Error when moving mailboxes (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)]

Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE
 
Good day to everyone:

I am currently in the process of moving mailboxes from one MDB
on an Exchange 2003 server to another in an attempt to recover about 50%
whitespace.

When running the EXCHANGE TASK of MOVE MAILBOX I will sometimes
receive an error on a mailbox. The detailed report records an error of
"0x80072020".  I've Googled the error and it seems to be related to
accessing Active Directory.  Does anyone on the list have an idea of how
to fix this?

Thanks.

John H. Matteson, Jr.
Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
Forward Operating Base Orgun-E
Afghanistan
DSN - 318 431 8001
VoSIP - (308) 431 - 
Iridium SatPhone - 717.633.3823
Roshain Mobile - 079 - 736 - 3832

"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes
here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he
shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an
outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or
birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming
in every facet an American, and nothing but an American... There can be
no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but
something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one
flag, the American flag.. We have room for but one language here, and
that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole
loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

Teddy Roosevelt; 1907


 
Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Internal Mail only on Exchange 2007

[Graeme Carstairs]

hi List,


Is there an easy way to set one user up as being able to send and receive
mail internally within the organisation only, and not to the internet?

Thanks

Graeme


-- 
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world
and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the
world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Internal Mail only on Exchange 2007

[Simon Butler]

Transport Rule. Set those using the wizard in EMC, Org Config, Hub Transport.
If this is likely to be used for many people you may want to create a group and 
apply the rule to the group - even if the group only has one member at this 
time.

Simon.


--
Simon Butler
MVP: Exchange, MCSE
Amset IT Solutions Ltd.

e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: www.amset.co.uk
w: www.amset.info

Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with Windows Mobile 5.0?
http://CertificatesForExchange.com/ for 
certificates from just $23.99.
Need a domain for your certificate? 
http://DomainsForExchange.net/







From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 June 2008 12:39
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Internal Mail only on Exchange 2007

hi List,


Is there an easy way to set one user up as being able to send and receive mail 
internally within the organisation only, and not to the internet?

Thanks

Graeme


--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and 
sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to 
make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Blackberry Webcasts

[Carol Fee]

OK, stupid question, but what is the TCode TSO field in the registration
? 


CFee


-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 17:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Webcasts

Just saw this come in and I know we have some folks who are fairly new
to the Blackberry Enterprise scene.

http://tinyurl.com/5w56qa

The next BB webcast on June 18th is on troubleshooting BES activation
issues.  Something this list seems to see its fair share of.


Hope it helps

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Internal Mail only on Exchange 2007

[Graeme Carstairs]

Thanks

Looks Good


On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Simon Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Transport Rule. Set those using the wizard in EMC, Org Config, Hub
> Transport.
> If this is likely to be used for many people you may want to create a group
> and apply the rule to the group - even if the group only has one member at
> this time.
>
> Simon.
>
>
> --
> Simon Butler
> MVP: Exchange, MCSE
> Amset IT Solutions Ltd.
>
> e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> w: www.amset.co.uk
> w: www.amset.info
>
> Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with Windows Mobile 5.0?
> http://CertificatesForExchange.com/ for 
> certificates from just $23.99.
> Need a domain for your certificate? 
> http://DomainsForExchange.net/
>
>
>
>
>
>  --
> *From:* Graeme Carstairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* 10 June 2008 12:39
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Internal Mail only on Exchange 2007
>
> hi List,
>
>
> Is there an easy way to set one user up as being able to send and receive
> mail internally within the organisation only, and not to the internet?
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
> --
> Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world
> and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the
> world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world
and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the
world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Blackberry Webcasts

[Maglinger, Paul]

Thanks from here too.  I'll pass it along to our Help Desk!
-Paul 

-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 5:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

And I'm one of them, thanks for sharing!
-Sam

My 30 Demo of the new Curve ends this week, and I have to ship it back
:(  I have grown to love it.
 

-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 4:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Webcasts

Just saw this come in and I know we have some folks who are fairly new
to the Blackberry Enterprise scene.

http://tinyurl.com/5w56qa

The next BB webcast on June 18th is on troubleshooting BES activation
issues.  Something this list seems to see its fair share of.


Hope it helps

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

email archiving

[Paul Everett]

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[Kennedy, Jim]

Journaling is a feature in Exch. that uses a mailbox to bcc every email that is 
sent to or from or within your organization. So everything sent or received 
goes to that mailbox. Then you set up an appliance, or a server...or on the 
same server if you want to hit that mailbox every few minutes and download 
those messages. The archiver then organizes those messages into a searchable 
database.

That way they are all on a machine that is secure from the users and the emails 
cannot be deleted by them

There is the appliance route, a box you just plug in and set up. There are also 
pure software solutions where you bring your own server and add their software 
to it. We went that route and went with GFI for Exchange. They have 
nonprofit/education discounts.




From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.
We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I don't 
know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and turn 
Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.
Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?  Is this 
the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a non-profit 
behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.
We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right now my 
total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

Thanks,

Paul Everett
IS Dept.
Lee Mental Health Center
239-791-1551

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper Center 
for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.  Visit our 
website at www.leementalhealth.orghttp://www.leementalhealth.org/> to 
learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message, including attachments.





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator]

Hi Paul,
 
My environment is almost exactly as yours.
We are a Non-Profit entity also.
 
We have been using GFI Mail Archiver with SQL Server 2005 which has
worked well, however some of the Exchange MVP's may state that
Journaling is not a good choice due to the fact it could cause high CPU
usage however we have not seen that occur in this environment...yet!
 
YMMV!
 
If I had it to do over again, I would choose another program. One I have
looked at is from MailTrust, www.Mailtrust.com
  or you can go with the one offered by our
host, Sunbelt-Software, which looks very nice indeed called, Sunbelt
Exchange Archiver.
 
You have to decide if you want to host your own archival solution or
outsource.
Both have their Pro's and Con's, the biggest negative being security of
information in the email's archived if you outsource and loss of
control.
 
HTH some,
Tom
 



From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving



I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[Martin Blackstone]

You might think of sharing the name of the solution so as to gain input for
others that may have it or looked at it.

 

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Journaling is a feature in Exch. that uses a mailbox to bcc every email that
is sent to or from or within your organization. So everything sent or
received goes to that mailbox. Then you set up an appliance, or a server.or
on the same server if you want to hit that mailbox every few minutes and
download those messages. The archiver then organizes those messages into a
searchable database.

 

That way they are all on a machine that is secure from the users and the
emails cannot be deleted by them..

 

There is the appliance route, a box you just plug in and set up. There are
also pure software solutions where you bring your own server and add their
software to it. We went that route and went with GFI for Exchange. They have
nonprofit/education discounts.

 

 

 

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.  

We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I don't
know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and turn
Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?  Is
this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right now
my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at  http://www.leementalhealth.org/>
www.leementalhealth.org to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or
distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message, including attachments.

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[Paul Everett]

It is MessageLabs.

 



From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

You might think of sharing the name of the solution so as to gain input
for others that may have it or looked at it.

 

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Journaling is a feature in Exch. that uses a mailbox to bcc every email
that is sent to or from or within your organization. So everything sent
or received goes to that mailbox. Then you set up an appliance, or a
server...or on the same server if you want to hit that mailbox every few
minutes and download those messages. The archiver then organizes those
messages into a searchable database.

 

That way they are all on a machine that is secure from the users and the
emails cannot be deleted by them

 

There is the appliance route, a box you just plug in and set up. There
are also pure software solutions where you bring your own server and add
their software to it. We went that route and went with GFI for Exchange.
They have nonprofit/education discounts.

 

 

 

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[Doige, Clayton]

Because journaling is turned on (plus a couple of reg hacks) every
message that passes through the MTA is archived. We use it here. While
it is great for compliance in terms of enforcing our retention policy,
it does not help to manage information store sizes as it is just taking
a copy of everything. We just put in a solution called Zantaz. It's not
cheap, but what it does is takes every email older than a specified date
and moves it to archive storage. What's cool though is that the email
appears to the user as if it is still in the original folder in outlook,
it just changes the icon slightly. It compresses the archive and
eliminates duplicates that may have got past single instance storage. We
have changed from having 160GB if information store date to having under
20, but then in the mean time the size of the archive is 70 GB because
of the compressions etc etc etc. Great solution.

 

Clayton Doige

IT Project Manager

CME Development Corporation

T: 020 7430 5355

M: 07949 255062

E:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

W:www.cetv-net.com

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 10 June 2008 14:15
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

How does a hosted solution like Messagelabs archive internal email sent
to<>from employees?

 

 



From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

It is MessageLabs.

 



From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

You might think of sharing the name of the solution so as to gain input
for others that may have it or looked at it.

 

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Journaling is a feature in Exch. that uses a mailbox to bcc every email
that is sent to or from or within your organization. So everything sent
or received goes to that mailbox. Then you set up an appliance, or a
server...or on the same server if you want to hit that mailbox every few
minutes and download those messages. The archiver then organizes those
messages into a searchable database.

 

That way they are all on a machine that is secure from the users and the
emails cannot be deleted by them

 

There is the appliance route, a box you just plug in and set up. There
are also pure software solutions where you bring your own server and add
their software to it. We went that route and went with GFI for Exchange.
They have nonprofit/education discounts.

 

 

 

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
__


__
This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information 
intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may 
contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt 
from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution 
of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or 
sanction. I

Re: email archiving

[John Cook]

Ditto on the Zantaz EAS but it's not cheap and may be overkill for smalller 
shops that don't have compliance issues.


From: Doige, Clayton
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Tue Jun 10 09:23:42 2008
Subject: RE: email archiving
Because journaling is turned on (plus a couple of reg hacks) every message that 
passes through the MTA is archived. We use it here. While it is great for 
compliance in terms of enforcing our retention policy, it does not help to 
manage information store sizes as it is just taking a copy of everything. We 
just put in a solution called Zantaz. It’s not cheap, but what it does is takes 
every email older than a specified date and moves it to archive storage. What’s 
cool though is that the email appears to the user as if it is still in the 
original folder in outlook, it just changes the icon slightly. It compresses 
the archive and eliminates duplicates that may have got past single instance 
storage. We have changed from having 160GB if information store date to having 
under 20, but then in the mean time the size of the archive is 70 GB because of 
the compressions etc etc etc. Great solution.

Clayton Doige
IT Project Manager
CME Development Corporation
T: 020 7430 5355
M: 07949 255062
E:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W:www.cetv-net.com
From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 June 2008 14:15
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

How does a hosted solution like Messagelabs archive internal email sent 
to<>from employees?



From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

It is MessageLabs.


From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

You might think of sharing the name of the solution so as to gain input for 
others that may have it or looked at it.

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

Journaling is a feature in Exch. that uses a mailbox to bcc every email that is 
sent to or from or within your organization. So everything sent or received 
goes to that mailbox. Then you set up an appliance, or a server…or on the same 
server if you want to hit that mailbox every few minutes and download those 
messages. The archiver then organizes those messages into a searchable database.

That way they are all on a machine that is secure from the users and the emails 
cannot be deleted by them….

There is the appliance route, a box you just plug in and set up. There are also 
pure software solutions where you bring your own server and add their software 
to it. We went that route and went with GFI for Exchange. They have 
nonprofit/education discounts.




From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

I’m sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.
We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I don’t 
know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and turn 
Journaling “on” on our Exchange server, and it’s wildly expensive.
Can someone give me an “in-a-nutshell” explanation of how this works?  Is this 
the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a non-profit 
behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.
We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right now my 
total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

Thanks,

Paul Everett
IS Dept.
Lee Mental Health Center
239-791-1551

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper Center 
for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.  Visit our 
website at www.leementalhealth.orghttp://www.leementalhealth.org/> to 
learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message, including attachments.

















__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
__

__
This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information 
intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may 
contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential 

RE: email archiving

[Eldridge, Dave]

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 




This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately via e-mail 
if you have received this e-mail by mistake; then, delete this e-mail from your 
system.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[Bob Fronk]

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[Eldridge, Dave]

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

 

 

 




This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately via e-mail 
if you have received this e-mail by mistake; then, delete this e-mail from your 
system.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[Bob Fronk]

Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very
little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[David Mazzaccaro]

How does a hosted solution like Messagelabs archive internal email sent
to<>from employees?

