RE: RPC/HTTP Revisited
PEBKAC in the end – needed to enter a different entry in wild card cert for the msstd setting All working From: Duncan Turnbull [mailto:dun...@e-simple.co.nz] Sent: 21 April 2010 18:57 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited One issue I had with installing a wild card certificate was in iiis expecting a client certificate for the rpc directory Somehow that changed during the certificate installation, I took this requirement off the rpc dir in iis and things came back to life. I found it using the rpc tools for server 2003, otherwise there were no error messages Then for some reason the setting would revert every few hours. Eventually rebooting evrything caused it to stick Good luck Cheers Duncan Sent from my iPhone please excuse the typos On 22/04/2010, at 2:58 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Use 2010. Honestly, I’ve no idea. If 2010 works, then it’s probably part of the security package rework that happened in 2010. Certainly not going to be backported… Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited OK, tried that, no joy. I'll document the settings in the client in this case: Digital Cert is a wild card and IT throws no errors when trying to connect Account Settings Tab: Mailserver = internal name of mail server (I am on the local LAN) Cached mode unticked username = * - this resolves when clicking check name internally More Settings General Automatically Detect Connection Type Ticked More Settings Security Encryption is ticked Kerberos/NTLM is the logon protocol RPC Proxy Settings https:// (domain name used to connect to webmail - MX record points to Web sense) Mutually Authenticate is ticked - target = msstd:*.webmaildomain Both HTTP connection types are ticked Authentication is set to basic Again, the above works with 2010, but not 2003 Thanks for any pointers Clayton On 21 April 2010 15:41, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Try enabling encryption. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited directory and referral only come up and both just say connecting, it gets no further and just re-prompts for the password I should add that Outlook 2010 works just fine, but 2003 and 2007 don't On 21 April 2010 15:37, Jay Dale jay.d...@3-gig.com wrote: Are you using Basic or NTLM Authentication? What does outlook /rpcdiag say? Almost all the time when this happens it has either to do with permissions on the virtual directories in IIS or with the ports in the registry. Jay Dale I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RPC/HTTP Revisited The other day I posted a question regarding rpc/http in an Exchange 2003 environment where the FE nlb cluster Exchange is sitting in a DMZ - turned out that Checkpoint was overriding some of the allow rules with it's smart defense stuff. Have a different problem now. I am on the local network with a fully patched Windows XP virtual machine, and a fully patched installation of Outlook 2003. If I set up a standard user profile and configure it without rpc/http no problems, as soon as I add the exchange proxy settings for rpc Outlook just continually prompts for a password, and goes no further (I am not asking Outlook to remember my password here - I want to have it accept it when I put it in) Any tips on what I am doing wrong here would be greatly appreciated. Clayton -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com
RPC/HTTP Revisited
The other day I posted a question regarding rpc/http in an Exchange 2003 environment where the FE nlb cluster Exchange is sitting in a DMZ - turned out that Checkpoint was overriding some of the allow rules with it's smart defense stuff. Have a different problem now. I am on the local network with a fully patched Windows XP virtual machine, and a fully patched installation of Outlook 2003. If I set up a standard user profile and configure it without rpc/http no problems, as soon as I add the exchange proxy settings for rpc Outlook just continually prompts for a password, and goes no further (I am not asking Outlook to remember my password here - I want to have it accept it when I put it in) Any tips on what I am doing wrong here would be greatly appreciated. Clayton
Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited
directory and referral only come up and both just say connecting, it gets no further and just re-prompts for the password I should add that Outlook 2010 works just fine, but 2003 and 2007 don't On 21 April 2010 15:37, Jay Dale jay.d...@3-gig.com wrote: Are you using Basic or NTLM Authentication? What does outlook /rpcdiag say? Almost all the time when this happens it has either to do with permissions on the virtual directories in IIS or with the ports in the registry. *Jay Dale* I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com kandy.luk...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:35 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RPC/HTTP Revisited The other day I posted a question regarding rpc/http in an Exchange 2003 environment where the FE nlb cluster Exchange is sitting in a DMZ - turned out that Checkpoint was overriding some of the allow rules with it's smart defense stuff. Have a different problem now. I am on the local network with a fully patched Windows XP virtual machine, and a fully patched installation of Outlook 2003. If I set up a standard user profile and configure it without rpc/http no problems, as soon as I add the exchange proxy settings for rpc Outlook just continually prompts for a password, and goes no further (I am not asking Outlook to remember my password here - I want to have it accept it when I put it in) Any tips on what I am doing wrong here would be greatly appreciated. Clayton -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com
Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited
OK, tried that, no joy. I'll document the settings in the client in this case: Digital Cert is a wild card and IT throws no errors when trying to connect Account Settings Tab: Mailserver = internal name of mail server (I am on the local LAN) Cached mode unticked username = * - this resolves when clicking check name internally More Settings General Automatically Detect Connection Type Ticked More Settings Security Encryption is ticked Kerberos/NTLM is the logon protocol RPC Proxy Settings https:// (domain name used to connect to webmail - MX record points to Web sense) Mutually Authenticate is ticked - target = msstd:*.webmaildomain Both HTTP connection types are ticked Authentication is set to basic Again, the above works with 2010, but not 2003 Thanks for any pointers Clayton On 21 April 2010 15:41, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Try enabling encryption. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:40 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited directory and referral only come up and both just say connecting, it gets no further and just re-prompts for the password I should add that Outlook 2010 works just fine, but 2003 and 2007 don't On 21 April 2010 15:37, Jay Dale jay.d...@3-gig.com wrote: Are you using Basic or NTLM Authentication? What does outlook /rpcdiag say? Almost all the time when this happens it has either to do with permissions on the virtual directories in IIS or with the ports in the registry. *Jay Dale* I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com kandy.luk...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:35 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RPC/HTTP Revisited The other day I posted a question regarding rpc/http in an Exchange 2003 environment where the FE nlb cluster Exchange is sitting in a DMZ - turned out that Checkpoint was overriding some of the allow rules with it's smart defense stuff. Have a different problem now. I am on the local network with a fully patched Windows XP virtual machine, and a fully patched installation of Outlook 2003. If I set up a standard user profile and configure it without rpc/http no problems, as soon as I add the exchange proxy settings for rpc Outlook just continually prompts for a password, and goes no further (I am not asking Outlook to remember my password here - I want to have it accept it when I put it in) Any tips on what I am doing wrong here would be greatly appreciated. Clayton -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com
Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited
unticked http for fast networks and it went through, now to test external On 21 April 2010 15:49, Clayton Doige clayton.do...@gmail.com wrote: OK, tried that, no joy. I'll document the settings in the client in this case: Digital Cert is a wild card and IT throws no errors when trying to connect Account Settings Tab: Mailserver = internal name of mail server (I am on the local LAN) Cached mode unticked username = * - this resolves when clicking check name internally More Settings General Automatically Detect Connection Type Ticked More Settings Security Encryption is ticked Kerberos/NTLM is the logon protocol RPC Proxy Settings https:// (domain name used to connect to webmail - MX record points to Web sense) Mutually Authenticate is ticked - target = msstd:*.webmaildomain Both HTTP connection types are ticked Authentication is set to basic Again, the above works with 2010, but not 2003 Thanks for any pointers Clayton On 21 April 2010 15:41, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Try enabling encryption. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:40 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited directory and referral only come up and both just say connecting, it gets no further and just re-prompts for the password I should add that Outlook 2010 works just fine, but 2003 and 2007 don't On 21 April 2010 15:37, Jay Dale jay.d...@3-gig.com wrote: Are you using Basic or NTLM Authentication? What does outlook /rpcdiag say? Almost all the time when this happens it has either to do with permissions on the virtual directories in IIS or with the ports in the registry. *Jay Dale* I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com kandy.luk...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:35 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RPC/HTTP Revisited The other day I posted a question regarding rpc/http in an Exchange 2003 environment where the FE nlb cluster Exchange is sitting in a DMZ - turned out that Checkpoint was overriding some of the allow rules with it's smart defense stuff. Have a different problem now. I am on the local network with a fully patched Windows XP virtual machine, and a fully patched installation of Outlook 2003. If I set up a standard user profile and configure it without rpc/http no problems, as soon as I add the exchange proxy settings for rpc Outlook just continually prompts for a password, and goes no further (I am not asking Outlook to remember my password here - I want to have it accept it when I put it in) Any tips on what I am doing wrong here would be greatly appreciated. Clayton -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com
Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited
yes, and from outside as well - I am actually disconnected from the LAN now as I got the thing working internally, but now externally it is still just prompting for the password, and it keeps prompting - I used the same user account to get the blank page when I tested connection rpc/rpcproxy.dll Thanks! On 21 April 2010 15:57, Jay Dale jay.d...@3-gig.com wrote: When you go to http://exchangeserver/rpc, do you get a login box? (From inside the network) *Jay Dale* I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com kandy.luk...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:49 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited OK, tried that, no joy. I'll document the settings in the client in this case: Digital Cert is a wild card and IT throws no errors when trying to connect Account Settings Tab: Mailserver = internal name of mail server (I am on the local LAN) Cached mode unticked username = * - this resolves when clicking check name internally More Settings General Automatically Detect Connection Type Ticked More Settings Security Encryption is ticked Kerberos/NTLM is the logon protocol RPC Proxy Settings https:// (domain name used to connect to webmail - MX record points to Web sense) Mutually Authenticate is ticked - target = msstd:*.webmaildomain Both HTTP connection types are ticked Authentication is set to basic Again, the above works with 2010, but not 2003 Thanks for any pointers Clayton On 21 April 2010 15:41, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Try enabling encryption. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:40 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited directory and referral only come up and both just say connecting, it gets no further and just re-prompts for the password I should add that Outlook 2010 works just fine, but 2003 and 2007 don't On 21 April 2010 15:37, Jay Dale jay.d...@3-gig.com wrote: Are you using Basic or NTLM Authentication? What does outlook /rpcdiag say? Almost all the time when this happens it has either to do with permissions on the virtual directories in IIS or with the ports in the registry. *Jay Dale* I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com kandy.luk...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:35 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RPC/HTTP Revisited The other day I posted a question regarding rpc/http in an Exchange 2003 environment where the FE nlb cluster Exchange is sitting in a DMZ - turned out that Checkpoint was overriding some of the allow rules with it's smart defense stuff. Have a different problem now. I am on the local network with a fully patched Windows XP virtual machine, and a fully patched installation of Outlook 2003. If I set up a standard user profile and configure it without rpc/http no problems, as soon as I add the exchange proxy settings for rpc Outlook just continually prompts for a password, and goes no further (I am not asking Outlook to remember my password here - I want to have it accept it when I put it in) Any tips on what I am doing wrong here would be greatly appreciated. Clayton -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com
Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited
can't, 2003 is my clients standard desktop - I am running 2010 on my machine, was very happy when it worked only to be dropped back into the frustration thereafter (my 2010 is Beta still!) thanks On 21 April 2010 15:58, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Use 2010. Honestly, I’ve no idea. If 2010 works, then it’s probably part of the security package rework that happened in 2010. Certainly not going to be backported… Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:49 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited OK, tried that, no joy. I'll document the settings in the client in this case: Digital Cert is a wild card and IT throws no errors when trying to connect Account Settings Tab: Mailserver = internal name of mail server (I am on the local LAN) Cached mode unticked username = * - this resolves when clicking check name internally More Settings General Automatically Detect Connection Type Ticked More Settings Security Encryption is ticked Kerberos/NTLM is the logon protocol RPC Proxy Settings https:// (domain name used to connect to webmail - MX record points to Web sense) Mutually Authenticate is ticked - target = msstd:*.webmaildomain Both HTTP connection types are ticked Authentication is set to basic Again, the above works with 2010, but not 2003 Thanks for any pointers Clayton On 21 April 2010 15:41, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Try enabling encryption. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:40 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: RPC/HTTP Revisited directory and referral only come up and both just say connecting, it gets no further and just re-prompts for the password I should add that Outlook 2010 works just fine, but 2003 and 2007 don't On 21 April 2010 15:37, Jay Dale jay.d...@3-gig.com wrote: Are you using Basic or NTLM Authentication? What does outlook /rpcdiag say? Almost all the time when this happens it has either to do with permissions on the virtual directories in IIS or with the ports in the registry. *Jay Dale* I.T. Manager, 3GiG Mobile: 713.299.2541 Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com kandy.luk...@3-gig.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:35 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RPC/HTTP Revisited The other day I posted a question regarding rpc/http in an Exchange 2003 environment where the FE nlb cluster Exchange is sitting in a DMZ - turned out that Checkpoint was overriding some of the allow rules with it's smart defense stuff. Have a different problem now. I am on the local network with a fully patched Windows XP virtual machine, and a fully patched installation of Outlook 2003. If I set up a standard user profile and configure it without rpc/http no problems, as soon as I add the exchange proxy settings for rpc Outlook just continually prompts for a password, and goes no further (I am not asking Outlook to remember my password here - I want to have it accept it when I put it in) Any tips on what I am doing wrong here would be greatly appreciated. Clayton -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com
Configuring RPC/HTTPS in a Multiple Cluster 2003 Environment
