RE: Mobile Device Management basics

[Martin Blackstone]

We looked at all the players and chose Zenprise, though MobileIron was a
close second.

 

From: Adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 11:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mobile Device Management basics

 

We use Zenprise. Generally happy with it.
Easy to use console.

And Joe Heaton, we had problems with Samsungs also, but that has been ironed
out nicely.




On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:14 AM, John Cook  wrote:

I know it comes up pretty regular so I'm offering a link I got that covers
all of the MDM players and gives a brief synopsis on what each one does.

http://www.cio.com/slideshow/detail/49367/10-Mobile-Device-Management-Apps-t
o-Take-Charge-of-BYOD?source=CIONLE_nlt_insider_2012-06-08#slide1 

 

John W. Cook

Network operations Manager

Partnership for Strong Families

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not
read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed
in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the
company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no
viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility
for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.

 

  _  

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist




-- 
smsadm

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Blackberry Outage.. here we go again...

[Martin Blackstone]

Try to connect to gb.srp.blackberry.com
That's their UK server.

-Original Message-
From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 8:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Outage.. here we go again...

Connection to srp.na.blackberry.net is failing... wait, up now...
and failing...and UP again!




-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Outage.. here we go again...

IMO, it seems they may be getting bit by an ongoing Juniper router bug (BGP
related) as I see traceroutes to  204.187.87.33 dying inside Level3 which
has reported issues. Fails also within the ATT backbone. There are other
things going on, apparently, on various parts of the Internet backbone.

Seems to be borne out by some people still having working service in N.
America.

~JasonG



> -Original Message-
> From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 10:49
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Blackberry Outage.. here we go again...
> 
> Awaiting formal confirmation.
> 
> 
> .
> 
> 
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt- 
> software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to 
> listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


.

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Blackberry Outage.. here we go again...

[Martin Blackstone]

Im on the phone with them now.

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 7:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Outage.. here we go again...

 

Awaiting formal confirmation. 


.

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Blackberry BES Image Vulnerability

[Martin Blackstone]

Fix is easy. Lay down a couple of replacement files and restart the BAS. 

We did it in less than 5 min with no downtime.

 

 

From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] 
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 4:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry BES Image Vulnerability

 

Apologies if this has already been posted but I didn't spot it so..

 

http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Images-used-to-break-into-BlackBe
rry-servers-1322436.html

  _  

MIRA Ltd

 

Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England

Registered in England and Wales No. 402570

VAT Registration  GB 100 1464 84

 

The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of
the intended recipient.  If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete
it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax.  You should not copy,
forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is
prohibited.

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Exchange 2003 OMA Security Policies

[Martin Blackstone]

Remember this thing:
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/exchange-2003-mobile-messaging-part3.htm
l

:-)

 

From: Simon Butler [mailto:si...@sembee.co.uk] 
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OMA Security Policies

 

Upgrade to Exchange 200 or higher. 

ActiveSync on Exchange 2003 was very much a version 1.0 implementation and
the management is close to nothing. 

 

Simon. 

 

 

--
Simon Butler
MVP: Exchange, MCSE
Sembee Ltd.

e: si...@sembee.co.uk
w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/
w: http://exchange.sembee.info/

w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/

Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with the iPhone?
http://CertificatesForExchange.com/ for certificates from just $26.99.
Need a domain for your certificate? http://DomainsForExchange.net/ 

 

Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/ 

 

 

 

From: Haritwal, Dhiraj [mailto:dhiraj.harit...@ap.sony.com] 
Sent: 11 August 2011 17:33
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 OMA Security Policies

 

Hi,

 

Is it possible to deploy additional Security policies for Exchange 2003 SP2
OMA ie. force user to use unlock PIN/Password for device, lock one mailbox
with one Device ID etc. 

 

 

Dhiraj

 

 

 

 

  _  


This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual
or entity named above and may contain information that is privileged. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error, please notify us immediately by return email
or telephone and destroy the original message. - This mail is sent via Sony
Asia Pacific Mail Gateway.

  _  

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Managing Activesync

[Martin Blackstone]

We are evaluating a number of MDM solutions right now. I haven't gotten to
Airwatch yet, but it is on the list.

My favorite so far has been Zenprise. I like the way they use app tunnels.

 

From: Rimmel, Carl [mailto:crimm...@hfhs.org] 
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Managing Activesync

 

Wondering what, if any, solutions people are using to manage, secure and
control Activesync connections to their Exchange environments.  We are
looking at a product from Airwatch (http://www.air-watch.com/).


==
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email contains information from the sender that

may be CONFIDENTIAL, LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY or otherwise protected 
from disclosure. This email is intended for use only by the person or entity

to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, 
disclosure, copying, distribution, printing, or any action taken in reliance

on the contents of this email, is strictly prohibited. If you received this 
email in error, please contact the sending party by reply email, delete the 
email from your computer system and shred any paper copies.
 
Note to Patients: There are a number of risks you should consider before
using 
e-mail to communicate with us. See our Privacy Policy and Henry Ford My
Health 
at www.henryford.com for more detailed information. If you do not believe
that 
our policy gives you the privacy and security protection you need, do not
send 
e-mail or Internet communications to us.

==

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Exchange 2010 SP1 and BES EXpress... Compatible?

[Martin Blackstone]

Ill say I have never heard such a thing..

 

From: Brian McGloin [mailto:sms...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 2:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 SP1 and BES EXpress... Compatible?

 

The problem I'm hearing is that full blown BES works, but not BES Express.

We won't pay for BES and only have a few upper mgmt types with Blackberries
using BES Express.

 

Thx

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Steve Ens  wrote:

Works for me...

 

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Brian McGloin  wrote:

I'm hearing conflicting stories.

Are these two compatible?

 

Thx in advance

-- 
smsadm

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist




-- 
smsadm

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: POP

[Martin Blackstone]

You don’t need POP for BIS. It will query your OWA server.
You can setup an acct on your carriers BIS site.
Query Google for your carrier name and BIS. For example Verizon BIS.


-Original Message-
From: Lynden A. Philadelphia [mailto:lphiladelp...@philadelphiagroup.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 2:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: POP

Do you have a document?

Not sure what to put in for pop and smtp


Lynden
P THINK GREEN before you PRINT SCREEN

-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: July-21-11 12:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: POP

I'd say the best way is to use BIS which is native to BBs and IIRC mimics 
outlook web access. You just need the login credentials.

On Wednesday, July 20, 2011, Lynden A. Philadelphia 
 wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have an SBS 2011 it works fine.
>
> I would like to receive and send e-mails on my blackberry and don’t want to 
> setup BESX.
>
> I think the best way is to setup POP on my Blackberry.
>
> I have started the POP services on SBS 2011.
>
> What do I do next?
>
> HELP
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, 
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader 
> of this message in not the intended recipient  or the employer or agent 
> responsible for delivering the message to the recipient, you are hereby 
> notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is 
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
> notify  me immediately by email or telephone, and delete this message and all 
> of its attachments.
>
> Thank You.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here: 
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
>
>

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist




This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and 
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message in 
not the intended recipient or the employer or agent responsible for delivering 
the message to the recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by 
email or telephone, and delete this message and all of its attachments.

Thank You.



---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Sending Large Files

[Martin Blackstone]

We will be using the VM appliance. No hardware needed.

 

From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 3:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Sending Large Files

 

Martin, which one are you buying?  Appliance or software?

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Martin Blackstone 
wrote:

Yep. Its all very smooth. Once we finish buying it, our FTP server is going
away forever.

 

From: Young, Darren [mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 3:36 PM


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Sending Large Files

 

We have that with faculty all the time, the user here sends an invite to the
external recipient. A local account is created for that user on the
appliance that only has the ability to send to the person that sent the
invite. I believe we have those local guest accounts set to be removed after
30 days.

 

From: Daniele Bartoli [mailto:danielebart...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 5:30 PM


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: Re: Sending Large Files

 

How do you deal with external customers who need to send large files to your
company that run into file size limitations?  



 

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Young, Darren
 wrote:

We have had Accellion here for around 6 years, the first one was their
dedicated appliance, now we're using the VM version and feeding it ATA disk.

 

Ours is used a ton and we receive very few complaints. The only recurring
one is that the login page says "Email Address" and in fact you have to use
your userid there. I honestly can't remember why that's the case, perhaps
because we authenticate to AD.

 

When we migrated from the previous physical hardware to the new VM they made
it extremely (utterly) easy. I brought up the new VM on a different IP
address; they handled the data migration then one morning they cut it over
for us. Reused the IP, moved the SSL cert over, literally everything.

 

I really can't say anything bad about it; it just sits there and works.

 

 

From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 5:16 PM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Sending Large Files

 

We don't use a plug-in, nor do we send from Outlook those attachments that
would otherwise be disallowed by Outlook (over 10 meg, executable, etc) - we
use the web interface in that case.

 

We've had it for years (since long before Axway acquired Tumbleweed) - if we
were looking now, Accellion sounds like it would be worth a look.

 

 

From: Daniele Bartoli [mailto:danielebart...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 3:09 PM


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: Re: Sending Large Files

 

Thanks Looks like for an Outlook user that Axway would require installing a
plug-in.  Any options that don't require a plug-in?

 

Daniele

 

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Don Andrews 
wrote:

We use Axway'x Secure Messenger - can demo if you'd like.

 

From: Young, Darren [mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 2:34 PM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Sending Large Files 

 

We use an Accellion.

 

From: Daniele Bartoli [mailto:danielebart...@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 4:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Sending Large Files

 

Hi Everyone!

 

I wanted to see what other folks are doing to solve the issue of emailing
large files.  We have internal employees that like to email large files
along with external customers.  Our Exchange servers are set up with an
attachment size limit of 10 megs. 

 

I am aware of 3rd party optionssuch as yousendit.com <http://yousendit.com/>
, wetransfer.com <http://wetransfer.com/> , etc. however I wanted to see if
there are any other options that someone could recommend.

 

Are there any options that would allow one to send large files using
Outlook, however if the file is greater than the attachment size limit it
will send a link instead of the file.

 

Any information is greatly appreciated.

 


Daniele

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbelt

RE: Sending Large Files

[Martin Blackstone]

Yep. Its all very smooth. Once we finish buying it, our FTP server is going
away forever.

 

From: Young, Darren [mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 3:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sending Large Files

 

We have that with faculty all the time, the user here sends an invite to the
external recipient. A local account is created for that user on the
appliance that only has the ability to send to the person that sent the
invite. I believe we have those local guest accounts set to be removed after
30 days.

 

From: Daniele Bartoli [mailto:danielebart...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 5:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Sending Large Files

 

How do you deal with external customers who need to send large files to your
company that run into file size limitations?  



 

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Young, Darren
 wrote:

We have had Accellion here for around 6 years, the first one was their
dedicated appliance, now we're using the VM version and feeding it ATA disk.

 

Ours is used a ton and we receive very few complaints. The only recurring
one is that the login page says "Email Address" and in fact you have to use
your userid there. I honestly can't remember why that's the case, perhaps
because we authenticate to AD.

 

When we migrated from the previous physical hardware to the new VM they made
it extremely (utterly) easy. I brought up the new VM on a different IP
address; they handled the data migration then one morning they cut it over
for us. Reused the IP, moved the SSL cert over, literally everything.

 

I really can't say anything bad about it; it just sits there and works.

 

 

From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 5:16 PM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sending Large Files

 

We don't use a plug-in, nor do we send from Outlook those attachments that
would otherwise be disallowed by Outlook (over 10 meg, executable, etc) - we
use the web interface in that case.

 

We've had it for years (since long before Axway acquired Tumbleweed) - if we
were looking now, Accellion sounds like it would be worth a look.

 

 

From: Daniele Bartoli [mailto:danielebart...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 3:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Sending Large Files

 

Thanks Looks like for an Outlook user that Axway would require installing a
plug-in.  Any options that don't require a plug-in?

 

Daniele

 

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Don Andrews 
wrote:

We use Axway'x Secure Messenger - can demo if you'd like.

 

From: Young, Darren [mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 2:34 PM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Sending Large Files 

 

We use an Accellion.

 

From: Daniele Bartoli [mailto:danielebart...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 4:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Sending Large Files

 

Hi Everyone!

 

I wanted to see what other folks are doing to solve the issue of emailing
large files.  We have internal employees that like to email large files
along with external customers.  Our Exchange servers are set up with an
attachment size limit of 10 megs. 

 

I am aware of 3rd party optionssuch as yousendit.com 
, wetransfer.com  , etc. however I wanted to see if
there are any other options that someone could recommend.

 

Are there any options that would allow one to send large files using
Outlook, however if the file is greater than the attachment size limit it
will send a link instead of the file.

 

Any information is greatly appreciated.

 


Daniele

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: un

RE: Sending Large Files

[Martin Blackstone]

We just finished an inhouse demo of this product and were very impressed. We
will most likely be buying it.

I give it a thumbs up.

 

From: Young, Darren [mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 2:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sending Large Files

 

We use an Accellion.

 

From: Daniele Bartoli [mailto:danielebart...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 4:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Sending Large Files

 

Hi Everyone!

 

I wanted to see what other folks are doing to solve the issue of emailing
large files.  We have internal employees that like to email large files
along with external customers.  Our Exchange servers are set up with an
attachment size limit of 10 megs. 

 

I am aware of 3rd party optionssuch as yousendit.com, wetransfer.com, etc.
however I wanted to see if there are any other options that someone could
recommend.

 

Are there any options that would allow one to send large files using
Outlook, however if the file is greater than the attachment size limit it
will send a link instead of the file.

 

Any information is greatly appreciated.

 


Daniele

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: The Sent Items folder contains the maximum number of allowed items

[Martin Blackstone]

Did anyone ever find a solution to this?
Im seeing the same thing with a user on OL2007

-Original Message-
From: Jean-Paul natola [mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 4:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: The Sent Items folder contains the maximum number of allowed items



Hi all,
 
I updated one of my users to outlook 2010 and she gets this error when she
tries to send an email
 
"The Sent Items folder contains the maximum number of allowed items.
Archive or move some items to another folder.  Until space is available,
sent messages will be saved in the Outbox folder, but will not be sent
again."
 
but the message actually does get sent , and sits in her outbox
 
There are no quotas set either 
 
running ex2010




















Jean-Paul Natola  
_
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:W
L:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: BES - "Lookup Failed"?

[Martin Blackstone]

What is your Exchange version?

 

From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 10:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: BES - "Lookup Failed"?

 

Appreciate this is the Exchange list but I also expect many of you use BES
so maybe someone's encountered this.

