RE: The Best Idea
Let me guess, HP.com? All depends on the traffic - ISDN would do... PBB. ~ndi -Original Message- From: Kiran, Murat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 March 2002 10:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The Best Idea Hi folks, 5 exchagne 5.5 organisations being in a short time one new organisation with a new name. What is your idea for an temporary messaging backbone for these 5 orgs with a new name. gr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: promoting E2K to a DC
Thomas, I was not doubting that your response was factually correct, it is. I'm just trying to save the guy some money! PBB -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 00:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC Agreed, however, I never speculated about anything. I merely stated that this message box is generally caused by network congestion and that IF this was the culprit in John's case, to call PSS for the solution. That's why I prefaced it the way I did. Note that he said there are only 25 on this particular server, not on his whole network. He did not say how many users are on the network. I have no idea how much traffic is on the segment his E2K box resides on, or on his network as a whole. He hasn't provided that information. I mentioned what I did because this is known to be caused by network congestion and other connectivity based issues. As I said, IF this is caused by network congestion, the fix is a few registry settings that must be obtained from PSS (unless you are under an MS NDA, in which case you can get the info from MPO). I figured that since I was aware, I would mention it so that if John confirmed the cause was network congestion, he'd know there was a potential solution available for that particular scenario. Tom. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC John has 25 users and I would hate to speculate on what is causing the network congestion! I have 400 users over thirty sites and PSS is not even an option yet until I have checked the cable etc. See my previous post. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 00:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC This is usually caused by network congestion. You can run a netmon trace to confirm this is the cause in your case. If that's what's causing the problem in your case, you can call PSS and get some information for registry changes to tune the length of time that will pass before the message box is presented or disable it altogether. Tom. -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give Requesting data from Exchange server errors to users. All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no avail. I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues. It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and then not, then a nother user will expirence the same isse. I would think it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem, there is no way. Even checked w Prof monitor. 1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space So I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication. So my fix is to promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it. Any reason I should not? Thank You, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4)
Tony, Great news. Have a good day! PBB. -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 01:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4) Hi Paul, Thanks very much for the advice. I did what you suggested and the problem is now fixed. The files involved were mbdperf.dll, mtaperf.dll, perfdsa.dll and msesperf.dll. That's a great relief. There's nothing like disappearing e-mail to invoke the wrath of the users. Thanks again Paul. Regards Tony Hi Tony, Yeah, the sp upgrade is crucial to every file. I cannot vouch for your particular problem but with most probs after an sp this is the most usual issue. I had a major crash last night which got me onto a 23 hour day and two hours of it could have been saved if the admin had actually ran sp4 successfully BEFORE calling me out (still fresh in my mind)! Let me know how you get on. Regards Paul. -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 23:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4) Thanks Paul, I think there was at lease one file skipped when I installed SP4. I will follow your advice and attempt a reinstall shortly. Regards Tony Did you skip any files that the SP update said were in use? You MUST upgrade every last bit. I would suggest re-running SP4, ensure that perfmon isn't running and ensuring that every file is updated. If it stops on a file that cannot be updated then bosh out of the upgrade, rename the existing file and start again. Good luck PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 22:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4) Hi Everyone, I installed Service Pack 4 on my Exchange 5.5 server last Friday and since then all mail users have had a weird problem with disappearing mail in their Outlook folders. At first the mail completely disappears when the user tries to sort it by Subject. It then returns when sorted by From or Received. In a few cases mail cannot be displayed in the Sent Items folder at all. At first I thought it was just user error but the whole site has this problem to one degree or another. Any ideas?? Regards Tony Tony McCarthy Systems Engineer OSI Software Auckland New Zealand Ph: 64 09 522 5909 (Auckland) Fax: 64 09 522 5901 (Auckland) Mob: 021 703035 (NZ) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: promoting E2K to a DC
auto-neg - work of the devil!! PBB -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 16:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC I didn't want him to spend money unnecessarily either. I just wanted him to have all the information I had. Anyway, it'll probably be something silly like having auto-negotiation enabled on the switch. :) Tom. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC Thomas, I was not doubting that your response was factually correct, it is. I'm just trying to save the guy some money! PBB -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 00:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC Agreed, however, I never speculated about anything. I merely stated that this message box is generally caused by network congestion and that IF this was the culprit in John's case, to call PSS for the solution. That's why I prefaced it the way I did. Note that he said there are only 25 on this particular server, not on his whole network. He did not say how many users are on the network. I have no idea how much traffic is on the segment his E2K box resides on, or on his network as a whole. He hasn't provided that information. I mentioned what I did because this is known to be caused by network congestion and other connectivity based issues. As I said, IF this is caused by network congestion, the fix is a few registry settings that must be obtained from PSS (unless you are under an MS NDA, in which case you can get the info from MPO). I figured that since I was aware, I would mention it so that if John confirmed the cause was network congestion, he'd know there was a potential solution available for that particular scenario. Tom. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC John has 25 users and I would hate to speculate on what is causing the network congestion! I have 400 users over thirty sites and PSS is not even an option yet until I have checked the cable etc. See my previous post. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 00:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC This is usually caused by network congestion. You can run a netmon trace to confirm this is the cause in your case. If that's what's causing the problem in your case, you can call PSS and get some information for registry changes to tune the length of time that will pass before the message box is presented or disable it altogether. Tom. -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give Requesting data from Exchange server errors to users. All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no avail. I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues. It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and then not, then a nother user will expirence the same isse. I would think it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem, there is no way. Even checked w Prof monitor. 1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space So I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication. So my fix is to promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it. Any reason I should not? Thank You, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
RE: promoting E2K to a DC
Wishing you luck John. PBB -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 18:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC I am on the phone with PSS right now. NOT MUCH HELP! They are recreating the steps I already took, but I understand that. Before I called PSS, I had extensively worked w/ the Network Engineer on the network layout/connections. Just to be safe we connected the E2K box both DC's and 1 client, to test with, all to a Foundry FastIron II switch. Set all NIC's to 100 FullDuplex and did the same on the switch interface. Also replaced all nics. Still the same issue. Should be fun. I really appreciate all the input. I'll let you know the fix but I'm sure it will be a site specific issue not much help in the future. - Original Message - From: Paul Bouzan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:42 AM Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC auto-neg - work of the devil!! PBB -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 16:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC I didn't want him to spend money unnecessarily either. I just wanted him to have all the information I had. Anyway, it'll probably be something silly like having auto-negotiation enabled on the switch. :) Tom. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC Thomas, I was not doubting that your response was factually correct, it is. I'm just trying to save the guy some money! PBB -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 00:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC Agreed, however, I never speculated about anything. I merely stated that this message box is generally caused by network congestion and that IF this was the culprit in John's case, to call PSS for the solution. That's why I prefaced it the way I did. Note that he said there are only 25 on this particular server, not on his whole network. He did not say how many users are on the network. I have no idea how much traffic is on the segment his E2K box resides on, or on his network as a whole. He hasn't provided that information. I mentioned what I did because this is known to be caused by network congestion and other connectivity based issues. As I said, IF this is caused by network congestion, the fix is a few registry settings that must be obtained from PSS (unless you are under an MS NDA, in which case you can get the info from MPO). I figured that since I was aware, I would mention it so that if John confirmed the cause was network congestion, he'd know there was a potential solution available for that particular scenario. Tom. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC John has 25 users and I would hate to speculate on what is causing the network congestion! I have 400 users over thirty sites and PSS is not even an option yet until I have checked the cable etc. See my previous post. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 00:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC This is usually caused by network congestion. You can run a netmon trace to confirm this is the cause in your case. If that's what's causing the problem in your case, you can call PSS and get some information for registry changes to tune the length of time that will pass before the message box is presented or disable it altogether. Tom. -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give Requesting data from Exchange server errors to users. All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no avail. I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues. It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and then not, then a nother user will expirence the same isse. I would think it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem, there is no way. Even checked w Prof monitor. 1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space So I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication. So my fix is to promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it. Any reason I should not? Thank You, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
RE: NDR's (was content)
Those drugs must be the purest ever! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 18:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) Chim-Chimie-ry Chim-Chimie-ry Chim-Chim-Churoo No mx, no mx, no mx for you. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR's (was content) There ain't no mx records for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. No mx records = no mailhost for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR's (was content) when I do local resolving it gives me these: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: INTAS Young Scientist Fellowship YSF 00-204 Type D Prolongation Sent: 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. mailserver.intas.be #5.4.0 Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Duplicate messages public folder
Tony, If a user opens an item in a PF and 'sends' it back then you will get a duplicate. If changes are supposed to be made to the item in the PF then the correct way to update the entry is to Save it and duplicate problem will not happen. OTOH it could be that your PF home server is having a bad day and thinking it should be homing in more than one location - have seen it before. Simply reinstate the 'correct' home server (if it displays the correct servername, select another and then reselect the correct name), then make a change to another property and change that back again to enable the Apply button. Apply and OK should fix it. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 21:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Duplicate messages public folder Hi Everyone, I'm having an odd thing happen. Posts to one of our public folders will show up twice. This does not happen consistently. There may be one or half a dozen duplicates on one day then no duplicates for several days. This doesn't look like any sort of user error. I haven't found any kb articles that have been of any help. I'd appreciate any suggestions that you folks might have. I've got Exchange 5.5 SP4 and run Outlook 98 as the client. Thanks Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permissions Problem on a Mailbox
Erm, the permissions tab! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 21:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permissions Problem on a Mailbox Ok now I'm feeling REALLY stupid... User permission from exchange admin... I know where to change it from within Outlook, but where do you change it in Exchange Administor? Thanks, Aaron -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permissions Problem on a Mailbox Have you granted user permission to this mailbox (from Exchange admin) for all the users who will be logging in? -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Permissions Problem on a Mailbox Hi, I have a mailbox on an Exchange 5.5 SP4 WinNT 4.0 SP6a server that is being stubborn. It has a rule in it to redirect messages to certain people. I have given owner permissions to 3 people at the mailbox level and at the inbox level. They are running Outlook 2000. If they click file, open, other user's folders and choose the mailbox and inbox, they can open up that folder fine. If they create a separate profile for the mailbox and try to log into it with their login credentials, it gives them Unable to open your default e-mail folders. You do not have permission to log on. I have set owner permissions for them on every folder underneath the mailbox and waited for a couple hours. I have checked out Q244523 and it hasn't helped either. Any ideas? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange over ISDN
You need to configure the ISDN as a virtual modem (using the elsa terminology, sorry) and then get the ex dialup to use this. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Arshad Rafat Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 06:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange over ISDN We have a ISDN connection, which is connected to a router, I need to know, what to configure in exchange 2000 to send and receive mail through the ISDN, instead of normal dial up. I'll appreciate any help in this regard. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange over ISDN
ARGH! - I missed the fact you are using a router! -- What router (please say Cisco x)?? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Arshad Rafat Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 06:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange over ISDN We have a ISDN connection, which is connected to a router, I need to know, what to configure in exchange 2000 to send and receive mail through the ISDN, instead of normal dial up. I'll appreciate any help in this regard. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 Inbox problem
I betcha someone else is reading them! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Roger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 15:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Inbox problem I have a mail box that when new messages arive they are marked as read after 70 seconds or so. The user does not have to have the exchange client open for this to happen. This only happens with in inbox. If a message arrives that is forwarded to another folder the message rmains marked as unread. This has just started to occure. No changes that I know of were made on the server. Any suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 Inbox problem
Someone is reading that mail...! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Roger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 18:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Inbox problem I have a user who's e-mail going to the inbox is being marked as read even when the client is closed on his desktop. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction Logs
Exchange -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March 2002 01:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction Logs Reuses what? -Original Message- From: Arshad Rafat Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Transaction Logs Exchange reuses it _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and attachments have been scanned for the presence of computer viruses, but neither Millfield Group plc nor any of its subsidiary companies will accept responsibility for any virus or defect. This email and any attachments transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. They may contain legally privileged information, and may not be disclosed to anyone else. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies from your system. Further information is available at: www.millfield-partnership.co.uk Millfield Partnership Limited is regulated by the FSA. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: promoting E2K to a DC
John, you don't give any indication that the clients fail to connect and/or timeout. I use Outlook XP at home to my 5.5 boxes at work via ISDN. Routing is from an 801 at home to a 3640 at work and I get requesting data (rd) all the time. Nothing serious but just latency - usually only for a few seconds. All pings and tracerts show fine, I can VNC to any box on my wires throughout the UK without problem but Outlook still gives me an rd box quite frequently. I use Outlook XP at work and very, very occasionally get an rd though this is exception rather than norm (hi Norm!). This is just a feature of Outlook XP and may be exaggerating the issue. I would say this is network traffic/DC loaded/client config/bad cat5 more than anything else - not a fault with E2K. It may be prudent to investigate local traffic or client configs to see if they have any bearing on your issue. Regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 20:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC You know the location or what CD this is located on? - Original Message - From: Stidley, Joel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:48 PM Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC How is your network setup? Is your Exchange server behind a firewall or VPN? Do you have a GC close to the clients? Have you done a netmon trace to see at what point the problem is occurring? Joel -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give Requesting data from Exchange server errors to users. All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no avail. I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues. It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and then not, then a nother user will expirence the same isse. I would think it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem, there is no way. Even checked w Prof monitor. 1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space So I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication. So my fix is to promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it. Any reason I should not? Thank You, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POST-SP2 PROBLEM with OWA
Shot in the dark and I haven't got my IIS servers in front of me but is the bit that says 'How many users should this site be optimised for' not set to somehing silly like less than 10 or something...? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 22:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POST-SP2 PROBLEM with OWA Logging in with UPN. Two-field prompt. OWA worked without a glitch for more than a year before we applied SP2. Certainly we NEVER had this problem. SP2 fixed a whole bunch of important things but it sucks that it seems to have introduced this problem. I restarted the server last Friday and it worked fine until late this afternoon - started doing the same thing, rejecting the password. It prompts three times, then displays UNAUTHORIZED as if you entered a wrong password. I use http://servername/exchange Actually, I even tried going directly to the server's console, the IIS Manager and right-clicking on Default Web Site/Exchange and choosing Browse. Stopping/starting the Default Web Site does not help Stopping/starting the WWW service does not help I restarted the IIS Admin service (which bounced everything else) and that helped. I have a feeling that the server starts behaving this way after too many hits. In the middle of the day it has close to 500 active concurrent connections. But on the other hand, the CPU and Memory do not show any signs of stress at all. No errors or warnings in the Event logs. Andrey Fyodorov Senior Exchange Administrator iNNERHOST http://www.innerhost.com -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POST-SP2 PROBLEM with OWA Are you getting prompting with a 2 or 3 tier prompt? If this is the default website, can you get to http://servername? Are you logging in with the UPN name or domain\username and password? I think we need a little more information as to what exactly you are seeing in the browser? If it prompts you 3 times for authentication, does it return a 401.3 or something similar? Mike -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POST-SP2 PROBLEM with OWA It happened for the second time today. No errors or warnings in the logs. Simply all of a sudden users are not able to log in. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POST-SP2 PROBLEM with OWA Hello everyone. We have recently upgraded some of our Exchange 2000 servers from SP1 to SP2. Now they run fine for a couple of days and then all of a sudden users cannot log into OWA anymore. OWA is simply not accepting their passwords. We have to do an IIS reset to make OWA work again. Anyone else with similar experience? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4)
Did you skip any files that the SP update said were in use? You MUST upgrade every last bit. I would suggest re-running SP4, ensure that perfmon isn't running and ensuring that every file is updated. If it stops on a file that cannot be updated then bosh out of the upgrade, rename the existing file and start again. Good luck PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 22:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4) Hi Everyone, I installed Service Pack 4 on my Exchange 5.5 server last Friday and since then all mail users have had a weird problem with disappearing mail in their Outlook folders. At first the mail completely disappears when the user tries to sort it by Subject. It then returns when sorted by From or Received. In a few cases mail cannot be displayed in the Sent Items folder at all. At first I thought it was just user error but the whole site has this problem to one degree or another. Any ideas?? Regards Tony Tony McCarthy Systems Engineer OSI Software Auckland New Zealand Ph: 64 09 522 5909 (Auckland) Fax: 64 09 522 5901 (Auckland) Mob: 021 703035 (NZ) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4)
