r¿råʸ¬¦W§µêÞÅÈZ{f¡ץjx
b²èº{.nÇ+·¦j)m¢W½ç±r§él³ §Ê&!jx .+-i٢X¬µ§f{0Êy ¢
Shortcuts to other users folders
Hopefully this isn't to much of a newbie question. I do scheduling for a variety of techs, And I manage their calendars via "Open other users folder" under file open. Is there a way to create a shortcut to the respective users calendar? John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- [EMAIL PROTECTED])j¹%Ë\¢o܂&âùr®+)éíz·±r§ë^Æ٨uéZ§X¬ :.˛±Êâm隊[hæ¯yì\ ©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-i٢Ì2G(
RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
BAS=Broke A$$ Sh!t I'd love to come up with more ideas than you or PSS have... Have you all considered an Offline Defrag? It's a LONG shot, but could be something to consider... -Original Message- From: Glenn Corbett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 7:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG Don. BAS ? Anyhoo... Disabling the AV software is certainly something that we have considered, however with the current raft of virii going around, its fairly low on the list, and other servers running exactly the same software and hardware config aren't affected. I would need some pretty serious convincing to disable the AV system on the server for an extended period. MS didnt mention / find anything that pointed at possible AV issues, and disabling it wasnt even mentioned as an option by MS. Yes, we have considered Sp3 for Exchange, however with the "feature" in SP3 of changes to the public folder rights (yes, I know it was fixed in a hotfix), we had put it on hold until the rollup came out this month before we applied it. I also inherited the Exchange servers around March this year in their current state, so have been reluctant to do major patchwork on them as the underlying build is not documented. And no, we aren't vulnerable to blaster/welchia etc, as we have the hotfix applied (and applied it several weeks ago), as the patch can be applied to SP2, 3 or 4 based 2k systems. We did get a spot of welchia on the network, but the exchange servers were unaffected. The main issue we have to deal with atm is that upping the storage limits for the organisation to cope with the massive increase in "undeleted" email has overcommitted our disk space allocations in Exchange by a factor of 8-10 times. We are currently working on a "clean" method of reducing the store limits without impacting the user population, and still allow us to reduce this overcommitment. We have a KVS project in the works to resolve this issue in the longer term. We had a lengthy meeting with MS today about the issue, and their recommendations are basically: - Don't touch the current servers that have the corruption (even though we have cleaned them up). This includes performing any patching or upgrades. The reasoning behind this is that running an Exchange SP on the server may force a db upgrade and "pooch" the databases completely. - Install new kit running the latest of everything (Win2k SP's and hotfixes, E2k Sp's and hotfixes) - Do a managed migration of mailboxes from the existing kit to the new kit, running ISINTEG at regular intervals to see if a) the corruption is returning, and b) if it is, to try and determine if its a hardware problem, or Move Mailbox is bringing the corruption along with it. We were planning on doing an Exchange consolidation anyway (6 servers to 3 + gateways), this has simply bought forward our plans. At least the new servers are cool...Dual 2.8ghz Xeon, 2gb RAM, 12 x 72gb drives, and Dual GBit Ethernet *grin*lucky I'm not paying for them. G. - Original Message - From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 9:42 AM Subject: RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG > Damn Glenn! That is some serious BAS(tm) you got there! > > Have you tried disabling the AV software for a start? Have you > considered > SP3 for Exchange? Are you aware you are vulnerable to MSBlaster > running W2k > SP2? > > -Original Message- > From: Glenn Corbett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 12:54 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG > > All, > > Recently we have been having some strange behaviours with user > mailboxes, such as users being denied access to folders in their > mailboxes, rules disappearing etc. After running ISINTEG on all > stores (approx 20), a number > of errors were found and fixed...all good so far. After remounting > the stores everything looked fineuntil the next morning when > people came back to work. > > A number of mailboxes had suddenly a LOT more mail in their inboxes > and deleted items folders, some users over 200mb worth, which threw a > lot of the > organisation over the store limits and stopped them sending and > receiving mail. We temporarily increased the store limits to cope > with the problem, however we are still at a loss to explain what happened. > > After speaking with PSS, they are also at a bit of a loss as well. > I've also > checked Technet and other online resources, but no mention is made of > this sort of problem. > > - Some users had no effect on their mailboxes > - Some users had lots of mail return to either their deleted items or inbox > (we are surmising that the way the message was originally deleted has > determined where it came back to - shift-delete - back to inbox, > deleted via > deleted items - back to d
RE: Shortcuts to other users folders
Not that I know of. Maybe save it as a web page, but that's it.
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 6:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Shortcuts to other users folders
Hopefully this isn't to much of a newbie question.
I do scheduling for a variety of techs, And I manage their calendars via
"Open other users folder" under file open. Is there a way to create a
shortcut to the respective users calendar?
John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Digital Display Systems.