 

We have a dedicated BES Express VM and around a dozen Blackberry's right
now.  What seems to happen randomly is that sending mail on some/all of the
Blackberry's fails, as does the ability to do address book lookups - you
just get "lookup failed" on the Blackberry, and restarting the BES fixes it.


The BES Express server is running 2003 R2 x64 and the BES Express is
5.0.2.29.

 

Any suggestions would be great.

 

Thanks,

Paul

  _  

MIRA Ltd

 

Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England

Registered in England and Wales No. 402570

VAT Registration  GB 100 1464 84

 

The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of
the intended recipient.  If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete
it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax.  You should not copy,
forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is
prohibited.

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: BES 5.0 and Exchange 2010

[Martin Blackstone]

I know right? Im the first to admit Im eating my words.

You know BES was great until 5 came out then it was all downhill.

And EAS in E2010 works just great.

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 5:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BES 5.0 and Exchange 2010

 

I can remember when both you and Don told me I was silly for recommending
EAS. :-)

 

Andy too!

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 5:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BES 5.0 and Exchange 2010

 

+1

 

From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: BES 5.0 and Exchange 2010

 

I'll speak!  Drop kick your BES server into the Sea of Japan and use EAS

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Michael B. Smith 
wrote:

It would be safe to presume (not ASSUME) :-) based on the way I worded my
answer that there are known issues until 2010 sp1 ur3.

 

Now, because of how I know what I know, I can't tell you what those issues
are. Silly, isn't it? But there are other people on this forum that don't
have the same restrictions on them that I do. Perhaps one or more of them
will speak up.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com <http://theessentialexchange.com/> 

 

From: Beahm, Keith [mailto:kbe...@stinson.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 12:57 PM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: RE: BES 5.0 and Exchange 2010

 

I'm sorry to belabor the topic, but I was hoping to clarify that E2010 SP1
RU2 with (either BES 5.02 MR5 or BES 5.03 MR1) is a stable bug free
combination?

 

 

Keith D. Beahm | Network Engineer | Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP
1201 Walnut Street, Suite 2900 | Kansas City, MO 64106-2150
T: 816.691.3374 | F: 816.412.1022 | M: 816.808.8983
kbe...@stinson.com | www.stinson.com <http://www.stinson.com/> 

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BES 5.0 and Exchange 2010

 

My recommendation (which comes from someone really knows but I'm not allowed
to say their names or companies) is that you should install 5.02 MR5 or 5.03
with MR1; plus Exchange 2010 sp1 ur3 as soon as it is re-released.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com <http://theessentialexchange.com/> 

 

From: Beahm, Keith [mailto:kbe...@stinson.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 12:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: BES 5.0 and Exchange 2010

 

It seems that Blackberry has released several updates to BES this week (SP2
MR5, SP 3, SP 3 MR1).  The last thread (BES 5.0 SP2 MR4 and Exchange 2010
SP1 RU3 warning..) on this topic as it related to Exchange 2010 indicated
some issues with duplication of sent items.  Has anyone had any successes or
issues with these RIM releases?

 

 

Keith D. Beahm | Network Engineer | Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP
1201 Walnut Street, Suite 2900 | Kansas City, MO 64106-2150
T: 816.691.3374 | F: 816.412.1022 | M: 816.808.8983
kbe...@stinson.com | www.stinson.com <http://www.stinson.com/> 

 

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

 

This communication is from a law firm and may contain confidential and/or
privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please contact
the sender for instructions concerning return or destruction, and do not use
or disclose the contents to others.

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbe

RE: BES 5.0 and Exchange 2010

[Martin Blackstone]

+1

 

From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: BES 5.0 and Exchange 2010

 

I'll speak!  Drop kick your BES server into the Sea of Japan and use EAS

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Michael B. Smith 
wrote:

It would be safe to presume (not ASSUME) :-) based on the way I worded my
answer that there are known issues until 2010 sp1 ur3.

 

Now, because of how I know what I know, I can't tell you what those issues
are. Silly, isn't it? But there are other people on this forum that don't
have the same restrictions on them that I do. Perhaps one or more of them
will speak up.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com  

 

From: Beahm, Keith [mailto:kbe...@stinson.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 12:57 PM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: RE: BES 5.0 and Exchange 2010

 

I'm sorry to belabor the topic, but I was hoping to clarify that E2010 SP1
RU2 with (either BES 5.02 MR5 or BES 5.03 MR1) is a stable bug free
combination?

 

 

Keith D. Beahm | Network Engineer | Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP
1201 Walnut Street, Suite 2900 | Kansas City, MO 64106-2150
T: 816.691.3374 | F: 816.412.1022 | M: 816.808.8983
kbe...@stinson.com | www.stinson.com  

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BES 5.0 and Exchange 2010

 

My recommendation (which comes from someone really knows but I'm not allowed
to say their names or companies) is that you should install 5.02 MR5 or 5.03
with MR1; plus Exchange 2010 sp1 ur3 as soon as it is re-released.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com  

 

From: Beahm, Keith [mailto:kbe...@stinson.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 12:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: BES 5.0 and Exchange 2010

 

It seems that Blackberry has released several updates to BES this week (SP2
MR5, SP 3, SP 3 MR1).  The last thread (BES 5.0 SP2 MR4 and Exchange 2010
SP1 RU3 warning..) on this topic as it related to Exchange 2010 indicated
some issues with duplication of sent items.  Has anyone had any successes or
issues with these RIM releases?

 

 

Keith D. Beahm | Network Engineer | Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP
1201 Walnut Street, Suite 2900 | Kansas City, MO 64106-2150
T: 816.691.3374 | F: 816.412.1022 | M: 816.808.8983
kbe...@stinson.com | www.stinson.com  

 

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

 

This communication is from a law firm and may contain confidential and/or
privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please contact
the sender for instructions concerning return or destruction, and do not use
or disclose the contents to others.

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Windows 2008 R2 SP1 patching in a DAG

[Martin Blackstone]

Nevermind. I read that wrong.

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 2:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Windows 2008 R2 SP1 patching in a DAG

 

Do you have BES?

 

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 2:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Windows 2008 R2 SP1 patching in a DAG

 

Hi all,

 

Going to be patching the member servers of my DAG tomorrow with SP1 for
Windows 2008 R2. Anyone done this yet? My plan was simply to switchover,
patch, switchover again, patch, balance the databases. Is it that simple or
so I need to do some reading?

 

Thanks

 

Richard

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Windows 2008 R2 SP1 patching in a DAG

[Martin Blackstone]

Do you have BES?

 

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 2:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Windows 2008 R2 SP1 patching in a DAG

 

Hi all,

 

Going to be patching the member servers of my DAG tomorrow with SP1 for
Windows 2008 R2. Anyone done this yet? My plan was simply to switchover,
patch, switchover again, patch, balance the databases. Is it that simple or
so I need to do some reading?

 

Thanks

 

Richard

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Public folders...

[Martin Blackstone]

Take em with you. E2010 still supports PF’s.

 

From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:dholst...@nbm.org] 
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 8:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public folders...

 

We have Exchange 07, and have carried public folders along for seven or eight 
years. We only have calendars. And only a few, about 10. Where else should I 
start thinking about moving them before I go to Exchange 10 later in the year? 
People here use them.

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: ActiveSync Question

[Martin Blackstone]

We just started allowing Droids. Need a fall back solution!

 

From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 10:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ActiveSync Question

 

LOL!  You have no idea!  Been on the phone almost daily with RIM and MS for
the last 3 weeks...  EAS is going full swing soon I think...

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Martin Blackstone 
wrote:

Better than BES!

 

From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 10:08 AM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: Re: ActiveSync Question 

 

I just disabled your account.  How's EAS working for you right now Martin?

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Martin Blackstone 
wrote:

Exch 2010.

If I disable a users acct, does that disable their AS access as well? Or do
I need to go into EMC and disable AS in there as well?

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: ActiveSync Question

[Martin Blackstone]

I thought so. Thanks!

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 10:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ActiveSync Question

 

You'll have to disable AS too.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 1:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ActiveSync Question

 

Exch 2010.

If I disable a users acct, does that disable their AS access as well? Or do
I need to go into EMC and disable AS in there as well?

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: ActiveSync Question

[Martin Blackstone]

Better than BES!

 

From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 10:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ActiveSync Question

 

I just disabled your account.  How's EAS working for you right now Martin?

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Martin Blackstone 
wrote:

Exch 2010.

If I disable a users acct, does that disable their AS access as well? Or do
I need to go into EMC and disable AS in there as well?

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: ex2010 transaction logs out of control

[Martin Blackstone]

Wasn't there an issue with iPhones causing run away Tlogs?

 

From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ex2010 transaction logs out of control

 

no backup routine that deletes log right now.  but, i don't want to get off
subject. we are consultants and not practicing what we preach to our clients
for backups right now.  i'm working on resolving that in the next couple of
weeks.  but regardless, the amount of transaction logs is troubling.

 Sean Martin wrote: 

Are your backups completing successfully?

 

- Sean

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Bill Humphries 
wrote:

Hub is 18 MB, Edge is 20 MB. 



Campbell, Rob wrote:

How about the Hub Transports?

-Original Message-
From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com] Sent: Thursday, January
06, 2011 4:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ex2010 transaction logs out of control

on the mailbox server, the message tracking folder is 4 MB.


Campbell, Rob wrote:
 

How do your message tracking log sized look?

-Original Message-
From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com] Sent: Thursday, January
06, 2011 4:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ex2010 transaction logs out of control

Hi all,

I'm hoping you guys can help me figure how to diagnose what is going on
here.  I have 30 users on this system and the transaction logs on the
mailbox server are way beyond what they should be.  I just deleted 75 gig of
logs that had accumulated in two weeks.  two weeks before that, I deleted
the same amount.  We have had this system up for maybe 6 months and this
just became a problem a few weeks ago.

Would you suspect some sort of loop issue or massive bounce issue?  Any
usual suspects?  I'm struggling for a good way to track this down.  
We have a separate anti-spam solution in front of exchange and an edge
server, CAS/Hub server and mailbox server.  I know the setup is overkill,
but we are using ourselves as guinea pigs before we use 2010 with any
clients.

I also have an 80 gig mailbox database, but only sjowing about 18 gigs in
the mailboxes.  This might be just due to not having any
mainenance/retention policies enabled, so I'm putting that on the back
burner.

Thanks for any insights.

Bill

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


**
Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message
is not the intended  recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering this message to  the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination,   distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you  have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by  replying to the message and deleting it
from your computer.

**



---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


 



---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


**
Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message
is not the intended  recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering this message to  the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination,   distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you  have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by  replying to the message and deleting it
from your computer.

**



---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


 



---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sun

RE: Testing new outbound mail config

[Martin Blackstone]

+1

 

From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 10:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Testing new outbound mail config

 

Why not start by using telnet from your mail server to the new gateway? That
should allow you to validate mail flow. 

 

- Sean

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Steve Hart  wrote:

I want to test outbound mailflow through our new mail gateway without
tampering with our main system.

 

I'm thinking that I create a new send connector to one specific domain with
a lower cost. I configure that send connector with a smart host with the IP
of the gateway. Then, if all is well, when I send mail to that domain, it
will go out through the gateway.

 

Correct?

 

Can I use a single address in a send connector, or is it strictly domain
based?

 

 

 

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: BB to Outlook Calendar

[Martin Blackstone]

Additionally how far are these sites from each other? BES likes to be very
close to the Exchange server its running with. Latency is not your friend.

 

 

From: Lynden A. Philadelphia [mailto:lphiladelp...@philadelphiagroup.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 2:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: BB to Outlook Calendar

 

I have blackberries and they cannot put calendar entries on the BBs and have
them sync up to Outlook/Exchange. 

 

They do see calendar items from Outlook/Exchange.

 

We are running Windows 2008 with Exchange 2007 and BESX in location A and
Windows 2003 with Exchange 2007 in location B.

 

Location B is the default route for mail.

 

Can anyone help?

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: BB to Outlook Calendar

[Martin Blackstone]

Is this affecting all users or just some?

 

From: Lynden A. Philadelphia [mailto:lphiladelp...@philadelphiagroup.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 2:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: BB to Outlook Calendar

 

I have blackberries and they cannot put calendar entries on the BBs and have
them sync up to Outlook/Exchange. 

 

They do see calendar items from Outlook/Exchange.

 

We are running Windows 2008 with Exchange 2007 and BESX in location A and
Windows 2003 with Exchange 2007 in location B.

 

Location B is the default route for mail.

 

Can anyone help?

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Calendar and BES

[Martin Blackstone]

If you are really unsure what to do, open a ticket with RIM. 

CDO download is here
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=e17e7f31-079a-43
a9-bff2-0a110307611e
<http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=e17e7f31-079a-4
3a9-bff2-0a110307611e&displaylang=en> &displaylang=en

 

 

From: Lynden A. Philadelphia [mailto:lphiladelp...@philadelphiagroup.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 6:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Calendar and BES

 

Nobody is having an issue with Outlook.

 

What shall I do?

 

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: September-20-10 9:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Calendar and BES

 

That could explain some things.

 

From: Lynden A. Philadelphia [mailto:lphiladelp...@philadelphiagroup.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 6:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Calendar and BES

 

I don't believe there is a CDO on exchange 2007.

 

I did a search and couldn't find anything.

 

Lynden 

 

 

From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com] 
Sent: September-20-10 5:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Calendar and BES

 

I would confirm the CDO.dll on the BES is the same or newer than the CDO on
the exchange server.


Bill

Lynden A. Philadelphia wrote: 

We are running Exchange Server 2007 and BESX.

  _  

From: Sobey, Richard A [r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: September-20-10 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Calendar and BES

What Exchange version are you running?

 

  _  

From: bounce-9106410-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[bounce-9106410-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Lynden A.
Philadelphia [lphiladelp...@philadelphiagroup.com]
Sent: 20 September 2010 17:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Calendar and BES

I have blackberries and they cannot put calendar entries on the BBs and have
them sync up to Outlook/Exchange. They DO see calendar items FROM
Outlook/Exchange.

 

We are running Exchange 2007 and BESX.

 

Can anyone help?

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Calendar and BES

[Martin Blackstone]

That could explain some things.

 

From: Lynden A. Philadelphia [mailto:lphiladelp...@philadelphiagroup.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 6:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Calendar and BES

 

I don't believe there is a CDO on exchange 2007.

 

I did a search and couldn't find anything.

 

Lynden 

 

 

From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com] 
Sent: September-20-10 5:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Calendar and BES

 

I would confirm the CDO.dll on the BES is the same or newer than the CDO on
the exchange server.


Bill

Lynden A. Philadelphia wrote: 

We are running Exchange Server 2007 and BESX.

  _  

From: Sobey, Richard A [r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: September-20-10 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Calendar and BES

What Exchange version are you running?