Dear all, I hope someone can help with this one. Environment Exchange Front End Servers are Windows 2003 SP2, Exchange 2003 SP configured in a load balanced set up using Windows NLB, digital cert is a wild card, and the servers are sitting in the DMZ (no ISA Server) Exchange back end servers live on a three node cluster (again all 2003 sp2) where node 1 and 3 typically host the two live cluster resources, with node 2 as a failover node for both. OWA works without firing a cert error when connecting. I have installed the RPC/HTTP proxy components on both front end servers, and ticked all the relevant rpc/http radio buttons on the rpc tab for all of the servers (ESM only shows the 4 (two front end, and two back end hosts) If I do an RPCDUMP.exe /v on the first backend server I am testing it is not listening on ports 6001, 6002 and 6004, so I am guessing that this is something to do with it living on a cluster? I have the below information rgearding reg hacks: Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Rpc\RpcProxy] ValidPorts=server-fe:100-5000; server-be:6001-6002; server-be.domain.local:6001-6002; server-dc:6001-6002; sWindows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Rpc\RpcProxy] ValidPorts=server-fe:100-5000; server-be:6001-6002; server-be.domain.local:6001-6002; server-dc:6001-6002; server-dc.domain.local:6001-6002; server-be:6004; server-be.domain.local:6004; server-dc:6004; server-dc.domain.local:6004; mail.external.com:6001-6002; mail.external.com:6004; server-dc:593; server-dc.domain.local:593; server-be:593; server-be.domain.local:593; mail.external.com:593;erver-dc.domain.local:6001-6002; server-be:6004; server-be.domain.local:6004; server-dc:6004; server-dc.domain.local:6004; mail.external.com:6001-6002; mail.external.com:6004; server-dc:593; server-dc.domain.local:593; server-be:593; server-be.domain.local:593; mail.external.com:593; My question is do I need to add both of the virtual node names in for the back end system on all three back end registries? I am guessing I do, just wanted to run it past you all in case someone else has done this, as google is not being friendly on this one. Thanks in advance Clayton
RE: Configuring RPC/HTTPS in a Multiple Cluster 2003 Environment
Simon, agreed, poor design, (pre-me) Michael, we are talking about people who don't want us deploying 2008 member servers even though they know support runs out soon. (GR) RPC/HTTP was my idea as the firewall they have wants MD5 VPN, and well, Vista and 7. Found out after the fact that we have another client with a similar set up, so gonna have a browse through their exchange registries - you know, I am so looking forward to that ;-) Hopefully that will sort me out (he says) This three node backend cluster still has me worried, but I guess it depends on the reg entries? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 19 April 2010 18:31 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Configuring RPC/HTTPS in a Multiple Cluster 2003 Environment Wildcards can be made to work. I did it years ago (but I'm shocked that anyone would be deploying a new feature on 2003 at this late date!), but can't find any notes I made about it. AFAICR, You'll need the external fqdn, the wildcard fqdn (*.example.com), the fqdn and shortnames of the fe, the be, and the proxy server. It'll be a long long validports entry. I'm pretty sure you'll also have to set this server is not a member of a managed front-end/back-end RPC/HTTP network for all servers. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk] Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Configuring RPC/HTTPS in a Multiple Cluster 2003 Environment Two problems immediately sprint to mind. 1. Exchange in a DMZ - that is such a poor design. 2. RPC over HTTPS does not like wildcard certificates. With outlook it is looking for an exact match. With a wild card certificate *.example.com is NOT the same as mail.example.com You shouldn't be making registry changes if you are using fe/be - only the GUI is required. However I suspect things are not working because of the use of a DMZ and wildcard. Simon. -- Simon Butler MVP: Exchange, MCSE Sembee Ltd. e: si...@sembee.co.uk w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ w: http://www.amset.info/ w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with Windows Mobile 5.0? http://CertificatesForExchange.com/ for certificates from just $23.99. Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/ Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/ From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: 19 April 2010 16:18 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Configuring RPC/HTTPS in a Multiple Cluster 2003 Environment Dear all, I hope someone can help with this one. Environment Exchange Front End Servers are Windows 2003 SP2, Exchange 2003 SP configured in a load balanced set up using Windows NLB, digital cert is a wild card, and the servers are sitting in the DMZ (no ISA Server) Exchange back end servers live on a three node cluster (again all 2003 sp2) where node 1 and 3 typically host the two live cluster resources, with node 2 as a failover node for both. OWA works without firing a cert error when connecting. I have installed the RPC/HTTP proxy components on both front end servers, and ticked all the relevant rpc/http radio buttons on the rpc tab for all of the servers (ESM only shows the 4 (two front end, and two back end hosts) If I do an RPCDUMP.exe /v on the first backend server I am testing it is not listening on ports 6001, 6002 and 6004, so I am guessing that this is something to do with it living on a cluster? I have the below information rgearding reg hacks: Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Rpc\RpcProxy] ValidPorts=server-fe:100-5000; server-be:6001-6002; server-be.domain.local:6001-6002; server-dc:6001-6002; sWindows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Rpc\RpcProxy] ValidPorts=server-fe:100-5000; server-be:6001-6002; server-be.domain.local:6001-6002; server-dc:6001-6002; server-dc.domain.local:6001-6002; server-be:6004; server-be.domain.local:6004; server-dc:6004; server-dc.domain.local:6004; mail.external.com:6001-6002; mail.external.com:6004; server-dc:593; server-dc.domain.local:593; server-be:593; server-be.domain.local:593; mail.external.com:593;erver-dc.domain.local:6001-6002; server-be:6004; server-be.domain.local:6004; server-dc:6004; server-dc.domain.local:6004; mail.external.com:6001-6002; mail.external.com:6004; server-dc:593; server-dc.domain.local:593; server-be:593; server-be.domain.local:593; mail.external.com:593; My question is do I need to add both of the virtual node names in for the back end system on all three back end registries? I am guessing I do, just wanted to run it past you all in case someone else has done this, as google is not being friendly on this one. Thanks in advance Clayton
RE: I lost the fight
Also, be prepared possible for complaints from iPhone users as AS in some versions of the iPhone OS are not full featured, I believe calendar sync is not fully functional in some revisions so probably worth looking at From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] Sent: 20 February 2010 16:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: I lost the fight If you have WM phones working via AS, iPhones will work. From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com] Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 8:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: I lost the fight I have to allow a selected few to connect to Exchange 2003 with iPhones. I'm still arguing for the use of Good software but in the mean time I have to configure Exchange to connect. Is there a definitive article that you may have used on how to configure Exchange for iPhones? Google has returned various results. Thanks in advance! Bill Lambert Windows System Administrator Concuity A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc. Phone 847-941-9206 Fax 847-465-9147 clip_image001 NASDAQ: TTPA The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. image001.gif
Re: Exchange 2010 sizing guide
This might help? http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd335108.aspx 2010/1/13 Ellis, John P. johnel...@wirral.gov.uk Is there such thing as an Exchange 2010 sizing guide? Currently we are using Exchange 2003 and im trying to size the servers Currently we have about 4300 users and this will probably grow to 5500. Thanks John ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com
RE: A blast from the past...
Classic! Although, I believe my most memorable list quote came from your good self Don - some doofus started slamming everyone for talking about the World Trade Center on 9-11. Your two word response was all that was required - well done J From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 15:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A blast from the past... For those of you who think it can get ugly around here... http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2009/12/old-quotes-from-an-old-exchang e-list.html
RE: A blast from the past...
Well retrieved! From: Andrew Laya [mailto:andrew.l...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 19:45 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: A blast from the past... Here you go... http://www.mail-archive.com/ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com/msg03884.h tml No, he didn't say well done. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Kim Longenbaugh k...@colonialsavings.com wrote: What was the response? You're not saying well done was what he said, are you? _ From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A blast from the past... Classic! Although, I believe my most memorable list quote came from your good self Don - some doofus started slamming everyone for talking about the World Trade Center on 9-11. Your two word response was all that was required - well done J From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 15:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A blast from the past... For those of you who think it can get ugly around here... http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2009/12/old-quotes-from-an-old-exchang e-list.html
RE: A blast from the past...
Yeah it is a bit of a head twister - I started lurking in 98! Just wish I had more time to spend on list! From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 19:52 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: A blast from the past... That's what I was guessing it was. I joined the list shortly after that, can't believe that it's been that long. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Andrew Laya andrew.l...@gmail.com wrote: Here you go... http://www.mail-archive.com/ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com/msg03884.h tml No, he didn't say well done. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Kim Longenbaugh k...@colonialsavings.com wrote: What was the response? You're not saying well done was what he said, are you? _ From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A blast from the past... Classic! Although, I believe my most memorable list quote came from your good self Don - some doofus started slamming everyone for talking about the World Trade Center on 9-11. Your two word response was all that was required - well done J From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 15:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A blast from the past... For those of you who think it can get ugly around here... http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2009/12/old-quotes-from-an-old-exchang e-list.html -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke
RE: A blast from the past...
Looks aren't everything... From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 20:15 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: A blast from the past... Lurker - you be scarey. ;) On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Clayton Doige clayton.do...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah it is a bit of a head twister - I started lurking in 98! Just wish I had more time to spend on list! From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 19:52 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: A blast from the past... That's what I was guessing it was. I joined the list shortly after that, can't believe that it's been that long. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Andrew Laya andrew.l...@gmail.com wrote: Here you go... http://www.mail-archive.com/ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com/msg03884.h tml No, he didn't say well done. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Kim Longenbaugh k...@colonialsavings.com wrote: What was the response? You're not saying well done was what he said, are you? _ From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A blast from the past... Classic! Although, I believe my most memorable list quote came from your good self Don - some doofus started slamming everyone for talking about the World Trade Center on 9-11. Your two word response was all that was required - well done J From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 15:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A blast from the past... For those of you who think it can get ugly around here... http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2009/12/old-quotes-from-an-old-exchang e-list.html -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
RE: A blast from the past...
Apparently both Baby Seals and Tiger Woods have now been clubbed by Scandinavians From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 20:39 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: A blast from the past... ApparentlyMrs. Tiger Woods is finding that out it seems Yes, I just took this wyyy off topic. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Clayton Doige clayton.do...@gmail.com wrote: Looks aren't everything... From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 20:15 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: A blast from the past... Lurker - you be scarey. ;) On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Clayton Doige clayton.do...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah it is a bit of a head twister - I started lurking in 98! Just wish I had more time to spend on list! From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 19:52 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: A blast from the past... That's what I was guessing it was. I joined the list shortly after that, can't believe that it's been that long. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Andrew Laya andrew.l...@gmail.com wrote: Here you go... http://www.mail-archive.com/ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com/msg03884.h tml No, he didn't say well done. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Kim Longenbaugh k...@colonialsavings.com wrote: What was the response? You're not saying well done was what he said, are you? _ From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: A blast from the past... Classic! Although, I believe my most memorable list quote came from your good self Don - some doofus started slamming everyone for talking about the World Trade Center on 9-11. Your two word response was all that was required - well done J From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: 08 December 2009 15:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A blast from the past... For those of you who think it can get ugly around here... http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2009/12/old-quotes-from-an-old-exchang e-list.html -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Keller, TX, United States
Re: Friday Funny - Banned From Wal-Mart
the funniest thing I have ever read! http://www.vtwinmama.com/demonic_squirrel_riding_story.htm 2009/7/17 pramatow...@mediageneral.com the squirrel motorcycle story? *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, July 17, 2009 10:06 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* OT: Friday Funny - Banned From Wal-Mart Mr. Caesare, this is especially for you since you need a laugh or two to get you through the long day/night you have scheduled. Warning, some may find this politically, moraly or gender(ly) incorrect, but it's one of the funniest things I've read since the squirrel motorcycle story.(1, 3 12 are my personal favorites). snip -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com
Questions about masquerade domains
Morning all, hope someone can educamate me on this topic. I am looking at this setting on our Exchange 2003 SP2 environment, and note that there is something entered in there. When I look on our external SMTP proxy I see that there are outbound emails referencing the Masquerade domain. The emails referenced originate from either a Web based IT Service desk which connects to a mailbox on the Exchange server, or from an Exchange server which routes email from a remote site to the local Exchange server through a routing group connector. I am wondering why this is, and if anyone uses masquerade domains what is the practical use for them. Me no understand :-) Thanks in advance. Clayton ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Updating User's Properties in the GAL
Hi all, I was just asked a question if there is a way that users can view the properties of their own account in the GAL through Outlook and fill in the details on the general tab (address, phone number etc). I was wondering if any of you fine folks have anything like this in place and if s how you have achieved it. Many thanks Clayton ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Updating User's Properties in the GAL
