RE: ninja to vipre

2009-08-27 Thread Joe Heaton
Ok, but the most important point here:

 

 

NO MORE NINJA!?!?!?!?!

 

Aww, man...

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:s...@sunbelt-software.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ninja to vipre

 

Hi Tom,

 

During the rebranding process and the engine swap-out we have not seen

any difference before-and-after in workload on the servers. 

 

Warm regards,


Stu Sjouwerman
Founder, VP Marketing.
P: +1-727-562-0101 ext 218
F: +1-727-562-5199
s...@sunbelt-software.com


  

 

 



From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ninja to vipre

Has anyone already performed the upgrade? If you have done the upgrade,
is there any change to the workload on the server? I just wanted to get
some feedback before I run the upgrade tonight.

 

 

 

Thanks,

 

 

Thomas Gonzalez

Technology Manager

Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas

210.349.2404 phone
210.403.1586 DID

210.349.2666 fax

www.girlscouts-swtx.org http://www.girlscouts-swtx.org/ 

tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org

 

 

 

 

GSSWTs Vision Statement: Our vision is to be a high performing,
girl-focused staff with the desire and skill set to provide the highest
standard of support that enriches, empowers and energizes the local Girl
Scout Movement.  In doing so, we create a lifetime of inspiration
through Girl Scout experiences that are so relevant and inclusive every
girl will want to be a part. 

 

 

.



RE: Activesync issue

2009-07-27 Thread Joe Heaton
So, after enjoying my weekend, I came into work this morning and
contacted Verisign support. Apparently, Microsoft has confirmed that
they forgot to include a Trusted Root cert with their Windows Mobile 5
and Windows Mobile 6 OSes.  Due to this, Verisign is giving me a free
upgrade to their SSL Pro cert, which still uses the old root cert.  They
also sent me the missing root cert, so over the next 12 months, I can
install this root cert to all my WM devices.

Oh Yay!

Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel

-Original Message-
From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] 
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 8:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Activesync issue

See if you can download a root cert from verisign and reapply it. 

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: 24 July 2009 15:59
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Activesync issue

I looked at the root certs on the phone, and there are some that have
expired, but none that expired yesterday, which is when Activesync
stopped working.

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.clearswift.com
**








RE: Activesync issue

2009-07-27 Thread Joe Heaton
Well, Verisign is saying that the upgraded cert uses the same root cert
as the cert we just renewed, so it should work with no issues.  But I'll
let you guys know if that's not the case. :)

Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel


-Original Message-
From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 8:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Activesync issue

FYI, if you migrate to the new cert, it won't be much different that
using a self signed cert for the WM5  6 devices. If the root cert isn't
installed in the firmware, you'll need to reinstall it after every time
you wipe the device.

...Tim


 -Original Message-
 From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
 Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 7:55 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Activesync issue
 
 So, after enjoying my weekend, I came into work this morning and
 contacted Verisign support. Apparently, Microsoft has confirmed that
 they forgot to include a Trusted Root cert with their Windows Mobile 5
 and Windows Mobile 6 OSes.  Due to this, Verisign is giving me a free
 upgrade to their SSL Pro cert, which still uses the old root cert.
They
 also sent me the missing root cert, so over the next 12 months, I can
 install this root cert to all my WM devices.
 
 Oh Yay!
 
 Joe Heaton
 Employment Training Panel
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
 Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 8:10 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Activesync issue
 
 See if you can download a root cert from verisign and reapply it.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
 Sent: 24 July 2009 15:59
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Activesync issue
 
 I looked at the root certs on the phone, and there are some that have
 expired, but none that expired yesterday, which is when Activesync
 stopped working.
 
 **
 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
 are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
 the system manager.
 
 This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
 MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
 
 www.clearswift.com
 **
 
 
 
 
 







RE: Activesync issue

2009-07-27 Thread Joe Heaton
Ahh, I got ya.  So the cert won't stay on the mobile device after a
wipe?  That's interesting.  The whole reason I was looking at doing
that, was for next year when we renew.  There's no reason to pay the
$995 for an Exchange cert, so we would be downgrading back to the
standard cert, and would need that root cert on the devices...

Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel


-Original Message-
From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 8:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Activesync issue

The upgraded cert shouldn't be a problem if the root cert is already on
the device. It sounded like you were going to install the missing root
cert on all your devices. I was just pointing out that I didn't see much
of a reason to install the missing root cert on those devices because
you'll have to reinstall it every time you wipe a device.

I can see now that what I typed didn't say that, so I'll just chalk it
up to a Monday morning and crawl back in my hole.


...Tim


 -Original Message-
 From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
 Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 8:36 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Activesync issue
 
 Well, Verisign is saying that the upgraded cert uses the same root
cert
 as the cert we just renewed, so it should work with no issues.  But
I'll
 let you guys know if that's not the case. :)
 
 Joe Heaton
 Employment Training Panel
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
 Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 8:15 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Activesync issue
 
 FYI, if you migrate to the new cert, it won't be much different that
 using a self signed cert for the WM5  6 devices. If the root cert
isn't
 installed in the firmware, you'll need to reinstall it after every
time
 you wipe the device.
 
 ...Tim
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
  Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 7:55 AM
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: Activesync issue
 
  So, after enjoying my weekend, I came into work this morning and
  contacted Verisign support. Apparently, Microsoft has confirmed that
  they forgot to include a Trusted Root cert with their Windows Mobile
5
  and Windows Mobile 6 OSes.  Due to this, Verisign is giving me a
free
  upgrade to their SSL Pro cert, which still uses the old root cert.
 They
  also sent me the missing root cert, so over the next 12 months, I
can
  install this root cert to all my WM devices.
 
  Oh Yay!
 
  Joe Heaton
  Employment Training Panel
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
  Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 8:10 AM
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: Activesync issue
 
  See if you can download a root cert from verisign and reapply it.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
  Sent: 24 July 2009 15:59
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: Activesync issue
 
  I looked at the root certs on the phone, and there are some that
have
  expired, but none that expired yesterday, which is when Activesync
  stopped working.
 
 
**
  This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
  intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
  are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify
  the system manager.
 
  This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
by
  MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
 
  www.clearswift.com
 
**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 







RE: Activesync issue

2009-07-24 Thread Joe Heaton
Verisign


Re: Activesync issue

2009-07-24 Thread Joe Heaton
Standard SSL cert from Verisign.  The $399 one.


RE: Activesync issue

2009-07-24 Thread Joe Heaton
I hope I don't have to do that, but how would I?  I haven't had to before.  I 
did look at the certs on the phone, and the intermediate from Verisign is not 
expired.

Treo 700wx


RE: Activesync issue

2009-07-24 Thread Joe Heaton
I looked at the root certs on the phone, and there are some that have expired, 
but none that expired yesterday, which is when Activesync stopped working.


Activesync issue

2009-07-23 Thread Joe Heaton
I just renewed my SSL cert today for my Exchange box.  OWA is working fine, but 
Activesync on my WM device is erroring out, saying the cert is not valid.  I 
double checked the config in the phone, and I've looked in IIS at the 
Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync settings, and the cert there shows the correct 
dates.  I've restarted all IIS and SMTP services, and I've rebooted the server.

Any other ideas?

Exchange 2k3, WM6.

Thanks,

Joe Heaton


OWA / SSL question

2009-07-21 Thread Joe Heaton
Guys,

 

Due to the budget issues here in California, my agency is down to the
wire with renewing our SSL cert for Exchange.  I've already told my
manager that we can easily go with one of the cheaper alternatives, and
have the same security, but she's really wanting to stick with Verisign.
Due to this, our SSL cert may end up expiring.  I've told her that the
impact would be that I would have to turn off OWA.  In addition,
wouldn't our phones be affected?  We're using Activesync on our Windows
Mobile devices, and requiring the SSL connection.  Would we be able to
make a secure SSL connection without the cert?  I'm thinking this is
possibly a stupid question, but my brain is really fuzzy this morning.

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 



RE: OWA / SSL question

2009-07-21 Thread Joe Heaton
I know about GoDaddy, and recommend it every time any of our 4 SSL certs
come up for renewal.  But the manager wants to stay with the industry
standard Verisign.  I'm the kind of guy that buys the Shasta colas, or
the Sam's colas, because it's pretty much the same thing at half the
price.

 

I have also looked at generating our own cert, which really makes sense
for this purpose, as it's only internal users that will be accessing
OWA.  What could they face from home, if I use a homemade cert?  Are
there browser issues, with certain browsers not liking homemade certs?

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 8:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA / SSL question

 

If your cert expires, users will have to either configure their browsers
to allow them to go the site, or click through warning/error messages to
get there.

I would believe depending on your mobile phone setup those users will
have similar problems.

Have you looked into generating your own internal certificate?

 

CHEAP: I got 3 year SSL Cert for OWA from GoDaddy.com for $67.47

 

 

 

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 11:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA / SSL question

Guys,

 

Due to the budget issues here in California, my agency is down to the
wire with renewing our SSL cert for Exchange.  I've already told my
manager that we can easily go with one of the cheaper alternatives, and
have the same security, but she's really wanting to stick with Verisign.
Due to this, our SSL cert may end up expiring.  I've told her that the
impact would be that I would have to turn off OWA.  In addition,
wouldn't our phones be affected?  We're using Activesync on our Windows
Mobile devices, and requiring the SSL connection.  Would we be able to
make a secure SSL connection without the cert?  I'm thinking this is
possibly a stupid question, but my brain is really fuzzy this morning.

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 

image001.jpgimage002.jpg

RE: OWA / SSL question

2009-07-21 Thread Joe Heaton
ME,

I've tried educating.  But since she's the one paying the bill, if she wants to 
pay $400, instead of $30, who am I to argue?  And I originally intended the 
high-profile name, versus what I actually said.  That's why I brought up the 
soda analogy.  Man, my head is fuzzy today.

Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel

-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 9:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OWA / SSL question

Verisign is not an industry standard.  The cert's themselves are
standards. Verisign is just a high-profile name.

Think of them as the Cadillac of certificate providers if you will.
Are they high performance?  Not really.  Full of bloat and
over-priced?  Yep.  But when the cert is only meant for you to get
from A to B, does it matter about the appearance or prestige of the
name/appearance?  Nope.

Unless you have a high-visibility web site, there is absolutely no
reason to use certs from Verisign.  There is no added prestige factor
to using Verisign certs with OWA.  None of your users care.  And you
and your manager shouldn't either.  A cert is a cert.  Its ease of use
only depends on if its publicly known and trusted: Issues/published by
a well-known certificate authority.

Some user education is in order for your manager.  You should be able
to educate and convince them of these things.

--
ME2



On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Joe Heatonjhea...@etp.ca.gov wrote:
 I know about GoDaddy, and recommend it every time any of our 4 SSL certs
 come up for renewal.  But the manager wants to stay with the industry
 standard Verisign.  I'm the kind of guy that buys the Shasta colas, or the
 Sam's colas, because it's pretty much the same thing at half the price.



 I have also looked at generating our own cert, which really makes sense for
 this purpose, as it's only internal users that will be accessing OWA.  What
 could they face from home, if I use a homemade cert?  Are there browser
 issues, with certain browsers not liking homemade certs?



 Joe Heaton

 Employment Training Panel



 From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 8:42 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: OWA / SSL question



 If your cert expires, users will have to either configure their browsers to
 allow them to go the site, or click through warning/error messages to get
 there.

 I would believe depending on your mobile phone setup those users will have
 similar problems.

 Have you looked into generating your own internal certificate?



 CHEAP: I got 3 year SSL Cert for OWA from GoDaddy.com for $67.47





 

 From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 11:27 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: OWA / SSL question

 Guys,



 Due to the budget issues here in California, my agency is down to the wire
 with renewing our SSL cert for Exchange.  I've already told my manager that
 we can easily go with one of the cheaper alternatives, and have the same
 security, but she's really wanting to stick with Verisign.  Due to this, our
 SSL cert may end up expiring.  I've told her that the impact would be that I
 would have to turn off OWA.  In addition, wouldn't our phones be affected?
 We're using Activesync on our Windows Mobile devices, and requiring the SSL
 connection.  Would we be able to make a secure SSL connection without the
 cert?  I'm thinking this is possibly a stupid question, but my brain is
 really fuzzy this morning.



 Joe Heaton

 AISA

 Employment Training Panel

 1100 J Street, 4th Floor

 Sacramento, CA  95814

 (916) 327-5276

 jhea...@etp.ca.gov








RE: E-mail address display question

2009-07-14 Thread Joe Heaton
Yep, just needed a little more patience.  Works properly now.

 

Thanks guys,

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 7:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E-mail address display question

 

Was the user logged in when their display name was changed?

And if so, did the user logout and login before sending the test e-mail?

And what about today?  Same/different?  Waiting up to 2 hours solves
many issues such as this.

 

Carl

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 2:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E-mail address display question

 

Ok, so I did that change, and if I'm looking through the GAL, it shows
correctly, but when I sent a test e-mail as that account, it still
displayed incorrectly in my Inbox.

