RE: Selective Wipe of ActiveSync devices
Yes, I am only looking to wipe the mail part of the phone. With
Exchange 2003 I also have the option to wipe completely as well but
management doesn't want to wipe users phones of all their personal
data/apps.
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:pa...@mmcwm.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 11:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Selective Wipe of ActiveSync devices
If you mean only wiping certain parts of a phone, for instance, it was
posted a while back on this forum that the iPhone would be wiped
completely if done through Exchange. We're using Exchange 07 and as
part of the user's agreement with us to enable Activesync, they give us
the right to completely wipe the phone if it becomes lost or stolen.
From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 10:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Selective Wipe of ActiveSync devices
Good morning all,
What is everyone using for their corp. environment to do selective wipes
of ActiveSync devices that aren't owned by the company? I'm currently
running Exchange 2003 SP2 with plans to upgrade to 2010 later this year.
With that in mind would I be better off upgrading to Exch 2010 first?
Eric Wittersheim
Network Administrator
American Academy of Sleep Medicine
2510 N. Frontage Road
Darien, IL. 60561
Thank you for your membership support! To continue receiving the value
of AASM membership through 2012, renew online! www.aasmnet.org
http://www.aasmnet.org/
{*}
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Selective Wipe of ActiveSync devices
Not yet J
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Selective Wipe of ActiveSync devices
Have you looked at Good Technologies?
From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 11:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Selective Wipe of ActiveSync devices
Yes, I am only looking to wipe the mail part of the phone. With
Exchange 2003 I also have the option to wipe completely as well but
management doesn't want to wipe users phones of all their personal
data/apps.
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:pa...@mmcwm.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 11:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Selective Wipe of ActiveSync devices
If you mean only wiping certain parts of a phone, for instance, it was
posted a while back on this forum that the iPhone would be wiped
completely if done through Exchange. We're using Exchange 07 and as
part of the user's agreement with us to enable Activesync, they give us
the right to completely wipe the phone if it becomes lost or stolen.
From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 10:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Selective Wipe of ActiveSync devices
Good morning all,
What is everyone using for their corp. environment to do selective wipes
of ActiveSync devices that aren't owned by the company? I'm currently
running Exchange 2003 SP2 with plans to upgrade to 2010 later this year.
With that in mind would I be better off upgrading to Exch 2010 first?
Eric Wittersheim
Network Administrator
American Academy of Sleep Medicine
2510 N. Frontage Road
Darien, IL. 60561
Thank you for your membership support! To continue receiving the value
of AASM membership through 2012, renew online! www.aasmnet.org
http://www.aasmnet.org/
{*}
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: OT: Yahoo spam load
I don't see anywhere that it is blocking SPAM generated by Yahoo. It could mean that it is blocking SPAM generated from other providers as well as their own network. From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 9:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT: Yahoo spam load Nevermind, actually clicking into it, it becomes more informative. Still, saying upfront how much SPAM your network generates isn't a huge selling point. On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure why Yahoo actually wants to disclose this... On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: http://visualize.yahoo.com/ and click the green buttons. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Is my server spamming?
Sounds like you should check to see if your Exchange server is an open relay. I don't think Vipre is going to block that. From: Kelsey, John [mailto:jckel...@drmc.org] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 8:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is my server spamming? Exchange 2003 patched up running Vipre 3.1.14903. Just this morning I've been getting flooded with NDR's (over 33,000). They all say they were sent by postmas...@drmc.org and they couldn't be delivered.Here is one of the headers. Is my server really trying to deliver these messages? If so...WHY?? And why doesn't Vipre put the kibosh on them? Thanks all! Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 From: postmas...@drmc.org To: jco...@yahoo.com.tw Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:30:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=9B095B5ADSN=_01CC34CD6EC491AA19DBex03.drmc.org X-DSNContext: 7ce717b1 - 1194 - 0002 - Message-ID: fsrauwiqj00010...@ex03.drmc.org Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) --9B095B5ADSN=_01CC34CD6EC491AA19DBex03.drmc.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 --9B095B5ADSN=_01CC34CD6EC491AA19DBex03.drmc.org Content-Type: message/delivery-status --9B095B5ADSN=_01CC34CD6EC491AA19DBex03.drmc.org Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from xruhby.com ([120.146.192.108]) by ex03.drmc.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:30:33 -0400 Message-ID: a7747dd5338a49a399d7f5451bc3a2ac@ef3b62ee724c43bbb322d9abf8265f3a Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:30:28 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 5, 190, 94 [[RNDMI]] X-Priority: 3 From: Hailey wbwqqfk jco...@yahoo.com.tw To: xzi_...@yahoo.com.tw Subject: =?BIG5?B?v/u63ru2qWYoqcmnZymleKVfr7irZaRqwXjZVKXefmVkZ3NxdQ==?= X-MSMail-Priority: Highest X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Type: text/html; charset=BIG5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-Path: jco...@yahoo.com.tw X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jun 2011 13:30:34.0298 (UTC) FILETIME=[649F71A0:01CC34CE] --9B095B5ADSN=_01CC34CD6EC491AA19DBex03.drmc.org-- * John C. Kelsey, MCSE, CCNA Network Architect DuBois Regional Medical Center (: 814.375.3073 2 : 814.375.4005 *: jckel...@drmc.org mailto:jckel...@drmc.org * --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- BR To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ BR or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com BR with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Is my server spamming?
Do you have port 25 blocked at the FW, only allowing your Exchange server access? From: Kelsey, John [mailto:jckel...@drmc.org] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 9:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is my server spamming? According to a couple of external checks, our server is NOT an open relay. From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 9:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is my server spamming? Sounds like you should check to see if your Exchange server is an open relay. I don't think Vipre is going to block that. From: Kelsey, John [mailto:jckel...@drmc.org] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 8:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is my server spamming? Exchange 2003 patched up running Vipre 3.1.14903. Just this morning I've been getting flooded with NDR's (over 33,000). They all say they were sent by postmas...@drmc.org and they couldn't be delivered.Here is one of the headers. Is my server really trying to deliver these messages? If so...WHY?? And why doesn't Vipre put the kibosh on them? Thanks all! Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 From: postmas...@drmc.org To: jco...@yahoo.com.tw Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:30:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=9B095B5ADSN=_01CC34CD6EC491AA19DBex03.drmc.org X-DSNContext: 7ce717b1 - 1194 - 0002 - Message-ID: fsrauwiqj00010...@ex03.drmc.org Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) --9B095B5ADSN=_01CC34CD6EC491AA19DBex03.drmc.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 --9B095B5ADSN=_01CC34CD6EC491AA19DBex03.drmc.org Content-Type: message/delivery-status --9B095B5ADSN=_01CC34CD6EC491AA19DBex03.drmc.org Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from xruhby.com ([120.146.192.108]) by ex03.drmc.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:30:33 -0400 Message-ID: a7747dd5338a49a399d7f5451bc3a2ac@ef3b62ee724c43bbb322d9abf8265f3a Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:30:28 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 5, 190, 94 [[RNDMI]] X-Priority: 3 From: Hailey wbwqqfk jco...@yahoo.com.tw To: xzi_...@yahoo.com.tw Subject: =?BIG5?B?v/u63ru2qWYoqcmnZymleKVfr7irZaRqwXjZVKXefmVkZ3NxdQ==?= X-MSMail-Priority: Highest X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Type: text/html; charset=BIG5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-Path: jco...@yahoo.com.tw X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jun 2011 13:30:34.0298 (UTC) FILETIME=[649F71A0:01CC34CE] --9B095B5ADSN=_01CC34CD6EC491AA19DBex03.drmc.org-- * John C. Kelsey, MCSE, CCNA Network Architect DuBois Regional Medical Center (: 814.375.3073 2 : 814.375.4005 *: jckel...@drmc.org mailto:jckel...@drmc.org * --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- BR To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ BR or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com BR with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Is my server spamming?
Someone is spoofing you then. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_job From: Kelsey, John [mailto:jckel...@drmc.org] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is my server spamming? Yes, only the exchange server is permitted to send out on port 25. All other hosts are denied. From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 10:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is my server spamming? Do you have port 25 blocked at the FW, only allowing your Exchange server access? From: Kelsey, John [mailto:jckel...@drmc.org] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 9:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is my server spamming? According to a couple of external checks, our server is NOT an open relay. From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 9:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Is my server spamming? Sounds like you should check to see if your Exchange server is an open relay. I don't think Vipre is going to block that. From: Kelsey, John [mailto:jckel...@drmc.org] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 8:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is my server spamming? Exchange 2003 patched up running Vipre 3.1.14903. Just this morning I've been getting flooded with NDR's (over 33,000). They all say they were sent by postmas...@drmc.org and they couldn't be delivered.Here is one of the headers. Is my server really trying to deliver these messages? If so...WHY?? And why doesn't Vipre put the kibosh on them? Thanks all! Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 From: postmas...@drmc.org To: jco...@yahoo.com.tw Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:30:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=9B095B5ADSN=_01CC34CD6EC491AA19DBex03.drmc.org X-DSNContext: 7ce717b1 - 1194 - 0002 - Message-ID: fsrauwiqj00010...@ex03.drmc.org Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) --9B095B5ADSN=_01CC34CD6EC491AA19DBex03.drmc.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 --9B095B5ADSN=_01CC34CD6EC491AA19DBex03.drmc.org Content-Type: message/delivery-status --9B095B5ADSN=_01CC34CD6EC491AA19DBex03.drmc.org Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from xruhby.com ([120.146.192.108]) by ex03.drmc.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:30:33 -0400 Message-ID: a7747dd5338a49a399d7f5451bc3a2ac@ef3b62ee724c43bbb322d9abf8265f3a Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:30:28 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 5, 190, 94 [[RNDMI]] X-Priority: 3 From: Hailey wbwqqfk jco...@yahoo.com.tw To: xzi_...@yahoo.com.tw Subject: =?BIG5?B?v/u63ru2qWYoqcmnZymleKVfr7irZaRqwXjZVKXefmVkZ3NxdQ==?= X-MSMail-Priority: Highest X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Type: text/html; charset=BIG5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-Path: jco...@yahoo.com.tw X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jun 2011 13:30:34.0298 (UTC) FILETIME=[649F71A0:01CC34CE] --9B095B5ADSN=_01CC34CD6EC491AA19DBex03.drmc.org-- * John C. Kelsey, MCSE, CCNA Network Architect DuBois Regional Medical Center (: 814.375.3073 2 : 814.375.4005 *: jckel...@drmc.org mailto:jckel...@drmc.org * --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- BR To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ BR or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com BR with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Exchange 2010 design
Sent from my LG phone pramatow...@mediageneral.com pramatow...@mediageneral.com wrote: We went WNLB for a couple of reasons- $ and it was supported happily for our size/needs. Pretty sure it still is but MS doesn't seem to like it nearly as much as they used to-I'd guess based on real world experience? Today, those size/needs would steer towards HLB. IIRC it was a pain for us to set up and get going properly- whether that was WNLB, me, or just all the #$^! that was going on at the time, I dunno. Once it was going I guess it LB's well enough as long as all the boxes were up. not that it was a regular occurrence by any means but if we lost/had to reboot a box it did screw with all the connections on that box. Had to fiddle with patching too (drainstopping etc) but so it goes. Also unless we missed something obvious, the only health checking you have is basically a ping test, HLB goes past that. Stuff I've done resulting in 0 client complaints- Pulled power on the active Kemp Rebooted a CAS Powered down CAS My other response in this thread I rated at .0002 Paul Cents. This one I'll rate at a full .02 PC- Given you're going there anyway, get the network guys to make their decision and skip WNLB altogether:) Paul From: sms adm [sms...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 4:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 design How reliable was your WNLB? We're planning to do the same ... start with WNLB and move to HW NLB when our network guys decide what they will buy and when. Thx in advance On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:58 PM, pramatow...@mediageneral.commailto:pramatow...@mediageneral.com wrote: Been running E2010 for a year now- We’re getting rid of WNLB, putting four Kemp loadmaster 2200’s into place, a high availability pair in each AD site Did one site yesterday, the other is planned for next week.We’re ~7K mailboxes with 2 real mbx/hub and 3 virtual cas in each site. ~1400 BB’s, few hundred EAS devs. Are you stuck on F5 for some reason? Not that I have any long experience with Kemp or anything but they seem to be pretty nice boxes for a very reasonable price… From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.commailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: neil.hob...@microsoft.commailto:neil.hob...@microsoft.com Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 design I need to do something very similar I need to decide if we want to use hardware from F5 or use NLB for an Exchange 2010 deployment. Thank you for the helpful links. Cheers Ryan From: Neil Hobson [mailto:neil.hob...@microsoft.commailto:neil.hob...@microsoft.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 10:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 design In addition to what Phil said in his reply, for a good overview of the load balancing options I’d recommend reading this topic : http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff625247.aspx FYI, if you go down the hardware load balancer route, here’s the page that lists the hardware load balancers that have completed solution testing with Exchange 2010 : http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/gg176682.aspx HTH, Neil From: Laurence Bryant [mailto:l...@cem.dur.ac.ukmailto:l...@cem.dur.ac.uk] Sent: 13 June 2011 13:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 design Hi Everyone, I'm a bit new to this so my apologies if I've not understood something correctly. I'm trying to plan new hardware to deploy Exchange 2010 (100 users, average mailbox size 500MB) and am looking at using two servers with CAS, HT and Mailbox roles installed on both and using DAG for high availability. I was thinking of using Windows NLB for load balancing,but have read that this can't be used with DAG (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd979781.aspx). My question is, if I set up two additional servers with NLB installed and moved the CAS and HT roles to them, would this solution then provide the load balancing I'm looking for? Alternatively, would I be better off with two highly redundant servers and use one for Mailbox and one for CAS and HT? Thanks for any advice! Laurence --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions
RE: Route company.com to multiple internal Business Units
Sent from my LG phone Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: [1] ILM/FIM are the automated solutions that MSFT has. Quest and NetWrix both sell others. I would suggest that you need a requirements analysis to determine exactly WHAT you need. ☺ [2] If Exchange or something like postfix are the “masters of all domains” then yes, it’s pretty easy to do. I can’t speak for Notes/Groupwise. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Mike Tavares [mailto:miketava...@comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Route company.com to multiple internal Business Units I have a situation were the parent company (A.com) is running Exchange 2007 and has multiple BU’s units that are COMPLETELY separate A/D Forests (b.com, c.com, d.com, etc). Most of these Business units are running email systems other then Exchange (Mostly Lotus Notes) and are currently receiving emails via u...@a.commailto:u...@a.com. All is good as I have 1 internal relay connector set up that if it doesn’t match on the exchange server it relays the message to a notes server and it handles the delivery to all of the other business units. Now the challenge comes that several of the BU’s are being forced to switch to exchange 2010 (new CRM solution requires it) and they want to keep using u...@a.commailto:u...@a.com as their primary addresses. (I will still have 10 to 12 bu’s running Notes). So this brings up at least 2 questions. 1. Since these are completely separate A/D forests how do I get all of the users into my A/D so a.com at least knows how to accept mail for these users (way too many users and groups to consider doing it manually). 2. is it even possible to route a.com to multiple internal relays without causing a massive routing headaches for all involved? Any thoughts or suggestions on how to make this work would be appreciated. -Mike --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Email delayed going to one specific domain
The filter would be on the receiver's end. From: King's Kid [mailto:kingskid1002...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Email delayed going to one specific domain Our spam filter doesn't filter outbound mail. I double checked it to make sure. BJ When the whole world is against you paranoia is just good sense - Johnny Fever From: Steve Ens stevey...@gmail.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Tue, November 30, 2010 8:52:15 AM Subject: Re: Email delayed going to one specific domain Spam filter? On Tuesday, November 30, 2010, King's Kid kingskid1002...@yahoo.com wrote: Our consultant is not getting our emails. The last email he received from us was 11/26 at 8:30pm. He hasn't received any since but he is getting emails from his other clients with no problem and when I email him using my Yahoo address it goes through with no delay. No error messages in Exchange or any of the event logs. The messages to him are just queued. All other emails are being delivered with no delay. BJ When the whole world is against you paranoia is just good sense - Johnny Fever From: Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Tue, November 30, 2010 8:44:33 AM Subject: RE: Email delayed going to one specific domain What does your consultant say? J Does exchange give an error or does it just queue the message? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: King's Kid [mailto:kingskid1002...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 9:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Email delayed going to one specific domain Hi all, Yesterday our Exchange server stopped sending email to one specific domain (our consultant). The only change that was made to the server was I put in a rule regarding the Deleted items folder for our users which I have since deleted. All other emails are being sent correctly and our consultant is receiving emails from other clients. We recently upgraded to this version of Exchange and I'm still learning all the ends and outs. I googled the issue and didn't come up with anything. Any help would be appreciated. We running Exchange 2k7 on Small Business Server 2k8. Thanks BJ When the whole world is against you paranoia is just good sense - Johnny Fever --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Help with unsolicited mail
God bless'em! From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Help with unsolicited mail Dang Bears fans! On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Kretche, Peter kretc...@uwgb.edu wrote: Restraining order is an option. We've done a couple for troublesome individuals. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+, HP APS Senior Network/Systems Administrator E-mail Administrator UW - Green Bay -Original Message- From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 12:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail How about just letting it go for a bit and see if he gets tired of this. I'd be a little nervous about what else he might do, if you frustrate this. CFee -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 12:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Help with unsolicited mail We have an ex employee that is sending messages to essentially the whole company. These messages are causing some moral issues and need to stop. We have a transport rule (E2K7) to reroute them but have been advised this person is going to open a new account to continue. Does anyone have any info, Legal or other, that we can use to put a halt to this? TIA John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership for Strong Families CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
RE: hol files compatible with Outlook 2003 and 2007?
.hol files are for importing the holidays into Outlook. I haven't tried to import 2003 .hol into 2007. -Original Message- From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 9:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: hol files compatable with Outlook 2003 and 2007? No reply = never heard of a .hol file here! Richard -Original Message- From: bounce-9037791-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-9037791-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Maglinger, Paul Sent: 30 July 2010 15:29 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: hol files compatable with Outlook 2003 and 2007? No replies = No opinions? -Original Message- From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: hol files compatable with Outlook 2003 and 2007? Does anyone know if the same .hol file that works with Outlook 2003 will work with Outlook 2007? What about Outlook 2010? Has anyone had any success in pushing the .hol file down to their users? Paul
RE: Denied By Policy 550
Google RBL check. From: bzalew...@comcast.net [mailto:bzalew...@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 8:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Denied By Policy 550 What is the easist way to determine the list you are on? - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 8:31:01 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: RE: Denied By Policy 550 Almost certainly. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Brent Zalewski [mailto:bzalew...@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 9:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Denied By Policy 550 We have an Exchange 2007 SP1 server. We have had several users send messages to Internet email addresses and have an NDR come back with the following: block.microcomps.com #550 Denied by policy ## dsmdc-mail-bxga2 #550 Denied by policy Is this from some RBL? Thanks Brent
RE: Spiceworks?
My experience with SW is that I tried it out and didn't really care for it and removed it. I continue to receive emails from them even though I have unsubscribed myself numerous times. IMO Spiceworks = Spammer From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 10:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Spiceworks? Hello all... I'm looking at Spiceworks for a pc inventory tool. Can anyone comment on it or make other recommendations? Thanks! Bill Lambert Windows System Administrator Concuity Phone 847-941-9206 Fax 847-465-9147 The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. image001.png
RE: Purging a mailbox's *contents*
I would use Mailbox management and delete anything older than X days. From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 9:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Purging a mailbox's *contents* I often have to do this for service related accounts that utilize a mailbox. I end up using exmerge to yank everything out. Although exmerge is scriptable, is there any other ways to programmatically do this without using exmerge? Thanks! jlc
RE: Friday funnies
Around here (suburbs of Chicago) coyotes only mess with the small dogs. From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 2:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Friday funnies I live in the country, and we've got coyotes. They don't mess with the dogs. I think most of the farm dogs would whip a coyote. From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Friday funnies Import a few coyotes and solve the dog and cat problems both at once. From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Friday funnies True. A lot of people don't realize it, but in most towns that have leash laws it applies to cats as well as dogs. From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 2:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Friday funnies Guess we are fortunate in having a leash law that is enforced. From: Ralph Smith [mailto:m...@gatewayindustries.org] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 11:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Friday funnies My 4 cats stay indoors, except for a screened in porch, which half the time they can't enjoy because my neighbor's dog comes in my yard and harrasses them, then craps all over my backyard, which I end up cleaning up (or stepping in). Then there are the times it jumps out in front of my car as I'm nearing the driveway, and the neighborhood kids who are terrorized on their bikes. but I'm not bitter :P Ralph From: Jeff Johnson [mailto:jjohn...@hydraflowusa.com] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 12:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Friday funnies Don't even get me started on my neighbor's cat... Jeff Johnson Systems Administrator 714-773-2600 Office 714-773-6351 Fax From: Brad Metzler [mailto:bmetz...@cu-portland.edu] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 9:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Friday funnies That's because your cat is pooping in your neighbors' yards and digging up their flower beds and leaving dead rodents on their doorsteps and scratching up their paint on their cars to enjoy the warmth of the engine, etc... but I'm not bitter :P -Brad From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 8:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Friday funnies I'd have to disagree. I don't spend countless hours outdoors picking up after my cat. I'd say dogs have slaves as well, they're just better at keeping your morale up so you don't realize it. - Sean On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Ellis, John P. johnel...@wirral.gov.uk wrote: I'd go with that. Dogs have masters and cats have slavessounds right to me. -Original Message- From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com] Sent: 19 March 2010 15:25 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Friday funnies They most certainly do not... They have slaves, thank you very much! lol - Original Message - From: Campbell, Rob rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 11:21 AM Subject: RE: Friday funnies Dogs have masters. Cats have staff. ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com http://www.clearswift.com/ ** Confidentiality Notice: ** This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and destroy all copies of the original message. Confidentiality Notice: ** This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and destroy all copies of the original
RE: I'm drawing a blank...
Import them into either a PST in 2007 or her mailbox. From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com] Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 10:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: I'm drawing a blank... I have a user who got a new desktop PC with Outlook 2007. She had Outlook 2003 on her old machine and stored her archive folders on a file server in her user directory. What is the best way to get her archive folders onto her new box? Thanks in advance for any help/advice! Bill Lambert Windows System Administrator Concuity A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc. Phone 847-941-9206 Fax 847-465-9147 NASDAQ: TTPA The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. image001.gif
RE: stopping spam from inside server?
Change the professors password. From: Boggis, Josh [mailto:josh.bog...@uconn.edu] Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: stopping spam from inside server? To be clear, this is the same as normal traffic. This is not being done on an open relay, a user has given out their ID/Password to a phishing scheme, and they are logging in remotely over OWA to send out large amounts of spam. It the same as a professor sending out 5000 mails to an academic group they run. This is where things get tough for me. I am looking for something to distinguish a user who has been compromised and is sending out spam vs a user sending out valid large amounts of email. Oh and I forgot to put in, we are running Exchange 2007. Do have Forefront installed to handle antivirus, and have a few barracuda boxes for spam filtering incoming. From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: stopping spam from inside server? +1. No port 25 traffic should be allowed out except from the known mail servers. Then all you have to secure is those servers. Carl From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: stopping spam from inside server? Have you verified you're not configured as an open relay? Is your firewall only allowing SMTP traffic to/from your Exchange box? Die dulci fruere! Roger Wright ___ Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/marie_von_ebnereschenbac.ht ml - Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Boggis, Josh josh.bog...@uconn.edu wrote: Anyone have any suggestions on anything for stopping what I call internal spam. Users who reply to phishing emails, who's account is then used to send out massive amounts of spam to the world. Because of this massive blast of spam, our mail server gets placed on many block lists, and then I have to spend the day getting us off block lists because of one users who thinks it's a good idea to give out login id, password, home address, favorite ice cream flavor and blood type just because an email asked them to. Any ideas on solutions? User education has proven fruitless, we still get people who reply.