 

  _  

From: bounce-9106410-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[bounce-9106410-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Lynden A.
Philadelphia [lphiladelp...@philadelphiagroup.com]
Sent: 20 September 2010 17:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Calendar and BES

I have blackberries and they cannot put calendar entries on the BBs and have
them sync up to Outlook/Exchange. They DO see calendar items FROM
Outlook/Exchange.

 

We are running Exchange 2007 and BESX.

 

Can anyone help?

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Calendar and BES

[Martin Blackstone]

I would match versions

 

From: Lynden A. Philadelphia [mailto:lphiladelp...@philadelphiagroup.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 5:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Calendar and BES

 

Which should I replace?

 

 

 

Lynden 

 

 

From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com] 
Sent: September-20-10 5:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Calendar and BES

 

I would confirm the CDO.dll on the BES is the same or newer than the CDO on
the exchange server.


Bill

Lynden A. Philadelphia wrote: 

We are running Exchange Server 2007 and BESX.

  _  

From: Sobey, Richard A [r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: September-20-10 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Calendar and BES

What Exchange version are you running?

 

  _  

From: bounce-9106410-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[bounce-9106410-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Lynden A.
Philadelphia [lphiladelp...@philadelphiagroup.com]
Sent: 20 September 2010 17:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Calendar and BES

I have blackberries and they cannot put calendar entries on the BBs and have
them sync up to Outlook/Exchange. They DO see calendar items FROM
Outlook/Exchange.

 

We are running Exchange 2007 and BESX.

 

Can anyone help?

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Calendar and BES

[Martin Blackstone]

That was going to be my suggestion. Verify they are the same version.

I keep them the same.

 

From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 2:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Calendar and BES

 

I would confirm the CDO.dll on the BES is the same or newer than the CDO on
the exchange server.


Bill

Lynden A. Philadelphia wrote: 

We are running Exchange Server 2007 and BESX.

  _  

From: Sobey, Richard A [r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: September-20-10 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Calendar and BES

What Exchange version are you running?

 

  _  

From: bounce-9106410-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[bounce-9106410-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Lynden A.
Philadelphia [lphiladelp...@philadelphiagroup.com]
Sent: 20 September 2010 17:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Calendar and BES

I have blackberries and they cannot put calendar entries on the BBs and have
them sync up to Outlook/Exchange. They DO see calendar items FROM
Outlook/Exchange.

 

We are running Exchange 2007 and BESX.

 

Can anyone help?

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Calendar and BES

[Martin Blackstone]

None of them or just some?

 

From: Lynden A. Philadelphia [mailto:lphiladelp...@philadelphiagroup.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Calendar and BES

 

I have blackberries and they cannot put calendar entries on the BBs and have
them sync up to Outlook/Exchange. They DO see calendar items FROM
Outlook/Exchange.

 

We are running Exchange 2007 and BESX.

 

Can anyone help?

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: IE9 beta

[Martin Blackstone]

I use Chrome with my BES Server. Works great!

 

From: Eric Woodford [mailto:ericwoodf...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 4:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: IE9 beta

 

Does it work with BES 5.0? I use the web console on my workstation and would
hate to lose that functionality. 

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Michael B. Smith 
wrote:

Less.


Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 6:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: RE: IE9 beta

Does it launch in 1 second like Chrome?

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 2:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: IE9 beta

Am I the only one that has installed the IE-9 beta?

I like the minimalism. Even more minimal than Chrome...it seems to work
pretty well with most sites. FB can crash it, though, when not in
compatibility mode...

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: IE9 beta

[Martin Blackstone]

Does it launch in 1 second like Chrome?

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 2:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: IE9 beta

Am I the only one that has installed the IE-9 beta?

I like the minimalism. Even more minimal than Chrome...it seems to work
pretty well with most sites. FB can crash it, though, when not in
compatibility mode...

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Two Smartphones for the same account in Exchange 2003 SP2 with WM

[Martin Blackstone]

Well I have no direct experience, but I have folks with an iPwn and an iPad
using them at the same time with no issues.

 

From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it] 
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2010 7:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT?: Two Smartphones for the same account in Exchange 2003 SP2 with
WM

 

 

 

I want to take with me ,in some occasions, another smartphone lighter than
the first, synchronizing the same account (An HTC HD2 vs. a HTC TYTNII)

Can this create issues ? 

TIA 

GuidoElia 
HELPPC 

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Single AS User Issue

[Martin Blackstone]

Thanks dude.

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 8:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Single AS User Issue

 

When you sign into OWA, click the "use the light version of OWA" box.that
carries over to ECP.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Single AS User Issue

 

How do you launch it in light mode?

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 8:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Single AS User Issue

 

You can do this from ECP - but, believe it or not, you have to run ECP in
LIGHT MODE to see this capability.

 

It's a bug in ECP for RTM and SP1. It'll be fixed in "some future update".

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 11:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Single AS User Issue

 

Running Exchange 2010.

I have a user with an iPhone that is trying to setup an AS partnership with
no success.

We have lots of AS users and his is the only one showing an issue. In
Exchange 2003, he was a disabled AS user. Since moving to 2010, I have
re-enabled him.

EMC shows there is a device partnership but no device is present.

I would like to delete the partnership but cant from EMC since there is no
device.

Is there am EMS equivalent that would force the deletion of the partnership?
Or perhaps something didn't get switched on?

 

Thanks

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Single AS User Issue

[Martin Blackstone]

I did it in OWA light. :-)

 

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 8:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Single AS User Issue

 

How do you launch it in light mode?

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 8:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Single AS User Issue

 

You can do this from ECP - but, believe it or not, you have to run ECP in
LIGHT MODE to see this capability.

 

It's a bug in ECP for RTM and SP1. It'll be fixed in "some future update".

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 11:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Single AS User Issue

 

Running Exchange 2010.

I have a user with an iPhone that is trying to setup an AS partnership with
no success.

We have lots of AS users and his is the only one showing an issue. In
Exchange 2003, he was a disabled AS user. Since moving to 2010, I have
re-enabled him.

EMC shows there is a device partnership but no device is present.

I would like to delete the partnership but cant from EMC since there is no
device.

Is there am EMS equivalent that would force the deletion of the partnership?
Or perhaps something didn't get switched on?

 

Thanks

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Single AS User Issue

[Martin Blackstone]

How do you launch it in light mode?

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 8:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Single AS User Issue

 

You can do this from ECP - but, believe it or not, you have to run ECP in
LIGHT MODE to see this capability.

 

It's a bug in ECP for RTM and SP1. It'll be fixed in "some future update".

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 11:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Single AS User Issue

 

Running Exchange 2010.

I have a user with an iPhone that is trying to setup an AS partnership with
no success.

We have lots of AS users and his is the only one showing an issue. In
Exchange 2003, he was a disabled AS user. Since moving to 2010, I have
re-enabled him.

EMC shows there is a device partnership but no device is present.

I would like to delete the partnership but cant from EMC since there is no
device.

Is there am EMS equivalent that would force the deletion of the partnership?
Or perhaps something didn't get switched on?

 

Thanks

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Single AS User Issue

[Martin Blackstone]

Running Exchange 2010.

I have a user with an iPhone that is trying to setup an AS partnership with
no success.

We have lots of AS users and his is the only one showing an issue. In
Exchange 2003, he was a disabled AS user. Since moving to 2010, I have
re-enabled him.

EMC shows there is a device partnership but no device is present.

I would like to delete the partnership but cant from EMC since there is no
device.

Is there am EMS equivalent that would force the deletion of the partnership?
Or perhaps something didn't get switched on?

 

Thanks


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: New blog post: Exchange 2010 Service Pack 1 and Required Hotfixes

[Martin Blackstone]

I can only complain about one thing at a time! :)


-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 6:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New blog post: Exchange 2010 Service Pack 1 and Required
Hotfixes

Oh, and I had two Microsoft people point out that on Windows Server 2003 and
pre-Windows 2008 sp2, Exchange 2007 also required updates - there was a .Net
2.0 specific update and MMC 3.0 and a Windows Installer update.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 9:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New blog post: Exchange 2010 Service Pack 1 and Required
Hotfixes

The first time I did the install, I had a half-dozen other things going on
(including the patch downloads and accumulation) and it took me about 2
hours.

Now, depending on the server, it's under an hour (I note that CAS seems to
take longer than anything else).

I'm guessing the "average admin", who only has one or two servers, and isn't
really comfortable with the process - it's going to take him or her 4 - 6
hours.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-----Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 9:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New blog post: Exchange 2010 Service Pack 1 and Required
Hotfixes

I would love to know how long it takes the "average" admin to install this
thing.
>From A-Z.

-Original Message-
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 4:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New blog post: Exchange 2010 Service Pack 1 and Required
Hotfixes

No problem at all. I only found this out because I was testing that new
"install required features" button in SP1, hoping that it might download and
install these pre-reqs for me. I was surprised as any that it worked, if I'm
honest!

I've got another server to install, I'll try it from the CLI this time and
see what difference it makes.

Richard

-Original Message-
From: bounce-9080375-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9080375-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Michael B. Smith
Sent: 31 August 2010 11:59
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New blog post: Exchange 2010 Service Pack 1 and Required
Hotfixes

Honestly, I only tested it from the command prompt; but I did have the
article reviewed by someone at MSFT before I posted it.

I'll give it a go too, and if you are right, I'll update my post. Thanks for
the heads up.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 6:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New blog post: Exchange 2010 Service Pack 1 and Required
Hotfixes

Michael,

In this blog post, you state:

" You cannot install Exchange 2010 SP1 without first installing a handful of
hotfixes. This is a hard-block in the Exchange setup program, which means
that if the hotfixes are not detected, the setup program will abort."

This is not true - let me tell you why I think so. I just installed a 2010
SP1 server with the HT role. During setup (GUI based) I selected the option
to download the necessary OS updates and features, and the installation went
without a hitch.

Afterwards, I manually ran the installer for each of the five hotfixes and
only one of them claimed to already be installed.

So it seems that although they are required for a supported installation of
Exchange, Exchange will still install without them.

Regards

Richard


-Original Message-
From: bounce-9079428-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9079428-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Michael B. Smith
Sent: 30 August 2010 16:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: New blog post: Exchange 2010 Service Pack 1 and Required Hotfixes

Of some general interest, I think:

<http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2010/08/30/exchange-2
010-service-pack-1-and-required-hotfixes.aspx>

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an 

RE: New blog post: Exchange 2010 Service Pack 1 and Required Hotfixes

[Martin Blackstone]

I would love to know how long it takes the "average" admin to install this
thing.
>From A-Z.

-Original Message-
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 4:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New blog post: Exchange 2010 Service Pack 1 and Required
Hotfixes

No problem at all. I only found this out because I was testing that new
"install required features" button in SP1, hoping that it might download and
install these pre-reqs for me. I was surprised as any that it worked, if I'm
honest!

I've got another server to install, I'll try it from the CLI this time and
see what difference it makes.

Richard

-Original Message-
From: bounce-9080375-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9080375-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Michael B. Smith
Sent: 31 August 2010 11:59
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New blog post: Exchange 2010 Service Pack 1 and Required
Hotfixes

Honestly, I only tested it from the command prompt; but I did have the
article reviewed by someone at MSFT before I posted it.

I'll give it a go too, and if you are right, I'll update my post. Thanks for
the heads up.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 6:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New blog post: Exchange 2010 Service Pack 1 and Required
Hotfixes

Michael,

In this blog post, you state:

" You cannot install Exchange 2010 SP1 without first installing a handful of
hotfixes. This is a hard-block in the Exchange setup program, which means
that if the hotfixes are not detected, the setup program will abort."

This is not true - let me tell you why I think so. I just installed a 2010
SP1 server with the HT role. During setup (GUI based) I selected the option
to download the necessary OS updates and features, and the installation went
without a hitch.

Afterwards, I manually ran the installer for each of the five hotfixes and
only one of them claimed to already be installed.

So it seems that although they are required for a supported installation of
Exchange, Exchange will still install without them.

Regards

Richard


-Original Message-
From: bounce-9079428-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9079428-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Michael B. Smith
Sent: 30 August 2010 16:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: New blog post: Exchange 2010 Service Pack 1 and Required Hotfixes

Of some general interest, I think:



Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: The Future of Exchange Starts Here!

[Martin Blackstone]

Looks like everything but an act of god is required to install it
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb691354(EXCHG.141).aspx


-Original Message-
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: The Future of Exchange Starts Here!

Cool!

Did the EWS Managed API 1.1 beta go RTM, too?

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 11:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: The Future of Exchange Starts Here!

I so wanted to share this with y'all a couple of weeks ago...but an NDA is
an NDA! (And availability dates change all the time anyway...)

The Future of Exchange Starts Here: Exchange Server 2010 SP1 Is Now
Available http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2010/08/25/455861.aspx

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com






**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential
and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**

RE: SSL recomendations

[Martin Blackstone]

We use them for our SAN certs. Work great and since I don't have to give my
money to VeriSign, it makes me feel good inside.

 

From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] 
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 6:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL recomendations

 

They get my vote.

 

  _  

From: Peter Johnson [mailto:peter.john...@peterstow.com] 
Sent: 23 August 2010 07:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL recomendations

Hi Steve

 

I can certainly second the endorsement of Digicert. Not the cheapest but
they are endorsed by MS as a UC cert vendor and I've always found there
support to be top notch!

 

Regards 


Description: C:\Users\PeterTJ\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Signatures\peterstow
logo2.jpg

Peter Johnson
I.T Architect
United Kingdom: +44 1285 658542
South Africa: +27 11 252 1100
Swaziland: +268 442 7000
Fax:+27 11 974 7130
Mobile: +2783 306 0019
peter.john...@peterstow.com
www.peterstow.com

 

This email message (including attachments) contains information which may be
confidential and/or legally privileged. Unless you are the intended
recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any
information contained in the message or from any attachments that were sent
with this email, and If you have received this email message in error,
please advise the sender by email, and delete the message. Unauthorised
disclosure and/or use of information contained in this email may result in
civil and criminal liability. Everything in this e-mail and attachments
relating to the official business of Peterstow Aquapower is proprietary to
the company. 

Caution should be observed in placing any reliance upon any information
contained in this e-mail, which is not intended to be a representation or
inducement to make any decision in relation to Peterstow Aquapower. Any
decision taken based on the information provided in this e-mail, should only
be made after consultation with appropriate legal, regulatory, tax,
technical, business, investment, financial, and accounting advisors. Neither
the sender of the e-mail, nor Peterstow Aquapower shall be liable to any
party for any direct, indirect or consequential damages, including, without
limitation, loss of profit, interruption of business or loss of information,
data or software or otherwise.