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E-mail address display question

 

Change the display name to whatever you want.

 

Carl

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 1:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: E-mail address display question

 

Is it possible to display three names in the From section?

 

I see mine, and most everyone's as Firstname Lastname.  I need to have
one account here display as First Second Last.  How can I do this?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 



E-mail address display question

2009-07-13 Thread Joe Heaton
Is it possible to display three names in the From section?

 

I see mine, and most everyone's as Firstname Lastname.  I need to have
one account here display as First Second Last.  How can I do this?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 



RE: E-mail address display question

2009-07-13 Thread Joe Heaton
Wow...it is Monday, isn't it?

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E-mail address display question

 

Change the display name to whatever you want.

 

Carl

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 1:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: E-mail address display question

 

Is it possible to display three names in the From section?

 

I see mine, and most everyone's as Firstname Lastname.  I need to have
one account here display as First Second Last.  How can I do this?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 



RE: E-mail address display question

2009-07-13 Thread Joe Heaton
Ok, so I did that change, and if I'm looking through the GAL, it shows
correctly, but when I sent a test e-mail as that account, it still
displayed incorrectly in my Inbox.

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E-mail address display question

 

Change the display name to whatever you want.

 

Carl

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 1:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: E-mail address display question

 

Is it possible to display three names in the From section?

 

I see mine, and most everyone's as Firstname Lastname.  I need to have
one account here display as First Second Last.  How can I do this?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 



RE: Cert OWA

2009-07-13 Thread Joe Heaton
Google is your friend!

Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel


-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 10:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cert OWA

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 09:44, Ben Scottmailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Don Andrewsdon.andr...@safeway.com wrote:
 Bing better is in the eye of the purveyor?

���Because It's Not Google!

But It's Not Good!




RE: Backup generations

2009-07-09 Thread Joe Heaton
We have a 1 meg pipe between us and our ISP, then it hits the internet
to our backup provider.  My .edb files total a little over 12GB, and my
.stm files total just over 6GB, so our nightly backup is around 18GB
plus log files.  Right now, we keep 5 dailies, 4 weeklies, and 3
monthlies in the vault.  I'm trying to reduce our online footprint,
though, as we're over our quota and can't renegotiate the contract.  So,
I happen to have an external USB drive sitting around doing nothing at
the moment, and am trying to do local backups for Exchange, instead of
sending all of them over the wire.  I'm thinking of keeping a week's
worth of dailies on the local drive, and keeping the weekly and monthly
backups in the online vault.

Any thoughts on my thought process?

Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel

-Original Message-
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 4:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup generations

Holly sh!t,
What size of pipe do you have and how small is your db?
I wish the public paid for my bandwidth :)


After our most recent tape library failed, we gave up on
tapes, too costly.

I now use vss and scripts to snapshot the db, and replicate
only differences across street (fiber) and to one of the owners
home's (vpn) but since only changes are replicated, the db's
are checked for integrity and made to appear as fulls everyday.

A zfs snapshot is taken after each backup that checks free space
and drops the oldest one if need be to make space.

jlc


-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 4:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup generations

We use an online service, uploading overnight.  We have two separate
Exchange backups.  The server(database), and a mapi backup(messages).

-Original Message-
From: Don Kuhlman drkuhl...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 12:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Backup generations

Is everyone still using tape for these keepers or something else?

My small client has their stuff in a less than clean factory environment
(the office where the servers are is part of the factory but still
dirty) and I can't keep tape drives working reliably.

Thanks

Don K






From: lists li...@bdtechnology.org
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2009 2:28:14 PM
Subject: RE: Backup generations


Full backups only. Keep for 30 days then keep the first day of every
month for a year.

Cheers.

From:Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Backup generations

I have two weeks of dailies, monthlies and a yearly as well...just for
sh!ts and giggles.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Joe Heaton jhea...@etp.ca.gov wrote:
How many generations of your Exchange database are you guys keeping?
Meaning, how far back are you keeping?  A couple of days, a week, a
month, 6 months?

Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
jhea...@etp.ca.gov











Backup generations

2009-07-08 Thread Joe Heaton
How many generations of your Exchange database are you guys keeping?
Meaning, how far back are you keeping?  A couple of days, a week, a
month, 6 months?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 



RE: Backup generations

2009-07-08 Thread Joe Heaton
Is that 2 weeks worth of dailies, or 5 dailies and 1 weekly?

-Original Message-
From: Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 11:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Backup generations

+1 on the 2 weeks.

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:00 PM, paul chinnery pdw1...@hotmail.com wrote:

  2 weeks


 --
 Subject: Backup generations
 Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:39:22 -0700
 From: jhea...@etp.ca.gov
 To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

  How many generations of your Exchange database are you guys keeping?
 Meaning, how far back are you keeping?  A couple of days, a week, a month, 6
 months?



 Joe Heaton

 AISA

 Employment Training Panel

 1100 J Street, 4th Floor

 Sacramento, CA  95814

 (916) 327-5276

 jhea...@etp.ca.gov



 --
 Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that’s right for 
 you.http://www.microsoft.com/windows/choosepc/?ocid=ftp_val_wl_290




-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Arthur C. Clarke




RE: Backup generations

2009-07-08 Thread Joe Heaton
We use an online service, uploading overnight.  We have two separate Exchange 
backups.  The server(database), and a mapi backup(messages).

-Original Message-
From: Don Kuhlman drkuhl...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 12:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Backup generations

Is everyone still using tape for these keepers or something else?

My small client has their stuff in a less than clean factory environment (the 
office where the servers are is part of the factory but still dirty) and I 
can't keep tape drives working reliably.

Thanks

Don K

 




From: lists li...@bdtechnology.org
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2009 2:28:14 PM
Subject: RE: Backup generations


Full backups only. Keep for 30 days then keep the first day of every month for 
a year.
 
Cheers.
 
From:Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Backup generations
 
I have two weeks of dailies, monthlies and a yearly as well...just for sh!ts 
and giggles.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Joe Heaton jhea...@etp.ca.gov wrote:
How many generations of your Exchange database are you guys keeping?  Meaning, 
how far back are you keeping?  A couple of days, a week, a month, 6 months?
 
Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
jhea...@etp.ca.gov


  




Changing default address format

2009-06-19 Thread Joe Heaton
I need to change our company's e-mail format from:
firstinitiallastn...@domain  to firstname.lastn...@domain.  I need to leave the 
original in place as a secondary for a period of time for the transition.  I 
know the variables I want are %g.%s, but here's my question:

Do I need to edit the existing default recipient policy and add the new format 
as a new SMTP address, and make it the default, or should I create a new 
recipient policy for it?  Also, when I enter the new address format, do I just 
put in the %g.%s, or do I enter %g...@domain?

Thanks,

Joe Heaton
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


OWA question

2009-05-21 Thread Joe Heaton
 I have a user working from home today, and she's trying to access her
mailbox through OWA.  She says that she is able to log in, but when she
clicks on any of the folders on the left side, Inbox, Calendar, Tasks,
etc.  that nothing ever loads.

 

Exchange 2k3 in -house.  No idea what browser she's using at home,
although it really shouldn't matter, right?

 

Anyone have any ideas what I could check on my end?  I've already opened
OWA on my desktop, with Firefox and IE8, with no issues, but I'm also
here in the office.  She's at home, about 100 or so miles away.

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Setting another user's OOO

2009-03-16 Thread Joe Heaton
I need to set the Out Of Office for a user that has departed.  Do I have
to login to a computer as that user to do this?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

2009-02-23 Thread Joe Heaton
In the reverse DNS section of this tool, do I need to check the box?  I
don't host my external DNS records, so I don't know what PTR records, if
any, are out there.

Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel

-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 8:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

Although it isn't perfect, this link has been out on the list before and
is a good way to generate an SPF if you are wondering where to start.

http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/safety/content/technologies/senderid/wiz
ard/


-troy

-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 6:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

+1. Although impossible to quantify, it can only help your situation.

--
ME2



On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Don Andrews don.andr...@safeway.com
wrote:
 You might consider advertising an SPF record - cheap and little
effort.  No
 guarantees except that it lets honest domains that check for it ignore
 spoofed sends.



 

 From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 10:24 AM

 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue



 Thomas,



 I think I've found a way to take care of some of this stuff.  I have a
 Watchguard firewall, which has a feature built in called an SMTP
Proxy.
 Within that, I can set a filter to deny any messages coming from
specific
 domains, or, as in this case, from specific country codes (.pl, .ru,
etc).



 I just put it in place, so I'm hoping it's going to help the issue
here.  As
 far as backscatter from within the US, I'm still working on that
one...



 Joe Heaton

 Employment Training Panel



 From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 10:35 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue



 That's exactly what I'm battling right now Joe...if you look at the
header you
 will see the actual sender / originator. I couldn't give you a correct
way
 how to tackle this issue. But this backscatter has become a pain in
the you
 know what.



 From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:30 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue



 I'm getting users who are getting lots of mail in their inbox every
morning
 that looks like it is coming from themselves.  Looking at the headers,
I see
 various actual senders, many coming from domains ending in .ru, or
.pl,
 etc.  Is there a way of blocking e-mails from these foreign domains?
None
 of my users have legitimate business with anyone in Russia, or Poland,
or
 any other foreign country.  I tried setting this up under Sender
Filtering,
 by putting the following in, for example:  *...@*.pl



 Is there a different way of putting this in?  I notice that the
instructions
 for Sender Filtering says to block messages claiming to be from the
 following:, but these messages are actually claiming to be from the
user,
 not what is actually in the header.  Is there a different way of
filtering
 these messages?  There's nothing in the subject line that is keying
the IMF,
 or my Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft Exchange.



 Joe Heaton

 AISA

 Employment Training Panel

 1100 J Street, 4th Floor

 Sacramento, CA  95814

 (916) 327-5276

 jhea...@etp.ca.gov







 This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for
 the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not
 read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions
expressed
 in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of
the Girl
 Scouts of Southwest Texas. Warning: Although precautions have been
taken to
 make sure no viruses are present in this email, Girl Scouts of
Southwest
 Texas cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise
from
 the use of this email or attachments.











~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~



RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

2009-02-23 Thread Joe Heaton
Thanks Don.  So in the creation process, since I only have one IP that
should be sending e-mail, I can check the box saying that all the
reverse DNS records for my domain resolve to outbound e-mail servers?
Or could there be PTR records for my web servers as well?

Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel


-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

You appear to have a valid PTR at least for the IP this message came
from.

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 7:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

In the reverse DNS section of this tool, do I need to check the box?  I
don't host my external DNS records, so I don't know what PTR records, if
any, are out there.

Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel

-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 8:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

Although it isn't perfect, this link has been out on the list before and
is a good way to generate an SPF if you are wondering where to start.

http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/safety/content/technologies/senderid/wiz
ard/


-troy

-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 6:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

+1. Although impossible to quantify, it can only help your situation.

--
ME2



On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Don Andrews don.andr...@safeway.com
wrote:
 You might consider advertising an SPF record - cheap and little
effort.  No
 guarantees except that it lets honest domains that check for it ignore
 spoofed sends.



 

 From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 10:24 AM

 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue



 Thomas,



 I think I've found a way to take care of some of this stuff.  I have a
 Watchguard firewall, which has a feature built in called an SMTP
Proxy.
 Within that, I can set a filter to deny any messages coming from
specific
 domains, or, as in this case, from specific country codes (.pl, .ru,
etc).



 I just put it in place, so I'm hoping it's going to help the issue
here.  As
 far as backscatter from within the US, I'm still working on that
one...



 Joe Heaton

 Employment Training Panel



 From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 10:35 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue



 That's exactly what I'm battling right now Joe...if you look at the
header you
 will see the actual sender / originator. I couldn't give you a correct
way
 how to tackle this issue. But this backscatter has become a pain in
the you
 know what.



 From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:30 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue



 I'm getting users who are getting lots of mail in their inbox every
morning
 that looks like it is coming from themselves.  Looking at the headers,
I see
 various actual senders, many coming from domains ending in .ru, or
.pl,
 etc.  Is there a way of blocking e-mails from these foreign domains?
None
 of my users have legitimate business with anyone in Russia, or Poland,
or
 any other foreign country.  I tried setting this up under Sender
Filtering,
 by putting the following in, for example:  *...@*.pl



 Is there a different way of putting this in?  I notice that the
instructions
 for Sender Filtering says to block messages claiming to be from the
 following:, but these messages are actually claiming to be from the
user,
 not what is actually in the header.  Is there a different way of
filtering
 these messages?  There's nothing in the subject line that is keying
the IMF,
 or my Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft Exchange.