Alpha Video
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Be excellent to each other"
---End of Line---
.+--xm ,)甠r(ື \檆y'
iǡ⁴)͙l+-r草rW{jxᬵm^zx%᥊S &ޙ^jǞZ崞 2傞G(L\xฬfyb֝) )
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shortcuts to other users folders
Tools | Services | Microsoft Exchange Server | Properties | Advanced | Add |
| {right-click Calendar folder} | Add to My Calendars (Outlook 2003) or Add to Outlook
bar in previous versions.
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 8:12 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
Subject: Shortcuts to other users folders
Hopefully this isn't to much of a newbie question.
I do scheduling for a variety of techs, And I manage their calendars via "Open other
users folder" under file open.
Is there a way to create a shortcut to the respective users calendar?
John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Digital Display Systems.
Alpha Video
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Be excellent to each other"
---End of Line---
.+x
)r뺷yiǶ)٥+rrʸW{j
[EMAIL
PROTECTED])j¹%Ë\¢o܂&âùr®+)éíz·±r§ë^Æ٨uéZ§X¬
:.˛±Êâm隊[hæ¯yì\
©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-i٢Ì2G(
Re: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
Glenn, I have seen this exact issue as well and the SIS hotfix does resolve it (after applying it and then running ISINTEG on each DB). When you run ISINTEG without the fix it will temporarily resolve the discrepancy between the "real" mailbox size and what is reported (thus the sudden mailbox size increases), but it will come back until the SIS hf is applied. > Jason, > > I did find the article in the end, IIRC you transposed some of the numbers > in the article ID. > > IIRC the article is more in reference to a bug in the SIS component, where a > message received by multiple users on the same store is modified by one or > more users and the size / references are not updated correctly (or something > like that). It certainly could be one of the problems we are having, > however the level of corruption (in the order of several hundred thousand > messages in one store alone) points to something more fundamental. > > Glenn > > - Original Message - > From: "Kelley, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:06 AM > Subject: RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG > > > It wasn't a premier article. I had pulled up the article when I sent > the e-mail but now I can't find it either. It's not even on the list of > bugs that the rollup hotfix addresses. > > Basically the mailbox size in ESM is different than what outlook tells > the user and when you run an isinteg the mailbox size in ESM is larger, > more accurate to what outlook says it is. > > Sorry I didn't send the full link initially > > Jason > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett > Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 2:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG > > > Is that a premier only article ? cant seem to find it on technet. > > G. > > - Original Message - > From: "Kelley, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 6:34 PM > Subject: RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG > > > Check out Q article Q818830 > > We applied the single instance store hotfix before it was part of the > Sept hotfix rollup. When we ran isinteg we had many mailboxes jump in > size. > > Jason > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett > Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 9:54 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG > > > All, > > Recently we have been having some strange behaviours with user > mailboxes, such as users being denied access to folders in their > mailboxes, rules disappearing etc. After running ISINTEG on all stores > (approx 20), a number of errors were found and fixed...all good so far. > After remounting the stores everything looked fineuntil the next > morning when people came back to work. > > A number of mailboxes had suddenly a LOT more mail in their inboxes and > deleted items folders, some users over 200mb worth, which threw a lot of > the organisation over the store limits and stopped them sending and > receiving mail. We temporarily increased the store limits to cope with > the problem, however we are still at a loss to explain what happened. > > After speaking with PSS, they are also at a bit of a loss as well. I've > also checked Technet and other online resources, but no mention is made > of this sort of problem. > > - Some users had no effect on their mailboxes > - Some users had lots of mail return to either their deleted items or > inbox (we are surmising that the way the message was originally deleted > has determined where it came back to - shift-delete - back to inbox, > deleted via deleted items - back to delete items). > - The restored messages don't seem to be from the previous days. In all > of the cases we have confirmed, messages deleted the couple of days > previous didn't come back, but messages deleted prior to that did come > back. > > Has anyone seen this behaviour before and could possibly explain what > happened ? As with all of these things, the people most affected were > senior management, and they are screaming for a satisfactory response. > > Config: > Windows 2000 SP2 with hotfixes > Exchange 2000 SP2 - 6 Servers, 2 badly affected, 1 with minor effects, 3 > not affected at all Trend Scanmail installed on all servers 1 Storage > group on each server, between 2 and 4 databases per storage group > > On the servers that were affected, only one or two of the 4 stores was > affected. > > As far as we can determine, either Exchange wasn't properly cleaning out > deleted items from mailboxes (but was reducing the size of mailboxes as > users were under the mailbox limit cap until the messages were > restored), OR something happened and exchange replayed some of the > transaction logs restoring old me
RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
Thanks for your comments everyone. As of this morning, the mail is flowing again so
they must have come to their senses overnight.
That's an interesting tidbit about spammers prefering the alternate servers. I'd never
heard that before, but it makes sense.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
Not to mention too many places spend mucho lucre on protecting their main MX from spam
and viruses and suchlike, then nominate a completely unfiltered secondary at their ISP
which of course doesn't have all their carefully crafted filters on it.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 09/09/2003 13:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
Not only are they breaking their email, they are doing it for naught. Spammers
often PREFER to use a target's second or third MX host. That way, their deluge doesn't
have to compete with every one else's traffic.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
The people you have spoken to are crack smoking maniacs, not an ISP support
team. 4xx is a temporary error. This is an invitation to try again later. This is what
you have.