Cool, thanks, will test that out. Clayton 2009/6/8 Vincent DeSouza vincent.deso...@nbkcapital.com Sorry. Should have been this one http://support.microsoft.com/kb/272198 Not Sure this will work with Exchange 2007 though Kind Regards, Vincent *From:* Vincent DeSouza [mailto:vincent.deso...@nbkcapital.com] *Sent:* Monday, June 08, 2009 12:29 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Updating User's Properties in the GAL How to install and use the Global Address List Modify for Web tool See http://support.microsoft.com/kb/242223 Kind Regards, Vincent *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Monday, June 08, 2009 12:10 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Updating User's Properties in the GAL Hi all, I was just asked a question if there is a way that users can view the properties of their own account in the GAL through Outlook and fill in the details on the general tab (address, phone number etc). I was wondering if any of you fine folks have anything like this in place and if s how you have achieved it. Many thanks Clayton [image: Global Finance declares NBK Capital 'The Best Investment Bank In Kuwait for 2009'] - www.nbkcapital.com -- *Attention* *This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sending individual or entity by e-mail and permanently delete the original e-mail and attachment(s) from your computer system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. * *Any opinions contained in this message are those of the author and are not given or endorsed by NBK Capital, unless clearly indicated in the message and the authority of the author to so bind NBK Capital is duly verified. No warranty is given as to the legitimacy of e-Mail content transmitted over the Internet.* [image: Global Finance declares NBK Capital 'The Best Investment Bank In Kuwait for 2009'] - *www.nbkcapital.com* http://www.nbkcapital.com/ -- *Attention* *This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sending individual or entity by e-mail and permanently delete the original e-mail and attachment(s) from your computer system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Any opinions contained in this message are those of the author and are not given or endorsed by NBK Capital, unless clearly indicated in the message and the authority of the author to so bind NBK Capital is duly verified. No warranty is given as to the legitimacy of e-Mail content transmitted over the Internet. * -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/909802
Hi all, we seem to be experiencing the issues described in the above referenced kb article. Just wondering if anyone has installed it with no problems, and did you have to install it across your exchange org, or was it only required on the server on which the effected users had their mailboxes. Many thanks in advance. Clayton ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Blackberry :-( Issue
Hi all, first if this is a reallynewbie stupid question I will apologies up front, as thus far in my career I have been fortunate enough not to have had the displeasure of supporting these devices too much, which leaves me not knowing a helck of a lot lol. BES, latest version, 2 mailbox servers, E2K3 SP2 If a user is on exchange server A changes made onthe blackberry calendar sync to Outlook, however if you move them to server B the Blackberry changes no longer sync. I read that this can occur is mapi32.dll and cdo.dll on the exchange server does not match the version on the BES. I checked this all through and the same versions are present on all three machines. I checked the version of all of dll's in program files\exchsrvr (sad huh) on both mailbox servers and found only one discrepancy, exmime.dll (the non working server has an older version, but it is still a 6.5.76 version. Has anyone seen mismatches of exmime.dll cause the calendar issues decribed, and if so is it a simple matter of copying the dll from server a to server b and bouncing the server or is there a specific hot fix for this, google has not come upwith too much on this so far. TIA Clayton ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Blackberry :-( Issue
cool, will do, thanks :-) 2009/5/14 Sobey, Richard A r.so...@imperial.ac.uk I’m not really sure what could cause this issue, but won’t hurt reading KB913643 and KB923537 (taken from the BES installation guide which is fresh in my memory). *From:* bounce-8529868-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto: bounce-8529868-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] *On Behalf Of *Clayton Doige *Sent:* 14 May 2009 16:23 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Blackberry :-( Issue Hi all, first if this is a reallynewbie stupid question I will apologies up front, as thus far in my career I have been fortunate enough not to have had the displeasure of supporting these devices too much, which leaves me not knowing a helck of a lot lol. BES, latest version, 2 mailbox servers, E2K3 SP2 If a user is on exchange server A changes made onthe blackberry calendar sync to Outlook, however if you move them to server B the Blackberry changes no longer sync. I read that this can occur is mapi32.dll and cdo.dll on the exchange server does not match the version on the BES. I checked this all through and the same versions are present on all three machines. I checked the version of all of dll's in program files\exchsrvr (sad huh) on both mailbox servers and found only one discrepancy, exmime.dll (the non working server has an older version, but it is still a 6.5.76 version. Has anyone seen mismatches of exmime.dll cause the calendar issues decribed, and if so is it a simple matter of copying the dll from server a to server b and bouncing the server or is there a specific hot fix for this, google has not come upwith too much on this so far. TIA Clayton -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Blackberry :-( Issue
I think I might have found the issue. In ADUC on the Exchange Advance tab besadmin has allow and deny ticked for full mailbox access. Does anyone know where this is inheritedfrom? I can't see it on the information store level. And I can't remove it as there is no tick box to sotp inheriting. Thanks:-) 2009/5/14 Sobey, Richard A r.so...@imperial.ac.uk No worries. The text for it simply states “Unicode support for CalendarsTo support Exchange 2003, these need to be installed on the Messaging Server (913643) and BES server (923537)”. *From:* bounce-8529883-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto: bounce-8529883-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] *On Behalf Of *Clayton Doige *Sent:* 14 May 2009 16:30 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Blackberry :-( Issue cool, will do, thanks :-) 2009/5/14 Sobey, Richard A r.so...@imperial.ac.uk I’m not really sure what could cause this issue, but won’t hurt reading KB913643 and KB923537 (taken from the BES installation guide which is fresh in my memory). *From:* bounce-8529868-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto: bounce-8529868-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] *On Behalf Of *Clayton Doige *Sent:* 14 May 2009 16:23 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Blackberry :-( Issue Hi all, first if this is a reallynewbie stupid question I will apologies up front, as thus far in my career I have been fortunate enough not to have had the displeasure of supporting these devices too much, which leaves me not knowing a helck of a lot lol. BES, latest version, 2 mailbox servers, E2K3 SP2 If a user is on exchange server A changes made onthe blackberry calendar sync to Outlook, however if you move them to server B the Blackberry changes no longer sync. I read that this can occur is mapi32.dll and cdo.dll on the exchange server does not match the version on the BES. I checked this all through and the same versions are present on all three machines. I checked the version of all of dll's in program files\exchsrvr (sad huh) on both mailbox servers and found only one discrepancy, exmime.dll (the non working server has an older version, but it is still a 6.5.76 version. Has anyone seen mismatches of exmime.dll cause the calendar issues decribed, and if so is it a simple matter of copying the dll from server a to server b and bouncing the server or is there a specific hot fix for this, google has not come upwith too much on this so far. TIA Clayton -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
5.5 System Folder Question
Dear all, would I be correct in saying that the name format for a 5.5 OAB system folder would be EX:/ O= etc? Thanks Clayton ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: 5.5 System Folder Question
I have got a system folder created in 2002 that has only a version2 OAB folder. The default folder with the three versions was created in 2005. So I beleive what I am seeing is a legacy 5.5 folder that was replicated across during a 5.5 to 2003 upgrade. I just want to be sure that's what it is before I blow it away. We have 50 users in three sites who are getting the wrong OAB when they connect to exchange in cached mode. 2009/5/7 Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com Exchange 5.5 You're kidding right? On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Clayton Doige clayton.do...@gmail.comwrote: Dear all, would I be correct in saying that the name format for a 5.5 OAB system folder would be EX:/ O= etc? Thanks Clayton -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Finally 2010
Cool, any word on when 2003 and 2007 support will eventually dry up post 2010 release? 2009/4/15 KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Finally 2010
Cool, thanks :-) 2009/4/15 Bolser, Scott scott.bol...@childrens.harvard.edu http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselect (explains MS’ lifecycle policy). -Scott *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 15, 2009 7:43 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Finally 2010 Cool, any word on when 2003 and 2007 support will eventually dry up post 2010 release? 2009/4/15 KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org We can finally talk to ya’ll about Exchange 2010 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=1898ed2c-2f88-48ac-824e-d3d20fad77d7 ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Dumb question - Contacts
What about an OU in AD for just contacts? They then show up in the GAL From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com] Sent: 18 March 2009 16:58 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Dumb question - Contacts Been a while since I've made a fool of myself* and I hate to disappoint my fans, so We're running a pretty small environment.. Exchange Server 2003 Enterprise and maybe 20 users. For years, peoples' address book has consisted of just using the auto-complete in Outlook 2003 (and now Outlook 2007 in some cases.) But now, I'm growing more and more concerned about that technique and would like an easy and reliable way to have a central repository of contacts that everyone can use and update. My question is, what is everyone doing? I would assume a public folder that contains contacts and then is assigned as an address book in people's Outlook configurations, but then I've also heard that public folders don't exist in E2K7, which I may upgrade to at some point, so I'm not sure how to proceed. So, is there a third party solution that people know of and use, or is it just a public folder filled with contacts? Thanks, Evan * on this list, anyway. __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Social Networking
Good article, I definitely use FB as a tool both for IT and music, very useful indeed From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: 16 March 2009 16:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT: Social Networking Okay, since I caused such an uproar with my other OT post today referencing FaceBook, here's an interesting ZDNet article about social networking. http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-272809.html -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OWA Message Content not displayed
Under options in the browser install email security, has worked for me previously From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org] Sent: 12 March 2009 12:18 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Message Content not displayed I'm hoping someone can point me in the right direction with a problem I am having with Outlook Web Access on a single Exchange 2003 Standard installation. About half the time after the server is rebooted there is a problem that the message content will not display. The message list is visible, but the preview pane is completely blank. Double clicking on a message opens a new window, also completely empty. Sometimes issuing IISreset at the command prompt will 'magically' fix the problem. Other times rebooting the Exchange server fixes it. Other times, like today after several IISresets, and reboots it is still not working. This problem actually started after MessageSolution added their OWA add-in to my system to handle messages that are stubbed by their archiving software. In the past they have remoted into my server and fixed the problem for me, but I have had to wait days for them to fix it, and it is always in the middle of the night because apparently the only people they have who can do this are located in China. They have promised several times to give me instructions on how to fix this, but they never follow through. Is there anything I can look at? Is there a pretty standard way that they might have implemented this add-in that may have some typical things to look at? I know I'm fishing here, but I am not knowledgeable about how OWA and IIS work, and the vendor is almost completely unresponsive. Thanks for any guidance someone might offer. Ralph Smith Confidentiality Notice: ** This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and destroy all copies of the original message. __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: favorite phone
the touch pro rocks! 2009/3/6 James Kerr cluster...@gmail.com I've already made a few iPhone users jealous with my Touch Pro (same thing as a fuze). Keyboard too small? Smaller then the keyboard on an iPhone? Doesnt the fuze have the slide out keyboard? I like the slide out keyboard but I find the touch screen one to be the same as the one on the iPhone. Also the touch screen is the same as the iPhones. I used both but for work purposes I need Win Mobile. On 3/5/09, Gene Giannamore gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com wrote: User already has the htc fuze from att. Keyboard is too small, too many pop-ups while typing, touch screen is flakey (does not work consistently). Probably just give him one of the extra 1st gen iphones we have to play with for now, until I find something better. Gene Giannamore Abide International Inc. Technical Support 561 1st Street West Sonoma,Ca.95476 (707) 935-1577 Office (707) 935-9387 Fax (707) 766-4185 Cell gene.giannam...@abideinternational.commailto: gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: favorite phone As something to use instead of an iPhone go with the Fuze. Awesome phone with a touch-screen and slide out keyboard. Does everything the OP asks and much more. TVK From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: favorite phone BB 9000 (aka Bold) - on BES - BB browser slowly getting better but still not IE - yes to voice dialing though I don't use it. (this is for work of course) From: Gene Giannamore [mailto:gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT: favorite phone We are looking at iphone alternatives. I was just wondering what your favorite phone is, especially for accessing exchange email, contacts, calendar, and browsing the web. Also does the phone have voice dialing? Gene Giannamore Abide International Inc. Technical Support 561 1st Street West Sonoma,Ca.95476 (707) 935-1577 Office (707) 935-9387 Fax (707) 766-4185 Cell gene.giannam...@abideinternational.commailto: gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ -- Sent from my mobile device ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Regards, Clayton clay...@alsipius.com http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Email Archiving Solutions
Have a look at Zantaz -Original Message- From: John Bowles [mailto:john_bow...@yahoo.com] Sent: 03 March 2009 16:15 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Email Archiving Solutions All- I've been tasked to find some email archiving solutions for our company. Besides Evault from Symantec which ones do you guys/gals recommend? I'm trying to gather a list of 5 different vendors so I can do a thorough eval of all of them. TIA, _ John Bowles ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange 2007 HT/CAS and Server 08 Web Edition
I am guessing the person insisting on that has not heard of the pay me now, or pay me later scenario... From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: 02 March 2009 13:43 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2007 HT/CAS and Server 08 Web Edition According to http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996719.aspx, Server 2008 Web Edition is NOT a recommended OS for Exch 07. I have someone who insists that it is a supported OS and that you can install the HT and or CAS roles on 08 Web Edition. My viewpoint is, if it is not on that page, we should not be recommending it to a customer. Just wanted to get your thoughts on the matter. Thanks Webster __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange 2007 HT/CAS and Server 08 Web Edition
That's what I mean, they will run it on the cheap, and then when they get in trouble and call PSS they will be told so sad too bad, and what will that cost??? From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 March 2009 13:58 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 HT/CAS and Server 08 Web Edition From: Doige, Clayton [mailto:clayton.do...@cme-net.com] Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 HT/CAS and Server 08 Web Edition I am guessing the person insisting on that has not heard of the pay me now, or pay me later scenario... This person says the Web Edition costs about $1000US less than the other editions. Says when a customer is pinching pennies, it helps to close the deal by offering them the Web Edition. Webster From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Subject: Exchange 2007 HT/CAS and Server 08 Web Edition According to http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996719.aspx, Server 2008 Web Edition is NOT a recommended OS for Exch 07. I have someone who insists that it is a supported OS and that you can install the HT and or CAS roles on 08 Web Edition. My viewpoint is, if it is not on that page, we should not be recommending it to a customer. Just wanted to get your thoughts on the matter. Thanks __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange 2007 HT/CAS and Server 08 Web Edition