 Joe Heaton

 AISA

 Employment Training Panel

 1100 J Street, 4th Floor

 Sacramento, CA  95814

 (916) 327-5276

 jhea...@etp.ca.gov







 This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for
 the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not
 read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions
expressed
 in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of
the Girl
 Scouts of Southwest Texas. Warning: Although precautions have been
taken to
 make sure no viruses are present in this email, Girl Scouts of
Southwest
 Texas cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise
from
 the use of this email or attachments.











~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http

RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

2009-02-18 Thread Joe Heaton
Thomas,

 

I think I've found a way to take care of some of this stuff.  I have a
Watchguard firewall, which has a feature built in called an SMTP Proxy.
Within that, I can set a filter to deny any messages coming from
specific domains, or, as in this case, from specific country codes (.pl,
.ru, etc).

 

I just put it in place, so I'm hoping it's going to help the issue here.
As far as backscatter from within the US, I'm still working on that
one...

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 10:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

 

That's exactly what I'm battling right now Joe...if you look at the
header you will see the actual sender / originator. I couldn't give you
a correct way how to tackle this issue. But this backscatter has become
a pain in the you know what.

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

 

I'm getting users who are getting lots of mail in their inbox every
morning that looks like it is coming from themselves.  Looking at the
headers, I see various actual senders, many coming from domains ending
in .ru, or .pl, etc.  Is there a way of blocking e-mails from these
foreign domains?  None of my users have legitimate business with anyone
in Russia, or Poland, or any other foreign country.  I tried setting
this up under Sender Filtering, by putting the following in, for
example:  *...@*.pl  

 

Is there a different way of putting this in?  I notice that the
instructions for Sender Filtering says to block messages claiming to
be from the following:, but these messages are actually claiming to be
from the user, not what is actually in the header.  Is there a different
way of filtering these messages?  There's nothing in the subject line
that is keying the IMF, or my Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft
Exchange.

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 

 

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or
opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not
represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas. Warning: Although
precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this
email, Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas cannot accept responsibility for
any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

2009-02-17 Thread Joe Heaton
I'm getting users who are getting lots of mail in their inbox every
morning that looks like it is coming from themselves.  Looking at the
headers, I see various actual senders, many coming from domains ending
in .ru, or .pl, etc.  Is there a way of blocking e-mails from these
foreign domains?  None of my users have legitimate business with anyone
in Russia, or Poland, or any other foreign country.  I tried setting
this up under Sender Filtering, by putting the following in, for
example:  *...@*.pl  

 

Is there a different way of putting this in?  I notice that the
instructions for Sender Filtering says to block messages claiming to
be from the following:, but these messages are actually claiming to be
from the user, not what is actually in the header.  Is there a different
way of filtering these messages?  There's nothing in the subject line
that is keying the IMF, or my Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft
Exchange.

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

2009-02-17 Thread Joe Heaton
I tried this, and there are hundreds, if not thousands of IP ranges
associated with .pl domains... 

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 10:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

 

One way would be to look up the IP address ranges associated with those
areas and block access to and from them with your firewall.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

 

I'm getting users who are getting lots of mail in their inbox every
morning that looks like it is coming from themselves.  Looking at the
headers, I see various actual senders, many coming from domains ending
in .ru, or .pl, etc.  Is there a way of blocking e-mails from these
foreign domains?  None of my users have legitimate business with anyone
in Russia, or Poland, or any other foreign country.  I tried setting
this up under Sender Filtering, by putting the following in, for
example:  *...@*.pl  

 

Is there a different way of putting this in?  I notice that the
instructions for Sender Filtering says to block messages claiming to
be from the following:, but these messages are actually claiming to be
from the user, not what is actually in the header.  Is there a different
way of filtering these messages?  There's nothing in the subject line
that is keying the IMF, or my Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft
Exchange.

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

2009-02-17 Thread Joe Heaton
AMEN Brother!!!  Unfortunately, I work for the state of California, and
still don't know if I'm going to have a job in a couple months...

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of Exchange
(Sunbelt)
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

 

Probably time to invest in a proper anti-spam solution.

 

S

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

 

I'm getting users who are getting lots of mail in their inbox every
morning that looks like it is coming from themselves.  Looking at the
headers, I see various actual senders, many coming from domains ending
in .ru, or .pl, etc.  Is there a way of blocking e-mails from these
foreign domains?  None of my users have legitimate business with anyone
in Russia, or Poland, or any other foreign country.  I tried setting
this up under Sender Filtering, by putting the following in, for
example:  *...@*.pl  

 

Is there a different way of putting this in?  I notice that the
instructions for Sender Filtering says to block messages claiming to
be from the following:, but these messages are actually claiming to be
from the user, not what is actually in the header.  Is there a different
way of filtering these messages?  There's nothing in the subject line
that is keying the IMF, or my Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft
Exchange.

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

2009-02-17 Thread Joe Heaton
I may do that.  The price wasn't really that bad for the number of seats
we have.  Right now, I'm working through the manual for my Watchguard,
trying to set up the SMTP proxy...

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Roger Wright [mailto:rwri...@evatone.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 2:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

 

I would propose installing something like Ninja in 30-day trial mode.
Perhaps when you the benefits are seen the funds may appear to keep it
going.

 

   

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

Evatone, Inc.

727.572.7076  x388

_  

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 5:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

 

AMEN Brother!!!  Unfortunately, I work for the state of California, and
still don't know if I'm going to have a job in a couple months...

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of Exchange
(Sunbelt)
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

 

Probably time to invest in a proper anti-spam solution.

 

S

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Incoming spoofed e-mail issue

 

I'm getting users who are getting lots of mail in their inbox every
morning that looks like it is coming from themselves.  Looking at the
headers, I see various actual senders, many coming from domains ending
in .ru, or .pl, etc.  Is there a way of blocking e-mails from these
foreign domains?  None of my users have legitimate business with anyone
in Russia, or Poland, or any other foreign country.  I tried setting
this up under Sender Filtering, by putting the following in, for
example:  *...@*.pl  

 

Is there a different way of putting this in?  I notice that the
instructions for Sender Filtering says to block messages claiming to
be from the following:, but these messages are actually claiming to be
from the user, not what is actually in the header.  Is there a different
way of filtering these messages?  There's nothing in the subject line
that is keying the IMF, or my Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft
Exchange.

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: mail store size question

2009-02-02 Thread Joe Heaton
No Don, I'd change the tool in my hand and use a screwdriver.  Did I
miss the point of your sarcasm?

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: mail store size question

 

Gee, you probably also disagree with the I have a hammer in my hand and
am using it to drive these screws - it isn't working well so fix the
screws philosophy.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: mail store size question

 

Why would you have mailboxes larger than 6GB?  I think the philosophy of
using e-mail as a file transfer/storage is flawed.  There are too many
other, better, more secure methods of transferring and storing files.
We give a warning at 150 MB, and shut them down at 200MB.

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 8:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: mail store size question

 

I have mailboxes bigger than that...  :P

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:16 AM, David.Ricci
david.ri...@hwinstitute.com wrote:

Is a 6 gig mail store large for 2003 sp2 exchange?

 

 

David 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: mail store size question

2009-02-02 Thread Joe Heaton
I guess I'm fortunate to have a manager that agrees with me then...
What's the recovery time on a 500GB store?

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: mail store size question

 

Why would I have 500GB mail stores as well?  I can only make
recommendations as to why its a bad thing...  If in the end, they don't
care and give me more money for more disk space, so be it...

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Joe Heaton jhea...@etp.ca.gov wrote:

Why would you have mailboxes larger than 6GB?  I think the philosophy of
using e-mail as a file transfer/storage is flawed.  There are too many
other, better, more secure methods of transferring and storing files.
We give a warning at 150 MB, and shut them down at 200MB.

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 8:36 AM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: mail store size question

 

I have mailboxes bigger than that...  :P

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:16 AM, David.Ricci
david.ri...@hwinstitute.com wrote:

Is a 6 gig mail store large for 2003 sp2 exchange?

 

 

David 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: mail store size question

2009-02-02 Thread Joe Heaton
Why would you have mailboxes larger than 6GB?  I think the philosophy of
using e-mail as a file transfer/storage is flawed.  There are too many
other, better, more secure methods of transferring and storing files.
We give a warning at 150 MB, and shut them down at 200MB.

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 8:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: mail store size question

 

I have mailboxes bigger than that...  :P

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:16 AM, David.Ricci
david.ri...@hwinstitute.com wrote:

Is a 6 gig mail store large for 2003 sp2 exchange?

 

 

David 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: mail store size question

2009-02-02 Thread Joe Heaton
My personal opinion may be old fashioned, but I believe that e-mail is
meant for communication, not file transfer.  If I have a document I need
to send to someone, fine, e-mail it.  But if it's a video, or something
of that nature, there are better ways to share that information.  We're
not factory workers here, we're office workers.  Some of which have a
rather high daily e-mail usage, with e-mailing contract changes back and
forth all day, and having to keep all versions until a point is agreed
on.  They still don't have more than 200 MB...

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: William Lefkovics [mailto:will...@lefkovics.net] 
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 10:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: mail store size question

 

I agree.  There are better places for file transfer and storage.  But I
don't think a 6GB mailbox is unreasonable at all though. An archiving
solution may be beneficial in that case, but as for size consideration,
6GB is not that much anymore for long term positions of high email use.
150MB is fine for the factory worker, but less so for the sales manager
or accounting executive.  Every customer/company/client is different.

 

What are the relative costs of using alternative storage or transfer
mechanism?  Are they less costly than the fixed investment in Exchange?
Why is it 'flawed'?

 

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: mail store size question

 

Why would you have mailboxes larger than 6GB?  I think the philosophy of
using e-mail as a file transfer/storage is flawed.  There are too many
other, better, more secure methods of transferring and storing files.
We give a warning at 150 MB, and shut them down at 200MB.

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 8:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: mail store size question

 

I have mailboxes bigger than that...  :P

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:16 AM, David.Ricci
david.ri...@hwinstitute.com wrote:

Is a 6 gig mail store large for 2003 sp2 exchange?

 

 

David 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Strange e-mail issue with one user

2009-02-02 Thread Joe Heaton
The user only has one rule, which is not looking at Sent Items.  I checked the 
Outlook SecureTemp folder, and there was about 26MB, so I cleared it out.  
We'll see if that helps at all.

Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 1:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Strange e-mail issue with one user

Within our agency.  I can't imagine it being a rule, as it is an intermittent 
issue.  Sometimes, the mail will go, others it sits in the Sent Items a few 
seconds and disappears.  Also, it seems that if she adds another document to 
the e-mail, such as a Word doc, then it goes.  Haven't tested multiple times 
for consistency on that one though.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Strange e-mail issue with one user

2009-01-30 Thread Joe Heaton
Exchange 2k3

Outlook 2k3

 

I have one user who is experiencing this problem.  I have tested from
her machine and verified that it is happening.  We have had PC
changeouts recently, so it's not a problem with her specific machine.

 

Each month, she fills out her timesheet, and e-mails it as an attachment
to the time clerk.  Or her boss, or someone else in her unit.  She opens
a new e-mail, fills in the To: and CC: boxes, fills in the Subject line,
attaches the timesheet, and hits Send.  The message then shows up in her
Sent Items, for about 10-15 seconds, then disappears.  The recipients
never receive the message.  It happens only with the timesheets, whether
she has one, or her whole unit's timesheets in the message.  It's not a
size issue, as one timesheet is only a couple hundred KB in size.  It is
also an intermittent issue, as I have also stood behind her, watching,
and sometimes it will work.  The strangest part, is that it only happens
with timesheets, which are .xls documents.  Any other time, attaching
any other file, is no problem.

 

 

Any ideas where I can start to troubleshoot this?

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Strange e-mail issue with one user

2009-01-30 Thread Joe Heaton
Within our agency.  I can't imagine it being a rule, as it is an intermittent 
issue.  Sometimes, the mail will go, others it sits in the Sent Items a few 
seconds and disappears.  Also, it seems that if she adds another document to 
the e-mail, such as a Word doc, then it goes.  Haven't tested multiple times 
for consistency on that one though.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Strange e-mail issue with one user

2009-01-30 Thread Joe Heaton
Yep, I sent it yesterday afternoon, my time, right about the time the Lyris 
server stopped sending stuff out.  We're running Symantec Corp. v.10 here on 
the desktops.  Wouldn't there be some kind of notification that it found 
something bad?  We're also running Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft 
Exchange on the Exchange box, but there's no notices from that end either.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Outbound message question

2009-01-16 Thread Joe Heaton
Ya, the logs before yesterday weren't setup right.  They weren't logging
any useful info.  I've changed that now, so if something like this
happens again, I can at least check what you're telling me to.

 

As far as the question about the system on the other end, I don't know
what they're using.  This only happened to one person, one time, so far,
so I'm not going to pursue it any further.

 

As always, I really appreciate the help from this list.

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 6:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outbound message question

 

A proper SMTP connection to a remote system ends with the remote system
sending a message prefixed by a 250 and then YOUR system sending a
QUIT and then the connection dropping.