5.xx would be a fatal error; give up sending email bub it ain't going to
happen. You'd see this if they'd deleted the mail accounts, blocked you from sending,
whatever.
To the best of my knowledge the only time that exchange or any other mail
system "should" look for the next MX record is if it fails to connect to the first
one. Not if it connects just fine and then gets told to try again later or sod off.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 09/09/2003 00:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
Hi All,
I'm a bit puzzled by something and I'm hoping that someone can help
out. There's a particular domain, seanet.com, that we can't send messages to at the
moment. Any message sent to this domain hangs in the IMC queue with the error, 452
4.3.0 Cannot write message to disk. According to this ISP's support group they've
recently reconfigured their main mail server so it can no longer receive messages from
the outside world, and I assume that the error we're seeing is a result of this
reconfiguration. They further claim that our server should try to deliver messages to
their second or third mail server, something it definitely isn't doing.
So here are my questions. Should an Exchange server (5.5, by the way)
try the next MX record after getting a 452 from the primary server, and are there any
settings in Exchange that affect this behavior? As an additional philosophical
question, does it strike anyone else as strange that they should deliberately put an
essentially malfunctioning server at the address of their first MX record in the name
of spam fighting and security?
-Peter
__
This message is private or privileged. If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+x )r뺷yiǶ)٥+rrʸW{j
.+--xm ,)r( \ٖy'iǡ)l+-rrʸW{jx욇VmyzrŞvi
.+--xm ,)盟r(躷 \y'
iǡᾹ)͙l+-r蟉rW{jx酵m^zx%ᩊS &ޙ^jZᑞ2稞G(L\x帬fyb֝) )
__
This message is private or privileged. If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Slightly OT: MOM with Exchange Module
Depends on what your needs are not what I am. Find out what is important for you to monitor then pick the one of many monitoring software packages that fits most closely to your needs. One package does not fit all. From: "Carmila Fresco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Slightly OT: MOM with Exchange Module Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 21:40:01 -0700 I am particularly interested in knowing whether it can alert you if a store has dismounted for some reason. If you're not using MOM, what do you use to monitor exchange then? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions What do you mean by something wrong. MOM by default has most of the Alerts buit in. It is a matterf of selecting which rules you put in place and configure to the Alerts. My limited experience with the product makes me want to wait for a promised newer version from MS. Remember it is a stripped down versionn of NETIQ From: "Carmila Fresco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Slightly OT: MOM with Exchange Module Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 21:51:06 -0700 Is anyone using MOM with the Exchange 2000 module pack? I'm interested in knowing how useful it is in monitoring Exchange and alerting you when something is wrong with exchnage. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock & Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock & Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock & Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock & Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock & Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock & Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shortcuts to other users folders
But make sure you have at least review rights to their mailbox or you won't
be able to browse it ;)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 6:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to other users folders
Tools | Services | Microsoft Exchange Server | Properties | Advanced | Add |
| {right-click Calendar folder} | Add to My Calendars (Outlook
2003) or Add to Outlook bar in previous versions.
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 8:12 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
Subject: Shortcuts to other users folders
Hopefully this isn't to much of a newbie question.
I do scheduling for a variety of techs, And I manage their calendars via
"Open other users folder" under file open.
Is there a way to create a shortcut to the respective users calendar?
John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Digital Display Systems.
Alpha Video
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Be excellent to each other"
---End of Line---
.+x
)r뺷yiǶ)٥+rrʸW{j
.+--xm
,)ഠr(ື \檆y'
iǡ⼼)͙l+-rࠉrW{jx轵m^zx%䱊S &ޙ^jǞZ嬞
2岞G(L\x帬fyb֝)
)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 questions
I am looking for some software to integrate into my Exchange 5.5 environment that will allow me to send duplicate emails sent from any user to their assigned manager. Basically we have several people in the building who are abusing the company's Electronic Communications policy. We would like to track any emails sent from their account to be duped into their managers inbox. I don't think Exchange has this built-in. I do know it has it for incoming mail and I can specify multiple recipients for incoming but not for outgoing mail. Also would like to know of software to create better backups for the Exchange 5.5 environment. Currently if a user gets mail and hard deletes it off the system then it never gets backed up at the nightly run, same thing goes for sent mail. Do you know of software to eliminate that circumvention as well? I know there is software out there to do that... just don't know who makes it or what it is called. Thanks. - Scott Weston - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shortcuts to other users folders
Actually, 'folder visible' permissions are the minimum required permissions at that
level. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 9:37 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Shortcuts to other users folders
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to other users folders
But make sure you have at least review rights to their mailbox or you won't
be able to browse it ;)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 6:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to other users folders
Tools | Services | Microsoft Exchange Server | Properties | Advanced | Add |
| {right-click Calendar folder} | Add to My Calendars (Outlook
2003) or Add to Outlook bar in previous versions.