The e-mail address of the sender may not be used, copied, sold, disclosed or
incorporated into any database or mailing list for spamming and/or other
marketing purposes without the prior consent of Peterstow Aquapower. 

No warranties are created or implied that an employee of Peterstow Aquapower
and/or a contractor of Peterstow Aquapower is authorized to create and send
this e-mail. 

 Description:
C:\Users\PeterTJ\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Signatures\environment2.jpg

From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] 
Sent: 20 August 2010 19:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SSL recomendations

 

Lots of questions today!

 

I'm getting a cert for the new 2007 server. We currently have 2 servers
using different domain names that we will be consolidating into 1. We will
be consolidating domain names as well, but sometimes old habits (and
shortcuts) die hard. Our real world server name convention is
mail.domain.com

 

I'm thinking that I need to specify five FQDNs in the cert request:
mail.domain1.com, autodiscover.domain1.com, mail.domain2.com,
autodiscover.domain2.com, realservername.domain1.com .  Is that correct?

 

Secondly, I've been asked to get the cert from Godaddy.  Does anyone know
offhand if their StandardSSL for Multiple Domains is the right cert to get?

 

Thanks in advance!

 

Steve

 

 

** 

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 

intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they 

are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify 

the system manager. 

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by 

MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. 

www.clearswift.com 

** 

<><>

RE: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this week.

[Martin Blackstone]

True to a point.

Let's face it, the cloud is here and one way or another you are going to end
up there. Either you get on board or your CFO will for you.

I will say if we were not a VAR, didn't have access to outstanding hardware,
and didn't eat our own dogfood, I would put Exchange in the cloud in a
heartbeat.

Besides how many of us are in there already? Who uses Salesforce or Netsuite
or some other such service? Online marketing, etc.

How many of us at home are backing up to the cloud?

 

 

 

 

From: Hank . [mailto:hgedr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 4:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this
week.

 

But you forgot to mention that you get to give all of your data to someone
else.

Remember one of the most basic of about security is that you maintain
physical control of your data.

On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Stephan Barr 
wrote:

Goggle Apps cost $50 per seat, per email address, per year. There are no
other costs.  For the $50 here's a short list of what you get:

*   Vanity email address / your.n...@yourdomainname.com
*   SSL
*   AntiSpam, AntiVirus
*   Postini
*   25GB of storage per email address

 

 

On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Dave Wade 
wrote:

Paul,

 

I am a Radio Ham and one of the guys I chat to works in a small (about 25
staff) organization, and has just upgraded his system to Windows/2008r2 and
Exchange 2010. When I expressed suprise that he wasn't out sourcing to
Google apps or some thing of that ilk he said when costed over 4 years it
looked very expensive, especially given the uncertainty in pricing given we
work in Sterling...

 

Dave Wade

0161 474 5456

 

  _  

From: Paul Hutchings
Sent: Fri 20/08/2010 17:13 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this
week.

 

I've never really seen it as "Google vs. Exchange" tbh, I think both do
different things and suit different needs.
 
Office with half a dozen people and no real IT need or infrastructure
and I think I'd find it hard to see past Google Apps or Hosted Exchange,
even scaled up to a couple dozen staff and a single server I'm not sure
Exchange would be first choice simply because if nothing else you do
need to back it up and someone needs to ensure that happens.
 
On the other hand, if you have a few dozen or a few hundred users and
have even a modest investment in things like a SAN or vmware and decent
connectivity and someone with IT knowledge then I'm not sure it's so
easy a decision.
 
-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com] 
Sent: 20 August 2010 13:23
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this
week.
 
Would definitely be interested in some details as far as client size,
feature usage (shared calendars, contacts, etc...), and the technical
level of the users.
 
It seems from past things I've read, the service is better suited to
companies with a greater proportion of more savvy users.
 
Jason
 
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephan Barr [mailto:stephanbarr.li...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 19:14
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps
this
> week.
> 
> Maybe you haven't used it recently. Groups do not count as email
> addresses and meet the need of distribution lists and shared boxes.
> 
> definitely different cost model. Per each client they will save
thousands
> per year.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Duncan Turnbull

> wrote:
> 
> 
>   There is a different cost model here, and some limitations but
> various upsides
> 
>   One big issue I see is if you have lots of shared mailboxes e.g.
> for client projects or other reasons then you have to pay for all of
> those as a license, as always it will be horses for courses
> 
>   What about Microsoft Live
> 
>   Cheers Duncan
> 
>   On 20/08/2010, at 9:59 AM, Stephan Barr wrote:
> 
> 
>  Super easy. Customers love it.
> 
> 
 
 
 
 
-- 
MIRA Ltd
 
Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England.
 
Registered in England and Wales No. 402570
VAT Registration  GB 114 5409 96
 
The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of
the intended recipient.
If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either
by e-mail, telephone or fax.
You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail
as this is prohibited.
 
 
 
 




**
Stockport Council - providing over 600 different services to local people .
More information on http://www.stockport.gov.uk/boost 

 


(free internet access is available at all Stockport libraries)

This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and


intended solely for the use of the individual or enti

RE: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this week.

[Martin Blackstone]

Rocks are history. Google Stones is in.

 

From: Don Ely so sc stops complaining [mailto:don@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this
week.

 

I got a rock...

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

  _  

From: "Martin Blackstone"  

Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:54:40 -0700

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

ReplyTo: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"


Subject: RE: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this
week.

 

What were the driving factors for the migration? What was the business case?

 

From: Stephan Barr [mailto:stephanbarr.li...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this week.

 

Super easy. Customers love it. 

RE: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this week.

[Martin Blackstone]

What were the driving factors for the migration? What was the business case?

 

From: Stephan Barr [mailto:stephanbarr.li...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this week.

 

Super easy. Customers love it. 

RE: Here is an interesting NDR

[Martin Blackstone]

Im about done with this "issue".

Im going to try doing it from another PC.

Thanks Michael

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 10:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Here is an interesting NDR

 

Bah. That was my best guess. Is it affecting only a single user? How about
this setting?

 



 

What about transport rules?

 

(Yes, now I'm grasping at straws.)

 

Does it happen via OWA too?

 

Does it happen on a DIFFERENT computer with a profile pointing to that user?

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 1:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Here is an interesting NDR

 

Same as yours

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 10:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Here is an interesting NDR

 

What is this set to on Mail Flow -> Delivery Options?

 



 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 12:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Here is an interesting NDR

 

Anyone seen this? OL 2007 and Ex2010.

User attempted a bulk email of about 50 people. Sending one at a time works
great. Even if he sends 5 he gets the NDR.

 

The following recipient(s) cannot be reached:

 

  Cardenas, Jon (j...@somedomain.com) on 8/10/2010 3:11 PM

This message could not be sent. Try sending the message again
later, or contact your network administrator.  Error is
[0x80004005--].

 

Spanks!

<><>

RE: Here is an interesting NDR

[Martin Blackstone]

Same as yours

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 10:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Here is an interesting NDR

 

What is this set to on Mail Flow -> Delivery Options?

 



 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 12:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Here is an interesting NDR

 

Anyone seen this? OL 2007 and Ex2010.

User attempted a bulk email of about 50 people. Sending one at a time works
great. Even if he sends 5 he gets the NDR.

 

The following recipient(s) cannot be reached:

 

  Cardenas, Jon (j...@somedomain.com) on 8/10/2010 3:11 PM

This message could not be sent. Try sending the message again
later, or contact your network administrator.  Error is
[0x80004005--].

 

Spanks!

<>

RE: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

[Martin Blackstone]

Take a look at this:

http://briandesmond.com/blog/blackberry-enterprise-server-and-exchange-serve
r-2010-throttling-policies/?utm_source=feedburner
<http://briandesmond.com/blog/blackberry-enterprise-server-and-exchange-serv
er-2010-throttling-policies/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campa
ign=Feed:+BrianDesmond+(Brian+Desmond's+Blog)>
&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+BrianDesmond+(Brian+Desmond's+Blog)

 

From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 9:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

 

FYI - BES gotcha

 

We just went through a very similar change...BES 4 to BES 5, Exchange 2003
to Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010 . The
only real issue we found was with the new MAPI profile for the BESADMIN
account. It seems that it only accepts 20 connections, so 1/2 of our BES
users didn't work. You need to use a PS command to change the default


 

And yes, 2 days with RIM tech support didn't help either...

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Maglinger, Paul  wrote:

Good information everybody.  Thanks to all!


-Original Message-
From: Paul Steele [mailto:paul.ste...@acadiau.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

We just went through the same process. Although it is possible to do an
in place upgrade of BES and migrate all users at the same time, it
complicates things. We decided to put in a new BES server in place and
migrate users one at a time. It made the process easier for everyone. Be
warned, you will most likely need to involve BES tech support. We were
on the line with them many times during the switch. A lot of things
don't work exactly as documented (also known as buggy software). Tech
support was able to resolve all the issues though.

-----Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: August-03-10 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

If you have a valid T-Support contract, you should get the Exchange 2010
upgrade instructions from them.

-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 8:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

Brilliant!  Thanks Martin!

-----Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

This is a tough one.
BES does require the Exch 2003 tools, BUT, part of upgrading to Exch
2010
requires you to remove them and run on MAPI/ CDO. This worked fine for
my Exchange 2003 users. SO, YMMV.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=E17E7F31-079A-4
3A9-
BFF2-0A110307611E&displaylang=en


-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 8:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

We're in the planning stages of going from Exchange 2003 to 2010.  We're
also wanting to upgrade our BES server to a system running Windows 2008.
BES requires the Exchange Tools to be installed on the server.  Exchange
2003 Tools will not install on Windows 2008.   Will it work to install
the Exchange 2010 Tools on the BES server but still be running Exchange
2003 for now?

Paul











 

RE: Here is an interesting NDR

[Martin Blackstone]

Trend. I could try to disable it. 

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 9:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Here is an interesting NDR

 

Antivirus product on client?

 

Saw this once with Norton installed on the client..  I am not sure if it was
the same error code, but the ability to send one vs. being able to send
multiple is the same.

 

 

 

--

 

Bob Fronk

b...@btrfronk.com

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 12:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Here is an interesting NDR

 

Anyone seen this? OL 2007 and Ex2010.

User attempted a bulk email of about 50 people. Sending one at a time works
great. Even if he sends 5 he gets the NDR.

 

The following recipient(s) cannot be reached:

 

  Cardenas, Jon (j...@somedomain.com) on 8/10/2010 3:11 PM

This message could not be sent. Try sending the message again
later, or contact your network administrator.  Error is
[0x80004005--].

 

Spanks!

Here is an interesting NDR

[Martin Blackstone]

Anyone seen this? OL 2007 and Ex2010.

User attempted a bulk email of about 50 people. Sending one at a time works
great. Even if he sends 5 he gets the NDR.

 

The following recipient(s) cannot be reached:

 

  Cardenas, Jon (j...@somedomain.com) on 8/10/2010 3:11 PM

This message could not be sent. Try sending the message again
later, or contact your network administrator.  Error is
[0x80004005--].

 

Spanks!

RE: Real question

[Martin Blackstone]

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/265203

 

From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 10:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Real question

 

Hey guys and gals, on Exchange 2003 what is the max recipients allowed?

 

 

 

Thank You

Description: file:///S:/Meadow%20Stebbins/Individuals/images/DRooney_01.jpg

 

<>

RE: Help with unsolicited mail

[Martin Blackstone]

That's how I roll

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:mi...@notsoclever.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

I just re-joined today. Blackstone made me do it.

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 4:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Help with unsolicited mail

We never knew you were lurking!
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families

- Original Message -
From: Missy Koslosky 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Sent: Thu Aug 05 16:09:29 2010
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

;) Miss me?

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

Missy? On THIS mailing list? Wow.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:mi...@notsoclever.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

I can't be the only one who finds it ironic that a former employee of
Partnership for Strong Families is a whack job.

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

It was a C level employee who was terminated by the BOD, he has no job other
than to do this to try and get his job back, methinks waiting him out won't
work.

-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail

How about just letting it go for a bit and see if he gets tired of this.
I'd be a little nervous about what else he might do, if you frustrate this.

CFee

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 12:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Help with unsolicited mail

We have an ex employee that is sending messages to essentially the whole
company. These messages are causing some moral issues and need to stop. We
have a transport rule (E2K7) to reroute them but have been advised this
person is going to open a new account to continue. Does anyone have any
info, Legal or other, that we can use to put a halt to this?
TIA
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.





CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil
and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.













CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI),
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information
may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or
unauthorized use or discl

RE: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

[Martin Blackstone]

If you have a valid T-Support contract, you should get the Exchange 2010
upgrade instructions from them.

-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 8:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

Brilliant!  Thanks Martin!

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

This is a tough one.
BES does require the Exch 2003 tools, BUT, part of upgrading to Exch
2010
requires you to remove them and run on MAPI/ CDO. This worked fine for my
Exchange 2003 users. SO, YMMV.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=E17E7F31-079A-4
3A9-
BFF2-0A110307611E&displaylang=en


-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 8:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

We're in the planning stages of going from Exchange 2003 to 2010.  We're
also wanting to upgrade our BES server to a system running Windows 2008.
BES requires the Exchange Tools to be installed on the server.  Exchange
2003 Tools will not install on Windows 2008.   Will it work to install
the Exchange 2010 Tools on the BES server but still be running Exchange
2003 for now?

Paul

RE: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

[Martin Blackstone]

Indeed! Im here for the beer!  :)


-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

Hey Martin! Long time no see...

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 11:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

This is a tough one.
BES does require the Exch 2003 tools, BUT, part of upgrading to Exch 2010
requires you to remove them and run on MAPI/ CDO. This worked fine for my
Exchange 2003 users. SO, YMMV.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=E17E7F31-079A-43A9-
BFF2-0A110307611E&displaylang=en


-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 8:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

We're in the planning stages of going from Exchange 2003 to 2010.  We're
also wanting to upgrade our BES server to a system running Windows 2008.
BES requires the Exchange Tools to be installed on the server.  Exchange
2003 Tools will not install on Windows 2008.   Will it work to install
the Exchange 2010 Tools on the BES server but still be running Exchange
2003 for now?

Paul

RE: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

[Martin Blackstone]

This is a tough one.
BES does require the Exch 2003 tools, BUT, part of upgrading to Exch 2010
requires you to remove them and run on MAPI/ CDO. This worked fine for my
Exchange 2003 users. SO, YMMV.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=E17E7F31-079A-43A9-
BFF2-0A110307611E&displaylang=en


-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 8:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 tools in a Exchange 2003 environment

We're in the planning stages of going from Exchange 2003 to 2010.  We're
also wanting to upgrade our BES server to a system running Windows 2008.
BES requires the Exchange Tools to be installed on the server.  Exchange
2003 Tools will not install on Windows 2008.   Will it work to install
the Exchange 2010 Tools on the BES server but still be running Exchange
2003 for now?