Thought so... From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: 02 March 2009 16:03 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 HT/CAS and Server 08 Web Edition This is the official word (which came from both an Escalation Engineer in PSS and from a member of Dev): We do not support Exchange on Core or Web editions. From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 9:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 HT/CAS and Server 08 Web Edition Is there a way to find out if Exchange 2007 HT and or CAS roles running on Server 2008 Web Edition is a PSS/CSS supported configuration? Webster From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com] Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 HT/CAS and Server 08 Web Edition From: Doige, Clayton [mailto:clayton.do...@cme-net.com] Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 HT/CAS and Server 08 Web Edition That's what I mean, they will run it on the cheap, and then when they get in trouble and call PSS they will be told so sad too bad, and what will that cost??? He claims to have talked directly with Microsoft and while it may not be a recommended config it IS a supported config. Meaning you can call PSS/CSS and receive support for either or both roles running on an 08 Web Edition server. Webster From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com] Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 HT/CAS and Server 08 Web Edition From: Doige, Clayton [mailto:clayton.do...@cme-net.com] Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 HT/CAS and Server 08 Web Edition I am guessing the person insisting on that has not heard of the pay me now, or pay me later scenario... This person says the Web Edition costs about $1000US less than the other editions. Says when a customer is pinching pennies, it helps to close the deal by offering them the Web Edition. Webster From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Subject: Exchange 2007 HT/CAS and Server 08 Web Edition According to http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996719.aspx, Server 2008 Web Edition is NOT a recommended OS for Exch 07. I have someone who insists that it is a supported OS and that you can install the HT and or CAS roles on 08 Web Edition. My viewpoint is, if it is not on that page, we should not be recommending it to a customer. Just wanted to get your thoughts on the matter. Thanks __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
recover dead 5.5 mdb
Hi there, have restored an old 5.5 db, but it won't mount no matter what we try. Can anyone recommend a tool that we can use to extract PST's? We are trying to get Stellar Phoenix Mailbox Exchange Recovery, which needs a serial code, so looking for any freeware, cheap type alternative? tia Clayton Doige Project Management Consultant Green IT Solutions Ltd clay...@greenit.co.uk mailto:clay...@greenit.co.uk 01277844943 07949255062 www.greenit.co.uk http://www.greenit.co.uk Internet communications are not secure and Green IT Solutions Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Green IT Solutions Ltd. Although Green IT Solutions Ltd operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Telephone communications and replies to this email may be monitored by Green IT Solutions Ltd for operational or training purposes. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: recover dead 5.5 mdb
All we have is a 6 gb 5.5 edb, and no back up of the previous server to restore from L From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: 21 January 2009 16:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: recover dead 5.5 mdb What errors do you get? Whats size is the EDB file? Have you tried running a edb check against the file? John From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@greenit.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2009 16:29 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: recover dead 5.5 mdb Hi there, have restored an old 5.5 db, but it won't mount no matter what we try. Can anyone recommend a tool that we can use to extract PST's? We are trying to get Stellar Phoenix Mailbox Exchange Recovery, which needs a serial code, so looking for any freeware, cheap type alternative? tia Clayton Doige Project Management Consultant Green IT Solutions Ltd clay...@greenit.co.uk 01277844943 07949255062 www.greenit.co.uk Internet communications are not secure and Green IT Solutions Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Green IT Solutions Ltd. Although Green IT Solutions Ltd operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Telephone communications and replies to this email may be monitored by Green IT Solutions Ltd for operational or training purposes. ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: recover dead 5.5 mdb
Perfect, thanks!!! -Original Message- From: KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org Sent: 21 January 2009 18:03 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: recover dead 5.5 mdb Qntrack recovery tools. Or Quest recovery tools.. those are you options From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@greenit.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 8:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: recover dead 5.5 mdb All we have is a 6 gb 5.5 edb, and no back up of the previous server to restore from L From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: 21 January 2009 16:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: recover dead 5.5 mdb What errors do you get? Whats size is the EDB file? Have you tried running a edb check against the file? John From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@greenit.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2009 16:29 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: recover dead 5.5 mdb Hi there, have restored an old 5.5 db, but it wont mount no matter what we try. Can anyone recommend a tool that we can use to extract PSTs? We are trying to get Stellar Phoenix Mailbox Exchange Recovery, which needs a serial code, so looking for any freeware, cheap type alternative? tia Clayton Doige Project Management Consultant Green IT Solutions Ltd clay...@greenit.co.uk 01277844943 07949255062 www.greenit.co.uk Internet communications are not secure and Green IT Solutions Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Green IT Solutions Ltd. Although Green IT Solutions Ltd operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Telephone communications and replies to this email may be monitored by Green IT Solutions Ltd for operational or training purposes. ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: exchange reporting tool
You could start here: http://www.solarwinds.com/register/registrationform.aspx?Program=825c=7015000Djc6lid=DD_DL_EMINTCMP=ILC-HP_DLDD_EM Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:clayton.do...@cme-net.com W:www.cetv-net.com -Original Message- From: Nirav Doshi [mailto:nirav_n...@yahoo.co.in] Sent: 12 January 2009 10:05 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exchange reporting tool Dear All my it head wants me to genrate a manual report for our exchange 2003 box. pls guide me what kind of manual report we can genrate from exchange 2003. my boss purpose is like we have to monito whole echange server through this report. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Killing Reminders
All, posted this on Monday, sorry for posting this again, but realise it probably got filtered in the North American post Labour Day shift delete festival ;-) Any tips would be greatly appreciated OK, here's ain interesting one. Exchange 2003 SP2, Outlook 2003, Windows Mobile 6 Assistant sets and appointment up in her boss's Calendar. Boss gets the reminder that the assistant sets. Assistant wants reminder, Boss does not. Disabled all reminder in Outlook, tested, no reminder from Outlook. BUT! On the phone the reminder sound plays (does not display anything, just makes the reminder sound. If you look on the phone and edit the appointment item the reminder is switched on. How do I get rid of these reminders? TIA Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Killing Reminders
I knew you'd save me ;-) Will let you know how that goes when the 'boss' is back in the office. Thanks Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 September 2008 17:43 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Killing Reminders I think that I would take a look at the switches available for starting Outlook, specifically the /Cleanreminders. Run it on both mailboxes. On 9/3/08, Doige, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, posted this on Monday, sorry for posting this again, but realise it probably got filtered in the North American post Labour Day shift delete festival ;-) Any tips would be greatly appreciated OK, here's ain interesting one. Exchange 2003 SP2, Outlook 2003, Windows Mobile 6 Assistant sets and appointment up in her boss's Calendar. Boss gets the reminder that the assistant sets. Assistant wants reminder, Boss does not. Disabled all reminder in Outlook, tested, no reminder from Outlook. BUT! On the phone the reminder sound plays (does not display anything, just makes the reminder sound. If you look on the phone and edit the appointment item the reminder is switched on. How do I get rid of these reminders? TIA Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Killing Reminders
OK, here's ain interesting one. Exchange 2003 SP2, Outlook 2003, Windows Mobile 6 Assistant sets and appointment up in her boss's Calendar. Boss gets the reminder that the assistant sets. Assistant wants reminder, Boss does not. Disabled all reminder in Outlook, tested, no reminder from Outlook. BUT! On the phone the reminder sound plays (does not display anything, just makes the reminder sound. If you look on the phone and edit the appointment item the reminder is switched on. How do I get rid of these reminders? TIA Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com http://www.cetv-net.com __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: SMTP generated by virus
Only allow outbound port 25 on your firewall from your exchange server IP address Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com -Original Message- From: JP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 August 2008 14:01 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP generated by virus We are being affected by viruses on workstations that send mail thru an SMTP generated by the virus, bypassing our exchange server. As a result, we get blacklisted before we know it. I can remove the entire server where exchange is from the network and mail is still flowing out. My question is this: is there a method of blocking E-Mail sent thru port 25 by anyone but exchange? How can we stop these situations? Thank you in advance for your assistance. J.P. Lacasse ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: SMTP generated by virus
Also, once you have the deny rule in place, log denied packets, that will tell what machine is infected Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com -Original Message- From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 August 2008 14:24 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP generated by virus Everyone should do this, before there is a problem. But just to nitpick the solution wordingAdd a rule to allow your exchange server, then add a default deny after that. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 9:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP generated by virus Do it at your firewall. Block anything on 25 outbound by default and then add a rule for your exchange server to allow only it outbound. That will solve the blacklisting issue while you can get the machines under wraps. -Original Message- From: JP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP generated by virus We are being affected by viruses on workstations that send mail thru an SMTP generated by the virus, bypassing our exchange server. As a result, we get blacklisted before we know it. I can remove the entire server where exchange is from the network and mail is still flowing out. My question is this: is there a method of blocking E-Mail sent thru port 25 by anyone but exchange? How can we stop these situations? Thank you in advance for your assistance. J.P. Lacasse ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange 2003 disaster recovery
It's feasible, but then you would also have to restore the system state of the Exchange server before doing the4 Exchange restore? Question to ask management: how long can Exchange be down before it starts to really hurt the business. I suspect you will find the answer is less than the amount of time it will take to restore to the new server from back up even if it goes smoothly the first time. Get yourself something like Double Take which can replicate all of the data in real time to the standby server. If your main server dies you will be back up and running in about 4 minutes from the time you tell it to failover. Way cheaper than a cluster and a lot less overhead to maintain. HTH Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com From: Andy Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 August 2008 10:36 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2003 disaster recovery I have inherited a network with 2 Windows 2000 file servers and a Windows 2003 server running exchange 2003 enterprise edition. There is also a spare server labelled mail dr which I believe was going to be used as a disaster recovery server in the event of a failure in the main mail server. Both the mail server and the mail dr server have the same tape drive in them. Allegedly the previous admin was going to configure the mail dr server so that he could use the previous night's backup to restore the data onto the server and everything would be back to normal relatively quickly. Does this sound feasible? And if so is there any documentation on the steps involved Thanks Andy Lawrence This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl http://www.blackspider.com/ __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange 2003 SP2 Mobile Messaging
In the ISA Server there will be a rule wizard to point to your exchange server for ActiveSync, so you can run through that fairly straight forwardly. Make sure you get a proper cert for it though or your mobile devices won't connect. Go to www.isaserver.org for various tutorials on the set up. Martin is right though, you don't have to have either ISA or a front end, and I have set this up just fine using a stand alone firewall with port 443 NAT's to the Backend Server. HTH Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 August 2008 15:19 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 SP2 Mobile Messaging If by mobile messaging, you mean ActiveSync, you need neither an FE server or an ISA box. Of course there is nothing wrong (in fact its good!) with having either, but neither is a requirement. If you want ISA, start here: http://www.isaserver.org/ -Original Message- From: Kumar, Guhan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 7:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2003 SP2 Mobile Messaging Hi all, Currently running on Windows 2003 Sp2, Exchange 2003 SP2. I am looking into setting up mobile messaging. We currently have 1 backend exchange server. I am looking into setting up mobile messaging by placing an ISA2006 server in the dmz. All most all articles I read recommend that there be a front end exchange server to which the ISA communicates to. I am looking to see if the front end exchange server can be avoided and have the ISA server talk directly to the backend server. My question is 1) Is this possible 2) If somebody can point an article on how this setup works. I am not finding much when I tried googling this. Thanks! Guhan Kumar Sr. Systems Engineer Liberty Bank [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 08:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007, memory usage, and hunt the thimble This one's useful, perhaps: Understanding Exchange 2007 Memory Usage and its use of the Paging File http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2008/08/06/449484.aspx Cheers, Phil -- Phil Randal Networks Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 August 2008 13:50 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007, memory usage, and hunt the thimble In another email in this thread, you also mentioned that it was the DC/GC. I would start with Perfmon, using the counters I named below (and I'd also be looking at disk queuing at the same time). Then exbpa. You should be able to quickly determine the problem. Fixing it may be a tad more challenging, but identifying it is cake. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 3:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007, memory usage, and hunt the thimble What leads me to ask? Well partly a general curiosity. Having a server who's memory is constantly in use fires off loads of alerts (here at least) and these alerts go to more people than just me, so questions will get asked, especially as we just upgraded the ram. Secondly, the server runs like a one legged dog with a bad foot. Everything exchange related from the exchange 2007 interface which redraws in small squares (god how I miss the ADUC integration, where did that go, hey?) to users complaining of 3+ seconds to open an email (frankly I don't think thats awful but hey-ho) and regularly up to 10 seconds. Flicking between email folders is the same. If it were a 2003 box I would say it needs more ram or look at replacing the sata disks, as it feels like a sata disk issue perhaps. However in this case we are running SAS disks, with lots of space etc. The server is only exchange, all the file duties are handled by an SVN box next door and sharepoint is on a separate server too. Olly -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 August 2008 16:05 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007, memory usage, and hunt the thimble I consider these the key performance counters used for looking at memory utilization on an Exchange Server: Memory\Pages/Sec Memory\% Committed Bytes In Use Memory\Available Mbytes Note that memory-in-use has little correlation with MEMORY PRESSURE, which is much more important on an Exchange Server. I use the same memory chart that Kevin recommends for initial memory sizing on my servers. So...what led you to add more memory? Why do you think you may need even more? Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP http
RE: Cliff...