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 8:12 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
Subject: Shortcuts to other users folders
Hopefully this isn't to much of a newbie question.
I do scheduling for a variety of techs, And I manage their calendars via
"Open other users folder" under file open.
Is there a way to create a shortcut to the respective users calendar?
John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Digital Display Systems.
Alpha Video
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Be excellent to each other"
---End of Line---
.+x
)r뺷yiǶ)٥+rrʸW{j
.+--xm
,)ഠr(ື \檆y'
iǡ⼼)͙l+-rࠉrW{jx轵m^zx%䱊S &ޙ^jǞZ嬞
2岞G(L\x帬fyb֝)
)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
PROTECTED])j¹%Ë\¢o܂&âùr®+)éíz·±r§ë^Æ٨uéZ§X¬
:.˛±Êâm隊[hæ¯yì\
©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-i٢Ì2G(
RE: Shortcuts to other users folders
Once the calendar is in the Outlook folder list, you can also right-click drag it to
the desktop, or any Windows folder, and select copy to create a shortcut.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 6:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to other users folders
Tools | Services | Microsoft Exchange Server | Properties | Advanced | Add |
| {right-click Calendar folder} | Add to My Calendars (Outlook 2003) or Add to Outlook
bar in previous versions.
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 8:12 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
Subject: Shortcuts to other users folders
Hopefully this isn't to much of a newbie question.
I do scheduling for a variety of techs, And I manage their calendars via "Open other
users folder" under file open.
Is there a way to create a shortcut to the respective users calendar?
John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Digital Display Systems.
Alpha Video
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Be excellent to each other"
---End of Line---
.+x
)r뺷yiǶ)٥+rrʸW{j
.+--xm ,)r(⺷ \y'
iǡ⁵)͙l+-rṉrW{jxm^zx%ᰊS &ޙ^jZᥞ2孞G(L\x㸬fyb֝) )
__
This message is private or privileged. If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 questions
Email Tracking = Journaling Avoiding Hard Deletes = Enable Deleted Items Retention Backup software = NT Backup will meet your needs. Backup Exec is another alternative -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 questions I am looking for some software to integrate into my Exchange 5.5 environment that will allow me to send duplicate emails sent from any user to their assigned manager. Basically we have several people in the building who are abusing the company's Electronic Communications policy. We would like to track any emails sent from their account to be duped into their managers inbox. I don't think Exchange has this built-in. I do know it has it for incoming mail and I can specify multiple recipients for incoming but not for outgoing mail. Also would like to know of software to create better backups for the Exchange 5.5 environment. Currently if a user gets mail and hard deletes it off the system then it never gets backed up at the nightly run, same thing goes for sent mail. Do you know of software to eliminate that circumvention as well? I know there is software out there to do that... just don't know who makes it or what it is called. Thanks. - Scott Weston - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 questions
What about messages deleted from the 'recover deleted Items' folder? Adam -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 questions Email Tracking = Journaling Avoiding Hard Deletes = Enable Deleted Items Retention Backup software = NT Backup will meet your needs. Backup Exec is another alternative -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 questions I am looking for some software to integrate into my Exchange 5.5 environment that will allow me to send duplicate emails sent from any user to their assigned manager. Basically we have several people in the building who are abusing the company's Electronic Communications policy. We would like to track any emails sent from their account to be duped into their managers inbox. I don't think Exchange has this built-in. I do know it has it for incoming mail and I can specify multiple recipients for incoming but not for outgoing mail. Also would like to know of software to create better backups for the Exchange 5.5 environment. Currently if a user gets mail and hard deletes it off the system then it never gets backed up at the nightly run, same thing goes for sent mail. Do you know of software to eliminate that circumvention as well? I know there is software out there to do that... just don't know who makes it or what it is called. Thanks. - Scott Weston - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * Note: This E-mail and any attachments may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this E-mail and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and deleting it from your computer system. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
I have some remote users who are unable to connect to Exchange via the internet. They can ping the Exchange server via hostname or IP address. Existing users seem to be ok but new users can't seem to connect. Thanks for any ideas. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
It is likely a netbios block between your server and the clients. With all of the worms and viruses lately I've seen similar problems. -Original Message- From: Israel Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet I have some remote users who are unable to connect to Exchange via the internet. They can ping the Exchange server via hostname or IP address. Existing users seem to be ok but new users can't seem to connect. Thanks for any ideas. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
ok let me see if I read you right here.. you have your exchange server 55 open to the internet...SO a user can directly access it using OL..with NO VPN or other.. just direct??? which means you have 135-139 open to the internet??? (amoung possible other ports??) AND Now these users can't connect to the exchange server with their OL? OR do you mean you are on some type of WAN, VPN ..etc bill -Original Message- From: Israel Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet I have some remote users who are unable to connect to Exchange via the internet. They can ping the Exchange server via hostname or IP address. Existing users seem to be ok but new users can't seem to connect. Thanks for any ideas. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
It sounds like the former. Anyhow, most ISP's are now blocking port 135. So the solution is VPN or OWA. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet ok let me see if I read you right here.. you have your exchange server 55 open to the internet...SO a user can directly access it using OL..with NO VPN or other.. just direct??? which means you have 135-139 open to the internet??? (amoung possible other ports??) AND Now these users can't connect to the exchange server with their OL? OR do you mean you are on some type of WAN, VPN ..etc bill -Original Message- From: Israel Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet I have some remote users who are unable to connect to Exchange via the internet. They can ping the Exchange server via hostname or IP address. Existing users seem to be ok but new users can't seem to connect. Thanks for any ideas. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