 

 



From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

It is MessageLabs.

 



From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

You might think of sharing the name of the solution so as to gain input
for others that may have it or looked at it.

 

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Journaling is a feature in Exch. that uses a mailbox to bcc every email
that is sent to or from or within your organization. So everything sent
or received goes to that mailbox. Then you set up an appliance, or a
server...or on the same server if you want to hit that mailbox every few
minutes and download those messages. The archiver then organizes those
messages into a searchable database.

 

That way they are all on a machine that is secure from the users and the
emails cannot be deleted by them

 

There is the appliance route, a box you just plug in and set up. There
are also pure software solutions where you bring your own server and add
their software to it. We went that route and went with GFI for Exchange.
They have nonprofit/education discounts.

 

 

 

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator]

SEA doesn't use Journaling.
 
"Direct Archiving" eliminates need for Journaling
SEA provides a unique Direct Archiving feature that enables archiving of
emails immediately after they are received. Direct Archiving is a
significant breakthrough in efficient email archiving which eliminates
the need for the Exchange Journal mailbox. Immediate archiving onto
storage media improves the performance of the Exchange server, helps to
ensure legal compliance, and diminishes the necessity to apply
scheduler, threshold and quota archiving jobs. 




From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving



Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[Eldridge, Dave]

That's good to know. I've gotten approval for an archive system this
summer and this is certainly one of my choices.

Thanks

 

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very
little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

 

 

 




This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately via e-mail 
if you have received this e-mail by mistake; then, delete this e-mail from your 
system.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[David Mazzaccaro]

How does that work? 

I imagine you must need a TON of storage for archiving?

Sunbelt claims they can reduce your exchange database, but I don't see
how when they are collecting everything that passes through?

 

 

 



From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very
little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[Kennedy, Jim]

It's magic as far as I can tell. Probably a factor of how efficient SQL seems 
to be with storage. We use GFI and the storage is dramatically smaller than in 
Exchange. I am sure Sunbelt delivers the same. I have about 100 gigs of active 
stores on Exchange. When I put it up we did a full archive of the existing 
stores, then everything sent/received since Feb 1st, yet the archive store is 
currently 108 gigs.



From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

How does that work?
I imagine you must need a TON of storage for archiving?
Sunbelt claims they can reduce your exchange database, but I don't see how when 
they are collecting everything that passes through?




From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very little 
(if any)impact on our Exchange server.

Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.


Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email 
retention.
Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do mention 
that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.
We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I don't 
know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and turn 
Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.
Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?  Is this 
the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a non-profit 
behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.
We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right now my 
total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

Thanks,

Paul Everett
IS Dept.
Lee Mental Health Center
239-791-1551

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper Center 
for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.  Visit our 
website at www.leementalhealth.orghttp://www.leementalhealth.org/> to 
learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message, including attachments.





This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not 
represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be 
confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in 
accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or any of its 
contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 
please return to sender and delete the message from your computer system.







This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not 
represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be 
confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in 
accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or any of its 
contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 
please return to sender and delete the message from your computer system.










~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[David Mazzaccaro]

Is the archive store on the same physical drives as the Exchange store?

 

 



From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

It's magic as far as I can tell. Probably a factor of how efficient SQL
seems to be with storage. We use GFI and the storage is dramatically
smaller than in Exchange. I am sure Sunbelt delivers the same. I have
about 100 gigs of active stores on Exchange. When I put it up we did a
full archive of the existing stores, then everything sent/received since
Feb 1st, yet the archive store is currently 108 gigs.

 

 

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

How does that work? 

I imagine you must need a TON of storage for archiving?

Sunbelt claims they can reduce your exchange database, but I don't see
how when they are collecting everything that passes through?

 

 

 



From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very
little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[Kennedy, Jim]

Completely separate server. GFI pulls the messages from the Journaling mailbox, 
with a glorified Outlook connection.


From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

Is the archive store on the same physical drives as the Exchange store?



From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

It's magic as far as I can tell. Probably a factor of how efficient SQL seems 
to be with storage. We use GFI and the storage is dramatically smaller than in 
Exchange. I am sure Sunbelt delivers the same. I have about 100 gigs of active 
stores on Exchange. When I put it up we did a full archive of the existing 
stores, then everything sent/received since Feb 1st, yet the archive store is 
currently 108 gigs.



From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

How does that work?
I imagine you must need a TON of storage for archiving?
Sunbelt claims they can reduce your exchange database, but I don't see how when 
they are collecting everything that passes through?




From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very little 
(if any)impact on our Exchange server.

Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.


Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email 
retention.
Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do mention 
that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.
We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I don't 
know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and turn 
Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.
Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?  Is this 
the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a non-profit 
behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.
We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right now my 
total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

Thanks,

Paul Everett
IS Dept.
Lee Mental Health Center
239-791-1551

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper Center 
for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.  Visit our 
website at www.leementalhealth.orghttp://www.leementalhealth.org/> to 
learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message, including attachments.





This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not 
represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be 
confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in 
accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or any of its 
contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 
please return to sender and delete the message from your computer system.







This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not 
represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be 
confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in 
accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or any of its 
contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 
please return to sender and delete t

RE: email archiving

[Bob Fronk]

I highly recommend it.  Price is better than just about anything else.
Performance is good.  Support has been excellent.

 

To answer a couple of the other questions posted:

 

RE: Storage:  I have 900GB available for my archive.  My Exchange store
is 250GB.  Currently my archive is using about 120GB (all the Exchange
store was archived, plus I have about 5 months of active archiving).
Everything is compressed, so space use is good in my opinion.

 

You can have SEA move things from Exchange to the archive to reduce
Exchange store space.  SEA would leave a "shortcut" in the users' inbox
and will retrieve the archived item when the shortcut is activated.
Currently I am not doing that, but plan on short cutting items older
than X years very soon.

 

The SEA server is on a separate box, so the archive is NOT on the same
physical drives.

 

 

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

That's good to know. I've gotten approval for an archive system this
summer and this is certainly one of my choices.

Thanks

 

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very
little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender an

RE: Blackberry Webcasts

[John Cook]

That would be your 5 digit technical support services code (if you have T 
Support with RIM) HTH
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Ph -  352-393-2741 x320
Fax - 352-393-2746
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, A+, N+

From: Carol Fee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

OK, stupid question, but what is the TCode TSO field in the registration
?


CFee


-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 17:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Webcasts

Just saw this come in and I know we have some folks who are fairly new
to the Blackberry Enterprise scene.

http://tinyurl.com/5w56qa

The next BB webcast on June 18th is on troubleshooting BES activation
issues.  Something this list seems to see its fair share of.


Hope it helps

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Blackberry Webcasts

[Troy Meyer]

AKA the subscriber code.

Guess I should have mentioned those webcasts are for folks with support 
contracts.


-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

That would be your 5 digit technical support services code (if you have T 
Support with RIM) HTH
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Ph -  352-393-2741 x320
Fax - 352-393-2746
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, A+, N+

From: Carol Fee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

OK, stupid question, but what is the TCode TSO field in the registration
?


CFee


-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 17:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Webcasts

Just saw this come in and I know we have some folks who are fairly new
to the Blackberry Enterprise scene.

http://tinyurl.com/5w56qa

The next BB webcast on June 18th is on troubleshooting BES activation
issues.  Something this list seems to see its fair share of.


Hope it helps

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[David Mazzaccaro]

What kind of box is the SEA on?  (Hardware/software?) 

I assume it is a dedicate server that sits close to Exchange?

SQL server? 

Thx

 

 



From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I highly recommend it.  Price is better than just about anything else.
Performance is good.  Support has been excellent.

 

To answer a couple of the other questions posted:

 

RE: Storage:  I have 900GB available for my archive.  My Exchange store
is 250GB.  Currently my archive is using about 120GB (all the Exchange
store was archived, plus I have about 5 months of active archiving).
Everything is compressed, so space use is good in my opinion.

 

You can have SEA move things from Exchange to the archive to reduce
Exchange store space.  SEA would leave a "shortcut" in the users' inbox
and will retrieve the archived item when the shortcut is activated.
Currently I am not doing that, but plan on short cutting items older
than X years very soon.

 

The SEA server is on a separate box, so the archive is NOT on the same
physical drives.

 

 

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

That's good to know. I've gotten approval for an archive system this
summer and this is certainly one of my choices.

Thanks

 

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very
little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not th

RE: email archiving

[Alex Eckelberry]

Actually you can opt to use Journaling or not in SEA. 
 
There are also environmental considerations to consider, Direct Archving
works well in smaller shops but for larger operations, we recommend
Journaling instead for overhead reasons.
 
Alex


Alex Eckelberry
CEO
Sunbelt Software
33 N. Garden Avenue, Suite 1200
Clearwater, FL 33755
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
p: 727.562.0101 x220
f: 727-562-3402
w: www.sunbeltsoftware.com  
b: www.sunbeltblog.com  
 

 

 




From: Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving


SEA doesn't use Journaling.
 
"Direct Archiving" eliminates need for Journaling
SEA provides a unique Direct Archiving feature that enables archiving of
emails immediately after they are received. Direct Archiving is a
significant breakthrough in efficient email archiving which eliminates
the need for the Exchange Journal mailbox. Immediate archiving onto
storage media improves the performance of the Exchange server, helps to
ensure legal compliance, and diminishes the necessity to apply
scheduler, threshold and quota archiving jobs. 




From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving



Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.


 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja

Schedule Free/Busy System Folder not showing up on Exchange Server

[Chris Pohlschneider]

Hello,

 

We have an Exchange 2003 SP2 Server running on Windows Server 2003 SP2.
We have an issue where no one can see the other user's calendar
information to determine if they can schedule a meeting at a particular
time. I have noticed that they Schedule+ Free/Busy folder is not showing
up underneath of the Public Folder Store. Supposedly there was an
Exchange Server crash a few years ago before I started and I am thinking
this may be a lingering problem from that crash. Does anyone have some
insight on how I would be able to fix this or is there even a fix
without rebuilding the server and Exchange? Any help is appreciated.

 

Chris Pohlschneider

Network Administrator

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

937-494-2559

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Restricted GAL

[Don Andrews]

Y'mean they always display the whole list and scroll through it everytime? - 
wow - guess I've never worked in that small an environment - we've always used 
the enter a fragment of the name and either check names or simply send.

 



From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 8:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: R: Restricted GAL

 

With 2000 users instead of 45 they have to input the surname to find it, so is 
easier to put them in a separate contact list

 

GuidoElia

HELPPC

 

 



Da: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Inviato: martedì 10 giugno 2008 1.12
A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Restricted GAL

Why can't they use the complete GAL?

 



From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 4:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricted GAL

 

What you are going to have to ask for I don't think they will want to do. 

It requires a complete reconstruction of the Address Lists for all users 
globally. 

 

Two replacement GALs would have to be created. The default GAL would have to be 
blocked using permissions. 
Then there would be a GAL for the users in the group you are working with and 
and a GAL for everyone else. 

 

It isn't a simple job, and isn't something many Exchange admins would want to 
do. I don't think that Microsoft support the changes required any longer 
either. The KB article on what you had to do was pulled last year. You can see 
it here: 
http://web.archive.org/web/20041121012214/http:/support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=822940

 

Unless they have already done the bulk of the work and it is something easy for 
them to do, I would strongly expect that they will say no. 

 

Simon. 

 

 

--
Simon Butler
MVP: Exchange, MCSE
Amset IT Solutions Ltd.

e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: www.amset.co.uk
w: www.amset.info

Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with Windows Mobile 5.0?
http://CertificatesForExchange.com/ for certificates from just $23.99.
Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/ 

 

 

 

 



From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 June 2008 05:15
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Restricted GAL

 

I migrate a customer to a WAN corporate domain (and Exchange) 
When the want to send a message they see as GAL all the corporate but they want 
just their internal users. 
What have I ask to the corporate exchange manager for . 