Heck of a way to harvest valid email addresses lol, had to forward that on internally for a laff Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 August 2008 16:16 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Cliff... Challenge/Response? Seriously? The 90's called and wants their spam solution back. -Original Message- From: Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 7:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 SP2 Mobile Messaging In the ISA Server there will be a rule wizard to point to your exchange server for ActiveSync, so you can run through that fairly straight forwardly. Make sure you get a proper cert for it though or your mobile devices won't connect. Go to www.isaserver.org for various tutorials on the set up. Martin is right though, you don't have to have either ISA or a front end, and I have set this up just fine using a stand alone firewall with port 443 NAT's to the Backend Server. HTH Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 August 2008 15:19 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 SP2 Mobile Messaging If by mobile messaging, you mean ActiveSync, you need neither an FE server or an ISA box. Of course there is nothing wrong (in fact its good!) with having either, but neither is a requirement. If you want ISA, start here: http://www.isaserver.org/ -Original Message- From: Kumar, Guhan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 7:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2003 SP2 Mobile Messaging Hi all, Currently running on Windows 2003 Sp2, Exchange 2003 SP2. I am looking into setting up mobile messaging. We currently have 1 backend exchange server. I am looking into setting up mobile messaging by placing an ISA2006 server in the dmz. All most all articles I read recommend that there be a front end exchange server to which the ISA communicates to. I am looking to see if the front end exchange server can be avoided and have the ISA server talk directly to the backend server. My question is 1) Is this possible 2) If somebody can point an article on how this setup works. I am not finding much when I tried googling this. Thanks! Guhan Kumar Sr. Systems Engineer Liberty Bank [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 08:54 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007, memory usage, and hunt the thimble This one's useful, perhaps: Understanding Exchange 2007 Memory Usage and its use of the Paging File http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2008/08/06/449484.aspx Cheers, Phil -- Phil Randal Networks Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 August 2008 13:50 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007, memory usage, and hunt the thimble In another email in this thread, you also mentioned that it was the DC/GC. I would start with Perfmon, using the counters I named below (and I'd also be looking at disk queuing at the same time). Then exbpa. You should be able to quickly determine the problem. Fixing it may be a tad more challenging, but identifying it is cake. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 3:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007, memory usage, and hunt the thimble What leads me to ask? Well partly a general curiosity. Having a server who's memory is constantly in use fires off loads of alerts (here at least) and these alerts go to more people than just me, so questions will get asked, especially as we just upgraded the ram. Secondly, the server runs like a one legged dog with a bad foot. Everything exchange related from the exchange 2007 interface which redraws in small squares (god how I miss the ADUC integration, where did that go, hey?) to users complaining of 3+ seconds to open an email (frankly I don't think thats awful but hey-ho) and regularly up to 10 seconds. Flicking between email folders is the same. If it were a 2003 box I would say it needs more ram or look at replacing the sata disks, as it feels like a sata disk issue perhaps. However in this case we are running SAS disks, with lots of space etc. The server is only exchange, all the file duties are handled by an SVN box next door and sharepoint is on a separate server too. Olly -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06
RE: New DL
Add them all, remove the 12 you don't want Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 July 2008 15:53 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: New DL Exchange 2003 I need to create a new DL that includes all but a dozen users (~300 total). What's the easiest way to do this without a lot of manual effort? Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 _ __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone
Should be fine with one server Check the type of authentication you are using in IIS for the active sync area of the site, set it to integrated, and not forms based, see if that helps -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 July 2008 16:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Hi Guys Day 3 I am still nowhere with IPhone. I have verified everything is setup how it needs to be but still not working. From the documentations that I found the only difference between our setup and the documentation is that we are not using a front end backend technology. Is it possible that my issue is that I don't have a front end server? Dr Something to do with front end and backend server as we only has one server. Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Is there something I need to configure on the Active sync options with in the IIS manager? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone The cert was deployed by VeriSign. Is there a way to install the certificate directly on the machine? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Is the cert trusted? In other words did you generate a cert request, send it off to your cert provider, etc etc etc. If you made the cert yourself the iPhone won't let you connect unless you install the cert up on the iPhone as well which I don't know how to do. HTH somewhat -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 July 2008 14:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone I don't have a front end server I just have one exchange I do have an SSL for my OWA it's assigned by version. Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax
RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone
To be fair, set up an ISA in the DMZ, have FE and BE exchange servers and the right NAT on your external firewall and Windows Mobile does what it says on the tin, and it's secure. (secure is as secure does ma'am) Trying to get anything Apple talking to the world of PC has always been a mare IMHO. My biggest peeve as an ex BB user is having to turn off the wireless if I don't mail at 4:00 AM, at least that was what is was like 3 years ago, where as you don't have to enable push on Exchange, and most of our 'users' prefer that K, will shut up now lol -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 July 2008 21:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Hmm, mentally contrasting this to adding a BB - or a dozen - or a whole new BES with users. And end up feeling good about having the ability of actually managing the remote devices and giving them free, secure intranet access without exposing Exchange or any other systems to the internet. [ok, smart-axx off] -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Hi Guys Day 3 I am still nowhere with IPhone. I have verified everything is setup how it needs to be but still not working. From the documentations that I found the only difference between our setup and the documentation is that we are not using a front end backend technology. Is it possible that my issue is that I don't have a front end server? Dr Something to do with front end and backend server as we only has one server. Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Is there something I need to configure on the Active sync options with in the IIS manager? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone The cert was deployed by VeriSign. Is there a way to install the certificate directly on the machine? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone
that's a powerful point 2008/7/16 Greg Mulholland [EMAIL PROTECTED]: you guys excel yourselves! -- *From:* Jonathan Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 July 2008 8:38 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone In the System Center? On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Only after you get your Groove on. - John Barsodi -Original Message- From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Word -Original Message- From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Yeah, they have a great Outlook on life. -Original Message- From: wjh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I really love these Exchanges in the group. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I bet there is a nice Vista from that height. *From:* Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, July 15, 2008 9:32 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I noticed from your auto sig that you are on the 12^th floor of your building. Do the Windows open far enough to fit an iPhone through? *Clayton Doige* IT Project Manager *C**M**E** Development Corporation* T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com http://www.cetv-net.com *From:* Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* 15 July 2008 17:29 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I just received an IP phone from the IT director requesting that I setup email on it. Based on the documentation it looks like a simple job yah right I have been fumbling with the device for about 2 hours now. On my firewall I have port 443 open as we allow Outlook Web Access I also enabled IMAP not sure what else to do. I have a feeling it has something to do with SSL encryption. Any assistance would be great Dr ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ This message is private and confidential. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and remove it from your system. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone
For sure, easy Access to information From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 July 2008 11:56 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone It's always good to share points... From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 3:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone that's a powerful point 2008/7/16 Greg Mulholland [EMAIL PROTECTED]: you guys excel yourselves! From: Jonathan Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2008 8:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone In the System Center? On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Only after you get your Groove on. - John Barsodi -Original Message- From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Word -Original Message- From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Yeah, they have a great Outlook on life. -Original Message- From: wjh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I really love these Exchanges in the group. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I bet there is a nice Vista from that height. *From:* Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, July 15, 2008 9:32 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I noticed from your auto sig that you are on the 12^th floor of your building. Do the Windows open far enough to fit an iPhone through? *Clayton Doige* IT Project Manager *C**M**E** Development Corporation* T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com http://www.cetv-net.com/ http://www.cetv-net.com http://www.cetv-net.com/ *From:* Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* 15 July 2008 17:29 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I just received an IP phone from the IT director requesting that I setup email on it. Based on the documentation it looks like a simple job yah right I have been fumbling with the device for about 2 hours now. On my firewall I have port 443 open as we allow Outlook Web Access I also enabled IMAP not sure what else to do. I have a feeling it has something to do with SSL encryption. Any assistance would be great Dr ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ This message is private and confidential. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and remove it from your system. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 July 2008 17:13 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone That's a pretty good question...and WM5/6 devices have the same issue. There is actually an 'iPhone Configuration Utility' that you can use to locally provision settings/lock down an iPhone with for Enterprise use. One of the tabs lets you install your own certs, in case you use internal PKI for the OWA/EAS SSL. But if you use something from a large cert house (Thawte, Verisign, etc). you should be safe. --James On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Sam Cayze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder what type of SSL certs they accept. Each device has a different list of SSL CAs, right? -Original Message- From: James Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 10:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone A big part of the iPhone 2.0 is licensing of the Exchange Activesync software from Microsoft. It will allow password policies, remote wipe, etc. Email and Calendar should work flawlessly. I'll know for sure once we get some demos in this week (but from checking the HTTP-agents in our logs, I can see that a few people already have theirs and are working). Whether this is good or bad -- the Exchange copy will overwrite the local email and calendar on the device (only one profile, I guess). The only requirement from an Exchange perspective is to have OWA servers exposed to the internet for HTTPS. If everything else is set to default, Exchange Activesync will work just fine. The only rare exception would be a firewall that wants to block unusual looking HTTP verbs. --James On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Clayton Doige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think iPhones do Active Sync do they? I thought you had to do IMAP? 2008/7/14 Stefan Jafs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have 1 users asking what happens if he replaces his BB with an iPhone? I'm on the BES server and I assume I delete him on the BES server but what do I need to do on the E2K3? Simply turn on Active Sync? __ Stefan Jafs This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone
Sorry to ask what could be a dumb question, but your verisign cert, you have installed it back into your computer's personal certificate store etc etc? As it's verisign as long as the FQDN on the cert matches the FQDN on the iPhone's exchange server address you should be OK. 2008/7/16 Dennis Rogov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The cert was deployed by VeriSign. Is there a way to install the certificate directly on the machine? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Is the cert trusted? In other words did you generate a cert request, send it off to your cert provider, etc etc etc. If you made the cert yourself the iPhone won't let you connect unless you install the cert up on the iPhone as well which I don't know how to do. HTH somewhat -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 July 2008 14:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone I don't have a front end server I just have one exchange I do have an SSL for my OWA it's assigned by version. Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Do you have a front end server? Do you have an SSL cert installed? If so, who is the provider of it? -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 6:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Good Morning I am still struggling to activity the IPhone From the documentation it tells me that I need to have a certificate * On the Front-End Server, verify that a server certificate is installed and enable SSL for the Exchange ActiveSync virtual directory (require basic SSL authentication I am somewhat confused whats being asked on the above statement. Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 2:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Do you need to have a cert dedicated
Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone
Hey, can't speak for Apache, but it seems to me that the cert needs to live on both the reverse proxy and the fe server. Certainly with the ISA set up you put the cert in both the ISA cert store and the website itself, else it does not work. PDA's also seem a lot more touchy with certs than a browser, as in a browser will connect when a pda won't. Can you telnet from the apache to IIS on 443? Also, on the ISA server set up's I have done I have had to make an entry for the FQDN of the cert in the hosts file on the ISA Server which points to the fe server. So if you can do this on the apache, and ping the fqdn and get a response from the fe server that might help? Dunno, just shotting out ideas really. HTH, will touch base with you later, but I am getting kicked out of the office now, so will check in from home :P C 2008/7/16 Sherry Abercrombie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Grrr, I'm getting a little frustrated, well a lot frustrated. We've just recently gone the route of setting up OWA and now I'm working on ActiveSync. We have an Apache server that is setup with a reverse proxy to do OWA, and it works flawlessly. Attempting to do the same thing with ActiveSync, and it's not working. I go between getting an 0x85010014error code on the device to it prompting me to Please correct your Exchange Server password. on the device over and over again. It just depends on what settings I have in IIS, I've broken OWA a few times in this and fixed it, but I don't know what it is I'm missing. Exchange 2003 sp2, IIS6, and some windows device that my manager had laying around that we've put a sim card in. ISA is out of the loop since we're doing a reverse proxy from an Apache server, and we've had to install a root cert from our colo facility on the device. My apache guy says we don't need the cert on the exchange server because we're doing the reverse proxy. I've got the active sync virtual directory set to ignore client certs, it's also set for no anonymouse access, and Integrated Windows authentication. What else do I need to look at in IIS? What other settings on what other directories do I need to make? Yes, I've been googling and searching for answers since yesterday afternoon and not making any progress. Oh, I get the 10014 error code when I set the active sync virtual directory to have both integrated basic authentication, or to just basic authentication. Thanks all On 7/16/08, Clayton Doige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry to ask what could be a dumb question, but your verisign cert, you have installed it back into your computer's personal certificate store etc etc? As it's verisign as long as the FQDN on the cert matches the FQDN on the iPhone's exchange server address you should be OK. 2008/7/16 Dennis Rogov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The cert was deployed by VeriSign. Is there a way to install the certificate directly on the machine? Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] -Original Message- From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone Is the cert trusted? In other words did you generate a cert request, send it off to your cert provider, etc etc etc. If you made the cert yourself the iPhone won't let you connect unless you install the cert up on the iPhone as well which I don't know how to do. HTH somewhat -Original Message- From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 July 2008 14:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPhone I don't have a front end server I just have one exchange I do have an SSL for my OWA it's assigned by version. Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain
RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone
I hear the kids are Hyper as it Virtually ready for release From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 July 2008 20:56 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Nah... I'll just wait for the SQL... _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone You guys keep singing OneNote. Consider taking a different InfoPath. _ From: Clayton Doige [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 4:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone For sure, easy Access to information From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 July 2008 11:56 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone It's always good to share points... _ From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 3:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone that's a powerful point 2008/7/16 Greg Mulholland [EMAIL PROTECTED]: you guys excel yourselves! _ From: Jonathan Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2008 8:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone In the System Center? On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Only after you get your Groove on. - John Barsodi -Original Message- From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Word -Original Message- From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Yeah, they have a great Outlook on life. -Original Message- From: wjh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I really love these Exchanges in the group. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I bet there is a nice Vista from that height. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone
I noticed from your auto sig that you are on the 12th floor of your building. Do the Windows open far enough to fit an iPhone through? Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 July 2008 17:29 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I just received an IP phone from the IT director requesting that I setup email on it. Based on the documentation it looks like a simple job yah right I have been fumbling with the device for about 2 hours now. On my firewall I have port 443 open as we allow Outlook Web Access I also enabled IMAP not sure what else to do. I have a feeling it has something to do with SSL encryption. Any assistance would be great Dr Dennis Rogov Senior Network Analyst THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 379 thornall street, 12th floor | edison, nj 08837 usa Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.peergroupinc.com [This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ] From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Forwarding off the article to the exec that just requested an iphone here as well :) Great link, I have been looking for this! Sam From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 7:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Priceless... A CEO hands me an Iphone 15 mins ago, I hand him a printed version of the page with the lack of features. Ask him to read it, and tell me if any of these lacking features as compared to the Blackberry will cause him problems. He takes the Iphone back with him and says, I'll go return it. He knew exactly what I would say and kinda gave me the sarcastic grin, that's says, You were right, I was wrong and thanks for not beating me up. Thanks for the link Kevin and the writeup Paul. Perfect timing. From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 2:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ok it's starting BB to iPone Paul did a brilliant write up on the iphone and how well it plays with activesnyc. http://www.robichaux.net/blog/2008/07/the-iphone-as-a-mail-device.php ~Kevinm WLKMMAS powered by 3Sharp http://www.3sharp.com/ , Always WLKMMAS http://www.wlkmmas.org/ What is your Zombie Plan? From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 7:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ok it's starting BB to iPone I have 1 users asking what happens if he replaces his BB with an iPhone? I'm on the BES server and I assume I delete him on the BES server but what do I need to do on the E2K3? Simply turn on Active Sync? __ Stefan Jafs This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received
Re: Setting up blackberries to connect to Exchange
Why don't people ask IT FIRST? We got a call from a user in Amsterdam, 'I just bought a Blackberry'... 'Take it back and get a Smart Phone, we don't support it' was the response. Without a BES there is no point to getting Blackberries, even if they are a good Canadian company ;-) 2008/7/14 Sherry Abercrombie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Well done Bob, ditto On 7/14/08, Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The best way is to install a Blackberry Enterprise Server. However, it sounds like you probably don't have the licenses for that. If you have your Exchange server setup for OWA, you can go to the BIS website of your cell provider and setup an account for each user and then add their email accounts. However, this will not work as well as BES. Calendars will not sync and the email does not sync as well in my experience. http://na.blackberry.com/eng/services/internet/email.jsp#tab_tab_email_setup Really… you need BES to properly manage Blackberries in an enterprise environment. Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] *From:* King's Kid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, July 14, 2008 10:32 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Setting up blackberries to connect to Exchange Hi all, My bosses in their infinite wisdom have decided to give our roaming supervisors Blackberry Curve 8330 phones. They have already received them. However, I wasn't notified until today that they are expecting to receive their e-mail using them. I've checked on Sprint's website (useless) and Microsoft's website and could find information about if there's a problem but not how to do an initial set-up. My question is, is there anything I need to do to our Exchange server to allow this? If so, could someone point me to a step by step to do it. Exchange 2k3, fully patched on an SBS 2k3 server sp2 TIA BJ No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone
I don't think iPhones do Active Sync do they? I thought you had to do IMAP? 2008/7/14 Stefan Jafs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have 1 users asking what happens if he replaces his BB with an iPhone? I'm on the BES server and I assume I delete him on the BES server but what do I need to do on the E2K3? Simply turn on Active Sync? *__* *Stefan Jafs* This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Ok it's starting BB to iPone