Hi Tony, Yeah, the sp upgrade is crucial to every file. I cannot vouch for your particular problem but with most probs after an sp this is the most usual issue. I had a major crash last night which got me onto a 23 hour day and two hours of it could have been saved if the admin had actually ran sp4 successfully BEFORE calling me out (still fresh in my mind)! Let me know how you get on. Regards Paul. -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 23:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4) Thanks Paul, I think there was at lease one file skipped when I installed SP4. I will follow your advice and attempt a reinstall shortly. Regards Tony Did you skip any files that the SP update said were in use? You MUST upgrade every last bit. I would suggest re-running SP4, ensure that perfmon isn't running and ensuring that every file is updated. If it stops on a file that cannot be updated then bosh out of the upgrade, rename the existing file and start again. Good luck PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 22:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing e-mail in Outlook folders (Exch 5.5 SP 4) Hi Everyone, I installed Service Pack 4 on my Exchange 5.5 server last Friday and since then all mail users have had a weird problem with disappearing mail in their Outlook folders. At first the mail completely disappears when the user tries to sort it by Subject. It then returns when sorted by From or Received. In a few cases mail cannot be displayed in the Sent Items folder at all. At first I thought it was just user error but the whole site has this problem to one degree or another. Any ideas?? Regards Tony Tony McCarthy Systems Engineer OSI Software Auckland New Zealand Ph: 64 09 522 5909 (Auckland) Fax: 64 09 522 5901 (Auckland) Mob: 021 703035 (NZ) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows
Sometimes it's the only way. I keep a couple of boxes ready to go and just swap them out before the user get's their knickers in a twist. Good luck Paul. -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 March 2002 14:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows That is what we are doing right now. Thank you anyway. regards Elmer -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows Yeah, RPC does lie occasionally... I think you are going to have to bite the bullet and reinstall from scratch. This looks like something has set itself in stone and not budging for no-one. Can't you fig up another box and swap it out to minimise the downtime/user's temper? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 15:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows I do not think, that rpc is the problem. According to rpingc I have rcp problems on all machines:( But Files and settings are the same, also on the machine which has the connecting problems. Any more Ideas? It is hard to tell the user that we have to completely reinstall his machine because Outlook is not working anymore. regards Elmer -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows Ah, yes... deleting the profile was the one of the first things I did. Firing up Oulook, it complains that no service is configured and asks me to do it in the 'system settings', 'mail'... so I open system settings -- mail -- add -- Exchange Server then I enter the server name the user name press 'test name' (translated from german). Error 1: Information Store not available press 'ok' Error 2: Exchange Adress Book is not able to connect to the server. (something similar in german...) :( Maybe an RPC-Problem. I am just checking, but so far with no result. Maybe I will check ghost, but what impact has a drive imaging application on Outlook/Exchange? regards Elmer -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows make sure the user is not logged in anywhere first. Go into Control Panel/Mail and delete the Exchange Server Component. Fire up Outlook, it should ask you which type of service you want to run, select Exchange server and fill out dem boxes! Ghost is a drive imaging application - very very handy! PBB. ~ndi -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 13:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows How can I delete an outlook profile? (the user is able to start outlook on different machines...) Yes, we reinstalled Outlook! what is ghost? Everything else is fine so far. The user has a lot of applications and is using it frequently. Thank you so far. Regards Elmer -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows Friggin Lyris... Delete and Recreate the OL profile? Uninstall and Reinstall OL? Ghost? Honestly, I wouldn't use the rebuild except to get Win running so I could pull data off. I have a feeling this is probably just the first of more issues the user will see. -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows Hi list, Situation: - w2k server, w2k clients, e2k, outlook2k - small network, single exchange server, about 20 users. User reinstalled win2k in repair mode and applied sp2. Problem: After that he can not start Outlook anymore. Immediate (_very_ quick) Outlook Error message: 'could not connect to information store'. More info: Outlook works with that user on different computer. User can connect via OWA. User reinstalled Office and Outlook (SP1). Same problem for two different users on two different machines. Everything else works fine. Network is accessible. Question: Anyone had this issue before? What is the cause? how can I
RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows
I don't need to tell you but that is one big false economy. A user down for any amount of time is money lost in anyones book. Even if you keep the spare boxes for anything from DR to testing to training they are not wasted. Why don't you create a ghost image of the base setup and also create a folder with only local/domain admin rights to access (stops the user from piddling about with it). Chuck all those crappy apps into this folder so when you have to zap the box it will carry the stuff that they want installed afterwards (or even install them anyway but hide the shortcuts in a this folder so you can just drag them out into the All Users profile when they need them??) The instant cure to the wimpering noise is a bottle of Admin-Acid (c)PBB 2002 - when applied in useful doses instantly cures the troublesome wimpering that so-affects the overworked network admin. Simply verbally apply it in measured doses towards the affected user who will remarkably shut their mouth and turn towards the ever-increasing 'bar-of-ghost' hoping that you will soon go away. Strangely enough I cannot seem to sell this product as it seems to have a rather positive and permanent effect on the users... Hope this helps... PBB -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 March 2002 14:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows I have had the same idea and supposed it to my boss... He told me something about increasing hardware prices and loss of money having unused hardware... And kicked me of his office. Installing Windows and Office is defintely not the problem but most users have all theese small unnecessary tools, individually configured for their use. But fortunately it takes their time to reinstall. Its just this whimpering noise, which is so disturbing;) regards Elmer -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows Sometimes it's the only way. I keep a couple of boxes ready to go and just swap them out before the user get's their knickers in a twist. Good luck Paul. -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 March 2002 14:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows That is what we are doing right now. Thank you anyway. regards Elmer -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows Yeah, RPC does lie occasionally... I think you are going to have to bite the bullet and reinstall from scratch. This looks like something has set itself in stone and not budging for no-one. Can't you fig up another box and swap it out to minimise the downtime/user's temper? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 15:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows I do not think, that rpc is the problem. According to rpingc I have rcp problems on all machines:( But Files and settings are the same, also on the machine which has the connecting problems. Any more Ideas? It is hard to tell the user that we have to completely reinstall his machine because Outlook is not working anymore. regards Elmer -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows Ah, yes... deleting the profile was the one of the first things I did. Firing up Oulook, it complains that no service is configured and asks me to do it in the 'system settings', 'mail'... so I open system settings -- mail -- add -- Exchange Server then I enter the server name the user name press 'test name' (translated from german). Error 1: Information Store not available press 'ok' Error 2: Exchange Adress Book is not able to connect to the server. (something similar in german...) :( Maybe an RPC-Problem. I am just checking, but so far with no result. Maybe I will check ghost, but what impact has a drive imaging application on Outlook/Exchange? regards Elmer -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows make sure the user is not logged in anywhere first. Go into Control Panel/Mail and delete the Exchange Server Component. Fire up Outlook, it should ask you which type
RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows
I usually keep the CD drive to whack the tough ones that do not respond to my product round the head with... the 12 pack is usually finished by munchtime... PBB -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 March 2002 22:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows Oh yea, and a 12 pack in the server room. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows I would say keep good quality PS, stick of Ram, NIC, and a HD on the shelf. A CD drive is rarely critical. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 8:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows We also do a lot of cannibalizing unused equipment. In my experience though, if your replacement hardware is too old, it just causes more problems. Maybe it's not compatible with the current chipset or OS, or needs a firmware update to work. Maybe it was exposed to some harsh environmental conditions while sitting on the shelf. Maybe the part was always faulty, and the regular user just never thought enough to report it, or thought it was caused by something else. The big problem is it puts the tech in the position of wasting a lot of time trying to get a recalcitrant spare part to work in user's environment while the user breathes down your neck wonderingly loudly about the incompetence of the tech support staff. You should at least have a good quality PS, stick of Ram, NIC, and a CD drive on the shelf. We have 75 employees, so if someone's machine dies, they can often borrow someone else's. If you only have 20, then you could easily not have an idle machine. Jim Helfer -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows We had quite a discussion about this issue. We have very few replacement parts (mostly old computer parts not used anymore). The idea is, if something breaks we order the parts. They are usually delivered on the next day (almost just in time;). We have half time workers so there is always an unused machine around. People share their computers. Yes you are right. The wage for an employee not able to work in 'his' environment for a day is probably higher then the cost for unused hardware. But this is not my descision. We have only 20 employees here and so far hardware problems were allways managable. I am sure after an worse case scenario the management will change it's position. Elmer -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows I have had the same idea and supposed it to my boss... He told me something about increasing hardware prices and loss of money having unused hardware... And kicked me of his office. Of course, he's entirely right. That's the same reason that airlines and motor fleets _never_ keep any spare parts or replacement items around. (g) How do you expect to fix things if you don't have replacement parts. Basketweaving? Jim Installing Windows and Office is defintely not the problem but most users have all theese small unnecessary tools, individually configured for their use. But fortunately it takes their time to reinstall. Its just this whimpering noise, which is so disturbing;) regards Elmer -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows Sometimes it's the only way. I keep a couple of boxes ready to go and just swap them out before the user get's their knickers in a twist. Good luck Paul. -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 March 2002 14:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows That is what we are doing right now. Thank you anyway. regards Elmer -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows Yeah, RPC does lie occasionally... I think you are going to have to bite the bullet and reinstall from scratch. This looks like something has set itself in stone and not budging for no-one. Can't you fig up another box and swap it out to minimise the downtime/user's temper? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Elmer
RE: OT outlook ops
Create the rule and then check the tickbox at the end that says Run this rule now on messages already in the xxx Simple as that! - No script, no cdo just Outlook...! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 10:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops how do I create a rule to check unread messages -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops Kim, Well, you could create a rule that replies to every unread email with a standard message apologising and ask the rules wizard to run it on messages already in the mailbox - but quite why you want to classify yourself as a spammer I really don't know! If she has to reply to them anyway wouldn't it make more sense to lock herself away in a darkened room and start working on them? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 10:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT outlook ops Hi I have a user who forgot to check two inboxes assigned to her and she would now like to send an appology to the about 2000 people that sent emails to those addresses. Is there a way she can automatically send a message to all the mails in a specific folder? She is using OL98. Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT outlook ops
Thats why I suggested she lock herself away in a darkened room to work through them instead.. No point putting off the inevitable.. PBB -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 13:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops But, be prepared for some people to get multiple copies which is going to look poor IMHO. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops Create the rule and then check the tickbox at the end that says Run this rule now on messages already in the xxx Simple as that! - No script, no cdo just Outlook...! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 10:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops how do I create a rule to check unread messages -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops Kim, Well, you could create a rule that replies to every unread email with a standard message apologising and ask the rules wizard to run it on messages already in the mailbox - but quite why you want to classify yourself as a spammer I really don't know! If she has to reply to them anyway wouldn't it make more sense to lock herself away in a darkened room and start working on them? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 10:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT outlook ops Hi I have a user who forgot to check two inboxes assigned to her and she would now like to send an appology to the about 2000 people that sent emails to those addresses. Is there a way she can automatically send a message to all the mails in a specific folder? She is using OL98. Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT outlook ops
Thats settled then -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 13:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops Agreed number one. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops Thats why I suggested she lock herself away in a darkened room to work through them instead.. No point putting off the inevitable.. PBB -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 13:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops But, be prepared for some people to get multiple copies which is going to look poor IMHO. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops Create the rule and then check the tickbox at the end that says Run this rule now on messages already in the xxx Simple as that! - No script, no cdo just Outlook...! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 10:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops how do I create a rule to check unread messages -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops Kim, Well, you could create a rule that replies to every unread email with a standard message apologising and ask the rules wizard to run it on messages already in the mailbox - but quite why you want to classify yourself as a spammer I really don't know! If she has to reply to them anyway wouldn't it make more sense to lock herself away in a darkened room and start working on them? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 10:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT outlook ops Hi I have a user who forgot to check two inboxes assigned to her and she would now like to send an appology to the about 2000 people that sent emails to those addresses. Is there a way she can automatically send a message to all the mails in a specific folder? She is using OL98. Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT outlook ops
Excellent idea. How about punishing them beforehand and making them migrate their Exchange box onto Notes! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 13:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops Yes. We will fire the user and delete the emails. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops Thats settled then -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 13:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops Agreed number one. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops Thats why I suggested she lock herself away in a darkened room to work through them instead.. No point putting off the inevitable.. PBB -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 13:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops But, be prepared for some people to get multiple copies which is going to look poor IMHO. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops Create the rule and then check the tickbox at the end that says Run this rule now on messages already in the xxx Simple as that! - No script, no cdo just Outlook...! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 10:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops how do I create a rule to check unread messages -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT outlook ops Kim, Well, you could create a rule that replies to every unread email with a standard message apologising and ask the rules wizard to run it on messages already in the mailbox - but quite why you want to classify yourself as a spammer I really don't know! If she has to reply to them anyway wouldn't it make more sense to lock herself away in a darkened room and start working on them? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 10:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT outlook ops Hi I have a user who forgot to check two inboxes assigned to her and she would now like to send an appology to the about 2000 people that sent emails to those addresses. Is there a way she can automatically send a message to all the mails in a specific folder? She is using OL98. Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows
make sure the user is not logged in anywhere first. Go into Control Panel/Mail and delete the Exchange Server Component. Fire up Outlook, it should ask you which type of service you want to run, select Exchange server and fill out dem boxes! Ghost is a drive imaging application - very very handy! PBB. ~ndi -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 13:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows How can I delete an outlook profile? (the user is able to start outlook on different machines...) Yes, we reinstalled Outlook! what is ghost? Everything else is fine so far. The user has a lot of applications and is using it frequently. Thank you so far. Regards Elmer -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows Friggin Lyris... Delete and Recreate the OL profile? Uninstall and Reinstall OL? Ghost? Honestly, I wouldn't use the rebuild except to get Win running so I could pull data off. I have a feeling this is probably just the first of more issues the user will see. -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows Hi list, Situation: - w2k server, w2k clients, e2k, outlook2k - small network, single exchange server, about 20 users. User reinstalled win2k in repair mode and applied sp2. Problem: After that he can not start Outlook anymore. Immediate (_very_ quick) Outlook Error message: 'could not connect to information store'. More info: Outlook works with that user on different computer. User can connect via OWA. User reinstalled Office and Outlook (SP1). Same problem for two different users on two different machines. Everything else works fine. Network is accessible. Question: Anyone had this issue before? What is the cause? how can I fix it? Thank you for any help. regards elm -- Elmer Stöwer CyberConsult - Beratungsgesellschaft für Neue Medien mbH Tel: (030) 39 99 05 -42, Fax: (030) 39 99 05 -67 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: late answer YS
Argh! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 14:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: late answer YS Due to a technical problem with the YS ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) address your message was qeued and is now being processed. You will receive a personalised answer shortly. Thank you for your patience, Kind regards, the INTAS secretariat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: late answer YS
Fire = burn or fire = slow painful excruciating toe-nail extraction?? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 14:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: late answer YS I thought we had agreed to fire the user? -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 6:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: late answer YS Argh! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 14:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: late answer YS Due to a technical problem with the YS ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) address your message was qeued and is now being processed. You will receive a personalised answer shortly. Thank you for your patience, Kind regards, the INTAS secretariat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows
Yeah, RPC does lie occasionally... I think you are going to have to bite the bullet and reinstall from scratch. This looks like something has set itself in stone and not budging for no-one. Can't you fig up another box and swap it out to minimise the downtime/user's temper? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 15:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows I do not think, that rpc is the problem. According to rpingc I have rcp problems on all machines:( But Files and settings are the same, also on the machine which has the connecting problems. Any more Ideas? It is hard to tell the user that we have to completely reinstall his machine because Outlook is not working anymore. regards Elmer -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows Ah, yes... deleting the profile was the one of the first things I did. Firing up Oulook, it complains that no service is configured and asks me to do it in the 'system settings', 'mail'... so I open system settings -- mail -- add -- Exchange Server then I enter the server name the user name press 'test name' (translated from german). Error 1: Information Store not available press 'ok' Error 2: Exchange Adress Book is not able to connect to the server. (something similar in german...) :( Maybe an RPC-Problem. I am just checking, but so far with no result. Maybe I will check ghost, but what impact has a drive imaging application on Outlook/Exchange? regards Elmer -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows make sure the user is not logged in anywhere first. Go into Control Panel/Mail and delete the Exchange Server Component. Fire up Outlook, it should ask you which type of service you want to run, select Exchange server and fill out dem boxes! Ghost is a drive imaging application - very very handy! PBB. ~ndi -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 13:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows How can I delete an outlook profile? (the user is able to start outlook on different machines...) Yes, we reinstalled Outlook! what is ghost? Everything else is fine so far. The user has a lot of applications and is using it frequently. Thank you so far. Regards Elmer -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows Friggin Lyris... Delete and Recreate the OL profile? Uninstall and Reinstall OL? Ghost? Honestly, I wouldn't use the rebuild except to get Win running so I could pull data off. I have a feeling this is probably just the first of more issues the user will see. -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with Outlook after repairing windows Hi list, Situation: - w2k server, w2k clients, e2k, outlook2k - small network, single exchange server, about 20 users. User reinstalled win2k in repair mode and applied sp2. Problem: After that he can not start Outlook anymore. Immediate (_very_ quick) Outlook Error message: 'could not connect to information store'. More info: Outlook works with that user on different computer. User can connect via OWA. User reinstalled Office and Outlook (SP1). Same problem for two different users on two different machines. Everything else works fine. Network is accessible. Question: Anyone had this issue before? What is the cause? how can I fix it? Thank you for any help. regards elm -- Elmer Stöwer CyberConsult - Beratungsgesellschaft für Neue Medien mbH Tel: (030) 39 99 05 -42, Fax: (030) 39 99 05 -67 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: FREE HOT XXX EMAIL ADMINS!!! ADULTS ONLY!!!