TIA 

 

GuidoElia 
HELPPC 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Schedule Free/Busy System Folder not showing up on Exchange Server

[Sherry Abercrombie]

A quick Google search yielded this link:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/284200/en-us

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Chris Pohlschneider <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Hello,
>
>
>
> We have an Exchange 2003 SP2 Server running on Windows Server 2003 SP2. We
> have an issue where no one can see the other user's calendar information to
> determine if they can schedule a meeting at a particular time. I have
> noticed that they Schedule+ Free/Busy folder is not showing up underneath of
> the Public Folder Store. Supposedly there was an Exchange Server crash a few
> years ago before I started and I am thinking this may be a lingering problem
> from that crash. Does anyone have some insight on how I would be able to fix
> this or is there even a fix without rebuilding the server and Exchange? Any
> help is appreciated.
>
>
>
> Chris Pohlschneider
>
> Network Administrator
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 937-494-2559
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Schedule Free/Busy System Folder not showing up on Exchange Server

[Chris Pohlschneider]

Actually I just went through that article and still unfortunately have
the same results. The article assumes that you have an old server name
listed in the SiteFolderServer section and the value that is in there is
the current server that we are running off of.

 



From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Schedule Free/Busy System Folder not showing up on Exchange
Server

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

[Ehren Benson]

Hi-

This should be a quickie

I learned a while back (the hard way) the difference between "disable" and 
"remove" for mailboxes.  Luckily (or not) it was on my own mailbox.  
Anyway...there is a user on our systems whose data got completely convoluted by 
their own doingsso I DISABLED their mailbox and created a new one.  Now 
presumably the old one would go to the "disconnected mailboxes" list and I 
would delete it for good with this powershell command

Get-MailboxStatistics 
-database "server\db" | where {$_.disconnectdate -ne $null} | foreach 
{Remove-mailbox -database $_.database -storemailboxidentity $_.mailboxguid}

However for some reason it does not go to the disconnected mailbox list, 
but I still want to delete it because I don't want this 3.3GB mailbox floating 
around in limbo somewhere.  When I run the powershell command...

Get-MailboxStatistics | sort-object TotalItemSize |  format-table  DisplayName, 
@{expression={$_.TotalItemSize.Value.ToMB()};label="TotalItemSize(MB)"}

To see a list of all of our mailboxes with the sizes in MB sorted smallest to 
biggest I can still see the old one at the bottom of the list (because its 
huge) and the new one which I am currently filling with all of his good data 
closer to the top.  So its in the system somewhere but not in the disconnected 
list.

How do I smoke the thing?

Many thanks!

Feel free to copy my PS commands if you don't currently have them in your 
"handy commands" list :)

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Michigan State University
1209 A Biomed Phys Sci

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

[Ehren Benson]

Sorry, if it wasn't clear this is exchange 2007.

Thanks

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469

From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

Hi-

This should be a quickie

I learned a while back (the hard way) the difference between "disable" and 
"remove" for mailboxes.  Luckily (or not) it was on my own mailbox.  
Anyway...there is a user on our systems whose data got completely convoluted by 
their own doingsso I DISABLED their mailbox and created a new one.  Now 
presumably the old one would go to the "disconnected mailboxes" list and I 
would delete it for good with this powershell command

Get-MailboxStatistics 
-database "server\db" | where {$_.disconnectdate -ne $null} | foreach 
{Remove-mailbox -database $_.database -storemailboxidentity $_.mailboxguid}

However for some reason it does not go to the disconnected mailbox list, 
but I still want to delete it because I don't want this 3.3GB mailbox floating 
around in limbo somewhere.  When I run the powershell command...

Get-MailboxStatistics | sort-object TotalItemSize |  format-table  DisplayName, 
@{expression={$_.TotalItemSize.Value.ToMB()};label="TotalItemSize(MB)"}

To see a list of all of our mailboxes with the sizes in MB sorted smallest to 
biggest I can still see the old one at the bottom of the list (because its 
huge) and the new one which I am currently filling with all of his good data 
closer to the top.  So its in the system somewhere but not in the disconnected 
list.

How do I smoke the thing?

Many thanks!

Feel free to copy my PS commands if you don't currently have them in your 
"handy commands" list :)

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Michigan State University
1209 A Biomed Phys Sci

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[Bob Fronk]

Windows 2003 / SQL 2005

It is a quad-dual core 2GHZ with 4GB Ram

It has a Raid 0+1 with 6 300GB SAS drives.

It is in the same rack as the Exchange box.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

What kind of box is the SEA on?  (Hardware/software?) 

I assume it is a dedicate server that sits close to Exchange?

SQL server? 

Thx

 

 



From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I highly recommend it.  Price is better than just about anything else.
Performance is good.  Support has been excellent.

 

To answer a couple of the other questions posted:

 

RE: Storage:  I have 900GB available for my archive.  My Exchange store
is 250GB.  Currently my archive is using about 120GB (all the Exchange
store was archived, plus I have about 5 months of active archiving).
Everything is compressed, so space use is good in my opinion.

 

You can have SEA move things from Exchange to the archive to reduce
Exchange store space.  SEA would leave a "shortcut" in the users' inbox
and will retrieve the archived item when the shortcut is activated.
Currently I am not doing that, but plan on short cutting items older
than X years very soon.

 

The SEA server is on a separate box, so the archive is NOT on the same
physical drives.

 

 

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

That's good to know. I've gotten approval for an archive system this
summer and this is certainly one of my choices.

Thanks

 

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very
little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

RE: email archiving

[David Mazzaccaro]

Is it dedicated to archiving?   

Meaning it is only running Sunbelt's Exchange Archiver?

 

 

 



From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Windows 2003 / SQL 2005

It is a quad-dual core 2GHZ with 4GB Ram

It has a Raid 0+1 with 6 300GB SAS drives.

It is in the same rack as the Exchange box.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

What kind of box is the SEA on?  (Hardware/software?) 

I assume it is a dedicate server that sits close to Exchange?

SQL server? 

Thx

 

 



From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I highly recommend it.  Price is better than just about anything else.
Performance is good.  Support has been excellent.

 

To answer a couple of the other questions posted:

 

RE: Storage:  I have 900GB available for my archive.  My Exchange store
is 250GB.  Currently my archive is using about 120GB (all the Exchange
store was archived, plus I have about 5 months of active archiving).
Everything is compressed, so space use is good in my opinion.

 

You can have SEA move things from Exchange to the archive to reduce
Exchange store space.  SEA would leave a "shortcut" in the users' inbox
and will retrieve the archived item when the shortcut is activated.
Currently I am not doing that, but plan on short cutting items older
than X years very soon.

 

The SEA server is on a separate box, so the archive is NOT on the same
physical drives.

 

 

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

That's good to know. I've gotten approval for an archive system this
summer and this is certainly one of my choices.

Thanks

 

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very
little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and fe

RE: email archiving

[Bob Fronk]

Yes.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Is it dedicated to archiving?   

Meaning it is only running Sunbelt's Exchange Archiver?

 

 

 



From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Windows 2003 / SQL 2005

It is a quad-dual core 2GHZ with 4GB Ram

It has a Raid 0+1 with 6 300GB SAS drives.

It is in the same rack as the Exchange box.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

What kind of box is the SEA on?  (Hardware/software?) 

I assume it is a dedicate server that sits close to Exchange?

SQL server? 

Thx

 

 



From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I highly recommend it.  Price is better than just about anything else.
Performance is good.  Support has been excellent.

 

To answer a couple of the other questions posted:

 

RE: Storage:  I have 900GB available for my archive.  My Exchange store
is 250GB.  Currently my archive is using about 120GB (all the Exchange
store was archived, plus I have about 5 months of active archiving).
Everything is compressed, so space use is good in my opinion.

 

You can have SEA move things from Exchange to the archive to reduce
Exchange store space.  SEA would leave a "shortcut" in the users' inbox
and will retrieve the archived item when the shortcut is activated.
Currently I am not doing that, but plan on short cutting items older
than X years very soon.

 

The SEA server is on a separate box, so the archive is NOT on the same
physical drives.

 

 

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

That's good to know. I've gotten approval for an archive system this
summer and this is certainly one of my choices.

Thanks

 

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very
little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical C

RE: email archiving

[David Mazzaccaro]

Nice!

Thanks for the info... I need to start investigating archiving as well.

-Dave

 

 



From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Yes.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Is it dedicated to archiving?   

Meaning it is only running Sunbelt's Exchange Archiver?

 

 

 



From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Windows 2003 / SQL 2005

It is a quad-dual core 2GHZ with 4GB Ram

It has a Raid 0+1 with 6 300GB SAS drives.

It is in the same rack as the Exchange box.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

What kind of box is the SEA on?  (Hardware/software?) 

I assume it is a dedicate server that sits close to Exchange?

SQL server? 

Thx

 

 



From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I highly recommend it.  Price is better than just about anything else.
Performance is good.  Support has been excellent.

 

To answer a couple of the other questions posted:

 

RE: Storage:  I have 900GB available for my archive.  My Exchange store
is 250GB.  Currently my archive is using about 120GB (all the Exchange
store was archived, plus I have about 5 months of active archiving).
Everything is compressed, so space use is good in my opinion.

 

You can have SEA move things from Exchange to the archive to reduce
Exchange store space.  SEA would leave a "shortcut" in the users' inbox
and will retrieve the archived item when the shortcut is activated.
Currently I am not doing that, but plan on short cutting items older
than X years very soon.

 

The SEA server is on a separate box, so the archive is NOT on the same
physical drives.

 

 

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

That's good to know. I've gotten approval for an archive system this
summer and this is certainly one of my choices.

Thanks

 

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very
little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If 

RE: email archiving

[Eldridge, Dave]

Alex what is the cutoff for a small shop? 250, 500 mailboxes?

 

From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Actually you can opt to use Journaling or not in SEA. 

 

There are also environmental considerations to consider, Direct Archving
works well in smaller shops but for larger operations, we recommend
Journaling instead for overhead reasons.

 

Alex


Alex Eckelberry
CEO
Sunbelt Software
33 N. Garden Avenue, Suite 1200
Clearwater, FL 33755
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
p: 727.562.0101 x220
f: 727-562-3402
w: www.sunbeltsoftware.com  
b: www.sunbeltblog.com  
 

 

 

 



From: Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

SEA doesn't use Journaling.

 

"Direct Archiving" eliminates need for Journaling
SEA provides a unique Direct Archiving feature that enables archiving of
emails immediately after they are received. Direct Archiving is a
significant breakthrough in efficient email archiving which eliminates
the need for the Exchange Journal mailbox. Immediate archiving onto
storage media improves the performance of the Exchange server, helps to
ensure legal compliance, and diminishes the necessity to apply
scheduler, threshold and quota archiving jobs. 

 



From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete
the message from your computer system.

 

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in erro

RE: email archiving

[Bob Fronk]

Although I am sure it is over kill for what it does.  I could probably
run something else on it, but I rather have it dedicated.

 

I

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Yes.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Is it dedicated to archiving?   

Meaning it is only running Sunbelt's Exchange Archiver?

 

 

 



From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Windows 2003 / SQL 2005

It is a quad-dual core 2GHZ with 4GB Ram

It has a Raid 0+1 with 6 300GB SAS drives.

It is in the same rack as the Exchange box.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

What kind of box is the SEA on?  (Hardware/software?) 

I assume it is a dedicate server that sits close to Exchange?

SQL server? 

Thx

 

 



From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I highly recommend it.  Price is better than just about anything else.
Performance is good.  Support has been excellent.

 

To answer a couple of the other questions posted:

 

RE: Storage:  I have 900GB available for my archive.  My Exchange store
is 250GB.  Currently my archive is using about 120GB (all the Exchange
store was archived, plus I have about 5 months of active archiving).
Everything is compressed, so space use is good in my opinion.

 

You can have SEA move things from Exchange to the archive to reduce
Exchange store space.  SEA would leave a "shortcut" in the users' inbox
and will retrieve the archived item when the shortcut is activated.
Currently I am not doing that, but plan on short cutting items older
than X years very soon.

 

The SEA server is on a separate box, so the archive is NOT on the same
physical drives.

 

 

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

That's good to know. I've gotten approval for an archive system this
summer and this is certainly one of my choices.