 

If you don't see that - the connection was faulty. So you are searching
for a negative indication not a positive indication.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael

I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 5:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outbound message question

 

I do have SMTP logging going, but is what you're talking about part of
the Advanced settings?  And the log file is odd looking, not very
conducive to reading.

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outbound message question

 

Could be a number of things. If you have SMTP logs turned on, you'll
probably see that the remote server is accepting the message and then
dropping the SMTP connection with saying thanks.

 

Without the thanks, Exchange thinks the message wasn't delivered and
sends it again.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael

I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 12:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outbound message question

 

Exchange 2K3, Outlook 2k3

 

I just had a user call me and tell me that an e-mail she sent to someone
outside our agency, had been delivered to that person 4 times throughout
the night.  This is the only user telling me this, so I just don't think
it's an Exchange issue, at least not on my side, but does anyone know
what could be happening?

 

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Outbound message question

2009-01-15 Thread Joe Heaton
Exchange 2K3, Outlook 2k3

 

I just had a user call me and tell me that an e-mail she sent to someone
outside our agency, had been delivered to that person 4 times throughout
the night.  This is the only user telling me this, so I just don't think
it's an Exchange issue, at least not on my side, but does anyone know
what could be happening?

 

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outbound message question

2009-01-15 Thread Joe Heaton
I do have SMTP logging going, but is what you're talking about part of
the Advanced settings?  And the log file is odd looking, not very
conducive to reading.

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outbound message question

 

Could be a number of things. If you have SMTP logs turned on, you'll
probably see that the remote server is accepting the message and then
dropping the SMTP connection with saying thanks.

 

Without the thanks, Exchange thinks the message wasn't delivered and
sends it again.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael

I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 12:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outbound message question

 

Exchange 2K3, Outlook 2k3

 

I just had a user call me and tell me that an e-mail she sent to someone
outside our agency, had been delivered to that person 4 times throughout
the night.  This is the only user telling me this, so I just don't think
it's an Exchange issue, at least not on my side, but does anyone know
what could be happening?

 

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

mailbox size recommendations for 2k7?

2009-01-13 Thread Joe Heaton
Anyone have a recommended size for mailboxes in Exchange 2007?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: mailbox size recommendations for 2k7?

2009-01-13 Thread Joe Heaton
I'm sorry, it was simply a very generic, simple question.  Meaning, is
10MB recommended as best practice, or maybe 500MB, or maybe 10GB.  Is
there a size where it becomes difficult to do a recovery?  Not really
worried about the infrastructure, the question is simply an attempt to
get to best practices...

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 12:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: mailbox size recommendations for 2k7?

 

Anybody that does based on no more information than that probably
shouldn't be trusted in the first place.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 2:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: mailbox size recommendations for 2k7?

 

Anyone have a recommended size for mailboxes in Exchange 2007?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: E-mail routing question

2009-01-02 Thread Joe Heaton
Any idea why I'm not getting an NDR, then?

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 1:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E-mail routing question

 

Internal users will get an NDR too.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael

I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 4:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: E-mail routing question

 

If I delete a user account, including the mailbox, and an internal user
then sends an e-mail to that address, will any kind of NDR be produced?
Or is that something that only external senders would get?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

jhea...@etp.ca.gov

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Message headers

2008-12-10 Thread Joe Heaton
Ok, maybe I've gone blind, but I'm not seeing what you're talking about.  I am 
using Outlook 2k7.


Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel

-Original Message-
From: Trimmel-Wyss Doris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 5:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Message headers

It's much simpler in Outlook 2007

Click on the arrow next to Options in the ribbon .

Doris

-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 2:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Message headers

 Open it and go to view options.

This works up till 2003.  

Sadly, in 2007, it's bit tougher (since it's now right-click-message
options).  Using a preview pane, there's two solutions I've found.

The easiest thing is drag the attachment to the desktop and open in my
favorite text editor.  Yea, you have to ignore the binary cruft.

The other way is to drag the attachment up to the message list where it is
now just another message.  But watch out, when you drag a message to the
message list your rules apply.  This is why I call the text editor easier

I guess it's better than nothing.  Anyone know if this issue will be
addressed in office 13 ...erm 14?  Would be great if the view headers
toggle actually did what it said.

~JasonG

-- 

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Need to change e-mail address format

2008-12-10 Thread Joe Heaton
Exchange 2k3

AD 2k3

Outlook 2k3 and 2k7

 

I need to change from current system of first initial last name, to
first name.lastname

 

The domain will stay the same.  Any one have good reference material for
this?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Message headers

2008-12-10 Thread Joe Heaton
Eric,

I've responded offline, but I see where the issue is.  With the message in 
question, it was forwarded to me as an attachment.  I then saved that 
attachment to my desktop.  When I open it from the desktop, I don't have that 
little icon in the bottom right corner of Options...

But if I open an original message from inside Outlook, I do have that icon.

Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel


-Original Message-
From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Message headers

Ok, when you have the email open look at the top ribbon.  There is Respond, 
Actions, Junk E-mail, Options, and Find.  See the little icon next to Options?  
Click on that.

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:58 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Message headers

Ok, maybe I've gone blind, but I'm not seeing what you're talking about.  I am 
using Outlook 2k7.


Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel

-Original Message-
From: Trimmel-Wyss Doris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 5:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Message headers

It's much simpler in Outlook 2007

Click on the arrow next to Options in the ribbon .

Doris

-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 2:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Message headers

 Open it and go to view options.

This works up till 2003.  

Sadly, in 2007, it's bit tougher (since it's now right-click-message
options).  Using a preview pane, there's two solutions I've found.

The easiest thing is drag the attachment to the desktop and open in my
favorite text editor.  Yea, you have to ignore the binary cruft.

The other way is to drag the attachment up to the message list where it is
now just another message.  But watch out, when you drag a message to the
message list your rules apply.  This is why I call the text editor easier

I guess it's better than nothing.  Anyone know if this issue will be
addressed in office 13 ...erm 14?  Would be great if the view headers
toggle actually did what it said.

~JasonG

-- 

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Need to change e-mail address format

2008-12-10 Thread Joe Heaton
Will this change the current addresses also, or just newly created ones?
Also, is there a chart or something somewhere that shows the options
(%g, etc...)

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Sean Rector [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Need to change e-mail address format

 

In Exchange System Manager, go to Recipients, then to Recipient
Policies.  Double-click the recipient policy that is applied to your
domain (probably Default Policy), and then go to E-Mail Addresses
(Policy).  Click New..., and add it as [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Make sure you
click Set as Primary after you're done, and click OK. 

 

Sean Rector, MCSE

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 1:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Need to change e-mail address format

 

Exchange 2k3

AD 2k3

Outlook 2k3 and 2k7

 

I need to change from current system of first initial last name, to
first name.lastname

 

The domain will stay the same.  Any one have good reference material for
this?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

Information Technology Manager
Virginia Opera Association 

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone:(757) 213-4548 (direct line)
{+}

 2008-2009 Season:  Tosca http://www.vaopera.org/tosca  |  The Barber
of Seville http://www.vaopera.org/barber 
 Recently Announced:  Virginia Opera's 35th Anniversary Season
2009-2010 http://www.vaopera.org/upcoming 
Visit us online at www.vaopera.org http://www.vaopera.org  or call
1-866-OPERA-VA 



This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the intended recipient(s). Unless otherwise specified, persons
unnamed as recipients may not read, distribute, copy or alter this
e-mail. Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail belong to the
author and may not necessarily represent those of Virginia Opera.
Although precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present,
Virginia Opera cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that
may arise from the use of this e-mail or attachments. 

{*}

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Message headers

2008-12-10 Thread Joe Heaton
Maybe it's just that it's an Undeliverable message.

Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel


-Original Message-
From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Message headers

Interesting, it worked for me.  I tested it from a laptop with Olk2K3 and saved 
it to my desktop on my Olk2k7 computer.  When I opened it I had the Options 
drop down arrow thingy.

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 12:08 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Message headers

Eric,

I've responded offline, but I see where the issue is.  With the message in 
question, it was forwarded to me as an attachment.  I then saved that 
attachment to my desktop.  When I open it from the desktop, I don't have that 
little icon in the bottom right corner of Options...

But if I open an original message from inside Outlook, I do have that icon.

Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel


-Original Message-
From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Message headers

Ok, when you have the email open look at the top ribbon.  There is Respond, 
Actions, Junk E-mail, Options, and Find.  See the little icon next to Options?  
Click on that.

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:58 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Message headers

Ok, maybe I've gone blind, but I'm not seeing what you're talking about.  I am 
using Outlook 2k7.


Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel

-Original Message-
From: Trimmel-Wyss Doris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 5:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Message headers

It's much simpler in Outlook 2007

Click on the arrow next to Options in the ribbon .

Doris

-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 2:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Message headers

 Open it and go to view options.

This works up till 2003.  

Sadly, in 2007, it's bit tougher (since it's now right-click-message
options).  Using a preview pane, there's two solutions I've found.

The easiest thing is drag the attachment to the desktop and open in my
favorite text editor.  Yea, you have to ignore the binary cruft.

The other way is to drag the attachment up to the message list where it is
now just another message.  But watch out, when you drag a message to the
message list your rules apply.  This is why I call the text editor easier

I guess it's better than nothing.  Anyone know if this issue will be
addressed in office 13 ...erm 14?  Would be great if the view headers
toggle actually did what it said.

~JasonG

-- 

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Message headers

2008-12-09 Thread Joe Heaton
If I have a user that forwards a message to me as an attachment, how can
I look at the header info for that attached message?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Editing distribution lists within Outlook

2008-12-02 Thread Joe Heaton
Server 2K3

Exchange 2K3

Outlook 2K3

 

I have a director, who would like to manage their unit's distribution
list.  By default, users don't have access to adding/removing members of
the list, through the GAL.  I also know there is a way of setting this
up so that you can give someone rights to do this, but I can't seem to
think straight enough to remember where I saw it.  Is it through
Outlook, as an admin, or is it on the backend somewhere?

 

Also, the director that I'm speaking of is not a technical person.  Is
it wise to allow users this type of access?

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Mobile admin question

2008-11-20 Thread Joe Heaton
I'll post this in the NTSysadmin list also, but the app is on Exchange,
so I figured I'd start here.

 

Using the mobileadmin tool, once I initiate a remote wipe, is there any
way to see if/when it happens?  Also, should I have the phone itself
turned on?  Does it require the phone to run a sync to the server?

 

New to this, so any help would be appreciated.

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Mobile admin question

2008-11-20 Thread Joe Heaton
In this situation, it's an old phone belonging to my manager.  She just
got her new phone, and I was going to do a remote wipe of the old one,
but then realized that the old phone no longer has service, so I'll have
to do a manual reset/wipe.

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 9:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mobile admin question

 

In other words, if the person now in possession doesn't want it remotely
wiped, all they need to do is turn off activesync until they get the
data they want.  Allowing remote wipe is an option controlled by the
device holder.

 



From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 9:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mobile admin question

 

Yes; the status showing in the list of devices for a mailbox changes
once the Wipe is acknowledged.  The Wipe is basically pending until the
phone tries to Sync again.

 

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 11:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mobile admin question

 

I'll post this in the NTSysadmin list also, but the app is on Exchange,
so I figured I'd start here.

 

Using the mobileadmin tool, once I initiate a remote wipe, is there any
way to see if/when it happens?  Also, should I have the phone itself
turned on?  Does it require the phone to run a sync to the server?

 

New to this, so any help would be appreciated.

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 
 






 
 
 
This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may
contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is
exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in
error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail
and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. 

 
 
 






 
 
 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Mobile admin question

2008-11-20 Thread Joe Heaton
Someday, hopefully TVK, someday...

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 9:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mobile admin question

 

Yet another reason to upgrade to Exchange 2007 and Direct Push. J

 

From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 11:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mobile admin question

 

In other words, if the person now in possession doesn't want it remotely
wiped, all they need to do is turn off activesync until they get the
data they want.  Allowing remote wipe is an option controlled by the
device holder.

 



From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 9:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mobile admin question

 

Yes; the status showing in the list of devices for a mailbox changes
once the Wipe is acknowledged.  The Wipe is basically pending until the
phone tries to Sync again.

 

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 11:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mobile admin question

 

I'll post this in the NTSysadmin list also, but the app is on Exchange,
so I figured I'd start here.

 

Using the mobileadmin tool, once I initiate a remote wipe, is there any
way to see if/when it happens?  Also, should I have the phone itself
turned on?  Does it require the phone to run a sync to the server?

 

New to this, so any help would be appreciated.

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 
 
 
 






 
 
 
 
 
This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may
contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is
exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in
error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail
and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. 