Hehe! - Mine didn't either. But then it does a great job of catching every other email from our Co's solicitors to the chief executive with legal guff in them!! Friggin' Mimesweeper! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 18:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: FREE HOT XXX EMAIL ADMINS!!! ADULTS ONLY!!! It was doubled over laughing? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: FREE HOT XXX EMAIL ADMINS!!! ADULTS ONLY!!! Why didn't my anti-spammer catch this? :) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: FREE HOT XXX EMAIL ADMINS!!! ADULTS ONLY!!! My dog ate them.. Sorry. Who wants to follow him around with the baggy? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: FREE HOT XXX EMAIL ADMINS!!! ADULTS ONLY!!! Alright, who hid Chris's medications? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOF replies to the Internet
OOF's only fire one per sender - internally or externally. It's the allowing automatic replies to the Internet that causes the mail loops as these do not discriminate. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 20:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet I don't mind autoreply. I dislike OOF though. -Original Message- From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOF replies to the Internet Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet. How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally? Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD. True? Thanks! Rob Sargent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why did I loose my forms...?
OK, so I managed to sucessfully move my ageing first 5.5 box over to a new - much rather well-endowed DL380 using the Ed C move server method, thanks Ed! The only thing that wouldn't play ball was the org forms. OK, so I only had a couple in there but they didn't go over even after allowing a week for replication and all that. I've re-created them now but would anyone know why they didn't make the leap? Every instruction was/has been followed to the letter and this was the only problem. PBB. ~ndi p.s. Ed, are you still using pliers as a shower regulator? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS Diagnostics Logging Path?
The path on NT4 is Start/programs/admin tools/event log!! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Pelfrey, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 January 2002 14:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMS Diagnostics Logging Path? All, I've searched and can't find any doc that tells me what the path is for the Diagnostic log? I've got to kick up the logging level to troubleshoot some issues and need to know where to find them, and if I can redirect them to another desired path (mapped drive) _ Paul E. Pelfrey MCSE, MCP, A+ NT/Citrix/Exchange Admin, The Scotts Company 14111 Scottslawn Road, Marysville, OH 43040 **: 937.644.7036 **: 614.496.7174 Mobile * [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Could not open one or more attatchments.
I had this issue when I prevented the Internet History folder from roaming with the profile. Couldn't tell you why this folder is needed for the opening of attachments other than a temporary storage area I suppose but re-enabled it and all was well. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Jake Wallendal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 January 2002 16:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Could not open one or more attatchments. We are getting this alot now. If you click OK the e-mail opens without the attatchments. If you close the e-mail and re-open it, everything is there. Any ideas of what I need to do to stop this. This is happening on mailboxes and .pst's. Jake. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Could not open one or more attatchments.
OK, but the symptoms are very much the same. Have you set any limits on the profile sizes? (p.s. - Don't chop the thread off - this enables others to add comment without having to scan back through the messages) PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Jake Wallendal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 January 2002 16:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Could not open one or more attatchments. We havent stopped that on our roaming profiles. This only is happening to some individuals with the number increasing quickly. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RAM
Stick 'em in a spare PC and see what the BIOS reports...? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RAM Check this site out for deciphering the RAM markings... http://www.arstechnica.com/paedia/r/ram_id-1.html Larry Josefowski Network Operations Analyst Conectiv, Inc. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: RAM Hi I found a box ful of different RAM slots, how can I see what is what? There are about 4 different types in the box and I don't recognise a single one... Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM Deletion
Ouch! Had a similar issue over xmas but you can add another 0 to that item count CR went nutty on a full hotmail account. Best way I found was to use find files to search for a unique line in the spam and keep on deleting them as they list up in the FF dialogue. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Also, we're Exchange 5.5 SP4 -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM Deletion We've been hit with a repeating message, whether accidentally or purposely, that we are currently deleting from our MTA queue. There are approximately 25,000 of these messages, interspersed with legitimate messages. Are there any tools that will let me stop the MTA and go after messages based upon author or subject to delete them from the queues. Otherwise, it will be a pretty long morning cleaning this up. In the meantime, we've been able to stop further messages at our TrendMicro gateway. Thanks, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW
Roger, I haven't had the pleasure of installing any version of office previous to 2K on a TS so I wouldn't know if anything had to be done via an admin kit or transform file (quite likely the same), sorry. Hopefully someone else on the list might be able to shed some light on the matter. If previous versions have to be transformed to work with TS then we might have some more luck... I would look into Dominic's suggestion of the profiles possibly having an effect as this may help. Regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Paul, Thanks for this; I avoided O2K as it needs the admin kit (is that the name) to install on TS but Outlook98 installs apparently OK. The symptoms you describe are very similar. When you say 'transformed', what are you referring to? Cheers, Roger -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 12:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Was Outlook Transformed to work with TS? We use W2K AS with TS to provide our Accounts with the means to run a legacy Access database that has grown so fat it needs a dual 1Gig + 512Mb RAM to process the queries (yes, I know - what a waste but the migration to SQL is happening slowly). Anyway back to the point. Fire up Access in a TS session and all is well and good. Fire up Access as an App on the server and it runs like a two-legged hamster. O2K had to be transformed to work with TS - I not know if other office versions need this but does any of it fit with your predicament Roger? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW just did, less than 10 ms. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 10:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Dumb question, but have you tried pinging your server and checking the response time? -Original Message- From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 10:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Folks, Does anyone recognise this bizarre situation. Outlook 98 on a NT4 Terminal Server (hosting a witches brew of other applications to do with telephone logging). MAPI profile connecting an Exchange 5.5 SP3 + store fix. Console auto logs in to run telephone statistics collection and uses Outlook 98 for the purposes of e-mailing reports. If you manually send mail to GAL entries, no problem. If you manually send mail to an SMTP address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) the Outlook process freezes as you type the '@' (this is not displayed) and task manager shows it burning lots of cpu. It eventually returns control. The automated report mailing process by necessity uses SMTP addresses and times out the application. Bizarrely if you check the properties of any of the standard folders they do not display permissions tabs, synchronisation tab etc as if the folders were based on a PST. BUT if you login to the same user via the TS client service, Outlook 98, using the same mail profile behaves completely normally! As this is a live logging service with bundles of bespoke applications I'm completely stuffed when it comes to experimenting with the service. Any thoughts? Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University) ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM Deletion
;-} -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 14:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion OK thanks. Simple is good. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion In essence yes. It may be basic but it works! PBB -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Thanks for your answer. Just to clarify, are you saying to stop the MTA, open up one of the DAT files to find a particular string, and then run Find File against the MTADATA directory in order to search against that string? Harold -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Ouch! Had a similar issue over xmas but you can add another 0 to that item count CR went nutty on a full hotmail account. Best way I found was to use find files to search for a unique line in the spam and keep on deleting them as they list up in the FF dialogue. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Also, we're Exchange 5.5 SP4 -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM Deletion We've been hit with a repeating message, whether accidentally or purposely, that we are currently deleting from our MTA queue. There are approximately 25,000 of these messages, interspersed with legitimate messages. Are there any tools that will let me stop the MTA and go after messages based upon author or subject to delete them from the queues. Otherwise, it will be a pretty long morning cleaning this up. In the meantime, we've been able to stop further messages at our TrendMicro gateway. Thanks, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anti-Spam
Groupshield guards against viruses, Mail Essentials (or Mimesweeper or whatever) provides the means to prevent spam etc... PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 04:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I am already running Group Shield. Is it feasible to run mail essential as well? -Original Message- From: Denise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Anti-Spam Or purchase a third party software such as Mail Essentials to block as much of the spam and inappropriate mail as possible. - Original Message - From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Make sure you don't relay for them and that's about it. Teach your users well... -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam Dear List, How can I control spammers on my Exchange 2000. Thanks in Advance Irfan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anti-Spam
Irfan, you could run Mail Essentials and Groupshield together but you give no indication of the spec of your hardware so if I say yes and it all grinds to a halt, don't blame me! (Neil, have been using VScan 470 on Mimesweeper 4.2_6 and Groupshield, and Webshield and lucky rabbits feet and crossed fingers for god knows how long... I might just even install Trend for a bit of extra security, that'll be fun vbg) PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 09:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Don't forget that MailSweeper provides anti-virus capabilities as well as content checking, so one option is to get rid of GroupShield and just use MailSweeper (or Mail Essentials, or even the new Trend offering if you like integrated AV engines...) Neil -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 January 2002 09:24 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Anti-Spam Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I know paul, but question is can I run mail essential on the server running group shield. Is there any performance related issues etc. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Anti-Spam Groupshield guards against viruses, Mail Essentials (or Mimesweeper or whatever) provides the means to prevent spam etc... PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 04:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I am already running Group Shield. Is it feasible to run mail essential as well? -Original Message- From: Denise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Anti-Spam Or purchase a third party software such as Mail Essentials to block as much of the spam and inappropriate mail as possible. - Original Message - From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Make sure you don't relay for them and that's about it. Teach your users well... -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam Dear List, How can I control spammers on my Exchange 2000. Thanks in Advance Irfan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
RE: Anti-Spam
Ah, you got no problems then! -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 13:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Yeah, that's amazing. Anyway I got 1 Ghz Processor, with 1 GB of ram, with RAID 1 and RAID 5. Regards, -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Anti-Spam Irfan, you could run Mail Essentials and Groupshield together but you give no indication of the spec of your hardware so if I say yes and it all grinds to a halt, don't blame me! (Neil, have been using VScan 470 on Mimesweeper 4.2_6 and Groupshield, and Webshield and lucky rabbits feet and crossed fingers for god knows how long... I might just even install Trend for a bit of extra security, that'll be fun vbg) PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 09:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Don't forget that MailSweeper provides anti-virus capabilities as well as content checking, so one option is to get rid of GroupShield and just use MailSweeper (or Mail Essentials, or even the new Trend offering if you like integrated AV engines...) Neil -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 January 2002 09:24 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Anti-Spam Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I know paul, but question is can I run mail essential on the server running group shield. Is there any performance related issues etc. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Anti-Spam Groupshield guards against viruses, Mail Essentials (or Mimesweeper or whatever) provides the means to prevent spam etc... PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 04:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anti-Spam I am already running Group Shield. Is it feasible to run mail essential as well? -Original Message- From: Denise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Anti-Spam Or purchase a third party software such as Mail Essentials to block as much of the spam and inappropriate mail as possible. - Original Message - From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: RE: Anti-Spam Make sure you don't relay for them and that's about it. Teach your users well... -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-Spam Dear List, How can I control spammers on my Exchange 2000. Thanks in Advance Irfan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented
RE: MDBDATA Log Files
nods head ~ndi -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 20:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files In which case, I am an outstanding admin. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 9:02 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files A paranoid admin is a good admin. S. -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files Good point. I forgot about perfwiz. Call me paranoid, but I'd still do a full backup before running perfwiz. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:42 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files If you use perfwiz to move them, it will be ok [1]. Especially since when perfwiz shuts down Exchange services to run, all logs will be committed to the database anyways. But yes, a backup ASAP is in good order. I don't recommend deleting the logfiles until a good backup [2]. S. [1] I give Skip enough credit to assume that when he meant move the logfiles he was indeed talking about PerfWiz. [2] Unless Skip is using circular logging [3], in which case it doesn't really matter. [3] *GASP* -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I wouldn't move them. Exchange expects to find them in the place they are. Get a full backup done asap. Do it now -Original Message- From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:30 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I do a full backup every night but had a bad tape so the log files did not get deleted and the server came to a halt. I only have a 2gb partition for these files. I'll see about moving them to a different partition. I just did not know what was considered normal. Thanks to all who replied, Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, Goulding -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files 5-10 minutes? That's terrible! It should be every 12 minutes! Those are transaction logs. They are created as email traffic is created. Someone sends that 100MB mpeg of Scharff in a pink dress (you know the one!) then the transaction logs will be created a little faster than that... William -Original Message- From: Skip Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MDBDATA Log Files How often should Exchange be writing MDBDATA log files? Our Exchange server appears to write a new 5mb log file every 5 to 10 minutes. I searched the FAQs and Archives but did find an answer. Here's our system. Single Server Exchange 5.5 SP 3 NT 4.0 SP 5 550 users Is this normal? Is this a Mail Loop? If so how can I find it? Is some one relaying mail off my server? If so how can I stop it? Thanks, Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, Goulding _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: highlight
How kind :-) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 January 2002 01:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I'm sorry, I realize how over your head this must be. I will try to keep it K-8 for your understanding... -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Mr Blackstone, I am totally disgusted at your flagrant disregard for some decorum on this list. Would you please stick to the subject in hand i.e. Exchange Issues and not some idle banter that wastes our time. Kind regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 21:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Is it XP? Did you SPack it? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight That is the Fifth Bloody time today. I am going home now. Will reformat in the morning at 2am when I get back to fix that blasted router. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It isn't unless you are a server or a female -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I don't see how being hung is a problem. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I have a server I am building right now that is hung. It is at Exodus, so I sent em an email to reboot it. Other than that, everything is peachy! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You have problems? W -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It is total therapy. Plus it is funner to work on others problems than your own. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my work day. As well as a great resource. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously. W -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing you had said on a different day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times. Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type of help I'd give you after a response like yours. W Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: highlight This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay
RE: Ed's Svr Move Method- Exch Svc account Q
Use the existing one until the move is complete and all up and working OK. Then follow the Q doc on changing the service account as it will affect more than just the one server (that is if you have more than one exchange box in your org) Rgds PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 January 2002 21:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ed's Svr Move Method- Exch Svc account Q Ok if I use the Ed svr move meth when adding the new/second server Does the new server with exchange need to use the existing Exchange service account OR can I make a new Exchange service account for it? FAQ: readit, reading it, loving it, learning it thx bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending HTML
After making the change you have to restart the IMS otherwise it will not work.. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Wei Yan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 January 2002 17:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending HTML Exchange 5.5 SP4 The Internet Mail Service server is configured to send plain text only, when I send HTML mail from an Outlook, the IMS does not override the user choice, and sends the mail in HTML format. Is that by design? Any comments? Wei Yan _ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: changing Outlook client mail profile