well well well, might have to go get one lol thanks 2008/7/14 Stefan Jafs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I guess this may help. http://images.apple.com/iphone/enterprise/docs/iPhone_Enterprise.pdf *__* *Stefan Jafs* *From:* Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, July 14, 2008 10:51 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Ok it's starting BB to iPone I have 1 users asking what happens if he replaces his BB with an iPhone? I'm on the BES server and I assume I delete him on the BES server but what do I need to do on the E2K3? Simply turn on Active Sync? *__* *Stefan Jafs* This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
OT Outlook POP Error 0X8004210A
All, sorry for the OT, I have a groups of four people who's pop email all stopped working about a week ago. When they send/receive the error in the subject comes up. Google reveals that this is due to Norton/McAffee blocking Outlook. In this case Norton is not installed, they are using AVG. I have had one of them turn off Windows Firewall and stop the AVG services and they still get the error. From a command window they can telnet to the mail server on port 110 and login, list, retrieve etc. If I had hair I would be pulling it out, and was wondering if anyone has any experience of this and can give me a few pointers. Thanks in advance Clayton ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: email archiving
Because journaling is turned on (plus a couple of reg hacks) every message that passes through the MTA is archived. We use it here. While it is great for compliance in terms of enforcing our retention policy, it does not help to manage information store sizes as it is just taking a copy of everything. We just put in a solution called Zantaz. It's not cheap, but what it does is takes every email older than a specified date and moves it to archive storage. What's cool though is that the email appears to the user as if it is still in the original folder in outlook, it just changes the icon slightly. It compresses the archive and eliminates duplicates that may have got past single instance storage. We have changed from having 160GB if information store date to having under 20, but then in the mean time the size of the archive is 70 GB because of the compressions etc etc etc. Great solution. Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 June 2008 14:15 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving How does a hosted solution like Messagelabs archive internal email sent tofrom employees? From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving It is MessageLabs. From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving You might think of sharing the name of the solution so as to gain input for others that may have it or looked at it. From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving Journaling is a feature in Exch. that uses a mailbox to bcc every email that is sent to or from or within your organization. So everything sent or received goes to that mailbox. Then you set up an appliance, or a server...or on the same server if you want to hit that mailbox every few minutes and download those messages. The archiver then organizes those messages into a searchable database. That way they are all on a machine that is secure from the users and the emails cannot be deleted by them There is the appliance route, a box you just plug in and set up. There are also pure software solutions where you bring your own server and add their software to it. We went that route and went with GFI for Exchange. They have nonprofit/education discounts. From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: email archiving I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat. We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor. I don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and turn Journaling on on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive. Can someone give me an in-a-nutshell explanation of how this works? Is this the best solution for our money? Any alternatives? We are a non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant. We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003. Approx 250 mailboxes and right now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub). Thanks, Paul Everett IS Dept. Lee Mental Health Center 239-791-1551 Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services. Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org blocked::http://www.leementalhealth.org/ to learn more. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message, including attachments. __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction
RE: Exchange Certificate
www.comodo.com do cheap certs compared to VeriSign, you need to add a trusted root cert as well as the base cert, all the documentation on the ms site will do just fine for the set up, and the Comodo site has some good docs as well, create the request, get the cert, and install in accordance with the instructions, no more warnings in IE Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 May 2008 17:36 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Certificate Hello! I need to get a certificate so that the warnings can go away for IMAP, SMTP and OWA. I have done a bit of reading on this and it seems less than straightforward. Has anyone done this and had an easy or hard time with it? Who did you buy your cert from and do you have any resources that clearly specify how to create the request and then import the cert. I want to have my ducks in a row before I do this because I know just as it can make everything work smoothly it can expediously bring everything to a screeching halt if not done correctly! Thanks Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University 1209 A Biomed Phys Sci [EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
NDR's generated via spoofed from address
Hi all, have a user who is getting nailed with NDR's for email she is not sending. We have verified that there are no matching emails coming out of the E2k3 SP2 server which means that someone 'out there' is spoofing the from address and NDR's are going to that address. What's the best bet to combat this? Said user is getting bored of deleting the NDR's Thanks in advance for any advice J Clayton Doige Project Management Consultant Green IT Solutions Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01277844943 07949255062 www.greenit.co.uk http://www.greenit.co.uk Internet communications are not secure and Green IT Solutions Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Green IT Solutions Ltd. Although Green IT Solutions Ltd operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Telephone communications and replies to this email may be monitored by Green IT Solutions Ltd for operational or training purposes. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: NDR's generated via spoofed from address
Deep joy, thanks for the advice J this blog was amusing to say the least: http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2007/12/19/drowning-in-the-backscatter From: Peter Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 April 2008 14:05 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NDR's generated via spoofed from address Absolutely. Unfortunately you have no way of dealing with this other than setting up an Outlook rule or killing NDR's at your edge mail server if you have such a thing. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 April 2008 14:57 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: NDR's generated via spoofed from address Tell her that Outlook rules are her friend. On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Clayton Doige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, have a user who is getting nailed with NDR's for email she is not sending. We have verified that there are no matching emails coming out of the E2k3 SP2 server which means that someone 'out there' is spoofing the from address and NDR's are going to that address. What's the best bet to combat this? Said user is getting bored of deleting the NDR's Thanks in advance for any advice J Clayton Doige Project Management Consultant Green IT Solutions Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01277844943 07949255062 www.greenit.co.uk Internet communications are not secure and Green IT Solutions Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Green IT Solutions Ltd. Although Green IT Solutions Ltd operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Telephone communications and replies to this email may be monitored by Green IT Solutions Ltd for operational or training purposes. -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke Disclaimer: The Development Bank of Southern Africa exercises no control over information contained in any e-mail message originating from within the organisation. The Bank makes no representation relating to the completeness or accuracy and accepts no responsibility for any loss, damage or liability that is incurred by reliance on the content hereof by the recipient or any other party. Each page attached hereto must also be read in conjunction with any disclaimer, which forms part of it. Confidentiality: The e-mail is privileged and confidential and for use of the addressee only. Should you have received this e-mail in error, please return it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Dissemination, disclosure, copying or any similar actions of the content of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RPC/HTTP
Dear all, we have an existing 2K3 SP2 front end back end server and a working RPC/HTTP environment running through an ISA 2004 box. We are adding a new mailbox server (all users will move to this new server in the coming weeks) and I was wondering if there are any gotchas or things I need to worry about regarding RPC/HTTP with this scenario. I have a colleague who went through a similar process and he lost RPC/HTTP functionality until he removed one of the back end servers. Any advice is appreciated. Regards Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com http://www.cetv-net.com __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Exchange fail-over
I have not tried 2007 SCR as yet, but have read a lot on it. SCR looks good, but do you really want to be doing stuff in command line when the boss is standing over you wondering when email is going to be back on line? The thing is, if you go to 2007 then you need to pitch your servers for 64 bit, and get the appropriate OS as well. If you are just wanting to get your existing data to an existing standby box, then Double Take is the way to go. The software will configure your target server so that all of the appropriate services are set to manual and stopped. When you failover it will update AD, and add the SPN for the source server to the target server, plus make any required changes in DNS. Users only have to restart Outlook if they were signed in at the time of the failover. And it can be controlled with one mouse click as opposed to having to type correctly when the poo hits the fan. On 18/03/2008, Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DoubleTake (as someone else mentioned) and NeverFail are the typical recommended solutions. MessageOne is a typical 3rd party provider providing message continuity. However, I would recommend you upgrade to Exchange 2007 and use LCR or SCR; which are built into the product. If you really actually want to do active/passive Exchange clustering, search on technet.microsoft.com for SCC – Single Copy Clustering. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com http://theessentialexchange.com/ *From:* Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:00 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Exchange fail-over Hello all… I want to have a stand-by Exchange box that can act as a fail-over in the event I lose my active Exchange server. I understand that this can be accomplished by clustering. Google has a zillion links about Windows/Exchange clustering so I was hoping the experts here could recommend a link where it would be a good place to start learning how to do this. Any help/advice would be greatly appreciated. Environment is W2K3 Servers and Exchange 2003, clients are a mixture of O2K3 and O2K7…all fully patched. *Bill Lambert* *Windows System Administrator* *Concuity* *A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc. * *Phone 847-941-9206* *Fax 847-465-9147* ** *NASDAQ: TTPA*** *The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. *** -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.gif
Re: Exchange fail-over
Very true, Double Take does however set itself to require a manual failover by default (you can disable this requirement, but why would you want to...) On 18/03/2008, Neil Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Regarding SCR, that's because it's a site resilience solution and not an HA solution. In my experience, most customers who want site resilience expect and understand that manual steps are required to get the system back up and running as they ultimately want to control when the failover occurs. The last thing they want is a DR site accidentally assuming control during a normal day when it shouldn't do. J *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* 18 March 2008 14:31 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Exchange fail-over I have not tried 2007 SCR as yet, but have read a lot on it. SCR looks good, but do you really want to be doing stuff in command line when the boss is standing over you wondering when email is going to be back on line? The thing is, if you go to 2007 then you need to pitch your servers for 64 bit, and get the appropriate OS as well. If you are just wanting to get your existing data to an existing standby box, then Double Take is the way to go. The software will configure your target server so that all of the appropriate services are set to manual and stopped. When you failover it will update AD, and add the SPN for the source server to the target server, plus make any required changes in DNS. Users only have to restart Outlook if they were signed in at the time of the failover. And it can be controlled with one mouse click as opposed to having to type correctly when the poo hits the fan. On 18/03/2008, *Michael B. Smith* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DoubleTake (as someone else mentioned) and NeverFail are the typical recommended solutions. MessageOne is a typical 3rd party provider providing message continuity. However, I would recommend you upgrade to Exchange 2007 and use LCR or SCR; which are built into the product. If you really actually want to do active/passive Exchange clustering, search on technet.microsoft.com for SCC – Single Copy Clustering. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com http://theessentialexchange.com/ *From:* Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:00 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Exchange fail-over Hello all… I want to have a stand-by Exchange box that can act as a fail-over in the event I lose my active Exchange server. I understand that this can be accomplished by clustering. Google has a zillion links about Windows/Exchange clustering so I was hoping the experts here could recommend a link where it would be a good place to start learning how to do this. Any help/advice would be greatly appreciated. Environment is W2K3 Servers and Exchange 2003, clients are a mixture of O2K3 and O2K7…all fully patched. *Bill Lambert* *Windows System Administrator* *Concuity* *A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc. * *Phone 847-941-9206* *Fax 847-465-9147* ** *NASDAQ: TTPA* *The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. * -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.gif
RE: Upgrading from 2003 to Exchange 2007 Estimate
Hi, first of all, forget upgrading Exchange, 2007 is 64 Bit, so you will need the appropriate hardware etc. Personally I am not a fan of upgrades, having been royally burned a few years back, but if you have no other choice, the actually domain controller part should not be too bad, and take 4 hours including Windows Update, Service Packs and testing. To be safe add an hour to that, and take an image of the box before you upgrade it. With the Exchange side of things, you will be adding the new Exchange server as a second server in your organisation and moving mailboxes. Call it 6 hours to build the server with patches, testing etc, and then the mailbox moves and public folder rehoming times depend on the amount of data stored in Exchange. Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com From: ExchList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 February 2008 16:36 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Upgrading from 2003 to Exchange 2007 Estimate I have a Windows 2000 / Exchange 2000 network that is scheduled for an upgrade to Windows 2003 / Exchange 2007. Server1: Windows 2000 Domain Controller, file/print Server2: Windows Domain Controller, Exchange 2000 Upgrade to Server1: Windows 2003 Domain Controller, File/print (new box) Server2: Windows 2003 Domain Controller, Exchange 2007. (new box) Understanding that my question is probably as uncertain as any answer I'll receive, but I would like to ask if anyone can give me a rough estimate of labor hours involved to perform the upgrade. P.S. Sarcasm is more than welcomed. Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-Messaging, MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Journaling to multiple archives
Monday morning, lol, figured this one out, and yes it is possible. Who would have thought the answer would be in the Exchange Help Files. Go figure! ;-) From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 February 2008 09:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Journaling to multiple archives Dear all, bit of a strange question perhaps. With a single archiving solution you typically turn on journaling on a store to a mailbox and then point the archive service to that mailbox. If I wanted to run two separate archive systems in parallel could I create a distribution list of two mailboxes, 1 per archiving mechanism, and then journal to that distribution list? Exchange 2003, SP2. Many thanks in advance Clayton Doige Project Management Consultant Green IT Solutions Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01277844943 07949255062 www.greenit.co.uk Internet communications are not secure and Green IT Solutions Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Green IT Solutions Ltd. Although Green IT Solutions Ltd operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Telephone communications and replies to this email may be monitored by Green IT Solutions Ltd for operational or training purposes. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Microsoft Makes Bid to Buy Yahoo
Yasosoft Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 February 2008 15:44 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Microsoft Makes Bid to Buy Yahoo Microsoft Zimbra Collaboration Suite. From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 6:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Microsoft Makes Bid to Buy Yahoo MSYahoo From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 6:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Microsoft Makes Bid to Buy Yahoo Miyahcrosofthoot? From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 8:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Microsoft Makes Bid to Buy Yahoo http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22947626 -- Sherry Abercrombie Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one. -Albert Einstein ** __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Tracking disk space consumption
Dear all, the partition that our mdb files live in is consistently reducing in free space by about 2 GB a day. Short of looking at mailbox sizes on a daily basis, and seeing a day to day delta for each mailbox, is there a way to work out where the disk space is going? E2K3 SP2 Thanks in advance Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com http://www.cetv-net.com __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Tracking disk space consumption
The backup job is taking care of the logs. We are in a very busy period, and I can see this volume of email being realistic. I am just trying to get a handle on individual mailbox growth so that if there is a training issue etc that needs addressing I can. Thanks On 30/01/2008, Greg Mulholland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would use windirstat or treesize to find out where the greatest % of space is being used if you want to look simply at the file system as a whole. However, it sounds like you have other issues, are your logs truncating? Greg *From:* Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, 30 January 2008 7:54 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Tracking disk space consumption Dear all, the partition that our mdb files live in is consistently reducing in free space by about 2 GB a day. Short of looking at mailbox sizes on a daily basis, and seeing a day to day delta for each mailbox, is there a way to work out where the disk space is going? E2K3 SP2 Thanks in advance *Clayton Doige* IT Project Manager *C**M**E** Development Corporation* T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Tracking disk space consumption
Can you use ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag, but use a network drive to do the expansion etc? We have 5 stores that are all bigger than the amount of free space on the volume. On 30/01/2008, Fergal O Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We had a similar issue that we couldn't diagnose – out IS stores were increasing by the minute– ended up moving all users to a new IS and that fixed it – May have been related to messages in the temp tables Regards Fergal O'Connell ICT Support Cúram Software Phone : +353 1 4323212 Emailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *From:* Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* 30 January 2008 08:54 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Tracking disk space consumption Dear all, the partition that our mdb files live in is consistently reducing in free space by about 2 GB a day. Short of looking at mailbox sizes on a daily basis, and seeing a day to day delta for each mailbox, is there a way to work out where the disk space is going? E2K3 SP2 Thanks in advance *Clayton Doige* IT Project Manager *C**M**E** Development Corporation* T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you. -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Tracking disk space consumption
That was the option I was hoping to avoid lol On 30/01/2008, Pierre Plamondon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, you can make a printscreen of the exchange manager system (mailbox by size) at the end of each day and compare. It is probably not the best way but you can find your space disk. Pierre -- *De :* Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Envoyé :* 30 janvier 2008 03:54 *À :* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Objet :* Tracking disk space consumption Dear all, the partition that our mdb files live in is consistently reducing in free space by about 2 GB a day. Short of looking at mailbox sizes on a daily basis, and seeing a day to day delta for each mailbox, is there a way to work out where the disk space is going? E2K3 SP2 Thanks in advance *Clayton Doige* IT Project Manager *C**M**E** Development Corporation* T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Tracking disk space consumption
Long story, but USB is not an option in our case, thus asking about a mapped drive or unc path J Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 January 2008 14:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Tracking disk space consumption Do you have IMF enabled and set to archive? If not cleaned up, the UCEArchive Folder can grow pretty quick. You can ESEutil defrag to a usb drive. It will be a little slower, be sure to use USB 2.0 or eSata if you can. From: Pierre Plamondon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 8:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Tracking disk space consumption Hi, you can make a printscreen of the exchange manager system (mailbox by size) at the end of each day and compare. It is probably not the best way but you can find your space disk. Pierre De : Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 30 janvier 2008 03:54 À : MS-Exchange Admin Issues Objet : Tracking disk space consumption Dear all, the partition that our mdb files live in is consistently reducing in free space by about 2 GB a day. Short of looking at mailbox sizes on a daily basis, and seeing a day to day delta for each mailbox, is there a way to work out where the disk space is going? E2K3 SP2 Thanks in advance Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Tracking disk space consumption
Great, many thanks! Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com From: Chris Blair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 January 2008 14:17 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Tracking disk space consumption I use this script to get a daily snapshot of mailboxes. You could output the data into excel or access and track it from there. http://techtasks.com/code/viewbookcode/229 From: Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 2:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Tracking disk space consumption Dear all, the partition that our mdb files live in is consistently reducing in free space by about 2 GB a day. Short of looking at mailbox sizes on a daily basis, and seeing a day to day delta for each mailbox, is there a way to work out where the disk space is going? E2K3 SP2 Thanks in advance Clayton Doige IT Project Manager CME Development Corporation T: 020 7430 5355 M: 07949 255062 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.cetv-net.com __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. __ This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged and/or proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, or use of this e-mail is prohibited. __ This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this message or its contents may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by electronic mail and delete the original message and any attachments without retaining any copies. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Virus Hunt (PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!)