I thought the solution was alcohol. - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:30 PM Subject: RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet > It sounds like the former. > Anyhow, most ISP's are now blocking port 135. So the solution is VPN or OWA. > > > -Original Message- > From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 10:27 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet > > ok let me see if I read you right here.. > you have your exchange server 55 open to the internet...SO a user can > directly access it using OL..with NO VPN or other.. > just direct??? > which means you have 135-139 open to the internet??? (amoung possible other > ports??) > > AND > > Now these users can't connect to the exchange server with their OL? > > OR > do you mean you are on some type of WAN, VPN ..etc > > > bill > > -Original Message- > From: Israel Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:13 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet > > > I have some remote users who are unable to connect to Exchange via the > internet. They can ping the Exchange server via hostname or IP address. > Existing users seem to be ok but new users can't seem to connect. > > Thanks for any ideas. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
It is in my book. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet I thought the solution was alcohol. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 questions
Journaling. -Original Message- From: Adam Staub [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:03 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Exchange 5.5 questions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 questions What about messages deleted from the 'recover deleted Items' folder? Adam -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 questions Email Tracking = Journaling Avoiding Hard Deletes = Enable Deleted Items Retention Backup software = NT Backup will meet your needs. Backup Exec is another alternative -Original Message- From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 questions I am looking for some software to integrate into my Exchange 5.5 environment that will allow me to send duplicate emails sent from any user to their assigned manager. Basically we have several people in the building who are abusing the company's Electronic Communications policy. We would like to track any emails sent from their account to be duped into their managers inbox. I don't think Exchange has this built-in. I do know it has it for incoming mail and I can specify multiple recipients for incoming but not for outgoing mail. Also would like to know of software to create better backups for the Exchange 5.5 environment. Currently if a user gets mail and hard deletes it off the system then it never gets backed up at the nightly run, same thing goes for sent mail. Do you know of software to eliminate that circumvention as well? I know there is software out there to do that... just don't know who makes it or what it is called. Thanks. - Scott Weston - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * Note: This E-mail and any attachments may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this E-mail and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and deleting it from your computer system. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
Insufficient data. -Original Message- From: Israel Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:13 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet Subject: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet I have some remote users who are unable to connect to Exchange via the internet. They can ping the Exchange server via hostname or IP address. Existing users seem to be ok but new users can't seem to connect. Thanks for any ideas. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
I believe it should use the secondary MX if it can't connect to the primary. Your problem is because it actually connects successfully and then drops the connection because of their [mis]configuration. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 7:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delivery to Alternate MX Records Hi All, I'm a bit puzzled by something and I'm hoping that someone can help out. There's a particular domain, seanet.com, that we can't send messages to at the moment. Any message sent to this domain hangs in the IMC queue with the error, 452 4.3.0 Cannot write message to disk. According to this ISP's support group they've recently reconfigured their main mail server so it can no longer receive messages from the outside world, and I assume that the error we're seeing is a result of this reconfiguration. They further claim that our server should try to deliver messages to their second or third mail server, something it definitely isn't doing. So here are my questions. Should an Exchange server (5.5, by the way) try the next MX record after getting a 452 from the primary server, and are there any settings in Exchange that affect this behavior? As an additional philosophical question, does it strike anyone else as strange that they should deliberately put an essentially malfunctioning server at the address of their first MX record in the name of spam fighting and security? -Peter __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
Yeah they chose a weird way of preventing people from sending mail to that server. Blocking port 25 is so much easier. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Delivery to Alternate MX Records IMNSHO their logic is screwed. The MX records work as follows Get me a list of MX records for the domain seanet.com [done] Can I connect to highest priority MX record ? Yes = try and send the email No = try next MX record Under Yes, if having trouble sending email , exchange server retries but because server can always connect to highest priority MX record, it will keep choosing to use that one until the message holding peroid for your exchange server times it out and sends the message back to the server. The people at seanet.com need to block port 25 for their server with the highest priority MX record. this will then force the exchange server to use the next available MX record. Whilst not exactly explained see ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2821.txt and http://www.rfc-editor.org for a 452 error your sherver should be (and is ) reacting as follows 4yz Transient Negative Completion reply The command was not accepted, and the requested action did not occur. However, the error condition is temporary and the action may be requested again. The sender should