RE: Outlook 2003 emails for administrator account
I would use a mailbox manager policy in ESM to get rid of those. Trying to get rid of that many emails seems to kill Outlook. From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 12:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook 2003 emails for administrator account Apparently someone unhid the administrator in the GAL and the domain administrator account has been receiving emails. It has some 24000 emails in it now. I have hid from GAL set on it now but I need to purge all the unwanted emails?? On a MS Exchange 2003 standard server using a MS Outlook 2003 client how do I get rid of those emails??
RE: Slightly OT: Connection
Why would you want to switch to a slower speed connection? Are you having problems with your DSL connection? From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection They suggested 15, we are at 20 max right now. Thank You ~Doug Rooney Sonoma Tilemakers IT Manager 7750 Bell Rd. Windsor Ca, 95492 (707) 837-8177 X211 (707) 837-9472 FAX i...@sonomatilemakers.com From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 8:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection How many channels do you need for phones at max usage? From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Slightly OT: Connection Hello, We are currently connected via DSL that I just tested at 2.4Mbps Down and 556Kbps up and we pay about $70 a month and we have a PRI for our phones. Well my ATT rep is suggesting we convert the PRI to a IP Flex T1, our concern is the download speed going from 2.4Mbps to 1.5Mbps and some of that going to the phones. Anyone have any good info regarding this, how our users will be affected? We have about 30 users on this circuit. Thank You ~Doug Rooney Sonoma Tilemakers IT Manager 7750 Bell Rd. Windsor Ca, 95492 (707) 837-8177 X211 (707) 837-9472 FAX i...@sonomatilemakers.com
RE: Slightly OT: Connection
Do you have any other DSL options? I don't buy his latency sales pitch. If your IP flex T1 is pegged you are going to feel it more, IMHO. I have 2 data T1 lines bonded for about 50 users plus Exchange and our web sites. I pretty much have at least 1 of the T1s worth of bandwidth used throughout the business day. We are about ready to switch over to 10MB Ethernet. From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection About once a month it goes down, but the rep said because latency is lower the speed is about the same, but that is why I am asking, because he is a sales guy, not a tech. Thank You ~Doug Rooney Sonoma Tilemakers IT Manager 7750 Bell Rd. Windsor Ca, 95492 (707) 837-8177 X211 (707) 837-9472 FAX i...@sonomatilemakers.com From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection Why would you want to switch to a slower speed connection? Are you having problems with your DSL connection? From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection They suggested 15, we are at 20 max right now. Thank You ~Doug Rooney Sonoma Tilemakers IT Manager 7750 Bell Rd. Windsor Ca, 95492 (707) 837-8177 X211 (707) 837-9472 FAX i...@sonomatilemakers.com From: Richard Stovall [mailto:richard.stov...@researchdata.com] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 8:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Connection How many channels do you need for phones at max usage? From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Slightly OT: Connection Hello, We are currently connected via DSL that I just tested at 2.4Mbps Down and 556Kbps up and we pay about $70 a month and we have a PRI for our phones. Well my ATT rep is suggesting we convert the PRI to a IP Flex T1, our concern is the download speed going from 2.4Mbps to 1.5Mbps and some of that going to the phones. Anyone have any good info regarding this, how our users will be affected? We have about 30 users on this circuit. Thank You ~Doug Rooney Sonoma Tilemakers IT Manager 7750 Bell Rd. Windsor Ca, 95492 (707) 837-8177 X211 (707) 837-9472 FAX i...@sonomatilemakers.com
RE: Advice
Outlook setup in cached mode and the second computer hadn't synched back yet? From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 8:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Advice Set up as POP account on his office Outlook? From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 7:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Advice First question. I don't think so as the email showed in the sent items on the other PC. Second question. He is in the same ou as about 100 other people and none of them are having this problem. Also, that is a server setting, set at the store level. Only one message store in this org. From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 8:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Advice Is the Outlook set up on the other PC not to save the sent items in the Sent folder? Is he in an OU that isn't set up to empty his trash? From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 7:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Advice Got a strange one here. Exchange 2003 sp2, fully patched, Outlook 2007 fully patched, cached mode. User logged into Outlook 2003 on a different pc than he normally uses. Sent an email to an internet email address, not internal, checked the sent folder and it is there. Went back to his office and the sent email was not showing in sent items on his everyday use pc. He called me, I checked message tracking on the server and the email shows in the search that it was sent. Now several hours later, it still hasn't shown in his sent folder. Also doesn't shown in sent items in OWA. Just for fun, I deleted his local OST file and let outlook rebuild it. Still the email is not showing. One other strange thing about his account. He has complained that his trash isn't emptying. Our default is to empty trash after 7 days. He has items in his trash that has been there several months. Any suggestions appreciated. Glen.
RE: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE
Murray, We have done our membership email blasts in house for as long as I have been here (over 7 years) and we have not had one problem. We do not have a tracking system in place that I could recommend to you. Our blasts consist of 1-5000 at a time typically. Eric From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE Hey, I thank everyone for their comments. I can tell you that we used to do all the blasts in house at night, and frankly never had any problems at all. Our marketing Dept, prompted by one former employee, decided that our blasts should go out during the daytime because in her words, people read their email between 10AM and 2PM. I didn't want to argue because it would be a waste of time. Frankly, the great majority of people read their email first thing in the morning and my feelings are that sending at nite guarantees that the email will be read early on before people get involved in other stuff like meetings. End result, Marketing went outside and spends enough money that would definitely allow us to redirect funds to better uses. We are not having a good year, and our CEO has mandated that we need to reduce expenses, and thus Marketing was told to start doing the blasts in house. We sent a large blast last evening, the full membership, and no problems, no slow down. Of course it was sent during the middle of the night! My thought was to continue to do the blasts in house, but marketing wants the stats and info provided by the outsource organization and thus I wanted to secure the software necessary. So, I appreciate the comments, but I don't agree with them. I suspect that for the rest of the year, the blasts will be in house with no stats reporting, so maybe they will continue after the first of the year without them. Murray From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:klu...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE +1. I worked for a firm that people PAID us to send them emails. Paid us a pretty good amount of money. Subscription based that they renewed monthly or yearly. They would still report us and cause us problems. I wouldn't bring it in house. If your current firm is costing so much that bringing in house frees up funding for other stuff, then put out an RFP and get competitive bids. Get the price down. If you bring it in house, plan on commiting a good portion of a techs time dealing with issues. Compare the service price to 1/4 to 1/3 of a tech's salary. On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: Another thing to keep in mind is that most people are idiots. If they get a message they don't want, they'll click the Spam button in their mail program. In many mail systems, that gets reported to a master list, and counts against you. It doesn't matter that the user asked for the subscription, that they confirmed the subscription, that they used to want it, that there is an unsubscribe link, that you're standing behind them telling them not to click Spam. To a luser, Spam means I don't want to read this email right this minute. (Later on, they will also complain that they're not getting the mail anymore.) -- Ben
RE: Checking another's e-mail
The user could give them access to his or her inbox. Right click the Inbox, permissions, then add the user and the permissions. Then the other user can Click file, open , other users folder. From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 11:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Checking another's e-mail Greetings, Is it possible to set up a user so they can check other peoples e-mail when they are gone, without having to know the persons password? I know I can set it up so they can send on behalf of... but what about reading new messages? Thank You ~Doug Rooney Sonoma Tilemakers IT Manager 7750 Bell Rd. Windsor Ca, 95492 (707) 837-8177 X211 (707) 837-9472 FAX i...@sonomatilemakers.com
RE: ninja to vipre
Would you post the contents of the email? I didn't get one either. From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ninja to vipre No, there's a change on the definitions, BitDefender is no longer providing definitions, so Sunbelt is incorporating the Vipre Definitions into the product and Ninja is now going to be known as Vipre email security for exchange. Did you see that email yesterday? From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ninja to vipre So, you're taking off your Exchange aware/integrated antivirus (ninja), and installing just file-level AV? From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: ninja to vipre Has anyone already performed the upgrade? If you have done the upgrade, is there any change to the workload on the server? I just wanted to get some feedback before I run the upgrade tonight. Thanks, Thomas Gonzalez Technology Manager Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas 210.349.2404 phone 210.403.1586 DID 210.349.2666 fax www.girlscouts-swtx.org http://www.girlscouts-swtx.org/ tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org GSSWTs Vision Statement: Our vision is to be a high performing, girl-focused staff with the desire and skill set to provide the highest standard of support that enriches, empowers and energizes the local Girl Scout Movement. In doing so, we create a lifetime of inspiration through Girl Scout experiences that are so relevant and inclusive every girl will want to be a part. GSSWTs Vision Statement: Our vision is to be a high performing, girl-focused staff with the desire and skill set to provide the highest standard of support that enriches, empowers and energizes the local Girl Scout Movement. In doing so, we create a lifetime of inspiration through Girl Scout experiences that are so relevant and inclusive every girl will want to be a part.
RE: ninja to vipre
Thanks Dave. From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ninja to vipre Here is the email that was sent out earlier today regarding the update to Ninja as it will now be called VIPRE Email Security: Product Notification: Ninja Email Security to VIPRE Email Security for Exchange Upgrade Date: August 24, 2009 Product: Ninja Email Security Version: All 2003 and 2007 Ninja versions Current versions of Ninja Email Security have supported two antivirus (AV) engines from third-party vendors: BitDefender and Authentium. Our relationship with one of these vendors, BitDefender, has come to an end. As a result, we cannot guarantee definition updates from BitDefender after the end of August. To address this issue, we have been working to integrate the VIPRE AV engine and will be releasing an updated product by the end of the month. In addition, the product is being renamed to VIPRE Email Security for Exchange. For those customers that are running the BitDefender AV engine, the upgrade process will make the necessary changes to replace the BitDefender engine with the VIPRE engine components. Note that the Authentium engine is not affected by this change and will continue to function correctly; there are no plans to remove the Authentium engine at this time. The release is currently available for download through Product Updates http://updates.sunbeltsoftware.com/ . For continued AV protection, it is important that all customers upgrade to this latest release. If you have any questions, please contact Technical Support at (877) 673-1153 or by email at supp...@sunbelt-software.com mailto:supp...@sunbelt-software.com From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ninja to vipre Would you post the contents of the email? I didn't get one either. From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ninja to vipre No, there's a change on the definitions, BitDefender is no longer providing definitions, so Sunbelt is incorporating the Vipre Definitions into the product and Ninja is now going to be known as Vipre email security for exchange. Did you see that email yesterday? From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ninja to vipre So, you're taking off your Exchange aware/integrated antivirus (ninja), and installing just file-level AV? From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: ninja to vipre Has anyone already performed the upgrade? If you have done the upgrade, is there any change to the workload on the server? I just wanted to get some feedback before I run the upgrade tonight. Thanks, Thomas Gonzalez Technology Manager Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas 210.349.2404 phone 210.403.1586 DID 210.349.2666 fax www.girlscouts-swtx.org http://www.girlscouts-swtx.org/ tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org GSSWTs Vision Statement: Our vision is to be a high performing, girl-focused staff with the desire and skill set to provide the highest standard of support that enriches, empowers and energizes the local Girl Scout Movement. In doing so, we create a lifetime of inspiration through Girl Scout experiences that are so relevant and inclusive every girl will want to be a part. GSSWTs Vision Statement: Our vision is to be a high performing, girl-focused staff with the desire and skill set to provide the highest standard of support that enriches, empowers and energizes the local Girl Scout Movement. In doing so, we create a lifetime of inspiration through Girl Scout experiences that are so relevant and inclusive every girl will want to be a part. This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy. This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your computer system.