Dear all, I have a server apparently spewing out a hoarde of SMTP messages, at least according to the Message Tracking system, which indicates the emails originate from a specific email address. This is Exchange 2003 by the way: I have checked and the system is not a relay, and only authenticated users are allowed to send. I blocked access for this particular user account to the smtp connector, and changed the password on the user account. When looking in Message Tracking subsequent to making the changes above, the messages are noted, and the last action for each message is Submitted to Categorizer. According to the ISP mails are still coming out, and there is no record of an SMTP server on the packets. netstat outputs also seem like everything is normal, although the output is extensive. The box has been swept by it's local Trend SMEX, and Office Scan, plus two other online scanners. WireShark is not telling me anything exciting, and none of the processes running in task manager seem out of the norm. If this was another authenticated machine on the LAN I would have expected the password change to have put an end to that. Has anyone seen similar, and if so could you kindly point this already bald person in the right direction? Many thanks in advance -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Virus Hunt (PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!)
None of the processes, services, or registry entries that Hijack This outputs looks untowards on the server. Can the tool be used centrally to analyse numerous hosts, or does this need to be done on a host by host basis. Really what I want to do is see where these messages are originating as they are not in sent items for this users mailbox. Message Tracking has limited output, and I am having a devil of a time trying to track down the source for these messages. BTW, OOF etc are disabled on this server. Thanks On 21/01/2008, Clayton Doige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have swept everything on the LAN, nothing revealed from that. I have downloaded HiJakc This and am just running the thing now, and looking at the results. thanks :-) On 21/01/2008, Candee Vaglica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Clayton. I second the Hijack this recommendation. Are you saying you swept the server or the user's workstation? I would pull the workstation off the LAN first thing. On Jan 21, 2008 10:03 AM, Clayton Doige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I have a server apparently spewing out a hoarde of SMTP messages, at least according to the Message Tracking system, which indicates the emails originate from a specific email address. This is Exchange 2003 by the way: I have checked and the system is not a relay, and only authenticated users are allowed to send. I blocked access for this particular user account to the smtp connector, and changed the password on the user account. When looking in Message Tracking subsequent to making the changes above, the messages are noted, and the last action for each message is Submitted to Categorizer. According to the ISP mails are still coming out, and there is no record of an SMTP server on the packets. netstat outputs also seem like everything is normal, although the output is extensive. The box has been swept by it's local Trend SMEX, and Office Scan, plus two other online scanners. WireShark is not telling me anything exciting, and none of the processes running in task manager seem out of the norm. If this was another authenticated machine on the LAN I would have expected the password change to have put an end to that. Has anyone seen similar, and if so could you kindly point this already bald person in the right direction? Many thanks in advance -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Virus Hunt (PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!)
It is the admin account, there goes my attempt at being discreet lol, Found out that Exchange 2003 SP2 is not on here, so trying that, and have disabled authenticated relaying as per your suggestions. Thanks On 21/01/2008, Simon Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The first thing I would do is disable authenticated relaying. It may cause some problems for some users, but it needs to be done. Very unusual for a specific user account to be targeted, the usual target is the administrator account. Therefore what might be happening is that a user account is being abused but the authentication prompt is the administrator account. I would not expect the messages to show in the Sent Items, almost certainly the messages are coming from outside and are being pushed through SMTP. Take a look at my spam cleanup article: http://www.amset.info/exchange/spam-cleanup.asp Also remember that ESM is notorious for not showing the true extent of the queues, so while you may think you have cleaned the server up, the messages can continue to flow. Simon. -- *From:* Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* 21 January 2008 15:36 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Virus Hunt (PLEASE HELP) None of the processes, services, or registry entries that Hijack This outputs looks untowards on the server. Can the tool be used centrally to analyse numerous hosts, or does this need to be done on a host by host basis. Really what I want to do is see where these messages are originating as they are not in sent items for this users mailbox. Message Tracking has limited output, and I am having a devil of a time trying to track down the source for these messages. BTW, OOF etc are disabled on this server. Thanks On 21/01/2008, Clayton Doige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have swept everything on the LAN, nothing revealed from that. I have downloaded HiJakc This and am just running the thing now, and looking at the results. thanks :-) On 21/01/2008, Candee Vaglica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Clayton. I second the Hijack this recommendation. Are you saying you swept the server or the user's workstation? I would pull the workstation off the LAN first thing. On Jan 21, 2008 10:03 AM, Clayton Doige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I have a server apparently spewing out a hoarde of SMTP messages, at least according to the Message Tracking system, which indicates the emails originate from a specific email address. This is Exchange 2003 by the way: I have checked and the system is not a relay, and only authenticated users are allowed to send. I blocked access for this particular user account to the smtp connector, and changed the password on the user account. When looking in Message Tracking subsequent to making the changes above, the messages are noted, and the last action for each message is Submitted to Categorizer. According to the ISP mails are still coming out, and there is no record of an SMTP server on the packets. netstat outputs also seem like everything is normal, although the output is extensive. The box has been swept by it's local Trend SMEX, and Office Scan, plus two other online scanners. WireShark is not telling me anything exciting, and none of the processes running in task manager seem out of the norm. If this was another authenticated machine on the LAN I would have expected the password change to have put an end to that. Has anyone seen similar, and if so could you kindly point this already bald person in the right direction? Many thanks in advance -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com -- Regards, Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://alsipius.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Service Account Not Installed
Hi there. I have a client who has an exchange 5.5 box running windows NT4, both running the latest service packs. They are having all sorts of nasty errors on the box, and when I view things, I notice for example that there is no service account installed, and that there is no Exchange administrators group. has anyone seen similar? TIA Claytonâ²Ð¡j»^©Ý¶m§ÿðà .·¥¶Ê ·«yÊ&ýì\ ©àzX¬µÈZ®×«Ù
RE: AOL postmaster errors
Getting close then eh? What it is, 1:30 there? Do they let you drink a beer at lunch there? -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 19, 2002 4:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors Tijuana -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors What time zone are you in :P -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 19, 2002 4:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors Ya they squirm til they figure out how to copy it all to a pst and fill up your file sever or blow up the poor little disk on their PC. sigh... is it time for a beer yet? -Original Message- From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors I have 10 as a default. Let the huddled masses squirm -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors Whose that guy on this list that has the 8mb mailbox limits. Now he's an email Nazi. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors You block jpg's? You email nazi. -Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors You got that right. we love em' jpg's on Antigen. -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors Actually the bosses wife has an aol account. Or is it the bosses mistress... Well one of them does. He'll be pissed if cant receive his booty call emails. -Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors LOL, Yeah As the bosses Home email ceases to come into the company. :-P He'd love that one. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors Just block *@aol.com in the message filtering section of IMS properties. :o) -Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors Yep, I have a client whose email address was being spoofed used as the return address for spam. He would average between 3/400 NDR's a day from Various Domains and I know he wasn't sending it out. We had to change his Email Address to get it to stop. -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: AOL postmaster errors Has anyone seen this before? It looks like someone is using a mailbox from one of our users and sending all kinds of emails out. We have NAV for Exchange blocking all attachements that are suspect to be virus attachments. The users is complaining that she is getting a ton of these post master errors. Any suggestions on how to eliminate this? We are not setup as relaying. Exhange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2k sp2 sr1 Thanks, The original message was received at Fri, 19 Apr 2002 15:04:36 -0400 (EDT) from logs-wq.proxy.aol.com [205.188.200.132] *** ATTENTION *** Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The address which
RE: AOL postmaster errors
Yes, golden nectar mate, breakfast of chumpiuns -Original Message- From: JFadigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 19, 2002 4:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors beer? -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors Ya they squirm til they figure out how to copy it all to a pst and fill up your file sever or blow up the poor little disk on their PC. sigh... is it time for a beer yet? -Original Message- From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors I have 10 as a default. Let the huddled masses squirm -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors Whose that guy on this list that has the 8mb mailbox limits. Now he's an email Nazi. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors You block jpg's? You email nazi. -Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors You got that right. we love em' jpg's on Antigen. -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors Actually the bosses wife has an aol account. Or is it the bosses mistress... Well one of them does. He'll be pissed if cant receive his booty call emails. -Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors LOL, Yeah As the bosses Home email ceases to come into the company. :-P He'd love that one. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors Just block *@aol.com in the message filtering section of IMS properties. :o) -Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: AOL postmaster errors Yep, I have a client whose email address was being spoofed used as the return address for spam. He would average between 3/400 NDR's a day from Various Domains and I know he wasn't sending it out. We had to change his Email Address to get it to stop. -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: AOL postmaster errors Has anyone seen this before? It looks like someone is using a mailbox from one of our users and sending all kinds of emails out. We have NAV for Exchange blocking all attachements that are suspect to be virus attachments. The users is complaining that she is getting a ton of these post master errors. Any suggestions on how to eliminate this? We are not setup as relaying. Exhange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2k sp2 sr1 Thanks, The original message was received at Fri, 19 Apr 2002 15:04:36 -0400 (EDT) from logs-wq.proxy.aol.com [205.188.200.132] *** ATTENTION *** Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section labeled: - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -. The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed
RE: all minus one
sorry, tired it, it does -Original Message- From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 16, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one I don't think so... -Original Message- From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one That works? -Original Message- From: Cebuly, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one New Message. Click To: button. Highlight DL. Click Properties. Select names, minus exceptions. Click on 'To' under Add to (lower left). -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one Thank you sirs. I got it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one If it is a one time thing, quickly remove the folks from the DL, send the mail, then put em back... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one That would be a neat feature, but I've never seen it on Exchange. :o| -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: all minus one Hello everybody, Is there a way to send mail to distribution list all but excluding one or two people? I checked in the rule wizard, but couldn't find anything appropriate. Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: all minus one
Martin, are you a Lesbian? :-) -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 16, 2002 2:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one I am glad, you are so nice to me today :) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one ::hugs:: -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one Thank you all. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one SIS is retained regardless of the presence of a DL. The DL gets expanded to its individual receipients at the server. William -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one I have an other question attached to this. I understand when a mail is sent to a DL, it will be a single instance storage. When you select so many users, will this still be a single instance storage? Thanks Mal -Original Message- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one Never even thought of that - cool! Plus, you could add them as bcc's so that people wouldn't see the other recipients, if required. -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: all minus one Wow! Cool!!! -Original Message- From: Cebuly, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one New Message. Click To: button. Highlight DL. Click Properties. Select names, minus exceptions. Click on 'To' under Add to (lower left). -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: What to use for outbound and inbound email
I believe that Mail travels on the connector, the virtual server does the routing, and that they are not exclusive of each other in this regard -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 16, 2002 4:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: What to use for outbound and inbound email I'd like to know how inbound works and how outbound works in exchange 2000. Do they both use SMTP connector or SMTP virtual servers together or can I isolate so I can use SMTP connector for inbound and SMTP virtual servers for outbound? Thanks. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 2000 book recommendation
Pastels, it's sort of a Monet Motif -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 10, 2002 12:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 book recommendation A pretty job, eh? Is it all foofoo like with pretty colours and stuff? ;o) --- Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 book recommendation In addition to what don said check out these links. And the Help file. They are written to help you and do a pretty job. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q155269 http://www.exchange-mail.org/books.html http://www.swinc.com/resource/books.asp http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm http://www.microsoft.com/exchange --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 book recommendation Tony Redmond - MS Exchange for W2K ISBN-1-8-224-9 Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: harshang shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2000 book recommendation Hi , Can anyone outhere give some recommendation on a book for Exchange 2000 that would help for practically working Excahnge 2000 and also for the Exam . I had used the Sybex Exchange 5.5 study guide which was really gr8 both for practical as well as Exam point of view , but i dont have any idea as which book should i use for E2k can anyone guide me . Thanks, Harshang Shah (MCSE,CCNA) __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: DNS
Title: Message First, what are you doing? Can't really help until then.. Sorry -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: April 10, 2002 12:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DNS off topic.. we have a DNS setup.. say..company.com we want to create a subdomain called au.company.com and let only the Admins in Australia control JUST that subdomain. im lost.. what am i doing wrong?? Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 60477 MCSE MS Exchange Administrator List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: DNS
Title: Message When you say you cannot see the properties, how are you trying to access them? The reason I ask, is that the options on the context menu in the explorer pane of the MMC can sometimes be different than those available in the main window of the MMC. If you first select the secondary zone on the left side, then right click it and you should then have properties. From there, you should have a security tab, done. HTH -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: April 10, 2002 1:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS i went thru the delegation wizard, and while i created a delegation, i cant see how i tell it who can do what in that delegation, nor can ya pull up a properties on it. All you can do it tell it what Server hosts it. -Original Message-From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS What problem are you having? Other than you doing something wrong? :0) -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DNS off topic.. we have a DNS setup.. say..company.com we want to create a subdomain called au.company.com and let only the Admins in Australia control JUST that subdomain. im lost.. what am i doing wrong?? Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 60477 MCSE MS Exchange Administrator List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: DNS
Title: Message access the properties in the left pane of the MMC, you should have a security tab there -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: April 10, 2002 1:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS ive highlighted company.com in the main DNS window. (start programs\admin tools\dns) choose "new delegation" create au.company.com tell it what Server is to host it. then its created, but HOW do you control security there, HOW do you add records? do you create a subdomain, then create the delegation? -Original Message-From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:07 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS When you say you cannot see the properties, how are you trying to access them? The reason I ask, is that the options on the context menu in the explorer pane of the MMC can sometimes be different than those available in the main window of the MMC. If you first select the secondary zone on the left side, then right click it and you should then have properties. From there, you should have a security tab, done. HTH -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: April 10, 2002 1:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS i went thru the delegation wizard, and while i created a delegation, i cant see how i tell it who can do what in that delegation, nor can ya pull up a properties on it. All you can do it tell it what Server hosts it. -Original Message-From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS What problem are you having? Other than you doing something wrong? :0) -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DNS off topic.. we have a DNS setup.. say..company.com we want to create a subdomain called au.company.com and let only the Admins in Australia control JUST that subdomain. im lost.. what am i doing wrong?? Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 60477 MCSE MS Exchange Administrator List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?