Paul

RE: OT - BES upgrade

[Martin Blackstone]

That's how I did it, but I didn't have to pay. It was free.

 

From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 12:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT - BES upgrade

 

They don't really publicize it, but RIM has a migration plan you can
purchase.  I think it costs $700, which I was willing to pay for the comfort
, peace of mind and convenience.  It basically allows you to have a second
SRP ID and your new server and old server both connected to the BB network
for 90 days.  With this and the free BES migration tools, I simply setup my
new server and moved users from the old system to the new one at my leisure.
No moving databases, knife edge cut-overs or other silliness.  The migration
was easy, with no downtime for users.

The only effect the migration had on users was each BB was restarted
remotely one time when I moved the specific user account.to the new server.


Bill



Tammy George wrote: 

Looking for any offers of advice or suggestions - 

 

I will be upgrading our BES server from 4.1 to 5.0 in preparation for our
Exchange upgrade from 2003 to 2010.  I have *no* experience with BES so I
need to familiarize myself with it first and go from there.   Lots to learn!

 

Just wondering if anyone is familiar with useful lists or forums?  Is the
process straightforward or complex?

 

If there's anything at all that you'd be willing to share to get me started,
it would be greatly appreciated!

 

Thanks in advance.

 

 

-- 

Tammy George

Sr. Systems Operator

Technology Services

Acadia University

tel: (902) 585-1158

fax: (902) 585-1066

 

 

RE: P2v - from a physical Dell server to a VMware virtual server

[Martin Blackstone]

The OEM software part will bite you in the a**. If your Windows version is
OEM, don't P2V it.

We P2V'd our "original" Exchange 2003 server. It worked fine. We also use a
SAN so we were not disk bound by the ESX host.

Since we are a SAN shop all our ESX hosts are pizza boxes with 2 disks in a
RAID config. All datastores and block storage is hosted on the SAN.

But if you don't have a SAN, you need to make sure your ESX host can handle
the disk IO of Exchange. If you have a good disk config, it very well may.
Mine never would.

 

Since that time, I've migrated to a "fresh" 2003 server and are now
migrating to 2010. All on the same SAN since we are not disk bound by the
ESX host.

 

How are your ESX hosts configured?

 

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 4:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: P2v - from a physical Dell server to a VMware virtual server

 

A SAN, per se, doesn't enter into the equation.

 

You have I/O requirements, CPU requirements, and memory requirements. How
you meet those - Exchange doesn't care.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Leedy, Andy [mailto:ale...@butlerschein.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 3:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: P2v - from a physical Dell server to a VMware virtual server

 

"Every virtualized Exchange horror story i've heard of has been the result
of poorly planned storage or virtural resources (over committment)."

 

I've always been afraid to virtualize Exchange due to the high I/O, CPU, and
memory requirements. 

 

Is a SAN recommend?

 

-Andy

 

 

From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 3:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: P2v - from a physical Dell server to a VMware virtual server

 

Not really assuming you take the proper precautions; dismounting databases,
stopping services, having a good backup standing by.  You also need to
remember to remove any old OEM software left behind that is used to monitor
hardware, drivers, etc.  Those use up resources that you probably won't want
to be wasting.

 

The usual advice is to spin up a new VM, install Exchange and migrate
mailboxes using the native methods.

 

Of course, as Steven mentioned - make sure your resources are adequate,
especially the storage you plan to host this on.  Every virtualized Exchange
horror story i've heard of has been the result of poorly planned storage or
virtural resources (over committment).

 

-alex

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Shih, Henry 
wrote:

We plan to perform a p2v on our Exchange 2003 server because the hardware
warranty will be expired soon. Is there any issue of performing p2v on
Exchange server?

Thanks.

Henry Shih
City of Livermore
  www.ci.livermore.ca.us

 



**

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - The information transmitted in this message is
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this document. Thank
you.

Butler Schein Animal Health

**

RE: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

[Martin Blackstone]

Please verify that your CDO.DLL and MAPI32.DLL are matching versions on your
Exchange server as well as BES.

If not, update one to match.

 

From: Jean-Paul natola [mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

 

go for contacts cleaner
 
everyone says thats the best (and for 3 bucks you cant beat it)
 
Also if you recently downloaded and installed BESexpress  when you
registered the device you automatically get a FREE tech support incident
from BB

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jean-Paul Natola
 



 

  _  

Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 15:31:08 -0400
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue
From: sms...@gmail.com
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

Thx, but there were no subfolders

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Jean-Paul natola 
wrote:

see if this helps
http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKC

&docType=kc&externalId=KB04227&sliceId=SAL_Public&dialogID=155864970&stateId
=1%200%20155866781
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jean-Paul Natola
 



 

  _  

Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:35:38 -0400 


Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Blackberry Issue

From: sms...@gmail.com
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 



We wiped and reactivated twice.
First time there was the duplicate contact problem, second time it went
well.
Thx for the suggestions and help

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:08 AM,  wrote:


Have seen that here with express and 5.0
Reactivation without wiping the dev causes it but we also saw it happen if
the user was not removed from the server.  A combination of device wipe with
remove/re-add did the trick.
/Never saw dupes in Outlook, was just the BB


New BB Express server.
One high level exec using it just fine. No problems.

Second high level exec just wiped his BB.
Then we created his activation password.
He activated and his mail synced fine, but his contacts are doubled and
sometimes tripled, or more?




-- 
smsadm

  _  

The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
Get started.




-- 
smsadm

  _  

The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with
Hotmail. Get busy.
 

RE: Any good suggestions?

[Martin Blackstone]

+1

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 4:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Any good suggestions?

 

Continue to use Public Folders sounds like a good plan to me.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Any good suggestions?

 

 


Exchange 2007, moving to 2010 in a couple of months.

 

I have several sales staff who need to share emails with each other from
clients with attachments that can add up to several gigs in email. The only
place I have to share the data at the moment to stop them sending is Public
folders.

 

Any good suggestions?

 

RE: Email Archive Solutions

[Martin Blackstone]

The cloud may be a good option as well. 

I think Mimosa is heading into the cloud, but not sure they are there yet.

 

From: Brent Zalewski [mailto:bre...@co.sangamon.il.us] 
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 9:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email Archive Solutions
Sensitivity: Confidential

 

We have looked at MXLogic.   Http://www.mxlogic.com  - McAfee has purchased.
No hardware/software to buy.  They pull mail from your system to their
archive system over internet

 

From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Email Archive Solutions
Sensitivity: Confidential

 

All,

 

We are looking to implement an email archiving solution into our environment
and would like some suggestions.  We currently have one Exchange server
running Exchange Server 2003 on a Windows Server 2003 R2 box.  At some point
we will upgrade to Windows Server 2008 R2 and Exchange 2010.

 

Thanks

 

_

Cameron Cooper

Network Administrator | CompTIA A+ Certified

Aurico Reports, Inc

Phone: 847-890-4021 | Fax: 847-255-1896

ccoo...@aurico.com | www.aurico.com

 

RE: Email Archive Solutions

[Martin Blackstone]

Who?

 

I think the big three are

Symantec Enterprise Vault

Mimosa Systems

Quest Archive Manager

 

 

From: Jay Dale [mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 9:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email Archive Solutions
Sensitivity: Confidential

 

Mailarchiva?

 

http://www.mailarchiva.com/

 

 

Jay Dale

I.T. Manager, 3GiG

Mobile: 713.299.2541

Email: jay.d...@3-gig.com   

 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may
contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and
attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive
information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply
e-mail and delete all copies of this message.

 

 

From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Email Archive Solutions
Sensitivity: Confidential

 

All,

 

We are looking to implement an email archiving solution into our environment
and would like some suggestions.  We currently have one Exchange server
running Exchange Server 2003 on a Windows Server 2003 R2 box.  At some point
we will upgrade to Windows Server 2008 R2 and Exchange 2010.

 

Thanks

 

_

Cameron Cooper

Network Administrator | CompTIA A+ Certified

Aurico Reports, Inc

Phone: 847-890-4021 | Fax: 847-255-1896

ccoo...@aurico.com | www.aurico.com

 

RE: Outlook 2003 and Exchange 2010

[Martin Blackstone]

::always sets clients to used cached mode::

 

From: Tom Kern [mailto:tpk...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Outlook 2003 and Exchange 2010

 

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;2009942
<http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;2009942&sd=rss&spid
=13965> &sd=rss&spid=13965

 



 

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Martin Blackstone 
wrote:

It is a supported client

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb125239.aspx

 

Exchange Client Planning

Before you deploy your Exchange 2010 organization, verify that client
computers and mobile devices in your organization meet the following
requirements.


Requirements

Check


All MAPI clients are running a supported version of Outlook, including
Microsoft Outlook 2007, Outlook 2003.



 

 

From: Chris Pohlschneider [mailto:chris.pohlschnei...@hollowayusa.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 7:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2003 and Exchange 2010

 

Hello List,

 

Is anyone running Outlook 2003 client connecting to an Exchange 2010
environment? If so, have you seen any issues with this? We are planning on
rolling out either Office 2007 or Office 2010 (probably Office 2010) later
this year, but we may have our new Exchange environment setup before then
which means I would have a lot of Outlook 2003 clients working with Exchange
2010.

 

Chris Pohlschneider

Holloway Sportswear

Network Administrator

chris.pohlschnei...@hollowayusa.com

937-494-2559

 

 

 

RE: Outlook 2003 and Exchange 2010

[Martin Blackstone]

It is a supported client

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb125239.aspx

 

Exchange Client Planning

Before you deploy your Exchange 2010 organization, verify that client
computers and mobile devices in your organization meet the following
requirements.


Requirements

Check


All MAPI clients are running a supported version of Outlook, including
Microsoft Outlook 2007, Outlook 2003.



 

 

From: Chris Pohlschneider [mailto:chris.pohlschnei...@hollowayusa.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 7:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2003 and Exchange 2010

 

Hello List,

 

Is anyone running Outlook 2003 client connecting to an Exchange 2010
environment? If so, have you seen any issues with this? We are planning on
rolling out either Office 2007 or Office 2010 (probably Office 2010) later
this year, but we may have our new Exchange environment setup before then
which means I would have a lot of Outlook 2003 clients working with Exchange
2010.

 

Chris Pohlschneider

Holloway Sportswear

Network Administrator

chris.pohlschnei...@hollowayusa.com

937-494-2559

 

 

RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

[Martin Blackstone]

Im confused. Is that what you are forced to do? You have no limits?

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 6:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

 

That’s the problem with letting the typical users run amok with technology.  
They have no clue and they do not care.  And even if you train them, they still 
don’t care until it impacts them.  It’s human nature.  You see it everywhere, 
not just IT.  But I digress, and will move my attention to things I can change. 
 J

 

 

From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] 
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 8:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

 

Absolutely. But (and this isn't philsopical it's financial) 99.9% of the end 
users have no clue as to what the cost of that clutter is nor do they care. In 
our case (a non profit) we have very finite ( and shrinking) resources so 
limits must be imposed and when those limits are met they know something has to 
give. And we have archiving in place, that makes a huge difference. 

  _  

From: Michael B. Smith 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Sent: Mon Mar 29 09:32:29 2010
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper 

And that’s a key factor – not all businesses have the same needs, and what 
makes sense to a medium or large organization may (probably won’t!) not make 
sense to a small organization.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 9:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

 

On the flip side if the mfg says “we have designed our product to do XYZ, then 
responsibly doing XYZ with it may not be such a bad thing. Also just because 
the product will do XYZ doesn’t mean you have to do it.

Obviously YMMV, but in my environment we allow people to have large mailboxes. 
We have some approaching 6GB today and they are looking forward to better 
performance and larger mailboxes and I’m happy for them.

I have an environment designed for this. I can backup my whole org in 30 
seconds, so that’s not an issue. I can restore a bad Store in less than 5 
minutes. A blown server in about 10 minutes.  I have plenty of disk and server 
horsepower. So we are going for it.

When $500K quotes and sales orders are flying back and forth in email, who the 
hell am I to say stop it? We are working on some new solutions now, but those 
take time. For now email rules and email it shall be.

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 5:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

 

The users have a obligation to use the technology responsibly. Don’t we have a 
likewise obligation?

 

From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] 
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 6:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

 

But who are we in IT to tell users what they can/need to save and what they 
can’t/don’t need to? That’s not our call to make. If they want to save 100% of 
their correspondence, shouldn’t we be okay with that? Isn’t that one of the big 
selling points of IT—to make it easy to store, search, and retrieve massive 
amounts of information?

 

I tend to take a more user-centric approach. To the extent feasible, I want my 
users to use technology the way they want to—I try to avoid forcing them to use 
it the way *I* want them to. The technology exists to serve them, not vice 
versa.

 

 

John

 

 

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 11:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

 



Dear employees,

Is your file cabinet full?  Can’t stuff another piece of paper in it?  Don’t 
worry, we just bought you a bigger file cabinet so you don’t have to clean out 
the useless cr*p in your old one, compliments of Microsoft.  Next we have to 
figure out how to finance the backup solution to cover this bloated whale that 
has washed up on shore.



 

 

 

From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] 
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 8:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

 

We’ve previously debated large mailboxes on this list, with some of us arguing 
that users ought to be able to use e-mail as a file transfer/storage mechanism 
even if that’s not what e-mail wasn’t originally designed for, while others 
argued that e-mail is much less efficient than other means of doing this. 
Actually, those two arguments aren’t mutually exclusive.

 

Anyhow, Microsoft seems to recognize that there’s just no stopping people from 
using e-mail thi

RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

[Martin Blackstone]

Exactly…..

 

From: sms adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 6:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

 

We're getting into a philosophical discussion :)

RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

[Martin Blackstone]

On the flip side if the mfg says "we have designed our product to do XYZ",
then responsibly doing XYZ with it may not be such a bad thing. Also just
because the product will do XYZ doesn't mean you have to do it.

Obviously YMMV, but in my environment we allow people to have large
mailboxes. We have some approaching 6GB today and they are looking forward
to better performance and larger mailboxes and I'm happy for them.

I have an environment designed for this. I can backup my whole org in 30
seconds, so that's not an issue. I can restore a bad Store in less than 5
minutes. A blown server in about 10 minutes.  I have plenty of disk and
server horsepower. So we are going for it.

When $500K quotes and sales orders are flying back and forth in email, who
the hell am I to say stop it? We are working on some new solutions now, but
those take time. For now email rules and email it shall be.

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 5:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

 

The users have a obligation to use the technology responsibly. Don't we have
a likewise obligation?