return to the beginning of the command sequence (if any). It is difficult to assign a meaning to "transient" when two different sites (receiver- and sender-SMTP agents) must agree on the interpretation. Each reply in this category might have a different time value, but the SMTP client is encouraged to try again. A rule of thumb to determine whether a reply fits into the 4yz or the 5yz category (see below) is that replies are 4yz if they can be successful if repeated without any change in command form or in properties of the sender or receiver (that is, the command is repeated identically and the receiver does not put up a new implementation.) cheers dean >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/09/2003 11:28:04 a.m. >>> Hi All, I'm a bit puzzled by something and I'm hoping that someone can help out. There's a particular domain, seanet.com, that we can't send messages to at the moment. Any message sent to this domain hangs in the IMC queue with the error, 452 4.3.0 Cannot write message to disk. According to this ISP's support group they've recently reconfigured their main mail server so it can no longer receive messages from the outside world, and I assume that the error we're seeing is a result of this reconfiguration. They further claim that our server should try to deliver messages to their second or third mail server, something it definitely isn't doing. So here are my questions. Should an Exchange server (5.5, by the way) try the next MX record after getting a 452 from the primary server, and are there any settings in Exchange that affect this behavior? As an additional philosophical question, does it strike anyone else as strange that they should deliberately put an essentially malfunctioning server at the address of their first MX record in the name of spam fighting and security? -Peter ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server
Hello, I am currently encountering problems with our Outlook and OWA clients connecting to exchange after a restore of our Exchange 2000 server. After the restore Outlook clients continuously receive a window that informs the user that “Outlook is retrieving data from the Microsoft Exchange server”. We have also noticed that OWA performance is very slow. On occasion messages that are selected for reply receive a page not found. Our exchange server setup is as follows: Exchange 2000 SP3 and post sp3 fixes applied Windows 2000 with SP4 Exchange is installed on a member server A Domain controller is located on the same network as the Exchange server We also have a domain controller at a remote location connected via T1 Has anyone encountered a similar problem? Thanks in advance Roy Anciso --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server
How exactly did you do the restore? From: "Anciso, Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:40:55 -0400 Hello, I am currently encountering problems with our Outlook and OWA clients connecting to exchange after a restore of our Exchange 2000 server. After the restore Outlook clients continuously receive a window that informs the user that Outlook is retrieving data from the Microsoft Exchange server. We have also noticed that OWA performance is very slow. On occasion messages that are selected for reply receive a page not found. Our exchange server setup is as follows: Exchange 2000 SP3 and post sp3 fixes applied Windows 2000 with SP4 Exchange is installed on a member server A Domain controller is located on the same network as the Exchange server We also have a domain controller at a remote location connected via T1 Has anyone encountered a similar problem? Thanks in advance Roy Anciso --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server
We only did a restore of exchange in ntbackup. The same computer name, and ip where configured. We basically downed the existing server unplugged it from the network, reset the computer account and brought up a new server with the same name rejoined to domain and restored exchange. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server How exactly did you do the restore? From: "Anciso, Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:40:55 -0400 Hello, I am currently encountering problems with our Outlook and OWA clients connecting to exchange after a restore of our Exchange 2000 server. After the restore Outlook clients continuously receive a window that informs the user that “Outlook is retrieving data from the Microsoft Exchange server”. We have also noticed that OWA performance is very slow. On occasion messages that are selected for reply receive a page not found. Our exchange server setup is as follows: Exchange 2000 SP3 and post sp3 fixes applied Windows 2000 with SP4 Exchange is installed on a member server A Domain controller is located on the same network as the Exchange server We also have a domain controller at a remote location connected via T1 Has anyone encountered a similar problem? Thanks in advance Roy Anciso --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.517 / Virus Database: 315 - Release Date: 9/8/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.517 / Virus Database: 315 - Release Date: 9/8/2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server
Did you install (re-install) Exchange? -Original Message- From: Anciso, Roy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server We only did a restore of exchange in ntbackup. The same computer name, and ip where configured. We basically downed the existing server unplugged it from the network, reset the computer account and brought up a new server with the same name rejoined to domain and restored exchange. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server How exactly did you do the restore? From: "Anciso, Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:40:55 -0400 Hello, I am currently encountering problems with our Outlook and OWA clients connecting to exchange after a restore of our Exchange 2000 server. After the restore Outlook clients continuously receive a window that informs the user that "Outlook is retrieving data from the Microsoft Exchange server". We have also noticed that OWA performance is very slow. On occasion messages that are selected for reply receive a page not found. Our exchange server setup is as follows: Exchange 2000 SP3 and post sp3 fixes applied Windows 2000 with SP4 Exchange is installed on a member server A Domain controller is located on the same network as the Exchange server We also have a domain controller at a remote location connected via T1 Has anyone encountered a similar problem? Thanks in advance Roy Anciso --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.517 / Virus Database: 315 - Release Date: 9/8/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.517 / Virus Database: 315 - Release Date: 9/8/2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server