Thanks

 

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very
little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
dis

RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

[Michelle Weaver]

Can you connect it to another user object and then delete?  You
obviously can't reconnect it to the orignal user.

Michelle Weaver
System Administrator - Materials Research Institute
Pennsylvania State University

-Original Message-
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

Sorry, if it wasn't clear this is exchange 2007.

 

Thanks

 

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE

Windows Systems Administrator

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

517-884-5469

 

From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

 

Hi-

 

This should be a quickie

 

I learned a while back (the hard way) the difference between "disable"
and "remove" for mailboxes.  Luckily (or not) it was on my own mailbox.
Anyway...there is a user on our systems whose data got completely
convoluted by their own doingsso I DISABLED their mailbox and
created a new one.  Now presumably the old one would go to the
"disconnected mailboxes" list and I would delete it for good with this
powershell command

 

Get-MailboxStatistics
  -database
"server\db" | where {$_.disconnectdate -ne $null} | foreach
{Remove-mailbox -database $_.database -storemailboxidentity
$_.mailboxguid}

 

However for some reason it does not go to the disconnected mailbox
list, but I still want to delete it because I don't want this 3.3GB
mailbox floating around in limbo somewhere.  When I run the powershell
command...

 

Get-MailboxStatistics | sort-object TotalItemSize |  format-table
DisplayName,
@{expression={$_.TotalItemSize.Value.ToMB()};label="TotalItemSize(MB)"}

 

To see a list of all of our mailboxes with the sizes in MB sorted
smallest to biggest I can still see the old one at the bottom of the
list (because its huge) and the new one which I am currently filling
with all of his good data closer to the top.  So its in the system
somewhere but not in the disconnected list.

 

How do I smoke the thing?

 

Many thanks!

 

Feel free to copy my PS commands if you don't currently have them in
your "handy commands" list J

 

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE

Windows Systems Administrator

Department of Physics and Astronomy

Michigan State University

1209 A Biomed Phys Sci

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

517-884-5469

 

 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

WAS: Blackberry Webcasts

[Sam Cayze]

OK, I REALLY want to keep my Blackberry Demo.  (Curve/8330).

Do I really have to pay Sprint the $45 Vision/Blackberry monthly fee to
get data to this device?  That might be a deal breaker.  My voice plan
isn't even that much.

I paid $10 a month for my Treo data package :(  



Very off topic, I know...

-Sam



-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

AKA the subscriber code.

Guess I should have mentioned those webcasts are for folks with support
contracts.


-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

That would be your 5 digit technical support services code (if you have
T Support with RIM) HTH
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Ph -  352-393-2741 x320
Fax - 352-393-2746
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, A+, N+

From: Carol Fee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

OK, stupid question, but what is the TCode TSO field in the registration
?


CFee


-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 17:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Webcasts

Just saw this come in and I know we have some folks who are fairly new
to the Blackberry Enterprise scene.

http://tinyurl.com/5w56qa

The next BB webcast on June 18th is on troubleshooting BES activation
issues.  Something this list seems to see its fair share of.


Hope it helps

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Blackberry Webcasts

[Barsodi.John]

$45 seems really high.  Does sprint offer different data packages?  I.e
BIS vs. BES vs. data only for web traffic?

-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: WAS: Blackberry Webcasts

OK, I REALLY want to keep my Blackberry Demo.  (Curve/8330).

Do I really have to pay Sprint the $45 Vision/Blackberry monthly fee to
get data to this device?  That might be a deal breaker.  My voice plan
isn't even that much.

I paid $10 a month for my Treo data package :(  



Very off topic, I know...

-Sam



-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

AKA the subscriber code.

Guess I should have mentioned those webcasts are for folks with support
contracts.


-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

That would be your 5 digit technical support services code (if you have
T Support with RIM) HTH
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Ph -  352-393-2741 x320
Fax - 352-393-2746
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, A+, N+

From: Carol Fee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

OK, stupid question, but what is the TCode TSO field in the registration
?


CFee


-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 17:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Webcasts

Just saw this come in and I know we have some folks who are fairly new
to the Blackberry Enterprise scene.

http://tinyurl.com/5w56qa

The next BB webcast on June 18th is on troubleshooting BES activation
issues.  Something this list seems to see its fair share of.


Hope it helps

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Schedule Free/Busy System Folder not showing up on Exchange Server

[Bingham, Kevin]

Then you will probably need to use GUIDGen to rebuild your system
folders, as described in KB822444.  Be sure you understand the impact -
it's more than just the Free/Busy folder, it's at least the Org Forms
library and Offline Address Books as well.

 

 



From: Chris Pohlschneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Schedule Free/Busy System Folder not showing up on Exchange
Server

 

Actually I just went through that article and still unfortunately have
the same results. The article assumes that you have an old server name
listed in the SiteFolderServer section and the value that is in there is
the current server that we are running off of.

 



From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Schedule Free/Busy System Folder not showing up on Exchange
Server

 

 

 

 



 
This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain 
privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from 
disclosure under law.  If you have received this message in error, please 
inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any 
printed copy.   Thank you. 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: email archiving

[Kurt Buff]

How many Exchange servers, and how widely separated are they?

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very
> little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.
>
>
>
> Bob Fronk
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: email archiving
>
>
>
> Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?
>
>
>
> From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: email archiving
>
>
>
> I am using SEA and am very happy with it.
>
>
>
>
>
> Bob Fronk
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: email archiving
>
>
>
> I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
> retention.
>
> Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
> mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.
>
>
>
> From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: email archiving
>
>
>
> I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.
>
> We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I don't
> know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and turn
> Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.
>
> Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?  Is
> this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
> non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.
>
> We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right now
> my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul Everett
> IS Dept.
> Lee Mental Health Center
> 239-791-1551
>
> "Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
> Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
> Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org to learn more."
>
> Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
> and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or
> distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended recipient, please
> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
> message, including attachments.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not
> represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.
>
> This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be
> confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in
> accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or
> any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication
> in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your computer
> system.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not
> represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.
>
> This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be
> confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in
> accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or
> any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication
> in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your computer
> system.
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[Bob Fronk]

Just one Exchange server.  (However I do have a replicate server using
DoubleTake at another site)

Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:54 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: email archiving
> 
> How many Exchange servers, and how widely separated are they?
> 
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see
very
> > little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.
> >
> >
> >
> > Bob Fronk
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> >
> >
> >
> > Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> >
> >
> >
> > I am using SEA and am very happy with it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Bob Fronk
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> >
> >
> >
> > I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and
email
> > retention.
> >
> > Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They
do
> > mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: email archiving
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old
hat.
> >
> > We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.
I don't
> > know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn
> > Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.
> >
> > Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this
works?  Is
> > this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
> > non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA
compliant.
> >
> > We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and
right now
> > my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Paul Everett
> > IS Dept.
> > Lee Mental Health Center
> > 239-791-1551
> >
> > "Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth
Cooper
> > Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis
Services.
> > Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org to learn more."
> >
> > Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any
attachments, is
> > for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential
> > and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or
> > distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended recipient,
please
> > contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original
> > message, including attachments.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and
does not
> > represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.
> >
> > This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named
above, may be
> > confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such
in
> > accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended
> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or
> > any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this
communication
> > in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your
computer
> > system.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and
does not
> > represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.
> >
> > This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named
above, may be
> > confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such
in
> > accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended
> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or
> > any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this
communication
> > in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your
computer
> > system.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Blackberry Webcasts

[Martin Blackstone]

You don't need Vision. You just need the BB Enterprise plan and your phone.
But it's still going to run you about $40 a month for the BB data plan.

Sprint also has that $99 a month all you can eat plan and it includes
Blackberry (unlike the other carriers).

-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: WAS: Blackberry Webcasts

OK, I REALLY want to keep my Blackberry Demo.  (Curve/8330).

Do I really have to pay Sprint the $45 Vision/Blackberry monthly fee to
get data to this device?  That might be a deal breaker.  My voice plan
isn't even that much.

I paid $10 a month for my Treo data package :(  



Very off topic, I know...

-Sam



-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

AKA the subscriber code.

Guess I should have mentioned those webcasts are for folks with support
contracts.


-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

That would be your 5 digit technical support services code (if you have
T Support with RIM) HTH
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Ph -  352-393-2741 x320
Fax - 352-393-2746
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, A+, N+

From: Carol Fee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

OK, stupid question, but what is the TCode TSO field in the registration
?


CFee


-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 17:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Webcasts

Just saw this come in and I know we have some folks who are fairly new
to the Blackberry Enterprise scene.

http://tinyurl.com/5w56qa

The next BB webcast on June 18th is on troubleshooting BES activation
issues.  Something this list seems to see its fair share of.


Hope it helps

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: email archiving

[Kurt Buff]

Ah.

I'm looking at an archiving solution to take care of three servers,
one each in the UK, US and Australia. That'lll prove interesting.
We're currently using MJ to get all mail to a mailbox here, and
(YUCK!) manually archiving to PSTs. It's painful, sinful, and a
heinous waste of time and resources, along with being not useful in
the event that we need to recover email. Thanks be to Chuthulu that we
haven't yet run into a discovery motion, or anything like it.

Kurt

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just one Exchange server.  (However I do have a replicate server using
> DoubleTake at another site)
>
> Bob Fronk
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:54 PM
>> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> Subject: Re: email archiving
>>
>> How many Exchange servers, and how widely separated are they?
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see
> very
>> > little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Bob Fronk
>> >
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
>> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> > Subject: RE: email archiving
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
>> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> > Subject: RE: email archiving
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I am using SEA and am very happy with it.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Bob Fronk
>> >
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
>> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> > Subject: RE: email archiving
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and
> email
>> > retention.
>> >
>> > Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They
> do
>> > mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
>> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> > Subject: email archiving
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old
> hat.
>> >
>> > We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.
> I don't
>> > know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
> turn
>> > Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.
>> >
>> > Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this
> works?  Is
>> > this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
>> > non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA
> compliant.
>> >
>> > We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and
> right now
>> > my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Paul Everett
>> > IS Dept.
>> > Lee Mental Health Center
>> > 239-791-1551
>> >
>> > "Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth
> Cooper
>> > Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis
> Services.
>> > Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org to learn more."
>> >
>> > Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any
> attachments, is
>> > for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
> confidential
>> > and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure, or
>> > distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended recipient,
> please
>> > contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
> original
>> > message, including attachments.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and
> does not
>> > represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.
>> >
>> > This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> above, may be
>> > confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such
> in
>> > accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended
>> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
> communication, or
>> > any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this
> communication
>> > in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your
> computer
>> > system.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and
> does not
>> > represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.
>> >
>> > This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> above, may be
>> > confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such
> in
>> > accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended
>> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of 

RE: Blackberry Webcasts

[Martin Blackstone]

You don't need Vision. You just need the BB Enterprise plan and your phone.
But it's still going to run you about $40 a month for the BB data plan.

Sprint also has that $99 a month all you can eat plan and it includes
Blackberry (unlike the other carriers).

-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: WAS: Blackberry Webcasts

OK, I REALLY want to keep my Blackberry Demo.  (Curve/8330).

Do I really have to pay Sprint the $45 Vision/Blackberry monthly fee to
get data to this device?  That might be a deal breaker.  My voice plan
isn't even that much.

I paid $10 a month for my Treo data package :(  



Very off topic, I know...

-Sam



-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

AKA the subscriber code.

Guess I should have mentioned those webcasts are for folks with support
contracts.


-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

That would be your 5 digit technical support services code (if you have
T Support with RIM) HTH
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Ph -  352-393-2741 x320
Fax - 352-393-2746
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, A+, N+

From: Carol Fee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

OK, stupid question, but what is the TCode TSO field in the registration
?


CFee


-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 17:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Webcasts

Just saw this come in and I know we have some folks who are fairly new
to the Blackberry Enterprise scene.

http://tinyurl.com/5w56qa

The next BB webcast on June 18th is on troubleshooting BES activation
issues.  Something this list seems to see its fair share of.