 

From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] 
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 6:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

 

But who are we in IT to tell users what they can/need to save and what they
can't/don't need to? That's not our call to make. If they want to save 100%
of their correspondence, shouldn't we be okay with that? Isn't that one of
the big selling points of IT-to make it easy to store, search, and retrieve
massive amounts of information?

 

I tend to take a more user-centric approach. To the extent feasible, I want
my users to use technology the way they want to-I try to avoid forcing them
to use it the way *I* want them to. The technology exists to serve them, not
vice versa.

 

 

John

 

 

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 11:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

 



Dear employees,

Is your file cabinet full?  Can't stuff another piece of paper in it?  Don't
worry, we just bought you a bigger file cabinet so you don't have to clean
out the useless cr*p in your old one, compliments of Microsoft.  Next we
have to figure out how to finance the backup solution to cover this bloated
whale that has washed up on shore.



 

 

 

From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] 
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 8:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

 

We've previously debated large mailboxes on this list, with some of us
arguing that users ought to be able to use e-mail as a file transfer/storage
mechanism even if that's not what e-mail wasn't originally designed for,
while others argued that e-mail is much less efficient than other means of
doing this. Actually, those two arguments aren't mutually exclusive.

 

Anyhow, Microsoft seems to recognize that there's just no stopping people
from using e-mail this way, and they designed Exchange 2010 with that in
mind. Below is a link to their Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision
Whitepaper:

 

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en

&FamilyID=e3303d34-af6c-4108-861b-dc05f9cf3e76&utm_source=feedburner&utm_med
ium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+MicrosoftDownloadCenter+(Microsoft+Download+Cent
er)

 

They write: "Giving your users the ability to store more e-mail has many
advantages. Large mailboxes keep e-mail on the Exchange Server instead of
allowing it to be scattered in Outlook Data Files (.PST files). That helps
reduce the risk of data loss, improve regulatory compliance, and increase
productivity among both workers and IT staff. The main barrier to
implementing large mailboxes is the perceived cost and complexity of storing
large amounts of e-mail data. MicrosoftR Exchange Server 2010 is
specifically designed to overcome these barriers. This paper discusses how
Exchange 2010 enables you to give users large mailboxes without breaking
your budget."

 

 

 

John Hornbuckle

MIS Department

Taylor County School District

www.taylor.k12.fl.us

 

 
 
NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications
to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the
public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to
public disclosure.
 
 
NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications
to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the
public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be 

RE: Anybody heard of these guys?

[Martin Blackstone]

Looks cool. I cant imagine the phones are free though.

-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 6:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Anybody heard of these guys?

I found an interesting IP PBX solution and wanted to know if anyone has any 
experience with it, it's a company called 3CX (www.3cx.com) they have a free 
version that may be useful for non profits.

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
 Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really 
need to.

RE: I lost the fight

[Martin Blackstone]

If you have WM phones working via AS, iPhones will work.

 

 

From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com] 
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 8:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: I lost the fight

 

I have to allow a selected few to connect to Exchange 2003 with iPhones.
I'm still arguing for the use of Good software but in the mean time I have
to configure Exchange to connect.  Is there a definitive article that you
may have used on how to configure Exchange for iPhones?  Google has returned
various results.

 

Thanks in advance! 

 

Bill Lambert

Windows System Administrator

Concuity

A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc.  

Phone  847-941-9206

Fax  847-465-9147

clip_image001

 

 

NASDAQ: TTPA

The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached
files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified
that you have received this communication in error and that any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact
the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.  Thank you.

 

<>

RE: iPhone and Exch 2007?

[Martin Blackstone]

We have 80 BB's and I don’t hear much from any of them.
Since we supply all phones, we don’t do iPhone. The number one reason is ATT 
wont insure them and without insurance, we have no interest in a device. You 
can go third party, but we have no interest in another telecom layer.

-Original Message-
From: Andrew Greene [mailto:agre...@cityofanderson.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 6:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: iPhone and Exch 2007?

We have 6 iPhones in our environment (including myself). I hear from the iPhone 
users the least and the Blackberry users (21 of them) the most, but it's mostly 
hardware failure and carrier issues with the BBs.

Andrew Greene
IS Technician / Webmaster
City of Anderson

-Original Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 9:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: iPhone and Exch 2007?

Let me follow-up with this - is anyone here using iPhone in their Exchange 
environment?

David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER 
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764



-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 7:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: iPhone and Exch 2007?

This is cool, but I thought Sybase was a database vendor.

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 17:01, Barsodi.John  wrote:
> Yes.
>
>
>
> Native encryption on the 3GS in a joke and can be easily bypassed.
>
>
>
> Our Security team did a complete risk assessment on it.  We also didn’t like
> relying on whatever subset of features of the EAS protocol the vendor
> decides to implement.
>
>
>
> So we have GOOD Messaging and Sybase in for a bake off to be our non-BB
> device management and connectivity point.  With the sandbox approach that
> both vendors have taken we don’t care if the device is corporate or
> personally owned.  The data lives in its owned encrypted sandbox.  So you
> kill pill/erase and disable/nuke only the corporate data and not the entire
> device.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> JB
>
>
>
> From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 4:30 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: iPhone and Exch 2007?
>
>
>
> Sorry if this has been covered already, but are there security concerns with
> an iPhone in a corpoerate Exchange environment?
>
>
>
> Dave

RE: Exchange 5.5 - Exchange 2010 Migration

[Martin Blackstone]

Check out the Exchange Deployment Assistant:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/exdeploy2010/default.aspx


-Original Message-
From: John Stevens [mailto:j...@js-internet.co.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 6:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 - Exchange 2010 Migration


Does anyone know the best way to migrate mailboxes from Exchange 5.5 into
Exchange 2010?

Would it be to just pst it all using exmerge?

Comments appreciated

John
Messaging Consultant

RE: Blackberry queries

[Martin Blackstone]

1 Do I need to have a mobile service provider involved
to get the BB working for the users to push the mail to their devices?  Or
can I use it as MS ActiveSync used to be?

Any mobile carrier that carries BB's is going to sell the data plan. If you
plan to use BES/BPS, you will need to make sure you have BB Enterprise plans
on all your phones

2 Which one is recommended? BES or BPS?

BES. BPS is history.

3 How big the MS-SQL database size may grow for 15-20
users?  Can I use MSDE or MS-SQL express?

I have 100 users and my SQL DB is about 200 MB. When you install BES, it
will install MSDE unless you point it at an existing SQL instance.

4 Will there be any additional bandwidth requirement?

No.its minimal.

5 Any other relevant info is appreciated.

 

 

From: Liby Philip Mathew [mailto:lmat...@path-solutions.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 1:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry queries

 

HI,

Kindly excuse my ignorance with BB.  I have a few queries.

I have two Exchange 2007 Enterprise servers.  One server  running all roles
except Edge and other running Edge role in DMZ.

I need to provide 15-20 users with BB. 

 

Below are the queries:

6 Do I need to have a mobile service provider involved
to get the BB working for the users to push the mail to their devices?  Or
can I use it as MS ActiveSync used to be?

7 Which one is recommended? BES or BPS?

8 How big the MS-SQL database size may grow for 15-20
users?  Can I use MSDE or MS-SQL express?

9 Will there be any additional bandwidth requirement?

10 Any other relevant info is appreciated.

Appreciate your assistance.

Regards

Liby

 

  _  

Disclaimer
[The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are
confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain
information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information
contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no
responsibility for any errors, omissions, computer viruses and other
defects.]

RE: Blackberry queries

[Martin Blackstone]

BPS is history. Blackberry announced they were writing it off some time back. 
So if you dig into it, you may find yourself heading down a dark road.

-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 6:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Blackberry queries

The choice between BES and BPS is dependent on your requirements.

We got BPS for free, but the Verizon rep who got us the deal told us
(or strongly implied - I wasn't part of the acquisition team) that we
were getting BES. That makes me more than a little cranky. I don't
know if that was slipperiness on the part of the individual rep, or if
that is a Verizon thing. Regardless, it kinda sucked. Be careful when
talking with your provider to specify exactly what you're getting.

If you search the BB web site, you'll find a comparison between the
two in chart form. It's useful.

If it were me, I'd go with BES over BPS.

Kurt

On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:47, Liby Philip Mathew
 wrote:
> HI,
>
> Kindly excuse my ignorance with BB.  I have a few queries.
>
> I have two Exchange 2007 Enterprise servers.  One server  running all roles
> except Edge and other running Edge role in DMZ.
>
> I need to provide 15-20 users with BB.
>
>
>
> Below are the queries:
>
> 1 Do I need to have a mobile service provider involved
> to get the BB working for the users to push the mail to their devices?  Or
> can I use it as MS ActiveSync used to be?
>
> 2 Which one is recommended? BES or BPS?
>
> 3 How big the MS-SQL database size may grow for 15-20
> users?  Can I use MSDE or MS-SQL express?
>
> 4 Will there be any additional bandwidth requirement?
>
> 5 Any other relevant info is appreciated.
>
> Appreciate your assistance.
>
> Regards
>
> Liby
>
> 
> Disclaimer
> [The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are
> confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual
> or entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
> sender immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended
> recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information
> contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no
> responsibility for any errors, omissions, computer viruses and other
> defects.]
>

Qwery: Is you BB via BES Working?

[Martin Blackstone]

Mine on ATT is back up.

How about Verizon or Sprint?

 

RE: BB Outage

[Martin Blackstone]

This is the kind of chiz that makes people want iPhones!

 

From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 6:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: BB Outage

 

I know!  You'd think they'd have a clue...

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Martin Blackstone 
wrote:

Fskers

 

From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 6:44 PM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: Re: BB Outage 

 

Well, that explains why mine is doing nothing...  :(

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Martin Blackstone 
wrote:

Seems we are having a similar issue. No BB service at all.

 

From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 6:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: BB Outage

 

BB outage in Tulsa, Ok.  Verizon service.  Have buddy on AT&T says his BB
network down as well.  Also heard from friend in Kansas City, no BB data
services Sprint and Verizon for his company.  anyone else monitoring the
group "after hours" down?

 

Jeff

 

 

RE: BB Outage

[Martin Blackstone]

Fskers

 

From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 6:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: BB Outage

 

Well, that explains why mine is doing nothing...  :(

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Martin Blackstone 
wrote:

Seems we are having a similar issue. No BB service at all.

 

From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 6:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: BB Outage

 

BB outage in Tulsa, Ok.  Verizon service.  Have buddy on AT&T says his BB
network down as well.  Also heard from friend in Kansas City, no BB data
services Sprint and Verizon for his company.  anyone else monitoring the
group "after hours" down?

 

Jeff

 

RE: BB Outage

[Martin Blackstone]

Seems we are having a similar issue. No BB service at all.

 

From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 6:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: BB Outage

 

BB outage in Tulsa, Ok.  Verizon service.  Have buddy on AT&T says his BB
network down as well.  Also heard from friend in Kansas City, no BB data
services Sprint and Verizon for his company.  anyone else monitoring the
group "after hours" down?

 

Jeff

RE: OT-ish...Blackberry Calendar question

[Martin Blackstone]

1)Ask the BlackBerry smartphone user to delete the Desktop [SYNC]
service book from the BlackBerry smartphone, then undelete it by completing
the following steps: 

a.On the Home screen of the BlackBerry smartphone, go to Options >
Advanced Options > Service Book. 

b.Highlight Desktop [SYNC], display the menu and click Delete. 

c.Confirm the delete before exiting the Service Book option. 

d.Navigate back to the Service Book option, display the menu and click
Undelete. 

 

 

To delete the data in the Calendar application over the wireless network and
reload it from the BlackBerry® Enterprise Server, complete the following
steps:

a.On the BlackBerry smartphone, open the Calendar application. 

b.Display the menu and click Options. 

c.Type RSET. 

Note: For BlackBerry smartphones that support SureType® technology, use the
multi-tap input method.

 

If wireless synchronization of the Calendar application is turned on, the
following message will appear:

This will erase your Desktop Calendar, and reload it from your server.
Continue?

After the data in the Calendar application has been deleted, the following
message will appear:

The Desktop Calendar has been wiped. It will be repopulated from your
server.

The Calendar application will be re-populated with Calendar data from the
BlackBerry Enterprise Server and the following message will be displayed:

Repopulation of the Calendar

 

 

From: Sean Rector [mailto:sean.rec...@vaopera.org] 
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 2:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT-ish...Blackberry Calendar question

 

Our first Blackberry – BES 5.0 is set up, and things seem to be working
properly, except when he adds an item to the calendar, it is not updating on
the exchange server.

 

Sean Rector, MCSE

 

Information Technology Manager
Virginia Opera Association 

E-Mail:   sean.rec...@vaopera.org
Phone:(757) 213-4548 (direct line)
{+}

  Virginia Opera's 35th Anniversary Season  The One
You Love

Celebrate with a 2009-2010 subscription: 
  La Bohème   |
 The Daughter of the
Regiment   | Don
Giovanni   | Porgy
and BessSM

Visit us online at   www.VaOpera.org or call
1-866-OPERA-VA

The vision of Virginia Opera is to enrich lives through the powerful
integration of music, voice and human drama.

  _  

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
the intended recipient(s). Unless otherwise specified, persons unnamed as
recipients may not read, distribute, copy or alter this e-mail. Any views or
opinions expressed in this e-mail belong to the author and may not
necessarily represent those of Virginia Opera. Although precautions have
been taken to ensure no viruses are present, Virginia Opera cannot accept
responsibility for any loss or damage that may arise from the use of this
e-mail or attachments.

{*}

RE: Native Exchange - Entourage

[Martin Blackstone]

The current version seems to be fine...


-Original Message-
From: Miguel Gonzalez [mailto:miguel_3_gonza...@yahoo.es] 
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 10:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Native Exchange - Entourage

In my previous job we used to call it hellourage. It's a nightmare with
Exchange 2003. Inboxes dissapeared and can't be recovered, etc, etc.