Sorry, yes complete re-install of exchange to the same release pack of downed server. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server Did you install (re-install) Exchange? -Original Message- From: Anciso, Roy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server We only did a restore of exchange in ntbackup. The same computer name, and ip where configured. We basically downed the existing server unplugged it from the network, reset the computer account and brought up a new server with the same name rejoined to domain and restored exchange. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server How exactly did you do the restore? From: "Anciso, Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:40:55 -0400 Hello, I am currently encountering problems with our Outlook and OWA clients connecting to exchange after a restore of our Exchange 2000 server. After the restore Outlook clients continuously receive a window that informs the user that "Outlook is retrieving data from the Microsoft Exchange server". We have also noticed that OWA performance is very slow. On occasion messages that are selected for reply receive a page not found. Our exchange server setup is as follows: Exchange 2000 SP3 and post sp3 fixes applied Windows 2000 with SP4 Exchange is installed on a member server A Domain controller is located on the same network as the Exchange server We also have a domain controller at a remote location connected via T1 Has anyone encountered a similar problem? Thanks in advance Roy Anciso --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.517 / Virus Database: 315 - Release Date: 9/8/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.517 / Virus Database: 315 - Release Date: 9/8/2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.517 / Virus Database: 315 - Release Date: 9/8/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.517 / Virus Database: 315 - Release Date: 9/8/2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Relaying problem (not quite sure)
Exchange 5.5. I have relaying restricted to only my internal network. There are a few domains that I had to allow to relay to. Example, system somewhere remote needs to send an alert. The computer connects to my SMTP server over the net and tries to send the alert and hits a wall. I enter in mydomain.com to ignore restrictions and all is well. But the systems manager at the remote site wants the e-mail as well so I enter his domain to ignore restrictions and all is well. Tested it and if there is any other domain in the e-mail list for the alert, the entire thing gets dumped and no one is alerted. This is what I wanted. So back to the problem, I am seeing since last week alot of NDR's sent to my postmasters mailbox that (somerandomgarbage)@mydomain.com could not be delivered. Most of them come from AOL addresses. Now am I being relayed thru? What should I look at first? From my slight knowledge I am secured from relaying because I cannot get a remote machine to relay thru my server. But I know there is always a way. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M: Drive Removal
Hi, If I remove the M:\ drive, because we do not need it, outside of the services stopping and starting will client have any impact? Lost email, attachments, etc. I have not seen anything regarding this but wanted to ask the masses. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Systems Consultant ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive Removal
No. There is no client impact. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik L. Vesneski Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M: Drive Removal Hi, If I remove the M:\ drive, because we do not need it, outside of the services stopping and starting will client have any impact? Lost email, attachments, etc. I have not seen anything regarding this but wanted to ask the masses. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Systems Consultant ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Drive Removal
I think hiding the M: actually helps prevent lost email and attachments. - Original Message - From: "Erik L. Vesneski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:59 PM Subject: M: Drive Removal Hi, If I remove the M:\ drive, because we do not need it, outside of the services stopping and starting will client have any impact? Lost email, attachments, etc. I have not seen anything regarding this but wanted to ask the masses. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Systems Consultant ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive Removal
Alien abduction -Original Message- From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M: Drive Removal Hi, If I remove the M:\ drive, because we do not need it, outside of the services stopping and starting will client have any impact? Lost email, attachments, etc. I have not seen anything regarding this but wanted to ask the masses. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Systems Consultant ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server
The OWA part I can understand as it is acting like a user hits the webserver for the first time. There are ways to speed up. Look at the OWA papers for E2K. The other sounds like a network issue possible. Guessing here different MAC addresses in the switches memory possible cause. From: "Anciso, Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:12:33 -0400 Sorry, yes complete re-install of exchange to the same release pack of downed server. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server Did you install (re-install) Exchange? -Original Message- From: Anciso, Roy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server We only did a restore of exchange in ntbackup. The same computer name, and ip where configured. We basically downed the existing server unplugged it from the network, reset the computer account and brought up a new server with the same name rejoined to domain and restored exchange. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server How exactly did you do the restore? From: "Anciso, Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Outlook and OWA clients slow after restore of Exchange 2000 Server Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:40:55 -0400 Hello, I am currently encountering problems with our Outlook and OWA clients connecting to exchange after a restore of our Exchange 2000 server. After the restore Outlook clients continuously receive a window that informs the user that "Outlook is retrieving data from the Microsoft Exchange server". We have also noticed that OWA performance is very slow. On occasion messages that are selected for reply receive a page not found. Our exchange server setup is as follows: Exchange 2000 SP3 and post sp3 fixes applied Windows 2000 with SP4 Exchange is installed on a member server A Domain controller is located on the same network as the Exchange server We also have a domain controller at a remote location connected via T1 Has anyone encountered a similar problem? Thanks in advance Roy Anciso --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.517 / Virus Database: 315 - Release Date: 9/8/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.517 / Virus Database: 315 - Release Date: 9/8/2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.517 / Virus Database: 315 - Release Date: 9/8/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.517