RE: Unhold
That's not what I heard! From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt) Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 7:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Unhold Wasn't holding in the first place!! From: Marlin L. Borsick [mailto:borsi...@coastalan.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 7:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Unhold unhold
RE: System says user has 250MB in sent folder
Holy cow, a 250MB attachment??? You said you were using quotas. What are they set at? From: Beahm, Keith [mailto:kbe...@stinson.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: System says user has 250MB in sent folder The issue is resolved. I am ashamed to say I was duped by the user, and overlooked the single item in their sent items (it had a 250MB attachment). I foolishly believed the user when they told me they just got behind in cleaning up their old sent items. All my bad, and I apologize for wasting everyone's time. From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:peter.d...@yum.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 1:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: System says user has 250MB in sent folder Maybe an item that was not a message was inadvertently dragged to the sent items folder. Since it is not a message type the outlook view may not show it. Try an 'Advanced Find' search with outlook for 'Any type of Outlook item' set the size to greater than 100 MB and see if it finds anything that is hidden from the default view configuration. From: Beahm, Keith [mailto:kbe...@stinson.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: System says user has 250MB in sent folder It's odd, this user did have the POP3 and IMAP4 protocols enabled. I have disabled them and will try some tests including a move. From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 12:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: System says user has 250MB in sent folder Are you using IMAP for this account??? I seem to remember something about sent items being able to be saved on the IMAP server itself instead of the local sent itemsjust a thought. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Beahm, Keith [mailto:kbe...@stinson.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 1:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: System says user has 250MB in sent folder I have moved the account between three different mail store DBs now. I was hoping for the same result, but nothing changed. From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 12:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: System says user has 250MB in sent folder Do you have another mail store you could move the mailbox to, and tell it to skip corrupted items during the move? From: Beahm, Keith [mailto:kbe...@stinson.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: System says user has 250MB in sent folder I have a user whose mailbox reports 250 MB in their Sent items, but there are no items visible in the Outlook 2007 client. The Exchange 2007 mailbox server (via properties of the user) confirms that the user has a total mailbox size that would confirm the 250MB in Sent items. I have moved the mailbox successfully between DBs (so it can't be a corrupt item issue), and I have also deleted all local OST and OAB files at the client. Nothing seems to clear the ghost sent items, and we impose mailbox quotas in our environment ... so this is an issue. Any suggestions or comments would be appreciated. Keith D. Beahm Network Engineer Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP 1201 Walnut Street, Suite 2900 Kansas City, MO 64106-2150 Direct: (816) 691-3374 Fax: (816) 412-1022 kbe...@stinson.com www.stinson.com http://www.stinson.com/ Working for a Greener Tomorrow This communication is from a law firm and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please contact the sender for instructions concerning return or destruction, and do not use or disclose the contents to others. ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential
RE: System says user has 250MB in sent folder
That is huge. I try to tell my users to keep it under 10 MB as a lot of mail servers will reject large attachments. At least that has been my experience in the past. I'm sure that you have your needs for such a large limit. From: Beahm, Keith [mailto:kbe...@stinson.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: System says user has 250MB in sent folder The quotas max for send at 250MB, but we operate in cached mode by GPO. The user sent the item and because of slow network connection combined with cached mode behavior the issue started it's spiral. Initially the user mailbox (in Outlook) didn't initially show the single sent item because it was that slow to sync. From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: System says user has 250MB in sent folder Holy cow, a 250MB attachment??? You said you were using quotas. What are they set at? From: Beahm, Keith [mailto:kbe...@stinson.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: System says user has 250MB in sent folder The issue is resolved. I am ashamed to say I was duped by the user, and overlooked the single item in their sent items (it had a 250MB attachment). I foolishly believed the user when they told me they just got behind in cleaning up their old sent items. All my bad, and I apologize for wasting everyone's time. From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:peter.d...@yum.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 1:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: System says user has 250MB in sent folder Maybe an item that was not a message was inadvertently dragged to the sent items folder. Since it is not a message type the outlook view may not show it. Try an 'Advanced Find' search with outlook for 'Any type of Outlook item' set the size to greater than 100 MB and see if it finds anything that is hidden from the default view configuration. From: Beahm, Keith [mailto:kbe...@stinson.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: System says user has 250MB in sent folder It's odd, this user did have the POP3 and IMAP4 protocols enabled. I have disabled them and will try some tests including a move. From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 12:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: System says user has 250MB in sent folder Are you using IMAP for this account??? I seem to remember something about sent items being able to be saved on the IMAP server itself instead of the local sent itemsjust a thought. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Beahm, Keith [mailto:kbe...@stinson.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 1:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: System says user has 250MB in sent folder I have moved the account between three different mail store DBs now. I was hoping for the same result, but nothing changed. From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 12:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: System says user has 250MB in sent folder Do you have another mail store you could move the mailbox to, and tell it to skip corrupted items during the move? From: Beahm, Keith [mailto:kbe...@stinson.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: System says user has 250MB in sent folder I have a user whose mailbox reports 250 MB in their Sent items, but there are no items visible in the Outlook 2007 client. The Exchange 2007 mailbox server (via properties of the user) confirms that the user has a total mailbox size that would confirm the 250MB in Sent items. I have moved the mailbox successfully between DBs (so it can't be a corrupt item issue), and I have also deleted all local OST and OAB files at the client. Nothing seems to clear the ghost sent items, and we impose mailbox quotas in our environment ... so this is an issue. Any suggestions or comments would be appreciated. Keith D. Beahm Network Engineer Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP 1201 Walnut Street, Suite 2900 Kansas City, MO 64106-2150 Direct: (816) 691-3374 Fax: (816) 412-1022 kbe...@stinson.com www.stinson.com http://www.stinson.com/ Working for a Greener Tomorrow This communication is from a law firm and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please contact the sender for instructions concerning return or destruction, and do not use or disclose the contents to others
RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?)
I bet this could have been the Jeep power plants. I drove the Grand Cherokee with the diesel and the 5.7 Hemi. The diesels torque was very impressive. The Hemi was the one we chose to buy. At the time diesel was over a dollar more a gallon than gas and the Hemi was such a nice motor. -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) Man, I'd love to have that plant in mid-size SUV. There are few attractive small diesels in the US, but those that are available often don't make their way in to passenger vehicles, where the emissions regulations are far more strict than the light-duty truck market, which is where you find the majority of diesels here. I read about one test that replaced the 4.7L V8 (which got MPG in the high teens) with a ~3.5L V6 turbo diesel. The mileage went to low/mid 30's, and the performance was nearly identical. That would be the perfect for my Toyota Sequoia. What many folks don't realize, is that other than particulate, modern diesels actually have LESS harmful emissions than their gasoline brethren in several categories. _SIGH_. -sc -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) 5 Cylinder Direct Injection Turbo Diesel with Intercooler ECU Controlled 122 bhp (120 PS, 90 kW) at 4200 rpm 300 Nm (221 lb.ft) of torque at 1950 rpm 2200kg (ish in weight) -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: 29 June 2009 16:52 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) What's the specs on a TD5 power plant? -sc -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) Can I chip in with a non American vehicle? Land Rover 110 Td5 full time 4x4 139k miles and 28mpg around town and 32/33mpg on a run. 2500cc 5 Cylinder. Manual. -Original Message- From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: 29 June 2009 09:41 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) Makes me so proud of my ~60MPG @ 70MPH in my new Mini Cooper Diesel (and ~40MPG @ 105MPH, but I never did that, honestly). /loves fuel bill. -Original Message- From: bounce-8579465-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce- 8579465-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Ben Scott Sent: 26 June 2009 16:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Ben Scottmailvor...@gmail.com wrote: Amazingly enough, doing 80 MPH in 5th gear yields lower MPG than doing 65 MPH in 5th gear. :-) On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Micheal Espinola Jrmichealespin...@gmail.com wrote: I believe it. I've def. had cars that had lower MPG at 75+. I've never seen savings at 55. Gah, I'm an idiot. I reversed the intended sense in my statement. I was trying to be sarcastic with the Amazingly, and so reinforced the confusion. MPG is better at 65 MPH than 80 MPH. How much, I'm not sure, but I know I can use less gas if I drive less aggressively. I do tend to drive aggressively. I also haven't had the plugs changed in too long. And I'm an AC junky. So I typically get between 21 and 25 MPG in my 9-year-old Forrester. On all-highway trips when it was new, 28 to 30 MPG, easily. 80 MPH is pushing the engine a bit, I think. Not oh my God it's going to explode, but it's starting to whine a little. I got it up to just over 90 MPH once, then concern for both road safety and the engine won over and I backed off. The speedometer goes up to 120 MPH but I think that's being optimistic. 90 was already getting close to redline, and the engine sounded like a blender on puree. This is on the 4-cylinder base engine. They have an H6 on some models that's considerably beefier, or so I've read. It's interesting to hear that some cars get lower MPG at higher speeds. I wouldn't have expected that. -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use
RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?)
HP is rated at 215 I think for the GC CRD. -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) Very cool... although the estimated 18/23 mpg seems a little anemic. No HP rating either... although at 376 TQ, I'd guess maybe about 200... that is a little low for a vehicle that size with probably only a 5-spd tranny. -sc -Original Message- From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 10:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) Yes they do. Check it out. http://www.jeep.com/crd/ -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) The test I read was using a Detroit diesel... What engine for a Grand Cherokee? I knew the liberty had a small 4-cyl diesel, but wasn't aware that the GC had a diesel option, at least here in the states... -sc -Original Message- From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) I bet this could have been the Jeep power plants. I drove the Grand Cherokee with the diesel and the 5.7 Hemi. The diesels torque was very impressive. The Hemi was the one we chose to buy. At the time diesel was over a dollar more a gallon than gas and the Hemi was such a nice motor. -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) Man, I'd love to have that plant in mid-size SUV. There are few attractive small diesels in the US, but those that are available often don't make their way in to passenger vehicles, where the emissions regulations are far more strict than the light-duty truck market, which is where you find the majority of diesels here. I read about one test that replaced the 4.7L V8 (which got MPG in the high teens) with a ~3.5L V6 turbo diesel. The mileage went to low/mid 30's, and the performance was nearly identical. That would be the perfect for my Toyota Sequoia. What many folks don't realize, is that other than particulate, modern diesels actually have LESS harmful emissions than their gasoline brethren in several categories. _SIGH_. -sc -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) 5 Cylinder Direct Injection Turbo Diesel with Intercooler ECU Controlled 122 bhp (120 PS, 90 kW) at 4200 rpm 300 Nm (221 lb.ft) of torque at 1950 rpm 2200kg (ish in weight) -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: 29 June 2009 16:52 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) What's the specs on a TD5 power plant? -sc -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) Can I chip in with a non American vehicle? Land Rover 110 Td5 full time 4x4 139k miles and 28mpg around town and 32/33mpg on a run. 2500cc 5 Cylinder. Manual. -Original Message- From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: 29 June 2009 09:41 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) Makes me so proud of my ~60MPG @ 70MPH in my new Mini Cooper Diesel (and ~40MPG @ 105MPH, but I never did that, honestly). /loves fuel bill. -Original Message- From: bounce-8579465-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce- 8579465-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Ben Scott Sent: 26 June 2009 16:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Ben Scottmailvor...@gmail.com wrote: Amazingly enough, doing 80 MPH in 5th gear yields lower MPG than doing 65 MPH in 5th gear. :-) On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Micheal Espinola Jrmichealespin...@gmail.com wrote: I believe it. I've def. had cars that had lower MPG at 75+. I've never seen savings at 55. Gah, I'm an idiot. I reversed the intended sense
RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?)