Hope it helps

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

[Ehren Benson]

I can not reconnect it because it is not listed in the disconnected mailboxes 
list, which is the original issue.  :)

Thanks

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469


-Original Message-
From: Michelle Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

Can you connect it to another user object and then delete?  You
obviously can't reconnect it to the orignal user.

Michelle Weaver
System Administrator - Materials Research Institute
Pennsylvania State University

-Original Message-
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

Sorry, if it wasn't clear this is exchange 2007.



Thanks



Ehren J. Benson, MCSE

Windows Systems Administrator



[EMAIL PROTECTED]

517-884-5469



From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)



Hi-



This should be a quickie



I learned a while back (the hard way) the difference between "disable"
and "remove" for mailboxes.  Luckily (or not) it was on my own mailbox.
Anyway...there is a user on our systems whose data got completely
convoluted by their own doingsso I DISABLED their mailbox and
created a new one.  Now presumably the old one would go to the
"disconnected mailboxes" list and I would delete it for good with this
powershell command



Get-MailboxStatistics
  -database
"server\db" | where {$_.disconnectdate -ne $null} | foreach
{Remove-mailbox -database $_.database -storemailboxidentity
$_.mailboxguid}



However for some reason it does not go to the disconnected mailbox
list, but I still want to delete it because I don't want this 3.3GB
mailbox floating around in limbo somewhere.  When I run the powershell
command...



Get-MailboxStatistics | sort-object TotalItemSize |  format-table
DisplayName,
@{expression={$_.TotalItemSize.Value.ToMB()};label="TotalItemSize(MB)"}



To see a list of all of our mailboxes with the sizes in MB sorted
smallest to biggest I can still see the old one at the bottom of the
list (because its huge) and the new one which I am currently filling
with all of his good data closer to the top.  So its in the system
somewhere but not in the disconnected list.



How do I smoke the thing?



Many thanks!



Feel free to copy my PS commands if you don't currently have them in
your "handy commands" list J



Ehren J. Benson, MCSE

Windows Systems Administrator

Department of Physics and Astronomy

Michigan State University

1209 A Biomed Phys Sci



[EMAIL PROTECTED]

517-884-5469











~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Blackberry Webcasts

[Sam Cayze]

Vision, Blackberry Data Plan, whatever it's called.   $40 is a rip off.

If I ditch the BES server, and use the outlook sync tool or BIS, do I
still need to pay the $40 a month?  Is there a non-enterprise data plan?



 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

You don't need Vision. You just need the BB Enterprise plan and your
phone.
But it's still going to run you about $40 a month for the BB data plan.

Sprint also has that $99 a month all you can eat plan and it includes
Blackberry (unlike the other carriers).

-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: WAS: Blackberry Webcasts

OK, I REALLY want to keep my Blackberry Demo.  (Curve/8330).

Do I really have to pay Sprint the $45 Vision/Blackberry monthly fee to
get data to this device?  That might be a deal breaker.  My voice plan
isn't even that much.

I paid $10 a month for my Treo data package :(  



Very off topic, I know...

-Sam



-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

AKA the subscriber code.

Guess I should have mentioned those webcasts are for folks with support
contracts.


-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

That would be your 5 digit technical support services code (if you have
T Support with RIM) HTH John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership
For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Ph -  352-393-2741 x320
Fax - 352-393-2746
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, A+, N+

From: Carol Fee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

OK, stupid question, but what is the TCode TSO field in the registration
?


CFee


-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 17:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Webcasts

Just saw this come in and I know we have some folks who are fairly new
to the Blackberry Enterprise scene.

http://tinyurl.com/5w56qa

The next BB webcast on June 18th is on troubleshooting BES activation
issues.  Something this list seems to see its fair share of.


Hope it helps

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Google Message Filtering/Security

[Troy Meyer]

Looked at them for filtering, but the getting a hold of a person to deal with 
was a nightmare.  Leave a message call backs and online support, total drag.  
Only available business hours..etc

Helped me sell a more expensive solution to management, with great support 
(using Proofpoint appliances).

If you go the google direction I would be curious to hear your experiences.

-troy

From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Google Message Filtering/Security

Anybody using Google's Postini filtering system ahead of your Exchange box?  
The pricing per mailbox seems radically low...

http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/compare.html



Roger Wright
Network Administrator
727.572.7076  x388

[cid:image001.jpg@01C8CAEE.3BDFA980]





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~<>

RE: Google Message Filtering/Security

[Theochares, George]

Looking at it now. Using Trend and want to get away from supporting a
box. Hesitant to move the MX. Users like what they have but backscatter
is a problem and Google claims to have a better solution for less then
the cost of Trend. Tough decision.



From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Google Message Filtering/Security



Anybody using Google's Postini filtering system ahead of your Exchange
box?  The pricing per mailbox seems radically low...

 

http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/compare.html

 

 

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

727.572.7076  x388

  

 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~<>

RE: Blackberry Webcasts

[Sam Cayze]

Cool.  

As for the unlimited, I'm on a shared business account, no can do. 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

You don't need Vision. You just need the BB Enterprise plan and your
phone.
But it's still going to run you about $40 a month for the BB data plan.

Sprint also has that $99 a month all you can eat plan and it includes
Blackberry (unlike the other carriers).

-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: WAS: Blackberry Webcasts

OK, I REALLY want to keep my Blackberry Demo.  (Curve/8330).

Do I really have to pay Sprint the $45 Vision/Blackberry monthly fee to
get data to this device?  That might be a deal breaker.  My voice plan
isn't even that much.

I paid $10 a month for my Treo data package :(  



Very off topic, I know...

-Sam



-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

AKA the subscriber code.

Guess I should have mentioned those webcasts are for folks with support
contracts.


-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

That would be your 5 digit technical support services code (if you have
T Support with RIM) HTH John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership
For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Ph -  352-393-2741 x320
Fax - 352-393-2746
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, A+, N+

From: Carol Fee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

OK, stupid question, but what is the TCode TSO field in the registration
?


CFee


-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 17:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Webcasts

Just saw this come in and I know we have some folks who are fairly new
to the Blackberry Enterprise scene.

http://tinyurl.com/5w56qa

The next BB webcast on June 18th is on troubleshooting BES activation
issues.  Something this list seems to see its fair share of.


Hope it helps

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Google Message Filtering/Security

[Roger Wright]

Anybody using Google's Postini filtering system ahead of your Exchange
box?  The pricing per mailbox seems radically low...

 

http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/compare.html

 

 

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

727.572.7076  x388

  

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~<>

RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

[Michelle Weaver]

So you didn't disconnect. You just disabled.  I must have missed that
little tidbit (you know, the important part).

If you have a little time and a cooperative customer, disconnect her
current mailbox, re-enable the old one, delete it, then reconnect the
current. It shouldn't take more than 5 minutes. You could also get
creative about the mail that might get bounced in those five minutes, by
forwarding it to another account then deleting the forwarding. It
depends on how important it is that mail always be deliverable, if 5 -
10 minutes really matter that much (or time it so you do it at night).

I don't know how else you can get rid of a disabled mailbox since I
don't think disabled mailboxes will ever purge. Hopefully someone else
has an ingenious plan. I'd just do it the hard way.

Michelle

-Original Message-
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

I can not reconnect it because it is not listed in the disconnected
mailboxes list, which is the original issue.  :)

Thanks

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469


-Original Message-
From: Michelle Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

Can you connect it to another user object and then delete?  You
obviously can't reconnect it to the orignal user.

Michelle Weaver
System Administrator - Materials Research Institute Pennsylvania State
University

-Original Message-
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

Sorry, if it wasn't clear this is exchange 2007.



Thanks



Ehren J. Benson, MCSE

Windows Systems Administrator



[EMAIL PROTECTED]

517-884-5469



From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)



Hi-



This should be a quickie



I learned a while back (the hard way) the difference between "disable"
and "remove" for mailboxes.  Luckily (or not) it was on my own mailbox.
Anyway...there is a user on our systems whose data got completely
convoluted by their own doingsso I DISABLED their mailbox and
created a new one.  Now presumably the old one would go to the
"disconnected mailboxes" list and I would delete it for good with this
powershell command



Get-MailboxStatistics
  -database
"server\db" | where {$_.disconnectdate -ne $null} | foreach
{Remove-mailbox -database $_.database -storemailboxidentity
$_.mailboxguid}



However for some reason it does not go to the disconnected mailbox
list, but I still want to delete it because I don't want this 3.3GB
mailbox floating around in limbo somewhere.  When I run the powershell
command...



Get-MailboxStatistics | sort-object TotalItemSize |  format-table
DisplayName,
@{expression={$_.TotalItemSize.Value.ToMB()};label="TotalItemSize(MB)"}



To see a list of all of our mailboxes with the sizes in MB sorted
smallest to biggest I can still see the old one at the bottom of the
list (because its huge) and the new one which I am currently filling
with all of his good data closer to the top.  So its in the system
somewhere but not in the disconnected list.



How do I smoke the thing?



Many thanks!



Feel free to copy my PS commands if you don't currently have them in
your "handy commands" list J



Ehren J. Benson, MCSE

Windows Systems Administrator

Department of Physics and Astronomy

Michigan State University

1209 A Biomed Phys Sci



[EMAIL PROTECTED]

517-884-5469











~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Google Message Filtering/Security

[Roger Wright]

We're using a redirected MX solution now with a local provider.  The
system (IronMail) works well enough but is about 50% more than Google's
Email Security option so am looking at it more closely.

 

   

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

727.572.7076  x388

_

 

 

From: Theochares, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Google Message Filtering/Security

 

Looking at it now. Using Trend and want to get away from supporting a
box. Hesitant to move the MX. Users like what they have but backscatter
is a problem and Google claims to have a better solution for less then
the cost of Trend. Tough decision.

 



From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Google Message Filtering/Security

Anybody using Google's Postini filtering system ahead of your Exchange
box?  The pricing per mailbox seems radically low...

 

http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/compare.html

 

 

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

727.572.7076  x388

  

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~<>

Re: Google Message Filtering/Security

[Matt Moore]

I'd be very leary about anything Google is selling.  They are data miners at 
the core. nuf said?
  - Original Message - 
  From: Roger Wright 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:29 AM
  Subject: Google Message Filtering/Security


  Anybody using Google's Postini filtering system ahead of your Exchange box?  
The pricing per mailbox seems radically low...

   

  http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/compare.html

   

   

   

  Roger Wright

  Network Administrator

  727.572.7076  x388





   





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~<>

RE: Google Message Filtering/Security

[Roger Wright]

Good point...

   

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

727.572.7076  x388

_

 

 

From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Google Message Filtering/Security

 

I'd be very leary about anything Google is selling.  They are data
miners at the core. nuf said?

- Original Message - 

From: Roger Wright   

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  

Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:29 AM

Subject: Google Message Filtering/Security

 

Anybody using Google's Postini filtering system ahead of your
Exchange box?  The pricing per mailbox seems radically low...

 

http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/compare.html

 

 

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

727.572.7076  x388

  

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~<>

RE: Blackberry Webcasts

[Martin Blackstone]

With Sprint, I'm not sure. I think they roll their BES/BIS plans together.
Other carriers have separate plans.
It's not the relevant though since the difference is usually only $10 a
month.

-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

Vision, Blackberry Data Plan, whatever it's called.   $40 is a rip off.

If I ditch the BES server, and use the outlook sync tool or BIS, do I
still need to pay the $40 a month?  Is there a non-enterprise data plan?



 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

You don't need Vision. You just need the BB Enterprise plan and your
phone.
But it's still going to run you about $40 a month for the BB data plan.

Sprint also has that $99 a month all you can eat plan and it includes
Blackberry (unlike the other carriers).

-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: WAS: Blackberry Webcasts

OK, I REALLY want to keep my Blackberry Demo.  (Curve/8330).

Do I really have to pay Sprint the $45 Vision/Blackberry monthly fee to
get data to this device?  That might be a deal breaker.  My voice plan
isn't even that much.

I paid $10 a month for my Treo data package :(  



Very off topic, I know...

-Sam



-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

AKA the subscriber code.

Guess I should have mentioned those webcasts are for folks with support
contracts.