No reconfiguration needed. Bring up new box and move the mailboxes. Once done just leave the old server running and Outlook will magically notice that the mailboxes have moved and connect to the new box. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Sakti Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 January 2002 06:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: changing Outlook client mail profile Hi folks, We are installing an Exchange 5.5 server in an organisation with one other Exchange 5.5 server and are going to move everything from the old server to the new server. There are about 150 clients running Outlook version 5.0.2653.22 or less (which I understand implies they are all on Outlook97?). After moving the mailboxes, we need to point mail profiles to the new server, what is the best way to go about doing this? We were thinking of enforcing a registry change on each Windows client using the logon script (obviously this won't work for the Macs, but that's ok). I've discovered utilities like NEWPROF ... but I wonder if anyone can confirm this is the best way? Thanks Sakti _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Problem
What OS on the laptops? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 January 2002 21:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I just did what you guys suggested. I went to each BDC and stopped and restarted the NetLogon service. Then tried to access my mailbox on the 1st server that works and I still get the message that my logon credentials are incorrect and try again. Ok we have 2 servers that house mailboxes. One of them works fine when trying to access the mailboxes on that server. On the second server you are unable to access any mailboxes using your logon credentials. What we have are users (for some reason) logging onto their laptops locally and opening their Outlook and it prompts you for your credentials. Once the apply their credentials they get the message that I stated earlier. I hope that clears it up. Let me know. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Explain exactly what you are doing and what is happening and when. There has not been much step-by-step in this thread. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I stopped and restarted all the Netlogon services, still with the same results. Any other suggestions? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem I had that happen once! In fact that was the issue and reboot cleared it up. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Make sure you do not have a BDC with a stalled netlogon service Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well the two jackasses who are calling in this problem today aren't. But for some reason it works for one server and not the other. That is strange. I tested my account on the 2nd server and it works fine. If I move my mailbox over to the 1st server, after i put my credentials in it comes back telling me my credentials are wrong. Which is incorrect because it worked from the 2nd serverWhat a pain. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Normally? Are some not doing this? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem The server is in the same domain. So there is no trust relationship between them. Well, it works for users on the 2nd mail server that houses mailboxes. But it doesn't work for the first. Normally, we have users loggin in under the domain account profile. But for some reason it works for some and not others. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Is the other server in another domain? Is there a trust relationship between the two? If not, this is what I would expect to see on the client. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Problem All, I'm having a strange problem. We have 2 Exchange 5.5 servers that houses mailboxes. When users are logged into their local computer and they try to access their Outlook they get prompted for their credentials and once they put that in, it comes back with an error stating that the credentials are incorrect and try again. But on our other server that houses mailboxes it works just fine when you type in your credentials. Granted this is an unsupported method they are using for us. But we are trying to figure out why it's working for one server and not the
RE: Information Store Stopping...
What does the event log say? - It may also be prudent to turn logging up to maximum for the time being as well. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 10:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Information Store Stopping... Hi all, My Exchange 2000 server's IS has just started to stop randomly. I thought that it may be because I had Netshield as well as Group shield installed. I rebuilt the server - Exchange SP2 all updates etc including Groupshield and did not install Netshield. The IS has just stopped again. I have set the automatic recovery to restart it for the time being. Could someone confirm that I should NOT install Netshield Has any one got any idea about the IS stopping Thanks in anticipation, Colin J Revell MCSE IS Manager Oakham School _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: highlight
Mr Blackstone, I am totally disgusted at your flagrant disregard for some decorum on this list. Would you please stick to the subject in hand i.e. Exchange Issues and not some idle banter that wastes our time. Kind regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 21:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Is it XP? Did you SPack it? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight That is the Fifth Bloody time today. I am going home now. Will reformat in the morning at 2am when I get back to fix that blasted router. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It isn't unless you are a server or a female -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I don't see how being hung is a problem. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I have a server I am building right now that is hung. It is at Exodus, so I sent em an email to reboot it. Other than that, everything is peachy! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You have problems? W -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It is total therapy. Plus it is funner to work on others problems than your own. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my work day. As well as a great resource. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously. W -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing you had said on a different day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times. Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type of help I'd give you after a response like yours. W Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: highlight This has been a problem for me on all versions of outlook. When changing folders the highlight, to tell you what folder you are in, will stay on one folder. So I can be looking in my inbox and the highlight is in my exchange folder still. This happens to me about 2 times a day. I have to restart outlook to fix this problem. Any one have a clue what I can do to fix this? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: highlight
I know, that Mr Blackstone and the Dogg-person really get my goat up with their constant references to sexual inuendo. It shouldn't be allowed! Mr Lefkovics only fuels the fire! PBB -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 22:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight This is related. At least he said Spack it, instead of Spank it! ;o) -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Mr Blackstone, I am totally disgusted at your flagrant disregard for some decorum on this list. Would you please stick to the subject in hand i.e. Exchange Issues and not some idle banter that wastes our time. Kind regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 21:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Is it XP? Did you SPack it? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight That is the Fifth Bloody time today. I am going home now. Will reformat in the morning at 2am when I get back to fix that blasted router. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It isn't unless you are a server or a female -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I don't see how being hung is a problem. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I have a server I am building right now that is hung. It is at Exodus, so I sent em an email to reboot it. Other than that, everything is peachy! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You have problems? W -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It is total therapy. Plus it is funner to work on others problems than your own. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my work day. As well as a great resource. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously. W -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing you had said on a different day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times. Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type of help I'd give you after a response like yours. W Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I never had that happen till OLXPI havent been able to stop it. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: highlight
RE: highlight
Just come out of a bad relationship? -Original Message- From: Jad Mouracadé [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 January 2002 00:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Sex should be banned world-wide for the next 3 generations. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Bouzan Sent: January 14, 2002 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I know, that Mr Blackstone and the Dogg-person really get my goat up with their constant references to sexual inuendo. It shouldn't be allowed! Mr Lefkovics only fuels the fire! PBB -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 22:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight This is related. At least he said Spack it, instead of Spank it! ;o) -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Mr Blackstone, I am totally disgusted at your flagrant disregard for some decorum on this list. Would you please stick to the subject in hand i.e. Exchange Issues and not some idle banter that wastes our time. Kind regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 21:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Is it XP? Did you SPack it? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight That is the Fifth Bloody time today. I am going home now. Will reformat in the morning at 2am when I get back to fix that blasted router. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It isn't unless you are a server or a female -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I don't see how being hung is a problem. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight I have a server I am building right now that is hung. It is at Exodus, so I sent em an email to reboot it. Other than that, everything is peachy! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You have problems? W -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight It is total therapy. Plus it is funner to work on others problems than your own. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Not a problem. It is all in fun. In my world this list is therapy for my work day. As well as a great resource. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Fair enough. Again my apologies for taking it so seriously. W -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Being someone who has the links to a good 100 plus TechNet articles memorized, and a good friend of Mr. Blackstone. Trust me I have been in the TechNet. Would never post a question with out a good few hours search. I think I am offended. =] but that's ok, I would have said the same thing you had said on a different day. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Smith Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup Actually confirming that it is not your setup can be very helpful at times. Now maybe you know you can find something on TechNet. Which is the only type of help I'd give you after a response like yours. W Hint: Don't blast the people who are willing to try to help you. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: highlight You are not much help to me then.. Other then verifying that this is a real problem and not my bizarre setup. Thanks Mr. Blackstone for that. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg
RE: New year, no contract
Hehe - I used to do that! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 January 2002 05:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Which was obvious if you played a 33-1/3 on 16. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Tullis Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 7:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Actually David Seville as Alvin The Chipmunks g... -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Alvin and the Chipmunks. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract The Harmonikats? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract I might be wrong; Maybe she was talking about those three whatzits who sing that christmas song. You know the one, Me, I want a hula hoop? -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract I thought she meant those rather large male-models that women tend to swoon over... PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 January 2002 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract They're so cute in that episode when they try to steal all of the acorns, then end up knocking over the christmas tree on top of Donald Duck... -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 4:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Shh.. I'm watchin the Chippendales. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:01 AM To: Baker, Jennifer Subject: RE: New year, no contract Grrr... -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 02:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Video tape and fuji film. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract How would one know? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yea, but how many of those 20 have seen you sober? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final clarifications: (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex. I happen to spend most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK employment situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries. (b) I have nothing to hide. If you search the archives, you'll see that I even put my contact details in most of my posts. I've added them in below again, to make the point. There are also more than twenty folks on this list (a loose guess) that have met me in person. Gary -- Gary K. Slinger Manager, Operations Design and Development CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning Projects Tampa, Florida US Office: +1-813-635-2189 UK Office: +44-1293-582778 -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list. Your post is nothing but spam. S/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using search sites, or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us. I am using the network
RE: New year, no contract
She was perhaps thinking about both - what a mental picture! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 January 2002 13:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract I might be wrong; Maybe she was talking about those three whatzits who sing that christmas song. You know the one, Me, I want a hula hoop? -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract I thought she meant those rather large male-models that women tend to swoon over... PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 January 2002 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract They're so cute in that episode when they try to steal all of the acorns, then end up knocking over the christmas tree on top of Donald Duck... -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 4:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Shh.. I'm watchin the Chippendales. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:01 AM To: Baker, Jennifer Subject: RE: New year, no contract Grrr... -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 02:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Video tape and fuji film. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract How would one know? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yea, but how many of those 20 have seen you sober? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final clarifications: (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex. I happen to spend most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK employment situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries. (b) I have nothing to hide. If you search the archives, you'll see that I even put my contact details in most of my posts. I've added them in below again, to make the point. There are also more than twenty folks on this list (a loose guess) that have met me in person. Gary -- Gary K. Slinger Manager, Operations Design and Development CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning Projects Tampa, Florida US Office: +1-813-635-2189 UK Office: +44-1293-582778 -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list. Your post is nothing but spam. S/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using search sites, or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us. I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do you, perhaps, have something to hide? -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended
RE: home server?
Yep, I can understand that, thanks! PBB -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 December 2001 20:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: home server? The last one in the site as in the last one installed into the site has no significance. The last one in the site as in there are no other servers in the site makes it special. - Original Message - From: Paul Bouzan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:18 PM Subject: RE: home server? Chris, What are the concerns about the last server in the site? I must admit to not ever seeing any warnings regarding this in all my education. I only ask because what was effectively my last server in the site was stolen a month ago! This is all assuming we are talking 5.5... Regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 December 2001 15:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? They have a site, but not a server. No reason for concern unless it is the last server in the site. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: home server? Hi HAPPY NEW YEAR! Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server? This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we made on that server. I cant see anything that would indicate that they have a home server like a mailbox does. Should I be concerned? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and Intranet
Do a Directory Export from Exchange, wack it into Excel and then use that to populate your intranet? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 January 2002 06:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and Intranet Upgrade to win2k and use AD. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE, CKST -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and Intranet I'm helping to build the intranet for our company and I'm looking to have the personnel Data (Phone Numbers, Direct Reports, Etc..) pulled from Exchange. Does anyone have any recommendations or examples they may be able to forward on? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ One is glad to be of service ---Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)--- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
We're not right now (hopefully never!) but we still have to geared up to accept and deal with it. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 December 2001 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract A Euro (sp?) is running about 88 cents U.S. Besides, I thought the UK wasn't going to implement the Euro. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract £25/hour is about US$37.50/hour. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New year, no contract 25/per hour??? Beer must be really cheap there too. - Original Message - From: Paul Cummins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 3:36 PM Subject: OT: New year, no contract Hi folks... Off topic for the list, but what the hell, it's christmas. Since ORB UK is now closed pending the creation of Horus, that means I'm out of contract now. I'm 30, been using MS since before they bought DOS, and I'm a Microsoft Partner in my own right. I have experience in Windows from 3.1 to ME, OS/2 and NT from 2.1 to XP, DOS'en from 3.3 to 7.1, and Linux. I also use BeOS, MacOS X, FreeBSD and SVR4. My current 'learning experience' is QNX. I have experience of Sendmail, QMail, Exim, Exchange 5 and 5.5, and Mailtraq, and have used SPTM, POP3, APOP, ETRN and ODMR. I've been doing telephone and deskside support for the better end of 4 years, and was part of the support team during the launch of Telewest SurfUnlimited. I've used and supported ISDN, ADSL, and Cable Modems, as well as Leased Line, Routed Solutions and Plain Old dial-up. Sad though I am, I can identify a modem model and a RAS by ear. With Lucent Portmasters, I can even tell the ComOs release by listening to it. I'm based in Basingstoke, UK, but don't mind commuting, consulting, homeworking, Remote Adminning, or even travelling if the price is right. I'll do Contract or Permanent, and would be looking for ?25 per hour for Contract or ?35,000 per annum for permanent. If you want more info, or a CV, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Many thanks all. -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS __ __ Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: home server?