 
 
 
 
 






 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Mailbox rights question

2008-10-17 Thread Joe Heaton
Exchange 2k3, all SPs and hotfixes installed

Outlook 2k3

Server 2k3

 

We have a dummy account, newsletter, that we use to mass-mail our
press releases, etc.  In the past, one of our IT guys has been the one
to send these mailings, simply by putting the newsletter address in the
From:  field.  He then puts the newsletter in the To: address, and BCCs
the actual recipients.  This has worked.  However, now, we're trying to
transfer responsibility for this task to our Marketing unit.  I have
gone into the Exchange Advanced options under the newsletter account,
and added the Marketing unit with Full Mailbox rights.  When someone
from that unit tries to send a press release, etc the same way the IT
guy did it, they get the following error:

 

 

You do not have permission to send to this recipient.  For assistance,
contact your system administrator.

 

 

Have I missed the Golden button here in setting up the permissions?
What have I missed in order to allow the Marketing unit to do this task?

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Mailbox rights question

2008-10-17 Thread Joe Heaton
Security tab in AD?  Can you be more specific, please?

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 3:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox rights question

 

Full mailbox rights doesn't grant 'Send As' permissions.

 

That's a separate permission that has to be assigned via the Security
tab in AD.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 5:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mailbox rights question

 

Exchange 2k3, all SPs and hotfixes installed

Outlook 2k3

Server 2k3

 

We have a dummy account, newsletter, that we use to mass-mail our
press releases, etc.  In the past, one of our IT guys has been the one
to send these mailings, simply by putting the newsletter address in the
From:  field.  He then puts the newsletter in the To: address, and BCCs
the actual recipients.  This has worked.  However, now, we're trying to
transfer responsibility for this task to our Marketing unit.  I have
gone into the Exchange Advanced options under the newsletter account,
and added the Marketing unit with Full Mailbox rights.  When someone
from that unit tries to send a press release, etc the same way the IT
guy did it, they get the following error:

 

 

You do not have permission to send to this recipient.  For assistance,
contact your system administrator.

 

 

Have I missed the Golden button here in setting up the permissions?
What have I missed in order to allow the Marketing unit to do this task?

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Mailbox rights question

2008-10-17 Thread Joe Heaton
Thanks guys J  Did a Google search while I was waiting for replies and
found it.  Now I can go home and relax for the weekend J

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 3:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox rights question

 

There's a Security tab in ADUC where you can set this on the dummy
account.

 

You have to enable Advanced Features in the View options in ADUC to
see this tab.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 5:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox rights question

 

Security tab in AD?  Can you be more specific, please?

 

Joe Heaton

Employment Training Panel

 

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 3:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mailbox rights question

 

Full mailbox rights doesn't grant 'Send As' permissions.

 

That's a separate permission that has to be assigned via the Security
tab in AD.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 5:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mailbox rights question

 

Exchange 2k3, all SPs and hotfixes installed

Outlook 2k3

Server 2k3

 

We have a dummy account, newsletter, that we use to mass-mail our
press releases, etc.  In the past, one of our IT guys has been the one
to send these mailings, simply by putting the newsletter address in the
From:  field.  He then puts the newsletter in the To: address, and BCCs
the actual recipients.  This has worked.  However, now, we're trying to
transfer responsibility for this task to our Marketing unit.  I have
gone into the Exchange Advanced options under the newsletter account,
and added the Marketing unit with Full Mailbox rights.  When someone
from that unit tries to send a press release, etc the same way the IT
guy did it, they get the following error:

 

 

You do not have permission to send to this recipient.  For assistance,
contact your system administrator.

 

 

Have I missed the Golden button here in setting up the permissions?
What have I missed in order to allow the Marketing unit to do this task?

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Departing user procedures

2008-09-17 Thread Joe Heaton
When you have an employee leave your business, do you Exmerge their
mailbox to a pst, then delete?  I'm trying to figure out the best method
for keeping old users' mailbox contents, without keeping old users'
mailboxes.

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Internal group e-mail question

2008-09-15 Thread Joe Heaton
Exchange 2K3

Outlook 2K3

 

 

I have several internal e-mail enabled groups, so that if I want to send
a message to all those people, I send it to their unit address.  These
groups are intended for internal usage only.  In the last couple of
days, I've seen an increase in phishing mails, some of which are
addressed to these internal groups.  Now, assuming that these messages
are coming from outside, I've been looking for ways to stop it.  I've
poked around in the properties of one of the groups within ADUC.  I see
on the Exchange General Tab, under message restrictions, a check box to
accept mail from Authenticated users only.  If I have this selected,
along with the From Everyone radio button, would this eliminate the
outside e-mails?  If not, then what is the suggested way of protecting
these internal groups from spam?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Blocking a whole domain

2008-09-11 Thread Joe Heaton
Chip,

Where do you have that rule?  That looks like something I'd really like to use.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Helpdesk mailbox

2008-09-09 Thread Joe Heaton
Sorry about the delay on this, it was kind of a weird day yesterday.

This mailbox is named Help, but it's not really a helpdesk type of
situation.  Our agency works with businesses around California, helping
to fund the training/retraining of employees in order to make them a
better workforce for California.  This mailbox is going to be used by
our Fiscal department to provide assistance to these customers.  There
are two people at the start that will have access to it, with a
possibility of increasing that in the future.  Since the security group
idea was shot down, my only other idea is to create the user/mailbox and
give the users rights to it.  We have a helpdesk app, Track-It!, but I
can't see using that for this, as I don't want to add these Fiscal Unit
employees to the tech list.  They're bean counters, not IT.

Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 3:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Helpdesk mailbox

Use a helpdesk system.

 

This almost certainly won't work the way they expect.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 6:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Helpdesk mailbox

 

I need to create a generic mailbox, that multiple people will be
accessing.
At first, I created a mail-enabled security group, and added the people
that
needed it to the group.  Now, I find that's not what they wanted.  They
want
an actual, separate mailbox, that these people will access, in addition
to
their own.  I need to verify that my thinking is correct here:

 

1) In order to do this, I have to create a new user within ADUC,
with a
mailbox. (Named Help, for example)

2) I then have to give the people that will be accessing this
mailbox
full rights to the mailbox.

3) I then need to go to their computers, and setup their Outlook to
open
this Help mailbox in addition to theirs.

 

 

Is this correct?  Is there a better way of doing this?

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.16/1653 - Release Date:
9/5/2008 1:24 PM

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Blocking a whole domain

2008-09-09 Thread Joe Heaton
I've been getting an increase of spam from .pl.  In order to block this
whole domain, would that be in the Sender Filtering of Global Settings
- Message Delivery?

I put it in as [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Is that correct?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Helpdesk mailbox

2008-09-05 Thread Joe Heaton
I need to create a generic mailbox, that multiple people will be
accessing.  At first, I created a mail-enabled security group, and added
the people that needed it to the group.  Now, I find that's not what
they wanted.  They want an actual, separate mailbox, that these people
will access, in addition to their own.  I need to verify that my
thinking is correct here:

 

1)   In order to do this, I have to create a new user within ADUC,
with a mailbox. (Named Help, for example)

2)   I then have to give the people that will be accessing this
mailbox full rights to the mailbox.

3)   I then need to go to their computers, and setup their Outlook
to open this Help mailbox in addition to theirs.

 

 

Is this correct?  Is there a better way of doing this?

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Public folders questions

2008-07-23 Thread Joe Heaton
1)   Is Microsoft still trying to get rid of public folders?

2)   What do they want us to use instead?

3)   We're creating a task list within a public folder and need to
know:

a.   Is it possible to add to the Master Category list, and have it
show up for all users of the public folder?

b.  Is it possible to make a default view of the public folder
showing specific columns and information?

 

I understand that Outlook is a client-side application, therefore making
it difficult to make the above changes, but I need to know for sure, so
I can inform my manager.  What she's trying to accomplish is creating an
IT project list, to keep track of the big stuff that's on the horizon.
I don't think she wants to go the Microsoft Project route.

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Public folders questions

2008-07-23 Thread Joe Heaton
Anyone know of a cheaper alternative to Sharepoint?

 

Joe Heaton



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folders questions

 

1.   No. 

2.   There are some things that PFs do well and some things that
SharePoint does well. for tasks where SharePoint does  a better job -
use SharePoint. Otherwise use PFs.

3.   I have no clue. I would use SharePoint for that.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 12:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folders questions

 

1)   Is Microsoft still trying to get rid of public folders?

2)   What do they want us to use instead?

3)   We're creating a task list within a public folder and need to
know:

a.   Is it possible to add to the Master Category list, and have it
show up for all users of the public folder?

b.  Is it possible to make a default view of the public folder
showing specific columns and information?

 

I understand that Outlook is a client-side application, therefore making
it difficult to make the above changes, but I need to know for sure, so
I can inform my manager.  What she's trying to accomplish is creating an
IT project list, to keep track of the big stuff that's on the horizon.
I don't think she wants to go the Microsoft Project route.

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 

 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.5/1569 - Release Date:
7/23/2008 1:31 PM



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Account question

2008-07-07 Thread Joe Heaton
Posting here on advice from the NTSysadmin list.
 
Exchange 2K3 - SP2
 
If I disable an account within ADUC, is that account still able to
receive e-mails?  My understanding was no, but am I wrong here?
 
Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Account question

2008-07-07 Thread Joe Heaton
I don't want the disabled account to receive e-mails.  I want it to spit
back an NDR...
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 3:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account question



We still don't know if the goal is to prevent or allow the E-mails.

 

What I was thinking was an SP2 change was actually the 916783 hotfix
(for SP2).

 

Without the hotfix, the answer to OP's question is no.

 

Carl

 

From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 6:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Account question

 

I replied to you on the NT list.  The short answer is yes.  We do it
here with a lot of accounts.  You need to grant SELF associated External
Account rights.

 

- John Barsodi

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 3:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Account question

 

Posting here on advice from the NTSysadmin list.

 

Exchange 2K3 - SP2

 

If I disable an account within ADUC, is that account still able to
receive e-mails?  My understanding was no, but am I wrong here?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Distribution group question

2008-06-16 Thread Joe Heaton
People can be in more than one address list at once, right?  i.e. I have
my GAL, which has everyone, then I create a custom address list, for a
specific department.  Those people can be listed in both lists at once,
right?
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question



In System Manager go to Recipients | All Address Lists.

 

Right Click and select Add to create a new one.  You can also create
address lists within address lists.

 

The available address lists should be in the Show Names from the
drop-down list in the Outlook Address Book.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

2K3

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

What version of Exchange?

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

And how do you go about creating these?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

You create address lists alongside the GAL.

 

The GAL will contain all the known recipients (that aren't hidden).  An
address list is some subset of that, based on criteria you specify.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

But isn't the address list what contains the distribution groups?  Or do
you create an address list within the GAL?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

That sounds like an Address List.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Distribution group question

 

Is there a type of distribution group where you can go into the Address
List, open the group, and select individual names to add to the To:
line?  My boss is saying she's done this before, but I've never heard of
it.

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting

RE: Distribution group question

2008-06-16 Thread Joe Heaton
Strange, I created a custom Address List almost 30 minutes ago.  In ESM,
it shows that it will display what I want, which took a long time to get
to by the way, but within Outlook the Address List is blank still.
Guess I'm just waiting for Recipient Updates, right?
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question



Yep.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

People can be in more than one address list at once, right?  i.e. I have
my GAL, which has everyone, then I create a custom address list, for a
specific department.  Those people can be listed in both lists at once,
right?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

In System Manager go to Recipients | All Address Lists.

 

Right Click and select Add to create a new one.  You can also create
address lists within address lists.

 

The available address lists should be in the Show Names from the
drop-down list in the Outlook Address Book.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

2K3

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

What version of Exchange?

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

And how do you go about creating these?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

You create address lists alongside the GAL.

 

The GAL will contain all the known recipients (that aren't hidden).  An
address list is some subset of that, based on criteria you specify.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

But isn't the address list what contains the distribution groups?  Or do
you create an address list within the GAL?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

That sounds like an Address List.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Distribution group question

 

Is there a type of distribution group where you can go into the Address
List, open the group, and select individual names to add to the To:
line?  My boss is saying she's done this before, but I've never heard of
it.

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer

RE: Distribution group question

2008-06-16 Thread Joe Heaton
Any idea why a user of Outlook 2007 would not be able to see this new
list?  I can see it now, with members, under OL2K3, but my manager is
using OL2K7 and can't see it.
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question



Yep.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

People can be in more than one address list at once, right?  i.e. I have
my GAL, which has everyone, then I create a custom address list, for a
specific department.  Those people can be listed in both lists at once,
right?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

In System Manager go to Recipients | All Address Lists.

 

Right Click and select Add to create a new one.  You can also create
address lists within address lists.

 

The available address lists should be in the Show Names from the
drop-down list in the Outlook Address Book.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

2K3

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

What version of Exchange?

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

And how do you go about creating these?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

You create address lists alongside the GAL.

 

The GAL will contain all the known recipients (that aren't hidden).  An
address list is some subset of that, based on criteria you specify.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

But isn't the address list what contains the distribution groups?  Or do
you create an address list within the GAL?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

That sounds like an Address List.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Distribution group question

 

Is there a type of distribution group where you can go into the Address
List, open the group, and select individual names to add to the To:
line?  My boss is saying she's done this before, but I've never heard of
it.