OT - ScanMail
I'm running Exchange 5.5/4 with ScanMail 3.52. Is there a way to stop e-mails from reaching a mailbox if they have been stripped because a virus was detected or an attachment was blocked because of a rule? Thanks, Scott. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: M: Drive Removal
All Lead Consultants do it. From: "Erik L. Vesneski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: M: Drive Removal Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:59:09 -0700 Hi, If I remove the M:\ drive, because we do not need it, outside of the services stopping and starting will client have any impact? Lost email, attachments, etc. I have not seen anything regarding this but wanted to ask the masses. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Systems Consultant ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: M: Drive Removal
All your M: belong to us. - Original Message - From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:08 PM Subject: Re: M: Drive Removal > All Lead Consultants do it. > > > From: "Erik L. Vesneski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: M: Drive Removal > Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:59:09 -0700 > > Hi, > > If I remove the M:\ drive, because we do not need it, outside of the > services stopping and starting will client have any impact? Lost email, > attachments, etc. I have not seen anything regarding this but wanted to > ask the masses. > > > Thanks in advance, > > Erik L. Vesneski > WCDC Intel Lead/Systems Consultant > ISO - Intel Systems > Ph#: 925-658-6161 > www.pmigroup.com > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. > http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive Removal
There is no M:\ Drive! -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive Removal Alien abduction -Original Message- From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M: Drive Removal Hi, If I remove the M:\ drive, because we do not need it, outside of the services stopping and starting will client have any impact? Lost email, attachments, etc. I have not seen anything regarding this but wanted to ask the masses. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Systems Consultant ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
test
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: M: Drive Removal All Lead Consultants do it. From: "Erik L. Vesneski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: M: Drive Removal Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:59:09 -0700 Hi, If I remove the M:\ drive, because we do not need it, outside of the services stopping and starting will client have any impact? Lost email, attachments, etc. I have not seen anything regarding this but wanted to ask the masses. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Systems Consultant ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PST Problem
I have a user that is a exchange environment. Everytime she uses her local address book to send a e-mail, her outlook shuts down. Also I have a user that has a 1.7gb .PST file, that is corrupted. Is 1.7gb to big for a PST file ? Also is a way to repair that file? Thanks Guy Stewart MyMyComputerguy.com Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: M: Drive Removal All Lead Consultants do it. From: "Erik L. Vesneski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: M: Drive Removal Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:59:09 -0700 Hi, If I remove the M:\ drive, because we do not need it, outside of the services stopping and starting will client have any impact? Lost email, attachments, etc. I have not seen anything regarding this but wanted to ask the masses. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Systems Consultant ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PST Problem
When you say local address book, do you mean a .PAB? Also, 1.7 GB is pretty darn big for a PST. Search the HD for Scanpst.exe and run it a bunch of times. Then retire that PST. They typically start to corrupt when they go over a gig though the limit is 2. -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PST Problem I have a user that is a exchange environment. Everytime she uses her local address book to send a e-mail, her outlook shuts down. Also I have a user that has a 1.7gb .PST file, that is corrupted. Is 1.7gb to big for a PST file ? Also is a way to repair that file? Thanks Guy Stewart MyMyComputerguy.com Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: M: Drive Removal All Lead Consultants do it. From: "Erik L. Vesneski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: M: Drive Removal Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:59:09 -0700 Hi, If I remove the M:\ drive, because we do not need it, outside of the services stopping and starting will client have any impact? Lost email, attachments, etc. I have not seen anything regarding this but wanted to ask the masses. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Systems Consultant ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PST Problem
Guy, Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 7:56:36 PM, you typed: > I have a user that is a exchange environment. Everytime she uses her local > address book to send a e-mail, her outlook shuts down. Also > I have a user that has a 1.7gb .PST file, that is corrupted. Is 1.7gb to big > for a PST file ? Also is a way to repair that file? No but it's getting close. 2GB is the limit (soon to be increased) before you are sure to have problems.. Try using scanpst.exe to repair the file OR check out http://www.slipstick.com for more Outlook help. Run it a few times, pull out what you need and start over. Slipstick is a handy site for Outlook issues. --- Cheers, joeluser Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows NT Clone 5.2 Build 3790 www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
install Collaborative Data Objects package
how do I install the Collaborative Data Objects package which is an optional part of Outlook Setup thanks in advance matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
install Collaborative Data Objects package
how do I install the Collaborative Data Objects package which is an optional part of Outlook Setup thanks in advance matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: install Collaborative Data Objects package
Start | Settings | Control Panel | Add/Remove Programs | Microsoft Outlook/Office | Select Outlook | Select CDO component | Click Next. -Original Message- From: Matt Cowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:54 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: install Collaborative Data Objects package Subject: install Collaborative Data Objects package how do I install the Collaborative Data Objects package which is an optional part of Outlook Setup thanks in advance matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