Chris, What are the concerns about the last server in the site? I must admit to not ever seeing any warnings regarding this in all my education. I only ask because what was effectively my last server in the site was stolen a month ago! This is all assuming we are talking 5.5... Regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 December 2001 15:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? They have a site, but not a server. No reason for concern unless it is the last server in the site. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: home server? Hi HAPPY NEW YEAR! Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server? This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we made on that server. I cant see anything that would indicate that they have a home server like a mailbox does. Should I be concerned? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
Thats interesting Gary - I'm in Crawley as well! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 December 2001 16:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final clarifications: (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex. I happen to spend most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK employment situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries. (b) I have nothing to hide. If you search the archives, you'll see that I even put my contact details in most of my posts. I've added them in below again, to make the point. There are also more than twenty folks on this list (a loose guess) that have met me in person. Gary -- Gary K. Slinger Manager, Operations Design and Development CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning Projects Tampa, Florida US Office: +1-813-635-2189 UK Office: +44-1293-582778 -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list. Your post is nothing but spam. S/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using search sites, or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us. I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do you, perhaps, have something to hide? -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: home server?
Office break-in. they had everthing away, PC's, server, even the dishwasher and the kettle! This was the last site that I had added to the WAN and ironically - feeding into the present discussions, it was a NT4 BDC with Ex5.5! PBB -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 December 2001 18:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? Stolen? Share this story!! -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? Chris, What are the concerns about the last server in the site? I must admit to not ever seeing any warnings regarding this in all my education. I only ask because what was effectively my last server in the site was stolen a month ago! This is all assuming we are talking 5.5... Regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 December 2001 15:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: home server? They have a site, but not a server. No reason for concern unless it is the last server in the site. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: home server? Hi HAPPY NEW YEAR! Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server? This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we made on that server. I cant see anything that would indicate that they have a home server like a mailbox does. Should I be concerned? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Scanners
Oh, nothing wrong with free products - whatever takes your fancy I suppose. Mailsweeper (and others) may be expensive and there are cheaper options around but then we could refer the debate to why use Microsoft Office when Star Office (and others) may be a lot cheaper etc etc etc. Horses for courses and an' all that.. my 2p worth... PBB -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 December 2001 00:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners Just curious, What's wrong with a free product? We have a P100 / 128 mb RAM machine, running RH Linux 7.0 with Qmail/Qmail Scan behind our firewall and between our boundary and our IMS. It scans for both attachment types and subject lines. We have not had a SINGLE infection since before Melissa. We have 5 mail servers and 1000 mail accounts. Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners ~ndi Mailsweeper is my favorite as well. Make sure you use the Mcafee 470 DOS version of their AV software and use Baltimore's method of deploying it. Its fast, efficient and reliable - it even caught the latest nasties and stopped them as Undetermined until I have the dat in place to catch them as dirty. Depending on what resources you have I would suggest the SMTP version running on a separate box between your main exchange box and your firewall. Regards PBB -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 December 2001 23:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners We've been mostly happy with MailSweeper from Baltimore Technologies. It will block attachments and scan content. Virus scanning can be done by hooking in a third-party scanner like McAfee, NAV or F-Secure. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Network Issues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners Sorry... We are running Exchange 5.5 / SP4 and the guys upstairs want to be able to block attachments, scan for viruses and scan the content of the email for what management deems inappropriate. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners And we're all partial to Kelly, except that damn ugly sig that she uses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Email Scanners The FAQ lists Trend... but I happen to be partial to Antigen from Sybari Software :) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Network Issues | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || om | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/06/2001 06:14 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- - -- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Email Scanners | - -- | I have been tasked to find an email scanner for our enterprise. I was wondering which one of the many products available do you recommend? Your advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: Email Scanners
~ndi Mailsweeper is my favorite as well. Make sure you use the Mcafee 470 DOS version of their AV software and use Baltimore's method of deploying it. Its fast, efficient and reliable - it even caught the latest nasties and stopped them as Undetermined until I have the dat in place to catch them as dirty. Depending on what resources you have I would suggest the SMTP version running on a separate box between your main exchange box and your firewall. Regards PBB -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 December 2001 23:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners We've been mostly happy with MailSweeper from Baltimore Technologies. It will block attachments and scan content. Virus scanning can be done by hooking in a third-party scanner like McAfee, NAV or F-Secure. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Network Issues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners Sorry... We are running Exchange 5.5 / SP4 and the guys upstairs want to be able to block attachments, scan for viruses and scan the content of the email for what management deems inappropriate. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners And we're all partial to Kelly, except that damn ugly sig that she uses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Email Scanners The FAQ lists Trend... but I happen to be partial to Antigen from Sybari Software :) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Network Issues | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || om | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/06/2001 06:14 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- - -- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Email Scanners | - -- | I have been tasked to find an email scanner for our enterprise. I was wondering which one of the many products available do you recommend? Your advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox?
~ndi Open the users mailbox alongside yours? PBB -Original Message- From: Lyall D. Shepperd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 December 2001 19:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox? How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox? This could be used in a situation when someone has sent a confidential document to the wrong person or deleting a message that contains a virus. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox?
Understood - but I saw no mention of W2K in the original posting therefore I assumed it to be 5.5. PBB. -Original Message- From: Tea, Justin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 December 2001 20:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox? In 2000, you need to take several steps to grant such permission. Ref. Q268754 -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox? ~ndi Open the users mailbox alongside yours? PBB -Original Message- From: Lyall D. Shepperd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 December 2001 19:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox? How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox? This could be used in a situation when someone has sent a confidential document to the wrong person or deleting a message that contains a virus. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox?
~ndi AH-ha! - So opening the users mailbox alongside your own would do the trick..! PBB -Original Message- From: Lyall D. Shepperd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 December 2001 20:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox? I have Exchange Server 5.5 running on Windows 2000. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox?
True, but if you wanted to get this message back asap then opening the other users mailbox is the first option I would choose especially if no read receipt was placed on the original message in the first place. PBB -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 December 2001 21:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox? IF the user has not read the email you can goto Sent Items - Actions - Recall This Message. You then have a few options that might come in handy. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox? ~ndi AH-ha! - So opening the users mailbox alongside your own would do the trick..! PBB -Original Message- From: Lyall D. Shepperd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 December 2001 20:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How can the Admin delete a message from a users mailbox? I have Exchange Server 5.5 running on Windows 2000. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 2k Prep
Yes there is, don't lie! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 December 2001 21:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep Their is no M drive.. I repeat their NO M drive.. And there dam well aren't 17 of them -- Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep But you do get an M: drive! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep Yes. It's awesome. In fact, it is gone. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch 2k Prep Just wondering... Does the Internet Mail connector get any better in Exchange 2000. Every frikin change I make in Exch 5.5 I have to restart the service which jacks which causes other problems for my A/V software. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 2k Prep
I know ;-} PBB -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 December 2001 23:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exch 2k Prep Not physically just virtually but there's the rub - Original Message - From: Paul Bouzan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 6:37 PM Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep Yes there is, don't lie! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 December 2001 21:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep Their is no M drive.. I repeat their NO M drive.. And there dam well aren't 17 of them -- Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep But you do get an M: drive! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep Yes. It's awesome. In fact, it is gone. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch 2k Prep Just wondering... Does the Internet Mail connector get any better in Exchange 2000. Every frikin change I make in Exch 5.5 I have to restart the service which jacks which causes other problems for my A/V software. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 2k Prep
ROFL! -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 December 2001 00:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep I just had a great one.. Love that gal downstairs -- Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep And who here doesn't like a good rub now and again? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 December 2001 23:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exch 2k Prep Not physically just virtually but there's the rub - Original Message - From: Paul Bouzan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 6:37 PM Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep Yes there is, don't lie! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 December 2001 21:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep Their is no M drive.. I repeat their NO M drive.. And there dam well aren't 17 of them -- Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep But you do get an M: drive! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 2k Prep Yes. It's awesome. In fact, it is gone. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch 2k Prep Just wondering... Does the Internet Mail connector get any better in Exchange 2000. Every frikin change I make in Exch 5.5 I have to restart the service which jacks which causes other problems for my A/V software. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: OWA In E2K 5.5 Mixed Setup
~ndi Tony has a valid point - what server is doing what, this is the key. The rule of thumb is; 5.5 webmail can see E2K mailboxes - E2K webmail cannot see 5.5 mailboxes. I have just had a very steep take-on of users of my 5.5 webmail over the past 3 months (~300 users) and the questions regarding usage that have been coming into my helpdesk have been mainly what password do I use! Just about all of them have taken to it like a duck to water and this includes some very non-tech users (Independent Financial Advisers - the worst!). If you are getting the usual training moans then you need to be harder on your users - they are acting like thickets just to prevent themselves from being moaned at for not doing their job properly. (You know what I mean, the sort of job an ape could do)... PBB -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 December 2001 00:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA In E2K 5.5 Mixed Setup OWA training. If they are using it now what's to train. Easier to use if anything. Is the OWA box also hold your mailboxes or are you holding them on another server. - Original Message - From: PATRICK, MARTIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:36 PM Subject: OWA In E2K 5.5 Mixed Setup Does anyone know of problems using a 5.5 OWA server to point to E2K mailboxes. We have 5.5 SP 4 OWA server visible to the world for web access. We are moving users to E2K, but we need more time to get the OWA training ready. What we would like to do is move mailboxes over to E2K but keep our 5.5 OWA as the web access point until we are ready to point users to the E2K URL. Thanks. -- Martin Patrick, MCSE Network Manager Information Systems Tarrant County College 828 W. Harwood Rd. Hurst, TX 76054 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.tccd.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spurious attachment permissions issue...
~ndi EX5.5 sp4 - 1 site, 11 servers - all attached via leased lines. Clients are all O2K on NT4 sp6a - identical builds. Random users at different sites complain of the inability to open attachments, getting a failure because of a lack of permissions. The not-so-helpful help message suggests saving the attachment first which of course does not work... because of a lack of permissions. Other users equivalent to the affected user who also receive a copy of the message can open it OK therefore because of single-instance messaging I can discount a corrupted file issue. Having the affected user send me the message, I can open it fine. The only resolution so far is to eventually trash their NT profile - once recreated the problem goes away. This is obviously not the best way to do it. I have done the usual searches of the archives, MS support and even some anti-virus sites and the web in general but no joy. Any ideas or pointers would be most appreciated. Regards, Paul W. Bouzan. Network Manager. Millfield Group plc. T 020 8680 5200 F 020 8680 5900 M 07940 583525 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
The only exchange server in the site running Groupshield is a site that is currently unaffected! The affected sites do not have an Exchange AV scanner - only Netshield scanning traffic in and out of the server (excluding the IS of course!). The techdoc was of interest but not entirely relevant, I shall read it though for reference, thanks. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 14:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue... What Antivirus software is running on the exchange servers? Is http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q264/7/31.ASP relevant? Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 14:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spurious attachment permissions issue... ~ndi EX5.5 sp4 - 1 site, 11 servers - all attached via leased lines. Clients are all O2K on NT4 sp6a - identical builds. Random users at different sites complain of the inability to open attachments, getting a failure because of a lack of permissions. The not-so-helpful help message suggests saving the attachment first which of course does not work... because of a lack of permissions. Other users equivalent to the affected user who also receive a copy of the message can open it OK therefore because of single-instance messaging I can discount a corrupted file issue. Having the affected user send me the message, I can open it fine. The only resolution so far is to eventually trash their NT profile - once recreated the problem goes away. This is obviously not the best way to do it. I have done the usual searches of the archives, MS support and even some anti-virus sites and the web in general but no joy. Any ideas or pointers would be most appreciated. Regards, Paul W. Bouzan. Network Manager. Millfield Group plc. T 020 8680 5200 F 020 8680 5900 M 07940 583525 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Very very close except there is no TS in the mix. I did come across this and even tried the reg hack to see if it worked... but no, sadly. Thanks anyway... PBB -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 14:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue... http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q268/7/44.ASP Try this. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 14:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spurious attachment permissions issue... ~ndi EX5.5 sp4 - 1 site, 11 servers - all attached via leased lines. Clients are all O2K on NT4 sp6a - identical builds. Random users at different sites complain of the inability to open attachments, getting a failure because of a lack of permissions. The not-so-helpful help message suggests saving the attachment first which of course does not work... because of a lack of permissions. Other users equivalent to the affected user who also receive a copy of the message can open it OK therefore because of single-instance messaging I can discount a corrupted file issue. Having the affected user send me the message, I can open it fine. The only resolution so far is to eventually trash their NT profile - once recreated the problem goes away. This is obviously not the best way to do it. I have done the usual searches of the archives, MS support and even some anti-virus sites and the web in general but no joy. Any ideas or pointers would be most appreciated. Regards, Paul W. Bouzan. Network Manager. Millfield Group plc. T 020 8680 5200 F 020 8680 5900 M 07940 583525 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Now, that is interesting because I prevent the Temporary Internet Files folder from roaming with the profile as many of my users tend to build up rather large profiles with their internet activity... Arrgh! - It's all my fault!! Thanks Louis! PBB -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue... The way i do it when i have the problem is to just simply make sure they have a Temporary Internet Folder in their roaming profile. I dont do any of the registry editing or anything. Make sure they are logged out first. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 14:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue... Very very close except there is no TS in the mix. I did come across this and even tried the reg hack to see if it worked... but no, sadly. Thanks anyway... PBB -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 14:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue... http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q268/7/44.ASP Try this. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 14:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spurious attachment permissions issue... ~ndi EX5.5 sp4 - 1 site, 11 servers - all attached via leased lines. Clients are all O2K on NT4 sp6a - identical builds. Random users at different sites complain of the inability to open attachments, getting a failure because of a lack of permissions. The not-so-helpful help message suggests saving the attachment first which of course does not work... because of a lack of permissions. Other users equivalent to the affected user who also receive a copy of the message can open it OK therefore because of single-instance messaging I can discount a corrupted file issue. Having the affected user send me the message, I can open it fine. The only resolution so far is to eventually trash their NT profile - once recreated the problem goes away. This is obviously not the best way to do it. I have done the usual searches of the archives, MS support and even some anti-virus sites and the web in general but no joy. Any ideas or pointers would be most appreciated. Regards, Paul W. Bouzan. Network Manager. Millfield Group plc. T 020 8680 5200 F 020 8680 5900 M 07940 583525 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
~ndi Well, I'm happy someone else brought the subject up as I was going to slyly ask if anyone had a means of 'controlling' the amount of cached/temporary internet data so that my roaming profiles didn't take hours to load. I know there is a limit profile size in Profile editor and the setting can be manually adjusted in IE properties but how can I do it en-masse? I would then be able to allow the folder to roam and cure my predicament!! PBB -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue... Given the negative side effects of this (huge amounts of disk space on servers wasted, for one, excessive network traffic, etc), it's just anoither reason not to use such software :-) Or maybe just to set it up correctly. We don't generally have too many problems here with roaming profiles getting too large because of temporary internet files. And some of our students are extremely heavy users of the internet *cough* Don't matter what software you use, if you set it up wrongly. -- Robert Moir, IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Sorry Robert, being a complete thicky here - on the workstation I assume? PBB -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 16:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue... Setting cache to a small size so it stays fresh and gets purged after just a short length of time works for us. -- Robert Moir, IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 16:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue... ~ndi Well, I'm happy someone else brought the subject up as I was going to slyly ask if anyone had a means of 'controlling' the amount of cached/temporary internet data so that my roaming profiles didn't take hours to load. I know there is a limit profile size in Profile editor and the setting can be manually adjusted in IE properties but how can I do it en-masse? I would then be able to allow the folder to roam and cure my predicament!! PBB -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue... Given the negative side effects of this (huge amounts of disk space on servers wasted, for one, excessive network traffic, etc), it's just anoither reason not to use such software :-) Or maybe just to set it up correctly. We don't generally have too many problems here with roaming profiles getting too large because of temporary internet files. And some of our students are extremely heavy users of the internet *cough* Don't matter what software you use, if you set it up wrongly. -- Robert Moir, IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K GAL . Love it or Leave It.