-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

That would be your 5 digit technical support services code (if you have
T Support with RIM) HTH John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership
For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Ph -  352-393-2741 x320
Fax - 352-393-2746
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, A+, N+

From: Carol Fee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Webcasts

OK, stupid question, but what is the TCode TSO field in the registration
?


CFee


-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 17:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Webcasts

Just saw this come in and I know we have some folks who are fairly new
to the Blackberry Enterprise scene.

http://tinyurl.com/5w56qa

The next BB webcast on June 18th is on troubleshooting BES activation
issues.  Something this list seems to see its fair share of.


Hope it helps

-troy

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Schedule Free/Busy System Folder not showing up on Exchange Server

[Chris Pohlschneider]

I was able to get the Schedule+ Free/Busy system folder back by
following the KB275171 Article

 



From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Schedule Free/Busy System Folder not showing up on Exchange
Server

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

[Ehren Benson]

Since they are still in the "system" I believe there is a way you can get the 
guid of the "bad" mailbox and get rid of it with a powershell command but of 
course I haven't figured out how to do that.

I already tried what you suggest and it is suprising that it didn't work.  
Generally when you 'disable' a mailbox it goes into the disconnected area and I 
use the PS command I pasted before to get rid of it.  Its unexpected that it 
not show up in the disconnected area.

If anyone knows how to do what I think works above I would love to know the 
commands, I will keep looking in the meantime.

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469


-Original Message-
From: Michelle Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

So you didn't disconnect. You just disabled.  I must have missed that
little tidbit (you know, the important part).

If you have a little time and a cooperative customer, disconnect her
current mailbox, re-enable the old one, delete it, then reconnect the
current. It shouldn't take more than 5 minutes. You could also get
creative about the mail that might get bounced in those five minutes, by
forwarding it to another account then deleting the forwarding. It
depends on how important it is that mail always be deliverable, if 5 -
10 minutes really matter that much (or time it so you do it at night).

I don't know how else you can get rid of a disabled mailbox since I
don't think disabled mailboxes will ever purge. Hopefully someone else
has an ingenious plan. I'd just do it the hard way.

Michelle

-Original Message-
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

I can not reconnect it because it is not listed in the disconnected
mailboxes list, which is the original issue.  :)

Thanks

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469


-Original Message-
From: Michelle Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

Can you connect it to another user object and then delete?  You
obviously can't reconnect it to the orignal user.

Michelle Weaver
System Administrator - Materials Research Institute Pennsylvania State
University

-Original Message-
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

Sorry, if it wasn't clear this is exchange 2007.



Thanks



Ehren J. Benson, MCSE

Windows Systems Administrator



[EMAIL PROTECTED]

517-884-5469



From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)



Hi-



This should be a quickie



I learned a while back (the hard way) the difference between "disable"
and "remove" for mailboxes.  Luckily (or not) it was on my own mailbox.
Anyway...there is a user on our systems whose data got completely
convoluted by their own doingsso I DISABLED their mailbox and
created a new one.  Now presumably the old one would go to the
"disconnected mailboxes" list and I would delete it for good with this
powershell command



Get-MailboxStatistics
  -database
"server\db" | where {$_.disconnectdate -ne $null} | foreach
{Remove-mailbox -database $_.database -storemailboxidentity
$_.mailboxguid}



However for some reason it does not go to the disconnected mailbox
list, but I still want to delete it because I don't want this 3.3GB
mailbox floating around in limbo somewhere.  When I run the powershell
command...



Get-MailboxStatistics | sort-object TotalItemSize |  format-table
DisplayName,
@{expression={$_.TotalItemSize.Value.ToMB()};label="TotalItemSize(MB)"}



To see a list of all of our mailboxes with the sizes in MB sorted
smallest to biggest I can still see the old one at the bottom of the
list (because its huge) and the new one which I am currently filling
with all of his good data closer to the top.  So its in the system
somewhere but not in the disconnected list.



How do I smoke the thing?



Many thanks!



Feel free to copy my PS commands if you don't currently have them in
your "handy commands" list J



Ehren J. Benson, MCSE

Windows Systems Administrator

Department of Physics and Astronomy

Michigan State University

1209 A Biomed Phys Sci



[EMAIL PROTECTED]

517-884-5469











~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja  

RE: email archiving

[Bob Fronk]

If I am not mistaken... SEA will do that.

Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:16 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: email archiving
> 
> Ah.
> 
> I'm looking at an archiving solution to take care of three servers,
> one each in the UK, US and Australia. That'lll prove interesting.
> We're currently using MJ to get all mail to a mailbox here, and
> (YUCK!) manually archiving to PSTs. It's painful, sinful, and a
> heinous waste of time and resources, along with being not useful in
> the event that we need to recover email. Thanks be to Chuthulu that we
> haven't yet run into a discovery motion, or anything like it.
> 
> Kurt
> 
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just one Exchange server.  (However I do have a replicate server
using
> > DoubleTake at another site)
> >
> > Bob Fronk
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:54 PM
> >> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> Subject: Re: email archiving
> >>
> >> How many Exchange servers, and how widely separated are they?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> > Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and
see
> > very
> >> > little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bob Fronk
> >> >
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
> >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
> >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I am using SEA and am very happy with it.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bob Fronk
> >> >
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
> >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and
> > email
> >> > retention.
> >> >
> >> > Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver.
They
> > do
> >> > mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
> >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: email archiving
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is
old
> > hat.
> >> >
> >> > We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside
vendor.
> > I don't
> >> > know much about it except they put an appliance on our network
and
> > turn
> >> > Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly
expensive.
> >> >
> >> > Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this
> > works?  Is
> >> > this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are
a
> >> > non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA
> > compliant.
> >> >
> >> > We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and
> > right now
> >> > my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Paul Everett
> >> > IS Dept.
> >> > Lee Mental Health Center
> >> > 239-791-1551
> >> >
> >> > "Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth
> > Cooper
> >> > Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis
> > Services.
> >> > Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org to learn more."
> >> >
> >> > Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any
> > attachments, is
> >> > for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
> > confidential
> >> > and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
> > disclosure, or
> >> > distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient,
> > please
> >> > contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
> > original
> >> > message, including attachments.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and
> > does not
> >> > represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.
> >> >
> >> > This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named
> > above, may be
> >> > confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such
> > in
> >> > accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended
> >> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
> > communication, or
> >> > any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this
> > communication
> >> 

RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

[Ehren Benson]

Another interesting tidbit is when I use get-mailboxstatistics I can see all 3 
of this guys mailboxes (only one of them being the one that is actually in use, 
the other 2 were 'disabled') however when I use get-mailbox it only shows the 
one that is currently enabled and in use.

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469


-Original Message-
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

Since they are still in the "system" I believe there is a way you can get the 
guid of the "bad" mailbox and get rid of it with a powershell command but of 
course I haven't figured out how to do that.

I already tried what you suggest and it is suprising that it didn't work.  
Generally when you 'disable' a mailbox it goes into the disconnected area and I 
use the PS command I pasted before to get rid of it.  Its unexpected that it 
not show up in the disconnected area.

If anyone knows how to do what I think works above I would love to know the 
commands, I will keep looking in the meantime.

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469


-Original Message-
From: Michelle Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

So you didn't disconnect. You just disabled.  I must have missed that
little tidbit (you know, the important part).

If you have a little time and a cooperative customer, disconnect her
current mailbox, re-enable the old one, delete it, then reconnect the
current. It shouldn't take more than 5 minutes. You could also get
creative about the mail that might get bounced in those five minutes, by
forwarding it to another account then deleting the forwarding. It
depends on how important it is that mail always be deliverable, if 5 -
10 minutes really matter that much (or time it so you do it at night).

I don't know how else you can get rid of a disabled mailbox since I
don't think disabled mailboxes will ever purge. Hopefully someone else
has an ingenious plan. I'd just do it the hard way.

Michelle

-Original Message-
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

I can not reconnect it because it is not listed in the disconnected
mailboxes list, which is the original issue.  :)

Thanks

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469


-Original Message-
From: Michelle Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

Can you connect it to another user object and then delete?  You
obviously can't reconnect it to the orignal user.

Michelle Weaver
System Administrator - Materials Research Institute Pennsylvania State
University

-Original Message-
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

Sorry, if it wasn't clear this is exchange 2007.



Thanks



Ehren J. Benson, MCSE

Windows Systems Administrator



[EMAIL PROTECTED]

517-884-5469



From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)



Hi-



This should be a quickie



I learned a while back (the hard way) the difference between "disable"
and "remove" for mailboxes.  Luckily (or not) it was on my own mailbox.
Anyway...there is a user on our systems whose data got completely
convoluted by their own doingsso I DISABLED their mailbox and
created a new one.  Now presumably the old one would go to the
"disconnected mailboxes" list and I would delete it for good with this
powershell command



Get-MailboxStatistics
  -database
"server\db" | where {$_.disconnectdate -ne $null} | foreach
{Remove-mailbox -database $_.database -storemailboxidentity
$_.mailboxguid}



However for some reason it does not go to the disconnected mailbox
list, but I still want to delete it because I don't want this 3.3GB
mailbox floating around in limbo somewhere.  When I run the powershell
command...



Get-MailboxStatistics | sort-object TotalItemSize |  format-table
DisplayName,
@{expression={$_.TotalItemSize.Value.ToMB()};label="TotalItemSize(MB)"}



To see a list of all of our mailboxes with the sizes in MB sorted
smallest to biggest I can still see the old one at the bottom of the
list (because its huge) and the new one which I am currently filling
with all of his good data closer to the top.  So its in the system
somewhere but not in the disconnected list.



How do I smoke the thing?



Many 

Re: email archiving

[Sherry Abercrombie]

Hmmm, I get the impression that Bob likes SEA

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> If I am not mistaken... SEA will do that.
>
> Bob Fronk
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:16 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: email archiving
> >
> > Ah.
> >
> > I'm looking at an archiving solution to take care of three servers,
> > one each in the UK, US and Australia. That'lll prove interesting.
> > We're currently using MJ to get all mail to a mailbox here, and
> > (YUCK!) manually archiving to PSTs. It's painful, sinful, and a
> > heinous waste of time and resources, along with being not useful in
> > the event that we need to recover email. Thanks be to Chuthulu that we
> > haven't yet run into a discovery motion, or anything like it.
> >
> > Kurt
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Just one Exchange server.  (However I do have a replicate server
> using
> > > DoubleTake at another site)
> > >
> > > Bob Fronk
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:54 PM
> > >> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > >> Subject: Re: email archiving
> > >>
> > >> How many Exchange servers, and how widely separated are they?
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >> > Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and
> see
> > > very
> > >> > little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Bob Fronk
> > >> >
> > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
> > >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
> > >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > I am using SEA and am very happy with it.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Bob Fronk
> > >> >
> > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
> > >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and
> > > email
> > >> > retention.
> > >> >
> > >> > Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver.
> They
> > > do
> > >> > mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
> > >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > >> > Subject: email archiving
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is
> old
> > > hat.
> > >> >
> > >> > We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside
> vendor.
> > > I don't
> > >> > know much about it except they put an appliance on our network
> and
> > > turn
> > >> > Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly
> expensive.
> > >> >
> > >> > Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this
> > > works?  Is
> > >> > this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are
> a
> > >> > non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA
> > > compliant.
> > >> >
> > >> > We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and
> > > right now
> > >> > my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> >
> > >> > Paul Everett
> > >> > IS Dept.
> > >> > Lee Mental Health Center
> > >> > 239-791-1551
> > >> >
> > >> > "Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth
> > > Cooper
> > >> > Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis
> > > Services.
> > >> > Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org to learn more."
> > >> >
> > >> > Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any
> > > attachments, is
> > >> > for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
> > > confidential
> > >> > and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
> > > disclosure, or
> > >> > distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
> recipient,
> > > please
> > >> > contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
> > > original
> > >> > message, including attachments.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and
> > > does not
> > >> > represent official Par

RE: email archiving

[Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator]

SEA = Shook in his underwear.




From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: email archiving


Hmmm, I get the impression that Bob likes SEA


On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


If I am not mistaken... SEA will do that.


Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:16 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: email archiving
>
> Ah.
>
> I'm looking at an archiving solution to take care of three
servers,
> one each in the UK, US and Australia. That'lll prove
interesting.
> We're currently using MJ to get all mail to a mailbox here,
and
> (YUCK!) manually archiving to PSTs. It's painful, sinful, and
a
> heinous waste of time and resources, along with being not
useful in
> the event that we need to recover email. Thanks be to Chuthulu
that we
> haven't yet run into a discovery motion, or anything like it.
>
> Kurt
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Just one Exchange server.  (However I do have a replicate
server
using
> > DoubleTake at another site)
> >
> > Bob Fronk
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:54 PM
> >> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> Subject: Re: email archiving
> >>
> >> How many Exchange servers, and how widely separated are
they?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Bob Fronk
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> > Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct
Archive and
see
> > very
> >> > little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bob Fronk
> >> >
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
> >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
> >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I am using SEA and am very happy with it.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bob Fronk
> >> >
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
> >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning
HIPAA and
> > email
> >> > retention.
> >> >
> >> > Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt
Archiver.
They
> > do
> >> > mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
> >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: email archiving
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it
this is
old
> > hat.
> >> >
> >> > We are looking at an email archive solution from an
outside
vendor.
> > I don't
> >> > know much about it except they put an appliance on our
network
and
> > turn
> >> > Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly
expensive.
> >> >
> >> > Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how
this
> > works?  Is
> >> > this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?
We are
a
> >> > non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay
HIPAA
> > compliant.
> >> >
> >> > We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250
mailboxes and
> > right now
> >> > my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >

RE: email archiving

[Kent, Larry CTR USA IMCOM]

I get the impression that Bob like SEA men  :) j/k



From: Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving


SEA = Shook in his underwear.




From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: email archiving


Hmmm, I get the impression that Bob likes SEA


On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


If I am not mistaken... SEA will do that.


Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:16 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: email archiving
>
> Ah.
>
> I'm looking at an archiving solution to take care of three
servers,
> one each in the UK, US and Australia. That'lll prove
interesting.
> We're currently using MJ to get all mail to a mailbox here,
and
> (YUCK!) manually archiving to PSTs. It's painful, sinful, and
a
> heinous waste of time and resources, along with being not
useful in
> the event that we need to recover email. Thanks be to Chuthulu
that we
> haven't yet run into a discovery motion, or anything like it.
>
> Kurt
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Just one Exchange server.  (However I do have a replicate
server
using
> > DoubleTake at another site)
> >
> > Bob Fronk
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:54 PM
> >> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> Subject: Re: email archiving
> >>
> >> How many Exchange servers, and how widely separated are
they?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Bob Fronk
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> > Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct
Archive and
see
> > very
> >> > little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bob Fronk
> >> >
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
> >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
> >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I am using SEA and am very happy with it.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bob Fronk
> >> >
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
> >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning
HIPAA and
> > email
> >> > retention.
> >> >
> >> > Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt
Archiver.
They
> > do
> >> > mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
> >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: email archiving
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it
this is
old
> > hat.
> >> >
> >> > We are looking at an email archive solution from an
outside
vendor.
> > I don't
> >> > know much about it except they put an appliance on our
network
and
> > turn
> >> > Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly
expensive.
> >> >
> >> > Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how
this
> > works?  Is
> >> > this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?
We are
a
> >> > non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay
HI

Re: email archiving

[Sherry Abercrombie]

E, no

SEA = Sherry E. Abercrombie  (really, those are my initials)

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  SEA = Shook in his underwear.
>
>  --
> *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:29 PM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: email archiving
>
> Hmmm, I get the impression that Bob likes SEA
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If I am not mistaken... SEA will do that.
>>
>> Bob Fronk
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:16 PM
>> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> > Subject: Re: email archiving
>> >
>> > Ah.
>> >
>> > I'm looking at an archiving solution to take care of three servers,
>> > one each in the UK, US and Australia. That'lll prove interesting.
>> > We're currently using MJ to get all mail to a mailbox here, and
>> > (YUCK!) manually archiving to PSTs. It's painful, sinful, and a
>> > heinous waste of time and resources, along with being not useful in
>> > the event that we need to recover email. Thanks be to Chuthulu that we
>> > haven't yet run into a discovery motion, or anything like it.
>> >
>> > Kurt
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > Just one Exchange server.  (However I do have a replicate server
>> using
>> > > DoubleTake at another site)
>> > >
>> > > Bob Fronk
>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> -Original Message-
>> > >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:54 PM
>> > >> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> > >> Subject: Re: email archiving
>> > >>
>> > >> How many Exchange servers, and how widely separated are they?
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > >> > Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct Archive and
>> see
>> > > very
>> > >> > little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Bob Fronk
>> > >> >
>> > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
>> > >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> > >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
>> > >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> > >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I am using SEA and am very happy with it.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Bob Fronk
>> > >> >
>> > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
>> > >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> > >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and
>> > > email
>> > >> > retention.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver.
>> They
>> > > do
>> > >> > mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
>> > >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> > >> > Subject: email archiving
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is
>> old
>> > > hat.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside
>> vendor.
>> > > I don't
>> > >> > know much about it except they put an appliance on our network
>> and
>> > > turn
>> > >> > Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly
>> expensive.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this
>> > > works?  Is
>> > >> > this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are
>> a
>> > >> > non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA
>> > > compliant.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and
>> > > right now
>> > >> > my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Thanks,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Paul Everett
>> > >> > IS Dept.
>> > >> > Lee Mental Health Center
>> > >> > 239-791-1551
>> > >> >
>> > >> > "Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth
>> > > Cooper
>> > >> > Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis
>> > > Services.
>> > >> > Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org to learn more."
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any
>> > > attachments, is
>> > >> > for 

RE: email archiving

[Bingham, Kevin]

Is this where we hum "Bob and Sherry, sitting in a tree..." ?

 

Seriously, though, almost all the Archive vendors will work in a
geographically disparate solution set... it's just a question of how,
and how well...

 

The archiving topic keeps coming up, and it seems most people are
missing the two important starting points: everyone needs different
things out of an archive system - they are not all equal; you need to
understand what you need the system to do before you try to pick it.

 

I'm thinking about writing up something basic guidelines on Archiving
101... no vendor specific details, just some of the various ways it is
implemented and considerations, from personal experience.  Would that
prove useful to the group?  If so, and I actually find time to throw it
together, would Michael or one of you guys with an actuall posting
place/history be willing to commandeer/enhance it?

 

 



From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: email archiving

 

E, no

SEA = Sherry E. Abercrombie  (really, those are my initials)

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems
Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

SEA = Shook in his underwear.

 



From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:29 PM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: email archiving

 

Hmmm, I get the impression that Bob likes SEA

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

If I am not mistaken... SEA will do that.


Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 



 
This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain 
privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from 
disclosure under law.  If you have received this message in error, please 
inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any 
printed copy.   Thank you. 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[David Mazzaccaro]

Yes, that would be very useful and greatly appreciated!

 

 



From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 4:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Is this where we hum "Bob and Sherry, sitting in a tree..." ?

 

Seriously, though, almost all the Archive vendors will work in a
geographically disparate solution set... it's just a question of how,
and how well...

 

The archiving topic keeps coming up, and it seems most people are
missing the two important starting points: everyone needs different
things out of an archive system - they are not all equal; you need to
understand what you need the system to do before you try to pick it.

 

I'm thinking about writing up something basic guidelines on Archiving
101... no vendor specific details, just some of the various ways it is
implemented and considerations, from personal experience.  Would that
prove useful to the group?  If so, and I actually find time to throw it
together, would Michael or one of you guys with an actuall posting
place/history be willing to commandeer/enhance it?

 

 



From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: email archiving

 

E, no

SEA = Sherry E. Abercrombie  (really, those are my initials)

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems
Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

SEA = Shook in his underwear.

 



From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:29 PM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: email archiving

 

Hmmm, I get the impression that Bob likes SEA

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

If I am not mistaken... SEA will do that.


Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 








 
This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may
contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is
exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in
error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail
and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. 

 







 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: email archiving

[Kurt Buff]

Well, I for one would surely benefit from it, and appreciate the
offer. I look forward to it.

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Bingham, Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this where we hum "Bob and Sherry, sitting in a tree…" ?
>
>
>
> Seriously, though, almost all the Archive vendors will work in a
> geographically disparate solution set… it's just a question of how, and how
> well…
>
>
>
> The archiving topic keeps coming up, and it seems most people are missing
> the two important starting points: everyone needs different things out of an
> archive system – they are not all equal; you need to understand what you
> need the system to do before you try to pick it.
>
>
>
> I'm thinking about writing up something basic guidelines on Archiving 101…
> no vendor specific details, just some of the various ways it is implemented
> and considerations, from personal experience.  Would that prove useful to
> the group?  If so, and I actually find time to throw it together, would
> Michael or one of you guys with an actuall posting place/history be willing
> to commandeer/enhance it?
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: email archiving
>
>
>
> E, no
>
> SEA = Sherry E. Abercrombie  (really, those are my initials)
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SEA = Shook in his underwear.
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:29 PM
>
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: email archiving
>
>
>
> Hmmm, I get the impression that Bob likes SEA
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If I am not mistaken... SEA will do that.
>
> Bob Fronk
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> 
>
> This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain
> privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from
> disclosure under law.  If you have received this message in error, please
> inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any
> printed copy.   Thank you.
>
> 
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Restricted GAL

[Michael B. Smith]

There is no need to use adsiedit to solve this problem.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 7:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricted GAL

 

If i understand the question you need to create an address list with all the
local users in it. The users will see the GAL by default so you have two
options. Teach them to select that list in the address book or use adsi edit
to assign an address list to your users.

 

Greg

 

From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, 9 June 2008 2:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Restricted GAL

 

 

I migrate a customer to a WAN corporate domain (and Exchange) 
When the want to send a message they see as GAL all the corporate but they
want just their internal users. 
What have I ask to the corporate exchange manager for . 

TIA 

 

GuidoElia 
HELPPC 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Restricted GAL

[Michael B. Smith]

Dave Goldman released updated guidance for doing address list segmentation
in Exchange 2007 and 2003. You should be able to google on that phrase at
site:*.microsoft.com and find the updated white paper.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 7:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricted GAL

 

What you are going to have to ask for I don't think they will want to do. 

It requires a complete reconstruction of the Address Lists for all users
globally. 

 

Two replacement GALs would have to be created. The default GAL would have to
be blocked using permissions. 
Then there would be a GAL for the users in the group you are working with
and and a GAL for everyone else. 

 

It isn't a simple job, and isn't something many Exchange admins would want
to do. I don't think that Microsoft support the changes required any longer
either. The KB article on what you had to do was pulled last year. You can
see it here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20041121012214/http:/support.microsoft.com/defaul
t.aspx?kbid=822940

 

Unless they have already done the bulk of the work and it is something easy
for them to do, I would strongly expect that they will say no. 

 

Simon. 

 

 

--
Simon Butler
MVP: Exchange, MCSE
Amset IT Solutions Ltd.

e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: www.amset.co.uk
w: www.amset.info

Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with Windows Mobile 5.0?
http://CertificatesForExchange.com/ for certificates from just $23.99.
Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/ 

 

 

 

 

  _  

From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 June 2008 05:15
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Restricted GAL

 

I migrate a customer to a WAN corporate domain (and Exchange) 
When the want to send a message they see as GAL all the corporate but they
want just their internal users. 
What have I ask to the corporate exchange manager for . 

TIA 

 

GuidoElia 
HELPPC 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Restricted GAL

[Greg Mulholland]

Maybe the new article is different but i seem to remember modifying some DN 
with adsiedit. Either way, it's still a PITA to do and maintain so id agree 
with the other sentiments.

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 11 June 2008 7:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricted GAL

There is no need to use adsiedit to solve this problem.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 7:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricted GAL

If i understand the question you need to create an address list with all the 
local users in it. The users will see the GAL by default so you have two 
options. Teach them to select that list in the address book or use adsi edit to 
assign an address list to your users.

Greg

From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 9 June 2008 2:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Restricted GAL



I migrate a customer to a WAN corporate domain (and Exchange)
When the want to send a message they see as GAL all the corporate but they want 
just their internal users.
What have I ask to the corporate exchange manager for .