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer

RE: Distribution group question

2008-06-16 Thread Joe Heaton
Doesn't that happen when the RUS updates?  I manually updated that, and
it is now showing populated in my Outlook, and in others running OL2K3,
but not on my manager's machine, running OL2K7.
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Damien Solodow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 10:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question



If he's using Cached Exchange Mode, it won't show up till the OAB is
updated and his computer downloads it.

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 1:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

Any idea why a user of Outlook 2007 would not be able to see this new
list?  I can see it now, with members, under OL2K3, but my manager is
using OL2K7 and can't see it.

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

Yep.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

People can be in more than one address list at once, right?  i.e. I have
my GAL, which has everyone, then I create a custom address list, for a
specific department.  Those people can be listed in both lists at once,
right?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

In System Manager go to Recipients | All Address Lists.

 

Right Click and select Add to create a new one.  You can also create
address lists within address lists.

 

The available address lists should be in the Show Names from the
drop-down list in the Outlook Address Book.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

2K3

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

What version of Exchange?

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

And how do you go about creating these?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

You create address lists alongside the GAL.

 

The GAL will contain all the known recipients (that aren't hidden).  An
address list is some subset of that, based on criteria you specify.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

But isn't the address list what contains the distribution groups?  Or do
you create an address list within the GAL?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

That sounds like an Address List.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Distribution group question

 

Is there a type of distribution group where you can go into the Address
List, open the group, and select individual names to add to the To:
line?  My boss is saying she's done this before, but I've never heard of
it.

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 

 

 


**
Note

RE: Distribution group question

2008-06-16 Thread Joe Heaton
Thanks Michael :)
 
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 12:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question



No. RUS, by default, runs always - which means about every two
minutes.

 

OAB rebuild happens, by default, at 4am.

 

Wrappage:

http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2007/11/13/forcin
g-an-offline-address-book-to-get-updated.aspx

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 1:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

Doesn't that happen when the RUS updates?  I manually updated that, and
it is now showing populated in my Outlook, and in others running OL2K3,
but not on my manager's machine, running OL2K7.

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Damien Solodow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 10:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

If he's using Cached Exchange Mode, it won't show up till the OAB is
updated and his computer downloads it.

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 1:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

Any idea why a user of Outlook 2007 would not be able to see this new
list?  I can see it now, with members, under OL2K3, but my manager is
using OL2K7 and can't see it.

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 9:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

Yep.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

People can be in more than one address list at once, right?  i.e. I have
my GAL, which has everyone, then I create a custom address list, for a
specific department.  Those people can be listed in both lists at once,
right?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

In System Manager go to Recipients | All Address Lists.

 

Right Click and select Add to create a new one.  You can also create
address lists within address lists.

 

The available address lists should be in the Show Names from the
drop-down list in the Outlook Address Book.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

2K3

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

What version of Exchange?

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

And how do you go about creating these?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

You create address lists alongside the GAL.

 

The GAL will contain all the known recipients (that aren't hidden).  An
address list is some subset of that, based on criteria you specify.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

But isn't the address list what contains the distribution groups?  Or do
you create an address list within the GAL?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

That sounds like an Address List.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Distribution group question

 

Is there a type of distribution group where you can go into the Address
List, open the group, and select individual names to add to the To:
line?  My boss is saying she's done this before, but I've never heard of
it.

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained

Distribution group question

2008-06-13 Thread Joe Heaton
Is there a type of distribution group where you can go into the Address
List, open the group, and select individual names to add to the To:
line?  My boss is saying she's done this before, but I've never heard of
it.
 
Thanks,
 
Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Distribution group question

2008-06-13 Thread Joe Heaton
But isn't the address list what contains the distribution groups?  Or do
you create an address list within the GAL?
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question



That sounds like an Address List.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Distribution group question

 

Is there a type of distribution group where you can go into the Address
List, open the group, and select individual names to add to the To:
line?  My boss is saying she's done this before, but I've never heard of
it.

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Distribution group question

2008-06-13 Thread Joe Heaton
And how do you go about creating these?
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question



You create address lists alongside the GAL.

 

The GAL will contain all the known recipients (that aren't hidden).  An
address list is some subset of that, based on criteria you specify.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

But isn't the address list what contains the distribution groups?  Or do
you create an address list within the GAL?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

That sounds like an Address List.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Distribution group question

 

Is there a type of distribution group where you can go into the Address
List, open the group, and select individual names to add to the To:
line?  My boss is saying she's done this before, but I've never heard of
it.

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Distribution group question

2008-06-13 Thread Joe Heaton
2K3
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question



What version of Exchange?

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

And how do you go about creating these?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

You create address lists alongside the GAL.

 

The GAL will contain all the known recipients (that aren't hidden).  An
address list is some subset of that, based on criteria you specify.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

 

But isn't the address list what contains the distribution groups?  Or do
you create an address list within the GAL?

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution group question

That sounds like an Address List.

 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Distribution group question

 

Is there a type of distribution group where you can go into the Address
List, open the group, and select individual names to add to the To:
line?  My boss is saying she's done this before, but I've never heard of
it.

 

Thanks,

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

 

 

 

 


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Really odd behavior

2008-05-28 Thread Joe Heaton
I don't remember getting the Exchange server wet, but ya never know ;)
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 7:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Really odd behavior



Can't be Gremlins...

 

You are not ready for Mogwi 

 

Bye Billy.

 

Shook



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Really odd behavior

 

I can't believe it's a delayed delivery issue, since the message went
out successfully back in August of 2005.  Plus, delayed delivery is
manually set, and this particular user is not savvy enough to even know
where those settings are.

 

I guess I chalk it up to gremlins in the system, as the user is denying
even looking at this message until after it went out again yesterday.

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Really odd behavior

It's not Exchange doing it. Exchange knows nothing about the Sent
Items folder.

 

That points to an Outlook or other client-side issue.

 

I know that Outlook has the capability for Delayed Delivery. I guess
I'd be taking a look in that direction...

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Really odd behavior

 

I've had this happen a few times in the last couple of months, but this
time it happened to a manager, so I have to look into it.

 

Exchange 2K3, latest SPs and patches

Outlook 2K3, cached mode

 

This manager sent an e-mail back in August of 2005, which was answered
way back then, etc.  The original message is sitting in her archive
folder.

 

This morning, this same message was sent again, without the user sending
it, just magically going out.  The only way she even knew this is
because the person on the other end responded to it.

 

I don't know of anything within Exchange that would do this, but I'm
hoping someone out there does.  The message sent today is in her Sent
Items, so something happened, but the user had nothing to do with it.

 

Any ideas?  Or are there simply gremlins in my Exchange system, randomly
resending messages from years ago?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Really odd behavior

2008-05-28 Thread Joe Heaton
No, I haven't been fondling the servers.  I leave that to you and Shook
:) 


Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 7:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Really odd behavior

must... resist... urge... to be...  obnoxious...

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I don't remember getting the Exchange server wet, but ya never know ;)

 Joe Heaton

 
 From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 7:26 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Really odd behavior

 Can't be Gremlins...



 You are not ready for Mogwi



 Bye Billy.



 Shook

 

 From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 10:23 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Really odd behavior



 I can't believe it's a delayed delivery issue, since the message went 
 out successfully back in August of 2005.  Plus, delayed delivery is 
 manually set, and this particular user is not savvy enough to even 
 know where those settings are.



 I guess I chalk it up to gremlins in the system, as the user is 
 denying even looking at this message until after it went out again
yesterday.



 Joe Heaton





 

 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 11:10 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Really odd behavior

 It's not Exchange doing it. Exchange knows nothing about the Sent
Items
 folder.



 That points to an Outlook or other client-side issue.



 I know that Outlook has the capability for Delayed Delivery. I guess

 I'd be taking a look in that direction...



 Regards,



 Michael B. Smith

 MCSE/Exchange MVP

 http://TheEssentialExchange.com



 From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:03 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Really odd behavior



 I've had this happen a few times in the last couple of months, but 
 this time it happened to a manager, so I have to look into it.



 Exchange 2K3, latest SPs and patches

 Outlook 2K3, cached mode



 This manager sent an e-mail back in August of 2005, which was answered

 way back then, etc.  The original message is sitting in her archive
folder.



 This morning, this same message was sent again, without the user 
 sending it, just magically going out.  The only way she even knew this

 is because the person on the other end responded to it.



 I don't know of anything within Exchange that would do this, but I'm 
 hoping someone out there does.  The message sent today is in her Sent 
 Items, so something happened, but the user had nothing to do with it.



 Any ideas?  Or are there simply gremlins in my Exchange system, 
 randomly resending messages from years ago?



 Joe Heaton

 AISA

 Employment Training Panel

 1100 J Street, 4th Floor

 Sacramento, CA  95814

 (916) 327-5276

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





















--
ME2

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Really odd behavior

2008-05-28 Thread Joe Heaton
I can't believe it's a delayed delivery issue, since the message went
out successfully back in August of 2005.  Plus, delayed delivery is
manually set, and this particular user is not savvy enough to even know
where those settings are.
 
I guess I chalk it up to gremlins in the system, as the user is denying
even looking at this message until after it went out again yesterday.
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Really odd behavior



It's not Exchange doing it. Exchange knows nothing about the Sent
Items folder.

 

That points to an Outlook or other client-side issue.

 

I know that Outlook has the capability for Delayed Delivery. I guess
I'd be taking a look in that direction...

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Really odd behavior

 

I've had this happen a few times in the last couple of months, but this
time it happened to a manager, so I have to look into it.

 

Exchange 2K3, latest SPs and patches

Outlook 2K3, cached mode

 

This manager sent an e-mail back in August of 2005, which was answered
way back then, etc.  The original message is sitting in her archive
folder.

 

This morning, this same message was sent again, without the user sending
it, just magically going out.  The only way she even knew this is
because the person on the other end responded to it.

 

I don't know of anything within Exchange that would do this, but I'm
hoping someone out there does.  The message sent today is in her Sent
Items, so something happened, but the user had nothing to do with it.

 

Any ideas?  Or are there simply gremlins in my Exchange system, randomly
resending messages from years ago?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Really odd behavior

2008-05-28 Thread Joe Heaton
John, you may win the cookie on this one.  Just had an interesting
conversation with my manager.  Seems that she was working with this user
yesterday, cleaning up some delegate issues, etc. and took the user out
of cached mode.  Seems really strange that a message from 3 years ago
would be stuck like that, but that's what I'm going to chalk this up to,
and move on with my day.
 
Thanks all for your help,
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Senter, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 12:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Really odd behavior



Did the manager log into a different system today?  I have seen stuck
messages in a OST file (cache mode) and when the user logins into a box
that have not been on in a while the message goes out.

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Really odd behavior

 

I've had this happen a few times in the last couple of months, but this
time it happened to a manager, so I have to look into it.

 

Exchange 2K3, latest SPs and patches

Outlook 2K3, cached mode

 

This manager sent an e-mail back in August of 2005, which was answered
way back then, etc.  The original message is sitting in her archive
folder.

 

This morning, this same message was sent again, without the user sending
it, just magically going out.  The only way she even knew this is
because the person on the other end responded to it.

 

I don't know of anything within Exchange that would do this, but I'm
hoping someone out there does.  The message sent today is in her Sent
Items, so something happened, but the user had nothing to do with it.

 

Any ideas?  Or are there simply gremlins in my Exchange system, randomly
resending messages from years ago?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Really odd behavior

2008-05-28 Thread Joe Heaton
I dunno, but that's the only thing that happened around the time this
message went out, so I'm gonna stick with that story... 


Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 8:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Really odd behavior

Interesting... I wonder what would cause that.

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 John, you may win the cookie on this one.  Just had an interesting 
 conversation with my manager.  Seems that she was working with this 
 user yesterday, cleaning up some delegate issues, etc. and took the 
 user out of cached mode.  Seems really strange that a message from 3 
 years ago would be stuck like that, but that's what I'm going to chalk

 this up to, and move on with my day.

 Thanks all for your help,

 Joe Heaton

 
 From: Senter, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 12:03 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Really odd behavior

 Did the manager log into a different system today?  I have seen stuck 
 messages in a OST file (cache mode) and when the user logins into a 
 box that have not been on in a while the message goes out.



 From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:03 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Really odd behavior



 I've had this happen a few times in the last couple of months, but 
 this time it happened to a manager, so I have to look into it.



 Exchange 2K3, latest SPs and patches

 Outlook 2K3, cached mode



 This manager sent an e-mail back in August of 2005, which was answered

 way back then, etc.  The original message is sitting in her archive
folder.



 This morning, this same message was sent again, without the user 
 sending it, just magically going out.  The only way she even knew this

 is because the person on the other end responded to it.