~ndi I love the sig. p.s. - have you replaced the pliers on your shower with vise grips yet or have you actually fixed it (cos I ain't!)? PBB -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 December 2001 20:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K GAL . Love it or Leave It. That might spur some activity. ©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I® Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!(tm) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 6:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K GAL . Love it or Leave It. Do you think that now that I am requesting it, Microsoft will make the change? I could threaten them with a week of listening to my jokes and humorous anecdotes if they don't comply... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 11:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K GAL . Love it or Leave It. Others have requested same. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K GAL . Love it or Leave It. I have to admit, I kinda wish you could have the same level of control over users in the ESM that the ADUC provides. But then again, it is a Saturday night and I am playing on my computer so you know how pathetic I am. Of course, if his AD has gone sour, he's got bigger problems than the GAL! ;) Andy -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 8:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K GAL . . . I hate it now You don't delete names in Exchange System Manager. You delete them in Active Directory Users and Computers (ADUC). Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K GAL . . . I hate it now I'll probably love it later . . . from what I'm reading. What I can not find is how to delete a Name in It . . . . I have duplicate names in the GAL but when you go into the Default GAL in ESM and click on Properties . . Preview I can not delete the mailbox as it is non exists! Have searched both M$ kb and through entries using ASDI but to no avail. Does anyone know how to remove a entry manually from the GAL? AD? Background - Just migrated mail from 5.5 sp 4 server to E2K SP1 on Win2K server, it's NOT a DC. New E2K server is in a seperate site than 5.5 was and it servered multiple domians, I only moved one to E2K. Used MS migration Util to move mailboxes. Created Sooo many corrupt entries in the GAL, . . . I know it's from a shitty AD. Can not find account associated with name in GAL as I have deleted it months ago. Thanks for reading this. -John Q - Original Message - From: Mark Harford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:18 AM Subject: RE: mailbox manager blues... What does the event log say? At the very least you should see the message relating to your test mailboxes being logged onto by an account that is not the PWNT. Mark H -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 November 2001 18:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox manager blues... Good afternoon, Exchange 5.5 Outlook 98. We are trying to implement Mailbox Manager on our test server. We have it turned on and have our settings in place. We press Clean Now and nothing happens. We also have it scheduled to run at 3:00 a.m. every morning. We do have aged eMAIL in our mailboxes. Nothing happens. Nothing disappears like we were hoping. Nothing moved from the folders to the deleted items folders. No reports sent to the administrator none the users. What could we be doing wrong? Thanks in advance for any light you can shed on this problem. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The
RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
Nate, In my case all of the desktops are new (less than 6 months old) Compaq Deskpro EN's PIII866 upwards, 128Mb memory and oodles of HDD space available. Protocols are all IP and bindings are fine. Attachment sizes are below 2-3Mb. Mcafee Vscan is used on all desktops - updating via FTP to my FTP server on the WAN. No PST's (I'm not that masochistic!) and PING, tracert show nothing to worry about... PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 November 2001 12:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Okay. What about the desktops we are dealing with? I haven't seen any information on them in your entries so far (have I missed anything?). What about binding order on the desktop? Make sure either RPC or TCPIP is first in line? How big are the attachments being opened? Are they larger than normal? What antivirus software is being used on the desktop (you do have AV software running on the desktop don't you?)? Do your users have PST's (PST=BAD)? If so, how big are they (on average)? What about network connectivity from the desktop (how are the PINGs during this peak time?). Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Roger Seielstad Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 05:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Exchange is quite capable of handling the load you're giving it. I have run similar loads on similar (or lesser) hardware without the issues you're describing. Based on the description of the symptoms you're seeing, I strongly suggest you revisit the switch/NIC settings - maybe even force both to 100/Half. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown My tendency is to agree with you - however my users are quite heavy. It might not be a hardware issue but how about some tweaking on how exchange itself handles message delivery and threads? Regards, Shawn -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Yep. I can state with quite a bit of certainty that you're wrong - many have run more users and data on less hardware without these performance issues. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown There have been absolutely no changes to any software, services or network configs. The only thing that I can think of is we have run into some kind of performance barrier based on the abilities of our hardware, size of our databases and server usage. Can anyone confirm these theories? Thanks Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Any changes to virus software that you can trace this to? Any new services introduced into your Exchange environment? -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown I am hoping someone out there is having some of the same issues as we are having and have come up with some solutions. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Our current setup is; - Single Server Exchange Server Enterprise 5.5 Sp4 running OWA - Compaq Server Dual PII 450 Xeon Processors - 5 hard drives - 3 10,000rpm 36.4 GB drives in RAID 5 (Databases) - 2 10,000rpm 9.1 GB drives in RAID 1 (Transaction Logs) - Server is running at 100mbps full duplex. - Pub.edb = 150mb - Priv.edb 18.5 GB (approx 40GB of free space) - Circular Logging Turned off - Differential Arcserve Backup enabled - 200 - 230 Users and 300 mailboxes Description For the past couple of weeks we have notice a perceptible slowdown in client side response times on our exchange server. The slowdown mainly
RE: Impact on Priv size from increasing deleted item retention
Ken, Users rarely delete items anyway (based on the 500+ hoarders I have!) so I think you would not find any noticeable size increases... PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 November 2001 15:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Impact on Priv size from increasing deleted item retention Hello, In an effort to justify not having to do brick level backups, I want to increase the Deleted Item Retention period to something like 30 days. My concern is the impact that it could have on the size of the information store. I realize it's impossible to tell precisely, but I was hoping to hear some experiences of what happened when others have turned it up. Thanks, Ken Jasa Messaging Administrator Weber Shandwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trying to post a message
Jim, Happens to me all the time. Do not attach anything to your message and also I tend to get rejections based on the fact that I have the unsub line in my mail. I now delete the footers inserted automatically as well before responding. When I used to use OWA it happened on every mailing I sent! PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Jim Blunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 November 2001 22:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trying to post a message I have tried twice now,to post a message to the list concerning an Internet Mail Header, but when I do, I get a message back from Swynk stating: Dear subscriber, Your message to exchange was rejected because it contained an attachment. Due the increase of email viruses we are now rejecting all messages with attachments. This may also include any virtual business cards, and some signature files. Thank you for your cooperation. How is this possible? All I did was paste a .txt version of the header file at the bottom of my message. TIA, Jim Blunt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
No. logging for the time spent debugging... -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 November 2001 06:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown No logging at all. Regards, Shawn -Original Message- From: Cook, David A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Has logging been on full the entire time or is that just for troubleshooting? Full logging = lost resources. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 5:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown It's becoming one of those unexplained things. I've been having those late-night keeping-me-awake-thoughts of database corruption and other equally nasty shockers though the scan of the event logs (logging on full!) have told me nothing. Confused of Croydon PBB -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 23:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Yes this is a very interesting discussion; - but one thing that I do not understand is why now after 2.5 years of running perfectly fine does the box decide to act up. It has been a DC the whole time and has had pretty much the same amount of users the whole time. The only thing that has changed is the priv.edb size and possible some usage and load changes. The server has 1GB of memory and uses it all - as Exchange should. In the spring we replaced some server switches with some high end 10/100 3com ones. It just does not make any sense unless of course the Database size combined with the number of users and load is the issue. Regards, Shawn -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Interesting. Very few members of this list have Ex on DC's for the already over discussed reasons. We may be seeing the downside of having such. Like you say, you can live with it but it does bug a little. Your hardware looks fine (well comparing it to mine anyway!) - the box I already have built and in the rack is a Compaq DL380 with 4 x 18.2Gb 10K2 RAID5 and 2 x 18Gb 10K2 Mirrored, 512Mb memory and dual 1Gb PIII's. Teaming NIC's and a 5200 RAID controller finish it off. I need to set aside some of the christmas holiday to do the transfer. I've discounted any bottlenecks in the LAN as I have just replaced all old hubs and switches with Cisco 3500XL 10/100 switches on GB fibre backbones so it must be the combo of DC and Exchange that is choking it. If I get any ideas I'll let you know. If anyone else has, well I think we'll soon find out Regards PBB -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 23:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Yes my box is a BDC - Compaq Proliant 1850R - and yes I inherited it as well so I did not have a choice in the matter. We are waiting for next years budget but it looks like we will have to live with this machine for at least another year. That is a very interesting thought - there is a 3rd party utility available called DC-Promo that can turn a domain controller into a standalone server. Thanks Shawn -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown ~ndi Ironically I get pretty much the same as you, bad slowdown at peak times. Now, my exchange box is a BDC which I know is against the rules but I inherited it from old and do not have the resource (read time) to migrate until the new year. Is yours a DC? - If so this may be the pattern. FYI, this box is a Dell 2400 single PIII 500, 3 x 9.1Gb RAID5 and 256Mb memory (5.5sp4) but only ~150 users in this particular site. PBB -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 20:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown I am hoping someone out there is having some of the same issues as we are having and have come up with some solutions. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Our current setup is; - Single Server Exchange Server Enterprise 5.5 Sp4 running OWA - Compaq Server Dual PII 450 Xeon Processors - 5 hard drives - 3 10,000rpm 36.4 GB drives in RAID 5 (Databases) - 2 10,000rpm 9.1 GB drives in RAID 1 (Transaction Logs) - Server is running at 100mbps full duplex. - Pub.edb = 150mb - Priv.edb 18.5 GB (approx 40GB of free space) - Circular Logging Turned off - Differential Arcserve Backup enabled - 200
RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
The new gear IS the Quake server Now, next Q - how do I get the quake users to bugger off! -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 November 2001 11:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown It IS the network. Force the NIC and switch port to 100m Full Duplex and save the new Compaq gear for a Quake server. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Interesting. Very few members of this list have Ex on DC's for the already over discussed reasons. We may be seeing the downside of having such. Like you say, you can live with it but it does bug a little. Your hardware looks fine (well comparing it to mine anyway!) - the box I already have built and in the rack is a Compaq DL380 with 4 x 18.2Gb 10K2 RAID5 and 2 x 18Gb 10K2 Mirrored, 512Mb memory and dual 1Gb PIII's. Teaming NIC's and a 5200 RAID controller finish it off. I need to set aside some of the christmas holiday to do the transfer. I've discounted any bottlenecks in the LAN as I have just replaced all old hubs and switches with Cisco 3500XL 10/100 switches on GB fibre backbones so it must be the combo of DC and Exchange that is choking it. If I get any ideas I'll let you know. If anyone else has, well I think we'll soon find out Regards PBB -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 23:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Yes my box is a BDC - Compaq Proliant 1850R - and yes I inherited it as well so I did not have a choice in the matter. We are waiting for next years budget but it looks like we will have to live with this machine for at least another year. That is a very interesting thought - there is a 3rd party utility available called DC-Promo that can turn a domain controller into a standalone server. Thanks Shawn -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown ~ndi Ironically I get pretty much the same as you, bad slowdown at peak times. Now, my exchange box is a BDC which I know is against the rules but I inherited it from old and do not have the resource (read time) to migrate until the new year. Is yours a DC? - If so this may be the pattern. FYI, this box is a Dell 2400 single PIII 500, 3 x 9.1Gb RAID5 and 256Mb memory (5.5sp4) but only ~150 users in this particular site. PBB -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 20:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown I am hoping someone out there is having some of the same issues as we are having and have come up with some solutions. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Our current setup is; - Single Server Exchange Server Enterprise 5.5 Sp4 running OWA - Compaq Server Dual PII 450 Xeon Processors - 5 hard drives - 3 10,000rpm 36.4 GB drives in RAID 5 (Databases) - 2 10,000rpm 9.1 GB drives in RAID 1 (Transaction Logs) - Server is running at 100mbps full duplex. - Pub.edb = 150mb - Priv.edb 18.5 GB (approx 40GB of free space) - Circular Logging Turned off - Differential Arcserve Backup enabled - 200 - 230 Users and 300 mailboxes Description For the past couple of weeks we have notice a perceptible slowdown in client side response times on our exchange server. The slowdown mainly happens at peak times,(9-10am and 2-3pm) however we have noticed it with attachments and at other times as well. It sometimes can take 5-8 seconds to open an e-mail with an attachment where we have been getting immediate response before. For scrolling through messages in Outlook we have also noticed a slow down. Also - when copying an attachment from an e-mail to your local machine,(right click and copy, then paste to desktop) this response time has decrease dramatically. Although these slowdowns do not stop us from working on a daily basis we would like to get on top of this issue and do what we need to do to keep our Exchange server speedy. Any ideas or recommendations are appreciated. Regards, _ Shawn M. Leblanc, Network Technician BULL, HOUSSER TUPPER Vancouver, Canada mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bht.com Tel: (604) 687-6575 or Direct # 641-4919 Fax: (604) 641-4949 or Direct
RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
~ndi Ironically I get pretty much the same as you, bad slowdown at peak times. Now, my exchange box is a BDC which I know is against the rules but I inherited it from old and do not have the resource (read time) to migrate until the new year. Is yours a DC? - If so this may be the pattern. FYI, this box is a Dell 2400 single PIII 500, 3 x 9.1Gb RAID5 and 256Mb memory (5.5sp4) but only ~150 users in this particular site. PBB -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 20:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown I am hoping someone out there is having some of the same issues as we are having and have come up with some solutions. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Our current setup is; - Single Server Exchange Server Enterprise 5.5 Sp4 running OWA - Compaq Server Dual PII 450 Xeon Processors - 5 hard drives - 3 10,000rpm 36.4 GB drives in RAID 5 (Databases) - 2 10,000rpm 9.1 GB drives in RAID 1 (Transaction Logs) - Server is running at 100mbps full duplex. - Pub.edb = 150mb - Priv.edb 18.5 GB (approx 40GB of free space) - Circular Logging Turned off - Differential Arcserve Backup enabled - 200 - 230 Users and 300 mailboxes Description For the past couple of weeks we have notice a perceptible slowdown in client side response times on our exchange server. The slowdown mainly happens at peak times,(9-10am and 2-3pm) however we have noticed it with attachments and at other times as well. It sometimes can take 5-8 seconds to open an e-mail with an attachment where we have been getting immediate response before. For scrolling through messages in Outlook we have also noticed a slow down. Also - when copying an attachment from an e-mail to your local machine,(right click and copy, then paste to desktop) this response time has decrease dramatically. Although these slowdowns do not stop us from working on a daily basis we would like to get on top of this issue and do what we need to do to keep our Exchange server speedy. Any ideas or recommendations are appreciated. Regards, _ Shawn M. Leblanc, Network Technician BULL, HOUSSER TUPPER Vancouver, Canada mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bht.com Tel: (604) 687-6575 or Direct # 641-4919 Fax: (604) 641-4949 or Direct # 646-2500 Pager: (604) 650-4155 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