Yes they do. Check it out. http://www.jeep.com/crd/ -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) The test I read was using a Detroit diesel... What engine for a Grand Cherokee? I knew the liberty had a small 4-cyl diesel, but wasn't aware that the GC had a diesel option, at least here in the states... -sc -Original Message- From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) I bet this could have been the Jeep power plants. I drove the Grand Cherokee with the diesel and the 5.7 Hemi. The diesels torque was very impressive. The Hemi was the one we chose to buy. At the time diesel was over a dollar more a gallon than gas and the Hemi was such a nice motor. -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) Man, I'd love to have that plant in mid-size SUV. There are few attractive small diesels in the US, but those that are available often don't make their way in to passenger vehicles, where the emissions regulations are far more strict than the light-duty truck market, which is where you find the majority of diesels here. I read about one test that replaced the 4.7L V8 (which got MPG in the high teens) with a ~3.5L V6 turbo diesel. The mileage went to low/mid 30's, and the performance was nearly identical. That would be the perfect for my Toyota Sequoia. What many folks don't realize, is that other than particulate, modern diesels actually have LESS harmful emissions than their gasoline brethren in several categories. _SIGH_. -sc -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) 5 Cylinder Direct Injection Turbo Diesel with Intercooler ECU Controlled 122 bhp (120 PS, 90 kW) at 4200 rpm 300 Nm (221 lb.ft) of torque at 1950 rpm 2200kg (ish in weight) -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: 29 June 2009 16:52 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) What's the specs on a TD5 power plant? -sc -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) Can I chip in with a non American vehicle? Land Rover 110 Td5 full time 4x4 139k miles and 28mpg around town and 32/33mpg on a run. 2500cc 5 Cylinder. Manual. -Original Message- From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: 29 June 2009 09:41 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) Makes me so proud of my ~60MPG @ 70MPH in my new Mini Cooper Diesel (and ~40MPG @ 105MPH, but I never did that, honestly). /loves fuel bill. -Original Message- From: bounce-8579465-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce- 8579465-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Ben Scott Sent: 26 June 2009 16:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Ben Scottmailvor...@gmail.com wrote: Amazingly enough, doing 80 MPH in 5th gear yields lower MPG than doing 65 MPH in 5th gear. :-) On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Micheal Espinola Jrmichealespin...@gmail.com wrote: I believe it. I've def. had cars that had lower MPG at 75+. I've never seen savings at 55. Gah, I'm an idiot. I reversed the intended sense in my statement. I was trying to be sarcastic with the Amazingly, and so reinforced the confusion. MPG is better at 65 MPH than 80 MPH. How much, I'm not sure, but I know I can use less gas if I drive less aggressively. I do tend to drive aggressively. I also haven't had the plugs changed in too long. And I'm an AC junky. So I typically get between 21 and 25 MPG in my 9-year-old Forrester. On all-highway trips when it was new, 28 to 30 MPG, easily. 80 MPH is pushing the engine a bit, I think. Not oh my God it's going to explode, but it's starting to whine a little. I got it up to just over 90 MPH once, then concern for both road safety and the engine won over and I backed off. The speedometer goes up to 120 MPH but I think that's being
RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?)
In the west burbs of Chicago Diesel is a bit cheaper than regular gas the last time I looked. From: Don Kuhlman [mailto:drkuhl...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 2:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) Reg. 2.63 at Costco Not sure about diesel right now Northwest Indiana near Chicago From: Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 2:35:56 PM Subject: Re: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) Since we're on the subject of fuel efficiency, I was curious what gas/diesel prices are in your area. Reg. Unleaded = $2.89 Diesel = $3.29 Anchorage, Alaska - Sean On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Dang - I considered a Mini Cooper when buying my Kia, but the cargo capacity wasn't there and it was more expensive. A diesel would be nice, fer sher. Kurt On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:40, Sobey, Richard Ar.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: Makes me so proud of my ~60MPG @ 70MPH in my new Mini Cooper Diesel (and ~40MPG @ 105MPH, but I never did that, honestly). /loves fuel bill. -Original Message- From: bounce-8579465-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8579465-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Ben Scott Sent: 26 June 2009 16:47 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Ben Scottmailvor...@gmail.com wrote: Amazingly enough, doing 80 MPH in 5th gear yields lower MPG than doing 65 MPH in 5th gear. :-) On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Micheal Espinola Jrmichealespin...@gmail.com wrote: I believe it. I've def. had cars that had lower MPG at 75+. I've never seen savings at 55. Gah, I'm an idiot. I reversed the intended sense in my statement. I was trying to be sarcastic with the Amazingly, and so reinforced the confusion. MPG is better at 65 MPH than 80 MPH. How much, I'm not sure, but I know I can use less gas if I drive less aggressively. I do tend to drive aggressively. I also haven't had the plugs changed in too long. And I'm an AC junky. So I typically get between 21 and 25 MPG in my 9-year-old Forrester. On all-highway trips when it was new, 28 to 30 MPG, easily. 80 MPH is pushing the engine a bit, I think. Not oh my God it's going to explode, but it's starting to whine a little. I got it up to just over 90 MPH once, then concern for both road safety and the engine won over and I backed off. The speedometer goes up to 120 MPH but I think that's being optimistic. 90 was already getting close to redline, and the engine sounded like a blender on puree. This is on the 4-cylinder base engine. They have an H6 on some models that's considerably beefier, or so I've read. It's interesting to hear that some cars get lower MPG at higher speeds. I wouldn't have expected that. -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?)
I'm sorry ME2 but this is pretty lame. There are too many different US and foreign auto companies to make this generalization. I'm sure you can cite examples of what you are trying to say but there are many examples of cars that fit the description larger body lines, more sway, less control that are made by non US companies. That sounds to me like you are describing most of Toyota's lineup. Look, I'm not trying to start some kind of flame war or anything like that but I really have a problem with your last statement. With the economy the way it is and so many US citizens without jobs why wouldn't people want to try and help by buying local. I don't accept the argument about quality anymore. I guess it is all good while WE have a job right? -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) I have to disagree. I believe its that they dont design and assemble cars well enough (as a whole) is what got them into trouble. As an example, many cars manufactured in the past 5 years still only being good in a straight line with inadequate braking and cornering abilities in comparison to the rest of the world market. Never mind being less fuel efficient. Larger body lines, more sway, less control, ugg. I grew up on street racing American muscle cars as a non-seat-belted passenger in my father's hot rods, racing light-to-light old-school style. I love the Camaro's and Mustang's he owned, as well as the ones I did when I became of age. But I have no interest in buying American anymore. Its mostly inferior tech and parts. And I dont buy inferior. -- ME2 On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Kurt Buffkurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/6/25 Michael B. Smith mich...@owa.smithcons.com GSKs business is pharma (and I bet using that word will cause this email to be blocked by some people). They develop, pipeline, and market drugs. Not email. Not collaboration software. IT, other than IT that helps them develop, pipeline, and market drugs isn't their core competency. Let someone who does it well do it for them. That philosophy is what got the US auto industry in heaps of trouble. We design and assemble cars, we don't make car parts is not a viable business model. Kurt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?)
I just found 56 in my local area for sale with less than 200k. most have less than 50k. Do I win a prize or something? -Original Message- From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 4:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) Agreed. I started wondering why I was paying for a car that wore out after 100K even when I religeously followed the scheduled maintenance. Lifters tapping, a transmission rebuild, head gaskets leaking, etc. I spoke with owners of import cars and they typically didn't have those problems (though I did know a guy who had a Kia in which the transmission failed just after the warranty expired). I just bought a Subaru a few months ago. I love that car. Nothing on the American marketing drives like it. I challenge anyone to find a used Subaru for sale with less than 200K. They are far and few between. And the kicker is, I overheard someone the other day saying how better made American cars are now than in the 70's. And he was right, but they're still not a good as the imports. Who's fault is that? -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) This is also true, along with the insane unions they suffered with and the financial overhead they represented. All were factors, and all together killed Detroit: Lack of vision and innovation Insane union overhead Outsourcing of too many functions (which I actually consider part of the lack of vision) And there were probably other issues as well, but that probably covers the majority of it. I bought a 2002 Kia Rio Cinco in August of 2002, and it came with a 100k/60k mile warranty. I'm still driving it. It cost me roughly $13k out the door, taxes, licensing, everything (manual transmission, air, no power anything - a very basic car.) I still get 30mpg after 110k miles. Nothing that Detroit built at the time came close at the time, and I doubt anything they sell currently does either, though I haven't looked to say for sure. I'm not looking back either. Kurt On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 13:33, Micheal Espinola Jr michealespin...@gmail.com wrote: I have to disagree. I believe its that they dont design and assemble cars well enough (as a whole) is what got them into trouble. As an example, many cars manufactured in the past 5 years still only being good in a straight line with inadequate braking and cornering abilities in comparison to the rest of the world market. Never mind being less fuel efficient. Larger body lines, more sway, less control, ugg. I grew up on street racing American muscle cars as a non-seat-belted passenger in my father's hot rods, racing light-to-light old-school style. I love the Camaro's and Mustang's he owned, as well as the ones I did when I became of age. But I have no interest in buying American anymore. Its mostly inferior tech and parts. And I dont buy inferior. -- ME2 On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Kurt Buffkurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/6/25 Michael B. Smith mich...@owa.smithcons.com GSKs business is pharma (and I bet using that word will cause this email to be blocked by some people). They develop, pipeline, and market drugs. Not email. Not collaboration software. IT, other than IT that helps them develop, pipeline, and market drugs isn't their core competency. Let someone who does it well do it for them. That philosophy is what got the US auto industry in heaps of trouble. We design and assemble cars, we don't make car parts is not a viable business model. Kurt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Single Instance Storage ratio survey
3.35 -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 12:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Single Instance Storage ratio survey Hi all, A thread on nt-sysadmin has got me wondering. Just how much do people actually benefit from SIS (Single Instance Storage) in Exchange? Would people be willing to share their SIS ratio from their Exchange server(s)? Approximations are fine. For multi-server organizations, an average or just picking a server at random would still inform. I'll start: SIS ratio = 5.6 You can discover the SIS ratio by: 1. Open Performance Monitor (PERFMON.EXE) 2. Select System Monitor on the left 3. Right-click the graph on the right, and pick Add Counters 4. For Performance Object, select MSExchangeIS Mailbox (or similar) 5. Select the Single Instance Ratio counter in the list on the left 6. Select the _ Total instance in the list on the right 7. Click Add 8. If needed, select the resulting counter in the list at the bottom of the graph 9. Look at the Last value reported for that counter -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Total messages handled by Exchange
cool From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Total messages handled by Exchange I run a PS script that does this. It runs as a scheduled task in the early am, pulls the message tracking logs for the previous day, and reads through the log entries and accumulates the message counts into a csv. At the end of the month, it pulls all the daily csv's back in and creates a monthly total report. I'm doing it per user, and splitting it out between internal and external for both sent and received, as both message counts and total bytes, so what you're after should be considerably easier if all you're after is just message counts. From: Barsodi.John [mailto:john.bars...@igt.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 11:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Total messages handled by Exchange So I have a request from my management to start tracking total Messages handled by Exchange on a monthly basis. I know there are software packages like Quest MessageStats that will easily produce this for me, however we have $0 in the budget for this. Wondering if anyone has had to produce this type of data and how they went about it? I'm running Exchange 2007 SP1 and have 10 Hub Transport servers across our Enterprise and I have journaling enabled for our Archive system. Our Archive System reports unique/deduplicated messages, not total messages that would see transport in Exchange. Any ideas would be helpful. TIA. - John Barsodi ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OT: Very Important Swine Flu Tip
The white zone is for unloading and loading passengers only. From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT: Very Important Swine Flu Tip Stop calling me Shirley! On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Rob Bonfiglio robbonfig...@gmail.com wrote: Ever seen a grown man naked? On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr michealespin...@gmail.com wrote: Ever been in a Turkish prison? -- ME2 On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote: No, but I held a local government job for 9 years. Does that count? From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 7:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: Very Important Swine Flu Tip Ever spend all day, particularly a windy one, loading and dragging a manure spreader around a pasture? From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 7:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: Very Important Swine Flu Tip That's because farmers and ranchers have enough sense to wash their hands before they pick up their sandwich... :-) From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: Very Important Swine Flu Tip Ever notice that when you read about someone getting deathly ill from eColi, it's somebody that lives in the city, but you never hear about farmers and ranchers who work around cattle and manure spreaders every day getting sick from it? From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OT: Very Important Swine Flu Tip +1 My science teacher in HS back in the mid-to-late 80's taught me the hows and whys that [the over use of] anti-bacterial products would probably be the death of a lot of people. Doctors and scientists know this, yet industry and the [not so] mighty $ keep pushing us toward self-extinction. -- ME2 On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: Jay Dale jd...@xpresstel.com wrote: All I know is, the stores here in Houston are running out of Anti-bacterial products left and right. That's scary. Not the swine flu -- the fact that so many people think antibiotics will do anything for a viral infection. We laugh at the snake oil peddlers of the 1800's, saying we've come so far, that people would never be fooled by that today, but snake oil would be just as effective. Below are a few facts, with references. Those so interested may want to forward this to others. Kind of the like the opposite of your typical Internet chain letter -- knowledge instead of rumor. * Antibiotics do nothing against the viruses that cause the common cold and the flu. Antibiotics do, however, become less effective when overused. So by taking antibiotics for viral infections, you're actually decreasing overall health. http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/community/know-and-do.htm * The US CDC recommends the following as the major action people should take: Wash your hands, especially before eating or after inter-personal contact. Note the distinct lack of drugs or isolation in that recommendation. http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/swineflu_you.htm * The regular flu kills approximately 36,000 people per year in the United States alone. This latest H1N1 strain can infect both pigs and humans, which is less common, so it gets classified as swine flu. The media goes bonkers over this because they can't report the same old 36,000 deaths/year stat as news, but they *can* report 150 swine flu deaths as news. http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/us_flu-related_deaths.htm * By WHO definitions, pandemic does not mean everybody is going to die, it means they're seeing a disease manifest in multiple regions. With modern air travel, this is not really an exceptional situation. http://www.who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/phase/en/index.html -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the
RE: Exmon Available for Exchange 2007
I bet that got old real quick. From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:mplahtin...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exmon Available for Exchange 2007 Years ago I had a boss that when every I came across a hard problem he would use the line How hard could it be? It's windows, it's just point and click On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Campbell, Rob rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net wrote: How hard can double-tapping an .msi file be? From: William Lefkovics [mailto:will...@lefkovics.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 12:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exmon Available for Exchange 2007 Well, ExMon itself is version 6.5, but all the support around it is old. You have to install it to get to the documentation that tells you how to install it. J From: William Lefkovics [mailto:will...@lefkovics.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 9:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exmon Available for Exchange 2007 Or wait until they put it up there. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 8:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exmon Available for Exchange 2007 Two years laterExmon (Exchange Server User Monitor) has finally been updated (publically) for Exchange 2007. Grab it here: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID= 9a49c22e-e0c7-4b7c-acef-729d48af7bc9 Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael Monitoring Exchange w/OpsMgr now available http://snurl.com/45ppf ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: BLOCING PORN SITES
OpenDNS is free and it will block the sites. Reporting is very limited at the moment. From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 9:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: BLOCING PORN SITES My boss has asked me to look into software that will block porn sites. The concern is a legal one, and I fully understand. So, is there software that wil just block porn sites in general? Is there software to monitor our staff workstations that access porn sites and report it to the administrator (me)? Also, is there software that monitors email for porn content? Murray ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Setting another user's OOO
How about OWA? From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 10:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Setting another user's OOO I need to set the Out Of Office for a user that has departed. Do I have to login to a computer as that user to do this? Joe Heaton AISA Employment Training Panel 1100 J Street, 4th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 327-5276 jhea...@etp.ca.gov ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OT: Social Networking
Cameron, It would be much more helpful if you included text from the posts that you are replying to so others can follow the conversation. Eric From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com] Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: Social Networking Installed it to see what it was about... but then uninstalled it due to system resources. It's a neat tool if you have enough resources to run it. _ Cameron Cooper IT Director - CompTIA A+ Certified Aurico Reports, Ine Phone: 847-890-4021Fax: 847-255-1896 ccoo...@aurico.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list?