 I don't know of anything within Exchange that would do this, but I'm 
 hoping someone out there does.  The message sent today is in her Sent 
 Items, so something happened, but the user had nothing to do with it.



 Any ideas?  Or are there simply gremlins in my Exchange system, 
 randomly resending messages from years ago?



 Joe Heaton

 AISA

 Employment Training Panel

 1100 J Street, 4th Floor

 Sacramento, CA  95814

 (916) 327-5276

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]













--
ME2

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Preventing spoofing

2008-05-28 Thread Joe Heaton
Any decent, effective ways out there to prevent someone from spoofing
our internal e-mail addresses?
 
Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Really odd behavior

2008-05-27 Thread Joe Heaton
I've had this happen a few times in the last couple of months, but this
time it happened to a manager, so I have to look into it.
 
Exchange 2K3, latest SPs and patches
Outlook 2K3, cached mode
 
This manager sent an e-mail back in August of 2005, which was answered
way back then, etc.  The original message is sitting in her archive
folder.
 
This morning, this same message was sent again, without the user sending
it, just magically going out.  The only way she even knew this is
because the person on the other end responded to it.
 
I don't know of anything within Exchange that would do this, but I'm
hoping someone out there does.  The message sent today is in her Sent
Items, so something happened, but the user had nothing to do with it.
 
Any ideas?  Or are there simply gremlins in my Exchange system, randomly
resending messages from years ago?
 
Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exch2007 in ESX

2008-04-30 Thread Joe Heaton
Lol...New Horizons trainers usually see the stuff they're teaching about
a day or so before they teach it.  And they're hired directly out of
school, so they have no real world experience.  When I was going to
Heald, New Horizons would hire guys still in the basic electronics
classes to teach applications
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 7:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exch2007 in ESX



New Horizons trainer at an Exchange 2007 class. Apparently he was
mistaken eh?

 

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands 

 

 

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 7:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exch2007 in ESX

 

Where did you get THIS guidance: My understanding Exchange 2K7 is
recommended to sit on a GC designated domain controller?

 

Let me know. If it's on a MSFT web page or an MVP's web page, I'm sure I
can get that fixed. 'Cuz it's wrong.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 9:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exch2007 in ESX

 

Soif you virtualize Exchange 2007...what other systems would you run
on the same ESX hosts, does it matter? My understanding Exchange 2K7 is
recommended to sit on a GC designated domain controller (so it has quick
access to the global catalog), but would it sit on the same box as say,
an SMS,  WSUS, or SQL server? Anything you WOULDN'T have it share a host
with?

 

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands 

 

 

 

From: Alex Fontana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 6:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exch2007 in ESX

 

Yes, currently four mailbox servers and six CAS/HT servers, working
towards a few thousand mailboxes to be migrated in the next few weeks.
All running on ESX 3.5.

You should get new Dell server guys if they can't quantify that
statement.  A properly configured VM running on a properly configured
ESX server (can't speak for Hyper-V) and properly sized should see no
noticeable performance hit.  Just as in the physical world you gotta
make sure you understand your current environment and size accordingly,
with emphasize on storage and memory.

There are at least a couple of whitepapers on Exchange 2007 performance
on ESX; HP and maybe Dell.  I would say take a look at those, test in
your environment with your type of workload and use that data to make
your decision.

-alex

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Dennis Melahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Anyone virtualized Exchange 2007? I'm getting mixed opinions. My Dell
server guys are saying performance would suffer too much.  I also have a
local integrator who is a VMware and MS Gold Partner and says they
virtualize everything and that because my information store is only
about 25GB for approx 150 boxes I wouldn't have performance problems.
Thoughts?

Thanks,
Dennis


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

 

 

 

 

 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Committing transaction logs

2008-04-28 Thread Joe Heaton
My Checkpoint is very exhausted, but that's because it's installed on a
very old server box...
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 11:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Committing transaction logs



In case anyone is interested, I expanded on this explanation a little
bit, and added a discussion of checkpoint exhaustion, which I recommend
you should be monitoring for on your Exchange server.

 

http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/04/28/ESE-Ch
eckpoint-Depth.aspx

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 9:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Committing transaction logs

 

The specific case that got me thinking about this is a remote office E2K
server with rather low disk space, on which the logs were accumulating
in the mdbdata directory. The backup job had hung waiting for a tape the
local person had not loaded, and there were an extra gig or so of log
files.  I just checked it again, and now it's back to normal level of
free space and only a few log files.  I didn't see any events in the
applog other than an ESE 215 error that showed when I canceled the
backup job, and the usual ESE 7xx events re. online defrags.  Maybe I
could turn up some logging to get more insight into tran log
commitments?

 

Thanks for this excellent explanation - I'm saving it.

 

Have a nice weekend.

 

-  Bob

 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 5:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Committing transaction logs

A concise explanation? Hrmmm.

 

Well, first, doing a backup does NOT force logs to be committed. It
means that the backup process waits until a checkpoint occurs, flushes
the current transaction log, and during the backup additional
checkpoints are not allowed to occur (that is, nothing is allowed to be
flushed to the ESE database until after the backup is complete - leading
to an increasing checkpoint depth, and in extreme situations, checkpoint
exhaustion - but that is another discussion altogether). The ESE buffers
are not flushed.

 

So...data is written, in a serialized fashion, to the in-memory ESE
cache and to the log buffers, as updates occur in an Exchange database.
Logs are written to disk as logs fill up, or as checkpoints occur. (This
may mean that a log can have nothing but a checkpoint record in it - but
that is not the normal case.) In the ESE buffers, I/O is accumulated and
prioritized by a process known as the lazy writer. The lazy writer
scans the ESE buffers for dirty (modified) pages and builds an optimized
list to flush those to disk. As that list is flushed to disk, the pages
are marked as clean, and the checkpoint is marked as having advanced
(on a transaction by transaction basis, not a log by log basis).
Whenever the transaction in a log are fully advanced, then the
checkpoint file and the database header are updated.

 

During a backup, the lazy writer is paused.

 

The ONLY time you are assured that logs are fully committed is during
clean shutdown, or after running soft recovery.

 

So...what is the problem you are trying to address or question you are
trying to answer? I might be of more help if I know that.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 6:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Committing transaction logs

 

I'm looking for a concise explanation of when/how the transaction logs
are committed.  Specifically, is there another way to force logs to be
committed other than the backup or stopping the IS?   (E2K3)

 

TIA

 

Bob Peitzke 

 

 

 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange Project Book

2008-04-15 Thread Joe Heaton
He was being facetious.
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Project Book



 

From: Jason Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: RE: Exchange Project Book

 

I've already pre-ordered at Amazon.

 

 

What did you pre-order.  I can't find it.

 

 

Webster

 

From: David Florea, SysAdmin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: RE: Exchange Project Book

 

Absolutely, I'm in for a copy.  That is, assuming I can avoid being drug
along toward a hosted solution

 

David



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: RE: Exchange Project Book

I think it would be great Michael, as we haven't even started looking at
upgrading yet...  So, when is the publish date?  (hehe, just kidding)

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Exchange Project Book

I've been discussing with a technical publisher about doing an Exchange
book that is project oriented. That is, the book has a specific goal in
mind, from beginning to end.

 

I have suggested a soup-to-nuts guide to installing and configuring
Exchange Server 2007 in small and medium organizations.

 

I would love to hear, either in this newsgroup or directly, what y'all
think about that concept. Good or bad.

 

Also, if you have other ideas about a project oriented Exchange book,
I'd like to hear that too.


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange Project Book

2008-04-14 Thread Joe Heaton
I think it would be great Michael, as we haven't even started looking at
upgrading yet...  So, when is the publish date?  (hehe, just kidding)
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 6:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Project Book



I've been discussing with a technical publisher about doing an Exchange
book that is project oriented. That is, the book has a specific goal in
mind, from beginning to end.

 

I have suggested a soup-to-nuts guide to installing and configuring
Exchange Server 2007 in small and medium organizations.

 

I would love to hear, either in this newsgroup or directly, what y'all
think about that concept. Good or bad.

 

Also, if you have other ideas about a project oriented Exchange book,
I'd like to hear that too.

 

Thanks!

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

2008-04-01 Thread Joe Heaton
I'm a Comcast customer, and have now successfully sent a message from my
work address to my home address, and replied back out.  Guess it's not
all e-mail to Comcast, or they've fixed it. 


Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

So I got a hold of someone at Comcast, I guess that are getting flooded
with calls about this, and they are telling people that we should use
SMTP port 587 and authenticate before we can send email?

I'm confused?  I know that if you are a [EMAIL PROTECTED] customer, you need
to configure your mail client to use these settings.   But can they
require outside organizations to do this?  Aren't they bound by some RFC
rules to allow unauthenticated smtp traffic on port 25?  

Plus, how in the heck would I even authenticate with them?  Do I need to
open an account?  Wft?  This can't be right...

-Sam






-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

FYI, it appears a few of the customers at our ISP have reported this
same issue.

Our ISP confirmed that the packets are being sent out from the ISP's
internet Routers, but being dropped on the Comcast end.

So now the pointing fingers game begins.






-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 4:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

Oh no's!

If this is accurate, Comcast's anti-spam is done by Symantec!

   http://www.comcastblacklist.com/?page_id=6


On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Someone posted a very good question to that 'A, MX, PTR' blog article 
 since I posted the link.  For those that are unfamiliar with PTR and 
 HELO filtering by anti-spam filters, you might want to check out the 
 question and my response(s).

 On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Oh how I wish I had the time to be a blogger, but I did make time
to
  comment on DNS issues with anti-spam products:
 
  http://www.espinola.net/blog/archives/5
 
  Summary:  Make sure you have accurate A, MX, and PTR records for
your
  outbound server.
 
 
  On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Sam Cayze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 
   So, do mean like having your PTR and reverse DNS setup correctly,
or
   something related to the nameservers?
  
   I will relay that info back to my provider.  It seems another one
of our
   ISP's customer has also reported the same issue.
   Good to know John, thanks.
   -Sam
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT) 
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 1:58 AM
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  
   Subject: RE: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?
  
   Make sure that you have all the appropriate DNS entries on the
external
   DNS server. Comcast is getting twitchy about accepting mail form
certain
   netblocks and domains. My home is wired to Comcast and they
sometimes
   reject mail from my domain here.
  
   If you need to, contact Comcast's corporate headquarters and have
them
   help in resolving the problem.
  
  
   John H. Matteson, Jr.
   Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
   FOB Orgun-E
   Afghanistan
   DSN - 318 431 8001
   VoSIP - (308) 431 - 
   Iridium - 717.633.3823
   Roshain - 079 - 736 - 3832
  
   A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national
group
   in America has not yet become an American. And the man who goes
among
   you to trade upon your nationality is no worthy son to live under
the
   Stars and Stripes.  Woodrow Wilson
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 1:53 AM
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
   Subject: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?
  
   All emails to Comcast are building up in our Queues and triggering
delay
   notifications.
  
   This is what I have tried:
   DNS Flush
   Verify our dns cache for Comcast.net matches that reported on 
   dnsstuff.com.
  
   A telnet connection to Comcast MX servers times out/no response.
(And a
   few find folks on the nt-list verified for me that mx1.comcast.net
is
   indeed 'putting out').
   I tried a telnet right to the IPs too.
  
   I kind of figured we are blacklisted, but from what I have heard
Comcast
   will actually send you an NDR back with an abuse message.
   Update: Just heard back from their abuse dept (in like 5 minutes -
   damn!) - we are NOT blacklisted.
  
  
   Ideas?!?  ISP Problem?
  
   -Sam
  
  
  
   ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam
~
   ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja
~
  
   ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets

RE: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

2008-04-01 Thread Joe Heaton
I understood that part Sam.  Just meant that I tested it by sending an
e-mail from my work address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and it went through.
Your reply also mentioned that it could be specific outside domains
(your ISP being one of them).  Hope you get it sorted... 


Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 12:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

Yeah, it's kinda related to NON Comcast customers FYI. And it's ISP
specific.  I had a bunch of people do a 'telnet mx1.comcast.net 25' for
me, and it worked for them.  But for many of us who are SunGard
customers, and have them as our ISP, it's not working...



-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

I'm a Comcast customer, and have now successfully sent a message from my
work address to my home address, and replied back out.  Guess it's not
all e-mail to Comcast, or they've fixed it. 


Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

So I got a hold of someone at Comcast, I guess that are getting flooded
with calls about this, and they are telling people that we should use
SMTP port 587 and authenticate before we can send email?

I'm confused?  I know that if you are a [EMAIL PROTECTED] customer, you need
to configure your mail client to use these settings.   But can they
require outside organizations to do this?  Aren't they bound by some RFC
rules to allow unauthenticated smtp traffic on port 25?  

Plus, how in the heck would I even authenticate with them?  Do I need to
open an account?  Wft?  This can't be right...

-Sam






-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

FYI, it appears a few of the customers at our ISP have reported this
same issue.