Interesting. Very few members of this list have Ex on DC's for the already over discussed reasons. We may be seeing the downside of having such. Like you say, you can live with it but it does bug a little. Your hardware looks fine (well comparing it to mine anyway!) - the box I already have built and in the rack is a Compaq DL380 with 4 x 18.2Gb 10K2 RAID5 and 2 x 18Gb 10K2 Mirrored, 512Mb memory and dual 1Gb PIII's. Teaming NIC's and a 5200 RAID controller finish it off. I need to set aside some of the christmas holiday to do the transfer. I've discounted any bottlenecks in the LAN as I have just replaced all old hubs and switches with Cisco 3500XL 10/100 switches on GB fibre backbones so it must be the combo of DC and Exchange that is choking it. If I get any ideas I'll let you know. If anyone else has, well I think we'll soon find out Regards PBB -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 23:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Yes my box is a BDC - Compaq Proliant 1850R - and yes I inherited it as well so I did not have a choice in the matter. We are waiting for next years budget but it looks like we will have to live with this machine for at least another year. That is a very interesting thought - there is a 3rd party utility available called DC-Promo that can turn a domain controller into a standalone server. Thanks Shawn -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown ~ndi Ironically I get pretty much the same as you, bad slowdown at peak times. Now, my exchange box is a BDC which I know is against the rules but I inherited it from old and do not have the resource (read time) to migrate until the new year. Is yours a DC? - If so this may be the pattern. FYI, this box is a Dell 2400 single PIII 500, 3 x 9.1Gb RAID5 and 256Mb memory (5.5sp4) but only ~150 users in this particular site. PBB -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 20:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown I am hoping someone out there is having some of the same issues as we are having and have come up with some solutions. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Our current setup is; - Single Server Exchange Server Enterprise 5.5 Sp4 running OWA - Compaq Server Dual PII 450 Xeon Processors - 5 hard drives - 3 10,000rpm 36.4 GB drives in RAID 5 (Databases) - 2 10,000rpm 9.1 GB drives in RAID 1 (Transaction Logs) - Server is running at 100mbps full duplex. - Pub.edb = 150mb - Priv.edb 18.5 GB (approx 40GB of free space) - Circular Logging Turned off - Differential Arcserve Backup enabled - 200 - 230 Users and 300 mailboxes Description For the past couple of weeks we have notice a perceptible slowdown in client side response times on our exchange server. The slowdown mainly happens at peak times,(9-10am and 2-3pm) however we have noticed it with attachments and at other times as well. It sometimes can take 5-8 seconds to open an e-mail with an attachment where we have been getting immediate response before. For scrolling through messages in Outlook we have also noticed a slow down. Also - when copying an attachment from an e-mail to your local machine,(right click and copy, then paste to desktop) this response time has decrease dramatically. Although these slowdowns do not stop us from working on a daily basis we would like to get on top of this issue and do what we need to do to keep our Exchange server speedy. Any ideas or recommendations are appreciated. Regards, _ Shawn M. Leblanc, Network Technician BULL, HOUSSER TUPPER Vancouver, Canada mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bht.com Tel: (604) 687-6575 or Direct # 641-4919 Fax: (604) 641-4949 or Direct # 646-2500 Pager: (604) 650-4155 _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
Jeff, My perfmons show very little is happening that could be attributed to bottlenecking but the reboot option has yet to be exorcised. I'm a bit of a fan of keeping servers up as I trust NT to do it's job but sometimes I suppose there is only one way to find out... Thanks Paul. -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 23:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown turn on some perf-mon counters and see whatcha see. be gentle with the graphing update interval. if you can squeeze in a server restart, you could possibly be an instant hero. -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown There have been absolutely no changes to any software, services or network configs. The only thing that I can think of is we have run into some kind of performance barrier based on the abilities of our hardware, size of our databases and server usage. Can anyone confirm these theories? Thanks Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Any changes to virus software that you can trace this to? Any new services introduced into your Exchange environment? -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown I am hoping someone out there is having some of the same issues as we are having and have come up with some solutions. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Our current setup is; - Single Server Exchange Server Enterprise 5.5 Sp4 running OWA - Compaq Server Dual PII 450 Xeon Processors - 5 hard drives - 3 10,000rpm 36.4 GB drives in RAID 5 (Databases) - 2 10,000rpm 9.1 GB drives in RAID 1 (Transaction Logs) - Server is running at 100mbps full duplex. - Pub.edb = 150mb - Priv.edb 18.5 GB (approx 40GB of free space) - Circular Logging Turned off - Differential Arcserve Backup enabled - 200 - 230 Users and 300 mailboxes Description For the past couple of weeks we have notice a perceptible slowdown in client side response times on our exchange server. The slowdown mainly happens at peak times,(9-10am and 2-3pm) however we have noticed it with attachments and at other times as well. It sometimes can take 5-8 seconds to open an e-mail with an attachment where we have been getting immediate response before. For scrolling through messages in Outlook we have also noticed a slow down. Also - when copying an attachment from an e-mail to your local machine,(right click and copy, then paste to desktop) this response time has decrease dramatically. Although these slowdowns do not stop us from working on a daily basis we would like to get on top of this issue and do what we need to do to keep our Exchange server speedy. Any ideas or recommendations are appreciated. Regards, _ Shawn M. Leblanc, Network Technician BULL, HOUSSER TUPPER Vancouver, Canada mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bht.com Tel: (604) 687-6575 or Direct # 641-4919 Fax: (604) 641-4949 or Direct # 646-2500 Pager: (604) 650-4155 This e-mail may be privileged or confidential. Any use of this e-mail by an unintended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please call me immediately. ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally privileged, they are intended solely for the use of the addressee only. The contents and information may not be used nor disclosed to anyone other than this addressee, nor may it be copied or distributed in any way. Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Millfield Partnership Limited. Millfield Partnership Limited recommend that this email and all attachments are checked for virus's before use. This email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or defect, which might affect any computer or IT system into which they are received and opened. However it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure they are virus free. No responsibility is accepted by Millfield Partnership Limited for any loss or damage arising in any way from receipt or use thereof. No contracts may be concluded on behalf of Millfield Partnership Limited by means of email communications. Where signatures are required email will not be accepted as a substitute. If you have received this email in error, could you please notify the sender immediately, so that Millfield Partnership Limited may arrange for its proper delivery. Would you
RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
It's becoming one of those unexplained things. I've been having those late-night keeping-me-awake-thoughts of database corruption and other equally nasty shockers though the scan of the event logs (logging on full!) have told me nothing. Confused of Croydon PBB -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 23:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Yes this is a very interesting discussion; - but one thing that I do not understand is why now after 2.5 years of running perfectly fine does the box decide to act up. It has been a DC the whole time and has had pretty much the same amount of users the whole time. The only thing that has changed is the priv.edb size and possible some usage and load changes. The server has 1GB of memory and uses it all - as Exchange should. In the spring we replaced some server switches with some high end 10/100 3com ones. It just does not make any sense unless of course the Database size combined with the number of users and load is the issue. Regards, Shawn -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Interesting. Very few members of this list have Ex on DC's for the already over discussed reasons. We may be seeing the downside of having such. Like you say, you can live with it but it does bug a little. Your hardware looks fine (well comparing it to mine anyway!) - the box I already have built and in the rack is a Compaq DL380 with 4 x 18.2Gb 10K2 RAID5 and 2 x 18Gb 10K2 Mirrored, 512Mb memory and dual 1Gb PIII's. Teaming NIC's and a 5200 RAID controller finish it off. I need to set aside some of the christmas holiday to do the transfer. I've discounted any bottlenecks in the LAN as I have just replaced all old hubs and switches with Cisco 3500XL 10/100 switches on GB fibre backbones so it must be the combo of DC and Exchange that is choking it. If I get any ideas I'll let you know. If anyone else has, well I think we'll soon find out Regards PBB -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 23:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Yes my box is a BDC - Compaq Proliant 1850R - and yes I inherited it as well so I did not have a choice in the matter. We are waiting for next years budget but it looks like we will have to live with this machine for at least another year. That is a very interesting thought - there is a 3rd party utility available called DC-Promo that can turn a domain controller into a standalone server. Thanks Shawn -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown ~ndi Ironically I get pretty much the same as you, bad slowdown at peak times. Now, my exchange box is a BDC which I know is against the rules but I inherited it from old and do not have the resource (read time) to migrate until the new year. Is yours a DC? - If so this may be the pattern. FYI, this box is a Dell 2400 single PIII 500, 3 x 9.1Gb RAID5 and 256Mb memory (5.5sp4) but only ~150 users in this particular site. PBB -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 20:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown I am hoping someone out there is having some of the same issues as we are having and have come up with some solutions. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Our current setup is; - Single Server Exchange Server Enterprise 5.5 Sp4 running OWA - Compaq Server Dual PII 450 Xeon Processors - 5 hard drives - 3 10,000rpm 36.4 GB drives in RAID 5 (Databases) - 2 10,000rpm 9.1 GB drives in RAID 1 (Transaction Logs) - Server is running at 100mbps full duplex. - Pub.edb = 150mb - Priv.edb 18.5 GB (approx 40GB of free space) - Circular Logging Turned off - Differential Arcserve Backup enabled - 200 - 230 Users and 300 mailboxes Description For the past couple of weeks we have notice a perceptible slowdown in client side response times on our exchange server. The slowdown mainly happens at peak times,(9-10am and 2-3pm) however we have noticed it with attachments and at other times as well. It sometimes can take 5-8 seconds to open an e-mail with an attachment where we have been getting immediate response before. For scrolling through messages in Outlook we have also noticed a slow down. Also - when copying an attachment from an e-mail to your local machine,(right click and copy, then paste to desktop) this response time has decrease dramatically. Although these slowdowns do not stop us from working on a daily basis we would like to get on top
RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
Hehe! -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 23:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Believe me I have become a perfmon master - all the counters indicate the server is a rocket ship. I have re-boot the exchange server multiple times - that did not work. Regards, Shawn -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown turn on some perf-mon counters and see whatcha see. be gentle with the graphing update interval. if you can squeeze in a server restart, you could possibly be an instant hero. -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown There have been absolutely no changes to any software, services or network configs. The only thing that I can think of is we have run into some kind of performance barrier based on the abilities of our hardware, size of our databases and server usage. Can anyone confirm these theories? Thanks Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Any changes to virus software that you can trace this to? Any new services introduced into your Exchange environment? -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown I am hoping someone out there is having some of the same issues as we are having and have come up with some solutions. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Our current setup is; - Single Server Exchange Server Enterprise 5.5 Sp4 running OWA - Compaq Server Dual PII 450 Xeon Processors - 5 hard drives - 3 10,000rpm 36.4 GB drives in RAID 5 (Databases) - 2 10,000rpm 9.1 GB drives in RAID 1 (Transaction Logs) - Server is running at 100mbps full duplex. - Pub.edb = 150mb - Priv.edb 18.5 GB (approx 40GB of free space) - Circular Logging Turned off - Differential Arcserve Backup enabled - 200 - 230 Users and 300 mailboxes Description For the past couple of weeks we have notice a perceptible slowdown in client side response times on our exchange server. The slowdown mainly happens at peak times,(9-10am and 2-3pm) however we have noticed it with attachments and at other times as well. It sometimes can take 5-8 seconds to open an e-mail with an attachment where we have been getting immediate response before. For scrolling through messages in Outlook we have also noticed a slow down. Also - when copying an attachment from an e-mail to your local machine,(right click and copy, then paste to desktop) this response time has decrease dramatically. Although these slowdowns do not stop us from working on a daily basis we would like to get on top of this issue and do what we need to do to keep our Exchange server speedy. Any ideas or recommendations are appreciated. Regards, _ Shawn M. Leblanc, Network Technician BULL, HOUSSER TUPPER Vancouver, Canada mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bht.com Tel: (604) 687-6575 or Direct # 641-4919 Fax: (604) 641-4949 or Direct # 646-2500 Pager: (604) 650-4155 This e-mail may be privileged or confidential. Any use of this e-mail by an unintended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please call me immediately. ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally privileged, they are intended solely for the use of the addressee only. The contents and information may not be used nor disclosed to anyone other than this addressee, nor may it be copied or distributed in any way. Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Millfield Partnership Limited. Millfield Partnership Limited recommend that this email and all attachments are checked for virus's before use. This email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or defect, which might affect any computer or IT system into which they are received and opened. However it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure they are virus free. No responsibility is accepted by Millfield Partnership Limited for any loss or damage arising in any way from receipt or use thereof. No contracts may be concluded on behalf of Millfield Partnership Limited by means of email communications. Where signatures are required email will not be accepted as a substitute. If you have received this email in error, could you please notify the
RE: Hello All meet...the new guy
~ndi Don't worry Desmond, Fridays are always like this. They all get serious from Monday onwards... Or so the King of the Potato People told me anyway PBB -Original Message- From: Desmond Witherspoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 19:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy Welcome to the biggest cat-fight-flirting-haiku-throwing-exchange-bash on the planet -Denis Baldwin Well, yeah that's what I meant -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy Welcome to the biggest cat-fight-flirting-haiku-throwing-exchange-bash on the planet. Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Desmond Witherspoon Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hello All meet...the new guy To all, Hey I just joined this list in the hopes that one of you guys will help in the coming months with some updates and upgrades. With that being said? How the hell is everybody? I received my first messages earlier this morning...and its not totally what I expected. Desmond Witherspoon Network and PC Support Technician Metropolitan New York Library Council 57 East 11th Street New York, NY 10003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hello All meet...the new guy
~ndi Ah, so the King of the Potato People has joined the list then... g PBB -Original Message- From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 19:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Paul Bouzan wrote: Don't worry Desmond, Fridays are always like this Not true. It's like this all the time. ;-) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hello All meet...the new guy
Oh yes..! -Original Message- From: Desmond Witherspoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 20:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy Fine line of warriors, the potato people -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy ~ndi Ah, so the King of the Potato People has joined the list then... g PBB -Original Message- From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 19:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Paul Bouzan wrote: Don't worry Desmond, Fridays are always like this Not true. It's like this all the time. ;-) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 5.5
~ndi OWA 5.5 can be used for 5.5 and 2K but OWA 2K can only do 2K and not 5.5. did that make sense...? PBB -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 20:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 Well, I think one could... But why? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 Er...iirc, that can NOT be done. Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: George Vijay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:41 PM Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion Conversation: OWA 5.5 Subject: OWA 5.5 Dear All, I wanted to have OWA5.5 for Exchange 2000 BE server. Can anyone advice me how can I acheive this? George Vijay _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 5.5