Out of Facility -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list? My last - how the heck did Out Of Office get abbreviated as OOF? (Out Of Foffice?) -Original Message- From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 12:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list? I think I'll add a rule sending any further messages on this topic to the bit-bucket... -Original Message- From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 12:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list? In outlook, I used to have a rule. When receive message from [whatever list] move to folder and Stop Processing more rules. This seemed to have prevented me from sending out corporate required OOOs. Steven On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:47 AM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote: Don't think it works on 2007. If it's 2003 here's a nice little add-on that helps http://www.ivasoft.biz/selectiveoof.shtml John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fa (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt) Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list? http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=825370 That works with 2003, nfi if it works with 2007 S -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list? I don't know who's defining this particular best practice, but I can tell you that the overwhelming majority of companies I do business with do it the way I do it. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list? The blame falls on you, for not following best business practices. On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 09:01, John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote: I don't want a second mailbox, but OOOs need to go to people who send me messages regardless of whether they're in my contact list. I know this issue has come up before... Where exactly does the fault lie with this issue? Is Exchange doing things wrong? Or is Lyris? Or is this just how SMTP is designed, and there really is no blame? -Original Message- From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 11:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OOF's was RE: Can some one remove me from this list? Second mailbox for yourself, subscribe to lists with that. Or Outlook 2007 and have the out of organization messages sent only to those in your contact list if that works for you..it is in the OOO setup area of Outlook 2007. -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 11:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Can some one remove me from this list? But I don't want to do that; external users need to know when I'm out of the office. -Original Message- From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Can some one remove me from this list? Exchange 2007 with Outlook 2007 makes it very easy. There are separate Out Of Office settings for internal vs. external. Just don't turn on OOO for external users. TVK -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 5:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Can some one remove me from this list? Guilty! But in all fairness, doesn't Exchange 2007 make it a bit tougher to prevent this than 2003 did? I seem to recall that 2003 had a registry hack for minimizing this, but 2007 doesn't have this. Plus, this distribution list could be configured such that those notices don't get sent to the list. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 9:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can some one remove me from this list? On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Sobey, Richard A r.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: And looking at the title of
RE: Can some one remove me from this list?
Can this one die then? Please From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Can some one remove me from this list? I've seen the error of my ways. I *am* using e-mail wrong. Have been for years. Thanks for convincing me. From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can some one remove me from this list? But I don't want to do that; external users need to know when I'm out of the office. - John Hornbuckle The problem is, there are 67 school districts in Florida and any number of people from any of them may contact me. Other state agencies from DOE to the Auditor General's office also contact me, and those are big bureaucracies with lots of employees. It wouldn't be practical to try to add them all to my contacts. -John Hornbuckle Pot, kettle, black. I was not being arrogant, I was saying you're using email wrong. If you think it's arrogant for me to say that, I find your comments to have a similar air about them. You're so important that you can't be bothered to manage OOO's to other people because some other external entity out there might need to contact you. On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:50 PM, John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote: I'm up for a good disagreement any time. But arrogance? Not so much. From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can some one remove me from this list? Ok, then you're not using email correctly. Even though email is nearly instantaneous, urgent communication should take place over the phone. I harp on employees all the time that email is not a substitution for more direct client contact. You should realize that your email might not ever make it to the intended recipient for whatever reason. At least with a telephone call follow-up you know much more, such as if the person is actually available to receive it and if you spoke to them if they received it and maybe even had a chance to read it and had been forumulating a response, but hey they're glad you called so you could discuss it more in depth. I do not OOO, my organization is flat enough that people know when I'm out on vacation or sick, or whatever. The clients I work with call me when something is urgent, and I do the same when I find out something that they need to know. I like to think of an OOO as a notification to the original emailer that I'm doing other business, which is more important than your business right now. Normally, clients don't know if you haven't seen their email right away, an OOO tells them that you won't see the email right away and that there is another client more important. While a client may academically understand that we service other clients, not one of them wants to think of themselves as the small client or the invaluable client, or at least less valuable than any other client. An OOO can and does reinforce the fact that the client is not the center of the universe. Right or wrong, there is something to be said for having a client-centric approach to business. On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:23 PM, John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote: Sigh. We don't live in a bubble here. I regularly communicate with the Florida Department of Education, other school districts, and vendors. If I e-mail any of them when they're out, I like to get an OOO so that I know when I can expect a reply, or whom to contact if my issue is urgent. I'm assuming-crazy as this may sound-that they might appreciate the same treatment. From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can some one remove me from this list? I have worked for a school district, and I still don't know why external users would need to know I'm out. -Jonathan On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:14 PM, John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote: If you're unsure, then you've probably never worked for a school district. -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Can some one remove me from this list? And from looking at your email domain name, you are probably not in a sales or external customer service position so I'm unsure of the reason EXTERNAL users need to know when your out. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Can some one remove me from this list? Heh. Not unless you're a one-man shop. If there is anyone else in your office, a co-worker should have delegate rights, and monitor your mail. It's not
RE: Outlook Login problem
Forget about Outlook anywhere and go be with your wife :-). From: Chris Blair [mailto:chris_bl...@identisys.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Login problem Sorry, my fault. I feel like I am going a 100mph in circles right now. My wife is due with our baby boy in 3 weeks, but she is calling saying she is having contractions. So far, they are about 10 -15 minutes apart. This all started last night while he was trying to use Outlook anywhere. Today he is in the office and I went through the steps I mentioned below. I have setup a mail profile for him on multiple computers now with the same result, a continuous prompting for username/password. I also tried granting myself 'Full Access' to his mailbox, and then opening his mailbox using Outlook, Open, Other User's folder, while I was logged in. I get the error 'Cannot display folder. The inbox Folder cannot be found'. So at this point, he can login to OWA, but not Outlook. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Outlook Login problem Well, you said in your original post it was Outlook at home. On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Chris Blair chris_bl...@identisys.com wrote: No VPN. This is happening on the internal network to only this user. Thanks, Chris Blair www.IdentiSys.com chris_bl...@identisys.com 952-294-1200 x270 From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 1:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Login problem Coming in through VPN? Looks like http is coming through okay, could it be a firewall issue on his home system blocking email? From: Chris Blair [mailto:chris_bl...@identisys.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Login problem Having some problems with an Exchange user. We are running Exchange 2007, with the all updates. The day started out by this user (our CEO of course) not being able to login to Outlook at home using Outlook Anywhere. Next we tried OWA, which gave an error saying it couldn't open the mailbox. I ended up deleting his AD account, creating a new user with the same name and then reconnecting the Exchange mailbox to the new account. This then allowed him to login to OWA, but not Outlook. Outlook continues to prompt for a username and password. I then type in his AD credentials, and after a second the login box pops back up. I have tried different version of Outlook, 2000, XP, 2003, and 2007, all prompt for a username and password. No matter what I enter it always comes back to a login prompt. Thanks! -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Outlook Login problem
I guess that is the one benefit of my wife having a C. I think I would loose all of my hair having to wait it out like you are. Congrats and good luck to you and the wife! From: Chris Blair [mailto:chris_bl...@identisys.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Login problem Thanks, I will be. The doctor says not to come in until the contractions are 3 minutes apart. I am 10 minutes from home and home is 1 minute from the hospital. So far, she is OK and relaxing now. I am more nervous about it then she is. Thanks, Chris Blair www.IdentiSys.com chris_bl...@identisys.com 952-294-1200 x270 From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 1:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Login problem Forget about Outlook anywhere and go be with your wife :-). From: Chris Blair [mailto:chris_bl...@identisys.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Login problem Sorry, my fault. I feel like I am going a 100mph in circles right now. My wife is due with our baby boy in 3 weeks, but she is calling saying she is having contractions. So far, they are about 10 -15 minutes apart. This all started last night while he was trying to use Outlook anywhere. Today he is in the office and I went through the steps I mentioned below. I have setup a mail profile for him on multiple computers now with the same result, a continuous prompting for username/password. I also tried granting myself 'Full Access' to his mailbox, and then opening his mailbox using Outlook, Open, Other User's folder, while I was logged in. I get the error 'Cannot display folder. The inbox Folder cannot be found'. So at this point, he can login to OWA, but not Outlook. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Outlook Login problem Well, you said in your original post it was Outlook at home. On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Chris Blair chris_bl...@identisys.com wrote: No VPN. This is happening on the internal network to only this user. Thanks, Chris Blair www.IdentiSys.com chris_bl...@identisys.com 952-294-1200 x270 From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 1:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Login problem Coming in through VPN? Looks like http is coming through okay, could it be a firewall issue on his home system blocking email? From: Chris Blair [mailto:chris_bl...@identisys.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Login problem Having some problems with an Exchange user. We are running Exchange 2007, with the all updates. The day started out by this user (our CEO of course) not being able to login to Outlook at home using Outlook Anywhere. Next we tried OWA, which gave an error saying it couldn't open the mailbox. I ended up deleting his AD account, creating a new user with the same name and then reconnecting the Exchange mailbox to the new account. This then allowed him to login to OWA, but not Outlook. Outlook continues to prompt for a username and password. I then type in his AD credentials, and after a second the login box pops back up. I have tried different version of Outlook, 2000, XP, 2003, and 2007, all prompt for a username and password. No matter what I enter it always comes back to a login prompt. Thanks! -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Cannot synch Exchange Contacts.