No good

--- El lun, 14/12/09, Martin Blackstone  escribió:

> De: Martin Blackstone 
> Asunto: RE: Native Exchange  - Entourage
> Para: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
> Fecha: lunes, 14 de diciembre, 2009 09:13
> I believe:
> 
> The Mac Mail (or Apple Mail) program in Snow Leopard needs
> Exchange 2007.
> But if he uses Entourage, Exchange 2003 shouldn't be a
> problem.
> 
> So is this guy wanting to use Entourage, or the "native"
> email app in SL?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Mayo, Bill [mailto:bem...@pittcountync.gov]
> 
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 5:34 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Native Exchange - Entourage
> 
> I am pretty sure that the box says that it requires
> Exchange 2007. 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John Stevens [mailto:j...@js-internet.co.uk]
> 
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 8:31 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Native Exchange - Entourage
> 
> It is the latest version (snow leopard) that I am referring
> to and is
> referred to as 'native'
> 
> What I am asking is what os and exchange versions are
> supported to make
> this work?
> 
> 
> > Well, what does "native Exchange" mean?
> >
> > The only Mac MAPI client was Mac Outlook:2001. I don't
> even think that
> 
> > runs on modern Macs (although I could be wrong - I've
> never tried).
> >
> > The most recent version of Entourage uses EWS
> (Exchange Web Services).
> > That's only available in Exchange 2007 (I believe it
> requires sp2) and
> 
> > Exchange 2010. That's PROBABLY what is being referred
> to.
> >
> > All other versions of Entourage used WebDAV, which was
> available in 
> > Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2007. It isn't available in
> Exchange 2010.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Stevens [mailto:j...@js-internet.co.uk]
> > Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 8:03 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Native Exchange - Entourage
> >
> > I have a client that wants to run native exchange of a
> mac (through 
> > entourage).
> >
> > He is currently running Exchange 2003 and Server 2003,
> but native 
> > exchange, he is told, only runs on Exchange 2007...
> >
> > 1)    Is his assumption right about
> Entourage?
> > 2)    Does he need to move to server
> 2008 to move to Exchange 2007
> >
> > Etc
> >
> > Any comments would be appreciated.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


  

RE: Native Exchange - Entourage

[Martin Blackstone]

I believe:

The Mac Mail (or Apple Mail) program in Snow Leopard needs Exchange 2007.
But if he uses Entourage, Exchange 2003 shouldn't be a problem.

So is this guy wanting to use Entourage, or the "native" email app in SL?

-Original Message-
From: Mayo, Bill [mailto:bem...@pittcountync.gov] 
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 5:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Native Exchange - Entourage

I am pretty sure that the box says that it requires Exchange 2007. 

-Original Message-
From: John Stevens [mailto:j...@js-internet.co.uk] 
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 8:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Native Exchange - Entourage

It is the latest version (snow leopard) that I am referring to and is
referred to as 'native'

What I am asking is what os and exchange versions are supported to make
this work?


> Well, what does "native Exchange" mean?
>
> The only Mac MAPI client was Mac Outlook:2001. I don't even think that

> runs on modern Macs (although I could be wrong - I've never tried).
>
> The most recent version of Entourage uses EWS (Exchange Web Services).
> That's only available in Exchange 2007 (I believe it requires sp2) and

> Exchange 2010. That's PROBABLY what is being referred to.
>
> All other versions of Entourage used WebDAV, which was available in 
> Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2007. It isn't available in Exchange 2010.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Stevens [mailto:j...@js-internet.co.uk]
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 8:03 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Native Exchange - Entourage
>
> I have a client that wants to run native exchange of a mac (through 
> entourage).
>
> He is currently running Exchange 2003 and Server 2003, but native 
> exchange, he is told, only runs on Exchange 2007...
>
> 1)Is his assumption right about Entourage?
> 2)Does he need to move to server 2008 to move to Exchange 2007
>
> Etc
>
> Any comments would be appreciated.
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>

RE: The ol red x on the reply

[Martin Blackstone]

That and dotnet framework.

-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 2:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: The ol red x on the reply

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Matthew Bullock  wrote:
> http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2006/11/16/431521.aspx

  ActiveX is a plague on humanity.

-- Ben

RE: Exchange 2007

[Martin Blackstone]

One is newer, one is older.

 

From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 7:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007

 

Greetings,

Can someone please point me in the right direction for a clear concise
comparison of Exchange 2003 standard vs. 2007?

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

 

 

 

RE: Top RBLs

[Martin Blackstone]

Dave, it seems like I tried Zen some time back and it was blocking a lot of
mail from things like yahoo, etc. Do you see that?

 

From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Top RBLs

 

This is what I have Ninja/Vipre using these days.

Zen.spamhaus.org

bl.spamcop.net

dnsbl.njabl.org

dnsbl.ahlb.org

Zen gets 99% of them. I threw the others on awhile back and they do catch
some.

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 7:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Top RBLs

 

What are the top RBL's you are using these days?

This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not
represent official Parkview Medical Center policy.

This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be
confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in
accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or
any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your computer
system.{token}

Top RBLs

[Martin Blackstone]

What are the top RBL's you are using these days?

RE: iPhone experience

[Martin Blackstone]

So let me pose an iPhone question.

Compared to a BB, how does it physically hold up. I have guys here that just
beat the living hell out of their phones and of course they are also the
ones who want iPhones and the iPhone just looks too delicate for day to day
usage by a lot of folks.

The BB can take a hell of a beating and short of the occasional track ball
replacement, I rarely have to replace them unless someone has dropped it in
a toilet or some other catastrophic issue.

But that glass front on the iPhone scares me.

So how many of you that have deployed the iPhone have had to deal with
physical damage?

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 8:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: iPhone experience

 

OK, so my reply to you:  

 

I didnt say to pin it on anything.  I said it can be done; which is true.

 

I didnt say to do it or not to; only that its possible.  I really dont know
how I could have written a more neutral statement about it originally or in
my reply to you.  I dont think its fair to say I'm being disingenuous
because of my intentional neutrality.

 

Touché on the open source bits of router firmware, which opens the door wide
for any modifications. My mistake for neglecting to take that into
consideration. But, these forums have not been quick to uphold Microsoft's
licensing when it comes to phone firmware/software customization.  Theft,
sure.  Customization?  No.

 

Jailbreaking is not theft.  Your comparison to BitTorrent use was
disingenuous - for real.
--
ME2



On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Ben Scott  wrote:

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
 wrote:
> I don't see what was "disingenuous" about my reply to Bob.

 Not your reply to Bob, you reply to me.  Which I read along the
lines of, "Oh, I didn't mean you should actually *do* what I was
talking about, I was just saying it's theoretically possible."  You
want to argue you don't think it's a big deal, or you interpret the
license different, or something like that (which you did, now), okay.
I might not agree, but I can respect that.  But playing language
lawyer to try and dodge ownership of what you say -- that is bogus.  I
have no respect for that.  Maybe that's not what you intended to mean,
in which case, I apologize.


> Its funny, because whenever someone wants to get better access control
with
> a home router, there are plenty of recommendations for DD-WRT.

 The license agreements with those routers don't prohibit third-party
firmware.  Indeed, in many cases, they're specifically required to
release the source under the GPL.  Some even advertise their
compatibility with third-party firmware as a feature, e.g., WRT54GL.

 Apple/AT&T forbids it in their licenses, release updates to counter
it, and threatens legal action.

 See the difference?

> Apple is not special.

 No, they're not.  And these forums are usually pretty quick to
uphold Microsoft's licenses.  So why not Apple's?

-- Ben

 

RE: Installing Windows 2K8 SP2

[Martin Blackstone]

Im sorry, I kept reading R2 in your post..

 

From: Wulff Jr, Ronald J. [mailto:rwu...@reedsmith.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 8:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Installing Windows 2K8 SP2

 

I may be reading that wrong, but it looks like SP2 is supported, and R2 is
not

 

Ronald Wulff Jr 
412.288.3601 
rwu...@reedsmith.com 

Reed Smith LLP 
20 Stanwix St

Suite 1200
Pittsburgh, PA 15222

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 10:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Installing Windows 2K8 SP2

 

Not supported.

Check the support matrix here:

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee338574.aspx

 

 

 

From: James Hill [mailto:james.h...@superamart.com.au] 
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 5:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Installing Windows 2K8 SP2

 

I have two Exchange 2007 RU7 servers running on Windows Server 2008.

 

Any gotchas with installing Windows Server 2008 SP2 on these?

 

* * * 

 

This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and may
well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on
notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then
delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for
any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for
your cooperation. 

* * * 

To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you
that, unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax advice
contained in this communication  (including any attachments) is not intended
or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding
penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state and local
provisions or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
tax-related matters addressed herein. 

Disclaimer Version RS.US.1.01.03

pdc1

RE: Installing Windows 2K8 SP2

[Martin Blackstone]

Not supported.

Check the support matrix here:

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee338574.aspx

 

 

 

From: James Hill [mailto:james.h...@superamart.com.au] 
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 5:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Installing Windows 2K8 SP2

 

I have two Exchange 2007 RU7 servers running on Windows Server 2008.

 

Any gotchas with installing Windows Server 2008 SP2 on these?

RE: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE

[Martin Blackstone]

I think you will find many of us who had it in house fought for ages to get
it out.

Consider yourself lucky and leave it out.

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 10:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE

 

+ a billion.  From personal experience.  Dont do it.

--
ME2



On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Martin Blackstone 
wrote:

Murray,

Unless you want to end up on a bunch of RBL's and other fun things that go
along with doing your own email blasts, I would keep doing things just the
way you are doing them.

Nothing good comes out of bringing this inhouse.

 

From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 2:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE

 

We currently outsource our blast email. I'd like to consider doing it
internally. The outsource company reports on such things as who opened the
email, who didn't, etc. Anyone here doing their own blast email and
collecting statistics? Obviously I need to be able to provide much the same
info if I'm to take over blast email activities.

 

Murray

 

 

RE: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE

[Martin Blackstone]

Murray,

Unless you want to end up on a bunch of RBL's and other fun things that go
along with doing your own email blasts, I would keep doing things just the
way you are doing them.

Nothing good comes out of bringing this inhouse.

 

From: Murray Freeman [mailto:mfree...@alanet.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 2:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: BLAST EMAIL STATISTICS SOFTWARE

 

We currently outsource our blast email. I'd like to consider doing it
internally. The outsource company reports on such things as who opened the
email, who didn't, etc. Anyone here doing their own blast email and
collecting statistics? Obviously I need to be able to provide much the same
info if I'm to take over blast email activities.

 

Murray

 

RE: Any Snow Leopard users?

[Martin Blackstone]

I have a number of hard core Mac users. Most support themselves.

They are all taking a wait and see attitude with Snow Leopard and letting it
bake a little.

I would suggest the same for anyone else thinking about it.

 

From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 10:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Any Snow Leopard users?

 

Folders are gone, from the mailbox and client.  Case is open with Apple,
interested to hear what they find, if anything.

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Steve Szabo  wrote:

I do not have anyone running a Mac, never mind upgrading to Snow Leopard,
but that does not stop me from reading about such things. As I saw mentioned
above, there seem to be a number of compatibility issues that have cropped
up, and it has been mentioned that there is a need for a number of patches
for various issues to be issued as soon as possible.

 

For those who have had the issue of disappearing folders, are they missing
in OWA as well? Have you checked with Apple support (probably the first
support call I would have made, since you say the issue is not reproducible
on other machines, figuring you are including Windows machines)?

 

\\Steve// 

 

From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 2:46 PM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Any Snow Leopard users?

 

We seem to have uncovered a strange/scary issue with some users who are
connecting to Exchange 2007 SP1 mailboxes via EWS using either Apple
mail.app, iCal or Entourage (more prevelant on mail.app and ical).

 

1. Users have reported inbox subfolders go missing, both from the client and
server, never to be seen again.  The inbox doesn't get touched though.

2. Users on occasion are presented someone elses mailbox when giving their
own credentials

3. Users have sent messages and the FROM address is someone elses, when
tracked via Exchange it appears from the "FROM" addresses mailbox

 

Raised a ticket with MS but thier response was "We don't support SL".  This
clearly seems like a server issue, but we can't reproduce on anything other
than SL.

 

Just curious if anyone else has seen any issues like this using EWS.

 

-alex

 

RE: Exchange and MSDE

[Martin Blackstone]

Well BE does use MSDE. I don’t remember the remote agents using it.

 

From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 8:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange and MSDE

 

Backup Exec -- The remote agent is installed since they have a stand alone 
server that acts as the Backup Exec media server. It could possibly be part of 
an older Backup Exec package, not quite sure..

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Martin Blackstone  
wrote:

What backup software are you running?

 

From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 8:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange and MSDE

 

All -

There is an MSDE instance on an Exchange box and i'm trying to figure out which 
application is actually writing to this instance. There aren't any SQL tools 
installed on the box, is there a way for me to determine who is writing to this 
MSDE database without installing the tools ?

After running Perfwiz i noticed high-disk usage coming from the sqlserver 
instance and i need to know if MSDE is even necessary on this box at all.

Best,

 

RE: Exchange and MSDE

[Martin Blackstone]

What backup software are you running?

 

From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 8:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange and MSDE

 

All -

There is an MSDE instance on an Exchange box and i'm trying to figure out which 
application is actually writing to this instance. There aren't any SQL tools 
installed on the box, is there a way for me to determine who is writing to this 
MSDE database without installing the tools ?

After running Perfwiz i noticed high-disk usage coming from the sqlserver 
instance and i need to know if MSDE is even necessary on this box at all.

Best,

RE: BPS reinstall.

[Martin Blackstone]

That’s the activation password email. It doesn’t mean dick.

-Original Message-
From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu] 
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 8:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BPS reinstall.

I'm so confused or at least I think I am.
Our first BB user forwarded me this email that he received in his outlook
email account when we were setting up his HH.
  From: Administrator
  Sent: Thu 6/25/2009 2:04 PM
  Subject: BlackBerry enterprise activation password
  Paul User,

  To activate your BlackBerry device over the wireless network, in the
device Options screen select
  Enterprise Activation. In that screen, enter your corporate email address
and the following password:

  bauqgd

  This password will expire in 48 hours.

I didn't make up that password, the system just randomly generated it.
In both cases, neither users phone was provisioned by RIM or the carrier,
just a monthly data plan and other than cal sync HH to Outlook they are
working fine.
So it looks like something in the BPS is broken as it never sends the
initial email.
I also check and sync both ways is enabled for the users.
I think, I'm gonna give this up for today, Monday morning, build a new
server and start over from scratch.


-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 10:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: BPS reinstall.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Glen Johnson wrote:
> For the sync problem.
> User enters appointment on HH cal and it never gets synced to the
> exchange/outlook cal.

  On the BB server, check the PIM sync properties of the user  Make
sure it's set to sync in both directions.  Also check the Options in
the calendar on the handheld; there may be a similar option there as
well.

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Glen Johnson wrote:
> Ok.  Maybe I'm confused but why would the SIM card cause an email from
> the BPS server to his outlook account not work?  Also, I don't think any
> of ours even have sim cards as we are on Alltel and Verizon and I don't
> think they use sim cards.  Correct me if I'm wrong here.

  As Mr. Sobey is using it, "SIM" really means "wireless subscriber".
If your phones use SIMs, the subscriber is associated with the SIM ID.
 If your phones don't use SIMs, the subscriber is associated with the
ESN/MEID of the phone.