Are you sure...? -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 20:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 It makes sense, but it's totally non-intuitive. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Having had it with the two of them, God's punishment was that Adam and Eve should have children of their own. Thus, the pattern was set and it has never changed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Bouzan Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 ~ndi OWA 5.5 can be used for 5.5 and 2K but OWA 2K can only do 2K and not 5.5. did that make sense...? PBB -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 20:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 Well, I think one could... But why? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 Er...iirc, that can NOT be done. Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: George Vijay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:41 PM Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion Conversation: OWA 5.5 Subject: OWA 5.5 Dear All, I wanted to have OWA5.5 for Exchange 2000 BE server. Can anyone advice me how can I acheive this? George Vijay _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FU Friday
~ndi Count yourself lucky, I AM the boss and I still end up in the office 'till 9pm each night! Damn minions want to get to the pub on time! PBB -Original Message- From: Desmond Witherspoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 21:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: FU Friday That's actually pretty good, my boss has bounced out the office early this whole week. When the web server went down I was the one here till 9pm, I'm the one who was in on Sunday. (Not to sound bitter or anything) -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FU Friday Anyone want to start an FU friday list. We can send out an FU to people who made their week that much harder. For example send an FU out to my boss because he made me create 250 dls at 430 on firday and then he left for the day. Give it some thought it would be fun. Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MimeSweeper vs MailEssentials
~ndi Been discussed at length before but I prefer Mailsweeper - probably just out of preference but it has a long track record and is very well supported and has saved me from numerous problems.. Try the eval and see what you think PBB -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 October 2001 04:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MimeSweeper vs MailEssentials Hi Has anyone played with MailEssentials and MimeSweeper for SMTP ? What are your impressions ? Are both doing about the same thing or one of those product is doing everything the other is doing and more ? What about Stability ? THANKS a lot for your input. JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
~ndi Been there Luckily only lost the keyb tho :-¬ PBB -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2001 22:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source *** WARNING - THIS MESSAGE ORIGINATES FROM THE INTERNET *** Al right...I like you guys. Here it is I just hit a full Coke on the corner of my desk (on accident). It punched a hole in it and proceeded to hose down both my monitors, KB, mouse and my minions laptop. The KB is wrecked. At the same moment our T1 went down! I would kill a user for this. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source oh, right, can't tell anyone. Soda boy. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net One of the greatest joys known to man is to take a flight into ignorance in search of knowledge. --Robert Lynd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source S!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source He's gotta do something after destroying his keyboard. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net One universal manifestation of raw, natural magic throughout the universe is this: that any domestic food store, raided furtively in the middle of the night, always contains, no matter what its daytime invertory, half a jar of elderly mayonnaise, a piece of very old chese, and a tomato with white mold growing on it. (From Mort, by Terry Pratchett) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source We're just a funny guy today aren't we? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Do you wear your leather mask while doing it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Just enter the domain name.. Flowgo.com and that's it. Stop/Restart the IMC and all should be well. D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Lambert Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Thanks, Lori. As you can tell, I'm relatively new to Exchange and appreciate all the help I can get. I did try the *.flowgo and it didn't work. I get the invalid domain name message which I thought I would using a wildcard. But it was worth a try. Thanks again. Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-465-2351 x2232 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source That, or it's not really from there. The best thing really is to educate your users to utilize the delete key and to not go on the internet willy-nilly waving a work e-mail address. Keeping up with spammers is like keeping up with content filters. It's a losing battle and only ends up making you crazy. -Original Message- From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source No. That's probably it. Thanks! Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-465-2351 x2232 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Did you put a stop in for *.flowgo.com?
RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
~ndi Just detach it from the laptop first PBB -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2001 22:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source *** WARNING - THIS MESSAGE ORIGINATES FROM THE INTERNET *** Put the KB in the dishwasher and it will be fine.. Trust me... Works with laptop KB's too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Al right...I like you guys. Here it is I just hit a full Coke on the corner of my desk (on accident). It punched a hole in it and proceeded to hose down both my monitors, KB, mouse and my minions laptop. The KB is wrecked. At the same moment our T1 went down! I would kill a user for this. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source oh, right, can't tell anyone. Soda boy. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net One of the greatest joys known to man is to take a flight into ignorance in search of knowledge. --Robert Lynd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source S!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source He's gotta do something after destroying his keyboard. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net One universal manifestation of raw, natural magic throughout the universe is this: that any domestic food store, raided furtively in the middle of the night, always contains, no matter what its daytime invertory, half a jar of elderly mayonnaise, a piece of very old chese, and a tomato with white mold growing on it. (From Mort, by Terry Pratchett) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source We're just a funny guy today aren't we? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Do you wear your leather mask while doing it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Just enter the domain name.. Flowgo.com and that's it. Stop/Restart the IMC and all should be well. D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Lambert Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Thanks, Lori. As you can tell, I'm relatively new to Exchange and appreciate all the help I can get. I did try the *.flowgo and it didn't work. I get the invalid domain name message which I thought I would using a wildcard. But it was worth a try. Thanks again. Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-465-2351 x2232 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source That, or it's not really from there. The best thing really is to educate your users to utilize the delete key and to not go on the internet willy-nilly waving a work e-mail address. Keeping up with spammers is like keeping up with content filters. It's a losing battle and only ends up making you crazy. -Original Message- From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source No. That's probably it. Thanks! Bill Lambert,
RE: exchange FOLDERS
~ndi You pay 25k for basic 5 day support on a Lucent PBX! I've got an INDeX 400 and only pay 6kgbp for the same level here in the UK. This includes the IVM, the IPNC and ad-hoc callout. Don't talk to me about crap databases, Filemaker support alone makes me acidic PBB -Original Message- From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2001 22:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange FOLDERS *** WARNING - THIS MESSAGE ORIGINATES FROM THE INTERNET *** I don't want to flame Richard, even though the only time he doesn't use caps is at the beginning of a sentence. Richard, Microsoft support is good. One the system I administer is our Lucent pbx and we pay $25,000 for basic 5 day business hours support. Also we just paid $30,000 support for a crap database called Vantive. Just a couple of examples. Microsoft is a great deal for $245 per incident. The one place Microsoft can not be accused of ripping us off is Support. Non commitment support, how can you slag that off? Not to mention TechNet? Nathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange FOLDERS yea I can never find crap that I want on technet I went to the MSFT search page and entered crap. This was the first hit: Can We Get Along? The Application Compatibility Team http://www.microsoft.com/WINDOWS2000/server/evaluation/news/fromms/kanoc ompa t.asp Can't we get along? I know what you mean, though. But they cost of $245 a call for Product Support Services is really not that much and provides a deterrent so people who don't have a clue don't use tech support as user/admin training. Technet has a little learning curve for searching, because your choice of words to look for might not be theirs. A little time spent will show you. Look at the search words at the bottom of the KB articles. The cost is standard. Most other large software producers do not provide free support. Even smaller applications. We support Great Plains Accounting software now. Their knowledge base is not available to the public or to customers without the big support contract, so I *have* to pay for tech support. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange FOLDERS No I did research TechNet a long time ago and they gave me 3 resources that had to do with my error on OWA but it seems like it didn't apply to my problem. Plus I really don't think Microsoft is that great when it comes to helping people with their software, sometimes it seems to me that they are in it for the money. Its kind of ridiculous when you can only get support from Microsoft if you pay a monthly or yearly fee. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS That's it!! I am hereby relinquishing my tech buddy assistance. It has become apparent that you do not care to learn for yourself and I as well as the rest of us are NOT going to baby you through Exchange. Maybe... Just maybe if you had one inkling of a clue you'd know how to search TechNet and other resources for such matters. I've never had a great deal of trouble researching TechNet. In fact, I find very useful information there almost daily as I would imagine others around here do. Maybe the problem is NOT TechNet, but YOU. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS yea I can never find crap that I want on technet. -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Hanji Jr., No it's not...Have you been introduced to TechNet, yet? www.microsoft.com/technet Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Does anyone know if the exchsrvr directory is shared by default. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: DISCLAIMER
~ndi Yeah, and what about the ...able-bodied workforce and top-notch professionals at the helm... chanting We are not worthy...! /chanting PBB -Original Message- From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 September 2001 13:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DISCLAIMER *** WARNING - THIS MESSAGE ORIGINATES FROM THE INTERNET *** sarcasm Come on folks, a little respect. This is, after all the Brain Behind the Intelligent Enterprise (from http://www.indbrain.com/) /sarcasm ...Joel -Original Message- From: .DL Helpdesk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DISCLAIMER Demand back your subscription fee. JJ -Original Message- From: kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: DISCLAIMER I only see useful info in mail not junk - Original Message - From: .DL Helpdesk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:42 PM Subject: RE: DISCLAIMER Ummm, Did you read Kumindas comments or are you just a bit cold? JJ -Original Message- From: kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: DISCLAIMER Disclaimer should add automatically for all the users in my exchange server, when ever they send a mail. - Original Message - From: Kuminda Chandimith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:21 PM Subject: RE: DISCLAIMER Before everyone come and flame you.. Take my advise...go to http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp Other wise your (apparently) first day in the list will not be a pleasant encounter at all.. good luck Kuminda Chandimith Sr. Technical Consultant Ducont.com FZ-LLC Tel: + 971-4-3913000 Ext 237 Fax: +971-4-3913001 http://www.ducont.com -Original Message- From: kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 September 2001 12:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DISCLAIMER Hi all, How do I add the Disclimer massege to each mail which is going out from my exchange server, (Exchange 5.5 SP4) thanks UK _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC Awards 2001
~ndi True... too true -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 August 2001 20:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 *** WARNING - THIS MESSAGE ORIGINATES FROM THE INTERNET *** Especially when you've had a few drinks. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael L. Callahan Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 snip Children, all said and done, are absolutely the loveliest things on earth. snip _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC Awards 2001
~ndi Hehe! - My son used to insist that I throw him FULL cans at him to keep him quiet - and that was at age six! PBB -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 August 2001 05:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 *** WARNING - THIS MESSAGE ORIGINATES FROM THE INTERNET *** I just throw empty beer cans at 'em when they say that. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neubauer, Joseph Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 yes - but you have 3 or 4 years of Daddy play with ME! in stereo until then. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 I disagree. Two are easier. One requires much more attention. With two (reasonably closely together in age), they entertain each other much of the time. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC Awards 2001 Funny. People keep telling me that a second won't make things more difficult. I knew they were lying. M - Original Message - From: Neubauer, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:14 PM Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Ah don't worry - Someone one told me that two was 10 times harder than one They we lying to me. its 100 times harder! -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Ahh.. such great encouragment once can receieve from this list. With the imminent birth of my second, my joy is turning into fear or the unknown.(1) --rex 1) At least with a computer it does what I expect it to do. Very logical and orderly.(2) 2) Except for those occasions when it does something totally unexpected. (3) 3) Usually those unexpected things can be traced back to my own silly actions at some point. -Original Message- From: Rosenthal, Daniel A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Like you can't imagine. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 That must have hurt. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rosenthal, Daniel A. Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 You don't want to be away from home now...I had my second in March and still can't leave! -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 airlines won't let a women who is due in 6 days fly.. liablity risk. Orlando is a bit too far to drive from Chicago.. Besides the need to stop ever hour for her to go to the bathroom, there is the risk of her going into labor and giving birth in the car.. or during one of the keynote sessions.. Naw.. I'll just have to pass this year and hit MEC next year. --rex -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC Awards 2001 You could bring your wife ... Martin - Original Message - From: Choi Rex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:50 PM Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 *sigh* I'd love to go to MEC this year.. unfortunatly, my wife is due with our 2nd baby the first week of October. Unless I wanted to be single again (I don't) it didn't seem like a good time to skip out for a week.. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 What about Best Fish Tacos? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Earnest A. Glazener Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions
RE: Routing SMTP mail in a Hub spoke exchange environment
~ndi How many users in all/at each office? PBB -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 August 2001 21:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Routing SMTP mail in a Hub spoke exchange environment *** WARNING - THIS MESSAGE ORIGINATES FROM THE INTERNET *** I am looking for a good document or advice on how to set up the following mail routing setup and any issues that anyone may have seen: I have 7 Branch offices, all connected by full t1 connections to the Corporate office, the only internet connection is through Corporates t1 out to the internet Currently we are running groupwise 5.5 for all messaging, and I have just implemented exchange 5.5sp3 on NT4/sp6 running the groupwise/exchange connector on exchange (man what a pain) and on Groupwise the Mail gateway NLM API. So now I have all of my Groupwise mailboxes synced to exchange 5.5 as Custom recipients,,, this is where I need advice at... I have to join an existing Exchange Organization and route all mail for company.com to the exchange servers running smtp at corporate, so I need advice/docs on how to set up smtp routing from multiple branch offices up to the corporate servers who actually have the internet connection I have the migration stuff licked my users can log onto either grouwise or exchange and see each other and send mail, but it is now time to remove groupwise, and set up the smtp from my branch offices to the corporate smtp servers for outside mail via exchange.. Thanks IA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