Our ISP confirmed that the packets are being sent out from the ISP's
internet Routers, but being dropped on the Comcast end.

So now the pointing fingers game begins.






-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 4:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

Oh no's!

If this is accurate, Comcast's anti-spam is done by Symantec!

   http://www.comcastblacklist.com/?page_id=6


On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Someone posted a very good question to that 'A, MX, PTR' blog article 
 since I posted the link.  For those that are unfamiliar with PTR and 
 HELO filtering by anti-spam filters, you might want to check out the 
 question and my response(s).

 On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Oh how I wish I had the time to be a blogger, but I did make time
to
  comment on DNS issues with anti-spam products:
 
  http://www.espinola.net/blog/archives/5
 
  Summary:  Make sure you have accurate A, MX, and PTR records for
your
  outbound server.
 
 
  On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Sam Cayze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 
   So, do mean like having your PTR and reverse DNS setup correctly,
or
   something related to the nameservers?
  
   I will relay that info back to my provider.  It seems another one
of our
   ISP's customer has also reported the same issue.
   Good to know John, thanks.
   -Sam
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT) 
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 1:58 AM
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  
   Subject: RE: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?
  
   Make sure that you have all the appropriate DNS entries on the
external
   DNS server. Comcast is getting twitchy about accepting mail form
certain
   netblocks and domains. My home is wired to Comcast and they
sometimes
   reject mail from my domain here.
  
   If you need to, contact Comcast's corporate headquarters and have
them
   help in resolving the problem.
  
  
   John H. Matteson, Jr.
   Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
   FOB Orgun-E
   Afghanistan
   DSN - 318 431 8001
   VoSIP - (308) 431 - 
   Iridium - 717.633.3823
   Roshain - 079 - 736 - 3832
  
   A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national
group
   in America has not yet become an American. And the man who goes
among
   you to trade upon your nationality is no worthy son to live under
the
   Stars and Stripes.  Woodrow Wilson
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 1:53 AM
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
   Subject: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?
  
   All emails

RE: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

2008-04-01 Thread Joe Heaton
Adam's got the answer Sam.  :)
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Adam Hitchcock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 1:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?


.net is the customers address while .com is the corporate address.


On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Sam Cayze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:


Ah, cool, thanks :)

Curious, is your home address comcast.net or .com?

Oddly enough, I can send to comcast.com address just fine...


-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

I understood that part Sam.  Just meant that I tested it by
sending an
e-mail from my work address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and it went
through.
Your reply also mentioned that it could be specific outside
domains
(your ISP being one of them).  Hope you get it sorted...


Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 12:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

Yeah, it's kinda related to NON Comcast customers FYI. And it's
ISP
specific.  I had a bunch of people do a 'telnet mx1.comcast.net
25' for
me, and it worked for them.  But for many of us who are SunGard
customers, and have them as our ISP, it's not working...



-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

I'm a Comcast customer, and have now successfully sent a message
from my
work address to my home address, and replied back out.  Guess
it's not
all e-mail to Comcast, or they've fixed it.


Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

So I got a hold of someone at Comcast, I guess that are getting
flooded
with calls about this, and they are telling people that we
should use
SMTP port 587 and authenticate before we can send email?

I'm confused?  I know that if you are a [EMAIL PROTECTED] customer,
you need
to configure your mail client to use these settings.   But can
they
require outside organizations to do this?  Aren't they bound by
some RFC
rules to allow unauthenticated smtp traffic on port 25?

Plus, how in the heck would I even authenticate with them?  Do I
need to
open an account?  Wft?  This can't be right...

-Sam






-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

FYI, it appears a few of the customers at our ISP have reported
this
same issue.

Our ISP confirmed that the packets are being sent out from the
ISP's
internet Routers, but being dropped on the Comcast end.

So now the pointing fingers game begins.






-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 4:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Help: Can't send to Comcast.net?!?

Oh no's!

If this is accurate, Comcast's anti-spam is done by Symantec!

  http://www.comcastblacklist.com/?page_id=6


On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Someone posted a very good question to that 'A, MX, PTR' blog
article
 since I posted the link.  For those that are unfamiliar with
PTR and
 HELO filtering by anti-spam filters, you might want to check
out the
 question and my response(s).

 On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Oh how I wish I had the time to be a blogger, but I did
make time
to
  comment on DNS issues with anti-spam products:
 
  http://www.espinola.net/blog/archives/5
 
  Summary:  Make sure you have accurate A, MX, and PTR records
for
your

RE: Cluster Server

2008-03-25 Thread Joe Heaton
Last I heard, it's not recommended to have Exchange on a DC.  However,
if you already do, don't just demote the server.  You have to uninstall
Exchange from that box first, or you'll get into a very difficult
situationisn't that right Don?
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 10:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Cluster Server



Hi All I have two questions:

 

Is there any issue to have your exchange 03 server be a domain
controller and a global catalog at the same time? 

 

I am looking to purchase a new additional server Exchange 03 server to
make a cluster for instant failover in case the main mail server goes
offline. What are my options?

 

Dennis Rogov

Senior Network Analyst 
THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 

379 thornall street, 12th floor  | edison, nj 08837 usa

Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.peergroupinc.com http://www.peergroupinc.com 
[This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or
lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of
this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly
prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify
me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any
copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ]

 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

forwarding a contact

2008-03-20 Thread Joe Heaton
I know it's possible to attach your own information to an e-mail, as a
vCard.  Is it possible to do this type of thing with one of your
contacts, in order to forward contact information?
 
Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: forwarding a contact

2008-03-20 Thread Joe Heaton
Never mind, I found it.  In Outlook 2K3, it's in the contact file
itself, you choose Action - forward as vCard.
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 11:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: forwarding a contact


I know it's possible to attach your own information to an e-mail, as a
vCard.  Is it possible to do this type of thing with one of your
contacts, in order to forward contact information?
 
Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Missing FROM

2008-03-14 Thread Joe Heaton
If you're talking about the From field while creating a message, I
believe that's always blank while creating the message.  Mine is blank
as I'm typing this message. 


Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: Brian Rudnicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 7:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Missing FROM

I have a client on a single Exchange 2003 box.  Small domain, 40 users. 
Everything is working fine except for one user.  When they send a
message using Outlook, it bounces back with the error that none of the
users accounts could send to this recipient.

Turns out, when you create a new message on their machine, the FROM
field is blank.  The only account they have configured is the Exchange
server.  How do I set his account as the default account when creating
messages?

Thaks,
Brian Rudnicke 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: External Mtg Invites Off By 1 Hour

2008-03-13 Thread Joe Heaton
It's not your issue at all.  It's from the other side.  Whoever sent the
invitation needs to make sure they have the update, etc.  We had the
same situation in reverse just the other day.  One of my users didn't
have the patch.  In fact, I found out this user didn't even have any SPs
applied to their machine.  I wasn't a happy camper on that one, as this
machine had just recently been rebuilt.
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Phil Hershey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: External Mtg Invites Off By 1 Hour



With all of our systems patched for the DST change last year, I'm
surprised to be seeing this.  Calendar invitations and accepted
appointments sent into some of our users from outside Exchange users
this week all come in 1 hour late.  For example an invitation for a
conference call with a supplier who sent it for 9:00 comes into some of
us displaying as at 10:00, and we accept it as such.  Thus we miss the
conference call.  Outlook invitations from Outlook clients that are
non-Exchange Server users are okay.  This is just new appointments, not
recurring appointments.  All the DC's and the Exchange 2003 server have
their times and time zones correctly set and are all in the Pacific
zone; it's not a multi-zone issue.

 

Any ideas?

 

Philip Hershey

Network Admin Supervisor | MCSA 2003:Server

AGIA Insurance Services

Carpinteria, CA 93013-2062

 

805.566.9191 Telephone (Ext. 2562)

805.566.1887 Fax

 

Web Site: www.AGIA.com http://www.ultraanalog.com/ 

AGIA Values:  Relationship, Integrity, Excellence, Innovation,
Contribution



This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of
addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying,
disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by
return e-mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies.

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: External Mtg Invites Off By 1 Hour

2008-03-13 Thread Joe Heaton
Hmm, well, as I seem to be saying about a dozen times a day  That's
wierd!
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Phil Hershey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: External Mtg Invites Off By 1 Hour



Unfortunately for us, that's not it.  We had an invitation sent in from
a system we know to be good.  In auto-preview it appears with the
correct time, but in the reading pane and when you open the invitation,
it's shifted an hour later.  Nuts.

 

- Philip

 

This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of
addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying,
disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by
return e-mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies.

 

 

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: External Mtg Invites Off By 1 Hour

 

It's not your issue at all.  It's from the other side.  Whoever sent the
invitation needs to make sure they have the update, etc.  We had the
same situation in reverse just the other day.  One of my users didn't
have the patch.  In fact, I found out this user didn't even have any SPs
applied to their machine.  I wasn't a happy camper on that one, as this
machine had just recently been rebuilt.

 

Joe Heaton

 

 



From: Phil Hershey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: External Mtg Invites Off By 1 Hour

With all of our systems patched for the DST change last year, I'm
surprised to be seeing this.  Calendar invitations and accepted
appointments sent into some of our users from outside Exchange users
this week all come in 1 hour late.  For example an invitation for a
conference call with a supplier who sent it for 9:00 comes into some of
us displaying as at 10:00, and we accept it as such.  Thus we miss the
conference call.  Outlook invitations from Outlook clients that are
non-Exchange Server users are okay.  This is just new appointments, not
recurring appointments.  All the DC's and the Exchange 2003 server have
their times and time zones correctly set and are all in the Pacific
zone; it's not a multi-zone issue.

 

Any ideas?

 

Philip Hershey

Network Admin Supervisor | MCSA 2003:Server

AGIA Insurance Services

Carpinteria, CA 93013-2062

 

805.566.9191 Telephone (Ext. 2562)

805.566.1887 Fax

 

Web Site: www.AGIA.com http://www.ultraanalog.com/ 

AGIA Values:  Relationship, Integrity, Excellence, Innovation,
Contribution

This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of
addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying,
disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by
return e-mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies.

 

 

 

 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Leap Year

2008-02-29 Thread Joe Heaton
I've added a new user today, but I'm still on E 2k3...
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Leap Year



I was trying to add a new user in Exchange 2007 SP1, and got the
following error:

 

Error:

The Exchange server address list service failed to respond. This could
be because of an address list or email address policy configuration
error.

 

I googled around and ran across a couple of posts that theorized it is a
leap year problem. Has anyone else seen this?

 

Scot

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: You WILL be assimilated....

2008-02-25 Thread Joe Heaton
Lucky for not having Iphones maybe, but not for where he is.  Keep your
head down John... 


Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 8:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: You WILL be assimilated

- and for that you may consider yourself lucky my friend. :)



-Original Message-
From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 8:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: You WILL be assimilated

Ahhh.. what's an iPhone?

Us folk out here in the middle of nowhere just don't keep up
with all that noise back in civil-I-zation


John H. Matteson, Jr.
Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
FOB Orgun-E
Afghanistan
DSN - 318 431 8001
VoSIP - (308) 431 - 
Iridium - 717.633.3823
Roshain - 079 - 736 - 3832

A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group
in America has not yet become an American. And the man who goes among
you to trade upon your nationality is no worthy son to live under the
Stars and Stripes.  Woodrow Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 9:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: You WILL be assimilated

Oh Come on John, I know all my iPHONE users will be asking when they can
get this upgrade :)

-troy


From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 11:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: You WILL be assimilated

I wondering what mixture of recreational pharmaceuticals were used to
come up with that little gem.


John H. Matteson, Jr.
Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
FOB Orgun-E
Afghanistan
DSN - 318 431 8001
VoSIP - (308) 431 - 
Iridium - 717.633.3823
Roshain - 079 - 736 - 3832

A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group
in America has not yet become an American. And the man who goes among
you to trade upon your nationality is no worthy son to live under the
Stars and Stripes.  Woodrow Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 6:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: You WILL be assimilated

http://www.physorg.com/news122819670.html

--
Sherry Abercrombie

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Arthur C. Clarke




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: OT: You WILL be assimilated....

2008-02-22 Thread Joe Heaton
YES!  Now that i'd be interested in.  My wife has a wonderful habit of
one of two things:
 
1) Misplacing the remote, or
2) Leaving the room without handing me the remote.
 
#2 is the most annoying, as the TV is usually left on some cooking show,
or Lifetime program... blech!
 
Joe Heaton
 



From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 8:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT: You WILL be assimilated



I predict the next thing will be to turn it into a TV remote that you
can't lose.

 



From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 10:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT: You WILL be assimilated

 

Whoa... next thing will be keyboards on your chest and monitors on your
belly.  :-)

 



From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 8:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: You WILL be assimilated

http://www.physorg.com/news122819670.html

-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. 
Arthur C. Clarke 

 

 

 



** 
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the
intended 
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you 
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by 
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**



 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

  1   2   >