Hi all, I am having a problem with Outlook 2K7 and Exchange 2003 SP2 both fully patched. This morning I deleted my OST because I was getting an synch error in OL after I deleted one of my RSS feeds. After I opened OL all of my contacts have been deleted. I am getting the following in my Sync Issues folder; 'Contacts' 14:29:49 Downloading from server 'Exchange server name' 14:29:51 The following message had an error and synchronization of it was skipped (0x000456): 14:29:51 person name One line was created for each contact in my list. I have gone and imported my contacts from a PST but when I fire up my laptop (a second computer with OL 2003) when it syncs with Exchange it will delete all the contacts in the folder on both the PC and the laptop. I don't know if I should export my mailbox to a PST and delete it from Exchange and recreate it or what. Any advice will be greatly appreciated. Eric Wittersheim American Academy of Sleep Medicine One Westbrook Corporate Center Suite 920 Westchester, IL. 60185 Ph. 708-492-0930 Fax. 708-492-0943 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Cannot synch Exchange Contacts.
I forgot to mention I even created a brand new contacts folder and the same thing happens. So the contacts get deleted from Contacts and my new Eric's Contacts folder. From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 10:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Cannot synch Exchange Contacts. Hi all, I am having a problem with Outlook 2K7 and Exchange 2003 SP2 both fully patched. This morning I deleted my OST because I was getting an synch error in OL after I deleted one of my RSS feeds. After I opened OL all of my contacts have been deleted. I am getting the following in my Sync Issues folder; 'Contacts' 14:29:49 Downloading from server 'Exchange server name' 14:29:51 The following message had an error and synchronization of it was skipped (0x000456): 14:29:51 person name One line was created for each contact in my list. I have gone and imported my contacts from a PST but when I fire up my laptop (a second computer with OL 2003) when it syncs with Exchange it will delete all the contacts in the folder on both the PC and the laptop. I don't know if I should export my mailbox to a PST and delete it from Exchange and recreate it or what. Any advice will be greatly appreciated. Eric Wittersheim American Academy of Sleep Medicine One Westbrook Corporate Center Suite 920 Westchester, IL. 60185 Ph. 708-492-0930 Fax. 708-492-0943 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Changed the FQDN on the Exchange SMTP
Do I need to reboot the server for the changes to take effect? Eric Wittersheim American Academy of Sleep Medicine One Westbrook Corporate Center Suite 920 Westchester, IL. 60185 Ph. 708-492-0930 Fax. 708-492-0943 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Changed the FQDN on the Exchange SMTP
Never mind. Got it. From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 3:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Changed the FQDN on the Exchange SMTP Do I need to reboot the server for the changes to take effect? Eric Wittersheim American Academy of Sleep Medicine One Westbrook Corporate Center Suite 920 Westchester, IL. 60185 Ph. 708-492-0930 Fax. 708-492-0943 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Mailbox Limit Notifications
That's what we do as well. From: Bill Songstad (WCUL) [mailto:administra...@waleague.org] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mailbox Limit Notifications I've taken a different tack when notifying my users. I set exchange to notify them every 15 minutes twice a day. I give them a break in the morning, and at the end of the day, but from 9:30-11:30 and 1:30 to 3:30 they get hammered. Very few people ignore the warnings for long. And those that do, c'mon, nobody can say they weren't given ample warnings. Bill From: Roger Wright [mailto:rwri...@evatone.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 2:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mailbox Limit Notifications It's not a major deal for us, but I'd rather make a phone call reminding them than have them deal with the hassle of doing it under pressure. 95% of my users are excellent, but, as always, it's the remaining 5% who seem to have 95% of the problems. Roger Wright Network Administrator Evatone, Inc. 727.572.7076 x388 _ From: Kat Collins [mailto:messagel...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 4:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Mailbox Limit Notifications I tend to treat my user community like grownups. I give them information, give them sufficient time between when they start getting warnings and when they can no longer send mail, then train them on how to help themselves. I do not do individual rescues unless the person is travelling and is not a regular traveler. In other words, if this is part of the person's normal work routine, then they need to figure out how to deal... Start as you mean to continue... On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Steven Peck sep...@gmail.com wrote: Wait, why are 'you' scrambling to help them clean up their mess? This is disruptive behavior and is bad training for your user population. If they can't send they can't work and their managers have to know that they may be having training issues if this is a re-occurring problem with select users. Perhaps a quarterly IT Newsletter to managers on #1 avoidable ticket/issues they could partner with IT to address in their department meetings? Now, you may very well be unable to effect a culture change in your company. Ah well. :) If you have standardized limits you could just script and run a mailbox size report every morning and then sort by size and decide whether to intervene on the ones close to the limits. A friendly phone call on why they shouldn't ignore the warnings ( you don't have them set to the same as the recieve size right?) Steven Peck http://www.blkmtn.org http://www.blkmtn.org/ On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.org wrote: If it is not a bunch of users you could have them set up a rule in their outlook so when they get it the message is then forwarded to you From: Roger Wright [mailto:rwri...@evatone.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 2:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mailbox Limit Notifications Exchange 2003 SP2 I have mailbox limits configured and the users receive Inbox notifications when they reach the limits, however many tend to ignore these until they can no longer send, then we have to scramble to help them clean up their mailbox. How can I also be notified when user limits have been reached? Any free tools/configurations to do this? Roger Wright Network Administrator Evatone, Inc. 727.572.7076 x388 _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Kat Collins - The Email of the species is more powerful than the Mail! ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Download too big for a DVD
Double layer DVD? From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:sj...@amico.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 1:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Download too big for a DVD Ok I finally was able to download Exchange 2007 from eOpen Download site. However it's almost 6Gb's and a DVD is only 4.5Gb! How am I supposed to burn a DVD from the ISO? __ Stefan Jafs This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Amico Corporation. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: VSS and Exchange - The Basics
Same here. From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 2:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: VSS and Exchange - The Basics Can't reach your site from here, is it meJ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: VSS and Exchange - The Basics After my Exchange Backup presentation at Fall Connections'08, a number of people asked me to write up my notes from the talk where I discussed how VSS works with Exchange. I finally got around to it today. I hope someone enjoys. http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2009/01/14/volume -shadow-copy-services-vss-and-exchange-the-basics.aspx Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: VSS and Exchange - The Basics
I kept refreshing the page and after the second try the page loaded. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 2:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: VSS and Exchange - The Basics It's up, even as y'all can't get to it. It would be good to see a tracert TheEssentialExchange.com to see where it's failing for you. Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:ewittersh...@aasmnet.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: VSS and Exchange - The Basics Same here. From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 2:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: VSS and Exchange - The Basics Can't reach your site from here, is it meJ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: VSS and Exchange - The Basics After my Exchange Backup presentation at Fall Connections'08, a number of people asked me to write up my notes from the talk where I discussed how VSS works with Exchange. I finally got around to it today. I hope someone enjoys. http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2009/01/14/volume -shadow-copy-services-vss-and-exchange-the-basics.aspx Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Bulk mail services?
Ben, In a nutshell that is what their tech support said. Eric -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 6:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Bulk mail services? On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Eric Wittersheim ewittersh...@aasmnet.org wrote: It is not sending the email. The errors happen when you are editing your messages/emails. It sounds like CC is tracking web user sessions by IP address, at least in part. Since you're all going through the same proxy server, you all appear to have the same IP address to them. This is bad web programming, of course. They should be using a cookie, or HTTP form fields, or something else to track state. But bad web programming is the rule, not the exception. You might be able to work around their defects by using multiple public IP addresses and doing something to make sure that each session comes from a different IP address. Myself, I'd just tell them they either fix their software or you take your business elsewhere. There's lots of competition in this market; don't reward bad service with repeat business. -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.2/1871 - Release Date: 1/1/2009 5:01 PM ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Bulk mail services?
Constant Contact From: Moss, Sue [mailto:sm...@cas.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 7:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Bulk mail services? Hello and Happy New Year! I'm looking for any feedback anyone has on bulk email services they have used. I'm googling for candidates, but it'd be nice to narrow the playing field a bit with real life experiences. Anyone? TIA ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Bulk mail services?
A little side note about constant contact. We use ISA 2004 as our proxy here and we can only have one person logged into CC at a time (even with separate CC accounts). The session somehow gets screwed up and one persons session will log out the other persons session. I have spoke to CC and they claim there is not a work around for this. I personally think that is crap but what do I know. We have 4 separate CC accounts and each person has to schedule a time slot to work with CC. Pain in the butt. From: Roger Wright [mailto:rwri...@evatone.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 7:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Bulk mail services? Constant Contact usually gets the highest vote count when this question is asked. Our company chose to go with Exact Target and has been satisfied. Roger Wright Network Administrator Evatone, Inc. 727.572.7076 x388 _ From: Moss, Sue [mailto:sm...@cas.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 8:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Bulk mail services? Hello and Happy New Year! I'm looking for any feedback anyone has on bulk email services they have used. I'm googling for candidates, but it'd be nice to narrow the playing field a bit with real life experiences. Anyone? TIA ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Internet cable problems...