Title: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Hi, here is a target on my head, beat me, beat me. DOH! -Original Message-From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: April 10, 2002 1:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Do you have anything more to add to back up your statement? Matt -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? I think it's ridiculous. -Original Message- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Our environment has Trend running on the firewall for anti-virus and content filtering. We have NAV running on the desktops. We are currently evaluating Antigen and SAVF (Symantec) to put on our E2K Exchange servers (including an E2K cluster on a Compaq SAN). However, our Microsoft resident is suggesting to us that AV on the servers themselves is not necessary and will only introduce problems and instability (particularly Symantec's product). He said that when a virus outbreak occurs that actually gets inside, a quick ExMerge on the server is just as effective as pushing out virus defs using the AV product. With AV software on the firewall and on the desktops, what do people think about not putting AV on the Exchange servers themselves? -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?
Title: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? For the cost of a license, is it not worth it to be protected from every possible angle? Sure, for the most part, your set up should trap most things, but it is not going to get everything. Why go through the hassle of running Exmerge etc., when a 3 minute session at the server to install AV will prevent (hopefully) you from ever having to do that. My previous bit of sarcasm is based on that thinking. Why take the chance? -Original Message-From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: April 10, 2002 2:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? If the target is IIS, then NAV running LiveUpdate on the server can handle that. -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:58 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? What if the target of the virus is not a desktop? What if the target is IIS? How will a desktop handle that. You need AV on the servers. It does not degrade functionality or stability so much as to let that slide. -Original Message-From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? This is not being helpful. It is a serious question. Any viruses that actually get through Trend on the firewall will most likely get cleaned by NAV on the desktop. This seems to make AV on the server itself not necessary. Matt -Original Message-From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:17 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Hi, here is a target on my head, beat me, beat me. DOH! -Original Message-From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: April 10, 2002 1:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Do you have anything more to add to back up your statement? Matt -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? I think it's ridiculous. -Original Message- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Our environment has Trend running on the firewall for anti-virus and content filtering. We have NAV running on the desktops. We are currently evaluating Antigen and SAVF (Symantec) to put on our E2K Exchange servers (including an E2K cluster on a Compaq SAN). However, our Microsoft resident is suggesting to us that AV on the servers themselves is not necessary and will only introduce problems and instability (particularly Symantec's product). He said that when a virus outbreak occurs that actually gets inside, a quick ExMerge on the server is just as effective as pushing out virus defs using the AV product. With AV software on the firewall and on the desktops, what do people think about not putting AV on the Exchange servers themselves? -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?
Title: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? lives in Redmond? -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: April 10, 2002 4:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? What is a 'Microsoft resident'? Is that some form of internship? -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? I think it's ridiculous. -Original Message- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Our environment has Trend running on the firewall for anti-virus and content filtering. We have NAV running on the desktops. We are currently evaluating Antigen and SAVF (Symantec) to put on our E2K Exchange servers (including an E2K cluster on a Compaq SAN). However, our Microsoft resident is suggesting to us that AV on the servers themselves is not necessary and will only introduce problems and instability (particularly Symantec's product). He said that when a virus outbreak occurs that actually gets inside, a quick ExMerge on the server is just as effective as pushing out virus defs using the AV product. With AV software on the firewall and on the desktops, what do people think about not putting AV on the Exchange servers themselves? -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?
Title: Message I used to live in Vancouver, does that count? We had AV on Exchange and the desktops, and the servers, and the net gateways there. -Original Message-From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: April 10, 2002 4:44 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? I used lived on westlake sammamish and 40th. 2 minute drive to work from there to the main campus. -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Posted At: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:33 PMPosted To: Exchange 2000 ServerConversation: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?Subject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Used to live a few blocks from there... Don ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message-From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Anything between 156th and E. Lake Sammamish/Fall City Road??? Heheh -Original Message-From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Posted At: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:17 PMPosted To: Exchange 2000 ServerConversation: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?Subject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? lives in Redmond? -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: April 10, 2002 4:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? What is a 'Microsoft resident'? Is that some form of internship? -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? I think it's ridiculous. -Original Message- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Our environment has Trend running on the firewall for anti-virus and content filtering. We have NAV running on the desktops. We are currently evaluating Antigen and SAVF (Symantec) to put on our E2K Exchange servers (including an E2K cluster on a Compaq SAN). However, our Microsoft resident is suggesting to us that AV on the servers themselves is not necessary and will only introduce problems and instability (particularly Symantec's product). He said that when a virus outbreak occurs that actually gets inside, a quick ExMerge on the server is just as effective as pushing out virus defs using the AV product. With AV software on the firewall and on the desktops, what do people think about not putting AV on the Exchange servers themselves? -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ---Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.344 / Virus Database: 191 - Release Date: 4/2/2002List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.344 / Virus Database: 191 - Release Date: 4/2/2002List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ---Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.344 / Virus Database: 191 - Release Date: 4/2/2002List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.344 / Virus Database: 191 - Release Date: 4/2/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com
Change Password in Outlook Web Access
E2K SP2 - W2K SP2 Hi, I have only just started to troubleshoot this, so forgive me if I am somewhat vague in my description, but I thought perhaps someone else has seen similar, and may be able to fire a suggestion my way, off of the top of their head. My problem is that in OWA, either remotely, or on the LAN, when you go to the options section, and click on Change Password, you are returned only with a new window withPage Cannot Be Displayed, with no HTTP error number etc. I am assuming it is an IIS issue, but thought I would throw this out there now, as I start to look into this. TIA in advance for any help or suggestions. Clayton Doige IT Manager MCSE, MCP + IGamedayInternational N.V.Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537C: +5 999 563 1845 F: +5 999 733 1259 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: WLKMMAS
A few years back I was a Security System Installer. I soon noted two things: Access Control Systems are VERY similar in function to network Access Control lists (identical really), and the guys doing networking seemed to be making a heck of a lot more money than I. So, I signed up at an ATEC, and went for it. Shortly before writing my first exam, two things happened; I got a job as a Computer Operator in a small Library, and I had a full on consulting company ask me to come and see them once I had completed my MCSE, fully aware of my background, and lack of experience in the IT industry. I did my 6 months at the Library, and passed my last exam while there. So, when my Library contract ended, I went back to the consultantcy. Here with my newly found MCSE certification, I performed illustrious tasks, such as unboxing PC's that were preconfigured, and setting them on the approriate desk, or Ghosting 125 PC's with an image someone else had already made. From there I moved onto a help desk for a large NT Network. In that 12 month period, I learned how a network really works, and that a lot of the stuff covered in the Enterprise course, really, went on the back burner when Becky in Accounts was having troubles with her company budgets in Excel. Getting MCSE Designation, without going the Boot Camp Route, as mentioned, shows you can stick at something, that, when it is totally new to you, is quite a challenege (remember this was before all the brain dump sites were really up as they are now etc. etc.) Where I really learned was on the job, and every once in a while, something I learned in my schooling and studying would pop into my head when addressing certain situations; but the reality of it is that I rely mainly on what I have learned doing this job, staying touch with lists like these, and making my own mistakes along the way. By all means, if you want to get a start in the IT industry, and you've no previous experience, go get certified, but don't think for a millisecond that you will even be close to being able to look after an enterprise environment once you are done. And, if you are already in the industry, and find that getting a certification will enhance your position or salary, go for it. Either way, the cert does not necessarily make you better at your job than someone who does not have it, but it does demonstrate commitment, and the ability to take on complex information and scenarios and apply practical solutions. Just stay away from the Bootcamps, as all you get out of that is a piece of paper, and you really might as well take it to the toilet with you for all the good it is in the real world. As for HR folks, if the Tech dept needs to bring someone in, let the Tech Manager do the initial interview to find out what the person actually does know, and then if the Tech Manager likes the person technically, and personality wise, then let HR loose on them with their questions like What would your Wife say are your weak points? Well of course, My Wife thinks I am perfect! Question: If a man speaks in the forest, and no Woman is around, is he still wrong? :-) List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: WLKMMAS
nah, if you want to get in anywhere bad enough, you will find a way :-) That works both physically, and logically, and is a sad fact of life. But on the bright side, folks get the tag of Computer Commando for it :-) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 4, 2002 12:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: WLKMMAS Poor security planning on the part of your facilities people. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be not afraid of growing slowly, be afraid only of standing still. --Chinese Proverb -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: WLKMMAS I am also UCC+WCA certified. I love false ceilings sometimes. At least in situations where I have no keys ;) -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller Posted At: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 2:13 PM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: WLKMMAS Subject: RE: WLKMMAS In a fit or rage from answering extreme bone head Questions from MCSE's I added a ton of letters after my name with a tag line of More letters after my name makes me SmArTER Oh man did I get flamed on that one. In true Don Ely style I flamed back, But in the end gave up the tag line. keeping some of the letters. Over time others have given me new letters with meaning and here they are. WLKMMAS=William Lefkovics Kevin Miller Mutual Appreciation Society [1] UCC+WCA=Urban Computer Commando + Wall Climbing Ability [2] [1] an inside joke between William and my self [2] Late on an all weekend upgrade, had no keys to an office that held some servers. I managed over the wall in the drop ceiling to get stuck above the door in the small hole, for about 10 minutes. Finally made it out and went back up and tried again. This time making it over. That is my story and I am sticking to it.. : www.wlkmmas.org --Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Tim Boswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT: WLKMMAS OK, I've been trying to hold it in, but it's no good What the hell does that acronym mean??!?!? I checked Google and the only results I saw involved Kevin!! Is this some bizarre practice of putting random letters after your name to try and look qualified? If so I gotta try it (my boss genuinely wouldn't catch onever) Tim Boswell QWE+RTY, UIOP(2.0), SkillDrill Certified (hey, that last one's genuine too!) - Original Message - From: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 4:05 PM Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q I like you = ] you got Spunk.. When you don't have Broke ass shit -Don Ely Why touch it? --Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q It aint broke yet so I aint fixin nuthing.. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 April 2002 04:31 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q wow, no service packs. that's wonderful. -Original Message- From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q The only reasons to reboot are: 1) A badly setup server 2) A lazy / Ignorant / uninformed administrator 3) Real hardware problems.. I've and exchange 5.5 box in another office that has not been rebooted since July 2000 (and that was a faulty UPS causing a power out).. Later Brent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 April 2002 09:12 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q I don't reboot unless I absolutely have to. This includes network equipment as well as servers. If you have to reboot things on a monthly basis for network stability, there is an underlying problem that should be addressed. ~ -K.Borndale IT Manager Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |-+ | | Joe Irvine | | | jirvine@tbopayro| | | ll.com | | || | | 04/01/2002 11:53 | | | AM | | | Please respond to| | | MS-Exchange | | | Admin
RE: Search
Tools, Message Tracking, but you have to enable it first. Have a look in online help on how to do that. Cheers -Original Message- From: Romulo Jeanegitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 4, 2002 1:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Search Hello, Do anybody know how to search a mailbox that send a e-mail address out side from my enterprise ? Thanks. Running Exchange w2k. Romulo Jeanegitz Support Analist List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: pst troubles, please help
when you say try to open it are you accessing directly, or trying to do an import? -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 4, 2002 5:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: pst troubles, please help I've got an evil .pst file that won't open now that I've reformatted the PC and recreated the Outlook account. This .pst file is approx. 584MB, not exceeding the 2GB limit... But, it's crashing everything that tries to get to it. When I open the mailbox, after approx. 7 minutes of cranking away at 100%CPU utilization, then I try to open this Personal Folders file, I get a message that I don't have permission to open it. What? I wonder if there's a way to get into this file? I've searched TechNet, Google, my archive of messages from this list. Anyone have a suggestion? Thanks in advance. [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