TIA


GuidoElia
HELPPC










~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Restricted GAL

[Barsodi.John]

Just permissions.

http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Shared-Hosting-Exchange-2003-Part2.h
tml

 

From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricted GAL

 

Maybe the new article is different but i seem to remember modifying some
DN with adsiedit. Either way, it's still a PITA to do and maintain so id
agree with the other sentiments. 

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 11 June 2008 7:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricted GAL

 

There is no need to use adsiedit to solve this problem.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 7:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricted GAL

 

If i understand the question you need to create an address list with all
the local users in it. The users will see the GAL by default so you have
two options. Teach them to select that list in the address book or use
adsi edit to assign an address list to your users.

 

Greg

 

From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, 9 June 2008 2:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Restricted GAL

 

 

I migrate a customer to a WAN corporate domain (and Exchange) 
When the want to send a message they see as GAL all the corporate but
they want just their internal users. 
What have I ask to the corporate exchange manager for . 

TIA 

 

GuidoElia 
HELPPC 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[Alex Eckelberry]

We have customers that are using direct archiving for a little more than
100 mailboxes without problems, but since the bottleneck is the Exchange
Server,  we do not suggest direct archiving for more than 50 mailboxes.
Instead we prefer setting up jobs that run every couple of hours, which
has the same effect.  Or use journaling, which the product supports. 
 
HTH,
 
Alex
 



From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving



Alex what is the cutoff for a small shop? 250, 500 mailboxes?

 

From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Actually you can opt to use Journaling or not in SEA. 

 

There are also environmental considerations to consider, Direct Archving
works well in smaller shops but for larger operations, we recommend
Journaling instead for overhead reasons.

 

Alex


Alex Eckelberry
CEO
Sunbelt Software
33 N. Garden Avenue, Suite 1200
Clearwater, FL 33755
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
p: 727.562.0101 x220
f: 727-562-3402
w: www.sunbeltsoftware.com  
b: www.sunbeltblog.com  
 

 

 

 



From: Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

SEA doesn't use Journaling.

 

"Direct Archiving" eliminates need for Journaling
SEA provides a unique Direct Archiving feature that enables archiving of
emails immediately after they are received. Direct Archiving is a
significant breakthrough in efficient email archiving which eliminates
the need for the Exchange Journal mailbox. Immediate archiving onto
storage media improves the performance of the Exchange server, helps to
ensure legal compliance, and diminishes the necessity to apply
scheduler, threshold and quota archiving jobs. 

 



From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as
such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please return to sender and d

RE: email archiving

[Alex Eckelberry]

Hey, be nice to customers of Sunbelt!  They pay for this list! ;-)
 
 
Alex
 



From: Kent, Larry CTR USA IMCOM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving


I get the impression that Bob like SEA men  :) j/k



From: Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving


SEA = Shook in his underwear.




From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: email archiving


Hmmm, I get the impression that Bob likes SEA


On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


If I am not mistaken... SEA will do that.


Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:16 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: email archiving
>
> Ah.
>
> I'm looking at an archiving solution to take care of three
servers,
> one each in the UK, US and Australia. That'lll prove
interesting.
> We're currently using MJ to get all mail to a mailbox here,
and
> (YUCK!) manually archiving to PSTs. It's painful, sinful, and
a
> heinous waste of time and resources, along with being not
useful in
> the event that we need to recover email. Thanks be to Chuthulu
that we
> haven't yet run into a discovery motion, or anything like it.
>
> Kurt
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Just one Exchange server.  (However I do have a replicate
server
using
> > DoubleTake at another site)
> >
> > Bob Fronk
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:54 PM
> >> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> Subject: Re: email archiving
> >>
> >> How many Exchange servers, and how widely separated are
they?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Bob Fronk
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> > Journaling is NOT enabled.  I am using SEA's Direct
Archive and
see
> > very
> >> > little (if any)impact on our Exchange server.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bob Fronk
> >> >
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
> >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
> >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I am using SEA and am very happy with it.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bob Fronk
> >> >
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
> >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: RE: email archiving
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning
HIPAA and
> > email
> >> > retention.
> >> >
> >> > Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt
Archiver.
They
> > do
> >> > mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
> >> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> >> > Subject: email archiving
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it
this is
old
> > hat.
> >> >
> >> > We are looking at an email archive solution from an
outside
vendor.
> > I don't
> >> > know much about it except they put an appliance on our
network
and
> > turn
> >> > Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly
expensive.
  

RE: Restricted GAL

[Michael B. Smith]

You could conceivably modify the msExchQueryBaseDN using ADSIEdit, but I
would use ADmodify as a much safer tool.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricted GAL

 

Maybe the new article is different but i seem to remember modifying some DN
with adsiedit. Either way, it's still a PITA to do and maintain so id agree
with the other sentiments. 

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 11 June 2008 7:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricted GAL

 

There is no need to use adsiedit to solve this problem.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 7:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricted GAL

 

If i understand the question you need to create an address list with all the
local users in it. The users will see the GAL by default so you have two
options. Teach them to select that list in the address book or use adsi edit
to assign an address list to your users.

 

Greg

 

From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, 9 June 2008 2:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Restricted GAL

 

 

I migrate a customer to a WAN corporate domain (and Exchange) 
When the want to send a message they see as GAL all the corporate but they
want just their internal users. 
What have I ask to the corporate exchange manager for . 

TIA 

 

GuidoElia 
HELPPC 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Error when moving mailboxes (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Steve Szabo]

Any indication of the error in the Event Logs?

 

\\Steve// 

 

From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Error when moving mailboxes (UNCLASSIFIED)

 

Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE 
  
Good day to everyone: 

I am currently in the process of moving mailboxes from one MDB on an
Exchange 2003 server to another in an attempt to recover about 50%
whitespace.

When running the EXCHANGE TASK of MOVE MAILBOX I will sometimes
receive an error on a mailbox. The detailed report records an error of
"0x80072020".  I've Googled the error and it seems to be related to
accessing Active Directory.  Does anyone on the list have an idea of how to
fix this?

Thanks. 

John H. Matteson, Jr. 
Systems Administrator/ITT Systems 
Forward Operating Base Orgun-E 
Afghanistan 
DSN - 318 431 8001 
VoSIP - (308) 431 -  
Iridium SatPhone - 717.633.3823 
Roshain Mobile - 079 - 736 - 3832 

"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here
in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be
treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to
discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or
origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an
American, and nothing but an American... There can be no divided allegiance
here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an
American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag.. We have
room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we
have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American
people."

Teddy Roosevelt; 1907 

 

  
Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email archiving

[Bob Fronk]

I am running Direct Archive with over 150 with no issues on the Exchange
side.  

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

 

 

 

From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

We have customers that are using direct archiving for a little more than
100 mailboxes without problems, but since the bottleneck is the Exchange
Server,  we do not suggest direct archiving for more than 50 mailboxes.
Instead we prefer setting up jobs that run every couple of hours, which
has the same effect.  Or use journaling, which the product supports. 

 

HTH,

 

Alex

 

 



From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

Alex what is the cutoff for a small shop? 250, 500 mailboxes?

 

From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

Actually you can opt to use Journaling or not in SEA. 

 

There are also environmental considerations to consider, Direct Archving
works well in smaller shops but for larger operations, we recommend
Journaling instead for overhead reasons.

 

Alex


Alex Eckelberry
CEO
Sunbelt Software
33 N. Garden Avenue, Suite 1200
Clearwater, FL 33755
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
p: 727.562.0101 x220
f: 727-562-3402
w: www.sunbeltsoftware.com  
b: www.sunbeltblog.com  
 

 

 

 



From: Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

SEA doesn't use Journaling.

 

"Direct Archiving" eliminates need for Journaling
SEA provides a unique Direct Archiving feature that enables archiving of
emails immediately after they are received. Direct Archiving is a
significant breakthrough in efficient email archiving which eliminates
the need for the Exchange Journal mailbox. Immediate archiving onto
storage media improves the performance of the Exchange server, helps to
ensure legal compliance, and diminishes the necessity to apply
scheduler, threshold and quota archiving jobs. 

 



From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

Bob are you running it with journaling turned off?

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I am using SEA and am very happy with it.

 

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: email archiving

 

I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email
retention.

Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do
mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on.

 

From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email archiving

 

I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat.


We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor.  I
don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and
turn Journaling "on" on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive.

Can someone give me an "in-a-nutshell" explanation of how this works?
Is this the best solution for our money?  Any alternatives?  We are a
non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant.

We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003.  Approx 250 mailboxes and right
now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub).

 

Thanks,

Paul Everett 
IS Dept. 
Lee Mental Health Center 
239-791-1551 

"Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper
Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services.
Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org
http://www.leementalhealth.org/>  to learn more."

Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message, including attachments.

 

 

 

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does
not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above,
may be confidential and/or leg

Re: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)

[Alex Fontana]

Have you tried running clean-mailboxdatabase against that particular mdb?
that should check those mailboxes again and mark those that are disconnected
as such.

-alex
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Ehren Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Another interesting tidbit is when I use get-mailboxstatistics I can see
> all 3 of this guys mailboxes (only one of them being the one that is
> actually in use, the other 2 were 'disabled') however when I use get-mailbox
> it only shows the one that is currently enabled and in use.
>
> Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
> Windows Systems Administrator
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 517-884-5469
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:15 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
>
> Since they are still in the "system" I believe there is a way you can get
> the guid of the "bad" mailbox and get rid of it with a powershell command
> but of course I haven't figured out how to do that.
>
> I already tried what you suggest and it is suprising that it didn't work.
>  Generally when you 'disable' a mailbox it goes into the disconnected area
> and I use the PS command I pasted before to get rid of it.  Its unexpected
> that it not show up in the disconnected area.
>
> If anyone knows how to do what I think works above I would love to know the
> commands, I will keep looking in the meantime.
>
> Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
> Windows Systems Administrator
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 517-884-5469
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michelle Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:45 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
>
> So you didn't disconnect. You just disabled.  I must have missed that
> little tidbit (you know, the important part).
>
> If you have a little time and a cooperative customer, disconnect her
> current mailbox, re-enable the old one, delete it, then reconnect the
> current. It shouldn't take more than 5 minutes. You could also get
> creative about the mail that might get bounced in those five minutes, by
> forwarding it to another account then deleting the forwarding. It
> depends on how important it is that mail always be deliverable, if 5 -
> 10 minutes really matter that much (or time it so you do it at night).
>
> I don't know how else you can get rid of a disabled mailbox since I
> don't think disabled mailboxes will ever purge. Hopefully someone else
> has an ingenious plan. I'd just do it the hard way.
>
> Michelle
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:29 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
>
> I can not reconnect it because it is not listed in the disconnected
> mailboxes list, which is the original issue.  :)
>
> Thanks
>
> Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
> Windows Systems Administrator
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 517-884-5469
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michelle Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:56 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
>
> Can you connect it to another user object and then delete?  You
> obviously can't reconnect it to the orignal user.
>
> Michelle Weaver
> System Administrator - Materials Research Institute Pennsylvania State
> University
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:10 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
>
> Sorry, if it wasn't clear this is exchange 2007.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
>
> Windows Systems Administrator
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 517-884-5469
>
>
>
> From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:04 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
>
>
>
> Hi-
>
>
>
> This should be a quickie
>
>
>
> I learned a while back (the hard way) the difference between "disable"
> and "remove" for mailboxes.  Luckily (or not) it was on my own mailbox.
> Anyway...there is a user on our systems whose data got completely
> convoluted by their own doingsso I DISABLED their mailbox and
> created a new one.  Now presumably the old one would go to the
> "disconnected mailboxes" list and I would delete it for good with this
> powershell command
>
>
>
> Get-MailboxStatistics
>   -database
> "server\db" | where {$_.disconnectdate -ne $null} | foreach
> {Remove-mailbox -database $_.database -storemailboxidentity
> $_.mailboxguid}
>
>
>
> However for some reason it does not go to the disconnected mailbox
> list, but I still want to delete it because I don't want this 3.3GB
> mailbox floating around in limbo somewhere.  When I run the powershell
> command...
>
>
>
> Get-MailboxStat