I feel for you. What version of GP are you upgrading from and to what version? I have to start planning my upgrade from 9 to 10 coming up here soon. -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 1:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Internet cable problems... According to reports; 3 of 4 internet cables have been damaged Looks like Orange has about the best info so far: http://www.orange.com/en_EN/press/press_releases/cp081219en.html Everyone loves a good terrorist story...let 'em fly. TGIFtho I am stuck with a Great Plains upgrade during a big snowstorm :) ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: .pst file sizes
Derik, You can use Sydi-Server to check what version of Outlook the clients are running. This will not help you if they are using Outlook Express though. From: Derik Peek [mailto:dp...@sctelcofcu.org] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 2:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: .pst file sizes No we don't have the server yet. It will be ordered on December 18th. From: bounce-8316691-8224...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8316691-8224...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Eric Woodford Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: .pst file sizes Do you have an Exchange server currently? You can check the logon field to see what client last connected to a specific mailbox. Otherwise, you might try a WMI script or a tool to skim the workstation registry. On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Derik Peek dp...@sctelcofcu.org wrote: Hi all. I have a question, we are getting ready to make the switch to Exchange at our company. We currently have people running Outlook 2007, Outlook 2003, and Outlook Express. My question is does anyone know of any tools to check to see which version of Outlook everyone is currently on and to give the size of their .pst file if they are running 2003 or 2007? Thanks in advance If you have any questions about this please email or call me. Thank you Derik R. Peek IT Technician SC Telco Federal Credit Union ph : 864.232.5588, ext 2381 fax: 864.271.6264 dp...@sctelcofcu.org mailto:dp...@sctelcofcu.org ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Message headers
Ok, when you have the email open look at the top ribbon. There is Respond, Actions, Junk E-mail, Options, and Find. See the little icon next to Options? Click on that. -Original Message- From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Message headers Ok, maybe I've gone blind, but I'm not seeing what you're talking about. I am using Outlook 2k7. Joe Heaton Employment Training Panel -Original Message- From: Trimmel-Wyss Doris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 5:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Message headers It's much simpler in Outlook 2007 Click on the arrow next to Options in the ribbon . Doris -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 2:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Message headers Open it and go to view options. This works up till 2003. Sadly, in 2007, it's bit tougher (since it's now right-click-message options). Using a preview pane, there's two solutions I've found. The easiest thing is drag the attachment to the desktop and open in my favorite text editor. Yea, you have to ignore the binary cruft. The other way is to drag the attachment up to the message list where it is now just another message. But watch out, when you drag a message to the message list your rules apply. This is why I call the text editor easier I guess it's better than nothing. Anyone know if this issue will be addressed in office 13 ...erm 14? Would be great if the view headers toggle actually did what it said. ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Message headers
Interesting, it worked for me. I tested it from a laptop with Olk2K3 and saved it to my desktop on my Olk2k7 computer. When I opened it I had the Options drop down arrow thingy. -Original Message- From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 12:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Message headers Eric, I've responded offline, but I see where the issue is. With the message in question, it was forwarded to me as an attachment. I then saved that attachment to my desktop. When I open it from the desktop, I don't have that little icon in the bottom right corner of Options... But if I open an original message from inside Outlook, I do have that icon. Joe Heaton Employment Training Panel -Original Message- From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Message headers Ok, when you have the email open look at the top ribbon. There is Respond, Actions, Junk E-mail, Options, and Find. See the little icon next to Options? Click on that. -Original Message- From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Message headers Ok, maybe I've gone blind, but I'm not seeing what you're talking about. I am using Outlook 2k7. Joe Heaton Employment Training Panel -Original Message- From: Trimmel-Wyss Doris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 5:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Message headers It's much simpler in Outlook 2007 Click on the arrow next to Options in the ribbon . Doris -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 2:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Message headers Open it and go to view options. This works up till 2003. Sadly, in 2007, it's bit tougher (since it's now right-click-message options). Using a preview pane, there's two solutions I've found. The easiest thing is drag the attachment to the desktop and open in my favorite text editor. Yea, you have to ignore the binary cruft. The other way is to drag the attachment up to the message list where it is now just another message. But watch out, when you drag a message to the message list your rules apply. This is why I call the text editor easier I guess it's better than nothing. Anyone know if this issue will be addressed in office 13 ...erm 14? Would be great if the view headers toggle actually did what it said. ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Message headers
That is what I am seeing. -Original Message- From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 12:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Message headers Maybe it's just that it's an Undeliverable message. Joe Heaton Employment Training Panel -Original Message- From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Message headers Interesting, it worked for me. I tested it from a laptop with Olk2K3 and saved it to my desktop on my Olk2k7 computer. When I opened it I had the Options drop down arrow thingy. -Original Message- From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 12:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Message headers Eric, I've responded offline, but I see where the issue is. With the message in question, it was forwarded to me as an attachment. I then saved that attachment to my desktop. When I open it from the desktop, I don't have that little icon in the bottom right corner of Options... But if I open an original message from inside Outlook, I do have that icon. Joe Heaton Employment Training Panel -Original Message- From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Message headers Ok, when you have the email open look at the top ribbon. There is Respond, Actions, Junk E-mail, Options, and Find. See the little icon next to Options? Click on that. -Original Message- From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Message headers Ok, maybe I've gone blind, but I'm not seeing what you're talking about. I am using Outlook 2k7. Joe Heaton Employment Training Panel -Original Message- From: Trimmel-Wyss Doris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 5:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Message headers It's much simpler in Outlook 2007 Click on the arrow next to Options in the ribbon . Doris -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 2:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Message headers Open it and go to view options. This works up till 2003. Sadly, in 2007, it's bit tougher (since it's now right-click-message options). Using a preview pane, there's two solutions I've found. The easiest thing is drag the attachment to the desktop and open in my favorite text editor. Yea, you have to ignore the binary cruft. The other way is to drag the attachment up to the message list where it is now just another message. But watch out, when you drag a message to the message list your rules apply. This is why I call the text editor easier I guess it's better than nothing. Anyone know if this issue will be addressed in office 13 ...erm 14? Would be great if the view headers toggle actually did what it said. ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Send on behalf of
Send As permissions in ADUC will let you do this. From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 7:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Send on behalf of Hi We have a user A that has send on Behalf of permissions on a mailbox belonging to User B. They also have full access to the mailbox. When they send an outbound email and change the From to the user B they have permission to send on behalf of the email says From User A sent on behalf of User B. WE would like the email to look as if it has just come from User B. It used to say this until a recent migration of both mailboxes to a new exchange server. Can anyone please point me in the right direction. Regards Kevan Dickinson Network Manager NSF-CMI 23 Lodge Road Hanborough Business Park, Long Hanborough, Oxford, OX29 8SJ, UK T:+44 01993 885661 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.nsf-cmi.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Send on behalf of
It's in the Security Tab about half way down in the list. From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 9:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Send on behalf of Maybe Im being a bit blind here, but ive been to the mailbox rights tab and cant see Send As. We dont have Blackberries, so we are OK on that score. I can see Delete Mailbox Storage Read Permissions Change Permissions Take Ownership Full Mailbox access Associated External account We do have an Advanced tab... Thanks John From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 October 2008 14:36 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Send on behalf of Exchange 2003. You're not changing this permission in Outlook or ESM, this is on the actual account properties in ADUC on the Exchange Advanced tab then click on the Mailbox Rights button and you will see all kinds of permissions. This is also where you have to make sure you BES account has Send As and Receive as permissions for a Blackberry user. On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Ellis, John P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this an Exchange 2003 or 2007 feature? If 2003 where does the option hide? We have a user who has SoBo permissions but would like to do SA permissions John From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 October 2008 14:08 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Send on behalf of This is a permission that is set on the account properties of the mailbox account in question, not a setting done in Outlook. ADUC. On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Don Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the permission you want is Send As rather than Send on Behalf of. - Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld - Original Message - From: Kevan Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Thu Oct 23 06:29:48 2008 Subject: Send on behalf of Hi We have a user A that has send on Behalf of permissions on a mailbox belonging to User B. They also have full access to the mailbox. When they send an outbound email and change the From to the user B they have permission to send on behalf of the email says From User A sent on behalf of User B. WE would like the email to look as if it has just come from User B. It used to say this until a recent migration of both mailboxes to a new exchange server. Can anyone please point me in the right direction. Regards Kevan Dickinson Network Manager NSF-CMI 23 Lodge Road Hanborough Business Park, Long Hanborough, Oxford, OX29 8SJ, UK T:+44 01993 885661 E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W:www.nsf-cmi.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com ** -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Quick Question
As Martin mentioned in a previous post we would need to know how many disks to answer any RAID questions. From: Theochares, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick Question Nobody will ever accuse me of being thorough, it's a small office (35 - 40 users) setup. Have the hardware. Curious if there were any recommendations on partition size and RAID for OS and Exchange data. If that's not enough info., then have at it. Thanks, I think. From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick Question That is where I was going Minimal question = Minimal answer From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick Question P3 133 with 256 MB RAM is the minimum recommended spec isn't it? J Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick Question I say he should get a server with a Pentium IV processor of 800 Mhz, and 2 GB of RAM, with at least 4GB of Hard Drive space. That ought to have him up and running in no time. From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick Question Quick answer: 42 Seriously, this is anything but a quick question. Without knowing anything about your environment we can't begin to help you. We don't know if you have 10 or 10,000 users, 1 or 100 disks, 1 GB or 1 TB of mail, are you running Exchange on a desktop PC or Cray? From: Theochares, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 6:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick Question Migrating to new server in PA office. Recommendations for RAID (i.e. 1, 10) and partition size for a 03 Exchange? George Theochares Campbell Campbell Edwards Conroy Professional Corporation One Constitution Plaza Boston, MA 02129 Tel: (617) 241-3044 Fax: (617) 241-5115 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note : This e-mail contains information from the law firm of Campbell Campbell Edwards Conroy Professional Corporation that may be proprietary, confidential, or protected under the attorney- client privilege or work-product doctrine. This e-mail is intended for the use only of the named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient named above, you are strictly prohibited from reading, disclosing, copying, or distributing this e-mail or its contents, and from taking any action in reliance on the contents of this e-mail. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete this message and respond immediately by e-mail to the author or call 617-241-3000. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpg
RE: Suggestion Requested for a email newsletter
Take a look at Constant Contact http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp -Original Message- From: roger rabus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 9:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Suggestion Requested for a email newsletter My boss ask today our department to setup a Email Newsletter system for our customers(500 to 750) to send out on a monthly basis. I wonder it it easier to manage in house vs outside service. i am pushing to use a outside service, but don't have a clue on how to pick one. so I ask the group who you have used and who you won't use. Also any pitfalls to watch out for. we are running exchange 2003, with this few address would it just as easy to do in house? thanks Roger Rabus Starrco ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: ActiveSync
Look at his settings on his Treo under ActiveSync. You can set the schedule there. BTW. I have not run into this same problem with our Treos and Exchange 2K3. From: Brian Rudnicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 11:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: ActiveSync Hello all. I have a user who uses a Treo to sync his contacts with Outlook 2003. He is using Microsoft ActiveSync. Since he started doing this, he repeatedly opens too many connections to the Exchange server, and then calls to yell at me when he cannot connect to the Exchange server with Outlook because he is over his connection limit. The only way to drop the connections is to restart the System Attendand (which also restarts the IS). Is there a way I can set his client to only Sync on demand? Is there a different fix for this issue? Exchange 2003 SP2. Thanks, Brian R. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Outlook losing favorites
I am seeing the same thing in Outlook 2007. I have not found a fix for it but would love to hear from someone who did. From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 10:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook losing favorites Outlook 2003, Exchange 2003 SP2 All of the users that have public folders in their favorites also shows up in their Calendar/Contacts as a secondary item. The next morning (it seems) the items are still in favorites but *not* in the calendar/contact areas, unless I go back and click on the Favorites under PF and then they will show up again. Anyone know of a patch/fix for this? I don't even know what to look for. Missing favorites in Outlook 2003 talks about a lot of other stuff. Thx ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Recurring Calendar Issue
Just notice it here for one of my reoccurring appointments that I made a long time ago. Another one that was made after the New Year is correct. Exchange 2003 SP 2. From: Yergeau, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Recurring Calendar Issue ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Sluggish performance of Mail Store, Server sitting mostly idle
Trend as your AV perhaps? This happened when we brought a new server online. I don't recall the exact details but an update from Trend fixed the problem. -Original Message- From: Robb Pickinpaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 8:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Sluggish performance of Mail Store, Server sitting mostly idle I have a really odd behavior pattern happening here and I'm sort of at a loss as to how to fix it. All of the sudden starting toward the end of last week (Thursday or Friday) the mail store seems to be acting funny. Outlook connections all over the building are popping the Trying to retrieve information message. To the point where just changing folders in the mailbox can take up to 30 seconds or so. This morning I tried to delete about 1800 messages from a folder in my mailbox and it's taken about 30 minutes and still not done, if the MS status bar is right it will have taken about 40 minutes to delete those messages, and thats just moving them to the deleted items bin, not a shift-delete. Pertinent data: Exchange 2003 SP2 Windows 2003 SP1 2 Dual Core 2.8Ghz Processors 4GB Ram Mailbox Public folder store is on a 4Gb Fiber Channel SAN Priv1.mdb = 130GB Priv1.stm = 51GB We shutdown the system for maintenance on the SAN this weekend, and that apparently has NOT solved the problem. I need some advice as to where the look for the issue. I've toyed with the idea of setting up a second store and migrating users to the new store, but I'm not sure if that will help. We have a possible archiving project in the future as well, but that's not going to help right now. I have mailboxes as large as 9.5 GB and as small as POP3 that don't leave anything on the server. To answer the inevitable question.. no the big mailbox users never delete anything (hence the archiving project). Suggestions, ideas? TIA Robb ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: UceArchive Folder
UCE Archive Explorer works well for me. From: vbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 8:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: UceArchive Folder I turned on IMF a short while ago and have not thought about it util I found thousands of messages filling up the UceArchive Folder. Though I could delete them I would like to review them just to make sure that I am not junking anything important. I Googled and found an article on the MSExchange.Org site describing two utilities to manage it. IMF Archive and IMF Companion. The first was a redirect to gotdotnet.com but this site has been closed down. The other site was still there but with the following: ... I've stopped, temporary, the support and enhancement of IMFcompanion. This is to give me time to update the current VB6 developed edition, to a version that uses the .NET Framework version 2, using VisualStudio 2005. There are several reports of overflow errors which I want to cure before going any further. And I expect this will go away using a more state-of-the-art platform. --- I downloaded it anyway to give it a try and when I opened it immediately recieved overflow errors. Any one have any recommedations on some tool to manage the UceArchive folder? I do not want to have to open thousands of emails with OutlookExpress Thanks ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: List Down?
Too many hung over people recovering from the SB? -Original Message- From: Davies,Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 9:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: List Down? It does seem a bit quite :) -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 February 2008 15:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: List Down? I think so, wait no it's not. On Mon, Feb 4, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Theochares, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ _ This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. Thank You. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