  The carrier has to provision the subscriber properly for BlackBerry
to work.  For some carriers, this just means a data plan; some
carriers have to specifically provision the subscriber as a
BlackBerry, or even as "for use with a BlackBerry server".  Contact
your provider and check.  It's a good idea.

  RIM can also check this, if you call them for support.

> For the two users that are on the system, when I added them, they
> received an email in their outlook account that had instructions to do
> something on their HH.

  Right.  OTA activation works like this: The admin adds an Exchange
user to the BB server, and makes up a password.  On the BB handheld,
the user enters their email address and the password.  The handheld
sends a special email to the address the user enters.  The email
includes the public key of the handheld, along with a hash of the
activation password.  The BB server continuously watches for such
messages (for users you've added to the BB server).  When it arrives,
if the password hash matches, the BB server stores that public key,
and uses it to initiate sync with the HH.

  If the user deletes the activation message using Outlook before the
BB server can process it, then activation won't work.  For our BES,
the BB server sees it practically immediately.  It may be that your BB
server is not talking to Exchange properly, not seeing the

> I just checked the exchange tracking and could not find an email to this
> new user during the time I re-added him, reloaded and re-sent service
> books so it looks like the BPS server didn't/couldn't send the initial
> email.

  For OTA activation, the BB server doesn't send the email, the handheld
does.

-- Ben

RE: BPS reinstall.

[Martin Blackstone]

US has CDMA which usually does not use a SIM card.
That's reserved for GSM which is what the rest of the world uses and I
prefer

-Original Message-
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 7:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BPS reinstall.

Well, if your phone doesn't have a SIM card it's no phone I've ever used ;)
The network needs to enable Blackberry functionality on the SIM to
communicate on the Blackberry network. Otherwise it's just a
dumb-smartphone. BES extensions are for BPS/BES, and BIS extensions are for
Blackberry Internet Service (the consumer version). Often, the BPS/BES
extenstion will cost more per month than BIS.

In a nutshell (and there are parts of this for which I'll have used the
wrong terminology) the activation email is generated by the Blackberry
network. The handheld communicates with its carrier's Blackberry
infrastructure to generate an encryption key. The key is sent, by email
(with an ETP.DAT attachment), to the mailbox of the new Blackberry user. You
BPS server will be monitoring the Inbox of that mailbox and looking out for
this specific email in order to finalise the activation. If that email never
arrives, your BPS server will never know which Blackberry to deliver mails
to. Look at Options > Advanced > Enterprise Activation.

It's also possible to activate a Blackberry through Blackberry Desktop
Manager, or plug the handheld in to a USB socket on the server itself and
"deploy" the handheld that way.

Richard

-Original Message-
From: bounce-8649063-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8649063-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Glen
Johnson
Sent: 04 September 2009 14:42
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BPS reinstall.

Ok.  Maybe I'm confused but why would the SIM card cause an email from
the BPS server to his outlook account not work?  Also, I don't think any
of ours even have sim cards as we are on Alltel and Verizon and I don't
think they use sim cards.  Correct me if I'm wrong here.

For the two users that are on the system, when I added them, they
received an email in their outlook account that had instructions to do
something on their HH.  I don't have one of the BBs so it sure makes
troubleshooting a pain in the back side.

I just checked the exchange tracking and could not find an email to this
new user during the time I re-added him, reloaded and re-sent service
books so it looks like the BPS server didn't/couldn't send the initial
email.



-Original Message-
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 8:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BPS reinstall.

If he's not receiving the email, first start by making sure that the
Blackberry / SIM card is correctly provisioned for Blackberry Enterprise
(may need to contact your carrier) and assuming it is, standard
troubleshooting to find out why someone hasn't received an email that
they know they've been sent.

Good luck - feel free to post back with any more questions.

Richard

-Original Message-
From: bounce-8648965-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8648965-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Glen Johnson
Sent: 04 September 2009 13:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BPS reinstall.

Looks like I am.  I left this user at the initializing state for 3 or 4
days first time and now second try has been overnight.
I'll check when he comes in today to see if he received anything?
He says he never received the initial email in his outlook that tells
him how to set up his HH.
Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot this problem?

-Original Message-
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 2:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BPS reinstall.

Glen,

Sorry to have to say this, but you realise your users will always say
"Initializing..." until Enterprise Activation is complete?! I had to
ask, it was too obvious not to. It seems that you may be having
activation issues instead.

Richard


From: bounce-8648446-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[bounce-8648446-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Glen
Johnson [gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: 04 September 2009 00:25
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BPS reinstall.

Ok.  I've deleted and re-added user, reloaded user and resent service
books.
I'll wait till Friday morning to see if it still shows status
initializing.

For the sync problem.
User enters appointment on HH cal and it never gets synced to the
exchange/outlook cal.
User can put entries on the Outlook cal and it does get synced to the
HH.
Email syncs fine both ways.

Thanks for the tips.

-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 6:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: BPS reinstall.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at

RE: BPS reinstall.

[Martin Blackstone]

Be sure that the email is not getting caught in a spam filter.
Whitelist *.blackberry.net in all your spam filters.
Be sure it's not ending up in the users junk mail folder.

Part of the activation process if there is another email that is quickly
sent to the users mailbox that the user will never see, but once in a while
it will end up in a junk mail folder. There you will actually see it. I have
seen this only in cases where the user has the OL junk folder configured to
block all mail except allowed senders.

-Original Message-
From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu] 
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 6:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BPS reinstall.

Ok.  Maybe I'm confused but why would the SIM card cause an email from
the BPS server to his outlook account not work?  Also, I don't think any
of ours even have sim cards as we are on Alltel and Verizon and I don't
think they use sim cards.  Correct me if I'm wrong here.

For the two users that are on the system, when I added them, they
received an email in their outlook account that had instructions to do
something on their HH.  I don't have one of the BBs so it sure makes
troubleshooting a pain in the back side.

I just checked the exchange tracking and could not find an email to this
new user during the time I re-added him, reloaded and re-sent service
books so it looks like the BPS server didn't/couldn't send the initial
email.



-Original Message-
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 8:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BPS reinstall.

If he's not receiving the email, first start by making sure that the
Blackberry / SIM card is correctly provisioned for Blackberry Enterprise
(may need to contact your carrier) and assuming it is, standard
troubleshooting to find out why someone hasn't received an email that
they know they've been sent.

Good luck - feel free to post back with any more questions.

Richard

-Original Message-
From: bounce-8648965-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8648965-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Glen Johnson
Sent: 04 September 2009 13:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BPS reinstall.

Looks like I am.  I left this user at the initializing state for 3 or 4
days first time and now second try has been overnight.
I'll check when he comes in today to see if he received anything?
He says he never received the initial email in his outlook that tells
him how to set up his HH.
Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot this problem?

-Original Message-
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 2:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BPS reinstall.

Glen,

Sorry to have to say this, but you realise your users will always say
"Initializing..." until Enterprise Activation is complete?! I had to
ask, it was too obvious not to. It seems that you may be having
activation issues instead.

Richard


From: bounce-8648446-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[bounce-8648446-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Glen
Johnson [gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: 04 September 2009 00:25
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BPS reinstall.

Ok.  I've deleted and re-added user, reloaded user and resent service
books.
I'll wait till Friday morning to see if it still shows status
initializing.

For the sync problem.
User enters appointment on HH cal and it never gets synced to the
exchange/outlook cal.
User can put entries on the Outlook cal and it does get synced to the
HH.
Email syncs fine both ways.

Thanks for the tips.

-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 6:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: BPS reinstall.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Glen Johnson wrote:
> I got a problem with our BB Professional 4.1.4.3 server.

  I've never used BPS but I've got BES, which I'm told is pretty
similar except for how the BB server communicates with Exchange.

> When I try to add a new user, it hangs at Initializing. Been there for
3
> days.

  Try removing the user from BPS, including their BB user data when
prompted, then re-adding back in.  Then do a reload and a resned
service books.  That's the moral equivalent of rebooting a stuck
Windows client, and fixes a lot of problems.   If the handheld is the
same, or it is a new user, it shouldn't loose any Outlook or handheld
data.  (If you're trying to restore a handheld, it may be an issue.)

> I've also got problems with cal sync from the handhelds back to
Outlook.

  Describe.  May be a known issue; I know some kinds of changes on the
HH simply won't be sync'ed back to Exchange.

> If I do this, will the users need to re-activate their handhelds

  After doing a clean install with a BB server, you will need to
re-activate the handhelds with the server.  Activation is basically
j

RE: stop BB server to sync the data for the individual user after hours

[Martin Blackstone]

Ive got a killer idea. Call BB support and ask them.

 

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: stop BB server to sync the data for the individual user after
hours

 

Right click > Disable redirection? It'll go some way to stopping them, but
they'll still be able to send mail.

 

From: bounce-8639699-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8639699-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Shih, Henry
Sent: 25 August 2009 20:00
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: stop BB server to sync the data for the individual user after
hours

 

Won't work ..

 

Just for some of the BB users, not for all of them.

 

  _  

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: stop BB server to sync the data for the individual user after
hours

 

Turn the BES server off :P

 

From: bounce-8638723-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8638723-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Shih, Henry
Sent: 24 August 2009 20:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: stop BB server to sync the data for the individual user after hours

 

Exchange 2003

BB enterprise server 4.1.6

We don't allow users to connect our BB server to sync their data (email,
calendar, ...) after hours between 5 PM and 8 AM.

How can we do it? Thanks for help. 

Henry

  hms...@ci.livermore.ca.us

RE: BES w/ Exchange 2010

[Martin Blackstone]

BES 5.0 MR2 just came out and there are no notes on Exch 2010.
HOWEVER given that 2010 is still in beta I would expect nothing less.


-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: BES w/ Exchange 2010

I know it took rim forever to support even 2007 but has anyone tried this
out yet?  Beta or RC of Exchange?  4.1.x or 5.0 BES?

~JasonG

RE: Mail store issues

[Martin Blackstone]

Your = you’re

 

 

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 11:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail store issues

 

If you have 100 GB mail on store A, your going have 100 GB on store B, plus
100 GB of logs.

Generally speaking of course. You mileage may vary.

 

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:sj...@amico.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 11:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail store issues

 

Just realize that if you create it on the same server you’ll have double the
store size until you delete the original one! Actually I think it actually
triples until you have done a successful B/U! Correct me if I’m wrong, just
make sure you have the disk space.

 

___

Stefan Jafs

 

From: Stephan Barr [mailto:stephanbarr.li...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 1:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mail store issues

 

Yes. On the same machine.  Not required though. If you have another Exchange
2003 server in the same site you can create the store there as well.
Apparently it's the moving of mailboxes from one store to another
effectively repairs.

 

Cheers.

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Doug Rooney 
wrote:

I am currently trying to copy the error message, but when you say create a
new store, is that on the same machine?

 

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

avatar42879_11

 

From: Stephan Barr [mailto:stephanbarr.li...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 9:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mail store issues

 

Try creating a new store. Move all the mailboxes to the new store and see if
that clears up the corruption problem.

 

Cheers.

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Doug Rooney 
wrote:

Hello,

I am running Ex 2003 on box that only run AD and is the PDC.

Since about 2 months ago, my backup have ÿÿ˜failedÿÿ™ but the byte counts is
still good.

The error says that there is corruption in the mail store. 

A re there utilities that I can run to clean this up?

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

 

 

 

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not
read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed
in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the
Amico Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to
make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept
responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email
or attachments.

<>

RE: Mail store issues

[Martin Blackstone]

If you have 100 GB mail on store A, your going have 100 GB on store B, plus
100 GB of logs.

Generally speaking of course. You mileage may vary.

 

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:sj...@amico.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 11:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail store issues

 

Just realize that if you create it on the same server you’ll have double the
store size until you delete the original one! Actually I think it actually
triples until you have done a successful B/U! Correct me if I’m wrong, just
make sure you have the disk space.

 

___

Stefan Jafs

 

From: Stephan Barr [mailto:stephanbarr.li...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 1:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mail store issues

 

Yes. On the same machine.  Not required though. If you have another Exchange
2003 server in the same site you can create the store there as well.
Apparently it's the moving of mailboxes from one store to another
effectively repairs.

 

Cheers.

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Doug Rooney 
wrote:

I am currently trying to copy the error message, but when you say create a
new store, is that on the same machine?

 

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

avatar42879_11

 

From: Stephan Barr [mailto:stephanbarr.li...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 9:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mail store issues

 

Try creating a new store. Move all the mailboxes to the new store and see if
that clears up the corruption problem.

 

Cheers.

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Doug Rooney 
wrote:

Hello,

I am running Ex 2003 on box that only run AD and is the PDC.

Since about 2 months ago, my backup have ÿÿ˜failedÿÿ™ but the byte counts is
still good.

The error says that there is corruption in the mail store. 

A re there utilities that I can run to clean this up?

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

 

 

 

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not
read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed
in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the
Amico Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to
make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept
responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email
or attachments.

<>

RE: Mail store issues

[Martin Blackstone]

Can you post the exact error? Are you doing store level backups or mailbox 
level (brick level) backups?

 

If you are running Ent Ed, the simplest solution would probably be to create a 
new mailstore and move the mailboxes over to it and then delete the corrupted 
store.

 

 

From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@sonomatilemakers.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 7:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mail store issues

 

Hello,

I am running Ex 2003 on box that only run AD and is the PDC.

Since about 2 months ago, my backup have failed but the byte counts is still 
good.

The error says that there is corruption in the mail store. 

A re there utilities that I can run to clean this up?

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

 

 

RE: Conference Room\Resource Booking - OT

[Martin Blackstone]

http://www.swinc.com/Software/Exchange-Resource-Manager.aspx

 

From: Kleciak, Clint D A7IT [mailto:clint.klec...@cigna.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 5:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Conference Room\Resource Booking - OT

 

Does anyone use a third party product to book conference rooms in your org.
We are thinking of moving off our current solution and look for a third
party solution.  Any recommendations on software would be thankful.

 

thanks

 


--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this email in error, please
immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This email
transmission may contain confidential information. This information is
intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is
intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if
you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance. Copyright
2009 CIGNA

==

RE: Activesync issue

[Martin Blackstone]

Where did you get the cert?

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 6:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Activesync issue

I just renewed my SSL cert today for my Exchange box.  OWA is working fine, but 
Activesync on my WM device is erroring out, saying the cert is not valid.  I 
double checked the config in the phone, and I've looked in IIS at the 
Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync settings, and the cert there shows the correct 
dates.  I've restarted all IIS and SMTP services, and I've rebooted the server.

Any other ideas?

Exchange 2k3, WM6.

Thanks,

Joe Heaton